正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

you know someone is not very bright when they use “should” as an argument

27,834 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

10 条评论

Rock Paper Sizzle 的头像
Rock Paper Sizzle1 年前

💪If you're seeing this, it must mean you support Trump. 👏 Let us help you show it. ✅ Classic, Tough, Real American Gear Here:

Victor Darius 的头像
Victor Darius1 年前

I agree, but how do we define “real world consequences”? Often times, they are hard to predict. In defense of the “should” person, they are seeing a negative norm, and deciding to act against it to set a new one. It is an act of principle, rejecting consequentialism.

divya venn 的头像
divya venn1 年前

The whole point of the original argument is that the effect of this action is not improving things for you, this is not a case of “acting this way will make it so”

Jia (Audrey) Chen 的头像
Jia (Audrey) Chen1 年前

Divya yess

divya venn 的头像
divya venn1 年前

Back on the wagon 😮‍💨😮‍💨

Kehinde 的头像
Kehinde1 年前

Right up there with 'everybody knows' imo

divya venn 的头像
divya venn1 年前

This one too LOL

boss ꒰ঌ aesop ໒꒱ ✨ 的头像
boss ꒰ঌ aesop ໒꒱ ✨1 年前

teleological thinking isn’t stupid just because it’s not fashionable or intuitive to you

Cryde 的头像
Cryde1 年前

I agree but also I'm just curious - Divya, what race/ethnicity are you?

Ryūkei "Loong" Fāang (龙发码) 的头像
Ryūkei "Loong" Fāang (龙发码)1 年前

So you can’t make any normative arguments then? Or rather, you shouldn’t?

相关视频