Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

You Can Hate The Meta, But Can't Fight The Math. While CT coped, Ansem 🐂🀄️ executed an attention masterclass. > $7M distributed > 25k to 1m holders > Trench energy + institutional access ~2min breakdown in "stick style visual" below. solana:9cRCn9rGT8V2imeM2BaKs13yhMEais3ruM3rPvTGpump, did I miss anything? Drop takes/wallets👇

highonalpha.thor 📵

695,306 subscribers

34,904 views • 3 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

4 Comments

Gbedu3 months ago

@blknoiz06 Nah this face looks damn serious😁😅

highonalpha.thor 📵3 months ago

@blknoiz06 Haha.. it is meant to be a meme

✨IbnWeb3👑3 months ago

@blknoiz06 😂😂the stick is funny! Just followed @blknoiz06 top chaf ngl

highonalpha.thor 📵3 months ago

@blknoiz06 Haha,.. will do more of it then.

Related Videos

I added a new tattoo: "Ansem To 1 Billion" I did this because I truly believe $ANSEM can go to $1B. But this is bigger than just a ticker. I admire Ansem 🐂🀄️ because he actually cares about the Solana community. He came back to Solana, created energy again, and kept asking the question a lot of people in the trenches have been waiting for: when Pump.fun airdrop? I’ll be honest. I’m not even a $ANSEM holder right now. I lost a lot of money in the pumpfun trenches before Ansem 🐂🀄️ came back. When he created the runner, I had no money left to participate. That hurts, but this is not me begging or asking for pity. This tattoo is my way of showing belief, respect, and support for what Ansem 🐂🀄️ is doing. Because many of us are still waiting. Pumpfun once gave hope to the community about an airdrop, but until now there is still no clear news. A lot of real users spent money, traded, lost, tried again, and helped build the entire ecosystem from the trenches. I hope more CT and KOLs become like Ansem 🐂🀄️ ,people who actually care about the #Solana community, not only when the market is hot. $ANSEM, you are a real GOAT. Keep going with your mission. The community is here. Send $ANSEM to 1 Billion. And if there is any small blessing for me, I would be grateful: 2NiaLvo8H3qA7qxiPQL3qZJMGeZsPRdWfKhTnwtYm6kn

Sensitive content

I added a new tattoo: "Ansem To 1 Billion" I did this because I truly believe $ANSEM can go to $1B. But this is bigger than just a ticker. I admire Ansem 🐂🀄️ because he actually cares about the Solana community. He came back to Solana, created energy again, and kept asking the question a lot of people in the trenches have been waiting for: when Pump.fun airdrop? I’ll be honest. I’m not even a $ANSEM holder right now. I lost a lot of money in the pumpfun trenches before Ansem 🐂🀄️ came back. When he created the runner, I had no money left to participate. That hurts, but this is not me begging or asking for pity. This tattoo is my way of showing belief, respect, and support for what Ansem 🐂🀄️ is doing. Because many of us are still waiting. Pumpfun once gave hope to the community about an airdrop, but until now there is still no clear news. A lot of real users spent money, traded, lost, tried again, and helped build the entire ecosystem from the trenches. I hope more CT and KOLs become like Ansem 🐂🀄️ ,people who actually care about the #Solana community, not only when the market is hot. $ANSEM, you are a real GOAT. Keep going with your mission. The community is here. Send $ANSEM to 1 Billion. And if there is any small blessing for me, I would be grateful: 2NiaLvo8H3qA7qxiPQL3qZJMGeZsPRdWfKhTnwtYm6kn

ghniy

157,689 views • 3 months ago

I spent 4 days finishing this pencil on paper portrait and every second was worth it. Hii Ansem 🐂🀄️, I hope this piece finds you well. Plenty of people create memes, Some build communities, A few build conviction but you’ve done all three with $ANSEM. What stood out wasn’t the charts or the attention, it was that you airdropped seven plus figures of $ANSEM back to the community in a bid to reignite the Solana ecosystem and on behalf of myself and all solana ecosystem enthusiasts we appreciate you! . You built something people genuinely want to be part of. “Take first, give later” is the default in this industry but You did the opposite. So I wanted to contribute something back, not just with words, but with 4 days of my time and effort. Every stroke was intentional, paying tribute to what matters most to you “family”. If this resonates, I’d be incredibly grateful if you’d consider blessing me with $3,300 worth of $ANSEM so I can finally open my first art gallery. Right now I create everything from home and a dedicated space would change everything for me. As for the rest of the $ANSEM token, I plan on holding all the way. A $10B+ valuation doesn’t sound crazy to me it sounds inevitable. Thank you for inspiring a community that believes not just in a token, but in the values behind it. With respect, A Black Bull believer. 🐂🀄️

I spent 4 days finishing this pencil on paper portrait and every second was worth it. Hii Ansem 🐂🀄️, I hope this piece finds you well. Plenty of people create memes, Some build communities, A few build conviction but you’ve done all three with $ANSEM. What stood out wasn’t the charts or the attention, it was that you airdropped seven plus figures of $ANSEM back to the community in a bid to reignite the Solana ecosystem and on behalf of myself and all solana ecosystem enthusiasts we appreciate you! . You built something people genuinely want to be part of. “Take first, give later” is the default in this industry but You did the opposite. So I wanted to contribute something back, not just with words, but with 4 days of my time and effort. Every stroke was intentional, paying tribute to what matters most to you “family”. If this resonates, I’d be incredibly grateful if you’d consider blessing me with $3,300 worth of $ANSEM so I can finally open my first art gallery. Right now I create everything from home and a dedicated space would change everything for me. As for the rest of the $ANSEM token, I plan on holding all the way. A $10B+ valuation doesn’t sound crazy to me it sounds inevitable. Thank you for inspiring a community that believes not just in a token, but in the values behind it. With respect, A Black Bull believer. 🐂🀄️

𝐄𝐥𝐥𝐚 ⏳

52,214 views • 3 months ago

[Pump.fun is down 86% and Ansem still thinks it’s one of the most interesting bets on Solana] Most people see an 86% drawdown and assume it’s over. Ansem sees something different. “I’m not long PUMP… but I do think PUMP is gonna be one of the most interesting things to watch over the next few months.” His thesis isn’t about the chart. It’s about the business. “Pumpfun is still one of the most talked about apps on Solana… they still have users, they’re still making money.” Despite the token getting crushed, the platform has reportedly generated ~$1B in revenue while trading around ~$1.1B FDV. That doesn’t mean it’s an immediate buy. “I wouldn’t try to knife catch this… you wanna wait for strength.” What changes the story? Ansem 🐂🀄️ points to a few catalysts: - Revenue growth starts accelerating again. - Product improvements restore user sentiment. - A well executed airdrop reignites attention. “If they do all these things at the same time… I think it’d be really easy for this to rip.” The takeaway: Price can stay weak while fundamentals evolve underneath. The setup isn’t “buy because it’s down 86%.” It’s wait until the business improves, then let the chart confirm it.

[Pump.fun is down 86% and Ansem still thinks it’s one of the most interesting bets on Solana] Most people see an 86% drawdown and assume it’s over. Ansem sees something different. “I’m not long PUMP… but I do think PUMP is gonna be one of the most interesting things to watch over the next few months.” His thesis isn’t about the chart. It’s about the business. “Pumpfun is still one of the most talked about apps on Solana… they still have users, they’re still making money.” Despite the token getting crushed, the platform has reportedly generated ~$1B in revenue while trading around ~$1.1B FDV. That doesn’t mean it’s an immediate buy. “I wouldn’t try to knife catch this… you wanna wait for strength.” What changes the story? Ansem 🐂🀄️ points to a few catalysts: - Revenue growth starts accelerating again. - Product improvements restore user sentiment. - A well executed airdrop reignites attention. “If they do all these things at the same time… I think it’d be really easy for this to rip.” The takeaway: Price can stay weak while fundamentals evolve underneath. The setup isn’t “buy because it’s down 86%.” It’s wait until the business improves, then let the chart confirm it.

Kaiz 🐂🀄️

56,186 views • 3 months ago

Ansem explains why people are so drawn to memecoins “One of the reasons dogecoin:native went so high is because you have this set of buyers who were never going to buy stocks. They didn't care about stocks at all and didn't have any money invested in the stock market” “They invested in Dogecoin because they related to the meme. They thought the meme was funny. It was fun to invest with their friends. Elon's attached to it. It was something they could understand easily and relate to” “I think it's discounted a lot how large that group of people is that will invest in whatever meme but won't invest in stocks” “If you look at Instagram, it has like 3B users but the holders of $META are only like 30M. There's only around 30M people that own Meta stock” “The reason Meta has value is because all the people on Instagram are spending a ton of time on that app, contributing a lot of value to the network by using their time and attention” “The people who are determining the value of this network typically don't have a stake in the upside” “If you can figure out a way to flip the social media model on its head where the people who are the reason the network has value also have upside in the value of the network, there's a complete regime change in how all these things operate” “I think one of the ways to do that is through memes” solana:9cRCn9rGT8V2imeM2BaKs13yhMEais3ruM3rPvTGpump

Ansem explains why people are so drawn to memecoins “One of the reasons dogecoin:native went so high is because you have this set of buyers who were never going to buy stocks. They didn't care about stocks at all and didn't have any money invested in the stock market” “They invested in Dogecoin because they related to the meme. They thought the meme was funny. It was fun to invest with their friends. Elon's attached to it. It was something they could understand easily and relate to” “I think it's discounted a lot how large that group of people is that will invest in whatever meme but won't invest in stocks” “If you look at Instagram, it has like 3B users but the holders of $META are only like 30M. There's only around 30M people that own Meta stock” “The reason Meta has value is because all the people on Instagram are spending a ton of time on that app, contributing a lot of value to the network by using their time and attention” “The people who are determining the value of this network typically don't have a stake in the upside” “If you can figure out a way to flip the social media model on its head where the people who are the reason the network has value also have upside in the value of the network, there's a complete regime change in how all these things operate” “I think one of the ways to do that is through memes” solana:9cRCn9rGT8V2imeM2BaKs13yhMEais3ruM3rPvTGpump

Jack

113,792 views • 2 months ago

This video is the one Kim Runner shared with me in July 2024 about how to tell whether you or others are NPCs. I can vividly imagine the stickiness and feel of holding an apple in my hand, the sensation of it denting when I squeeze it hard, its smell, and even its texture. Honestly, I was greatly shocked to learn that some people cannot do this. Below is the transcript of the audio.⬇️ Have you guys seen this experiment where you can not only test if the people around you are NPCs, but if you yourself are? Check this out. And if you don't know what an NPC is, basically, in the video game world, it's someone that's not being controlled by a person, just a random computer-generated thing. And in the real world, same thing, maybe just someone that's not being controlled by a soul. So I heard this experiment on a podcast, and I thought it was kind of crazy until I tried it out myself. And it has to do with apples. And you can probably use any object, but for our purposes, we're going to stick with apples. So there are going to be multiple layers to what I'm going to ask you to imagine. And depending on how far you can imagine it might just depend on if you're an NPC or not. So with this blank screen, I want you to picture a red apple here. Can you picture a red apple? If you can, great. So far, you're not an NPC. Next, I'd like you to think of that red apple, and in your mind—you can close your eyes if you need to—think of that apple as green. Can you change it to a green apple? Can you see a green apple without looking at it? Now stick with me. We're getting to the good parts here. If you can picture a red apple and then a green apple, great, but here's where a lot of people get stuck. And I'm taking away the image here. I want you to picture that green apple in your mind, and can you go in, and can you pick up that apple? Can you manipulate it? Can you move it around? Can you in your mind be holding it, and then all of a sudden it turns from green to purple? Do you have the ability to do that? Because for me, I could, no problem. I could hold that, I could throw it, I could take a bite of it, anything I wanted to do with that apple, I could do in my mind. But the shocking part was, as I was listening to this on the podcast, one person, they were stuck. They couldn't do anything but change colors. They couldn't grab it, they couldn't manipulate it. It was stuck there. One person couldn't even change colors of the apple. But I didn't believe this until I tried it on my wife. And my wife, she could change the color—she could go green and red—but she didn't have the ability to manipulate that apple. She couldn't grab that apple, she couldn't throw that apple. I'm juggling this apple, I'm doing all sorts of things with it, but hers is just a stuck image. And I thought that was nuts. I thought just because I had the ability to manipulate things in my mind and control things, that everybody did, but clearly that's not the case. And this leads me down the path of maybe this is why some people can't grasp the topics or the understanding of not living where we've been told we live our entire lives, because they can't visualize it, they can't think outside the green and red apple. Now, I'm not actually saying my wife is an NPC, but I do think our brains operate differently. I do think some are more right, some are more left, some are right down the middle, and some just don't really choose to think. But try it out, guys, because I found it fascinating, and I would love to hear how you did during this little experiment. Put it in the comments, test it on the people around you, and let me know, cause I want to know if I'm in the majority or if I'm in the minority. But something tells me I might be in the minority. But guys, as always, this was all for entertainment purposes. I don't really think my wife is an NPC... (Female voice) Tyler, can you come here?

This video is the one Kim Runner shared with me in July 2024 about how to tell whether you or others are NPCs. I can vividly imagine the stickiness and feel of holding an apple in my hand, the sensation of it denting when I squeeze it hard, its smell, and even its texture. Honestly, I was greatly shocked to learn that some people cannot do this. Below is the transcript of the audio.⬇️ Have you guys seen this experiment where you can not only test if the people around you are NPCs, but if you yourself are? Check this out. And if you don't know what an NPC is, basically, in the video game world, it's someone that's not being controlled by a person, just a random computer-generated thing. And in the real world, same thing, maybe just someone that's not being controlled by a soul. So I heard this experiment on a podcast, and I thought it was kind of crazy until I tried it out myself. And it has to do with apples. And you can probably use any object, but for our purposes, we're going to stick with apples. So there are going to be multiple layers to what I'm going to ask you to imagine. And depending on how far you can imagine it might just depend on if you're an NPC or not. So with this blank screen, I want you to picture a red apple here. Can you picture a red apple? If you can, great. So far, you're not an NPC. Next, I'd like you to think of that red apple, and in your mind—you can close your eyes if you need to—think of that apple as green. Can you change it to a green apple? Can you see a green apple without looking at it? Now stick with me. We're getting to the good parts here. If you can picture a red apple and then a green apple, great, but here's where a lot of people get stuck. And I'm taking away the image here. I want you to picture that green apple in your mind, and can you go in, and can you pick up that apple? Can you manipulate it? Can you move it around? Can you in your mind be holding it, and then all of a sudden it turns from green to purple? Do you have the ability to do that? Because for me, I could, no problem. I could hold that, I could throw it, I could take a bite of it, anything I wanted to do with that apple, I could do in my mind. But the shocking part was, as I was listening to this on the podcast, one person, they were stuck. They couldn't do anything but change colors. They couldn't grab it, they couldn't manipulate it. It was stuck there. One person couldn't even change colors of the apple. But I didn't believe this until I tried it on my wife. And my wife, she could change the color—she could go green and red—but she didn't have the ability to manipulate that apple. She couldn't grab that apple, she couldn't throw that apple. I'm juggling this apple, I'm doing all sorts of things with it, but hers is just a stuck image. And I thought that was nuts. I thought just because I had the ability to manipulate things in my mind and control things, that everybody did, but clearly that's not the case. And this leads me down the path of maybe this is why some people can't grasp the topics or the understanding of not living where we've been told we live our entire lives, because they can't visualize it, they can't think outside the green and red apple. Now, I'm not actually saying my wife is an NPC, but I do think our brains operate differently. I do think some are more right, some are more left, some are right down the middle, and some just don't really choose to think. But try it out, guys, because I found it fascinating, and I would love to hear how you did during this little experiment. Put it in the comments, test it on the people around you, and let me know, cause I want to know if I'm in the majority or if I'm in the minority. But something tells me I might be in the minority. But guys, as always, this was all for entertainment purposes. I don't really think my wife is an NPC... (Female voice) Tyler, can you come here?

kouji 🇯🇵

120,806 views • 13 days ago

I just cracked the code on AI UGC ads 🤯 This ad is nearly THREE minutes long, and it has perfect character, voice, and product consistency across the entire video. I found a winning authority-style ad running on Meta, recreated it shot-for-shot with AI, and ended up with what you see below. Two consistent characters, consistent voice, real product in hand. If you've been stuck generating 8 second clips that look fine but can't hold attention for a full funnel ad, this is the workflow you're missing. Here's exactly how I did it: → Find a winning ad in Meta Ad Library and download it → Upload to Loom to get a timestamped transcript (this becomes your script) → Screenshot each character → clean in ChatGPT Images 2.0 → upload as Seedance Elements → Generate your first clip per character to lock in their voice → Extract that voice as an MP3 via CapCut, attach it to every clip after → Edit in CapCut: remove dead zones, speed up to 1.1x, done → Drop final video in the Captions app, add subtitles, export 2 minutes and 40 seconds, perfect character & product consistency. I put together the full step-by-step playbook with exact Seedance prompts, the CapCut speed trick, and a voiceover technique most people don't know about. Want access completely for free? > Comment "UGC" > Like this post And I'll send it over (must be following so I can DM)

I just cracked the code on AI UGC ads 🤯 This ad is nearly THREE minutes long, and it has perfect character, voice, and product consistency across the entire video. I found a winning authority-style ad running on Meta, recreated it shot-for-shot with AI, and ended up with what you see below. Two consistent characters, consistent voice, real product in hand. If you've been stuck generating 8 second clips that look fine but can't hold attention for a full funnel ad, this is the workflow you're missing. Here's exactly how I did it: → Find a winning ad in Meta Ad Library and download it → Upload to Loom to get a timestamped transcript (this becomes your script) → Screenshot each character → clean in ChatGPT Images 2.0 → upload as Seedance Elements → Generate your first clip per character to lock in their voice → Extract that voice as an MP3 via CapCut, attach it to every clip after → Edit in CapCut: remove dead zones, speed up to 1.1x, done → Drop final video in the Captions app, add subtitles, export 2 minutes and 40 seconds, perfect character & product consistency. I put together the full step-by-step playbook with exact Seedance prompts, the CapCut speed trick, and a voiceover technique most people don't know about. Want access completely for free? > Comment "UGC" > Like this post And I'll send it over (must be following so I can DM)

Mike Futia

40,148 views • 4 months ago

why can't hyperliquid go to $1000? as one of my main positions in crypto right now, i look at it and ask if i want to keep buying here at $40/if i want to sell any i love the product, the blockchain layer makes sense with traditional markets. it's 24/7. but for it reach $1000, let's do some math: currently, it is at a ~$10B market cap, ~$40B fdv. yes, i want us to look at what happens when all tokens are unlocked. that is 25x to ~$1 trillion dollars. for reference, bitcoin is $1–2T eth $400–600B solana peak = ~$300B those are pretty significant coins to "chase." i do think there is a chance, but a few specific things need to happen. 1. hyperliquid becomes THE trading venue > not top 5, not top 3, #1 > onchain binance 2. volume stays insane > whales trust it > traders stick and bring in new ones > liquidity thickens 3. narrative timing > ai + trading narrative > dex > cex shift > regulatory pressure on cex > ct pushing it as the winner 4. unlocks don't kill momentum this is probably what im paying attention to the most. price may get capped even though product is very strong. can demand + usage increase 4x as the supply increases 4x? (this is my main simple question) --------- so do i think hype can reach $1000? i do think there is a chance. but it'll need to be a perfect domino effect. however, hopefully this breakdown can help you determine what you think the future price of it could be. still need to think about it more personally.

why can't hyperliquid go to $1000? as one of my main positions in crypto right now, i look at it and ask if i want to keep buying here at $40/if i want to sell any i love the product, the blockchain layer makes sense with traditional markets. it's 24/7. but for it reach $1000, let's do some math: currently, it is at a ~$10B market cap, ~$40B fdv. yes, i want us to look at what happens when all tokens are unlocked. that is 25x to ~$1 trillion dollars. for reference, bitcoin is $1–2T eth $400–600B solana peak = ~$300B those are pretty significant coins to "chase." i do think there is a chance, but a few specific things need to happen. 1. hyperliquid becomes THE trading venue > not top 5, not top 3, #1 > onchain binance 2. volume stays insane > whales trust it > traders stick and bring in new ones > liquidity thickens 3. narrative timing > ai + trading narrative > dex > cex shift > regulatory pressure on cex > ct pushing it as the winner 4. unlocks don't kill momentum this is probably what im paying attention to the most. price may get capped even though product is very strong. can demand + usage increase 4x as the supply increases 4x? (this is my main simple question) --------- so do i think hype can reach $1000? i do think there is a chance. but it'll need to be a perfect domino effect. however, hopefully this breakdown can help you determine what you think the future price of it could be. still need to think about it more personally.

۟

37,336 views • 6 months ago

Once this liquidity sweep hits my target price (TP), I make $85,600 from this trade. This is a clip from a LIVE trade two weeks ago. (it’s not edited, cherry-picked or fabricated) And I’m sharing it with you now to reveal the fundamental principles behind why it was successful that can be applied to ANY trade. The video below is just a 4-minute breakdown from the original 20-minute live recording where I walk the thought process on the liquidity sweep, demand zones and target price in real-time. If you want to watch the full uncut live trade, then I can send it over to you immediately. Just comment “TRADING” for me (and you must be following). Now, why did I set 1.3253 as my TP? I already considered the best AND worse case scenarios: Even if price switched bearish after my entry, it would have to sweep liquidity again before reversing, which means coming up to take out the swing high first. This means either price continues pumping OR it reverses—but both scenarios hit my TP first. Once I mapped out the liquidity sweep + extreme demand zone hold + higher timeframe alignment, I could comfortably set 1.3253 as the optimal TP. We're not doing anything fancy here. Just the fundamentals I've executed 1,000+ times. Once you begin seeing the patterns, you can do this like clockwork. But it takes repetition to wire it into your brain.

Once this liquidity sweep hits my target price (TP), I make $85,600 from this trade. This is a clip from a LIVE trade two weeks ago. (it’s not edited, cherry-picked or fabricated) And I’m sharing it with you now to reveal the fundamental principles behind why it was successful that can be applied to ANY trade. The video below is just a 4-minute breakdown from the original 20-minute live recording where I walk the thought process on the liquidity sweep, demand zones and target price in real-time. If you want to watch the full uncut live trade, then I can send it over to you immediately. Just comment “TRADING” for me (and you must be following). Now, why did I set 1.3253 as my TP? I already considered the best AND worse case scenarios: Even if price switched bearish after my entry, it would have to sweep liquidity again before reversing, which means coming up to take out the swing high first. This means either price continues pumping OR it reverses—but both scenarios hit my TP first. Once I mapped out the liquidity sweep + extreme demand zone hold + higher timeframe alignment, I could comfortably set 1.3253 as the optimal TP. We're not doing anything fancy here. Just the fundamentals I've executed 1,000+ times. Once you begin seeing the patterns, you can do this like clockwork. But it takes repetition to wire it into your brain.

The Trading Geek (Brad Goh)

48,950 views • 9 months ago

Private transactions between wallets now possible on Solana using ZERAs Private Cash Addresses. A closer look at last week’s MVP drop: Private P2P. Most "privacy" on Solana still falls back to withdraw-to-address (recipient + metadata leaks) or multi-step send flows that leave trails. Our P2P is different: one atomic in-pool transaction, the sender’s note is nullified, and two new encrypted notes are created, all inside the vault. No stepping out. No re-deposit choreography. Why it’s so hard to deanonymize: ✅ Your Private Cash Address has zero link to your Solana wallet: it’s an X25519 keypair derived from a wallet signature, and the public key becomes your private address. ✅ Notes are encrypted with NaCl box using a fresh ephemeral key every send, meaning even two payments to the same person looks unrelated. ✅ Recipients discover incoming notes via trial decryption, the chain never learns "who owns what." While we have immense respect for those building privacy on Solana, we are proud to be the first to achieve one-shot, in-pool P2P with full privacy. To our knowledge, this remains an industry first. This is the difference between hiding balances inside a pool and moving value privately between people. Note: Right now, the sender’s wallet still signs the private transaction, so on-chain you can see that a wallet performed a P2P action, but the amount and recipient remain private. The upcoming P2P Relayer removes that footprint too, completing the "cash-style" flow with no on-chain sender trace. What’s coming next: ✅ More assets: At least SOL + ZERA alongside USDC. ✅ P2P Relayer: A decentralized signing/relaying network that can submit transactions for you — enabling withdrawals with minimal linkage after the initial deposit, and removing the sender’s on-chain P2P footprint. Try it out in the ZERA Dashboard below ⤵️

Private transactions between wallets now possible on Solana using ZERAs Private Cash Addresses. A closer look at last week’s MVP drop: Private P2P. Most "privacy" on Solana still falls back to withdraw-to-address (recipient + metadata leaks) or multi-step send flows that leave trails. Our P2P is different: one atomic in-pool transaction, the sender’s note is nullified, and two new encrypted notes are created, all inside the vault. No stepping out. No re-deposit choreography. Why it’s so hard to deanonymize: ✅ Your Private Cash Address has zero link to your Solana wallet: it’s an X25519 keypair derived from a wallet signature, and the public key becomes your private address. ✅ Notes are encrypted with NaCl box using a fresh ephemeral key every send, meaning even two payments to the same person looks unrelated. ✅ Recipients discover incoming notes via trial decryption, the chain never learns "who owns what." While we have immense respect for those building privacy on Solana, we are proud to be the first to achieve one-shot, in-pool P2P with full privacy. To our knowledge, this remains an industry first. This is the difference between hiding balances inside a pool and moving value privately between people. Note: Right now, the sender’s wallet still signs the private transaction, so on-chain you can see that a wallet performed a P2P action, but the amount and recipient remain private. The upcoming P2P Relayer removes that footprint too, completing the "cash-style" flow with no on-chain sender trace. What’s coming next: ✅ More assets: At least SOL + ZERA alongside USDC. ✅ P2P Relayer: A decentralized signing/relaying network that can submit transactions for you — enabling withdrawals with minimal linkage after the initial deposit, and removing the sender’s on-chain P2P footprint. Try it out in the ZERA Dashboard below ⤵️

ZERA

36,632 views • 7 months ago

I've built an AI agent that generates a logline of its choosing, creates text-to-video clips via 'scenes' it prompts with Luma, and then stitches them together automatically—even adding background music if you happen to have some present! At first, I let the model run wild—no direction, just "generate an interesting logline & prompts", basically. The results were quite interesting, but style was a bit all over the place (which was kinda cool in some ways actually). Then, I refined the prompt it was using to create the content—attempting to focus on cinematic feeling, character consistency (age, hair, ethnicity, name), and visual style. The idea is to build it out so that it can (hopefully) stick to genre, director influence, and a cohesive color palette. That will take some time, though. The agent is fully autonomous. It: Writes a story/logline and then the corresponding prompts Generates video clips Downloads them Stitches them into a final video (Optional) Adds background music all in one shot (it just takes ~5-10 minutes, and generates 17 clips or so at this time - I was using 30 as well but shortened it to test). You can upload your own background music to merge seamlessly, too. I'm working on more integrations to refine the output even further. Right now, I want everyone to try it out, but you'll likely need to upload your own API keys (because I'm broke 😂). Still figuring out the best way to share it! I'll have to explore Replit or Gradio, but that will be a little bit either tonight or tomorrow. The final video below shows where it's at as of right now. And in the comments, I’ve included different outputs—some completely chaotic, others more polished after prompt tuning.

I've built an AI agent that generates a logline of its choosing, creates text-to-video clips via 'scenes' it prompts with Luma, and then stitches them together automatically—even adding background music if you happen to have some present! At first, I let the model run wild—no direction, just "generate an interesting logline & prompts", basically. The results were quite interesting, but style was a bit all over the place (which was kinda cool in some ways actually). Then, I refined the prompt it was using to create the content—attempting to focus on cinematic feeling, character consistency (age, hair, ethnicity, name), and visual style. The idea is to build it out so that it can (hopefully) stick to genre, director influence, and a cohesive color palette. That will take some time, though. The agent is fully autonomous. It: Writes a story/logline and then the corresponding prompts Generates video clips Downloads them Stitches them into a final video (Optional) Adds background music all in one shot (it just takes ~5-10 minutes, and generates 17 clips or so at this time - I was using 30 as well but shortened it to test). You can upload your own background music to merge seamlessly, too. I'm working on more integrations to refine the output even further. Right now, I want everyone to try it out, but you'll likely need to upload your own API keys (because I'm broke 😂). Still figuring out the best way to share it! I'll have to explore Replit or Gradio, but that will be a little bit either tonight or tomorrow. The final video below shows where it's at as of right now. And in the comments, I’ve included different outputs—some completely chaotic, others more polished after prompt tuning.

Kiri

69,476 views • 1 year ago

THE US’🇺🇸 ACHILLES HEEL AGAINST IRAN: THE END OF THE PETRODOLLAR ‘You’re bringing up the Achilles heel of this entire action, something everybody’s talking about. Look, I’ll tell you, I personally criticise deeply President Trump’s moves to get rid of USAID. They fired all of the energy staff at the State Department. The people would have handled this issue and managed it much better. I heard yesterday on a discussion of $10 a gallon. This is bad. This is really bad. This is what hurts Americans and it’s what we pay attention to more than anything. And I think that’s also why you’re seeing flirting with an off-ramp. Not there yet, but I think that that is also a very significant part of the way the American people view the relevance and the value of this military action.’ -Joel Rubin, Deputy Assistant Secretary of State under Barack Obama joins us for Monday’s Going Underground for a heated debate on the war on Iran Don’t miss it, follow our Rumble channel, link below in the replies👇

THE US’🇺🇸 ACHILLES HEEL AGAINST IRAN: THE END OF THE PETRODOLLAR ‘You’re bringing up the Achilles heel of this entire action, something everybody’s talking about. Look, I’ll tell you, I personally criticise deeply President Trump’s moves to get rid of USAID. They fired all of the energy staff at the State Department. The people would have handled this issue and managed it much better. I heard yesterday on a discussion of $10 a gallon. This is bad. This is really bad. This is what hurts Americans and it’s what we pay attention to more than anything. And I think that’s also why you’re seeing flirting with an off-ramp. Not there yet, but I think that that is also a very significant part of the way the American people view the relevance and the value of this military action.’ -Joel Rubin, Deputy Assistant Secretary of State under Barack Obama joins us for Monday’s Going Underground for a heated debate on the war on Iran Don’t miss it, follow our Rumble channel, link below in the replies👇

Going Underground

32,399 views • 6 months ago

The judge in the capital murder case against Charlie Kirk's accused killer saw texts and Discord messages today in which suspect Tyler Robinson discusses looking for his rifle and apologizes for "roping you all into this." Robinson also texted his roommate and romantic partner Lance Twiggs, “I am still ok my love, but am stuck in Orem for a little while longer yet” “shouldn’t be long until I can come home, but I gotta grab my rifle still. to be honest I had hoped to keep this secret till I died of old age. I am sorry to involve you.” Twiggs replied, “you weren’t the one who did it right????” “I am, I’m sorry,” Robinson said. “I thought they caught the person?” Twiggs asked. “no, they grabbed some crazy old dude, then interrogated someone in in similar clothing,” Robinson replied. Robinson continued, “I had planned to grab my rifle from my drop point shortly after, but most of that side of town got locked down. its quiet, almost enough to get out, but theres one vehicle lingering.” Robinson told Twiggs he "had enough of his hatred. Some hate can't be negotiated out. If I'm able to grab my rifle unseen, I will have left no evidence." The messages were displayed during the testimony of Brian Davis, an agent with the Utah Department of Public Safety today (Thursday, July 9) during the fourth day of Robinson's preliminary hearing before Judge Tony F. Graf Jr. in Provo, Utah. This clip has been edited for brevity. You can watch all of the testimony unedited on my YouTube channel or Facebook page. The proceeding before Judge Tony F. Graf Jr. in Utah's 4th Judicial District in Provo is not a trial. It is a hearing for Graf to determine if probable cause supports the charges against Robinson.

The judge in the capital murder case against Charlie Kirk's accused killer saw texts and Discord messages today in which suspect Tyler Robinson discusses looking for his rifle and apologizes for "roping you all into this." Robinson also texted his roommate and romantic partner Lance Twiggs, “I am still ok my love, but am stuck in Orem for a little while longer yet” “shouldn’t be long until I can come home, but I gotta grab my rifle still. to be honest I had hoped to keep this secret till I died of old age. I am sorry to involve you.” Twiggs replied, “you weren’t the one who did it right????” “I am, I’m sorry,” Robinson said. “I thought they caught the person?” Twiggs asked. “no, they grabbed some crazy old dude, then interrogated someone in in similar clothing,” Robinson replied. Robinson continued, “I had planned to grab my rifle from my drop point shortly after, but most of that side of town got locked down. its quiet, almost enough to get out, but theres one vehicle lingering.” Robinson told Twiggs he "had enough of his hatred. Some hate can't be negotiated out. If I'm able to grab my rifle unseen, I will have left no evidence." The messages were displayed during the testimony of Brian Davis, an agent with the Utah Department of Public Safety today (Thursday, July 9) during the fourth day of Robinson's preliminary hearing before Judge Tony F. Graf Jr. in Provo, Utah. This clip has been edited for brevity. You can watch all of the testimony unedited on my YouTube channel or Facebook page. The proceeding before Judge Tony F. Graf Jr. in Utah's 4th Judicial District in Provo is not a trial. It is a hearing for Graf to determine if probable cause supports the charges against Robinson.

Meghann Cuniff

48,733 views • 3 months ago

I was watching a lecture on YouTube by David Tse from Stanford (see link below), and he quoted his advisor Bob Gallager: "Good theory should prune rather than grow the knowledge tree." To demonstrate what Gallager meant, we takes one idea… "how do you move mass from one shape to another as cheaply as possible?" and watch 200 years of mathematics cut that idea down to its clean geometric core. Monge (1781, "Mémoire sur la théorie des déblais et des remblais") A mound on the left, a trench on the right, and every grain of earth has to choose one destination and stick to it. In the animation that’s strict one-to-one matching: each point marches to a single partner, no splitting, no sharing. It’s beautiful but rigid and hard to work with. Kantorovich (1942, "On the Translocation of Masses"; 1948, "On a Problem of Monge") Kantorovich relaxes the rules. Instead of forcing each point to pick exactly one target, he allows mass to split: part of it can go here, part of it can go there. On screen you see packets of mass spraying from one source cell to several targets along smooth arcs. The problem becomes a clean convex optimisation problem. Brenier (1991, "Polar factorization and monotone rearrangement of vector-valued functions"); McCann (1995, "Existence and uniqueness of monotone measure-preserving maps"; 1997, "A convexity principle for interacting gases") Bernier then shows that, in the most natural cost setting, the best way to move mass always comes from a hidden height function whose slopes tell you where to send things. McCann shows that many natural energy functionals behave nicely along the paths generated this way. In the animation you see contour lines of that hidden landscape, with particles gliding along the most economical path between the two shapes. Jordan-Kinderlehrer-Otto (1998, "The variational formulation of the Fokker-Planck equation") JKO change the question from "what is the best single shuffle?" to "how does a whole cloud evolve in time?". They show that a familiar diffusion-with-drift equation can be reinterpreted as steepest descent of a free energy in the space of probability distributions. In the scene, a blob both smooths out and gets pulled toward the embankment while a free-energy counter steadily drops. Ambrosio-Gagli-Savaré (2005, "Gradient flows in metric spaces and in the spaces of probability measures") Ambrosio-Gigli-Savaré take that idea and generalise it far beyond this one setting. They build a theory of gradient flows on abstract metric spaces: you only need a notion of distance and an energy, and you can talk about curves of maximal slope. Wasserstein spaces become one important example among many. In the final scene the probability field evolves in the top panel while its energy traces a clean descending curve below.

I was watching a lecture on YouTube by David Tse from Stanford (see link below), and he quoted his advisor Bob Gallager: "Good theory should prune rather than grow the knowledge tree." To demonstrate what Gallager meant, we takes one idea… "how do you move mass from one shape to another as cheaply as possible?" and watch 200 years of mathematics cut that idea down to its clean geometric core. Monge (1781, "Mémoire sur la théorie des déblais et des remblais") A mound on the left, a trench on the right, and every grain of earth has to choose one destination and stick to it. In the animation that’s strict one-to-one matching: each point marches to a single partner, no splitting, no sharing. It’s beautiful but rigid and hard to work with. Kantorovich (1942, "On the Translocation of Masses"; 1948, "On a Problem of Monge") Kantorovich relaxes the rules. Instead of forcing each point to pick exactly one target, he allows mass to split: part of it can go here, part of it can go there. On screen you see packets of mass spraying from one source cell to several targets along smooth arcs. The problem becomes a clean convex optimisation problem. Brenier (1991, "Polar factorization and monotone rearrangement of vector-valued functions"); McCann (1995, "Existence and uniqueness of monotone measure-preserving maps"; 1997, "A convexity principle for interacting gases") Bernier then shows that, in the most natural cost setting, the best way to move mass always comes from a hidden height function whose slopes tell you where to send things. McCann shows that many natural energy functionals behave nicely along the paths generated this way. In the animation you see contour lines of that hidden landscape, with particles gliding along the most economical path between the two shapes. Jordan-Kinderlehrer-Otto (1998, "The variational formulation of the Fokker-Planck equation") JKO change the question from "what is the best single shuffle?" to "how does a whole cloud evolve in time?". They show that a familiar diffusion-with-drift equation can be reinterpreted as steepest descent of a free energy in the space of probability distributions. In the scene, a blob both smooths out and gets pulled toward the embankment while a free-energy counter steadily drops. Ambrosio-Gagli-Savaré (2005, "Gradient flows in metric spaces and in the spaces of probability measures") Ambrosio-Gigli-Savaré take that idea and generalise it far beyond this one setting. They build a theory of gradient flows on abstract metric spaces: you only need a notion of distance and an energy, and you can talk about curves of maximal slope. Wasserstein spaces become one important example among many. In the final scene the probability field evolves in the top panel while its energy traces a clean descending curve below.

Mathelirium

65,902 views • 10 months ago

Jordan Peterson on why you can't be good without integrating your capacity for aggression: Peterson argues that morality without aggression is hollow. The person who has never developed their capacity for force isn't actually good. They're just harmless. And there's a crucial difference. "No one can be a good person without integrating their capacity for aggression. Because without that capacity for aggression, you cannot say no." He unpacks what a real "no" actually means: "No means, if you really say it, no means there isn't anything that you can do to me that will make me change my mind. Or conversely, it means I will play for higher stakes than you will. And unless you've got your aggression integrated, there isn't a chance you can say that. And if you did, no one would take you seriously, because they'd know it was just a show." This is where Peterson brings in Jung and contrasts him with Freud. For Freud, morality was the super ego clamping down on the id. The aggressive, instinctual parts of you were the enemy, and the moral project was suppression. Jung saw it differently. Peterson explains that Jung was deeply interested in the problem of evil, particularly while trying to make sense of Nazi Germany and the Second World War. The question that preoccupied him: what do you do with the part of you that's aggressive and potentially malevolent? "Do you just crush it? That's the super ego response in some sense. Do you just put it behind you, so to speak? Is that a possibility? Or do you admit to its existence and bring it into the game?" Jung's answer, what Peterson calls "the integration of the shadow" was to invite the bad guys out to play rather than lock them in the basement. The hockey player analogy lands the point: "You're an aggressive hockey player, but it's disciplined aggression that gives you access to a whole source of energy you wouldn't otherwise have." Goodness is the disciplined integration of harm. A person who can't be dangerous can't really be trusted when they say no, can't protect what matters, and is cut off from an enormous reservoir of energy. The moral person is the one who has made peace with theirs and put it to work.

Jordan Peterson on why you can't be good without integrating your capacity for aggression: Peterson argues that morality without aggression is hollow. The person who has never developed their capacity for force isn't actually good. They're just harmless. And there's a crucial difference. "No one can be a good person without integrating their capacity for aggression. Because without that capacity for aggression, you cannot say no." He unpacks what a real "no" actually means: "No means, if you really say it, no means there isn't anything that you can do to me that will make me change my mind. Or conversely, it means I will play for higher stakes than you will. And unless you've got your aggression integrated, there isn't a chance you can say that. And if you did, no one would take you seriously, because they'd know it was just a show." This is where Peterson brings in Jung and contrasts him with Freud. For Freud, morality was the super ego clamping down on the id. The aggressive, instinctual parts of you were the enemy, and the moral project was suppression. Jung saw it differently. Peterson explains that Jung was deeply interested in the problem of evil, particularly while trying to make sense of Nazi Germany and the Second World War. The question that preoccupied him: what do you do with the part of you that's aggressive and potentially malevolent? "Do you just crush it? That's the super ego response in some sense. Do you just put it behind you, so to speak? Is that a possibility? Or do you admit to its existence and bring it into the game?" Jung's answer, what Peterson calls "the integration of the shadow" was to invite the bad guys out to play rather than lock them in the basement. The hockey player analogy lands the point: "You're an aggressive hockey player, but it's disciplined aggression that gives you access to a whole source of energy you wouldn't otherwise have." Goodness is the disciplined integration of harm. A person who can't be dangerous can't really be trusted when they say no, can't protect what matters, and is cut off from an enormous reservoir of energy. The moral person is the one who has made peace with theirs and put it to work.

Kevin Tanaka

22,073 views • 5 months ago

Development containers are awesome, especially when you can swap the hardware running your environment without changing a single thing. Apparently, I've been living under a rock because I didn't know about this. I recorded a 3-min video to show you Gitpod Flex running on my laptop. This takes less than 5 minutes to configure and run. Here is a quick summary: 1. One click to run any of my GitHub projects in a container, isolated from everything else. 2. I can use Visual Studio Code, JetBrains, Cursor, or any other IDE that supports development containers. 3. I don't have to mess up with my computer anymore (or have 17 versions of Python installed) ← this alone is awesome! 4. I can spin up a runner in AWS with my dev container and have access to any hardware I want while developing. 5. I can configure one-click buttons to run services and tasks I need every day. 6. I can share the environment with anyone on my team. I left this for the end, but I know this is one of the most important features of Gitpod Flex: They built a zero-trust architecture to manage these development environments. This is huge for those working at companies where security is crucial. Below is the link with an explanation of how they built their architecture. Thanks to the Gitpod team for their work on Flex and for sponsoring this post. I have it running now, and I'm planning to keep using it!

Development containers are awesome, especially when you can swap the hardware running your environment without changing a single thing. Apparently, I've been living under a rock because I didn't know about this. I recorded a 3-min video to show you Gitpod Flex running on my laptop. This takes less than 5 minutes to configure and run. Here is a quick summary: 1. One click to run any of my GitHub projects in a container, isolated from everything else. 2. I can use Visual Studio Code, JetBrains, Cursor, or any other IDE that supports development containers. 3. I don't have to mess up with my computer anymore (or have 17 versions of Python installed) ← this alone is awesome! 4. I can spin up a runner in AWS with my dev container and have access to any hardware I want while developing. 5. I can configure one-click buttons to run services and tasks I need every day. 6. I can share the environment with anyone on my team. I left this for the end, but I know this is one of the most important features of Gitpod Flex: They built a zero-trust architecture to manage these development environments. This is huge for those working at companies where security is crucial. Below is the link with an explanation of how they built their architecture. Thanks to the Gitpod team for their work on Flex and for sponsoring this post. I have it running now, and I'm planning to keep using it!

Santiago

33,098 views • 1 year ago

Sora animates with this wonderful wonky, sketchy dreamlike quality that perfectly captures the nostalgic atmosphere of a hazy 90's suburban summer afternoon. While Seedance is just as sophisticated and in some aspects superior, I will miss the quality of Sora. Sora feels like 35mm film, with the nuanced way it captures lighting, color, and perspective, while Seedance feels digital - a bit too clean. I am confident that I can replicate this sketchy quality in Seedance by tweaking my prompts, but Sora has a unique way of animating that really should be preserved. There are many more bugs and mistakes with Sora, but when it gets it right, it REALLY hits a level of artful magic that sets it above all other models. I am shocked that I still appear to be the only person who is creating AI-Generated 2D animation with original characters while developing a unique Western style. Practically no one is doing 2D AI-animation at all, and when they do, it is usually an attempt to mimic an Anime style. 2D really should be attempted more by AI Filmmakers!! Especially with a Western model like Sora, before it is terminated in the fall. Really, everyone should be taking advantage of the way this model so skillfully animates, with the heart and soul of a seasoned professional. I personally feel AI-generated animation is superior to 3D/realistic AI filmmaking. While AI-generated realism is an attempt to mimic real life through a lens, 2D animation IS what it is - not a replica of anything, just a cartoon. I love all my AI filmmaker bros and all of the cutting edge work going on, but I urge all of you to give 2D animation a chance. : ) I'm still not giving up hope that we can save Sora somehow. Now that I see that Seedance is able to animate 2D brilliantly and beautifully, I know that it's not some hidden secret, and we can replicate the weights and maths of Sora. If we can't preserve Sora, we can make a comparable model. It's not just in the interest of AI-Animators like me to preserve this model, but in the interest of the entire American AI community if they want Western AI to be superior. If not, Chinese video models will dominate. And while I am perfectly happy to use a Chinese model and I am just eternally grateful that this technology exists at all, I would love to see American audiovisual models continue to be developed! #AIAnimation #AIFilmmaking #AIArt #SaveSora #SummerofSora #WillStancilShow Elon Musk Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸 Sora Bill Peebles NVIDIA Sam Altman

Sora animates with this wonderful wonky, sketchy dreamlike quality that perfectly captures the nostalgic atmosphere of a hazy 90's suburban summer afternoon. While Seedance is just as sophisticated and in some aspects superior, I will miss the quality of Sora. Sora feels like 35mm film, with the nuanced way it captures lighting, color, and perspective, while Seedance feels digital - a bit too clean. I am confident that I can replicate this sketchy quality in Seedance by tweaking my prompts, but Sora has a unique way of animating that really should be preserved. There are many more bugs and mistakes with Sora, but when it gets it right, it REALLY hits a level of artful magic that sets it above all other models. I am shocked that I still appear to be the only person who is creating AI-Generated 2D animation with original characters while developing a unique Western style. Practically no one is doing 2D AI-animation at all, and when they do, it is usually an attempt to mimic an Anime style. 2D really should be attempted more by AI Filmmakers!! Especially with a Western model like Sora, before it is terminated in the fall. Really, everyone should be taking advantage of the way this model so skillfully animates, with the heart and soul of a seasoned professional. I personally feel AI-generated animation is superior to 3D/realistic AI filmmaking. While AI-generated realism is an attempt to mimic real life through a lens, 2D animation IS what it is - not a replica of anything, just a cartoon. I love all my AI filmmaker bros and all of the cutting edge work going on, but I urge all of you to give 2D animation a chance. : ) I'm still not giving up hope that we can save Sora somehow. Now that I see that Seedance is able to animate 2D brilliantly and beautifully, I know that it's not some hidden secret, and we can replicate the weights and maths of Sora. If we can't preserve Sora, we can make a comparable model. It's not just in the interest of AI-Animators like me to preserve this model, but in the interest of the entire American AI community if they want Western AI to be superior. If not, Chinese video models will dominate. And while I am perfectly happy to use a Chinese model and I am just eternally grateful that this technology exists at all, I would love to see American audiovisual models continue to be developed! #AIAnimation #AIFilmmaking #AIArt #SaveSora #SummerofSora #WillStancilShow Elon Musk Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸 Sora Bill Peebles NVIDIA Sam Altman

Emily Youcis

20,006 views • 4 months ago

I asked Garry Tan how to use meta prompting to get better at AI: "My partners at YC Jared Friedman and Pete Koomen showed me how to do this. You can take almost anything that you do all the time and just drop it into a context window. And then say, “Here’s a bunch of inputs and outputs." And maybe you also add a bunch of notes. And then you tell it, “Write me a prompt that can act as an agent that takes this input and makes this output over here.” You can do this for almost any type of knowledge work. And you can even introspect. "What are things you notice that I did to convert this from the input to the output?”. And then you can just start using the prompt. Initially, it’s going to suck. Because it’s just not that smart yet. But what’s funny is now, I also use it to Iterate my writing. You can be very direct, "I would never say that", "Don’t say it like this", or "Oh, you used the long word there, use the short word". Just speak to it conversationally. And then when you're happy with the output, you can use that new output to make a new prompt. "Based on this conversation, give me a better initial prompt that incorporates all the things we talked about." And you can do this with literally everything. And in theory, there’s so much it applies to that people do day-to-day. You could use it for tweets. You could use it for editing podcasts. You can use it for pretty much everything. I have a folder of prompts that I use all the time. My YouTube prompt is on v27 or something. I'll go through this process with all the different max models. I'll use GPT 5.2 Pro. I’ll use Grok. I'll use Claude. Then, I’ll take all the outputs from all the models and put them into Claude and say "Here’s my prompt, here’s the output from four LLMs, including yourself. Rate each response and tell me what the pros and cons of each approach are." And I usually say "give it to me in numbered form". And then you can agree with one, disagree with two, tell it three is this or that. And then after that, you say given all of this, synthesize it."

I asked Garry Tan how to use meta prompting to get better at AI: "My partners at YC Jared Friedman and Pete Koomen showed me how to do this. You can take almost anything that you do all the time and just drop it into a context window. And then say, “Here’s a bunch of inputs and outputs." And maybe you also add a bunch of notes. And then you tell it, “Write me a prompt that can act as an agent that takes this input and makes this output over here.” You can do this for almost any type of knowledge work. And you can even introspect. "What are things you notice that I did to convert this from the input to the output?”. And then you can just start using the prompt. Initially, it’s going to suck. Because it’s just not that smart yet. But what’s funny is now, I also use it to Iterate my writing. You can be very direct, "I would never say that", "Don’t say it like this", or "Oh, you used the long word there, use the short word". Just speak to it conversationally. And then when you're happy with the output, you can use that new output to make a new prompt. "Based on this conversation, give me a better initial prompt that incorporates all the things we talked about." And you can do this with literally everything. And in theory, there’s so much it applies to that people do day-to-day. You could use it for tweets. You could use it for editing podcasts. You can use it for pretty much everything. I have a folder of prompts that I use all the time. My YouTube prompt is on v27 or something. I'll go through this process with all the different max models. I'll use GPT 5.2 Pro. I’ll use Grok. I'll use Claude. Then, I’ll take all the outputs from all the models and put them into Claude and say "Here’s my prompt, here’s the output from four LLMs, including yourself. Rate each response and tell me what the pros and cons of each approach are." And I usually say "give it to me in numbered form". And then you can agree with one, disagree with two, tell it three is this or that. And then after that, you say given all of this, synthesize it."

The Peel

51,632 views • 7 months ago

$VET, #VeFam. In this video, I demonstrate in less than 4:30 minutes how to create an AI agent on veworld(.)ai. Watch me build a Mr. Robot Monologue Writer agent. If you haven't seen Mr. Robot, I suggest you watch it! This is just early bird access. The options for tools and integrations and such are limited, but what exists is already working quite well. The process is easy peasy. The UI is simple, but effective. It asks you for... 1. Role & Purpose 2. Voice & Style 3. Behavior 4. Rules 5. Tags 6. Avatar image 7. Welcome text. 8. Test drive before publication. ... and that's about it. This free version lets you have at most 3 agents, I am told. This implies that there is also a paid version. I'm all for it, because it sounds to me like VeChain is ready to do real business! I am providing feedback to Jérôme Grillères in order to help improve VeChain's AI agent marketplace. I didn't have to set up anything. The web UI is all I needed! The agent is running on Claude Sonnet 3.7. I did not have to provide a Claude API key. We seem to be riding along on VeChain's. I hope there'll be a choice for more models, including ChatGPT, in the future. This is so user friendly, that I can easily imagine that this would take off in a big, big way. I'm definitely building on this, when it goes into production with full features. Even if my own AI agents aren't successful, then I'm sure others' will be. And that means the $VET / $VTHO / $B3TR flywheel is going to take off in a big, big way. I, for one, am here for it. (See the reply below for the listing of the AI agent I just created.)

₿lackthorne AI

16,741 views • 3 months ago

Day 8-9 of building an AMM. (repos in the next post) I added the protocol fee + the swap fees to LPs yesterday. It's the same as Uniswap v2, which is 0.25% (goes to LP) + 0.05% (goes to protocol) per swap. It was actually not that easy, as you want to spend the least amount of gas (CUs) possible, and you have to compound the fees into the pool. But I figured it out and in the end, it hopefully works. I don't transfer the fee out of the pool on every swap for the protocol, fees just go to the liquidity pool's LP token associated token account on deposits/withdraws, which I'll be able to withdraw later. (instruction still needs to be implemented) I still haven't written a test in Mollusk, and instead I started working on the frontend, for reason I won't tell you now... but just let me tell you that there may be good thing coming out of this whole AMM project besides just the AMM. So we'll put the tests on hold, for now. About the frontend... well yeah. This is the part I hate the most. I don't like frontend development. I'm not really good at it, and I can just get by fine, especially with Claude. If vibecoding was invented for something, it was frontend. God bless Claude for being a React beast. All I really did with the frontend today was initilize it from the solana template, and make the basic interface without hooking it up to the program. So everything you see is just mock data, I have attached a small little video on how it looks now. The recorder is laggy for some reason, so bear with me, but the actual site is fine, for the most part. (and also the video quality is really shitty on X, idk why) Just FYI, I'm gonna be taking a break from building this AMM for a couple days, and there will be less updates for a bit - I have exams soon for university and I have to study, and I also have to work on some other stuff. Maybe I'll stick to these updates to once a week? We'll see, I like doing it a lot so I might end up working anyways lmfaooooo. Your patience & attention is always appreciated, and thank you for following along!

Day 8-9 of building an AMM. (repos in the next post) I added the protocol fee + the swap fees to LPs yesterday. It's the same as Uniswap v2, which is 0.25% (goes to LP) + 0.05% (goes to protocol) per swap. It was actually not that easy, as you want to spend the least amount of gas (CUs) possible, and you have to compound the fees into the pool. But I figured it out and in the end, it hopefully works. I don't transfer the fee out of the pool on every swap for the protocol, fees just go to the liquidity pool's LP token associated token account on deposits/withdraws, which I'll be able to withdraw later. (instruction still needs to be implemented) I still haven't written a test in Mollusk, and instead I started working on the frontend, for reason I won't tell you now... but just let me tell you that there may be good thing coming out of this whole AMM project besides just the AMM. So we'll put the tests on hold, for now. About the frontend... well yeah. This is the part I hate the most. I don't like frontend development. I'm not really good at it, and I can just get by fine, especially with Claude. If vibecoding was invented for something, it was frontend. God bless Claude for being a React beast. All I really did with the frontend today was initilize it from the solana template, and make the basic interface without hooking it up to the program. So everything you see is just mock data, I have attached a small little video on how it looks now. The recorder is laggy for some reason, so bear with me, but the actual site is fine, for the most part. (and also the video quality is really shitty on X, idk why) Just FYI, I'm gonna be taking a break from building this AMM for a couple days, and there will be less updates for a bit - I have exams soon for university and I have to study, and I also have to work on some other stuff. Maybe I'll stick to these updates to once a week? We'll see, I like doing it a lot so I might end up working anyways lmfaooooo. Your patience & attention is always appreciated, and thank you for following along!

8bitpenis.sol

60,557 views • 9 months ago