Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Yes daddy get all that spit 😍😍😩 Ask about my menu 💕 #bbw #ContentCreator #contentcreators #cum #follo4follo #FolloMe #FYP #fyp #fypage #fypageシ #head #onlyfansbabe #TrendingTopics #SloppyFilms

Jewelie1_'s profile picture

Jewelie😝 - Akron, Ohio📍

12,374 subscribers

89,470 views • 7 months ago •via X (Twitter)

NSFW#bbw#ContentCreator#contentcreators#cum#follo4follo#FolloMe#FYP#fyp#fypage#fypageシ#head#onlyfansbabe#TrendingTopics#SloppyFilms
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

A girlfriend (former dental hygienist) said this should go viral b/c so many times she’s been on first dates and never saw the guy again because of periodontal disease/bad breath. Bad breath is a huge deterrent for most people and in many cases easily solved. I know I’ll be torn to bits over this but GEEZUS!!! Take a freaking hint. Granted, you should never take anything from someone you don’t trust but friends, I won’t leave you on that hill alone, I’ll be chewing the gum too. In fact many a time I try to play it off as I’m getting one for me, you want one too and EVERY freaking time I get hit with “Does my breath stink?” along with another pungent puff of your tonsel stone breath. Have you priced altoids or Ice Breakers lately?!? Gum isn’t cheap, and I’m not giving it away for no good reason. Don’t make it awkward for both of us, yeah your breath reeks. Take the mint and a trip to the dentist. That’s all I have to say about that. Wait, I have more, trim your finger nails! Claws only look good on Wolverine. Also, pedicures aren’t just for women. Some of you look like you could snatch fish out of the lake with your feet and flip flop season is upon us. #psa #fyp #fypシ #over40 #blogger #xreels #viral #stink #badbreath #laurenslabyrinth79 #fypシ゚viralシ #lauren #freckles #nofilter #single #blogger #bloggerstyle #ll79atx
1:31

A girlfriend (former dental hygienist) said this should go viral b/c so many times she’s been on first dates and never saw the guy again because of periodontal disease/bad breath. Bad breath is a huge deterrent for most people and in many cases easily solved. I know I’ll be torn to bits over this but GEEZUS!!! Take a freaking hint. Granted, you should never take anything from someone you don’t trust but friends, I won’t leave you on that hill alone, I’ll be chewing the gum too. In fact many a time I try to play it off as I’m getting one for me, you want one too and EVERY freaking time I get hit with “Does my breath stink?” along with another pungent puff of your tonsel stone breath. Have you priced altoids or Ice Breakers lately?!? Gum isn’t cheap, and I’m not giving it away for no good reason. Don’t make it awkward for both of us, yeah your breath reeks. Take the mint and a trip to the dentist. That’s all I have to say about that. Wait, I have more, trim your finger nails! Claws only look good on Wolverine. Also, pedicures aren’t just for women. Some of you look like you could snatch fish out of the lake with your feet and flip flop season is upon us. #psa #fyp #fypシ #over40 #blogger #xreels #viral #stink #badbreath #laurenslabyrinth79 #fypシ゚viralシ #lauren #freckles #nofilter #single #blogger #bloggerstyle #ll79atx

Lauren

23,315 views • 1 month ago

Dan Bongino demolishes Joe Kent AKA Vindman 2.0 on Butler, reveals he offered Kent a briefing but Kent never took it. "I want you to know something. I offered Joe face-to-face and you know it, Joe, don't bullsh*t people. I offered him a briefing on Butler. Did he show up the FBI headquarters to take it? No way. He did not. That's a fact, bro. You are a liar and a bullsh*tter. And you know it. I offered you that briefing and you didn't take it. You have hidden knowledge about something that happened at Butler? He's got hidden knowledge, folks. Amazing. The president, he was shot in the head. in Butler. He was shot in the head. No one spoke out more about the secret service failures in me. My first week on the job, I had the case agent in my office with an entire team, including a former secret service agent, briefing me about Butler. You know something? Spit it out! Grow a pair! Spit it out! You got some hidden knowledge? You see the grift though? Well, we don't know nothing. I know something. Black box, I got it. Watch my podcast. The FBI examined 35 accounts linked to Crooks. I thought we didn't analyze anything. I thought they told me that I thought they said that. Including social media, bank and other online accounts. But we don't know nothing. We don't know nothing about nothing. Amazing by the way, how keep this up. The same people out there, clan of people who were telling you out there that Iran's no threat can constantly tell you or imply at least that Iran was behind this kid produced no evidence. They tell you they know something and then they go but Iran's no threat. You just implied Iran tried to shoot Trump at with through this kid. Which story is it mother? Which story is it? Get your story straight. We don't have any evidence of that. Yes, Iran wants to kill Trump. Yes, this kid is a lunatic. It happens all the time a sadly. John Hinkley, Arthur Bremer, people lose their minds and do stupid stuff. Here's another more from this article. You guys can read it yourself. The home was completely swept, every device was collected and accessed. There were reports out there say we didn't get into certain devices. That's false. That is just made up. Joe would have known that if he would have read the article or just showed up at our office. " He is just Alexander Vindman 2.0. He is a liar and has zero credibility. Take everything he said last night and dump it in the garbage.
7:01

Dan Bongino demolishes Joe Kent AKA Vindman 2.0 on Butler, reveals he offered Kent a briefing but Kent never took it. "I want you to know something. I offered Joe face-to-face and you know it, Joe, don't bullsh*t people. I offered him a briefing on Butler. Did he show up the FBI headquarters to take it? No way. He did not. That's a fact, bro. You are a liar and a bullsh*tter. And you know it. I offered you that briefing and you didn't take it. You have hidden knowledge about something that happened at Butler? He's got hidden knowledge, folks. Amazing. The president, he was shot in the head. in Butler. He was shot in the head. No one spoke out more about the secret service failures in me. My first week on the job, I had the case agent in my office with an entire team, including a former secret service agent, briefing me about Butler. You know something? Spit it out! Grow a pair! Spit it out! You got some hidden knowledge? You see the grift though? Well, we don't know nothing. I know something. Black box, I got it. Watch my podcast. The FBI examined 35 accounts linked to Crooks. I thought we didn't analyze anything. I thought they told me that I thought they said that. Including social media, bank and other online accounts. But we don't know nothing. We don't know nothing about nothing. Amazing by the way, how keep this up. The same people out there, clan of people who were telling you out there that Iran's no threat can constantly tell you or imply at least that Iran was behind this kid produced no evidence. They tell you they know something and then they go but Iran's no threat. You just implied Iran tried to shoot Trump at with through this kid. Which story is it mother? Which story is it? Get your story straight. We don't have any evidence of that. Yes, Iran wants to kill Trump. Yes, this kid is a lunatic. It happens all the time a sadly. John Hinkley, Arthur Bremer, people lose their minds and do stupid stuff. Here's another more from this article. You guys can read it yourself. The home was completely swept, every device was collected and accessed. There were reports out there say we didn't get into certain devices. That's false. That is just made up. Joe would have known that if he would have read the article or just showed up at our office. " He is just Alexander Vindman 2.0. He is a liar and has zero credibility. Take everything he said last night and dump it in the garbage.

Jacktron

272,677 views • 3 months ago

Caller: “My 20-year-old son is dating a 37-year-old woman… and she’s one of my husband’s employees.” Dr. John: Hold on… you’re 39? Caller: Yes. Dr. John: So your son is dating a woman your age? Caller: Exactly. Dr. John: How did this even happen? Caller: They met through work. She works with my husband. Dr. John: Have you talked to your son? Caller: I keep asking what he wants for his future, but all I get are one-word answers. He isn’t ending the relationship. Dr. John: He’s 20. Lecturing him isn’t going to work. Caller: So what do I do? Dr. John: Does he still live with you? Caller: Yes. Dr. John: Then you have leverage. Dr. John: If you want to make adult decisions, you need to live an adult life. Dr. John: I’m not paying your bills while you drive straight toward a brick wall. Caller: I never thought about it like that. Dr. John: Let me ask you this… Dr. John: If you had a 20-year-old daughter dating a 37-year-old man, would you feel the same way? Caller: No… it would be completely different. Dr. John: Why? Dr. John: Your son deserves the same protection. Caller: She even had a pregnancy scare last month. Dr. John: He’s in way over his head. Caller: Should I call her? Dr. John: No. Dr. John: She isn’t your problem. Dr. John: Your son is. Dr. John: Tell him exactly how you feel. Tell him you love him. Dr. John: And remind him that if this all falls apart… Dr. John: He can always come home.
3:15

Sensitive content

Caller: “My 20-year-old son is dating a 37-year-old woman… and she’s one of my husband’s employees.” Dr. John: Hold on… you’re 39? Caller: Yes. Dr. John: So your son is dating a woman your age? Caller: Exactly. Dr. John: How did this even happen? Caller: They met through work. She works with my husband. Dr. John: Have you talked to your son? Caller: I keep asking what he wants for his future, but all I get are one-word answers. He isn’t ending the relationship. Dr. John: He’s 20. Lecturing him isn’t going to work. Caller: So what do I do? Dr. John: Does he still live with you? Caller: Yes. Dr. John: Then you have leverage. Dr. John: If you want to make adult decisions, you need to live an adult life. Dr. John: I’m not paying your bills while you drive straight toward a brick wall. Caller: I never thought about it like that. Dr. John: Let me ask you this… Dr. John: If you had a 20-year-old daughter dating a 37-year-old man, would you feel the same way? Caller: No… it would be completely different. Dr. John: Why? Dr. John: Your son deserves the same protection. Caller: She even had a pregnancy scare last month. Dr. John: He’s in way over his head. Caller: Should I call her? Dr. John: No. Dr. John: She isn’t your problem. Dr. John: Your son is. Dr. John: Tell him exactly how you feel. Tell him you love him. Dr. John: And remind him that if this all falls apart… Dr. John: He can always come home.

hi.

112,419 views • 18 days ago

🚨 horrible conditions of more than 6.000 Sudanese refugees in Kumar, Ethiopia 🇪🇹 ( This morning we woke up to several phone calls on our WhatsApp hotline as usual. But this time it is a number with the country code of Ethiopia. One goes into the guess: what would someone from Ethiopia want from Refugees in Libya? But let’s answer the call! We picked up the call and someone started the conversation in an Arabic tone: “Are you David Yambio?” “Yes, I am” i told him. He goes on to introduce himself and says that they are dying and they need help. But in the meanwhile he asks “will you allow me to turn on my camera to broadcast the situation?” I tell him to wait while I ask immediately another comrade to start filming, because I don’t know what he will show me on a video call or if we will ever get in touch with him or who knows if that is the last drop of his battery 🪫. We dive into the topic, as I ask curious questions about everything possible to foster my understanding of the situation. But the bandwidth is low. I can’t see clearly what is happening, but I see throngs of people and his voice comes in and out. I tell him to rather record a short video of the circumstance and then tell me all details in a voice message via WhatsApp because that is easier in such situations. The network is still dropping and I am so lost, that I haven’t convened the right message and at the same time I wonder if I raised his expectations for a rescue by asking him to record a short video. The call ends and I immediately sent him a voice message, explaining in details what I need to know: the location, what is happening, when did they leave Sudan and who is there helping on the ground, the UNHCR? The government? Charity organisations? I ask for anything that could help us understand the situation and who to target. It is more that two minutes that the message has been delivered, but in my WhatsApp status it indicates that he hasn’t seen the message yet. I am lost and mad because I couldn’t help, I wondered if I will ever hear from him again and if not, what will happen to the thousands of people that I saw in that video call? I went out to get some fruits for breakfast but every minute I check my phone as messages pop up but none is from that stranger from Ethiopia. in between, I receive two calls from Libya but I tell them that I will call them in a few minutes, because in my head I am hoping that the person stuck in a desperate situation in Ethiopia will call and he would find the line busy? I did the shopping and immediately went home, but I can’t sit or start my breakfast as I move up and down in my room. I ask my comrade “what if the person doesn’t call back? How do we reach him? What do they want from Refugees in Libya? What if they send us the video we requested for, what will we do with it?” “We can ring an alarm 🚨?” I asked while feeling disappointed. A few more minutes passed and messages started to pop in: desperate faces, many more hundreds in one picture, signposts and banners about the situation at Kumar camp in Ethiopia ( In the pictures are persons wearing jackets with the UNHCR logo and I immediately tell myself that at least they will be helped. I insist for a video, because for me it would be easier to understand what is happening. He tells me, “be patient because our network is slow and the video is loading”. Finally after 6 minutes, the video arrives and I am shocked. But what do I tell him: a “thank you”? “I will do something about your situation?” “I will report about it?” I found out that in my head was this tag of war between choices and approaches to such miserable conditions. 1/3
0:48

🚨 horrible conditions of more than 6.000 Sudanese refugees in Kumar, Ethiopia 🇪🇹 ( This morning we woke up to several phone calls on our WhatsApp hotline as usual. But this time it is a number with the country code of Ethiopia. One goes into the guess: what would someone from Ethiopia want from Refugees in Libya? But let’s answer the call! We picked up the call and someone started the conversation in an Arabic tone: “Are you David Yambio?” “Yes, I am” i told him. He goes on to introduce himself and says that they are dying and they need help. But in the meanwhile he asks “will you allow me to turn on my camera to broadcast the situation?” I tell him to wait while I ask immediately another comrade to start filming, because I don’t know what he will show me on a video call or if we will ever get in touch with him or who knows if that is the last drop of his battery 🪫. We dive into the topic, as I ask curious questions about everything possible to foster my understanding of the situation. But the bandwidth is low. I can’t see clearly what is happening, but I see throngs of people and his voice comes in and out. I tell him to rather record a short video of the circumstance and then tell me all details in a voice message via WhatsApp because that is easier in such situations. The network is still dropping and I am so lost, that I haven’t convened the right message and at the same time I wonder if I raised his expectations for a rescue by asking him to record a short video. The call ends and I immediately sent him a voice message, explaining in details what I need to know: the location, what is happening, when did they leave Sudan and who is there helping on the ground, the UNHCR? The government? Charity organisations? I ask for anything that could help us understand the situation and who to target. It is more that two minutes that the message has been delivered, but in my WhatsApp status it indicates that he hasn’t seen the message yet. I am lost and mad because I couldn’t help, I wondered if I will ever hear from him again and if not, what will happen to the thousands of people that I saw in that video call? I went out to get some fruits for breakfast but every minute I check my phone as messages pop up but none is from that stranger from Ethiopia. in between, I receive two calls from Libya but I tell them that I will call them in a few minutes, because in my head I am hoping that the person stuck in a desperate situation in Ethiopia will call and he would find the line busy? I did the shopping and immediately went home, but I can’t sit or start my breakfast as I move up and down in my room. I ask my comrade “what if the person doesn’t call back? How do we reach him? What do they want from Refugees in Libya? What if they send us the video we requested for, what will we do with it?” “We can ring an alarm 🚨?” I asked while feeling disappointed. A few more minutes passed and messages started to pop in: desperate faces, many more hundreds in one picture, signposts and banners about the situation at Kumar camp in Ethiopia ( In the pictures are persons wearing jackets with the UNHCR logo and I immediately tell myself that at least they will be helped. I insist for a video, because for me it would be easier to understand what is happening. He tells me, “be patient because our network is slow and the video is loading”. Finally after 6 minutes, the video arrives and I am shocked. But what do I tell him: a “thank you”? “I will do something about your situation?” “I will report about it?” I found out that in my head was this tag of war between choices and approaches to such miserable conditions. 1/3

Refugees In Libya

12,701 views • 3 years ago

What a beautiful, laid-back year. I worked and rested in equal measure, I laughed hard and loved hard. And I travelled! I ate croissants in Paris, ate too much cheese in Amsterdam, had amazing fish in Mozambique, swam at the edge of the Victoria Falls, had ice cream in Zambia, lunch in Botswana, coffee in Kenya and bitterballen in Den Haag. I fell in love with windmills and canals, trains and bicycles, and enjoyed European winter. Netherlands was a second home 😍 And I finally explored Cape Town like a tourist and went home every chance I got. And I went to the gym, hiked Lion’s Head religiously and went to church. And my career catapulted. I wouldn’t even know where to begin expressing my gratitude because it wasn’t just hard work, it was my seniors at work vouching for me, motivating for me and dropping my name in high places. It was my postgraduate students working hard and cooperating. It was my supervisor saying: “I feel like I photocopied myself in you.” And her pushing me in her footsteps -Guiding me on Funding, Ratings, Publications, Patents, Roping me into high-value projects and mentoring me like a mother. I got ALL the fundings I applied for. Like all of them said YES. I’m still speechless. I got NRF rated (Super huge for my career). I was granted a patent for the nanocomposite I produced during my PhD by South Africa, UK and USA, and the university poured funds into me moving to commercialisation (This happened after I wrote an email to the VC one 3 am. I woke up regretting how ‘harsh’ I had sounded and wanted to walk up to his office and ask him to delete the email before reading it - Long story 💀 But turns out I had just been assertive and not rude, so yay! “Sign here, here and here.”) In all the cities I went to this year, I wrote the way I think - endlessly, deeply and utterly silly sometimes. I wrote my heart out and fought hard against impostor syndrome. I finally published my 6th novel, made progress on The y in your man is silent 3, finished my other novel (Lelani), finished my non-fiction book (about my childhood) and wrote my novel (The Praying Mantis) on my Facebook page. And I got the Outstanding Author award, making me a Multi-award winner… It meant the world! I also finally stopped focusing on the next goal and slowed down. I savoured every moment as it happened and was present in real life. I looked out of airplane windows, went to spas regularly and drank a lot of tea. I also stopped trying to lose weight and ate my heart out. This year, I gave myself the love and kindness I give other people, and I was very gentle with myself. Through it all, God carried me and loved me as if I was His only creation. And I made many connections on and offline. And as always, I enjoyed Twitter a LOT. All that made the year so so beautiful 😍 Also refurnished my house and renovated just nje for no reason at all 🤭 Oh, and I LOVED and allowed myself to be LOVED 😍 And I took many pictures of innuendos 🤭🤣 Chilling and working just enough has been fun, but resting is over. Next year, we go hard!💪 The best is yet to come 🤞✨
1:16

What a beautiful, laid-back year. I worked and rested in equal measure, I laughed hard and loved hard. And I travelled! I ate croissants in Paris, ate too much cheese in Amsterdam, had amazing fish in Mozambique, swam at the edge of the Victoria Falls, had ice cream in Zambia, lunch in Botswana, coffee in Kenya and bitterballen in Den Haag. I fell in love with windmills and canals, trains and bicycles, and enjoyed European winter. Netherlands was a second home 😍 And I finally explored Cape Town like a tourist and went home every chance I got. And I went to the gym, hiked Lion’s Head religiously and went to church. And my career catapulted. I wouldn’t even know where to begin expressing my gratitude because it wasn’t just hard work, it was my seniors at work vouching for me, motivating for me and dropping my name in high places. It was my postgraduate students working hard and cooperating. It was my supervisor saying: “I feel like I photocopied myself in you.” And her pushing me in her footsteps -Guiding me on Funding, Ratings, Publications, Patents, Roping me into high-value projects and mentoring me like a mother. I got ALL the fundings I applied for. Like all of them said YES. I’m still speechless. I got NRF rated (Super huge for my career). I was granted a patent for the nanocomposite I produced during my PhD by South Africa, UK and USA, and the university poured funds into me moving to commercialisation (This happened after I wrote an email to the VC one 3 am. I woke up regretting how ‘harsh’ I had sounded and wanted to walk up to his office and ask him to delete the email before reading it - Long story 💀 But turns out I had just been assertive and not rude, so yay! “Sign here, here and here.”) In all the cities I went to this year, I wrote the way I think - endlessly, deeply and utterly silly sometimes. I wrote my heart out and fought hard against impostor syndrome. I finally published my 6th novel, made progress on The y in your man is silent 3, finished my other novel (Lelani), finished my non-fiction book (about my childhood) and wrote my novel (The Praying Mantis) on my Facebook page. And I got the Outstanding Author award, making me a Multi-award winner… It meant the world! I also finally stopped focusing on the next goal and slowed down. I savoured every moment as it happened and was present in real life. I looked out of airplane windows, went to spas regularly and drank a lot of tea. I also stopped trying to lose weight and ate my heart out. This year, I gave myself the love and kindness I give other people, and I was very gentle with myself. Through it all, God carried me and loved me as if I was His only creation. And I made many connections on and offline. And as always, I enjoyed Twitter a LOT. All that made the year so so beautiful 😍 Also refurnished my house and renovated just nje for no reason at all 🤭 Oh, and I LOVED and allowed myself to be LOVED 😍 And I took many pictures of innuendos 🤭🤣 Chilling and working just enough has been fun, but resting is over. Next year, we go hard!💪 The best is yet to come 🤞✨

Dr. Yvonne Maphosa

22,731 views • 1 year ago

Let’s call this what it is. This is a national scandal built on silence, covered up by politicians who would rather let girls be raped than face uncomfortable truths. Let me say this plainly. This is not about hate. It is not about racism. It is not a small trumpet, a dog whistle or political point scoring. It is about truth. And for the survivors, and the girls still being preyed upon today, it’s a truth they’ve lived with while the rest of the country buried its head in the sand. Yes, it’s uncomfortable. Yes, it will create tension. But what’s worse - offending sensibilities or letting another generation of our children be abused because the institutions are too cowardly to speak? Staying quiet hasn’t protected anyone. It’s enabled thousands more to be targeted. It’s made truth a casualty. It’s made justice impossible. That’s why we won’t shut up. And that’s why we need your help to make it impossible for The Labour Party and the legacy media to shut this conversation down. So the next time someone accuses you of "blowing a small trumpet", “dog-whistling” or being a member of a "far right bandwagon", ask them this: Why are you so desperate to keep this truth hidden? Because the only people who benefit from silence are the ones doing the abusing and those that gain from the cover up of the gang rape and torture of our nation's children. _______ Many thanks to Sonia Poulton for allowing me the time this morning. For those new to me, I'm Raja Miah MBE. I spent six years leading a small team that exposed how politicians protected the rape gangs. My work continues despite powerful forces including the media, politicians, police and public officials all conspiring to desperately stop me and bury the truth. Now millions know the truth of the industrial scale gang rape of working class White girls by organised networks of politically protected Pakistani men. You won't find me in the mainstream media. With no corporate backers or political sponsors, I rely solely on the support of ordinary people who understand what's at stake. If you value this work, please subscribe to my newsletter. My modest target is to get to 10,000 subscribers. As of the beginning of May, we are at 3540. We really need to grow our numbers. All my work is 100% free. I only ask for a small contribution if you can afford to do so; Prefer a one-time contribution? Please help finish this. Raja 🙏
20:28

Let’s call this what it is. This is a national scandal built on silence, covered up by politicians who would rather let girls be raped than face uncomfortable truths. Let me say this plainly. This is not about hate. It is not about racism. It is not a small trumpet, a dog whistle or political point scoring. It is about truth. And for the survivors, and the girls still being preyed upon today, it’s a truth they’ve lived with while the rest of the country buried its head in the sand. Yes, it’s uncomfortable. Yes, it will create tension. But what’s worse - offending sensibilities or letting another generation of our children be abused because the institutions are too cowardly to speak? Staying quiet hasn’t protected anyone. It’s enabled thousands more to be targeted. It’s made truth a casualty. It’s made justice impossible. That’s why we won’t shut up. And that’s why we need your help to make it impossible for The Labour Party and the legacy media to shut this conversation down. So the next time someone accuses you of "blowing a small trumpet", “dog-whistling” or being a member of a "far right bandwagon", ask them this: Why are you so desperate to keep this truth hidden? Because the only people who benefit from silence are the ones doing the abusing and those that gain from the cover up of the gang rape and torture of our nation's children. _______ Many thanks to Sonia Poulton for allowing me the time this morning. For those new to me, I'm Raja Miah MBE. I spent six years leading a small team that exposed how politicians protected the rape gangs. My work continues despite powerful forces including the media, politicians, police and public officials all conspiring to desperately stop me and bury the truth. Now millions know the truth of the industrial scale gang rape of working class White girls by organised networks of politically protected Pakistani men. You won't find me in the mainstream media. With no corporate backers or political sponsors, I rely solely on the support of ordinary people who understand what's at stake. If you value this work, please subscribe to my newsletter. My modest target is to get to 10,000 subscribers. As of the beginning of May, we are at 3540. We really need to grow our numbers. All my work is 100% free. I only ask for a small contribution if you can afford to do so; Prefer a one-time contribution? Please help finish this. Raja 🙏

Raja Miah

78,460 views • 1 year ago

Full speech, not 100% accurate PERTHSANTA CHEQUERED FLAG 🖤🤍: “1, 2, 3— hello everyone!” 🖤: “Since we’re rapping this hard, should we introduce ourselves like rappers too? If we’re gonna rap this intensely, then.” 🤍: “Yes” 🖤: “Yo! I’m PerthSanta baby 🤍: “Yeahhhh!” 🤍: “If you wanna have a taste of us…If you wanna try us out, then come see the full PerthSanta ‘The Devil Kiss Concert’!” 🖤: “Please support it, it’ll be on July 18th–19th and the tickets are already sold out.” 🤍: “Yes. Before anything else, we really want to thank everyone for supporting us.” 🖤 Perth kneels down in front of Santa 😭🖤🤍 🤍: “What are you doing?” 🖤: “Also… I saw my juniors doing this earlier. WilliamEst, WilliamEst…They are boyfriends! They are boyfriends.” 🤍: “ For real, for real! Backstage they were hugging each other all curled up too.” 🖤: “And then there’s GeminiFourth too. Yesterday didn’t they say something about us? Yeah, Fourth…” 🤍: “I SAW IT. Really, what did he say about our couple?” 🖤: “He said that it's normal for us to kiss each other’s cheeks.” 🤍: “Don’t make me say more.” 🤣 🖤: “Don't let me speak! Really, it’s not true. Who would do something like that.” 🖤 Kiss Santas forehead 😭 🖤: “No one would do that backstage. If it's about us, it’s not true at all, yeah, yeah, um... Who would even do that?” 🖤: Kiss Santa’s forehead the second time 😭 🖤: “Anyway, please support Devil Kiss Concert.” 🖤: “Since it’s called Devil Kiss Concert…” 🖤 Pretends to kiss Santa’s cheek 🤍: “But, what kind of "kisses" will there be in Devil's Kiss? Please wait and follow it. 🖤: “Today is already the last day, do you still have energy left?” 👥: Yeahhh 🖤“Really?” 🤍: “The voices... 🖤: “The voices are a bit quiet, huh? So quiet, huh baby? Wow, amazing baby!” 🤍: “If you’re not tired yet, can you scream for us?” 🖤: “Let’s ask about your condition first. How are you now?” 🤍: “Right now, it's a lot better. I already went to see the doctor. The doctor said it's fine. Just a little bit, just a little bit. It’s normal. Dancers always end up with injuries.” 🖤: “Some wounds.” 🤍: “Warriors always have scars.” 😭❤️‍🩹 🖤: “Honestly I really admire Santa’s spirit. He has such a strong artist mindset, and I’m truly comforted knowing I get to be with you through every moment and every phase of life. Don’t scream, I’m getting shy. 🤍: “Yes. But.. “ Santa is getting so shy😭 🖤: “Even though Santa’s body still isn’t 100%, the heart I have for you is definitely 100%.” 😭 🤍: “That’s exactly why I can’t leave P’ alone. How could I, when he’s this cute?” (pretends to kiss him) 😭🤍 Both so shy and giggly 🖤: “I’m losing my composure…” 🖤: “We’re only halfway through the concert actually. There are still many artists left. Who’s waiting for PondPhuwin? Those two backstage, they also have "something" going on. “ 🤍: “Just now, I saw them like...” 🖤: “Yes, "something like that." 🤍: “Touching cheeks.” 🖤: “Touching each other's cheeks! Outside they act like they never touch each other at all, right?I already told them to send Pond to study under me. I’ll teach him myself.” 🤍: “But honestly he’s probably already learned a lot from you.” 🖤: “There’s only one thing left for him to learn…To call Pond ‘Daddy.’” 😭🤣 🤍: “YES, I really want to hear that.” 🖤: “I want to hear it too actually.” 🤍: “What’s up, daddy? Are you satisfied? Are you satisfied now?” #LOLFanFest2026D3 #PerthSanta #เพิร์ธแซนต้า
7:11

Full speech, not 100% accurate PERTHSANTA CHEQUERED FLAG 🖤🤍: “1, 2, 3— hello everyone!” 🖤: “Since we’re rapping this hard, should we introduce ourselves like rappers too? If we’re gonna rap this intensely, then.” 🤍: “Yes” 🖤: “Yo! I’m PerthSanta baby 🤍: “Yeahhhh!” 🤍: “If you wanna have a taste of us…If you wanna try us out, then come see the full PerthSanta ‘The Devil Kiss Concert’!” 🖤: “Please support it, it’ll be on July 18th–19th and the tickets are already sold out.” 🤍: “Yes. Before anything else, we really want to thank everyone for supporting us.” 🖤 Perth kneels down in front of Santa 😭🖤🤍 🤍: “What are you doing?” 🖤: “Also… I saw my juniors doing this earlier. WilliamEst, WilliamEst…They are boyfriends! They are boyfriends.” 🤍: “ For real, for real! Backstage they were hugging each other all curled up too.” 🖤: “And then there’s GeminiFourth too. Yesterday didn’t they say something about us? Yeah, Fourth…” 🤍: “I SAW IT. Really, what did he say about our couple?” 🖤: “He said that it's normal for us to kiss each other’s cheeks.” 🤍: “Don’t make me say more.” 🤣 🖤: “Don't let me speak! Really, it’s not true. Who would do something like that.” 🖤 Kiss Santas forehead 😭 🖤: “No one would do that backstage. If it's about us, it’s not true at all, yeah, yeah, um... Who would even do that?” 🖤: Kiss Santa’s forehead the second time 😭 🖤: “Anyway, please support Devil Kiss Concert.” 🖤: “Since it’s called Devil Kiss Concert…” 🖤 Pretends to kiss Santa’s cheek 🤍: “But, what kind of "kisses" will there be in Devil's Kiss? Please wait and follow it. 🖤: “Today is already the last day, do you still have energy left?” 👥: Yeahhh 🖤“Really?” 🤍: “The voices... 🖤: “The voices are a bit quiet, huh? So quiet, huh baby? Wow, amazing baby!” 🤍: “If you’re not tired yet, can you scream for us?” 🖤: “Let’s ask about your condition first. How are you now?” 🤍: “Right now, it's a lot better. I already went to see the doctor. The doctor said it's fine. Just a little bit, just a little bit. It’s normal. Dancers always end up with injuries.” 🖤: “Some wounds.” 🤍: “Warriors always have scars.” 😭❤️‍🩹 🖤: “Honestly I really admire Santa’s spirit. He has such a strong artist mindset, and I’m truly comforted knowing I get to be with you through every moment and every phase of life. Don’t scream, I’m getting shy. 🤍: “Yes. But.. “ Santa is getting so shy😭 🖤: “Even though Santa’s body still isn’t 100%, the heart I have for you is definitely 100%.” 😭 🤍: “That’s exactly why I can’t leave P’ alone. How could I, when he’s this cute?” (pretends to kiss him) 😭🤍 Both so shy and giggly 🖤: “I’m losing my composure…” 🖤: “We’re only halfway through the concert actually. There are still many artists left. Who’s waiting for PondPhuwin? Those two backstage, they also have "something" going on. “ 🤍: “Just now, I saw them like...” 🖤: “Yes, "something like that." 🤍: “Touching cheeks.” 🖤: “Touching each other's cheeks! Outside they act like they never touch each other at all, right?I already told them to send Pond to study under me. I’ll teach him myself.” 🤍: “But honestly he’s probably already learned a lot from you.” 🖤: “There’s only one thing left for him to learn…To call Pond ‘Daddy.’” 😭🤣 🤍: “YES, I really want to hear that.” 🖤: “I want to hear it too actually.” 🤍: “What’s up, daddy? Are you satisfied? Are you satisfied now?” #LOLFanFest2026D3 #PerthSanta #เพิร์ธแซนต้า

ɾαɱσɳα 🖤🤍⁀➴⛅️

13,496 views • 1 month ago

🚨TRANSLATE🚨 💬: Are there any plans for this year? 🐬: Actually, I have a lot in my head. We’ve planned many things. I'm looking very far into the future—like, okay, what do we need to prepare now so that we don't have any gaps? I’m trying to create an agenda and a schedule for everything, like: "Okay, we’ll do this here, then move on to that." But sometimes, when you do everything at once, it’s not as good; it’s not all perfect. Sometimes things might even get delayed. For me, if I’m working on a specific project, I want to focus on it intensely. But that doesn’t mean I’ve abandoned the projects we have planned for the future. I’m slowly gathering details and trying to make everything perfect. Right now, doing everything at the same time doesn't make the results better, so I’m trying to... 💬: ...prioritize them first. 🐬: ...do one thing at a time. 💬: Yes. 🐬: Yes. 💬: Tangkwa, after your role as "Queen," what other roles would you like to play? 🦌: I've been asked this a lot lately, and my answer is never the same. At first, I wanted to play a doctor because I watch a lot of Korean dramas and thought it looked cool. I didn't think about how difficult the role might actually be! Then, I thought about playing a ghost—like a Yuri ghost that people would love. There are so many different roles I'd like to try, but the one I'd most like to play is a character that's true to myself. I want a role where I don't have to change much, where I can use my own voice and personality. People would say, "Hey, is that TK?" 💬: Does that mean TK is a mix of sweetness and coolness? 🦌: Yes, that's it! Basically, we should just swap roles. (We should swap who is the top and the bottom.) 💬 :Yeah, let's try swapping. 🐬: Would that be a good idea? 💬: And what about you (Nur)? Is there a specific role you’d like to play? 🐬: I don't have one in particular. I feel like every role has its own special quality and interest. Taking on a character is like getting to know a brand-new person. We have to think like them, feel like them, and act like them. So, regardless of the role, the experience of learning and getting to know a new person is always interesting to me. 💬: Since the series ended, we’ve seen that you have a lot of international fans as well. Can you tell us where you’ll be heading soon? 🐬: Well, coming up very soon, we have Manila. 🦌: Yes. 🐬: And for the ones already announced, there's Manila and Chongqing. 💬: Oh, wow! 🐬: Yes, so besides Thailand, we’ll be having fan meetings in Manila and Chongqing. The posters for those have already been released. And the specific details will be announced later. 💬: How do you feel about your fans… especially the international ones? 🐬: It’s amazing! We actually have a lot of international fans, and the feedback has been really positive. We’re so happy we get the chance to meet them. 💬: I have a question about the Chongqing event. Where exactly will it be held? 🐬: Chongqing event? 💬: Yes, in Chongqing. Which studio? Someone asked me to find out. 🐬: Oh… which studio…I can’t tell you! I just can’t tell you. 💬: Besides the fan meeting that just finished, there are many other events happening this month. 🦌: Yes, I’d like to ask everyone to stay tuned for the details of our upcoming events and various other activities on S. Nur Entertainment’s pages. We have things lined up until the end of the month. So, you can still meet us, even though the fan meeting is over. If anyone misses us, you can come see us at these other events throughout this period. 💬 :Where are you going on the 25th? 🦌: We're going to Central Park. You can come and see us at Central Park. 💬: And where else? 🦌: The list is long... there are many events until the 31st. 🐬: We'll hurry and have P'Saeng inform everyone. 💬: Okay, then we can get ready. 🐬🦌: Thank you everyone. Thank you. TKNUR LOVE BLOOMING #TKNur1stFanMeetingTH #nurdesoraya #TKphinyanech #TKNur
4:53

🚨TRANSLATE🚨 💬: Are there any plans for this year? 🐬: Actually, I have a lot in my head. We’ve planned many things. I'm looking very far into the future—like, okay, what do we need to prepare now so that we don't have any gaps? I’m trying to create an agenda and a schedule for everything, like: "Okay, we’ll do this here, then move on to that." But sometimes, when you do everything at once, it’s not as good; it’s not all perfect. Sometimes things might even get delayed. For me, if I’m working on a specific project, I want to focus on it intensely. But that doesn’t mean I’ve abandoned the projects we have planned for the future. I’m slowly gathering details and trying to make everything perfect. Right now, doing everything at the same time doesn't make the results better, so I’m trying to... 💬: ...prioritize them first. 🐬: ...do one thing at a time. 💬: Yes. 🐬: Yes. 💬: Tangkwa, after your role as "Queen," what other roles would you like to play? 🦌: I've been asked this a lot lately, and my answer is never the same. At first, I wanted to play a doctor because I watch a lot of Korean dramas and thought it looked cool. I didn't think about how difficult the role might actually be! Then, I thought about playing a ghost—like a Yuri ghost that people would love. There are so many different roles I'd like to try, but the one I'd most like to play is a character that's true to myself. I want a role where I don't have to change much, where I can use my own voice and personality. People would say, "Hey, is that TK?" 💬: Does that mean TK is a mix of sweetness and coolness? 🦌: Yes, that's it! Basically, we should just swap roles. (We should swap who is the top and the bottom.) 💬 :Yeah, let's try swapping. 🐬: Would that be a good idea? 💬: And what about you (Nur)? Is there a specific role you’d like to play? 🐬: I don't have one in particular. I feel like every role has its own special quality and interest. Taking on a character is like getting to know a brand-new person. We have to think like them, feel like them, and act like them. So, regardless of the role, the experience of learning and getting to know a new person is always interesting to me. 💬: Since the series ended, we’ve seen that you have a lot of international fans as well. Can you tell us where you’ll be heading soon? 🐬: Well, coming up very soon, we have Manila. 🦌: Yes. 🐬: And for the ones already announced, there's Manila and Chongqing. 💬: Oh, wow! 🐬: Yes, so besides Thailand, we’ll be having fan meetings in Manila and Chongqing. The posters for those have already been released. And the specific details will be announced later. 💬: How do you feel about your fans… especially the international ones? 🐬: It’s amazing! We actually have a lot of international fans, and the feedback has been really positive. We’re so happy we get the chance to meet them. 💬: I have a question about the Chongqing event. Where exactly will it be held? 🐬: Chongqing event? 💬: Yes, in Chongqing. Which studio? Someone asked me to find out. 🐬: Oh… which studio…I can’t tell you! I just can’t tell you. 💬: Besides the fan meeting that just finished, there are many other events happening this month. 🦌: Yes, I’d like to ask everyone to stay tuned for the details of our upcoming events and various other activities on S. Nur Entertainment’s pages. We have things lined up until the end of the month. So, you can still meet us, even though the fan meeting is over. If anyone misses us, you can come see us at these other events throughout this period. 💬 :Where are you going on the 25th? 🦌: We're going to Central Park. You can come and see us at Central Park. 💬: And where else? 🦌: The list is long... there are many events until the 31st. 🐬: We'll hurry and have P'Saeng inform everyone. 💬: Okay, then we can get ready. 🐬🦌: Thank you everyone. Thank you. TKNUR LOVE BLOOMING #TKNur1stFanMeetingTH #nurdesoraya #TKphinyanech #TKNur

Nori’s FunBase🌴

11,841 views • 3 months ago

“Dave Smith; the Pennywise of Pacifism” “Comic” Dave Smith is currently in an X spat with Dan Crenshaw over the perils of war. Yes, Dave Smith is staring at Crenshaw with two good eyes and telling Crenshaw’s eye patch about war. Hubris, thy name be “Comic” Dave Smith. Dave Smith presents himself as the anti-war guy despite LOVING and INCENTIVIZING all the worst actors in history: The terrorists who committed genocide against Israel and Israelis on October 7th? According to Dave Smith, “well, what do you think happens when you occupy somebody for 60 (sic) years?” Want to ensure more wars? Excuse the people who commit genocide and complain about the people who sacrifice their own soldiers so as to avoid as many civilian casualties as possible. EVERY war starting entity should be so lucky as to go to war against Israel. Don’t believe me? Ask the Ukrainians. Dave Smith’s current favorite current historian? Martyr Made, AKA “the Churchill was the main villain of World War II guy.” Boo the world savers? Yay the Hitler stans? What’s next, “why Mao was the greatest hop scotch player of all-time?” If you think that’s a leap, you don’t know what I’m talking about. And that’s Dave Smith. He’s loud. He’s confident. And he doesn’t have a fucking clue what he’s talking about. His morality doesn’t belong in the United States of American. Every debate with him should never move past this one issue: Why do you defend the war starters? Why do YOU—the anti-war guy—incentivize wars? Because you, Dave, are why many young men are dead in Israel AND Gaza. You, Dave, are why many young men and women in Israel don’t have limbs. Because you and your rhetoric incentivize wars. You incentivize death. Dave, you’re morally angry in the way a college freshman is morally angry after reading half a Chomsky essay. I’m morally angry because I’ve seen what your worldview does to actual families, actual children, and actual warriors. You get applause for your anger… I can’t get Arnon Zamora out of my head. I can’t get Sabine Taasa crumbling to the ground out of my head. Your rhetoric JUSTIFIES the terrorists to murder her husband. Your worldview made that possible. Your morality helped usher in the inevitable deaths of tens of thousands of Gazans… But you’re too much of an unserious, unfunny clown to see it. You’re not the Clown of Peace. You’re the Pennywise of Pacifism; waving people toward a moral sewer you’ll never have to drown in. And nobody who’s lived through real violence finds any of this funny. Nobody is laughing, Dave… Just like at your standup sets.
3:00

“Dave Smith; the Pennywise of Pacifism” “Comic” Dave Smith is currently in an X spat with Dan Crenshaw over the perils of war. Yes, Dave Smith is staring at Crenshaw with two good eyes and telling Crenshaw’s eye patch about war. Hubris, thy name be “Comic” Dave Smith. Dave Smith presents himself as the anti-war guy despite LOVING and INCENTIVIZING all the worst actors in history: The terrorists who committed genocide against Israel and Israelis on October 7th? According to Dave Smith, “well, what do you think happens when you occupy somebody for 60 (sic) years?” Want to ensure more wars? Excuse the people who commit genocide and complain about the people who sacrifice their own soldiers so as to avoid as many civilian casualties as possible. EVERY war starting entity should be so lucky as to go to war against Israel. Don’t believe me? Ask the Ukrainians. Dave Smith’s current favorite current historian? Martyr Made, AKA “the Churchill was the main villain of World War II guy.” Boo the world savers? Yay the Hitler stans? What’s next, “why Mao was the greatest hop scotch player of all-time?” If you think that’s a leap, you don’t know what I’m talking about. And that’s Dave Smith. He’s loud. He’s confident. And he doesn’t have a fucking clue what he’s talking about. His morality doesn’t belong in the United States of American. Every debate with him should never move past this one issue: Why do you defend the war starters? Why do YOU—the anti-war guy—incentivize wars? Because you, Dave, are why many young men are dead in Israel AND Gaza. You, Dave, are why many young men and women in Israel don’t have limbs. Because you and your rhetoric incentivize wars. You incentivize death. Dave, you’re morally angry in the way a college freshman is morally angry after reading half a Chomsky essay. I’m morally angry because I’ve seen what your worldview does to actual families, actual children, and actual warriors. You get applause for your anger… I can’t get Arnon Zamora out of my head. I can’t get Sabine Taasa crumbling to the ground out of my head. Your rhetoric JUSTIFIES the terrorists to murder her husband. Your worldview made that possible. Your morality helped usher in the inevitable deaths of tens of thousands of Gazans… But you’re too much of an unserious, unfunny clown to see it. You’re not the Clown of Peace. You’re the Pennywise of Pacifism; waving people toward a moral sewer you’ll never have to drown in. And nobody who’s lived through real violence finds any of this funny. Nobody is laughing, Dave… Just like at your standup sets.

Jake Donnelly

274,734 views • 7 months ago

[𝙁𝙖𝙣 𝙎𝙩𝙤𝙧𝙮 | 𝙎𝙤𝙛𝙩 𝙃𝙤𝙪𝙧𝙨] If I were to write this memory into a story, I’d definitely have this POV of my “Finally.” Each of your fans carry their own story, I even knew a few chapters of ‘em. But here’s mine. The last 5 years of my life was spent in solidifying my foundation in both career and business. Given that I came from nothing, this hits home and this is why I always say that Freen’s story is a representation of what a breadwinner in SEA looks like. Fast forward, I finally managed to graduate, build a career, and buy my mom a house where my sister and I can live with her. 5 years into working, not having fun despite of earning more than regular—it feels living like a hamster in a wheel. It’s exhausting and can make you ask “is this all about life?” “Why does having fun and being happy with life feels like a luxury?” Last year, I told my mom that I’d pause for a while and get myself sometime to have fun. This is why she’s so supportive. I even told a friend who often goes to concerts, “Hopefully, y’all are still available when it’s time for me to have fun. Because what if not? What if I’m finally able to find a time and you’re just no longer there?” The thought breaks me. So I decided that “2023 will be my year.” But then again, aside from Taylor Swift, who am I gonna stan? 5H went on hiatus years ago. It’s hard for me to stan just anyone. 😭 December came, I don’t have plans on Christmas eve after the regular activities of Filipino families when the clock strike 12 midnight. Decided to finally gave #GapTheSeries a chance—I’ve been seeing them in my FYP for quite sometime. However, I was also going through a spiritual crisis at the time so I don’t usually feed myself much of this content. But heeeey, now we’re here. 🤍 When it got announced that they’d be here in March, I prayed, manifested, and wish every forces in the Universe to allow me secure MVP. Same happened with #FreenBeckyFanBoomMNL but unfortunately, I wasn’t able to get a front row despite camping at MOA the night before. Then Aromagicare Official®️ announced #FreenBeckyAromagicare, and I was so ready to try again. I’d like to know how it feels being in the front row, and having that chance to see them up close. AND THIS, my “one day” turned into “finally”. 😭 I’d only want to thank P'freen (real) & Becky Armstrong for existing and for being my source of happiness in this noisy and hustling world. My life continues but I always find comfort and rest with you. Thank you, too, for being the reason why I met new people turned into friends. 🥺🌷 Thank you Aromagicare Official®️ for capturing this moment for me. 🥺💛 To other fans who haven’t gotten the chance yet, hold onto it, it can happen. Trust me. Look forward to your “one day” and work on it. The Universe is kind to those who doesn’t give up. I look forward to seeing your “finally” story when the time comes. With love, RAE 💛 #beckysangels #srchafreen #ฟรีนเบค #FreenBecky
0:26

[𝙁𝙖𝙣 𝙎𝙩𝙤𝙧𝙮 | 𝙎𝙤𝙛𝙩 𝙃𝙤𝙪𝙧𝙨] If I were to write this memory into a story, I’d definitely have this POV of my “Finally.” Each of your fans carry their own story, I even knew a few chapters of ‘em. But here’s mine. The last 5 years of my life was spent in solidifying my foundation in both career and business. Given that I came from nothing, this hits home and this is why I always say that Freen’s story is a representation of what a breadwinner in SEA looks like. Fast forward, I finally managed to graduate, build a career, and buy my mom a house where my sister and I can live with her. 5 years into working, not having fun despite of earning more than regular—it feels living like a hamster in a wheel. It’s exhausting and can make you ask “is this all about life?” “Why does having fun and being happy with life feels like a luxury?” Last year, I told my mom that I’d pause for a while and get myself sometime to have fun. This is why she’s so supportive. I even told a friend who often goes to concerts, “Hopefully, y’all are still available when it’s time for me to have fun. Because what if not? What if I’m finally able to find a time and you’re just no longer there?” The thought breaks me. So I decided that “2023 will be my year.” But then again, aside from Taylor Swift, who am I gonna stan? 5H went on hiatus years ago. It’s hard for me to stan just anyone. 😭 December came, I don’t have plans on Christmas eve after the regular activities of Filipino families when the clock strike 12 midnight. Decided to finally gave #GapTheSeries a chance—I’ve been seeing them in my FYP for quite sometime. However, I was also going through a spiritual crisis at the time so I don’t usually feed myself much of this content. But heeeey, now we’re here. 🤍 When it got announced that they’d be here in March, I prayed, manifested, and wish every forces in the Universe to allow me secure MVP. Same happened with #FreenBeckyFanBoomMNL but unfortunately, I wasn’t able to get a front row despite camping at MOA the night before. Then Aromagicare Official®️ announced #FreenBeckyAromagicare, and I was so ready to try again. I’d like to know how it feels being in the front row, and having that chance to see them up close. AND THIS, my “one day” turned into “finally”. 😭 I’d only want to thank P'freen (real) & Becky Armstrong for existing and for being my source of happiness in this noisy and hustling world. My life continues but I always find comfort and rest with you. Thank you, too, for being the reason why I met new people turned into friends. 🥺🌷 Thank you Aromagicare Official®️ for capturing this moment for me. 🥺💛 To other fans who haven’t gotten the chance yet, hold onto it, it can happen. Trust me. Look forward to your “one day” and work on it. The Universe is kind to those who doesn’t give up. I look forward to seeing your “finally” story when the time comes. With love, RAE 💛 #beckysangels #srchafreen #ฟรีนเบค #FreenBecky

Boss Rae 🧸🦋 (incorrect-pheempan)

220,047 views • 3 years ago

"I worked for several years... to understand what was happening with the injections... they were trying to install operating systems in people's bodies... [Like]... tagging livestock... if you get... nanoparticles into the... body, you're creating... an organic barcode." (1/3) Catherine Austin Fitts, a former Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, investment banker, and founder of the Solari Report (The Solari Report | Catherine Austin Fitts), describes for Danny Jones (Danny Jones Podcast) how she believes that the mRNA injections serve as a platform for installing "operating systems" in people's bodies in order to build out the so-called "Internet of Bodies" by "basically [make it] easier [for people's bodies] to interact with telecommunications and digital technology." Fitts notes that she's been working for "several years" with "a group of doctors and scientists" trying to understand "what was happening with the injections" and has arrived at this purpose as one of the central reasons they were rolled out. Fitts likens these operating systems to "organic barcodes." "It's not sci-fi at all," Fitts says. "It's...like...they're tagging livestock... if you've ever studied livestock management, a lot of this makes a lot more sense: They are tagging all the livestock... if you get a lot of these nanoparticles into the human body, you're creating the equivalent of an organic barcode." Furthermore, Fitts notes that Moncef Slaoui, the former head of the vaccines department at GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) who served as the head of Operation Warp Speed (OWS) under President Donald Trump from 2020 to 2021 "was a brain-machine interface expert." Indeed, in tweet 2/3 you'll hear Slaoui discuss "microchips or nanochips" that can be implanted in the body that would allow for the "understand[ing] [and] read[ing] [of] the electrical language that nerves" use to talk to organs. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "My guess is, because I worked for several years with a group of doctors and scientists trying to understand what was happening with the injections. And I absolutely believe that they were trying to install operating systems in people's bodies. Operating systems? "If you listen, there's a great clip from right at the beginning of the pandemic when the chief scientist officer at Moderna says, we're installing an operating system in people's bodies. And he's describing something that can be used plug and play for future vaccines. But if you look at all the material on the Internet of Bodies, you're talking about putting materials in people's bodies that make them basically easier to interact with, with telecommunications and digital technology. "It's not sci-fi at all. It's not just like they're. They're tagging livestock. I mean, if one of the things that really helps you to understand what this looks like. I live in a farming community in the United States. And if you've ever studied livestock management. A lot of this makes a lot more sense. "They are tagging all the livestock, but this is simply a way of, you know, if you, if you get a lot of these nanoparticles into the human body, you're creating the equivalent of an organic barcode. "I strongly recommend you. We just published, Patrick Wood at Technocracy News. I was the moderator. We just published, the second, symposium called omniwar, and this one is called the Battle for the Brain, and it gets into the Internet of Bodies. Here's what I believe, and I'm not a scientist, so don't ask me to explain this at all, but, if you look at all the patents and research and other work done on the Internet of Bodies, you know, it is clear that there are mysterious ingredients in the food, there are mysterious ingredients in the spray, there are mysterious ingredients in the injections. And the question is, what are those for? And I think it's very intentional. I don't think it's an accident. "And I think one of the goals is, as the chief scientist officer at Moderna said, is to Is to install an operating system in your body. That's pretty dark. Yes, it's very dark. So go to the Purdue. Go to the Purdue Engineering website to the Internet of Bodies and look at the whole Internet of bodies. "And then so they authorized Operation Warp Speed, which, remember, it's a military program. And who did they put in charge of it? But they put the former head of research at GSK, who is what, a brain-machine interface expert. The guy who ran Operation Warp Speed that Trump appointed was a brain-machine interface expert."
4:16

"I worked for several years... to understand what was happening with the injections... they were trying to install operating systems in people's bodies... [Like]... tagging livestock... if you get... nanoparticles into the... body, you're creating... an organic barcode." (1/3) Catherine Austin Fitts, a former Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, investment banker, and founder of the Solari Report (The Solari Report | Catherine Austin Fitts), describes for Danny Jones (Danny Jones Podcast) how she believes that the mRNA injections serve as a platform for installing "operating systems" in people's bodies in order to build out the so-called "Internet of Bodies" by "basically [make it] easier [for people's bodies] to interact with telecommunications and digital technology." Fitts notes that she's been working for "several years" with "a group of doctors and scientists" trying to understand "what was happening with the injections" and has arrived at this purpose as one of the central reasons they were rolled out. Fitts likens these operating systems to "organic barcodes." "It's not sci-fi at all," Fitts says. "It's...like...they're tagging livestock... if you've ever studied livestock management, a lot of this makes a lot more sense: They are tagging all the livestock... if you get a lot of these nanoparticles into the human body, you're creating the equivalent of an organic barcode." Furthermore, Fitts notes that Moncef Slaoui, the former head of the vaccines department at GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) who served as the head of Operation Warp Speed (OWS) under President Donald Trump from 2020 to 2021 "was a brain-machine interface expert." Indeed, in tweet 2/3 you'll hear Slaoui discuss "microchips or nanochips" that can be implanted in the body that would allow for the "understand[ing] [and] read[ing] [of] the electrical language that nerves" use to talk to organs. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "My guess is, because I worked for several years with a group of doctors and scientists trying to understand what was happening with the injections. And I absolutely believe that they were trying to install operating systems in people's bodies. Operating systems? "If you listen, there's a great clip from right at the beginning of the pandemic when the chief scientist officer at Moderna says, we're installing an operating system in people's bodies. And he's describing something that can be used plug and play for future vaccines. But if you look at all the material on the Internet of Bodies, you're talking about putting materials in people's bodies that make them basically easier to interact with, with telecommunications and digital technology. "It's not sci-fi at all. It's not just like they're. They're tagging livestock. I mean, if one of the things that really helps you to understand what this looks like. I live in a farming community in the United States. And if you've ever studied livestock management. A lot of this makes a lot more sense. "They are tagging all the livestock, but this is simply a way of, you know, if you, if you get a lot of these nanoparticles into the human body, you're creating the equivalent of an organic barcode. "I strongly recommend you. We just published, Patrick Wood at Technocracy News. I was the moderator. We just published, the second, symposium called omniwar, and this one is called the Battle for the Brain, and it gets into the Internet of Bodies. Here's what I believe, and I'm not a scientist, so don't ask me to explain this at all, but, if you look at all the patents and research and other work done on the Internet of Bodies, you know, it is clear that there are mysterious ingredients in the food, there are mysterious ingredients in the spray, there are mysterious ingredients in the injections. And the question is, what are those for? And I think it's very intentional. I don't think it's an accident. "And I think one of the goals is, as the chief scientist officer at Moderna said, is to Is to install an operating system in your body. That's pretty dark. Yes, it's very dark. So go to the Purdue. Go to the Purdue Engineering website to the Internet of Bodies and look at the whole Internet of bodies. "And then so they authorized Operation Warp Speed, which, remember, it's a military program. And who did they put in charge of it? But they put the former head of research at GSK, who is what, a brain-machine interface expert. The guy who ran Operation Warp Speed that Trump appointed was a brain-machine interface expert."

Sense Receptor

124,872 views • 1 year ago

📣 After party interview was very nice 🫶🏻: A: Hello R: Hello, how are you? A: I'm doing well. How are you? R: We're fine too. Thank you. It was a beautiful birthday night. Your friends didn't leave you alone. Likewise, your mother is with you. How did it go? What did you wish for? A: It was very beautiful. As I said, I wished for health first of all, then the rest will be taken care of. We celebrated with a small group. Ahh (she saw the cake slice the reporter brought for her) R: Good evening, happy birthday A: Thank you. Thank you very much R: Can you take the microphone, uncle? A: Uncle? Is he an uncle? 😁 A: Is he your uncle? R: Yes I am his nephew R: will you make a wish? (For the cake 🍰 ) A: ok, let’s make a wish. Thank you, thanks a lot, you are very kind. Really thank you. R: May you have a happy birthday! A: Thank you R: What did you wish for? A: Well, this year has been a great one for me. We did a great job for Disney Plus. I really enjoyed it. It was something I really did from my heart. I hope it finds its reward in the new year too. Apart from that, as I said health, peace, and happiness. We also have a new work for the new season of ATV… R: …the ABI series is coming. A: Exactly. R: It’s been talked about a lot as always. So is there going to be a movie 🍿 ? A: we don't have such a plan right now. But why not , of course. R: I get a lot of questions about the movie. They (fans) specifically asked whether she would do it or not. Your fans, we haven’t seen such audience (in a good way) when we look at them. A: I am thankful to them, they are very special (😊😍) R: You are world-class, you’ve left all your fellow artists and actors behind. How doesn’t it feel like? A: Thank you, of course it’s a great feeling to be rewarded for the work I do. I am glad they (fans) exist, and I am glad they are with me. I always feel their support. I'm glad they exist. R: So, what gift did your mom give you? Let’s learn that. A: She bought a beautiful sweater. R: : Vallahi A: It has a ribbon in the back like that. Very nice. R: You are also well prepared (well dressed) for the night. A: Thanks a lot. Thank you! R: The fans had a question. Let’s ask that. Well, did you wish for a relationship or something like that. A: Well, I am focused on my career now, there's nothing else I can say (there is nothing more to say). I mean, I don’t know what to wish for. If something is going to happen, it will happen. let’s see. I don’t know , I'm focused on my career right now. I am at work; I am in my strength. R: Yes. You are in a very good place in your job and career. A: thanks a lot R: How do you find your other actors/friends (in the industry)? For example, are there any TV series that you watch or follow? A: I am following the series we are watching. I watch #TaşacakBuDeniz , it’s going very well. I like them (actors) all very much. That is it. R: #YalıCapkını ‘s voice has been heard worldwide, but is there any longing? Isn't that possible? A: Of course, we always miss such successful works. Any time. Thank you very much. R: Have many wonderful year ahead of you A: Thanks a lot #AfraSaraçoğlu We are incredibly proud of her! She also met some fans and greeted them in Russian, taking photos with them as well.
2:46

📣 After party interview was very nice 🫶🏻: A: Hello R: Hello, how are you? A: I'm doing well. How are you? R: We're fine too. Thank you. It was a beautiful birthday night. Your friends didn't leave you alone. Likewise, your mother is with you. How did it go? What did you wish for? A: It was very beautiful. As I said, I wished for health first of all, then the rest will be taken care of. We celebrated with a small group. Ahh (she saw the cake slice the reporter brought for her) R: Good evening, happy birthday A: Thank you. Thank you very much R: Can you take the microphone, uncle? A: Uncle? Is he an uncle? 😁 A: Is he your uncle? R: Yes I am his nephew R: will you make a wish? (For the cake 🍰 ) A: ok, let’s make a wish. Thank you, thanks a lot, you are very kind. Really thank you. R: May you have a happy birthday! A: Thank you R: What did you wish for? A: Well, this year has been a great one for me. We did a great job for Disney Plus. I really enjoyed it. It was something I really did from my heart. I hope it finds its reward in the new year too. Apart from that, as I said health, peace, and happiness. We also have a new work for the new season of ATV… R: …the ABI series is coming. A: Exactly. R: It’s been talked about a lot as always. So is there going to be a movie 🍿 ? A: we don't have such a plan right now. But why not , of course. R: I get a lot of questions about the movie. They (fans) specifically asked whether she would do it or not. Your fans, we haven’t seen such audience (in a good way) when we look at them. A: I am thankful to them, they are very special (😊😍) R: You are world-class, you’ve left all your fellow artists and actors behind. How doesn’t it feel like? A: Thank you, of course it’s a great feeling to be rewarded for the work I do. I am glad they (fans) exist, and I am glad they are with me. I always feel their support. I'm glad they exist. R: So, what gift did your mom give you? Let’s learn that. A: She bought a beautiful sweater. R: : Vallahi A: It has a ribbon in the back like that. Very nice. R: You are also well prepared (well dressed) for the night. A: Thanks a lot. Thank you! R: The fans had a question. Let’s ask that. Well, did you wish for a relationship or something like that. A: Well, I am focused on my career now, there's nothing else I can say (there is nothing more to say). I mean, I don’t know what to wish for. If something is going to happen, it will happen. let’s see. I don’t know , I'm focused on my career right now. I am at work; I am in my strength. R: Yes. You are in a very good place in your job and career. A: thanks a lot R: How do you find your other actors/friends (in the industry)? For example, are there any TV series that you watch or follow? A: I am following the series we are watching. I watch #TaşacakBuDeniz , it’s going very well. I like them (actors) all very much. That is it. R: #YalıCapkını ‘s voice has been heard worldwide, but is there any longing? Isn't that possible? A: Of course, we always miss such successful works. Any time. Thank you very much. R: Have many wonderful year ahead of you A: Thanks a lot #AfraSaraçoğlu We are incredibly proud of her! She also met some fans and greeted them in Russian, taking photos with them as well.

fan.afra.saracoglu.and.co

10,791 views • 7 months ago

Zack Polanski on BBC Radio 4's Today prog calmly knocking back everything Nick Robinson throws at him across 17 minutes NR (00:00.2), "Delighted to say that Zach Polanski is here in the Today programme studio, for the latest, indeed, for the last of our party leader interviews. Morning to you and thanks for coming in." ZP (00:09.2), "Thanks for having me." NR (00:09.8), "Nick, I want to talk to you about what your party would do if it does indeed gain some power after the votes on Thursday. But I want to begin by putting to you one of the latest storeys about you. A Times investigation says that you've made a series of false or disputed claims about jobs you've had in the past with." NR (00:31.8), "Why, for example, did you say you were a spokesperson for the British Red Cross when they are absolutely clear that, though a supporter of theirs, you were never a spokesperson for them?" ZP (00:42.3), "So I hosted, various fundraisers for the British Red Cross and indeed I would go on stage and speak for them about the amazing work they do tackling humanitarian crises, on the climate crisis and indeed for refugees all around the world. I use the wrong word and I accept that." ZP (00:57.5), "But I would essentially take words on stage with me and speak. It's important, though, and I accept this, that, you know, I don't support any political party and I've made sure that's been taken down." NR (01:06.5), "You say this sort of storey is a fuss about nothing, that you get your facts wrong because it comes up with other examples." ZP (01:11.7), "Well, I think it's totally fine to ask me questions about my past. I would also say in the same breath, though the Times published a pretty anti Semitic cartoon of me last week. I asked them to apologise. And it feels some of these storeys feel like scraping the barrel to kind of go back 10, 15 years. I've had so many friends, I'm literally talking maybe 20 or 30 in the last few weeks who have phoned me and said, a Times journalist has been phoning and they've been desperately trying, trying to find things about your past." ZP (01:36.5), "They asked me lots of questions and seemed disappointed that I didn't have some juicy, dirty gossip." NR (01:41.6), "Yeah, well, there was. Whether you call it juicy or dirty, and it wasn't gossip, it was a fact. The fact that you claimed that as a hypnotherapist, you could enlarge women's breasts using the power of thought. People are entitled to say, what's this guy really about?" ZP (01:57.2), "People are totally entitled to say that. And that's an important part of politics, that people ask you questions. What I would say is that, you know, this was 13 years ago. It was a Sun journalist's idea. I've apologised for that. Because even though it was a son journalist idea, I was an adult and I should have said no, you went along with it." NR (02:12.6), "Yeah." ZP (02:12.9), "It's important to say I wasn't a politician. And I've apologised for it repeatedly." NR (02:16.7), "And the BBC showed that some days later, in fact, you repeated the claim that you could do it. But let us not get bogged down in the past. It is striking, though, that on X last night, when, let's be honest, people who are critics of you are having a go. The Daily Mail calls it the Green Menace on its front page." NR (02:34.1), "How did you react? You said you were under relentless attacks because they, your critics don't want a wealth tax, don't want public ownership. They're trying everything in their power to stop us, you said. It's a curious thing to say, isn't it? Ahead of local elections, Green councillors will not have the power to implement any of those policies, will they?" ZP (02:54.8), "Well, I think the relentless attacks on the Green Party in this election, for a local election have partly been about the local election, but really they're about the bigger picture right now. The bigger picture is when I ran to be leader of the Green party, we had 50,000 members, we've now got 225,000 members. So we are rising." ZP (03:11.1), "And I think lots of people are worried about the prospect. And when I say people, people who own, right wing media, multimillionaires and billionaires who are worried about the prospect that they might have to pay a little bit more tax. And so I think it's important that I focus on the vision and the hope and our actual plan." ZP (03:27.4), "I also think it's a complete reality, though we've seen it in the past before with left wing leaders, that there's no secret, there's no love lost between me and the right wing media. And almost every single day they print things that just aren't true." NR (03:38.8), "But just address the point I raised. Wealth tax councils won't get to do that. Public ownership councils don't get to do that. Well, not entirely. We'll come to that in a second. You are running on a national platform of change that the people who are elected on Thursday, whether in the Welsh Parliament, you don't run candidates in the Scottish one, or in English, local councils simply cannot do." ZP (04:03.2), "Well, I think it's about what are your values as a party? And whilst other party leaders and other parties take donations from oil and gas companies or arms trade companies, private healthcare or gambling, Green Party councillors only have two vested interests and Those vested interests. We want to protect the communities we seek to serve and we want to protect the environment." NR (04:21.6), "Well, let's come to that, then, because most interesting, perhaps, is to look at what Greens say who are running for office. You are not. You are a member of the London assembly, you're not a Member of Parliament, you're not running in these elections. Now, you live in Hackney. Hackney happens in northeast London to be a top Green target for taking control from the Labour Party." NR (04:41.9), "So let's look at protecting communities. For example, on crime, the manifesto calls the Metropolitan Police institutionally racist, homophobic, sexist and misogynists. It goes on to say, greens cannot accept this system. It calls for safe spaces for, heroin users to shoot up, to end cautions for street prostitution and to end what the manifesto calls discriminatory policing of delivery riders." NR (05:08.8), "This is an agenda for an endless fight with the police, isn't it?" ZP (05:12.0), "I don't think so. Baroness Casey, in the last couple of years, did a review into Metropolitan Police and it was actually the findings that found it institutionally racist and misogynistic. Something that Sadiq Khan, the Mayor of London, to his credit, accepts. It is noticeable that Mark Rowley, the Commissioner of the Police, doesn't accept that, yet they continue, to work together in that way." ZP (05:31.1), "On the issue of drug harm, we have the highest drug deaths, of any country in Europe. And every single year for the past 13 years, drug deaths have increased. So I think the question anyone has, and we have in Hackney, is that the war on drugs has clearly failed. It's failed in cities right across this country, and more and more people are, often taking dangerous drugs." ZP (05:50.3), "So do we want people to buy them on the black market or on street corners? Or do we want people to go to a pharmacy or a medical health professional where, if they have an addiction to dangerous drugs, we can work with them to take a public health approach based in harm reduction." NR (06:02.7), "Public health approaches to. Is to legalise hard drugs and to legalise prostitution, you say to legalise and regulate and the regulators. It's still legalised, isn't it?" ZP (06:11.5), "No, the point is you can't just go into a shop and buy drugs, which is how it's presented in the press. Again, because I can keep talking about what councillors can do, rather than what" NR (06:18.3), "you would do if you were Prime Minister, because that's for another interview. Are you saying councillors should cut the police budget? Because that's what it seems to imply when you say, we cannot accept this system, let the council spend Money on crime reduction. Don't give that money to the police." ZP (06:33.7), "It's about reprioritizing. So it's." NR (06:35.5), "Does that mean cut in English?" ZP (06:36.7), "No. So let's look at example. We're straight back onto drugs. A lot of police time is spent on stop and search for cannabis use, for instance. It doesn't escape people's notice that that is often, in the politics of racism, if you're a young black person, I think it's something like you're 18 times more likely to be stopped and searched than your white peer, despite the fact there's no evidence that they're more likely to be dealing or using drugs." ZP (07:00.8), "And so I think it's important that we make sure the police time is spent properly, which I think is about community prevention, about cohesiveness and bringing communities together, particularly in, like, whether it means redirecting the budget." NR (07:11.4), "Does it mean the police budget?" ZP (07:12.9), "Well, it means redirecting within the police budget, so making sure that the time police are spent is spent on community safety." NR (07:18.2), "Well, it's interesting that we talked about police because, as you know, you've come under serious criticism for retweeting criticism of the action of the police officers who stopped the alleged attacker of Jews in Golda's Green. Now, you apologised for retweeting that." NR (07:34.1), "You said you should have a meeting with the head of the Met. You sent him a letter. I want to ask you a different question. You've not apologised for the content of that. Why did you empathise with the attacker, and not with police officers who feared for their own lives and were trying to protect other people's lives?" ZP (07:53.3), "I think there's two things in that that I, really clearly want to say. The first is my very first response to the attack was to be horrif, as everyone was, I'm sure. And the first thing I posted was solidarity to the victim, to the family and indeed, to people who are suffering right now, including as a Jewish man, where Jewish safety is not abstract." NR (08:12.0), "But then you posted that officers were repeatedly and violently kicking a mentally ill man in the head when he was incapacitated by a Taser, caused extreme offence to those officers, to the head of the Met and to many people. I ask you again, why did you empathise, Empathise with the attacker, not with the police officer." ZP (08:28.9), "As I said, there's two things I wanted to say, so that was the first. The second, what I want to say is two things can be true at the same Time officers are incredibly brave when they run towards scenes of crimes that most people, including myself, would want to run away from. At the same time, I think it is accurate, and that I was also traumatised, by seeing, someone handcuffed and completely, repeatedly kicked in the head." ZP (08:51.7), "Now, sure, if you'll forgive me, it is an answer," NR (08:54.4), "but it's not an answer to the question. You posted something with the power that you have, with the number of people who follows us, and not empathising in that post with the Jewish community or critically with the police officers, you empathise with the attacker. Look what they're doing to the alleged attacker." ZP (09:11.1), "I don't think it was your choice. As I say, the first thing I did was show solidarity to the victims and I thank the officers. Second, though, I think the sign of a compassionate society is how we treat people, even people who have done horrific things, because actually, the way we do justice in this country is in court." NR (09:26.0), "You said a key value of the Greens was protecting communities. What are your proposals for protecting the Jewish community?" ZP (09:33.5), "The Jewish community is not safe right now. And as I said, as a Jewish man, this isn't abstract for me. In fact, in the last six weeks alone, two people have been arrested. So how would you protect anti Semitic attacks towards me? I think there's lots that needs to happen in this country. The first is community cohesion and community building. Some of the work that I'm proudest of in London, that I see Londoners do, is where I see the Jewish community working alongside the Muslim community." NR (09:55.1), "What would you do? What would Zach Polanski do in order to reduce attacks on the Jewish community?" ZP (09:59.9), "So, first of all, to invest in that work, that community, faith work, to make sure communities stand together. Second, to make sure that the Jewish community, give them the investment that they need. In fact, what the Prime Minister has been doing to make sure that happens. I do think a police response is the last response when everything before it has failed." NR (10:17.6), "I still think you're not really answering the question about what you would do. Let me ask you this." ZP (10:21.0), "I think I do." NR (10:21.6), "Would you deal with, for example, a candidate who says Jewish people fear hate because they know they should be hated. Another one who suggested that the attacks on the ambulances was a false flag and carried out, presumably by Israel. Another of your candidates who blamed Israel for the Bondi beach terrorist attack." NR (10:41.0), "A fourth candidate who said Donald Trump was, quote, owned by Jews. And most horrifying of all, although this individual has now been arrested, one of your candidates who Reposted something saying ramming a synagogue isn't anti Semitism, it's revenge." NR (10:56.8), "What are you, Zach Polanski doing to end these disgusting messages?" ZP (11:03.5), "Those messages are all unacceptable and it's important to condemn that. The Green Party are an anti racist party and it's important that we stick to our values." NR (11:11.0), "We can't just say the words were an anti racist bar to. And I've just read you out five of the most revolting comments at a time when, according to an independent advisor, we face a national emergency of anti Semitism. I'm asking you, you're not responsible for everything they say. Of course you're not." NR (11:26.3), "You can't be." ZP (11:27.3), "I am responsible, actually." NR (11:28.2), "What are you going to do about it?" ZP (11:29.0), "I am the leader of a party. I was about to finish my sentence." NR (11:31.5), "Forgive me. Go on." ZP (11:32.4), "We're an anti racist party. And so what I've already committed to doing is making sure that we have a standardised vetting process in future. And also make sure that we have compulsory training of all our candidates to make it clear that anti Semitism is completely unwelcome in the Green Party as it is in society. It is also important to say one case of anti Semitism is one too many." ZP (11:50.5), "This is a handful of cases and actually we have over 4,500 candidates, the vast, vast majority of which are doing amazing work in their communities right now, going out there to tackle the cost of living crisis, to make sure that we're funding public services and making sure that it's about people power and community, grassroots power." NR (12:05.1), "You can dismiss one or two as, just, unrepresentative. I've just read five. I could have read 20 cases of revolting anti Semitism posted by your candidates. Now you're a new leader, how are you going to avoid becoming the new Jeremy Corbyn of British politics?" ZP (12:21.5), "Well, I think me and Jeremy are very different people and there's much, you know, the question was almost inviting me to condemn Jeremy Corbyn. I think there was lots that Jeremy Corbyn was putting forward to this country that I think was really positive. We've talked about wealth taxes, about public ownership. I also think it's important, speaking, for myself right now, that we make sure that we have this vetting process, that it's really clear that anti Semitism, Islamophobia, any form of hatred or hate, crime is not welcome." NR (12:47.3), "Do you believe that Palestine is, to coin a phrase, on the ballot this Thursday?" ZP (12:52.3), "I think lots of things are on the ballot this Thursday." NR (12:54.6), "But is Palestine on the ballot? This." ZP (12:56.2), "I think it's one of the elements, as is the climate crisis. As is." NR (12:58.7), "What does it mean Palestine is on the ballot? Because. The reason I ask you is because your candidate for mayor of Lewisham says Palestine is on the ballot this Thursday. Haringey Green Party campaign launch video. You might think it'd be about bins, you might think it'd be about schools, hospitals, it might be about cleaning up the roads." NR (13:17.2), "It is a series of councillors saying, as a council, I will take all appropriate steps to, uphold the inalienable rights of the Palestinian people. Do you think council elections really should be about Palestine?" ZP (13:29.8), "I think they can be about all of those things. And I think what people have seen in this country is a genocide for two and a half years that our government is still arming, are still sharing intelligence with. And I think lots of people feel very strongly both about their local services, as they should do, and feel equally strongly about the fact that there's a reprehensible genocide happening." ZP (13:48.5), "And they vote, but the way they vote in local elections" NR (13:52.6), "should be determined by their views of Israel and Palestine." ZP (13:56.0), "I wouldn't tell anyone how their vote should be determined, but I think it's an element for lots of people in how they vote." NR (14:00.1), "And do you think that will contribute to community cohesion? Do you?" ZP (14:02.7), "I think yes, because I think, we shouldn't pit Jewish safety against a genocide in Gaza. That's conflating anti Semitism and criticism of the Israeli government. That's something Benjamin Netanyahu does regularly. And as a Jewish person, that makes me feel less safe." NR (14:16.4), "Sure. But there are lots of Jewish people who would say to you they feel unsafe if they feel that their counsellors are motivated first and foremost by Palestine. And if somebody gives that speech, for example, about Palestine being on the ballot, they are likely to think that." NR (14:34.6), "We looked for, example at Barnett Greens, where one in seven residents identify as Jewish. And it includes in its manifesto the fact that, you're standing up for Palestine. Do you think that's going to help?" ZP (14:49.0), "Well, I walk regularly on Palestinian marches with hundreds and hundreds, in fact, thousands of people, many of whom are Jewish. And there have been rabbis who have spoken out on this too. I accept, though, there are Jewish people whose views are equally as valid who, don't agree with those views." ZP (15:04.0), "And I think the job of all of us who are in public life right now is to de. Escalate tensions. And look, how do we bring people together? And I accept that's a huge challenge. And I think one of the ways we could do that is by ending our complicity in the genocide." NR (15:15.4), "Let's turn finally to another issue. We'll talk at greater length when, we're talking about the possibility of you being Prime Minister, which you have said that you would like to do. One thing that is very high on the agenda now is the soaring cost of government borrowing. What would the Greens do to cut it?" ZP (15:30.6), "Well, I think we need to make sure that we're investing. So I think there's two ways of doing that. The first is, wealth taxes, which I know we've rehearsed before, but I'll just say that's for first place." NR (15:38.4), "How does that cut government borrowing?" ZP (15:40.2), "Because ultimately it means you need to borrow less if you're." NR (15:43.0), "If you're ultimately about cutting the cost of government borrowing." ZP (15:45.5), "Yes." NR (15:45.8), "Which is soaring. It's higher than it's been any time this century because people are nervous about high spending, high taxing governments that are politically unstable." ZP (15:54.7), "I think someone who speaks brilliantly on this, who I've spoken to, is the economist Mariana Matsicatu, and she talks about the fact that a government should have a mission that should be a very clear plan of how you tackle the climate crisis, how you reduce inequality. Now, if you have a clear plan and you're borrowing for that, you're taking the market with you because they can clearly see what the return on investment is and how you're bringing money back into the." ZP (16:15.2), "That's how you reduce borrowing levels. If we don't have a plan and continue to borrow, then it feels very, very scattered, and that's why things are getting worse. We need to make sure that there's a consistent plan in place that's set out carefully that can make sure we're putting money back into our communities and investing in those communities." NR (16:29.3), "Do you think you're ready to be Prime Minister?" ZP (16:31.1), "I'm not ready right now, no. I've been leader for eight months, and there's lots of skills and lots of knowledge to get, and I think that's fine. I think I'm a human being. I'm not perfect." NR (16:38.5), "But give it two years, you will be." ZP (16:40.0), "Well, we'll see in two years time, won't we? But I'll certainly be putting in the work." NR (16:43.2), "Zach Polanski, leader of the Green Party in England and Wales, thanks very much for coming into the." ZP (16:46.3), "Thank you, Nick."
16:47

Zack Polanski on BBC Radio 4's Today prog calmly knocking back everything Nick Robinson throws at him across 17 minutes NR (00:00.2), "Delighted to say that Zach Polanski is here in the Today programme studio, for the latest, indeed, for the last of our party leader interviews. Morning to you and thanks for coming in." ZP (00:09.2), "Thanks for having me." NR (00:09.8), "Nick, I want to talk to you about what your party would do if it does indeed gain some power after the votes on Thursday. But I want to begin by putting to you one of the latest storeys about you. A Times investigation says that you've made a series of false or disputed claims about jobs you've had in the past with." NR (00:31.8), "Why, for example, did you say you were a spokesperson for the British Red Cross when they are absolutely clear that, though a supporter of theirs, you were never a spokesperson for them?" ZP (00:42.3), "So I hosted, various fundraisers for the British Red Cross and indeed I would go on stage and speak for them about the amazing work they do tackling humanitarian crises, on the climate crisis and indeed for refugees all around the world. I use the wrong word and I accept that." ZP (00:57.5), "But I would essentially take words on stage with me and speak. It's important, though, and I accept this, that, you know, I don't support any political party and I've made sure that's been taken down." NR (01:06.5), "You say this sort of storey is a fuss about nothing, that you get your facts wrong because it comes up with other examples." ZP (01:11.7), "Well, I think it's totally fine to ask me questions about my past. I would also say in the same breath, though the Times published a pretty anti Semitic cartoon of me last week. I asked them to apologise. And it feels some of these storeys feel like scraping the barrel to kind of go back 10, 15 years. I've had so many friends, I'm literally talking maybe 20 or 30 in the last few weeks who have phoned me and said, a Times journalist has been phoning and they've been desperately trying, trying to find things about your past." ZP (01:36.5), "They asked me lots of questions and seemed disappointed that I didn't have some juicy, dirty gossip." NR (01:41.6), "Yeah, well, there was. Whether you call it juicy or dirty, and it wasn't gossip, it was a fact. The fact that you claimed that as a hypnotherapist, you could enlarge women's breasts using the power of thought. People are entitled to say, what's this guy really about?" ZP (01:57.2), "People are totally entitled to say that. And that's an important part of politics, that people ask you questions. What I would say is that, you know, this was 13 years ago. It was a Sun journalist's idea. I've apologised for that. Because even though it was a son journalist idea, I was an adult and I should have said no, you went along with it." NR (02:12.6), "Yeah." ZP (02:12.9), "It's important to say I wasn't a politician. And I've apologised for it repeatedly." NR (02:16.7), "And the BBC showed that some days later, in fact, you repeated the claim that you could do it. But let us not get bogged down in the past. It is striking, though, that on X last night, when, let's be honest, people who are critics of you are having a go. The Daily Mail calls it the Green Menace on its front page." NR (02:34.1), "How did you react? You said you were under relentless attacks because they, your critics don't want a wealth tax, don't want public ownership. They're trying everything in their power to stop us, you said. It's a curious thing to say, isn't it? Ahead of local elections, Green councillors will not have the power to implement any of those policies, will they?" ZP (02:54.8), "Well, I think the relentless attacks on the Green Party in this election, for a local election have partly been about the local election, but really they're about the bigger picture right now. The bigger picture is when I ran to be leader of the Green party, we had 50,000 members, we've now got 225,000 members. So we are rising." ZP (03:11.1), "And I think lots of people are worried about the prospect. And when I say people, people who own, right wing media, multimillionaires and billionaires who are worried about the prospect that they might have to pay a little bit more tax. And so I think it's important that I focus on the vision and the hope and our actual plan." ZP (03:27.4), "I also think it's a complete reality, though we've seen it in the past before with left wing leaders, that there's no secret, there's no love lost between me and the right wing media. And almost every single day they print things that just aren't true." NR (03:38.8), "But just address the point I raised. Wealth tax councils won't get to do that. Public ownership councils don't get to do that. Well, not entirely. We'll come to that in a second. You are running on a national platform of change that the people who are elected on Thursday, whether in the Welsh Parliament, you don't run candidates in the Scottish one, or in English, local councils simply cannot do." ZP (04:03.2), "Well, I think it's about what are your values as a party? And whilst other party leaders and other parties take donations from oil and gas companies or arms trade companies, private healthcare or gambling, Green Party councillors only have two vested interests and Those vested interests. We want to protect the communities we seek to serve and we want to protect the environment." NR (04:21.6), "Well, let's come to that, then, because most interesting, perhaps, is to look at what Greens say who are running for office. You are not. You are a member of the London assembly, you're not a Member of Parliament, you're not running in these elections. Now, you live in Hackney. Hackney happens in northeast London to be a top Green target for taking control from the Labour Party." NR (04:41.9), "So let's look at protecting communities. For example, on crime, the manifesto calls the Metropolitan Police institutionally racist, homophobic, sexist and misogynists. It goes on to say, greens cannot accept this system. It calls for safe spaces for, heroin users to shoot up, to end cautions for street prostitution and to end what the manifesto calls discriminatory policing of delivery riders." NR (05:08.8), "This is an agenda for an endless fight with the police, isn't it?" ZP (05:12.0), "I don't think so. Baroness Casey, in the last couple of years, did a review into Metropolitan Police and it was actually the findings that found it institutionally racist and misogynistic. Something that Sadiq Khan, the Mayor of London, to his credit, accepts. It is noticeable that Mark Rowley, the Commissioner of the Police, doesn't accept that, yet they continue, to work together in that way." ZP (05:31.1), "On the issue of drug harm, we have the highest drug deaths, of any country in Europe. And every single year for the past 13 years, drug deaths have increased. So I think the question anyone has, and we have in Hackney, is that the war on drugs has clearly failed. It's failed in cities right across this country, and more and more people are, often taking dangerous drugs." ZP (05:50.3), "So do we want people to buy them on the black market or on street corners? Or do we want people to go to a pharmacy or a medical health professional where, if they have an addiction to dangerous drugs, we can work with them to take a public health approach based in harm reduction." NR (06:02.7), "Public health approaches to. Is to legalise hard drugs and to legalise prostitution, you say to legalise and regulate and the regulators. It's still legalised, isn't it?" ZP (06:11.5), "No, the point is you can't just go into a shop and buy drugs, which is how it's presented in the press. Again, because I can keep talking about what councillors can do, rather than what" NR (06:18.3), "you would do if you were Prime Minister, because that's for another interview. Are you saying councillors should cut the police budget? Because that's what it seems to imply when you say, we cannot accept this system, let the council spend Money on crime reduction. Don't give that money to the police." ZP (06:33.7), "It's about reprioritizing. So it's." NR (06:35.5), "Does that mean cut in English?" ZP (06:36.7), "No. So let's look at example. We're straight back onto drugs. A lot of police time is spent on stop and search for cannabis use, for instance. It doesn't escape people's notice that that is often, in the politics of racism, if you're a young black person, I think it's something like you're 18 times more likely to be stopped and searched than your white peer, despite the fact there's no evidence that they're more likely to be dealing or using drugs." ZP (07:00.8), "And so I think it's important that we make sure the police time is spent properly, which I think is about community prevention, about cohesiveness and bringing communities together, particularly in, like, whether it means redirecting the budget." NR (07:11.4), "Does it mean the police budget?" ZP (07:12.9), "Well, it means redirecting within the police budget, so making sure that the time police are spent is spent on community safety." NR (07:18.2), "Well, it's interesting that we talked about police because, as you know, you've come under serious criticism for retweeting criticism of the action of the police officers who stopped the alleged attacker of Jews in Golda's Green. Now, you apologised for retweeting that." NR (07:34.1), "You said you should have a meeting with the head of the Met. You sent him a letter. I want to ask you a different question. You've not apologised for the content of that. Why did you empathise with the attacker, and not with police officers who feared for their own lives and were trying to protect other people's lives?" ZP (07:53.3), "I think there's two things in that that I, really clearly want to say. The first is my very first response to the attack was to be horrif, as everyone was, I'm sure. And the first thing I posted was solidarity to the victim, to the family and indeed, to people who are suffering right now, including as a Jewish man, where Jewish safety is not abstract." NR (08:12.0), "But then you posted that officers were repeatedly and violently kicking a mentally ill man in the head when he was incapacitated by a Taser, caused extreme offence to those officers, to the head of the Met and to many people. I ask you again, why did you empathise, Empathise with the attacker, not with the police officer." ZP (08:28.9), "As I said, there's two things I wanted to say, so that was the first. The second, what I want to say is two things can be true at the same Time officers are incredibly brave when they run towards scenes of crimes that most people, including myself, would want to run away from. At the same time, I think it is accurate, and that I was also traumatised, by seeing, someone handcuffed and completely, repeatedly kicked in the head." ZP (08:51.7), "Now, sure, if you'll forgive me, it is an answer," NR (08:54.4), "but it's not an answer to the question. You posted something with the power that you have, with the number of people who follows us, and not empathising in that post with the Jewish community or critically with the police officers, you empathise with the attacker. Look what they're doing to the alleged attacker." ZP (09:11.1), "I don't think it was your choice. As I say, the first thing I did was show solidarity to the victims and I thank the officers. Second, though, I think the sign of a compassionate society is how we treat people, even people who have done horrific things, because actually, the way we do justice in this country is in court." NR (09:26.0), "You said a key value of the Greens was protecting communities. What are your proposals for protecting the Jewish community?" ZP (09:33.5), "The Jewish community is not safe right now. And as I said, as a Jewish man, this isn't abstract for me. In fact, in the last six weeks alone, two people have been arrested. So how would you protect anti Semitic attacks towards me? I think there's lots that needs to happen in this country. The first is community cohesion and community building. Some of the work that I'm proudest of in London, that I see Londoners do, is where I see the Jewish community working alongside the Muslim community." NR (09:55.1), "What would you do? What would Zach Polanski do in order to reduce attacks on the Jewish community?" ZP (09:59.9), "So, first of all, to invest in that work, that community, faith work, to make sure communities stand together. Second, to make sure that the Jewish community, give them the investment that they need. In fact, what the Prime Minister has been doing to make sure that happens. I do think a police response is the last response when everything before it has failed." NR (10:17.6), "I still think you're not really answering the question about what you would do. Let me ask you this." ZP (10:21.0), "I think I do." NR (10:21.6), "Would you deal with, for example, a candidate who says Jewish people fear hate because they know they should be hated. Another one who suggested that the attacks on the ambulances was a false flag and carried out, presumably by Israel. Another of your candidates who blamed Israel for the Bondi beach terrorist attack." NR (10:41.0), "A fourth candidate who said Donald Trump was, quote, owned by Jews. And most horrifying of all, although this individual has now been arrested, one of your candidates who Reposted something saying ramming a synagogue isn't anti Semitism, it's revenge." NR (10:56.8), "What are you, Zach Polanski doing to end these disgusting messages?" ZP (11:03.5), "Those messages are all unacceptable and it's important to condemn that. The Green Party are an anti racist party and it's important that we stick to our values." NR (11:11.0), "We can't just say the words were an anti racist bar to. And I've just read you out five of the most revolting comments at a time when, according to an independent advisor, we face a national emergency of anti Semitism. I'm asking you, you're not responsible for everything they say. Of course you're not." NR (11:26.3), "You can't be." ZP (11:27.3), "I am responsible, actually." NR (11:28.2), "What are you going to do about it?" ZP (11:29.0), "I am the leader of a party. I was about to finish my sentence." NR (11:31.5), "Forgive me. Go on." ZP (11:32.4), "We're an anti racist party. And so what I've already committed to doing is making sure that we have a standardised vetting process in future. And also make sure that we have compulsory training of all our candidates to make it clear that anti Semitism is completely unwelcome in the Green Party as it is in society. It is also important to say one case of anti Semitism is one too many." ZP (11:50.5), "This is a handful of cases and actually we have over 4,500 candidates, the vast, vast majority of which are doing amazing work in their communities right now, going out there to tackle the cost of living crisis, to make sure that we're funding public services and making sure that it's about people power and community, grassroots power." NR (12:05.1), "You can dismiss one or two as, just, unrepresentative. I've just read five. I could have read 20 cases of revolting anti Semitism posted by your candidates. Now you're a new leader, how are you going to avoid becoming the new Jeremy Corbyn of British politics?" ZP (12:21.5), "Well, I think me and Jeremy are very different people and there's much, you know, the question was almost inviting me to condemn Jeremy Corbyn. I think there was lots that Jeremy Corbyn was putting forward to this country that I think was really positive. We've talked about wealth taxes, about public ownership. I also think it's important, speaking, for myself right now, that we make sure that we have this vetting process, that it's really clear that anti Semitism, Islamophobia, any form of hatred or hate, crime is not welcome." NR (12:47.3), "Do you believe that Palestine is, to coin a phrase, on the ballot this Thursday?" ZP (12:52.3), "I think lots of things are on the ballot this Thursday." NR (12:54.6), "But is Palestine on the ballot? This." ZP (12:56.2), "I think it's one of the elements, as is the climate crisis. As is." NR (12:58.7), "What does it mean Palestine is on the ballot? Because. The reason I ask you is because your candidate for mayor of Lewisham says Palestine is on the ballot this Thursday. Haringey Green Party campaign launch video. You might think it'd be about bins, you might think it'd be about schools, hospitals, it might be about cleaning up the roads." NR (13:17.2), "It is a series of councillors saying, as a council, I will take all appropriate steps to, uphold the inalienable rights of the Palestinian people. Do you think council elections really should be about Palestine?" ZP (13:29.8), "I think they can be about all of those things. And I think what people have seen in this country is a genocide for two and a half years that our government is still arming, are still sharing intelligence with. And I think lots of people feel very strongly both about their local services, as they should do, and feel equally strongly about the fact that there's a reprehensible genocide happening." ZP (13:48.5), "And they vote, but the way they vote in local elections" NR (13:52.6), "should be determined by their views of Israel and Palestine." ZP (13:56.0), "I wouldn't tell anyone how their vote should be determined, but I think it's an element for lots of people in how they vote." NR (14:00.1), "And do you think that will contribute to community cohesion? Do you?" ZP (14:02.7), "I think yes, because I think, we shouldn't pit Jewish safety against a genocide in Gaza. That's conflating anti Semitism and criticism of the Israeli government. That's something Benjamin Netanyahu does regularly. And as a Jewish person, that makes me feel less safe." NR (14:16.4), "Sure. But there are lots of Jewish people who would say to you they feel unsafe if they feel that their counsellors are motivated first and foremost by Palestine. And if somebody gives that speech, for example, about Palestine being on the ballot, they are likely to think that." NR (14:34.6), "We looked for, example at Barnett Greens, where one in seven residents identify as Jewish. And it includes in its manifesto the fact that, you're standing up for Palestine. Do you think that's going to help?" ZP (14:49.0), "Well, I walk regularly on Palestinian marches with hundreds and hundreds, in fact, thousands of people, many of whom are Jewish. And there have been rabbis who have spoken out on this too. I accept, though, there are Jewish people whose views are equally as valid who, don't agree with those views." ZP (15:04.0), "And I think the job of all of us who are in public life right now is to de. Escalate tensions. And look, how do we bring people together? And I accept that's a huge challenge. And I think one of the ways we could do that is by ending our complicity in the genocide." NR (15:15.4), "Let's turn finally to another issue. We'll talk at greater length when, we're talking about the possibility of you being Prime Minister, which you have said that you would like to do. One thing that is very high on the agenda now is the soaring cost of government borrowing. What would the Greens do to cut it?" ZP (15:30.6), "Well, I think we need to make sure that we're investing. So I think there's two ways of doing that. The first is, wealth taxes, which I know we've rehearsed before, but I'll just say that's for first place." NR (15:38.4), "How does that cut government borrowing?" ZP (15:40.2), "Because ultimately it means you need to borrow less if you're." NR (15:43.0), "If you're ultimately about cutting the cost of government borrowing." ZP (15:45.5), "Yes." NR (15:45.8), "Which is soaring. It's higher than it's been any time this century because people are nervous about high spending, high taxing governments that are politically unstable." ZP (15:54.7), "I think someone who speaks brilliantly on this, who I've spoken to, is the economist Mariana Matsicatu, and she talks about the fact that a government should have a mission that should be a very clear plan of how you tackle the climate crisis, how you reduce inequality. Now, if you have a clear plan and you're borrowing for that, you're taking the market with you because they can clearly see what the return on investment is and how you're bringing money back into the." ZP (16:15.2), "That's how you reduce borrowing levels. If we don't have a plan and continue to borrow, then it feels very, very scattered, and that's why things are getting worse. We need to make sure that there's a consistent plan in place that's set out carefully that can make sure we're putting money back into our communities and investing in those communities." NR (16:29.3), "Do you think you're ready to be Prime Minister?" ZP (16:31.1), "I'm not ready right now, no. I've been leader for eight months, and there's lots of skills and lots of knowledge to get, and I think that's fine. I think I'm a human being. I'm not perfect." NR (16:38.5), "But give it two years, you will be." ZP (16:40.0), "Well, we'll see in two years time, won't we? But I'll certainly be putting in the work." NR (16:43.2), "Zach Polanski, leader of the Green Party in England and Wales, thanks very much for coming into the." ZP (16:46.3), "Thank you, Nick."

Farrukh

165,871 views • 2 months ago

[Trans/summarized] #ScarletHeartTH 🎤: We finally got to watch the trailer! How do the actors feel? Starting with P’Win. 🐰: I’m really happy. This is another project that everyone poured their hearts into not just the cast but everyone behind the scenes too. We went through so many obstacles to get this trailer out. I’m really, really glad. 😊 NNN: Very happy. We faced quite a lot of obstacles on set. Everyone was exhausted and gave their all. Seeing the trailer made us feel relieved.😄 Tu: I’m happy, because I know everyone has been looking forward to it. Once we started filming, I felt it would turn out well. Seeing the final visuals made all the hard work worth it.🥰 Force: Super happy. The team really went through a lot, there was rain, storms but everyone gave 100%.🥺 Prim: I’m happy I got to work with everyone.😍 Aye: So relieved. I don’t have to keep things secret anymore, and I feel honored.😊 CZ: Very relieved and very happy. Please support this series.🥰 Milk: I’ve been holding back for so long. I want to post photos!🥹 Pan: Really happy I got to do things I’ve never done before.😊 🎤: Tell us about the atmosphere on set. Fourth: I have no gossip. I was focused on working unlike Phuwin and Perth 😄 PW: There were many fun things we got to do together on this set. Now that the trailer is out, we can finally start posting photos.☺️ Fourth: The trailer was very white, right? (shirtless 😆). You can really see how big P’Win is.😄 🐰: Yes. White 🤣 Fourth: Never in my life did I think I was skinny… until I stood next to P’Win. I look tiny next to him. 🤏🏻 Perth: I’m really happy to be part of this project, and to work with such a talented director and cast.🥰 P’Tay: Please don’t judge me from the trailer. I might actually be a good person. 🫣🤭 #GMMTV2026
7:56

[Trans/summarized] #ScarletHeartTH 🎤: We finally got to watch the trailer! How do the actors feel? Starting with P’Win. 🐰: I’m really happy. This is another project that everyone poured their hearts into not just the cast but everyone behind the scenes too. We went through so many obstacles to get this trailer out. I’m really, really glad. 😊 NNN: Very happy. We faced quite a lot of obstacles on set. Everyone was exhausted and gave their all. Seeing the trailer made us feel relieved.😄 Tu: I’m happy, because I know everyone has been looking forward to it. Once we started filming, I felt it would turn out well. Seeing the final visuals made all the hard work worth it.🥰 Force: Super happy. The team really went through a lot, there was rain, storms but everyone gave 100%.🥺 Prim: I’m happy I got to work with everyone.😍 Aye: So relieved. I don’t have to keep things secret anymore, and I feel honored.😊 CZ: Very relieved and very happy. Please support this series.🥰 Milk: I’ve been holding back for so long. I want to post photos!🥹 Pan: Really happy I got to do things I’ve never done before.😊 🎤: Tell us about the atmosphere on set. Fourth: I have no gossip. I was focused on working unlike Phuwin and Perth 😄 PW: There were many fun things we got to do together on this set. Now that the trailer is out, we can finally start posting photos.☺️ Fourth: The trailer was very white, right? (shirtless 😆). You can really see how big P’Win is.😄 🐰: Yes. White 🤣 Fourth: Never in my life did I think I was skinny… until I stood next to P’Win. I look tiny next to him. 🤏🏻 Perth: I’m really happy to be part of this project, and to work with such a talented director and cast.🥰 P’Tay: Please don’t judge me from the trailer. I might actually be a good person. 🫣🤭 #GMMTV2026

◡̈ ✿〜*:.｡. ꕤ M a R y ꕤ*･.｡.*･*✿.

29,761 views • 7 months ago

Eng Trans : 🦆🐰 KENGNAMPING 2ND ANNIVERSARY #KNP2getherForever 🦆 R there any questions? 🗣️ P’Keng, what moment did u feel to choose him (Namping) as ur partner? The exact moment u decided. 🦆 Honestly. Before the reality show. 🗣️ Yeah, because people say u were locked each other before joining the show (like already chosen each other). So when u thought It has to be this person. 🦆 I think it was after we met. I can’t remember a specific moment because when we first met, I didn’t talk to anyone at all. I couldn’t remember anyone. I was just really in my own head. They told me to go on stage to introduce the lineup, so I went up. That was it. 🦆 First time we really talked was when I started working with Nong (Namping). 🗣️ Which job, do u remember? 🦆 I don’t remember either, it gradually happened. It wasn’t like in a drama where u meet and suddenly go, Oh! 🗣️ (laughs) 🦆 And then a song starts playing… (hums Everytime - Descendants of the Sun OST while looking at Namping) 🗣️ Scream! Why this song? (cuz it’s very romantic) 🦆 And then Camera 2 slowly zooms in wooo. It wasn’t like that. 🗣️ After u showed up on the first day, u just disappeared? 🦆 My mom said not to talk to strangers. (P’Keng jokes that he didn’t talk to anyone at first cuz his mom told him not to.) 🗣️ But I was already in the office. 🦆 Still stranger, we had just met. 🗣️ What about Namping? 🦆 Namping isn’t a stranger. (smiles) 🗣️ Wooow. (teasing) 🐰 (smiles shyly) 🗣️ Next, let’s ask Namping. Same question as P’Keng. 🐰 What was it again? 🗣️ When did it click for u with P’Keng? The moment u felt like, It has to be this person. 🐰 Wow, that’s a hard one. (smiles) I think it was around… hmm, it was around this time last year. 🐰 Every time we went out to do something of work, normally we only saw each other at work and I already knew how he worked, what kind of worker he was. But around his birthday last year, I started feeling like I wanted to get to know this person more. I wanted to know what his life was like. 🐰 So I decided to go a project with him, I got to see that he’s a really kind. He appreciates what I do, I feel comfortable with him. I feel he’s very talented. 🦆 Yes, I’m Keng. (Keng means talented) (smiles) 🐰 (smiles) Talented. So I thought to myself, Hmm, is this person good? But I didn’t really know how it would turn out, at that time we didn’t talk about this kind of thing. We didn’t talk much about choosing each other or anything like that. We just let things go with the flow. 🐰 Then the show happened, which is that scene I asked him directly, I’m someone who if I want to know something, I’ll ask straight up. I just asked what he thought. Because if he didn’t have a plan, didn’t see a future with me, I would understand. 🐰 But as we kept learning about each other, it kept clicking more and more, there wasn’t really big turning point, it was just getting to know each other little by little. 🦆 (nods, smiles) 🐰 One thing that’s really important to me is I feel he never judges me. When I first entered the industry, I was very scared, a new place, new company, new environment. I was judged by everything, society, people, who didn’t even know me. But P’Keng never did like that. 🐰 Even now, after many things have happened, he’s never judges me based on what others say or on any situation. He knows, he’s been with me. He knows what I am. I feel very comfortable with him. 🐰 I don’t care whether u’re talent or not. I just think about who I fit with, who I feel comfortable with. And that’s this person. (points at P’Keng, smiles) 🐰 Now I feel like, as long as I’m in a place that suits me, where I can grow. I want to stay there. Can I stay with u?(asks P’Keng in a soft tone) 🦆 (smiles) Yes. We’ll stay together. 🗣️ Ur ears are red again! (laughs) 🐰 (points at P’Keng’s ears) 🦆 Huhhh? 🗣️ Your ears are red. 🦆 Is it the lighting? They set up the gallery follow the tone. (lol) #KengNamping #เก่งน้ําปิง
6:35

Eng Trans : 🦆🐰 KENGNAMPING 2ND ANNIVERSARY #KNP2getherForever 🦆 R there any questions? 🗣️ P’Keng, what moment did u feel to choose him (Namping) as ur partner? The exact moment u decided. 🦆 Honestly. Before the reality show. 🗣️ Yeah, because people say u were locked each other before joining the show (like already chosen each other). So when u thought It has to be this person. 🦆 I think it was after we met. I can’t remember a specific moment because when we first met, I didn’t talk to anyone at all. I couldn’t remember anyone. I was just really in my own head. They told me to go on stage to introduce the lineup, so I went up. That was it. 🦆 First time we really talked was when I started working with Nong (Namping). 🗣️ Which job, do u remember? 🦆 I don’t remember either, it gradually happened. It wasn’t like in a drama where u meet and suddenly go, Oh! 🗣️ (laughs) 🦆 And then a song starts playing… (hums Everytime - Descendants of the Sun OST while looking at Namping) 🗣️ Scream! Why this song? (cuz it’s very romantic) 🦆 And then Camera 2 slowly zooms in wooo. It wasn’t like that. 🗣️ After u showed up on the first day, u just disappeared? 🦆 My mom said not to talk to strangers. (P’Keng jokes that he didn’t talk to anyone at first cuz his mom told him not to.) 🗣️ But I was already in the office. 🦆 Still stranger, we had just met. 🗣️ What about Namping? 🦆 Namping isn’t a stranger. (smiles) 🗣️ Wooow. (teasing) 🐰 (smiles shyly) 🗣️ Next, let’s ask Namping. Same question as P’Keng. 🐰 What was it again? 🗣️ When did it click for u with P’Keng? The moment u felt like, It has to be this person. 🐰 Wow, that’s a hard one. (smiles) I think it was around… hmm, it was around this time last year. 🐰 Every time we went out to do something of work, normally we only saw each other at work and I already knew how he worked, what kind of worker he was. But around his birthday last year, I started feeling like I wanted to get to know this person more. I wanted to know what his life was like. 🐰 So I decided to go a project with him, I got to see that he’s a really kind. He appreciates what I do, I feel comfortable with him. I feel he’s very talented. 🦆 Yes, I’m Keng. (Keng means talented) (smiles) 🐰 (smiles) Talented. So I thought to myself, Hmm, is this person good? But I didn’t really know how it would turn out, at that time we didn’t talk about this kind of thing. We didn’t talk much about choosing each other or anything like that. We just let things go with the flow. 🐰 Then the show happened, which is that scene I asked him directly, I’m someone who if I want to know something, I’ll ask straight up. I just asked what he thought. Because if he didn’t have a plan, didn’t see a future with me, I would understand. 🐰 But as we kept learning about each other, it kept clicking more and more, there wasn’t really big turning point, it was just getting to know each other little by little. 🦆 (nods, smiles) 🐰 One thing that’s really important to me is I feel he never judges me. When I first entered the industry, I was very scared, a new place, new company, new environment. I was judged by everything, society, people, who didn’t even know me. But P’Keng never did like that. 🐰 Even now, after many things have happened, he’s never judges me based on what others say or on any situation. He knows, he’s been with me. He knows what I am. I feel very comfortable with him. 🐰 I don’t care whether u’re talent or not. I just think about who I fit with, who I feel comfortable with. And that’s this person. (points at P’Keng, smiles) 🐰 Now I feel like, as long as I’m in a place that suits me, where I can grow. I want to stay there. Can I stay with u?(asks P’Keng in a soft tone) 🦆 (smiles) Yes. We’ll stay together. 🗣️ Ur ears are red again! (laughs) 🐰 (points at P’Keng’s ears) 🦆 Huhhh? 🗣️ Your ears are red. 🦆 Is it the lighting? They set up the gallery follow the tone. (lol) #KengNamping #เก่งน้ําปิง

DEAR U

17,025 views • 5 months ago

Like seemingly everyone on this app I have plenty of opinions about Twitter > X and figure now is a good time to open up a bit about my experience at the company. I tweeted for years into the void for the love of it like many of you, but after selling my startup to Twitter in 2020 I finally got to see it from the inside. Up close it was both amazing and terrible, like so many other companies and things in life. As someone with a maniacal sense of urgency built into me, Twitter often felt siloed and bureaucratic. Dumb power plays, reorgs and team name changes for the sake of someone’s ego were distractions that occurred too regularly. You couldn’t just be a builder — you also needed to be a politician. I was shocked by how old and bespoke the infrastructure was, but there was little will to think beyond quarterly earnings calls because we were all beholden to the masters of mDAU and revenue growth as a public company. It often felt like things were held together with duct tape and glue, and that many people had just accepted that a small product change could take months or quarters to build. Management had become bloated to accommodate career growth and the company culture felt too soft and entitled for my own taste. Healthy debate and criticism was replaced by a default refrain of “no, that can’t be done” or “another team owns that so don’t touch it”. Teams could spend months building a feature and then some last-minute kerfuffle meant it’d get killed for being too risky. Just talking directly to customers could turn into a turf war and create deadlocks between functions. I recall one such episode where a teammate spent a month trying to get clearance to reach out to some creators. He went through 3 layers of management and 6 different functional teams. In the end 4 executives were involved in the approval. It was insanity, and unfortunately I saw several top performers get burnt out and demoralized after exhausting experiences like that. Most people were good at their jobs but it was nearly impossible to fire poor performers — instead they got shuffled around to other teams because few managers had the will or resources to figure out how to get them out. A high performance culture pulls everyone up, but the opposite weighs everyone down. Twitter often felt like a place that kept squandering its own potential, which was sad and frustrating to see. The person who was best at cutting through the BS and inspiring a vision during my tenure was Kayvon Beykpour, but he wasn’t fully empowered to run the company since he wasn’t the CEO. Despite those real issues, I was lucky enough to work with some of the most talented people in the business at Twitter in product, design, engineering, research, legal, BD, trust & safety, marketing, PR and more. Often it was a small cross-functional team of intrinsically motivated people who made the biggest impact by challenging some core assumption. Those teams were very fun to be on but they felt like the exception rather than the rule. The months of waiting for the deal to close in 2022 were particularly slow and painful; it felt like leadership hid behind lawyers and legal language as all answers about the company’s future notoriously included the phrase “fiduciary duty”. Colleagues openly talked about how Twitter was being sold because leadership didn’t have conviction in their own plan or ability to fix longstanding problems. Although I didn’t know much about Elon I was cautiously optimistic – I saw him as the guy who built incredible and enduring companies like Tesla and SpaceX, so perhaps his private ownership could shake things up and breathe new life into the company. My take on what’s happened since then is full of lived nuance. When people ask why I stayed it’s easy to answer: optimism, curiosity, personal growth and money. From the beginning I saw that some changes Elon was going to make were smart and others were stupid, but when I’m on a team I uphold the philosophy of “praise in public and criticize in private”. I was far from a silent wallflower. I shared my opinions openly and pushed back often, both before and after the acquisition. I made peace with the fact that I didn’t have psychological safety at Twitter 2.0 and that meant I could be fired at any moment, and for no reason at all. I watched it happen repeatedly and saw how negatively it impacted team morale. Although I couldn’t change the situation I did my best to shine a light on folks who were doing important work while being an emotionally supportive leader for those who were struggling to adapt to the more brutalist and hardcore culture. In person Elon is oddly charming and he’s genuinely funny. He also has personality quirks like telling the same stories and jokes over and over. The challenge is his personality and demeanor can turn on a dime going from excited to angry. Since it was hard to read what mood he might be in and what his reaction would be to any given thing, people quickly became afraid of being called into meetings or having to share negative news with him. At times it felt like the inner circle was too zealous and fanatical in their unwavering support of everything he said. When individuals encouraged me to be careful about what I said I politely thanked them and said I would not be taking their advice. I had no interest in adding to a culture of fear or walking on eggshells around Elon. Either he would respect me for being real or he could fire me. Either outcome was okay. I quickly learned that product and business decisions were nearly always the result of him following his gut instinct, and he didn’t seem compelled to seek out or rely on a lot of data or expertise to inform it. That was particularly frustrating for me since I believed I had useful institutional knowledge that could help him make better decisions. Instead he'd poll Twitter, ask a friend, or even ask his biographer for product advice. At times it seemed he trusted random feedback more than the people in the room who spent their lives dedicated to tackling the problem at hand. I never figured out why and remain puzzled by it. I don’t think things had to be as difficult or dramatic as they turned out to be but I can’t say I’d bet against Elon or count him out. He’s smart and has enough money to make a lot of mistakes and then course correct when things go awry. As the largest shareholder he can tank the value in the short-term, but eventually he’ll need things to turn around. His focus on speed is incredible and he’s obviously not afraid of blowing things up, but now the real measure will be how it get reconstructed and if enough people want the new everything app he is building. I learned a ton from watching Elon up close – the good, the bad and the ugly. His boldness, passion and storytelling is inspiring, but his lack of process and empathy is painful. Elon has an exceptional talent for tackling hard physics-based problems but products that facilitate human connection and communication require a different type of social-emotional intelligence. Social networks are hard to kill but they’re not immune from death spirals. Only time will tell what the outcome will be but I hope X finds its footing because competition is good for consumers. In the meantime, I have a lot of empathy for the employees who are working tirelessly behind the scenes, the advertisers who want a stable platform to sell their stuff on, and the customers who are experiencing chaotic updates. It’s been a madhouse. Twitter moved at the speed of molasses and suffered from bureaucracy but now X is run by a mercurial leader whose instinct is driven by the unique and undoubtedly weird experience of being the biggest voice on the platform. Many of you know me from the sleeping bag incident where I slept on a conference room floor, so I figure, let’s talk about that too. Going viral was an odd and interesting experience. I was attacked by people on the left and called a billionaire bootlicker, while simultaneously being attacked by people on the right for being a working mom who was demonized as an example of a woman choosing her career over her family. Thankfully I can laugh at myself and I don’t take armchair keyboard ideologues too seriously. Being the main character on the timeline, even for a few minutes, requires a thick skin and a strong sense of self. The real story is pretty simple. I was given a nearly impossible deadline for his first project and as the product lead I would never ask anyone to do anything I wasn’t willing to do myself. So I worked round the clock alongside an amazing team spanning many timezones, and we delivered it on schedule – truly against the odds. It was intense but also fun. Those first few months were wildly crazy but I wanted to be there and I have no regrets. Showing up and giving it your all should, in most cases, be celebrated. Obviously you can’t work at that pace forever but there are moments where bursts are mission critical. I’ve pulled many all-nighters in my career and also when I was a student for something that mattered to me. I don’t regret putting in long hours or being ambitious, and feel proud of how far I’ve come from where I started thanks in part to that type of work ethic. I think of life as a game, and being at Twitter after the acquisition was like playing life at Level 10 on Hard Mode. Since I like taking on difficult challenges I found it interesting and rewarding because I was growing and learning so rapidly. I realize our society today trends toward polarization but when it comes to this app, its owner, and its future, I am neither a fangirl nor a hater — I’m an optimistic pragmatist. This may really irritate the internet but you cannot pigeonhole me into some radical position of either loving or hating every change that’s occurred. I escaped my fundamentalist upbringing and am a free thinker these days. Everyone can be seen as both a hero or a villain, depending on who is telling what angle of the story. Elon doesn’t deserve to be venerated or vilified. He’s a complicated person with an unfathomable amount of financial and geopolitical power which is why humanity needs him to err on the side of goodness, rather than political divisiveness and pettiness. I disagree with many of his decisions and am surprised by his willingness to burn so much down, but with enough money and time, something new & innovative may emerge. I hope it does. Sometimes I get asked about how I felt when I got laid off, and the truth is it was the best gift I’ve ever received. Sure the headlines and punchlines wrote themselves but I was battle hardened by then. I knew that I’d worked in a way where I could walk out with my head held high. I have no bitterness about the Product Management team being dismantled, and it made sense for me to exit as nearly all of the remaining PMs were let go. Going on a sabbatical afterward has been exactly what I needed to decompress and I’m finally feeling rested and relaxed. I’m a creative and a builder, so sooner than later I’ll jump back into a high intensity company but I’m grateful for this season of thinking, reading, traveling and being with people I love. After having time to reflect I believe more than ever that the very best outcomes flow from great leadership that combines the head and the heart. I’d be remiss if I didn’t note that in all of this there is also a cautionary tale for anyone who succeeds at something — which is that the higher you climb, the smaller your world becomes. It’s a strange paradox but the richest and most powerful people are also some of the most isolated. I found myself frequently looking at Elon and seeing a person who seemed quite alone because his time and energy was so purely devoted to work, which is not the model of a life I want to live. Money and fame can create psychological prisons which may worsen mental health conditions. We’ve all seen high profile cases of celebrities who end up with some combination of depression, paranoia, delusions of grandeur, mania and/or erratic behavior. Living in an echo chamber is dangerous and being at the top makes a person even more susceptible to being surrounded by yes people when nearly everyone around you is on the payroll and somehow stands to benefit from being in your orbit. Figuring out how to keep “better angels” around in the form of family, friends, and teammates is critical to staying on the rails and enduring intense ups and downs. Everyone needs to hear hard truths sometimes and if you fire all the people who speak up then the reality distortion field may just turn into a vortex. I was drawn to Twitter because I’m obsessed with the problem of loneliness and connection between people. I find it fascinating & troubling that humans are getting lonelier as we simultaneously create a world that’s both safer and wealthier. I don’t believe that trade-off has to exist, which is why I keep returning to that theme in my personal and professional life. I realize this is too long of a tweet but Twitter was a weird and special place on the internet, and I’m grateful to have played a teeny tiny role in its story and evolution. I’m here for whatever comes next — on this app and in new places. Consumer social is very much alive and at a fascinating juncture, so I’ll be watching and participating and sharing hot takes because I don’t want to, and probably can’t, turn that part of me off. Perhaps X becomes a resounding success. Or it fails epically. Either way, I expect it will continue to be a very entertaining ride. 🫡
14:49

Like seemingly everyone on this app I have plenty of opinions about Twitter > X and figure now is a good time to open up a bit about my experience at the company. I tweeted for years into the void for the love of it like many of you, but after selling my startup to Twitter in 2020 I finally got to see it from the inside. Up close it was both amazing and terrible, like so many other companies and things in life. As someone with a maniacal sense of urgency built into me, Twitter often felt siloed and bureaucratic. Dumb power plays, reorgs and team name changes for the sake of someone’s ego were distractions that occurred too regularly. You couldn’t just be a builder — you also needed to be a politician. I was shocked by how old and bespoke the infrastructure was, but there was little will to think beyond quarterly earnings calls because we were all beholden to the masters of mDAU and revenue growth as a public company. It often felt like things were held together with duct tape and glue, and that many people had just accepted that a small product change could take months or quarters to build. Management had become bloated to accommodate career growth and the company culture felt too soft and entitled for my own taste. Healthy debate and criticism was replaced by a default refrain of “no, that can’t be done” or “another team owns that so don’t touch it”. Teams could spend months building a feature and then some last-minute kerfuffle meant it’d get killed for being too risky. Just talking directly to customers could turn into a turf war and create deadlocks between functions. I recall one such episode where a teammate spent a month trying to get clearance to reach out to some creators. He went through 3 layers of management and 6 different functional teams. In the end 4 executives were involved in the approval. It was insanity, and unfortunately I saw several top performers get burnt out and demoralized after exhausting experiences like that. Most people were good at their jobs but it was nearly impossible to fire poor performers — instead they got shuffled around to other teams because few managers had the will or resources to figure out how to get them out. A high performance culture pulls everyone up, but the opposite weighs everyone down. Twitter often felt like a place that kept squandering its own potential, which was sad and frustrating to see. The person who was best at cutting through the BS and inspiring a vision during my tenure was Kayvon Beykpour, but he wasn’t fully empowered to run the company since he wasn’t the CEO. Despite those real issues, I was lucky enough to work with some of the most talented people in the business at Twitter in product, design, engineering, research, legal, BD, trust & safety, marketing, PR and more. Often it was a small cross-functional team of intrinsically motivated people who made the biggest impact by challenging some core assumption. Those teams were very fun to be on but they felt like the exception rather than the rule. The months of waiting for the deal to close in 2022 were particularly slow and painful; it felt like leadership hid behind lawyers and legal language as all answers about the company’s future notoriously included the phrase “fiduciary duty”. Colleagues openly talked about how Twitter was being sold because leadership didn’t have conviction in their own plan or ability to fix longstanding problems. Although I didn’t know much about Elon I was cautiously optimistic – I saw him as the guy who built incredible and enduring companies like Tesla and SpaceX, so perhaps his private ownership could shake things up and breathe new life into the company. My take on what’s happened since then is full of lived nuance. When people ask why I stayed it’s easy to answer: optimism, curiosity, personal growth and money. From the beginning I saw that some changes Elon was going to make were smart and others were stupid, but when I’m on a team I uphold the philosophy of “praise in public and criticize in private”. I was far from a silent wallflower. I shared my opinions openly and pushed back often, both before and after the acquisition. I made peace with the fact that I didn’t have psychological safety at Twitter 2.0 and that meant I could be fired at any moment, and for no reason at all. I watched it happen repeatedly and saw how negatively it impacted team morale. Although I couldn’t change the situation I did my best to shine a light on folks who were doing important work while being an emotionally supportive leader for those who were struggling to adapt to the more brutalist and hardcore culture. In person Elon is oddly charming and he’s genuinely funny. He also has personality quirks like telling the same stories and jokes over and over. The challenge is his personality and demeanor can turn on a dime going from excited to angry. Since it was hard to read what mood he might be in and what his reaction would be to any given thing, people quickly became afraid of being called into meetings or having to share negative news with him. At times it felt like the inner circle was too zealous and fanatical in their unwavering support of everything he said. When individuals encouraged me to be careful about what I said I politely thanked them and said I would not be taking their advice. I had no interest in adding to a culture of fear or walking on eggshells around Elon. Either he would respect me for being real or he could fire me. Either outcome was okay. I quickly learned that product and business decisions were nearly always the result of him following his gut instinct, and he didn’t seem compelled to seek out or rely on a lot of data or expertise to inform it. That was particularly frustrating for me since I believed I had useful institutional knowledge that could help him make better decisions. Instead he'd poll Twitter, ask a friend, or even ask his biographer for product advice. At times it seemed he trusted random feedback more than the people in the room who spent their lives dedicated to tackling the problem at hand. I never figured out why and remain puzzled by it. I don’t think things had to be as difficult or dramatic as they turned out to be but I can’t say I’d bet against Elon or count him out. He’s smart and has enough money to make a lot of mistakes and then course correct when things go awry. As the largest shareholder he can tank the value in the short-term, but eventually he’ll need things to turn around. His focus on speed is incredible and he’s obviously not afraid of blowing things up, but now the real measure will be how it get reconstructed and if enough people want the new everything app he is building. I learned a ton from watching Elon up close – the good, the bad and the ugly. His boldness, passion and storytelling is inspiring, but his lack of process and empathy is painful. Elon has an exceptional talent for tackling hard physics-based problems but products that facilitate human connection and communication require a different type of social-emotional intelligence. Social networks are hard to kill but they’re not immune from death spirals. Only time will tell what the outcome will be but I hope X finds its footing because competition is good for consumers. In the meantime, I have a lot of empathy for the employees who are working tirelessly behind the scenes, the advertisers who want a stable platform to sell their stuff on, and the customers who are experiencing chaotic updates. It’s been a madhouse. Twitter moved at the speed of molasses and suffered from bureaucracy but now X is run by a mercurial leader whose instinct is driven by the unique and undoubtedly weird experience of being the biggest voice on the platform. Many of you know me from the sleeping bag incident where I slept on a conference room floor, so I figure, let’s talk about that too. Going viral was an odd and interesting experience. I was attacked by people on the left and called a billionaire bootlicker, while simultaneously being attacked by people on the right for being a working mom who was demonized as an example of a woman choosing her career over her family. Thankfully I can laugh at myself and I don’t take armchair keyboard ideologues too seriously. Being the main character on the timeline, even for a few minutes, requires a thick skin and a strong sense of self. The real story is pretty simple. I was given a nearly impossible deadline for his first project and as the product lead I would never ask anyone to do anything I wasn’t willing to do myself. So I worked round the clock alongside an amazing team spanning many timezones, and we delivered it on schedule – truly against the odds. It was intense but also fun. Those first few months were wildly crazy but I wanted to be there and I have no regrets. Showing up and giving it your all should, in most cases, be celebrated. Obviously you can’t work at that pace forever but there are moments where bursts are mission critical. I’ve pulled many all-nighters in my career and also when I was a student for something that mattered to me. I don’t regret putting in long hours or being ambitious, and feel proud of how far I’ve come from where I started thanks in part to that type of work ethic. I think of life as a game, and being at Twitter after the acquisition was like playing life at Level 10 on Hard Mode. Since I like taking on difficult challenges I found it interesting and rewarding because I was growing and learning so rapidly. I realize our society today trends toward polarization but when it comes to this app, its owner, and its future, I am neither a fangirl nor a hater — I’m an optimistic pragmatist. This may really irritate the internet but you cannot pigeonhole me into some radical position of either loving or hating every change that’s occurred. I escaped my fundamentalist upbringing and am a free thinker these days. Everyone can be seen as both a hero or a villain, depending on who is telling what angle of the story. Elon doesn’t deserve to be venerated or vilified. He’s a complicated person with an unfathomable amount of financial and geopolitical power which is why humanity needs him to err on the side of goodness, rather than political divisiveness and pettiness. I disagree with many of his decisions and am surprised by his willingness to burn so much down, but with enough money and time, something new & innovative may emerge. I hope it does. Sometimes I get asked about how I felt when I got laid off, and the truth is it was the best gift I’ve ever received. Sure the headlines and punchlines wrote themselves but I was battle hardened by then. I knew that I’d worked in a way where I could walk out with my head held high. I have no bitterness about the Product Management team being dismantled, and it made sense for me to exit as nearly all of the remaining PMs were let go. Going on a sabbatical afterward has been exactly what I needed to decompress and I’m finally feeling rested and relaxed. I’m a creative and a builder, so sooner than later I’ll jump back into a high intensity company but I’m grateful for this season of thinking, reading, traveling and being with people I love. After having time to reflect I believe more than ever that the very best outcomes flow from great leadership that combines the head and the heart. I’d be remiss if I didn’t note that in all of this there is also a cautionary tale for anyone who succeeds at something — which is that the higher you climb, the smaller your world becomes. It’s a strange paradox but the richest and most powerful people are also some of the most isolated. I found myself frequently looking at Elon and seeing a person who seemed quite alone because his time and energy was so purely devoted to work, which is not the model of a life I want to live. Money and fame can create psychological prisons which may worsen mental health conditions. We’ve all seen high profile cases of celebrities who end up with some combination of depression, paranoia, delusions of grandeur, mania and/or erratic behavior. Living in an echo chamber is dangerous and being at the top makes a person even more susceptible to being surrounded by yes people when nearly everyone around you is on the payroll and somehow stands to benefit from being in your orbit. Figuring out how to keep “better angels” around in the form of family, friends, and teammates is critical to staying on the rails and enduring intense ups and downs. Everyone needs to hear hard truths sometimes and if you fire all the people who speak up then the reality distortion field may just turn into a vortex. I was drawn to Twitter because I’m obsessed with the problem of loneliness and connection between people. I find it fascinating & troubling that humans are getting lonelier as we simultaneously create a world that’s both safer and wealthier. I don’t believe that trade-off has to exist, which is why I keep returning to that theme in my personal and professional life. I realize this is too long of a tweet but Twitter was a weird and special place on the internet, and I’m grateful to have played a teeny tiny role in its story and evolution. I’m here for whatever comes next — on this app and in new places. Consumer social is very much alive and at a fascinating juncture, so I’ll be watching and participating and sharing hot takes because I don’t want to, and probably can’t, turn that part of me off. Perhaps X becomes a resounding success. Or it fails epically. Either way, I expect it will continue to be a very entertaining ride. 🫡

Esther Crawford ✨

5,495,869 views • 3 years ago

The most epic 13 minute AI rant I've heard in 2026 PS: My parent's heard this when I was playing it in the car and thought Jason ✨👾SaaStr.Ai✨ Lemkin went OFF like Stephen A Smith does on first take PPS: Full transcript below [17:00] Harry Stebbings: I I just wanted to ask Jason, if the people that we want are fundamentally different, the developers that we used to hire, we don't because AI writes the code for us. The marketers we don't want, the sales people we don't want—who who do we want genuinely? Like what is the attractive profile? Because your Anthropic’s and your OpenAIs are hiring, so so what are the people that we want in the companies of the future? [17:18] Jason Lemkin: Look, I know it sounds trite, but but the answer is simple. It's just the expression each year changes. We want folks that are genuinely AI fluent. It's pretty simple. Now you know, maybe last year we called them prompt engineers, right? That used to be a job. I don't know if you remember that actually used to be the hottest job on planet earth. Now no one needs a prompt engineer because it's pretty easy to prompt all these tools. That job died. Okay. Um and now we need go-to-market engineers. Um I think that job's going to die. We need—everyone needs so many forward deployed engineers. Like you can't hire enough forward deployed engineers. But uh you know um but Palantir just announced in whatever their their big their big event—they've gotten their deployment times down over 90% with forward deployed engineers. So that may become—so the this wave of disruption for the titles and the specificity, it's also exhaustingly accelerating. But it's really simple. You meet anyone for any role—sales, marketing, engineering, product, QA—they're they're either they're either they can't keep all of the ways they use AI to accelerate their job from spewing out of their mouth, or they're staring at you. It's there's nowhere in the middle. Like, and the person that comes in and says—it's it's it sounds Captain Obvious—but like, you know, you just had the whatever from Lovable, the the marketing head that was super popular on the show, right? She's just spewing AI-native insights into Lovable, right? It's not that complicated. You hire her, Elena, or whatever it is. You just hire her. It doesn't matter whether she's still in college or a junior or a senior or a middler, a left or right. And honestly, if you interview people, I would say of all even of the best startups I've invested in, maybe 30% of the management team meets this standard at best. 30%. Maybe less. And of the interviews I do in general, it's single-digit percents. It's just and in in that sense, it's the same as ever. Like you either lower the bar in hiring or you hire someone that's actually great. And someone that's actually great is so far ahead of you in how to apply to to employ the efficiencies of AI in their role, your jaw falls on the table. The difference is we used to need warm bodies. That's what's changing. We used to need warm bodies to answer the call, to do QA, to do code review, to to get the blue pixel to go from the upper left to the lower right. You laugh, but you need you literally needed to brute force this with humans. With AI, every day that goes by, the AI—you do not need brute force human beings on your team. And that's another reason they're shrinking. Why are all these new companies so efficient? They're just not brute forcing things with humans. They're just not. They're choosing not to. And so these team—all the brute forcers out there—everyone talks about how bloated teams got in 2021. I don't agree with that. I think they got as big as they needed to be when growth was high and you needed humans to do everything. All you look at these teams that that doubled—well if growth continued at 60% like the rate in early 2021 for 5 years or can help me do the math and every single thing a software company did required a human. You were understaffed by your 2021 headcount. You'd be sitting here in 2026. You every office in SoMa would be triple packed and you there wouldn't be enough humans to staff your company. It's just the world changed. [20:33] Harry Stebbings: Jason, you live on the bleeding edge. I think me and Rory see that and I think the world sees that when they hear you every week in terms of how you run SaaS. For all of the CEOs and execs who listen to the show, what would you advise them in terms of determining whether someone is AI fluent when they meet them for jobs, for talent? [20:51] Jason Lemkin: Here's I realized I was just asked this. I just did a review with a super fast startup growing just crossing 100 million and I was asked this question. And one of my favorite executives, I thought his answer was pretty dated and because he gave me an answer that was about 6 months old. The answer 6 months old is: "I look for folks in my team, I look for you know at what tools they play with." Okay, that was a great answer in like summer of 2025. Okay, I tried Lovable last week. Okay, the answer in 2026 is: "What commercial AI tool have you brought into your organization this month?" That's the test. Anyone that is on the bleeding edge that you would want to hire—now there are so many great products in the market. Okay, there is no excuse in any role to have not brought one tool a month into your organization. Okay, there—now there's going to be better and better tools and better and better products as the year goes on. What's the one you did? And you will see folks with their deer in the headlights to this question. What what sales tool? What marketing tool? What product tool? What engineering tool? What did you bring in? Why did you pick it? How does it working? Because if you're at remotely at the cutting edge, you're all over this. You're looking for the next agentic tools that will radically improve how you do business. This is—you think everyone thinks SaaS is at the bleeding edge, right? You know, you know, all we do is we're just looking for the tools and trying them. Okay? Okay, we're one year ahead of everybody else because we did the simplest thing in the world. Like we tried the tools early and we trained them. We trained them for a month. Okay, I'll give you—want hear a horrible example from this week? Super hot AI company valued at 6 billion. Okay, I'm not going to name it. Um, this week yesterday told us we had to quadruple what we spent on their product. Okay, their agent told us, right? And why did this happen? Okay. Well, at this $6 billion company, no one had trained the agent on its pricing properly. No one had tested it. They said, "Well, well, we've been in beta." And we said, "Well, when did the beta launch? A year ago." Okay, these are people asleep at at the wheel. You want somebody who the instant this comes up, they exactly know what the issue is. And "Hey, when I was at Lovable Replit, we trained the agent. This is how we did it. I brought in this tool. I brought in this tool that that Rory invested in last week. It solved all these issues." That's what you want to hear. And if they haven't brought in a tool in the last 30 days, at least deeply evaluated it. I don't really care whether they bought it, but gone so far down the funnel they can tell you—pick whatever tool: Fixie, Regie, GC, AIGC—I don't care how you went through it, you looked at it, you can tell me the eight ways it would improve the productivity of your business and three you didn't. Just don't hire that person because they're going to run your company to the ground. This is the job today. The job today is not to screw around on ChatGPT and to be a prompt engineer. The job today is to bring the best AI and agentic products into your organization and leverage all the hard work that the engineers have done building those products. That's your job. You don't have to screw around. You don't have to be a prompt engineer anymore. You have to be an agent deployment expert. A—this is the new job we're making up today. An Agentic Deployment Expert. That's your job from C-level to junior. Agentic Deployment Expert. Don't hire anybody else. You're going to regret it. They're going to stare at the camera. He's good. Stare at the camera. He's honorable. We could probably just I could slip away, get a coffee, and come back. No. And I I sound exasperated, Rory. And I—but the reason I am is I can just see I can see my best companies doing it. And I can see some companies I've invested in not doing it. And I want to cry. I just want to cry when they have no ADs on their team. I just—like you're flushing your years of your life down the toilet by not approaching your how you're building this company this way. [24:33] Rory: Yes. And at the risk of being positive, it's worth pointing out two things he didn't say. Well, something implicit why he said—Jason didn't do the only hire, you know, he didn't commit the um employment law, I think it's a civil penalty of saying only employ people below X who get the new new thing because he implicitly said anyone can do it provided you're willing to learn. And I think that's the big aha that's one of the positive statements to make here right? Look and I think it applies—I'm always wary of being "Hey, coming across, hey this this is the things that you all have to do." I think it applies to everyone including investors right? I mean I will say I have found that unless you're willing to invest the time learning these tools you actually shouldn't be investing in them. One of my partners Andy had this expression: "You know, if you decide you want to stop learning new things you probably should retire within 6 to 12 months and never write another check again." Maybe that's down to 3 to 6 months at this stage, right? And I think, you know, it's— [25:27] Harry Stebbings: Yeah, I actually I actually had a meeting with mine and Jason's biggest investor the other day and I—pretend he's not here—I said I think he's the most equipped investor for this generation of investing because I don't think anyone quite sits at the bleeding edge like he does on the investor side. [25:42] Harry Stebbings: Why in terms of using the equip stuff? Yeah. Yeah. In terms of using the stuff, understanding understanding bottlenecks, constraints. For sure. [25:51] Jason Lemkin: But can I just add one point? We can just cuz it's so important if it helps people. Okay, we are—and thank you Harry. We're going through these phases. Okay, and when AI started to blow up for real for us, uh call it early 2024, right? Maybe late '23, I wasn't equipped. It was too technical. I wasn't going to go in and figure out—I wasn't smart enough to figure out how to deal with a massively hallucinating LLM API and turn that and turn that into something magical. Kudos to investors and others that that got it in early '23, '22. I mean I remember I—I guess it was maybe SaaStr Annual '23. I was with David Sacks and I did a Q&A and I said, "How you thinking about AI at Craft?" He's like, "Well we're all in. We want 80% of '23 of investments to be AI." I'm like, "Great but like show me the show me the great ones in market." He's like, "They're all prototypes. We're all they're all they're all proof of concepts but we're all in anyway." That's where you kind of had to be in '23 if you weren't investing at like the LLM level. Okay, I wasn't smart enough. Then we went through this weird-ass prompt engineer era where like you you could torture these products to do something good, right? But you had to torture them. You had to like craft these crazy things that made no sense. Now we are in the era where mere ordinarily smart generalists can make these tools do magical things. And literally I go to these meetings and people be like, "I don't know how to like this is so scary. I don't know how to do this." And we show them our backends. Do you know how to do a workflow generator? Do you know how to do a a decision tree? Like we've been building these since software in the '90s. Okay, if you—I can show you all of our agents. The how they work is novel. They do have to be trained. You can't be lazy and have these agents work. But honestly, the the UI, the UX, the way we interact with them, it's just software. And so my point is: Pick yourself off the ground. This is your time now. If you felt lost in AI era, if you felt like you're behind, you don't understand what all these people are saying on X and Twitter and their Claude and and their and talking about all the 4.6 point Nano point and it's over—like you just it's not your world. This is your time. This is your time for the generalist that knows how to use software tools really really well. And I—this is my last point but it's so important. If ever in your recent life—and this is why you could be all you need to be is young at heart to Rory's point—if in the last three to five years you have successfully deployed a piece of enterprise software of any sort you yourself, not some agency you hired, but if you have deployed it, you can deploy any agentic tool. Any. And you can become the hero in your company and you can become the hero in your functional area. But I watch folks—I'm literally helping a company now that they're adding hundreds of sales folks this year with a new pre-IPO COO—he's not hasn't brought in a single tool, totally scared of it. Okay, it's not that hard. Did you use SalesLoft? Did you use Outreach? Did you use HubSpot? Do you know these tools? If you can deploy these tools, you can deploy a world-changing AI agent. And so this is the time for people like the folks that that were shut out of the AI revolution right now. The generalist folks that are not that know how to deploy software that don't even know how to build software. Like vibe coding for me was folks who knew how to build software, but you didn't have to be an engineer. Now, you just need to know how to deploy software to win with AI agents. That's all you need to know. So many people have these skills and they're petrified of AI. "How did you do that? How did you deploy an AI BDR?" Well, we bought a piece of software, we figured out how it worked for a day, we set it up in an afternoon, and then and then we did spend 30 months training it, which you didn't do with this old software because in the old days, we just had to manually upload all the data, right? And there was no training. The the only non-intuitive part is training these things. And it's it's it's just work. So that's why when I see folks on the management team not doing this, there's no excuse. You do not need to be technical to win with AI agents in Q2 of '26. You do not need to be even 1% technical. Not at all. So it's your time. Or you're going to get laid off. Or you're going to get laid off because you're not going to matter.
13:04

The most epic 13 minute AI rant I've heard in 2026 PS: My parent's heard this when I was playing it in the car and thought Jason ✨👾SaaStr.Ai✨ Lemkin went OFF like Stephen A Smith does on first take PPS: Full transcript below [17:00] Harry Stebbings: I I just wanted to ask Jason, if the people that we want are fundamentally different, the developers that we used to hire, we don't because AI writes the code for us. The marketers we don't want, the sales people we don't want—who who do we want genuinely? Like what is the attractive profile? Because your Anthropic’s and your OpenAIs are hiring, so so what are the people that we want in the companies of the future? [17:18] Jason Lemkin: Look, I know it sounds trite, but but the answer is simple. It's just the expression each year changes. We want folks that are genuinely AI fluent. It's pretty simple. Now you know, maybe last year we called them prompt engineers, right? That used to be a job. I don't know if you remember that actually used to be the hottest job on planet earth. Now no one needs a prompt engineer because it's pretty easy to prompt all these tools. That job died. Okay. Um and now we need go-to-market engineers. Um I think that job's going to die. We need—everyone needs so many forward deployed engineers. Like you can't hire enough forward deployed engineers. But uh you know um but Palantir just announced in whatever their their big their big event—they've gotten their deployment times down over 90% with forward deployed engineers. So that may become—so the this wave of disruption for the titles and the specificity, it's also exhaustingly accelerating. But it's really simple. You meet anyone for any role—sales, marketing, engineering, product, QA—they're they're either they're either they can't keep all of the ways they use AI to accelerate their job from spewing out of their mouth, or they're staring at you. It's there's nowhere in the middle. Like, and the person that comes in and says—it's it's it sounds Captain Obvious—but like, you know, you just had the whatever from Lovable, the the marketing head that was super popular on the show, right? She's just spewing AI-native insights into Lovable, right? It's not that complicated. You hire her, Elena, or whatever it is. You just hire her. It doesn't matter whether she's still in college or a junior or a senior or a middler, a left or right. And honestly, if you interview people, I would say of all even of the best startups I've invested in, maybe 30% of the management team meets this standard at best. 30%. Maybe less. And of the interviews I do in general, it's single-digit percents. It's just and in in that sense, it's the same as ever. Like you either lower the bar in hiring or you hire someone that's actually great. And someone that's actually great is so far ahead of you in how to apply to to employ the efficiencies of AI in their role, your jaw falls on the table. The difference is we used to need warm bodies. That's what's changing. We used to need warm bodies to answer the call, to do QA, to do code review, to to get the blue pixel to go from the upper left to the lower right. You laugh, but you need you literally needed to brute force this with humans. With AI, every day that goes by, the AI—you do not need brute force human beings on your team. And that's another reason they're shrinking. Why are all these new companies so efficient? They're just not brute forcing things with humans. They're just not. They're choosing not to. And so these team—all the brute forcers out there—everyone talks about how bloated teams got in 2021. I don't agree with that. I think they got as big as they needed to be when growth was high and you needed humans to do everything. All you look at these teams that that doubled—well if growth continued at 60% like the rate in early 2021 for 5 years or can help me do the math and every single thing a software company did required a human. You were understaffed by your 2021 headcount. You'd be sitting here in 2026. You every office in SoMa would be triple packed and you there wouldn't be enough humans to staff your company. It's just the world changed. [20:33] Harry Stebbings: Jason, you live on the bleeding edge. I think me and Rory see that and I think the world sees that when they hear you every week in terms of how you run SaaS. For all of the CEOs and execs who listen to the show, what would you advise them in terms of determining whether someone is AI fluent when they meet them for jobs, for talent? [20:51] Jason Lemkin: Here's I realized I was just asked this. I just did a review with a super fast startup growing just crossing 100 million and I was asked this question. And one of my favorite executives, I thought his answer was pretty dated and because he gave me an answer that was about 6 months old. The answer 6 months old is: "I look for folks in my team, I look for you know at what tools they play with." Okay, that was a great answer in like summer of 2025. Okay, I tried Lovable last week. Okay, the answer in 2026 is: "What commercial AI tool have you brought into your organization this month?" That's the test. Anyone that is on the bleeding edge that you would want to hire—now there are so many great products in the market. Okay, there is no excuse in any role to have not brought one tool a month into your organization. Okay, there—now there's going to be better and better tools and better and better products as the year goes on. What's the one you did? And you will see folks with their deer in the headlights to this question. What what sales tool? What marketing tool? What product tool? What engineering tool? What did you bring in? Why did you pick it? How does it working? Because if you're at remotely at the cutting edge, you're all over this. You're looking for the next agentic tools that will radically improve how you do business. This is—you think everyone thinks SaaS is at the bleeding edge, right? You know, you know, all we do is we're just looking for the tools and trying them. Okay? Okay, we're one year ahead of everybody else because we did the simplest thing in the world. Like we tried the tools early and we trained them. We trained them for a month. Okay, I'll give you—want hear a horrible example from this week? Super hot AI company valued at 6 billion. Okay, I'm not going to name it. Um, this week yesterday told us we had to quadruple what we spent on their product. Okay, their agent told us, right? And why did this happen? Okay. Well, at this $6 billion company, no one had trained the agent on its pricing properly. No one had tested it. They said, "Well, well, we've been in beta." And we said, "Well, when did the beta launch? A year ago." Okay, these are people asleep at at the wheel. You want somebody who the instant this comes up, they exactly know what the issue is. And "Hey, when I was at Lovable Replit, we trained the agent. This is how we did it. I brought in this tool. I brought in this tool that that Rory invested in last week. It solved all these issues." That's what you want to hear. And if they haven't brought in a tool in the last 30 days, at least deeply evaluated it. I don't really care whether they bought it, but gone so far down the funnel they can tell you—pick whatever tool: Fixie, Regie, GC, AIGC—I don't care how you went through it, you looked at it, you can tell me the eight ways it would improve the productivity of your business and three you didn't. Just don't hire that person because they're going to run your company to the ground. This is the job today. The job today is not to screw around on ChatGPT and to be a prompt engineer. The job today is to bring the best AI and agentic products into your organization and leverage all the hard work that the engineers have done building those products. That's your job. You don't have to screw around. You don't have to be a prompt engineer anymore. You have to be an agent deployment expert. A—this is the new job we're making up today. An Agentic Deployment Expert. That's your job from C-level to junior. Agentic Deployment Expert. Don't hire anybody else. You're going to regret it. They're going to stare at the camera. He's good. Stare at the camera. He's honorable. We could probably just I could slip away, get a coffee, and come back. No. And I I sound exasperated, Rory. And I—but the reason I am is I can just see I can see my best companies doing it. And I can see some companies I've invested in not doing it. And I want to cry. I just want to cry when they have no ADs on their team. I just—like you're flushing your years of your life down the toilet by not approaching your how you're building this company this way. [24:33] Rory: Yes. And at the risk of being positive, it's worth pointing out two things he didn't say. Well, something implicit why he said—Jason didn't do the only hire, you know, he didn't commit the um employment law, I think it's a civil penalty of saying only employ people below X who get the new new thing because he implicitly said anyone can do it provided you're willing to learn. And I think that's the big aha that's one of the positive statements to make here right? Look and I think it applies—I'm always wary of being "Hey, coming across, hey this this is the things that you all have to do." I think it applies to everyone including investors right? I mean I will say I have found that unless you're willing to invest the time learning these tools you actually shouldn't be investing in them. One of my partners Andy had this expression: "You know, if you decide you want to stop learning new things you probably should retire within 6 to 12 months and never write another check again." Maybe that's down to 3 to 6 months at this stage, right? And I think, you know, it's— [25:27] Harry Stebbings: Yeah, I actually I actually had a meeting with mine and Jason's biggest investor the other day and I—pretend he's not here—I said I think he's the most equipped investor for this generation of investing because I don't think anyone quite sits at the bleeding edge like he does on the investor side. [25:42] Harry Stebbings: Why in terms of using the equip stuff? Yeah. Yeah. In terms of using the stuff, understanding understanding bottlenecks, constraints. For sure. [25:51] Jason Lemkin: But can I just add one point? We can just cuz it's so important if it helps people. Okay, we are—and thank you Harry. We're going through these phases. Okay, and when AI started to blow up for real for us, uh call it early 2024, right? Maybe late '23, I wasn't equipped. It was too technical. I wasn't going to go in and figure out—I wasn't smart enough to figure out how to deal with a massively hallucinating LLM API and turn that and turn that into something magical. Kudos to investors and others that that got it in early '23, '22. I mean I remember I—I guess it was maybe SaaStr Annual '23. I was with David Sacks and I did a Q&A and I said, "How you thinking about AI at Craft?" He's like, "Well we're all in. We want 80% of '23 of investments to be AI." I'm like, "Great but like show me the show me the great ones in market." He's like, "They're all prototypes. We're all they're all they're all proof of concepts but we're all in anyway." That's where you kind of had to be in '23 if you weren't investing at like the LLM level. Okay, I wasn't smart enough. Then we went through this weird-ass prompt engineer era where like you you could torture these products to do something good, right? But you had to torture them. You had to like craft these crazy things that made no sense. Now we are in the era where mere ordinarily smart generalists can make these tools do magical things. And literally I go to these meetings and people be like, "I don't know how to like this is so scary. I don't know how to do this." And we show them our backends. Do you know how to do a workflow generator? Do you know how to do a a decision tree? Like we've been building these since software in the '90s. Okay, if you—I can show you all of our agents. The how they work is novel. They do have to be trained. You can't be lazy and have these agents work. But honestly, the the UI, the UX, the way we interact with them, it's just software. And so my point is: Pick yourself off the ground. This is your time now. If you felt lost in AI era, if you felt like you're behind, you don't understand what all these people are saying on X and Twitter and their Claude and and their and talking about all the 4.6 point Nano point and it's over—like you just it's not your world. This is your time. This is your time for the generalist that knows how to use software tools really really well. And I—this is my last point but it's so important. If ever in your recent life—and this is why you could be all you need to be is young at heart to Rory's point—if in the last three to five years you have successfully deployed a piece of enterprise software of any sort you yourself, not some agency you hired, but if you have deployed it, you can deploy any agentic tool. Any. And you can become the hero in your company and you can become the hero in your functional area. But I watch folks—I'm literally helping a company now that they're adding hundreds of sales folks this year with a new pre-IPO COO—he's not hasn't brought in a single tool, totally scared of it. Okay, it's not that hard. Did you use SalesLoft? Did you use Outreach? Did you use HubSpot? Do you know these tools? If you can deploy these tools, you can deploy a world-changing AI agent. And so this is the time for people like the folks that that were shut out of the AI revolution right now. The generalist folks that are not that know how to deploy software that don't even know how to build software. Like vibe coding for me was folks who knew how to build software, but you didn't have to be an engineer. Now, you just need to know how to deploy software to win with AI agents. That's all you need to know. So many people have these skills and they're petrified of AI. "How did you do that? How did you deploy an AI BDR?" Well, we bought a piece of software, we figured out how it worked for a day, we set it up in an afternoon, and then and then we did spend 30 months training it, which you didn't do with this old software because in the old days, we just had to manually upload all the data, right? And there was no training. The the only non-intuitive part is training these things. And it's it's it's just work. So that's why when I see folks on the management team not doing this, there's no excuse. You do not need to be technical to win with AI agents in Q2 of '26. You do not need to be even 1% technical. Not at all. So it's your time. Or you're going to get laid off. Or you're going to get laid off because you're not going to matter.

Arjun Mahadevan (Mr. LLC 🇺🇸)

37,524 views • 3 months ago

dave meltzer: youtube enthusiast 💀 perfect. now we can stop pretending this was ever complicated. the real story is not that wwe is afraid of aew. the real story is not that “high level wwe officials” are whispering scary things to dave meltzer. the real story is not even that tony khan got asked a planted question on a media call with very little distribution about the possibility of aew soon having very little distribution, although that sentence is so stupidly perfect it should be bronzed and placed outside the wrestling observer newsletter office like a war memorial for people who died pretending this was journalism. the real story is that aew is going to lose its wbd distribution deal. either it ends at the expiration of the three-year term in 2027, or it ends earlier if paramount closes wbd and decides aew has no strategic place inside the new company. and based on the board as it exists right now, the most likely landing spot for aew in 2027 is google / youtube. that is the story. everything else is laundering. tony khan wants the story to be: “why would wwe say this about us?” that is the whole operation. take my public analysis. run it through dave meltzer. assign it to wwe / tko. then let tony khan answer a canned question on a media call with very little distribution about potentially having very little distribution. a media call for a lightly viewed roh show. a planted story. a planted messenger. a rehearsed answer. a pr flack probably wrote it. tony khan performs hurt. tony khan says “i don’t know why wwe would…” tony khan denies the obvious. tony khan keeps me minimized. tony khan removes me from the public conversation about the exact thing i have repeatedly said is going to happen to aew. everyone is supposed to pretend this is organic. it is not. it is the most bubble wrapped, manufactured, artificial environment possible. aew is heading toward youtube because the domestic media rights board is closing around them. not as a troll. not as a bit. not as “pr spin.” as a business conclusion. aew is not leverage. wwe is not afraid of aew. the $185 million number was bullshit. the buyer universe was shrinking. paramount / skydance was coming for wbd. wbd was not going to be some permanent aew safe house. youtube was only ever a real “option” if someone at google was actually cutting a media rights check and underwriting production. not because every divorced mom with a ring light and a gmail account can upload video to the same platform. that was always the distinction. that is still the distinction. Nick LoPiccolo — February 28, 2025 “YouTube is an option the same way you or I could start a YT channel tomorrow. Is Jon Cruz cutting AEW a media rights check or underwriting a production budget? Hell no. Just the reality. It isn’t the model. Jon is global head of sports over there.” that was february, not last week. not after dave meltzer suddenly discovered youtube prelim numbers like columbus finding the new world. it is becoming inevitable now. Nick LoPiccolo — April 30, 2026 — 11:26 AM — 251.2K Views “to every journalist and every podcast who interviews tony khan from this day forward: please ask tony if wbd told him back in august they would not be renewing aew. wbd told him in august. i confirmed it directly and triple sourced it. please ask why tony has been acting like nothing is wrong for the last 8 months, and then please ask tony what his actual distribution plan is. because the only distributor left that will take aew is google/youtube. the myaew app is not realistic. the my aewapp is a death sentence in 2026 if youtube doesn’t make an mg deal for aew. they started building it too late and there is no realistic way to scale it. also, who is going to sell ads for the platform? kiswe is not the best. they built the myaew app. they are new to the game. hold tony’s feet to the fire. Paramount is not real for aew. WBD passed back in August. CW/Roku is now off the table. Amazon and Fox do not want AEW. ask Tony why he's been lying to you and to the locker room and to the fans, acting like things are all great with the network? i am sure a lot of people would love to hear his answer.” april 30. 251.2k views. not whispered. not hidden. not vague. not “high level wwe officials.” i said it publicly and directly: wbd passed back in august. paramount is not real for aew. cw / roku is off the table. amazon and fox do not want aew. the myaew app is not realistic. google / youtube is the only distributor left on the board that makes sense. that is the actual story tony khan does not want to answer. not “why would wwe say this?” ask tony khan if wbd told him in august that wbd would not be renewing aew. ask what his actual distribution plan is. ask who is selling ads for the myaew app. ask how a platform built this late scales in 2026. ask whether youtube is an actual rights partner with an mg, or just the place you go when the real buyers are gone. that is the question. not the fake question dave meltzer laundered into “high level wwe officials.” the real question. Nick LoPiccolo — July 9, 2025 — 10:51 AM — 9,565 Views “No one in Hollywood believes the $185 million number.” Nick LoPiccolo — July 9, 2025 — 11:35 AM — 7,470 Views “The $185 million figure is inflated. Variety’s October 2, 2024 article was likely updated after a publicist called on AEW’s behalf, as early reports placed the deal between $140 and $150 million per year. Tony Khan was also included in Variety’s Dealmakers 2024 list, which, while not officially pay to play, strongly favors those spending significant advertising dollars with the outlet. No one in Hollywood seriously believes WBD, which is in junk bond status, is paying AEW $185 million per year. Clear enough?” clear enough? the number was never clean. the number was never real in the way aew fans and wrestling media pretended it was real. and when the $185 million number started getting laughed out of adult rooms, the number magically became $178 million. that is where the shell game gets funny. because $178 million was not some sacred sourced number either. it was brandon thurston taking the median between $170 million, reported by sports business journal, and $185 million, reported by variety and others. that is literally what wrestlenomics said. Wrestlenomics — October 4, 2024 “Why use $178 million here for AEW’s new deal when some outlets are reporting the average annual value is $185 million?” Wrestlenomics — October 4, 2024 “I used $178 million here because it is simply the median of $170 million, as reported by Sports Business Journal, and $185 million, reported by Variety and others.” there it is. arithmetic. not an all-cash rights fee. not a clean license number. not proof wbd valued aew like raw. not a finance-department document from warner bros. discovery. a midpoint between conflicting public reports. then wrestling media treated that midpoint like scripture because they needed the story to be “aew is valued like raw,” not “aew pr inflated a number no serious person in hollywood believed.” and by the way, $170 million was not the clean all-cash number either. that is the scam. float the number. repeat the number. launder the number. defend the number with people who do not understand the difference between cash rights fees, in-kind services, equity, marketing commitments, platform value, make-goods, ad inventory, and press release math. then when the number collapses, pretend the next number was always the number. that is not reporting. that is aew state news. Nick LoPiccolo — July 10, 2025 — 5:53 AM — 12.6K Views “AEW isn’t leverage. It’s not competition. It’s a niche product with loud fans and limited reach.” Nick LoPiccolo — July 10, 2025 — 8:56 AM — 1,018 Views “We handle wrestling deals too, but thinking we need AEW for leverage is myopic. The landscape is changing and the game I’m playing is different.” Nick LoPiccolo — July 15, 2025 — 25.7K Views “AEW isn’t leverage.” that was never emotional. that was never tribal. that was never “i hate aew.” it was market structure. wwe did not need aew as leverage because real leverage was never “another wrestling show exists.” real leverage is architecture, scale, subscriber churn, platform strategy, sports adjacency, global rights, advertising, sponsorship, live inventory, library value, data, brand safety, executive relationships, and the actual buyer universe of maybe 18-20 companies in the united states that matter for live sports rights. aew fans thought this was a wrestling argument. it was never a wrestling argument. it was a board. and the board was already moving. Nick LoPiccolo — August 11, 2025 — 482 Views “I wasn’t viewing the above in that context (TKO vs AEW counter programming), it was more of this is what I’m hearing after 2 weeks of big media deals rolling out (Skydance closing, South Park library moving) etc. Which have all been in the works for awhile.” Nick LoPiccolo — August 11, 2025 — 388 Views “But if you were to look at it from a counter programming perspective (and I don’t think this was a factor in UFC deal) - there are only so many players for these big media rights deals. PARA is likely off the board (via TKO deal) & then what if they acquire WB in 2026/27?” Nick LoPiccolo — August 11, 2025 — 535 Views “Yes, of course, that wouldn’t mean the end for AEW. It would make navigating their media rights deal more challenging, I would guess. But this is a hypothetical scenario & I do not believe anyone is paying $7.7b for UFC or a $40b valuation for WB w/ how do we fuck AEW, either.” Nick LoPiccolo — August 11, 2025 “And hearing all weekend Paramount is still interested in WBD.” Nick LoPiccolo — August 11, 2025 — 1.3K Views “I think more interesting for what it could mean as the dominoes keep falling in terms of the still evolving landscape. The deals are massive & the number of major players at the top are shrinking as still big push for consolidation & scale.” Nick LoPiccolo — August 11, 2025 — 12:11 PM — 2,588 Views “And I’d view AAA on Google/YouTube as directly competitive. It targets both the CMLL collab & the audience that used to watch AEW Dark on YouTube, & WWE is able to send well known stars to AAA events with an eye towards converting more of the younger, YouTube demo of viewers who don’t watch streamers.” again: august 11. not yesterday. not after dave meltzer tweeted a netflix prelim number. not after anyone had to retrofit the argument. the point was already there: the major players at the top were shrinking, paramount was still interested in wbd, paramount was likely off the board for aew because of the tko deal, google / youtube was becoming directly competitive for the exact audience aew used to reach through dark, and the buyer universe was consolidating around deals much bigger than tony khan’s feelings. this was not mysticism. this was not inside baseball for the sake of sounding smart. this was the board. Nick LoPiccolo — August 24, 2025 “This isn’t fair. I misread your question. AEW will exist but likely on the Discovery Global app (if it ever launches, I would bet that it doesn’t) and it will continue to do consistent ratings. If Paramount/Skydance buys WBD in a year…” Nick LoPiccolo — September 4, 2025 — 76 Views “No, that’s the WBD network division (cable, news, sports) that was already announced as being spun off under Discovery Global. The article you’re citing is about them selling a minority equity stake in that unit to cut debt and boost valuation ahead of the 2026 split.” Nick LoPiccolo — September 16, 2025 — 3.6K Views “This is not just about Hollywood scale. It is the foundation of a conservative aligned media infrastructure. A Paramount/WBD merger would fold CBS, CNN, HBO, and Warner Bros IP into Ellison’s orbit under Trump’s regulatory umbrella.” Nick LoPiccolo — September 16, 2025 — 11K Views “Within 48 hours of the rumor, WBD stock surged ~55% and Paramount Skydance rose ~24%. That market response itself boxed David Zaslav in; his board, Wall Street, and his own contract now expect movement.” Nick LoPiccolo — September 27, 2025 — 12:16 PM — 3,516 Views “Nah homie. Enjoy watching the show on YouTube after Ellison buys WBD and Ari who is advising Ellison and used to represent Trump and runs TKO makes the call.” Nick LoPiccolo — September 28, 2025 — 174 Views “I believe if and when Paramount acquires WBD, TKO will push to lock down a monopoly on combat sports. The long knives are already out for competitors, and the rights deals have likely been spread around town precisely to keep rivals from signing with those streamers.” none of that was random. paramount / skydance, ellison, ari, tko, wbd linear assets, youtube, aaa, the tko deal, the wbd split, the shrinking rights buyer universe — all of it was one connected domestic rights architecture. that is why this conversation was always over the heads of the people screaming “cope” in my replies. they were arguing like fans. i was reading the cap table. Nick LoPiccolo — December 6, 2025 — 3:07 PM — 41.4K Views “Yes, I always believed Paramount would walk away with WBD. I was one of the first to talk about it on here, even if I wasn’t the first to hear it. The Paramount Skydance acquisition closed on August 7. I posted this on August 11, about 1 month before the The Wall Street Journal first broke the news on September 12 that Paramount Skydance was preparing a bid for WBD.” Nick LoPiccolo — December 6, 2025 — 3:07 PM — 41.4K Views “The bid was always going to be hostile. We are only in this process because it was a hostile bid. Most people in Hollywood believed Ellison long coveted WB and Jack Warner’s chair. WB was not for sale when Skydance acquired Paramount, which is much smaller in scale.” Nick LoPiccolo — December 6, 2025 — 3:07 PM — 41.4K Views “Nearly everyone in town assumed an Ellison acquisition of WBD was inevitable until the Netflix bid shocked everyone. Signs were there for the last two weeks, which is also when I stopped posting about what might happen. Of course, its not over yet. Paramount still has paths to winning this acquisition. The one thing that’s for certain though is an Ellison-led acquisition of WBD is no longer inevitable.” Nick LoPiccolo — December 8, 2025 “END CREDITS” space jam is a warner bros. movie. that was the joke. and the joke was the same thing i had been saying the whole time: paramount was winning the bid, for those who did not understand. Nick LoPiccolo — December 19, 2025 — 4:30 PM — 828 Views “Here is another reference to it. So tell me how exactly is Paramount the better outcome for Dave’s argument? Netflix doesn’t touch the WBD linear assets. Gunnar keeps his SpinCo.” Puck excerpt — December 19, 2025 “Many industry insiders are also skeptical about Paramount’s seven-year, $7.7 billion deal for exclusive UFC rights in the U.S. Yes, it can be read as a signal that Ellison came to play. But some people see it more as Ari Emanuel having his way with the person to whom he is ostensibly an (unpaid) advisor…” that is the board. that is the relationship map. that is the thing wrestling media either does not understand or pretends not to understand, because understanding it means admitting the story is not “aew has leverage.” the story is that aew is sitting in the middle of a consolidating rights marketplace where the people with leverage are doing much bigger things than worrying about tony khan’s feelings. Nick LoPiccolo — January 21, 2026 — 4:22 PM — 870 Views “i mean get ready to learn youtube buddy” Nick LoPiccolo — February 19, 2026 — 2.8K Views “Paramount was always my bet to acquire Warner Bros. Never wavered.” Nick LoPiccolo — February 28, 2026 — 1:27 PM — 118 Views “you don’t need to look under a hood I AM SAYING THE QUIET PART OUT LOUD 🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨 I BEEN SAYING IT SINCE JULY / AUGUST 🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨 PARAMOUNT IS COMING FOR WBD AEW WILL LOSE A TV DEAL 🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨 GUESS WHO WAS RIGHT 💀” so no, this is not hindsight. this is not showing up after the fact with a flashlight and pretending i discovered the body. this is a paper trail. february: youtube is not a real rights model unless google is cutting the check. april: wbd passed back in august, the myaew app is not realistic, paramount is not real for aew, cw / roku is off the table, amazon and fox do not want aew, and google / youtube is the only distributor left that makes sense. july: the $185 million number is inflated and aew is not leverage. august: the buyer board is shrinking, paramount is still interested in wbd, and google / youtube becomes directly competitive. september: paramount / wbd folds the board into ellison’s orbit, and if ellison buys wbd, enjoy youtube. december: paramount was always the bet, the bid was always going to be hostile, and netflix does not solve dave meltzer’s argument because netflix does not touch the linear assets. january: get ready to learn youtube. february: paramount is coming for wbd and aew will lose a tv deal. same board. same thesis. same answer. now here is the part tony khan and dave meltzer do not want to say out loud. tony khan and dave meltzer do not mention me publicly for a reason. because the second they say my name out loud, they admit where this conversation has actually been coming from. not wwe. not some anonymous “high level official.” not some shadowy tko whisper campaign. me. that is the problem for them. behind the scenes, ask any real insider what happens when my name comes up around this subject. there is a reaction. not because i’m magic. not because i’m some internet boogeyman. because they know exactly who is saying it, why i’m saying it, what rooms i have been in, what companies i have dealt with, what executives i have spoken to, and why the analysis keeps landing. that is why they keep trying to non-person me publicly while reacting to me privately. they want the argument. they want the benefit of responding to the argument. they just do not want to admit whose argument it is. when i said wbd told aew back in august 2025 they were not exercising the option for the fourth year, tony khan blew up behind the scenes and forced john mcmullen to revise / update his article 2-3 weeks ago after i tweeted it. which is hilarious because that should not even be crazy or damaging “news.” that is how this business works. when a distributor is not continuing, they tell you early enough so you have time to find a new home. that is not sabotage. that is not wwe. that is not nick lopiccolo hiding inside david zaslav’s air vents with a clipboard. that is corporate courtesy. wbd execs privately whisper and shake their heads at tony khan’s behavior because their view is very simple: why does tony khan act like everything is great and rainbows and sunshine with the studio? we told tony khan as a courtesy so tony khan would have time to find a new home. and no, this has zero to do with paramount looming as an excuse. paramount did not even make its first hostile bid for wbd until september 11 or 12. that was after tony khan was already told there would not be a wbd renewal. so what did tony khan do? tony khan turned the truth into a wrestling angle. tony khan, or one of tony khan’s minions, gets dave meltzer to drop a story assigning my claims and what i have been publicly posting about tony khan to “high level wwe officials.” why? because it gives tony khan a safer enemy. tony khan does not want the story to be the actual timeline. because the actual timeline is brutal. on february 28, i said youtube was not a real media rights model unless google was actually cutting the check and underwriting production. on april 30, i said wbd passed in august, the myaew app was not realistic, paramount was not real for aew, cw / roku was off the table, amazon and fox did not want aew, and the only distributor left that made sense was google / youtube. on july 9, i said no one in hollywood believed the $185 million number. on july 10, i said aew was not leverage. on august 11, i said the major players at the top were shrinking, paramount was still interested in wbd, and google / youtube was becoming a directly competitive lane. on september 16, i said a paramount / wbd merger would fold cbs, cnn, hbo, and warner bros. ip into ellison’s orbit. on september 27, i said enjoy the show on youtube after ellison buys wbd. on september 28, i said if paramount acquires wbd, tko would push to lock down a monopoly on combat sports. on december 6, i said paramount skydance was preparing a bid for wbd long before most people admitted the obvious. on february 19, i said paramount was always my bet to acquire warner bros. and on february 28, i said it in all caps: paramount is coming for wbd. aew will lose a tv deal. that is the part tony khan cannot answer directly, because the direct answer means admitting this was never “wwe is scared of us.” it was always the board closing. tony khan wants the story to be: why would wwe say this about us? that is the laundering operation. take my public analysis. run it through dave meltzer. assign it to wwe / tko. then let tony khan answer a canned question on a media call with very little distribution about potentially having very little distribution. a media call for a show with very little distribution answering a canned question about aew potentially having very little distribution. based on a planted story, from a planted messenger, with a rehearsed answer, after an roh show maybe 8-15k people watched. a pr flack probably wrote it. tony khan performs hurt. tony khan says “i don’t know why wwe would…” tony khan denies the obvious. tony khan keeps me minimized. tony khan removes me from the public conversation about the very thing i have repeatedly said is going to happen to aew. everyone is supposed to pretend this is organic. it is the most bubble wrapped, manufactured, artificial environment possible. a canned and rehearsed answer at an roh media scrum about a planted dave meltzer story based on my very real and very public analysis of the media rights board. but make no mistake. tony khan was responding to my words. tony khan just laundered them through dave meltzer and assigned them to wwe / tko so tony khan could keep lying about it publicly without ever saying my name. and now, voila. dave meltzer is posting about youtube viewers and prelims. Dave Meltzer — May 16, 2026 “At this moment there are 340,000 people watching prelims for Netflix on YouTube. It’s a good number.” yes, dave meltzer. youtube can have good numbers. nobody said youtube cannot have good numbers. that was never the issue. the issue is whether youtube is being used as a funnel into a premium rights ecosystem or as a substitute because the premium rights ecosystem rejected you. that is the difference. that has always been the difference. netflix using youtube prelims as audience acquisition is not the same thing as aew trying to spin youtube as a media rights home because the real buyers are gone. ufc using youtube as a funnel is not the same thing as aew using youtube as a life raft. wwe sending stars to aaa on youtube to convert a younger demo is not the same thing as aew retreating to youtube after the traditional buyer board closes. and the fact that dave meltzer is now suddenly tweeting like the mayor of youtube is the punchline. because the same people who mocked the youtube outcome are now going to spend the next several months explaining why youtube is actually good. of course it can be good. for the right use case. for the right property. inside the right architecture. with the right check attached. but when you spend two years telling everyone you were valued like raw and your next stop is “please subscribe and smash that bell,” maybe stop pretending this is victory formation? i told y’all where this was going. the record is right there. i’m still right. and tony and dave: you guys are see through translucent. that’s it for ye 🎤🎤🎤
0:20

dave meltzer: youtube enthusiast 💀 perfect. now we can stop pretending this was ever complicated. the real story is not that wwe is afraid of aew. the real story is not that “high level wwe officials” are whispering scary things to dave meltzer. the real story is not even that tony khan got asked a planted question on a media call with very little distribution about the possibility of aew soon having very little distribution, although that sentence is so stupidly perfect it should be bronzed and placed outside the wrestling observer newsletter office like a war memorial for people who died pretending this was journalism. the real story is that aew is going to lose its wbd distribution deal. either it ends at the expiration of the three-year term in 2027, or it ends earlier if paramount closes wbd and decides aew has no strategic place inside the new company. and based on the board as it exists right now, the most likely landing spot for aew in 2027 is google / youtube. that is the story. everything else is laundering. tony khan wants the story to be: “why would wwe say this about us?” that is the whole operation. take my public analysis. run it through dave meltzer. assign it to wwe / tko. then let tony khan answer a canned question on a media call with very little distribution about potentially having very little distribution. a media call for a lightly viewed roh show. a planted story. a planted messenger. a rehearsed answer. a pr flack probably wrote it. tony khan performs hurt. tony khan says “i don’t know why wwe would…” tony khan denies the obvious. tony khan keeps me minimized. tony khan removes me from the public conversation about the exact thing i have repeatedly said is going to happen to aew. everyone is supposed to pretend this is organic. it is not. it is the most bubble wrapped, manufactured, artificial environment possible. aew is heading toward youtube because the domestic media rights board is closing around them. not as a troll. not as a bit. not as “pr spin.” as a business conclusion. aew is not leverage. wwe is not afraid of aew. the $185 million number was bullshit. the buyer universe was shrinking. paramount / skydance was coming for wbd. wbd was not going to be some permanent aew safe house. youtube was only ever a real “option” if someone at google was actually cutting a media rights check and underwriting production. not because every divorced mom with a ring light and a gmail account can upload video to the same platform. that was always the distinction. that is still the distinction. Nick LoPiccolo — February 28, 2025 “YouTube is an option the same way you or I could start a YT channel tomorrow. Is Jon Cruz cutting AEW a media rights check or underwriting a production budget? Hell no. Just the reality. It isn’t the model. Jon is global head of sports over there.” that was february, not last week. not after dave meltzer suddenly discovered youtube prelim numbers like columbus finding the new world. it is becoming inevitable now. Nick LoPiccolo — April 30, 2026 — 11:26 AM — 251.2K Views “to every journalist and every podcast who interviews tony khan from this day forward: please ask tony if wbd told him back in august they would not be renewing aew. wbd told him in august. i confirmed it directly and triple sourced it. please ask why tony has been acting like nothing is wrong for the last 8 months, and then please ask tony what his actual distribution plan is. because the only distributor left that will take aew is google/youtube. the myaew app is not realistic. the my aewapp is a death sentence in 2026 if youtube doesn’t make an mg deal for aew. they started building it too late and there is no realistic way to scale it. also, who is going to sell ads for the platform? kiswe is not the best. they built the myaew app. they are new to the game. hold tony’s feet to the fire. Paramount is not real for aew. WBD passed back in August. CW/Roku is now off the table. Amazon and Fox do not want AEW. ask Tony why he's been lying to you and to the locker room and to the fans, acting like things are all great with the network? i am sure a lot of people would love to hear his answer.” april 30. 251.2k views. not whispered. not hidden. not vague. not “high level wwe officials.” i said it publicly and directly: wbd passed back in august. paramount is not real for aew. cw / roku is off the table. amazon and fox do not want aew. the myaew app is not realistic. google / youtube is the only distributor left on the board that makes sense. that is the actual story tony khan does not want to answer. not “why would wwe say this?” ask tony khan if wbd told him in august that wbd would not be renewing aew. ask what his actual distribution plan is. ask who is selling ads for the myaew app. ask how a platform built this late scales in 2026. ask whether youtube is an actual rights partner with an mg, or just the place you go when the real buyers are gone. that is the question. not the fake question dave meltzer laundered into “high level wwe officials.” the real question. Nick LoPiccolo — July 9, 2025 — 10:51 AM — 9,565 Views “No one in Hollywood believes the $185 million number.” Nick LoPiccolo — July 9, 2025 — 11:35 AM — 7,470 Views “The $185 million figure is inflated. Variety’s October 2, 2024 article was likely updated after a publicist called on AEW’s behalf, as early reports placed the deal between $140 and $150 million per year. Tony Khan was also included in Variety’s Dealmakers 2024 list, which, while not officially pay to play, strongly favors those spending significant advertising dollars with the outlet. No one in Hollywood seriously believes WBD, which is in junk bond status, is paying AEW $185 million per year. Clear enough?” clear enough? the number was never clean. the number was never real in the way aew fans and wrestling media pretended it was real. and when the $185 million number started getting laughed out of adult rooms, the number magically became $178 million. that is where the shell game gets funny. because $178 million was not some sacred sourced number either. it was brandon thurston taking the median between $170 million, reported by sports business journal, and $185 million, reported by variety and others. that is literally what wrestlenomics said. Wrestlenomics — October 4, 2024 “Why use $178 million here for AEW’s new deal when some outlets are reporting the average annual value is $185 million?” Wrestlenomics — October 4, 2024 “I used $178 million here because it is simply the median of $170 million, as reported by Sports Business Journal, and $185 million, reported by Variety and others.” there it is. arithmetic. not an all-cash rights fee. not a clean license number. not proof wbd valued aew like raw. not a finance-department document from warner bros. discovery. a midpoint between conflicting public reports. then wrestling media treated that midpoint like scripture because they needed the story to be “aew is valued like raw,” not “aew pr inflated a number no serious person in hollywood believed.” and by the way, $170 million was not the clean all-cash number either. that is the scam. float the number. repeat the number. launder the number. defend the number with people who do not understand the difference between cash rights fees, in-kind services, equity, marketing commitments, platform value, make-goods, ad inventory, and press release math. then when the number collapses, pretend the next number was always the number. that is not reporting. that is aew state news. Nick LoPiccolo — July 10, 2025 — 5:53 AM — 12.6K Views “AEW isn’t leverage. It’s not competition. It’s a niche product with loud fans and limited reach.” Nick LoPiccolo — July 10, 2025 — 8:56 AM — 1,018 Views “We handle wrestling deals too, but thinking we need AEW for leverage is myopic. The landscape is changing and the game I’m playing is different.” Nick LoPiccolo — July 15, 2025 — 25.7K Views “AEW isn’t leverage.” that was never emotional. that was never tribal. that was never “i hate aew.” it was market structure. wwe did not need aew as leverage because real leverage was never “another wrestling show exists.” real leverage is architecture, scale, subscriber churn, platform strategy, sports adjacency, global rights, advertising, sponsorship, live inventory, library value, data, brand safety, executive relationships, and the actual buyer universe of maybe 18-20 companies in the united states that matter for live sports rights. aew fans thought this was a wrestling argument. it was never a wrestling argument. it was a board. and the board was already moving. Nick LoPiccolo — August 11, 2025 — 482 Views “I wasn’t viewing the above in that context (TKO vs AEW counter programming), it was more of this is what I’m hearing after 2 weeks of big media deals rolling out (Skydance closing, South Park library moving) etc. Which have all been in the works for awhile.” Nick LoPiccolo — August 11, 2025 — 388 Views “But if you were to look at it from a counter programming perspective (and I don’t think this was a factor in UFC deal) - there are only so many players for these big media rights deals. PARA is likely off the board (via TKO deal) & then what if they acquire WB in 2026/27?” Nick LoPiccolo — August 11, 2025 — 535 Views “Yes, of course, that wouldn’t mean the end for AEW. It would make navigating their media rights deal more challenging, I would guess. But this is a hypothetical scenario & I do not believe anyone is paying $7.7b for UFC or a $40b valuation for WB w/ how do we fuck AEW, either.” Nick LoPiccolo — August 11, 2025 “And hearing all weekend Paramount is still interested in WBD.” Nick LoPiccolo — August 11, 2025 — 1.3K Views “I think more interesting for what it could mean as the dominoes keep falling in terms of the still evolving landscape. The deals are massive & the number of major players at the top are shrinking as still big push for consolidation & scale.” Nick LoPiccolo — August 11, 2025 — 12:11 PM — 2,588 Views “And I’d view AAA on Google/YouTube as directly competitive. It targets both the CMLL collab & the audience that used to watch AEW Dark on YouTube, & WWE is able to send well known stars to AAA events with an eye towards converting more of the younger, YouTube demo of viewers who don’t watch streamers.” again: august 11. not yesterday. not after dave meltzer tweeted a netflix prelim number. not after anyone had to retrofit the argument. the point was already there: the major players at the top were shrinking, paramount was still interested in wbd, paramount was likely off the board for aew because of the tko deal, google / youtube was becoming directly competitive for the exact audience aew used to reach through dark, and the buyer universe was consolidating around deals much bigger than tony khan’s feelings. this was not mysticism. this was not inside baseball for the sake of sounding smart. this was the board. Nick LoPiccolo — August 24, 2025 “This isn’t fair. I misread your question. AEW will exist but likely on the Discovery Global app (if it ever launches, I would bet that it doesn’t) and it will continue to do consistent ratings. If Paramount/Skydance buys WBD in a year…” Nick LoPiccolo — September 4, 2025 — 76 Views “No, that’s the WBD network division (cable, news, sports) that was already announced as being spun off under Discovery Global. The article you’re citing is about them selling a minority equity stake in that unit to cut debt and boost valuation ahead of the 2026 split.” Nick LoPiccolo — September 16, 2025 — 3.6K Views “This is not just about Hollywood scale. It is the foundation of a conservative aligned media infrastructure. A Paramount/WBD merger would fold CBS, CNN, HBO, and Warner Bros IP into Ellison’s orbit under Trump’s regulatory umbrella.” Nick LoPiccolo — September 16, 2025 — 11K Views “Within 48 hours of the rumor, WBD stock surged ~55% and Paramount Skydance rose ~24%. That market response itself boxed David Zaslav in; his board, Wall Street, and his own contract now expect movement.” Nick LoPiccolo — September 27, 2025 — 12:16 PM — 3,516 Views “Nah homie. Enjoy watching the show on YouTube after Ellison buys WBD and Ari who is advising Ellison and used to represent Trump and runs TKO makes the call.” Nick LoPiccolo — September 28, 2025 — 174 Views “I believe if and when Paramount acquires WBD, TKO will push to lock down a monopoly on combat sports. The long knives are already out for competitors, and the rights deals have likely been spread around town precisely to keep rivals from signing with those streamers.” none of that was random. paramount / skydance, ellison, ari, tko, wbd linear assets, youtube, aaa, the tko deal, the wbd split, the shrinking rights buyer universe — all of it was one connected domestic rights architecture. that is why this conversation was always over the heads of the people screaming “cope” in my replies. they were arguing like fans. i was reading the cap table. Nick LoPiccolo — December 6, 2025 — 3:07 PM — 41.4K Views “Yes, I always believed Paramount would walk away with WBD. I was one of the first to talk about it on here, even if I wasn’t the first to hear it. The Paramount Skydance acquisition closed on August 7. I posted this on August 11, about 1 month before the The Wall Street Journal first broke the news on September 12 that Paramount Skydance was preparing a bid for WBD.” Nick LoPiccolo — December 6, 2025 — 3:07 PM — 41.4K Views “The bid was always going to be hostile. We are only in this process because it was a hostile bid. Most people in Hollywood believed Ellison long coveted WB and Jack Warner’s chair. WB was not for sale when Skydance acquired Paramount, which is much smaller in scale.” Nick LoPiccolo — December 6, 2025 — 3:07 PM — 41.4K Views “Nearly everyone in town assumed an Ellison acquisition of WBD was inevitable until the Netflix bid shocked everyone. Signs were there for the last two weeks, which is also when I stopped posting about what might happen. Of course, its not over yet. Paramount still has paths to winning this acquisition. The one thing that’s for certain though is an Ellison-led acquisition of WBD is no longer inevitable.” Nick LoPiccolo — December 8, 2025 “END CREDITS” space jam is a warner bros. movie. that was the joke. and the joke was the same thing i had been saying the whole time: paramount was winning the bid, for those who did not understand. Nick LoPiccolo — December 19, 2025 — 4:30 PM — 828 Views “Here is another reference to it. So tell me how exactly is Paramount the better outcome for Dave’s argument? Netflix doesn’t touch the WBD linear assets. Gunnar keeps his SpinCo.” Puck excerpt — December 19, 2025 “Many industry insiders are also skeptical about Paramount’s seven-year, $7.7 billion deal for exclusive UFC rights in the U.S. Yes, it can be read as a signal that Ellison came to play. But some people see it more as Ari Emanuel having his way with the person to whom he is ostensibly an (unpaid) advisor…” that is the board. that is the relationship map. that is the thing wrestling media either does not understand or pretends not to understand, because understanding it means admitting the story is not “aew has leverage.” the story is that aew is sitting in the middle of a consolidating rights marketplace where the people with leverage are doing much bigger things than worrying about tony khan’s feelings. Nick LoPiccolo — January 21, 2026 — 4:22 PM — 870 Views “i mean get ready to learn youtube buddy” Nick LoPiccolo — February 19, 2026 — 2.8K Views “Paramount was always my bet to acquire Warner Bros. Never wavered.” Nick LoPiccolo — February 28, 2026 — 1:27 PM — 118 Views “you don’t need to look under a hood I AM SAYING THE QUIET PART OUT LOUD 🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨 I BEEN SAYING IT SINCE JULY / AUGUST 🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨 PARAMOUNT IS COMING FOR WBD AEW WILL LOSE A TV DEAL 🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨 GUESS WHO WAS RIGHT 💀” so no, this is not hindsight. this is not showing up after the fact with a flashlight and pretending i discovered the body. this is a paper trail. february: youtube is not a real rights model unless google is cutting the check. april: wbd passed back in august, the myaew app is not realistic, paramount is not real for aew, cw / roku is off the table, amazon and fox do not want aew, and google / youtube is the only distributor left that makes sense. july: the $185 million number is inflated and aew is not leverage. august: the buyer board is shrinking, paramount is still interested in wbd, and google / youtube becomes directly competitive. september: paramount / wbd folds the board into ellison’s orbit, and if ellison buys wbd, enjoy youtube. december: paramount was always the bet, the bid was always going to be hostile, and netflix does not solve dave meltzer’s argument because netflix does not touch the linear assets. january: get ready to learn youtube. february: paramount is coming for wbd and aew will lose a tv deal. same board. same thesis. same answer. now here is the part tony khan and dave meltzer do not want to say out loud. tony khan and dave meltzer do not mention me publicly for a reason. because the second they say my name out loud, they admit where this conversation has actually been coming from. not wwe. not some anonymous “high level official.” not some shadowy tko whisper campaign. me. that is the problem for them. behind the scenes, ask any real insider what happens when my name comes up around this subject. there is a reaction. not because i’m magic. not because i’m some internet boogeyman. because they know exactly who is saying it, why i’m saying it, what rooms i have been in, what companies i have dealt with, what executives i have spoken to, and why the analysis keeps landing. that is why they keep trying to non-person me publicly while reacting to me privately. they want the argument. they want the benefit of responding to the argument. they just do not want to admit whose argument it is. when i said wbd told aew back in august 2025 they were not exercising the option for the fourth year, tony khan blew up behind the scenes and forced john mcmullen to revise / update his article 2-3 weeks ago after i tweeted it. which is hilarious because that should not even be crazy or damaging “news.” that is how this business works. when a distributor is not continuing, they tell you early enough so you have time to find a new home. that is not sabotage. that is not wwe. that is not nick lopiccolo hiding inside david zaslav’s air vents with a clipboard. that is corporate courtesy. wbd execs privately whisper and shake their heads at tony khan’s behavior because their view is very simple: why does tony khan act like everything is great and rainbows and sunshine with the studio? we told tony khan as a courtesy so tony khan would have time to find a new home. and no, this has zero to do with paramount looming as an excuse. paramount did not even make its first hostile bid for wbd until september 11 or 12. that was after tony khan was already told there would not be a wbd renewal. so what did tony khan do? tony khan turned the truth into a wrestling angle. tony khan, or one of tony khan’s minions, gets dave meltzer to drop a story assigning my claims and what i have been publicly posting about tony khan to “high level wwe officials.” why? because it gives tony khan a safer enemy. tony khan does not want the story to be the actual timeline. because the actual timeline is brutal. on february 28, i said youtube was not a real media rights model unless google was actually cutting the check and underwriting production. on april 30, i said wbd passed in august, the myaew app was not realistic, paramount was not real for aew, cw / roku was off the table, amazon and fox did not want aew, and the only distributor left that made sense was google / youtube. on july 9, i said no one in hollywood believed the $185 million number. on july 10, i said aew was not leverage. on august 11, i said the major players at the top were shrinking, paramount was still interested in wbd, and google / youtube was becoming a directly competitive lane. on september 16, i said a paramount / wbd merger would fold cbs, cnn, hbo, and warner bros. ip into ellison’s orbit. on september 27, i said enjoy the show on youtube after ellison buys wbd. on september 28, i said if paramount acquires wbd, tko would push to lock down a monopoly on combat sports. on december 6, i said paramount skydance was preparing a bid for wbd long before most people admitted the obvious. on february 19, i said paramount was always my bet to acquire warner bros. and on february 28, i said it in all caps: paramount is coming for wbd. aew will lose a tv deal. that is the part tony khan cannot answer directly, because the direct answer means admitting this was never “wwe is scared of us.” it was always the board closing. tony khan wants the story to be: why would wwe say this about us? that is the laundering operation. take my public analysis. run it through dave meltzer. assign it to wwe / tko. then let tony khan answer a canned question on a media call with very little distribution about potentially having very little distribution. a media call for a show with very little distribution answering a canned question about aew potentially having very little distribution. based on a planted story, from a planted messenger, with a rehearsed answer, after an roh show maybe 8-15k people watched. a pr flack probably wrote it. tony khan performs hurt. tony khan says “i don’t know why wwe would…” tony khan denies the obvious. tony khan keeps me minimized. tony khan removes me from the public conversation about the very thing i have repeatedly said is going to happen to aew. everyone is supposed to pretend this is organic. it is the most bubble wrapped, manufactured, artificial environment possible. a canned and rehearsed answer at an roh media scrum about a planted dave meltzer story based on my very real and very public analysis of the media rights board. but make no mistake. tony khan was responding to my words. tony khan just laundered them through dave meltzer and assigned them to wwe / tko so tony khan could keep lying about it publicly without ever saying my name. and now, voila. dave meltzer is posting about youtube viewers and prelims. Dave Meltzer — May 16, 2026 “At this moment there are 340,000 people watching prelims for Netflix on YouTube. It’s a good number.” yes, dave meltzer. youtube can have good numbers. nobody said youtube cannot have good numbers. that was never the issue. the issue is whether youtube is being used as a funnel into a premium rights ecosystem or as a substitute because the premium rights ecosystem rejected you. that is the difference. that has always been the difference. netflix using youtube prelims as audience acquisition is not the same thing as aew trying to spin youtube as a media rights home because the real buyers are gone. ufc using youtube as a funnel is not the same thing as aew using youtube as a life raft. wwe sending stars to aaa on youtube to convert a younger demo is not the same thing as aew retreating to youtube after the traditional buyer board closes. and the fact that dave meltzer is now suddenly tweeting like the mayor of youtube is the punchline. because the same people who mocked the youtube outcome are now going to spend the next several months explaining why youtube is actually good. of course it can be good. for the right use case. for the right property. inside the right architecture. with the right check attached. but when you spend two years telling everyone you were valued like raw and your next stop is “please subscribe and smash that bell,” maybe stop pretending this is victory formation? i told y’all where this was going. the record is right there. i’m still right. and tony and dave: you guys are see through translucent. that’s it for ye 🎤🎤🎤

Nick LoPiccolo

99,106 views • 1 month ago