Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

16,700 Aufrufe • vor 5 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Why is my book on The Lust of the Flesh necessary? Because of teachings like this from Sam Allberry. He has believed the lie from the devil that he is same-sex attracted and cannot get married and have children, though he would love to, and it breaks my heart for him. He says, "I would love to be...opposite-sex attracted rather than same-sex attracted. I would love to be a husband to a wife. I'd love to be a father to a child....I love family life. I'd love to have kids. But however much I might want those things, the great goal in my life is not that one day I'd become heterosexual. That is not the win for me. That is not the prize that excites me as a Christian. It'd be lovely if it happened but it's not what I spend every waking hour kind of trying to go towards. No. Far, far greater than becoming heterosexual is knowing Jesus better....We have found the One who provides real satisfaction." 1) Who told Allberry that he was "same-sex attracted" and could not marry a woman? The Bible didn't. God didn't. The Holy Spirit didn't. The world and Allberry's flesh did. But we are who God says we are, not who our flesh or the world says we are. You don't have to be a "heterosexual man" to marry a woman, you just have to be a man! Because all men are "heterosexuals" according to Scripture, meaning that God created them to be men, and entailed in being a man is finding a woman to marry (Gen 2:18-25). *This is the created order. This is the default. There are exceptions for not pursuing marriage given in Scripture, but "I'm same-sex attracted" is not one of them. 2) Biblically, since Allberry is a Christian man who desires marriage and children, he should pursue a godly Christian woman to marry. The only thing keeping him from doing so is believing the world and his flesh. Sexual desire is not a prerequisite for marriage, though he should desire to cut a sexual covenant with a Christian woman to become his wife. 3) Allberry is obviously lonely, obviously desiring marriage and kids but has rejected God's wonderful gifts because he has bought into the world's lie that his sexuality is separate from his biology. He is not a "same-sex attracted" man; rather, he is a man that God designed for marriage, based on his biology. God literally designed Allberry's body to fit together with a woman in the marriage bed. But his flesh has warped his desires to be contrary to God and His design. 4) Instead of rejecting God's good design, Allberry should turn from his same-sex desires, find the godliest single woman he can, and pursue her for marriage. Repentant men make the best husbands and fathers. And I believe a repentant Allberry would be a great husband and father! 5) To summarize, the only thing keeping Allberry from biblical marriage is Allberry. I pray he repents, because he's unnecessarily reaping loneliness. And he doesn't have to. And...if you have same-sex desires, you don't have to reap loneliness either. #marriage #bible #singleness You can buy my book here

Jared Moore

483,301 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Alec Guinness on how he nearly turned down Star Wars: When asked how he came to be involved in a science fiction film, Guinness revealed his first reaction was far from enthusiastic. "A script arrived on my dressing table. And I heard that it had been delivered by George Lucas and I thought, well, that's rather impressive because he's an up-and-coming and very respected young director. So, and then when I opened it and found it was science fiction, I thought, 'Oh crumbs,' you know, 'this is simply not for me.'" But something kept him reading: "I started reading. And it seemed to me the dialogue was pretty ropey. Uh, but I had to go on turning the page and I mean that's an essential in any script. You've got to know what happens next or what's going to be said next." He eventually met Lucas, they got on well, and he signed on. Then came the contract negotiation that would become legendary. Guinness had never taken a percentage on a film before because, in his words, films "lose money like mad" when he takes a percentage. His agent suggested 2%. He agreed, expecting nothing. The day before Star Wars opened in San Francisco, Lucas called him personally: "He said, 'I think the movie is kind of going to be all right.' I said, 'I'm glad, George.' He said, 'Yeah, the press quite like it.' I said, 'Good.' He said, 'We're pleased with, you know, very grateful for little alterations you suggested, and so we'd like to offer you another half percent.'" Guinness thought he had 2.5%. But when he later asked the producer to put the offer in writing, he discovered the half-percent had quietly become a quarter-percent. He ended up with 2.25%. On why he thinks the film connected so deeply with audiences, Guinness offered a simple diagnosis: "A marvelous healthy innocence. Great pace, wonderful to look at, full of guts, nothing unpleasant. I mean, people go bang bang and people fall over and are dead. But, you know, no horrors, no sleazy sex… a sort of wonderful freshness about it, a kind of like a wonderful fresh air." He added that when he walked out of the cinema onto Tottenham Court Road, the real world suddenly felt "awfully sort of gritty and dirty and full of rubbish." It was, he said, "one of the few movies I've come out of recently where I really felt happy and uplifted." His warning to anyone looking for deeper meaning in it: "People are going to read too much into it. It's a simple, simple stuff for all ages." Though the letters he was already receiving suggested the reading-too-much-into-it had begun. One couple wrote asking if he'd come live with them for a few months to help fix their marriage.

Emmett Voss

108,498 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Look at this madness from (bizarrely) one of the most popular podcasts in the country. Kara Swisher declares how wonderful it is that Prince Andrew was arrested for some vague "public misconduct" offense, because he "should've been arrested for something else," but "this is what they could get him on." And she also declares that she knows Andrew "did this," meaning commit a child sex crime, even though the central claims of his accuser have been resoundingly discredited, including by US government investigators, according to newly released Epstein Files that Kara evidently never got a chance to read. But in any event, "show me the man and I'll show you the crime" used to be regarded as the quintessential Stalinist ethos of how to enforce criminal law. Kara explicitly calls on the US to import this once-reviled philosophy, because in her mind, "everybody's dirty" who was ever associated with Epstein, in any way, ever. She therefore calls for a US special counsel of some sort, to pursue further prosecutions on the basis of her newly embraced Stalinist philosophy. Scott Galloway, whose apparent appeal as a media personality I'm still constantly baffled by, agrees with his co-host and says US prosecutors should simply pour through Epstein's flight logs, and pick out some random people to prosecute. He demands "dozens if not hundreds" of new indictments on the basis of this quintessentially Stalinist imperative. Just incredible stuff. The contemporary podcast media ecosystem is such a ridiculous blight on humanity.

Michael Tracey

282,599 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

In 1977, before anyone knew what Star Wars would become, Alec Guinness sat down to explain how a knighted Shakespearean actor ended up in a science fiction film he almost turned down. The script arrived while Guinness was finishing a picture in Hollywood. The name attached to it impressed him. "I heard it had been delivered by George Lucas, and I thought that was impressive because he was a respected young director." Then he learned what kind of film it was, and his enthusiasm collapsed: "When I found out it was science fiction, I thought, 'oh crumbs,' and felt it simply wasn't for me. But then I started reading." What kept him going wasn't the writing. By his own account, the writing was a problem: "It seemed to me the dialogue was pretty ropey, but I had to keep turning the page. That is an essential quality in a script. You have to want to know what happens next." That instinct, the inability to put the pages down, was enough. He met Lucas, the two got on well, and Guinness found himself signing on. Then comes the part of the interview that has since become legend, told here in 1977 with no idea of how the numbers would balloon. Guinness recounts the percentage deal: "My agent asked for 2% because we didn't think it would make any money. I'd never had a percentage on a film before." The story of how it grew is almost comic in its modesty: "The day before the film opened in San Francisco, George Lucas phoned me. He's very diffident and shy, and said he thought the movie was going to be all right. He said they were grateful for the little alterations I suggested and offered me another half percent, making it two and a half. A few weeks later, I asked the producer for something in writing, and he mentioned a quarter percent, so it ended up being 2 1/4%." A modest slice of a film nobody expected to earn anything. Asked what fascinated him about it, Guinness reached past the genre and landed on something simpler: "I think it has a marvelous healthy innocence. It has great pace, it's wonderful to look at, and it's full of guts. There are no horrors and no sex at all." He described the strange aftereffect of watching it: "It had a sort of wonderful freshness about it. It was like fresh air. When I came out of the cinema into London, I thought the city looked gritty and full of rubbish because the film had been so invigorating. It's simple stuff for all ages." And already, before the franchise existed, people were reading more into it than Guinness ever intended. Asked if he was becoming a kind of guru figure, he answered with characteristic dryness: "I am getting some pretty strange letters. One said, 'my wife and I have got problems, would you come over and live with us for a few months?'"

History Nerd

94,762 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Saving Myself For Marriage Was A waste. Caller (Anna): ...how can I help the bitterness and resentment that's growing in me towards my husband, I feel like he's ruining s*x for me. Dr. John Delony: How is he ruining sex for you? Caller: Okay, so background... I grew up... Dr. John Delony: (laughing) You were like, "Okay, let's do this." Caller: (laughs) I grew up very religious. Dr. John Delony: Okay. Caller: Very religious. No fun things in the bedroom until marriage. Dr. John Delony: Okay, so you didn't sleep with anybody else until you got married. Caller: Correct. Dr. John Delony: Okay. Caller: I met my husband now, husband at 27, married at 30. So a long time. A long time. Dr. John Delony: Awesome. Caller: And while I absolutely adore him and I think he is a wonderful wonderful person when we got married, it was... it just was not at all... Dr. John Delony: What you had built it up to be? Caller: Yes, and it still isn't. I feel like... and I've... I've talked to him about it, and my thing is... our honeymoon felt like a vacation. It didn't feel like a honeymoon. Dr. John Delony: What does that mean? What does that mean? Caller: That means that I had to initiate a lot of the time. That means that he initiated maybe once in the whole honeymoon. And I feel like he was more concerned about looking pool-time and, you know, sightseeing than he was with the point of the honeymoon, in my opinion. Dr. John Delony: Okay. Caller (Anna): And that carried when we got home, of course, that carried on. It only kind of became a little bit more stagnant. And that aggression, that lust, that passion isn't there. And I've had to initiate a lot, way more than I really want to. And I don't feel desired anymore. And this is going to sound so stupid, but... Dr. John Delony: Nothing you're saying is stupid. Caller (Anna): I've been having these thoughts where it's like, if this was what it was going to be, I could have been having fun in my twenties. Dr. John Delony: Sure. That's not stupid at all, not even a tiny bit. Caller (Anna): Okay. Dr. John Delony: Don't beat yourself up about that. Caller (Anna): What was the point? What was the point if I was just going to have a regular, normal, boring marital s*x life, then I could have had fun while I had time, you know? And as horrible as that sounds, it's how I feel, you know? Dr. John Delony: I don't think it sounds horrible. I don't think it sounds horrible, it makes sense. But I think there's something deeper than this. Tell me if I'm crazy, okay?

Hecto Crypto | NetLink ⛓

48,488 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

A Muslim prayer room will be opening at the Vatican. Prayer rugs will be provided for daily prayers People are outraged “What the Vatican is currently doing is a spit in the faces to all of our Christian brothers and sisters who have been genocided in the name of Islam.” “I say this as a proud Catholic who absolutely adores her religion and is sick and tired of seeing leftism Co-op it and try to destroy it from the inside out, because that's exactly what's happening right now. For those of you who haven't heard, the pope decided that it would be a wonderful idea to open up a Muslim prayer room at the Vatican. Just one quick question. Are you kidding me? Like, are we being so serious right now, guys? The religion that that is responsible for the actual genocide of Christians all throughout the Middle East. We're inviting them into our holiest site for what reason exactly? I don't know, but it's something that is so sick and twisted that it's not even funny. Muslims openly celebrate being able to take over Christian sites. This is something that is seen as a very high honor in their religion, and they will specifically go after churches to do so. They view Christians as subservient to them, and we're inviting them in. You think that's a good idea? There are Christian women right now being held as sex slaves by them and the Pope hasn't said a word on it. Are you kidding me?” “How long do we have to sit here and act nice and play pretend like these people don't want our death? This is what they've been doing all over the world and I am so sick of it. Honestly, I don't know how much longer we have to sit there and play pretend with these people.”

Wall Street Apes

56,451 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

If THIS is what got CAUGHT, imagine what didn't. THREE brothers. FIVE victims. One just TWELVE. His own victims had a name for him. KILLER, and somehow he still STOOD FOR LABOUR in 2016. Nothing stopped him, because the law that should have is OLDER than colour television. This country opened doors for him before any of it caught up. Labour candidate, 2016. Youth worker. Director of an anti-knife charity, Mums United, given a Points of Light award by the PRIME MINISTER, police and councillors applauding. Stabbed in 2019, called a “wonderful comrade.” All while what he'd done sat undiscovered. Here's what he was actually doing. A gun. Threats of gang rape. Twenty offences against five children, and he still told one she couldn't complain because of her culture. The judge's words are on record. “Proven to be incorrect.”He's in Pakistan now, the judge said, “deliberately avoiding these proceedings for no other reason than cowardice.” His brothers weren't just standing nearby. One raped a child under 13. The other helped hand a victim to his own brother. A predator stood for office, trusted around children, publicly honoured by Downing Street, while what he'd done sat undiscovered. How much of this country's child protection is actually a cover story? This isn't one rotten exception. It's what the whole system looks like when nobody's checking. The rule meant to stop men like him isn't broken by accident. It's from 1972, before the sex offenders register even existed. The government's own answer isn't to fix it. It's to admit, in writing, that it's failing, and carry on anyway. It’s not just one bad apple from one party. Baroness Casey's own audit found a file where someone TIPPEXED OUT the word "Pakistani." A Tory MP's whip was quietly handed back before a confidence vote he was needed for. Another sat in Parliament ten years before an old crime caught up. Different parties, different rosettes, same rot, same erasure. FIFTY years, and nobody’s fixed the door. That law is still standing wide open TODAY. Whoever’s asking for your trust next, the next government, the next MP, the next candidate, could be walking through that exact same gap.

BanksyCat

19,252 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Elliot Page, the genuine 100% definitely male manliest man who ever manned Is complaining that heeeee can't get any work since portraying some sort of very skinny female-looking man with a girly voice in Christopher Nolan's Odyssey film. I just don't know what role heeeeee wants to play. "Honey, I Shrunk the Actress"? Maybe a reboot of Snow White with Elliot Page as new dwarf, “Indoctrinated”? Dundee's healthiest junkie? What did heeeeee think was going to happen when heeeeee transitioned to being a white man? Did heeeeee really believe all the guff about "white male privilege"? I've seen this before. People transition to being a man, and then they find out it's actually hard being a man. It's similar to Reddititis - when people get led down a harmful progressive path on internet forums. You see sex workers ask things like, "Will I be able to find a husband?" and all the Reddit people say, "Oh, of course. Your history has no bearing. Sex work is real work." Then, in the real world, they can't find a husband. The whole world was a Reddit forum for Ellen Page. They all told her that she would be the most stunning, bravest, most wonderful male of all time. If you go on Reddit and ask, "Will I be able to find work as an actor after transitioning to being a man and looking like the skinniest, most female-looking man of all time?" they'll all say, "Oh yes, of course, of course you will." But in the real world, you can't, because And with Elliot Page now famous for transitioning, if you cast himmmmmm in a film, that transition story becomes the dominant thing about the film. Page isn't playing a role in the film. The film has cast a transitioned actor in it. For all the gushing lefty liberals who stand on the stage at the Oscars and say, "We must be inclusive, and trans men are real men” - in real life, nobody wants the film to be dominated by that narrative. They want the film to allow people to suspend their disbelief and for a couple of hours, be lost in a world that isn't about contemporary politics. Fortunately, Elliot, the manliest man who ever lived, has managed to find work narrating documentaries. When I say documentaries, I mean absolute nonsensical gender propaganda pretending to be a documentary. I can tell you right now, this documentary is going to say that there are millions of transgender animals. Animals transition. There are queer animals. Animals support Palestine. Animals are concerned about climate change. Animals vote democrat. Animals think we should have more asylum seekers from the Horn of Africa. Animals think we should tax the rich (but other rich, not Hollywood elites). You basically can't trust any academia, history books, or documentaries that are made after about 2014, because that's when everything became infected with woke ideology. The ideology became the prism through which everything is viewed. You can't trust anything anymore. The only thing you can trust is my YouTube channel.

Leo Kearse - see me on tour! Links in bio

58,817 Aufrufe • vor 15 Tagen