正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Yes. And CEPPS is the exact USAID program that ran a formal explicit global Internet censorship program, pooling 100s of censorship NGOs into one combined network, with the express stated purpose to pressure foreign governments to pass laws & regulations to censor speech online.

918,541 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

10 条评论

USMC Lady Vet 🇺🇸 的头像
USMC Lady Vet 🇺🇸1 年前

I know you have to feel vindicated, but I am keeping you in my prayers for safety

Second-rate Savant 的头像
Second-rate Savant1 年前

Burn it to the ground 🔥

IX 的头像
IX1 年前

The government has been working against you the entire time. DOGE cannot reduce the size of government fast enough. Restore the Bill of Rights. Shrink government.

Surf Panther 的头像
Surf Panther1 年前

This is 1,000 fucking percent treason

Karen Waterbury 的头像
Karen Waterbury1 年前

@DataRepublican Mike comes with receipts 😉

GOP Jesus 的头像
GOP Jesus1 年前

Yikes is right.

MatthewJshow 的头像
MatthewJshow1 年前

Disturbing.

ERICA 🤌🏼 的头像
ERICA 🤌🏼1 年前

Benz is just a messenger, you homicidal whacko jobs. We are watching you, and he is NOT suicidal.

Lisa 的头像
Lisa1 年前

Wow. Never ends

Olymo 的头像
Olymo1 年前

Pure corruption

相关视频

It's All Much Worse Than I Thought The corporate media are all-in on government censorship Over the last three years, we have come to learn of the role that our own government officials have played in demanding censorship by social media platforms. Some of this censorship was overt, particularly as it related to COVID. However, some of it was also done in secrecy, as we discovered in the Twitter Files. Many of us thought that once we had uncovered the censorship, governments would be sufficiently embarrassed to stop doing it. And to some extent, that has been the case. But now, governments around the world are stepping up their efforts to demand more censorship. Last week, the Federal Bureau of Investigation quietly announced it had resumed its outreach to social media companies. Scotland’s Police could even investigate comedians under a new hate speech law if someone complains about a joke. Major media outlets are currently working with government-funded censorship activists at the University of Washington and Stanford Internet Observatory to demand greater censorship in the name of “saving Democracy.” Without a doubt, those of us who have uncovered censorship have had an impact. On “60 Minutes” last Sunday, the government-funded advocates of censorship at the University of Washington said they have stopped demanding censorship of social media platforms. Simply drawing awareness to who is demanding censorship and who is funding them has weakened their power. But governments, government-funded NGOs, and the news media have been relentless in their demands for a crackdown on speech they deem hateful and false. At the Supreme Court last week, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson expressed unironic concern that the First Amendment restricts the government’s ability to censor. And everyone from the New Yorker to the New York Times to NBC is suggesting that the only people who are worried about government censorship are Trump supporters, which is obviously false. The 60 Minutes segment was particularly shocking. Lesly Stahl never mentioned the mass censorship of accurate information about COVID’S origins, COVID vaccines, and lockdowns. She falsely suggested that shining a light on the censorship activists was tantamount to persecution. And she suggested that if the government didn’t do more to censor misinformation, Trump supporters would overthrow the government, which is a form of disinformation aimed at scaring people into giving up our first and most fundamental freedom. There are many reasons why they are doing this....

Michael Shellenberger

21,897,944 次观看 • 2 年前