正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

You don't need to know how to code to turn a messy spreadsheet into something you can actually use. I had an Excel file of 20 brands I want to pitch. I dropped it in a folder, opened Qoder, and typed one sentence: turn this into a dashboard with...

143,163 次观看 • 2 天前 •via X (Twitter)

17 条评论

Jay 的头像
Jay2 天前

Sign up first here: Then download:

Bruce Langston 的头像
Bruce Langston2 天前

Imagine doing this without opening a code editor.

Adam 的头像
Adam2 天前

For everyday data work, this looks genuinely practical.

Sanchoy Hossain 的头像
Sanchoy Hossain2 天前

A clear end goal makes the whole process cleaner.

Arthur Collins 的头像
Arthur Collins2 天前

What stands out is how little manual work remains.

Sheikh Mahfuz 的头像
Sheikh Mahfuz2 天前

That jump from spreadsheet to usable product is impressive.

Alex Moore 的头像
Alex Moore2 天前

One file, one prompt, and suddenly you have a dashboard.

Nolan Carter 的头像
Nolan Carter2 天前

For non-coders, workflows like this can be a game changer.

Milton Graves 的头像
Milton Graves2 天前

Search, dashboard, testing—all handled from one instruction.

Ryan | AI & Tech 的头像
Ryan | AI & Tech2 天前

Once AI can verify the result, the workflow gets much stronger.

Amelia Fiorini 的头像
Amelia Fiorini2 天前

No coding background, yet a functional tool comes out.

May 🎀 的头像
May 🎀2 天前

Seeing the agent test its own work is impressive.

Allen Braden 的头像
Allen Braden2 天前

Small internal tools suddenly feel much easier to build.

Salma ✨ 的头像
Salma ✨2 天前

Being able to iterate without touching the code is huge.

Abu siddik 的头像
Abu siddik2 天前

Raw Excel data becoming interactive is a useful shift.

Patrick Lawson 的头像
Patrick Lawson2 天前

A messy spreadsheet has never looked this useful.

Maya 的头像
Maya2 天前

A few words can now replace a lot of development work.

相关视频

I wanted to see if an AI agent could take one goal all the way to a finished artifact. I gave Qoder a weekly competitor-tracking task. I started on the task screen, selected my workspace, left the model on Auto, set permissions, and sent the outcome instead of a step-by-step prompt. Qoder read the context and began planning. Rather than one generic research pass, it ran subagents for Cursor, Windsurf and GitHub Copilot in parallel. I watched them check public updates and bring their findings back into the main task. The work was visible: planning, tool calls, terminal commands, file changes and progress updates. It did not feel like another chat answer. It felt like watching a task move through an actual workflow. The final artifact was competitor-weekly-2026-09-22.md It summarized the week's highlights and included sources and caveats, including where public evidence was limited. That made the output reviewable: I could check the sources, question the conclusions, and decide what to do next. That is the part I care about. Qoder is a desktop AI agent you can hand an outcome as a task. It reads context, plans, uses tools, executes and verifies. You can watch, adjust, pause or take over. One goal → planning → parallel research → terminal work → verified Markdown report. In the model picker, Qwen3.8-Flash was showing 0.0x Credits through September 30, so that option was available at zero cost during the offer. If you want to try it, Qoder has a 14-day Pro trial with 300 Credits. Sign up first using this link at before you download. That adds another 300 Credits, for 600 total.

Nelly;

159,743 次观看 • 5 天前

I just built an AI-powered creative search engine with Gemini Embedding 2 + Claude Code 🤯 Drop in your UGC clips, product shots, and ad variations — then search through everything in plain English. "Show me all the unboxing clips." "Find product shots with natural lighting." "Which creator talked about sensitive skin?" All inside Claude Code. Perfect for DTC brands and agencies sitting on hundreds of creative files they can never find when they actually need them. If you're digging through a folder of random file names, scrubbing through raw footage to find that one clip, and relying on memory to track down what's already been shot... This system eliminates the entire loop: → Drop your videos, images, and docs into a project folder → One prompt to Claude Code — it builds the entire search app for you → Google's new Gemini Embedding 2 model actually watches your videos and looks at your images → It understands what's inside each file — not just the file name → Search in plain English and get back the actual assets with confidence scores No scrolling through folders. No relying on file names to find anything. No re-shooting footage you already have. What you get: → A searchable library of every creative asset your brand has ever produced → Natural language search across video, images, and documents at the same time → Results that show the actual files inline — play videos, view images, read docs → A system that gets smarter every time you add richer descriptions to your assets One free API key. No monthly subscriptions. Runs on your machine. I put together a full playbook with the exact build prompt, the setup process, and DTC/agency use cases to get this running in under 30 minutes. Want the full playbook? > Like this post > Comment "SEARCH" And I'll send it over (must be following so I can DM)

Mike Futia

12,283 次观看 • 6 个月前

i watched gemma 4 12b build something genuinely impressive today, and then loop itself to death right in front of me. the full run is in the video, sped up but completely uncut, watch it to the end and you will catch the exact moment it stops building and starts looping right in the middle of the work. the task was clean, build a single file gravity simulator, n-body physics, orbits, collisions, running locally on one 3090 through an agent. and for ten minutes it was a joy to watch. it reached for a symplectic integrator on its own, the correct one, the kind that keeps orbits stable instead of spiralling out. real gravity with softening, proper orbital velocities, momentum conserved on collision. the physics was right. the thing actually worked. then on the very last step, writing a few tests to prove its own code, it fell into a loop. not a crash, a loop. it started repeating itself and would not stop. ten more minutes, thirty four thousand tokens into a single answer, the same fragments over and over, until i killed it myself. so it's not that gemma can't code. it did the hard part beautifully. it cannot finish. it cannot hold a long task together without unravelling, and finishing is the entire job in agentic work. here's the part that stings. i run this exact task, same harness, same card, on the chinese open models, qwen especially, and i never see this. they build it, they test it, they stop. every single time. google has the raw capability, you can see it sitting right there in the code, and then the model loops itself to death on a task a 27b from alibaba finishes clean. open weights, apache 2.0, so much to love on paper. i just need it to know when to stop talking.

Sudo su

39,764 次观看 • 3 个月前

This might be the best "AI Engineer" I've tried so far. ​ I'm an old school developer who started 30 years ago. I feel very uncomfortable letting AI take control of my code, but for the sake of science, I spent two hours building an application that took me weeks to build a couple of years ago. ​ I used Pythagora, a brand new tool backed by Y Combinator. They just released to the public. ​ Keep in mind that I use AI every day to write code, but Pythagora is something different: it's a tool that leads, and uses you—the human—as the copilot. ​ I go into more details in the video, but here is the TLDR; ​ 1. Holy molly! We've made a ton of progress on this front! This is way better than Devin when I tested it a few months back. ​ 2. Love the approach of generating a plan with sub-tasks before writing any code. ​ 3. The tools never tries to do too much: it tackles every small task one at a time, and gives you instructions so you test everything. ​ 4. It does exactly what you'd do when it gets stuck: writes a bunch of logs and uses those to correct itself. Pretty neat! ​ 5. It's fast. It runs locally. It's an extension to Visual Studio Code. ​ I'm impressed, but I don't think this tool is for me. ​ I'm not the type of developer who's ready to relinquish control. I felt I had no connection with the code because I didn't write it. It was not my code. ​ I know many people who don't care about this. I know many people who will get tremendous value out of Pythagora. I hope they keep pushing the limits, providing feedback, and helping this get to a point where old folks like me feel more comfortable using it. ​ Don't take my word for it. The best thing you can do is to give it a try and see how you feel using it. ​ Thanks to the team who built this, for all of the explanations and support, and especially, for sitting and listening to my dumb questions for 2 hours while I tested this.

Santiago

212,056 次观看 • 2 年前