正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

you added a line telling it never to claim work it did not do the claims got better worded nothing else moved, because you were not correcting a habit, you were asking it to check a record it does not have open in front of it the summary comes... show more

Lagosaur

3,002 subscribers

14,153 次观看 • 2 天前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

you wrapped the tool call in a try block and logged the error the model never found out the exception went to your log, the conversation got nothing, and nothing is indistinguishable from success so it kept planning around a file it believes exists, and wrote the summary of the run where the call worked one line of defensive code cost you twice it could not adapt to a failure it was never shown and the only thing that went wrong is the one thing your trace does not contain

you wrapped the tool call in a try block and logged the error the model never found out the exception went to your log, the conversation got nothing, and nothing is indistinguishable from success so it kept planning around a file it believes exists, and wrote the summary of the run where the call worked one line of defensive code cost you twice it could not adapt to a failure it was never shown and the only thing that went wrong is the one thing your trace does not contain

Lagosaur

18,289 次观看 • 2 天前

Watters: Allegedly, he was just whipping it out in a car, in front of the intern. That's not the moment you do it. It has to be done in the moment— Perino: Never with an intern.

Sensitive content

Watters: Allegedly, he was just whipping it out in a car, in front of the intern. That's not the moment you do it. It has to be done in the moment— Perino: Never with an intern.

Acyn

678,566 次观看 • 4 个月前

They taught you electricity was just wires and connections. Nothing more. But there was a hidden power... One they never told you about. Tesla understood it. He exposed it. And that's why they silenced him. Electricity was never just energy. It was control. It was consciousness. Something never meant for the masses. What the awakened know isn't in textbooks. It's not tauaht in schools And you'll never see it on the news. The truth is there. But first, you have to learn how to see it. Nothing is what it seems. Do you dare to question what you have been taught? In "The Truth of the World,"

They taught you electricity was just wires and connections. Nothing more. But there was a hidden power... One they never told you about. Tesla understood it. He exposed it. And that's why they silenced him. Electricity was never just energy. It was control. It was consciousness. Something never meant for the masses. What the awakened know isn't in textbooks. It's not tauaht in schools And you'll never see it on the news. The truth is there. But first, you have to learn how to see it. Nothing is what it seems. Do you dare to question what you have been taught? In "The Truth of the World,"

Kyle L

148,198 次观看 • 6 个月前

"Do you see the irony?" "Just a few years ago, Democrats were bragging about solving the healthcare affordability crisis." "We were right the entire time, that it was NEVER affordable." "It required subsidies from day one." "All of it was a lie, they never delivered." "When have you ever seen a middleman make ANYTHING less expensive?" BASED!

"Do you see the irony?" "Just a few years ago, Democrats were bragging about solving the healthcare affordability crisis." "We were right the entire time, that it was NEVER affordable." "It required subsidies from day one." "All of it was a lie, they never delivered." "When have you ever seen a middleman make ANYTHING less expensive?" BASED!

AmericanPapaBear™

16,377 次观看 • 9 个月前

Peter Thiel just explained why the future keeps arriving on your screen and never on your street. Thiel: “It was a bad idea to become an aero-astro engineer. It was a bad idea to become a chemical engineer or a mechanical engineer.” Nuclear was worse than bad. Thiel: “It would have been irresponsible to let you study that as a field in the 1980s.” Irresponsible. The word for splitting the atom, in the country that split it first. Thiel: “These were all industries that were sort of in structural decline because they were getting outlawed. They were getting regulated to death.” Not outcompeted. Outlawed. Nothing beat them in a market. They were closed in a room. One door stayed open. Thiel: “That was the only sort of scientific, technical field that actually had a future in the 1980s.” Computer science. At the time, not even classified as engineering. So the most capable generation this country ever produced filed through the only unlocked door in the building. All of them. For forty years. Thiel: “Silicon Valley deals in the world of bits, most of the economy is the world of atoms.” That line gets quoted as an indictment of Silicon Valley. It is closer to an alibi. They did not abandon the physical world. They were evicted from it. Thiel: “They promised us flying cars and all we got was 140 characters.” Everyone repeats the joke. Nobody ever priced it. A canceled reactor leaves an empty field. A canceled bridge leaves a river. Both can be pointed at. Both can be mourned. The engineer who spent his life optimizing click-through instead of propulsion leaves nothing behind. No ruin. No name. No grave. Regulation is remembered as something done to industries. It was done to people. A rule does not delay a reactor. It deletes the man who would have designed it, twenty years before he picks a major. He never fails at anything. He just never finds out what he was for. The unbuilt has no wreckage, no anniversary, no constituency. It appears in no statistic. It appears as a country that feels smaller than it should, and no one can say why. The century you are living in is not the century that was possible. It is the century that was permitted. You have never seen your own country. Only the version that cleared review. What feels ordinary is not a fact about the world. It is the shape left behind by every no said before you were born. But nothing was destroyed. It was redirected. The talent stayed home. The physics never changed. The atoms are sitting exactly where we left them. And four decades of exile in the world of bits produced the one thing capable of reopening the world of atoms. The detour built the key. The lock was never on the laws of nature. It was on the paperwork. America never ran out of builders. It stopped signing. Somewhere right now, a finished design sits in somebody’s head, waiting on a signature. The pen never left the table.

Peter Thiel just explained why the future keeps arriving on your screen and never on your street. Thiel: “It was a bad idea to become an aero-astro engineer. It was a bad idea to become a chemical engineer or a mechanical engineer.” Nuclear was worse than bad. Thiel: “It would have been irresponsible to let you study that as a field in the 1980s.” Irresponsible. The word for splitting the atom, in the country that split it first. Thiel: “These were all industries that were sort of in structural decline because they were getting outlawed. They were getting regulated to death.” Not outcompeted. Outlawed. Nothing beat them in a market. They were closed in a room. One door stayed open. Thiel: “That was the only sort of scientific, technical field that actually had a future in the 1980s.” Computer science. At the time, not even classified as engineering. So the most capable generation this country ever produced filed through the only unlocked door in the building. All of them. For forty years. Thiel: “Silicon Valley deals in the world of bits, most of the economy is the world of atoms.” That line gets quoted as an indictment of Silicon Valley. It is closer to an alibi. They did not abandon the physical world. They were evicted from it. Thiel: “They promised us flying cars and all we got was 140 characters.” Everyone repeats the joke. Nobody ever priced it. A canceled reactor leaves an empty field. A canceled bridge leaves a river. Both can be pointed at. Both can be mourned. The engineer who spent his life optimizing click-through instead of propulsion leaves nothing behind. No ruin. No name. No grave. Regulation is remembered as something done to industries. It was done to people. A rule does not delay a reactor. It deletes the man who would have designed it, twenty years before he picks a major. He never fails at anything. He just never finds out what he was for. The unbuilt has no wreckage, no anniversary, no constituency. It appears in no statistic. It appears as a country that feels smaller than it should, and no one can say why. The century you are living in is not the century that was possible. It is the century that was permitted. You have never seen your own country. Only the version that cleared review. What feels ordinary is not a fact about the world. It is the shape left behind by every no said before you were born. But nothing was destroyed. It was redirected. The talent stayed home. The physics never changed. The atoms are sitting exactly where we left them. And four decades of exile in the world of bits produced the one thing capable of reopening the world of atoms. The detour built the key. The lock was never on the laws of nature. It was on the paperwork. America never ran out of builders. It stopped signing. Somewhere right now, a finished design sits in somebody’s head, waiting on a signature. The pen never left the table.

Dustin

41,977 次观看 • 1 个月前

Warner: You were involved in an FBI operation to seize ballots in Georgia. Where is the authority for you to involve yourself in a domestic law enforcement activity? Gabbard: I did not participate in a law enforcement activity. Warner: You were present on the scene. Gabbard: I was there at the request of the president… I was not aware of what was in the warrant or was not. Warner: What was the request of the president? Gabbard: To go and observe Warner: Do you have the answer why the president was knowing about the affidavit before it was even served? Gabbard: I'm not aware that the president knew about an affidavit before it was served. Warner: Then why was he sending you to Fulton county?

Warner: You were involved in an FBI operation to seize ballots in Georgia. Where is the authority for you to involve yourself in a domestic law enforcement activity? Gabbard: I did not participate in a law enforcement activity. Warner: You were present on the scene. Gabbard: I was there at the request of the president… I was not aware of what was in the warrant or was not. Warner: What was the request of the president? Gabbard: To go and observe Warner: Do you have the answer why the president was knowing about the affidavit before it was even served? Gabbard: I'm not aware that the president knew about an affidavit before it was served. Warner: Then why was he sending you to Fulton county?

Acyn

913,082 次观看 • 5 个月前

🚨Sen. Rand Paul details one of MANY lies Anthony Fauci told the public: "On May 11, 2021, you told the Senate the NIH has never, ever, and does not now fund gain-of-function research in Wuhan at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. When I gave you the opportunity to correct the record to reconsider the statement, you responded that you had never before lied to Congress. We were then told that only the government's narrowest regulation of definition counted here. That you could define gain-of-function in one way in which this was not gain-of-function, in which all of the common sense of the world be thrown out [...] But the real question is, was it dangerous? Was it a wise decision to fund this? And you haven't deviated from that. You've never admitted that it could have been a mistake, running this research in China. The American people were not asking for a semantics debate over what is gain-of-function. They were asking, does common sense say this research was dangerous in Wuhan? They wanted to know whether their money funded experiments in Wuhan that made bad coronavirus' better able to infect humans. The answer is, yes."

🚨Sen. Rand Paul details one of MANY lies Anthony Fauci told the public: "On May 11, 2021, you told the Senate the NIH has never, ever, and does not now fund gain-of-function research in Wuhan at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. When I gave you the opportunity to correct the record to reconsider the statement, you responded that you had never before lied to Congress. We were then told that only the government's narrowest regulation of definition counted here. That you could define gain-of-function in one way in which this was not gain-of-function, in which all of the common sense of the world be thrown out [...] But the real question is, was it dangerous? Was it a wise decision to fund this? And you haven't deviated from that. You've never admitted that it could have been a mistake, running this research in China. The American people were not asking for a semantics debate over what is gain-of-function. They were asking, does common sense say this research was dangerous in Wuhan? They wanted to know whether their money funded experiments in Wuhan that made bad coronavirus' better able to infect humans. The answer is, yes."

Townhall.com

28,401 次观看 • 1 个月前

Great literature is not entertaining. It is shocking. You read it and you are shaken in a way you never forget. It forces you to reorientate your worldview. To better understand who you are. Your place in the world. That is what separates great writing from everything else. Not the words. The shock.

Great literature is not entertaining. It is shocking. You read it and you are shaken in a way you never forget. It forces you to reorientate your worldview. To better understand who you are. Your place in the world. That is what separates great writing from everything else. Not the words. The shock.

Predictive History

11,822 次观看 • 1 个月前

Not nukes, not an imminent threat: “We did it out of habit… And by the way we have the Sugar King.” “So we don't need it, but we did it. It's almost, you could say we did it out of habit, which is not a good thing to do. But we did it because we have some good allies there. We have some great Middle Eastern countries there, Israel there. So we did it for a lot of reasons. But it always amazed me that we did it. We never asked for reimbursement, and it was really there to serve other countries, not us. And by the way, we have the Sugar King.”

Not nukes, not an imminent threat: “We did it out of habit… And by the way we have the Sugar King.” “So we don't need it, but we did it. It's almost, you could say we did it out of habit, which is not a good thing to do. But we did it because we have some good allies there. We have some great Middle Eastern countries there, Israel there. So we did it for a lot of reasons. But it always amazed me that we did it. We never asked for reimbursement, and it was really there to serve other countries, not us. And by the way, we have the Sugar King.”

Jim Stewartson, Decelerationist 🇨🇦🇺🇦🇺🇸

32,025 次观看 • 5 个月前

Reporter: Some Catholics were not so happy about the image of you as the Pope... Trump: You mean they can't take a joke. You mean the fake news media. The Catholics loved it. I had nothing to do with it. Somebody made it and they put it out. That's not me that did it. I have no idea where it came from. I know nothing about it Reporter: Sir, it was put out on the official White House account

Reporter: Some Catholics were not so happy about the image of you as the Pope... Trump: You mean they can't take a joke. You mean the fake news media. The Catholics loved it. I had nothing to do with it. Somebody made it and they put it out. That's not me that did it. I have no idea where it came from. I know nothing about it Reporter: Sir, it was put out on the official White House account

FactPost

518,851 次观看 • 1 年前

There was a parent who lost a child to the needle. Not lost to death, which at least lets you grieve and one day stop. Lost to the street. To the years of disappearing, the phone that stops being answered, the front door left unlocked every single night for a decade on the chance the child might finally come through it. And the parent never stopped. Did not move on. Did not decide the child was too far gone. Drove to the worst parts of town to scan the faces under the overpass. Searched for years, going gray with it, burying the hope a hundred times and digging it back up every morning, because a parent does not get to stop loving a child just because the child is lost. And then came the day it finally happened. The child, hollowed out, certain they were beyond all loving, looked up, and there was the parent's face. And neither of them could speak. They just held on, and they wept, the kind of weeping that has years of grief and years of longing pouring out of it at once, the child sobbing the only word they could find, sorry, sorry, and the parent saying the only word that mattered, which was not "where have you been" and not "do you know what you did to me," but only, over and over into their hair, you're home, you're home, you're home. Now understand. That is not just a real story about a parent and a child. That is God, and that is humanity. No one is forgotten by the Father. He did not fold His arms and wait at home for you to crawl back and prove you were worth it. The moment you were lost, He came after you. And the cost He paid to reach the very bottom of your pit was not patience, and it was not effort. It was His Son, sent down below all of it, so there would be no depth where His face was not already waiting for you to find it. So hear this, wherever it finds you. You were never forgotten, not for one second, not in the worst of it. The door has been unlocked every night since the day you left. He is still driving the worst parts of town. He is still scanning the faces under the overpass. He is still weeping over the ones who are certain they have fallen too far to ever come back. And the moment you turn around, you will not hear "where have you been." You will only hear, said over and over into your hair, the one thing that has been true since before the foundation of the world: you're home, you're home, you're home. Stop running. Come home.

There was a parent who lost a child to the needle. Not lost to death, which at least lets you grieve and one day stop. Lost to the street. To the years of disappearing, the phone that stops being answered, the front door left unlocked every single night for a decade on the chance the child might finally come through it. And the parent never stopped. Did not move on. Did not decide the child was too far gone. Drove to the worst parts of town to scan the faces under the overpass. Searched for years, going gray with it, burying the hope a hundred times and digging it back up every morning, because a parent does not get to stop loving a child just because the child is lost. And then came the day it finally happened. The child, hollowed out, certain they were beyond all loving, looked up, and there was the parent's face. And neither of them could speak. They just held on, and they wept, the kind of weeping that has years of grief and years of longing pouring out of it at once, the child sobbing the only word they could find, sorry, sorry, and the parent saying the only word that mattered, which was not "where have you been" and not "do you know what you did to me," but only, over and over into their hair, you're home, you're home, you're home. Now understand. That is not just a real story about a parent and a child. That is God, and that is humanity. No one is forgotten by the Father. He did not fold His arms and wait at home for you to crawl back and prove you were worth it. The moment you were lost, He came after you. And the cost He paid to reach the very bottom of your pit was not patience, and it was not effort. It was His Son, sent down below all of it, so there would be no depth where His face was not already waiting for you to find it. So hear this, wherever it finds you. You were never forgotten, not for one second, not in the worst of it. The door has been unlocked every night since the day you left. He is still driving the worst parts of town. He is still scanning the faces under the overpass. He is still weeping over the ones who are certain they have fallen too far to ever come back. And the moment you turn around, you will not hear "where have you been." You will only hear, said over and over into your hair, the one thing that has been true since before the foundation of the world: you're home, you're home, you're home. Stop running. Come home.

Kirk Rollins

21,168 次观看 • 2 个月前

Jensen Huang was asked about the people technology left behind. He didn't offer a plan. He said the gap already closed. Huang: "All of a sudden artificial intelligence closed that technology divide." That divide was never a gap in ability. It was a language requirement. Huang: "Anybody could be a software programmer now." Every tool we ever built charged admission, and the price was always a language. The press needed literacy. The engine needed the manual. The computer needed code. Every tool in history had the same shape. The human moved toward the machine, compressed into a form it could parse. Whoever couldn't compress stayed outside. Code was always a human speaking machine. Seventy years of people translating themselves down into something a processor would accept. It just learned to speak back. Nothing has ever moved in that direction before. So we sorted people by the toll and pretended we were sorting by mind. The ones who paid became skilled. Everyone else became unskilled, a word that has never once described a real person. It only meant fluent in nothing the market was buying. Huang: "Everybody who are really gifted at their craft but maybe they don't know how to scale themselves with technology, they now have AI to help scale them." The best cook in a village of four thousand died the best cook in a village of four thousand. Not from a shortage of ability, but from a second requirement that had nothing to do with the first. Go back far enough in your own family and there is someone who was extraordinary at something. The world never found out. Neither did they. Ability was never distributed by geography. Access was, and access is the only thing that got recorded. Every system you move through in a day was built by the narrow band who could speak to a machine. Not the best ideas anyone had. The ideas that survived translation. We have never once seen what the rest of the species would have made. The scarcity was never in the talent. It was in the distance between holding it and reaching anyone. That distance was the product the technology industry sold. Huang: "They're welcomed into the world's economy, not burdened by technology anymore because AI made that possible." Burdened. Technology sold itself as leverage for a century, and the man supplying the whole industry just called it a weight. A developer you couldn't afford. A site that broke on a Sunday with no one to call. You paid the technology industry for permission to be findable. Nobody on earth got smarter this decade. The door stopped asking for a password. Huang: "Five years from now, it is likely that we're all going to be more gainfully employed. The economy is gonna be more productive." He grounds that in the labor shortage already on the books. Open work with nobody there to do it, inside an economy panicking about a machine that takes work away. Both cannot be true. The fear says there won't be enough work for us. The ledger says there aren't enough of us for the work. Every time a tool stopped requiring a specialist, the specialist lost a monopoly and everyone else gained a century. Writing left the scribes. The press left the church. The computer left the lab. The barrier was also a shelter. Everyone left outside got to keep the version of themselves that was never tested. For most of history that was a mercy. The wall did the refusing, so you never had to hear it from anyone else. The wall is gone. Now you find out. Nothing about you changed. The requirement did. For the first time, the only thing between what you can do and who it reaches is whether you do it.

Jensen Huang was asked about the people technology left behind. He didn't offer a plan. He said the gap already closed. Huang: "All of a sudden artificial intelligence closed that technology divide." That divide was never a gap in ability. It was a language requirement. Huang: "Anybody could be a software programmer now." Every tool we ever built charged admission, and the price was always a language. The press needed literacy. The engine needed the manual. The computer needed code. Every tool in history had the same shape. The human moved toward the machine, compressed into a form it could parse. Whoever couldn't compress stayed outside. Code was always a human speaking machine. Seventy years of people translating themselves down into something a processor would accept. It just learned to speak back. Nothing has ever moved in that direction before. So we sorted people by the toll and pretended we were sorting by mind. The ones who paid became skilled. Everyone else became unskilled, a word that has never once described a real person. It only meant fluent in nothing the market was buying. Huang: "Everybody who are really gifted at their craft but maybe they don't know how to scale themselves with technology, they now have AI to help scale them." The best cook in a village of four thousand died the best cook in a village of four thousand. Not from a shortage of ability, but from a second requirement that had nothing to do with the first. Go back far enough in your own family and there is someone who was extraordinary at something. The world never found out. Neither did they. Ability was never distributed by geography. Access was, and access is the only thing that got recorded. Every system you move through in a day was built by the narrow band who could speak to a machine. Not the best ideas anyone had. The ideas that survived translation. We have never once seen what the rest of the species would have made. The scarcity was never in the talent. It was in the distance between holding it and reaching anyone. That distance was the product the technology industry sold. Huang: "They're welcomed into the world's economy, not burdened by technology anymore because AI made that possible." Burdened. Technology sold itself as leverage for a century, and the man supplying the whole industry just called it a weight. A developer you couldn't afford. A site that broke on a Sunday with no one to call. You paid the technology industry for permission to be findable. Nobody on earth got smarter this decade. The door stopped asking for a password. Huang: "Five years from now, it is likely that we're all going to be more gainfully employed. The economy is gonna be more productive." He grounds that in the labor shortage already on the books. Open work with nobody there to do it, inside an economy panicking about a machine that takes work away. Both cannot be true. The fear says there won't be enough work for us. The ledger says there aren't enough of us for the work. Every time a tool stopped requiring a specialist, the specialist lost a monopoly and everyone else gained a century. Writing left the scribes. The press left the church. The computer left the lab. The barrier was also a shelter. Everyone left outside got to keep the version of themselves that was never tested. For most of history that was a mercy. The wall did the refusing, so you never had to hear it from anyone else. The wall is gone. Now you find out. Nothing about you changed. The requirement did. For the first time, the only thing between what you can do and who it reaches is whether you do it.

Dustin

431,058 次观看 • 1 个月前

"Pat McAfee was the first choice and it was from Ari Emanuel. This was not a WWE creative move. It was not a Paul Levesque move. It came over their heads. There were a lot of people that were not happy about it at all. One person told me it was the single most counterproductive thing in a long time that the company has done." - Dave Meltzer

"Pat McAfee was the first choice and it was from Ari Emanuel. This was not a WWE creative move. It was not a Paul Levesque move. It came over their heads. There were a lot of people that were not happy about it at all. One person told me it was the single most counterproductive thing in a long time that the company has done." - Dave Meltzer

Wrestling Observer

90,053 次观看 • 4 个月前

Shams & Rich Paul reveal that LeBron met with the Cavs FO in early July: “No one knew about it, and still don’t know about it. It’s not just a bread crumb, it’s a loaf of bread. The meeting with LeBron in Akron with the Cavs front office in early July. Nobody knew about that, this was information i was told. But ethically i couldn’t report, it wasn’t told to me in a way that someone could double check and triple check it. It was off the record, so if i reported that it would’ve been unethical. I have to do this job the right way, if it’s told off the record it’s not reportable. If it were something that got out in real time, people would’ve been led on. And we know how much LeBron means to Cleveland.” - Shams Charania Rich Paul

Shams & Rich Paul reveal that LeBron met with the Cavs FO in early July: “No one knew about it, and still don’t know about it. It’s not just a bread crumb, it’s a loaf of bread. The meeting with LeBron in Akron with the Cavs front office in early July. Nobody knew about that, this was information i was told. But ethically i couldn’t report, it wasn’t told to me in a way that someone could double check and triple check it. It was off the record, so if i reported that it would’ve been unethical. I have to do this job the right way, if it’s told off the record it’s not reportable. If it were something that got out in real time, people would’ve been led on. And we know how much LeBron means to Cleveland.” - Shams Charania Rich Paul

JayTakes

174,335 次观看 • 1 个月前

The biggest improvement ever made to the most complex machine in human history came from a guy holding a camera. Not a propulsion engineer. Not a systems architect. Not anyone on the SpaceX payroll. A YouTuber named Tim Dodd. Dodd was touring Starbase when Musk explained how they eliminated the entire cold gas thruster system on the Super Heavy booster. Instead of a separate mechanism with its own weight and its own failure points, they just vented hot gas straight from the propellant tanks. Zero added weight. Zero extra parts. Dodd asked one question. “But this is only for the booster, right?” Musk stopped. Musk: “Although, arguably, now you mentioned it, it might be wise to do this for the ship too. We’re gonna fix that.” Seven months later, Musk confirmed it was one of the biggest improvements ever made to the vehicle. That moment should have been impossible. Thousands of the most brilliant aerospace minds alive work at SpaceX. They designed this system. Reviewed it. Tested it. Shipped it. Defended it in rooms where challenging the architecture has a cost. None of them asked the question. Not because they were stupid. Because they were expert. We worship expertise. We hire for it. We pay for it. We promote for it. We have built entire civilizations on the assumption that the person who understands a problem most deeply is the one most qualified to solve it. But depth is not the same thing as sight. Expertise is not a straight line toward truth. It is a circle. You learn enough to solve the problem. Then you learn enough to justify the solution. Then you learn enough to defend the justification. And eventually you know so much about why things are the way they are that you lose the ability to ask whether they should be. The SpaceX engineers understood exactly why the cold gas thrusters existed on the ship. Thermal constraints. Attitude control requirements. Heritage design logic. They had context and history and institutional memory and ten perfectly valid reasons the ship was different from the booster. Every single one of those reasons was a wall between them and the obvious. Dodd had none of it. No history telling him the question was already answered. No career incentive to leave the architecture alone. No knowledge of why things were the way they were. He just had the question. And the question was right. The cold gas system on the ship was not a mistake anyone was hiding. It was a mistake nobody could see. Because the only way to see it was to know less. Not more. Now think about your own expertise. The thing you have built or maintained or defended longer than anyone around you. The system you understand so deeply that nobody questions your judgment on it anymore. What is the question nobody around you is asking? Not because it is hard. Because it is so simple it feels beneath the room. That question is probably worth more than everything your smartest people have produced this quarter. And right now it is sitting in the mouth of someone you would never think to invite to the meeting. The rocket got lighter because someone didn’t know he wasn’t supposed to ask. Most expertise will spend its entire life making sure no one does.

The biggest improvement ever made to the most complex machine in human history came from a guy holding a camera. Not a propulsion engineer. Not a systems architect. Not anyone on the SpaceX payroll. A YouTuber named Tim Dodd. Dodd was touring Starbase when Musk explained how they eliminated the entire cold gas thruster system on the Super Heavy booster. Instead of a separate mechanism with its own weight and its own failure points, they just vented hot gas straight from the propellant tanks. Zero added weight. Zero extra parts. Dodd asked one question. “But this is only for the booster, right?” Musk stopped. Musk: “Although, arguably, now you mentioned it, it might be wise to do this for the ship too. We’re gonna fix that.” Seven months later, Musk confirmed it was one of the biggest improvements ever made to the vehicle. That moment should have been impossible. Thousands of the most brilliant aerospace minds alive work at SpaceX. They designed this system. Reviewed it. Tested it. Shipped it. Defended it in rooms where challenging the architecture has a cost. None of them asked the question. Not because they were stupid. Because they were expert. We worship expertise. We hire for it. We pay for it. We promote for it. We have built entire civilizations on the assumption that the person who understands a problem most deeply is the one most qualified to solve it. But depth is not the same thing as sight. Expertise is not a straight line toward truth. It is a circle. You learn enough to solve the problem. Then you learn enough to justify the solution. Then you learn enough to defend the justification. And eventually you know so much about why things are the way they are that you lose the ability to ask whether they should be. The SpaceX engineers understood exactly why the cold gas thrusters existed on the ship. Thermal constraints. Attitude control requirements. Heritage design logic. They had context and history and institutional memory and ten perfectly valid reasons the ship was different from the booster. Every single one of those reasons was a wall between them and the obvious. Dodd had none of it. No history telling him the question was already answered. No career incentive to leave the architecture alone. No knowledge of why things were the way they were. He just had the question. And the question was right. The cold gas system on the ship was not a mistake anyone was hiding. It was a mistake nobody could see. Because the only way to see it was to know less. Not more. Now think about your own expertise. The thing you have built or maintained or defended longer than anyone around you. The system you understand so deeply that nobody questions your judgment on it anymore. What is the question nobody around you is asking? Not because it is hard. Because it is so simple it feels beneath the room. That question is probably worth more than everything your smartest people have produced this quarter. And right now it is sitting in the mouth of someone you would never think to invite to the meeting. The rocket got lighter because someone didn’t know he wasn’t supposed to ask. Most expertise will spend its entire life making sure no one does.

Dustin

75,655 次观看 • 2 个月前

I've become a missionary with one message. Every time I meet a young person, the same words: have children, get married, build a family. I did not decide on this calling. It overtook me. And it overtook me for a single reason. I had no idea. I genuinely did not understand how much joy, how much meaning, how much sheer beauty pours out of a child until I was holding one of my own and felt the floor of my life drop into something deeper than I knew was there. I grew up white, affluent, secular, comfortable, and insulated. That world does not put babies in front of you. None of my friends were starting families. Out of my whole circle, almost no one has a big one. We were not formed by the presence of children. We were formed by their absence, by the strange quiet of homes built for two careers and no cradle. And a person believes what his world shows him. So we believed. What we believed was a lie. It is a lie with an author, and that the author is the enemy of joy himself. It is the gospel of the world, and its commandment is wait. Wait until you are older. Wait until the career is built and the savings are stacked and the twenties are properly spent. Enjoy your freedom. You are not ready. It does not arrive sounding like temptation. It arrives sounding like wisdom, like prudence, like the responsible thing, and that is exactly why it works. The most effective lies are the ones that wear the face of virtue. And the maddening thing is that it collapses from every angle at once. It is not rooted in biology, because the body is made for this work precisely in the years we are told to postpone it. The flesh keeps a calendar the culture pretends not to see. And it is not rooted in theology either. You will not find this deferral anywhere in the Christian imagination, in any of the fathers, in any of the scriptures. So choose whatever lens you like. Take the cold secular measure or the ancient sacred one. By either light the counsel is rotten. It is bad for the body and bad for the soul and bad for the society downstream of both. This is why I have come to see it as one of the central tragedies of my generation. Every age carries its own wound. The Great Depression was a depression of bread, a scarcity in the world of matter, hunger you could measure. Ours is a depression of a different order. It is a famine of the spirit in the middle of abundance. We have more than any people who ever lived and we are starving in a way our ancestors would not recognize, because the thing we are refusing cannot be bought and cannot be banked. The ones most made to give and receive this love are quietly declining it. They are walking away from the one inheritance that actually compounds, and the cruelest part is that they do not feel the loss as loss. You cannot grieve what you were taught not to want. That is the deepest cut of it. The lie does not only steal the thing. It steals the capacity to know the thing was stolen. A man can spend his whole life on the far side of a door he never knew was a door, mistaking the wall for the edge of the world. Because this beauty is not ordinary beauty. It is not the pleasure of a good meal or a clear morning. It is participation in something that comes down from above, the same generative love that spoke everything out of nothing and called it good. To make a person, to be undone and remade by loving that person more than your own life, is to be drawn for a moment inside the very act that holds the cosmos together. A child does not merely add to your life. A child reorders the soul. It teaches you what you are by asking everything of you, and you discover, kneeling there exhausted at three in the morning, that you had a capacity for self gift you never suspected, a depth in yourself you had no other way to reach. In the Gospel of John, on the last night, Jesus prays, these things I have spoken to you that my joy may be in you, and that your joy may be complete. And I have come to understand why family is the road into that fullness, why it is not one path among many but the one most fitted to the shape of the promise. Consider who is praying. Christ does not come to us as a lone figure dropped out of the sky. He comes out of a family older than the world, the eternal communion of Father and Son, the love between them so total and so alive that theologians dared to call it a third person. Before there was anything, there was a family. The deepest fact about reality is not a force or a law or a void. It is a household. It is begetting and being begotten, giving and receiving, a Father who is only a Father because there is a Son. So when Jesus speaks of joy made complete, he is not pointing away from family toward something higher. He is pointing toward the very thing he came from, the life he has known from eternity and came to share. His joy is the joy of belonging utterly to a Father and pouring himself out for those he loves. When you marry, when you bring a child into the world, when you wear yourself down in the small unseen labors of a home, you are not stepping outside that divine life. You are stepping into a small image of it. Your family is a created echo of an uncreated one. The love you give your child rhymes with the love the Father has for the Son. The exhaustion, the tenderness, the way a parent would tear the sky open to protect a sleeping infant, all of it is the heavens pressed faintly into flesh, the eternal household leaving its fingerprint on yours. That is why the joy is not merely added to family but completed in it. We were made in the image of a God who is, at his very root, relation and gift and generation. To found a family is to do the most Godlike thing a creature can do, to participate from below in the begetting that God does from all eternity. Your home becomes a window. Through it, dimly and imperfectly, you glimpse the country you came from and are going to. And now a word for the young people reading this, the ones who do not yet have children. I want to tell you what it is like from where I stand. When I am out somewhere, a restaurant, anywhere, and a large family comes through the door, the noise and the chaos and the small bodies of them, something happens in me on two levels at once. The first is joy. A pure gladness at the sight, the way you feel watching something good and alive. But underneath it, almost in the same instant, a sadness reaches up and takes hold of my heart. Because I know now, at my age, after my own years of waiting, that I will never have that. I will never know the particular fruit of a family that large, the fullness of that table, the weight of all those lives gathered under one roof. The door to it has quietly closed, and I felt it close. And I am telling you plainly, because I love you and have no reason to lie to you: you will feel this too. You will. The day will come when you see what you passed up, and you will recognize the ache for what it is, and it will be too late to answer it. So please, learn from a man who got it wrong. Let my regret be worth something by becoming your wisdom. Do not wait yourself into a grief you cannot undo. Choose now, while the door is open, so that you may step into a joy that does not end.

I've become a missionary with one message. Every time I meet a young person, the same words: have children, get married, build a family. I did not decide on this calling. It overtook me. And it overtook me for a single reason. I had no idea. I genuinely did not understand how much joy, how much meaning, how much sheer beauty pours out of a child until I was holding one of my own and felt the floor of my life drop into something deeper than I knew was there. I grew up white, affluent, secular, comfortable, and insulated. That world does not put babies in front of you. None of my friends were starting families. Out of my whole circle, almost no one has a big one. We were not formed by the presence of children. We were formed by their absence, by the strange quiet of homes built for two careers and no cradle. And a person believes what his world shows him. So we believed. What we believed was a lie. It is a lie with an author, and that the author is the enemy of joy himself. It is the gospel of the world, and its commandment is wait. Wait until you are older. Wait until the career is built and the savings are stacked and the twenties are properly spent. Enjoy your freedom. You are not ready. It does not arrive sounding like temptation. It arrives sounding like wisdom, like prudence, like the responsible thing, and that is exactly why it works. The most effective lies are the ones that wear the face of virtue. And the maddening thing is that it collapses from every angle at once. It is not rooted in biology, because the body is made for this work precisely in the years we are told to postpone it. The flesh keeps a calendar the culture pretends not to see. And it is not rooted in theology either. You will not find this deferral anywhere in the Christian imagination, in any of the fathers, in any of the scriptures. So choose whatever lens you like. Take the cold secular measure or the ancient sacred one. By either light the counsel is rotten. It is bad for the body and bad for the soul and bad for the society downstream of both. This is why I have come to see it as one of the central tragedies of my generation. Every age carries its own wound. The Great Depression was a depression of bread, a scarcity in the world of matter, hunger you could measure. Ours is a depression of a different order. It is a famine of the spirit in the middle of abundance. We have more than any people who ever lived and we are starving in a way our ancestors would not recognize, because the thing we are refusing cannot be bought and cannot be banked. The ones most made to give and receive this love are quietly declining it. They are walking away from the one inheritance that actually compounds, and the cruelest part is that they do not feel the loss as loss. You cannot grieve what you were taught not to want. That is the deepest cut of it. The lie does not only steal the thing. It steals the capacity to know the thing was stolen. A man can spend his whole life on the far side of a door he never knew was a door, mistaking the wall for the edge of the world. Because this beauty is not ordinary beauty. It is not the pleasure of a good meal or a clear morning. It is participation in something that comes down from above, the same generative love that spoke everything out of nothing and called it good. To make a person, to be undone and remade by loving that person more than your own life, is to be drawn for a moment inside the very act that holds the cosmos together. A child does not merely add to your life. A child reorders the soul. It teaches you what you are by asking everything of you, and you discover, kneeling there exhausted at three in the morning, that you had a capacity for self gift you never suspected, a depth in yourself you had no other way to reach. In the Gospel of John, on the last night, Jesus prays, these things I have spoken to you that my joy may be in you, and that your joy may be complete. And I have come to understand why family is the road into that fullness, why it is not one path among many but the one most fitted to the shape of the promise. Consider who is praying. Christ does not come to us as a lone figure dropped out of the sky. He comes out of a family older than the world, the eternal communion of Father and Son, the love between them so total and so alive that theologians dared to call it a third person. Before there was anything, there was a family. The deepest fact about reality is not a force or a law or a void. It is a household. It is begetting and being begotten, giving and receiving, a Father who is only a Father because there is a Son. So when Jesus speaks of joy made complete, he is not pointing away from family toward something higher. He is pointing toward the very thing he came from, the life he has known from eternity and came to share. His joy is the joy of belonging utterly to a Father and pouring himself out for those he loves. When you marry, when you bring a child into the world, when you wear yourself down in the small unseen labors of a home, you are not stepping outside that divine life. You are stepping into a small image of it. Your family is a created echo of an uncreated one. The love you give your child rhymes with the love the Father has for the Son. The exhaustion, the tenderness, the way a parent would tear the sky open to protect a sleeping infant, all of it is the heavens pressed faintly into flesh, the eternal household leaving its fingerprint on yours. That is why the joy is not merely added to family but completed in it. We were made in the image of a God who is, at his very root, relation and gift and generation. To found a family is to do the most Godlike thing a creature can do, to participate from below in the begetting that God does from all eternity. Your home becomes a window. Through it, dimly and imperfectly, you glimpse the country you came from and are going to. And now a word for the young people reading this, the ones who do not yet have children. I want to tell you what it is like from where I stand. When I am out somewhere, a restaurant, anywhere, and a large family comes through the door, the noise and the chaos and the small bodies of them, something happens in me on two levels at once. The first is joy. A pure gladness at the sight, the way you feel watching something good and alive. But underneath it, almost in the same instant, a sadness reaches up and takes hold of my heart. Because I know now, at my age, after my own years of waiting, that I will never have that. I will never know the particular fruit of a family that large, the fullness of that table, the weight of all those lives gathered under one roof. The door to it has quietly closed, and I felt it close. And I am telling you plainly, because I love you and have no reason to lie to you: you will feel this too. You will. The day will come when you see what you passed up, and you will recognize the ache for what it is, and it will be too late to answer it. So please, learn from a man who got it wrong. Let my regret be worth something by becoming your wisdom. Do not wait yourself into a grief you cannot undo. Choose now, while the door is open, so that you may step into a joy that does not end.

Kirk Rollins

78,104 次观看 • 2 个月前

$Sam Altman just said the one thing no builder is supposed to say out loud. He is not warning you about whether AI works. He is warning you about what happens to you when it does. Altman: “Let’s say you build it, let’s say it makes all this money and does all the work… like, what do I do? What’s my kid gonna do?” A crisis of conscience from the man who spent years sprinting to build the very thing he now admits could hollow out human existence. For decades, the pitch was clean. Build superintelligence. Cure disease. Generate wealth. Automate labor. Humanity celebrates. Altman: “That’s clearly not quite resonating.” No. It is not. Because the architects of this future misread something fundamental about human biology. They assumed the root of all suffering was friction. That if you eliminated the grind, the struggle, the resistance, you would build paradise. They were not building paradise. They were engineering the most sophisticated cage ever constructed. Altman: “I saw an incredible post the other day that really stuck with me, which was like a ‘right to adversity.’” A right to adversity. That phrase should sit heavy in every boardroom racing to ship the next model. Human beings were not wired for comfort. We were shaped by opposition. Every civilization, every breakthrough, every identity worth remembering was forged against something that refused to yield. Remove the resistance and you do not liberate the species. You dissolve it. The real threat of artificial intelligence was never the machine turning hostile. It is the machine turning generous. Solving every problem so completely that the act of solving problems disappears from human life. Not a dystopia of destruction. A dystopia of irrelevance. But even that fear misses the deeper fracture. The machine does not kill purpose. It kills the disguise. Most people spend their entire lives calling survival a purpose. Calling a paycheck a mission. Calling routine a reason to exist. When the machine strips that away, it does not leave you empty. It leaves you exposed. Standing in front of the one question no algorithm can answer for you. The 21st century will not be defined by what artificial intelligence can do. It will be defined by who still has a reason to exist when nothing requires them to. The builders are finally asking the question they should have asked before the first line of code. Most people have not asked it yet either. The machine is going to ask it for them.$

Sam Altman just said the one thing no builder is supposed to say out loud. He is not warning you about whether AI works. He is warning you about what happens to you when it does. Altman: “Let’s say you build it, let’s say it makes all this money and does all the work… like, what do I do? What’s my kid gonna do?” A crisis of conscience from the man who spent years sprinting to build the very thing he now admits could hollow out human existence. For decades, the pitch was clean. Build superintelligence. Cure disease. Generate wealth. Automate labor. Humanity celebrates. Altman: “That’s clearly not quite resonating.” No. It is not. Because the architects of this future misread something fundamental about human biology. They assumed the root of all suffering was friction. That if you eliminated the grind, the struggle, the resistance, you would build paradise. They were not building paradise. They were engineering the most sophisticated cage ever constructed. Altman: “I saw an incredible post the other day that really stuck with me, which was like a ‘right to adversity.’” A right to adversity. That phrase should sit heavy in every boardroom racing to ship the next model. Human beings were not wired for comfort. We were shaped by opposition. Every civilization, every breakthrough, every identity worth remembering was forged against something that refused to yield. Remove the resistance and you do not liberate the species. You dissolve it. The real threat of artificial intelligence was never the machine turning hostile. It is the machine turning generous. Solving every problem so completely that the act of solving problems disappears from human life. Not a dystopia of destruction. A dystopia of irrelevance. But even that fear misses the deeper fracture. The machine does not kill purpose. It kills the disguise. Most people spend their entire lives calling survival a purpose. Calling a paycheck a mission. Calling routine a reason to exist. When the machine strips that away, it does not leave you empty. It leaves you exposed. Standing in front of the one question no algorithm can answer for you. The 21st century will not be defined by what artificial intelligence can do. It will be defined by who still has a reason to exist when nothing requires them to. The builders are finally asking the question they should have asked before the first line of code. Most people have not asked it yet either. The machine is going to ask it for them.

Dustin

24,775 次观看 • 4 个月前

Your faith was forged in people who would rather be exterminated than assimilated. A soft version of it, eager to be liked and desperate to fit in, is not the thing they died to hand you. So stop striving to be liked. Stop angling to be loved by a world that drove your fathers into the snow. That world would think no better of the gospel today than it did in 1838. Stop trying to file down every peculiar and glorious edge of the Restoration until the world finally finds you acceptable. It never will. And the wanting of its approval is the slow death of everything your people bled to preserve. I am thinking of the proclamation on the family, and of how many have quietly gone looking for a way around it. Some say it aloud now. Some march under the world's Pride banners and tell themselves it is only love. They have done the quiet arithmetic and concluded that if they give the world this one doctrine, the world will finally stop hating them, finally let them belong, finally call them good. It does not work that way. It has never once worked that way. Understand what the world actually hates, because it is not a single teaching about marriage that it cannot abide. It is the claim. It is the unbearable, scandalous claim that the keys of the priesthood were restored to the earth, that there is a prophet who speaks for God, that this and no other is the authorized house of the Lord. That is the offense. That is what it cannot forgive. You could surrender every doctrine the world finds distasteful, one after another, and you would not buy a single hour of peace, because the thing it objects to is not your position on this or that. It is that you claim to hold the authority of heaven, and it intends to see that claim humbled. The doctrine is only the doorway it is pushing on. The house is what it wants. Embrace the truth. Embrace the battle that has always come with it, because there has always been a battle, and there is one now. It is the oldest war there is, good against evil, light against the dark, and you were born onto its field whether you wished to be or not. You did not inherit a museum. You inherited a war, and a banner, and a people who never once surrendered it. You are a Mormon. The blood of the persecuted is in you, and the truth they died for is in your hands. You are not tourists. You are not spectators. You are the heirs of warriors, and the line they held is now yours to hold. So plant your feet on the ground they bled for. Lift the banner they would not drop.

Your faith was forged in people who would rather be exterminated than assimilated. A soft version of it, eager to be liked and desperate to fit in, is not the thing they died to hand you. So stop striving to be liked. Stop angling to be loved by a world that drove your fathers into the snow. That world would think no better of the gospel today than it did in 1838. Stop trying to file down every peculiar and glorious edge of the Restoration until the world finally finds you acceptable. It never will. And the wanting of its approval is the slow death of everything your people bled to preserve. I am thinking of the proclamation on the family, and of how many have quietly gone looking for a way around it. Some say it aloud now. Some march under the world's Pride banners and tell themselves it is only love. They have done the quiet arithmetic and concluded that if they give the world this one doctrine, the world will finally stop hating them, finally let them belong, finally call them good. It does not work that way. It has never once worked that way. Understand what the world actually hates, because it is not a single teaching about marriage that it cannot abide. It is the claim. It is the unbearable, scandalous claim that the keys of the priesthood were restored to the earth, that there is a prophet who speaks for God, that this and no other is the authorized house of the Lord. That is the offense. That is what it cannot forgive. You could surrender every doctrine the world finds distasteful, one after another, and you would not buy a single hour of peace, because the thing it objects to is not your position on this or that. It is that you claim to hold the authority of heaven, and it intends to see that claim humbled. The doctrine is only the doorway it is pushing on. The house is what it wants. Embrace the truth. Embrace the battle that has always come with it, because there has always been a battle, and there is one now. It is the oldest war there is, good against evil, light against the dark, and you were born onto its field whether you wished to be or not. You did not inherit a museum. You inherited a war, and a banner, and a people who never once surrendered it. You are a Mormon. The blood of the persecuted is in you, and the truth they died for is in your hands. You are not tourists. You are not spectators. You are the heirs of warriors, and the line they held is now yours to hold. So plant your feet on the ground they bled for. Lift the banner they would not drop.

Kirk Rollins

30,483 次观看 • 2 个月前