Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Yes, it’s true. You can copy certain Redacted Epstein files and paste it into a word processor and it does show up Intentional? Or major screwup? This isn’t consistent with all redacted documents, but I have found some to be the case. In this particular document, this is what...

MJTruthUltra's profile picture

MJTruthUltra

648,054 subscribers

82,313 views • 9 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

TikTok user reportedly discover a way to read through redacted text in the Epstein files. The user explained that in certain documents, text was only visually covered in black and could be revealed by copying and pasting it into a blank document. “If you simply copy paste some of them into a blank doc the original text appears!” [🎥: evangeleeeen/TT ]
0:46

TikTok user reportedly discover a way to read through redacted text in the Epstein files. The user explained that in certain documents, text was only visually covered in black and could be revealed by copying and pasting it into a blank document. “If you simply copy paste some of them into a blank doc the original text appears!” [🎥: evangeleeeen/TT ]

Complex

491,588 views • 9 months ago

Listen, some of this stuff wasn’t supposed to be shown yet as it’s clearly footage from [REDACTED]. We haven’t even launched The Can, or the [REDACTED] yet… or even announced our big partnerships with [REDACTED] or [REDACTED] yet, but already we’re showing [REDACTED]? But between you and me, we couldn’t wait.. Tis what it is… here’s more than you deserve anon.
2:15

Listen, some of this stuff wasn’t supposed to be shown yet as it’s clearly footage from [REDACTED]. We haven’t even launched The Can, or the [REDACTED] yet… or even announced our big partnerships with [REDACTED] or [REDACTED] yet, but already we’re showing [REDACTED]? But between you and me, we couldn’t wait.. Tis what it is… here’s more than you deserve anon.

Lowlife Forms

659,379 views • 2 years ago

I just found this disturbing video in the Epstein files. It shows a dog "doing something" to a young girl, and then there is an unknown man at the end of the video. Does anyone know who this man is. For some reason the Trump DOJ appears to have redacted all of the sound from the video.
0:22

Sensitive content

I just found this disturbing video in the Epstein files. It shows a dog "doing something" to a young girl, and then there is an unknown man at the end of the video. Does anyone know who this man is. For some reason the Trump DOJ appears to have redacted all of the sound from the video.

Ed Krassenstein

85,069 views • 8 months ago

Does Ehud Barak’s wife still live in a building owned by Jeffrey Epstein’s brother? A House staffer asked Darren Indyke that question in his deposition. Indyke was Epstein’s lawyer for 23 years and co-executor of the estate. The building is 301 East 66th Street, majority owned by Mark Epstein through Ossa Properties. The staffer asked if Barak had stayed there. Indyke hedged: “He may have stayed.” Possible, but not certain. Then the follow-up: Would it surprise you that property records show Barak’s wife has lived there from 2019 to today? Indyke: “It would surprise me, yes.” Epstein died in 2019. That was the same year she reportedly moved in. The man running the Epstein estate after his death didn’t know…or says he didn’t.
1:32

Does Ehud Barak’s wife still live in a building owned by Jeffrey Epstein’s brother? A House staffer asked Darren Indyke that question in his deposition. Indyke was Epstein’s lawyer for 23 years and co-executor of the estate. The building is 301 East 66th Street, majority owned by Mark Epstein through Ossa Properties. The staffer asked if Barak had stayed there. Indyke hedged: “He may have stayed.” Possible, but not certain. Then the follow-up: Would it surprise you that property records show Barak’s wife has lived there from 2019 to today? Indyke: “It would surprise me, yes.” Epstein died in 2019. That was the same year she reportedly moved in. The man running the Epstein estate after his death didn’t know…or says he didn’t.

Katie

15,841 views • 4 months ago

Rep. Roy on Jeffrey Epstein files vote: "Today, a united Republican Party and a bipartisan super majority is going to pass a bill to increase transparency regarding the egregious abuses by Jeffrey Epstein - a goal that anyone of conscience desires... It was President Trump's Department of Justice that indicted Jeffrey Epstein in July of 2019. It was President Trump's DOJ that arrested and indicted [Ghislaine] Maxwell. Meanwhile, my colleagues on other side of the aisle have largely ignored this issue. It was Democrats who redacted an email to mislead the American people about the truth of a witness that exonerated President Trump. It was a Democrat representative who literally texted with Jeffrey Epstein as we questioned Michael Cohen."
0:59

Rep. Roy on Jeffrey Epstein files vote: "Today, a united Republican Party and a bipartisan super majority is going to pass a bill to increase transparency regarding the egregious abuses by Jeffrey Epstein - a goal that anyone of conscience desires... It was President Trump's Department of Justice that indicted Jeffrey Epstein in July of 2019. It was President Trump's DOJ that arrested and indicted [Ghislaine] Maxwell. Meanwhile, my colleagues on other side of the aisle have largely ignored this issue. It was Democrats who redacted an email to mislead the American people about the truth of a witness that exonerated President Trump. It was a Democrat representative who literally texted with Jeffrey Epstein as we questioned Michael Cohen."

Rep. Chip Roy Press Office

16,401 views • 10 months ago

Thomas Massie: “Leslie Wexner should go to court.” “He’s listed in the FBI’s documents as a co-conspirator of Jeffrey Epstein in the sex trafficking ring.” “The DOJ is still covering up files, or over-redacting files.” “This week, I had a chance to go to the DOJ and look at the un-redacted files.” “There’s a very troubling email in the Epstein files where somebody sends Epstein a torture video, and he says, ‘I really enjoyed the torture video.’” “They had redacted who it came from.” “I went in there, I got the email that it came from, and I was able to use the DOJ’a own computers to match the email up with an individual.” “It’s a sultan from overseas that Jeffrey Epstein interacted with quite frequently.” “So just in the last two days, we have released more names.” Thomas Massie
1:43

Thomas Massie: “Leslie Wexner should go to court.” “He’s listed in the FBI’s documents as a co-conspirator of Jeffrey Epstein in the sex trafficking ring.” “The DOJ is still covering up files, or over-redacting files.” “This week, I had a chance to go to the DOJ and look at the un-redacted files.” “There’s a very troubling email in the Epstein files where somebody sends Epstein a torture video, and he says, ‘I really enjoyed the torture video.’” “They had redacted who it came from.” “I went in there, I got the email that it came from, and I was able to use the DOJ’a own computers to match the email up with an individual.” “It’s a sultan from overseas that Jeffrey Epstein interacted with quite frequently.” “So just in the last two days, we have released more names.” Thomas Massie

Holden Culotta

189,921 views • 8 months ago

Joe Rogan says the Trump administration “looks f*cking terrible” as questions mount over Epstein Files redactions. “Why is [the sultan who sent Epstein the torture video]’s name redacted?” “What is this? This is not good. None of this is good for this administration. It looks f*cking terrible. It looks terrible for Trump when he was saying that none of this was real. This is all a hoax.” “This is not a hoax. Like, did you not know? Maybe he didn’t know, if you want to be charitable, but this is definitely not a hoax. And if you got redacted people’s names, and these people aren’t victims, you’re not protecting the victim. So what are you doing? And how come all this sh*t is not released?”
1:06

Joe Rogan says the Trump administration “looks f*cking terrible” as questions mount over Epstein Files redactions. “Why is [the sultan who sent Epstein the torture video]’s name redacted?” “What is this? This is not good. None of this is good for this administration. It looks f*cking terrible. It looks terrible for Trump when he was saying that none of this was real. This is all a hoax.” “This is not a hoax. Like, did you not know? Maybe he didn’t know, if you want to be charitable, but this is definitely not a hoax. And if you got redacted people’s names, and these people aren’t victims, you’re not protecting the victim. So what are you doing? And how come all this sh*t is not released?”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

1,376,238 views • 8 months ago

BREAKING: Rep. Jamie Raskin says Epstein survivors are accusing the Trump administration of "threatening victims" by releasing un-redacted names. "A lot of the survivors believe, a deliberate threat to other survivors who are thinking about coming forward that they need to be careful because they can be exposed and have their personal information drive through the mud as well." He made this statement immediately after reviewing un-redacted Epstein files made available by the DOJ.
1:24

BREAKING: Rep. Jamie Raskin says Epstein survivors are accusing the Trump administration of "threatening victims" by releasing un-redacted names. "A lot of the survivors believe, a deliberate threat to other survivors who are thinking about coming forward that they need to be careful because they can be exposed and have their personal information drive through the mud as well." He made this statement immediately after reviewing un-redacted Epstein files made available by the DOJ.

E X X ➠A L E R T S

133,457 views • 8 months ago

Rep Luna on the Epstein Files: “It’s important to know why the files have been delayed is because [Obama appointed Judge Paul Engelmayer] has ordered a SECOND review of those documents and is now requiring certification of those documents by U.S. Attorney Jay Clayton, while simultaneously blocking the appointment of a special counsel. This is causing MAJOR delays. Anna says she will be bringing forward a bill to IMPEACH Judge Engelmayer for obstructing the release of the Epstein files. As of today, the DOJ has completed a review of over 5 million documents, conducted by over 500 attorneys, and they are ready to be released NOW.
1:19

Rep Luna on the Epstein Files: “It’s important to know why the files have been delayed is because [Obama appointed Judge Paul Engelmayer] has ordered a SECOND review of those documents and is now requiring certification of those documents by U.S. Attorney Jay Clayton, while simultaneously blocking the appointment of a special counsel. This is causing MAJOR delays. Anna says she will be bringing forward a bill to IMPEACH Judge Engelmayer for obstructing the release of the Epstein files. As of today, the DOJ has completed a review of over 5 million documents, conducted by over 500 attorneys, and they are ready to be released NOW.

MJTruthUltra

35,344 views • 8 months ago

Thomas Massie just put Pam Bondi on the spot over the Epstein files cover-up. And it was explosive. “I caught you red-handed!” “This is bigger than Watergate.” “This cover-up spans decades, and you are responsible for this portion of it.” Watch this bombshell moment: “This email was a list of names not to release.” “What did the DOJ do with this email?” “They released this email in the document production.” “Literally the worst thing you could do to the survivors.” “The next document I want to show you … the title of this one is Child Sex Trafficking Co-Conspirators.” “Fully redacted.” “I’m gonna un-redact them here.” “Les Wexner is in this.” “The third exhibit that I have … these are the documents that we need, that you’re over-redacting, because they have the names of the men who are implicated.” “Who’s responsible?” “Are you able to track who it was that obscured Les Wexner’s name as a co-conspirator in an FBI document?” Bondi: “I believe Wexner’s name was listed more than 4,000 times—” Massie: “Yeah, I already told you that.” “This is where he’s listed as a co-conspirator.” Bondi: “Within 40 minutes, Wexner’s name was added back—” Massie: “Within 40 minutes of me catching you red-handed!” Bondi: “Did you ask Merrick Garland that the last four years?” Massie: “I’m glad you’re asking about Merrick Garland, because this is bigger than Watergate.” “This goes over four administrations.” “Let’s go back to Obama.” “Let’s go back to George Bush.” “This cover-up spans decades, and you are responsible for this portion of it.” Thomas Massie
5:16

Thomas Massie just put Pam Bondi on the spot over the Epstein files cover-up. And it was explosive. “I caught you red-handed!” “This is bigger than Watergate.” “This cover-up spans decades, and you are responsible for this portion of it.” Watch this bombshell moment: “This email was a list of names not to release.” “What did the DOJ do with this email?” “They released this email in the document production.” “Literally the worst thing you could do to the survivors.” “The next document I want to show you … the title of this one is Child Sex Trafficking Co-Conspirators.” “Fully redacted.” “I’m gonna un-redact them here.” “Les Wexner is in this.” “The third exhibit that I have … these are the documents that we need, that you’re over-redacting, because they have the names of the men who are implicated.” “Who’s responsible?” “Are you able to track who it was that obscured Les Wexner’s name as a co-conspirator in an FBI document?” Bondi: “I believe Wexner’s name was listed more than 4,000 times—” Massie: “Yeah, I already told you that.” “This is where he’s listed as a co-conspirator.” Bondi: “Within 40 minutes, Wexner’s name was added back—” Massie: “Within 40 minutes of me catching you red-handed!” Bondi: “Did you ask Merrick Garland that the last four years?” Massie: “I’m glad you’re asking about Merrick Garland, because this is bigger than Watergate.” “This goes over four administrations.” “Let’s go back to Obama.” “Let’s go back to George Bush.” “This cover-up spans decades, and you are responsible for this portion of it.” Thomas Massie

Holden Culotta

313,754 views • 8 months ago

This is insane In the Jeffrey Epstein files, the FBI labeled Les Wexner as a coconspirator with Epstein Les Wexner’s name was only redacted by the DOJ in one place, everywhere else they left his name visible His name was only redacted where the FBI named him as a coconspirator Again, everywhere else his name was left in the Epstein files “Leslie Wexner. Pam Bondi, when I pointed out to her that she had redacted his name from the files, she said, well, his name appears thousands of times in the files. I said, yes, but in the one instance where it appears on an FBI document listing him as a co-conspirator in a child sex trafficking ring, his name has been redacted. In the only one place where it implicates him” Our government is still protecting these predators. Our justice system is a lie Bondi and the DOJ’s response: They called it an “error” or oversight The document listed Leslie Wexner among 8-9 potential co-conspirators for possible grand jury summonses
0:43

This is insane In the Jeffrey Epstein files, the FBI labeled Les Wexner as a coconspirator with Epstein Les Wexner’s name was only redacted by the DOJ in one place, everywhere else they left his name visible His name was only redacted where the FBI named him as a coconspirator Again, everywhere else his name was left in the Epstein files “Leslie Wexner. Pam Bondi, when I pointed out to her that she had redacted his name from the files, she said, well, his name appears thousands of times in the files. I said, yes, but in the one instance where it appears on an FBI document listing him as a co-conspirator in a child sex trafficking ring, his name has been redacted. In the only one place where it implicates him” Our government is still protecting these predators. Our justice system is a lie Bondi and the DOJ’s response: They called it an “error” or oversight The document listed Leslie Wexner among 8-9 potential co-conspirators for possible grand jury summonses

Wall Street Apes

64,531 views • 5 months ago

🚨 BREAKING: The DOJ just released the Epstein files and it’s a complete farce. The entire 119-page grand jury document is fully redacted. Not a word visible. On top of that, court filings are literally missing pages. Files jump from 011.pdf to 013.pdf as if evidence evaporated. This isn’t transparency. It’s a cover-up in plain sight.
0:33

🚨 BREAKING: The DOJ just released the Epstein files and it’s a complete farce. The entire 119-page grand jury document is fully redacted. Not a word visible. On top of that, court filings are literally missing pages. Files jump from 011.pdf to 013.pdf as if evidence evaporated. This isn’t transparency. It’s a cover-up in plain sight.

Brian Allen

598,069 views • 9 months ago

.Shermichael Singleton talks Graham Platner on CNN: “Voters can forgive a mistake. This is a pattern. This is a pattern of a guy who continues to lie over and over and over again. The nazi tattoo, at first it was ‘I didn’t know what it was.’ Turns out he knew what it was years ago.”
0:42

.Shermichael Singleton talks Graham Platner on CNN: “Voters can forgive a mistake. This is a pattern. This is a pattern of a guy who continues to lie over and over and over again. The nazi tattoo, at first it was ‘I didn’t know what it was.’ Turns out he knew what it was years ago.”

RNC Research

43,778 views • 4 months ago

Joe Rogan says the redaction of the Epstein Files "looks f*cking terrible" for the Trump administration. "It looks terrible for Trump when he was saying that none of this was real, this is all a hoax." "This is definitely not a hoax." "And if you've got redacted people's names and these people aren't victims, you're not protecting the victim. So what are you doing?"
1:06

Joe Rogan says the redaction of the Epstein Files "looks f*cking terrible" for the Trump administration. "It looks terrible for Trump when he was saying that none of this was real, this is all a hoax." "This is definitely not a hoax." "And if you've got redacted people's names and these people aren't victims, you're not protecting the victim. So what are you doing?"

Red Pill Dispenser

55,741 views • 7 months ago

I just fact checked this, it’s true “The day before Jeffrey Epstein died, there was a DOJ document announcing his death. Do you understand what I just said to you? Jeffrey Epstein was found dead on August 10th of 2019. Newly released DOJ documents show that they had a draft announcement already made on August 9th of 2019 announcing his death. Guys, I wish this were a joke or conspiracy theory, but it's not” Drafts dated August 9, 2019, the day before his body was discovered detailed Jeffrey Epstein was found dead. Some early drafts omit any cause of death, instead they say he was found unresponsive and pronounced dead. (Again, this is a day before he was found dead) “I think we're getting to the point where we may need to remove every single member of our government, like every f*cking one of them.”
1:11

I just fact checked this, it’s true “The day before Jeffrey Epstein died, there was a DOJ document announcing his death. Do you understand what I just said to you? Jeffrey Epstein was found dead on August 10th of 2019. Newly released DOJ documents show that they had a draft announcement already made on August 9th of 2019 announcing his death. Guys, I wish this were a joke or conspiracy theory, but it's not” Drafts dated August 9, 2019, the day before his body was discovered detailed Jeffrey Epstein was found dead. Some early drafts omit any cause of death, instead they say he was found unresponsive and pronounced dead. (Again, this is a day before he was found dead) “I think we're getting to the point where we may need to remove every single member of our government, like every f*cking one of them.”

Wall Street Apes

480,114 views • 8 months ago