正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

World's Most Satisfying 66 kg Hexagonal Rusty Weight Block! Cutting! 🔪 😱

BOMBE YA KAYONZA🚀💣

47,856 subscribers

303,087 次观看 • 2 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

@TimesAlgebraIND Kejriwal's weight on the first day of jail : 65 Kg Kejriwal's weight on 29th day in Jail : 66 KG Kejriwal's weight on the day of Bail : 64 KG This manhoos is shamelessly lying that he lost 6 kg in jail...

@TimesAlgebraIND Kejriwal's weight on the first day of jail : 65 Kg Kejriwal's weight on 29th day in Jail : 66 KG Kejriwal's weight on the day of Bail : 64 KG This manhoos is shamelessly lying that he lost 6 kg in jail...

Sk Palanikumar Yadav

402,934 次观看 • 2 年前

This is the most oddly satisfying way to cut vegetables. 🤣🥕🔪

This is the most oddly satisfying way to cut vegetables. 🤣🥕🔪

USA NEWS 🇺🇸

679,654 次观看 • 1 个月前

The most satisfying wildlife cleanup ever 😱😱☺️

The most satisfying wildlife cleanup ever 😱😱☺️

BURETSE GATO🛡️

78,956 次观看 • 1 个月前

The most satisfying wildlife cleanup ever 😱😱😳

The most satisfying wildlife cleanup ever 😱😱😳

MISSED CALL ❌

3,232,246 次观看 • 2 个月前

The most satisfying wildlife cleanup ever 😱😱😳

The most satisfying wildlife cleanup ever 😱😱😳

BURETSE GATO🛡️

7,701,436 次观看 • 2 个月前

the most satisfying ending so far 😱

the most satisfying ending so far 😱

Restricted footage

20,762 次观看 • 1 个月前

"This place is World's most powerful R&D center and I feel Nityananda Swamy ji is world's most powerful, cutting edge research R&D person" : Rajiv Malhotra

"This place is World's most powerful R&D center and I feel Nityananda Swamy ji is world's most powerful, cutting edge research R&D person" : Rajiv Malhotra

Mohammed Zubair

20,663 次观看 • 7 个月前

You've been cutting apples wrong your whole life 🍎🔪 This satisfying technique is faster, cleaner, and keeps your fingers safe. Watch till the end—you’ll never go back to the old way again.

You've been cutting apples wrong your whole life 🍎🔪 This satisfying technique is faster, cleaner, and keeps your fingers safe. Watch till the end—you’ll never go back to the old way again.

Living Tricks

3,996,010 次观看 • 11 个月前

🚨🚨CRAZIEST VIDEO EVER🚨🚨 66-year-old legendary #NFL cornerback Darrell Green still has some of the most INSANE FOOTWORK you will ever see. Not human 😱😱😱

🚨🚨CRAZIEST VIDEO EVER🚨🚨 66-year-old legendary #NFL cornerback Darrell Green still has some of the most INSANE FOOTWORK you will ever see. Not human 😱😱😱

MLFootball

495,842 次观看 • 7 个月前

#AI x #Metaverse - #XANA is venturing into the world's most cutting-edge metaverse powered by AI. Introducing Phase 1: 'Text to Skybox' released today. With just a prompt, anyone can easily create high-quality spaces outside their world, elevating the world experience to another dimension. Stay tuned for Phases 2 and 3 of these AI x Metaverse features!

#AI x #Metaverse - #XANA is venturing into the world's most cutting-edge metaverse powered by AI. Introducing Phase 1: 'Text to Skybox' released today. With just a prompt, anyone can easily create high-quality spaces outside their world, elevating the world experience to another dimension. Stay tuned for Phases 2 and 3 of these AI x Metaverse features!

XANA

23,690 次观看 • 3 年前

Kaspa nodes delete most of the chain's history by design Bitcoin nodes store and replay every block back to 2009. #Kaspa takes the opposite approach: nodes keep only recent blocks and discard everything older than a cutoff known as the pruning point. Since the Crescendo upgrade took block production from 1 to 10 per second, that window covers roughly 30 hours of history, down from 50 before, per the official Rusty Kaspa release notes. New nodes sync from the pruning point rather than from the chain's first block. Operators who want a longer archive can set a retention period of at least two days. Every node still keeps the full ledger of unspent coins, so kaspa:native balances stay verifiable without the deleted history.

Kaspa nodes delete most of the chain's history by design Bitcoin nodes store and replay every block back to 2009. #Kaspa takes the opposite approach: nodes keep only recent blocks and discard everything older than a cutoff known as the pruning point. Since the Crescendo upgrade took block production from 1 to 10 per second, that window covers roughly 30 hours of history, down from 50 before, per the official Rusty Kaspa release notes. New nodes sync from the pruning point rather than from the chain's first block. Operators who want a longer archive can set a retention period of at least two days. Every node still keeps the full ledger of unspent coins, so kaspa:native balances stay verifiable without the deleted history.

BSCN

23,841 次观看 • 19 天前

What if aircraft were built like open-source software? Project Caribou is an ambitious open-source effort to build a 200 kg-class heavy-lift hexacopter that anyone can study, improve, and contribute to. The long-term goal is to accelerate the development of larger open-source aircraft and eVTOL platforms. The project targets a ~200 kg maximum takeoff weight with an ~100 kg payload, uses an 18S power architecture, and is built around an ArduPilot-based flight stack. The repository includes CAD models, PCB designs, documentation, and engineering workflows that are evolving in the open. If you are interested in drones, aerospace, robotics, or embedded systems, this is one of the most exciting open-source engineering projects to follow.

What if aircraft were built like open-source software? Project Caribou is an ambitious open-source effort to build a 200 kg-class heavy-lift hexacopter that anyone can study, improve, and contribute to. The long-term goal is to accelerate the development of larger open-source aircraft and eVTOL platforms. The project targets a ~200 kg maximum takeoff weight with an ~100 kg payload, uses an 18S power architecture, and is built around an ArduPilot-based flight stack. The repository includes CAD models, PCB designs, documentation, and engineering workflows that are evolving in the open. If you are interested in drones, aerospace, robotics, or embedded systems, this is one of the most exciting open-source engineering projects to follow.

Praveen Kumar Verma

37,152 次观看 • 1 个月前

This might be the most terrifying-looking military aircraft ever built 😱 The new Japanese XEC-2 "Platypus" looks more like a sci-fi villain than an aircraft. If the goal was to make something absolutely terrifying, they nailed it. I bet those giant side pods (“tumours”) are packed with every piece of cutting-edge electronic warfare hardware imaginable. Somehow it's both the ugliest... and one of the coolest military aircraft I've ever seen. 🇯🇵✈️

This might be the most terrifying-looking military aircraft ever built 😱 The new Japanese XEC-2 "Platypus" looks more like a sci-fi villain than an aircraft. If the goal was to make something absolutely terrifying, they nailed it. I bet those giant side pods (“tumours”) are packed with every piece of cutting-edge electronic warfare hardware imaginable. Somehow it's both the ugliest... and one of the coolest military aircraft I've ever seen. 🇯🇵✈️

Airforce Geek

1,213,186 次观看 • 1 个月前

🚨🚨 Thousands of people are already using Dr. William Makis's ivermectin dosing chart... 📌📌Clear and categorized breakdown based on body weight (mg/kg per day) recommended by Makis: 💊 LOW DOSE: ≤ 0.5 mg/kg/day Best for: - Cancers in remission - Strong family history or genetic predisposition - Prophylaxis (preventive) *Side effects:** No long-term side effects have been reported. **Example:** Dr. Tess Lawrie reported a case of stage 3 ovarian cancer treated with chemotherapy + 12 mg of ivermectin daily. The tumor marker CA125 dropped from 288 to 22 after 2 months and the tumor disappeared. 💊💊 MEDIUM DOSE: 1.0 mg/kg/day *Best for: Initial dose for **most cancers** (lung, pancreas, renal cell, gastric, etc.). **Side effects:** No long-term side effects have been reported. **Example:** The 70-year-old patient with prostate cancer (PSA 89) from Dr. Shankara Chetty took 45 mg/day (plus lactoferrin). After two months, the PSA fell to 10.9. 💊💊💊 HIGH DOSE: 2.0 mg/kg/day Best for: Very aggressive cancers (leukemia, pancreas, brain cancers). **Side effects:** No long-term side effects have been reported. **Example:** The stage 4 gallbladder cancer patient of Dr. Allan Landrito took 2 mg/kg daily for 14 months — the cancer disappeared. 💊💊💊💊 VERY HIGH DOSE: ≥ 2.5 mg/kg/day Best for: Extensive metastatic disease, extremely poor prognosis, or certain brain cancers. **Side effects:** Possible short-term and transient visual effects (generally resolve in a few days). **Example:** Dr. Shankara Chetty treated a patient with 2.5 mg/kg/day — no side effects were reported. **Quick conversion example (for a 60 kg / 132 lb person):** - Low: ≤30 mg/day - Medium: 60 mg/day (≈5×12 mg tablets or 1 teaspoon of liquid) - High: 120 mg/day - Very High: ≥150 mg/day There are many anecdotal reports of long-term daily use (months to over a year) without serious toxicity, but individual responses vary... Always work with a knowledgeable clinician, especially if you have preexisting conditions (e.g., vision problems or glaucoma)...🚨🚨 This is for educational purposes only... Share to spread awareness and save lives... Information is power...

🚨🚨 Thousands of people are already using Dr. William Makis's ivermectin dosing chart... 📌📌Clear and categorized breakdown based on body weight (mg/kg per day) recommended by Makis: 💊 LOW DOSE: ≤ 0.5 mg/kg/day Best for: - Cancers in remission - Strong family history or genetic predisposition - Prophylaxis (preventive) *Side effects: No long-term side effects have been reported. Example:** Dr. Tess Lawrie reported a case of stage 3 ovarian cancer treated with chemotherapy + 12 mg of ivermectin daily. The tumor marker CA125 dropped from 288 to 22 after 2 months and the tumor disappeared. 💊💊 MEDIUM DOSE: 1.0 mg/kg/day *Best for: Initial dose for most cancers (lung, pancreas, renal cell, gastric, etc.). Side effects: No long-term side effects have been reported. Example: The 70-year-old patient with prostate cancer (PSA 89) from Dr. Shankara Chetty took 45 mg/day (plus lactoferrin). After two months, the PSA fell to 10.9. 💊💊💊 HIGH DOSE: 2.0 mg/kg/day Best for: Very aggressive cancers (leukemia, pancreas, brain cancers). Side effects: No long-term side effects have been reported. Example: The stage 4 gallbladder cancer patient of Dr. Allan Landrito took 2 mg/kg daily for 14 months — the cancer disappeared. 💊💊💊💊 VERY HIGH DOSE: ≥ 2.5 mg/kg/day Best for: Extensive metastatic disease, extremely poor prognosis, or certain brain cancers. Side effects: Possible short-term and transient visual effects (generally resolve in a few days). Example: Dr. Shankara Chetty treated a patient with 2.5 mg/kg/day — no side effects were reported. Quick conversion example (for a 60 kg / 132 lb person): - Low: ≤30 mg/day - Medium: 60 mg/day (≈5×12 mg tablets or 1 teaspoon of liquid) - High: 120 mg/day - Very High: ≥150 mg/day There are many anecdotal reports of long-term daily use (months to over a year) without serious toxicity, but individual responses vary... Always work with a knowledgeable clinician, especially if you have preexisting conditions (e.g., vision problems or glaucoma)...🚨🚨 This is for educational purposes only... Share to spread awareness and save lives... Information is power...

Commentary | Global Ivermectin Research Hub

20,713 次观看 • 3 个月前

🚨 Thousands of people are already using Dr. William Makis’s ivermectin dosing chart... 📌 Clear and categorized breakdown based on body weight (mg/kg per day), as recommended by Dr. William Makis: 💊 LOW DOSE: ≤ 0.5 mg/kg/day Best for: • Cancers in remission • Strong family history or genetic predisposition • Prophylaxis (preventive use) Side effects: No long-term side effects have been reported. Example: Dr. Tess Lawrie reported a case of stage 3 ovarian cancer treated with chemotherapy plus 12 mg of ivermectin daily. The tumor marker CA-125 dropped from 288 to 22 after two months, and the tumor reportedly disappeared. 💊 MEDIUM DOSE: 1.0 mg/kg/day Best for: An initial dose for most cancers, including lung, pancreatic, renal, gastric, and other cancers. Side effects: No long-term side effects have been reported. Example: A 70-year-old patient with prostate cancer (PSA 89), treated by Dr. Shankara Chetty, took 45 mg/day plus lactoferrin. After two months, the PSA level fell to 10.9. 💊 HIGH DOSE: 2.0 mg/kg/day Best for: Very aggressive cancers, including leukemia, pancreatic cancer, and brain cancers. Side effects: No long-term side effects have been reported. Example: A patient with stage 4 gallbladder cancer treated by Dr. Allan Landrito reportedly took 2 mg/kg daily for 14 months, after which the cancer reportedly disappeared. 💊 VERY HIGH DOSE: ≥ 2.5 mg/kg/day Best for: Extensive metastatic disease, extremely poor prognosis, or certain brain cancers. Side effects: Possible short-term and temporary visual effects, which generally resolve within a few days. Example: Dr. Shankara Chetty treated a patient with 2.5 mg/kg/day, and no side effects were reported. 📌 Quick conversion example for a 60 kg / 132 lb person: Low: ≤ 30 mg/day Medium: 60 mg/day (approximately five 12 mg tablets or one teaspoon of liquid) High: 120 mg/day Very High: ≥ 150 mg/day There are many anecdotal reports of long-term daily use, ranging from several months to more than a year, without serious toxicity, but individual responses vary. Always work with a knowledgeable clinician, especially if you have preexisting conditions or take other medications. 📗This information is provided for educational purposes only. Share to spread awareness and save lives. Information is power. Visit: 👉 #Ivermectin #Fenbendazole #CancerResearch

🚨 Thousands of people are already using Dr. William Makis’s ivermectin dosing chart... 📌 Clear and categorized breakdown based on body weight (mg/kg per day), as recommended by Dr. William Makis: 💊 LOW DOSE: ≤ 0.5 mg/kg/day Best for: • Cancers in remission • Strong family history or genetic predisposition • Prophylaxis (preventive use) Side effects: No long-term side effects have been reported. Example: Dr. Tess Lawrie reported a case of stage 3 ovarian cancer treated with chemotherapy plus 12 mg of ivermectin daily. The tumor marker CA-125 dropped from 288 to 22 after two months, and the tumor reportedly disappeared. 💊 MEDIUM DOSE: 1.0 mg/kg/day Best for: An initial dose for most cancers, including lung, pancreatic, renal, gastric, and other cancers. Side effects: No long-term side effects have been reported. Example: A 70-year-old patient with prostate cancer (PSA 89), treated by Dr. Shankara Chetty, took 45 mg/day plus lactoferrin. After two months, the PSA level fell to 10.9. 💊 HIGH DOSE: 2.0 mg/kg/day Best for: Very aggressive cancers, including leukemia, pancreatic cancer, and brain cancers. Side effects: No long-term side effects have been reported. Example: A patient with stage 4 gallbladder cancer treated by Dr. Allan Landrito reportedly took 2 mg/kg daily for 14 months, after which the cancer reportedly disappeared. 💊 VERY HIGH DOSE: ≥ 2.5 mg/kg/day Best for: Extensive metastatic disease, extremely poor prognosis, or certain brain cancers. Side effects: Possible short-term and temporary visual effects, which generally resolve within a few days. Example: Dr. Shankara Chetty treated a patient with 2.5 mg/kg/day, and no side effects were reported. 📌 Quick conversion example for a 60 kg / 132 lb person: Low: ≤ 30 mg/day Medium: 60 mg/day (approximately five 12 mg tablets or one teaspoon of liquid) High: 120 mg/day Very High: ≥ 150 mg/day There are many anecdotal reports of long-term daily use, ranging from several months to more than a year, without serious toxicity, but individual responses vary. Always work with a knowledgeable clinician, especially if you have preexisting conditions or take other medications. 📗This information is provided for educational purposes only. Share to spread awareness and save lives. Information is power. Visit: 👉 #Ivermectin #Fenbendazole #CancerResearch

Ivermectin Shop | Ivermectincure |

16,338 次观看 • 27 天前

Every house seems to have that one feature that makes absolutely no sense... This 2-inch-wide, 3-foot-deep kitchen drawer might be the reigning champion. Too narrow for most utensils. Too deep for spices. Somehow it's just big enough to become a black hole for random kitchen odds and ends. So what was it actually designed for? Some homeowners swear these narrow pull-outs were originally meant for items like baking sheets, cutting boards, wrapping paper, trays, or bottles in certain cabinet layouts. Others insist they're just a byproduct of awkward cabinet spacing that builders decided to turn into "storage." Whatever the original idea was, most of them end up holding the same thing: a collection of forgotten items you'll rediscover years later. It's oddly satisfying... and completely baffling. What's the strangest built-in feature you've ever found in a house?

Every house seems to have that one feature that makes absolutely no sense... This 2-inch-wide, 3-foot-deep kitchen drawer might be the reigning champion. Too narrow for most utensils. Too deep for spices. Somehow it's just big enough to become a black hole for random kitchen odds and ends. So what was it actually designed for? Some homeowners swear these narrow pull-outs were originally meant for items like baking sheets, cutting boards, wrapping paper, trays, or bottles in certain cabinet layouts. Others insist they're just a byproduct of awkward cabinet spacing that builders decided to turn into "storage." Whatever the original idea was, most of them end up holding the same thing: a collection of forgotten items you'll rediscover years later. It's oddly satisfying... and completely baffling. What's the strangest built-in feature you've ever found in a house?

PeachProof

29,138 次观看 • 2 个月前

$Jet Fuel is a fascinating story. We don’t measure it in litres, we measure it in weight, because fuel expands/contracts with temperature while weight stays constant. Jet fuel’s specific gravity is ~0.8, so 1 litre ≈ 0.8 kg (lighter than water). It’s also worth noting that jet fuel is essentially a highly refined kerosene, far less volatile than gasoline, which makes it safer to handle in large quantities. On a long-haul, fuel can be close to half the aircraft’s total weight at departure. On the A350-1000, that can be ~129 tonnes. At most major international airports, this much fuel doesn’t turn up in a tanker. It’s stored in a depot and delivered through a network of underground hydrant pipes to each stand. The “tanker” you see is really a pump truck connecting the hydrant to the aircraft and metering the exact uplift. When I moved from the A340-600 to the A350-1000, one of the things that struck me most was just how much simpler and smarter the fuel system became and how much less fuel we required for the same journeys. On the A340-600, we needed a rear trim tank in the tail to keep the aircraft in balance during cruise. It worked beautifully, but it added complexity. The A350 doesn’t need that, instead, it uses tiny fractions of flap in cruise, together with the latest wing aerodynamics, to keep perfectly in trim. London → New York comparison (typical figures): - A340-600: ~80–90 tonnes of trip fuel - A350-1000: ~50–60 tonnes of trip fuel That’s roughly 30–40% less fuel, saving ~25–30 tonnes on a single flight, which also means about 80–95 tonnes less CO₂ (rule of thumb: 1 tonne of jet fuel ≈ 3.16 tonnes CO₂) 📸 by ig/captainchris$

Jet Fuel is a fascinating story. We don’t measure it in litres, we measure it in weight, because fuel expands/contracts with temperature while weight stays constant. Jet fuel’s specific gravity is ~0.8, so 1 litre ≈ 0.8 kg (lighter than water). It’s also worth noting that jet fuel is essentially a highly refined kerosene, far less volatile than gasoline, which makes it safer to handle in large quantities. On a long-haul, fuel can be close to half the aircraft’s total weight at departure. On the A350-1000, that can be ~129 tonnes. At most major international airports, this much fuel doesn’t turn up in a tanker. It’s stored in a depot and delivered through a network of underground hydrant pipes to each stand. The “tanker” you see is really a pump truck connecting the hydrant to the aircraft and metering the exact uplift. When I moved from the A340-600 to the A350-1000, one of the things that struck me most was just how much simpler and smarter the fuel system became and how much less fuel we required for the same journeys. On the A340-600, we needed a rear trim tank in the tail to keep the aircraft in balance during cruise. It worked beautifully, but it added complexity. The A350 doesn’t need that, instead, it uses tiny fractions of flap in cruise, together with the latest wing aerodynamics, to keep perfectly in trim. London → New York comparison (typical figures): - A340-600: ~80–90 tonnes of trip fuel - A350-1000: ~50–60 tonnes of trip fuel That’s roughly 30–40% less fuel, saving ~25–30 tonnes on a single flight, which also means about 80–95 tonnes less CO₂ (rule of thumb: 1 tonne of jet fuel ≈ 3.16 tonnes CO₂) 📸 by ig/captainchris

aircraftmaintenancengineer

509,428 次观看 • 1 年前