Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

yea! exactly!

kariinagamer's profile picture

Karina 🧁

12,846 subscribers

19,531 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Urm yea... The reality can be so cruel sometimes 🥲 But this is exactly one of the real ways to deal with it #着せ恋 #着せ恋アニメ #MyDressUpDarling
0:47

Urm yea... The reality can be so cruel sometimes 🥲 But this is exactly one of the real ways to deal with it #着せ恋 #着せ恋アニメ #MyDressUpDarling

𝓡𝓲𝔁𝓲 🌺

535,535 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

They say the truth comes out on mad day…. And last night was exactly that!! #Maniac317 wakes it up on #Noah who most know him as #RickRosa ex boyfriend . Things went from Meth, to backpacks🎒, No lube usage , to prostitution tag team sessions. Chile…. Oh yea “Allegedly “. Take a look #Bigorecap #Bigolive #Bigousa #Bigo
5:33

They say the truth comes out on mad day…. And last night was exactly that!! #Maniac317 wakes it up on #Noah who most know him as #RickRosa ex boyfriend . Things went from Meth, to backpacks🎒, No lube usage , to prostitution tag team sessions. Chile…. Oh yea “Allegedly “. Take a look #Bigorecap #Bigolive #Bigousa #Bigo

BIGO RECAP

57,264 просмотров • 3 лет назад

Luke: I find the whole 5 love languages thing complicated, isn't I'm like all of them? Yerin: Totally but there's like 1 that's slightly more- Luke: Not for me.. yea I want everything, greedy 🤣 Yerin: 😭 "I want gifts and all, I want a lamborghini, and I want words of affirmation" Luke: Yeah exactly, at the same time Yerin: "I love you here's my car 🫴🚗"
0:26

Luke: I find the whole 5 love languages thing complicated, isn't I'm like all of them? Yerin: Totally but there's like 1 that's slightly more- Luke: Not for me.. yea I want everything, greedy 🤣 Yerin: 😭 "I want gifts and all, I want a lamborghini, and I want words of affirmation" Luke: Yeah exactly, at the same time Yerin: "I love you here's my car 🫴🚗"

lukerin clips

145,588 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Interviewer : From what you people are seeing now who do you think gonna win the show? Let’s start with you Sultex , na betting be this o if you win ham you go cash out, so who you think say go win? Neche : Exactly , if you like call Oyin again🤣🤣😭 Sultex : Oyin😭😭😂😂werey✋🏾 Neche : I am not doing the friend thing that was why I said I’m speaking from being in the house and outside of the house, so I would think either Blue or Aikou Interviewer : Awww 🥰 your baby Blue Neche : oh yea yea she’s my baby but she’s also pulling a lot of weight, I think she’s a very strong contender and she doesn’t realize it!! Me : Lemme drag you small , you nko? You realize it?🙄
1:09

Interviewer : From what you people are seeing now who do you think gonna win the show? Let’s start with you Sultex , na betting be this o if you win ham you go cash out, so who you think say go win? Neche : Exactly , if you like call Oyin again🤣🤣😭 Sultex : Oyin😭😭😂😂werey✋🏾 Neche : I am not doing the friend thing that was why I said I’m speaking from being in the house and outside of the house, so I would think either Blue or Aikou Interviewer : Awww 🥰 your baby Blue Neche : oh yea yea she’s my baby but she’s also pulling a lot of weight, I think she’s a very strong contender and she doesn’t realize it!! Me : Lemme drag you small , you nko? You realize it?🙄

‘Mide

75,359 просмотров • 4 дней назад

🌲 describe what “being in heat” feels like😭 🌲: It’s that “in heat” kind of feeling 🌊: Like what exactly? 🌲: Like… an asthma attack kind of feeling.. i’ve never had asthma but i’ve seen people have attacks.. and another thing is when i get panicky at night, when i get up, i can’t even walk.. i have to hold onto the bed to make it to the bathroom… My legs feel super heavy and my head spinning : Let me add one, after he works out 🌲: Yea, after working out it’s like my whole body just shuts down 🌊: *nod nod* 🌲: I just end up lying on the floor like this MBTI MEETS D4 ACTING #D4ActingCampMBTI
0:26

🌲 describe what “being in heat” feels like😭 🌲: It’s that “in heat” kind of feeling 🌊: Like what exactly? 🌲: Like… an asthma attack kind of feeling.. i’ve never had asthma but i’ve seen people have attacks.. and another thing is when i get panicky at night, when i get up, i can’t even walk.. i have to hold onto the bed to make it to the bathroom… My legs feel super heavy and my head spinning : Let me add one, after he works out 🌲: Yea, after working out it’s like my whole body just shuts down 🌊: *nod nod* 🌲: I just end up lying on the floor like this MBTI MEETS D4 ACTING #D4ActingCampMBTI

nini 🍒

18,638 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

LeBron James said the 2011 Finals was the “lowest” point of his career and goes into depth about the BIG 3 Heat’s offense🍿 “Oh for sure (2011) the lowest, yea the lowest.” “The slot cuts — it unlocked exactly what myself and D-Wade thrive on…we all know how great D-Wade is on the baseline, it’s hard to cut the defense when the 5 is standing there…I get the pocket pass from Chalmers or Cole and now Bosh is in the strong corner…it unlocked so much for our offense…the bigs were not allowed to run in the lane…if I’m bringing the ball up and the big is behind me — he can’t cross the court…Spo is that damn good.” (via Mind the Game)
2:17

LeBron James said the 2011 Finals was the “lowest” point of his career and goes into depth about the BIG 3 Heat’s offense🍿 “Oh for sure (2011) the lowest, yea the lowest.” “The slot cuts — it unlocked exactly what myself and D-Wade thrive on…we all know how great D-Wade is on the baseline, it’s hard to cut the defense when the 5 is standing there…I get the pocket pass from Chalmers or Cole and now Bosh is in the strong corner…it unlocked so much for our offense…the bigs were not allowed to run in the lane…if I’m bringing the ball up and the big is behind me — he can’t cross the court…Spo is that damn good.” (via Mind the Game)

The HEAT Realm

231,059 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Heck yea I’m Tesla crazy. And honestly, that’s exactly why I’m the investor I am today. I’m 36 yrs old, but I feel yrs ahead of people my age when it comes to understanding where the world is going. Many call this luck, but it isn’t. Many call this a coincidence, but it isn’t I have an obsessive personality, and instead of fighting it, I use it. When I fall in love with something, I dive all the way in, head in first. I study it. I live it. I breathe it. Every single day. And with Tesla, that’s exactly why obsession is my biggest advantage. When the stock goes up or down, I don’t panic. I know what I own. I’ve seen and used all the products, the tech, the mission, the vision. I’ve seen it all evolve. That’s why it’s so easy for me to tear out the emotions in investing. The product speaks for itself. This is why conviction matters. This is why going deep matters. This is why understanding what you own matters. And this is why I’m all in $TSLA.
1:49

Heck yea I’m Tesla crazy. And honestly, that’s exactly why I’m the investor I am today. I’m 36 yrs old, but I feel yrs ahead of people my age when it comes to understanding where the world is going. Many call this luck, but it isn’t. Many call this a coincidence, but it isn’t I have an obsessive personality, and instead of fighting it, I use it. When I fall in love with something, I dive all the way in, head in first. I study it. I live it. I breathe it. Every single day. And with Tesla, that’s exactly why obsession is my biggest advantage. When the stock goes up or down, I don’t panic. I know what I own. I’ve seen and used all the products, the tech, the mission, the vision. I’ve seen it all evolve. That’s why it’s so easy for me to tear out the emotions in investing. The product speaks for itself. This is why conviction matters. This is why going deep matters. This is why understanding what you own matters. And this is why I’m all in $TSLA.

Teslaconomics

49,509 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

#LOLFanFest2026LIVED3 #JuniorMark #junniorrs #markjrtn Q: Which pair makes your heart beat the most? Joong: JuniorMark. Actually, I didn’t have many opportunities to work with this pair, but we went to an event together. There’s this vibe—It’s like he’s possessive but not possessive-wait no, I mean “it’s like he seems not possessive, but he’s actually very possessive.” Joong: if I took a picture with P’Ju, I could feel a strong gaze staring at me. The moment I turn around- Joss: His eyes are exactly like this 🗣️: Mark’s face is being like this? 😆 Joong: And since I’m close with P’Mark, right? After I took pictures with P’Ju, I went to take one with P’Mark or just play around with him. Whenever I did that, I felt the same energy—the same gaze staring back at me—and his face was just like this! (→ poster) 🗣️: (the vibes is like) That’s my person Joong: yea, “who’s this guy?!”
1:27

#LOLFanFest2026LIVED3 #JuniorMark #junniorrs #markjrtn Q: Which pair makes your heart beat the most? Joong: JuniorMark. Actually, I didn’t have many opportunities to work with this pair, but we went to an event together. There’s this vibe—It’s like he’s possessive but not possessive-wait no, I mean “it’s like he seems not possessive, but he’s actually very possessive.” Joong: if I took a picture with P’Ju, I could feel a strong gaze staring at me. The moment I turn around- Joss: His eyes are exactly like this 🗣️: Mark’s face is being like this? 😆 Joong: And since I’m close with P’Mark, right? After I took pictures with P’Ju, I went to take one with P’Mark or just play around with him. Whenever I did that, I felt the same energy—the same gaze staring back at me—and his face was just like this! (→ poster) 🗣️: (the vibes is like) That’s my person Joong: yea, “who’s this guy?!”

n’wineeeeeee

64,002 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

“They’ve seen the right hand, they ain’t seen my mother F** left hook.” 👀 Alycia Baumgardner Oh yea- Alycia talks that stuff in this one!! Not holding back as she tells Ryan, Channing and Fred exactly who she is, where she comes from and what’s on the line as she defends her Undisputed Featherweight title this week🥊🔥 Alycia opens up on her unlikely journey to the top of women’s boxing, the setbacks and heartbreak along the way, balancing being a beauty and a beast, what’s fueled her fighting power and how the high-stakes July 11th title fight on Netflix is not just an monumental moment for women’s sports but life changing for the young fighter who doesn’t hold back on why she will leave Madison Square Garden hearing those two infamous words words, “And still…” Tap in for this powerful conversation of resilience and what it takes to be a champion streaming now on all audio platforms and YouTube #boxing #netflix #msg #womenssports #jakepaul #pivot #podcast #champion #fight #sports Ryan Clark Channing Crowder Fred Taylor MVP - Most Valuable Promotions Jake Paul
2:46

“They’ve seen the right hand, they ain’t seen my mother F** left hook.” 👀 Alycia Baumgardner Oh yea- Alycia talks that stuff in this one!! Not holding back as she tells Ryan, Channing and Fred exactly who she is, where she comes from and what’s on the line as she defends her Undisputed Featherweight title this week🥊🔥 Alycia opens up on her unlikely journey to the top of women’s boxing, the setbacks and heartbreak along the way, balancing being a beauty and a beast, what’s fueled her fighting power and how the high-stakes July 11th title fight on Netflix is not just an monumental moment for women’s sports but life changing for the young fighter who doesn’t hold back on why she will leave Madison Square Garden hearing those two infamous words words, “And still…” Tap in for this powerful conversation of resilience and what it takes to be a champion streaming now on all audio platforms and YouTube #boxing #netflix #msg #womenssports #jakepaul #pivot #podcast #champion #fight #sports Ryan Clark Channing Crowder Fred Taylor MVP - Most Valuable Promotions Jake Paul

Pivot Podcast

42,761 просмотров • 1 год назад

Introducing Agentic Animator You can now just tell Codex to create new model animations from scratch, here's how it works: - Be precise. Describe exactly the motion, hands, shoulders, legs - Don't expect a oneshot, we're in a completely new field here, it will get the rotation of arms wrong (see demo), just tell it what you see. - The harness: If you try to build a similar app, you will be frustrated very quickly, because a skeleton rig may contain dozens of bones, each with translation, rotation, scale. We're talking about at least 12 properties per bone per frame! Instead, I gave it some high level tool to build an initial animation "blockout", it only places a few keyframes on select bones. That is often enough! ThreeJS can interpolate between the frames and you might not need 30 fps to get a good animation for your model. Anyways it's open source and on github so you can just tell your agent to copy whatever i did and it'll likely work Just promise me to stay open source, yea? Don't you apply to YC with my findings bro
0:44

Introducing Agentic Animator You can now just tell Codex to create new model animations from scratch, here's how it works: - Be precise. Describe exactly the motion, hands, shoulders, legs - Don't expect a oneshot, we're in a completely new field here, it will get the rotation of arms wrong (see demo), just tell it what you see. - The harness: If you try to build a similar app, you will be frustrated very quickly, because a skeleton rig may contain dozens of bones, each with translation, rotation, scale. We're talking about at least 12 properties per bone per frame! Instead, I gave it some high level tool to build an initial animation "blockout", it only places a few keyframes on select bones. That is often enough! ThreeJS can interpolate between the frames and you might not need 30 fps to get a good animation for your model. Anyways it's open source and on github so you can just tell your agent to copy whatever i did and it'll likely work Just promise me to stay open source, yea? Don't you apply to YC with my findings bro

robot

10,555 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Diet soda makes you fat because it has chemicals that your body doesn’t know how to ‘process’? 🤣 Actually diet soda sweetened with say aspartame is processed into aspartate and phenylalanine (2 amino acids found in every source of protein & in way higher amounts) and methanol 😱. Before yall get your panties in a twist, the amount of methanol produced by diet sodas relative to what would cause issues would mean you’d need to drink approx 20,000 12 oz cans of Diet Coke to cause problems. And no, methanol does not accumulate in the body & it is metabolized by the liver & excreted by the kidneys. You’d die of fluid toxicity before you’d ever even come close to the level of methanol needed to cause any issues from drinking diet soda 🤷🏼‍♂️ So yea, our body knows what to do with it. But her claim doesn’t even make sense. If the body didn’t know what to do with it, how would it get stored as fat? And WHAT would get stored as fat? Which ‘chemicals’ and HOW EXACTLY THROUGH WHAT MECHANISM? 🤣 Maybe she’d say they cause insulin release which makes you fat… only one problem with that… they conclusively DO NOT increase insulin (PMID: 36839408) And diet drinks do NOT make you fat. In fact, in the HUMAN. RANDOMIZED. CONTROLLED. TRIALS where they have people drink diet drinks in place of regular sugar sweetened beverages, people lose weight, & in several studies they actually lose more weight than people who substituted water 🤷🏼‍♂️ (PMIDs: 37794246, 37475684, 26708700, & 35285920) I’m not saying you should drink diet soda in place of water. What I’m saying is for many people, diet drinks help them stop drinking regular soda, which in turn helps them lose weight, & get healthier If we fear monger this useful tool, it confuses people & the unintended consequence is many people takeaway not that they will drink more water, but they should not drink diet soda so they might as well continue drinking regular soda since diet soda is portrayed as just as bad by these influencers Also no one tell this gal water has dihydrogen monoxide 🤣. I don’t know her name… y’all tag her 🤷🏼‍♂️ DATA>feelings
1:28

Diet soda makes you fat because it has chemicals that your body doesn’t know how to ‘process’? 🤣 Actually diet soda sweetened with say aspartame is processed into aspartate and phenylalanine (2 amino acids found in every source of protein & in way higher amounts) and methanol 😱. Before yall get your panties in a twist, the amount of methanol produced by diet sodas relative to what would cause issues would mean you’d need to drink approx 20,000 12 oz cans of Diet Coke to cause problems. And no, methanol does not accumulate in the body & it is metabolized by the liver & excreted by the kidneys. You’d die of fluid toxicity before you’d ever even come close to the level of methanol needed to cause any issues from drinking diet soda 🤷🏼‍♂️ So yea, our body knows what to do with it. But her claim doesn’t even make sense. If the body didn’t know what to do with it, how would it get stored as fat? And WHAT would get stored as fat? Which ‘chemicals’ and HOW EXACTLY THROUGH WHAT MECHANISM? 🤣 Maybe she’d say they cause insulin release which makes you fat… only one problem with that… they conclusively DO NOT increase insulin (PMID: 36839408) And diet drinks do NOT make you fat. In fact, in the HUMAN. RANDOMIZED. CONTROLLED. TRIALS where they have people drink diet drinks in place of regular sugar sweetened beverages, people lose weight, & in several studies they actually lose more weight than people who substituted water 🤷🏼‍♂️ (PMIDs: 37794246, 37475684, 26708700, & 35285920) I’m not saying you should drink diet soda in place of water. What I’m saying is for many people, diet drinks help them stop drinking regular soda, which in turn helps them lose weight, & get healthier If we fear monger this useful tool, it confuses people & the unintended consequence is many people takeaway not that they will drink more water, but they should not drink diet soda so they might as well continue drinking regular soda since diet soda is portrayed as just as bad by these influencers Also no one tell this gal water has dihydrogen monoxide 🤣. I don’t know her name… y’all tag her 🤷🏼‍♂️ DATA>feelings

Layne Norton, PhD

243,462 просмотров • 2 лет назад

“People were saying I didn't look happy about Avocean being able to talk.” CERAVE WITH JIMMY #CeraVeSunxJimmy #jimmyyjp #AVOCEAN 💬: How do you feel about Avocean being able to talk now? 💜: To be honest, I’ve been wanting him to talk for a while. I’m really happy he has more gimmicks and features now. It’s going to make working together so much more fun. But actually, I caught some comments earlier... some of them were a bit dramatic. 💬: Oh? How so? 💜: People were saying I didn't look happy about it. 💬: Oiiii!?? 💜: They were like, "Oh, he doesn't seem happy," and I was just confused. Like, hey, there are so many different ways to express joy, you know? 💬: Okay, can you show us "Three Styles of Joy" then? 💜: Sure! 💬: What’s the first style like? 💜: “🙂🙂🙂” This one is "internal joy." I’m happy on the inside, but... 💬: Overwhelmed with emotion? 💜: Yeah, exactly. It’s that deep, heartwarming kind of happy. You get it? 💬: Got it. And what’s the second style? 💜: “Ahehehe! 👏👏😃😃” 💬: Okay, ka! 💜: If I do it like that, it looks more like I'm surprised. 💬: No way! You can be even more surprised than that. Let’s see the third style! 💜: “Yes! ✊🏻🤨✊🏻” This is the kind of joy you feel when you win a game or a match. 💜: Anyway, I was just puzzled how do they know if I'm happy or not? I’m genuinely moved. I mean, think about how long Avocean has been working. It’s been a year, right? It took a long time for him to develop into his own character. People actually like him for who he is, not just because of me or Sea. He has real fans now. Seeing his development makes me proud. I believe that in the future, his voice is going to "hook" so many more people. He’s going to get stronger, entertain better, and make people even happier. I feel fulfilled knowing we made Avocean happy and that he makes the fans happy. That’s just how I express my joy. 💬: So, was that joy style number one, two, or three? 💜: Definitely Style Number One. If you go back and watch my reaction video, I look calm, but my eyes are like, "Whoa..." I saw the drama, honestly, but I didn't want to say anything. Since I have the chance now, I figured I'd just clear it up! ——— Ok He was definitely pissed by those stupid comments. Yea, F those morons!
2:42

“People were saying I didn't look happy about Avocean being able to talk.” CERAVE WITH JIMMY #CeraVeSunxJimmy #jimmyyjp #AVOCEAN 💬: How do you feel about Avocean being able to talk now? 💜: To be honest, I’ve been wanting him to talk for a while. I’m really happy he has more gimmicks and features now. It’s going to make working together so much more fun. But actually, I caught some comments earlier... some of them were a bit dramatic. 💬: Oh? How so? 💜: People were saying I didn't look happy about it. 💬: Oiiii!?? 💜: They were like, "Oh, he doesn't seem happy," and I was just confused. Like, hey, there are so many different ways to express joy, you know? 💬: Okay, can you show us "Three Styles of Joy" then? 💜: Sure! 💬: What’s the first style like? 💜: “🙂🙂🙂” This one is "internal joy." I’m happy on the inside, but... 💬: Overwhelmed with emotion? 💜: Yeah, exactly. It’s that deep, heartwarming kind of happy. You get it? 💬: Got it. And what’s the second style? 💜: “Ahehehe! 👏👏😃😃” 💬: Okay, ka! 💜: If I do it like that, it looks more like I'm surprised. 💬: No way! You can be even more surprised than that. Let’s see the third style! 💜: “Yes! ✊🏻🤨✊🏻” This is the kind of joy you feel when you win a game or a match. 💜: Anyway, I was just puzzled how do they know if I'm happy or not? I’m genuinely moved. I mean, think about how long Avocean has been working. It’s been a year, right? It took a long time for him to develop into his own character. People actually like him for who he is, not just because of me or Sea. He has real fans now. Seeing his development makes me proud. I believe that in the future, his voice is going to "hook" so many more people. He’s going to get stronger, entertain better, and make people even happier. I feel fulfilled knowing we made Avocean happy and that he makes the fans happy. That’s just how I express my joy. 💬: So, was that joy style number one, two, or three? 💜: Definitely Style Number One. If you go back and watch my reaction video, I look calm, but my eyes are like, "Whoa..." I saw the drama, honestly, but I didn't want to say anything. Since I have the chance now, I figured I'd just clear it up! ——— Ok He was definitely pissed by those stupid comments. Yea, F those morons!

Mhokstache ✨

55,635 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

🚨JD Vance Says that He's Obsessed With UFOs. Eric Burlison Is Actually Chasing the Files. There is a really strange split forming inside the UAP disclosure conversation as far as I'm concerned. On the one side, JD Vance keeps declaring that he is fascinated by UFOs. He has said he wants to get to the bottom of it, that he has access, that no one is telling him 'no,' and that the main issue is finding time to push through the classification walls. On the other side, Rep. Eric Burlison is already doing the boring but necessary work that actually pushes this topic forward. He is sending letters, tracing records, pressuring the CIA and FBI, and asking specific questions about the 1996 Varginha case in Brazil. Vance told Joe Rogan that, as vice president, he effectively has access to everything. He said the problem is not that people are blocking him, but that he has not had time to really dig into the UFO files. That is a strange answer from someone who also describes himself as obsessed with the subject don't you think? Ask yourself, if the vice president of the United States has access, interest, and a shrinking window of time, then what exactly is he waiting for? This is really weird because President Trump's UFO records directive has already led to new file releases. We have now seen multiple 'tranches' of UFO material released to the public, yet Vance appears to be watching from the sidelines while saying he still intends to look into it properly at some point... At what point? Meanwhile, Burlison has moved directly toward the Varginha case, one of the most prolific UFO incidents on record. The Brazilian witnesses have claimed for decades that something crashed, that beings were recovered, and that American personnel were involved in the removal of material or biological evidence. Burlison wants to know if there were U.S. government flights in or near Campinas, Brazil, between January 14 and January 28, 1996? Were there material transfers? Were there communications with Brazilian authorities? Were contractors involved? Did the FBI have investigative equities connected to U.S. personnel, aircraft, contractors, or biological samples? A previous CIA FOIA request connected to the Varginha matter was met with a Glomar response. The agency would neither confirm nor deny whether responsive records exist, citing national security exemptions. That is not the same as saying there are no records... Yea ok. So while Vance argues that something as big as recovered alien material would have leaked in the age of smartphones during a Joe Rogan interview, Rogan pushed back with the people who would see the most sensitive material are not walking around with iPhones in their hands. They are inside SCIFs. They are under NDAs. They are operating inside systems designed specifically to stop leaks and he is right. The absence of a viral phone video doesn't prove the absence of a program. It just proves that the secrecy architecture works exactly as it was intended. Where has Vance been? No leaks? Is he for real right now? This is why Burlison's approach is more important right now. He is not relying on vibes, assumptions, or whether someone "would have leaked it by now." He is following the paper trail. And if Varginha involved U.S. aircraft, U.S. personnel, U.S. agencies, or U.S. contractors, then somewhere there should be records. I think that Vance has reveled his true colors on the topic. He has access, he has been briefed and he doesn't give a shit. Meanwhile Burlison is doing the work, digging in and asking the questions, looking in the right places. Respect Burlison... Vance you know where you can go... #UAP #UFO #UAPDisclosure #JDVance #EricBurlison #Varginha #BrazilUFO #CIA #FBI #DisclosureNow #UFOtwitter
1:13

🚨JD Vance Says that He's Obsessed With UFOs. Eric Burlison Is Actually Chasing the Files. There is a really strange split forming inside the UAP disclosure conversation as far as I'm concerned. On the one side, JD Vance keeps declaring that he is fascinated by UFOs. He has said he wants to get to the bottom of it, that he has access, that no one is telling him 'no,' and that the main issue is finding time to push through the classification walls. On the other side, Rep. Eric Burlison is already doing the boring but necessary work that actually pushes this topic forward. He is sending letters, tracing records, pressuring the CIA and FBI, and asking specific questions about the 1996 Varginha case in Brazil. Vance told Joe Rogan that, as vice president, he effectively has access to everything. He said the problem is not that people are blocking him, but that he has not had time to really dig into the UFO files. That is a strange answer from someone who also describes himself as obsessed with the subject don't you think? Ask yourself, if the vice president of the United States has access, interest, and a shrinking window of time, then what exactly is he waiting for? This is really weird because President Trump's UFO records directive has already led to new file releases. We have now seen multiple 'tranches' of UFO material released to the public, yet Vance appears to be watching from the sidelines while saying he still intends to look into it properly at some point... At what point? Meanwhile, Burlison has moved directly toward the Varginha case, one of the most prolific UFO incidents on record. The Brazilian witnesses have claimed for decades that something crashed, that beings were recovered, and that American personnel were involved in the removal of material or biological evidence. Burlison wants to know if there were U.S. government flights in or near Campinas, Brazil, between January 14 and January 28, 1996? Were there material transfers? Were there communications with Brazilian authorities? Were contractors involved? Did the FBI have investigative equities connected to U.S. personnel, aircraft, contractors, or biological samples? A previous CIA FOIA request connected to the Varginha matter was met with a Glomar response. The agency would neither confirm nor deny whether responsive records exist, citing national security exemptions. That is not the same as saying there are no records... Yea ok. So while Vance argues that something as big as recovered alien material would have leaked in the age of smartphones during a Joe Rogan interview, Rogan pushed back with the people who would see the most sensitive material are not walking around with iPhones in their hands. They are inside SCIFs. They are under NDAs. They are operating inside systems designed specifically to stop leaks and he is right. The absence of a viral phone video doesn't prove the absence of a program. It just proves that the secrecy architecture works exactly as it was intended. Where has Vance been? No leaks? Is he for real right now? This is why Burlison's approach is more important right now. He is not relying on vibes, assumptions, or whether someone "would have leaked it by now." He is following the paper trail. And if Varginha involved U.S. aircraft, U.S. personnel, U.S. agencies, or U.S. contractors, then somewhere there should be records. I think that Vance has reveled his true colors on the topic. He has access, he has been briefed and he doesn't give a shit. Meanwhile Burlison is doing the work, digging in and asking the questions, looking in the right places. Respect Burlison... Vance you know where you can go... #UAP #UFO #UAPDisclosure #JDVance #EricBurlison #Varginha #BrazilUFO #CIA #FBI #DisclosureNow #UFOtwitter

Skywatch Signal

11,523 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

#AMC THIS POST WILL REACH WHO GOD (THE ENTIRE COSMOS) WANTS IT TO REACH! AMC'S "3RD SQUEEZE" PROPHECY! *NOT A FINANCIAL ADVISOR* (2:46 is where I start talking about the prophecy I received and how I received it) Psychic reading from a beginner (Nov 2022 spiritual awakening). Might not be MOASS, but a squeeze nonetheless. If the metaphysical energy around changes, so does the outcome n unfortunately since we gotta deal with millions of souls (metaphysical energy) in the market, it makes it difficult to pinpoint an exact date of a squeeze. This is why they say "the future is not set in stone", tho that's not entirely true. The date can shift sooner or later on our timeline, but the outcome can always be the same... Make no mistake, they will cheat n payoff fed authorities to stay in control with this Bernie Madoff 2.0 Ken Griffin PFOF dark pool system for as long as possible. If u don't believe in this type of stuff, then joke's on you, cuz I've had premonitions plenty of times b4 they actually happened (Science confirms this as precognition)... Everyone on the planet has 2 kinds of senses: Physical (human body senses) and Metaphysical (soul, energy, psychic senses). U can only communicate with God n any other entities/angels metaphysically. N since God is the entire Cosmos itself and u r not separate from God (1 Corinthians 3:16), He can connect to the stock market, all other people around the world, computer systems (God is literally all of existence itself including all beings aka the entire human race, all the animals, etc.), n then can relay guidance to u directly. Think of God/angels as ur personal spies. Some people say God is a silent teacher only or God doesn't speak using an actual voice at all. The people that say these things are right, but also wrong. Half-truths. God can only speak to you with the metaphysical soul senses u r using/strengthened. If u strengthen ur clairaudience/mediumship, u WILL hear God speak to u with an actual voice (God uses a male voice, even tho He is the entire cosmos n has no gender). If not, He can only speak to you thru ur other metaphysical soul senses that u do have/strengthened (clairvoyance aka dreams/visions, etc.) God and the angels (or any other spirit guide) know exactly what it is going on at any particular point n time cuz all of existence is connected via metaphysical energy (invisible energy u cannot see with ur physical eyes aka atoms/molecules/particles). Connects to other people n things without them being aware of it. Yea, it's kinda invading people's privacies (remote viewing), but when u understand that we are all the "collective consciousness" of God, u realize we r all metaphysically connected as an entire human race at all times... It's all about awareness/consciousness. U don't believe in this stuff cuz ur not aware u can do the same shit, but ur limited beliefs stop u from doing so. N yes, I am operating on pure blind faith... I have to in my situation/life at this point in time. So take this video with a grain of salt. Just sharing my spiritual experience and what I was told by God/angels when AMC will squeeze. When u put ur entire faith in God, u will be rewarded/blessed out of respect. Idc if u believe me. If it does happen, I'll be here for the apologies... FYI, I am NOT religious, I am spiritual...there's a difference
8:13

#AMC THIS POST WILL REACH WHO GOD (THE ENTIRE COSMOS) WANTS IT TO REACH! AMC'S "3RD SQUEEZE" PROPHECY! *NOT A FINANCIAL ADVISOR* (2:46 is where I start talking about the prophecy I received and how I received it) Psychic reading from a beginner (Nov 2022 spiritual awakening). Might not be MOASS, but a squeeze nonetheless. If the metaphysical energy around changes, so does the outcome n unfortunately since we gotta deal with millions of souls (metaphysical energy) in the market, it makes it difficult to pinpoint an exact date of a squeeze. This is why they say "the future is not set in stone", tho that's not entirely true. The date can shift sooner or later on our timeline, but the outcome can always be the same... Make no mistake, they will cheat n payoff fed authorities to stay in control with this Bernie Madoff 2.0 Ken Griffin PFOF dark pool system for as long as possible. If u don't believe in this type of stuff, then joke's on you, cuz I've had premonitions plenty of times b4 they actually happened (Science confirms this as precognition)... Everyone on the planet has 2 kinds of senses: Physical (human body senses) and Metaphysical (soul, energy, psychic senses). U can only communicate with God n any other entities/angels metaphysically. N since God is the entire Cosmos itself and u r not separate from God (1 Corinthians 3:16), He can connect to the stock market, all other people around the world, computer systems (God is literally all of existence itself including all beings aka the entire human race, all the animals, etc.), n then can relay guidance to u directly. Think of God/angels as ur personal spies. Some people say God is a silent teacher only or God doesn't speak using an actual voice at all. The people that say these things are right, but also wrong. Half-truths. God can only speak to you with the metaphysical soul senses u r using/strengthened. If u strengthen ur clairaudience/mediumship, u WILL hear God speak to u with an actual voice (God uses a male voice, even tho He is the entire cosmos n has no gender). If not, He can only speak to you thru ur other metaphysical soul senses that u do have/strengthened (clairvoyance aka dreams/visions, etc.) God and the angels (or any other spirit guide) know exactly what it is going on at any particular point n time cuz all of existence is connected via metaphysical energy (invisible energy u cannot see with ur physical eyes aka atoms/molecules/particles). Connects to other people n things without them being aware of it. Yea, it's kinda invading people's privacies (remote viewing), but when u understand that we are all the "collective consciousness" of God, u realize we r all metaphysically connected as an entire human race at all times... It's all about awareness/consciousness. U don't believe in this stuff cuz ur not aware u can do the same shit, but ur limited beliefs stop u from doing so. N yes, I am operating on pure blind faith... I have to in my situation/life at this point in time. So take this video with a grain of salt. Just sharing my spiritual experience and what I was told by God/angels when AMC will squeeze. When u put ur entire faith in God, u will be rewarded/blessed out of respect. Idc if u believe me. If it does happen, I'll be here for the apologies... FYI, I am NOT religious, I am spiritual...there's a difference

GamingCanBeFun (YouTuber)

19,397 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Here's why $NEAR is a no-brainer in 2025 👇 Everybody loves NEAR Protocol and there is a reason for that (or many). Near is well-positioned to be one of the leading blockchain ecosystems this year. Let’s explore the “whys”. TIMESTAMPS Quick Bio – 00:00:15 Inflation Reduction Proposal – 00:00:43 Technically Speaking – 00:02:40 Near Intents – 00:03:37 Chain Signatures and AI – 00:04:39 Decentralization and DeFi – 00:05:59 I have my Near account since March 2023, but it has been inactive for a while, as I was focused on other stuff. However, the recent inflation halving proposal by HOT DAO (HOT Protocol 🔥) and LiNEAR (LiNEAR Protocol) brought my eyes back to the project and I really like what I’m seeing. So, here’s my first point. If this proposal passes, NEAR could lead the way in what appears to be a market trend of improving the tokenomics, as more and more experts realize holders have been overpaying for these networks' security, with a too high supply inflation. Solana tried something similar, but the proposal was rejected. In my opinion, validators voting favorably to that show a commitment to the chain for the long term. On the other hand, voting against it signals a short-term vision focused on milking the emissions as much as possible, at the ecosystem’s expense. The voting currently goes with 28% “YEA” votes, needing 66.76% to pass. Most of the validators who already cast their votes went with the yes. 2pilot, avb, openshards, qbit, sicmundus, fox, and intear are, so far, the only seven who voted “NAY”. This proposal has the vocal support of most influential figures in the Near ecosystem, including the Near Foundation (NEAR Foundation), led by Illia (root.near) (🇺🇦, ⋈), which makes me believe it will pass and show the power of the halving in getting the market’s attention and presenting a huge investment asymmetry for the native token right now. Is this everything I like about NEAR? Definitely not. This is just what got me looking at it again, just to discover a (very much) thriving ecosystem, full of interesting things happening at the same time. I’ll mention a few, but there is (much) more. Technically speaking, Near is a high-performance blockchain, with really low fees and one of the fastest finalities, with 600ms block time and approximately 1.8s finality. It also has my favorite architecture for internet-scale scalability, using sharding, while keeping a high decentralization standard. As a learning programmer, Near also has one of the best dev experiences (in my limited opinion). The documentation is clear, has a logical journey, presenting from the basic anatomy in details to more complex SDKs and tools. I’m also in love with the near-cli-rs. A command line interface program written in Rust for seamless interaction with the Near blockchain. Allowing wallet creation, chain query, sending transactions, staking, smart contract calls, and more. Near Intents. This was the second thing to get my attention, while studying the project again, and it sets a whole new standard for blockchain interactions, especially cross-chain. Basically, users can declare an intention (for example, swap Ethereum-USDT to Bitcoin) and a network of solvers, running on Near, will find the best path to accomplish this task. We recently saw an impressive 465k-worth swap happening in exactly this example, paying 0.55% of trading fees to thorswap.near and swapkit.near. According to a Dune Dashboard, the protocol accumulates nearly $400 million in volume since its launch not long ago, in November 2024. *obs.: half this volume was achieved in the last month. Massive! Near Intents is possible due to two other very interesting things: (i) Chain abstraction, and (ii) a solid AI infrastructure. Chain abstraction (via Chain Signatures) is a powerful interoperability feature, allowing Near to friendly connect different blockchains as if they were part of a single network. Users and devs benefit from wallet, address, fees, and cross-chain bridges abstractions - not even noticing they are interacting with multiple chains. One wallet that powers everything. Powered by Near. On AI, Near is just built differently. Not for the hype, but for the solution. The team has been looking for AI solutions much before the ChatGPT fever. Actually, they started as an AI company, pivoting to blockchain later. So, being one of the most promising networks for the growing AI economy was just the natural path to follow. There is an extensive and super complete research piece on that topic, recently published by Reflexivity Research (Reflexivity Research) on July 1st. It presents Near as an AI-optimized blockchain, covering AITP, Shade Agents, x402, Near Intents, and more. Definitely worth the reading. Wrapping up this content with one more aspect that really matters to me is how Near remains truthful to decentralization, data ownership, censorship-resistance and open-source primitives that have been increasingly abandoned by other key players. A simple example of that is how the Near Foundation decided to deprecate its public APIs, encouraging the surge of a more decentralized and competitive market of SaaS projects, with a highlight to Lava Network, that recently appeared in my timeline talking about that. DeFi is also huge on Near, leveraging all the previous properties I mentioned, creating a truly decentralized liquidity pool via Rhea Finance, connected with other chains like BTC, Ethereum, ZCash, and more. All that contributes to Near having the second-largest monthly active addresses, with nearly 50 million, only losing to Solana’s nearly 90 million. In the meantime, NEAR, the token, is not even at the 30rd position by market cap. Crazy stuff. To (finally) wrap it up, I also want to mention Near’s consensus decentralization. While having a low node-count, the network has a Nakamoto Coefficient of 11, which is not bad at all. Surely, there is still room for improvement, which is possible as becoming a validator is accessible staking and hardware-wise. If you liked this content, make sure to click the like bottom and share it around. Follow me on X or subscribe to my YouTube channel, both at vinibarbosabr. See ya!
7:52

Here's why $NEAR is a no-brainer in 2025 👇 Everybody loves NEAR Protocol and there is a reason for that (or many). Near is well-positioned to be one of the leading blockchain ecosystems this year. Let’s explore the “whys”. TIMESTAMPS Quick Bio – 00:00:15 Inflation Reduction Proposal – 00:00:43 Technically Speaking – 00:02:40 Near Intents – 00:03:37 Chain Signatures and AI – 00:04:39 Decentralization and DeFi – 00:05:59 I have my Near account since March 2023, but it has been inactive for a while, as I was focused on other stuff. However, the recent inflation halving proposal by HOT DAO (HOT Protocol 🔥) and LiNEAR (LiNEAR Protocol) brought my eyes back to the project and I really like what I’m seeing. So, here’s my first point. If this proposal passes, NEAR could lead the way in what appears to be a market trend of improving the tokenomics, as more and more experts realize holders have been overpaying for these networks' security, with a too high supply inflation. Solana tried something similar, but the proposal was rejected. In my opinion, validators voting favorably to that show a commitment to the chain for the long term. On the other hand, voting against it signals a short-term vision focused on milking the emissions as much as possible, at the ecosystem’s expense. The voting currently goes with 28% “YEA” votes, needing 66.76% to pass. Most of the validators who already cast their votes went with the yes. 2pilot, avb, openshards, qbit, sicmundus, fox, and intear are, so far, the only seven who voted “NAY”. This proposal has the vocal support of most influential figures in the Near ecosystem, including the Near Foundation (NEAR Foundation), led by Illia (root.near) (🇺🇦, ⋈), which makes me believe it will pass and show the power of the halving in getting the market’s attention and presenting a huge investment asymmetry for the native token right now. Is this everything I like about NEAR? Definitely not. This is just what got me looking at it again, just to discover a (very much) thriving ecosystem, full of interesting things happening at the same time. I’ll mention a few, but there is (much) more. Technically speaking, Near is a high-performance blockchain, with really low fees and one of the fastest finalities, with 600ms block time and approximately 1.8s finality. It also has my favorite architecture for internet-scale scalability, using sharding, while keeping a high decentralization standard. As a learning programmer, Near also has one of the best dev experiences (in my limited opinion). The documentation is clear, has a logical journey, presenting from the basic anatomy in details to more complex SDKs and tools. I’m also in love with the near-cli-rs. A command line interface program written in Rust for seamless interaction with the Near blockchain. Allowing wallet creation, chain query, sending transactions, staking, smart contract calls, and more. Near Intents. This was the second thing to get my attention, while studying the project again, and it sets a whole new standard for blockchain interactions, especially cross-chain. Basically, users can declare an intention (for example, swap Ethereum-USDT to Bitcoin) and a network of solvers, running on Near, will find the best path to accomplish this task. We recently saw an impressive 465k-worth swap happening in exactly this example, paying 0.55% of trading fees to thorswap.near and swapkit.near. According to a Dune Dashboard, the protocol accumulates nearly $400 million in volume since its launch not long ago, in November 2024. *obs.: half this volume was achieved in the last month. Massive! Near Intents is possible due to two other very interesting things: (i) Chain abstraction, and (ii) a solid AI infrastructure. Chain abstraction (via Chain Signatures) is a powerful interoperability feature, allowing Near to friendly connect different blockchains as if they were part of a single network. Users and devs benefit from wallet, address, fees, and cross-chain bridges abstractions - not even noticing they are interacting with multiple chains. One wallet that powers everything. Powered by Near. On AI, Near is just built differently. Not for the hype, but for the solution. The team has been looking for AI solutions much before the ChatGPT fever. Actually, they started as an AI company, pivoting to blockchain later. So, being one of the most promising networks for the growing AI economy was just the natural path to follow. There is an extensive and super complete research piece on that topic, recently published by Reflexivity Research (Reflexivity Research) on July 1st. It presents Near as an AI-optimized blockchain, covering AITP, Shade Agents, x402, Near Intents, and more. Definitely worth the reading. Wrapping up this content with one more aspect that really matters to me is how Near remains truthful to decentralization, data ownership, censorship-resistance and open-source primitives that have been increasingly abandoned by other key players. A simple example of that is how the Near Foundation decided to deprecate its public APIs, encouraging the surge of a more decentralized and competitive market of SaaS projects, with a highlight to Lava Network, that recently appeared in my timeline talking about that. DeFi is also huge on Near, leveraging all the previous properties I mentioned, creating a truly decentralized liquidity pool via Rhea Finance, connected with other chains like BTC, Ethereum, ZCash, and more. All that contributes to Near having the second-largest monthly active addresses, with nearly 50 million, only losing to Solana’s nearly 90 million. In the meantime, NEAR, the token, is not even at the 30rd position by market cap. Crazy stuff. To (finally) wrap it up, I also want to mention Near’s consensus decentralization. While having a low node-count, the network has a Nakamoto Coefficient of 11, which is not bad at all. Surely, there is still room for improvement, which is possible as becoming a validator is accessible staking and hardware-wise. If you liked this content, make sure to click the like bottom and share it around. Follow me on X or subscribe to my YouTube channel, both at vinibarbosabr. See ya!

Vini B |「 thecoding 」

40,183 просмотров • 1 год назад

When I was reading Brian Tully, Ken Mello and Robert Cosgrove's affidavits yesterday in the Aidan TurtleBoy Kearney case, I was challenged by an account that was intent on defending Leigha Bathtub Genduso and Kate Peter. Best quotes from my retort; "Number one, Steph, please address the fact—please address why Kate Peter’s February 24, 2024 email to Ken Mello was not turned over in the 5,000 pages of emails that Robert Cosgrove spent seven months putting together that were between Kate Peter and Ken Mello and Kate Peter and Brian Tully. Why was that February 24, 2024 email not turned over? Secondly, is the fact that those emails were turned over—despite the fact that it wasn’t a full turnover of emails—in August of 2025 tie into why the Lindsey Gaetani charges involving Aiden were dismissed? Thirdly: is the fact that Kate Peter—now we know from these documents—directly handled two pieces of key evidence in the Gaetani indictments involving Kearney the reason why, coupled with the August 2025 disclosure of those manipulated email records between Tully and Kate and Kate Peter and Ken Mello, was that the reason why the 2024 indictments involving Lindsey Gaetani were actually null-prossed? Time to answer some tough questions, Steph. Why was that audio of Leigha Genduso not included in the extraction that Brian Tully released completely unredacted in April of 2024? And why have you never said a word about how Tully manipulated that extraction to remove messages from Tully to Lindsey and from Kate to Lindsey before releasing it? And Tully apparently didn’t include Leigha Genduso’s audio message that is now part of the public court record, as well? Yes, Steph, you can’t address it on merit, you can’t, because you’re not here to do that, are you? You’re here to vacuously distract with nonsensical emotional rhetoric. And I will not stand for it. No, I’ll continue reading. It’ll get worse before it gets better, Steph. I’ll tell you that right now. No, she did not, Steph. I’ll tell you what, right now. You know how I know? Because look at Steph, it was posted on social media. Oh, Steph, it was posted on social media and not included in the extraction. So how could Lindsey have deleted it? Lindsey saved it, because Tully didn’t include it in the extraction, and then Lindsey dropped it on social media. And that proves it. That absolutely proves it. All right, so Steph, if you don’t know and don’t care, that’s the end of this discussion. If we have to move you on begrudgingly, we will. But as of now, you can’t address any of this on merit. You don’t know the factual record. You’re getting humiliated. And furthermore, I’m sending a message through you to Kate that her moles are not welcome here. So, well, yeah, but no, that’s not—hold on, do you realize, Steph, the point is not where it was posted. It was that the audio file exists. If it was not on Lindsey’s phone when they did the extraction, she couldn’t have it. But she still has it. There you go. So, listen, oh, I knew we were onto something. I didn’t know it was this bad, Steph. You shouldn’t have tipped Kate’s hand like this, by the way. Reacting that way is only making me aware that this is the whole kit and caboodle. No, Steph, again, you have no standing to stand up for anyone, call anyone anything, or otherwise say anything here, because you will not address the merits of the argument. You just admitted you don’t care about the filings, you don’t know the details, and you refuse to engage. So therefore, we’re done." PARTIAL TRANSCRIPT: If you’re just tuning in, my name is Grant Smith Ellis, and we are reading through Brian Tully, Robert Cosgrove, and Ken Mello’s affidavit. It’s tough to call it an affidavit from Ken Mello, because quite frankly, he didn’t write an affidavit. Robert Cosgrove adapted hearsay statements in Ken Mello’s voice in his own affidavit. That might tell you something. I don’t know. What the fuck do I know? I’m just a towel. Thank you very much for tuning in. I have noticed that there is a very specific group of people in Kate Peter’s orbit trying to target Towel right now. People do not want Towel to be heard. That means I’m going to speak more. I am going to just keep talking and keep saying things, because now I have put it all together. Oh, that’s right. I have one more thing to type. Furthermore, as soon as, within weeks of Kate’s emails to Tully and Mello being turned over in, what was it? August of 2025, the TurtleBoy charges involving Lindsey Gaetani were dropped. And what do you know? Kate was involved in handling evidence submitted by Tully and Mello to the grand jury for Lindsey’s charges, for the charges involving Lindsey Gaetani, for Aiden’s charges involving Lindsey Gaetani. Furthermore, the new email from Kate to Mello indicates Kate was indeed also involved in the 2023 indictments against Kearney that the Norfolk DA seems intent on trying to wall off from Kate Peter’s involvement. Oh, little towels, I'm just a little towel. Steph, Grant says, “Why are you making fun of her by calling her bathtub.” Wait, what? No, no, no, Steph, let’s be very clear. When Leigha Genduso engaged in—and I think it was Kate actually who did it—but when Leigha Genduso or Kate responded to revenge porn with revenge porn, nothing about that was okay, okay? Whether it was legal or not at the time, nobody sharing revenge porn of anybody else was okay, all right? I just want to be very clear. So when Kate did it, it was not okay. When Aiden did it, if that’s what happened with Leigha—I don’t know, I wasn’t around—not okay. If Leigha did it to Aiden, not okay, okay? Everybody on the same page? Like, it’s not okay to do that to people. I just want everyone on the same page. No one would—it’s just like, treat people how you want to be treated, bro. So I just don’t do it. Now, I get some people would say, fight fire with fire, okay, still, don’t fucking do it. Please don’t do it. I don’t understand why people do it. It blows my mind. I don’t understand why people justify it. Oh, it’s okay that Kate or Leigha did it, cause Aiden did it too. It’s like, no, though. I get it's a shitty thing to happen. Don’t do it back. Just stop. It’s ridiculous. Steph's like—"I keep seeing you call her bathtub." Yea, bro she took a video in a bathtub once and posted it on social media. Okay, you want to livestream yourself from a fucking bathtub then I'm going to call you Leigha Bathtub Genduso. I don’t know what to tell you. You don’t have to call her that, but I’m going to do that, right? And I’m not going to stop. But yeah, Three-Clerk-Monte bang bang. Sometimes you just got to tell them how it is, Three-Clerk Monte, you know what I’m saying? Even while you’re on your break. By the way, Steph, I’m just going to break here just posting things, right? And I’m saying I’m not even supposed to be riled up right now. We’re going to go back to reading the indictment in a little bit. I’m just a little towel. I’m on one, you know what I’m saying? Absolutely not. I don’t know which Steph you are. I don’t know if you’re that Steph or whatever, the fake Canadian. You’re not going to come on here and tell me I cannot call her Leigha Bathtub Genduso. I’m going to triple down. I’m going to call Leigha Bathtub Genduso more now. Thank you for all the comments, by the way. It helps the stream get attention in the Kate Peter sucks. Remember that? Yes, that I want you to get this tattooed on your arm: Kate Peter sucks. I’ll help you spell it: K-A-T-E P-E-T-E-R, no S at the end, just Kate Peter, now a new word, sucks, S-U-C-K-S. Everybody on the same page? All right, it’s artistic expression, bro. What do you want to say? Oh no, she’s gone. Steph, I was enjoying all your comments. Yes, Steph, that’s exactly what I want. I want you to keep interacting in the comments because it gets the stream more attention in the feed. I want that. I want you to continue to engage, and I’m going to keep calling her Leigha Bathtub Genduso. It’s not an obsession. It is the product of multiple years of work on the story to uncover something hidden that you don’t want to be talked about in public. That’s the reality. Is that not right Steph, you’re concerned that Kate Peter compromised the cases against Aiden Kearney because she worked as a PI for Marty Craft, who’s now lost his license because of what she was up to according to people’s reports in this chat, and you feel that it’s uncomfortable to have to hold her to the same moral standard that you do Aiden because you’re biased, right? Fine, I don’t care. I’ll tell it to your face yes. No, Steph, you have something to say? You say it right here, one-on-one. Let’s debate. We can do it. I have all the evidence now. We can talk about it all. That’s correct. I don’t create realities, Steph. I bring them to light. Your normative moral framework and what you want to happen is just that. The descriptive reality is independent of what any of us want. It is simply a factual record. In the context of our asymptotic relationship with that factual record, notwithstanding, I was interested in the truth, and you are who is afraid of it, let’s be clear. I wouldn’t say you’re debating me, Steph. You can’t debate on the merit of the facts. You want to know why? Because, for example, it would be very hard for you to counter something like this paragraph right here, right? Where Robert Cosgrove says that any data missing from Lindsey Gaetani’s phone was not on the phone at the time Brian Tully did the extraction. And you might be saying to yourself, Grant, how can you know? How can you know that Brian Tully intentionally released the phone unredacted after only removing messages from Kate to Lindsey and from Tully to Lindsey and after removing things like audio messages from Leigha Genduso? How do I know? Well, because how else would Lindsey have posted it on social media? My word, Steph. It’s almost like there’s proof that Robert Cosgrove was withholding material information related to the sum and substance of Kate Peter’s communications with various members of the prosecution team and/or witnesses and/or the handling of evidence in order to insulate certain charges from Kate Peter touching that evidence so that they could continue to trial, notwithstanding the discovery obligations of the state under the new updated Rule 14 as implemented on March 1, 2025. And towel is in a snarky mood indeed. And you’re not going to be able to do anything about it—oh, please, you're not saying to yourself, "what’s wrong with towel, Steph?" You’re basically saying, "why are you crossing the thin blue line?" And I would like to respond to you by saying, in the least unloving way, but the fact that you would ask me, “What is Grant doing?” because I won’t adhere to your thin blue line? Get the fuck out of here. Go climb up somebody else’s tree. Go find your own treehouse. Not happening. Absolutely not happening. You will look this factual record in the eye. You will confront your moral problems with the various actions of different people involved on your own time. And Leigha Bathtub Genduso will be central to this moral reckoning. And there’s not a damn thing you or your fake Canadian ass can do about it. I’m on one. I told you. Listen, you want it? You want it to be on record? We’ll do it. No, no, I’m just not loyal to your interests, Steph. I’m loyal to truth. I’m loyal to the people who are actually harmed. I’m not loyal to you or any of your friends or Kate Peter or the thin blue line or the thin green line or the thin pink line for that matter. All of you can take your lines and go fuck yourselves. Fake Canadian. Yeah, right, Steph. Yeah, let’s go with that. Yep, let’s go with fake Canadian, because why would you want me looking more in to you? A reporter? You want me to look more into you? No. God, take the L, man, just move on. That’s correct. No, listen, Steph, you want to talk about Michael Proctor’s family’s relationship to my mother? You want to be the person who draws that line? I’ll tell you about it. You sure you want to talk about it? You damn fake Canadian. We may have to get this fake Canadian out of here. She’s riling me up. You’re riling me up by trying to defend Kate Peter. I knew you were a rat the whole time. Goddamn Kate Peter mole. I knew it. I saw through that shit. "I just heard you acknowledge me about the AI. No hate. I appreciate you reading this. Good content." Thank you, sir. Thank you, to the person who said that! You see what I’m saying, Steph? You know what? I think we should just let Steph talk to herself, all right? She can just keep promoting the stream and the algorithm. Let her talk to herself. But Steph, even if you’re talking to yourself, I still have to write the post, okay? Damn fake Canadians. Steph is a fake Canadian and she may or may not be a communist. What you gonna' do about it? You damn fake Canadian. All right, no, I actually have to write this follow-up post. Stop it, Steph. Stop trying to gaslight to protect Kate Peter. You’ll be thrown out of here faster than someone with a cannabis conviction trying to enter Canada who doesn’t actually live there. Damn fake Canadians. Thank you, Kristina. I appreciate it. Yes, and Kristina, you ever wonder if maybe people come in here specifically to derail the conversation because we’re talking about very damning things as to Kate Peter? Well then, let me write my other post, by the way. I’ll help. I will put it up on the screen for you in one second. I just got to get the video loading before I start typing. Oh, Steph, you were on assignment. Stop bitching. I hope they paid you well for it. Don’t bark up my towel tree about you had to spend time with me so you could run intel to all the Kate Peter people. I don’t care. I knew what you were doing. Do you think I was born yesterday? Come on. You all insult my intelligence routinely—not you in the chat. Some of you moles are just like, “He won’t know.” What, are you just going to tell me I’m the greatest thing ever and then it’s going to go along? I’m just saying, I’ve been posting on social media being like, “Aidan, if people tell you that you’re the greatest thing ever, that might be true, but some of them are going to tell you that because they’re moles.” Come on. This is very basic-level intel stuff here. Steph, that was very nice of you. I am never going to degrade you for supporting people in need. What I’m concerned about, okay—I’m not concerned about who you are as a person. I’m concerned about what you didn’t tell us. All right? Yeah? And that's my right. No, absolutely not, Steph. You know exactly what happened. You flipped on a dime as soon as I started asking questions about Kate Peter because she has a lot of moles in her orbit. And then as soon as we started talking about her today, coincidentally enough, you popped right back up. Oh, what’s this? Robert Cosgrove represented in a sworn affidavit that any material missing from Lindsey Gaetani’s—see what I’m doing, Steph? This is, uh, this is for you—Lindsey Gaetani’s phone extraction was not on the phone when MSP did that extraction. And then Brian Tully leaked that extraction unredacted. That’s a message from Leigha Bathtub Genduso proves Tully failed to include material that was indeed on Lindsey's phone. That was for you too, Steph. It’s weird that you know Bathtub, by the way. That’s just odd. Like she’s known Kate Peter for years too. If this Steph, who I watched Sandlot with, is the same Steph as the one who’s a second cousin of John O’Keefe, then she lied to me. She lied to me. If we can prove that this is the same, same Steph, then she lied to me. She told me she was from Canada, Saskatchewan, whatever the fuck. That’s what I’m saying. So Steph, if you are that Steph from wherever the fuck you live, bro—if you are that Steph—you lied to us all. You told us you were fucking Canadian. Wait a minute, wait a minute, wait a minute, wait a minute, wait a minute—are you actually that Steph? No fucking way. You lied to all of us this whole time and pretended to be Canadian? No, that was not—I didn’t ask if you were from Canada. I said, are you the same Steph who was second cousins with John O’Keefe and did you come on this channel and go on a Zoom call with me representing yourself to be Canadian from Saskatchewan? I don’t even have—no, that is not the question I’m asking you. Are you the same Steph that is second cousins with John O’Keefe? Thanks for letting us know. See what I mean? Kristina, it’s not the same Steph. It’s just some random person who really likes Leigha Genduso, Leigha Bathtub Genduso, and Kate Peter. Random coincidence! Just totally random. Come on. I’m rolling my eyes so hard I’m laughing. This has been really interesting though. I know you said no. That makes it even weirder. If you’re not that Steph, your fervent defense of Kate Peter and Leigha Bathtub Genduso is even more weird. Go back to Discord. Come on now, shoo. You’re bothering me. If you bother me too much, I’m just going to go on a 45-minute rant eviscerating Kate Peter with facts, all right? So it’s better to just go. Like I told Benny Sweatpants the other day. Send him my regards, all right? No, I like calling out your hypocrisy. You wouldn’t say a negative word about Kate Peter if I demonstrated the factual record for you in real time. Live! Which I’m doing. You haven’t addressed one element of it on substance. All you’ve done is gaslight, and frankly you’re going to find yourself removed if you continue to fail to adhere to the rules of Towel Channel. As you know, the rules of Towel Channel are pretty simple, which is: one, don’t be discriminatory; two, don’t be derogatory; three, don’t sealion; four, don’t gaslight; and five, no Kate Peters. All right? Jay’s like, “I’m aboard the Grant train.” Thanks, Jay. It wasn’t one question, Steph. It was three questions. Let me reiterate them to you very quickly. Number one, Steph, please address the fact—please address why Kate Peter’s February 24, 2024 email to Ken Mello was not turned over in the 5,000 pages of emails that Robert Cosgrove spent seven months putting together that were between Kate Peter and Ken Mello and Kate Peter and Brian Tully. Why was that February 24, 2024 email not turned over? Secondly, is the fact that those emails were turned over—despite the fact that it wasn’t a full turnover of emails—in August of 2025 tie into why the Lindsey Gaetani charges involving Aiden were dismissed? Second question: is the fact that Kate Peter—now we know from these documents—directly handled two pieces of key evidence in the Gaetani indictments involving Kearney the reason why, coupled with the August 2025 disclosure of those manipulated email records between Tully and Kate and Kate Peter and Ken Mello, was that the reason why the 2024 indictments involving Lindsey Gaetani were actually null-prossed? Time to answer some tough questions, Steph. And furthermore, why was that audio of Leigha Genduso not included in the extraction that Brian Tully released completely unredacted in April of 2024? And why have you never said a word about how Tully manipulated that extraction to remove messages from Tully to Lindsey and from Kate to Lindsey before releasing it? And Tully apparently didn’t include Leigha Genduso’s audio message that is now part of the public court record. Yes, Steph, you can’t address it on merit, you can’t, because you’re not here to do that, are you? You’re here to vacuously distract with nonsensical emotional rhetoric. And I will not stand for it. No, I’ll continue reading. It’ll get worse before it gets better, Steph. I’ll tell you that right now. No, she did not, Steph. I’ll tell you what, right now. You know how I know? Because look at Steph, it was posted on social media. Oh, Steph, it was posted on social media and not included in the extraction. So how could Lindsey have deleted it? Lindsey saved it, because Tully didn’t include it in the extraction, and then Lindsey dropped it on social media. And that proves it. That absolutely proves it. All right, so Steph, if you don’t know and don’t care, that’s the end of this discussion. If we have to move you on begrudgingly, we will. But as of now, you can’t address any of this on merit. You don’t know the factual record. You’re getting humiliated. And furthermore, I’m sending a message through you to Kate that her moles are not welcome here. So, well, yeah, but no, that’s not—hold on, do you realize, Steph, the point is not where it was posted. It was that the audio file exists. If it was not on Lindsey’s phone when they did the extraction, she couldn’t have it. But she still has it. There you go. So, listen, oh, I knew we were onto something. I didn’t know it was this bad, Steph. You shouldn’t have tipped Kate’s hand like this, by the way. The reacting that way is only making me aware that this is the whole kitten caboodle. No, Steph, again, you have no standing to stand up for anyone, call anyone anything, or otherwise say anything here, because you will not address the merits of the argument. You just admitted you don’t care about the filings, you don’t know the details, and you refuse to engage. So therefore, we’re done. Oh, it’s such a shame. All right, I gotta move her on. All right, Steph, it was great. We’ll put you in a little timeout. You can come back tomorrow, okay? I’m glad you spent some time with us, but the reality is I just don’t—I don’t wanna play that type of Kate Peter game, all right? Yep, now, Christina, you, as you know, this channel in Br… every possible perspective. I don’t care what you want to come in here and believe, you know you and I align on a lot of the factual record about a lot of these different cases. It’s not that. I’ll never ever have a problem with that. It’s the bad faith—and it’s not you, Christina. You are wonderful. You’ve never done it—but it’s the people who get too close to Kate Peter and then as embodied in that colloquy with Steph right there, whoever the fuck she is, we still don’t know. As embodied in that colloquy, you have a situation where when confronted with the facts instead of responding or even giving the time of day to what Kate Peter or Tully or Cosgrove might have done wrong, immediately it starts with the emotional manipulation, the attacks, the distraction. So I hope that—I hope that tells us all something. But yes, let’s keep reading because before I got in that fun colloquy, we were—I bet Steph was sent here to try to derail me. Nice try, Steph, take it elsewhere. All right, so we got those two posts up, by the way. All right, following service. Do you remember where we were in all this? The very last—so we just read about the Kate emails. By the way, now we know the whole Kate and Kaboodle is the Kate emails. We just read about the Kate emails and take a look where it goes next. All right, it just keeps going and going. Oh, do you think I should add Kate, Steph to the chart, by the way? Where should she go on the chart? Should she go under the Trollhollmio section? I feel like that’s appropriate. You know, this is just my opinion of how all these people tie together. Say you got Kate Peter, the Lord of Darkness in the middle—that’s my opinion. Then you got Jamz up there, Llama over there, Jason Broyles down here, Gaffney over here, Trollhollomio here. Then you got people like Critical Mass, Virgil, that—I don’t know who that is. And then you got Tully, Michael Morrissey, and Michael Proctor. Then you got Jake Sun, Twisted Tragedies tied to Gaffney. Then you got that guy, Jason Broyles, who thinks—who pretends to be a woman online. You got him, I think he’s tied to Barry Lewis and this weird woman from Connecticut that Kate keeps working with. She used to pretend to be like an advocate for medical patients, but now apparently she’s a big advocate of prednisone. I don’t really understand. She’s been going online telling people that people with colitis have to use prednisone apparently and they can’t use cannabis. I’m baffled by it. I didn’t know she was a doctor. Listen, if I knew that this woman was a doctor, I would start looking to whether she’s received payments from the pharmaceutical industry because I’ve never met a cannabis advocate who tells people they have to use prednisone for colitis. So that woman baffles me. Also, she’s the reason consumption event in Massachusetts are now regulated by the CCC. So listen, you all think that Kate Peter’s just some kind of like moron. She just plays that role, okay? Like she plays like she doesn’t know what she’s talking about and she doesn’t mostly with these court developments. But look at her network. Like people fawn over her like TurtleBoy. She is the female TurtleBoy in so many ways. And what makes her scary is she doesn’t own it.
33:21

When I was reading Brian Tully, Ken Mello and Robert Cosgrove's affidavits yesterday in the Aidan TurtleBoy Kearney case, I was challenged by an account that was intent on defending Leigha Bathtub Genduso and Kate Peter. Best quotes from my retort; "Number one, Steph, please address the fact—please address why Kate Peter’s February 24, 2024 email to Ken Mello was not turned over in the 5,000 pages of emails that Robert Cosgrove spent seven months putting together that were between Kate Peter and Ken Mello and Kate Peter and Brian Tully. Why was that February 24, 2024 email not turned over? Secondly, is the fact that those emails were turned over—despite the fact that it wasn’t a full turnover of emails—in August of 2025 tie into why the Lindsey Gaetani charges involving Aiden were dismissed? Thirdly: is the fact that Kate Peter—now we know from these documents—directly handled two pieces of key evidence in the Gaetani indictments involving Kearney the reason why, coupled with the August 2025 disclosure of those manipulated email records between Tully and Kate and Kate Peter and Ken Mello, was that the reason why the 2024 indictments involving Lindsey Gaetani were actually null-prossed? Time to answer some tough questions, Steph. Why was that audio of Leigha Genduso not included in the extraction that Brian Tully released completely unredacted in April of 2024? And why have you never said a word about how Tully manipulated that extraction to remove messages from Tully to Lindsey and from Kate to Lindsey before releasing it? And Tully apparently didn’t include Leigha Genduso’s audio message that is now part of the public court record, as well? Yes, Steph, you can’t address it on merit, you can’t, because you’re not here to do that, are you? You’re here to vacuously distract with nonsensical emotional rhetoric. And I will not stand for it. No, I’ll continue reading. It’ll get worse before it gets better, Steph. I’ll tell you that right now. No, she did not, Steph. I’ll tell you what, right now. You know how I know? Because look at Steph, it was posted on social media. Oh, Steph, it was posted on social media and not included in the extraction. So how could Lindsey have deleted it? Lindsey saved it, because Tully didn’t include it in the extraction, and then Lindsey dropped it on social media. And that proves it. That absolutely proves it. All right, so Steph, if you don’t know and don’t care, that’s the end of this discussion. If we have to move you on begrudgingly, we will. But as of now, you can’t address any of this on merit. You don’t know the factual record. You’re getting humiliated. And furthermore, I’m sending a message through you to Kate that her moles are not welcome here. So, well, yeah, but no, that’s not—hold on, do you realize, Steph, the point is not where it was posted. It was that the audio file exists. If it was not on Lindsey’s phone when they did the extraction, she couldn’t have it. But she still has it. There you go. So, listen, oh, I knew we were onto something. I didn’t know it was this bad, Steph. You shouldn’t have tipped Kate’s hand like this, by the way. Reacting that way is only making me aware that this is the whole kit and caboodle. No, Steph, again, you have no standing to stand up for anyone, call anyone anything, or otherwise say anything here, because you will not address the merits of the argument. You just admitted you don’t care about the filings, you don’t know the details, and you refuse to engage. So therefore, we’re done." PARTIAL TRANSCRIPT: If you’re just tuning in, my name is Grant Smith Ellis, and we are reading through Brian Tully, Robert Cosgrove, and Ken Mello’s affidavit. It’s tough to call it an affidavit from Ken Mello, because quite frankly, he didn’t write an affidavit. Robert Cosgrove adapted hearsay statements in Ken Mello’s voice in his own affidavit. That might tell you something. I don’t know. What the fuck do I know? I’m just a towel. Thank you very much for tuning in. I have noticed that there is a very specific group of people in Kate Peter’s orbit trying to target Towel right now. People do not want Towel to be heard. That means I’m going to speak more. I am going to just keep talking and keep saying things, because now I have put it all together. Oh, that’s right. I have one more thing to type. Furthermore, as soon as, within weeks of Kate’s emails to Tully and Mello being turned over in, what was it? August of 2025, the TurtleBoy charges involving Lindsey Gaetani were dropped. And what do you know? Kate was involved in handling evidence submitted by Tully and Mello to the grand jury for Lindsey’s charges, for the charges involving Lindsey Gaetani, for Aiden’s charges involving Lindsey Gaetani. Furthermore, the new email from Kate to Mello indicates Kate was indeed also involved in the 2023 indictments against Kearney that the Norfolk DA seems intent on trying to wall off from Kate Peter’s involvement. Oh, little towels, I'm just a little towel. Steph, Grant says, “Why are you making fun of her by calling her bathtub.” Wait, what? No, no, no, Steph, let’s be very clear. When Leigha Genduso engaged in—and I think it was Kate actually who did it—but when Leigha Genduso or Kate responded to revenge porn with revenge porn, nothing about that was okay, okay? Whether it was legal or not at the time, nobody sharing revenge porn of anybody else was okay, all right? I just want to be very clear. So when Kate did it, it was not okay. When Aiden did it, if that’s what happened with Leigha—I don’t know, I wasn’t around—not okay. If Leigha did it to Aiden, not okay, okay? Everybody on the same page? Like, it’s not okay to do that to people. I just want everyone on the same page. No one would—it’s just like, treat people how you want to be treated, bro. So I just don’t do it. Now, I get some people would say, fight fire with fire, okay, still, don’t fucking do it. Please don’t do it. I don’t understand why people do it. It blows my mind. I don’t understand why people justify it. Oh, it’s okay that Kate or Leigha did it, cause Aiden did it too. It’s like, no, though. I get it's a shitty thing to happen. Don’t do it back. Just stop. It’s ridiculous. Steph's like—"I keep seeing you call her bathtub." Yea, bro she took a video in a bathtub once and posted it on social media. Okay, you want to livestream yourself from a fucking bathtub then I'm going to call you Leigha Bathtub Genduso. I don’t know what to tell you. You don’t have to call her that, but I’m going to do that, right? And I’m not going to stop. But yeah, Three-Clerk-Monte bang bang. Sometimes you just got to tell them how it is, Three-Clerk Monte, you know what I’m saying? Even while you’re on your break. By the way, Steph, I’m just going to break here just posting things, right? And I’m saying I’m not even supposed to be riled up right now. We’re going to go back to reading the indictment in a little bit. I’m just a little towel. I’m on one, you know what I’m saying? Absolutely not. I don’t know which Steph you are. I don’t know if you’re that Steph or whatever, the fake Canadian. You’re not going to come on here and tell me I cannot call her Leigha Bathtub Genduso. I’m going to triple down. I’m going to call Leigha Bathtub Genduso more now. Thank you for all the comments, by the way. It helps the stream get attention in the Kate Peter sucks. Remember that? Yes, that I want you to get this tattooed on your arm: Kate Peter sucks. I’ll help you spell it: K-A-T-E P-E-T-E-R, no S at the end, just Kate Peter, now a new word, sucks, S-U-C-K-S. Everybody on the same page? All right, it’s artistic expression, bro. What do you want to say? Oh no, she’s gone. Steph, I was enjoying all your comments. Yes, Steph, that’s exactly what I want. I want you to keep interacting in the comments because it gets the stream more attention in the feed. I want that. I want you to continue to engage, and I’m going to keep calling her Leigha Bathtub Genduso. It’s not an obsession. It is the product of multiple years of work on the story to uncover something hidden that you don’t want to be talked about in public. That’s the reality. Is that not right Steph, you’re concerned that Kate Peter compromised the cases against Aiden Kearney because she worked as a PI for Marty Craft, who’s now lost his license because of what she was up to according to people’s reports in this chat, and you feel that it’s uncomfortable to have to hold her to the same moral standard that you do Aiden because you’re biased, right? Fine, I don’t care. I’ll tell it to your face yes. No, Steph, you have something to say? You say it right here, one-on-one. Let’s debate. We can do it. I have all the evidence now. We can talk about it all. That’s correct. I don’t create realities, Steph. I bring them to light. Your normative moral framework and what you want to happen is just that. The descriptive reality is independent of what any of us want. It is simply a factual record. In the context of our asymptotic relationship with that factual record, notwithstanding, I was interested in the truth, and you are who is afraid of it, let’s be clear. I wouldn’t say you’re debating me, Steph. You can’t debate on the merit of the facts. You want to know why? Because, for example, it would be very hard for you to counter something like this paragraph right here, right? Where Robert Cosgrove says that any data missing from Lindsey Gaetani’s phone was not on the phone at the time Brian Tully did the extraction. And you might be saying to yourself, Grant, how can you know? How can you know that Brian Tully intentionally released the phone unredacted after only removing messages from Kate to Lindsey and from Tully to Lindsey and after removing things like audio messages from Leigha Genduso? How do I know? Well, because how else would Lindsey have posted it on social media? My word, Steph. It’s almost like there’s proof that Robert Cosgrove was withholding material information related to the sum and substance of Kate Peter’s communications with various members of the prosecution team and/or witnesses and/or the handling of evidence in order to insulate certain charges from Kate Peter touching that evidence so that they could continue to trial, notwithstanding the discovery obligations of the state under the new updated Rule 14 as implemented on March 1, 2025. And towel is in a snarky mood indeed. And you’re not going to be able to do anything about it—oh, please, you're not saying to yourself, "what’s wrong with towel, Steph?" You’re basically saying, "why are you crossing the thin blue line?" And I would like to respond to you by saying, in the least unloving way, but the fact that you would ask me, “What is Grant doing?” because I won’t adhere to your thin blue line? Get the fuck out of here. Go climb up somebody else’s tree. Go find your own treehouse. Not happening. Absolutely not happening. You will look this factual record in the eye. You will confront your moral problems with the various actions of different people involved on your own time. And Leigha Bathtub Genduso will be central to this moral reckoning. And there’s not a damn thing you or your fake Canadian ass can do about it. I’m on one. I told you. Listen, you want it? You want it to be on record? We’ll do it. No, no, I’m just not loyal to your interests, Steph. I’m loyal to truth. I’m loyal to the people who are actually harmed. I’m not loyal to you or any of your friends or Kate Peter or the thin blue line or the thin green line or the thin pink line for that matter. All of you can take your lines and go fuck yourselves. Fake Canadian. Yeah, right, Steph. Yeah, let’s go with that. Yep, let’s go with fake Canadian, because why would you want me looking more in to you? A reporter? You want me to look more into you? No. God, take the L, man, just move on. That’s correct. No, listen, Steph, you want to talk about Michael Proctor’s family’s relationship to my mother? You want to be the person who draws that line? I’ll tell you about it. You sure you want to talk about it? You damn fake Canadian. We may have to get this fake Canadian out of here. She’s riling me up. You’re riling me up by trying to defend Kate Peter. I knew you were a rat the whole time. Goddamn Kate Peter mole. I knew it. I saw through that shit. "I just heard you acknowledge me about the AI. No hate. I appreciate you reading this. Good content." Thank you, sir. Thank you, to the person who said that! You see what I’m saying, Steph? You know what? I think we should just let Steph talk to herself, all right? She can just keep promoting the stream and the algorithm. Let her talk to herself. But Steph, even if you’re talking to yourself, I still have to write the post, okay? Damn fake Canadians. Steph is a fake Canadian and she may or may not be a communist. What you gonna' do about it? You damn fake Canadian. All right, no, I actually have to write this follow-up post. Stop it, Steph. Stop trying to gaslight to protect Kate Peter. You’ll be thrown out of here faster than someone with a cannabis conviction trying to enter Canada who doesn’t actually live there. Damn fake Canadians. Thank you, Kristina. I appreciate it. Yes, and Kristina, you ever wonder if maybe people come in here specifically to derail the conversation because we’re talking about very damning things as to Kate Peter? Well then, let me write my other post, by the way. I’ll help. I will put it up on the screen for you in one second. I just got to get the video loading before I start typing. Oh, Steph, you were on assignment. Stop bitching. I hope they paid you well for it. Don’t bark up my towel tree about you had to spend time with me so you could run intel to all the Kate Peter people. I don’t care. I knew what you were doing. Do you think I was born yesterday? Come on. You all insult my intelligence routinely—not you in the chat. Some of you moles are just like, “He won’t know.” What, are you just going to tell me I’m the greatest thing ever and then it’s going to go along? I’m just saying, I’ve been posting on social media being like, “Aidan, if people tell you that you’re the greatest thing ever, that might be true, but some of them are going to tell you that because they’re moles.” Come on. This is very basic-level intel stuff here. Steph, that was very nice of you. I am never going to degrade you for supporting people in need. What I’m concerned about, okay—I’m not concerned about who you are as a person. I’m concerned about what you didn’t tell us. All right? Yeah? And that's my right. No, absolutely not, Steph. You know exactly what happened. You flipped on a dime as soon as I started asking questions about Kate Peter because she has a lot of moles in her orbit. And then as soon as we started talking about her today, coincidentally enough, you popped right back up. Oh, what’s this? Robert Cosgrove represented in a sworn affidavit that any material missing from Lindsey Gaetani’s—see what I’m doing, Steph? This is, uh, this is for you—Lindsey Gaetani’s phone extraction was not on the phone when MSP did that extraction. And then Brian Tully leaked that extraction unredacted. That’s a message from Leigha Bathtub Genduso proves Tully failed to include material that was indeed on Lindsey's phone. That was for you too, Steph. It’s weird that you know Bathtub, by the way. That’s just odd. Like she’s known Kate Peter for years too. If this Steph, who I watched Sandlot with, is the same Steph as the one who’s a second cousin of John O’Keefe, then she lied to me. She lied to me. If we can prove that this is the same, same Steph, then she lied to me. She told me she was from Canada, Saskatchewan, whatever the fuck. That’s what I’m saying. So Steph, if you are that Steph from wherever the fuck you live, bro—if you are that Steph—you lied to us all. You told us you were fucking Canadian. Wait a minute, wait a minute, wait a minute, wait a minute, wait a minute—are you actually that Steph? No fucking way. You lied to all of us this whole time and pretended to be Canadian? No, that was not—I didn’t ask if you were from Canada. I said, are you the same Steph who was second cousins with John O’Keefe and did you come on this channel and go on a Zoom call with me representing yourself to be Canadian from Saskatchewan? I don’t even have—no, that is not the question I’m asking you. Are you the same Steph that is second cousins with John O’Keefe? Thanks for letting us know. See what I mean? Kristina, it’s not the same Steph. It’s just some random person who really likes Leigha Genduso, Leigha Bathtub Genduso, and Kate Peter. Random coincidence! Just totally random. Come on. I’m rolling my eyes so hard I’m laughing. This has been really interesting though. I know you said no. That makes it even weirder. If you’re not that Steph, your fervent defense of Kate Peter and Leigha Bathtub Genduso is even more weird. Go back to Discord. Come on now, shoo. You’re bothering me. If you bother me too much, I’m just going to go on a 45-minute rant eviscerating Kate Peter with facts, all right? So it’s better to just go. Like I told Benny Sweatpants the other day. Send him my regards, all right? No, I like calling out your hypocrisy. You wouldn’t say a negative word about Kate Peter if I demonstrated the factual record for you in real time. Live! Which I’m doing. You haven’t addressed one element of it on substance. All you’ve done is gaslight, and frankly you’re going to find yourself removed if you continue to fail to adhere to the rules of Towel Channel. As you know, the rules of Towel Channel are pretty simple, which is: one, don’t be discriminatory; two, don’t be derogatory; three, don’t sealion; four, don’t gaslight; and five, no Kate Peters. All right? Jay’s like, “I’m aboard the Grant train.” Thanks, Jay. It wasn’t one question, Steph. It was three questions. Let me reiterate them to you very quickly. Number one, Steph, please address the fact—please address why Kate Peter’s February 24, 2024 email to Ken Mello was not turned over in the 5,000 pages of emails that Robert Cosgrove spent seven months putting together that were between Kate Peter and Ken Mello and Kate Peter and Brian Tully. Why was that February 24, 2024 email not turned over? Secondly, is the fact that those emails were turned over—despite the fact that it wasn’t a full turnover of emails—in August of 2025 tie into why the Lindsey Gaetani charges involving Aiden were dismissed? Second question: is the fact that Kate Peter—now we know from these documents—directly handled two pieces of key evidence in the Gaetani indictments involving Kearney the reason why, coupled with the August 2025 disclosure of those manipulated email records between Tully and Kate and Kate Peter and Ken Mello, was that the reason why the 2024 indictments involving Lindsey Gaetani were actually null-prossed? Time to answer some tough questions, Steph. And furthermore, why was that audio of Leigha Genduso not included in the extraction that Brian Tully released completely unredacted in April of 2024? And why have you never said a word about how Tully manipulated that extraction to remove messages from Tully to Lindsey and from Kate to Lindsey before releasing it? And Tully apparently didn’t include Leigha Genduso’s audio message that is now part of the public court record. Yes, Steph, you can’t address it on merit, you can’t, because you’re not here to do that, are you? You’re here to vacuously distract with nonsensical emotional rhetoric. And I will not stand for it. No, I’ll continue reading. It’ll get worse before it gets better, Steph. I’ll tell you that right now. No, she did not, Steph. I’ll tell you what, right now. You know how I know? Because look at Steph, it was posted on social media. Oh, Steph, it was posted on social media and not included in the extraction. So how could Lindsey have deleted it? Lindsey saved it, because Tully didn’t include it in the extraction, and then Lindsey dropped it on social media. And that proves it. That absolutely proves it. All right, so Steph, if you don’t know and don’t care, that’s the end of this discussion. If we have to move you on begrudgingly, we will. But as of now, you can’t address any of this on merit. You don’t know the factual record. You’re getting humiliated. And furthermore, I’m sending a message through you to Kate that her moles are not welcome here. So, well, yeah, but no, that’s not—hold on, do you realize, Steph, the point is not where it was posted. It was that the audio file exists. If it was not on Lindsey’s phone when they did the extraction, she couldn’t have it. But she still has it. There you go. So, listen, oh, I knew we were onto something. I didn’t know it was this bad, Steph. You shouldn’t have tipped Kate’s hand like this, by the way. The reacting that way is only making me aware that this is the whole kitten caboodle. No, Steph, again, you have no standing to stand up for anyone, call anyone anything, or otherwise say anything here, because you will not address the merits of the argument. You just admitted you don’t care about the filings, you don’t know the details, and you refuse to engage. So therefore, we’re done. Oh, it’s such a shame. All right, I gotta move her on. All right, Steph, it was great. We’ll put you in a little timeout. You can come back tomorrow, okay? I’m glad you spent some time with us, but the reality is I just don’t—I don’t wanna play that type of Kate Peter game, all right? Yep, now, Christina, you, as you know, this channel in Br… every possible perspective. I don’t care what you want to come in here and believe, you know you and I align on a lot of the factual record about a lot of these different cases. It’s not that. I’ll never ever have a problem with that. It’s the bad faith—and it’s not you, Christina. You are wonderful. You’ve never done it—but it’s the people who get too close to Kate Peter and then as embodied in that colloquy with Steph right there, whoever the fuck she is, we still don’t know. As embodied in that colloquy, you have a situation where when confronted with the facts instead of responding or even giving the time of day to what Kate Peter or Tully or Cosgrove might have done wrong, immediately it starts with the emotional manipulation, the attacks, the distraction. So I hope that—I hope that tells us all something. But yes, let’s keep reading because before I got in that fun colloquy, we were—I bet Steph was sent here to try to derail me. Nice try, Steph, take it elsewhere. All right, so we got those two posts up, by the way. All right, following service. Do you remember where we were in all this? The very last—so we just read about the Kate emails. By the way, now we know the whole Kate and Kaboodle is the Kate emails. We just read about the Kate emails and take a look where it goes next. All right, it just keeps going and going. Oh, do you think I should add Kate, Steph to the chart, by the way? Where should she go on the chart? Should she go under the Trollhollmio section? I feel like that’s appropriate. You know, this is just my opinion of how all these people tie together. Say you got Kate Peter, the Lord of Darkness in the middle—that’s my opinion. Then you got Jamz up there, Llama over there, Jason Broyles down here, Gaffney over here, Trollhollomio here. Then you got people like Critical Mass, Virgil, that—I don’t know who that is. And then you got Tully, Michael Morrissey, and Michael Proctor. Then you got Jake Sun, Twisted Tragedies tied to Gaffney. Then you got that guy, Jason Broyles, who thinks—who pretends to be a woman online. You got him, I think he’s tied to Barry Lewis and this weird woman from Connecticut that Kate keeps working with. She used to pretend to be like an advocate for medical patients, but now apparently she’s a big advocate of prednisone. I don’t really understand. She’s been going online telling people that people with colitis have to use prednisone apparently and they can’t use cannabis. I’m baffled by it. I didn’t know she was a doctor. Listen, if I knew that this woman was a doctor, I would start looking to whether she’s received payments from the pharmaceutical industry because I’ve never met a cannabis advocate who tells people they have to use prednisone for colitis. So that woman baffles me. Also, she’s the reason consumption event in Massachusetts are now regulated by the CCC. So listen, you all think that Kate Peter’s just some kind of like moron. She just plays that role, okay? Like she plays like she doesn’t know what she’s talking about and she doesn’t mostly with these court developments. But look at her network. Like people fawn over her like TurtleBoy. She is the female TurtleBoy in so many ways. And what makes her scary is she doesn’t own it.

Grant Smith Ellis

13,617 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад