Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

You can take issue with Trump's stance on Iran's nuclear program. You can rightfully be concerned about the potential of another foreign entanglement. But what you can't in good faith do is suggest Trump's stance is some sort of about face. He has been remarkably consistent on his view... show more

Steven Crowder

2,546,068 subscribers

1,054,278 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

9 Comments

Nicholas J. Fuentes1 year ago

Lol

Peter Lemonjello1 year ago

Lmfao go away, Crowder. You're a clown.

homans top guy1 year ago

The Haitians in Springfield are weeks away from weapons grade enrichment

Hermann Rorschach1 year ago

Just for you

Armold T Pants1 year ago

Oh phew, then we have no problems, right?

James1 year ago

If there was a wall, if Epsteins clients were in jail, if Ukraine was wrapped up, if mass deportations were happening, if DOGE cuts were codified, if ANY of his main talking points had been accomplished, this would be going over much better. I can't point to any meaningful change he has made...

David1 year ago

Steven we voted for no more wars. 1) Our own intel director said Iran wasn't building a nuke 2) even if they did, they don't have reasonable deployment capability to target the US. This is clearly a war on behalf of a foreign nation. This betrays America first entirely.

Jesse Oppenheimer1 year ago

Trump has never changed his position, and anyone who claims to be maga or America first and denys this isn't America First

LurkMcGurk1 year ago

It’s people bought and paid for by Qatar. Like Tucker

Related Videos

🚨NEW: Stephen A. Smith BACKS Trump's stance that Iran *can't* have nuclear weapon🚨 "I don't like war. I don't like war involving America. I get that part." "But I do believe that if Iran had a nuclear weapon, that they would use it. And I do agree that you can't allow an enemy of the United States to have a nuclear weapon." "It's that simple to me." Daily Caller

🚨NEW: Stephen A. Smith BACKS Trump's stance that Iran can't have nuclear weapon🚨 "I don't like war. I don't like war involving America. I get that part." "But I do believe that if Iran had a nuclear weapon, that they would use it. And I do agree that you can't allow an enemy of the United States to have a nuclear weapon." "It's that simple to me." Daily Caller

Jason Cohen 🇺🇸

40,278 views • 1 year ago

President Trump's decisive actions on Iran's nuclear program will be studied for years to come. Because of his leadership, America is stronger and the world is safer.

President Trump's decisive actions on Iran's nuclear program will be studied for years to come. Because of his leadership, America is stronger and the world is safer.

Kevin McCarthy

90,228 views • 1 year ago

40 for Rolling Stone ‘I only work with one person, really. There is no one who can come in and tell us what to think and do. That is my privilege, to be vocal. I am proud of that and will do that to the death’ when asked about his stance on Palestine 🇵🇸

40 for Rolling Stone ‘I only work with one person, really. There is no one who can come in and tell us what to think and do. That is my privilege, to be vocal. I am proud of that and will do that to the death’ when asked about his stance on Palestine 🇵🇸

diana

31,350 views • 10 months ago

The foreign bots and opportunist podcasters are all lying to you. Trump has never wavered in his belief that Iran can NEVER be allowed to have a nuclear weapon. I pulled pages of quotes. In speeches, interviews, and on the campaign trail, President Trump has remained consistently firm in his stance regarding this issue for over a decade. Foreign funded influencers and fake MAGA mouthpieces want you to forget that. Too bad for them, I’ve got the receipts:

The foreign bots and opportunist podcasters are all lying to you. Trump has never wavered in his belief that Iran can NEVER be allowed to have a nuclear weapon. I pulled pages of quotes. In speeches, interviews, and on the campaign trail, President Trump has remained consistently firm in his stance regarding this issue for over a decade. Foreign funded influencers and fake MAGA mouthpieces want you to forget that. Too bad for them, I’ve got the receipts:

Laura Loomer

85,129 views • 1 year ago

It's amazing what evidence based policy can do. The evidence that the 20mph limit is working fantastic from the point of view of saving lives and saving the taxpayer money in Wales is overwhelming. You can be annoyed about it. You can be frustrated by it. But you can't argue that it isn't doing what it was supposed to do.

It's amazing what evidence based policy can do. The evidence that the 20mph limit is working fantastic from the point of view of saving lives and saving the taxpayer money in Wales is overwhelming. You can be annoyed about it. You can be frustrated by it. But you can't argue that it isn't doing what it was supposed to do.

Will Hayward

28,136 views • 11 months ago

🚨 JUST IN — SEN. JOHN KENNEDY: "The Ayatollah is Muslim, but his strain of Islam says that if you do not agree with his interpretation, you deserve TO DIE." "The Ayatollah wants to KILL ME." "We're not trying to start a war in Iran. The president is trying to end the war in Iran." "I'm talking about the Ayatollah and his followers. In America, we separate government from religion. Not Iran. The government IS the religion." "He acts on this belief." "If the Ayatollah gets a nuclear weapon, he will use it. He could use it against America. He could use it against Israel. I don't know who he'll use it against, and I hope I'm wrong, but he will use it." "And you know what else will happen? As soon as he gets a nuclear weapon, Saudi Arabia is going to get a nuclear weapon, and the UAE is going to get a nuclear weapon, and Japan is going to get a nuclear weapon, and South Korea, and I could go on, and on, and on." "He exports terrorism. He was the person behind Hamas and Hezbollah that has killed, that have killed so many people throughout the world, not just in the Middle East, but across the world, including, but not limited to, Americans. That's why we ought to care."

🚨 JUST IN — SEN. JOHN KENNEDY: "The Ayatollah is Muslim, but his strain of Islam says that if you do not agree with his interpretation, you deserve TO DIE." "The Ayatollah wants to KILL ME." "We're not trying to start a war in Iran. The president is trying to end the war in Iran." "I'm talking about the Ayatollah and his followers. In America, we separate government from religion. Not Iran. The government IS the religion." "He acts on this belief." "If the Ayatollah gets a nuclear weapon, he will use it. He could use it against America. He could use it against Israel. I don't know who he'll use it against, and I hope I'm wrong, but he will use it." "And you know what else will happen? As soon as he gets a nuclear weapon, Saudi Arabia is going to get a nuclear weapon, and the UAE is going to get a nuclear weapon, and Japan is going to get a nuclear weapon, and South Korea, and I could go on, and on, and on." "He exports terrorism. He was the person behind Hamas and Hezbollah that has killed, that have killed so many people throughout the world, not just in the Middle East, but across the world, including, but not limited to, Americans. That's why we ought to care."

Eric Daugherty

967,183 views • 4 months ago

Senator Chris Murhpy on Iran's nuclear program: The president has also said over and over again that a goal of the war is to permanently deny Iran the ability to have nuclear weapons. But in our closed-door briefings, we learned that this is not actually a goal of the war plan. It is not a goal of the war to destroy Iran’s nuclear program — which is not surprising, because you cannot destroy Iran’s nuclear program from the air. You cannot destroy knowledge. You cannot hunt down with missiles every Iranian scientist who knows how to build a nuclear reactor. And much of the material is buried so far underground that it is immune to an air campaign. But then why is the president and the Department of Defense telling the American people that the point of the war is to destroy Iran’s nuclear program?

Senator Chris Murhpy on Iran's nuclear program: The president has also said over and over again that a goal of the war is to permanently deny Iran the ability to have nuclear weapons. But in our closed-door briefings, we learned that this is not actually a goal of the war plan. It is not a goal of the war to destroy Iran’s nuclear program — which is not surprising, because you cannot destroy Iran’s nuclear program from the air. You cannot destroy knowledge. You cannot hunt down with missiles every Iranian scientist who knows how to build a nuclear reactor. And much of the material is buried so far underground that it is immune to an air campaign. But then why is the president and the Department of Defense telling the American people that the point of the war is to destroy Iran’s nuclear program?

Clash Report

31,792 views • 4 months ago

.Tulsi Gabbard 🌺 Do you realize that the video you posted shows the EXACT OPPOSITE of what you are now saying after President Trump called you out? You testified to Congress and said, “the IC continues to assess that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon, and Supreme Leader Khamenei.ir has not authorized the nuclear weapons program that he suspended in 2003.” Not only is what you said here different than what you are saying now, but he also never suspended the program. Iran has always been working toward a nuclear weapon. We cannot afford to have a DNI Director who gets its wrong, and can’t admit she is wrong. See video below 👇🏻

.Tulsi Gabbard 🌺 Do you realize that the video you posted shows the EXACT OPPOSITE of what you are now saying after President Trump called you out? You testified to Congress and said, “the IC continues to assess that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon, and Supreme Leader Khamenei.ir has not authorized the nuclear weapons program that he suspended in 2003.” Not only is what you said here different than what you are saying now, but he also never suspended the program. Iran has always been working toward a nuclear weapon. We cannot afford to have a DNI Director who gets its wrong, and can’t admit she is wrong. See video below 👇🏻

Laura Loomer

489,203 views • 1 year ago

WHAT?! Trump reportedly tried to use the nuclear codes against Iran but one of his generals refused. This can’t be true, can it? Is this what you voted for?

WHAT?! Trump reportedly tried to use the nuclear codes against Iran but one of his generals refused. This can’t be true, can it? Is this what you voted for?

Ed Krassenstein

321,929 views • 2 months ago

Trump just announced that Iran is a week away from a nuclear weapon. That was Trump's choice. When he became President in 2017, Iran was over a year away from a bomb and it was Trump's decision to throw out the nuclear agreement that started Iran's program again.

Trump just announced that Iran is a week away from a nuclear weapon. That was Trump's choice. When he became President in 2017, Iran was over a year away from a bomb and it was Trump's decision to throw out the nuclear agreement that started Iran's program again.

Chris Murphy 🟧

94,409 views • 4 months ago

Whether or not you agree with Trump's actions, he's been consistent in his rhetoric when it comes to tariffs. There's a strong argument to be made that his imposition of tariffs on foreign trading partners is in alignment with his general America first purview.

Whether or not you agree with Trump's actions, he's been consistent in his rhetoric when it comes to tariffs. There's a strong argument to be made that his imposition of tariffs on foreign trading partners is in alignment with his general America first purview.

Russell Brand

116,860 views • 1 year ago

In one of his interviews, the UAP whistleblower Luis Elizondo said, “Time is not a luxury that we can afford.” In another interview, he stated that he is aware of the rumors about a catastrophic event, but that he cannot talk about it, because frankly, it is not his job to do so and no one would believe it anyway. A few months later, he revealed that he is building a doomsday bunker. I asked him on X at what elevation his bunker is located, and he answered that it is at 5,500 feet. Lue knows what is coming.

In one of his interviews, the UAP whistleblower Luis Elizondo said, “Time is not a luxury that we can afford.” In another interview, he stated that he is aware of the rumors about a catastrophic event, but that he cannot talk about it, because frankly, it is not his job to do so and no one would believe it anyway. A few months later, he revealed that he is building a doomsday bunker. I asked him on X at what elevation his bunker is located, and he answered that it is at 5,500 feet. Lue knows what is coming.

Open Minded Approach

205,404 views • 6 months ago

CNBC: Trump said today that Iran has already agreed to not have a nuclear weapon… do you trust that? Is that good enough for you? Netanyahu: It’s a precondition— Trump believes he can do it diplomatically and he should be given the chance. “He should be given the chance..” Who does he think he is?

CNBC: Trump said today that Iran has already agreed to not have a nuclear weapon… do you trust that? Is that good enough for you? Netanyahu: It’s a precondition— Trump believes he can do it diplomatically and he should be given the chance. “He should be given the chance..” Who does he think he is?

MJTruthUltra

24,576 views • 1 month ago

Marco Rubio on Iran: You can call it a toll, you can call it a fee, whatever you want to call it—it's a game of semantics. The reality of it is that no country on earth has a right to charge for the use of international waterways. And that will never be an acceptable condition of any deal. The President's been fundamentally clear about that.

Marco Rubio on Iran: You can call it a toll, you can call it a fee, whatever you want to call it—it's a game of semantics. The reality of it is that no country on earth has a right to charge for the use of international waterways. And that will never be an acceptable condition of any deal. The President's been fundamentally clear about that.

Clash Report

32,627 views • 17 days ago

Secretary of State Marco Rubio on March 2: "The purpose of this is to destroy that missile capability. Why does Iran want that ballistic missile capability? What they are trying to do and have been trying to do for a very long time is build a conventional weapons capability as a shield where they can hide behind. Meaning there would come a point where they have so many conventional missiles, so many drones, and it can inflict so much damage that no one can do anything about their nuclear program. That is what they were trying to do, is put themselves in a place of immunity where the damage they could inflict on the region would be so high that no one can do anything about their nuclear program or their nuclear ambitions."

Secretary of State Marco Rubio on March 2: "The purpose of this is to destroy that missile capability. Why does Iran want that ballistic missile capability? What they are trying to do and have been trying to do for a very long time is build a conventional weapons capability as a shield where they can hide behind. Meaning there would come a point where they have so many conventional missiles, so many drones, and it can inflict so much damage that no one can do anything about their nuclear program. That is what they were trying to do, is put themselves in a place of immunity where the damage they could inflict on the region would be so high that no one can do anything about their nuclear program or their nuclear ambitions."

Batya Ungar-Sargon

30,882 views • 25 days ago

'Are you happy with Iran having a nuclear bomb?' 'Yeah, absolutely.' Nick Ferrari is left in disbelief as caller Nazir explains his stance on why he thinks the UK and US should stay out of Iran.

'Are you happy with Iran having a nuclear bomb?' 'Yeah, absolutely.' Nick Ferrari is left in disbelief as caller Nazir explains his stance on why he thinks the UK and US should stay out of Iran.

LBC

19,647 views • 4 months ago

Bret Weinstein expands on what he means by President Trump may not fully be in Control — he says Trump maybe is being Shown False Realities to manipulate his decisions Tucker compounds this thought and says if you think about it, the majority of Iranian signal intelligence that we receive has been translated by Israel. —— “So… it’s been filtered. Maybe honestly, maybe not, but he’s not seeing the whole picture. No president does. But to go back to what you just said, he overrode his own instincts. His amazing political instincts — his instincts are at the highest level and he ignored them. Why?” My Thoughts: It sounds like he, as well as many… feel like it’s a total 180 from what Trump campaigned on and criticized — Afghanistan and Iraq wars — but Trump has long taken a stance on Iran. His stance on this has never changed. After years of research, and what Obama did with Iran (Pallets of Cash), I’ve come to understand we’ve funded a lot of the terrorism and chaos we see in the Middle East.. Clip Tucker X

Bret Weinstein expands on what he means by President Trump may not fully be in Control — he says Trump maybe is being Shown False Realities to manipulate his decisions Tucker compounds this thought and says if you think about it, the majority of Iranian signal intelligence that we receive has been translated by Israel. —— “So… it’s been filtered. Maybe honestly, maybe not, but he’s not seeing the whole picture. No president does. But to go back to what you just said, he overrode his own instincts. His amazing political instincts — his instincts are at the highest level and he ignored them. Why?” My Thoughts: It sounds like he, as well as many… feel like it’s a total 180 from what Trump campaigned on and criticized — Afghanistan and Iraq wars — but Trump has long taken a stance on Iran. His stance on this has never changed. After years of research, and what Obama did with Iran (Pallets of Cash), I’ve come to understand we’ve funded a lot of the terrorism and chaos we see in the Middle East.. Clip Tucker X

MJTruthUltra

25,064 views • 4 months ago

.Ambassador Mike Waltz: "One of the things that we should be very clear on is how consistent President Trump has been in terms of Iran never having a nuclear weapon — he said it in his 2016 campaign, his 2020 campaign, his 2024 campaign."

.Ambassador Mike Waltz: "One of the things that we should be very clear on is how consistent President Trump has been in terms of Iran never having a nuclear weapon — he said it in his 2016 campaign, his 2020 campaign, his 2024 campaign."

Rapid Response 47

177,122 views • 3 months ago

The James Cook slander is crazy to me. If you want to be upset about his stance on his contract, fine. But to say he is not a top 10 back is insane. He was easily the second biggest playmaker on offense last year, by a wide margin. Exhibit A…

The James Cook slander is crazy to me. If you want to be upset about his stance on his contract, fine. But to say he is not a top 10 back is insane. He was easily the second biggest playmaker on offense last year, by a wide margin. Exhibit A…

Dave Myers BIB

62,925 views • 1 year ago