Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Wow Rep. Neguse is very good at this

Acyn's profile picture

Acyn

755,730 subscribers

954,415 просмотров • 2 лет назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политика
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 9

Фото профиля Acyn
Acyn2 лет назад

I posted this video from the House Rules Committee by using @SnapStream. If your organization is interested in capturing, clipping, and covering events live as they happen, you can learn more here:

Фото профиля Art Candee 🍿🥤
Art Candee 🍿🥤2 лет назад

Neguse using Green’s own words against him was golden! 🔥

Фото профиля Alex Cole
Alex Cole2 лет назад

Damn!!!!

Фото профиля Jenny(Ø,G)KGeN
Jenny(Ø,G)KGeN2 лет назад

Just torched the witness there. Man, he's good.

Фото профиля sɴᴀʀᴋᴀsᴛɪᴄ sʜᴇɴᴀɴɪɢᴀɴs™️ 🇺🇸🇬🇧🇺🇦🇱🇻𓍝
sɴᴀʀᴋᴀsᴛɪᴄ sʜᴇɴᴀɴɪɢᴀɴs™️ 🇺🇸🇬🇧🇺🇦🇱🇻𓍝2 лет назад

@MeidasTouch The depth of talent on the Dem side amazes me. While the R's have sycophantic whiners using the absolute worst logic possible, Dems have articulate, educated, well-spoken scholars of the trade. I don't even dare try listing them because I would forget many of them.

Фото профиля Outspoken™️
Outspoken™️2 лет назад

🔥

Фото профиля Kenji
Kenji2 лет назад

The I assume you disagree with this (ie himself) is amazing. 🤣

Фото профиля Jenny(Ø,G)KGeN
Jenny(Ø,G)KGeN2 лет назад

What good for Neguse is not good for the gander here. *this tweet only sort of makes sense if you know how to pronounce The Goose's name

Фото профиля KJT
KJT2 лет назад

The more Republicans lie, the more they get caught. MAGA won't care. Most of America does.

Похожие видео

Wow this is an impressive line of questioning from Rep. Neguse
2:20

Wow this is an impressive line of questioning from Rep. Neguse

Acyn

1,144,941 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Wow she is very good at this.
2:57

Wow she is very good at this.

The Figen

1,695,424 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Rep. Neguse receives the 40 page amendment while he’s talking
0:34

Rep. Neguse receives the 40 page amendment while he’s talking

Acyn

37,015 просмотров • 1 год назад

Newsom is very good at this
0:43

Newsom is very good at this

Acyn

1,603,944 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Neguse: That man works for you now right? The man allegedly yelling kill them at police officers? Bondi: He does work for us. Neguse: This is who you choose to hire. Bondi: He was pardoned by President Trump.
1:53

Neguse: That man works for you now right? The man allegedly yelling kill them at police officers? Bondi: He does work for us. Neguse: This is who you choose to hire. Bondi: He was pardoned by President Trump.

Acyn

167,706 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

.Rep. Joe Neguse just left this Trump official speechless.
1:06

.Rep. Joe Neguse just left this Trump official speechless.

Majority Democrats

188,167 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Neguse: It sounds like you’re a big fan of these AHPs Walberg: I am Neguse: Are you on one? Walberg: I don’t have to be Neguse: What do you mean? Walberg: I have insurance Neguse: What kind of insurance? Walberg: A good insurance Neguse: Not an AHP? Do you get essential health benefits? I think the people should have the same health insurance you have.
1:12

Neguse: It sounds like you’re a big fan of these AHPs Walberg: I am Neguse: Are you on one? Walberg: I don’t have to be Neguse: What do you mean? Walberg: I have insurance Neguse: What kind of insurance? Walberg: A good insurance Neguse: Not an AHP? Do you get essential health benefits? I think the people should have the same health insurance you have.

Acyn

136,077 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

NEGUSE: Elon Musk has been very vocal on his opposition to this bill. You think he’s wrong? ARRINGTON: No, I think he has sincerely held convictions about runaway spending NEGUSE: Why not follow his lead? ARRINGTON: I don’t follow any man NEGUSE: This is from your website: Arrington applauds Musk’s leadership. We should not only appreciate his leadership but follow it… Sounds like you were telling people a month ago that we should follow his lead.
4:13

NEGUSE: Elon Musk has been very vocal on his opposition to this bill. You think he’s wrong? ARRINGTON: No, I think he has sincerely held convictions about runaway spending NEGUSE: Why not follow his lead? ARRINGTON: I don’t follow any man NEGUSE: This is from your website: Arrington applauds Musk’s leadership. We should not only appreciate his leadership but follow it… Sounds like you were telling people a month ago that we should follow his lead.

Acyn

690,333 просмотров • 1 год назад

Strange scene in Judiciary as Republicans refuse to debate with Rep. Neguse over an amendment that protects grants for local police departments
3:38

Strange scene in Judiciary as Republicans refuse to debate with Rep. Neguse over an amendment that protects grants for local police departments

Acyn

49,361 просмотров • 1 год назад

Tim Walz continues to be very good at this
0:47

Tim Walz continues to be very good at this

Acyn

9,787,278 просмотров • 1 год назад

Tim Walz continues to be very good at this
1:01

Tim Walz continues to be very good at this

Acyn

731,118 просмотров • 1 год назад

Rep. Grothman (R-WI): President Trump has done some very good things Crowd: Booooo
0:31

Rep. Grothman (R-WI): President Trump has done some very good things Crowd: Booooo

Acyn

1,099,990 просмотров • 1 год назад

Governor Tim Walz continues to be very good at this
1:03

Governor Tim Walz continues to be very good at this

Acyn

2,407,678 просмотров • 1 год назад

NEGUSE: I assume you’re going to vote against the rule when your amendment is excluded? CLYDE: You’ll find out when I vote NEGUSE: You realize your amendment is not getting ruled in order? CLYDE: We shall see NEGUSE: We’re going to finish here in about five minutes. There are going to be no amendments to this bill.
2:15

NEGUSE: I assume you’re going to vote against the rule when your amendment is excluded? CLYDE: You’ll find out when I vote NEGUSE: You realize your amendment is not getting ruled in order? CLYDE: We shall see NEGUSE: We’re going to finish here in about five minutes. There are going to be no amendments to this bill.

Acyn

366,232 просмотров • 1 год назад

Rep. Neguse: “The man in that video, the one…allegedly yelling 'kill em' at police officers on Jan. 6. His name is Jared Wise." Bondi: "He does work for us." Neguse: "This is who you choose…to hire at DOJ?" Bondi: "I believe he was pardoned by President Trump."
2:14

Rep. Neguse: “The man in that video, the one…allegedly yelling 'kill em' at police officers on Jan. 6. His name is Jared Wise." Bondi: "He does work for us." Neguse: "This is who you choose…to hire at DOJ?" Bondi: "I believe he was pardoned by President Trump."

The Bulwark

176,727 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Jamel Dean had a strip sack because of a Greg Gaines coverage rep, AKA, why Todd Bowles is very good at this
4:51

Jamel Dean had a strip sack because of a Greg Gaines coverage rep, AKA, why Todd Bowles is very good at this

Benjamin Solak

304,022 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Neguse: Do you know when he submitted the budget? Smith: I don’t remember Neguse: March 9. Smith: It was late. Neguse: When did Republicans submit their budget?
1:04

Neguse: Do you know when he submitted the budget? Smith: I don’t remember Neguse: March 9. Smith: It was late. Neguse: When did Republicans submit their budget?

Acyn

2,607,444 просмотров • 3 лет назад

Trump to Indiana Hoosiers: We’re building a ballroom. I’m very good at ballrooms. I’m very good at building things.
0:31

Trump to Indiana Hoosiers: We’re building a ballroom. I’m very good at ballrooms. I’m very good at building things.

Acyn

20,456 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Wow. The author of the pesticide liability shield just got grilled on the House floor. His argument literally boils down to: “Trust the science.” And he claimed he “doesn’t know” why Bayer removed glyphosate from residential products. This exchange was full of fireworks. Watch this wild moment for yourself where Rep. Joe Neguse grills Rep. Glenn Thompson, who wrote and sponsored the pesticide immunity shield: Rep. Neguse: “You don’t believe that this bill includes a liability shield?” Rep. Thompson: “Not for bad actors that mislead the EPA.” Rep. Neguse: “It is a liability shield by the plain language of the statute.” Rep. Thompson: “If they’re in compliance with the EPA standards, there’s nothing to sue about … because the science is proven.” Rep. Neguse: “If that’s the case, what in the world motivated Bayer to propose a settlement of $7.25 billion for hundreds of thousands of claims that are being litigated at the Supreme Court today?” Rep. Thompson: “I can’t speak to decision that Bayer—” Rep. Neguse: “So you are in good faith arguing that this provision … has nothing to do with the Supreme Court case that was heard today?” Rep. Thompson: “Not for me personally.” “This is about providing what the farmers are asking for.” Rep. Neguse: “Why do you think Bayer spent $2 million in the last three months lobbying on this bill?” “Can’t explain it?” Rep. Thompson: “We wanted to make sure that if there’s bad actors out there that aren’t in compliance with the labeling standards and providing the EPA the proper information to apply to the label, that those individuals can be sued.” Rep. Neguse: “Bayer has publicly said that if the Supreme Court decision goes their way, or if this language that you’ve written is enacted … they don’t have to worry about failure to warn cases anywhere in the country.” “There are other colleagues of yours who would say, yes, that’s exactly what we want.” “It’s a liability shield for the pesticide manufacturer.” “You’re aware that a couple years ago, Bayer removed glyphosate from residential products?” Rep. Thompson: “Yes.” Rep. Neguse: “If it’s so safe, why’d they do that?” Rep. Thompson: “I don’t know.” Rep. Neguse: “There are Republicans who oppose this provision.” “There are Democrats who oppose this provision.” “And I hope that enough Republican members of the US House tomorrow decide … that this Amendment is worth fighting.” Rep. Thompson: “I hope there’s enough who believe in science.” Rep. Joe Neguse Glenn "GT" Thompson
6:29

Wow. The author of the pesticide liability shield just got grilled on the House floor. His argument literally boils down to: “Trust the science.” And he claimed he “doesn’t know” why Bayer removed glyphosate from residential products. This exchange was full of fireworks. Watch this wild moment for yourself where Rep. Joe Neguse grills Rep. Glenn Thompson, who wrote and sponsored the pesticide immunity shield: Rep. Neguse: “You don’t believe that this bill includes a liability shield?” Rep. Thompson: “Not for bad actors that mislead the EPA.” Rep. Neguse: “It is a liability shield by the plain language of the statute.” Rep. Thompson: “If they’re in compliance with the EPA standards, there’s nothing to sue about … because the science is proven.” Rep. Neguse: “If that’s the case, what in the world motivated Bayer to propose a settlement of $7.25 billion for hundreds of thousands of claims that are being litigated at the Supreme Court today?” Rep. Thompson: “I can’t speak to decision that Bayer—” Rep. Neguse: “So you are in good faith arguing that this provision … has nothing to do with the Supreme Court case that was heard today?” Rep. Thompson: “Not for me personally.” “This is about providing what the farmers are asking for.” Rep. Neguse: “Why do you think Bayer spent $2 million in the last three months lobbying on this bill?” “Can’t explain it?” Rep. Thompson: “We wanted to make sure that if there’s bad actors out there that aren’t in compliance with the labeling standards and providing the EPA the proper information to apply to the label, that those individuals can be sued.” Rep. Neguse: “Bayer has publicly said that if the Supreme Court decision goes their way, or if this language that you’ve written is enacted … they don’t have to worry about failure to warn cases anywhere in the country.” “There are other colleagues of yours who would say, yes, that’s exactly what we want.” “It’s a liability shield for the pesticide manufacturer.” “You’re aware that a couple years ago, Bayer removed glyphosate from residential products?” Rep. Thompson: “Yes.” Rep. Neguse: “If it’s so safe, why’d they do that?” Rep. Thompson: “I don’t know.” Rep. Neguse: “There are Republicans who oppose this provision.” “There are Democrats who oppose this provision.” “And I hope that enough Republican members of the US House tomorrow decide … that this Amendment is worth fighting.” Rep. Thompson: “I hope there’s enough who believe in science.” Rep. Joe Neguse Glenn "GT" Thompson

Holden Culotta

54,712 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Katherine Clark is very very good at this
1:30

Katherine Clark is very very good at this

Aaron Rupar

153,250 просмотров • 3 лет назад