Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

"Yeah RienSang isn't meta defining bro keep using Solemn Lament"

63,396 views • 5 months ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Claude Code + Google Stitch 2.0 is f*cking cracked 🤯 Google just dropped a free AI design agent that solves Claude Code's biggest weakness: frontend design. One screenshot of a high-converting landing page → a production-ready site for your brand in minutes. All inside Google Stitch + Claude Code. Perfect for DTC brands and agencies who are building advertorial pages and product launch pages for Meta but burning days on designer back-and-forth. If you're running Meta ads and need 5-10 different landing pages testing different hooks, angles, and offers — each one targeting a different audience and pain point — you know the bottleneck isn't the ads. It's the pages. Briefing designers, waiting for revisions, paying $2-5K per page. Stitch eliminates the design bottleneck: → Find a high-converting advertorial that's scaling on Meta → Screenshot it and drop it into Stitch (powered by Gemini 3.1) → Stitch redesigns it with your brand's colors, fonts, and imagery using Nano Banana 2 → Edit sections visually — headlines, CTAs, layouts — without touching code → Export the code and paste it into Claude Code → Claude builds the full production site and deploys to Vercel or Netlify in 60 seconds No designer. No $3K per landing page. No Claude Code frontend that looks like a template from 2019. What you get: → Designer-quality landing pages and advertorials built in minutes, not weeks → Visual editing so you actually see the design before you code it → Nano Banana 2 generating on-brand product imagery and hero shots → A repeatable system — new angle, new page, same pipeline Built 100% with Google Stitch 2.0 + Claude Code. I put together a full playbook showing the exact workflow: how to find winning pages, redesign them in Stitch, and deploy with Claude Code. Want it for free? > Like this post > Comment "STITCH" And I'll send it over (must be following so I can DM)

Mike Futia

125,827 views • 4 months ago

🚨 DOUBLE STANDARD: Why hasn’t the DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE taken action against CARDI B for SEX CRIMES, ROBBERY, AND DRUGGING MEN? On March 26, 2019, rapper Cardi B (Cardi B) whose real name is Belcalis Marlenis Almánzar, PUBLICLY BOASTED ON SOCIAL MEDIA about USING SEX to DRUG and ROB MEN, taking all of their money. She stated, “N-Words must have forgot what I did… Oh yeah, you wanna fu*k me? Yeah, yeah, yeah, let’s go to this hotel, and I drugged N-Words up, and I robbed them. That’s what I used to do.” Then, on August 9, 2024, during an X Space, Cardi B reaffirmed her lack of remorse, proudly stating she would repeat these actions. She said, “Why do y’all keep writing ‘Cardi B drugged men for? So what, I’ll do it again bi^ch. I don’t feel bad for no N-Words, and I’ll do it the f^*k again.” These incidents, which Cardi B has openly admitted to, allegedly took place in New York. The pressing question remains: why hasn’t Cardi B been charged with sex crimes and drug-related offenses? Why does the justice system seem to treat non-Black women offenders differently? Despite her public confessions, #CardiB appears to have avoided any legal consequences, by The NYPD (NYPD NEWS) and THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT (U.S. Department of Justice) or the FBI (FBI New York) sparking significant concerns about unequal justice. Would a Black woman be afforded the same leniency if she admitted to the same actions? Why does Cardi B seem above the law? She’s no different than R Kelly, Diddy, Bill Cosby, Rick Ross, Jeffery Epstein or Harvey Weinstein. How is Cardi B still allowed to be played on radio stations, featured on TV shows, perform live in venues across America, and retain her endorsement deals and contracts?
0:17

Sensitive content

🚨 DOUBLE STANDARD: Why hasn’t the DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE taken action against CARDI B for SEX CRIMES, ROBBERY, AND DRUGGING MEN? On March 26, 2019, rapper Cardi B (Cardi B) whose real name is Belcalis Marlenis Almánzar, PUBLICLY BOASTED ON SOCIAL MEDIA about USING SEX to DRUG and ROB MEN, taking all of their money. She stated, “N-Words must have forgot what I did… Oh yeah, you wanna fu*k me? Yeah, yeah, yeah, let’s go to this hotel, and I drugged N-Words up, and I robbed them. That’s what I used to do.” Then, on August 9, 2024, during an X Space, Cardi B reaffirmed her lack of remorse, proudly stating she would repeat these actions. She said, “Why do y’all keep writing ‘Cardi B drugged men for? So what, I’ll do it again bi^ch. I don’t feel bad for no N-Words, and I’ll do it the f^*k again.” These incidents, which Cardi B has openly admitted to, allegedly took place in New York. The pressing question remains: why hasn’t Cardi B been charged with sex crimes and drug-related offenses? Why does the justice system seem to treat non-Black women offenders differently? Despite her public confessions, #CardiB appears to have avoided any legal consequences, by The NYPD (NYPD NEWS) and THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT (U.S. Department of Justice) or the FBI (FBI New York) sparking significant concerns about unequal justice. Would a Black woman be afforded the same leniency if she admitted to the same actions? Why does Cardi B seem above the law? She’s no different than R Kelly, Diddy, Bill Cosby, Rick Ross, Jeffery Epstein or Harvey Weinstein. How is Cardi B still allowed to be played on radio stations, featured on TV shows, perform live in venues across America, and retain her endorsement deals and contracts?

Sir Maejor 🇺🇸

4,165,036 views • 1 year ago

I just built a $10K/month creative strategist inside Claude Code 🤯 Give it your competitor Facebook page URLs → it scrapes their ads, watches every video with AI, and delivers a data-backed creative brief with 10 ad concepts in your brand voice. All inside Claude Code. Perfect for DTC brands and agencies who are still manually scrolling the Meta Ad Library, screenshotting ads into Google Docs, and guessing at what's working. If you're spending hours every week pulling competitor ads one by one, watching videos to figure out the hook, copying notes into a brief, and rewriting concepts from scratch every time... This system eliminates the entire loop: → Apify scrapes your competitors' active ads from Meta Ad Library (video + image) → Downloads every creative asset locally → Gemini watches each video and analyzes the hook, angle, visual format, copy framework, CTA, and emotional trigger → Runs the full batch and finds the patterns that repeat across 3+ ads → Claude generates 10 ad concepts using the proven mechanics, matched to your brand voice No manually scrolling the Ad Library. No screenshotting ads into docs. No guessing which hooks are actually working. What you get: → Individual creative breakdowns for every competitor ad (7 dimensions each) → A pattern report showing which hooks, formats, and triggers keep repeating → 10 ready-to-brief ad concepts traced back to real competitor data → A reusable system — new competitors, new brief, same pipeline The research that takes your team a full day now runs in 15 minutes for ~$3 in API costs. Built 100% in Claude Code with Apify + Gemini. I put together a full playbook showing you can build the entire thing step-by-step from scratch. Want the playbook for free? > Like this post > Comment "ADS" And I'll send it over (must be following so I can DM)

Mike Futia

54,687 views • 4 months ago

‼️Blakey, I need you to put down the copium and step away from the keyboard.🫣 You didn't just betray Charlie—you helped bury him. You The entire world knows a leftist didn't murder Charlie, Turning Point's own security team did (you know, the ones you all trusted). They didn't just 'fail' to protect him—they delevered his head on a silver platter to Israel. And you? You've been sitting in his chair, using his name, and grifting off his ghost ever since. The projection is astronomical—you're like a thief screaming 'stop stealing!' while you're literally wearing the victim's shoes. Candace didn't just 'not hate' Charlie—she's the ONLY one with the courage to put her entire career (and life) on the line to find out who actually killed her best friend. While you were livestreaming from his studio like vultures picking at a carcass, she was risking everything to expose the truth you cowards are too busy covering up to acknowledge. The 'overwhelming backlash' isn't from 'left-wing zealots,' Blakey. It's from Charlie's actual fans who watched his 'friends' turn his legacy into a content farm and cash cow. You didn't love him. You loved what he could do for your follower count and bankroll. The fact that you're 'proud' to keep his show running while actively obstructing justice for his murder isn't loyalty—it's the most disgusting kind of careerism masquerading as friendship. Seek discernment, seek repentance, and maybe—just maybe—seek a lawyer. The truth has a way of catching up to grifters who play stupid games." CC: Candace Owens
0:13

Sensitive content

‼️Blakey, I need you to put down the copium and step away from the keyboard.🫣 You didn't just betray Charlie—you helped bury him. You The entire world knows a leftist didn't murder Charlie, Turning Point's own security team did (you know, the ones you all trusted). They didn't just 'fail' to protect him—they delevered his head on a silver platter to Israel. And you? You've been sitting in his chair, using his name, and grifting off his ghost ever since. The projection is astronomical—you're like a thief screaming 'stop stealing!' while you're literally wearing the victim's shoes. Candace didn't just 'not hate' Charlie—she's the ONLY one with the courage to put her entire career (and life) on the line to find out who actually killed her best friend. While you were livestreaming from his studio like vultures picking at a carcass, she was risking everything to expose the truth you cowards are too busy covering up to acknowledge. The 'overwhelming backlash' isn't from 'left-wing zealots,' Blakey. It's from Charlie's actual fans who watched his 'friends' turn his legacy into a content farm and cash cow. You didn't love him. You loved what he could do for your follower count and bankroll. The fact that you're 'proud' to keep his show running while actively obstructing justice for his murder isn't loyalty—it's the most disgusting kind of careerism masquerading as friendship. Seek discernment, seek repentance, and maybe—just maybe—seek a lawyer. The truth has a way of catching up to grifters who play stupid games." CC: Candace Owens

Project Constitution

113,793 views • 1 month ago

🚨 THE BIGGEST BOTTLENECK IN AI ISN'T COMPUTING POWER ANYMORE IT'S MOVING DATA. Instead of laying new cables, Chinese researchers have upgraded existing fiber infrastructure by doing two things at once: Using three wavelength bands (C + L + S) instead of the usual two. Using four cores inside each fiber instead of one. Each core acts like an independent highway, and each band acts like an extra lane on that highway. Together, they’ve reportedly increased transmission capacity per core by nearly 50% and overall data throughput by up to 5×. This matters enormously for AI. Modern AI clusters move terabits of data per second between thousands of GPUs. The biggest bottleneck is often not the chips themselves, but moving data fast enough between them. If you can push 5× more data through the same physical cables, you can train bigger models faster and reduce network congestion. Why this is significant: • It shows multi-core + extended spectrum technology moving from labs into real-world commercial use • The system has already run over 35 km of existing telecom network • It could be especially useful for submarine cables and large-scale data center interconnects • China is also eyeing it for its “Eastern Data, Western Computing” project The deeper implication: We’re reaching the physical limits of how much data we can push through single-core fibers using traditional methods. By combining spatial multiplexing (multiple cores) with spectral multiplexing (more wavelength bands), engineers are finding new ways to keep scaling bandwidth without having to dig up the planet to lay new cables. This kind of breakthrough is quiet but foundational it’s the kind of infrastructure upgrade that will determine how fast AI and cloud computing can actually grow in the coming years. The future of data movement might not require more cables. It might just require smarter ones. How important do you think multi-core and multi-band fiber will be for keeping up with AI’s exploding data demands? Follow for more frontier networking, photonics, and infrastructure technology.

TheNewPhysics

20,485 views • 1 month ago

THE DEPTH MAP TRICK THAT FIXED DANCE ACCURACY IN SEEDANCE 2.0 Feed the model a video of someone dancing and it tries to interpret everything- the person, the clothes, the lighting, the room, and somewhere in there, the movement. Feed it a depth map and there's nothing left to interpret but the motion. Most creators trying to transfer a dance to a character reference the source footage directly, then wonder why the choreography drifts. The problem isn't the model - it's that you handed it ten variables when you only wanted one. Here's the workflow 1. Lock the character reference in GPT Image 2 first -face, build, costume, so identity holds independently of whatever motion gets applied to it 2. Convert the source dance footage into a depth map instead of using the raw video -this strips out the original performer's appearance, clothing, and environment entirely 3. Feed the depth map as the motion reference and the character sheet as the identity reference- two separate inputs doing two separate jobs, not one input trying to do both 5. Let the depth map carry only spatial movement -the model receives body position and momentum with no competing information about who's moving or what they look like 6. Keep the character and motion inputs isolated throughout - the moment you mix appearance data into the motion reference, the model starts negotiating between two identities Why this works • Raw footage passes the model everything at once- performer, wardrobe, room, lighting -and the choreography competes with all of it for attention • A depth map is pure spatial information, so the only thing left to transfer is movement • Separating identity from motion means the character can stay locked while the dance stays accurate - normally you're trading one for the other • The accuracy gain isn't the model getting better, it's the model getting fewer decisions to make Use cases: ⁃ Dance and choreography transfer onto original characters ⁃ Motion capture-style workflows without motion capture ⁃ Any sequence where a specific movement needs to survive intact ⁃ Character showcase content built on existing performance footage The character sheet answers who's dancing. The depth map answers how - and keeping those two questions separate is the whole trick.

Nexlow

84,184 views • 18 days ago