Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Yes. And CEPPS is the exact USAID program that ran a formal explicit global Internet censorship program, pooling 100s of censorship NGOs into one combined network, with the express stated purpose to pressure foreign governments to pass laws & regulations to censor speech online.

918,541 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)

10 Yorum

USMC Lady Vet 🇺🇸 profil fotoğrafı
USMC Lady Vet 🇺🇸1 yıl önce

I know you have to feel vindicated, but I am keeping you in my prayers for safety

Second-rate Savant profil fotoğrafı
Second-rate Savant1 yıl önce

Burn it to the ground 🔥

IX profil fotoğrafı
IX1 yıl önce

The government has been working against you the entire time. DOGE cannot reduce the size of government fast enough. Restore the Bill of Rights. Shrink government.

Surf Panther profil fotoğrafı
Surf Panther1 yıl önce

This is 1,000 fucking percent treason

Karen Waterbury profil fotoğrafı
Karen Waterbury1 yıl önce

@DataRepublican Mike comes with receipts 😉

GOP Jesus profil fotoğrafı
GOP Jesus1 yıl önce

Yikes is right.

MatthewJshow profil fotoğrafı
MatthewJshow1 yıl önce

Disturbing.

ERICA 🤌🏼 profil fotoğrafı
ERICA 🤌🏼1 yıl önce

Benz is just a messenger, you homicidal whacko jobs. We are watching you, and he is NOT suicidal.

Lisa profil fotoğrafı
Lisa1 yıl önce

Wow. Never ends

Olymo profil fotoğrafı
Olymo1 yıl önce

Pure corruption

Benzer Videolar

It's All Much Worse Than I Thought The corporate media are all-in on government censorship Over the last three years, we have come to learn of the role that our own government officials have played in demanding censorship by social media platforms. Some of this censorship was overt, particularly as it related to COVID. However, some of it was also done in secrecy, as we discovered in the Twitter Files. Many of us thought that once we had uncovered the censorship, governments would be sufficiently embarrassed to stop doing it. And to some extent, that has been the case. But now, governments around the world are stepping up their efforts to demand more censorship. Last week, the Federal Bureau of Investigation quietly announced it had resumed its outreach to social media companies. Scotland’s Police could even investigate comedians under a new hate speech law if someone complains about a joke. Major media outlets are currently working with government-funded censorship activists at the University of Washington and Stanford Internet Observatory to demand greater censorship in the name of “saving Democracy.” Without a doubt, those of us who have uncovered censorship have had an impact. On “60 Minutes” last Sunday, the government-funded advocates of censorship at the University of Washington said they have stopped demanding censorship of social media platforms. Simply drawing awareness to who is demanding censorship and who is funding them has weakened their power. But governments, government-funded NGOs, and the news media have been relentless in their demands for a crackdown on speech they deem hateful and false. At the Supreme Court last week, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson expressed unironic concern that the First Amendment restricts the government’s ability to censor. And everyone from the New Yorker to the New York Times to NBC is suggesting that the only people who are worried about government censorship are Trump supporters, which is obviously false. The 60 Minutes segment was particularly shocking. Lesly Stahl never mentioned the mass censorship of accurate information about COVID’S origins, COVID vaccines, and lockdowns. She falsely suggested that shining a light on the censorship activists was tantamount to persecution. And she suggested that if the government didn’t do more to censor misinformation, Trump supporters would overthrow the government, which is a form of disinformation aimed at scaring people into giving up our first and most fundamental freedom. There are many reasons why they are doing this....

Michael Shellenberger

21,897,944 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce