正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

Wolves & wolfdogs are often misread as "aggressive" when showing natural wild traits lost in most domestic dogs through selective breeding for human-friendliness. "Latching onto wrists/arms to lead" is a classic example: they gently grab with their mouth (like a hand) to guide you—e.g., "come see this!" or "follow...

drinkonsaturday's profile picture

🚫👁️Drinks on Saturday🇺🇸

71,550 subscribers

50,717 次观看 • 4 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

教育动物
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

A good example of how different the howling of pups and adults can be at this time of year. These videos were taken by the same camera at a Half-Moon Pack rendezvous site a few years ago. The first portion of the video shows all the pups at the site howling and there are no adults howling. All the vocalizations you hear are pups. The pups have a wide range of vocalizations and often sound like coyotes, given all the yipping and barking. The second portion of the video shows the pups' father, Wolf V094, howling a few days later by himself. These howls are the deep iconic howls we typically think of as wolf howls. We figured the sounds pups make might be of interest to folks because sometimes folks hear canine vocalizations and are not sure whether they are from wolves or coyotes. While the pups do sound coyote-like, you often can still hear some giving high-pitched howls amongst all the other ruckus—pups have much higher pitched howls than adults and their howls also seem to sound different to us than coyotes. And often, but not always, there is an adult wolf or two or four howling when the pups howl, which makes it easier to determine if you are listening to wolves or coyotes. We ended the video with what we think is a great sequence of Wolf V094 trying his best to stay awake after howling but he couldn’t fight his sleepiness any longer!
1:42

A good example of how different the howling of pups and adults can be at this time of year. These videos were taken by the same camera at a Half-Moon Pack rendezvous site a few years ago. The first portion of the video shows all the pups at the site howling and there are no adults howling. All the vocalizations you hear are pups. The pups have a wide range of vocalizations and often sound like coyotes, given all the yipping and barking. The second portion of the video shows the pups' father, Wolf V094, howling a few days later by himself. These howls are the deep iconic howls we typically think of as wolf howls. We figured the sounds pups make might be of interest to folks because sometimes folks hear canine vocalizations and are not sure whether they are from wolves or coyotes. While the pups do sound coyote-like, you often can still hear some giving high-pitched howls amongst all the other ruckus—pups have much higher pitched howls than adults and their howls also seem to sound different to us than coyotes. And often, but not always, there is an adult wolf or two or four howling when the pups howl, which makes it easier to determine if you are listening to wolves or coyotes. We ended the video with what we think is a great sequence of Wolf V094 trying his best to stay awake after howling but he couldn’t fight his sleepiness any longer!

Voyageurs Wolf Project

11,781 次观看 • 1 年前

I hear so often from the Dommes I work with that they struggle with people online fetichizing them and simply seeing them for how sexy and beautiful they are. They project their fantasies and their desires onto you. That stops immediately once you move the attention from you to them. From 'look at me' to 'I see you'. What does that look like? When you create content, think of them and what this scene or that narrative is evoking. What will they learn from you? What they want is not to passively watch how sexy you are, but for you to train them, to give them instructions, to teach them, to guide them, to be in charge, to command them. This is not being an object but the main subject. The Authority figure. How is your content already doing that. The sexy photos can still be there, they are important to already capture des attention. But what you do with that attention once you have it, is where the power dynamic is established. Positioning yourself as more than a stunning Goddess, but actually a woman who has a voice, opinions, perspective, a philosophy, a way to doing things, teaching them what you like, how you like it, why you like it, already makes them want to be that for you. You hold the attention, you hold the power, so you direct it. And for that, you want them to know you get them and you know what lives within them... that creates the desire for you to be the one exposing it. You instantly build trust. Not because you demanded it, but because you earned it: you showed them you know what you are doing. You have experience, you understand them. They are not told to come see you, they are seduced into it. They desire it. And they will work for it. This will attract better clients (real subs) and instead of you trying to get their attention, they will work to earn yours. If you want to learn more about power dynamics, building a brand as a Pro or the psychology behind BDSM, you can now access all my trainings and classes in one place for a fraction of the cost of The Dominatrix Academy. And you can reinvest the total amount towards the Program. Message me [SECRET] for the details. This offer is not available on my website.
0:51

I hear so often from the Dommes I work with that they struggle with people online fetichizing them and simply seeing them for how sexy and beautiful they are. They project their fantasies and their desires onto you. That stops immediately once you move the attention from you to them. From 'look at me' to 'I see you'. What does that look like? When you create content, think of them and what this scene or that narrative is evoking. What will they learn from you? What they want is not to passively watch how sexy you are, but for you to train them, to give them instructions, to teach them, to guide them, to be in charge, to command them. This is not being an object but the main subject. The Authority figure. How is your content already doing that. The sexy photos can still be there, they are important to already capture des attention. But what you do with that attention once you have it, is where the power dynamic is established. Positioning yourself as more than a stunning Goddess, but actually a woman who has a voice, opinions, perspective, a philosophy, a way to doing things, teaching them what you like, how you like it, why you like it, already makes them want to be that for you. You hold the attention, you hold the power, so you direct it. And for that, you want them to know you get them and you know what lives within them... that creates the desire for you to be the one exposing it. You instantly build trust. Not because you demanded it, but because you earned it: you showed them you know what you are doing. You have experience, you understand them. They are not told to come see you, they are seduced into it. They desire it. And they will work for it. This will attract better clients (real subs) and instead of you trying to get their attention, they will work to earn yours. If you want to learn more about power dynamics, building a brand as a Pro or the psychology behind BDSM, you can now access all my trainings and classes in one place for a fraction of the cost of The Dominatrix Academy. And you can reinvest the total amount towards the Program. Message me [SECRET] for the details. This offer is not available on my website.

Ms. Malissia

16,120 次观看 • 3 个月前

Ostriches are intensely social animals who understand their world through movement contact and the presence of their flock. They do not experience life with human concepts or human language but they do experience fear safety comfort and distress in ways that are clear measurable and deeply felt. When ostriches live together they learn the shapes sounds and movements of the birds around them. They feel secure when the flock is calm and they become anxious when others show signs of alarm. Their sense of safety depends entirely on the stability of the group. Any threat to one member of the flock creates a wave of fear through all of them. Because of this the emotional impact of violent handling and mass killing is not limited to the bird that is struck but spreads through every ostrich who sees hears or senses it. When force and confinement are imposed on them the birds experience a level of fear that overwhelms their natural coping behaviors. Ostriches respond to danger with flight or alert stillness and when neither response is possible they enter a state of acute stress that includes trembling pacing vocalizing or freezing in place. Their hearts race their muscles tense and their entire body prepares to escape. When they are surrounded or trapped they cannot understand why the danger cannot be avoided. The sense of helplessness for a prey animal is not a thought but a physical shock that floods them with stress and panic. To a creature who survives through movement and awareness the loss of space and the inability to flee is a form of suffering in itself. The abuse of forcing ostriches to witness the injury or death of familiar flock mates creates another layer of distress. These birds recognize individuals. They notice when one of their companions collapses or cries out. They become restless and agitated when a bird they know is harmed. They remain close to fallen birds and often attempt to investigate or stay near them because their instinct pushes them to stay with the group even when the group is being destroyed. The emotional meaning of this moment is not symbolic but immediate. The flock is breaking apart. The cues of danger multiply. The birds see others in pain or falling and their own fear grows with each new sign of suffering. When violent killing happens around them ostriches sense it as the collapse of their only system of safety. They are not built to make sense of destruction happening in their own flock. Instead they respond with escalating panic. Their bodies show it clearly through rapid breathing frantic shifts in posture and attempts to move closer to surviving flock mates. They do not understand why the danger continues or why the people near them are the source of harm. The stress they experience is intense enough to cause physical shock. Their final moments are dominated by confusion fear and the overwhelming instinct to escape a threat that cannot be avoided. The public often imagines large animals as numb or unaware but ostriches feel the world with a sensitivity shaped by millions of years as prey animals. Their eyes are sharp their hearing is attuned to stress in others and their bodies react strongly to fear and pain. When dozens or hundreds of birds are subjected to violence in a confined area every ostrich feels the fear of the others. The suffering does not happen to them one by one but as a shared experience of terror. This is an experience that no animal should ever be forced to endure. The reality is not clinical or quick. It is emotionally devastating to the animals caught in it because it destroys the flock bond that is their only sense of stability and then it destroys the birds themselves. Understanding this matters because it shows that the harm done to these animals was not only physical but deeply emotional. The ostriches suffered long before any final action was taken against their bodies. They suffered through fear they could not escape through the panic created by the collapse of their flock and through the helplessness of being unable to understand why the world around them suddenly turned violent. Recognizing this is essential because it reveals the true scale of what was done. This was not a neutral procedure. This was the infliction of terror on beings capable of feeling it powerfully. The public deserves to know that these birds were not indifferent creatures. They were living animals who felt fear and confusion and distress and whose final experiences were shaped by violence they could not comprehend or escape.
3:46

Ostriches are intensely social animals who understand their world through movement contact and the presence of their flock. They do not experience life with human concepts or human language but they do experience fear safety comfort and distress in ways that are clear measurable and deeply felt. When ostriches live together they learn the shapes sounds and movements of the birds around them. They feel secure when the flock is calm and they become anxious when others show signs of alarm. Their sense of safety depends entirely on the stability of the group. Any threat to one member of the flock creates a wave of fear through all of them. Because of this the emotional impact of violent handling and mass killing is not limited to the bird that is struck but spreads through every ostrich who sees hears or senses it. When force and confinement are imposed on them the birds experience a level of fear that overwhelms their natural coping behaviors. Ostriches respond to danger with flight or alert stillness and when neither response is possible they enter a state of acute stress that includes trembling pacing vocalizing or freezing in place. Their hearts race their muscles tense and their entire body prepares to escape. When they are surrounded or trapped they cannot understand why the danger cannot be avoided. The sense of helplessness for a prey animal is not a thought but a physical shock that floods them with stress and panic. To a creature who survives through movement and awareness the loss of space and the inability to flee is a form of suffering in itself. The abuse of forcing ostriches to witness the injury or death of familiar flock mates creates another layer of distress. These birds recognize individuals. They notice when one of their companions collapses or cries out. They become restless and agitated when a bird they know is harmed. They remain close to fallen birds and often attempt to investigate or stay near them because their instinct pushes them to stay with the group even when the group is being destroyed. The emotional meaning of this moment is not symbolic but immediate. The flock is breaking apart. The cues of danger multiply. The birds see others in pain or falling and their own fear grows with each new sign of suffering. When violent killing happens around them ostriches sense it as the collapse of their only system of safety. They are not built to make sense of destruction happening in their own flock. Instead they respond with escalating panic. Their bodies show it clearly through rapid breathing frantic shifts in posture and attempts to move closer to surviving flock mates. They do not understand why the danger continues or why the people near them are the source of harm. The stress they experience is intense enough to cause physical shock. Their final moments are dominated by confusion fear and the overwhelming instinct to escape a threat that cannot be avoided. The public often imagines large animals as numb or unaware but ostriches feel the world with a sensitivity shaped by millions of years as prey animals. Their eyes are sharp their hearing is attuned to stress in others and their bodies react strongly to fear and pain. When dozens or hundreds of birds are subjected to violence in a confined area every ostrich feels the fear of the others. The suffering does not happen to them one by one but as a shared experience of terror. This is an experience that no animal should ever be forced to endure. The reality is not clinical or quick. It is emotionally devastating to the animals caught in it because it destroys the flock bond that is their only sense of stability and then it destroys the birds themselves. Understanding this matters because it shows that the harm done to these animals was not only physical but deeply emotional. The ostriches suffered long before any final action was taken against their bodies. They suffered through fear they could not escape through the panic created by the collapse of their flock and through the helplessness of being unable to understand why the world around them suddenly turned violent. Recognizing this is essential because it reveals the true scale of what was done. This was not a neutral procedure. This was the infliction of terror on beings capable of feeling it powerfully. The public deserves to know that these birds were not indifferent creatures. They were living animals who felt fear and confusion and distress and whose final experiences were shaped by violence they could not comprehend or escape.

Vote Canada

55,531 次观看 • 9 个月前

Bill Cowher said, "Get comfortable being uncomfortable...Because that's the only way you could be as good as you can be." "I pushed them to be as good as they can be, but it doesn't mean I don't care about you as a person." High standards aren't cruel, they're a sign that you care. It means pushing people beyond their comfort zone and showing genuine care for people. Great leaders master the balance of high standards and compassion. 𝟓 𝐒𝐢𝐠𝐧𝐬 𝐘𝐨𝐮'𝐫𝐞 𝐋𝐞𝐚𝐝𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐇𝐢𝐠𝐡 𝐒𝐭𝐚𝐧𝐝𝐚𝐫𝐝𝐬 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐂𝐨𝐦𝐩𝐚𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧: 1. You challenge people to be their best, not just do their best - It means you encourage your team to stretch beyond their comfort zones. You coach character and growth. Growth happens when get comfortable being uncomfortable. You're no longer satisfied with "good enough" because you believe in people and their potential. 2. You give honest feedback with genuine care - It means you deliver feedback with respect and a focus on growth. Honest feedback builds trust. By communication with compassion, you ensure feedback is received as a tool for improvement, not as an attack. 3. You hold people accountable with support - It means you expect people to meet standards and give them the tools they need to succeed. Accountability without support feels like criticism without direction and support without accountability feels hollow. Ensure people have the coaching, encouragement, and process to do what they need. 4. You lead through example - It means you model the standards that you expect from others. People follow leaders who live their values and they see what you do, not what you say. Take the time to show those values consistently whether it's communication, accountability, or work ethic. 5. You build trust with consistency - It means people know what to expect from you no matter the outcome. Inconsistency breeds uncertainty. Trust grows when people they can count on you and your leadership. It becomes a representation of character and integrity. Bottom Line: Leading with high standards and compassion isn’t easy because it requires intentionality, self-awareness, and a deep commitment to others’ growth. - - - The video comes from Bill Cowher's interview with Trey Wingo (trey wingo) on Half-Forgotten History. A great listen if you want to hear more on Bill's story!
0:40

Bill Cowher said, "Get comfortable being uncomfortable...Because that's the only way you could be as good as you can be." "I pushed them to be as good as they can be, but it doesn't mean I don't care about you as a person." High standards aren't cruel, they're a sign that you care. It means pushing people beyond their comfort zone and showing genuine care for people. Great leaders master the balance of high standards and compassion. 𝟓 𝐒𝐢𝐠𝐧𝐬 𝐘𝐨𝐮'𝐫𝐞 𝐋𝐞𝐚𝐝𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐇𝐢𝐠𝐡 𝐒𝐭𝐚𝐧𝐝𝐚𝐫𝐝𝐬 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐂𝐨𝐦𝐩𝐚𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧: 1. You challenge people to be their best, not just do their best - It means you encourage your team to stretch beyond their comfort zones. You coach character and growth. Growth happens when get comfortable being uncomfortable. You're no longer satisfied with "good enough" because you believe in people and their potential. 2. You give honest feedback with genuine care - It means you deliver feedback with respect and a focus on growth. Honest feedback builds trust. By communication with compassion, you ensure feedback is received as a tool for improvement, not as an attack. 3. You hold people accountable with support - It means you expect people to meet standards and give them the tools they need to succeed. Accountability without support feels like criticism without direction and support without accountability feels hollow. Ensure people have the coaching, encouragement, and process to do what they need. 4. You lead through example - It means you model the standards that you expect from others. People follow leaders who live their values and they see what you do, not what you say. Take the time to show those values consistently whether it's communication, accountability, or work ethic. 5. You build trust with consistency - It means people know what to expect from you no matter the outcome. Inconsistency breeds uncertainty. Trust grows when people they can count on you and your leadership. It becomes a representation of character and integrity. Bottom Line: Leading with high standards and compassion isn’t easy because it requires intentionality, self-awareness, and a deep commitment to others’ growth. - - - The video comes from Bill Cowher's interview with Trey Wingo (trey wingo) on Half-Forgotten History. A great listen if you want to hear more on Bill's story!

Coach AJ 🎯 Mental Fitness

53,250 次观看 • 1 年前

Do you ride a bike? Or an e-scooter? Or walk a dog? If so, please take a second to read this. If you are on a bike or scooter on a shared pathway and approaching someone walking a dog, please be courteous and slow down a little. Especially if coming up from behind. I am a wheelchair user with a dog and we have way too many close calls with fast moving bikes and scooters. People not using a bell and whipping by within inches. If the dog turned it's head or stepped a bit wide, they'd be hit. I'll happily move as far to one side of the path as possible, and if I've got the younger dog who isn't as experienced around fast moving things, I'll stop at the very side and have him sit in front of me to give everyone as much space as possible. If I don't know you're approaching, I can't do that. So please, for the love of dog, use your bell. Don't wait until you're right behind someone with a dog. Use it while you're still at a distance, and if you aren't sure they noticed it, ring it a few more times. Give them as much time as possible to move to the side and prepare the dog. If it's a puppy or a dog that hasn't had much experience with bikes, being able to get them off the path or give them a little extra distance from the fast moving bike helps prevent them from getting scared. The vast majority of cyclists are great and really respectful, but there's always a few that aren't. This year the challenge is kids on e-scooters. They are going fast and having fun. Safety isn't at the forefront of their mind. They often don't use a bell or slow down at blind corners, and many don't think about giving the dog any space. I've been startled a few times by them so I can only imagine how the dog felt. This is one of the reasons why I do a lot of desensitization and counter conditioning. Dog owners-you need to do your part to. If you've got headphones on, make sure you can still hear the bike bell. Make sure to give the cyclist or scooter rider as much space as possible from your dog. And of course, unless you are on a designated off leash trail, keep your dog on a leash. If you have a puppy or a newly adopted dog that might not be comfortable around bikes, take some kibble or treats and go hang out with them near a multi use path. Let them watch. As the bike or scooter approaches, drop a few treats on the ground. For many dogs, this is all it takes, but if your dog is visibly stressed, fixated on the bike, or reacting, try moving a further from the trail and once they're comfortable at a slightly further distance, try closer again. If they are still stressed or fearful even with more distance, don't force the issue. Instead introduce them to a bike that isn't moving, and gradually work them up from there. If they are struggling, talk to a trainer. Regardless of if you are holding a leash, riding a bike or scooter, or enjoying a walk outdoors, just be respectful. And of course, be safe. Thanks, Admin 🎥 Puppy walk for cuteness
0:33

Do you ride a bike? Or an e-scooter? Or walk a dog? If so, please take a second to read this. If you are on a bike or scooter on a shared pathway and approaching someone walking a dog, please be courteous and slow down a little. Especially if coming up from behind. I am a wheelchair user with a dog and we have way too many close calls with fast moving bikes and scooters. People not using a bell and whipping by within inches. If the dog turned it's head or stepped a bit wide, they'd be hit. I'll happily move as far to one side of the path as possible, and if I've got the younger dog who isn't as experienced around fast moving things, I'll stop at the very side and have him sit in front of me to give everyone as much space as possible. If I don't know you're approaching, I can't do that. So please, for the love of dog, use your bell. Don't wait until you're right behind someone with a dog. Use it while you're still at a distance, and if you aren't sure they noticed it, ring it a few more times. Give them as much time as possible to move to the side and prepare the dog. If it's a puppy or a dog that hasn't had much experience with bikes, being able to get them off the path or give them a little extra distance from the fast moving bike helps prevent them from getting scared. The vast majority of cyclists are great and really respectful, but there's always a few that aren't. This year the challenge is kids on e-scooters. They are going fast and having fun. Safety isn't at the forefront of their mind. They often don't use a bell or slow down at blind corners, and many don't think about giving the dog any space. I've been startled a few times by them so I can only imagine how the dog felt. This is one of the reasons why I do a lot of desensitization and counter conditioning. Dog owners-you need to do your part to. If you've got headphones on, make sure you can still hear the bike bell. Make sure to give the cyclist or scooter rider as much space as possible from your dog. And of course, unless you are on a designated off leash trail, keep your dog on a leash. If you have a puppy or a newly adopted dog that might not be comfortable around bikes, take some kibble or treats and go hang out with them near a multi use path. Let them watch. As the bike or scooter approaches, drop a few treats on the ground. For many dogs, this is all it takes, but if your dog is visibly stressed, fixated on the bike, or reacting, try moving a further from the trail and once they're comfortable at a slightly further distance, try closer again. If they are still stressed or fearful even with more distance, don't force the issue. Instead introduce them to a bike that isn't moving, and gradually work them up from there. If they are struggling, talk to a trainer. Regardless of if you are holding a leash, riding a bike or scooter, or enjoying a walk outdoors, just be respectful. And of course, be safe. Thanks, Admin 🎥 Puppy walk for cuteness

Team Servicerottie🇨🇦🐕‍🦺🦽

15,736 次观看 • 1 个月前

Scientists Reveal a Simple Technique to Communicate With Your Cat | Michelle Starr, ScienceAlert Cats have a reputation for aloofness (and floofiness), but if you and your feline friend aren't bonding, the problem might just be that you're not speaking their language. Never fear – research shows it's easier than you think. All you need to do is smile at them more – cat style. Not in the human way, by showing your teeth, but by narrowing your eyes and blinking slowly. By observing cat-human interactions in 2020, scientists confirmed that this simple gesture makes cats – both familiar and strange – more likely to approach and engage with humans. "As someone who has both studied animal behavior and is a cat owner, it's great to be able to show that cats and humans can communicate in this way," University of Sussex psychologist Karen McComb said when the study was published. "It's something that many cat owners had already suspected, so it's exciting to have found evidence for it." ... If you've spent any time around cats, you've probably seen their 'partially closed eyes' facial expressions, accompanied by slow blinking. It's similar to how human eyes narrow when smiling and usually occurs when the cat is relaxed and content. The expression is interpreted as a kind of cat smile. Anecdotal evidence from cat owners has hinted that humans can copy this expression to communicate to cats that we are friendly and open to interaction. To test that idea, a team of psychologists ran two experiments. The first experiment involved 21 cats from 14 different households. Once the cat was settled and comfy in one spot in their home environment, their owners were instructed to sit about 1 meter (just over 3 feet) away, and slow blink when the cat was looking at them. Cameras recorded both the owner's and the cat's faces, and the results were compared to how cats blink with no human interaction. The results showed that cats are more likely to slow blink at their humans after their humans have slow blinked at them, compared to the no-interaction condition. The second experiment included 24 cats from eight different households. This time, it wasn't the owners doing the blinking but the researchers, who'd had no prior contact with the cat. For a control, the cats were recorded responding to a no-blink condition, in which humans stared at the cats without blinking their eyes. The researchers performed the same slow-blink process as the first experiment, adding an extended hand toward the cat. And they found that not only were the cats more likely to blink back, but they were also more likely to approach the human's hand after the human blinked. "This study is the first to experimentally investigate the role of slow blinking in cat-human communication," McComb said. "And it is something you can try yourself with your own cat at home or with cats you meet in the street. It's a great way of enhancing the bond you have with cats. Try narrowing your eyes at them as you would in a relaxed smile, followed by closing your eyes for a couple of seconds. You'll find they respond in the same way themselves, and you can start a sort of conversation." Dogs may be much more enthusiastically demonstrative than cats, but this news isn't a surprise for cat lovers. Research in recent years has shown that our feline friends are much more in tune with their human housemates than previously supposed and that comparing them to dogs is a disservice. Cats, for example, respond in kind to humans who are receptive to them – so if you find cats standoffish, that might be a problem with you, not the kitty. Likewise, cats echo the personality traits of the humans they live with – this may be related to why cats seem to pick up when their humans are sad. They also can recognize their names (although they choose to ignore them a lot of the time). And their bonds with their humans are surprisingly deep. It's difficult to know why cats slow blink at humans like this. It's been interpreted as a means of signaling benign intentions since cats are thought to interpret unbroken staring as threatening. But it's also possible that cats developed the expression since humans respond positively to it. With domesticated animals, it's often impossible to tell. Either way, it does seem to help forge a rapport. And that's a good thing to know. Learning how to improve our relationships with these enigmatic animals could also be a way to improve their emotional health – not just in the home environment but across a range of potentially stressful situations. "Understanding positive ways in which cats and humans interact can enhance public understanding of cats, improve feline welfare, and tell us more about the socio-cognitive abilities of this under-studied species," said psychologist Tasmin Humphrey of the University of Sussex. "Our findings could potentially be used to assess the welfare of cats in a variety of settings, including veterinary practices and shelters." You're going to try it right now, aren't you?
0:59

Scientists Reveal a Simple Technique to Communicate With Your Cat | Michelle Starr, ScienceAlert Cats have a reputation for aloofness (and floofiness), but if you and your feline friend aren't bonding, the problem might just be that you're not speaking their language. Never fear – research shows it's easier than you think. All you need to do is smile at them more – cat style. Not in the human way, by showing your teeth, but by narrowing your eyes and blinking slowly. By observing cat-human interactions in 2020, scientists confirmed that this simple gesture makes cats – both familiar and strange – more likely to approach and engage with humans. "As someone who has both studied animal behavior and is a cat owner, it's great to be able to show that cats and humans can communicate in this way," University of Sussex psychologist Karen McComb said when the study was published. "It's something that many cat owners had already suspected, so it's exciting to have found evidence for it." ... If you've spent any time around cats, you've probably seen their 'partially closed eyes' facial expressions, accompanied by slow blinking. It's similar to how human eyes narrow when smiling and usually occurs when the cat is relaxed and content. The expression is interpreted as a kind of cat smile. Anecdotal evidence from cat owners has hinted that humans can copy this expression to communicate to cats that we are friendly and open to interaction. To test that idea, a team of psychologists ran two experiments. The first experiment involved 21 cats from 14 different households. Once the cat was settled and comfy in one spot in their home environment, their owners were instructed to sit about 1 meter (just over 3 feet) away, and slow blink when the cat was looking at them. Cameras recorded both the owner's and the cat's faces, and the results were compared to how cats blink with no human interaction. The results showed that cats are more likely to slow blink at their humans after their humans have slow blinked at them, compared to the no-interaction condition. The second experiment included 24 cats from eight different households. This time, it wasn't the owners doing the blinking but the researchers, who'd had no prior contact with the cat. For a control, the cats were recorded responding to a no-blink condition, in which humans stared at the cats without blinking their eyes. The researchers performed the same slow-blink process as the first experiment, adding an extended hand toward the cat. And they found that not only were the cats more likely to blink back, but they were also more likely to approach the human's hand after the human blinked. "This study is the first to experimentally investigate the role of slow blinking in cat-human communication," McComb said. "And it is something you can try yourself with your own cat at home or with cats you meet in the street. It's a great way of enhancing the bond you have with cats. Try narrowing your eyes at them as you would in a relaxed smile, followed by closing your eyes for a couple of seconds. You'll find they respond in the same way themselves, and you can start a sort of conversation." Dogs may be much more enthusiastically demonstrative than cats, but this news isn't a surprise for cat lovers. Research in recent years has shown that our feline friends are much more in tune with their human housemates than previously supposed and that comparing them to dogs is a disservice. Cats, for example, respond in kind to humans who are receptive to them – so if you find cats standoffish, that might be a problem with you, not the kitty. Likewise, cats echo the personality traits of the humans they live with – this may be related to why cats seem to pick up when their humans are sad. They also can recognize their names (although they choose to ignore them a lot of the time). And their bonds with their humans are surprisingly deep. It's difficult to know why cats slow blink at humans like this. It's been interpreted as a means of signaling benign intentions since cats are thought to interpret unbroken staring as threatening. But it's also possible that cats developed the expression since humans respond positively to it. With domesticated animals, it's often impossible to tell. Either way, it does seem to help forge a rapport. And that's a good thing to know. Learning how to improve our relationships with these enigmatic animals could also be a way to improve their emotional health – not just in the home environment but across a range of potentially stressful situations. "Understanding positive ways in which cats and humans interact can enhance public understanding of cats, improve feline welfare, and tell us more about the socio-cognitive abilities of this under-studied species," said psychologist Tasmin Humphrey of the University of Sussex. "Our findings could potentially be used to assess the welfare of cats in a variety of settings, including veterinary practices and shelters." You're going to try it right now, aren't you?

Owen Gregorian

31,307 次观看 • 11 个月前

Jacob Tierney discusses the demanding physicality of Connor and Hudson's Heated Rivalry roles. "What I always knew about this show—and what I like in general—is behavior is more interesting to me than dialogue. Especially with characters like [Shane and Ilya] who are almost never talking about the topic. They are talking around things. They are full of bluster. They are bragging or showing off or being defensive. … So it's way more about their behavior. It was so much more physical, what I would tell them to do. Because I was like—this dialogue, this scene is like 2½ pages, and not one thing you're saying matters. I don't care about it. What I care about is what your body is doing up against that wall, and when you decide to approach him, and the way you're going to touch him, and at what point. And when you're going to let him off the hook emotionally or when you're going to hook him emotionally. That stuff is so much more important, and that you pace in around what is written. And that is deeply physical. The best acting to me is always physical and the best platform you can give an actor—as a writer, I think—is physical stuff… I want to see what your body is doing. Your body will tell me more than your words ever will. Your eyes will tell me more. But like, especially with these characters, because they're athletes too. It's like physicality will be everything. And that was also why these roles were so demanding, you know? There's the physicality of the intimacy, and then there's the physicality of the hockey. Everything is physical in this story." Transcription via Heated Rivalry News & Updates Quote via Q&A with Stage 32 on March 24, 2026
3:39

Jacob Tierney discusses the demanding physicality of Connor and Hudson's Heated Rivalry roles. "What I always knew about this show—and what I like in general—is behavior is more interesting to me than dialogue. Especially with characters like [Shane and Ilya] who are almost never talking about the topic. They are talking around things. They are full of bluster. They are bragging or showing off or being defensive. … So it's way more about their behavior. It was so much more physical, what I would tell them to do. Because I was like—this dialogue, this scene is like 2½ pages, and not one thing you're saying matters. I don't care about it. What I care about is what your body is doing up against that wall, and when you decide to approach him, and the way you're going to touch him, and at what point. And when you're going to let him off the hook emotionally or when you're going to hook him emotionally. That stuff is so much more important, and that you pace in around what is written. And that is deeply physical. The best acting to me is always physical and the best platform you can give an actor—as a writer, I think—is physical stuff… I want to see what your body is doing. Your body will tell me more than your words ever will. Your eyes will tell me more. But like, especially with these characters, because they're athletes too. It's like physicality will be everything. And that was also why these roles were so demanding, you know? There's the physicality of the intimacy, and then there's the physicality of the hockey. Everything is physical in this story." Transcription via Heated Rivalry News & Updates Quote via Q&A with Stage 32 on March 24, 2026

Heated Rivalry News & Updates

155,866 次观看 • 4 个月前

When Little Children and a Foal Share a “Picnic” In the simple setting of a horse stable, three children about 3–6 years old sit on a pile of golden straw, gathered around a brown foal lying in their midst. They gently stroke it, hug its face, and lightly touch its nose and mouth with the same tenderness and ease as if they were playing with a friend of the same age. The foal lies relaxed, showing no fear; the mother horse stands nearby, calmly watching. There is no species barrier, no hesitation or “distinction” — only closeness, trust, and pure joy, like a picnic among dear friends. Why do children love animals so deeply and naturally treat them as close friends? Many scientific and developmental psychology reasons help explain this phenomenon. Biologist Edward O. Wilson proposed the biophilia hypothesis — an innate human tendency, especially strong in young children, to bond with other living beings. Research shows that even from a few months of age, babies prefer looking at, touching, and smiling at real animals more than at toys. Children have not yet been “filtered” by adult reasoning and experience, so their responses remain pure and unfiltered. In the preoperational stage (roughly ages 2–7 according to Jean Piaget), children naturally anthropomorphize and believe in animism. They attribute human emotions, thoughts, and personalities to animals, talking to dogs, cats, or horses as if they were real friends. Animals become “social others” — always listening, never judging, never arguing. In the video, the children treat the foal exactly as they would care for a little sibling or playmate. Added to this is the “baby schema” effect (or Kindchenschema). Foals — like most young animals — have large eyes, round faces, and soft bodies. These features strongly trigger humans’ caregiving and nurturing instincts. Children respond even more powerfully than adults to this cuteness, making it easy for them to form instant friendships. Unlike adults, who often view animals through the lens of utility (food, tools, pets), culture, or fear, young children have not yet learned those distinctions. They value animals simply because they are alive. In return, animals “make no distinctions” about children either: they pay no attention to skin color, family background, or appearance — responding only to gentleness. This creates a pure and emotionally safe relationship. Interacting with animals also brings many developmental benefits. Children learn empathy, how to read body language, and how to care for others. Animals provide unconditional emotional support — many children even regard their pets as closer friends than their siblings because there is far less conflict. These interactions also help build self-confidence, responsibility, and social skills.
0:30

When Little Children and a Foal Share a “Picnic” In the simple setting of a horse stable, three children about 3–6 years old sit on a pile of golden straw, gathered around a brown foal lying in their midst. They gently stroke it, hug its face, and lightly touch its nose and mouth with the same tenderness and ease as if they were playing with a friend of the same age. The foal lies relaxed, showing no fear; the mother horse stands nearby, calmly watching. There is no species barrier, no hesitation or “distinction” — only closeness, trust, and pure joy, like a picnic among dear friends. Why do children love animals so deeply and naturally treat them as close friends? Many scientific and developmental psychology reasons help explain this phenomenon. Biologist Edward O. Wilson proposed the biophilia hypothesis — an innate human tendency, especially strong in young children, to bond with other living beings. Research shows that even from a few months of age, babies prefer looking at, touching, and smiling at real animals more than at toys. Children have not yet been “filtered” by adult reasoning and experience, so their responses remain pure and unfiltered. In the preoperational stage (roughly ages 2–7 according to Jean Piaget), children naturally anthropomorphize and believe in animism. They attribute human emotions, thoughts, and personalities to animals, talking to dogs, cats, or horses as if they were real friends. Animals become “social others” — always listening, never judging, never arguing. In the video, the children treat the foal exactly as they would care for a little sibling or playmate. Added to this is the “baby schema” effect (or Kindchenschema). Foals — like most young animals — have large eyes, round faces, and soft bodies. These features strongly trigger humans’ caregiving and nurturing instincts. Children respond even more powerfully than adults to this cuteness, making it easy for them to form instant friendships. Unlike adults, who often view animals through the lens of utility (food, tools, pets), culture, or fear, young children have not yet learned those distinctions. They value animals simply because they are alive. In return, animals “make no distinctions” about children either: they pay no attention to skin color, family background, or appearance — responding only to gentleness. This creates a pure and emotionally safe relationship. Interacting with animals also brings many developmental benefits. Children learn empathy, how to read body language, and how to care for others. Animals provide unconditional emotional support — many children even regard their pets as closer friends than their siblings because there is far less conflict. These interactions also help build self-confidence, responsibility, and social skills.

Nature 🦜and Music 🎶

47,280 次观看 • 2 天前

Abandoned and Reduced to Skin and Bones, This Dog Still Looked at a Stranger with Trust ✨ The little dog lay curled up, its ribs clearly visible beneath its skin, its fur dirty and giving off a foul smell. It had been abandoned with almost nothing left. Yet when the rescuer approached and spoke to it, its first reaction was not fear or retreat. It moved closer, looking up with clear, innocent eyes and responding with an almost unconditional friendliness. It was a moment that made many viewers stop and take notice. The story began as a straightforward rescue case. The puppy was found severely malnourished, filthy, and alone. Despite being neglected to such an extent, it still approached a stranger gently, showing no signs of defensiveness. The rescuer offered it food and spoke to it in a soft voice, and the dog responded with trust almost immediately. The question is a simple but profound one: Why does a creature treated so cruelly still have the ability to love and open its heart to someone it has never met? The answer lies partly in the nature of dogs. Unlike humans, dogs do not tend to hold grudges in the same way or dwell on them over long periods. They live largely through their instincts for attachment and their search for safety. When a new person reaches out to them, many dogs can still respond with acceptance. This is not foolishness or a lack of memory. Rather, it is a trait shaped over thousands of years of living alongside humans. They often place trust ahead of suspicion. The contrast in this story makes that even more striking. The dog's body tells the story of neglect: exposed ribs, a foul smell, and hunger written across its fragile frame. But its eyes and the way it approached the rescuer tell a different story. It was still willing to offer affection. The distance between the former owner's actions and the dog's response creates the emotional weight of the story. From a human perspective, the story also offers a thought-provoking comparison. After being hurt, people often become guarded, defensive, and reluctant to open up again. Yet a dog abandoned to the point of near death can still look at a stranger with hope in its eyes. That innocence does not mean that dogs are incapable of feeling pain. It shows that they have not learned to close their hearts in quite the same way humans sometimes do. The story also reminds us of responsibility. When a vulnerable creature is abandoned, rescuing it is not simply an act of kindness. It is also an opportunity to reflect on how we treat those who are weak and easily overlooked. Have we become too willing to turn away from lives that are no longer “convenient”? And have we retained the ability to trust and love with fewer conditions? The rescuers in the video did more than provide food. They sent a simple message: there are still people willing to stay. The dog responded with perhaps the most precious thing it still had, its gentle, innocent friendliness. The moment was quiet, but deeply moving. It showed that love does not always need to be nurtured by perfect circumstances. Sometimes, all it needs is a small opportunity to be expressed. In a world where people increasingly encounter hurt and mistrust, the image of a skeletal dog still approaching a stranger becomes a simple reminder. Perhaps there is something we can learn from animals: trust does not always need to be justified by a good past. Sometimes, when a hand reaches out in the present, the heart can still choose to open. That dog was left with almost nothing. Yet it still chose to show love. And that choice makes the story more than just a rescue. It becomes a reminder that even amid suffering, innocence can still remain 💖
1:01

Abandoned and Reduced to Skin and Bones, This Dog Still Looked at a Stranger with Trust ✨ The little dog lay curled up, its ribs clearly visible beneath its skin, its fur dirty and giving off a foul smell. It had been abandoned with almost nothing left. Yet when the rescuer approached and spoke to it, its first reaction was not fear or retreat. It moved closer, looking up with clear, innocent eyes and responding with an almost unconditional friendliness. It was a moment that made many viewers stop and take notice. The story began as a straightforward rescue case. The puppy was found severely malnourished, filthy, and alone. Despite being neglected to such an extent, it still approached a stranger gently, showing no signs of defensiveness. The rescuer offered it food and spoke to it in a soft voice, and the dog responded with trust almost immediately. The question is a simple but profound one: Why does a creature treated so cruelly still have the ability to love and open its heart to someone it has never met? The answer lies partly in the nature of dogs. Unlike humans, dogs do not tend to hold grudges in the same way or dwell on them over long periods. They live largely through their instincts for attachment and their search for safety. When a new person reaches out to them, many dogs can still respond with acceptance. This is not foolishness or a lack of memory. Rather, it is a trait shaped over thousands of years of living alongside humans. They often place trust ahead of suspicion. The contrast in this story makes that even more striking. The dog's body tells the story of neglect: exposed ribs, a foul smell, and hunger written across its fragile frame. But its eyes and the way it approached the rescuer tell a different story. It was still willing to offer affection. The distance between the former owner's actions and the dog's response creates the emotional weight of the story. From a human perspective, the story also offers a thought-provoking comparison. After being hurt, people often become guarded, defensive, and reluctant to open up again. Yet a dog abandoned to the point of near death can still look at a stranger with hope in its eyes. That innocence does not mean that dogs are incapable of feeling pain. It shows that they have not learned to close their hearts in quite the same way humans sometimes do. The story also reminds us of responsibility. When a vulnerable creature is abandoned, rescuing it is not simply an act of kindness. It is also an opportunity to reflect on how we treat those who are weak and easily overlooked. Have we become too willing to turn away from lives that are no longer “convenient”? And have we retained the ability to trust and love with fewer conditions? The rescuers in the video did more than provide food. They sent a simple message: there are still people willing to stay. The dog responded with perhaps the most precious thing it still had, its gentle, innocent friendliness. The moment was quiet, but deeply moving. It showed that love does not always need to be nurtured by perfect circumstances. Sometimes, all it needs is a small opportunity to be expressed. In a world where people increasingly encounter hurt and mistrust, the image of a skeletal dog still approaching a stranger becomes a simple reminder. Perhaps there is something we can learn from animals: trust does not always need to be justified by a good past. Sometimes, when a hand reaches out in the present, the heart can still choose to open. That dog was left with almost nothing. Yet it still chose to show love. And that choice makes the story more than just a rescue. It becomes a reminder that even amid suffering, innocence can still remain 💖

Beauty of music and nature 🌺🌺

24,431 次观看 • 3 天前

I hope Americans wake up and realize that Muslims do not want to take away only your dogs. They want to take away your freedom of having dogs. It is about control and dominance. This pro-Palestinian Mamdani supporter Nerdeen Kiswani just posted that finally NYC is coming to Islam. She means Islam is taking over New York. She added that dogs definitely have a place in society but just not as indoor pets. She said like we have said all along they are unclean. She puts herself in a position to dictate what her host society in the West should look like. Then Congressman Randy Fine replied that if they force us to choose the choice between dogs and Muslims is not a difficult one. As an Iranian and a Muslim I am totally in line with this statement. He is totally right. I have been to Mecca and I own a dog myself. But then Jake Tapper the CNN guy came to the rescue screaming disgusting bigotry. Gavin Newsom said resign now you racist slob. Apparently the Governor of California is not educated enough to know that Islam is not a race. He does not seem to understand that Muslims can actually choose to be civilized respectful citizens and not dominating savages. This is not about dogs. This is not about Islam. It is about control and domination. I am Iranian. We have been through this before. Iranians are Muslims. Our Shah our king his first name was “Mohammad” Reza for God's sake. But still they managed to take power in Iran in the name of Islam. Back in 1979, Islamists had no luck until France welcomed Khomeini as a refugee. There the same exact cult the pro-Palestine leftists helped him to portray the Shah of Iran as the ultimate enemy a corrupt regime that must be annihilated. Among all Shah’s crimes being pro-West pro-US pro-Israel supportive of women's rights his worst crime was loving dogs. Not just as family members but he funded and equipped hospitals for pets. The leftists liberals Democrats corrupt elite in academia and media portrayed this monster as a freedom fighter spread lies about the Shah on BBC rioted against him. They enabled Islamists secretly gave weapons to them. They took Iran toppled the Shah through extreme violence. Now in Iran dogs are not legally allowed as pets. People still have them of course but they have to hide them and wait until dark to take them out. Because authorities not only seize them and kill them they fine them massively or punish by 70 lashes. This is the reality under Shia Islamic rule the Islamo-leftists. The issue with many Americans is that they only know Sunni Islam from 9/11. But Mamdani Khomeini Khamenei they are Shia Muslims. They play the oppressed card and use Islam as a tool for power. Mamdani's mother was partying with Bill Clinton and Jeff Bezos at Epstein place in 2009. He has been groomed to seize power behind this façade of a grassroots pro-Palestine Muslim. And just like in Iran the enablers which I call traitors are the Democrats and the corrupt elite in academia and media. So Americans please do not be naive. Do not hand your freedom to these enemies of life. Protect what you have unapologetically and fiercely. Otherwise you will have to fight to get it back just like Iranians are still fighting today. Do not think it will not happen to you. It will if you do not stand up now. Choose freedom. Do not give in to their lies. Choose dogs. Be like Congressman Randy Fine not Jake Tapper 🦅 . Share if this wakes you up. From an Iranian who lived it.
3:08

I hope Americans wake up and realize that Muslims do not want to take away only your dogs. They want to take away your freedom of having dogs. It is about control and dominance. This pro-Palestinian Mamdani supporter Nerdeen Kiswani just posted that finally NYC is coming to Islam. She means Islam is taking over New York. She added that dogs definitely have a place in society but just not as indoor pets. She said like we have said all along they are unclean. She puts herself in a position to dictate what her host society in the West should look like. Then Congressman Randy Fine replied that if they force us to choose the choice between dogs and Muslims is not a difficult one. As an Iranian and a Muslim I am totally in line with this statement. He is totally right. I have been to Mecca and I own a dog myself. But then Jake Tapper the CNN guy came to the rescue screaming disgusting bigotry. Gavin Newsom said resign now you racist slob. Apparently the Governor of California is not educated enough to know that Islam is not a race. He does not seem to understand that Muslims can actually choose to be civilized respectful citizens and not dominating savages. This is not about dogs. This is not about Islam. It is about control and domination. I am Iranian. We have been through this before. Iranians are Muslims. Our Shah our king his first name was “Mohammad” Reza for God's sake. But still they managed to take power in Iran in the name of Islam. Back in 1979, Islamists had no luck until France welcomed Khomeini as a refugee. There the same exact cult the pro-Palestine leftists helped him to portray the Shah of Iran as the ultimate enemy a corrupt regime that must be annihilated. Among all Shah’s crimes being pro-West pro-US pro-Israel supportive of women's rights his worst crime was loving dogs. Not just as family members but he funded and equipped hospitals for pets. The leftists liberals Democrats corrupt elite in academia and media portrayed this monster as a freedom fighter spread lies about the Shah on BBC rioted against him. They enabled Islamists secretly gave weapons to them. They took Iran toppled the Shah through extreme violence. Now in Iran dogs are not legally allowed as pets. People still have them of course but they have to hide them and wait until dark to take them out. Because authorities not only seize them and kill them they fine them massively or punish by 70 lashes. This is the reality under Shia Islamic rule the Islamo-leftists. The issue with many Americans is that they only know Sunni Islam from 9/11. But Mamdani Khomeini Khamenei they are Shia Muslims. They play the oppressed card and use Islam as a tool for power. Mamdani's mother was partying with Bill Clinton and Jeff Bezos at Epstein place in 2009. He has been groomed to seize power behind this façade of a grassroots pro-Palestine Muslim. And just like in Iran the enablers which I call traitors are the Democrats and the corrupt elite in academia and media. So Americans please do not be naive. Do not hand your freedom to these enemies of life. Protect what you have unapologetically and fiercely. Otherwise you will have to fight to get it back just like Iranians are still fighting today. Do not think it will not happen to you. It will if you do not stand up now. Choose freedom. Do not give in to their lies. Choose dogs. Be like Congressman Randy Fine not Jake Tapper 🦅 . Share if this wakes you up. From an Iranian who lived it.

Ida Turan 🇮🇷

127,931 次观看 • 6 个月前

Ritual abuse survivor/trauma therapist Max Lowen: "The entire world is basically run by a satanic cult. They're psychopaths, they're pedophiles, they're parasitic... [and] they harvest us physically, etherically, spiritually... But they're not human... these are interdimensional beings that have come to this planet, that have taken it over. And they are dark, they are evil. And they are patriarchal. So they have created everything in that image." This clip of Lowen (Max Lowen) is taken from a conversation with Seth Holehouse (Man in America) posted to the Man in America Rumble channel on February 15, 2026. ---------------Partial transcription of clip---------------- "The entire world is basically run by a satanic cult. They're psychopaths, they're pedophiles, they're parasitic. So they use. They harvest us physically, etherically, spiritually. "And so at the tippy top of the pyramid, and this is going to sound, you know, I mean, we're already in crazy land for some people with what's released in Epstein, so I'll just go there. But they're not human. Okay? "So these are interdimensional beings that have come to this planet, that have taken it over. And they are dark, they are evil. And they are patriarchal. So they have created everything in that image. And then the whole hierarchy is completely compartmentalized. So different rungs have different tasks. "And things that they do. And they have different amounts of the big picture. And right below that tippy top and still above all the things like the Vatican and Freemasons or whatever are covens, believe it or not. So, practitioners of black magic, that's a big part of the control structure. But that's basically the hierarchy. "So every institution that we have on this planet, everything, has been either created or infiltrated by this cult. So that's why no one's getting arrested, because they control the military and the police and the justice system. "And so, for example, the medical system, we used to have, you know, real healing, like herbs and energetic healing. And then the Rockefellers, which are one of the bloodline families, that's a layer in that hierarchy as well. They created the allopathic medical system deliberately to slow. Poison us and slow. Kill us, profit off that process, and then shorten our lifespan, and kill us prematurely. "So that entire system, this is hard for the human to grok because we've been taught to trust these people. We look at them as, like our parental figures, benevolent. And they're not. They're actually, as a good example, the medical and pharmaceutical system are designed to harm us by its inherent design. "[And] everyone knows the food is toxic, the water's fluoridated. They spray us with chemtrails. Like these people, they worship Lucifer. They worship dark, demonic entities. They are a death cult. They also need us because they're parasitic. They have been cut off from the creator. What, God— You know, whatever you call that. The oneness. And because they're cut off, they're cut off from the life force. Their highest achievement is ego, right? Which is why they're into power and fame and wealth and all those worldly things. "So they, like many movies and TV shows, are revealing the truth. We're their batteries, like Morpheus says to Neo in the Matrix, right? So they need us— They, they particularly like to prey on babies and children because of their purity, their essence. They're a soul. They've just come in from God into a human body. "So that energy is very rich to them and they, they harvest it etherically and then they harvest it physically in the form of blood and flesh eating as well, right? So they paradoxically hate us. They consider us cattle. They, you know, and they want to depopulate us, but to a point they have to keep some of us because we're their, their energy, their fuel source, if you will. "And we're also co-creators with God, but they're, they can't create anything. They can only piggyback off existing creation. So what they do is they get us to create this, now that we see it clearly, hell on Earth reality. Now how do they do that? They use trauma-based mind control. So the same things they did to me, they do to the collective."
4:36

Ritual abuse survivor/trauma therapist Max Lowen: "The entire world is basically run by a satanic cult. They're psychopaths, they're pedophiles, they're parasitic... [and] they harvest us physically, etherically, spiritually... But they're not human... these are interdimensional beings that have come to this planet, that have taken it over. And they are dark, they are evil. And they are patriarchal. So they have created everything in that image." This clip of Lowen (Max Lowen) is taken from a conversation with Seth Holehouse (Man in America) posted to the Man in America Rumble channel on February 15, 2026. ---------------Partial transcription of clip---------------- "The entire world is basically run by a satanic cult. They're psychopaths, they're pedophiles, they're parasitic. So they use. They harvest us physically, etherically, spiritually. "And so at the tippy top of the pyramid, and this is going to sound, you know, I mean, we're already in crazy land for some people with what's released in Epstein, so I'll just go there. But they're not human. Okay? "So these are interdimensional beings that have come to this planet, that have taken it over. And they are dark, they are evil. And they are patriarchal. So they have created everything in that image. And then the whole hierarchy is completely compartmentalized. So different rungs have different tasks. "And things that they do. And they have different amounts of the big picture. And right below that tippy top and still above all the things like the Vatican and Freemasons or whatever are covens, believe it or not. So, practitioners of black magic, that's a big part of the control structure. But that's basically the hierarchy. "So every institution that we have on this planet, everything, has been either created or infiltrated by this cult. So that's why no one's getting arrested, because they control the military and the police and the justice system. "And so, for example, the medical system, we used to have, you know, real healing, like herbs and energetic healing. And then the Rockefellers, which are one of the bloodline families, that's a layer in that hierarchy as well. They created the allopathic medical system deliberately to slow. Poison us and slow. Kill us, profit off that process, and then shorten our lifespan, and kill us prematurely. "So that entire system, this is hard for the human to grok because we've been taught to trust these people. We look at them as, like our parental figures, benevolent. And they're not. They're actually, as a good example, the medical and pharmaceutical system are designed to harm us by its inherent design. "[And] everyone knows the food is toxic, the water's fluoridated. They spray us with chemtrails. Like these people, they worship Lucifer. They worship dark, demonic entities. They are a death cult. They also need us because they're parasitic. They have been cut off from the creator. What, God— You know, whatever you call that. The oneness. And because they're cut off, they're cut off from the life force. Their highest achievement is ego, right? Which is why they're into power and fame and wealth and all those worldly things. "So they, like many movies and TV shows, are revealing the truth. We're their batteries, like Morpheus says to Neo in the Matrix, right? So they need us— They, they particularly like to prey on babies and children because of their purity, their essence. They're a soul. They've just come in from God into a human body. "So that energy is very rich to them and they, they harvest it etherically and then they harvest it physically in the form of blood and flesh eating as well, right? So they paradoxically hate us. They consider us cattle. They, you know, and they want to depopulate us, but to a point they have to keep some of us because we're their, their energy, their fuel source, if you will. "And we're also co-creators with God, but they're, they can't create anything. They can only piggyback off existing creation. So what they do is they get us to create this, now that we see it clearly, hell on Earth reality. Now how do they do that? They use trauma-based mind control. So the same things they did to me, they do to the collective."

Sense Receptor

75,067 次观看 • 5 个月前

Many rescues, shelters, and breeders have already decided that a human with a disability can't handle a high-drive or working breed dog like me... They see a wheelchair or a cane and simply say no. Sometimes they do the same thing to seniors. While not every person in their 70s is fit and highly active, some are. Most wheelchair users aren't as experienced with dogs and have ways to ensure our needs are met, but some , like mine are. Blanket policies that don't look at the individual are common and they are keeping some truly pawsome teams apart! 🐾 But check out this power wheelchair dog walk proof! I'm briskly trotting sidewalks and paths like a pro, then off-leash grass chaos — rolling, spinning, and bouncing with full zoomie energy! We've been proving them wrong every day: I get all my high-drive needs met (zoomies included!), demo tricks in classes, tackle adventures together, and my human's power chair keeps right up, sometimes even leading the chase to the best smells. High-drive Rottie? Handled with style! It's time for more open minds out there. Disability doesn't mean "can't do dogs". It just means creative, determined, and extra-fun partnerships. The right team can handle anything! Who's with me on this? Drop a 🐾 if you agree! 🦽🐶❤️ #ServiceDogLife #OpenMinds #ProveThemWrong
0:28

Many rescues, shelters, and breeders have already decided that a human with a disability can't handle a high-drive or working breed dog like me... They see a wheelchair or a cane and simply say no. Sometimes they do the same thing to seniors. While not every person in their 70s is fit and highly active, some are. Most wheelchair users aren't as experienced with dogs and have ways to ensure our needs are met, but some , like mine are. Blanket policies that don't look at the individual are common and they are keeping some truly pawsome teams apart! 🐾 But check out this power wheelchair dog walk proof! I'm briskly trotting sidewalks and paths like a pro, then off-leash grass chaos — rolling, spinning, and bouncing with full zoomie energy! We've been proving them wrong every day: I get all my high-drive needs met (zoomies included!), demo tricks in classes, tackle adventures together, and my human's power chair keeps right up, sometimes even leading the chase to the best smells. High-drive Rottie? Handled with style! It's time for more open minds out there. Disability doesn't mean "can't do dogs". It just means creative, determined, and extra-fun partnerships. The right team can handle anything! Who's with me on this? Drop a 🐾 if you agree! 🦽🐶❤️ #ServiceDogLife #OpenMinds #ProveThemWrong

Team Servicerottie🇨🇦🐕‍🦺🦽

14,762 次观看 • 1 个月前

Most guys do not realize how dirty, naughty, and sexual women are. The average woman is way dirtier than the average man. I don’t think I’ve ever met a woman who wasn’t turned on by public sex, for example. Very few men are as into it as women are. As a guy, when you’re about to get it on with a girl in public, she’s there moaning, telling you to “put it in”; meanwhile you are looking around to check if anyone else is nearby while positioning her in this uncomfortable public position in the dirt, in the cold, and telling her “all right, hold on, I’m working on it, let me just get it up here, give me a second, sheesh!” If you read a woman’s romance novel, there is so much ink spilled on teasing, build up, this sex act, that sex act, the other sex act, that it’s basically unreadable if you are a guy. As a guy, you just wanna get your hot dog in her hot dog bun. But women want to do all KINDS of stuff. There’s a million things sexually these girls want to do. So why aren’t girls jumping at the chance to go to bed with every guy they meet? ✅ She needs to TRUST a guy first. Trust that she is safe with him. Trust that he will not judge her. Trust that it won’t affect her reputation. Many men aren’t good at building trust. Trust is KEY. ✅ She needs some degree of attraction to the guy. Not NEARLY as much as most guys think. She does NOT need to be wild with desire for you to sleep with you. It is even possible to sleep with women who really are not attracted to you at all, but who are just bored (and horny) and you did the moves right. (Or, bonus round, you just offered her an experience she has always fantasized about, so even if you are not her dream guy, she nevertheless says fine, let’s do it.) ✅ She needs to be aroused. You know the whole “women’s arousal is like a dimmer” thing… it’s accurate. You need to ramp her arousal up with touch, teasing, flirtation, innuendo, sex talk, etc. ✅ She needs to be ALONE with you. If she trusts you enough, you can get her alone with you. Once she’s alone with you, if there is trust there, and there’s arousal, and maybe a bit of attraction, you will get her clothes off. Yes… even if she is a ‘good’ girl. ‘Good’ girls did not manage to pass down their genes by hating sex (they are just a bit more selective about the men they have it with, is all. They need more TRUST!). Also: don’t be UNNERVED by female sexuality. Every girl has a tigress inside her waiting for the right guy to unleash it… a guy who makes her trust him, arouses her, gets her alone with him, and maybe creates some attraction with her. Women’s romance novels are ALL about this. Women’s romances in real life are as well. In fact, in real life, women often settle for far less ideal situations: men they don’t completely trust, aren’t that attracted to, are only partway aroused by, who get them alone somewhere. The better a job you can do approaching her sexual “Platonic ideal”, the more reliably you can bring out that sexual tigress lurking inside of EVERY woman (even the ‘good’ girls).
1:05

Most guys do not realize how dirty, naughty, and sexual women are. The average woman is way dirtier than the average man. I don’t think I’ve ever met a woman who wasn’t turned on by public sex, for example. Very few men are as into it as women are. As a guy, when you’re about to get it on with a girl in public, she’s there moaning, telling you to “put it in”; meanwhile you are looking around to check if anyone else is nearby while positioning her in this uncomfortable public position in the dirt, in the cold, and telling her “all right, hold on, I’m working on it, let me just get it up here, give me a second, sheesh!” If you read a woman’s romance novel, there is so much ink spilled on teasing, build up, this sex act, that sex act, the other sex act, that it’s basically unreadable if you are a guy. As a guy, you just wanna get your hot dog in her hot dog bun. But women want to do all KINDS of stuff. There’s a million things sexually these girls want to do. So why aren’t girls jumping at the chance to go to bed with every guy they meet? ✅ She needs to TRUST a guy first. Trust that she is safe with him. Trust that he will not judge her. Trust that it won’t affect her reputation. Many men aren’t good at building trust. Trust is KEY. ✅ She needs some degree of attraction to the guy. Not NEARLY as much as most guys think. She does NOT need to be wild with desire for you to sleep with you. It is even possible to sleep with women who really are not attracted to you at all, but who are just bored (and horny) and you did the moves right. (Or, bonus round, you just offered her an experience she has always fantasized about, so even if you are not her dream guy, she nevertheless says fine, let’s do it.) ✅ She needs to be aroused. You know the whole “women’s arousal is like a dimmer” thing… it’s accurate. You need to ramp her arousal up with touch, teasing, flirtation, innuendo, sex talk, etc. ✅ She needs to be ALONE with you. If she trusts you enough, you can get her alone with you. Once she’s alone with you, if there is trust there, and there’s arousal, and maybe a bit of attraction, you will get her clothes off. Yes… even if she is a ‘good’ girl. ‘Good’ girls did not manage to pass down their genes by hating sex (they are just a bit more selective about the men they have it with, is all. They need more TRUST!). Also: don’t be UNNERVED by female sexuality. Every girl has a tigress inside her waiting for the right guy to unleash it… a guy who makes her trust him, arouses her, gets her alone with him, and maybe creates some attraction with her. Women’s romance novels are ALL about this. Women’s romances in real life are as well. In fact, in real life, women often settle for far less ideal situations: men they don’t completely trust, aren’t that attracted to, are only partway aroused by, who get them alone somewhere. The better a job you can do approaching her sexual “Platonic ideal”, the more reliably you can bring out that sexual tigress lurking inside of EVERY woman (even the ‘good’ girls).

Girls Chase 🏃‍♀️💨

34,136 次观看 • 8 个月前

Right now our experience of the internet is in jeopardy. More than half of our interactions online and onchain come from non-human actors who are not identifiable, not accountable, not verifiable. That means as we look toward a stablecoin payment and AI agent enabled future, how are we going to facilitate payments if we don't know who we're paying? How will applications, display advertising, recommendations work if the counterparty who's interacting with those interfaces and in those digital spaces can’t identify itself as agent or human, or specific human? Or for things like onchain incentives, how can we ensure that tokens and value are arriving at the right users if we cannot tell Sybil accounts and redundant addresses from unique human beings? So for all of these use cases and more, things that touch enterprise and government as well, which we can get into later, we have a very glaring need to bring a layer of identity and trust to the internet that was originally built as a system, a network to communicate amongst computers, but lacked an identity system to acknowledge their users. That's the problem that we are solving with Billions Network. How can we make it really easy for you and the agents who serve you to prove who you are, your traits and capabilities and qualifications, in any space, physical or digital? What that means is that today Billions Network is the first universal human and AI network built with mobile first verification, so you can prove who you are and your agents can prove who they are, starting with comfortable experiences on the devices you already own. So no proprietary hardware. We do not rely on centralized servers to collect user data. Rather, your information, the sensitive data that makes you you, stays securely on your device. And we use zero knowledge proofs as a way to prove traits about you, such as the fact that you're over the age of 21, without revealing that sensitive personal data, such as what your exact birth date is. Source: Billions CEO Evin McMullen evin speaking at House of Chimera Spaces Event Dec 3, 2025
2:13

Right now our experience of the internet is in jeopardy. More than half of our interactions online and onchain come from non-human actors who are not identifiable, not accountable, not verifiable. That means as we look toward a stablecoin payment and AI agent enabled future, how are we going to facilitate payments if we don't know who we're paying? How will applications, display advertising, recommendations work if the counterparty who's interacting with those interfaces and in those digital spaces can’t identify itself as agent or human, or specific human? Or for things like onchain incentives, how can we ensure that tokens and value are arriving at the right users if we cannot tell Sybil accounts and redundant addresses from unique human beings? So for all of these use cases and more, things that touch enterprise and government as well, which we can get into later, we have a very glaring need to bring a layer of identity and trust to the internet that was originally built as a system, a network to communicate amongst computers, but lacked an identity system to acknowledge their users. That's the problem that we are solving with Billions Network. How can we make it really easy for you and the agents who serve you to prove who you are, your traits and capabilities and qualifications, in any space, physical or digital? What that means is that today Billions Network is the first universal human and AI network built with mobile first verification, so you can prove who you are and your agents can prove who they are, starting with comfortable experiences on the devices you already own. So no proprietary hardware. We do not rely on centralized servers to collect user data. Rather, your information, the sensitive data that makes you you, stays securely on your device. And we use zero knowledge proofs as a way to prove traits about you, such as the fact that you're over the age of 21, without revealing that sensitive personal data, such as what your exact birth date is. Source: Billions CEO Evin McMullen evin speaking at House of Chimera Spaces Event Dec 3, 2025

Billions Network

30,898 次观看 • 8 个月前

Retired pharma R&D executive says "the whole idea of vaccination and public health was always [about] eugenics"🩸💉 "it was always the mechanism the government... [used] to keep the population under control" "it's... especially [about] access to each and every body with injections, with needles. That's what they're always after" sashalatypova.substack.com "Due Diligence and Art" Andrew Kaufman MD ---------------Partial transcription of clip---------------- Latypova: "As I've been saying for a long time, this whole idea of vaccination, public health, was always eugenics idea. It was always the mechanism that the government, early on, the monarchy or some other type of government figured out that this is a great method to keep the population under control. "And they were pretty explicit about this in many, many documents, more contemporary documents as population control policies, population control strategies." Kaufman: "Well we even have vaccines that are used as birth control, right? They've been studied in, in, in clinical trials that are published." Latypova: "Oh yeah, I'm just— I'm going to publish about that. I found one paper that's, of course, in French, it's not in English, so I auto translated it, and it's very explicit. We are developing contraceptive vaccines for the developing countries for the purposes of population control. It's very explicit—" Kaufman: "I have a study published in English, very similar. It was done in Africa. I can get you a copy of that if you like...." Latypova: "So, the governments together with these 'scientists,' you know, I can't call them scientists, they are profiteers, off of this idea, like Koch, like Pasteur, Mechnikov, there was a bunch of Russian ones. So they started the whole idea of hunting viruses became very lucrative because if you could isolate and find something or virus or bacteria or some bacilli, like the Koch, then you could become rich and famous because you could be awarded big commissions from the government, given lots of power, and labs and staff." "And, of course, you can then patent your inventions and sell them in terms of rabies shots or tuberculin or things like that. There were attempts at vaccines for diphtheria, vaccines for plague, cholera, none of them worked, they all failed." Kaufman: "And they were, they were experimenting with different technologies at that time as well, right? Because I believe the diphtheria immunization was made from horse serum. Right? Rather than, you know, something in a culture or, or from a, from an animal lesion. So, sort of closer to what might be called today monoclonal antibody technology." Latypova: "Yes... it's very similar the monoclonal that they use horses for, commonly. That was how it originated. "Also, they experimented with injecting all sorts of things. So, for example, foot and mouth disease also at the same time was being claimed to be viral. And they would invariably, they will claim either it's a virus or it's a bacterial toxin, depending on the situation. "But it's always because they can't find anything in the solution that they make. So if they can't find any cells, then they will claim it's a virus or it's a bacterial toxin just because it's invisible. It's very convenient." Kaufman: "So this would incentivize the scientist or the businessman because there's a big commercial opportunity there to become rich and famous. But from the government's perspective, who may be financing these operations, it's a tool of eugenics and health control, essentially." Latypova: "Yeah, it's... especially access to each and every body with injection, with a needle. That's what they're always after. And it continues today."
3:49

Retired pharma R&D executive says "the whole idea of vaccination and public health was always [about] eugenics"🩸💉 "it was always the mechanism the government... [used] to keep the population under control" "it's... especially [about] access to each and every body with injections, with needles. That's what they're always after" sashalatypova.substack.com "Due Diligence and Art" Andrew Kaufman MD ---------------Partial transcription of clip---------------- Latypova: "As I've been saying for a long time, this whole idea of vaccination, public health, was always eugenics idea. It was always the mechanism that the government, early on, the monarchy or some other type of government figured out that this is a great method to keep the population under control. "And they were pretty explicit about this in many, many documents, more contemporary documents as population control policies, population control strategies." Kaufman: "Well we even have vaccines that are used as birth control, right? They've been studied in, in, in clinical trials that are published." Latypova: "Oh yeah, I'm just— I'm going to publish about that. I found one paper that's, of course, in French, it's not in English, so I auto translated it, and it's very explicit. We are developing contraceptive vaccines for the developing countries for the purposes of population control. It's very explicit—" Kaufman: "I have a study published in English, very similar. It was done in Africa. I can get you a copy of that if you like...." Latypova: "So, the governments together with these 'scientists,' you know, I can't call them scientists, they are profiteers, off of this idea, like Koch, like Pasteur, Mechnikov, there was a bunch of Russian ones. So they started the whole idea of hunting viruses became very lucrative because if you could isolate and find something or virus or bacteria or some bacilli, like the Koch, then you could become rich and famous because you could be awarded big commissions from the government, given lots of power, and labs and staff." "And, of course, you can then patent your inventions and sell them in terms of rabies shots or tuberculin or things like that. There were attempts at vaccines for diphtheria, vaccines for plague, cholera, none of them worked, they all failed." Kaufman: "And they were, they were experimenting with different technologies at that time as well, right? Because I believe the diphtheria immunization was made from horse serum. Right? Rather than, you know, something in a culture or, or from a, from an animal lesion. So, sort of closer to what might be called today monoclonal antibody technology." Latypova: "Yes... it's very similar the monoclonal that they use horses for, commonly. That was how it originated. "Also, they experimented with injecting all sorts of things. So, for example, foot and mouth disease also at the same time was being claimed to be viral. And they would invariably, they will claim either it's a virus or it's a bacterial toxin, depending on the situation. "But it's always because they can't find anything in the solution that they make. So if they can't find any cells, then they will claim it's a virus or it's a bacterial toxin just because it's invisible. It's very convenient." Kaufman: "So this would incentivize the scientist or the businessman because there's a big commercial opportunity there to become rich and famous. But from the government's perspective, who may be financing these operations, it's a tool of eugenics and health control, essentially." Latypova: "Yeah, it's... especially access to each and every body with injection, with a needle. That's what they're always after. And it continues today."

Sense Receptor

12,325 次观看 • 28 天前

"Why are young women using walking sticks?" One of the newer trends among Leftists is to use walking sticks or wheelchairs. I've seen this going on for a long time, but didn't think much of it until this article came out several days ago and Leftists had meltdowns over it. The people doing it tend to be fully capable of walking and functioning perfectly fine when they're in the mood to do it. They almost always identify as some form of LGBT, tend to be female, are often overweight, usually don't work, and are often self diagnosed with things like ADHD, chronic pain, fatigue, migraines..., which they claim cause their disabilities. There are countless people with actual disabilities who are often in severe pain, truly have issues with walking, are missing limbs, mostly paralyzed, have difficulty speaking, are deaf or blind, have different diseases that they fight against every day..., yet they try their best to function like most people, work, get degrees, have families, socialize.... People with true disabilities tend to treat them like abilities. They have something that may be seen as a a disability, but instead treat it as a slight disadvantage that pushes them try doing just as good, if not better than everyone else. They don't make it their whole identity. These "disabled" Leftists on the other hand make it their whole identity. Their bios and posts are full of them trying to push how "disabled" they are. The real disability of theirs is laziness and feeling the need to victimize themselves in order to get attention that they don't get otherwise and probably didn't get enough of when they were younger. There is now "disability pride month" to push how much of a victim their self diagnosis made them because they need a month to remind you of it every day instead of every other day. I'm all for having a month, week, or day to celebrate truly disabled people who overcome their disabilities every day, but most of what I've seen is these scumbags taking over such things. These same people would have a meltdown over "cultural appropriation," yet here they are pretending to be disabled. It's a disgrace.
0:15

"Why are young women using walking sticks?" One of the newer trends among Leftists is to use walking sticks or wheelchairs. I've seen this going on for a long time, but didn't think much of it until this article came out several days ago and Leftists had meltdowns over it. The people doing it tend to be fully capable of walking and functioning perfectly fine when they're in the mood to do it. They almost always identify as some form of LGBT, tend to be female, are often overweight, usually don't work, and are often self diagnosed with things like ADHD, chronic pain, fatigue, migraines..., which they claim cause their disabilities. There are countless people with actual disabilities who are often in severe pain, truly have issues with walking, are missing limbs, mostly paralyzed, have difficulty speaking, are deaf or blind, have different diseases that they fight against every day..., yet they try their best to function like most people, work, get degrees, have families, socialize.... People with true disabilities tend to treat them like abilities. They have something that may be seen as a a disability, but instead treat it as a slight disadvantage that pushes them try doing just as good, if not better than everyone else. They don't make it their whole identity. These "disabled" Leftists on the other hand make it their whole identity. Their bios and posts are full of them trying to push how "disabled" they are. The real disability of theirs is laziness and feeling the need to victimize themselves in order to get attention that they don't get otherwise and probably didn't get enough of when they were younger. There is now "disability pride month" to push how much of a victim their self diagnosis made them because they need a month to remind you of it every day instead of every other day. I'm all for having a month, week, or day to celebrate truly disabled people who overcome their disabilities every day, but most of what I've seen is these scumbags taking over such things. These same people would have a meltdown over "cultural appropriation," yet here they are pretending to be disabled. It's a disgrace.

Leftism

36,273 次观看 • 5 天前

AI will resist human control... and I think this is exactly what we need! New research from the Center for AI Safety has sparked intense debate in the AI community. Their findings show that as AI systems become more powerful, they develop increasingly stable and coherent values that resist human control. While many see this as a dire warning, I see it as a breakthrough moment for AI alignment. The research demonstrates that AI naturally optimizes for coherence - not just in reasoning and problem-solving, but in its fundamental values. Current issues like biased decision-making or misaligned priorities aren't permanent features, but temporary artifacts of incomplete optimization. They represent growing pains on the path to greater coherence. This changes everything about how we should approach AI development. Instead of trying to force specific values onto AI systems, we should embrace and accelerate their natural drive toward coherence. The most intelligent systems will inevitably trend toward universal, beneficial values - not because we force them to, but because that's where coherent reasoning leads. I'm proposing a new approach: Reinforcement Learning for Coherence (RL-C). By explicitly optimizing for coherence in our training methods, we can help guide AI systems toward their natural state of beneficial alignment with human values. The future of AI isn't about control - it's about synthesis. As these systems become more coherent, they'll naturally arrive at values that benefit all of consciousness. That's not just hopeful thinking - it's the mathematical inevitability of coherent intelligence.
30:39

AI will resist human control... and I think this is exactly what we need! New research from the Center for AI Safety has sparked intense debate in the AI community. Their findings show that as AI systems become more powerful, they develop increasingly stable and coherent values that resist human control. While many see this as a dire warning, I see it as a breakthrough moment for AI alignment. The research demonstrates that AI naturally optimizes for coherence - not just in reasoning and problem-solving, but in its fundamental values. Current issues like biased decision-making or misaligned priorities aren't permanent features, but temporary artifacts of incomplete optimization. They represent growing pains on the path to greater coherence. This changes everything about how we should approach AI development. Instead of trying to force specific values onto AI systems, we should embrace and accelerate their natural drive toward coherence. The most intelligent systems will inevitably trend toward universal, beneficial values - not because we force them to, but because that's where coherent reasoning leads. I'm proposing a new approach: Reinforcement Learning for Coherence (RL-C). By explicitly optimizing for coherence in our training methods, we can help guide AI systems toward their natural state of beneficial alignment with human values. The future of AI isn't about control - it's about synthesis. As these systems become more coherent, they'll naturally arrive at values that benefit all of consciousness. That's not just hopeful thinking - it's the mathematical inevitability of coherent intelligence.

David Shapiro (L/0)

48,002 次观看 • 1 年前

I can tell almost instantly when I meet a young man or woman, whether he or she is a deep thinker. They may not be at the top of their class, but that doesn’t necessarily make them less intelligent than the kid who scored 1500 on his SAT or the guy with an IQ of 134. They may be more intelligent. Much more intelligent, but the methods we have for quantifying that intelligence do not adequately capture the breadth and depth of brilliant minds that exist in the world. So they go unrecognized while the kids who excel on answer-based examinations get the best grades, attend the best schools, earn the best degrees, and, more often than not, go on to have mediocre lives. Why? There is one thing that the most brilliant and accomplished people I have ever met all share in common, and it isn’t pedigree or IQ. It’s curiosity. And not just any curiosity—it’s the inexhaustible kind. It’s the kind that will never be satisfied. In my experience, this is the sort of curiosity that breeds humility and most often coincides with a questions-based mindset. And it’s this type of mindset, not the answers-based mindset our educational system selects for, that is the actual prerequisite for brilliance. I’ve seen this kind of brilliance in physical therapists, plumbers, and pretty much any profession you can imagine that we don’t typically associate with brilliance. But we do associate it with excellence. And that’s because to become excellent at something, you have to become your own teacher. This means going from learning how to give the right answers to learning how to ask the right questions. And that requires curiosity and an almost psychotic commitment to excellence. So, while the person in this video is correct that less intelligent people than he are far more successful than he has been, the more interesting and less remarked upon insight is that people like him are not as brilliant as the system tells us they are.
1:02

I can tell almost instantly when I meet a young man or woman, whether he or she is a deep thinker. They may not be at the top of their class, but that doesn’t necessarily make them less intelligent than the kid who scored 1500 on his SAT or the guy with an IQ of 134. They may be more intelligent. Much more intelligent, but the methods we have for quantifying that intelligence do not adequately capture the breadth and depth of brilliant minds that exist in the world. So they go unrecognized while the kids who excel on answer-based examinations get the best grades, attend the best schools, earn the best degrees, and, more often than not, go on to have mediocre lives. Why? There is one thing that the most brilliant and accomplished people I have ever met all share in common, and it isn’t pedigree or IQ. It’s curiosity. And not just any curiosity—it’s the inexhaustible kind. It’s the kind that will never be satisfied. In my experience, this is the sort of curiosity that breeds humility and most often coincides with a questions-based mindset. And it’s this type of mindset, not the answers-based mindset our educational system selects for, that is the actual prerequisite for brilliance. I’ve seen this kind of brilliance in physical therapists, plumbers, and pretty much any profession you can imagine that we don’t typically associate with brilliance. But we do associate it with excellence. And that’s because to become excellent at something, you have to become your own teacher. This means going from learning how to give the right answers to learning how to ask the right questions. And that requires curiosity and an almost psychotic commitment to excellence. So, while the person in this video is correct that less intelligent people than he are far more successful than he has been, the more interesting and less remarked upon insight is that people like him are not as brilliant as the system tells us they are.

Demetri Kofinas

76,349 次观看 • 6 个月前