Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

xAI has just released a STRONG model for vibe coding Grok Code Fast 1 is by far the fastest I've tested 🔥 → Usable in Cline (100% open source) → Also Cursor, Copilot, etc. → 160 toks/s (GPT-5 runs at 50 tok/s) → Free for the launch, 6x cheaper... show more

Paul Couvert

220,959 subscribers

144,713 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Наука и технологии Образование

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

GPT-5 is 25x cheaper than GPT-4 at launch It raced to billions of tokens/minute within 2 hours of launch I talked to OpenAI's Olivier Godement about: • GPT-5, gpt-oss, and OpenAI's release strategy • How open-source models solve the enterprise puzzle • The fastest tech adoption in recent memory Check out our full conversation below:

GPT-5 is 25x cheaper than GPT-4 at launch It raced to billions of tokens/minute within 2 hours of launch I talked to OpenAI's Olivier Godement about: • GPT-5, gpt-oss, and OpenAI's release strategy • How open-source models solve the enterprise puzzle • The fastest tech adoption in recent memory Check out our full conversation below:

Zain Kahn

438,660 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

OpenAI has just released GPT-5-Codex specifically for coding! Friendly reminder that they've a VS Code extension that you can use with your ChatGPT account at NO additional cost. Basically a strong alternative to Claude Code or Cursor. (Setup below)

OpenAI has just released GPT-5-Codex specifically for coding! Friendly reminder that they've a VS Code extension that you can use with your ChatGPT account at NO additional cost. Basically a strong alternative to Claude Code or Cursor. (Setup below)

Paul Couvert

261,857 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

So Alibaba has just released a coding plan with all the best open source models You’ve access to Qwen 3.5-Plus, Kimi K2.5, MiniMax M2.5, GLM-5, etc. And you can plug it to: - Claude Code (as I did) - OpenClaw - Codex - Cline… While being waaay cheaper than the paid plan of Codex, Claude & Cie. More below

So Alibaba has just released a coding plan with all the best open source models You’ve access to Qwen 3.5-Plus, Kimi K2.5, MiniMax M2.5, GLM-5, etc. And you can plug it to: - Claude Code (as I did) - OpenClaw - Codex - Cline… While being waaay cheaper than the paid plan of Codex, Claude & Cie. More below

Paul Couvert

88,333 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Qwen just published the 'Thinking' variant of this model 🔥 So you can run a model EVEN MORE powerful than GPT-4o locally! - Still only 3B active parameters - Open source license - 256k context window extendable to 1M - Strong in math, science and coding Details below ↓

Qwen just published the 'Thinking' variant of this model 🔥 So you can run a model EVEN MORE powerful than GPT-4o locally! - Still only 3B active parameters - Open source license - 256k context window extendable to 1M - Strong in math, science and coding Details below ↓

Paul Couvert

106,261 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

SOMEONE VIBE CODED A FULL PC GAME 100% prompts with no code the stack: - built entirely in Cursor - 90% Grok 4.5, rest Opus 4.8 and GPT 5.5 - switched to Grok 4.5 for speed and cost - built on Godot - art generated with ChatGPT Images through his own custom tool Act 1 is already playable this is what vibe coding actually looks like now

SOMEONE VIBE CODED A FULL PC GAME 100% prompts with no code the stack: - built entirely in Cursor - 90% Grok 4.5, rest Opus 4.8 and GPT 5.5 - switched to Grok 4.5 for speed and cost - built on Godot - art generated with ChatGPT Images through his own custom tool Act 1 is already playable this is what vibe coding actually looks like now

Madni Aghadi

99,606 просмотров • 5 дней назад

Vibe-coding without real infrastructure is just a toy. We’re merging AI-native front-end freedom with the battle-tested WordPress backend: turning vibe-coding to full production machine. Idea -> AI builds -> You shape by chatting -> Launch with confidence. Why launch with confidence: - Fully hosted, secure, version-controlled, SEO-tuned - Build your way: chat, visual, or code - Runs on WordPress—the engine that already runs the internet Fast to create. Faster to ship. On a real CMS. Comment “VIBE” to double your free credits. Comment “VIBE” & join our Discord for 5× more. Let’s launch something real.

Vibe-coding without real infrastructure is just a toy. We’re merging AI-native front-end freedom with the battle-tested WordPress backend: turning vibe-coding to full production machine. Idea -> AI builds -> You shape by chatting -> Launch with confidence. Why launch with confidence: - Fully hosted, secure, version-controlled, SEO-tuned - Build your way: chat, visual, or code - Runs on WordPress—the engine that already runs the internet Fast to create. Faster to ship. On a real CMS. Comment “VIBE” to double your free credits. Comment “VIBE” & join our Discord for 5× more. Let’s launch something real.

Arto Minasyan

23,849,392 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Vibe-coding without real infrastructure is just a toy. We’re merging AI-native front-end freedom with the battle-tested WordPress backend: turning vibe-coding to full production machine. Idea → AI builds → You shape by chatting → Launch with confidence. Why launch with confidence: ✔️Fully hosted, secure, version-controlled, SEO-tuned ✔️Build your way: chat, visual, or code ✔️You own the code. Always. ✔️Runs on WordPress—the engine that already runs the internet Fast to create. Faster to ship. On a real CMS. Comment “VIBE” to double your free credits. Join our Discord & comment “VIBE” for 5× more. Let’s launch something real.

Vibe-coding without real infrastructure is just a toy. We’re merging AI-native front-end freedom with the battle-tested WordPress backend: turning vibe-coding to full production machine. Idea → AI builds → You shape by chatting → Launch with confidence. Why launch with confidence: ✔️Fully hosted, secure, version-controlled, SEO-tuned ✔️Build your way: chat, visual, or code ✔️You own the code. Always. ✔️Runs on WordPress—the engine that already runs the internet Fast to create. Faster to ship. On a real CMS. Comment “VIBE” to double your free credits. Join our Discord & comment “VIBE” for 5× more. Let’s launch something real.

Arto Minasyan

535,603 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Grok 4.5 is out!!! here is what you need to know : On cursor bench it matched fable 5 high at 83% cheaper, although the ui generation feels similar to gpt 5.5 in a bad way. Important to note, cursor bench was LEAKED to grok 4.5 and may have skewed the results! My initial thoughts are this could be a insanely cheap opus 4.8 level model that runs insanely fast. Will you be using grok build?

Grok 4.5 is out!!! here is what you need to know : On cursor bench it matched fable 5 high at 83% cheaper, although the ui generation feels similar to gpt 5.5 in a bad way. Important to note, cursor bench was LEAKED to grok 4.5 and may have skewed the results! My initial thoughts are this could be a insanely cheap opus 4.8 level model that runs insanely fast. Will you be using grok build?

Max Blade

18,675 просмотров • 16 дней назад

.OpenAI's GPT-5.1 is live in Cline. After testing the last several weeks, here's what we've found makes GPT-5.1 an exceptional model in Cline: GPT-5.1 is an obsessive researcher. It reads everything before writing anything. Where other models grab context and go, GPT-5.1 investigates thoroughly first, even for one-line changes. We found this overkill for simple tasks, and modified GPT-5.1's prompting resultantly, but a superpower when channeled right. Here's what you should expect from GPT-5.1 in Cline: > deep, systematic investigation before any edits > follows constraints religiously (specs, todo lists, your requirements) > maintains coherent reasoning with large contexts > delivers complete features with fewer corrections How we optimized Cline for GPT-5.1: 1. redesigned prompts for execution focus and stricter Plan/Act transitions 2. tightened tool specs, GPT-5.1 internalizes rules with just single examples 3. split /deep-planning investigation into two phases (read first, then search) Result: GPT-5.1 is a model that finishes what it starts, even across dozens of files and thousands of lines. Both GPT-5.1 (272K context) and GPT-5.1-codex (400K context) available now in Cline. $1.25/M input, $10/M output. Enable native tool calling in settings for best results. Use /deep-planning to see GPT-5.1 at its best. Full technical breakdown linked below.

.OpenAI's GPT-5.1 is live in Cline. After testing the last several weeks, here's what we've found makes GPT-5.1 an exceptional model in Cline: GPT-5.1 is an obsessive researcher. It reads everything before writing anything. Where other models grab context and go, GPT-5.1 investigates thoroughly first, even for one-line changes. We found this overkill for simple tasks, and modified GPT-5.1's prompting resultantly, but a superpower when channeled right. Here's what you should expect from GPT-5.1 in Cline: > deep, systematic investigation before any edits > follows constraints religiously (specs, todo lists, your requirements) > maintains coherent reasoning with large contexts > delivers complete features with fewer corrections How we optimized Cline for GPT-5.1: 1. redesigned prompts for execution focus and stricter Plan/Act transitions 2. tightened tool specs, GPT-5.1 internalizes rules with just single examples 3. split /deep-planning investigation into two phases (read first, then search) Result: GPT-5.1 is a model that finishes what it starts, even across dozens of files and thousands of lines. Both GPT-5.1 (272K context) and GPT-5.1-codex (400K context) available now in Cline. $1.25/M input, $10/M output. Enable native tool calling in settings for best results. Use /deep-planning to see GPT-5.1 at its best. Full technical breakdown linked below.

Cline

72,111 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

GPT-5 is live in Cline. We've been working with OpenAI to get this model ready, and here's our take: it's disciplined, persistent, & highly competent. It's collaborative in planning & and a diligent operator while acting. It plans thoroughly, asks optioned follow-ups when needed, & then gets out of the way and ships code. On long tasks it keeps going before pausing to check in. It follows instructions to the letter. And most importantly -- it writes good code. GPT-5 is like "The Wolf" from Pulp Fiction. Comes in, assesses the situation, then executes. Here's what you can expect from GPT-5 in Cline: > verbose while planning; terse while executing > asks a lot of good clarification questions, & frequently provides options when appropriate > strong context retention and persistence over long horizons (256k context window) > good at diff-style edits and multi-file changes (we'll monitor as more usage data comes in) > quiet in Act mode -- writes code without yapping Metaprompting is another strength. We tested early with OpenAI and used GPT-5 to tune our own prompt for GPT-5. Here's a pattern we like: “Answer from your own perspective: what changes or additions would help you better follow this prompt? Here is the prompt (or snippet): [snippet]. Users have complained about X and Y. What minimal edits would you make while keeping the rest intact?” Do you need to change any of your existing patterns in Cline? No -- it's good out of the box. Give a clear goal and constraints, let it plan, then let it cook. Expect more clarifying questions than most models. Pricing: $1.25/M input tokens (+90% cache), $10/M output. Roughly half of Sonnet 4 ($3/$15). Want to try GPT-5? Use it in Cline today for pure, unfiltered inference via the OpenAI, Cline, or OpenRouter providers. (fyi -- GPT-5 one-shotted this browser DAW below on the prompt "build something impressive to show me what you're capable of")

GPT-5 is live in Cline. We've been working with OpenAI to get this model ready, and here's our take: it's disciplined, persistent, & highly competent. It's collaborative in planning & and a diligent operator while acting. It plans thoroughly, asks optioned follow-ups when needed, & then gets out of the way and ships code. On long tasks it keeps going before pausing to check in. It follows instructions to the letter. And most importantly -- it writes good code. GPT-5 is like "The Wolf" from Pulp Fiction. Comes in, assesses the situation, then executes. Here's what you can expect from GPT-5 in Cline: > verbose while planning; terse while executing > asks a lot of good clarification questions, & frequently provides options when appropriate > strong context retention and persistence over long horizons (256k context window) > good at diff-style edits and multi-file changes (we'll monitor as more usage data comes in) > quiet in Act mode -- writes code without yapping Metaprompting is another strength. We tested early with OpenAI and used GPT-5 to tune our own prompt for GPT-5. Here's a pattern we like: “Answer from your own perspective: what changes or additions would help you better follow this prompt? Here is the prompt (or snippet): [snippet]. Users have complained about X and Y. What minimal edits would you make while keeping the rest intact?” Do you need to change any of your existing patterns in Cline? No -- it's good out of the box. Give a clear goal and constraints, let it plan, then let it cook. Expect more clarifying questions than most models. Pricing: $1.25/M input tokens (+90% cache), $10/M output. Roughly half of Sonnet 4 ($3/$15). Want to try GPT-5? Use it in Cline today for pure, unfiltered inference via the OpenAI, Cline, or OpenRouter providers. (fyi -- GPT-5 one-shotted this browser DAW below on the prompt "build something impressive to show me what you're capable of")

Cline

63,496 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

OpenAI Dev Day Just kicked off and it was the biggest day for AI since the launch of GPT-4 in April. Here's a 3 minute video with everything you need to know and a full summary: 1. GPT-4 Turbo is released. It is much better than GPT-4, can accept up to 128k characters and is 3x cheaper. The knowledge cut off is now April 2023 2. Text to Speech is also being released. They offer 6 hyper-realistic voice models that are the best I've heard from any other AI t-t-s software on the market. 3. Copyright Shield. OpenAI will actually defend your legal costs if you get sued for copyright infringement using their API! 4. GPTs. Maybe the most exciting IMHO, you can now create custom "GPTs" by training your own model of GPT and selling it on their store. This will create a massive shakeup of the current AI software landscape and is the first step towards autonomous agents.

OpenAI Dev Day Just kicked off and it was the biggest day for AI since the launch of GPT-4 in April. Here's a 3 minute video with everything you need to know and a full summary: 1. GPT-4 Turbo is released. It is much better than GPT-4, can accept up to 128k characters and is 3x cheaper. The knowledge cut off is now April 2023 2. Text to Speech is also being released. They offer 6 hyper-realistic voice models that are the best I've heard from any other AI t-t-s software on the market. 3. Copyright Shield. OpenAI will actually defend your legal costs if you get sued for copyright infringement using their API! 4. GPTs. Maybe the most exciting IMHO, you can now create custom "GPTs" by training your own model of GPT and selling it on their store. This will create a massive shakeup of the current AI software landscape and is the first step towards autonomous agents.

Mark Gadala-Maria

79,177 просмотров • 2 лет назад

GPT-5.6 vs GPT-5.5 on my custom spaceship prompt. I gave both models the exact same custom prompt. This is also the same prompt I previously gave to Fable 5. For context, GPT-5.6 Pro worked for 87 minutes, while GPT-5.5 Extra High worked for 34 minutes and 42 seconds. As I’ve said before, based on great authority GPT-5.6 will be an incremental/soldi improvement over GPT-5.5, not a “Fable killer.” My rough expectation has been that it would trade blows with Fable 5 on some benchmarks, maybe win around half depending on the category, but not clearly surpass it overall. And again fable five will have bigger model smell, but this was expected. After testing this coding output, that view feels pretty accurate. GPT-5.6 is clearly better than GPT-5.5 in several visual areas. The lighting, shading, chairs, object details, and exterior of the spaceship looked noticeably stronger. The scene was also easier to test. I do want to give GPT-5.5 credit though. It built out the rooms much much better and the planets looked better than GPT-5.6’s. It was also interesting that both GPT-5.5 and GPT-5.6 produced better-looking planets than Fable 5 in this specific test. The downside with GPT-5.5 was stability. The game was much glitchier and harder to test compared to GPT-5.6. But when it comes to the core of the demo, which is the spaceship itself, Fable 5 still beat both models pretty comfortably. GPT-5.6 is impressive, but from this test, it looks exactly like what I expected which was a meaningful incremental improvement over GPT-5.5, at least for indie game demos, but not something that replaces Fable 5. In collaboration with Chetaslua

GPT-5.6 vs GPT-5.5 on my custom spaceship prompt. I gave both models the exact same custom prompt. This is also the same prompt I previously gave to Fable 5. For context, GPT-5.6 Pro worked for 87 minutes, while GPT-5.5 Extra High worked for 34 minutes and 42 seconds. As I’ve said before, based on great authority GPT-5.6 will be an incremental/soldi improvement over GPT-5.5, not a “Fable killer.” My rough expectation has been that it would trade blows with Fable 5 on some benchmarks, maybe win around half depending on the category, but not clearly surpass it overall. And again fable five will have bigger model smell, but this was expected. After testing this coding output, that view feels pretty accurate. GPT-5.6 is clearly better than GPT-5.5 in several visual areas. The lighting, shading, chairs, object details, and exterior of the spaceship looked noticeably stronger. The scene was also easier to test. I do want to give GPT-5.5 credit though. It built out the rooms much much better and the planets looked better than GPT-5.6’s. It was also interesting that both GPT-5.5 and GPT-5.6 produced better-looking planets than Fable 5 in this specific test. The downside with GPT-5.5 was stability. The game was much glitchier and harder to test compared to GPT-5.6. But when it comes to the core of the demo, which is the spaceship itself, Fable 5 still beat both models pretty comfortably. GPT-5.6 is impressive, but from this test, it looks exactly like what I expected which was a meaningful incremental improvement over GPT-5.5, at least for indie game demos, but not something that replaces Fable 5. In collaboration with Chetaslua

Chris

249,713 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

GPT-5.4 is my new default model for OpenClaw. For the last 2 months, Opus was the only model I felt could really unlock OpenClaw for serious agent tasks. GPT-5.4 is the first one that got close enough in quality to change that. In practice, it feels ~60% faster (73 tok/s vs 46), costs about half as much, and gives ~5x longer context. That combination makes OpenClaw much more snappy as a default. I tested it side by side against Opus 4.6 on deep research + slide generation, and the outputs are inspectable too. Full video below:

GPT-5.4 is my new default model for OpenClaw. For the last 2 months, Opus was the only model I felt could really unlock OpenClaw for serious agent tasks. GPT-5.4 is the first one that got close enough in quality to change that. In practice, it feels ~60% faster (73 tok/s vs 46), costs about half as much, and gives ~5x longer context. That combination makes OpenClaw much more snappy as a default. I tested it side by side against Opus 4.6 on deep research + slide generation, and the outputs are inspectable too. Full video below:

Quinn Leng

131,551 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

You can use a 100% open source and MUCH cheaper/free alternative to Claude Code and Opus 4.5 OpenCode + MiniMax M2.1 can even build a 3D website using pure vibe coding. Steps are really simple: 1. Install OpenCode using the command 'npm i -g opencode-ai' 2. Get your MiniMax API key here: 3. Configure the MiniMax (official) mode Just type "opencode connect minimax" Coding plans start at $2… 10x cheaper than Claude Code (yes). You can also invite friends so they can get 10% off and you’ll get 10% API credits. (You can also use it locally if you have the config) And you're ready to build and iterate almost endlessly since the model is both way faster and cheaper than Opus in CC.

You can use a 100% open source and MUCH cheaper/free alternative to Claude Code and Opus 4.5 OpenCode + MiniMax M2.1 can even build a 3D website using pure vibe coding. Steps are really simple: 1. Install OpenCode using the command 'npm i -g opencode-ai' 2. Get your MiniMax API key here: 3. Configure the MiniMax (official) mode Just type "opencode connect minimax" Coding plans start at $2… 10x cheaper than Claude Code (yes). You can also invite friends so they can get 10% off and you’ll get 10% API credits. (You can also use it locally if you have the config) And you're ready to build and iterate almost endlessly since the model is both way faster and cheaper than Opus in CC.

Paul Couvert

42,443 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Creator of Claude Code: “Fable 5 is writing 100% of my code now. It’s at least 3x more powerful than Opus.” Every problem I gave to Fable, it one-shotted. I’m running out of coding problems for it. in 40-minute talk Boris explain how to unlock 100% potential of Claude new models Fable 5 + loops + dynamic workflows + routines- that’s the secret Worth more then 500$ vibe-coding course

Creator of Claude Code: “Fable 5 is writing 100% of my code now. It’s at least 3x more powerful than Opus.” Every problem I gave to Fable, it one-shotted. I’m running out of coding problems for it. in 40-minute talk Boris explain how to unlock 100% potential of Claude new models Fable 5 + loops + dynamic workflows + routines- that’s the secret Worth more then 500$ vibe-coding course

Codez

284,474 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

timelapse #86 (15 hrs): - got my first OOM on 8xB200 node - defaulting back to grok-code-fast-1, the fastest reliable coding model with by far most intuitive instruction following, combined with grok 4 fast reasoning to plan before i let grok code work its magic - drank 2 large tim hortons iced capps, loaded myself w/ creatine, daily nootropics - tried out gpt-5-codex but it simply doesnt match the speed i require when i go deep into one thing at a time sequentially - got caught watching youtube videos in the middle, need to make sure i block any and all content that could get in my way - caught up on all book revisions so getting super ahead with other chapters - developed an overnight addiction to switching color themes in cursor - did some pair programming w/ Kearm h/eng using Tuple on free trial - applying for O-1

timelapse #86 (15 hrs): - got my first OOM on 8xB200 node - defaulting back to grok-code-fast-1, the fastest reliable coding model with by far most intuitive instruction following, combined with grok 4 fast reasoning to plan before i let grok code work its magic - drank 2 large tim hortons iced capps, loaded myself w/ creatine, daily nootropics - tried out gpt-5-codex but it simply doesnt match the speed i require when i go deep into one thing at a time sequentially - got caught watching youtube videos in the middle, need to make sure i block any and all content that could get in my way - caught up on all book revisions so getting super ahead with other chapters - developed an overnight addiction to switching color themes in cursor - did some pair programming w/ Kearm h/eng using Tuple on free trial - applying for O-1

Elliot Arledge

102,959 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

$Grok Code just literally cloned the entire Netflix UI with a one shot prompt From the iconic Hero section to the interactive Carousel, all with a single prompt and a few web-sourced image links It’s not just fast, it's the most cost-effective SOTA model out there ➝ Input: Grok $0.20 vs Claude $3 (15x cheaper) ➝ Output: Grok $1.50 vs Claude $15 (10x cheaper) Here’s how you can do it in VS Code with Kilo Code Grok Code matches Claude Sonnet 4 in performance, but is 10-15x more cost-effective All this for less than $1 SOTA power, fractional cost$

Grok Code just literally cloned the entire Netflix UI with a one shot prompt From the iconic Hero section to the interactive Carousel, all with a single prompt and a few web-sourced image links It’s not just fast, it's the most cost-effective SOTA model out there ➝ Input: Grok $0.20 vs Claude $3 (15x cheaper) ➝ Output: Grok $1.50 vs Claude $15 (10x cheaper) Here’s how you can do it in VS Code with Kilo Code Grok Code matches Claude Sonnet 4 in performance, but is 10-15x more cost-effective All this for less than $1 SOTA power, fractional cost

X Freeze

6,972,865 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

Alibaba just released a coding model that hits 82 percent on SWE-Bench Verified. That is the highest score ever published for an open-source model. The weights are free. The license is Apache 2.0. You can run it today. The model is Qwen 4 Coder 32B. Here is what 82 percent on SWE-Bench Verified actually means. SWE-Bench Verified tests whether an AI can autonomously resolve real bugs pulled from real production GitHub repositories. Not synthetic exercises. Real open-source projects that real teams depend on. A model gets a bug report, reads the code, writes a fix, and either passes the test suite or it does not. At 82 percent, Qwen 4 Coder 32B resolves 82 out of every 100 real production bugs it is given. Without a human guiding it. On code it has never seen before. For comparison: Qwen 4 Coder 32B: 82 percent SWE-Bench Verified. Open source. Apache 2.0. Claude Fable 5: 80.3 percent SWE-Bench Pro. $10 input / $50 output per million tokens. Currently suspended. GPT-5.6 Sol: Competitive on Terminal-Bench. $5 input / $30 output per million tokens. An open-weight model that you can download and run for free just beat both of them on the benchmark designed to measure real software engineering capability. Here is the architecture. Qwen 4 Coder 32B is a 32 billion parameter dense model. Not a Mixture-of-Experts. Every parameter is active on every request. This matters for inference: a dense 32B model runs on 22 gigabytes of VRAM, which fits on a single high-end consumer GPU or a MacBook Pro with 64GB of unified memory. The smaller variant, Qwen 4 Coder 4B, runs at approximately 135 tokens per second on an M5 Max and fits inside 8 gigabytes of RAM. For a model with usable coding capability, that is a new bar for what fits in a single laptop. The training methodology continued Alibaba's approach of reinforcement learning on verifiable coding tasks. The model gets rewarded when its code passes tests. It gets penalized when it fails. Over millions of training steps, the model learns to write code that actually runs rather than code that looks plausible. License: Apache 2.0. Full commercial use. No attribution requirement. No revenue threshold. No monthly active user ceiling. Weights: Hugging Face, available today. Runs on: vLLM, Ollama, SGLang, and any standard GGUF-compatible inference engine. Qwen 4 32B also runs at approximately 135 tokens per second on an M5 Max chip, setting a new bar for what a sub-8GB model can do on Apple Silicon. The open-source coding model just beat the best closed-source model in the world on the benchmark designed to test whether AI can actually do software engineering. The weights are free. The subscription is optional. Source: Autom8Labs AI Insight July 2026, State of Open Source LLMs June 2026, Kunal Ganglani blog June 2026.

Alibaba just released a coding model that hits 82 percent on SWE-Bench Verified. That is the highest score ever published for an open-source model. The weights are free. The license is Apache 2.0. You can run it today. The model is Qwen 4 Coder 32B. Here is what 82 percent on SWE-Bench Verified actually means. SWE-Bench Verified tests whether an AI can autonomously resolve real bugs pulled from real production GitHub repositories. Not synthetic exercises. Real open-source projects that real teams depend on. A model gets a bug report, reads the code, writes a fix, and either passes the test suite or it does not. At 82 percent, Qwen 4 Coder 32B resolves 82 out of every 100 real production bugs it is given. Without a human guiding it. On code it has never seen before. For comparison: Qwen 4 Coder 32B: 82 percent SWE-Bench Verified. Open source. Apache 2.0. Claude Fable 5: 80.3 percent SWE-Bench Pro. $10 input / $50 output per million tokens. Currently suspended. GPT-5.6 Sol: Competitive on Terminal-Bench. $5 input / $30 output per million tokens. An open-weight model that you can download and run for free just beat both of them on the benchmark designed to measure real software engineering capability. Here is the architecture. Qwen 4 Coder 32B is a 32 billion parameter dense model. Not a Mixture-of-Experts. Every parameter is active on every request. This matters for inference: a dense 32B model runs on 22 gigabytes of VRAM, which fits on a single high-end consumer GPU or a MacBook Pro with 64GB of unified memory. The smaller variant, Qwen 4 Coder 4B, runs at approximately 135 tokens per second on an M5 Max and fits inside 8 gigabytes of RAM. For a model with usable coding capability, that is a new bar for what fits in a single laptop. The training methodology continued Alibaba's approach of reinforcement learning on verifiable coding tasks. The model gets rewarded when its code passes tests. It gets penalized when it fails. Over millions of training steps, the model learns to write code that actually runs rather than code that looks plausible. License: Apache 2.0. Full commercial use. No attribution requirement. No revenue threshold. No monthly active user ceiling. Weights: Hugging Face, available today. Runs on: vLLM, Ollama, SGLang, and any standard GGUF-compatible inference engine. Qwen 4 32B also runs at approximately 135 tokens per second on an M5 Max chip, setting a new bar for what a sub-8GB model can do on Apple Silicon. The open-source coding model just beat the best closed-source model in the world on the benchmark designed to test whether AI can actually do software engineering. The weights are free. The subscription is optional. Source: Autom8Labs AI Insight July 2026, State of Open Source LLMs June 2026, Kunal Ganglani blog June 2026.

Harman

41,148 просмотров • 16 дней назад

OpenAI gpt-oss 120B orchestrates a full video using Hugging Face spaces! 🤯 All of it, in one SINGLE prompt: create an image of a Labrador and use it to generate a simple video of it 🛠️ Tools used: 1. Flux.1 Krea Dev by Black Forest Labs 2. LTX Fast by Lightricks That's it, gpt-oss 120B is one of the BEST open source models I've used for tool calling so far! Kudos OpenAI 🤗

OpenAI gpt-oss 120B orchestrates a full video using Hugging Face spaces! 🤯 All of it, in one SINGLE prompt: create an image of a Labrador and use it to generate a simple video of it 🛠️ Tools used: 1. Flux.1 Krea Dev by Black Forest Labs 2. LTX Fast by Lightricks That's it, gpt-oss 120B is one of the BEST open source models I've used for tool calling so far! Kudos OpenAI 🤗

Vaibhav (VB) Srivastav

45,098 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

20 free Tembo runs/day sounds tiny until you actually do the math The stack: Opus 4.7, GPT 5.5, GLM 5.1. That means the "free tier" is not toy-model autocomplete It is frontier coding models doing real work 1 Bugfix - 1-3 runs 1 Refactor - 3-5 runs 1 PR review - 1 run 1 Architecture pass - 2-4 runs So 20 runs/day is enough for: 5-7 Focused bug fixes 3-4 Serious refactors 10+ PR reviews Full solo dev session Every day, for $0 That is $240-$1,200/year saved if it replaces a $20-$100/mo coding agent subscription Meanwhile most devs are still paying $20-$100/mo because they think the wrapper is the product It is not The product is output And if 20 free runs can ship the same PR, the pricing math gets very uncomfortable Bookmark it before everyone starts pretending they found this first

20 free Tembo runs/day sounds tiny until you actually do the math The stack: Opus 4.7, GPT 5.5, GLM 5.1. That means the "free tier" is not toy-model autocomplete It is frontier coding models doing real work 1 Bugfix - 1-3 runs 1 Refactor - 3-5 runs 1 PR review - 1 run 1 Architecture pass - 2-4 runs So 20 runs/day is enough for: 5-7 Focused bug fixes 3-4 Serious refactors 10+ PR reviews Full solo dev session Every day, for $0 That is $240-$1,200/year saved if it replaces a $20-$100/mo coding agent subscription Meanwhile most devs are still paying $20-$100/mo because they think the wrapper is the product It is not The product is output And if 20 free runs can ship the same PR, the pricing math gets very uncomfortable Bookmark it before everyone starts pretending they found this first

rari

14,193 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад