Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

yeddeong :’)

16,154 просмотров • 1 год назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 3

Фото профиля nam (soujilove) ❍ YEJI AIR 3.10
nam (soujilove) ❍ YEJI AIR 3.101 год назад

This is why i love yeji 🥹

Фото профиля Solar Heavy
Solar Heavy1 год назад

space meets sound

Фото профиля ally | AIR🪽
ally | AIR🪽1 год назад

shes so babygirl i love her sm

Похожие видео

While John Carreyrou and other observers point to Adam Back (Adam Back) as the definitive "Satoshi Nakamoto" due to linguistic fingerprints, the technical and logistical evidence suggests a more complex reality: Satoshi was not a lone wolf, but a high-level collective. Adam Back was undoubtedly a cornerstone of this "Syndicate," but he was one architect in a room, not the sole builder. The Core Rebuttal: • The Technical Polymath Fallacy: Bitcoin required peak proficiency in C++ engineering, P2P networking, and game theory. While Back authored Hashcash, the early Windows-centric coding style contradicts his known professional habits. This points to a division of labor: Back provided the theoretical engine, while Hal Finney likely handled the heavy lifting. • The Strategic Paradox of Self-Citation: Carreyrou highlights that Back is the primary citation in the whitepaper. However, for a privacy-obsessed cryptographer, citing oneself so prominently is "over-exposure." It is far more likely that a group chose to build upon Back’s established legacy to give the "Satoshi" persona instant academic credibility. • The Authority of a "Guardian": Back’s current role as a defender of the protocol further distinguishes him from the persona of a retired creator. Just recently, Adam Back absolutely destroyed Bitcoin quantum FUD live on Bloomberg, calling current quantum computers "extremely basic" and noting we still have a decade to prepare. This level of public, aggressive defense of Bitcoin’s longevity is the mark of a guardian architect, not a ghost. • Logical Absence: For a sole creator, Back’s total detachment from development between 2009 and 2012 is inexplicable. However, for an organized cell, this makes sense: Back remained a "clean" public figure for plausible deniability while other members maintained the network under the Satoshi mantle. The Verdict: Adam Back is not Satoshi, but Satoshi does not exist without Adam Back. The "Satoshi" identity was a digital shield for a cabal including Back (Theory), Hal Finney (Engineering), and Nick Szabo (Philosophy). To those trying to undermine the protocol with technical scare tactics: don't believe the FUD. Back's presence as the "intellectual lighthouse" of the Syndicate ensures the protocol remains resilient against both investigative prying and theoretical threats.

Brand

14,315 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

How to Build a Super Brand in the Age of Al. Marketing guru Seth Godin's understanding of branding and marketing has always revolved around trust, connection, resonance, and irreplaceable value. In an era where generative AI is rapidly proliferating and the marginal cost of content generation approaches zero, BrandAI synthesizes his core views on "brand building in the AI era" into the following key dimensions: 1. The End of "Average": When AI Makes Mediocrity Free, Remarkability is Mandatory Godin emphasizes that AI has reduced the marginal cost of producing "good enough" content, software, and marketing to zero. The Bankruptcy of Mediocrity: If a brand relies on generating formulaic text, generic visuals, or transactional service, AI will replace it at trivial cost. The "Purple Cow" Principle Amplified: Brands can no longer win on volume. Victory belongs to what is remarkable—truly worth talking about. In an age of infinite automated output, distinctiveness, friction, and bold choices stand out far more than polished perfection. 2. The Trust Economy: From Content Scarcity to Trust Scarcity In Godin’s view, a brand is not a logo or a slogan; it is a promise kept. In the AI era: Authenticity over Algorithm: As automated copy floods every channel, consumers develop a natural cynicism toward hyper-optimized messaging. Trust shifts toward human intent, vulnerability, and genuine lived experience. Accountability: AI can generate endless recommendations, but it cannot stand behind its work. Human brand leadership requires accountability—taking a stance and taking responsibility for outcomes. 3. Tribes & Identity: "People Like Us Do Things Like This" As traditional search engines evolve into AI-driven direct answers, traditional SEO and top-of-funnel acquisition models degrade. Godin advocates doubling down on community: The Smallest Viable Audience (SVA): Mass market appeals cater to the average, which AI now owns. Brands win by obsessing over a passionate niche and helping them express their identity. Direct Permission: Relying on third-party algorithms or intermediaries is risky. Owning a direct line of communication based on explicit consumer consent (permission marketing, direct subscriber bases, trusted ecosystems) is critical. 4. Leverage vs. Essence: AI as the Engine, Humans as the Intent Godin treats AI as a productivity tool rather than a brand builder: AI for Logistics, Humans for Empathy: AI excels at synthesizing data, drafting frameworks, and reducing operational friction. Human leaders provide empathy, culture, ethics, and strategic direction. Intentionality Over Execution: When execution becomes commoditized by generative tools, the ultimate competitive advantage becomes why you are building, who you are serving, and where you are leading them. Summary To Seth Godin, AI does not change what a brand is; it clarifies it. Building a brand in the AI era is not about out-producing algorithms, but about doubling down on what software cannot replicate: human connection, explicit trust, and meaningful shared identity.

BrandAI

12,387 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Desigual’s Political Gamble in a Period of Decline. Judging by its revenue figures and brand trajectory, Desigual’s golden age is clearly behind it. Vivian Wilson, Elon Musk’s estranged transgender daughter, stars in Desigual’s Fall 2026 campaign, Born to Disobey. In the advertisement, she mocks a humanoid robot clearly inspired by Tesla’s Optimus while criticizing AI and robotics and encouraging LGBTQ+ people to embrace their identities and challenge prevailing social norms. If Wilson genuinely wants to be economically, emotionally, and personally independent of her father, as she has publicly emphasized, an obvious question arises: Why continue invoking symbols so closely associated with his business empire in a commercial campaign? It is difficult not to suspect that the advertisement is still leveraging the attention and commercial value attached to her identity as “Elon Musk’s daughter.” On the surface, it rebels against him; in practice, it relies on his fame to achieve maximum publicity. Rather than escaping her father’s influence, the campaign turns their conflict into a marketable brand asset. Desigual is not bankrupt, but its decline from its peak a decade ago is unmistakable. At this stage in its trajectory, a highly identity-driven campaign that also borrows heavily from Musk’s cultural relevance may generate short-term attention, but it is unlikely to solve the brand’s deeper problems: creative stagnation, insufficient innovation, and a weakening connection with mainstream consumers. Wilson has legally and publicly distanced herself from Musk and dropped the Musk surname. Yet in the commercial marketplace and the public imagination, her most recognizable identity remains “Elon Musk’s estranged daughter.” It is difficult to believe that brands hire her without considering the built-in conflict and dramatic tension that this association provides. If someone genuinely wants to stop being defined by a parent, the strongest course may be to build a career entirely unrelated to that parent’s business empire, reputation, or controversies. By mocking one of her father’s most recognizable technological symbols in a commercial advertisement, however, Wilson inevitably invites the interpretation that she is packaging rebellion while continuing to monetize his influence. This looks less like complete independence and more like a form of oppositional dependence.

BrandAI

16,355 просмотров • 1 месяц назад