Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

🚨 WOW! DHS Sec. Markwayne Mullin just stared insufferable Sen. Chris Murphy (D) IN THE EYE and PUMMELED his lies 🫳🏻🎤 MURPHY: DHS is just making up the law! MULLIN: "When YOU throw out reckless terms, and you start referring to our agents as being 'dangerous, unconstitutional, and lawless,'...

warDaniel47's profile picture

War Correspondent

119,410 subscribers

125,322 views • 2 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Mullin in response to Sen. Murphy's opening statement: "When you throw out reckless terms and start referring to our agents as being dangerous, unconstitutional, and lawless – that's why our agents' death threats are up by 8,000%. I know that's not what you want, but your political theater, that's what it causes."
0:27

Mullin in response to Sen. Murphy's opening statement: "When you throw out reckless terms and start referring to our agents as being dangerous, unconstitutional, and lawless – that's why our agents' death threats are up by 8,000%. I know that's not what you want, but your political theater, that's what it causes."

The Bulwark

26,633 views • 2 months ago

“When…you start referring to our agents as being dangerous, unconstitutional, and lawless — that’s why our agent death threats are up 8,000%. I know that’s not what you want. But your political theatre, that’s what it causes.” Secretary Markwayne Mullin
0:26

“When…you start referring to our agents as being dangerous, unconstitutional, and lawless — that’s why our agent death threats are up 8,000%. I know that’s not what you want. But your political theatre, that’s what it causes.” Secretary Markwayne Mullin

Homeland Security

70,996 views • 2 months ago

CHRIS MURPHY: Can you commit to us that if a court judges something ICE or DHS is doing as illegal or unconstitutional and tells you to stop, that you will comply with the court order? MARKWAYNE MULLIN: We will never break the Constitution and we're not going to break the law, but we're gonna enforce our nation's laws MURPHY: That's not the same thing as committing to obey a court order MULLIN: We see courts over and over use their bench for political opinion
2:56

CHRIS MURPHY: Can you commit to us that if a court judges something ICE or DHS is doing as illegal or unconstitutional and tells you to stop, that you will comply with the court order? MARKWAYNE MULLIN: We will never break the Constitution and we're not going to break the law, but we're gonna enforce our nation's laws MURPHY: That's not the same thing as committing to obey a court order MULLIN: We see courts over and over use their bench for political opinion

Aaron Rupar

136,001 views • 2 months ago

Sen. Chris Murphy (D-CT): “Now that you are on the job, can you commit to us that if a court judges something ICE is doing, something DHS is doing, is illegal, is unconstitutional, tells you to stop — that you will comply with the court order?” DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin: “We will never break the Constitution, and we’re not going to break the law, but we’re gonna enforce our nation’s laws, and we’re gonna enforce the laws that you guys passed, and that we implement. We will never go outside that, and if we do, we will hold each other accountable for that.” Chris Murphy: “But that doesn’t sound like the same thing as committing that you will obey a court order. Obviously, the entire structure of the federal government gives the power to the federal court to divine whether you are obeying or not. I mean, I think it’s an easy thing to say. Will you or will you not implement court orders?” Markwayne Mullin: “If we didn’t think courts were politicized, then I would probably be able to answer that. But we see courts over and over again that use their bench for their political opinion, not just the rule of law. And we can see that because we see how many times —” Chris Murphy: “You’re going to pick and choose what court orders you obey?” Markwayne Mullin: “We’re saying we’re going to enforce the law and we’re never gonna break the Constitution.”
2:08

Sen. Chris Murphy (D-CT): “Now that you are on the job, can you commit to us that if a court judges something ICE is doing, something DHS is doing, is illegal, is unconstitutional, tells you to stop — that you will comply with the court order?” DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin: “We will never break the Constitution, and we’re not going to break the law, but we’re gonna enforce our nation’s laws, and we’re gonna enforce the laws that you guys passed, and that we implement. We will never go outside that, and if we do, we will hold each other accountable for that.” Chris Murphy: “But that doesn’t sound like the same thing as committing that you will obey a court order. Obviously, the entire structure of the federal government gives the power to the federal court to divine whether you are obeying or not. I mean, I think it’s an easy thing to say. Will you or will you not implement court orders?” Markwayne Mullin: “If we didn’t think courts were politicized, then I would probably be able to answer that. But we see courts over and over again that use their bench for their political opinion, not just the rule of law. And we can see that because we see how many times —” Chris Murphy: “You’re going to pick and choose what court orders you obey?” Markwayne Mullin: “We’re saying we’re going to enforce the law and we’re never gonna break the Constitution.”

RedWave Press

126,818 views • 2 months ago

DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin torches Shri Thanedar and the Democrats for the party’s hypocrisy in supporting Graham Platner while claiming Homeland Security is promoting ‘racist’ and ‘bigoted’ content online. REP. THANEDAR: "When will you stop DHS from using its social media accounts to spread bigoted and racist words and imagery?" SEC. MULLIN: "It's interesting how you make those claims and give no facts, but yet your party is the one that's supporting the guy that's got a Nazi tattoo on his chest." "You throw out nationalism, Nazism. And that's exactly what causes the hatred and the violence that happens to our officers every single day. And you should be ashamed of using that."
0:34

DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin torches Shri Thanedar and the Democrats for the party’s hypocrisy in supporting Graham Platner while claiming Homeland Security is promoting ‘racist’ and ‘bigoted’ content online. REP. THANEDAR: "When will you stop DHS from using its social media accounts to spread bigoted and racist words and imagery?" SEC. MULLIN: "It's interesting how you make those claims and give no facts, but yet your party is the one that's supporting the guy that's got a Nazi tattoo on his chest." "You throw out nationalism, Nazism. And that's exactly what causes the hatred and the violence that happens to our officers every single day. And you should be ashamed of using that."

Fox News

230,188 views • 2 months ago

.Thomas D. Homan tears apart Mamdani's claim that ICE is just showing up in unmarked vans and taking people away: “What Mamdani doesn't understand, we're doing the same thing we've done for decades: we're enforcing immigration law. And the reason we're wearing masks is because of the 8,000% increase in death threats, just not against the agents. Against their spouses and their children. I've yelled at every Democrat on the Hill that says ‘take the mask off.’ I said, ‘We’ll take the mask off when you stop going on national media and comparing ICE to the Nazis and the secret police, because you are driving the hate.' I said, ‘So why don't you support ICE, because they're enforcing laws that you wrote? So if they're the secret police for enforcing that, what's that make you? You wrote the law.’ So, stop the hateful rhetoric and the masks can come off quickly.”
1:10

.Thomas D. Homan tears apart Mamdani's claim that ICE is just showing up in unmarked vans and taking people away: “What Mamdani doesn't understand, we're doing the same thing we've done for decades: we're enforcing immigration law. And the reason we're wearing masks is because of the 8,000% increase in death threats, just not against the agents. Against their spouses and their children. I've yelled at every Democrat on the Hill that says ‘take the mask off.’ I said, ‘We’ll take the mask off when you stop going on national media and comparing ICE to the Nazis and the secret police, because you are driving the hate.' I said, ‘So why don't you support ICE, because they're enforcing laws that you wrote? So if they're the secret police for enforcing that, what's that make you? You wrote the law.’ So, stop the hateful rhetoric and the masks can come off quickly.”

Glenn Beck

204,208 views • 1 month ago

🚨 NOW: DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin is CHEWING OUT Democrats for saying DHS has "lost their moral compass" "You've lost YOUR moral compass when you are willing to put the lives of your constituent at risk so you can have POLITICAL TALKING POINTS and get reelected." "How do we lose OUR moral compass?! We are simply enforcing the laws that CONGRESS passed. We didn't make the laws. We didn't even make the statues! Congress did!" "What is the Democrat policy? Open borders. They spend more time protecting the criminals and fighting for justice for their own constituents."
2:18

🚨 NOW: DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin is CHEWING OUT Democrats for saying DHS has "lost their moral compass" "You've lost YOUR moral compass when you are willing to put the lives of your constituent at risk so you can have POLITICAL TALKING POINTS and get reelected." "How do we lose OUR moral compass?! We are simply enforcing the laws that CONGRESS passed. We didn't make the laws. We didn't even make the statues! Congress did!" "What is the Democrat policy? Open borders. They spend more time protecting the criminals and fighting for justice for their own constituents."

Nick Sortor

383,642 views • 3 months ago

.Acting AG Todd Blanche: "You saw the Governor and the Mayor actively encouraging criminals to go out on the street and impede ICE. That is not allowed under our law... That's what we're looking at."
0:57

.Acting AG Todd Blanche: "You saw the Governor and the Mayor actively encouraging criminals to go out on the street and impede ICE. That is not allowed under our law... That's what we're looking at."

Rapid Response 47

95,152 views • 6 months ago

Hero–Doctor Kirk Moore, who's now facing 35 years in prison, defends his decision to give saline injections instead of COVID death jabs: "What law did I break?.... [there was] no ingredient list... no toxicity studies... [the jabs were] studied for a total of two months." This clip of board-certified plastic surgeon Dr. Kirk Moore (@Moore22K) is taken from an interview with Shannon Joy (Shannon Joy) posted to Rumble on June 10, 2025. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "So my one position that I've said all along is, what law did I break? There is no law. There was no Covid law passed. There was no. Nothing that said that I had to do whatever the government says that I need to do. There's no law that says that. And the government is trying to kind of put me into this fraud side, like you said, you know, saying I. That I absconded or I misused or I purloined, you know, $28,000, $28,800 worth of product that they gave me for free and that, you know, that I had a contract with them to give it in such a way. So, I think that's, you know, that That's That's the law side of it. "The ethical side of it wasn't that hard for me. I'm doing what my patients wanted me to do. After a full discussion of what it is. I, have no ingredient list. I don't know what this product is. There are no toxicity studies. There are no carcinogenic, you know, carcinogenic studies. There are no mutagenic studies. There's nothing out there. This is something that was studied for a total of two months. "And the control group was. Was terminated, because they found that it had 95% effectiveness. Once the numbers came out and it showed that that actual effectiveness was less than 1%, by an absolute risk reduction, then that in and of itself should prove, you know, should show that, hey, this is just ridiculous. There was no benefit. There's nothing out there. "You know, you look at Brook Jackson's study and what it was that she was, you know, that she's tried to present in Texas. That's been thrown out, at least twice now. And you just look at all of the. Everything that's behind it. You know, you mentioned, you know, the ethical side of it. You know, the AMA code of ethics says that a physician is supposed to take care of the patient that's in front of them. Okay? That's your oath. My oath is if you were my patient, I would take care of you. You tell me what your concerns are, you tell me, you know, what your symptoms are, and we come up with a plan. I explain to you what the pros and cons of that are, and then you and I come up with a plan on how to treat you. "And I'm not treating you for your husband or your kids or your neighbors or anybody else. I'm treating you that's in front of you. Okay, that's in front of me. And we come up with a plan. So that's the code of ethics. "There's also a known issue with medicine and the legal system. And the, again, the AMA code of ethics says two things. We know that there is going to be a conflict between ethical and moral medical treatment of people and the law at times. And so as a physician, your duty is to try to do what you can, to do both to take care of your patient and to kind of reconcile the law. "So I did. I went to the state of Utah, I went to the House, I went to some of the Senate subcommittees, I, I was, I testified in some of these committee hearings, to try to get laws changed, mandate laws, mask mandates, Covid mandates, shot mandates. And we were successful. In the state of Utah, we were able to pass laws, that reversed the mask mandates. That made it actually, to some degree, a fineable offense for businesses to require Covid vaccines in order to go to work and to go to school. "And so that was my first step. The second step out of this is that if you cannot change that during the time that you're doing, you are, by ethics and moral values, you are required to take care of your patient in front of you, not to abide by, like you said, to abide by the law. So where is the AMA and all this? That's their code of ethics. I don't see them standing behind me and, you know, and trying to support the medical values and ethics that they, that, you know, that they claim on their website is one of, you know, one of their, you know, bastions of health and what physicians need to do."
4:25

Hero–Doctor Kirk Moore, who's now facing 35 years in prison, defends his decision to give saline injections instead of COVID death jabs: "What law did I break?.... [there was] no ingredient list... no toxicity studies... [the jabs were] studied for a total of two months." This clip of board-certified plastic surgeon Dr. Kirk Moore (@Moore22K) is taken from an interview with Shannon Joy (Shannon Joy) posted to Rumble on June 10, 2025. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "So my one position that I've said all along is, what law did I break? There is no law. There was no Covid law passed. There was no. Nothing that said that I had to do whatever the government says that I need to do. There's no law that says that. And the government is trying to kind of put me into this fraud side, like you said, you know, saying I. That I absconded or I misused or I purloined, you know, $28,000, $28,800 worth of product that they gave me for free and that, you know, that I had a contract with them to give it in such a way. So, I think that's, you know, that That's That's the law side of it. "The ethical side of it wasn't that hard for me. I'm doing what my patients wanted me to do. After a full discussion of what it is. I, have no ingredient list. I don't know what this product is. There are no toxicity studies. There are no carcinogenic, you know, carcinogenic studies. There are no mutagenic studies. There's nothing out there. This is something that was studied for a total of two months. "And the control group was. Was terminated, because they found that it had 95% effectiveness. Once the numbers came out and it showed that that actual effectiveness was less than 1%, by an absolute risk reduction, then that in and of itself should prove, you know, should show that, hey, this is just ridiculous. There was no benefit. There's nothing out there. "You know, you look at Brook Jackson's study and what it was that she was, you know, that she's tried to present in Texas. That's been thrown out, at least twice now. And you just look at all of the. Everything that's behind it. You know, you mentioned, you know, the ethical side of it. You know, the AMA code of ethics says that a physician is supposed to take care of the patient that's in front of them. Okay? That's your oath. My oath is if you were my patient, I would take care of you. You tell me what your concerns are, you tell me, you know, what your symptoms are, and we come up with a plan. I explain to you what the pros and cons of that are, and then you and I come up with a plan on how to treat you. "And I'm not treating you for your husband or your kids or your neighbors or anybody else. I'm treating you that's in front of you. Okay, that's in front of me. And we come up with a plan. So that's the code of ethics. "There's also a known issue with medicine and the legal system. And the, again, the AMA code of ethics says two things. We know that there is going to be a conflict between ethical and moral medical treatment of people and the law at times. And so as a physician, your duty is to try to do what you can, to do both to take care of your patient and to kind of reconcile the law. "So I did. I went to the state of Utah, I went to the House, I went to some of the Senate subcommittees, I, I was, I testified in some of these committee hearings, to try to get laws changed, mandate laws, mask mandates, Covid mandates, shot mandates. And we were successful. In the state of Utah, we were able to pass laws, that reversed the mask mandates. That made it actually, to some degree, a fineable offense for businesses to require Covid vaccines in order to go to work and to go to school. "And so that was my first step. The second step out of this is that if you cannot change that during the time that you're doing, you are, by ethics and moral values, you are required to take care of your patient in front of you, not to abide by, like you said, to abide by the law. So where is the AMA and all this? That's their code of ethics. I don't see them standing behind me and, you know, and trying to support the medical values and ethics that they, that, you know, that they claim on their website is one of, you know, one of their, you know, bastions of health and what physicians need to do."

Sense Receptor

75,540 views • 1 year ago

🚨WATCH: Border Czar Tom Homan completely destroys MSNBC’s Mika Brzezinski for the outrageous claim that ICE has “disappeared” people. Into my veins: MIKA: “I'd love some transparency as to why a lot of these people have been disappeared. You say you have data, we would love to see it.” HOMAN: “That is a ridiculous thing to say. ICE is doing the same thing we've done for decades. But because of the last four years, ICE wasn't allowed to enforce a law. ICE was told to sit back and you can't arrest an illegal alien for simply being here illegally.” “ICE agents are enforcing the laws enacted by Congress. They're appropriately enforcing the laws. If you don't like what ICE is doing, then go protest Congress. However, to say we disappeared people, no. We're arresting people that are in the country illegally and they are public safety threat.” “Comments that you just made is one of the reasons why these men and women are under threat every day. Not just the men and women in ICE, but their spouses and their children.”
1:44

🚨WATCH: Border Czar Tom Homan completely destroys MSNBC’s Mika Brzezinski for the outrageous claim that ICE has “disappeared” people. Into my veins: MIKA: “I'd love some transparency as to why a lot of these people have been disappeared. You say you have data, we would love to see it.” HOMAN: “That is a ridiculous thing to say. ICE is doing the same thing we've done for decades. But because of the last four years, ICE wasn't allowed to enforce a law. ICE was told to sit back and you can't arrest an illegal alien for simply being here illegally.” “ICE agents are enforcing the laws enacted by Congress. They're appropriately enforcing the laws. If you don't like what ICE is doing, then go protest Congress. However, to say we disappeared people, no. We're arresting people that are in the country illegally and they are public safety threat.” “Comments that you just made is one of the reasons why these men and women are under threat every day. Not just the men and women in ICE, but their spouses and their children.”

Benny Johnson

104,079 views • 11 months ago

🚨 JUST IN: DHS Sec. Kristi Noem reveals what she personally told Tim Walz in a PRIVATE conversation, and it all make sense why he's TERRIFIED right now "I said, 'sir, listen, Tim, you know the situation, what's going on. We are enforcing federal law. If you don't like the laws, go CHANGE them, but don't do it by giving place to these protesters and rioters that are perpetuating violence!'" "And I said, 'you have my personal cell phone. You call me. If you need me, you call me. We will be there to help back you up but protect your city, protect your state.'" "And he paused for a few seconds and he just said, 'yeah, okay.'" "'We have very different viewpoints of what's going on.' I said, maybe we do, but we will be here if you need us because that's our goal every day is to keep people safe." TIM SHOULD RESIGN. He is trying to FLAUNT federal law!
1:12

🚨 JUST IN: DHS Sec. Kristi Noem reveals what she personally told Tim Walz in a PRIVATE conversation, and it all make sense why he's TERRIFIED right now "I said, 'sir, listen, Tim, you know the situation, what's going on. We are enforcing federal law. If you don't like the laws, go CHANGE them, but don't do it by giving place to these protesters and rioters that are perpetuating violence!'" "And I said, 'you have my personal cell phone. You call me. If you need me, you call me. We will be there to help back you up but protect your city, protect your state.'" "And he paused for a few seconds and he just said, 'yeah, okay.'" "'We have very different viewpoints of what's going on.' I said, maybe we do, but we will be here if you need us because that's our goal every day is to keep people safe." TIM SHOULD RESIGN. He is trying to FLAUNT federal law!

Eric Daugherty

69,909 views • 7 months ago

"We are a nation of laws…if you guys don’t like the law: change it, that’s your job.” @Sec_Noem The men and women of DHS law enforcement will continue to enforce the LAW that Congress created.
1:29

"We are a nation of laws…if you guys don’t like the law: change it, that’s your job.” @Sec_Noem The men and women of DHS law enforcement will continue to enforce the LAW that Congress created.

Homeland Security

87,004 views • 8 months ago

This is how the left treats our law enforcement agents enforcing OUR OWN LAWS. There were just multiple rapists and murderers with deportation orders located by ICE hiding out in Minnesota..If it was up to democrats, they would just leave them in your community. It's wild when you think about it. The democratic party really is a problem..
2:45

This is how the left treats our law enforcement agents enforcing OUR OWN LAWS. There were just multiple rapists and murderers with deportation orders located by ICE hiding out in Minnesota..If it was up to democrats, they would just leave them in your community. It's wild when you think about it. The democratic party really is a problem..

Jeffery Mead

39,589 views • 7 months ago

“We are Europe, not you.” - Russian chief propagandist, Solovyov in an interview with the Swiss Russian apologist Köppel. “Scottish, Irish, different roots, and they all worked for a Russian Empire. And let me remind you that Catherine the Great was not of Russian origin, like at all, and that in the blood of Russian Tsar Nicholas the Second, there was only 1/128th of a Russian blood. Of course. We are Europe, not you. You betrayed all that Europe of the 19th Century believed in. You made a wrong turn. And that's the problem. At first, you get rid of real Christian values, then you get rid of your culture. You forgot your great authors of the 19th. You betrayed your roots, and that's why you hate us. Because in us you see what Europe should be. But as I mentioned before, we're aliens to you. And that's why you do not understand when we remember our mutual history. And when we look at Kremlin, you can see part of Milanese influence. And when you look at Saint Petersburg, and you understand, oh yeah, that's when Perron decided to rebuild Paris, and that's what inspired him. And when you look at Moscow, and you see a lot of signs of Europe that you've lost.”
1:31

“We are Europe, not you.” - Russian chief propagandist, Solovyov in an interview with the Swiss Russian apologist Köppel. “Scottish, Irish, different roots, and they all worked for a Russian Empire. And let me remind you that Catherine the Great was not of Russian origin, like at all, and that in the blood of Russian Tsar Nicholas the Second, there was only 1/128th of a Russian blood. Of course. We are Europe, not you. You betrayed all that Europe of the 19th Century believed in. You made a wrong turn. And that's the problem. At first, you get rid of real Christian values, then you get rid of your culture. You forgot your great authors of the 19th. You betrayed your roots, and that's why you hate us. Because in us you see what Europe should be. But as I mentioned before, we're aliens to you. And that's why you do not understand when we remember our mutual history. And when we look at Kremlin, you can see part of Milanese influence. And when you look at Saint Petersburg, and you understand, oh yeah, that's when Perron decided to rebuild Paris, and that's what inspired him. And when you look at Moscow, and you see a lot of signs of Europe that you've lost.”

Yasmina

141,183 views • 1 month ago

🚨 HOLY SMOKES. DHS Sec. Markwayne Mullin just OBLITERATED Indian Rep. Shri Thanedar 🔥 THANEDAR: When will you stop spreading bigoted and racist words? MULLIN: It's INTERESTING you make those claims with no facts yet YOUR party is the one supporting a guy with a NAZI TATTOO on his CHEST in Maine! THANEDAR: I have the facts! MULLIN: No, there IS no facts. You throw out Nazism, that's EXACTLY what causes hatred and violence to our officers! You should be ASHAMED! THANEDAR: It's not my words! MULLIN: It IS your words...did you endorse the Nazi candidate in Maine? THANEDAR: Colorado fusion center says white nationalist messaging could lead to violence MULLIN: Who? What message? Don't give me some left-wing POLL. Give me your specific details about what DHS SAID. THANEDAR: Let me reclaim my time! MULLIN: YEAH — you don't want to TALK about it but you want to throw out RACISM all the time at my Department, which ISN'T TRUE. 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
1:17

🚨 HOLY SMOKES. DHS Sec. Markwayne Mullin just OBLITERATED Indian Rep. Shri Thanedar 🔥 THANEDAR: When will you stop spreading bigoted and racist words? MULLIN: It's INTERESTING you make those claims with no facts yet YOUR party is the one supporting a guy with a NAZI TATTOO on his CHEST in Maine! THANEDAR: I have the facts! MULLIN: No, there IS no facts. You throw out Nazism, that's EXACTLY what causes hatred and violence to our officers! You should be ASHAMED! THANEDAR: It's not my words! MULLIN: It IS your words...did you endorse the Nazi candidate in Maine? THANEDAR: Colorado fusion center says white nationalist messaging could lead to violence MULLIN: Who? What message? Don't give me some left-wing POLL. Give me your specific details about what DHS SAID. THANEDAR: Let me reclaim my time! MULLIN: YEAH — you don't want to TALK about it but you want to throw out RACISM all the time at my Department, which ISN'T TRUE. 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥

Eric Daugherty

694,603 views • 2 months ago

🚨 HOLY SMOKES. Tom Homan just pummeled a Texas House Democrat candidate planning to LOCK UP ICE agents for "human trafficking" "She's obviously an IDIOT! Bottom line is, BRING IT! I'm SICK of the threats from some of these out of touch Democrats." "We're enforcing the laws THEY enacted. We're not making this up! And we're going to KEEP enforcing the law. You can threaten lawsuits and arrests ALL YOU WANT — we're going to KEEP doing the job." 🔥 "Keep the threats going! We're going to keep pushing ahead." 🇺🇸 "Try it all you want. You're NOT stopping what we're doing." Thomas D. Homan is a national treasure!
1:00

🚨 HOLY SMOKES. Tom Homan just pummeled a Texas House Democrat candidate planning to LOCK UP ICE agents for "human trafficking" "She's obviously an IDIOT! Bottom line is, BRING IT! I'm SICK of the threats from some of these out of touch Democrats." "We're enforcing the laws THEY enacted. We're not making this up! And we're going to KEEP enforcing the law. You can threaten lawsuits and arrests ALL YOU WANT — we're going to KEEP doing the job." 🔥 "Keep the threats going! We're going to keep pushing ahead." 🇺🇸 "Try it all you want. You're NOT stopping what we're doing." Thomas D. Homan is a national treasure!

Eric Daugherty

44,739 views • 2 months ago

America BUY GUNS & AMMO 🚨 Dr. Phill Interview “Venezuela has a lowest murder rate ever right now. What does that tell you? All the murderers are gone” They’re here in America “This is not a hearsay. There was a memo by DHS last year admitting that, in fact, they knew that Venezuela's government was emptying their prison and rehabilitation centers or drug centers, releasing them on purpose because they knew with instructions instructions to make if you were gonna get out, you're gonna make your way to the US. That is not we're not making that up. That that that's true. It was it was reported on and DHS admitted that that was happening and in fact it has. El Trene Aragua is heavily present in our country now. So you're telling me that DHS has acknowledged that Venezuela, for example, is empty in their prisons and their rehabilitation centers with the understanding you get out if you leave here and go to the United States. Yes. And DHS has in writing said, we know that's happening, we know they're coming here, we're processing them in and have no idea where they are.”
1:41

America BUY GUNS & AMMO 🚨 Dr. Phill Interview “Venezuela has a lowest murder rate ever right now. What does that tell you? All the murderers are gone” They’re here in America “This is not a hearsay. There was a memo by DHS last year admitting that, in fact, they knew that Venezuela's government was emptying their prison and rehabilitation centers or drug centers, releasing them on purpose because they knew with instructions instructions to make if you were gonna get out, you're gonna make your way to the US. That is not we're not making that up. That that that's true. It was it was reported on and DHS admitted that that was happening and in fact it has. El Trene Aragua is heavily present in our country now. So you're telling me that DHS has acknowledged that Venezuela, for example, is empty in their prisons and their rehabilitation centers with the understanding you get out if you leave here and go to the United States. Yes. And DHS has in writing said, we know that's happening, we know they're coming here, we're processing them in and have no idea where they are.”

Wall Street Apes

1,072,219 views • 2 years ago

“What did you think of Lando being booed at race because people and I've seen it online as well say he doesn't deserve the title because McLaren favored him over his teammate. Do you think that's total nonsense?” Jacques Villeneuve: “That's a little bit ridiculous. When there was some booing in some races, that was embarrassing. You should never boo a driver that's clean, doesn't do anything dirty, on track is respectful, and on top of it is super fast. What's wrong with people? That was embarrassing. And, had it been that Piastri was a second a lap faster than him and somehow Lando was winning because a lot of things were happening, his car breaking down every time, then you could start thinking, okay, that's really not cool. That's not fair. But that wasn't the case. And in the second half, Norris has been faster right at the beginning as well, last year as well. So there's this whole middle of the season where Piastri was driving a lot better than Norris and was getting the points. Norris had an engine blowing up, not Piastri. And so those fans, they don't look at that either. You have to look at the whole picture, at the whole season. And suddenly if your favorite is starting to go backwards, you just got to bite the bullet and accept it. Your favorite is just going backwards. That doesn't mean that the other one is treated better or the other one is undeserving just because the one you're a fan of is not winning right now. That’s really wrong. If you're a fan of the sport, then you have to be a fan of the sport and understand when your driver is maybe not cutting it at this point in time, even though he was before and he will in the future again. It's all a question of timing. But that's the price we have to pay now with social media and how big F1 has become. It's very passionate. The people are passionate and once, you know, fans come from fanatism, you stop thinking, when you get in that mindset and it happens to all of us. You want something so much that you get attached and you cannot - it's hard to start seeing reality. So you will try to mold the reality to your thought process and if your champion is not winning then it cannot be his fault. It has to be something from the outside. It has to be the team destroying his chance or not favoring and so on and so on and so on. But there's nothing concrete behind those comments. It's pure fandom and it'll always be like this. And ultimately it's not a bad thing. You know drivers at that - sportsman at that level have to grow a thick skin. If not, you don't deserve to be there. You just have to have a thick skin because they're all very happy to get the compliments. They love it when it's just positive, but it gets balanced out with negatives and you need to be able to take and accept the negatives as well. It goes both ways. You cannot have the good. You just have to be a thick skin and know that it's part and parcels of what's going on. And in one month, it will be forgotten and maybe everything will change and it be the other driver that suddenly will be criticized and so on. So, it's just that's just the way it is.”
3:10

“What did you think of Lando being booed at race because people and I've seen it online as well say he doesn't deserve the title because McLaren favored him over his teammate. Do you think that's total nonsense?” Jacques Villeneuve: “That's a little bit ridiculous. When there was some booing in some races, that was embarrassing. You should never boo a driver that's clean, doesn't do anything dirty, on track is respectful, and on top of it is super fast. What's wrong with people? That was embarrassing. And, had it been that Piastri was a second a lap faster than him and somehow Lando was winning because a lot of things were happening, his car breaking down every time, then you could start thinking, okay, that's really not cool. That's not fair. But that wasn't the case. And in the second half, Norris has been faster right at the beginning as well, last year as well. So there's this whole middle of the season where Piastri was driving a lot better than Norris and was getting the points. Norris had an engine blowing up, not Piastri. And so those fans, they don't look at that either. You have to look at the whole picture, at the whole season. And suddenly if your favorite is starting to go backwards, you just got to bite the bullet and accept it. Your favorite is just going backwards. That doesn't mean that the other one is treated better or the other one is undeserving just because the one you're a fan of is not winning right now. That’s really wrong. If you're a fan of the sport, then you have to be a fan of the sport and understand when your driver is maybe not cutting it at this point in time, even though he was before and he will in the future again. It's all a question of timing. But that's the price we have to pay now with social media and how big F1 has become. It's very passionate. The people are passionate and once, you know, fans come from fanatism, you stop thinking, when you get in that mindset and it happens to all of us. You want something so much that you get attached and you cannot - it's hard to start seeing reality. So you will try to mold the reality to your thought process and if your champion is not winning then it cannot be his fault. It has to be something from the outside. It has to be the team destroying his chance or not favoring and so on and so on and so on. But there's nothing concrete behind those comments. It's pure fandom and it'll always be like this. And ultimately it's not a bad thing. You know drivers at that - sportsman at that level have to grow a thick skin. If not, you don't deserve to be there. You just have to have a thick skin because they're all very happy to get the compliments. They love it when it's just positive, but it gets balanced out with negatives and you need to be able to take and accept the negatives as well. It goes both ways. You cannot have the good. You just have to be a thick skin and know that it's part and parcels of what's going on. And in one month, it will be forgotten and maybe everything will change and it be the other driver that suddenly will be criticized and so on. So, it's just that's just the way it is.”

naenia ¹ ⁶³

29,833 views • 8 months ago