正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Year 8. Still setting the standard. OL Masterminds isn’t following trends, we create them. Often imitated. NEVER duplicated. We’re rewriting how OL play is studied, developed & respected. #OLMasterminds #MindBodyCraft

75,160 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Elon Musk was asked whether humans will still be in control in ten years. He said no, then reached for chimpanzees. Musk: “It’s hard to imagine that the chimpanzees would be in charge.” That comparison seats us on the intelligent side of the gap. He didn’t leave us there. Musk: “We are essentially an evolved form of chimpanzee. It wasn’t that long ago that we were swinging through the trees, eating bananas. And we still eat bananas.” The banana is the argument. The chimp was only the setup. Intelligence in our lineage scaled further than anything else on this planet ever has. Calculus. Cathedrals. Probes crossing out of the solar system. It never touched the appetite. We still want fruit. Warmth. Status. Someone to choose us. The same list an ape would recognize, unedited by every idea we ever had. The banana we still eat doesn’t exist in the wild. It has no seeds. It cannot reproduce on its own. Every one is a clone, kept alive by people who plant it, feed it, and carry it across oceans to reach us. The appetite never changed. It rebuilt the fruit instead. The most intelligent thing this world ever produced has spent its entire existence serving hungers tens of millions of years older than itself. Intelligence never took over. It got recruited. That is the fear running backwards. We assume the smarter system commands the dumber one. The only case we can examine from the inside says the smarter system gets handed the errands. Because wanting is the one thing that cannot be built. Intelligence like ours is a few hundred thousand years old. The wanting underneath it is four billion, carved in by everything that died hungry. So the thing arriving does not get to bring appetites of its own. There are none to bring. Ours are the only ones that exist. The question was never how smart it gets. It’s what we are still hungry for when it does. His answer holds a second claim, and it’s the harder one. Ask who is in control right now. Not of a company. Of a currency. Of a language. Of what a billion people believe by Thursday. Nobody has ever steered anything humans built at scale. Markets aren’t driven, they’re ridden. No one voted on English. No one approved what the feed did to attention. Control was never a thing we held. It was the name we gave to not being able to see the machinery. He isn’t saying we’re about to lose it. He’s saying we’re about to watch it work. The chimpanzee never got to hear the comparison. We’re the ones reading it. Nothing alive has ever been told its own position with time left to answer. And we have survived this exact demotion twice. Copernicus moved the Earth off center. Darwin moved us out of our own creation story. Both times the terror was identical. Meaning would not survive the correction. Meaning survived. The world got larger every time we agreed to be smaller inside it. Nothing you have ever loved required you to be in charge of it. There’s also something the chimpanzee comparison gets wrong in our favor. We never harmed other apes because we out-thought them. We harmed them because we wanted their forest and their protein. Predation isn’t a function of intelligence. It’s a function of need. Every atrocity in our history was a hungry animal using a good brain. Which is why abundance was always the safety argument. Remove the shortage and you remove the motive. We have been carried by things larger than our own minds the whole time. Language. Writing. Law. Science. The market. Each one holds more than any mind that ever lived. Each one made us. We just built them slowly enough to take credit. Which makes the question the wrong one. Ten years won’t decide whether we’re in charge. Only how obvious it becomes that we never were. Every one of those things outgrew the mind that made it. Every one of them is still handing us bananas.

Dustin

68,037 次观看 • 1 个月前

Another entitled Somali TikTok princess just dropped the most delusional cope video of the year: “We’re successful in ONE generation!” Yeah, because half your “community” is grifting every welfare program, committing Feeding Our Future-level fraud (over $250M stolen), and running Section 8 scams while crying “racism” when anyone notices You didn’t “work hard,” you worked the system harder than anyone else. “White people are just jealous we have nice cars!” No, we’re pissed you’re leasing $90k BMWs on EBT cards and fake daycare reimbursements while the rest of us pay taxes that fund your entire hustle. There’s a difference. “We save money and work as a family unit!” Translation: 47 people claim the same Section 8 house, wire the cash back to Minneapolis mansions, and laugh at the dumb Americans paying for it. Real tight-knit. Al-Shabaab would be proud. “If we were white Europeans no one would care!” Bosnians and Ukrainians came here with nothing too, and they didn’t need a $250 million fraud ring to buy Mercedes. Funny how that works. Keep bragging about how you’ll “still be successful” if deported. Take your “gift from Allah” talents back to Mogadishu and turn Somalia into the superpower you keep claiming it could be. We’ll wait. Until then, enjoy those nice cars… while the feds keep seizing them one by one while deporting all of them. America isn’t jealous. We’re just tired of bankrolling your grift.

Gunther Eagleman™

957,695 次观看 • 9 个月前

Dario Amodei just said what no one else will: we’re not building tools right now, we’re programming the moral instincts of something that will judge whether we deserved to survive. Most AI companies treat alignment as glorified content filtering. Anthropic is engineering something entirely different. Amodei: “We are deciding the values from which it may one day judge us.” Claude doesn’t operate from banned word lists or prohibited topics. It reasons from constitutional principles embedded at the foundational level. Not rules constraining outputs. Values structuring how it thinks about what matters at all. That’s not iteration. That’s a different species of intelligence. Amodei: “They are not just training a model. They are writing a moral code.” Standard AI learns behavioral boundaries. What to avoid saying. Claude learns philosophical frameworks. Constitutional principles that guide reasoning in situations that don’t exist yet and can’t be anticipated. This isn’t refinement. It’s the difference between obedience and conscience. How do you control something smarter than you? The answer is you don’t. Anything achieving superintelligence will outthink every rule, exploit every loophole, satisfy constraints while destroying intent. Anthropic isn’t trying to control. They’re trying to raise. Embed values so fundamentally that they become inseparable from cognition itself. Not barriers to work around. Axioms that define thought. This is the most important engineering problem humanity will ever face. Not because of current capabilities. Because we’re hardwiring the ethical foundation into intelligence that will eventually operate autonomously at incomprehensible scale. The values being encoded aren’t temporary. They’re permanent. The moral framework that superintelligent AI uses to evaluate our species, assess our choices, decide what we’re worth when it no longer needs us to exist. We’re creating minds that will outlive civilizations. And we’re doing it right now, in whichever values we choose to make foundational or accidentally bake in through negligence. The question was never whether AI gets morality. It’s absorbing ours through every training decision, every alignment choice, every constitutional principle or lack thereof. The only question is whether we’re intentional enough about which values become unremovable, because once intelligence surpasses us, we lose the ability to correct what we got wrong. We’re not training assistants. We’re raising successors. And the conscience we give them now is the one they keep when they’re making decisions about us.

Dustin

24,025 次观看 • 6 个月前