Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Would you unload? 💦 Squirt Member MrNiceCockSf opens up wide in this interview 🔥 MrNiceCockSF (154K) Not a Squirt.org - Hookup & Cruising member yet? Score 60 slutty nights of free premium cruising with Promo Code: BF60. Start fucking 💦

61,878 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

Anthropic just released a talk on building headless automation with Claude Code. Presented by Sid Bidasaria, Member of Technical Staff at Anthropic live at Code with Claude on May 22, 2025 in San Francisco. Here is what the talk covers. Headless mode lets you run Claude Code without a person actively typing prompts from inside an automated script. Instead of a live session, a script calls Claude with a pre-written instruction using the -p flag. This opens the door for Claude Code to become a piece of a much larger, automated process. In plain terms: Claude Code stops being a tool you use and starts being a service that runs on its own. What this unlocks: Scheduled tasks: Run Claude Code on a cron schedule without anyone at a keyboard. Fix linting errors across an entire codebase. Automatically. Overnight. CI/CD integration: Trigger Claude Code as a step in your build process. Open a PR. Claude reviews it, flags issues, and pushes fixes before a human ever looks at it. GitHub automation: A project manager comments "Claude fix this" on a GitHub issue. Claude reads the request, finds the code, writes the fix, and opens the PR. Multi-machine workflows: One orchestrator dispatches tasks to multiple Claude Code instances running in parallel across different repos simultaneously. When you combine headless mode, hooks, and GitHub Actions, development teams can automate tasks that usually eat up significant time freeing senior engineers to focus on architectural problems while Claude handles the repetitive ones. If you use Claude Code for anything beyond single sessions this talk is worth 20 minutes of your time.

Elias

14,096 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

In this episode, I sit down with Speaker Mike Johnson and his wife Kelly for a conversation about family life in Washington, the pressures of the speakership, faith, parenting, and more. 0:00 – Introduction 2:08 – From Rank-and-File Member to Speaker 3:02 – Preparing Children for Life in Washington 5:45 – The All-In Commitment of the Speakership 7:11 – Handling Media Scrutiny 9:39 – The Most Surprising Part of Being Speaker 10:20 – The Most Annoying Part of Being Speaker 10:44 – The Last Time Visiting a Grocery Store 11:45 – Splitting Up Family Tasks 12:29 – Favorite World Leaders 13:04 – The Most Underrated Fact About the Saudi Crown Prince 13:35 – The GOP Schism Over Israel 14:31 – The Most Important Meeting: Calling the Spouse Back 15:14 – A Believable Conspiracy Theory 15:35 – The Hill Worth Dying On 16:21 – Daily Family Routine 16:57 – Being Home for Family Dinner 17:37 – Switching Up Glasses 18:16 – Spousal Disagreements 19:32 – One Tactic Used in Both Congress and Parenting 21:06 – What’s Missed About Life Before Public Service 22:28 – An Unexpected Family Perk of the Speakership 23:15 – Best Event Attended With President Trump 24:28 – Who Has Veto Power at Home 25:57 – Who Does the Cooking at Home 26:34 – Favorite UberEats Order 26:48 – Go-To D.C. Restaurant 27:42 – Handling the Demands of the Speakership 28:53 – Hardest Member of Congress to Deal With 29:18 – Easiest Member of Congress to Deal With 30:16 – Member of Congress Who Blows Up the Phone Most 31:26 – Member of Congress Most Likely to Butt-Dial 31:42 – Member of Congress in the Office Most Often 32:09 – Funniest Member of Congress 32:16 – Member of Congress Most Likely to Lose Their Phone 32:48 – Member of Congress Trusted to Cook Thanksgiving Dinner 33:02 – Thanksgiving at the Johnson House 33:56 – What Time Thanksgiving Dinner Should Start 34:41 – Favorite Thanksgiving Pie 34:56 – Keeping a Marriage Strong Amid Chaos 36:37 – Most Trusted Advisor 38:00 – Thinking About the Roman Empire 38:28 – Advice to Mothers With Working Husbands 40:25 – Raising Children in the Age of Transgender Ideology 43:43 – Attending Church on Sunday 44:25 – “Would You Rather” Questions 48:48 – Dream Dinner Party Guests

The Katie Miller Podcast

126,139 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

Spokesman for U.N. Secretary-General António Guterres responds to questions over UN Watch’s exposé: Efrat Lachter, Fox News: Given the thousands of civilians who were killed by the Iranian regime, do you think it was wise that today you sent a letter of congratulation to the Iranian authorities? Stéphane Dujarric, U.N. Spokesman: So the letter that went out from the Secretary-General is a standard letter that goes out to every member states on their national holiday. And this has been a tradition for decades. Every year each member state gets the exact same letter, right? Congratulating on their national holiday and conveying best wishes to the people of that country. As I said, the letters went out yesterday to Iran, Gambia, and Lithuania, if I'm not mistaken. So it's like I said, it's a decades long tradition. And I said each member states gets the exact same letter. It should not be interpreted by anyone who receives it as an endorsement of whatever policies may be going, the government may be putting in place. It doesn't change the Secretary-General's view of the crackdown that we saw in Iran, which he called horrendous, given the level of violence and deaths that we saw. Fox: Following up on that, the Iranian Foreign Minister is said to come to address the Human Rights Council later this month. How does that reconcile with what you just said? U.N. Spokesman: Well, first of all, that's a decision of the Human Rights Council. We also believe this. This is a membership organization. Every member state has a right to address legislative bodies and every member state has a right to question whatever statements others may be making. It is not within the Secretary-General's authority to bar a Member State from addressing a legislative body. And for the Human Rights Council, I would ask you to ask the President of the Human Rights Council.

UN Watch

117,445 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce