Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Wow, first I discovered the 2007 NIH workshop that ranked Il-15 the number one immunotherapy to cure cancer, now I find a 2017 lecture on IL-15 by NIH AND NCI describing its power. Building on the shoulders of immunology giants at the NIH and NCI , the late Drs...

DrPatrick's profile picture

Dr. Pat Soon-Shiong

155,146 subscribers

183,339 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Gesundheit & WellnessBildungWissenschaft & Technologie
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Many are saying “the immune system is our last hope if we are going to cure cancer”. So why has Chemo remained standard of care? And why did Government agencies fail to develop “the most important molecule to cure cancer”? And in that same year (2007) IL-15 was identified, Dr. Wafik El-Deiry’s team discovered ONC201 (dordaviprone), a small molecule that recruits and activates NK cells into tumors. Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong unearthed the 2007 report live in front of NIH Director Dr. Jay Bhattacharya. Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong: “This is a report done in 2007.... every scientific thought leader had identified... the number 1 molecule... IL-15... the cytokine that stimulates the growth of T cells and NK cells... the thought leaders of the country have known for 20 years.” The connection? NK cells. El-Deiry’s ONC201 attracts and activates NK cells inside tumors, while Soon-Shiong’s therapy boosts their numbers and power body-wide. Two complementary arms of the same innate immune strategy. Prof. El Deiry: “We discovered a drug... it boosts our innate immune system.. the same type of Natural Killer Cells that Dr. Soon-Shion is trying to use to help patients.” Yet the toxic chemotherapy paradigm still dominates. Why the slow shift away from it?
1:09

Many are saying “the immune system is our last hope if we are going to cure cancer”. So why has Chemo remained standard of care? And why did Government agencies fail to develop “the most important molecule to cure cancer”? And in that same year (2007) IL-15 was identified, Dr. Wafik El-Deiry’s team discovered ONC201 (dordaviprone), a small molecule that recruits and activates NK cells into tumors. Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong unearthed the 2007 report live in front of NIH Director Dr. Jay Bhattacharya. Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong: “This is a report done in 2007.... every scientific thought leader had identified... the number 1 molecule... IL-15... the cytokine that stimulates the growth of T cells and NK cells... the thought leaders of the country have known for 20 years.” The connection? NK cells. El-Deiry’s ONC201 attracts and activates NK cells inside tumors, while Soon-Shiong’s therapy boosts their numbers and power body-wide. Two complementary arms of the same innate immune strategy. Prof. El Deiry: “We discovered a drug... it boosts our innate immune system.. the same type of Natural Killer Cells that Dr. Soon-Shion is trying to use to help patients.” Yet the toxic chemotherapy paradigm still dominates. Why the slow shift away from it?

Humanspective

36,301 Aufrufe • vor 11 Tagen

Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong says to Megyn Kelly that he received an unverified FOIA-related email from Francis Collins saying we "must find a way to stop him" — regarding his 2017 potential NIH Director nomination. While that was happening, Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong said the NIH/NCI identified IL-15 as the "most important molecule to cure cancer". The NIH were sitting on it — trying to develop it for about 10 years but "failed" due to challenges. He views this as a missed opportunity to prioritize immunotherapy (activating natural killer cells and immune responses) over toxic chemo/radiation, suggesting this period was a pivotal moment that influenced the direction of cancer therapy, potentially delaying a stronger emphasis on immunotherapy approaches like IL-15. Dr. PAtrick Soon-Shiong - "The NIH tried to develop this for 10 years." "The NIH and NCI designated this IL15 as the most important molecule to cure cancer"
3:32

Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong says to Megyn Kelly that he received an unverified FOIA-related email from Francis Collins saying we "must find a way to stop him" — regarding his 2017 potential NIH Director nomination. While that was happening, Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong said the NIH/NCI identified IL-15 as the "most important molecule to cure cancer". The NIH were sitting on it — trying to develop it for about 10 years but "failed" due to challenges. He views this as a missed opportunity to prioritize immunotherapy (activating natural killer cells and immune responses) over toxic chemo/radiation, suggesting this period was a pivotal moment that influenced the direction of cancer therapy, potentially delaying a stronger emphasis on immunotherapy approaches like IL-15. Dr. PAtrick Soon-Shiong - "The NIH tried to develop this for 10 years." "The NIH and NCI designated this IL15 as the most important molecule to cure cancer"

Humanspective

103,302 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Of all the casualties in the war on cancer, the most critical have been the most ignored: your NK and T cells. As Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong explains, while oncology has long treated the anemia and neutropenia caused by chemotherapy, it has overlooked the destruction of the very immune cells that fight cancer. For 35 years, there was no treatment for this catastrophic side effect. That era is over. Dr. Soon-Shiong announces ANKTIVA, the first FDA-approved therapy proven to activate NK cells, T cells, and memory T cells. The result? Documented complete responses in bladder cancer patients, free of disease for over nine years. This breakthrough shatters a long-standing medical blind spot. Whether from chemo, radiation, or a severe viral infection, the body's primary defense is often wiped out. ANKTIVA represents a paradigm shift—from solely attacking disease to actively re-arming the patient's own immune system. The future of medicine is not just fighting the enemy, but empowering the army within.
3:35

Of all the casualties in the war on cancer, the most critical have been the most ignored: your NK and T cells. As Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong explains, while oncology has long treated the anemia and neutropenia caused by chemotherapy, it has overlooked the destruction of the very immune cells that fight cancer. For 35 years, there was no treatment for this catastrophic side effect. That era is over. Dr. Soon-Shiong announces ANKTIVA, the first FDA-approved therapy proven to activate NK cells, T cells, and memory T cells. The result? Documented complete responses in bladder cancer patients, free of disease for over nine years. This breakthrough shatters a long-standing medical blind spot. Whether from chemo, radiation, or a severe viral infection, the body's primary defense is often wiped out. ANKTIVA represents a paradigm shift—from solely attacking disease to actively re-arming the patient's own immune system. The future of medicine is not just fighting the enemy, but empowering the army within.

Camus

55,225 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

The NIH were sitting on a cancer breakthrough for 10 years, but did nothing with it. In a NEW report, we find out instead of helping this treatment without the toxicity of Chemo and radiation, the FDA just blocked it, choosing to give priority authorisation to Chemotherapy instead. IL-15 stimulates the bodies own natural cancer fighting capabilities, by up regulating the immune systems NK cells. Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong explains how IL-15 was designated by the NIH as the most important molecule to fight cancer, but they couldn't make it work. "The NIH tried to develop this for 10 years." "The NIH and NCI designated this IL15 as the most important molecule to cure cancer, and they failed to develop it, because they couldn't make it last long [or] figure out how to actually just target directly the NK cells. We did that". Just months ago, 2 senior scientists in the FDA said “we don’t care” when Patrick Soon-Shiong approached them and urged for a priority approval process.
1:15

The NIH were sitting on a cancer breakthrough for 10 years, but did nothing with it. In a NEW report, we find out instead of helping this treatment without the toxicity of Chemo and radiation, the FDA just blocked it, choosing to give priority authorisation to Chemotherapy instead. IL-15 stimulates the bodies own natural cancer fighting capabilities, by up regulating the immune systems NK cells. Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong explains how IL-15 was designated by the NIH as the most important molecule to fight cancer, but they couldn't make it work. "The NIH tried to develop this for 10 years." "The NIH and NCI designated this IL15 as the most important molecule to cure cancer, and they failed to develop it, because they couldn't make it last long [or] figure out how to actually just target directly the NK cells. We did that". Just months ago, 2 senior scientists in the FDA said “we don’t care” when Patrick Soon-Shiong approached them and urged for a priority approval process.

Humanspective

116,943 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

💥Neale Hanvey in the UK Parliament Excess Deaths Debate mentioned the concerns of London Professor of Oncology, and principal of the Institute for Cancer Vaccines and Immunotherapy, Professor Angus Dalgleish in this 20m speech below. "According to the University of London Professor of Oncology, and principal of the Institute for Cancer Vaccines and Immunotherapy, Professor Angus Dalgleish, this has precipitated various serious and sometimes fatal consequences due to antibody development mediated by the spike protein. I will not go into the detail of that, but at a meeting convened by the hon. Member for North West Leicestershire, Professor Dalgleish told us that the UK Government and their agencies are in serious denial about this issue, resulting in many deaths being poorly understood" [NEALE CONTINUED FURTHER] “a sequence that is ‘used to drive DNA into the nucleus, especially in gene therapies’ and that this is ‘something that regulatory agencies around the world have specifically said is not possible with the mRNA vaccines’. These SV40 promotors are also well recognised as being oncogenic”— or cancer-inducing genetic material. Other scientists have confirmed those findings. Professor Dalgleish further notes: “To put it bluntly, this means that they are not vaccines at all but a…Genetically Modified Organism that should have been subject to totally different regulatory conditions and certainly not be classed as vaccines.” Worryingly, Professor Dalgleish also notes that oncologists have contacted him from across the world, and the consensus is that this is thought to be precipitating relapse in melanoma, lymphoma, leukaemia and kidney cancers. He concludes with the following warning - To advise booster vaccines, as is the current case, is no more and no less than medical incompetence" It appears that this specialist DR in Japan shares concerns similar to this specialist Oncologist in the United Kingdom, Professor Angus Dalgleish
22:25

💥Neale Hanvey in the UK Parliament Excess Deaths Debate mentioned the concerns of London Professor of Oncology, and principal of the Institute for Cancer Vaccines and Immunotherapy, Professor Angus Dalgleish in this 20m speech below. "According to the University of London Professor of Oncology, and principal of the Institute for Cancer Vaccines and Immunotherapy, Professor Angus Dalgleish, this has precipitated various serious and sometimes fatal consequences due to antibody development mediated by the spike protein. I will not go into the detail of that, but at a meeting convened by the hon. Member for North West Leicestershire, Professor Dalgleish told us that the UK Government and their agencies are in serious denial about this issue, resulting in many deaths being poorly understood" [NEALE CONTINUED FURTHER] “a sequence that is ‘used to drive DNA into the nucleus, especially in gene therapies’ and that this is ‘something that regulatory agencies around the world have specifically said is not possible with the mRNA vaccines’. These SV40 promotors are also well recognised as being oncogenic”— or cancer-inducing genetic material. Other scientists have confirmed those findings. Professor Dalgleish further notes: “To put it bluntly, this means that they are not vaccines at all but a…Genetically Modified Organism that should have been subject to totally different regulatory conditions and certainly not be classed as vaccines.” Worryingly, Professor Dalgleish also notes that oncologists have contacted him from across the world, and the consensus is that this is thought to be precipitating relapse in melanoma, lymphoma, leukaemia and kidney cancers. He concludes with the following warning - To advise booster vaccines, as is the current case, is no more and no less than medical incompetence" It appears that this specialist DR in Japan shares concerns similar to this specialist Oncologist in the United Kingdom, Professor Angus Dalgleish

Humanspective

19,416 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Amazing, a former FDA associate commissioner Peter J. Pitts affirmed that the mechanism of action in the approved label confirms the science of Anktiva, by the FDA itself. Jay Bhattacharya agrees with Dr. Pitts and highlights the new path just released by Dr. Marty Makary of the “Plausible Mechanism of Action” to expedite and accelerate access to the American public. Two senior thoughtful members of the panel, a former FDA senior official and the present NIH/CDC director now affirm that the plausible mechanism of action is the path to rapid access. This is what we have been presenting to the FDA for the past 6 months to desperately allow the 13,000+ requests from Americans to access Anktiva via this pathway. A groundswell of patients desperate for this to happen is growing and I am pleased that Christopher C. Cuomo promised that this conversation will continue… as it must.
1:06

Amazing, a former FDA associate commissioner Peter J. Pitts affirmed that the mechanism of action in the approved label confirms the science of Anktiva, by the FDA itself. Jay Bhattacharya agrees with Dr. Pitts and highlights the new path just released by Dr. Marty Makary of the “Plausible Mechanism of Action” to expedite and accelerate access to the American public. Two senior thoughtful members of the panel, a former FDA senior official and the present NIH/CDC director now affirm that the plausible mechanism of action is the path to rapid access. This is what we have been presenting to the FDA for the past 6 months to desperately allow the 13,000+ requests from Americans to access Anktiva via this pathway. A groundswell of patients desperate for this to happen is growing and I am pleased that Christopher C. Cuomo promised that this conversation will continue… as it must.

Dr. Pat Soon-Shiong

825,140 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

#WATCH | Delhi | EAM Dr S Jaishankar says, "...We have important strategic relationships with a number of countries, and it's in the nature of global politics or global strategy today that each one of these relationships would be maintained and optimised. So to me, both Germany in itself and Germany as the biggest country of the European Union are obviously central to the calculations and to the relationships that we have in the world...For us, this is an enormously important relationship. This relationship is growing in substance and I can see at this time of uncertainties that actually it has a greater value. It's a very steady relationship. It is a relationship where largely what we promise to each other and policies that we have remain constant and predictable. So predictability today has a huge premium in global politics..."
2:20

#WATCH | Delhi | EAM Dr S Jaishankar says, "...We have important strategic relationships with a number of countries, and it's in the nature of global politics or global strategy today that each one of these relationships would be maintained and optimised. So to me, both Germany in itself and Germany as the biggest country of the European Union are obviously central to the calculations and to the relationships that we have in the world...For us, this is an enormously important relationship. This relationship is growing in substance and I can see at this time of uncertainties that actually it has a greater value. It's a very steady relationship. It is a relationship where largely what we promise to each other and policies that we have remain constant and predictable. So predictability today has a huge premium in global politics..."

ANI

105,569 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

“We express our gratitude for this crystal clear position by the 145 countries addressed to the host country, to respect its obligation under the Headquarters Agreement… the host country does not have the right or the privilege to abuse its authority and deny visas for our leaders to participate. We sincerely hope that this abuse is reversed as quickly as possible. We have the right to be with all of you, for our leaders, to be with all of you, and to share our thoughts and ideas peacefully, diplomatically, legally, and in a civilized way. Denying us, denying our leaders, the opportunity to do so is an abuse of the authority, and it is a punishment for the State of Palestine that should not take place. Our leaders will participate in the capacity that is possible to us, but we will not yield an inch for our right to be treated like the rest of you and to receive our visas for our leaders in any meetings that we are invited to participate in, and we will continue doing that. “
3:32

“We express our gratitude for this crystal clear position by the 145 countries addressed to the host country, to respect its obligation under the Headquarters Agreement… the host country does not have the right or the privilege to abuse its authority and deny visas for our leaders to participate. We sincerely hope that this abuse is reversed as quickly as possible. We have the right to be with all of you, for our leaders, to be with all of you, and to share our thoughts and ideas peacefully, diplomatically, legally, and in a civilized way. Denying us, denying our leaders, the opportunity to do so is an abuse of the authority, and it is a punishment for the State of Palestine that should not take place. Our leaders will participate in the capacity that is possible to us, but we will not yield an inch for our right to be treated like the rest of you and to receive our visas for our leaders in any meetings that we are invited to participate in, and we will continue doing that. “

State of Palestine

81,051 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

EU gave €225 million to projects in #Gaza between 2021-2023, a place that was under the full control of #Hamas since 2006. How much of the EU money given to projects in Gaza ended up in the hands and pockets of this terrorist organisation? I asked Commissioner Olivér Várhelyi this and other questions in the Budgetary Control committee on October 26, 2023. Watch and share this video along with the transcript. MEP Cristian Terheș: "Thank you so much. Before I go into my questions I just want to make a note that this committee has on paper 55, 54 MEPs, and we are in this room, right now, only five [MEPs] and two over there. I think it is outrageous that, for an important topic like this, that is discussing about how the Commission is spending or wasting people's money, apparently the Left is not interested in see[ing] what exactly and how exactly people's money was spent. Going back to the questions, I have six specific questions. The first one is related to the books printed under the supervision or under the authority of the Palestinian Authority. And I saw, I carefully read the answer from the European Commission, which pretty much acknowledged that there was a problem, and I restate that, that there was, in the past, a problem with these books. And the answer says that "EU has stepped up its engagement with the Palestinian Authority to ensure that further curriculum reform addresses problematic issues identified in the shortest possible timeframe". So the "further curriculum" will address this issue. Well, here's an example of a book. This is a literature book for the fifth grade that is used in the UNRWA schools. In this book, this is what the Arab kids are learning. If you're not aware of who this person is, her name is Dalal Mughrabi. On March the 11th, 1978, along with other terrorists, [she] hijacked two busses. And when the Israeli authorities tried to free those people, they blew themselves up and killed 38 Israelis, including 13 children, and over 70 people were wounded. So how is it possible that now, in 2023, and I'm not talking about past books… This is 2023. These kids are still learning that this is a role model for them. And now, out of the blue, we are surprised that people are blowing themselves up and killing innocent people. I'm not interested what are you going to do in the future. I hope that you will do something and we will make sure that you will do something. But what have you done so far to make sure that these Arab kids, these Palestinian kids are not indoctrinated with this kind of evil figures? The second question is about the "Pay for Slay". #PayForSlay According to the Palestinian law if a Palestinian person is killing a Jew, his or her family is getting a pension. So we are rewarding terrorist activities. And this was done for years. A few years ago, when Trump was president, a U.S. military guy was killed in one of these terror attacks. And U.S. Congress passed a law called "Taylor Force Act", which is conditioning any U.S. money for the Palestinian Authority to make sure that these families of the terrorists are not getting reimbursed for life after these terror activities. Why aren’t we imposing exactly the same rules? Because, according to the answer from the Commission, we are paying pension and pensions to these people. Third question, the issue of Gaza. According to your official answer, you're stating, and I quote: "Between 2021 and [20]23, EU funded €681 million for the Palestinian Authority and UNRWA. A third of this money went to Gaza." A third means €225 million from 2021 to 2023. But we know for a fact that in 2005, when Israel withdrew from Gaza, after 2006 or [200]7, Gaza is under the control of Hamas. You said here that you will run a survey or whatever, an analysis to see how the money was spent. What have you done already? Hamas was called, and recognized and acknowledged as a terrorist organisation. How was it possible to pour €225 million in a place that is fully controlled by a terrorist organisation and nobody did anything or said anything? It is absolutely absurd! Forth question. Following reports about stealing of pipelines for rocket production and fuel for hospitals, to what extent can the European Commission or the Court of Auditors verify or assess the damage caused to EU and European funded projects in Gaza? Fifth question. Following news that Hamas is directing money for social allowances to members of this terrorist organisation, how do you verify that such money gets to those really in need? Nevertheless, following reports about control of Hamas of the teacher unions and UNRWA workers union, what are the steps you are taking to verify that EU money for UNRWA is not used to serve Hamas agenda? Thank you." Commissioner Olivér Várhelyi: "Madam Chair. I want to assure all the participating members of this committee that I very much appreciate their presence and their engagement with us. And I think that this is very important that we have this discussion, no matter how many members of the committee are here. Now, first of all, on the Gaza project. Let me make it very clear what has been done in Gaza since 2006 when the IDF and Israel has left the Gaza Strip. I fully agree with you. The control and the governance of that strip has been de facto exercised by the Hamas. Unfortunately! And it was for that reason that all institution financing activity has been stopped and it is for that reason that only projects of public interest have been continued in the Gaza Strip. Now, with the emergence of the horror that we have seen instigated by Hamas, the review also has a very clear message to those projects that we have tried for many, many years to create for the benefit of the people in Gaza, like the Gas for Gaza project or the desalination plant creating fresh water for the people in the Gaza Strip or building a new hospital in the Gaza Strip, that are on hold. And it is not possible even physically to continue on those projects. And we will have to wait until the end of this war to see what engagement would still be considered in the in the Gaza area, if feasible. Now, in relation to the broader question of the review, what is the timeline? The timeline is that we are already doing it. We have a methodology established and our review is carried out by the whole House, mainly the DG Near, but also other parts of the Commission, DG Budget and also the other external family members of the Commission. The result of the review is going to be presented to the College [of Commissioners]. So the College is going to take the conclusions of these findings and they will be, I very much hope, endorsed by the College. In terms of its cost, we do not foresee any additional cost for this, and we want to act rapidly because, as I said, given the very fragile security situation, we have to act immediately to filter out all those who have, even indirectly, participated or contributed to the violence that we have seen emerge. Now, when it comes to the textbooks, to be honest with you, it's very difficult to answer your question because this is the question I have been putting since the very beginning of my mandate. How is it possible to embed hatred and nurture hatred in textbooks? How is it possible to teach kids to hate? How is it possible? And we have been sitting down several times with the Palestinian Authority. We have run a study that came to the same conclusion as you have. And we have had difficult discussions also in this House. But now I see that there is a change in the position of this House, which is, I think, very important. And it is not only very important, but we took very, very careful note of a request from the Parliament, because there is also a request adopted by the plenary, to look into this issue. And this is what we are going to do and this issue will have to be addressed. The result that we have achieved was that we have raised the issue with the Palestinian Authority, and I don't think there's disagreement between us and them that this is an issue. Second, we are working very closely with our partners in UNRWA. I'm very sad to see that this is a training material or education material that you have shown today, which is used by UNRWA, because UNRWA was the one who not only was able to talk about this problem, but undertook commitments with us to eradicate any material, any views expressed, including on social media or in the territories of the schools of this kind, glorification of terrorists, glorification of hatred, anti-Semitism. And this is why we have concluded a three year financing contract with UNRWA. This was a very important element for us that UNRWA started to cooperate and we have seen results coming in. But, of course, I agree with you. We cannot rest until the very last of these materials disappear. And I'm fully committed to deliver on that, including in the discussions for next year. On the "Pay for Slay". We have a list to check that direct beneficiaries do not appear on any of the terrorist list. But, if there is one, I wouldn't like to draw any conclusions of the review, but, if there is one issue to look at is, of course, that we do not create the possibility of indirect benefit for those who are involved in terrorist activities or for those who have been even convicted for such acts. And this is what we are addressing also in our review. Now, on the on the damage to our projects in Gaza, I cannot tell you now. What we see is that there is clearly devastation in the northern part, serious level of damage in the south, but it will be only after that the war will stop that we can go back and take a look at that. Now, on the humanitarian aspect and how to guarantee that our humanitarian aid is not going to be misused. If you look back at the statement the European Council has adopted just last weekend, you see also a very clear call for them to make sure. And this is why our decision has been to channel our humanitarian aid through our own institutions; DG Echo is delivering on the ground and in-kind. So we are providing help, in-kind, not providing financing. We're not providing other items that could be used for other purposes. And we are coordinating our work with international organisations only, so to ensure that it doesn't get to the wrong hands. So there was one more question about the breakdown of the €103 million, and I think I can confirm what you said that we have composed the €103 million by €50 million that were allocated in support of payments of salaries and pensions. These are going directly as direct budget support into the budget of the Palestinian Authority. However, we want to check the final beneficiaries and we have a list. And now we're looking at indirect beneficiaries as well as part of the review. The 40 million… The other element is the €40 million support for the most vulnerable families. Again, this is this is paid in the form of direct budgetary contribution. And the third and lastly, the €13 million, this is the remaining part of 103 [million], is financing the East Jerusalem hospitals that we have paid already in April 2023 to keep the health care system running in East Jerusalem. I hope with this I have answered all the questions that have been raised. Thank you."
16:12

EU gave €225 million to projects in #Gaza between 2021-2023, a place that was under the full control of #Hamas since 2006. How much of the EU money given to projects in Gaza ended up in the hands and pockets of this terrorist organisation? I asked Commissioner Olivér Várhelyi this and other questions in the Budgetary Control committee on October 26, 2023. Watch and share this video along with the transcript. MEP Cristian Terheș: "Thank you so much. Before I go into my questions I just want to make a note that this committee has on paper 55, 54 MEPs, and we are in this room, right now, only five [MEPs] and two over there. I think it is outrageous that, for an important topic like this, that is discussing about how the Commission is spending or wasting people's money, apparently the Left is not interested in see[ing] what exactly and how exactly people's money was spent. Going back to the questions, I have six specific questions. The first one is related to the books printed under the supervision or under the authority of the Palestinian Authority. And I saw, I carefully read the answer from the European Commission, which pretty much acknowledged that there was a problem, and I restate that, that there was, in the past, a problem with these books. And the answer says that "EU has stepped up its engagement with the Palestinian Authority to ensure that further curriculum reform addresses problematic issues identified in the shortest possible timeframe". So the "further curriculum" will address this issue. Well, here's an example of a book. This is a literature book for the fifth grade that is used in the UNRWA schools. In this book, this is what the Arab kids are learning. If you're not aware of who this person is, her name is Dalal Mughrabi. On March the 11th, 1978, along with other terrorists, [she] hijacked two busses. And when the Israeli authorities tried to free those people, they blew themselves up and killed 38 Israelis, including 13 children, and over 70 people were wounded. So how is it possible that now, in 2023, and I'm not talking about past books… This is 2023. These kids are still learning that this is a role model for them. And now, out of the blue, we are surprised that people are blowing themselves up and killing innocent people. I'm not interested what are you going to do in the future. I hope that you will do something and we will make sure that you will do something. But what have you done so far to make sure that these Arab kids, these Palestinian kids are not indoctrinated with this kind of evil figures? The second question is about the "Pay for Slay". #PayForSlay According to the Palestinian law if a Palestinian person is killing a Jew, his or her family is getting a pension. So we are rewarding terrorist activities. And this was done for years. A few years ago, when Trump was president, a U.S. military guy was killed in one of these terror attacks. And U.S. Congress passed a law called "Taylor Force Act", which is conditioning any U.S. money for the Palestinian Authority to make sure that these families of the terrorists are not getting reimbursed for life after these terror activities. Why aren’t we imposing exactly the same rules? Because, according to the answer from the Commission, we are paying pension and pensions to these people. Third question, the issue of Gaza. According to your official answer, you're stating, and I quote: "Between 2021 and [20]23, EU funded €681 million for the Palestinian Authority and UNRWA. A third of this money went to Gaza." A third means €225 million from 2021 to 2023. But we know for a fact that in 2005, when Israel withdrew from Gaza, after 2006 or [200]7, Gaza is under the control of Hamas. You said here that you will run a survey or whatever, an analysis to see how the money was spent. What have you done already? Hamas was called, and recognized and acknowledged as a terrorist organisation. How was it possible to pour €225 million in a place that is fully controlled by a terrorist organisation and nobody did anything or said anything? It is absolutely absurd! Forth question. Following reports about stealing of pipelines for rocket production and fuel for hospitals, to what extent can the European Commission or the Court of Auditors verify or assess the damage caused to EU and European funded projects in Gaza? Fifth question. Following news that Hamas is directing money for social allowances to members of this terrorist organisation, how do you verify that such money gets to those really in need? Nevertheless, following reports about control of Hamas of the teacher unions and UNRWA workers union, what are the steps you are taking to verify that EU money for UNRWA is not used to serve Hamas agenda? Thank you." Commissioner Olivér Várhelyi: "Madam Chair. I want to assure all the participating members of this committee that I very much appreciate their presence and their engagement with us. And I think that this is very important that we have this discussion, no matter how many members of the committee are here. Now, first of all, on the Gaza project. Let me make it very clear what has been done in Gaza since 2006 when the IDF and Israel has left the Gaza Strip. I fully agree with you. The control and the governance of that strip has been de facto exercised by the Hamas. Unfortunately! And it was for that reason that all institution financing activity has been stopped and it is for that reason that only projects of public interest have been continued in the Gaza Strip. Now, with the emergence of the horror that we have seen instigated by Hamas, the review also has a very clear message to those projects that we have tried for many, many years to create for the benefit of the people in Gaza, like the Gas for Gaza project or the desalination plant creating fresh water for the people in the Gaza Strip or building a new hospital in the Gaza Strip, that are on hold. And it is not possible even physically to continue on those projects. And we will have to wait until the end of this war to see what engagement would still be considered in the in the Gaza area, if feasible. Now, in relation to the broader question of the review, what is the timeline? The timeline is that we are already doing it. We have a methodology established and our review is carried out by the whole House, mainly the DG Near, but also other parts of the Commission, DG Budget and also the other external family members of the Commission. The result of the review is going to be presented to the College [of Commissioners]. So the College is going to take the conclusions of these findings and they will be, I very much hope, endorsed by the College. In terms of its cost, we do not foresee any additional cost for this, and we want to act rapidly because, as I said, given the very fragile security situation, we have to act immediately to filter out all those who have, even indirectly, participated or contributed to the violence that we have seen emerge. Now, when it comes to the textbooks, to be honest with you, it's very difficult to answer your question because this is the question I have been putting since the very beginning of my mandate. How is it possible to embed hatred and nurture hatred in textbooks? How is it possible to teach kids to hate? How is it possible? And we have been sitting down several times with the Palestinian Authority. We have run a study that came to the same conclusion as you have. And we have had difficult discussions also in this House. But now I see that there is a change in the position of this House, which is, I think, very important. And it is not only very important, but we took very, very careful note of a request from the Parliament, because there is also a request adopted by the plenary, to look into this issue. And this is what we are going to do and this issue will have to be addressed. The result that we have achieved was that we have raised the issue with the Palestinian Authority, and I don't think there's disagreement between us and them that this is an issue. Second, we are working very closely with our partners in UNRWA. I'm very sad to see that this is a training material or education material that you have shown today, which is used by UNRWA, because UNRWA was the one who not only was able to talk about this problem, but undertook commitments with us to eradicate any material, any views expressed, including on social media or in the territories of the schools of this kind, glorification of terrorists, glorification of hatred, anti-Semitism. And this is why we have concluded a three year financing contract with UNRWA. This was a very important element for us that UNRWA started to cooperate and we have seen results coming in. But, of course, I agree with you. We cannot rest until the very last of these materials disappear. And I'm fully committed to deliver on that, including in the discussions for next year. On the "Pay for Slay". We have a list to check that direct beneficiaries do not appear on any of the terrorist list. But, if there is one, I wouldn't like to draw any conclusions of the review, but, if there is one issue to look at is, of course, that we do not create the possibility of indirect benefit for those who are involved in terrorist activities or for those who have been even convicted for such acts. And this is what we are addressing also in our review. Now, on the on the damage to our projects in Gaza, I cannot tell you now. What we see is that there is clearly devastation in the northern part, serious level of damage in the south, but it will be only after that the war will stop that we can go back and take a look at that. Now, on the humanitarian aspect and how to guarantee that our humanitarian aid is not going to be misused. If you look back at the statement the European Council has adopted just last weekend, you see also a very clear call for them to make sure. And this is why our decision has been to channel our humanitarian aid through our own institutions; DG Echo is delivering on the ground and in-kind. So we are providing help, in-kind, not providing financing. We're not providing other items that could be used for other purposes. And we are coordinating our work with international organisations only, so to ensure that it doesn't get to the wrong hands. So there was one more question about the breakdown of the €103 million, and I think I can confirm what you said that we have composed the €103 million by €50 million that were allocated in support of payments of salaries and pensions. These are going directly as direct budget support into the budget of the Palestinian Authority. However, we want to check the final beneficiaries and we have a list. And now we're looking at indirect beneficiaries as well as part of the review. The 40 million… The other element is the €40 million support for the most vulnerable families. Again, this is this is paid in the form of direct budgetary contribution. And the third and lastly, the €13 million, this is the remaining part of 103 [million], is financing the East Jerusalem hospitals that we have paid already in April 2023 to keep the health care system running in East Jerusalem. I hope with this I have answered all the questions that have been raised. Thank you."

Cristian Terhes MEP

32,797 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

It is now the seventh day – something that has never happened before – of an emergency situation at the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant. Because of Russian shelling, the plant has been cut off from power, disconnected from the electrical grid, and is being supplied with electricity by diesel generators. This is extraordinary. The generators and the plant were not designed for this, have never operated in this mode for long, and we already have information that one generator has failed. It is Russian shelling that prevents repair of the power lines to the plant and the restoration of basic safety. This is a threat to everyone – no terrorist in the world has ever dared to do to a nuclear plant what Russia is doing. And it is right that the world does not stay silent.
5:47

It is now the seventh day – something that has never happened before – of an emergency situation at the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant. Because of Russian shelling, the plant has been cut off from power, disconnected from the electrical grid, and is being supplied with electricity by diesel generators. This is extraordinary. The generators and the plant were not designed for this, have never operated in this mode for long, and we already have information that one generator has failed. It is Russian shelling that prevents repair of the power lines to the plant and the restoration of basic safety. This is a threat to everyone – no terrorist in the world has ever dared to do to a nuclear plant what Russia is doing. And it is right that the world does not stay silent.

Volodymyr Zelenskyy / Володимир Зеленський

971,352 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Kamala Harris: We cannot despair. We cannot despair. The nature of a democracy is such that I think there's a duality. On the one hand, there's an incredible strength when our democracy is intact. An incredible strength in what it does to protect the freedoms and rights of its people. Oh, there's great strength in that. And it is very fragile. It is only as strong as our willingness to fight for it. And so that's the moment we're in. And I say do not despair because in a democracy, as long as we can keep it, in our democracy the people, every individual has the power to make a decision about what this will be. And so let's not feel powerless. Because then we have been defeated. And that's not our character as the American people. We are not one to be defeated. We rise to a moment and we stand on broad shoulders of people who have fought this fight before for our country. And in many ways let us look at the challenge then that we are being presented and not be overwhelmed by it. The baton is now in our hands, to fight for, not against, but for this country we love.
2:12

Kamala Harris: We cannot despair. We cannot despair. The nature of a democracy is such that I think there's a duality. On the one hand, there's an incredible strength when our democracy is intact. An incredible strength in what it does to protect the freedoms and rights of its people. Oh, there's great strength in that. And it is very fragile. It is only as strong as our willingness to fight for it. And so that's the moment we're in. And I say do not despair because in a democracy, as long as we can keep it, in our democracy the people, every individual has the power to make a decision about what this will be. And so let's not feel powerless. Because then we have been defeated. And that's not our character as the American people. We are not one to be defeated. We rise to a moment and we stand on broad shoulders of people who have fought this fight before for our country. And in many ways let us look at the challenge then that we are being presented and not be overwhelmed by it. The baton is now in our hands, to fight for, not against, but for this country we love.

Acyn

343,172 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

French Army General and Chief of the Defence Staff Thierry Burkhard Chef d'état-major des armées: "Russia is a lasting threat. The war in Ukraine is existential for Russia. And it is determined to achieve what it has set as its goal, or at least what Putin has set as his goal, with the ultimate objective, in military terms, being to weaken Europe and dismantle NATO. That is Russia's goal, it is Putin's goal. To achieve it, through the war in Ukraine, it has reorganized itself quite quickly and effectively, setting up a war economy that is now running at full capacity. This war economy, I believe, is currently one of the key factors keeping the Russian economy afloat. And so, there is no reason - and even a kind of impossibility - to abruptly stop this. This means that Russia will continue to rearm at this pace. And so, despite the losses it is suffering, the incredible losses it is suffering, we estimate that by 2030, it will once again be a force that will pose a real threat to our borders on the eastern flank of Europe. It is clear that what is at stake in Ukraine is, on the one hand, the security of Europe, but I also think that it is, in fact, the place of European countries in the world, in tomorrow's world, in the world that we are shaping today. And if the outcome in Ukraine were a Russian victory and a Ukrainian defeat, we often say that would be a Western defeat, I think that it would be, and is increasingly becoming, due to the American stance, something that would be a real European defeat. And this European defeat is something we would have to endure and absorb. So, Ukraine, of course, must be defended as such. And I think that defending Ukraine is also, in a way, about how we see ourselves and what we are willing to do to shape Europe as it needs to be in the future, and live in today's world. And you understand that, if that doesn't happen - to use an image that has already been used - we would become something like herbivores in a world of carnivores. And that's not a very comfortable position — being at the bottom of the food chain. So for that reason, we must remain extremely vigilant."
2:05

French Army General and Chief of the Defence Staff Thierry Burkhard Chef d'état-major des armées: "Russia is a lasting threat. The war in Ukraine is existential for Russia. And it is determined to achieve what it has set as its goal, or at least what Putin has set as his goal, with the ultimate objective, in military terms, being to weaken Europe and dismantle NATO. That is Russia's goal, it is Putin's goal. To achieve it, through the war in Ukraine, it has reorganized itself quite quickly and effectively, setting up a war economy that is now running at full capacity. This war economy, I believe, is currently one of the key factors keeping the Russian economy afloat. And so, there is no reason - and even a kind of impossibility - to abruptly stop this. This means that Russia will continue to rearm at this pace. And so, despite the losses it is suffering, the incredible losses it is suffering, we estimate that by 2030, it will once again be a force that will pose a real threat to our borders on the eastern flank of Europe. It is clear that what is at stake in Ukraine is, on the one hand, the security of Europe, but I also think that it is, in fact, the place of European countries in the world, in tomorrow's world, in the world that we are shaping today. And if the outcome in Ukraine were a Russian victory and a Ukrainian defeat, we often say that would be a Western defeat, I think that it would be, and is increasingly becoming, due to the American stance, something that would be a real European defeat. And this European defeat is something we would have to endure and absorb. So, Ukraine, of course, must be defended as such. And I think that defending Ukraine is also, in a way, about how we see ourselves and what we are willing to do to shape Europe as it needs to be in the future, and live in today's world. And you understand that, if that doesn't happen - to use an image that has already been used - we would become something like herbivores in a world of carnivores. And that's not a very comfortable position — being at the bottom of the food chain. So for that reason, we must remain extremely vigilant."

Anton Gerashchenko

66,283 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

So here we are in 2026 and I was so excited to hear Jim's comment just before I gave my talk, "...the field has changed a bit and it was all about taking the brakes off T cells now its understanding how T cells are modulated by all all the other different components of the immune system so its a lot more complex..." That was exactly our focus and trials over the last decade to identify the killers and the suppressors in the tumor microenvironment and orchestrate our treatment based on the dynamics of "quantum" oncotherapeutics - how NK cells and T cells modulate each other.
0:27

So here we are in 2026 and I was so excited to hear Jim's comment just before I gave my talk, "...the field has changed a bit and it was all about taking the brakes off T cells now its understanding how T cells are modulated by all all the other different components of the immune system so its a lot more complex..." That was exactly our focus and trials over the last decade to identify the killers and the suppressors in the tumor microenvironment and orchestrate our treatment based on the dynamics of "quantum" oncotherapeutics - how NK cells and T cells modulate each other.

Dr. Pat Soon-Shiong

28,287 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

WATCH: CNN’s John Miller mentions the video and notes left behind by the alleged Minneapolis Catholic church shooter, citing their mental illness and the working motive is “he was in pain,” but NOTHING about the shooter being transgender and that they hated Christians, Jews, and Trump... Well, we’ve been looking into the shooter who law enforcement sources have identified as Robin Westman and police have been examining some of the postings online by an individual of the same name, presumed to be the same individual. It shows numerous weapons, magazines, things in preparation for the shooting along with a book and different notes. But one of them is particularly telling in that it says: ‘I have waited for this for so long. I am not well. I am not right. I am a sad person, haunted by these thoughts that do not go away. I know this is wrong’ and he goes on to describe that the action he is going to take against this world before taking his own life — which is not uncommon in these incidents, these active shooter scenarios where you see someone who reports to be in — in — in pain and trauma and that they write all of this out and leave it behind with the foreknowledge that what they're about to do is going to end their own life as well, while taking these — these strangers, these innocent people with them in the process. But investigators are going back through this material and a lot of other material trying to determine motive. So what do we know? I mean, what we know, if this in fact is from the shooter, that his motive was he was in pain. But what we don't see here and there's more to go through is what was, what was the shooter — Robin Westman in pain about specifically?”
1:41

WATCH: CNN’s John Miller mentions the video and notes left behind by the alleged Minneapolis Catholic church shooter, citing their mental illness and the working motive is “he was in pain,” but NOTHING about the shooter being transgender and that they hated Christians, Jews, and Trump... Well, we’ve been looking into the shooter who law enforcement sources have identified as Robin Westman and police have been examining some of the postings online by an individual of the same name, presumed to be the same individual. It shows numerous weapons, magazines, things in preparation for the shooting along with a book and different notes. But one of them is particularly telling in that it says: ‘I have waited for this for so long. I am not well. I am not right. I am a sad person, haunted by these thoughts that do not go away. I know this is wrong’ and he goes on to describe that the action he is going to take against this world before taking his own life — which is not uncommon in these incidents, these active shooter scenarios where you see someone who reports to be in — in — in pain and trauma and that they write all of this out and leave it behind with the foreknowledge that what they're about to do is going to end their own life as well, while taking these — these strangers, these innocent people with them in the process. But investigators are going back through this material and a lot of other material trying to determine motive. So what do we know? I mean, what we know, if this in fact is from the shooter, that his motive was he was in pain. But what we don't see here and there's more to go through is what was, what was the shooter — Robin Westman in pain about specifically?”

Curtis Houck

64,113 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

🚨Iran’s Chabahar Port VITAL for the global south, India’s🇮🇳 PM Modi may be the ONLY ONE capable of bringing peace to the region ‘The US or Israelis have attacked not only the Bandar Abbas Port, there has been attack on the Kharg island which happens to be quite an important port for energy exports. Now Chabahar Port will definitely play an important role, but there is ambiguity towards that. India was working on developing the Chabahar Port. Given the recent political issues, there has been a slowdown on the development of Chabahar Port. So whether that will be reactivated by India, that needs to be seen. 85% of the exports from that region is catered to the Global South. So it’s not only India that will benefit, the entire Global South will benefit out of this. Iran has been under embargo and sanctions for decades now. India has taken the initiative to develop that port, and they have achieved considerable success in that, and they wanted to move forward on that. However, in the recent past we have seen that there had been a slowdown. We feel that India should relook into activating that port, and to bring sanity, as that could be part of one of the peace talks. As far as BRICS is concerned, BRICS has become a very strong body. The next BRICS meeting is in a couple of months, so they may play a very important role to bring sanity in this region. The Global South should stand up to this and find sanity. There has been talk that the Prime Minister of India is perhaps the only person who can bring peace to this region. The Israelis have said they don’t want to accept Pakistanis as a mediator. So the world may have to go back to India, to Prime Minister Modi. Whether he’ll accept or not accept, that remains to be seen. But for the sanity of the world, probably he may have to look at that positively and come forward for peace.’ -Dr. S. V. Anchan, Chairman of the Safesea Group, which owns the Safesea Vishnu which was attacked by the IRGC Watch the full interview in the quoted post below👇
3:57

🚨Iran’s Chabahar Port VITAL for the global south, India’s🇮🇳 PM Modi may be the ONLY ONE capable of bringing peace to the region ‘The US or Israelis have attacked not only the Bandar Abbas Port, there has been attack on the Kharg island which happens to be quite an important port for energy exports. Now Chabahar Port will definitely play an important role, but there is ambiguity towards that. India was working on developing the Chabahar Port. Given the recent political issues, there has been a slowdown on the development of Chabahar Port. So whether that will be reactivated by India, that needs to be seen. 85% of the exports from that region is catered to the Global South. So it’s not only India that will benefit, the entire Global South will benefit out of this. Iran has been under embargo and sanctions for decades now. India has taken the initiative to develop that port, and they have achieved considerable success in that, and they wanted to move forward on that. However, in the recent past we have seen that there had been a slowdown. We feel that India should relook into activating that port, and to bring sanity, as that could be part of one of the peace talks. As far as BRICS is concerned, BRICS has become a very strong body. The next BRICS meeting is in a couple of months, so they may play a very important role to bring sanity in this region. The Global South should stand up to this and find sanity. There has been talk that the Prime Minister of India is perhaps the only person who can bring peace to this region. The Israelis have said they don’t want to accept Pakistanis as a mediator. So the world may have to go back to India, to Prime Minister Modi. Whether he’ll accept or not accept, that remains to be seen. But for the sanity of the world, probably he may have to look at that positively and come forward for peace.’ -Dr. S. V. Anchan, Chairman of the Safesea Group, which owns the Safesea Vishnu which was attacked by the IRGC Watch the full interview in the quoted post below👇

New Order with Afshin Rattansi

83,158 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Smith "I would say that it is a single judge who's made a decision and we have now 700,000 Albertans, whether they're on the remain side or the leave side, who've said that they want to have this public debate." "...I'll listen to my caucus and I'll listen to my cabinet because we are the duly elected representatives of the people of Alberta and this is a decision by one judge at a lower court level and it's appealable. And so because we think they have been incorrect in law, we will be appealing it." "we think that there may have been an error in law made here because the duty to consult has been interpreted normally when you're talking about a specific project like a pipeline project, which is what we're doing right now in consulting on a west coast pipeline route" "...This is not clear and so that's why we think it may be incorrect in law and why we will be appealing it. " "The proponent of that petition always intended for it to go to a referendum... so that is what the committee is grappling with right now since he seemed to have flip flopped and changed his mind after the fact." Danielle Smith
5:04

Smith "I would say that it is a single judge who's made a decision and we have now 700,000 Albertans, whether they're on the remain side or the leave side, who've said that they want to have this public debate." "...I'll listen to my caucus and I'll listen to my cabinet because we are the duly elected representatives of the people of Alberta and this is a decision by one judge at a lower court level and it's appealable. And so because we think they have been incorrect in law, we will be appealing it." "we think that there may have been an error in law made here because the duty to consult has been interpreted normally when you're talking about a specific project like a pipeline project, which is what we're doing right now in consulting on a west coast pipeline route" "...This is not clear and so that's why we think it may be incorrect in law and why we will be appealing it. " "The proponent of that petition always intended for it to go to a referendum... so that is what the committee is grappling with right now since he seemed to have flip flopped and changed his mind after the fact." Danielle Smith

cbcwatcher

56,959 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Joe Rogan and Ky Dickens creator of the telepathy tapes discuss the stigma against studying psychic phenomena in the scientific community and how Ky thinks it’s changing Ky -“I think in like 50 to a hundred years the scientists gripping onto the materialist paradigm. I really believe that that's gonna be kind of like the flat earthers in the future. I think,the scientists doing this are on the right side of history” Source -JRE 🔗 in comments Ky -“I think that's changing actually. And, and one of the things that we look at in the telepathy tapes in episode six, which we call our science episode, is this idea of materialism, which I'm sure you've heard of. You know, this idea that at least for the past few hundred years, that that the reigning philosophy around how we interpret the world is, is is only true if we can measure it and observe it. Right. And, and that makes you seem foolish. If you believe in something that can't be measured or observed like telepathy or precognition or, or dreams. Being able to communicate with someone or any of that stuff would be thrown out as being silly. And I think there's been a massive effort to make that true, right? That, that if you believe this or you're a scientist and you wanna publish this, we're gonna dismiss you or ridicule you just for even daring to ask that question. Research about this type of stuff has been dismissed because it's materialist. You know, scientists who've for a long time run the journals. But, but there is something interesting here, which is that consciousness, we don't know where it comes from, you know? And so what, you know, the brilliant scientist Dean Radden talks about in the telepathy tapes is that if you think of materialism as a pyramid, right? And the base of the pyramid and all the things that have built up our world, which are biology and physics and chemistry and all those things, those have rules and properties and we shouldn't throw those out. Those are pretty much true. But currently at the top of the pyramid is consciousness. And we can't explain where that comes from and why it's there. But if you just take consciousness from the top and put it on the bottom so that consciousness is the basis of all of all reality, right? That consciousness is fundamental, that all of everything is the, is the product of our thoughts first, then, then we can account for all this stuff. Then we can account for precognition or telepathy. And it's not that big of a change, it's just flipping kind of the order of the pyramid. And I think that makes a lot of sense. And so there's been a lot of scientists who have, have looked into near-death experience research, who've looked into the research on telepathy, who've looked into the research around precognition and said, we can't dismiss this. This is happening. There's a lot of anecdotal evidence here. There's a lot of things that add up. So we're gonna start the Academy of Post materialist sciences where we will take this stuff seriously and we will look at the research and we will advance science. And, and I tend to believe that there needs to be a bit of, there needs to be quite a few funerals, but I think in like 50 to a hundred years the scientists that are gripping onto the materialist paradigm. I really believe that that's gonna be kind of like the flat earthers in the future. Like I think, wow, the scientists doing this are on the right side of history because you can't, you have to account for it.”
3:21

Joe Rogan and Ky Dickens creator of the telepathy tapes discuss the stigma against studying psychic phenomena in the scientific community and how Ky thinks it’s changing Ky -“I think in like 50 to a hundred years the scientists gripping onto the materialist paradigm. I really believe that that's gonna be kind of like the flat earthers in the future. I think,the scientists doing this are on the right side of history” Source -JRE 🔗 in comments Ky -“I think that's changing actually. And, and one of the things that we look at in the telepathy tapes in episode six, which we call our science episode, is this idea of materialism, which I'm sure you've heard of. You know, this idea that at least for the past few hundred years, that that the reigning philosophy around how we interpret the world is, is is only true if we can measure it and observe it. Right. And, and that makes you seem foolish. If you believe in something that can't be measured or observed like telepathy or precognition or, or dreams. Being able to communicate with someone or any of that stuff would be thrown out as being silly. And I think there's been a massive effort to make that true, right? That, that if you believe this or you're a scientist and you wanna publish this, we're gonna dismiss you or ridicule you just for even daring to ask that question. Research about this type of stuff has been dismissed because it's materialist. You know, scientists who've for a long time run the journals. But, but there is something interesting here, which is that consciousness, we don't know where it comes from, you know? And so what, you know, the brilliant scientist Dean Radden talks about in the telepathy tapes is that if you think of materialism as a pyramid, right? And the base of the pyramid and all the things that have built up our world, which are biology and physics and chemistry and all those things, those have rules and properties and we shouldn't throw those out. Those are pretty much true. But currently at the top of the pyramid is consciousness. And we can't explain where that comes from and why it's there. But if you just take consciousness from the top and put it on the bottom so that consciousness is the basis of all of all reality, right? That consciousness is fundamental, that all of everything is the, is the product of our thoughts first, then, then we can account for all this stuff. Then we can account for precognition or telepathy. And it's not that big of a change, it's just flipping kind of the order of the pyramid. And I think that makes a lot of sense. And so there's been a lot of scientists who have, have looked into near-death experience research, who've looked into the research on telepathy, who've looked into the research around precognition and said, we can't dismiss this. This is happening. There's a lot of anecdotal evidence here. There's a lot of things that add up. So we're gonna start the Academy of Post materialist sciences where we will take this stuff seriously and we will look at the research and we will advance science. And, and I tend to believe that there needs to be a bit of, there needs to be quite a few funerals, but I think in like 50 to a hundred years the scientists that are gripping onto the materialist paradigm. I really believe that that's gonna be kind of like the flat earthers in the future. Like I think, wow, the scientists doing this are on the right side of history because you can't, you have to account for it.”

neandrewthal

33,379 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr