Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

You ask why everyone is bothered about Mandelson… well, this isn’t just about him OR Starmer! No, it’s about much more than that. Here’s Mandy with Mad Ed 17 years ago. Mandelson has been a repeat attendee at the private Bilderberg conferences in 1999 2008 2009 2011 2012 2013...

Artemisfornow's profile picture

Bernie

126,389 subscribers

49,471 views • 4 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & PoliticsFinance
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Beth Rigby, "The things which really stood out for me is the extent to which Peter Mandelson strayed from his brief" "His brief was to be UK Ambassador to Washington" "And he clearly spent a lot of time in Washington messaging people at the top of government, not just about foreign affairs, but also about domestic policy" "You see how Peter Mandelson becomes more and more critical of Starmer, the man who appointed him" "No loyalty there at all"
1:02

Beth Rigby, "The things which really stood out for me is the extent to which Peter Mandelson strayed from his brief" "His brief was to be UK Ambassador to Washington" "And he clearly spent a lot of time in Washington messaging people at the top of government, not just about foreign affairs, but also about domestic policy" "You see how Peter Mandelson becomes more and more critical of Starmer, the man who appointed him" "No loyalty there at all"

Farrukh

122,219 views • 2 months ago

🚨 Jon Sopel exposed Robert Jenrick’s opportunism who got angry and tried to put the journalist on trial and failed. The audience saw it for what it was. Jenrick: “John, I'm not gonna take any lessons from the man who said that Peter Mandelson was a class act, when he was appointed as our ambassador to Washington.” Sopel: “Nigel Farage said much the same.” Jenrick: “Didn't you also go on telly and say that Hugh Edwards, after he'd committed the most appalling crime- Sopel: “I think everyone can see that you're deflecting because- Well, you- know, this, I'm not seeking elected office.” Fiona Bruce: “I- in fairness-John's not asking anyone to vote for him.” Jenrick: “Do you think that Peter Mandelson is a class act, John? distance yourself from Peter Mandelson, John?” Sopel: “I've said on the podcast repeatedly- that what we've learned about Peter Mandelson has absolutely, completely changed- But you knew, you...” Jenrick: When you said he was a class act- Okay, okay! Fiona Bruce: “Robert, I might remind you that, that your current leader, Nigel Farage, also said some very complimentary things about Peter Mandelson when he was appointed.” #bbcqt
1:16

🚨 Jon Sopel exposed Robert Jenrick’s opportunism who got angry and tried to put the journalist on trial and failed. The audience saw it for what it was. Jenrick: “John, I'm not gonna take any lessons from the man who said that Peter Mandelson was a class act, when he was appointed as our ambassador to Washington.” Sopel: “Nigel Farage said much the same.” Jenrick: “Didn't you also go on telly and say that Hugh Edwards, after he'd committed the most appalling crime- Sopel: “I think everyone can see that you're deflecting because- Well, you- know, this, I'm not seeking elected office.” Fiona Bruce: “I- in fairness-John's not asking anyone to vote for him.” Jenrick: “Do you think that Peter Mandelson is a class act, John? distance yourself from Peter Mandelson, John?” Sopel: “I've said on the podcast repeatedly- that what we've learned about Peter Mandelson has absolutely, completely changed- But you knew, you...” Jenrick: When you said he was a class act- Okay, okay! Fiona Bruce: “Robert, I might remind you that, that your current leader, Nigel Farage, also said some very complimentary things about Peter Mandelson when he was appointed.” #bbcqt

Liz Webster

162,864 views • 6 months ago

Peter Mandelson is one of the dodgiest people in politics. We've known this for decades - he first resigned in disgrace when I was 7 years old. Yet Starmer appointed him. He didn't need a full vetting process to know that Mandelson was no good. He could have just Googled him. In 1996, he took an interest-free £373,000 loan from Geoffrey Robinson, former Labour MP and owner of the New Statesman. The loan was offered, no strings attached, and Mandelson went on to buy a new house in Notting Hill. Robinson had previously been close with Robert Maxwell, the disgraced media baron charged with embezzling millions from his own companies' pension funds. Mandelson, as Secretary of State for Trade and Industry, was responsible for the Department's investigation into Maxwell. Despite the huge loan that he'd been offered, Mandelson never declared that he had a conflict of interest in conducting that investigation. Robinson had dealings with many of Maxwell's companies - and again, Mandelson saw no need to declare a conflict of interest. In 1998, the story broke, and Mandelson was forced to resign in disgrace. He'd taken a huge loan from a friend, who could have been implicated in a corruption investigation that he was carrying out. In 1999, he was back, this time as Northern Ireland Secretary. By 2001, he was resigning again, after allegations that he used his position to influence a passport application for the sponsor of a major New Labour project. That man was Srichand Hinduja, who was under investigation by the Indian Government for his role in the Bofors scandal. He was alleged to have taken kickbacks as part of an arms deal. Yet Mandelson personally intervened to try and secure him a British passport. In 2004, Mandelson billed the taxpayer £3,000 to refurbish his constituency home in Hartlepool, after announcing his decision to stand down as an MP. In 2005, it was reported that, while serving as an EU Commissioner, he spent New Year’s Eve on the yacht of Paul Allen, the co-founder of Microsoft, while Microsoft was undergoing a major EU investigation. In 2006, he received a free cruise from an Italian fashion mogul, just before he helped to impose tariffs on Chinese shoes. In 2008, he spent time on a yacht with Oleg Deripaska, a Russian oligarch. In that same year, he cut aluminium tariffs on Russia, in a move that massively benefitted Deripaska's businesses. It turns out that when he'd visited Russia in 2005, the head of security at Deripaska's metals company had organised for Mandelson to get a swift entry visa. Following Jeffrey Epstein's conviction for soliciting prostitution from a minor, Mandelson maintained close contact with Epstein. This was a matter of public record. That's to say nothing of the most recent allegations - including the claim that he fed market-sensitive information to Jeffrey Epstein just before the 2008 Financial Crash, after receiving money from Epstein. The Prime Minister and his team will try to hide behind the appointments process. There is plenty wrong with that process, including with who receives information, and when. But there was no need to conduct a formal vetting process into Mandelson. He’s been nationally famous as a dodgy politician for more than 25 years. Starmer knew the political risk in appointing him. He chose to do it anyway. That’s not a process issue, and it’s pathetic to pretend otherwise. It’s a judgment issue. Making important judgement calls is the Prime Minister’s job. The trouble is, he’s terrible at it.
0:38

Peter Mandelson is one of the dodgiest people in politics. We've known this for decades - he first resigned in disgrace when I was 7 years old. Yet Starmer appointed him. He didn't need a full vetting process to know that Mandelson was no good. He could have just Googled him. In 1996, he took an interest-free £373,000 loan from Geoffrey Robinson, former Labour MP and owner of the New Statesman. The loan was offered, no strings attached, and Mandelson went on to buy a new house in Notting Hill. Robinson had previously been close with Robert Maxwell, the disgraced media baron charged with embezzling millions from his own companies' pension funds. Mandelson, as Secretary of State for Trade and Industry, was responsible for the Department's investigation into Maxwell. Despite the huge loan that he'd been offered, Mandelson never declared that he had a conflict of interest in conducting that investigation. Robinson had dealings with many of Maxwell's companies - and again, Mandelson saw no need to declare a conflict of interest. In 1998, the story broke, and Mandelson was forced to resign in disgrace. He'd taken a huge loan from a friend, who could have been implicated in a corruption investigation that he was carrying out. In 1999, he was back, this time as Northern Ireland Secretary. By 2001, he was resigning again, after allegations that he used his position to influence a passport application for the sponsor of a major New Labour project. That man was Srichand Hinduja, who was under investigation by the Indian Government for his role in the Bofors scandal. He was alleged to have taken kickbacks as part of an arms deal. Yet Mandelson personally intervened to try and secure him a British passport. In 2004, Mandelson billed the taxpayer £3,000 to refurbish his constituency home in Hartlepool, after announcing his decision to stand down as an MP. In 2005, it was reported that, while serving as an EU Commissioner, he spent New Year’s Eve on the yacht of Paul Allen, the co-founder of Microsoft, while Microsoft was undergoing a major EU investigation. In 2006, he received a free cruise from an Italian fashion mogul, just before he helped to impose tariffs on Chinese shoes. In 2008, he spent time on a yacht with Oleg Deripaska, a Russian oligarch. In that same year, he cut aluminium tariffs on Russia, in a move that massively benefitted Deripaska's businesses. It turns out that when he'd visited Russia in 2005, the head of security at Deripaska's metals company had organised for Mandelson to get a swift entry visa. Following Jeffrey Epstein's conviction for soliciting prostitution from a minor, Mandelson maintained close contact with Epstein. This was a matter of public record. That's to say nothing of the most recent allegations - including the claim that he fed market-sensitive information to Jeffrey Epstein just before the 2008 Financial Crash, after receiving money from Epstein. The Prime Minister and his team will try to hide behind the appointments process. There is plenty wrong with that process, including with who receives information, and when. But there was no need to conduct a formal vetting process into Mandelson. He’s been nationally famous as a dodgy politician for more than 25 years. Starmer knew the political risk in appointing him. He chose to do it anyway. That’s not a process issue, and it’s pathetic to pretend otherwise. It’s a judgment issue. Making important judgement calls is the Prime Minister’s job. The trouble is, he’s terrible at it.

Katie Lam

52,329 views • 6 months ago

🚨 🧵 BOMBSHELL. Holy… After initially refusing to answer twice. After a 3rd question (5:11 below) Keir Starmer has CONFESSED he was made aware of Peter Mandelson's ongoing relationship with Jeffrey Epstein at the time he appointed him US ambassador. Starmer then goes on to keep saying that Mandelson lied to him. So… he just took his word for it. With no thorough investigation (bar an obviously feeble attempt by the security committee, as Kemi said, it was in Google) and then made him Ambassador to the United States? And then spoke highly of him TWICE at the Dispatch box? Even though he now admits that he was made aware of the relationship. It’s also EXTREMELY concerning to National Security that the Security committee also just… took Mandelson’s word for it. Again, as Kemi said, it was on bloody google! All in all, the fact Starmer has now confessed he knew about the relationship between Mandelson and Epstein post-Epstein conviction and pre-appointment of Mandelson to Ambassodor is SHOCKING All details MUST be released to the public immediately. There MUST be a public I have also added two other questions on Mandelson/Epstein in the thread below by Ed Davey and another MP that I think are also important in my opinion.
14:07

🚨 🧵 BOMBSHELL. Holy… After initially refusing to answer twice. After a 3rd question (5:11 below) Keir Starmer has CONFESSED he was made aware of Peter Mandelson's ongoing relationship with Jeffrey Epstein at the time he appointed him US ambassador. Starmer then goes on to keep saying that Mandelson lied to him. So… he just took his word for it. With no thorough investigation (bar an obviously feeble attempt by the security committee, as Kemi said, it was in Google) and then made him Ambassador to the United States? And then spoke highly of him TWICE at the Dispatch box? Even though he now admits that he was made aware of the relationship. It’s also EXTREMELY concerning to National Security that the Security committee also just… took Mandelson’s word for it. Again, as Kemi said, it was on bloody google! All in all, the fact Starmer has now confessed he knew about the relationship between Mandelson and Epstein post-Epstein conviction and pre-appointment of Mandelson to Ambassodor is SHOCKING All details MUST be released to the public immediately. There MUST be a public I have also added two other questions on Mandelson/Epstein in the thread below by Ed Davey and another MP that I think are also important in my opinion.

Kosher

32,064 views • 6 months ago

Listen to this and you will quickly realize how screwed we are under this Government. Forest fires are “climate change” & Carney is more worried about the “carbon” that was released than the people & businesses that were affected. He also says worrying about the climate will make your business more competitive & they will force you to be part of the solution & if you don’t you can bet banks will refuse to do business with you. This is GFANZ & this grifter is one of the architects who will get immensely rich off of it. These people in my opinion are criminals.
3:29

Listen to this and you will quickly realize how screwed we are under this Government. Forest fires are “climate change” & Carney is more worried about the “carbon” that was released than the people & businesses that were affected. He also says worrying about the climate will make your business more competitive & they will force you to be part of the solution & if you don’t you can bet banks will refuse to do business with you. This is GFANZ & this grifter is one of the architects who will get immensely rich off of it. These people in my opinion are criminals.

Ryan Gerritsen🇨🇦🇳🇱

47,933 views • 9 months ago

Sophy Ridge, "Should Keir Starmer lose his job?" Ed Miliband, "I don't think so" Sophy Ridge, "He made the error as you admit" Ed Miliband, "Prime Ministers make errors, they're fallible, they're human" "As you know I steered well clear of Peter Mandelson when I became leader in 2010" "But people make mistakes, the point about mistakes, you fess up to it, say you made an error, he was clear on that on a number of occasions including yesterday in the House of Commons" Sophy Ridge, "You said you stayed clear of Mandelson when you were leader, what went through your mind when you saw him appointed as US ambassador?" Ed Miliband, "That it could blow up, that it could go wrong. I had conversation with David Lammy about it as well" Sophy Ridge, "What did David Lammy say about it?" Ed Miliband, "He was worried about it too" "Peter Mandelson was a familiar figure in the past 30 years of the Labour party. It's almost as because of his familiarity, his flaws faded into the background, and that was obviously wrong" Sophy Ridge, "If Keir Starmer wasn't listening to people such as yourself, David Lammy, and others raising concerns" Ed Miliband, "Prime Ministers make judgments, sometimes they get them right, sometimes they don't get them right"
2:44

Sophy Ridge, "Should Keir Starmer lose his job?" Ed Miliband, "I don't think so" Sophy Ridge, "He made the error as you admit" Ed Miliband, "Prime Ministers make errors, they're fallible, they're human" "As you know I steered well clear of Peter Mandelson when I became leader in 2010" "But people make mistakes, the point about mistakes, you fess up to it, say you made an error, he was clear on that on a number of occasions including yesterday in the House of Commons" Sophy Ridge, "You said you stayed clear of Mandelson when you were leader, what went through your mind when you saw him appointed as US ambassador?" Ed Miliband, "That it could blow up, that it could go wrong. I had conversation with David Lammy about it as well" Sophy Ridge, "What did David Lammy say about it?" Ed Miliband, "He was worried about it too" "Peter Mandelson was a familiar figure in the past 30 years of the Labour party. It's almost as because of his familiarity, his flaws faded into the background, and that was obviously wrong" Sophy Ridge, "If Keir Starmer wasn't listening to people such as yourself, David Lammy, and others raising concerns" Ed Miliband, "Prime Ministers make judgments, sometimes they get them right, sometimes they don't get them right"

Farrukh

154,007 views • 4 months ago

UAE-based speaker Tim Humble reveals that he can only speak about Islam with government approval. The UAE government has to approve every single lecture that he gives or posts online. Similar restrictions exist throughout the Gulf, but the most restrictive controls are in the UAE and Bahrain. The UAE and Bahrain governments are also the ones most in bed with Israel. This is why you cannot trust speakers based in the UAE or Bahrain, or those who have business interests in those countries. Anything they say online has been approved by, essentially, Israel. This is why we should call them Zionist agents. That is what they really are.
0:42

UAE-based speaker Tim Humble reveals that he can only speak about Islam with government approval. The UAE government has to approve every single lecture that he gives or posts online. Similar restrictions exist throughout the Gulf, but the most restrictive controls are in the UAE and Bahrain. The UAE and Bahrain governments are also the ones most in bed with Israel. This is why you cannot trust speakers based in the UAE or Bahrain, or those who have business interests in those countries. Anything they say online has been approved by, essentially, Israel. This is why we should call them Zionist agents. That is what they really are.

Daniel Haqiqatjou

51,169 views • 5 days ago

We are witnessing an extraordinary constitutional anomaly unfold before our eyes. The Nari Shakti Vandan Adhiniyam passed in September 2023 has come into force with being published in the Gazette only at 9.55pm last night. It is shocking that the Government brought amendments to a Constitutional provision that was not even published in the Gazette! This shows the Government’s unprepared and lackadaisical approach to serious lawmaking. This is also yet another evidence that the treasury benches look at Parliament as no more than a rubber stamp, not bothered about the procedures and protocol necessary for a fair legislative process.
1:09

We are witnessing an extraordinary constitutional anomaly unfold before our eyes. The Nari Shakti Vandan Adhiniyam passed in September 2023 has come into force with being published in the Gazette only at 9.55pm last night. It is shocking that the Government brought amendments to a Constitutional provision that was not even published in the Gazette! This shows the Government’s unprepared and lackadaisical approach to serious lawmaking. This is also yet another evidence that the treasury benches look at Parliament as no more than a rubber stamp, not bothered about the procedures and protocol necessary for a fair legislative process.

K C Venugopal

21,816 views • 4 months ago

This man is a restaurant owner and he says that Door Dash is a completely different restaurant within a restaurant. Prices are higher when you order from them because Door Dash can take up to 30% from the business. So when you think you are helping that business by ordering from them through Door Dash, sometimes you aren’t. He also says that Door dash sometimes lets the food you ordered sit for for 20,30, even up to 45 minutes before they pick it up. So when you get it and it’s cold and call to complain, it was made on time but they were late. As he says, I know it’s a convenience but I don’t like paying and extra fee. And herring this from him, I don’t think I will ever use it. Why don’t these restaurants just cancel their contract with Door Dash? Do you use Door Dash? Will what he said change your mind about using them? What’s been your experience with them?
2:38

This man is a restaurant owner and he says that Door Dash is a completely different restaurant within a restaurant. Prices are higher when you order from them because Door Dash can take up to 30% from the business. So when you think you are helping that business by ordering from them through Door Dash, sometimes you aren’t. He also says that Door dash sometimes lets the food you ordered sit for for 20,30, even up to 45 minutes before they pick it up. So when you get it and it’s cold and call to complain, it was made on time but they were late. As he says, I know it’s a convenience but I don’t like paying and extra fee. And herring this from him, I don’t think I will ever use it. Why don’t these restaurants just cancel their contract with Door Dash? Do you use Door Dash? Will what he said change your mind about using them? What’s been your experience with them?

👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈

1,586,002 views • 4 months ago

The truth and misinformation about the carbon tax: ✅ Mark Carney “urged national governments” to implement it in 2016 ✅ the carbon tax is an Act. It’s literally passed as a law, called “Greenhouse Gas Pollution Pricing Act” ✅ You can go to jail for a failure to file a return, or comply with demand order ✅ Last I checked, NO LAW has been passed to repeal the Carbon Tax So how can they “kill” a law with no Parliament? ✅ No one voted to repeal it So what precedent does this set when the government can decide to not enforce, or in this case, break their own laws when it’s unpopular and affects their ability to get reelected? This has nothing to do with Canada‘s best interest, if it did, they would’ve ended it years ago but instead they sold it to us as “we get more money back”. This is purely for their own selfish reasons to stay in power. It’s disgusting
3:32

The truth and misinformation about the carbon tax: ✅ Mark Carney “urged national governments” to implement it in 2016 ✅ the carbon tax is an Act. It’s literally passed as a law, called “Greenhouse Gas Pollution Pricing Act” ✅ You can go to jail for a failure to file a return, or comply with demand order ✅ Last I checked, NO LAW has been passed to repeal the Carbon Tax So how can they “kill” a law with no Parliament? ✅ No one voted to repeal it So what precedent does this set when the government can decide to not enforce, or in this case, break their own laws when it’s unpopular and affects their ability to get reelected? This has nothing to do with Canada‘s best interest, if it did, they would’ve ended it years ago but instead they sold it to us as “we get more money back”. This is purely for their own selfish reasons to stay in power. It’s disgusting

Mario Zelaya

42,120 views • 1 year ago

How did we sign 46 of the top 50 grossing filmmakers in the world? I was in a competitive environment, in a competitive business, in a competitive arena. The entertainment business is dog-eat-dog and it’s been like that since it started. It has never changed. I read everything I could get my hands on about the golden years of the movie business and I used it to start CAA. I made up a reading list and gave it to everyone we were working with. Our group knew history. The reason that was important is because when you started talking to filmmakers and they start talking about Frank Capra, or David Lean, or Howard Hawks, or Willy Wyler, or Michael Curtiz — who all made some of the great movies. If you don’t know what they did how can you talk to a filmmaker? How? You can’t. How did we sign every director in the business? We spoke their language.
1:16

How did we sign 46 of the top 50 grossing filmmakers in the world? I was in a competitive environment, in a competitive business, in a competitive arena. The entertainment business is dog-eat-dog and it’s been like that since it started. It has never changed. I read everything I could get my hands on about the golden years of the movie business and I used it to start CAA. I made up a reading list and gave it to everyone we were working with. Our group knew history. The reason that was important is because when you started talking to filmmakers and they start talking about Frank Capra, or David Lean, or Howard Hawks, or Willy Wyler, or Michael Curtiz — who all made some of the great movies. If you don’t know what they did how can you talk to a filmmaker? How? You can’t. How did we sign every director in the business? We spoke their language.

David Senra

47,220 views • 8 months ago

You Can’t Legislate Trust What unfolded in the Legislature yesterday was more than an exchange - it was a glimpse into how this Wildrose government operates. For them, it’s not about dialogue or cooperation - it’s about dominance and control. When faced with challenge or criticism, they reach for the heaviest hand possible. It’s all they know. They resist control from others but embrace control for themselves - power without restraint. These aren’t isolated moments; they reflect a pattern of governance unbecoming of any organization that claims to serve the public. Because the true measure of power isn’t how much of it you hold - it’s how you use it. #abpoli #ableg #abpc #albertapc
13:21

You Can’t Legislate Trust What unfolded in the Legislature yesterday was more than an exchange - it was a glimpse into how this Wildrose government operates. For them, it’s not about dialogue or cooperation - it’s about dominance and control. When faced with challenge or criticism, they reach for the heaviest hand possible. It’s all they know. They resist control from others but embrace control for themselves - power without restraint. These aren’t isolated moments; they reflect a pattern of governance unbecoming of any organization that claims to serve the public. Because the true measure of power isn’t how much of it you hold - it’s how you use it. #abpoli #ableg #abpc #albertapc

Peter Guthrie

32,658 views • 9 months ago

We are going to sweep the election in Keralam. We will cross 100+ seats in this election. The people of Keralam need a change as they are fed up with Pinarayi Vijayan as Chief Minister for the last 10 years. Gold was stolen from Lord Ayyappa at Sabarimala, and this government is trying to cover up the culprits and the case. The people’s court has given its verdict that they do not want a government that supported the culprits involved in the gold theft. You can never see such a Chief Minister. They are not even bothered about the people of Keralam. : Congress General Secretary (Organization) Shri K C Venugopal
2:00

We are going to sweep the election in Keralam. We will cross 100+ seats in this election. The people of Keralam need a change as they are fed up with Pinarayi Vijayan as Chief Minister for the last 10 years. Gold was stolen from Lord Ayyappa at Sabarimala, and this government is trying to cover up the culprits and the case. The people’s court has given its verdict that they do not want a government that supported the culprits involved in the gold theft. You can never see such a Chief Minister. They are not even bothered about the people of Keralam. : Congress General Secretary (Organization) Shri K C Venugopal

Congress

42,328 views • 4 months ago

Hannity: Trump Didn't Show Much Interest in UFOs (Trump has never seemed to give a crap about UFOs, and when DOES do something good (like the Truth-Social post), he also pokes fun at the subject when he can. Not surprised at this. ⬇️) Hannity: "I'm going to take you back to President Trump's first term. I asked him about this issue, privately. He didn't seem that interested, or...which is very uncharacteristic for him. I said, 'You know, I've been reading about UFOs.' I said, 'Are they real?' And this was a private conversation, I've known him for 30 years. And, he didn't show much interest and that [was] very uncharacteristic for him because he's very curious about everything. And if he can find out a State secret, he'd wanna find out."
0:32

Hannity: Trump Didn't Show Much Interest in UFOs (Trump has never seemed to give a crap about UFOs, and when DOES do something good (like the Truth-Social post), he also pokes fun at the subject when he can. Not surprised at this. ⬇️) Hannity: "I'm going to take you back to President Trump's first term. I asked him about this issue, privately. He didn't seem that interested, or...which is very uncharacteristic for him. I said, 'You know, I've been reading about UFOs.' I said, 'Are they real?' And this was a private conversation, I've known him for 30 years. And, he didn't show much interest and that [was] very uncharacteristic for him because he's very curious about everything. And if he can find out a State secret, he'd wanna find out."

Joe Murgia

20,227 views • 1 month ago

Gent in black, "I was a junior lawyer when Keir Starmer was Director of Public Prosecution, he was an inspiring person at that point in time" "He's obviously progressed onto the position he's in now" "The issue with appointing Mandelson to his role" "Isn't the issue really about how people like Mandelson has got through the system, with someone like Keir Starmer who is a man of integrity I believe" "Doesn't that make the case for having people in the Houses of Parliament who are ordinary people" "People like this Green candidate who is standing in Denton and Gorton, who is a normal people, who is someone who in my view be someone of integrity" "Someone who is going to be more reflective of the people" "As opposed to promoting political elites just to get into positions of power"
0:54

Gent in black, "I was a junior lawyer when Keir Starmer was Director of Public Prosecution, he was an inspiring person at that point in time" "He's obviously progressed onto the position he's in now" "The issue with appointing Mandelson to his role" "Isn't the issue really about how people like Mandelson has got through the system, with someone like Keir Starmer who is a man of integrity I believe" "Doesn't that make the case for having people in the Houses of Parliament who are ordinary people" "People like this Green candidate who is standing in Denton and Gorton, who is a normal people, who is someone who in my view be someone of integrity" "Someone who is going to be more reflective of the people" "As opposed to promoting political elites just to get into positions of power"

Farrukh

218,902 views • 6 months ago

The news media ranted on and on about Starmer, Mandelson & Epstein, but they have been almost entirely silent about Farage, Bannon & Epstein. (Let's not forget that Farage said that Mandelson was a good choice for ambassador). Here we see Farage thanking Bannon for his help in winning the Brexit referendum, and fawning over Bannon as he outlines the plans that he was discussing with Epstein, plans that included Farage. Russia's far-right friends pose as defenders of women and girls, but when we look, to take a few examples, at Bannon, and the links between Andrew Tate and Farage, Galloway, and Trump Jr., and Scott Ritter's links with RFK Jr. and Galloway, we get a very different picture. It is curious how so much of the media talks-up Farage as a potential PM, but completely fails to subject him to the scrutiny appropriate for someone in that position. The British news media, with a few honourable exceptions, is the greatest threat to our democracy.
0:57

The news media ranted on and on about Starmer, Mandelson & Epstein, but they have been almost entirely silent about Farage, Bannon & Epstein. (Let's not forget that Farage said that Mandelson was a good choice for ambassador). Here we see Farage thanking Bannon for his help in winning the Brexit referendum, and fawning over Bannon as he outlines the plans that he was discussing with Epstein, plans that included Farage. Russia's far-right friends pose as defenders of women and girls, but when we look, to take a few examples, at Bannon, and the links between Andrew Tate and Farage, Galloway, and Trump Jr., and Scott Ritter's links with RFK Jr. and Galloway, we get a very different picture. It is curious how so much of the media talks-up Farage as a potential PM, but completely fails to subject him to the scrutiny appropriate for someone in that position. The British news media, with a few honourable exceptions, is the greatest threat to our democracy.

Nick Reeves #RejoinEU #NAFO #FBPE

12,987 views • 6 months ago

The news media are ranting on and on about Starmer - Mandelson - Epstein, but they are almost entirely silent about Farage - Bannon- Epstein. And let's not forget that Farage said Epstein was a good choice for ambassador. If Starmer has questions to answer regarding Epstein, then so does Farage, perhaps even more so because Farage was part of Bannon and Epstein's political project. It is curious how so much of the media talks-up Farage as a potential PM, but completely fails to subject him to the scrutiny appropriate for someone in that position. The British news media, with a few honourable exceptions, is the greatest threat to our democracy.
0:57

The news media are ranting on and on about Starmer - Mandelson - Epstein, but they are almost entirely silent about Farage - Bannon- Epstein. And let's not forget that Farage said Epstein was a good choice for ambassador. If Starmer has questions to answer regarding Epstein, then so does Farage, perhaps even more so because Farage was part of Bannon and Epstein's political project. It is curious how so much of the media talks-up Farage as a potential PM, but completely fails to subject him to the scrutiny appropriate for someone in that position. The British news media, with a few honourable exceptions, is the greatest threat to our democracy.

Nick Reeves #RejoinEU #NAFO #FBPE

84,739 views • 6 months ago

Dodgy Deals, Blackmail and Firebombs... MCSWEENEY TO CIVIL SERVANTS RE MANDELSON: JUST. FUCKING. APPROVE. IT. In the select Committee Meeting today, with three men sitting uncomfortably, wondering whether an F Bomb was appropriate, the only person prepared to give an unedited, unredacted version of McSweeney's Bullying and Intimidation was a woman: "Dame Emily Thornberry, the chairman of the foreign affairs committee, claimed Sir Olly’s predecessor had been told to “just f---ing approve” the appointment" Well Said, Dame Emily. Harsh Realities: Deals, Blackmail and FIREBOMBS. Has anyone thought to ask Starmer just WHY it was so vital that Mandelson was appointed? The Palentir NHS Deal, which Mandelson engineered, at a private meeting with Starmer, unknown at the time to be at that meeting in Washington, was the reason. THIEL WANTED THE NHS DEAL TO DESTROY THE INSTITUTION AND REPLACE IT WITH PRIVATE INSURANCE MANDELSON ASSURED THIEL, ANOTHER CLOSE FRIEND OF THE PAEDOPHILE, EPSTEIN, THAT STARMER COULD BE "BOUGHT AND SOLD" IF KEPT IN NUMBER 10 FOR TWO TERMS, AND FINANCE WAS NEEDED TO MAKE THAT A REALITY. STARMER ASSURED MANDELSON THE AMBASSADOR JOB WAS HIS, AND HIS DREADFUL PAST ERASED TO PUSH THAT OVER THE LINE. All the Players in this Farce were Corrupt and all wanted their own Corner. Thiel and Plantir got the NHS Mandelson got the job he coveted and his % Starmer mistook his power and influence and forced the appointment in such a shoddy way it was bound to, ahem, rebound. WHICH IT DID -- SPECTACULARLY. For Starmer to come out of this with any honour or credibility: He would admit Thiel bribed him. He would admit he promised Mandelson the job. He would admit it all fell to crap, and all he has left is a few more weeks of lies and shame before the elections he wanted to ban. AND NOW WE KNOW WHY. Never mind the upcoming Trials of the Young Ukrainian men wishing to firebomb property belonging to the PM and family. THAT TRIAL WILL BE DELAYED TILL 2027. What a Tangled Web We Weave... #StarmerOut #LocalElections
0:24

Dodgy Deals, Blackmail and Firebombs... MCSWEENEY TO CIVIL SERVANTS RE MANDELSON: JUST. FUCKING. APPROVE. IT. In the select Committee Meeting today, with three men sitting uncomfortably, wondering whether an F Bomb was appropriate, the only person prepared to give an unedited, unredacted version of McSweeney's Bullying and Intimidation was a woman: "Dame Emily Thornberry, the chairman of the foreign affairs committee, claimed Sir Olly’s predecessor had been told to “just f---ing approve” the appointment" Well Said, Dame Emily. Harsh Realities: Deals, Blackmail and FIREBOMBS. Has anyone thought to ask Starmer just WHY it was so vital that Mandelson was appointed? The Palentir NHS Deal, which Mandelson engineered, at a private meeting with Starmer, unknown at the time to be at that meeting in Washington, was the reason. THIEL WANTED THE NHS DEAL TO DESTROY THE INSTITUTION AND REPLACE IT WITH PRIVATE INSURANCE MANDELSON ASSURED THIEL, ANOTHER CLOSE FRIEND OF THE PAEDOPHILE, EPSTEIN, THAT STARMER COULD BE "BOUGHT AND SOLD" IF KEPT IN NUMBER 10 FOR TWO TERMS, AND FINANCE WAS NEEDED TO MAKE THAT A REALITY. STARMER ASSURED MANDELSON THE AMBASSADOR JOB WAS HIS, AND HIS DREADFUL PAST ERASED TO PUSH THAT OVER THE LINE. All the Players in this Farce were Corrupt and all wanted their own Corner. Thiel and Plantir got the NHS Mandelson got the job he coveted and his % Starmer mistook his power and influence and forced the appointment in such a shoddy way it was bound to, ahem, rebound. WHICH IT DID -- SPECTACULARLY. For Starmer to come out of this with any honour or credibility: He would admit Thiel bribed him. He would admit he promised Mandelson the job. He would admit it all fell to crap, and all he has left is a few more weeks of lies and shame before the elections he wanted to ban. AND NOW WE KNOW WHY. Never mind the upcoming Trials of the Young Ukrainian men wishing to firebomb property belonging to the PM and family. THAT TRIAL WILL BE DELAYED TILL 2027. What a Tangled Web We Weave... #StarmerOut #LocalElections

Pete Sanford

21,495 views • 4 months ago