Sensitive content
This media may contain sensitive content.
Video wird geladen...
Video konnte nicht geladen werden
Wow that was fast! Thanks for the retweets here is the extended version ✨ double the cum 💦 with Kinky Vinky ⁹¹ᴷ ➡️ FOLSOM Europe 14.000 follower special Gay public exhibitionist 𝗚𝗔𝗬𝗦𝗘𝗫𝗜𝗡𝗣𝗨𝗕𝗟𝗜𝗖 1️⃣9️⃣0️⃣ K exib 🔞 500k Exhib Public EXTREME EXHIB (New Main) #exhib #outdoor #public #cebu #alter #alterph #gay
0 Kommentare
Keine Kommentare verfügbar
Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt
![#new Clancy Defense Attorney Asked Internet Blogger For Help Making Lindsay Look Innocent,Turtleboy Says Fast Fact: Kevin Reddington reportedly asked Aidan Kearney (Turtleboy) for help on the Lindsay Clancy case in July 2023, according to Turtleboy's website and social media posts Critics say it is a major ethical violation to enlist the help of a social media blogger to help create a perception of innocence about a client that Reddington was (and still is) representing. In messages shared by Kearney, Reddington praised Kearney because he 'created' Karen Read's innocence. Karen Read is the woman who was accused of klling her police officer boyfriend, but claimed she was being framed by his friends, who were also cops and the ones she claims actually k*lled him. Karen Read was acquitted of second-degree m*rder and manslaughter. 🔶On July 22, 2023 - Reddington was already on the Clancy case, and also representing Jennifer McCabe in the Read case. (McCabe was the woman that Read claims was trying to frame her) 🔶Screenshots show a Messenger account labeled Kevin Reddington writing to Kearney late at night. 🔶The message praised Kearney for being a great investigative reporter, while saying they started off on the wrong foot. 🔶The account then asked Kearney to help with the Clancy case. Other messages in the same thread detailed how Kearney created “more than reasonable doubt” for Karen Read. Kearney replied the next morning saying he was already on the Clancy case and said Patrick Clancy was the strongest person he had seen, “followed by Karen Read.” Kearney posted the messages on his website in September of 2023 under the title: 🔶"Reddington thought Read was innocent and “could use my help defending his client, Lindsay Clancy.” Critics say this is an ethical violation for a defense attorney to enlist the help of an online blogger - who was already facing legal trouble for jury intimidation - to sway public opinion about a client he is representing. So what is the jury intimidation? Well it stems from the Karen Read case. Oct. 11, 2023 – Kearney was: ➡️Arrested on multiple counts of witness intimidation / conspiracy tied to witnesses in the Karen Read trial. ➡️He was indicted Dec. 2023 - 8 counts of witness intimidation, 3 counts of conspiracy, and 5 counts of picketing a witness ➡️He Pleaded not guilty, and a trial set for December of this year. 2. He was arrested in late December when: ➡️His ex-girlfriend Lindsey Gaetani alleged he attacked her and threatened to release nude photos of her after she was summoned to a grand jury about him. ➡️He was charged with domestic assault and battery and witness intimidation. ➡️Bail on the Read case was revoked. He did about 60 days in the Norfolk County jail. ➡️Oct. 22, 2025: Charges dropped after the special prosecutor quit, and no replacement was appointed. This was not an acquittal; just a lucky break for Kearney 3. In 2024 – he was: ➡️Charged with violating an abuse-prevention order. ➡️June 12, 2025: Judge Michael Pomarole found him not guilty after a two-day bench trial. The one-year RO was not extended in Jan. 2025. 4. May 13, 2025 - third indictment Two more witness intimidation counts after he stopped at D&E Pizza and caused a scene. ➡️Pleaded not guilty. This is part of the remaining pending charges. 5. July 2026 - Atlantic County, New Jersey indictment (sealed) ➡️His lawyer Mark Bederow said NJ indicted him on a civilian complaint from a woman who contacted him about humiliating John O’Keefe’s brother. Some claim that Reddington knew Kearney's methods and wanted him to impact the jury pool in the Clancy case as well - however there is no proof of that. 🔶Another message Kearney posted is one from the Reddington account that said he believed Karen Read was innocent –to which Kearney posted with this comment: 🔶“Kevin Reddington messaged me a month or so ago to tell me thta [sic] he believes Karen Read is innocent, which by default means that his client Jennifer McCabe was involved in covering up John O'Keefe's m*rder.” Which is also very interesting. Reddington has not admitted that the messages were sent by him, but he hasn't denied it either. 🔶In April 2023 (about three months before the friendly message exchange) Reddington left a public comment on Turtleboy’s Facebook page calling him “turd boy” and saying he wanted to “dance” with him in court. They later shook hands in a courthouse, according to Kearney. In the Clancy case Reddington took aim at the lone holdout juror himself when he thanked “these jurors”. Minus one.” He said the other 11 had been “robbed by one man, for whatever his agenda was,” who “stole seven weeks” from people who “were so attentive, so beautiful, so wonderful.” Then: “I hope that guy can sleep well at night.” He accused the juror of being a bigot, gender--doxxed him and tried to get the judge to reveal his identity by holding an open court questioning. Leading many to claim jury intimidation is part of Reddington’s MO – which is why he reached out to Kearney in the first place. He saw what Kearney did for Karen Read, and he wanted him do the same thing for Clancy – again, this is a claim and not a proven fact. Jonathan Turley called Reddington’s attack on the juror “utterly reprehensible” and said Reddington “put a target on the back of a juror who committed the unpardonable sin of not being convinced by his arguments.” And now, after all this mess, the local NBC Boston report releasing searchable data about the holdout juror, the doxxing of that juror via photos, name, and details about his personal life - Judge Sullivan – in the Clancy case, has extended the lock down on the jury list indefinitely. Sullivan was petitioned by a juror to keep the list sealed, and ruled there is credible fear for the jurors. What do you think? Should a defense attorney be able to enlist the help of an online blogger to 'create' an innocent view of his client before the jury is even selected? #ChristinaAguayoNews](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2100200530937360889/amplify_video_thumb/2100055661384228864/img/XO_O5yKSSfI50ydH.jpg)
![A TRUST FUND FOR EVERYONE: How to create a Monetary Commons that socialises money and funds a basic dividend without new taxes or debt [At a time Donald Trump, Big Tech and Wall Street deploy stablecoins to privatise the dollar, usurping the decentralising power of blockchain to enrich themselves at everyone else’s expense, here is an alternative use of blockchain that harnesses its decentralising powers to benefit everyone equally – to pay everyone a substantial, non-inflationary, basic dividend – without the need to tax or borrow. Read on and/or watch the video] Here is an idea that can make a real, urgently needed, difference to our awfully divided, exploitative societies. Imagine a trust fund for everyone paying a personal dividend to each. Now imagine a common, a public digital platform, let’s call it a Monetary Commons, that harnesses our collective capacity to create the money needed to fund this personal dividend for all. The idea of a personal or basic income is not new, of course. People have sung its praises for decades. But they were stifled. The majority doesn’t want to pay higher taxes, or the higher interest rates more public debt would bring, to deliver a personal payment to others, including to the already stinking rich. But what if it is now possible to pay a decent personal dividend without new taxes or new public debt. How? Not by magic or hocus pocus economics but by reclaiming from private bankers our society’s power to create money. Today, we have the digital tools to take back the power to create money, use that power to create a common trust fund, and pay each a personal dividend. These tools are here already. And if we do not use them for benefitting everyone, the bankers and Big Tech will use them to print more money for themselves. So, let’s get cracking! Let’s build a new Monetary Commons to pay a personal dividend to each! How would it work? Technically, it is ever so simple. You download an app, let’s call it Monetary Commons Pay (or MCPay). MCPay is provided by your central bank (the Fed in the US, the ECB in Europe, the Bank of England in Britain etc.). Essentially, the central bank has opened a digital account for you which you can use to receive and pay money, the way you use your normal bank account app. How is this MCPay app helpful? In three fabulous ways, which I shall present in ascending order of importance. First, because with MCPay you can send and receive money for free, avoiding the terrible, inexcusable, fees charged by private banks – even the ‘fuel fees’ of crypto. The second, even greater, benefit is that the money you keep in your MCPay grows at the central bank interest rate – which is always higher than the measly rate private banks pay for your savings. Free transactions and higher interest on your savings would be good enough reasons to have the MCPay app. But, the truly mesmerising, hugely exciting benefit is the third one: The new app makes it possible for the Central Bank to pay you, and everyone else, a substantial personal dividend. Pay attention to see where this money will come from, why it is not inflationary, why it requires no new taxes, no new debt and no magic: You have heard of how private banks create loans from thin air, right? How they can turn, on average, $3 of new deposits into a new $100 loan? [Yes, lest we forget, only 3% of the money in our advanced economies come from the central bank – the rest is conjured up by private banks.] But this works in reverse as well! If bankers turn $3 into $100, were you to transfer $3 from your normal bank to your MCPay, to take advantage of free transactions and the higher interest rate, you will have annulled your banker’s opportunity to create $100. In other words, as you transfer $3 from your bank to your new MCPay account, the total quantity of money in the economy would fall by, $100 minus $3, $97. Would this not be bad for the economy? It sure would be if nothing was done about it. But wait. Suppose the central bank were to create $97 for every $3 transferred to someone’s MCPay and credit that extra $97, equally, to everyone’s MCPay account. Bingo! Do you see now how a personal dividend was made possible without new taxes, new debt or potentially inflationary increases in the quantity of money? Now, please do not think that this a theoretical discussion. Yes, our governments, in the pockets of financiers as they are, are not interested in giving you the option of an MCPay app. But, with Donald Trump at the helm and his GENIUS Act on the statutes, they are busily handing over this incredible power to create money not to society, not to a Monetary Commons, but to Big Tech and Wall Street. How? By shunning the MCPay app that would benefit you, everyone, equally, and pushing instead for so-called stablecoins issued by privateers, mainly Big Tech and Wall Street, for their benefit. But how much money could we expect to receive as a personal dividend if we were to create a monetary commons? The answer is: a lot! The US Treasury recently predicted that around worth $6.6 trillion of US bank deposits will be transferred to stablecoins - the private version of MCPay from which you will benefit not at all. Yes, $6.6 trillion, that is more than six thousand billion dollars. If such a sum were to be transferred to the monetary commons, to our MCPay accounts, keeping the quantity of money in the US constant would require that the Fed credits $213 trillion to everyone’s MCPay accounts. That’s considerably more than $600 thousand for each woman, man and child resident in the US! And similarly in Britain, Europe, Japan etc. A sizeable trust fund for everyone. This is a remarkable opportunity for making a difference to our awfully divided societies. We must seize it. For the benefit of the many, not the few. Of course, the few – beginning with the bankers – will scream blue murder. They will do their utmost to stop this from happening. They will fearmonger like crazy, eager as they are to usurp the lion’s share of the money that society generates collectively. They will try to terrorise you with tales of calamities that will befall you if this Monetary Commons were to be created. They will prognosticate cataclysmic inflation – even though the whole point of the personal dividend is to keep the money supply constant. They will terrorise you with the prospect of new taxation and new public debt – even though they understand that there is no need for new taxes or new public debt to pay you a substantial personal dividend. To appeal to your social conscience, they will tell you that a Monetary Commons is Elon Musk’s and the libertarians’ way to dismantle social security – even though there is no reason to cut social security in any way to fund everyone’s personal dividend. They will bombard you with the spectre of Big Brother, likening the Monetary Commons to a Chinese Communist Party ploy to have the central bank follow your every transaction – even though they know that MCPay can easily be built on distributed ledger technology that guarantees privacy to each while preventing the authorities from manipulating the money supply without the public noticing. As they scream and shout and terrorise you, you will know: Bankers just hate the idea of going back to the role of intermediaries, of borrowing from Jack to lend to Jill. They are only interested in maintaining their monopoly over the money system – and to extend it now that digital money enhances society’s capacity to create even more new money, a capacity that they want to privatise when we should want to share equally. So, let us ignore the shrieks of the moneymen and let us use new tech to share better the benefits from our collective capacity to create money. Let’s make building a Monetary Commons our common goal. It won’t cure all of our deeply exploitative society’s ills. But it will go a long way to cure many and, perhaps more importantly, it will give the many a sense of their power. FOR MORE ON THE MONETARY COMMONS, VISIT Raphael Arar Hirad Sab DiEM25](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1976538948781400403/amplify_video_thumb/1976530183273254912/img/gV3pzVf2scFTSo_3.jpg)
