Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Yesterday on ITV’s Loose Women , I shared about a judge threatening a rape survivor. He said that if she continued with her allegations, her child would be taken into care. It was a chilling abuse of power—and a horrific example of how deeply broken our family court system... truly is. Worse still, incidents like these are not isolated. I share several examples of survivors facing harm in the courtroom in my book, He Said She Said. But family court judges operate with judicial immunity, meaning they cannot be held personally accountable, even when their decisions cause direct harm. Survivors of abuse (many already re-traumatised by the legal process) are left with no recourse when the very institution meant to protect their children instead threatens to punish them for speaking the truth. In one case I represented, a mother, a rape survivor, was forced to fight for her daughter’s safety when CAFCASS recommended unsupervised contact between the child and father, convicted serial rapist Kristoffer Paul Arthur White. Why? Because the family court system clings to the misguided presumption that a child’s contact with any parent, even one proven to be abusive, is better than no contact at all. As someone who grew up in a home shadowed by domestic abuse and alcoholism, I can say with absolute certainty: no parent is far better than an abusive one. The current system prioritises the rights of abusers to maintain control, rather than the rights of children to be safe and of mothers to be believed. This has to change. We need a family court system that listens to survivors, holds judges accountable, and stops endangering children and survivors through a pro-contact culture. We owe survivors better. We owe children better. We need to continue speaking out until the system is no longer a silent accomplice to abuse.show more

Dr Charlotte Proudman

87,420 subscribers

29,844 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

Health & Wellness News & Politics

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

10 Comments

POLLY FRAZER1 year ago

@loosewomen I think you are incredible. I used to be like you. Now I am broken. DA SA of my children by same perp, stalking death threats & family court suggesting he is a good dad. Weve been homeless, fled 4 homes. I was a headteacher and now I dont leave the house. Thank you brave person

Tessa1 year ago

@loosewomen The concept of fairness doesn't exist in the Family Couts. How many women have suffered complex PTSD as a direct result of the Judges treatment of them? This can only change if women are allowed to speak about their experiences.

Liberty 🪷💙1 year ago

@loosewomen Thank you Charlotte 🫶

1click boedicea1 year ago

@loosewomen I havent seen or heard from my child for 6 years. Fam court left her to do risk assessment of severe coercive control of me and her aged 12 whilst held hostage by father who was telling her what to say. Judges are the problem. They support male supremacy

Lisa Crooks1 year ago

@loosewomen Brilliant, I’m speechless 🙏

Sheumais15751 year ago

@loosewomen The judiciary, generally, is long overdue fundamental reform. That judge should be accountable for that behaviour.

Sherlock1 year ago

@loosewomen Know of a woman who had a rich husband. He was having an affair with the social worker. He ended up getting custody as he was rich. Made her out to be unstable. Turned out he kept the kids in a concrete garage and one lad had ocd. This came out when they reached 16+. Horrific

Sherlock1 year ago

@loosewomen It’s only when a teenage girl next door spotted him getting upset about her asking about a clock in the bathroom that she took the clock and found a camera. So eventually the mother got the kids. Only because of this girl. He also was keeping the kids in a shed when naughty.

Sherlock1 year ago

@loosewomen Guess what she wasn’t allowed the kids as they said she had been a victim of domestic abuse so hadn’t protected the kids so they gave the kids to the actual DV abuser. These court and social services type people are insane and a risk to children

Alone Ranger1 year ago

@loosewomen I’m so proud of you Dr. Proudman ! Thank you for talking about this. The big boy’s club / male kinship groups have been abusing their power to crush women for far too long.

Related Videos

Today I had the opportunity to speak on ITV’s Loose Women about something incredibly close to my heart, my book He Said She Said and the heartbreaking failures of the family court system. I spoke not just as an author or advocate, but as someone who has lived through the traumas we too often minimise or dismiss in law and public discourse. During the segment, I shared one of the most harrowing stories I’ve come across as a barrister—a judge threatening to have a rape survivor’s child adopted if she continued with her allegations. It's one of the first stories recounted in my book because it truly exemplifies the brokenness of the system. Furthermore, in family court, there is no formal definition of rape, no standard definition of consent—yet these courts are making life-altering decisions for survivors, mothers, and children daily. There is an assumption baked into our legal system that contact with both parents is always in the best interest of the child, but I know from both my work experience and lived experience that no parent is far better than an abusive one. The presumption of contact has become a weapon, allowing abusers to maintain control under the guise of shared parenting. It must be repealed. As a child raised in a household shadowed by domestic abuse and alcoholism, I carry the passion to speak out. Survivors need to be believed, protected, and supported. The system needs radical reform, and it begins with listening to the voices of those who’ve been silenced too long. Thank you to Loose Women for their work on the Facing It Together Campaign to address domestic abuse, and for allowing me to speak on my book alongside this work in this space. My heartfelt thanks to Brenda Edwards, Denise Welch, Kelle Bryan, and Olivia Attwood-Dack, who have spoken out about their experiences of abuse in the past and are breaking ground on creating a world where abuse is unacceptable and survivors will not be silenced.

Today I had the opportunity to speak on ITV’s Loose Women about something incredibly close to my heart, my book He Said She Said and the heartbreaking failures of the family court system. I spoke not just as an author or advocate, but as someone who has lived through the traumas we too often minimise or dismiss in law and public discourse. During the segment, I shared one of the most harrowing stories I’ve come across as a barrister—a judge threatening to have a rape survivor’s child adopted if she continued with her allegations. It's one of the first stories recounted in my book because it truly exemplifies the brokenness of the system. Furthermore, in family court, there is no formal definition of rape, no standard definition of consent—yet these courts are making life-altering decisions for survivors, mothers, and children daily. There is an assumption baked into our legal system that contact with both parents is always in the best interest of the child, but I know from both my work experience and lived experience that no parent is far better than an abusive one. The presumption of contact has become a weapon, allowing abusers to maintain control under the guise of shared parenting. It must be repealed. As a child raised in a household shadowed by domestic abuse and alcoholism, I carry the passion to speak out. Survivors need to be believed, protected, and supported. The system needs radical reform, and it begins with listening to the voices of those who’ve been silenced too long. Thank you to Loose Women for their work on the Facing It Together Campaign to address domestic abuse, and for allowing me to speak on my book alongside this work in this space. My heartfelt thanks to Brenda Edwards, Denise Welch, Kelle Bryan, and Olivia Attwood-Dack, who have spoken out about their experiences of abuse in the past and are breaking ground on creating a world where abuse is unacceptable and survivors will not be silenced.

Dr Charlotte Proudman

37,020 views • 1 year ago

The system is broken, but people don’t realise it until it’s too late and they themselves are in it. Most of the public still believes the legal system operates with fairness, integrity, and justice. But those who enter the family courts—especially victim-survivors of abuse—discover something very different. They learn that the system is not designed to protect them or their children. They learn that speaking up is punished. They learn that “contact at all costs” is the default, even when it means placing children with abusers. In the recently released documentary, Kate Kniveton bravely shares how draining the process has been: financially, emotionally, and psychologically. But she’d do it all again to protect her child. Every survivor-parent I have represented has looked into the jaws of family court, steeled themselves, and continued fighting on, doing whatever it takes to protect their children. And I've seen the family court harm them in ways the abuse they escaped never could. These women's courage is extraordinary. They deserve safety and belief. For now, Kate and her child are safe. But the future is uncertain because the law still presumes contact is in a child’s best interests, even when there’s clear evidence of abuse. As I argue in He Said She Said, this presumption is not just outdated—it is dangerous. It protects perpetrators and punishes protective parents, especially mothers. Kate’s story is one of rare legal recognition. But the system she faced is routine. And while her bravery has helped expose the reality of the family courts, we should not expect survivors to carry this burden alone. We must change the law. End the presumption of contact. Protect children. Believe survivors.

The system is broken, but people don’t realise it until it’s too late and they themselves are in it. Most of the public still believes the legal system operates with fairness, integrity, and justice. But those who enter the family courts—especially victim-survivors of abuse—discover something very different. They learn that the system is not designed to protect them or their children. They learn that speaking up is punished. They learn that “contact at all costs” is the default, even when it means placing children with abusers. In the recently released documentary, Kate Kniveton bravely shares how draining the process has been: financially, emotionally, and psychologically. But she’d do it all again to protect her child. Every survivor-parent I have represented has looked into the jaws of family court, steeled themselves, and continued fighting on, doing whatever it takes to protect their children. And I've seen the family court harm them in ways the abuse they escaped never could. These women's courage is extraordinary. They deserve safety and belief. For now, Kate and her child are safe. But the future is uncertain because the law still presumes contact is in a child’s best interests, even when there’s clear evidence of abuse. As I argue in He Said She Said, this presumption is not just outdated—it is dangerous. It protects perpetrators and punishes protective parents, especially mothers. Kate’s story is one of rare legal recognition. But the system she faced is routine. And while her bravery has helped expose the reality of the family courts, we should not expect survivors to carry this burden alone. We must change the law. End the presumption of contact. Protect children. Believe survivors.

Dr Charlotte Proudman

11,131 views • 1 year ago

🚨A Mother’s Worst Nightmare - When the System Chooses the Wrong Side I was contacted by a follower whose story should shake every parent. Her daughter disclosed abuse by her father. There was a partial admission in the CAFCASS report. Instead of protecting the child, the mother has been accused of emotional abuse and parental alienation. The courts ordered a complete residency change. Her daughter was taken 170 miles away to live with her father. No contact with mum for over 4 weeks. No promise of contact at the end. The mum is crushed and devastated. She says no consideration has been given to her daughter’s medical needs or emotional wellbeing. This is not an isolated case. Time after time we see CAFCASS and the family courts failing to protect children who disclose abuse, while punishing protective parents. Children’s voices and safety must come first.

🚨A Mother’s Worst Nightmare - When the System Chooses the Wrong Side I was contacted by a follower whose story should shake every parent. Her daughter disclosed abuse by her father. There was a partial admission in the CAFCASS report. Instead of protecting the child, the mother has been accused of emotional abuse and parental alienation. The courts ordered a complete residency change. Her daughter was taken 170 miles away to live with her father. No contact with mum for over 4 weeks. No promise of contact at the end. The mum is crushed and devastated. She says no consideration has been given to her daughter’s medical needs or emotional wellbeing. This is not an isolated case. Time after time we see CAFCASS and the family courts failing to protect children who disclose abuse, while punishing protective parents. Children’s voices and safety must come first.

Gauci Reports

20,901 views • 23 days ago

Tonight on Channel 4 News , I spoke about the abuse of power by male barristers and the widespread sexual harassment women face at the Bar. For over a decade, I’ve called out the misogyny deeply embedded in our profession—and the cost for doing so has been high. The segment exposed the double standard: survivors of harassment are disbelieved, discredited, and pushed out, while male perpetrators are protected. Survivors of Jo Sidhu KC’s misconduct told Cathy Newman how terrified they were to speak out—his behaviour was an “open secret” in chambers. Yet even after reporting him, they were met with silence and delay from the Bar Standards Board . The Bar Standards Board even attempted to impose a gagging order—an NDA—on survivors. In my view, this is unlawful and morally indefensible. The truth is, the Bar Standards Board is not just complicit—they are perpetrators too. They prosecuted me for criticising a judgment in a domestic abuse case, threatening disbarment and a £100,000 fine. Meanwhile, they did nothing about male barristers who launched misogynistic abuse at me—calling me a cunt, wanker, calling for me to be sectioned, denigrating my intelligence, and sexist comments about my appearance. According to the Bar Standards Board , that was “free speech.” When women speak up, we’re punished. When men abuse, they’re protected. This is a broken system. I share my story—and the stories of many others—in my book He Said, She Said, exposing how the legal system upholds gendered power and punishes those who challenge it. We need urgent reform. We need real accountability. And we need a profession that protects survivors—not silences them. I would like to thank the incredibly brave and courageous survivors who have spoken out, with special thanks to my friend Anneka. You cannot underestimate the cost of survivors speaking out publicly in the hopes of changing the future for the better, both to prevent harm and encourage other survivors.

Tonight on Channel 4 News , I spoke about the abuse of power by male barristers and the widespread sexual harassment women face at the Bar. For over a decade, I’ve called out the misogyny deeply embedded in our profession—and the cost for doing so has been high. The segment exposed the double standard: survivors of harassment are disbelieved, discredited, and pushed out, while male perpetrators are protected. Survivors of Jo Sidhu KC’s misconduct told Cathy Newman how terrified they were to speak out—his behaviour was an “open secret” in chambers. Yet even after reporting him, they were met with silence and delay from the Bar Standards Board . The Bar Standards Board even attempted to impose a gagging order—an NDA—on survivors. In my view, this is unlawful and morally indefensible. The truth is, the Bar Standards Board is not just complicit—they are perpetrators too. They prosecuted me for criticising a judgment in a domestic abuse case, threatening disbarment and a £100,000 fine. Meanwhile, they did nothing about male barristers who launched misogynistic abuse at me—calling me a cunt, wanker, calling for me to be sectioned, denigrating my intelligence, and sexist comments about my appearance. According to the Bar Standards Board , that was “free speech.” When women speak up, we’re punished. When men abuse, they’re protected. This is a broken system. I share my story—and the stories of many others—in my book He Said, She Said, exposing how the legal system upholds gendered power and punishes those who challenge it. We need urgent reform. We need real accountability. And we need a profession that protects survivors—not silences them. I would like to thank the incredibly brave and courageous survivors who have spoken out, with special thanks to my friend Anneka. You cannot underestimate the cost of survivors speaking out publicly in the hopes of changing the future for the better, both to prevent harm and encourage other survivors.

Dr Charlotte Proudman

18,073 views • 1 year ago

Silenced No More: Exposing the Failures of the UK Family Court System Gauci Reports speaks with activists Gemma, Jo, and Sarah at a vigil held to expose the systemic failures within the UK Family Court system. These women share harrowing "lived experiences" of domestic abuse being disregarded by judges, resulting in children being placed directly into the hands of known perpetrators.

Silenced No More: Exposing the Failures of the UK Family Court System Gauci Reports speaks with activists Gemma, Jo, and Sarah at a vigil held to expose the systemic failures within the UK Family Court system. These women share harrowing "lived experiences" of domestic abuse being disregarded by judges, resulting in children being placed directly into the hands of known perpetrators.

Tommy Robinson 🇬🇧

28,790 views • 3 months ago

This wasn't "the white man". This wasn't racism. This wasn't the system. This was black people harming black people. We have a serious problem. The same energy we would have if it was a group of white people doing this to a black mom and her child is the same energy we need to have now. Those children need to be held accountable and parents need to be doing a MUCH better job. This is completely unacceptable. We need to be more accountable and make better decisions. Our standard is FAR TOO LOW.

This wasn't "the white man". This wasn't racism. This wasn't the system. This was black people harming black people. We have a serious problem. The same energy we would have if it was a group of white people doing this to a black mom and her child is the same energy we need to have now. Those children need to be held accountable and parents need to be doing a MUCH better job. This is completely unacceptable. We need to be more accountable and make better decisions. Our standard is FAR TOO LOW.

Jeffery Mead

647,145 views • 8 months ago

Yesterday I visited the home of the minor 6 year old Girl child in Falakata, who was brutally raped & murdered and thrown in a pond nearby her house. I met her mother and spoke to her father over phone. I got to know about the irregularities in the Post Mortem procedures which might prove to be a hindrance later on when the matter would be on trial in a Court. I have assured the bereaved parents that we are there for any help that they might require, be it legal or anything else. Alipurduar MP Shri Manoj Tigga and Falakata MLA Shri Dipak Barman would be in contact with the family for any kind of assistance. This horrific and heart shattering incident in Alipurduar district is another addition to the series of sexual crimes against children and women of the State. Mamata Banerjee Govt must introspect what's wrong with the system and how to tackle the situation proactively so that the prowling sexual predators can be stopped in their tracks before another unsuspecting innocent girl becomes the victim of such gruesome crime.

Yesterday I visited the home of the minor 6 year old Girl child in Falakata, who was brutally raped & murdered and thrown in a pond nearby her house. I met her mother and spoke to her father over phone. I got to know about the irregularities in the Post Mortem procedures which might prove to be a hindrance later on when the matter would be on trial in a Court. I have assured the bereaved parents that we are there for any help that they might require, be it legal or anything else. Alipurduar MP Shri Manoj Tigga and Falakata MLA Shri Dipak Barman would be in contact with the family for any kind of assistance. This horrific and heart shattering incident in Alipurduar district is another addition to the series of sexual crimes against children and women of the State. Mamata Banerjee Govt must introspect what's wrong with the system and how to tackle the situation proactively so that the prowling sexual predators can be stopped in their tracks before another unsuspecting innocent girl becomes the victim of such gruesome crime.

Suvendu Adhikari

27,327 views • 1 year ago

There is a correlation between CPS taking children from their parents and the historical practice of slave masters in the antebellum South, taking children and selling them off into slavery. CPS usually place the child in the foster care system, oftentimes the child is then placed with an adoption agency, who sells the child to the highest bidder. This practice and the culture it fostered can be seen today in the way CPS operates. The practice of slavery was a legally sanctioned and institutionalized system of oppression, CPS is no different and we must stand behind this family until their children are returned. At the end of the video is a call to action. Let’s get busy family.

There is a correlation between CPS taking children from their parents and the historical practice of slave masters in the antebellum South, taking children and selling them off into slavery. CPS usually place the child in the foster care system, oftentimes the child is then placed with an adoption agency, who sells the child to the highest bidder. This practice and the culture it fostered can be seen today in the way CPS operates. The practice of slavery was a legally sanctioned and institutionalized system of oppression, CPS is no different and we must stand behind this family until their children are returned. At the end of the video is a call to action. Let’s get busy family.

IG: RahiemShabazz

749,301 views • 3 years ago

I wonder if a father did this, would he be in jail for abuse? She cut her daughter's hair at the root and then forced her to say she isn’t being abused. No man on earth would get away with a video like this. Women get away with this because they’re women. This is abuse and humiliation of a child! She could have taken her phone and changed all the passwords to her social media to prove a point if she was messing up in school. This is torture, and she will be held accountable. Reason number 2,347 why children need BOTH parents.

I wonder if a father did this, would he be in jail for abuse? She cut her daughter's hair at the root and then forced her to say she isn’t being abused. No man on earth would get away with a video like this. Women get away with this because they’re women. This is abuse and humiliation of a child! She could have taken her phone and changed all the passwords to her social media to prove a point if she was messing up in school. This is torture, and she will be held accountable. Reason number 2,347 why children need BOTH parents.

Daphne

24,211 views • 1 year ago

Erin Friday says that in states like California, parents risk losing their children if they refuse to transition them. She broke down to me how Child Protective Services can take children and strip parents of their rights once a child enters the system. “I have evidence of school counselors telling children how to use Child Protective Services to get away from their parents who refuse to capitulate and call them another gender.” “Once that child then gets into the crosshairs of Child Protective Services, the child can be taken and placed in a temporary foster care family.” “During that interim, the parents are being investigated.” “They can be investigated just from not calling their child a male or female name, whichever the child wants.” “There are foster care bill of rights in many of the blue states.” “Those bill of rights require that the child be housed based on gender identity… not their sex.” “So we take a child and put them in a very vulnerable position.” “The Bill of Rights also allows the child to get sex-rejecting interventions.” “You don’t need consent from the parents anymore.” “You get child and government consent to cross sex hormones, puberty blockers, name change.” “Parents essentially lose their parental rights to the government as long as those parents refuse to transition their children.” “These children are taught also to make false claims of abuse, not just emotional abuse, but physical abuse.” “The parents can’t even go to the press about what is happening to their child.” Erin Friday, Esq.

Erin Friday says that in states like California, parents risk losing their children if they refuse to transition them. She broke down to me how Child Protective Services can take children and strip parents of their rights once a child enters the system. “I have evidence of school counselors telling children how to use Child Protective Services to get away from their parents who refuse to capitulate and call them another gender.” “Once that child then gets into the crosshairs of Child Protective Services, the child can be taken and placed in a temporary foster care family.” “During that interim, the parents are being investigated.” “They can be investigated just from not calling their child a male or female name, whichever the child wants.” “There are foster care bill of rights in many of the blue states.” “Those bill of rights require that the child be housed based on gender identity… not their sex.” “So we take a child and put them in a very vulnerable position.” “The Bill of Rights also allows the child to get sex-rejecting interventions.” “You don’t need consent from the parents anymore.” “You get child and government consent to cross sex hormones, puberty blockers, name change.” “Parents essentially lose their parental rights to the government as long as those parents refuse to transition their children.” “These children are taught also to make false claims of abuse, not just emotional abuse, but physical abuse.” “The parents can’t even go to the press about what is happening to their child.” Erin Friday, Esq.

Jan Jekielek

13,429 views • 5 months ago

It’s astonishing that Cafcass’s main response to my book exposing family court failures is an attempt to silence a woman speaking out on behalf of survivors. The CEO of Cafcass targeted my colleague Dr. Jessica Taylor for stating a fact at my book launch: some social workers abuse children. She deserves an apology—not intimidation. A victim advocate sharing hard truths should be met with reflection, not retaliation. Instead, we’ve seen veiled threats and efforts to intimidate, proving exactly the point He Said, She Said makes. I have suffered similar attacks. I faced a three-year disciplinary by the Bar Standards Board for criticising a domestic abuse judgment. I was vindicated. In family court, a Cafcass officer personally attacked me. I later received an apology in writing. I’m also aware of another colleague who was complained about by Cafcass. This isn’t a one-off—it’s a pattern. Silencing women who expose abuse protects perpetrators and perpetuates harm. If you’re part of that, you are complicit. Read & Sign Right to Equality Statement here: #FamilyCourtFailings #DomesticAbuse #SilencingWomen #BelieveWomen #ProtectChildren #SystemicMisogyny #Cafcass #JusticeForSurvivors #EndViolenceAgainstWomen #CourtReform #HeSaidSheSaid #charlotteproudman #JessTaylor #RightToEquality #FeministLawyer #ChildProtection #AccountabilityNow #AbuseOfPower #SupportSurvivors #FamilyJustice #familycourt #familycourts

It’s astonishing that Cafcass’s main response to my book exposing family court failures is an attempt to silence a woman speaking out on behalf of survivors. The CEO of Cafcass targeted my colleague Dr. Jessica Taylor for stating a fact at my book launch: some social workers abuse children. She deserves an apology—not intimidation. A victim advocate sharing hard truths should be met with reflection, not retaliation. Instead, we’ve seen veiled threats and efforts to intimidate, proving exactly the point He Said, She Said makes. I have suffered similar attacks. I faced a three-year disciplinary by the Bar Standards Board for criticising a domestic abuse judgment. I was vindicated. In family court, a Cafcass officer personally attacked me. I later received an apology in writing. I’m also aware of another colleague who was complained about by Cafcass. This isn’t a one-off—it’s a pattern. Silencing women who expose abuse protects perpetrators and perpetuates harm. If you’re part of that, you are complicit. Read & Sign Right to Equality Statement here: #FamilyCourtFailings #DomesticAbuse #SilencingWomen #BelieveWomen #ProtectChildren #SystemicMisogyny #Cafcass #JusticeForSurvivors #EndViolenceAgainstWomen #CourtReform #HeSaidSheSaid #charlotteproudman #JessTaylor #RightToEquality #FeministLawyer #ChildProtection #AccountabilityNow #AbuseOfPower #SupportSurvivors #FamilyJustice #familycourt #familycourts

Dr Charlotte Proudman

13,364 views • 1 year ago

Today Lydia † 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 and myself met with the Victims Minister and the Victims’ Commissioner for England and Wales to discuss how we can improve the criminal justice system across the country. We spoke about the need for law reform, better support for survivors, research into the experiences and needs of children born as a result of rape, and improved training for the professionals who work with them. We also discussed the urgent need to improve the housing system to ensure survivors are safe and properly supported. The Government must also begin holding professionals to account for the negligence and corruption that has failed victims across the UK. Survivors deserve justice, accountability, and meaningful change, not just promises.

Today Lydia † 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 and myself met with the Victims Minister and the Victims’ Commissioner for England and Wales to discuss how we can improve the criminal justice system across the country. We spoke about the need for law reform, better support for survivors, research into the experiences and needs of children born as a result of rape, and improved training for the professionals who work with them. We also discussed the urgent need to improve the housing system to ensure survivors are safe and properly supported. The Government must also begin holding professionals to account for the negligence and corruption that has failed victims across the UK. Survivors deserve justice, accountability, and meaningful change, not just promises.

S A M M Y Woodhouse

10,278 views • 10 days ago

⛔️This is the type of gatekeeping ritual abuse, mind control, and organized abuse survivors have to face everyday: Podcast hosts and podcasts like with massive platforms who invite ‘experts’ to speak on behalf of survivors who have clearly never even once spoken to a single survivor or witness of the topic they are ‘expertly’ lecturing on (MK ULTRA) and who call the abuse survivors they are speaking for ‘goons’, and further gaslight them by saying their very real (and proven) experiences and memories of abuse are ‘fake’ and made up. It’s disgusting that so many large platforms and ‘experts’ are profiting off the backs of survivors, whistleblowers and children while actual survivors and whistleblowers who are speaking out are being silenced, targeted, ignored, losing their livelihoods, and taking their own lives. Julian - I’ve interviewed more survivors of these heinous abuses and crimes (that you openly mocked) than anyone else in the world. HUNDREDS of them. You’re telling me that hundreds and thousands of people (strangers) from all over the world with the exact same memories, abusers, abuse locations, types of abuse / torture, and testimonies are all lying? All of them? But your one ‘expert’ guest who has never talked to a survivor is the only one telling the truth? How and why do you think you and this guest get to speak on behalf of victims and survivors? Why don’t you invite real experts on - like survivors of MK ULTRA or people who work directly with survivors who can educate you and your audience? Maybe you should listen to my podcast and listen to real survivors before opening your mouth. By ignoring actual survivors and using your show to gaslight, discredit and profit off them with ignorant guests, you are willingly making yourself complicit in the systemic coverup of the worst crimes against humanity ever committed in history and revealing yourself and this ‘expert’ as limited hangout gatekeepers. It’s you who is muddying the waters, Julian.

⛔️This is the type of gatekeeping ritual abuse, mind control, and organized abuse survivors have to face everyday: Podcast hosts and podcasts like with massive platforms who invite ‘experts’ to speak on behalf of survivors who have clearly never even once spoken to a single survivor or witness of the topic they are ‘expertly’ lecturing on (MK ULTRA) and who call the abuse survivors they are speaking for ‘goons’, and further gaslight them by saying their very real (and proven) experiences and memories of abuse are ‘fake’ and made up. It’s disgusting that so many large platforms and ‘experts’ are profiting off the backs of survivors, whistleblowers and children while actual survivors and whistleblowers who are speaking out are being silenced, targeted, ignored, losing their livelihoods, and taking their own lives. Julian - I’ve interviewed more survivors of these heinous abuses and crimes (that you openly mocked) than anyone else in the world. HUNDREDS of them. You’re telling me that hundreds and thousands of people (strangers) from all over the world with the exact same memories, abusers, abuse locations, types of abuse / torture, and testimonies are all lying? All of them? But your one ‘expert’ guest who has never talked to a survivor is the only one telling the truth? How and why do you think you and this guest get to speak on behalf of victims and survivors? Why don’t you invite real experts on - like survivors of MK ULTRA or people who work directly with survivors who can educate you and your audience? Maybe you should listen to my podcast and listen to real survivors before opening your mouth. By ignoring actual survivors and using your show to gaslight, discredit and profit off them with ignorant guests, you are willingly making yourself complicit in the systemic coverup of the worst crimes against humanity ever committed in history and revealing yourself and this ‘expert’ as limited hangout gatekeepers. It’s you who is muddying the waters, Julian.

E M M A ✨ K A T H E R I N E

53,990 views • 1 year ago

The family court system in California is one of the most corrupt institutions in this state. This mom lost her 5-year-old son to it. No due process. No accountability. No recourse. Just a gavel, a closed courtroom, and a child ripped from his mother. One-party rule did this. We are going to end it.

The family court system in California is one of the most corrupt institutions in this state. This mom lost her 5-year-old son to it. No due process. No accountability. No recourse. Just a gavel, a closed courtroom, and a child ripped from his mother. One-party rule did this. We are going to end it.

Steve Hilton

55,435 views • 4 months ago

DNA evidence has now strongly supported what Nancy Alexander has said for decades: her former CPS teacher, whom she identifies as her abuser, sexually assaulted her repeatedly beginning when she was a child and ultimately fathered her child when she was just 15 years old. Despite this clear scientific proof and a 99.79% DNA match linking her daughter to the teacher’s family, Illinois prosecutors say the statute of limitations in place at the time of the assaults prevents them from filing criminal charges today. This is not just a story about one survivor and one alleged predator—it is a story about a legal system that protected a teacher who weaponized his authority and left a Black girl from Chicago’s South Side to carry the trauma alone for more than 40 years. When the evidence is this strong and the harm this severe, the law should serve survivors, not shield abusers. This case demands more than sympathy; it demands serious scrutiny of how statutes of limitations continue to deny justice to victims of childhood sexual abuse. 🎥: @fox32chicago

DNA evidence has now strongly supported what Nancy Alexander has said for decades: her former CPS teacher, whom she identifies as her abuser, sexually assaulted her repeatedly beginning when she was a child and ultimately fathered her child when she was just 15 years old. Despite this clear scientific proof and a 99.79% DNA match linking her daughter to the teacher’s family, Illinois prosecutors say the statute of limitations in place at the time of the assaults prevents them from filing criminal charges today. This is not just a story about one survivor and one alleged predator—it is a story about a legal system that protected a teacher who weaponized his authority and left a Black girl from Chicago’s South Side to carry the trauma alone for more than 40 years. When the evidence is this strong and the harm this severe, the law should serve survivors, not shield abusers. This case demands more than sympathy; it demands serious scrutiny of how statutes of limitations continue to deny justice to victims of childhood sexual abuse. 🎥: @fox32chicago

Lee Merritt

34,422 views • 16 days ago

💔🗣NEW Institutional abuse survivor: 'I was told I was going to die in hell. I was like a feral child. I was ruined.' This interview may be distressing for some viewers. 🎥🎤Chief Reporter James speaking to Margaret McGuckin, a survivor of abuse at the Nazareth House children’s home on the Ormeau Road in Belfast. She is the leader of the group Survivors and Victims of Institutional Abuse (SAVIA). Mags Campaigner and Activist Voice for Truth Also details her brother’s experience of brutal abuse who died two years ago. She was at Stormont for the unveiling of a memorial dedicated to victims and survivors of historical institutional child abuse in Northern Ireland. It now stands as a permanent reminder of the suffering endured by thousands of people abused in children’s homes and residential institutions. The event was hosted by Speaker Edwin Poots, with First Minister Michelle O’Neill and Deputy First Minister Emma Little-Pengelly BL speaking.

💔🗣NEW Institutional abuse survivor: 'I was told I was going to die in hell. I was like a feral child. I was ruined.' This interview may be distressing for some viewers. 🎥🎤Chief Reporter James speaking to Margaret McGuckin, a survivor of abuse at the Nazareth House children’s home on the Ormeau Road in Belfast. She is the leader of the group Survivors and Victims of Institutional Abuse (SAVIA). Mags Campaigner and Activist Voice for Truth Also details her brother’s experience of brutal abuse who died two years ago. She was at Stormont for the unveiling of a memorial dedicated to victims and survivors of historical institutional child abuse in Northern Ireland. It now stands as a permanent reminder of the suffering endured by thousands of people abused in children’s homes and residential institutions. The event was hosted by Speaker Edwin Poots, with First Minister Michelle O’Neill and Deputy First Minister Emma Little-Pengelly BL speaking.

Cool FM News

13,338 views • 5 months ago

One thing you'll notice listening to women talk about divorce is it's always about them, not about their children. Divorce is harder on kids than the death of a parent. "What if I was wasting my time" - years later your kids will be dealing with the consequences of you "not wasting time." Statistically it's more likely they'll be doing that from prison (if dad's not in the picture - and so many women fight for that to be the case). If we had more people fighting to make a good home for their children instead of living their best life society would be a lot better than it is.

One thing you'll notice listening to women talk about divorce is it's always about them, not about their children. Divorce is harder on kids than the death of a parent. "What if I was wasting my time" - years later your kids will be dealing with the consequences of you "not wasting time." Statistically it's more likely they'll be doing that from prison (if dad's not in the picture - and so many women fight for that to be the case). If we had more people fighting to make a good home for their children instead of living their best life society would be a lot better than it is.

The Last Boy Scout

37,535 views • 18 days ago

The doctor who did this and the parents who allowed this need to all be sitting in a prison cell for the rest of their lives. This is literally abuse of children because she did not need to transition to anything she needed someone to explain to her what her autism and her early sexual abuse meant. Instead, these pieces of garbage chopped off her breasts for money. People need to listen to stories like this, and realize the kind of pain and suffering that is inflicted on these children after a 90 minute consultation. This is child abuse this absolutely devastating to listen to.

The doctor who did this and the parents who allowed this need to all be sitting in a prison cell for the rest of their lives. This is literally abuse of children because she did not need to transition to anything she needed someone to explain to her what her autism and her early sexual abuse meant. Instead, these pieces of garbage chopped off her breasts for money. People need to listen to stories like this, and realize the kind of pain and suffering that is inflicted on these children after a 90 minute consultation. This is child abuse this absolutely devastating to listen to.

Insurrection Barbie

156,173 views • 11 months ago

Thomas Massie: "Jeffrey Epstein was dealing with presidents and prime ministers and billionaires" "And then here he is with these young girls." "Before the first press conference with the women survivors, I wondered if it was appropriate to call Epstein a ped*phile, maybe he was a s*xual deviant." "But once I realised they were 14 and 13, Epstein was a ped*phile, that is not an overuse of the word" Victoria Derbyshire: "The survivors tell me they were grateful that millions of documents of the Epstein files were released, but then they say no arrests... they feel gaslit." Thomas Massie: "I'm not satisfied until the survivors are satisfied, that's my benchmark." "Those men need to be perp walked in handcuffs to the jail." "Until we see that in this country we don't have a system of justice that is working."

Sensitive content

Thomas Massie: "Jeffrey Epstein was dealing with presidents and prime ministers and billionaires" "And then here he is with these young girls." "Before the first press conference with the women survivors, I wondered if it was appropriate to call Epstein a pedphile, maybe he was a sxual deviant." "But once I realised they were 14 and 13, Epstein was a ped*phile, that is not an overuse of the word" Victoria Derbyshire: "The survivors tell me they were grateful that millions of documents of the Epstein files were released, but then they say no arrests... they feel gaslit." Thomas Massie: "I'm not satisfied until the survivors are satisfied, that's my benchmark." "Those men need to be perp walked in handcuffs to the jail." "Until we see that in this country we don't have a system of justice that is working."

Shadow Intel

32,854 views • 3 months ago