Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Yes. And CEPPS is the exact USAID program that ran a formal explicit global Internet censorship program, pooling 100s of censorship NGOs into one combined network, with the express stated purpose to pressure foreign governments to pass laws & regulations to censor speech online.

MikeBenzCyber's profile picture

Mike Benz

1,156,341 subscribers

918,541 просмотров • 1 год назад •via X (Twitter)

Наука и технологииНовости и политика
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 10

Фото профиля USMC Lady Vet 🇺🇸
USMC Lady Vet 🇺🇸1 год назад

I know you have to feel vindicated, but I am keeping you in my prayers for safety

Фото профиля Second-rate Savant
Second-rate Savant1 год назад

Burn it to the ground 🔥

Фото профиля IX
IX1 год назад

The government has been working against you the entire time. DOGE cannot reduce the size of government fast enough. Restore the Bill of Rights. Shrink government.

Фото профиля Surf Panther
Surf Panther1 год назад

This is 1,000 fucking percent treason

Фото профиля Karen Waterbury
Karen Waterbury1 год назад

@DataRepublican Mike comes with receipts 😉

Фото профиля GOP Jesus
GOP Jesus1 год назад

Yikes is right.

Фото профиля MatthewJshow
MatthewJshow1 год назад

Disturbing.

Фото профиля ERICA 🤌🏼
ERICA 🤌🏼1 год назад

Benz is just a messenger, you homicidal whacko jobs. We are watching you, and he is NOT suicidal.

Фото профиля Lisa
Lisa1 год назад

Wow. Never ends

Фото профиля Olymo
Olymo1 год назад

Pure corruption

Похожие видео

How The USAID NED CEPPS Program Got Foreign Countries To Pass Foreign Censorship Laws and Judicial Edicts
37:22

How The USAID NED CEPPS Program Got Foreign Countries To Pass Foreign Censorship Laws and Judicial Edicts

Mike Benz

971,396 просмотров • 1 год назад

NEW: Mike Benz, speaking on Joe Rogan, exposes how USAID-funded networks influence judges, courts, legal systems, and government structures in multiple countries worldwide. One such USAID-funded group, OCCRP, targets judges and legal systems to “rig the scales of justice” in favor of foreign policy establishment interests abroad. “judicial reformer” Joe Rogan and Mike Benz expose how USAID-funded NGOs—Internews, CEPPS, and EcoHealth Alliance—financed the Wuhan lab, a global propaganda network, and the online censorship of American citizens.
9:16

NEW: Mike Benz, speaking on Joe Rogan, exposes how USAID-funded networks influence judges, courts, legal systems, and government structures in multiple countries worldwide. One such USAID-funded group, OCCRP, targets judges and legal systems to “rig the scales of justice” in favor of foreign policy establishment interests abroad. “judicial reformer” Joe Rogan and Mike Benz expose how USAID-funded NGOs—Internews, CEPPS, and EcoHealth Alliance—financed the Wuhan lab, a global propaganda network, and the online censorship of American citizens.

I Meme Therefore I Am 🇺🇸

1,633,516 просмотров • 1 год назад

This same CIA cut-out NED is using US taxpayer dollars to conspire with foreign governments to pass social media censorship laws. These NED-led “legal and regulatory frameworks” for “social media content moderation” helped establish the censorship laws now in Brazil and the UK.
2:20

This same CIA cut-out NED is using US taxpayer dollars to conspire with foreign governments to pass social media censorship laws. These NED-led “legal and regulatory frameworks” for “social media content moderation” helped establish the censorship laws now in Brazil and the UK.

Mike Benz

55,486 просмотров • 1 год назад

It sounds shocking, but it's true: the world's richest and most powerful people, NGOs, & governments are conspiring to censor the entire Internet. Gates, Clinton, & Harris have all demanded it. Ireland's censorship law is back. Australia's on the brink. It's time to fight back.
6:15

It sounds shocking, but it's true: the world's richest and most powerful people, NGOs, & governments are conspiring to censor the entire Internet. Gates, Clinton, & Harris have all demanded it. Ireland's censorship law is back. Australia's on the brink. It's time to fight back.

Michael Shellenberger

1,157,647 просмотров • 1 год назад

How USAID and the UN went after advertisers to force together social media companies to censor. They get huge swarms of NGOs to sign "Global Principles" (norms and standards) and then get legislatures and judges to codify them (laws and regulations).
3:39

How USAID and the UN went after advertisers to force together social media companies to censor. They get huge swarms of NGOs to sign "Global Principles" (norms and standards) and then get legislatures and judges to codify them (laws and regulations).

Mike Benz

120,449 просмотров • 1 год назад

The TikTok censorship affair, while real and condemnable, is a good example of raw gross Censorship Amateur Hour, as opposed to a Censorship Industrial Complex of 1000s of outside NGOs & orgs paid to do it smoothly & expertly. What’s happening is what that difference looks like.
5:40

The TikTok censorship affair, while real and condemnable, is a good example of raw gross Censorship Amateur Hour, as opposed to a Censorship Industrial Complex of 1000s of outside NGOs & orgs paid to do it smoothly & expertly. What’s happening is what that difference looks like.

Mike Benz

123,927 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

In the wake of our reporting that Stanford, EU, UK, Brazil, and Australia are involved in a secret global censorship effort, Australian Senator Alex Antic took to the floor of the Senate to demand answers. Why is Australia's top "eSafety" censor demanding total global censorship?
1:50

In the wake of our reporting that Stanford, EU, UK, Brazil, and Australia are involved in a secret global censorship effort, Australian Senator Alex Antic took to the floor of the Senate to demand answers. Why is Australia's top "eSafety" censor demanding total global censorship?

Michael Shellenberger

424,130 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Jonathan Turley reveals how Hillary Clinton directly targeted Elon Musk, urging the EU to weaponize their censorship apparatus of the Digital Services Act to force censorship on X and American citizens after Musk bought Twitter to restore free speech. After Elon Musk purchased Twitter and dismantled previous censorship systems embedded within the platform, Hillary Clinton called on the EU to deploy one of the most anti-free speech laws in decade to try and bully Elon into censoring accounts on 𝕏 that are exposing Truth, threatening extreme fines for Elon refusing. Hillary Clinton, a former presidential candidate, tried to bypass our First Amendment rights and protections by outsourcing censorship to a foreign government full of globalists, to censor conservative accounts ahead of the 2024 presidential election with candidate Donald Trump. That's election interference — which is TREASON! "When Twitter was purchased by Elon Musk, she called on the EU to use the infamous Digital Services Act... to force the censorship of American citizens, force people like Musk to censor!"
1:59

Jonathan Turley reveals how Hillary Clinton directly targeted Elon Musk, urging the EU to weaponize their censorship apparatus of the Digital Services Act to force censorship on X and American citizens after Musk bought Twitter to restore free speech. After Elon Musk purchased Twitter and dismantled previous censorship systems embedded within the platform, Hillary Clinton called on the EU to deploy one of the most anti-free speech laws in decade to try and bully Elon into censoring accounts on 𝕏 that are exposing Truth, threatening extreme fines for Elon refusing. Hillary Clinton, a former presidential candidate, tried to bypass our First Amendment rights and protections by outsourcing censorship to a foreign government full of globalists, to censor conservative accounts ahead of the 2024 presidential election with candidate Donald Trump. That's election interference — which is TREASON! "When Twitter was purchased by Elon Musk, she called on the EU to use the infamous Digital Services Act... to force the censorship of American citizens, force people like Musk to censor!"

Bridgett Fertig

46,281 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

New video discussing the UK social media ban for children under 16 and why it’s a trojan horse to implement Digital ID, mass surveillance & internet censorship. Corrupt Western governments have been losing the information war thanks to the internet so their plan is to censor it.
2:06

New video discussing the UK social media ban for children under 16 and why it’s a trojan horse to implement Digital ID, mass surveillance & internet censorship. Corrupt Western governments have been losing the information war thanks to the internet so their plan is to censor it.

Power to the People ☭🕊

21,173 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

BREAKING: Meta is considering a policy change to censor speech on protecting women's sports & spaces. This is the video that set them off. Censorship is antithetical to free speech. This is setting the precedent for Kamala's America.
0:25

BREAKING: Meta is considering a policy change to censor speech on protecting women's sports & spaces. This is the video that set them off. Censorship is antithetical to free speech. This is setting the precedent for Kamala's America.

Riley Gaines

1,076,754 просмотров • 1 год назад

It's All Much Worse Than I Thought The corporate media are all-in on government censorship Over the last three years, we have come to learn of the role that our own government officials have played in demanding censorship by social media platforms. Some of this censorship was overt, particularly as it related to COVID. However, some of it was also done in secrecy, as we discovered in the Twitter Files. Many of us thought that once we had uncovered the censorship, governments would be sufficiently embarrassed to stop doing it. And to some extent, that has been the case. But now, governments around the world are stepping up their efforts to demand more censorship. Last week, the Federal Bureau of Investigation quietly announced it had resumed its outreach to social media companies. Scotland’s Police could even investigate comedians under a new hate speech law if someone complains about a joke. Major media outlets are currently working with government-funded censorship activists at the University of Washington and Stanford Internet Observatory to demand greater censorship in the name of “saving Democracy.” Without a doubt, those of us who have uncovered censorship have had an impact. On “60 Minutes” last Sunday, the government-funded advocates of censorship at the University of Washington said they have stopped demanding censorship of social media platforms. Simply drawing awareness to who is demanding censorship and who is funding them has weakened their power. But governments, government-funded NGOs, and the news media have been relentless in their demands for a crackdown on speech they deem hateful and false. At the Supreme Court last week, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson expressed unironic concern that the First Amendment restricts the government’s ability to censor. And everyone from the New Yorker to the New York Times to NBC is suggesting that the only people who are worried about government censorship are Trump supporters, which is obviously false. The 60 Minutes segment was particularly shocking. Lesly Stahl never mentioned the mass censorship of accurate information about COVID’S origins, COVID vaccines, and lockdowns. She falsely suggested that shining a light on the censorship activists was tantamount to persecution. And she suggested that if the government didn’t do more to censor misinformation, Trump supporters would overthrow the government, which is a form of disinformation aimed at scaring people into giving up our first and most fundamental freedom. There are many reasons why they are doing this....
2:48

It's All Much Worse Than I Thought The corporate media are all-in on government censorship Over the last three years, we have come to learn of the role that our own government officials have played in demanding censorship by social media platforms. Some of this censorship was overt, particularly as it related to COVID. However, some of it was also done in secrecy, as we discovered in the Twitter Files. Many of us thought that once we had uncovered the censorship, governments would be sufficiently embarrassed to stop doing it. And to some extent, that has been the case. But now, governments around the world are stepping up their efforts to demand more censorship. Last week, the Federal Bureau of Investigation quietly announced it had resumed its outreach to social media companies. Scotland’s Police could even investigate comedians under a new hate speech law if someone complains about a joke. Major media outlets are currently working with government-funded censorship activists at the University of Washington and Stanford Internet Observatory to demand greater censorship in the name of “saving Democracy.” Without a doubt, those of us who have uncovered censorship have had an impact. On “60 Minutes” last Sunday, the government-funded advocates of censorship at the University of Washington said they have stopped demanding censorship of social media platforms. Simply drawing awareness to who is demanding censorship and who is funding them has weakened their power. But governments, government-funded NGOs, and the news media have been relentless in their demands for a crackdown on speech they deem hateful and false. At the Supreme Court last week, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson expressed unironic concern that the First Amendment restricts the government’s ability to censor. And everyone from the New Yorker to the New York Times to NBC is suggesting that the only people who are worried about government censorship are Trump supporters, which is obviously false. The 60 Minutes segment was particularly shocking. Lesly Stahl never mentioned the mass censorship of accurate information about COVID’S origins, COVID vaccines, and lockdowns. She falsely suggested that shining a light on the censorship activists was tantamount to persecution. And she suggested that if the government didn’t do more to censor misinformation, Trump supporters would overthrow the government, which is a form of disinformation aimed at scaring people into giving up our first and most fundamental freedom. There are many reasons why they are doing this....

Michael Shellenberger

21,897,944 просмотров • 2 лет назад