Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

you know someone is not very bright when they use “should” as an argument

27,834 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)

10 Yorum

Rock Paper Sizzle profil fotoğrafı
Rock Paper Sizzle1 yıl önce

💪If you're seeing this, it must mean you support Trump. 👏 Let us help you show it. ✅ Classic, Tough, Real American Gear Here:

Victor Darius profil fotoğrafı
Victor Darius1 yıl önce

I agree, but how do we define “real world consequences”? Often times, they are hard to predict. In defense of the “should” person, they are seeing a negative norm, and deciding to act against it to set a new one. It is an act of principle, rejecting consequentialism.

divya venn profil fotoğrafı
divya venn1 yıl önce

The whole point of the original argument is that the effect of this action is not improving things for you, this is not a case of “acting this way will make it so”

Jia (Audrey) Chen profil fotoğrafı
Jia (Audrey) Chen1 yıl önce

Divya yess

divya venn profil fotoğrafı
divya venn1 yıl önce

Back on the wagon 😮‍💨😮‍💨

Kehinde profil fotoğrafı
Kehinde1 yıl önce

Right up there with 'everybody knows' imo

divya venn profil fotoğrafı
divya venn1 yıl önce

This one too LOL

boss ꒰ঌ aesop ໒꒱ ✨ profil fotoğrafı
boss ꒰ঌ aesop ໒꒱ ✨1 yıl önce

teleological thinking isn’t stupid just because it’s not fashionable or intuitive to you

Cryde profil fotoğrafı
Cryde1 yıl önce

I agree but also I'm just curious - Divya, what race/ethnicity are you?

Ryūkei "Loong" Fāang (龙发码) profil fotoğrafı
Ryūkei "Loong" Fāang (龙发码)1 yıl önce

So you can’t make any normative arguments then? Or rather, you shouldn’t?

Benzer Videolar