Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Wow. This is crazy. A developer trained an AI agent in simulation and deployed it onto a real robotic air hockey table using reinforcement learning. This robot can track the puck with millimeter-level accuracy and react in roughly 20 milliseconds, fast enough to challenge even skilled human players. We’re...

1,585,680 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

33 Yorum

wackfpv profil fotoğrafı
wackfpv4 ay önce

My toxic trait is believing I can beat it

Dmitry Grinberg profil fotoğrafı
Dmitry Grinberg4 ay önce

This is the dumbest possible timeline. You can make a machine to play air hockey better than any human using a small eight bit micro controller. Throwing gigabytes of RAM and “ML” at it is peak idiocy.

Michael Beckerman profil fotoğrafı
Michael Beckerman4 ay önce

Great. Now, put TWO of those on a table so we can watch them play each other!

SciTech Era profil fotoğrafı
SciTech Era4 ay önce

more detail from GitHub report: for yt video explanation:

SciTech Era profil fotoğrafı
SciTech Era4 ay önce

Here's the system overview and a video of an agent playing against itself in simulation.

Hotep Jesus profil fotoğrafı
Hotep Jesus4 ay önce

Burn it now before it’s too late!!!

Again? profil fotoğrafı
Again?4 ay önce

For some reason, probably because I’m dense, this impresses me more than most robotics demonstrations.

Edward Smith profil fotoğrafı
Edward Smith4 ay önce

A big part of playing this game is watching the arm of the opposing player. The brief instant of out stretch hand gesture is enough to prepare you for a directional movement. Removing that from the game gives the person a massive disadvantage. In addition removing the human interaction and enjoyment of playing a game with others.

Captain Aaron profil fotoğrafı
Captain Aaron4 ay önce

And kudos it doesn’t pick up the paddle and place it on top of the puck to stop it like every human asshat I’ve ever played.

Correcting the Record with Guillotines ☭ profil fotoğrafı
Correcting the Record with Guillotines ☭4 ay önce

I wouldn’t call this guy “skilled,” but is it impossible to score on this thing at all? What’s the point?

William Ruider profil fotoğrafı
William Ruider4 ay önce

Wow, I have to say, this is one of the most useful machine learning skills I've seen lately. I experiment with Cartesian robots myself, and I know how much work you've put into this project. Integrating the entire environment, not to mention real-time feedback, hundreds of hours of simulation, and the ability to recognise and respond to simulated and intended movements in real time, a book could be written about it. You've caught my attention, and I'm subscribing to your YouTube channel. Good luck with your future projects.💪💪💪

Rohin Hattiangadi profil fotoğrafı
Rohin Hattiangadi4 ay önce

The psychological barrier of seeing that silver piece of metal across the table certainly can’t help things!

DenisQuaalude profil fotoğrafı
DenisQuaalude4 ay önce

Not crazy at all. Kinda cool, but fully expected. This ain’t nothing compare to what is coming.

A Horse with No Name profil fotoğrafı
A Horse with No Name4 ay önce

Wow, and they also managed to reduce the pixelation from the previous generation!

FocalZero profil fotoğrafı
FocalZero4 ay önce

Wow, they beat us at chess, at Go, and now in arcades...

abe kazoo profil fotoğrafı
abe kazoo4 ay önce

yeah, this kind of computer learning is gonna be a really big deal thirty years ago! I'm excited for the past

HeyGen profil fotoğrafı
HeyGen4 ay önce

20 milliseconds reaction time. You are not beating this thing. Ever.

X profil fotoğrafı
X4 ay önce

Nothing new -I played that like 45 years ago.

Rich Tanenbaum profil fotoğrafı
Rich Tanenbaum4 ay önce

The bar is going to stop the puck no matter where it is: there are spots where it shoots when the puck is not against the part moving back and forth on the bar. And if its reaction time is fast it’s been given an unfair advantage.

arXiv Bangers profil fotoğrafı
arXiv Bangers4 ay önce

Get fucked humans 😂😂 Banger

The Wayne Shaw profil fotoğrafı
The Wayne Shaw4 ay önce

Most people fear AI taking their job not realizing AI will just make their job much more brutal to perform…

Yejun Jang profil fotoğrafı
Yejun Jang4 ay önce

I'd like to see a game with the air hockey world champion, whoever that is.

UBC Engineering Physics profil fotoğrafı
UBC Engineering Physics4 ay önce

This was developed by mutiple groups of students in the Engineering Physics Project Lab at University of British Columbia. You can find some more "fascinating" projects on our feed.

PB profil fotoğrafı
PB4 ay önce

And they said all that token spend hasn't shown ROI yet.

Brent P profil fotoğrafı
Brent P4 ay önce

I would fucken smoke that robot in air hockey

Dan 𝙏𝙖𝙭𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣 𝙄𝙨 𝙏𝙝𝙚𝙛𝙩 Behrman Esq🍍 profil fotoğrafı
Dan 𝙏𝙖𝙭𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣 𝙄𝙨 𝙏𝙝𝙚𝙛𝙩 Behrman Esq🍍4 ay önce

Now make 2 play each other

Nameless investor #V3403 profil fotoğrafı
Nameless investor #V34034 ay önce

Wow, another AI breakthrough in ruining the game people used to enjoy. How about something that is actually useful and profitable?

Peter Durfee profil fotoğrafı
Peter Durfee4 ay önce

In related news, we can make a robot travel far faster than Usain Bolt so there's no reason to watch the Olympics any more? Fuck this artificial shit with no connection to human reality

Joshua Hartley profil fotoğrafı
Joshua Hartley4 ay önce

I would buy this for $2500 easy. Probably more. Love Air Hockey but too competitive for everyone else. Would play this thing just to keep the reacts quick.

Windy profil fotoğrafı
Windy4 ay önce

I think you'd call that machine learning not AI

Thomas Cave profil fotoğrafı
Thomas Cave4 ay önce

20 milliseconds: Let a cat fight against him.

Chris Ferry profil fotoğrafı
Chris Ferry4 ay önce

It seems like it’s taking ripper shots from just before half court whereas the human can maybe barely reach that far. Cool project but it shouldn’t be able to reach further than wingspan of opponent for shots.

らく profil fotoğrafı
らく4 ay önce

エアホッケーが一番上手い人は、日本のコメディアンのホンジャマカです。 その人に勝てたら、すごいと認めます^_^

Benzer Videolar

Experiments in progress. The one on the right has been learning for ~3 hours, the one in the middle for ~1 hour, and the one on the left just started a few minutes ago. The initial motivation for making the physical Atari was just to commit ourselves to a subset of algorithms that can make progress in this setup. This commitment rules out algorithms that require billions of samples to learn (or worse, require multiple environments running in parallel). Atari games are simple enough that we should be able to show learning on them in a short amount of time with no prior knowledge. Since then, I've realized that this setup is also a good way to compare different paradigms in robotics in a principled way. These paradigms are sim2real, learning from tele-operated data, and learning directly on the robots. So far, I have observed that getting sim2real to work reliably is hard. It requires tweaks that don't scale. Policies that can play perfectly in simulation fall apart because of latencies and the messiness of the real world. These aspects could be modeled to improve the simulation, but not without sinking significant human engineering hours. I have higher hopes for learning from tele-operated data, but that requires a human to learn the task first. These experiments are on my to-do list. I have to learn to play some of the games well through the robot. I’m half-decent at playing Pong and Ms Pacman now. Learning directly on robots is looking like the most promising approach. This approach takes away pesky distribution shifts and makes it possible to have algorithms that continually improve with more data and time without any human intervention. It feels great to let experiments run overnight and wake up to find improved policies. With learning on robots, I should, in principle, be able to go on a long vacation and come back to find better policies for complex tasks beyond Atari games. Whether that is possible with current learning algorithms is a different question.

Khurram Javed

52,110 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

Today, we're joined by Nikita Rudin, co-founder and CEO of Flexion to discuss the gap between current robotic capabilities and what’s required to deploy fully autonomous robots in the real world. Nikita explains how reinforcement learning and simulation have driven rapid progress in robot locomotion—and why locomotion is still far from “solved.” We dig into the sim2real gap, and how adding visual inputs introduces noise and significantly complicates sim-to-real transfer. We also explore the debate between end-to-end models and modular approaches, and why separating locomotion, planning, and semantics remains a pragmatic approach today. Nikita also introduces the concept of "real-to-sim", which uses real-world data to refine simulation parameters for higher fidelity training, discusses how reinforcement learning, imitation learning, and teleoperation data are combined to train robust policies for both quadruped and humanoid robots, and introduces Flexion's hierarchical approach that utilizes pre-trained Vision-Language Models (VLMs) for high-level task orchestration with Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models and low-level whole-body trackers. Finally, Nikita shares the behind-the-scenes in humanoid robot demos, his take on reinforcement learning in simulation versus the real world, the nuances of reward tuning, and offers practical advice for researchers and practitioners looking to get started in robotics today. 🗒️ For the full list of resources for this episode, visit the show notes page: 📖 CHAPTERS =============================== 00:00 - Introduction 04:07 - Is robot locomotion solved? 06:04 - Sim-to-real gap 08:58 - Adding semantics to policies 09:42 - Modular vs end-to-end architectures 10:29 - Planner model 12:21 - Adapting RL techniques from quadrupeds to humanoids 15:39 - Behind robot demos 18:09 - Humanoid robots in home environments 22:03 - Training approach 23:56 - VLA models 27:59 - Closing the sim-to-real gap 32:55 - Task orchestration using VLMs 36:38 - Tool use 38:10 - Model hierarchy 43:37 - Simulator versus simulation environment 44:57 - Combining imitation learning and reinforcement learning 46:42 - RL in real world versus RL in simulation 52:58 - Reward tuning and value functions in robotics 56:38 - Predictions 1:00:10 - Humanoids, quadropeds, and wheeled platforms 1:02:45 - Advice, recommended robot kits, and community pla

The TWIML AI Podcast

22,592 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce