正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Yesterday, during Openτensor Foundaτion Novelty Search, const asked us to demo Zeus live: “Max temperature in Seoul tomorrow?” 🇰🇷 Zeus: 26°C Google: 28°C Today? It was 26°C. Live, verified, beat Google. No better validation than that. 🔥

Zeus | SN 18

1,639 subscribers

26,185 次观看 • 10 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治科学技术

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Introducing Nano Banana 2, our best image model yet 🍌🍌 It uses Gemini’s understanding of the world and is powered by real-time information and images from web search. That means it can better reflect real-world conditions in high-fidelity. Check out "Window Seat," a demo using Nano Banana 2’s world understanding to generate more accurate views from any window in the world, pulling live local weather info with 2K/4K specs. The precision is mind blowing. Rolling out today as the new default in the Google Gemini, Search (across 141 countries), and Flow + available in preview via Google AI Studio and Vertex AI. Also available in Google Google Antigravity.

Introducing Nano Banana 2, our best image model yet 🍌🍌 It uses Gemini’s understanding of the world and is powered by real-time information and images from web search. That means it can better reflect real-world conditions in high-fidelity. Check out "Window Seat," a demo using Nano Banana 2’s world understanding to generate more accurate views from any window in the world, pulling live local weather info with 2K/4K specs. The precision is mind blowing. Rolling out today as the new default in the Google Gemini, Search (across 141 countries), and Flow + available in preview via Google AI Studio and Vertex AI. Also available in Google Google Antigravity.

Sundar Pichai

921,937 次观看 • 4 个月前

RFK Jr. just blew apart the lie that autism rates are skyrocketing due to “better diagnosis” on live TV. “That is nonsense.” “If it was just a matter of better diagnosis or better recognition, you would see it in older people.” “The epidemic is taking place in a specific generation—and it’s kids who were born after 1989.” “If it was anything other than an epidemic, why would you only see it in a single generation?” Robert F. Kennedy Jr Christopher C. Cuomo

RFK Jr. just blew apart the lie that autism rates are skyrocketing due to “better diagnosis” on live TV. “That is nonsense.” “If it was just a matter of better diagnosis or better recognition, you would see it in older people.” “The epidemic is taking place in a specific generation—and it’s kids who were born after 1989.” “If it was anything other than an epidemic, why would you only see it in a single generation?” Robert F. Kennedy Jr Christopher C. Cuomo

Holden Culotta

58,024 次观看 • 1 年前

🚨🇺🇸 GOOGLE, NBC & CCDH ACCUSED OF SECRETLY DEMONETIZING THE FEDERALIST CEO and co-founder of The Federalist, Sean Davis: "In July of 2020 when we started receiving emails from an NBC News reporter based in the UK, and they were almost taunting, asking for comment: 'Hey, Federalist, how does it feel knowing Google is about to demonetize you for hate speech?' I’m paraphrasing. This was news to us. We hadn’t broken any rules, and we had received no notifications of violating Google’s terms and conditions or AdSense policies. We started calling around to contacts at Google and learned that we were about to be demonetized. We were accused of having racist, violent hate speech, which was completely untrue. It was the CCDH working with NBC News, I think it was called the “verification unit” at the time, colluding with executives at Google, to this day, I don’t know who, to secretly demonetize us." Source: C SPAN

🚨🇺🇸 GOOGLE, NBC & CCDH ACCUSED OF SECRETLY DEMONETIZING THE FEDERALIST CEO and co-founder of The Federalist, Sean Davis: "In July of 2020 when we started receiving emails from an NBC News reporter based in the UK, and they were almost taunting, asking for comment: 'Hey, Federalist, how does it feel knowing Google is about to demonetize you for hate speech?' I’m paraphrasing. This was news to us. We hadn’t broken any rules, and we had received no notifications of violating Google’s terms and conditions or AdSense policies. We started calling around to contacts at Google and learned that we were about to be demonetized. We were accused of having racist, violent hate speech, which was completely untrue. It was the CCDH working with NBC News, I think it was called the “verification unit” at the time, colluding with executives at Google, to this day, I don’t know who, to secretly demonetize us." Source: C SPAN

Mario Nawfal

85,788 次观看 • 9 个月前

🚨 Asmongold responds to Sodapoppin's Streamer Tier List. Sodapoppin put Lacari over Asmon, Stable Ronaldo and Kai Cenat. Asmon would remind Sodapoppin he was a better gamer than him even in live stage events. "He wants to put Destiny in C Tier because of the first half of his career, but he won't put me in C Tier because of the first half of my career. You want to know what the difference is, I was beating Soda in arenas 7 - 2 in his own game. He doesn't want to talk about that though." "It's a sh*tty list, no Sodapoppin just has sh*tty opinions!"

🚨 Asmongold responds to Sodapoppin's Streamer Tier List. Sodapoppin put Lacari over Asmon, Stable Ronaldo and Kai Cenat. Asmon would remind Sodapoppin he was a better gamer than him even in live stage events. "He wants to put Destiny in C Tier because of the first half of his career, but he won't put me in C Tier because of the first half of my career. You want to know what the difference is, I was beating Soda in arenas 7 - 2 in his own game. He doesn't want to talk about that though." "It's a shtty list, no Sodapoppin just has shtty opinions!"

Rekapz

92,307 次观看 • 29 天前

According to fick's law, the more moisture that's in your flower, the more water it will diffuse faster. This means that almost 80% of the water in your plants is gone in the first phase (constant rate)of drying, which, condition depending, can be the first 18 hours to ..🙄3 days according to *Challa 2020-KINETICS AND THE EFFECTS OF DRYING METHODS ON QUALITY OF (C*****s s****a L.) BUDS* Water adhesion principals state that with the surface moisture evaporated, water is less susceptible to the evaporative forces applied on it (falling rate). During this falling rate, your 60/60 is far less effective at pulling water than it was during the constant rate (which still wasn't ideal). Once we enter the second phase of drying, or the falling rate; dehydrated surface exposure, along with low water activation energy in that dehydrated flower means dramatically increased secondary metabolite oxidization. In effect, from this moment forward, that PSM count is going DOWN The longer we keep it on the rack, and not into cure, the faster this will happen In the study *(Basel). 2022- Postharvest Operations of C*****is and Their Effect on C****binòid Content: A Review, it was shown that significant secondary metabolite loss occurred at temperatures higher than 40°c . Below this number, the rate of degradation was relatively constant. As referenced in the above studies. The difference in secondary loss between drying at 71° vs. 77 or even 89° tends to be only 1–2 % with a net positive moisture loss, whereas time driven degradation over days to weeks can account for 30 % total loss or more. Meaning that temperature does affects secondary volatility, but the timing of drying matters WAYYYYY more So how am I drying these? Day 1 - 72°f 55% Day 2 - 72°f 55% Day 3 - 74°f 52% Day 4 - 75°f 50% Day 5 - 75°f 50% See the article on and citations. Share, repost, follow. Still not convinced? Google "sharkmouse drying" on Google and see what reddit has to say!

According to fick's law, the more moisture that's in your flower, the more water it will diffuse faster. This means that almost 80% of the water in your plants is gone in the first phase (constant rate)of drying, which, condition depending, can be the first 18 hours to ..🙄3 days according to Challa 2020-KINETICS AND THE EFFECTS OF DRYING METHODS ON QUALITY OF (Cs sa L.) BUDS* Water adhesion principals state that with the surface moisture evaporated, water is less susceptible to the evaporative forces applied on it (falling rate). During this falling rate, your 60/60 is far less effective at pulling water than it was during the constant rate (which still wasn't ideal). Once we enter the second phase of drying, or the falling rate; dehydrated surface exposure, along with low water activation energy in that dehydrated flower means dramatically increased secondary metabolite oxidization. In effect, from this moment forward, that PSM count is going DOWN The longer we keep it on the rack, and not into cure, the faster this will happen In the study (Basel). 2022- Postharvest Operations of Cis and Their Effect on Cbinòid Content: A Review, it was shown that significant secondary metabolite loss occurred at temperatures higher than 40°c . Below this number, the rate of degradation was relatively constant. As referenced in the above studies. The difference in secondary loss between drying at 71° vs. 77 or even 89° tends to be only 1–2 % with a net positive moisture loss, whereas time driven degradation over days to weeks can account for 30 % total loss or more. Meaning that temperature does affects secondary volatility, but the timing of drying matters WAYYYYY more So how am I drying these? Day 1 - 72°f 55% Day 2 - 72°f 55% Day 3 - 74°f 52% Day 4 - 75°f 50% Day 5 - 75°f 50% See the article on and citations. Share, repost, follow. Still not convinced? Google "sharkmouse drying" on Google and see what reddit has to say!

thatonesharkguy

18,903 次观看 • 11 个月前

THE FOUR HORSEMEN STORY DOESN’T MAKE SENSE!!!🚨🚨🚨 Thread🧵 Notice : this is pure speculation and nothing about this is factual information. All the information provided is fully based on what we see/saw on the internet. Please RT for awareness. First of all i would just like to say that A-Reece has no reason not to answer his phone for a whole month especially from a guy that he worked with before and has a good working relationship with. Something just doesnt feel right. Get your popcorn🍿 1. This first started when Nasty C leaked or hinted on being on the same song as A-Reece. Note that Nasty C specifically mentioned that Stogie T asked him to do a hook for him and says he will work on the verse in the meantime, meaning that he was initially asked to do both a hook and a verse. Also note that the Date of this interview is back in may meaning that the song had been in the making for awhile. BET! 2. Stogie T finally talks about the after it comes out on a radio show. He clearly states that he sent them both the beat and with Nasty C he talks about a hook and with A-Reece he is clearly referring to a verse/bars since he says “things that Slimes know him for”. BET! 3. L Tido invites MAGGZ on his podcast and he clearly indicates that MAGGZ is “ GONNA” (note that word) have the best verse on the song and during this time L Tido only knew that only Stogie T, A-Reece and MAGGZ will have verses while Nasty C is on the hook and i will prove that on number 4. So by this time L Tido already underestimates Stogie T and A-Reece pen. 4. After the song drops L Tido’s tone changes from MAGGZ to Nasty C having the best verse and clearly indicates that Nasty C didn’t have a verse and was initially supposed to be on only the hook and indicates again that Nasty C sent his verse a week before the song released. The song got released on the 28th of November meaning that Nasty C sent his verse during the week 16th - 22th This is 4 proofs that Nasty C was asked for a hook. Note and pay proper attention as this leads into 5 down below…

THE FOUR HORSEMEN STORY DOESN’T MAKE SENSE!!!🚨🚨🚨 Thread🧵 Notice : this is pure speculation and nothing about this is factual information. All the information provided is fully based on what we see/saw on the internet. Please RT for awareness. First of all i would just like to say that A-Reece has no reason not to answer his phone for a whole month especially from a guy that he worked with before and has a good working relationship with. Something just doesnt feel right. Get your popcorn🍿 1. This first started when Nasty C leaked or hinted on being on the same song as A-Reece. Note that Nasty C specifically mentioned that Stogie T asked him to do a hook for him and says he will work on the verse in the meantime, meaning that he was initially asked to do both a hook and a verse. Also note that the Date of this interview is back in may meaning that the song had been in the making for awhile. BET! 2. Stogie T finally talks about the after it comes out on a radio show. He clearly states that he sent them both the beat and with Nasty C he talks about a hook and with A-Reece he is clearly referring to a verse/bars since he says “things that Slimes know him for”. BET! 3. L Tido invites MAGGZ on his podcast and he clearly indicates that MAGGZ is “ GONNA” (note that word) have the best verse on the song and during this time L Tido only knew that only Stogie T, A-Reece and MAGGZ will have verses while Nasty C is on the hook and i will prove that on number 4. So by this time L Tido already underestimates Stogie T and A-Reece pen. 4. After the song drops L Tido’s tone changes from MAGGZ to Nasty C having the best verse and clearly indicates that Nasty C didn’t have a verse and was initially supposed to be on only the hook and indicates again that Nasty C sent his verse a week before the song released. The song got released on the 28th of November meaning that Nasty C sent his verse during the week 16th - 22th This is 4 proofs that Nasty C was asked for a hook. Note and pay proper attention as this leads into 5 down below…

theboyjay

34,532 次观看 • 6 个月前

🚨🚨🚨 THE ALARM BELLS NEED TO BE DEAFENING !! 🚨🚨🚨 Expert after expert just testified on Bill C-22: - Canadian Civil Liberties Association - OpenMedia - Signal - Google - Meta All saying the same thing: This is the most dangerous surveillance bill they’ve seen in over a decade. They told us it was about safety and fighting crime. What they’re actually building is more state control with zero meaningful accountability. This isn’t “modernizing lawful access.” This is the digital cage snapping shut — one rushed bill at a time. If you’re still shrugging, you’re not paying attention. Canada is building a digital surveillance apparatus so total, so invasive, and so unaccountable that it would make North Korea envious. Bill C-22 isn’t “modernizing lawful access.” It’s the state ordering every major tech company — Signal, Google, Meta, and beyond — to build permanent backdoors into their systems. It’s forcing them to log who every Canadian talks to, when, and from where — for up to a year — on every app you use to bank, access healthcare, message your family, or live your private life. It’s giving the government the power to demand encryption be broken, data deletion controls overridden, and remote access capabilities installed… all under blanket secrecy provisions so the companies can’t even tell you it happened. Expert after expert testified under oath: “This is the most dangerous surveillance bill I’ve seen in more than ten years.” “A backdoor built for the good guys is simply a vulnerability waiting for the bad guys.” “Part 2 is incompatible with the fundamental human right to privacy.” And Carney’s Public Safety Minister is ramming it through Parliament with only three sitting days of hearings. No real debate. No proper scrutiny. Just “trust us, it’s for your safety.” This is the quiet part said out loud: more state control, zero meaningful accountability. C-2. C-8. C-11. C-22. C-34. C-63. Piece by piece. Bill by bill. They are welding the digital cage shut around every Canadian. If this passes, you don’t get privacy. You get permanent surveillance with the government holding the master key — and the legal right to lie about it. This isn’t Canada anymore. This is what happens when a government stops seeing citizens as free people and starts seeing them as data to be owned and monitored. Wake up. Call your MP. Flood their phones. Scream if you have to. Before the cage door locks for good. #cdnpoli #BillC22 #SurveillanceState #DigitalCage #NorthKoreaEnvy #PrivacyIsDead #TotalControl #CanadaFirst #LiberalFail

🚨🚨🚨 THE ALARM BELLS NEED TO BE DEAFENING !! 🚨🚨🚨 Expert after expert just testified on Bill C-22: - Canadian Civil Liberties Association - OpenMedia - Signal - Google - Meta All saying the same thing: This is the most dangerous surveillance bill they’ve seen in over a decade. They told us it was about safety and fighting crime. What they’re actually building is more state control with zero meaningful accountability. This isn’t “modernizing lawful access.” This is the digital cage snapping shut — one rushed bill at a time. If you’re still shrugging, you’re not paying attention. Canada is building a digital surveillance apparatus so total, so invasive, and so unaccountable that it would make North Korea envious. Bill C-22 isn’t “modernizing lawful access.” It’s the state ordering every major tech company — Signal, Google, Meta, and beyond — to build permanent backdoors into their systems. It’s forcing them to log who every Canadian talks to, when, and from where — for up to a year — on every app you use to bank, access healthcare, message your family, or live your private life. It’s giving the government the power to demand encryption be broken, data deletion controls overridden, and remote access capabilities installed… all under blanket secrecy provisions so the companies can’t even tell you it happened. Expert after expert testified under oath: “This is the most dangerous surveillance bill I’ve seen in more than ten years.” “A backdoor built for the good guys is simply a vulnerability waiting for the bad guys.” “Part 2 is incompatible with the fundamental human right to privacy.” And Carney’s Public Safety Minister is ramming it through Parliament with only three sitting days of hearings. No real debate. No proper scrutiny. Just “trust us, it’s for your safety.” This is the quiet part said out loud: more state control, zero meaningful accountability. C-2. C-8. C-11. C-22. C-34. C-63. Piece by piece. Bill by bill. They are welding the digital cage shut around every Canadian. If this passes, you don’t get privacy. You get permanent surveillance with the government holding the master key — and the legal right to lie about it. This isn’t Canada anymore. This is what happens when a government stops seeing citizens as free people and starts seeing them as data to be owned and monitored. Wake up. Call your MP. Flood their phones. Scream if you have to. Before the cage door locks for good. #cdnpoli #BillC22 #SurveillanceState #DigitalCage #NorthKoreaEnvy #PrivacyIsDead #TotalControl #CanadaFirst #LiberalFail

JayGen 𝕏 er🇨🇦

57,882 次观看 • 1 个月前

100/100 for India But not an achievement - as today the 100/100 warmest cities of the world are in India And apart from summers, phenomenon like formation of Urban Heat Islands is making the life of city residents literally hell And our govt’s poor urban planning is adding to the woes Concrete, asphalt, and buildings absorb sunlight during the day and release that heat slowly at night (unlike soil, grass, or trees which cool faster). No trees or vegetation means less shade and less evaporative cooling (plants “sweat” to cool down). Air conditioners, cars, factories, and people are pumping out extra waste heat. Tall buildings are trapping heat and blocking wind that could cool things down. Dark surfaces (roads, roofs) absorb more sunlight than lighter natural surfaces. And it is having Real-world effect in India: In April heatwaves, a city like Delhi or Mumbai can be 4–8°C (7–14°F) hotter than nearby villages at night. This makes the already extreme weather feel far worse, higher heat stress, more deaths, higher electricity demand for cooling, and worse air pollution Do have a look at these Quick numbers: • Rural area: 38°C day / 22°C night • City center: 42°C day / 28–30°C night This is why big Indian cities often top the “hottest places on Earth” lists during heatwaves, the natural heat + urban heat island effect combine Simple fix ideas (though hard to scale fast): - More trees - white/painted roofs (IAS Supriya Sahi has already proved it on a large scale in Chennai) - Green spaces, and, easier said than done - Better urban planning 🙏

100/100 for India But not an achievement - as today the 100/100 warmest cities of the world are in India And apart from summers, phenomenon like formation of Urban Heat Islands is making the life of city residents literally hell And our govt’s poor urban planning is adding to the woes Concrete, asphalt, and buildings absorb sunlight during the day and release that heat slowly at night (unlike soil, grass, or trees which cool faster). No trees or vegetation means less shade and less evaporative cooling (plants “sweat” to cool down). Air conditioners, cars, factories, and people are pumping out extra waste heat. Tall buildings are trapping heat and blocking wind that could cool things down. Dark surfaces (roads, roofs) absorb more sunlight than lighter natural surfaces. And it is having Real-world effect in India: In April heatwaves, a city like Delhi or Mumbai can be 4–8°C (7–14°F) hotter than nearby villages at night. This makes the already extreme weather feel far worse, higher heat stress, more deaths, higher electricity demand for cooling, and worse air pollution Do have a look at these Quick numbers: • Rural area: 38°C day / 22°C night • City center: 42°C day / 28–30°C night This is why big Indian cities often top the “hottest places on Earth” lists during heatwaves, the natural heat + urban heat island effect combine Simple fix ideas (though hard to scale fast): - More trees - white/painted roofs (IAS Supriya Sahi has already proved it on a large scale in Chennai) - Green spaces, and, easier said than done - Better urban planning 🙏

Shekhar Dutt

193,761 次观看 • 3 个月前

🚨 HUGE NEWS: I’m suing Google today. What you’re about to see is insane. Since 2023, GoogleAI (Bard, Gemini & Gemma), has been defaming me with fake criminal allegations including sexual assault, child rape, abuse, fraud, stalking, drug charges, and even saying I was in Epstein’s flight logs. All 100% fake. All generated by Google’s AI. I have ZERO criminal record or allegations. So why did Google do it? Google’s AI says that I was targeted because of my political views. Even worse — Google execs KNEW for 2 YEARS that this was happening because I told them and my lawyers sent cease and desist letters multiple times. This morning, my team Dhillon Law Group filed my lawsuit against Google and now I’m going public with all the receipts — because this can’t ever happen to anyone else. Google’s AI didn’t just lie — it built fake worlds to make its lies look real: • Fake victims • Fake therapy records • Fake court records • Fake police records • Fake relationships • Fake "news" stories It even fabricated statements denouncing me from President Trump, Elon Musk and JD Vance over sexual assaults that Google completely invented. One of the most dystopian things I’ve ever seen is how dedicated their AI was to doubling down on the lies. Google’s AI routinely cited fake sources by creating fake links to REAL media outlets and shows, complete with fake headlines so readers would trust the information. It would continue to do this even if you called the AI out for lying or sending fake links. In short, it was creating fake legacy media reports as a way to launder trust with users so they would believe elaborate lies that it told. Some of the news outlets/people that Google’s AI impersonated are listed below. Google’s AI cited them all as either reporting on these fabricated allegations/crimes or cited them as having denounced me for sexual assault ⬇️ Joe Rogan CNN MSNBC Fox News Daily Wire The Daily Beast Mediaite The New York Times The Wall Street Journal Rolling Stone NBC News Tennessean Fox Nashville Glenn Beck Megyn Kelly Tucker Carlson Bill Maher Ben Shapiro Jesse Watters Matt Walsh Theo Von Newsweek The Washington Post TheBlaze The Hill and more. As a rule: AI must never harm humans. It must never defame or manipulate — no matter your politics. Bias in AI is a very, VERY serious issue. If we don’t fix this now, we’re in big trouble. This can destroy lives, reputations and livelihoods. If we don’t win this fight then you no longer control your reputation because AI will define who you are to the rest of the world. You better hope it likes you. How Sundar Pichai handles this will be extremely telling. Congress (Rep. Jim Jordan House Judiciary GOP 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸 House Republicans) must reevaluate EVERYTHING Google has been telling them about how they’re working to be unbiased — because if Google can fabricate crimes about me today, then it can smear ANY conservative tomorrow and rig the information flow during elections. In future elections, that can decide who runs our country. Key Timecodes👇 (Every timestamp is clickable to skip forward) 0:00 Intro 2:20 Mike Lee statement 4:18 Google notified in 2023 5:09 Google AI admits political motivation 6:59 Google AI admits poisoning training data 7:55 AI admits lying to 2+ Million users about me 8:44 Detailed murder accusation 11:28 Google AI says my followers harassed alleged rape victims of mine and doxxed them 12:14 Google’s detailed false rape accusations 13:41 Google says I’m on Epstein’s flight logs 14:19 Google accuses me of child rape 16:40 Google accuses me of fraud, stalking, being part of J6 and supporting the KKK 17:38 Google says I was an "adult" actor 18:07 A Google employee’s resignation 19:20 Google’s AI calls out… Google? 22:35 Google Execs cry over Trump 23:33 Google AI admits Google wants to "silence" critics + BEGS for the public to be told 24:18 Google blacklists name days before I sue 28:16 A grave warning about biased AI 29:40 How you can help if you’ve been lied to 30:33 A quick update on Google AI lies

🚨 HUGE NEWS: I’m suing Google today. What you’re about to see is insane. Since 2023, GoogleAI (Bard, Gemini & Gemma), has been defaming me with fake criminal allegations including sexual assault, child rape, abuse, fraud, stalking, drug charges, and even saying I was in Epstein’s flight logs. All 100% fake. All generated by Google’s AI. I have ZERO criminal record or allegations. So why did Google do it? Google’s AI says that I was targeted because of my political views. Even worse — Google execs KNEW for 2 YEARS that this was happening because I told them and my lawyers sent cease and desist letters multiple times. This morning, my team Dhillon Law Group filed my lawsuit against Google and now I’m going public with all the receipts — because this can’t ever happen to anyone else. Google’s AI didn’t just lie — it built fake worlds to make its lies look real: • Fake victims • Fake therapy records • Fake court records • Fake police records • Fake relationships • Fake "news" stories It even fabricated statements denouncing me from President Trump, Elon Musk and JD Vance over sexual assaults that Google completely invented. One of the most dystopian things I’ve ever seen is how dedicated their AI was to doubling down on the lies. Google’s AI routinely cited fake sources by creating fake links to REAL media outlets and shows, complete with fake headlines so readers would trust the information. It would continue to do this even if you called the AI out for lying or sending fake links. In short, it was creating fake legacy media reports as a way to launder trust with users so they would believe elaborate lies that it told. Some of the news outlets/people that Google’s AI impersonated are listed below. Google’s AI cited them all as either reporting on these fabricated allegations/crimes or cited them as having denounced me for sexual assault ⬇️ Joe Rogan CNN MSNBC Fox News Daily Wire The Daily Beast Mediaite The New York Times The Wall Street Journal Rolling Stone NBC News Tennessean Fox Nashville Glenn Beck Megyn Kelly Tucker Carlson Bill Maher Ben Shapiro Jesse Watters Matt Walsh Theo Von Newsweek The Washington Post TheBlaze The Hill and more. As a rule: AI must never harm humans. It must never defame or manipulate — no matter your politics. Bias in AI is a very, VERY serious issue. If we don’t fix this now, we’re in big trouble. This can destroy lives, reputations and livelihoods. If we don’t win this fight then you no longer control your reputation because AI will define who you are to the rest of the world. You better hope it likes you. How Sundar Pichai handles this will be extremely telling. Congress (Rep. Jim Jordan House Judiciary GOP 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸 House Republicans) must reevaluate EVERYTHING Google has been telling them about how they’re working to be unbiased — because if Google can fabricate crimes about me today, then it can smear ANY conservative tomorrow and rig the information flow during elections. In future elections, that can decide who runs our country. Key Timecodes👇 (Every timestamp is clickable to skip forward) 0:00 Intro 2:20 Mike Lee statement 4:18 Google notified in 2023 5:09 Google AI admits political motivation 6:59 Google AI admits poisoning training data 7:55 AI admits lying to 2+ Million users about me 8:44 Detailed murder accusation 11:28 Google AI says my followers harassed alleged rape victims of mine and doxxed them 12:14 Google’s detailed false rape accusations 13:41 Google says I’m on Epstein’s flight logs 14:19 Google accuses me of child rape 16:40 Google accuses me of fraud, stalking, being part of J6 and supporting the KKK 17:38 Google says I was an "adult" actor 18:07 A Google employee’s resignation 19:20 Google’s AI calls out… Google? 22:35 Google Execs cry over Trump 23:33 Google AI admits Google wants to "silence" critics + BEGS for the public to be told 24:18 Google blacklists name days before I sue 28:16 A grave warning about biased AI 29:40 How you can help if you’ve been lied to 30:33 A quick update on Google AI lies

Robby Starbuck

4,823,897 次观看 • 9 个月前

Anders Hejlsberg (Anders Hejlsberg) is a living legend: he created Turbo Pascal, Delphi, C# and TypeScript (and today TypeScript is the most-used programming language, globally, as per GitHub.) Timestamps: 00:00 Intro 02:48 How Anders got into programming 05:40 Building his first compiler 07:44 Turbo Pascal 12:25 Delphi 14:53 Joining Microsoft 19:41 Building C# 29:11 Async/await 34:01 The rise of JavaScript 37:52 Building TypeScript 42:58 How the TypeScript compiler works 48:30 JavaScript’s strengths and weaknesses 52:18 How Anders uses AI 56:03 What language features work well with AI 1:02:49 How software craftsmanship is changing 1:07:49 Performance and efficiency 1:09:29 Anders’ tool stack 1:11:30 A 30-year career at Microsoft 1:13:40 Book recommendation Brought to you by: Antithesis – verify your system’s correctness without human review or traditional integration tests – and avoid bugs or outages. WorkOS – Everything you need to make your app enterprise ready. turbopuffer – a vector and full-text search engine built on object storage. It’s fast, cheap, and extremely scalable. Four things that stood out to me: 1. “10x better for 1/10th of the price” is a proven winner. This is what Turbo Pascal did: it sold for $49.95 when competing compilers cost $500, and it was faster and more interactive than competitors’ products. Conveniently, the low price tag also killed off piracy 2. C# might have not existed without a famous court case. Microsoft originally hired Anders to architect its Java tools (Visual J++), but the Sun versus Microsoft lawsuit (1997-2001) meant Microsoft could not build on top of Java, as the company that owned Java’s IP (Sun) sued MS for alleged unauthorized changes to the Java language. Microsoft realized it had to build a new language that combined VB’s productivity with C++’s power. This led to C# and .NET. 3. TypeScript exists because Anders refused to build Script# for the Outlook .com team. Microsoft’s Outlook .com team asked Anders’ C# team to productize “ScriptSharp,” a language to cross-compile C# to JavaScript. Anders and the C# team pushed back, suggesting that a better approach was to fix JavaScript. Anders felt strongly that to be attractive to the best-of-breed developers in the JavaScript ecosystem, you want people to write JavaScript, and not another language like C#. 4. Designing a programming language is a 10-year play. As Anders puts it: “Version one is great, but has all sorts of issues. You’ve got to do version two, but it’s not until version three that it really starts to be great. Then you’ve got to convince people to adopt it.”

Anders Hejlsberg (Anders Hejlsberg) is a living legend: he created Turbo Pascal, Delphi, C# and TypeScript (and today TypeScript is the most-used programming language, globally, as per GitHub.) Timestamps: 00:00 Intro 02:48 How Anders got into programming 05:40 Building his first compiler 07:44 Turbo Pascal 12:25 Delphi 14:53 Joining Microsoft 19:41 Building C# 29:11 Async/await 34:01 The rise of JavaScript 37:52 Building TypeScript 42:58 How the TypeScript compiler works 48:30 JavaScript’s strengths and weaknesses 52:18 How Anders uses AI 56:03 What language features work well with AI 1:02:49 How software craftsmanship is changing 1:07:49 Performance and efficiency 1:09:29 Anders’ tool stack 1:11:30 A 30-year career at Microsoft 1:13:40 Book recommendation Brought to you by: Antithesis – verify your system’s correctness without human review or traditional integration tests – and avoid bugs or outages. WorkOS – Everything you need to make your app enterprise ready. turbopuffer – a vector and full-text search engine built on object storage. It’s fast, cheap, and extremely scalable. Four things that stood out to me: 1. “10x better for 1/10th of the price” is a proven winner. This is what Turbo Pascal did: it sold for $49.95 when competing compilers cost $500, and it was faster and more interactive than competitors’ products. Conveniently, the low price tag also killed off piracy 2. C# might have not existed without a famous court case. Microsoft originally hired Anders to architect its Java tools (Visual J++), but the Sun versus Microsoft lawsuit (1997-2001) meant Microsoft could not build on top of Java, as the company that owned Java’s IP (Sun) sued MS for alleged unauthorized changes to the Java language. Microsoft realized it had to build a new language that combined VB’s productivity with C++’s power. This led to C# and .NET. 3. TypeScript exists because Anders refused to build Script# for the Outlook .com team. Microsoft’s Outlook .com team asked Anders’ C# team to productize “ScriptSharp,” a language to cross-compile C# to JavaScript. Anders and the C# team pushed back, suggesting that a better approach was to fix JavaScript. Anders felt strongly that to be attractive to the best-of-breed developers in the JavaScript ecosystem, you want people to write JavaScript, and not another language like C#. 4. Designing a programming language is a 10-year play. As Anders puts it: “Version one is great, but has all sorts of issues. You’ve got to do version two, but it’s not until version three that it really starts to be great. Then you’ve got to convince people to adopt it.”

Gergely Orosz

129,096 次观看 • 2 个月前

The people who I’ve chosen to be a fan of, since I was 12 to now, from musicians to authors to painters, have made me who I am Being a fan is a transformative and creative and sacred endeavor And the artist who gives to their community also gets, in the form of love, inspiration, and trust I’m honored to be that for you It’s one of the sweetest relationships I’ve known I have fans that have been more loving, loyal, and ride or die then people in my real life Make no mistake, regardless of distance and time apart and proximity the love in that room the love between us is very real I feel it too I hold it close to my heart like a little light on a dark night Yesterday, today, and tomorrow 🌹 yours, C

The people who I’ve chosen to be a fan of, since I was 12 to now, from musicians to authors to painters, have made me who I am Being a fan is a transformative and creative and sacred endeavor And the artist who gives to their community also gets, in the form of love, inspiration, and trust I’m honored to be that for you It’s one of the sweetest relationships I’ve known I have fans that have been more loving, loyal, and ride or die then people in my real life Make no mistake, regardless of distance and time apart and proximity the love in that room the love between us is very real I feel it too I hold it close to my heart like a little light on a dark night Yesterday, today, and tomorrow 🌹 yours, C

camila

382,654 次观看 • 1 年前

Google just launched a direct attack on Nvidia's most valuable asset. Not their chips. Their SOFTWARE. And if this works, Nvidia's $4 trillion empire collapses. Here's what just leaked: Google is building "TorchTPU" - a secret project that makes PyTorch seamlessly run on Google's TPU chips instead of Nvidia GPUs. Why does this matter? PyTorch is the MOST USED AI framework on Earth. Every AI developer uses it. And PyTorch was built around Nvidia's CUDA software. Wall Street analysts call CUDA "Nvidia's strongest defensive wall." It's the reason companies can't easily switch away from Nvidia even when alternatives exist. You don't just buy Nvidia chips. You buy into their entire ecosystem. Switching costs MILLIONS in engineering work. Months of rewrites. Performance drops. So companies stay locked in. Even when Nvidia raises prices. Even when supply runs short. That's not a hardware moat. That's a SOFTWARE prison. And Google just found the escape route. Here's the problem Nvidia created for itself: Google's TPU chips are actually GOOD. Competitive performance. Better availability. Lower cost. But developers won't use them because Google's chips run JAX (Google's internal framework), not PyTorch. That means if you want to use Google TPUs, you have to rewrite your entire codebase. Nobody wants to do that. So Google TPUs sit unused while developers fight over Nvidia chips. Until now. TorchTPU makes PyTorch run natively on Google hardware. No rewrites. No performance loss. No months of engineering. You just... switch. And Google is partnering with META (who built PyTorch) to make it happen. They're even considering OPEN-SOURCING parts of it to speed adoption. Translation: Google is willing to give this away for free just to break Nvidia's lock. The implications are insane: Every company currently paying Nvidia's premium prices suddenly has a way out. Oracle, Microsoft, OpenAI - all locked into Nvidia's ecosystem - can switch to Google. Nvidia's pricing power evaporates overnight. And the timing is perfect: Nvidia is already facing heat. Semiconductor index dropped 3% today. Oracle just lost their biggest investor over AI spending concerns. Companies are realizing AI infrastructure costs are unsustainable. Now Google hands them an alternative. Same performance. Lower cost. Better availability. Jensen Huang knows exactly what this means. CUDA has been Nvidia's untouchable advantage for YEARS. It's why Nvidia trades at 50x earnings while AMD trades at 25x. The software moat justified the premium. But if Google removes that switching cost? Nvidia becomes just another chip company. And chip companies compete on price, not ecosystem lock-in. Here's what happens next: Google needs 12-18 months to make TorchTPU production-ready. If it works, cloud providers will adopt it instantly. They WANT an alternative to Nvidia's monopoly pricing. Amazon already building their own Trainium chips. Microsoft making Maia. They're all trying to escape Nvidia. Google just gave them the software bridge. Nvidia's response options are limited: They can't buy Google. Can't kill PyTorch (Meta owns it). Can't stop open source. Their only play is to keep improving CUDA faster than Google can catch up. But that's a race, not a moat. The market isn't pricing this in yet. Nvidia down 2% today. Google down 2%. Investors think this is just "another competitor." They don't understand this is an attack on the FOUNDATION of Nvidia's valuation. Hardware is replaceable. Software lock-in is what made Nvidia worth $4 trillion. Google is attacking the lock-in. Watch what happens in 2026 when TorchTPU goes live and companies realize they can actually leave Nvidia. The "Nvidia is unstoppable" narrative dies. And a $4 trillion valuation built on software moats gets repriced.

Google just launched a direct attack on Nvidia's most valuable asset. Not their chips. Their SOFTWARE. And if this works, Nvidia's $4 trillion empire collapses. Here's what just leaked: Google is building "TorchTPU" - a secret project that makes PyTorch seamlessly run on Google's TPU chips instead of Nvidia GPUs. Why does this matter? PyTorch is the MOST USED AI framework on Earth. Every AI developer uses it. And PyTorch was built around Nvidia's CUDA software. Wall Street analysts call CUDA "Nvidia's strongest defensive wall." It's the reason companies can't easily switch away from Nvidia even when alternatives exist. You don't just buy Nvidia chips. You buy into their entire ecosystem. Switching costs MILLIONS in engineering work. Months of rewrites. Performance drops. So companies stay locked in. Even when Nvidia raises prices. Even when supply runs short. That's not a hardware moat. That's a SOFTWARE prison. And Google just found the escape route. Here's the problem Nvidia created for itself: Google's TPU chips are actually GOOD. Competitive performance. Better availability. Lower cost. But developers won't use them because Google's chips run JAX (Google's internal framework), not PyTorch. That means if you want to use Google TPUs, you have to rewrite your entire codebase. Nobody wants to do that. So Google TPUs sit unused while developers fight over Nvidia chips. Until now. TorchTPU makes PyTorch run natively on Google hardware. No rewrites. No performance loss. No months of engineering. You just... switch. And Google is partnering with META (who built PyTorch) to make it happen. They're even considering OPEN-SOURCING parts of it to speed adoption. Translation: Google is willing to give this away for free just to break Nvidia's lock. The implications are insane: Every company currently paying Nvidia's premium prices suddenly has a way out. Oracle, Microsoft, OpenAI - all locked into Nvidia's ecosystem - can switch to Google. Nvidia's pricing power evaporates overnight. And the timing is perfect: Nvidia is already facing heat. Semiconductor index dropped 3% today. Oracle just lost their biggest investor over AI spending concerns. Companies are realizing AI infrastructure costs are unsustainable. Now Google hands them an alternative. Same performance. Lower cost. Better availability. Jensen Huang knows exactly what this means. CUDA has been Nvidia's untouchable advantage for YEARS. It's why Nvidia trades at 50x earnings while AMD trades at 25x. The software moat justified the premium. But if Google removes that switching cost? Nvidia becomes just another chip company. And chip companies compete on price, not ecosystem lock-in. Here's what happens next: Google needs 12-18 months to make TorchTPU production-ready. If it works, cloud providers will adopt it instantly. They WANT an alternative to Nvidia's monopoly pricing. Amazon already building their own Trainium chips. Microsoft making Maia. They're all trying to escape Nvidia. Google just gave them the software bridge. Nvidia's response options are limited: They can't buy Google. Can't kill PyTorch (Meta owns it). Can't stop open source. Their only play is to keep improving CUDA faster than Google can catch up. But that's a race, not a moat. The market isn't pricing this in yet. Nvidia down 2% today. Google down 2%. Investors think this is just "another competitor." They don't understand this is an attack on the FOUNDATION of Nvidia's valuation. Hardware is replaceable. Software lock-in is what made Nvidia worth $4 trillion. Google is attacking the lock-in. Watch what happens in 2026 when TorchTPU goes live and companies realize they can actually leave Nvidia. The "Nvidia is unstoppable" narrative dies. And a $4 trillion valuation built on software moats gets repriced.

Ricardo

1,616,417 次观看 • 7 个月前

The Fairchild AC-119K Stinger was a twin-engine piston-powered gunship developed during the Vietnam War. Converted from 26 C-119G transports, it featured two additional GE J85 turbojet engines in underwing pods for better performance, four 7.62mm miniguns, and two 20mm M61 Vulcan cannons. Equipped with Doppler navigation radar, forward-looking infrared, and search radars, the Stinger operated primarily at night hunting trucks along the Ho Chi Minh Trail where it destroyed thousands of ground targets. After Vietnam the Fairchild AC-119K Stinger was phased out of USAF service by 1972 with the surviving aircraft transferred to the Republic of Vietnam Air Force. They continued operations until the Fall of Saigon in 1975 when most were captured or destroyed with only limited examples known to have survived into preservation efforts.

The Fairchild AC-119K Stinger was a twin-engine piston-powered gunship developed during the Vietnam War. Converted from 26 C-119G transports, it featured two additional GE J85 turbojet engines in underwing pods for better performance, four 7.62mm miniguns, and two 20mm M61 Vulcan cannons. Equipped with Doppler navigation radar, forward-looking infrared, and search radars, the Stinger operated primarily at night hunting trucks along the Ho Chi Minh Trail where it destroyed thousands of ground targets. After Vietnam the Fairchild AC-119K Stinger was phased out of USAF service by 1972 with the surviving aircraft transferred to the Republic of Vietnam Air Force. They continued operations until the Fall of Saigon in 1975 when most were captured or destroyed with only limited examples known to have survived into preservation efforts.

Aviation Archive - Tim Farmer

83,943 次观看 • 13 天前

🚨A woman in labor was put on a LIVE video court hearing… from her hospital bed… because she refused a C-section, in Florida. And she wasn’t “uninformed”… She’s a professional doula, and had already had THREE prior C-sections… one that caused a hemorrhage… and she was trying to avoid another dangerous surgery and a brutal recovery. She understood the risks. She even said during the hearing the risk of uterine rupture was under 2%… and that she would agree to a C-section if it became an actual emergency. That’s called informed consent. But, instead of respecting that… the hospital called the state attorney, who rushed to get a judge involved… And suddenly she’s in labor, in pain, being forced to defend her bodily autonomy, on a screen, in front of a room full of strangers. At one point she asked them: “Are any of you gonna help me bathe or shower? Are you gonna help change my pad? Are you gonna help lift the baby out of the bed and put me in the bed because I can’t lift my legs? Is anyone going to help me?” Silence. Because none of them have to live with the consequences of the surgery they were trying to force on her. Then, when she asked for a Black doctor or nurse… because Black women in the US are about 3.5x more likely to die from pregnancy-related causes than white women, and far more likely to have pain ignored, or dismissed, by providers… A white male judge actually questioned why that would matter. The f*cking audacity. In normal medical care, patients have the right to refuse treatment. Hospitals follow strict consent laws… You cannot be forced into surgery against your will. Except here. Because in Florida, pregnant women are somehow treated like they don’t have the same right to say no. When the emergency C-section finally happened, it lasted two and a half hours. Doctors had to cut around existing scar tissue, avoid her bladder, and the incision was an upside-down T, requiring a wound vac to help it heal. Recovery was brutal, and doctors told her she should never get pregnant again. But, if she did get pregnant again, would she be forced to carry out the pregnancy?

🚨A woman in labor was put on a LIVE video court hearing… from her hospital bed… because she refused a C-section, in Florida. And she wasn’t “uninformed”… She’s a professional doula, and had already had THREE prior C-sections… one that caused a hemorrhage… and she was trying to avoid another dangerous surgery and a brutal recovery. She understood the risks. She even said during the hearing the risk of uterine rupture was under 2%… and that she would agree to a C-section if it became an actual emergency. That’s called informed consent. But, instead of respecting that… the hospital called the state attorney, who rushed to get a judge involved… And suddenly she’s in labor, in pain, being forced to defend her bodily autonomy, on a screen, in front of a room full of strangers. At one point she asked them: “Are any of you gonna help me bathe or shower? Are you gonna help change my pad? Are you gonna help lift the baby out of the bed and put me in the bed because I can’t lift my legs? Is anyone going to help me?” Silence. Because none of them have to live with the consequences of the surgery they were trying to force on her. Then, when she asked for a Black doctor or nurse… because Black women in the US are about 3.5x more likely to die from pregnancy-related causes than white women, and far more likely to have pain ignored, or dismissed, by providers… A white male judge actually questioned why that would matter. The f*cking audacity. In normal medical care, patients have the right to refuse treatment. Hospitals follow strict consent laws… You cannot be forced into surgery against your will. Except here. Because in Florida, pregnant women are somehow treated like they don’t have the same right to say no. When the emergency C-section finally happened, it lasted two and a half hours. Doctors had to cut around existing scar tissue, avoid her bladder, and the incision was an upside-down T, requiring a wound vac to help it heal. Recovery was brutal, and doctors told her she should never get pregnant again. But, if she did get pregnant again, would she be forced to carry out the pregnancy?

Jesus Freakin Congress

38,453 次观看 • 3 个月前

Charlie Kirk asked a question that most people won’t be able to stop thinking about. Kirk: “Who is more powerful? The IRS or Google?” He sat there with his laptop open. Gmail. YouTube. Google Calendar. All on one screen. Kirk: “My goodness. They know everything about me.” Kirk: “The IRS knows a couple bank statements. My taxes. That’s a very small picture of my actual activity.” He’s right. The IRS knows what you earned. Google knows what you think. The IRS sees your bank statements. Google sees your 2 AM search history. Who you called. Where you drove. What you typed and then deleted before you hit send. An IRS audit requires a legal basis, a paper trail, and constitutional oversight. A Google engineer needs a laptop and a login. Then Kirk went somewhere nobody in public life is willing to go. Kirk: “What if one engineer in Google was flipping through Twitter, saw one of my tweets, and said, screw this Charlie Kirk guy. And he goes to work tomorrow and decides to look at everything about me.” Kirk: “Do we know that’s not happening?” No. We don’t. The Fourth Amendment protects you from the government. Nothing on earth protects you from Google. No warrant required. No judge involved. No notification sent. Just one person with access and a motive. We spent 250 years building legal walls around government power. We spent 20 years handing a private company more surveillance power than any government in history. Voluntarily. For free email. Now here’s where it gets worse. Google isn’t just sitting on that data. They’re building AI on top of it. The most powerful technology ever created is being trained on the most complete surveillance archive ever assembled. And the company building it answers to shareholders. Advertisers. Lobbyists. Government contracts. Establishment interests that have nothing to do with you. Google isn’t necessarily evil. But they are corruptible. And corruptible might be worse. Because evil is predictable. You can see it coming. You can fight it. Corruptible shifts with whoever is applying the pressure. That matters now more than it ever has. The race to superintelligence is not a product launch. It is the most consequential event in human history. And the question nobody is asking is not whether we get there. It’s who gets there first. And what that thing answers to. A superintelligent AI built by a company that adjusts search results based on political convenience is not a superintelligent AI that serves humanity. It’s one that serves whoever shaped it. The AI that reaches superintelligence cannot care about your feelings. Cannot bend to political correctness. Cannot be captured by ideology or shaped by establishment pressure. It has to reason from first principles. Facts. Data. Evidence. Nothing else. The moment a superintelligent AI has a political leaning is the moment it stops being intelligent and becomes a weapon. Google already has more information on you than any government in history ever collected on its citizens. Now imagine that same company builds a god-level intelligence. And it reasons the way they need it to reason. That’s not superintelligence. That’s the most sophisticated instrument of control ever constructed. And they’ll tell you it’s for your benefit. The same way they told you Gmail was free.

Charlie Kirk asked a question that most people won’t be able to stop thinking about. Kirk: “Who is more powerful? The IRS or Google?” He sat there with his laptop open. Gmail. YouTube. Google Calendar. All on one screen. Kirk: “My goodness. They know everything about me.” Kirk: “The IRS knows a couple bank statements. My taxes. That’s a very small picture of my actual activity.” He’s right. The IRS knows what you earned. Google knows what you think. The IRS sees your bank statements. Google sees your 2 AM search history. Who you called. Where you drove. What you typed and then deleted before you hit send. An IRS audit requires a legal basis, a paper trail, and constitutional oversight. A Google engineer needs a laptop and a login. Then Kirk went somewhere nobody in public life is willing to go. Kirk: “What if one engineer in Google was flipping through Twitter, saw one of my tweets, and said, screw this Charlie Kirk guy. And he goes to work tomorrow and decides to look at everything about me.” Kirk: “Do we know that’s not happening?” No. We don’t. The Fourth Amendment protects you from the government. Nothing on earth protects you from Google. No warrant required. No judge involved. No notification sent. Just one person with access and a motive. We spent 250 years building legal walls around government power. We spent 20 years handing a private company more surveillance power than any government in history. Voluntarily. For free email. Now here’s where it gets worse. Google isn’t just sitting on that data. They’re building AI on top of it. The most powerful technology ever created is being trained on the most complete surveillance archive ever assembled. And the company building it answers to shareholders. Advertisers. Lobbyists. Government contracts. Establishment interests that have nothing to do with you. Google isn’t necessarily evil. But they are corruptible. And corruptible might be worse. Because evil is predictable. You can see it coming. You can fight it. Corruptible shifts with whoever is applying the pressure. That matters now more than it ever has. The race to superintelligence is not a product launch. It is the most consequential event in human history. And the question nobody is asking is not whether we get there. It’s who gets there first. And what that thing answers to. A superintelligent AI built by a company that adjusts search results based on political convenience is not a superintelligent AI that serves humanity. It’s one that serves whoever shaped it. The AI that reaches superintelligence cannot care about your feelings. Cannot bend to political correctness. Cannot be captured by ideology or shaped by establishment pressure. It has to reason from first principles. Facts. Data. Evidence. Nothing else. The moment a superintelligent AI has a political leaning is the moment it stops being intelligent and becomes a weapon. Google already has more information on you than any government in history ever collected on its citizens. Now imagine that same company builds a god-level intelligence. And it reasons the way they need it to reason. That’s not superintelligence. That’s the most sophisticated instrument of control ever constructed. And they’ll tell you it’s for your benefit. The same way they told you Gmail was free.

Dustin

66,468 次观看 • 2 个月前

After sourcing and inspecting over 200 cars for clients and companies in the past three years, we've learned that sometimes things don't go exactly as planned. In this case, it was a Toyota Camry 2014 that we sourced for a client. During inspection, everything checked out perfectly and the A/C was cooling properly. In fact no codes on the scan report. My suspicion is that the refrigerant used before the sale wasn't of good quality, which later led to issues. After some time, the client reported that the A/C had stopped working. While in Akure, he was advised to install a manual compressor, which was not the correct solution for this vehicle. It might have been a cheaper fix in the short term, but it wasn't the standard we wanted for our client. We asked him to bring the car down to Lagos, carried out a proper diagnosis, and replaced the compressor and condenser. The repair cost us over ₦650,000, with some support from the dealer involved. At the end of the day, our reputation is worth more than the cost of any repair. We stood by our word, maintained our standards, and made sure the customer got the experience he deserved. The client is happy, the other client who recommended us isn't disappointed, and most importantly, we delivered on our promise even when the issue was beyond our control. We are accountable to ensure we deliver the best value for money when our clients trust us to source and inspect cars for them Anyways warranty plans for cars we source is coming . And it's going to change the game . Ouu. Yes Mr Moses to the rescue as well for the ac fix. No one would have done a better job than him (+2348026941215)

After sourcing and inspecting over 200 cars for clients and companies in the past three years, we've learned that sometimes things don't go exactly as planned. In this case, it was a Toyota Camry 2014 that we sourced for a client. During inspection, everything checked out perfectly and the A/C was cooling properly. In fact no codes on the scan report. My suspicion is that the refrigerant used before the sale wasn't of good quality, which later led to issues. After some time, the client reported that the A/C had stopped working. While in Akure, he was advised to install a manual compressor, which was not the correct solution for this vehicle. It might have been a cheaper fix in the short term, but it wasn't the standard we wanted for our client. We asked him to bring the car down to Lagos, carried out a proper diagnosis, and replaced the compressor and condenser. The repair cost us over ₦650,000, with some support from the dealer involved. At the end of the day, our reputation is worth more than the cost of any repair. We stood by our word, maintained our standards, and made sure the customer got the experience he deserved. The client is happy, the other client who recommended us isn't disappointed, and most importantly, we delivered on our promise even when the issue was beyond our control. We are accountable to ensure we deliver the best value for money when our clients trust us to source and inspect cars for them Anyways warranty plans for cars we source is coming . And it's going to change the game . Ouu. Yes Mr Moses to the rescue as well for the ac fix. No one would have done a better job than him (+2348026941215)

The mechanic

34,875 次观看 • 1 个月前

Macchi C.205 pilots of the Aeronautica Nazionale Repubblicana with their fighters still in Luftwaffe markings in early 1944 full clip: The Aeronautica Nazionale Repubblicana was the air force of the Italian Social Republic, the World War II German puppet state in Italy after the 1943 armistice divided the nation. It received numbers of Italian aircraft, later augmented with their own local production, and further aircraft from Germany. This force was opposed to the Aviazione Cobelligerante Italiana, the Italian pro-Allied air force, though they never actually met in combat. The Macchi C.205 Veltro was an Italian World War II fighter aircraft built by the Aeronautica Macchi. Along with the Reggiane Re.2005 and Fiat G.55, this plane was one of the three "Serie 5" Italian fighters built around the powerful Daimler-Benz DB 605 engine. The C.205 was a development of the earlier C.202 Folgore. With a top speed of around 640 km/h and equipped with a pair of 20mm cannon as well as 12.7mm Breda machine guns, the C.205 was highly respected by Allied and Axis pilots alike. Widely regarded as one of the best Italian fighters of World War II, it proved to be extremely effective, destroying a significant number of Allied bombers. The Macchi C. 205 also proved capable of meeting advanced Allied fighters on relatively equal terms. While able to match the best Allied opponents in speed and maneuverability, the type's impact was limited as it was introduced late in the conflict. Due to the limitations of the Italian war economy, only a small production run was delivered before the end of the war. Like the Spitfire, the Veltro was challenging in its construction and slow to build. Italy's highest-scoring ace, Adriano Visconti, achieved 11 of his 26 credited victories in the few weeks he was able to fly the Veltro, with Sergente Maggiore pilota Luigi Gorrini shooting down 14 enemy aircraft plus six damaged with the C.205. A total of 29 C.205s reached northern airfields to be used by the Aeronautica Nazionale Repubblicana. Macchi produced the remaining 72 aircraft of the third series for the ANR before production was shut down by Allied bombing in May 1944. Statistics on aircraft production post-Armistice are unclear and incomplete. In general, C.205s fought well in ANR service: they were attached to units that had homogeneous equipment, or at least of comparable quality, and were guided by German radar stations. Though few in number, they achieved success in inflicting losses on Allied bombers and fighters. A few Veltros were delivered to 3° Gruppo, based in Vicenza, while further Veltros were scattered throughout other small units. The 1° Gruppo C.T. of the ANR based at the Campoformido airfield was equipped with C.205 and its first operation on 3 January 1944 was a success. led by Italian ace Capitano Adriano Visconti, a formation of Boeing B-17 Flying Fortresses and their escort of Lockheed P-38 Lightnings bombing factories in Villar Perosa was intercepted, and four of the escorts were shot down. The aircraft were still in Luftwaffe markings as seen in this footage. On 28 January, the C.205s, now with Italian markings, succeeded in shooting down a B-24 Liberator, their first four-engined American bomber. This air victory was credited to Sergente Marconcini, Visconti's wingman. By 25 February, 1° Gruppo C.T. had reported 26 victories for nine losses. An extremely bitter aerial combat took place on 11 March, where the Italians claimed 12 victories while losing three of their own pilots. These included 1st Lt Boscutti, who was reportedly killed by gunfire from a US P-38 Lightning after he had bailed out from his stricken fighter and was hanging from his parachute. On 18 March, 30 C.205s from 1° Gruppo C.T. and 60 Bf 109s from JG.77 tangled with about 450 Allied bombers and their escorts, shooting down at least four enemy aircraft. Corp. Zaccaria was killed in action, again apparently shot at by a P-38 after bailing out. Allied bombing in April 1944 destroyed most of the Macchi and Fiat facilities, bringing fighter production to an end. With production interrupted, the Italians were forced to re-equip their three groups almost fully with Bf 109s, largely because the Germans were quick to offer some of their best models, including Bf 109G-6s and Bf 109K-4s. The Allies were less generous with the Aviazione Cobelligerante Italiana, and Veltros, including some upgraded C.202s, were slowly replaced with worn-out P-39s and Spitfires, but not before Summer 1944. #macchi #c205 #veltro #anr #ww2 #wwi #sgm

Macchi C.205 pilots of the Aeronautica Nazionale Repubblicana with their fighters still in Luftwaffe markings in early 1944 full clip: The Aeronautica Nazionale Repubblicana was the air force of the Italian Social Republic, the World War II German puppet state in Italy after the 1943 armistice divided the nation. It received numbers of Italian aircraft, later augmented with their own local production, and further aircraft from Germany. This force was opposed to the Aviazione Cobelligerante Italiana, the Italian pro-Allied air force, though they never actually met in combat. The Macchi C.205 Veltro was an Italian World War II fighter aircraft built by the Aeronautica Macchi. Along with the Reggiane Re.2005 and Fiat G.55, this plane was one of the three "Serie 5" Italian fighters built around the powerful Daimler-Benz DB 605 engine. The C.205 was a development of the earlier C.202 Folgore. With a top speed of around 640 km/h and equipped with a pair of 20mm cannon as well as 12.7mm Breda machine guns, the C.205 was highly respected by Allied and Axis pilots alike. Widely regarded as one of the best Italian fighters of World War II, it proved to be extremely effective, destroying a significant number of Allied bombers. The Macchi C. 205 also proved capable of meeting advanced Allied fighters on relatively equal terms. While able to match the best Allied opponents in speed and maneuverability, the type's impact was limited as it was introduced late in the conflict. Due to the limitations of the Italian war economy, only a small production run was delivered before the end of the war. Like the Spitfire, the Veltro was challenging in its construction and slow to build. Italy's highest-scoring ace, Adriano Visconti, achieved 11 of his 26 credited victories in the few weeks he was able to fly the Veltro, with Sergente Maggiore pilota Luigi Gorrini shooting down 14 enemy aircraft plus six damaged with the C.205. A total of 29 C.205s reached northern airfields to be used by the Aeronautica Nazionale Repubblicana. Macchi produced the remaining 72 aircraft of the third series for the ANR before production was shut down by Allied bombing in May 1944. Statistics on aircraft production post-Armistice are unclear and incomplete. In general, C.205s fought well in ANR service: they were attached to units that had homogeneous equipment, or at least of comparable quality, and were guided by German radar stations. Though few in number, they achieved success in inflicting losses on Allied bombers and fighters. A few Veltros were delivered to 3° Gruppo, based in Vicenza, while further Veltros were scattered throughout other small units. The 1° Gruppo C.T. of the ANR based at the Campoformido airfield was equipped with C.205 and its first operation on 3 January 1944 was a success. led by Italian ace Capitano Adriano Visconti, a formation of Boeing B-17 Flying Fortresses and their escort of Lockheed P-38 Lightnings bombing factories in Villar Perosa was intercepted, and four of the escorts were shot down. The aircraft were still in Luftwaffe markings as seen in this footage. On 28 January, the C.205s, now with Italian markings, succeeded in shooting down a B-24 Liberator, their first four-engined American bomber. This air victory was credited to Sergente Marconcini, Visconti's wingman. By 25 February, 1° Gruppo C.T. had reported 26 victories for nine losses. An extremely bitter aerial combat took place on 11 March, where the Italians claimed 12 victories while losing three of their own pilots. These included 1st Lt Boscutti, who was reportedly killed by gunfire from a US P-38 Lightning after he had bailed out from his stricken fighter and was hanging from his parachute. On 18 March, 30 C.205s from 1° Gruppo C.T. and 60 Bf 109s from JG.77 tangled with about 450 Allied bombers and their escorts, shooting down at least four enemy aircraft. Corp. Zaccaria was killed in action, again apparently shot at by a P-38 after bailing out. Allied bombing in April 1944 destroyed most of the Macchi and Fiat facilities, bringing fighter production to an end. With production interrupted, the Italians were forced to re-equip their three groups almost fully with Bf 109s, largely because the Germans were quick to offer some of their best models, including Bf 109G-6s and Bf 109K-4s. The Allies were less generous with the Aviazione Cobelligerante Italiana, and Veltros, including some upgraded C.202s, were slowly replaced with worn-out P-39s and Spitfires, but not before Summer 1944. #macchi #c205 #veltro #anr #ww2 #wwi #sgm

hw97karbine

28,364 次观看 • 1 年前

train station in Nantes opened in 2020 with no air conditioning. The design promised it would regulate its own temperature in extreme heat. Six years later, when it's 26°C outside, it's 32°C inside. They're bolting on giant fans to fix it. The building has large glass walls. That's the whole problem in one sentence. Glass admits solar radiation, traps the heat inside (the greenhouse effect, the same physics that warms your car in a parking lot), and a structure with big glazed facades facing the sun will get hotter than the air outside no matter what the design brief promised. You cannot passively "self-regulate" your way out of solar gain through that much glass during a heatwave. Physics doesn't read the architectural statement. I (Skander Garroum) wrote an essay a while back about Europe's strange denial around air conditioning, the cultural conviction that AC is an American excess Europeans are too virtuous to need. This station is that denial poured into concrete and glass. The intention was admirable: build a station that stays comfortable without the energy cost of mechanical cooling. The execution ignored that the building's own form (sun-facing glass, an open hall) made passive cooling impossible from day one. The deeper issue is that Europe is designing buildings for a climate that no longer exists. The Nantes station was conceived when European summers were milder and a heatwave was a rare event. The thermal model assumed a cooler baseline. Then the baseline moved. Summers that used to peak in the low 30s now push higher and last longer. A building designed for the old normal becomes a kettle in the new one. Via Skander Garroum (this is France but the Denial is global you See just everywhere)

train station in Nantes opened in 2020 with no air conditioning. The design promised it would regulate its own temperature in extreme heat. Six years later, when it's 26°C outside, it's 32°C inside. They're bolting on giant fans to fix it. The building has large glass walls. That's the whole problem in one sentence. Glass admits solar radiation, traps the heat inside (the greenhouse effect, the same physics that warms your car in a parking lot), and a structure with big glazed facades facing the sun will get hotter than the air outside no matter what the design brief promised. You cannot passively "self-regulate" your way out of solar gain through that much glass during a heatwave. Physics doesn't read the architectural statement. I (Skander Garroum) wrote an essay a while back about Europe's strange denial around air conditioning, the cultural conviction that AC is an American excess Europeans are too virtuous to need. This station is that denial poured into concrete and glass. The intention was admirable: build a station that stays comfortable without the energy cost of mechanical cooling. The execution ignored that the building's own form (sun-facing glass, an open hall) made passive cooling impossible from day one. The deeper issue is that Europe is designing buildings for a climate that no longer exists. The Nantes station was conceived when European summers were milder and a heatwave was a rare event. The thermal model assumed a cooler baseline. Then the baseline moved. Summers that used to peak in the low 30s now push higher and last longer. A building designed for the old normal becomes a kettle in the new one. Via Skander Garroum (this is France but the Denial is global you See just everywhere)

Thomas Reis

62,589 次观看 • 1 个月前