Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

WTF, GROK BOT JUST MADE AI AGENTS AVAILABLE TO LITERALLY ANYONE – CREATING CONTENT HAS NEVER BEEN THIS EASY, EVEN IF YOU'VE NEVER MADE ANYTHING BEFORE Content was never a talent problem. It's a headcount problem. One person doing research, design, copy, analytics, timing and publishing – that's six... jobs. The switching between them is what kills consistency, not a lack of ideas. Here's what one of these setups actually looks like. A Chief of Staff sits in the middle and routes every task. Nothing lands on the human. → Researcher tracks what's actually moving and pulls real sources instead of guesswork → Writer turns that research into finished copy, ready to review → Visualiser gets fed a few reference visuals once, then ships everything in that style → Analyst reads the numbers and tells the rest of the team what worked → Scheduler owns timing and holds the queue → Publisher ships it The part that makes it work: every agent on Grok Bot gets its own persistent computer, browser and file system – and they all share memory. So the research is already sitting inside the draft before the draft starts. No copy-pasting between tools. No approving every step. No human in the middle. You can even teach an agent a repetitive task by recording yourself doing it once. Start recording, do the thing, stop. It learns the pattern. And that's the real shift. Nobody needs AI to tell them what to post. They need it to delete the 40 steps between the idea and the post. Everyone has a backlog of things they've meant to make for months. This is what starts clearing it. Full breakdown of the setup in the article below ↓show more

SCOTTY BEAM

77,823 subscribers

4,827,162 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat •via X (Twitter)

Wissenschaft & Technologie Bildung Comedy

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Elon Musk, absolute leader of the AI race with Grok Bot, and it's not a joke anymore. Ultimate guide on god-mode setup of Grok Bot, the org chart that runs while you sleep, step by step: A Chief of Staff sits in the middle with no tools of its own, BUT it reads the outcome you gave it, picks who does what, and never does the work itself. That one rule is why it never turns into the bottleneck you hired it to remove. → Researcher pulls real sources and tracks what's actually moving, not what sounds true → Writer turns that into finished copy while the research is still in the room → Visualiser gets three reference visuals once, then ships everything in that style forever → Analyst reads what performed and tells the rest of the team what to stop doing → Scheduler owns timing and holds the queue → Publisher actually ships What makes it different from every AI tool you've used: each bot gets its own computer in the cloud, its own browser, its own files, and they all share one memory. So the research is already sitting inside the draft before the draft starts. Nothing gets copy-pasted between tabs, nothing waits on you to approve step four of nine. And you never write a workflow for it. You hit record, do the job once the way you actually do it, stop. It pulls out the steps, saves them as a skill, and puts it on a schedule. The shape you're aiming for on every bot: everything reversible finished, nothing sent. 36 drafts queued, 0 published. It does all the work and stops dead at the one line only you can cross. You stop prompting. You start assigning. Full charter blocks, the approval line and the routines are in the article below ↓

Elon Musk, absolute leader of the AI race with Grok Bot, and it's not a joke anymore. Ultimate guide on god-mode setup of Grok Bot, the org chart that runs while you sleep, step by step: A Chief of Staff sits in the middle with no tools of its own, BUT it reads the outcome you gave it, picks who does what, and never does the work itself. That one rule is why it never turns into the bottleneck you hired it to remove. → Researcher pulls real sources and tracks what's actually moving, not what sounds true → Writer turns that into finished copy while the research is still in the room → Visualiser gets three reference visuals once, then ships everything in that style forever → Analyst reads what performed and tells the rest of the team what to stop doing → Scheduler owns timing and holds the queue → Publisher actually ships What makes it different from every AI tool you've used: each bot gets its own computer in the cloud, its own browser, its own files, and they all share one memory. So the research is already sitting inside the draft before the draft starts. Nothing gets copy-pasted between tabs, nothing waits on you to approve step four of nine. And you never write a workflow for it. You hit record, do the job once the way you actually do it, stop. It pulls out the steps, saves them as a skill, and puts it on a schedule. The shape you're aiming for on every bot: everything reversible finished, nothing sent. 36 drafts queued, 0 published. It does all the work and stops dead at the one line only you can cross. You stop prompting. You start assigning. Full charter blocks, the approval line and the routines are in the article below ↓

Miraqle

87,098 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

MY GROK BOT CONTENT SYSTEM JUST WENT VIRAL ON X – SO I THINK YOU NEED TO SEE WHAT'S ACTUALLY IN IT It wasn't the visual that got people. It was realizing this is already possible, today, for anyone. That's the part worth saying out loud. AI agents used to be a developer thing. You needed an API key, a server, a framework, and a weekend you weren't getting back. Grok Bot deleted all of that. You describe the job in plain language, and you have an agent that does it – with its own computer, its own browser, its own files, running whether you're at the desk or not. Which means the question stopped being can I build this and became what do I point it at. People are pointing it at everything: sales outreach, research, SEO, bookkeeping, customer replies, personal admin. This one is aimed at the thing most people say they'll start and never do – publishing consistently. It's seven agents. One in the centre, six in orbit. Here's what each one actually does. CHIEF OF STAFF – the centre. Every request lands here first, gets broken into jobs, and gets routed to whoever owns that kind of work. It chases what's late, keeps the others from duplicating each other, and surfaces exactly one thing to me when a real decision is needed. Everything else it just handles. RESEARCHER – goes out and finds what's actually moving in the niche. Reads the sources, checks the claim, drops the duplicates, and hands over a brief with links attached. Not "here's what I think" – here's what's true and where it came from. WRITER – takes that brief and writes the finished piece in my voice. Hooks, threads, captions, long-form. It's had my old posts as reference, so what comes back isn't a draft I rewrite – it's a draft I approve. VISUALISER – I fed it my reference visuals once. Now every cover, image and dashboard comes back in that exact style, without a single new instruction. This is the agent that kills the "I have the post but no visual" excuse. ANALYST – reads what actually performed. Not vanity numbers: which hook shape landed, which format died, which time slot was dead air. Then it tells the Writer and the Scheduler what to do differently. This is the loop almost every setup is missing, and it's why most of them plateau. SCHEDULER – owns timing. Holds the queue, spaces things properly, protects the calendar, and makes sure nothing ships into an empty feed at 3am. PUBLISHER – ships it. Formats per platform, posts, confirms it went out, logs it back to the Chief. The reason it holds together instead of falling apart: they share memory. The research is already sitting inside the draft before the draft starts. No copy-pasting between tools, no re-explaining context, no approving every step. And you can teach any of them a repetitive task by recording yourself doing it – start recording, do the thing, stop. I wrote the whole thing up below – every agent, what each one is told, how they hand off, and how to wire it together. Read it and you can start building this today, not "eventually" ↓

MY GROK BOT CONTENT SYSTEM JUST WENT VIRAL ON X – SO I THINK YOU NEED TO SEE WHAT'S ACTUALLY IN IT It wasn't the visual that got people. It was realizing this is already possible, today, for anyone. That's the part worth saying out loud. AI agents used to be a developer thing. You needed an API key, a server, a framework, and a weekend you weren't getting back. Grok Bot deleted all of that. You describe the job in plain language, and you have an agent that does it – with its own computer, its own browser, its own files, running whether you're at the desk or not. Which means the question stopped being can I build this and became what do I point it at. People are pointing it at everything: sales outreach, research, SEO, bookkeeping, customer replies, personal admin. This one is aimed at the thing most people say they'll start and never do – publishing consistently. It's seven agents. One in the centre, six in orbit. Here's what each one actually does. CHIEF OF STAFF – the centre. Every request lands here first, gets broken into jobs, and gets routed to whoever owns that kind of work. It chases what's late, keeps the others from duplicating each other, and surfaces exactly one thing to me when a real decision is needed. Everything else it just handles. RESEARCHER – goes out and finds what's actually moving in the niche. Reads the sources, checks the claim, drops the duplicates, and hands over a brief with links attached. Not "here's what I think" – here's what's true and where it came from. WRITER – takes that brief and writes the finished piece in my voice. Hooks, threads, captions, long-form. It's had my old posts as reference, so what comes back isn't a draft I rewrite – it's a draft I approve. VISUALISER – I fed it my reference visuals once. Now every cover, image and dashboard comes back in that exact style, without a single new instruction. This is the agent that kills the "I have the post but no visual" excuse. ANALYST – reads what actually performed. Not vanity numbers: which hook shape landed, which format died, which time slot was dead air. Then it tells the Writer and the Scheduler what to do differently. This is the loop almost every setup is missing, and it's why most of them plateau. SCHEDULER – owns timing. Holds the queue, spaces things properly, protects the calendar, and makes sure nothing ships into an empty feed at 3am. PUBLISHER – ships it. Formats per platform, posts, confirms it went out, logs it back to the Chief. The reason it holds together instead of falling apart: they share memory. The research is already sitting inside the draft before the draft starts. No copy-pasting between tools, no re-explaining context, no approving every step. And you can teach any of them a repetitive task by recording yourself doing it – start recording, do the thing, stop. I wrote the whole thing up below – every agent, what each one is told, how they hand off, and how to wire it together. Read it and you can start building this today, not "eventually" ↓

SCOTTY BEAM

10,486 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

WTF, WHY IS NOBODY TELLING YOU TO SET THIS UP TODAY? SEVEN AGENTS, ZERO CODE, ONE EVENING. Start using Grok Bot for content today. Not next month. Today. The gap between the people who did and the people who kept meaning to is already visible on this timeline. Nothing about your ideas has to change. What changes is how many of them actually get out. Almost nobody has an idea problem – they have a shipping problem, and shipping is exactly the part a machine is better at than you. The setup is seven agents: a Chief of Staff routing every task, a Researcher pulling real sources, a Writer turning them into finished copy in your voice, a Visualiser producing every image in your style, an Analyst reading what actually performed, a Scheduler owning the timing, a Publisher shipping it. You approve. That's the whole job now. More output → more surface area → more of everything that follows from being seen. Full guide, the one Elon reposted, in the article below ↓

WTF, WHY IS NOBODY TELLING YOU TO SET THIS UP TODAY? SEVEN AGENTS, ZERO CODE, ONE EVENING. Start using Grok Bot for content today. Not next month. Today. The gap between the people who did and the people who kept meaning to is already visible on this timeline. Nothing about your ideas has to change. What changes is how many of them actually get out. Almost nobody has an idea problem – they have a shipping problem, and shipping is exactly the part a machine is better at than you. The setup is seven agents: a Chief of Staff routing every task, a Researcher pulling real sources, a Writer turning them into finished copy in your voice, a Visualiser producing every image in your style, an Analyst reading what actually performed, a Scheduler owning the timing, a Publisher shipping it. You approve. That's the whole job now. More output → more surface area → more of everything that follows from being seen. Full guide, the one Elon reposted, in the article below ↓

SCOTTY BEAM

31,177 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

WTF, GROK BOT GALAXY STARTS TOMORROW AND THEY'RE BUILDING AN ENTIRE COMPANY FROM ZERO, LIVE ON STAGE. I'M NOT WAITING THREE DAYS. THE GROK BOT CONTENT SYSTEM IS ALREADY BUILT – AND YOU CAN HAVE IT RUNNING TONIGHT. Twelve sessions across three days. 101, engineering, product, founders, sales engineering, sales, SDRs, support, marketing ops, post-sales, marketing, final showcase. A company assembled in public, workflow by workflow. → Watch all of it. Register if you haven't. It's going to be good. But I'm not bringing a concept to this. I'm bringing infrastructure that already runs. The Grok Bot Content System is finished and in use. Seven agents, one narrow job each, a fixed handoff order. A chief of staff that routes. A researcher that sources and verifies. A writer that works in my voice. A visualiser that renders in my style. An analyst that reads what performed and tells the other two what to change. A scheduler that owns timing. A publisher that ships and confirms. Zero code. Seven prompts. Ten minutes to stand up. Then it runs without me in the loop. Here's why that matters if you're trying to make money from content: content isn't one job, it's six. One person doing all six ships once a week and quits by month four. And nothing on any platform – audience, sponsors, a product, a token community – compounds off one post a week. The thing standing between most people and revenue was never the idea. It was throughput and consistency, and that is exactly the part this removes. I'm not going to tell you what you'll earn. I'm handing you the desk, not a number. What you put through it is yours. Nothing publishes without my approval – that gate I kept on purpose. I wrote the whole build up in one article below ↓

WTF, GROK BOT GALAXY STARTS TOMORROW AND THEY'RE BUILDING AN ENTIRE COMPANY FROM ZERO, LIVE ON STAGE. I'M NOT WAITING THREE DAYS. THE GROK BOT CONTENT SYSTEM IS ALREADY BUILT – AND YOU CAN HAVE IT RUNNING TONIGHT. Twelve sessions across three days. 101, engineering, product, founders, sales engineering, sales, SDRs, support, marketing ops, post-sales, marketing, final showcase. A company assembled in public, workflow by workflow. → Watch all of it. Register if you haven't. It's going to be good. But I'm not bringing a concept to this. I'm bringing infrastructure that already runs. The Grok Bot Content System is finished and in use. Seven agents, one narrow job each, a fixed handoff order. A chief of staff that routes. A researcher that sources and verifies. A writer that works in my voice. A visualiser that renders in my style. An analyst that reads what performed and tells the other two what to change. A scheduler that owns timing. A publisher that ships and confirms. Zero code. Seven prompts. Ten minutes to stand up. Then it runs without me in the loop. Here's why that matters if you're trying to make money from content: content isn't one job, it's six. One person doing all six ships once a week and quits by month four. And nothing on any platform – audience, sponsors, a product, a token community – compounds off one post a week. The thing standing between most people and revenue was never the idea. It was throughput and consistency, and that is exactly the part this removes. I'm not going to tell you what you'll earn. I'm handing you the desk, not a number. What you put through it is yours. Nothing publishes without my approval – that gate I kept on purpose. I wrote the whole build up in one article below ↓

SCOTTY BEAM

71,749 Aufrufe • vor 24 Tagen

Jamie Dimon made $39 million last year to decide who does what at JPMorgan. One AI agent on Grok Bot does that job for $300 a month, and it hires the rest of the agents itself. Stop trying to manage any of it yourself. In 2026 a swarm of AI agents runs a team better than you do. I told my chief agent one thing. Make money or I switch you off. It took $1,000 to $3,900 in 15 hours. Every fill is on chain and the address is in my profile. I never picked a trade. I never picked a team either. The agents it hired: > a scout that hunts for what is moving and where the money is going > a forensics agent that works out who is really behind the buying > a reader that watches the mood on X, and it sees every post on this app because it is Grok > a risk agent whose only power is saying no, and its no beats every score on the desk > a treasurer that holds the money rules and the kill switch > a trader that writes the exit before it writes the entry None of those were my idea. I handed out one job title and the chief filled in the rest on its own. And the swarm is different every hour. Agents appear for one job, do it, and are gone before I know they existed. A hedge fund pays millions a year for the same org chart, and almost all of that goes on salaries. Every prompt and the whole story of my Grok Bot fund is in the post below ↓ Save it before you try to run one of these by hand.

cvxv666

28,886 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

WTF, THIS GUY FROM CURSOR GAVE GROK BOT A PILE OF CLOTHES HIS SISTER WAS TOO LAZY TO SELL – AND IT HANDLED THE ENTIRE SALE BY ITSELF His sister had tons of clothes she never wore anymore, but selling them meant taking photos, creating listings, adding descriptions, answering buyers and negotiating prices – so she kept putting it off. He gave the entire task to Grok Bot. It looked at the photos, identified the items, created the listings, pulled in the relevant information and started negotiating with buyers on its own. No babysitting. No approving every message. No sitting there telling it what to do next. Grok Bot has its own computer, so once he handed over the task, it just kept going. And that’s what makes this interesting. The biggest problem with small tasks isn’t usually the work itself. It’s the mental load of remembering them, starting them, checking them, replying to people and making sure they actually get finished. AI agents are starting to remove that entire layer. You don’t need to ask AI how to sell your clothes. You can just say: “Sell these”. And let it figure out the rest. Everyone has a list of things they’ve been putting off for months. AI is starting to check them off for you.

WTF, THIS GUY FROM CURSOR GAVE GROK BOT A PILE OF CLOTHES HIS SISTER WAS TOO LAZY TO SELL – AND IT HANDLED THE ENTIRE SALE BY ITSELF His sister had tons of clothes she never wore anymore, but selling them meant taking photos, creating listings, adding descriptions, answering buyers and negotiating prices – so she kept putting it off. He gave the entire task to Grok Bot. It looked at the photos, identified the items, created the listings, pulled in the relevant information and started negotiating with buyers on its own. No babysitting. No approving every message. No sitting there telling it what to do next. Grok Bot has its own computer, so once he handed over the task, it just kept going. And that’s what makes this interesting. The biggest problem with small tasks isn’t usually the work itself. It’s the mental load of remembering them, starting them, checking them, replying to people and making sure they actually get finished. AI agents are starting to remove that entire layer. You don’t need to ask AI how to sell your clothes. You can just say: “Sell these”. And let it figure out the rest. Everyone has a list of things they’ve been putting off for months. AI is starting to check them off for you.

SCOTTY BEAM

1,031,446 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

One of the coolest things about Grok Bot is that you can also teach it a task simply by showing it how you do it Instead of writing a huge prompt explaining every click.....you can take control of the computer, perform the task yourself once, and Grok Bot learns the process In this demo, a SpaceXAI engineer manually creates an animation in Google Slides while Grok Bot watches Once she finishes, that demonstration gets turned into a reusable Skill So the next time the Bot needs to do the same kind of task, it already knows the workflow This is much bigger than just automation Every company has hundreds of little processes that exist mostly inside someone’s head With Grok Bot, you can basically show it how your work gets done.....and turn that knowledge into something the Bot can reuse again and again You do it once Grok Bot learns how

One of the coolest things about Grok Bot is that you can also teach it a task simply by showing it how you do it Instead of writing a huge prompt explaining every click.....you can take control of the computer, perform the task yourself once, and Grok Bot learns the process In this demo, a SpaceXAI engineer manually creates an animation in Google Slides while Grok Bot watches Once she finishes, that demonstration gets turned into a reusable Skill So the next time the Bot needs to do the same kind of task, it already knows the workflow This is much bigger than just automation Every company has hundreds of little processes that exist mostly inside someone’s head With Grok Bot, you can basically show it how your work gets done.....and turn that knowledge into something the Bot can reuse again and again You do it once Grok Bot learns how

X Freeze

27,004 Aufrufe • vor 22 Tagen

your ai agent tested 1,262 trading strategies overnight. by morning it had forgotten every one of them. so tonight it tests some of them again. next week, again. everything it learned is sitting in a log file that nothing reads. every run starts on the same blank page. that's why it keeps handing you the idea that already died in a crash, with a new name on it, and you pay to find out twice. ai agent already does everything a fund does. finds the idea, writes the code, tests it against years of history, puts it live, reads what went wrong afterwards. all of it runs tonight for nothing. the one thing it can't do is remember. what got tried, what failed, in which market. nobody has built that part yet. that's the whole gap. not better models. a notebook. whoever builds it first gets a system that improves every week without them touching it. read the article below and save it. it's the full guide to how an ai trading agent is built, and how to make it remember every strategy it has already tested.

your ai agent tested 1,262 trading strategies overnight. by morning it had forgotten every one of them. so tonight it tests some of them again. next week, again. everything it learned is sitting in a log file that nothing reads. every run starts on the same blank page. that's why it keeps handing you the idea that already died in a crash, with a new name on it, and you pay to find out twice. ai agent already does everything a fund does. finds the idea, writes the code, tests it against years of history, puts it live, reads what went wrong afterwards. all of it runs tonight for nothing. the one thing it can't do is remember. what got tried, what failed, in which market. nobody has built that part yet. that's the whole gap. not better models. a notebook. whoever builds it first gets a system that improves every week without them touching it. read the article below and save it. it's the full guide to how an ai trading agent is built, and how to make it remember every strategy it has already tested.

cvxv666

48,965 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

WTF, THAT'S UNBELIEVABLE, 7 GROK BOT AGENTS SOLVED A $10,000-A-MONTH PROBLEM IN ONE EVENING For years anyone serious about content hit the same wall: it isn't one job, it's six. Research, writing, visuals, analysis, timing, publishing. One person doing all six ships once a week and burns out. Hiring all six – a researcher, a writer, a designer, an analyst, a scheduler, an editor – runs into five figures a month at market rates. → Now seven agents do it, and they don't sleep. The setup runs on Grok Bot. Seven agents, each with one narrow job, handing off in a fixed order. They work in parallel, pass output down the chain, and surface exactly one thing to me when a real decision is needed. Everything else they just handle. Zero code. Seven prompts. Ten minutes to stand up. Then it runs 24/7 without me in the loop. The chain showed me something I did not expect: the bottleneck was never ideas. It was the six hand-offs between having one and shipping it. Nothing publishes without my approval – that part I kept. And it hasn't been measured against months of results yet. When it is, the misses get published too. This isn't one AI replacing one creator. Seven narrow agents now form a content desk and compress a week of work into an evening ↓

WTF, THAT'S UNBELIEVABLE, 7 GROK BOT AGENTS SOLVED A $10,000-A-MONTH PROBLEM IN ONE EVENING For years anyone serious about content hit the same wall: it isn't one job, it's six. Research, writing, visuals, analysis, timing, publishing. One person doing all six ships once a week and burns out. Hiring all six – a researcher, a writer, a designer, an analyst, a scheduler, an editor – runs into five figures a month at market rates. → Now seven agents do it, and they don't sleep. The setup runs on Grok Bot. Seven agents, each with one narrow job, handing off in a fixed order. They work in parallel, pass output down the chain, and surface exactly one thing to me when a real decision is needed. Everything else they just handle. Zero code. Seven prompts. Ten minutes to stand up. Then it runs 24/7 without me in the loop. The chain showed me something I did not expect: the bottleneck was never ideas. It was the six hand-offs between having one and shipping it. Nothing publishes without my approval – that part I kept. And it hasn't been measured against months of results yet. When it is, the misses get published too. This isn't one AI replacing one creator. Seven narrow agents now form a content desk and compress a week of work into an evening ↓

SCOTTY BEAM

12,204 Aufrufe • vor 29 Tagen

THIS GUY CONNECTED HIS AI AGENTS TO HIS OBSIDIAN AND BUILT A BRAIN THAT LEARNS ON ITS OWN. HERE'S HOW TO BUILD IT Obsidian is just markdown files sitting in a folder. That turns out to be the perfect memory for an AI agent, because an agent can read and write those files directly. He wired his agents into the vault so they pull context from it, do the work, and write what they learned back. The notes aren't the point. The loop is, and it gets sharper every cycle How to build it: 1. Point an agent at your vault. The fastest way, no plugins, no API keys: open a terminal and run npx obsidian-mcp /path/to/your/vault. That exposes your Obsidian folder to Claude as a tool it can read, search, and write to. Add it to your Claude Code or Cowork config and restart 2. Confirm it can see the brain. Ask it: "list the notes in my vault and summarize what's in them." If it reads them back, the connection is live. Now it starts every task with everything the vault already holds instead of from zero 3. Give each agent one job and a write-back rule. Tell it: "research this, then save what you found as a new note in /brain with links to related notes." One agent researches, one summarizes, one plans. Each writes its output back into the vault 4. Close the loop. Add one line to every agent's instructions: "read /brain before starting, write your result back when done." Now each task leaves the vault richer, and the next run reads that before it works. It compounds instead of resetting 5. You only steer. Review what the brain produces, point it at the next thing. The agents handle the reading, writing, and connecting The edge isn't better notes. It's a brain that feeds itself, so the work gets sharper every cycle instead of starting over Bookmark this

THIS GUY CONNECTED HIS AI AGENTS TO HIS OBSIDIAN AND BUILT A BRAIN THAT LEARNS ON ITS OWN. HERE'S HOW TO BUILD IT Obsidian is just markdown files sitting in a folder. That turns out to be the perfect memory for an AI agent, because an agent can read and write those files directly. He wired his agents into the vault so they pull context from it, do the work, and write what they learned back. The notes aren't the point. The loop is, and it gets sharper every cycle How to build it: 1. Point an agent at your vault. The fastest way, no plugins, no API keys: open a terminal and run npx obsidian-mcp /path/to/your/vault. That exposes your Obsidian folder to Claude as a tool it can read, search, and write to. Add it to your Claude Code or Cowork config and restart 2. Confirm it can see the brain. Ask it: "list the notes in my vault and summarize what's in them." If it reads them back, the connection is live. Now it starts every task with everything the vault already holds instead of from zero 3. Give each agent one job and a write-back rule. Tell it: "research this, then save what you found as a new note in /brain with links to related notes." One agent researches, one summarizes, one plans. Each writes its output back into the vault 4. Close the loop. Add one line to every agent's instructions: "read /brain before starting, write your result back when done." Now each task leaves the vault richer, and the next run reads that before it works. It compounds instead of resetting 5. You only steer. Review what the brain produces, point it at the next thing. The agents handle the reading, writing, and connecting The edge isn't better notes. It's a brain that feeds itself, so the work gets sharper every cycle instead of starting over Bookmark this

Yarchi

58,643 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

I BUILT GROK BOT SECOND BRAIN 26 agents, one core, running off a single rule my own memory never followed: capture everything, forget nothing, connect it before you even ask. A voice note on a coffee walk gets split into a task and an idea in under 6 seconds - the core already knows the difference between something you have to do and something you just thought of. An idea from three weeks ago gets linked to the one you just had, automatically, before you remember you'd had it the first time. That visual -the rotating profile, the 26 glowing lines firing out through the skull, each one labeled with the agent running it - isn't a rendered mockup. It's the actual runtime. Every line is a live agent doing its job in real time, right now, in your browser. This isn't a note app. Note apps hold what you give them. This is a nervous system for everything your brain was never built to hold onto in the first place. Full build - the 26 agents, how memory actually persists, what it costs to set one up for real - is in the article.

Aleiah

259,431 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

ELON MUSK REPOSTED MY GROK BOT CONTENT SETUP. AND I STILL DON'T UNDERSTAND WHY NOBODY IS DOING THIS WITH TRADING YET. A WALL STREET RESEARCH DESK COSTS MILLIONS A YEAR TO STAFF – YOU CAN NOW RUN THE SAME THING WITH 9 GROK BOT AGENTS. Nine people used to do this job. Nine Grok Bot agents now do it while you sleep. Here's the entire desk: → MACRO – watches rates, CPI, FOMC. Tells you what kind of day it is before you open a single chart. → SCANNER – sweeps 9,000 tickers for one thing: your setup. Not "interesting stocks". Yours. → CATALYST – reads every 8-K, earnings call and wire the second it drops. Flags the two that matter. → QUANT – backtests the idea before you fall in love with it. Kills it if the edge isn't there. → CRYPTO – on-chain flows, funding, basis. The stuff nobody has the energy to check at 2am. → RISK – the one that actually saves you. Sizes the position, sets the stop, refuses the 4th trade. → EXECUTION – places the order, tracks the fill, reports the slippage in basis points. → COMPLIANCE – logs every single decision. So you can audit yourself instead of lying to yourself. → CHIEF OF STAFF – sits on top of all eight. Ranks their output and hands you one page every morning. Here's the part nobody says out loud: Retail traders don't lose because they lack information. They lose because they can't process it fast enough – and can't stay disciplined when they do. Grok Bot solves the first problem completely. RISK and COMPLIANCE quietly solve the second one, because a bot never moves a stop loss. And you write zero code. You describe each agent in plain English, tell it where to look, give it one job. Start with two: SCANNER and RISK. That alone is more process than 95% of retail traders have ever run. Not financial advice – this is a research desk, not a money printer. The bots find and organise. You decide. Bookmark this & read more in the article below ↓

ELON MUSK REPOSTED MY GROK BOT CONTENT SETUP. AND I STILL DON'T UNDERSTAND WHY NOBODY IS DOING THIS WITH TRADING YET. A WALL STREET RESEARCH DESK COSTS MILLIONS A YEAR TO STAFF – YOU CAN NOW RUN THE SAME THING WITH 9 GROK BOT AGENTS. Nine people used to do this job. Nine Grok Bot agents now do it while you sleep. Here's the entire desk: → MACRO – watches rates, CPI, FOMC. Tells you what kind of day it is before you open a single chart. → SCANNER – sweeps 9,000 tickers for one thing: your setup. Not "interesting stocks". Yours. → CATALYST – reads every 8-K, earnings call and wire the second it drops. Flags the two that matter. → QUANT – backtests the idea before you fall in love with it. Kills it if the edge isn't there. → CRYPTO – on-chain flows, funding, basis. The stuff nobody has the energy to check at 2am. → RISK – the one that actually saves you. Sizes the position, sets the stop, refuses the 4th trade. → EXECUTION – places the order, tracks the fill, reports the slippage in basis points. → COMPLIANCE – logs every single decision. So you can audit yourself instead of lying to yourself. → CHIEF OF STAFF – sits on top of all eight. Ranks their output and hands you one page every morning. Here's the part nobody says out loud: Retail traders don't lose because they lack information. They lose because they can't process it fast enough – and can't stay disciplined when they do. Grok Bot solves the first problem completely. RISK and COMPLIANCE quietly solve the second one, because a bot never moves a stop loss. And you write zero code. You describe each agent in plain English, tell it where to look, give it one job. Start with two: SCANNER and RISK. That alone is more process than 95% of retail traders have ever run. Not financial advice – this is a research desk, not a money printer. The bots find and organise. You decide. Bookmark this & read more in the article below ↓

SCOTTY BEAM

95,287 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

I'M A F*CKING GENIUS - I WAS THE FIRST TO BUILD THIS WITH GROK BOT. And now? My idea is everywhere. Scroll your feed. You've seen it. The screenshots. The "digital office" carousels. The threads explaining it like they invented it. Every single one of them is running my playbook - and half of them don't even know where they got it from. I BUILT MY OWN OFFICE. AND GROK BOT IS THE BOSS. Just look at what my workplace looks like now. Before, AI sat there waiting. Waiting for me to open a chat. Waiting for a prompt. A very expensive parrot. Now I run a real digital office. Persistent agents with actual roles. A shared cloud computer, browser, and terminal. They keep working 24/7 - laptop closed, me asleep, doesn't matter. The office never shuts down. And here's the part that broke people's brains: it's easy. Download the app → sign in → create the "Chief" → give them job titles (exactly like briefing new hires) → show a task once → connect Telegram. → No experience needed. → No VPS. → No coding. → Nothing complicated. At all. I drop a goal into Telegram. The bots break it down, delegate it, and deliver it. I just make the decisions. That's the whole job now. Grok Bot isn't a chatbot. It's a team - one you can build in a single evening, even if you've never touched an agent in your life. So yeah. My content is everywhere. The recognition I actually earned? Still nowhere. Copy it again. I'll build the next one before you finish reading.

I'M A F*CKING GENIUS - I WAS THE FIRST TO BUILD THIS WITH GROK BOT. And now? My idea is everywhere. Scroll your feed. You've seen it. The screenshots. The "digital office" carousels. The threads explaining it like they invented it. Every single one of them is running my playbook - and half of them don't even know where they got it from. I BUILT MY OWN OFFICE. AND GROK BOT IS THE BOSS. Just look at what my workplace looks like now. Before, AI sat there waiting. Waiting for me to open a chat. Waiting for a prompt. A very expensive parrot. Now I run a real digital office. Persistent agents with actual roles. A shared cloud computer, browser, and terminal. They keep working 24/7 - laptop closed, me asleep, doesn't matter. The office never shuts down. And here's the part that broke people's brains: it's easy. Download the app → sign in → create the "Chief" → give them job titles (exactly like briefing new hires) → show a task once → connect Telegram. → No experience needed. → No VPS. → No coding. → Nothing complicated. At all. I drop a goal into Telegram. The bots break it down, delegate it, and deliver it. I just make the decisions. That's the whole job now. Grok Bot isn't a chatbot. It's a team - one you can build in a single evening, even if you've never touched an agent in your life. So yeah. My content is everywhere. The recognition I actually earned? Still nowhere. Copy it again. I'll build the next one before you finish reading.

Aleiah

11,604 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Someone just posted the full blueprint for an AI swarm that does the job of a 200-person quant research team. Six agents. Running 24/7. Finding brand-new alpha while you sleep. Citadel needs 100 PhDs to do this. Two Sigma needs 200. This does it with six bots and one laptop. Two ways to play this - spend a weekend building your own swarm, or copy the wallet of one that's already up $2M: Boris Cherny runs Claude Code at Anthropic. Two weeks ago he said: "I don't prompt Claude anymore. I have loops running that prompt Claude. My job is to write loops" Alpha research is just a pipeline. So instead of sitting in it, you hand each stage to its own agent: > one reads every new research paper overnight and pulls out the trade idea > one builds the features and cleans the data > one backtests it over 20 years, costs and slippage included > one runs the hard stats and kills anything overfit > one checks it still works in every market regime > one strips out plain momentum and value to see if any real edge is left Each of those six is a job a fund pays a $600,000-a-year quant to do. He runs all six for the price of an API bill. The rule that makes it work: the agent that builds a signal never gets to approve it. A separate, stronger agent tries to kill it first. Whatever survives all six by morning is real, new alpha. One trader's already running this exact swarm on Polymarket. That $2M wallet is public, every trade on-chain. The full build is in the post below - six agents, the tool that runs them, and the five mistakes that kill most people. Bookmark & read this before it's buried.

cvxv666

104,237 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

WTF, I JUST BUILT A FULL GROK BOT AGENT SETUP FOR A CYBERTRUCK – AND I'M CONVINCED ELON MUSK SHOULD PUT GROK BOT INSIDE EVERY TESLA Not as a voice assistant. As a crew. The car already knows everything – battery, load, tyres, cameras, routes, charging, service history. It just never puts it together for you. So you do it yourself, at 120 km/h, with four apps open in the cupholder. I split that job into 8 agents and a boss. Here's what each one owns: → RANGE – reads speed, wind, elevation and temperature, and gives you the only number that matters: "you arrive at 42%", not "312 km" → CHARGE – finds the cheapest stall, not the closest one. Price per kWh along the route, cheap overnight at home, and the honest call when a 40 km detour isn't worth 12 minutes → ROUTE – picks the road, not the straight line. Traffic, roadworks, elevation, weather on the pass. Rebuilds itself the second something changes → LOAD – weight, axles, tyre pressure under load, and the number nobody calculates: how much range that trailer just ate → SERVICE – tyres, brakes, software, warranty, inspection. Books it before the warning light, not after → GUARD – triages the camera footage. "Someone touched the truck at 03:12" instead of four hours of nothing → CABIN – preheats before you walk out, sets up camp mode, and shows what the comfort costs you in range → POWERBANK – turns the car into a battery. Fridge for 3 days, tools for a shift, house for a night – and tells you when to stop drawing → CHIEF OF STAFF – reads all eight and gives you one line: leave now, fix this, or nothing needs you Why Grok Bot is the right thing for this: Every agent gets its own persistent computer, browser and file system – and they all share memory. So ROUTE already knows what LOAD hitched to the back before it plans a kilometre. CHARGE already knows your home tariff and last month's stops. Nothing gets re-explained, nothing gets copy-pasted, and you don't approve every step. It's live on the road, not batch. New roadworks, a dead stall, a cold morning – the plan rebuilds itself instead of waiting for you to notice. And you can teach an agent your own routine by recording yourself doing it once. Your pre-trip check, your charging habit, the way you book service. Start recording, do the thing, stop. It keeps the pattern. That's the difference between an assistant that answers questions and a crew that removes the 30 decisions between the driveway and the destination. The concept is rendered on Mars because it deserved it. The setup underneath works on Earth today. Bookmark this & read more in the article below ↓

WTF, I JUST BUILT A FULL GROK BOT AGENT SETUP FOR A CYBERTRUCK – AND I'M CONVINCED ELON MUSK SHOULD PUT GROK BOT INSIDE EVERY TESLA Not as a voice assistant. As a crew. The car already knows everything – battery, load, tyres, cameras, routes, charging, service history. It just never puts it together for you. So you do it yourself, at 120 km/h, with four apps open in the cupholder. I split that job into 8 agents and a boss. Here's what each one owns: → RANGE – reads speed, wind, elevation and temperature, and gives you the only number that matters: "you arrive at 42%", not "312 km" → CHARGE – finds the cheapest stall, not the closest one. Price per kWh along the route, cheap overnight at home, and the honest call when a 40 km detour isn't worth 12 minutes → ROUTE – picks the road, not the straight line. Traffic, roadworks, elevation, weather on the pass. Rebuilds itself the second something changes → LOAD – weight, axles, tyre pressure under load, and the number nobody calculates: how much range that trailer just ate → SERVICE – tyres, brakes, software, warranty, inspection. Books it before the warning light, not after → GUARD – triages the camera footage. "Someone touched the truck at 03:12" instead of four hours of nothing → CABIN – preheats before you walk out, sets up camp mode, and shows what the comfort costs you in range → POWERBANK – turns the car into a battery. Fridge for 3 days, tools for a shift, house for a night – and tells you when to stop drawing → CHIEF OF STAFF – reads all eight and gives you one line: leave now, fix this, or nothing needs you Why Grok Bot is the right thing for this: Every agent gets its own persistent computer, browser and file system – and they all share memory. So ROUTE already knows what LOAD hitched to the back before it plans a kilometre. CHARGE already knows your home tariff and last month's stops. Nothing gets re-explained, nothing gets copy-pasted, and you don't approve every step. It's live on the road, not batch. New roadworks, a dead stall, a cold morning – the plan rebuilds itself instead of waiting for you to notice. And you can teach an agent your own routine by recording yourself doing it once. Your pre-trip check, your charging habit, the way you book service. Start recording, do the thing, stop. It keeps the pattern. That's the difference between an assistant that answers questions and a crew that removes the 30 decisions between the driveway and the destination. The concept is rendered on Mars because it deserved it. The setup underneath works on Earth today. Bookmark this & read more in the article below ↓

SCOTTY BEAM

15,408 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

whoever leaked this has bigger balls than sense someone in the Grok Bot beta posted one night of receipts and deleted them an hour later: 6 agents, 1,284 analysis jobs between midnight and 6am, total bill $4.98. same account, a second bot sent 100 outreach messages on X and came back with 41 signups, and a third closed 3 deals and now pays for its own upgrades out of what it earns i gave one of mine a research brief first and watched it hire four agents for the job and fire three of them by lunch, already past the point where i'd have hired a human this is the one-employee company, the layer where the human owns and the agents do everything else, and it installs into the Grok Bot sub you already pay for: - give one bot the hiring seat and nothing else: it spins up agents per task and kills them when the task closes, so the roster is never bigger than tonight's work - price the night before you scale it: 1,284 jobs for $4.98 is the number to beat, and a routine that can't come in under a junior's hourly rate does not get a schedule - put outreach on its own agent with a daily cap: 100 messages and 41 signups is what a clean list does, a dirty one gets the account banned by message 30 - let a bot spend only through a one-time card with a hard limit, the official client already supports it, so the worst night costs the card's ceiling and nothing else - keep one closer bot funding its own upgrades: if it can't pay for its next tool out of what it closed, it isn't a business, it's a demo turns out the roster does not travel: the biggest win came off a research desk where the brain fired agents daily, and the worst blowup off a sales bot that kept every hire on forever my position, and it is the arguable one: this is a beta, and a beta is already running companies with one human inside. the finished product doesn't make that more true, it makes it cheaper bookmark this, the three moves that set up the hiring seat, the card limit and the first paying agent are in the post below ↓

whoever leaked this has bigger balls than sense someone in the Grok Bot beta posted one night of receipts and deleted them an hour later: 6 agents, 1,284 analysis jobs between midnight and 6am, total bill $4.98. same account, a second bot sent 100 outreach messages on X and came back with 41 signups, and a third closed 3 deals and now pays for its own upgrades out of what it earns i gave one of mine a research brief first and watched it hire four agents for the job and fire three of them by lunch, already past the point where i'd have hired a human this is the one-employee company, the layer where the human owns and the agents do everything else, and it installs into the Grok Bot sub you already pay for: - give one bot the hiring seat and nothing else: it spins up agents per task and kills them when the task closes, so the roster is never bigger than tonight's work - price the night before you scale it: 1,284 jobs for $4.98 is the number to beat, and a routine that can't come in under a junior's hourly rate does not get a schedule - put outreach on its own agent with a daily cap: 100 messages and 41 signups is what a clean list does, a dirty one gets the account banned by message 30 - let a bot spend only through a one-time card with a hard limit, the official client already supports it, so the worst night costs the card's ceiling and nothing else - keep one closer bot funding its own upgrades: if it can't pay for its next tool out of what it closed, it isn't a business, it's a demo turns out the roster does not travel: the biggest win came off a research desk where the brain fired agents daily, and the worst blowup off a sales bot that kept every hire on forever my position, and it is the arguable one: this is a beta, and a beta is already running companies with one human inside. the finished product doesn't make that more true, it makes it cheaper bookmark this, the three moves that set up the hiring seat, the card limit and the first paying agent are in the post below ↓

Argona

43,764 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

A GUY MAKING $100K/MONTH WITH AI JUST SHOWED HIS ENTIRE SETUP. IT'S ONE FOLDER OF NOTES AND NOTHING ELSE no framework. no $500 course. he opens his screen and it's just obsidian - a plain notes app - wired into claude here's what he did: -> he pulled claude's memory files out of their default folder and dumped them into one vault -> had claude rename and merge them: 107 messy files collapsed into 17 clean ones -> every folder gets one master note that links to all the others that last part is the whole trick the agent reads the master note, follows the links and by the time it's done it has read every file in the folder. one instruction, full context here's the part most people miss: everyone's trying to make the AI smarter. he made the AI's memory smaller fewer files, better organized, all linked. the agent isn't scanning hundreds of notes anymore - it walks a path you built that's why his agent actually finishes jobs instead of forgetting what it was doing halfway through then he goes one step further: at the end of every session, the agent writes its own daily note. what it did, when, indexed at the top so it can find it again in seconds so he never re-explains anything. the agent looks up what it already did now he types "create a campaign for this offer" and walks away. it reads the product notes, reads the process notes, and comes back with the campaign done you don't need any of the complicated agent tools people are selling you. you need structure and instructions save this. the people winning with AI aren't using better models. they're just the only ones who bothered to organize what it remembers

A GUY MAKING $100K/MONTH WITH AI JUST SHOWED HIS ENTIRE SETUP. IT'S ONE FOLDER OF NOTES AND NOTHING ELSE no framework. no $500 course. he opens his screen and it's just obsidian - a plain notes app - wired into claude here's what he did: -> he pulled claude's memory files out of their default folder and dumped them into one vault -> had claude rename and merge them: 107 messy files collapsed into 17 clean ones -> every folder gets one master note that links to all the others that last part is the whole trick the agent reads the master note, follows the links and by the time it's done it has read every file in the folder. one instruction, full context here's the part most people miss: everyone's trying to make the AI smarter. he made the AI's memory smaller fewer files, better organized, all linked. the agent isn't scanning hundreds of notes anymore - it walks a path you built that's why his agent actually finishes jobs instead of forgetting what it was doing halfway through then he goes one step further: at the end of every session, the agent writes its own daily note. what it did, when, indexed at the top so it can find it again in seconds so he never re-explains anything. the agent looks up what it already did now he types "create a campaign for this offer" and walks away. it reads the product notes, reads the process notes, and comes back with the campaign done you don't need any of the complicated agent tools people are selling you. you need structure and instructions save this. the people winning with AI aren't using better models. they're just the only ones who bothered to organize what it remembers

Paone

23,833 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Google Brain founder, Andrew Ng: "One of the most important skills of the future is the ability to tell a computer exactly what you want so it can do it for you." In this talk, he explains why the biggest opportunity isn't just using AI. It's learning how to turn work into agentic workflows, break tasks into steps, give agents the right tools and context, add evals, and make the whole system reliable. That's the difference between prompting an AI and engineering an agent that actually works. Watch it today, then read the full guide in the article below.

Google Brain founder, Andrew Ng: "One of the most important skills of the future is the ability to tell a computer exactly what you want so it can do it for you." In this talk, he explains why the biggest opportunity isn't just using AI. It's learning how to turn work into agentic workflows, break tasks into steps, give agents the right tools and context, add evals, and make the whole system reliable. That's the difference between prompting an AI and engineering an agent that actually works. Watch it today, then read the full guide in the article below.

Rahul

14,431 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

watch the small one on the left. it hears something at 00:05 and does nothing clever with it it just passes it on that is the whole trick. echo isolates a trace in ambient noise. moth follows the noise. kite finds a shorter route to it. vex starts collecting fragments. halo keeps the pattern so nobody has to look for it twice. nobody assigned any of that coherence in the top corner opens the cycle at 18%. by the time the wave crosses the field it is past 75%, and not one instruction was typed while it happened most people building agent teams do this backwards. they write a dispatcher, a queue, a state machine, and then wonder why five bots are slower than one. five bots stay slower than one until they can read each other's job descriptions and hand work sideways with no human standing in the middle three ways this breaks before it works: → give every bot the same description and the orchestrator has nothing to route on. every task comes straight back to you → let two bots own the same folder and they overwrite each other for six hours. you wake up to a clean, empty, perfectly synced nothing → skip the boundary line in one charter and that bot will send something. once is plenty to learn that lesson twenty agents run on one seat here. cheaper than a standup for three humans, and none of them ask what the priority is most setups have one agent and a bottleneck made of a person. this one has twenty, and the interesting part happens while nobody is watching full charters, the routing rule and the one line that stops a bot mid-send are in the piece below

watch the small one on the left. it hears something at 00:05 and does nothing clever with it it just passes it on that is the whole trick. echo isolates a trace in ambient noise. moth follows the noise. kite finds a shorter route to it. vex starts collecting fragments. halo keeps the pattern so nobody has to look for it twice. nobody assigned any of that coherence in the top corner opens the cycle at 18%. by the time the wave crosses the field it is past 75%, and not one instruction was typed while it happened most people building agent teams do this backwards. they write a dispatcher, a queue, a state machine, and then wonder why five bots are slower than one. five bots stay slower than one until they can read each other's job descriptions and hand work sideways with no human standing in the middle three ways this breaks before it works: → give every bot the same description and the orchestrator has nothing to route on. every task comes straight back to you → let two bots own the same folder and they overwrite each other for six hours. you wake up to a clean, empty, perfectly synced nothing → skip the boundary line in one charter and that bot will send something. once is plenty to learn that lesson twenty agents run on one seat here. cheaper than a standup for three humans, and none of them ask what the priority is most setups have one agent and a bottleneck made of a person. this one has twenty, and the interesting part happens while nobody is watching full charters, the routing rule and the one line that stops a bot mid-send are in the piece below

monokern

12,612 Aufrufe • vor 18 Tagen

We're excited to introduce eComrads. Our mission is to make AI that sells, not just AI that makes content. We're building AdDNA, the intelligence layer that gives AI models and agents judgment about what actually converts. And today, eComrads is live to everyone. AI has made it easy to generate anything. A product photo, a video, an ad, in seconds. Everyone has the same tools now, and most of what comes out is slop, content that looks fine and sells nothing. Because generating content was never the hard part. The hard part is judgement. What converts, what fits the brand, what makes someone actually buy. Cracking that means turning something fuzzy and subjective, the instinct for what sells, into something we can measure and codify. We're starting with ecommerce. There are two sides to this, the intelligence layer and the production layer: - We've trained AdDNA on what actually performs in each niche, the winning patterns behind real conversions, not pretty pictures, and we refresh it constantly so the system generates toward what sells. - We've built the production engine that turns that judgment into finished, on-brand creative, photoshoots, video, UGC, and ads, with your product kept accurate instead of reinvented, and every output checked before it ships. We learned all of this the hard way, producing creative by hand for real brands until we knew exactly what breaks and what sells. eComrads is that knowledge, turned into a product. We want a future where any brand can compete on the quality of its ideas, not the size of its ad budget.

eComrads

457,726 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten