Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

You Make A Girl Feel Safe & Secure Enough, She'll Do Literally Whatever The Fuck You Want. #cowgirlstyle #pornhub #nsfw #interracial #bbc #amateur #porn #blackbred #bnwo #sysbm #blacked #nsfwtwt #bigbooty #wetpussy #doggystyle #snowbunny #cum #blowjob #blackowned #pov #throatgoat #head #bigass #cumslut #pawg #backshots (Follow BootyTubeXXX๐Ÿ‘ ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ฟ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ฟ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ช and comment, like...

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfรผgbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

ร„hnliche Videos

This girl gets some of her flirting advice right, but some is very OFF BASE. This is why you have to take dating advice for men that comes from women with a giant grain of salt ๐Ÿง‚ Some of womenโ€™s advice may be usefulโ€ฆ but some of it will always be MISLEADING. If you are not already savvy enough to tell the difference, youโ€™ll mix in the bad with the good and not know where youโ€™re tripping up. Break down of what is useful vs. what is MISLEADING: โœ… USEFUL: do not open her with โ€œYouโ€™re really pretty/beautiful, I wanted to meet you.โ€ She doesnโ€™t know what to say to that; she has also heard it before so many times you sound like a broken record. You can say pretty much ANYTHING other than this (e.g.: โ€œHey, howโ€™s it going?โ€ This is 10x better than a generic looks-based compliment). โœ… USEFUL: open her with something relevant to the situation. Situationally relevant openers can work great. For instance: โ€œThink weโ€™ll be in line forever?โ€ if youโ€™re waiting in line, or โ€œThe art here sure is interesting huh,โ€ if thereโ€™s a weird piece of art. ๐Ÿ†‡ MISLEADING: you should not expect a girl to take over on your opener, like this girl did with the โ€œcute/sweetโ€ coffee recommendation opener. Most girls are not outgoing enough that they are going to decide to โ€œhave a chatโ€ with you immediately on the open. You are the man; you need to EXPECT to drive at least the first 2 minutes of conversation YOURSELF! โœ… USEFUL: โ€œkeep the conversation short, sweet, casual, funโ€: all that, yes. The initial conversation needs to be light, playful, and engaging. Tease her within the first 30 seconds (thatโ€™s how she knows itโ€™s a FLIRTATION and not a platonic chat). Make an observation about her or two (keep it positive and light). Tap her on the forearm on a joke or a high point. SMILE! You want your presence to be a warm, welcome, & flirtatious one. ๐Ÿ†‡ MISLEADING: โ€œworst thing you could possibly do is annoy her with your presenceโ€; I mean, YES, BUT you do not need to be thinking about โ€œIโ€™d better not annoy herโ€ when you are talking to girls. If you do, you will play it too safe, act very boring, get into your head, and become uninteresting and un-fun. Instead, just focus on bringing fun and good energy (not โ€˜avoiding annoyanceโ€™). โœ… USEFUL: what she is calling a โ€˜non-invasive call to actionโ€™ (is this chick a marketer? Because this is marketer speak!) we call a โ€˜soft closeโ€™. Yes, soft close her. Easy one-size-fits-all soft close you can use with any girl (say this on a high point): โ€œWe should grab a bite or a drink sometime.โ€ As soon as she says โ€œyesโ€, you have your green light ๐ŸŸข to grab her # ๐Ÿ†‡ MISLEADING: โ€œgive her your numberโ€โ€ฆ this is the WORST piece of advice in the video; even worse than the โ€œdonโ€™t annoy herโ€ bit (which will get you in your head doing things wrong). This girl has a wide face, deep voice, and high confidence, so sheโ€™s probably higher testosterone and extroverted. Girls like this are go-getters who will chase down guys on their own and make things happen sometimes (hence the โ€œdeciding to have a chatโ€ with a guy when she liked his opener). Most women are NOT extroverted high testosterone women who will take charge and make things happen themselves. Most women are PASSIVE. The average girl who is into you will not text you first if you give her your number. She will just look at it, debate whether to text you, think about what she should text, feel self-conscious about it, feel like she shouldnโ€™t be the first one to text, then you will simply never hear from her. You need to get HER number, so YOU can text, not give her YOURS. ๐Ÿ†‡ MISLEADING: โ€œsweet and endearingโ€, sorry to say it and pop anyoneโ€™s bubble, but women do not usually hook up with the โ€œsweet and endearingโ€ guys. They think the stuff these guys do is โ€œcuteโ€, like how little children and pets are โ€œcuteโ€, but they do not find them SEXY. You need to be in the lead, taking CHARGE, leading her through an interaction she enjoys, and setting the pace. Do not be โ€œsweet and endearing.โ€ Anyway, this girl seems really cool and itโ€™s neat that she wants to help guys out. Well-meaning women advising you on dating though are some of the most dangerous because they believe what they are saying and just do not KNOW when the advice theyโ€™re giving is counterproductive for a man to actually use vs. productive! (That said, positive encouragement for men to approach & flirt is ALWAYS good! So hat tip to her!)

Girls Chase ๐Ÿƒโ€โ™€๏ธ๐Ÿ’จ

340,369 Aufrufe โ€ข vor 9 Monaten

๐Ÿ’ฌ: What does receiving this award mean in terms of validating the hard work you and your partner have put in as a pair? ๐ŸŒป: More than anything, this award is a source of encouragement for people like us who work in this field. It motivates us to keep creating new projects. Itโ€™s both encouragement and the love everyone has given us. ๐Ÿ‘: Itโ€™s also a source of strength. ๐ŸŒป: Exactly. It makes us feel even more motivated to keep working and continue improving ourselves. ๐Ÿ‘: And it makes us want to create even more great works for our fans to enjoy. ๐Ÿ’ฌ: Atom, has this award helped you overcome the fear you once talked about? You used to say you were afraid, but today your work has been recognized with this award. ๐Ÿ‘: Yes, it has helped me move past that fear. The excitement and happiness are still there every single time, but the fear has completely disappeared. I feel much more at ease and more confident about where I stand now. ๐Ÿ’ฌ: How has Pโ€™Faye supported you throughout this journey? ๐Ÿ‘: I can honestly say that without Pโ€™Faye, I wouldnโ€™t be where I am today. Sheโ€™s my peace of mind and my safe place. Whenever something happens, I can always talk to her or ask for her advice. Just having her by my side makes me feel so much more at ease continuing on this path. ๐Ÿ’ฌ: Faye, how have you supported Atom? ๐ŸŒป: Honestly, from the very first day we met, I told myself that I wasnโ€™t doing this alone anymore. Atom had become part of my company, so what I wanted to do was support and encourage her as much as I could, whether it was her solo work, our work together, or whatever lies ahead. We hope to keep creating new projects for our fans to enjoy and continue supporting. โธป Note: The Thai phrase โ€œเธ–เน‰เธฒเธซเธ™เธนเธ‚เธฒเธ”เธžเธตเนˆเธเน‰เธฒเธข เธซเธ™เธนเธ•เธฒเธขเนเธ™เนˆเน†โ€ is a common exaggeration. Literally, it means โ€œIf I didnโ€™t have Pโ€™Faye, Iโ€™d be dead.โ€ Here, itโ€™s translated as โ€œWithout Pโ€™Faye, I wouldnโ€™t be where I am todayโ€ to preserve the intended meaning while sounding more natural and gentle in English. FAYEATOM AT TVHLM AWARDS #TVHLMA2026xFayeAtom #FayePeraya #FayeAtom #AtomPariya

ALAN

21,301 Aufrufe โ€ข vor 1 Monat

๐ˆ'๐ฏ๐ž ๐Ÿ๐จ๐ฎ๐ง๐ Vultisig ๐ญ๐จ ๐›๐ž ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐›๐ž๐ฌ๐ญ ๐œ๐ก๐จ๐ข๐œ๐ž. ๐‡๐ž๐ซ๐ž'๐ฌ ๐ฆ๐ฒ ๐ญ๐จ๐ฉ ๐š๐๐ฏ๐ข๐œ๐ž ๐Ÿ๐จ๐ซ ๐ฆ๐š๐ฑ๐ข๐ฆ๐ข๐ณ๐ข๐ง๐  ๐ฌ๐ž๐œ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ข๐ญ๐ฒ ๐š๐ง๐ ๐ž๐š๐ฌ๐ž ๐จ๐Ÿ ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ž: ๐–๐ก๐š๐ญโ€™๐ฌ ๐•๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ญ๐ข๐ฌ๐ข๐ ? Vultisig is a multi-chain multi-signature wallet, which means it's like your bank's 2FA for blockchain transactions. Vultisig enables you to customize your security level based on your needs. You can set up transactions on your device and use another device to approve them. For an everyday wallet, set up a Fast Vault on a single device like your phone using Vultiserver. This allows you to make transactions swiftly without needing multiple devices to sign in. If you want a more secure yet accessible wallet, create a 2-of-3 Secure Vault using devices you have at least two of (e.g., laptop, tablet, and phone). Protect long-term assets by setting up a 3-of-4 Secure Vault with separate devices, minimizing the chances of theft or unauthorized access to the minimum required for signing. ๐Œ๐š๐ฑ๐ข๐ฆ๐ข๐ณ๐ž ๐•๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ญ๐ข๐ฌ๐ข๐  ๐–๐š๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ž๐ญ ๐’๐ž๐œ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ข๐ญ๐ฒ ๐ฐ๐ข๐ญ๐ก ๐“๐ก๐ž๐ฌ๐ž ๐“๐จ๐ฉ ๐“๐ข๐ฉ๐ฌ With numerous options and settings available, it's essential to follow best practices for optimal security. Keep these three key tips in mind: ๐๐ซ๐จ๐ญ๐ž๐œ๐ญ ๐˜๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ ๐•๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ญ๐ข๐ฌ๐ข๐  ๐–๐š๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ž๐ญ ๐๐š๐œ๐ค๐ฎ๐ฉ๐ฌ: โž› Secure multiple backups from each device and store them separately to avoid single points of failure. Keep backups in secure locations, such as encrypted cloud storage or separate, off-site devices like memory sticks or portable hard drives. โž› Once your wallet is set up and all backups are made, remove the Vault Shares from every device and restore them from your backups. This ensures your backups are functioning and error-free. โž› Before transferring significant funds, ensure your new wallet functions correctly by sending a small amount back to your old wallet. Once all checks are complete, you're ready to embrace the Vultisig experience! Do you have vulties? Click here to get started โ˜Ÿ Join Vultisig dc to always get latest updates on Vultisigโ˜Ÿ Remember that anyone with enough backups to meet the signing threshold can access your funds. Safeguard backup files with strong passwords and store them across different devices and locations for maximum security. Please watch the video below to understand Vultisig better. If you have questions don't hesitate to leave a comment below, and I'll be happy to reply! ๐Ÿ˜Š

๐—ก๐—œ๐—–๐—ข๐—Ÿ๐—˜โœฐ

26,648 Aufrufe โ€ข vor 1 Jahr

Why are these horrible date ideas & what mistakes did these guys make? 1๏ธโƒฃ MOVIES: if you want to make a movie date work, your arm needs to be around her the entire time, you need to be whispering into her ear, talking with her, joking with her, and touching her (oh, and it probably shouldnโ€™t be a first dateโ€ฆ unless you guys really hit it off the first time you met before the date). You 100% do not want to do the thing where you go to the movies, ignore her for 2 hours, and stare at a screen. Doesnโ€™t get more awkward than that. 2๏ธโƒฃ TALKING ABOUT YOURSELF THE WHOLE DATE: (the problem wasnโ€™t the Applebees, it was the conversation at the Applebees) you need to get the girl talking about HERSELF, then relate back to what she is saying, on anything you relate with. Leave little interesting baits about stuff about you, and if she is interested, sheโ€™ll ask, and then you can talk about it. If you are not interested in talking about HER and exploring HER, then that is not a date; instead it might be a good idea to start a YouTube channel, film yourself talking about yourself, upload it, and then anyone who wants to watch that can watch it there. But not a date idea. 3๏ธโƒฃ IKEA: or any window shopping date โ€” these can actually be awesome dates IF you are great at conversation and flirtation. If you are ass at that, however, a date like this is just torture, since there is nothing to distract from the ass conversation, and she is going to be saying to herself, โ€œWHY are we just walking around looking at towels and stuff?โ€ IKEA PT. 2: the 15-minute drive back in silenceโ€ฆ ๐Ÿ˜‘ Gotta keep that conversation rolling, my man. Convo during transition points (like the car ride) needs to be light and fluffy. Keep it fun, keep it flirty, donโ€™t go too deep here; just keep her talking. If you want to do the OPPOSITE of all these guys: โœ… Take girls on dates that mind the Five Cs: cheap, convenient, conversation, covert, control. โœ… Get girls talking about THEMSELVES and dig to find stuff you relate to, then relate back on it. โœ… Leave little interesting baits about details about you, and then IF she takes the bait, share more. โœ… Only do window shopping dates if you have the conversation + flirtation skills to back that up. The funโ€™s gotta come from somewhere โ€” if itโ€™s not the date activity itself, then it better be YOU. If YOU are not fun, then at least the date should be (and window shopping, in and of itself, is not โ€œfunโ€ per se. Though a fun dude can make it fun). โœ… During transitions (walks, car rides, etc.), keep the conversation flowing. Light, playful, flirty, Not heavy topics during transitions; just not the right setting for that. P. S. Seeing as there is a large and easily triggered incel community on this site, I only share these tips because I care. If you donโ€™t want to follow them, feel free to continue giving women boring dates then scratching your head when no second date ๐Ÿ˜‰

Girls Chase ๐Ÿƒโ€โ™€๏ธ๐Ÿ’จ

37,092 Aufrufe โ€ข vor 9 Monaten

The most epic 13 minute AI rant I've heard in 2026 PS: My parent's heard this when I was playing it in the car and thought Jason โœจ๐Ÿ‘พSaaStr.Aiโœจ Lemkin went OFF like Stephen A Smith does on first take PPS: Full transcript below [17:00] Harry Stebbings: I I just wanted to ask Jason, if the people that we want are fundamentally different, the developers that we used to hire, we don't because AI writes the code for us. The marketers we don't want, the sales people we don't wantโ€”who who do we want genuinely? Like what is the attractive profile? Because your Anthropicโ€™s and your OpenAIs are hiring, so so what are the people that we want in the companies of the future? [17:18] Jason Lemkin: Look, I know it sounds trite, but but the answer is simple. It's just the expression each year changes. We want folks that are genuinely AI fluent. It's pretty simple. Now you know, maybe last year we called them prompt engineers, right? That used to be a job. I don't know if you remember that actually used to be the hottest job on planet earth. Now no one needs a prompt engineer because it's pretty easy to prompt all these tools. That job died. Okay. Um and now we need go-to-market engineers. Um I think that job's going to die. We needโ€”everyone needs so many forward deployed engineers. Like you can't hire enough forward deployed engineers. But uh you know um but Palantir just announced in whatever their their big their big eventโ€”they've gotten their deployment times down over 90% with forward deployed engineers. So that may becomeโ€”so the this wave of disruption for the titles and the specificity, it's also exhaustingly accelerating. But it's really simple. You meet anyone for any roleโ€”sales, marketing, engineering, product, QAโ€”they're they're either they're either they can't keep all of the ways they use AI to accelerate their job from spewing out of their mouth, or they're staring at you. It's there's nowhere in the middle. Like, and the person that comes in and saysโ€”it's it's it sounds Captain Obviousโ€”but like, you know, you just had the whatever from Lovable, the the marketing head that was super popular on the show, right? She's just spewing AI-native insights into Lovable, right? It's not that complicated. You hire her, Elena, or whatever it is. You just hire her. It doesn't matter whether she's still in college or a junior or a senior or a middler, a left or right. And honestly, if you interview people, I would say of all even of the best startups I've invested in, maybe 30% of the management team meets this standard at best. 30%. Maybe less. And of the interviews I do in general, it's single-digit percents. It's just and in in that sense, it's the same as ever. Like you either lower the bar in hiring or you hire someone that's actually great. And someone that's actually great is so far ahead of you in how to apply to to employ the efficiencies of AI in their role, your jaw falls on the table. The difference is we used to need warm bodies. That's what's changing. We used to need warm bodies to answer the call, to do QA, to do code review, to to get the blue pixel to go from the upper left to the lower right. You laugh, but you need you literally needed to brute force this with humans. With AI, every day that goes by, the AIโ€”you do not need brute force human beings on your team. And that's another reason they're shrinking. Why are all these new companies so efficient? They're just not brute forcing things with humans. They're just not. They're choosing not to. And so these teamโ€”all the brute forcers out thereโ€”everyone talks about how bloated teams got in 2021. I don't agree with that. I think they got as big as they needed to be when growth was high and you needed humans to do everything. All you look at these teams that that doubledโ€”well if growth continued at 60% like the rate in early 2021 for 5 years or can help me do the math and every single thing a software company did required a human. You were understaffed by your 2021 headcount. You'd be sitting here in 2026. You every office in SoMa would be triple packed and you there wouldn't be enough humans to staff your company. It's just the world changed. [20:33] Harry Stebbings: Jason, you live on the bleeding edge. I think me and Rory see that and I think the world sees that when they hear you every week in terms of how you run SaaS. For all of the CEOs and execs who listen to the show, what would you advise them in terms of determining whether someone is AI fluent when they meet them for jobs, for talent? [20:51] Jason Lemkin: Here's I realized I was just asked this. I just did a review with a super fast startup growing just crossing 100 million and I was asked this question. And one of my favorite executives, I thought his answer was pretty dated and because he gave me an answer that was about 6 months old. The answer 6 months old is: "I look for folks in my team, I look for you know at what tools they play with." Okay, that was a great answer in like summer of 2025. Okay, I tried Lovable last week. Okay, the answer in 2026 is: "What commercial AI tool have you brought into your organization this month?" That's the test. Anyone that is on the bleeding edge that you would want to hireโ€”now there are so many great products in the market. Okay, there is no excuse in any role to have not brought one tool a month into your organization. Okay, thereโ€”now there's going to be better and better tools and better and better products as the year goes on. What's the one you did? And you will see folks with their deer in the headlights to this question. What what sales tool? What marketing tool? What product tool? What engineering tool? What did you bring in? Why did you pick it? How does it working? Because if you're at remotely at the cutting edge, you're all over this. You're looking for the next agentic tools that will radically improve how you do business. This isโ€”you think everyone thinks SaaS is at the bleeding edge, right? You know, you know, all we do is we're just looking for the tools and trying them. Okay? Okay, we're one year ahead of everybody else because we did the simplest thing in the world. Like we tried the tools early and we trained them. We trained them for a month. Okay, I'll give youโ€”want hear a horrible example from this week? Super hot AI company valued at 6 billion. Okay, I'm not going to name it. Um, this week yesterday told us we had to quadruple what we spent on their product. Okay, their agent told us, right? And why did this happen? Okay. Well, at this $6 billion company, no one had trained the agent on its pricing properly. No one had tested it. They said, "Well, well, we've been in beta." And we said, "Well, when did the beta launch? A year ago." Okay, these are people asleep at at the wheel. You want somebody who the instant this comes up, they exactly know what the issue is. And "Hey, when I was at Lovable Replit, we trained the agent. This is how we did it. I brought in this tool. I brought in this tool that that Rory invested in last week. It solved all these issues." That's what you want to hear. And if they haven't brought in a tool in the last 30 days, at least deeply evaluated it. I don't really care whether they bought it, but gone so far down the funnel they can tell youโ€”pick whatever tool: Fixie, Regie, GC, AIGCโ€”I don't care how you went through it, you looked at it, you can tell me the eight ways it would improve the productivity of your business and three you didn't. Just don't hire that person because they're going to run your company to the ground. This is the job today. The job today is not to screw around on ChatGPT and to be a prompt engineer. The job today is to bring the best AI and agentic products into your organization and leverage all the hard work that the engineers have done building those products. That's your job. You don't have to screw around. You don't have to be a prompt engineer anymore. You have to be an agent deployment expert. Aโ€”this is the new job we're making up today. An Agentic Deployment Expert. That's your job from C-level to junior. Agentic Deployment Expert. Don't hire anybody else. You're going to regret it. They're going to stare at the camera. He's good. Stare at the camera. He's honorable. We could probably just I could slip away, get a coffee, and come back. No. And I I sound exasperated, Rory. And Iโ€”but the reason I am is I can just see I can see my best companies doing it. And I can see some companies I've invested in not doing it. And I want to cry. I just want to cry when they have no ADs on their team. I justโ€”like you're flushing your years of your life down the toilet by not approaching your how you're building this company this way. [24:33] Rory: Yes. And at the risk of being positive, it's worth pointing out two things he didn't say. Well, something implicit why he saidโ€”Jason didn't do the only hire, you know, he didn't commit the um employment law, I think it's a civil penalty of saying only employ people below X who get the new new thing because he implicitly said anyone can do it provided you're willing to learn. And I think that's the big aha that's one of the positive statements to make here right? Look and I think it appliesโ€”I'm always wary of being "Hey, coming across, hey this this is the things that you all have to do." I think it applies to everyone including investors right? I mean I will say I have found that unless you're willing to invest the time learning these tools you actually shouldn't be investing in them. One of my partners Andy had this expression: "You know, if you decide you want to stop learning new things you probably should retire within 6 to 12 months and never write another check again." Maybe that's down to 3 to 6 months at this stage, right? And I think, you know, it'sโ€” [25:27] Harry Stebbings: Yeah, I actually I actually had a meeting with mine and Jason's biggest investor the other day and Iโ€”pretend he's not hereโ€”I said I think he's the most equipped investor for this generation of investing because I don't think anyone quite sits at the bleeding edge like he does on the investor side. [25:42] Harry Stebbings: Why in terms of using the equip stuff? Yeah. Yeah. In terms of using the stuff, understanding understanding bottlenecks, constraints. For sure. [25:51] Jason Lemkin: But can I just add one point? We can just cuz it's so important if it helps people. Okay, we areโ€”and thank you Harry. We're going through these phases. Okay, and when AI started to blow up for real for us, uh call it early 2024, right? Maybe late '23, I wasn't equipped. It was too technical. I wasn't going to go in and figure outโ€”I wasn't smart enough to figure out how to deal with a massively hallucinating LLM API and turn that and turn that into something magical. Kudos to investors and others that that got it in early '23, '22. I mean I remember Iโ€”I guess it was maybe SaaStr Annual '23. I was with David Sacks and I did a Q&A and I said, "How you thinking about AI at Craft?" He's like, "Well we're all in. We want 80% of '23 of investments to be AI." I'm like, "Great but like show me the show me the great ones in market." He's like, "They're all prototypes. We're all they're all they're all proof of concepts but we're all in anyway." That's where you kind of had to be in '23 if you weren't investing at like the LLM level. Okay, I wasn't smart enough. Then we went through this weird-ass prompt engineer era where like you you could torture these products to do something good, right? But you had to torture them. You had to like craft these crazy things that made no sense. Now we are in the era where mere ordinarily smart generalists can make these tools do magical things. And literally I go to these meetings and people be like, "I don't know how to like this is so scary. I don't know how to do this." And we show them our backends. Do you know how to do a workflow generator? Do you know how to do a a decision tree? Like we've been building these since software in the '90s. Okay, if youโ€”I can show you all of our agents. The how they work is novel. They do have to be trained. You can't be lazy and have these agents work. But honestly, the the UI, the UX, the way we interact with them, it's just software. And so my point is: Pick yourself off the ground. This is your time now. If you felt lost in AI era, if you felt like you're behind, you don't understand what all these people are saying on X and Twitter and their Claude and and their and talking about all the 4.6 point Nano point and it's overโ€”like you just it's not your world. This is your time. This is your time for the generalist that knows how to use software tools really really well. And Iโ€”this is my last point but it's so important. If ever in your recent lifeโ€”and this is why you could be all you need to be is young at heart to Rory's pointโ€”if in the last three to five years you have successfully deployed a piece of enterprise software of any sort you yourself, not some agency you hired, but if you have deployed it, you can deploy any agentic tool. Any. And you can become the hero in your company and you can become the hero in your functional area. But I watch folksโ€”I'm literally helping a company now that they're adding hundreds of sales folks this year with a new pre-IPO COOโ€”he's not hasn't brought in a single tool, totally scared of it. Okay, it's not that hard. Did you use SalesLoft? Did you use Outreach? Did you use HubSpot? Do you know these tools? If you can deploy these tools, you can deploy a world-changing AI agent. And so this is the time for people like the folks that that were shut out of the AI revolution right now. The generalist folks that are not that know how to deploy software that don't even know how to build software. Like vibe coding for me was folks who knew how to build software, but you didn't have to be an engineer. Now, you just need to know how to deploy software to win with AI agents. That's all you need to know. So many people have these skills and they're petrified of AI. "How did you do that? How did you deploy an AI BDR?" Well, we bought a piece of software, we figured out how it worked for a day, we set it up in an afternoon, and then and then we did spend 30 months training it, which you didn't do with this old software because in the old days, we just had to manually upload all the data, right? And there was no training. The the only non-intuitive part is training these things. And it's it's it's just work. So that's why when I see folks on the management team not doing this, there's no excuse. You do not need to be technical to win with AI agents in Q2 of '26. You do not need to be even 1% technical. Not at all. So it's your time. Or you're going to get laid off. Or you're going to get laid off because you're not going to matter.

Arjun Mahadevan (Mr. LLC ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ)

37,744 Aufrufe โ€ข vor 5 Monaten

Just in $AMD Anush "Speed is the moat"|ROCm๐ŸŽ™๏ธ In the race to define the future of AI, what's the one advantage that truly lasts? It's not proprietary tech, argues Anush Elangovan Elangovan, VP of AI Software at AMD , but the sustainable speed of innovation. He explains why AMD is rejecting the "walled garden" model for its open source ROCm stack, betting that an open community flywheel is the key to victory. Listen to understand how this open strategy is designed to out-innovate closed systems by empowering developers to solve everything from frontier-model challenges to the mundane, everyday problems that define the "last mile" of AI. AMD ROCm Software: Part 1 Transcript [00:00:00] Andrew Zigler: Joining me is Anush Elangovan, VP of AI software at AMD. And when people talk about AI compute, the conversation often stops at hardware specs, but it's more than just physical chips that win the game. It's also the software ecosystems supporting them. [00:00:18] Andrew Zigler: The prevailing strategy in the industry has been to build something like a walled garden. You know, something closed, proprietary locks, developers in. But AMD is betting on an entirely different play, open source acceleration, and with rock, their open source AI software stack. AMD is building not just hardware parity, but an innovation flywheel that's powered by the community with interoperability and the freedom to scale without all of that pesky lockin. [00:00:48] Andrew Zigler: And in this world, speed is your moat and how fast you can innovate while your platform remains open, flexible, and standardize across all of its applications. That's what we're gonna explore [00:01:00] today. So Anush, I'm really excited to have you here. Welcome to Dev Interrupted. [00:01:04] Anush Elangovan: Thanks for having me. Uh, super excited to chat about it. [00:01:07] Andrew Zigler: Amazing. Well, let's go ahead and dive right in with kind of what I laid it out with in the beginning, the idea of the moat and it being about speed. I wanna unpack that a bit because that came from you when you and I first spoke. And I, and I want to know, you know, how do you define speed inside of AMD beyond just things like hardware, benchmarks. [00:01:27] Anush Elangovan: Yeah, that's a very good question. So when we typically talk about speed, everyone's like, Hey, hardware benchmark specs, right? Like, uh, memory bandwidth or, or flops. And that is one important part of it, uh, AMD does very well. With that, we do have, a, a very good history of executing on that axis. [00:01:47] Anush Elangovan: But when I say speed is the moat, it is about, uh, how we prepare, how we build the muscle to run the race for a long time and run it fast. And it is [00:02:00] not about a single point in time that you've, you've beat some you know, benchmark and, and you declare victory. It's about building the ability to consistently develop and deliver. [00:02:13] Anush Elangovan: Both hardware and software innovation at scale and do it fast, right? Like, you know, we we're increasingly getting to a point where models come out and they're, uh, you know, a year or two ago it was like, Hey, they work on AMD on day zero, which is great, but now they are performing on AMD the day it releases, right? [00:02:32] Anush Elangovan: So, what does it take to Prefetch where the industry is going? Be prepared to intercept. At that point is what you know, I, I refer to as you know, the, the speed factor in, in creating this mode, right? And the mode is just shed all things that hold you back and run as fast as you can. [00:02:53] Anush Elangovan: Uh, because the pace of innovation that is, uh, being seen in, in AI [00:03:00] industries is just. Amazing. Right? And it's like, it's transformational at at how you generate electricity. It's transformational as at how you build data centers. It's transformational at how you deploy compute, networking. It's transformational at what kind of use cases you, you know, uh, use AI for. [00:03:17] Anush Elangovan: Uh, and for that, you need to be prepared to, see what comes tomorrow and be prepared to run the race tomorrow. [00:03:23] Andrew Zigler: Yeah, it's a really great perspective because it highlights that it's not just like a checkpoint that you run through. I like how you called out, like it's not just hitting that benchmark or being the best in class at that moment, in that snapshot, it's about having a. The throughput and about having that dedication to the idea and continuing to deliver on it. [00:03:43] Andrew Zigler: It's not just crossing the threshold, but it's also being the engine. And that's what, that's what protects a business. That is the moat, because the moat is that innovation layer, the faster and more, uh, future forward. That you can work and think, [00:04:00] you know, the better. Uh, we, we talk a lot about like future forward work styles. [00:04:04] Andrew Zigler: Like what are the things I could be doing right now today that are gonna be like, way more useful tomorrow? Let, let's abandon those, workflows that are older and that kind of like, that translates into. An advantage when you work that way. You know, what kind of things have you learned working with, uh, like across all spectrums of people who would use ROCm, right? [00:04:23] Andrew Zigler: You have like the developers, but then you also have the enterprises and you have this large span of adoptees, right? So what is the, what does that look like that you learn? [00:04:32] Anush Elangovan: Yeah, so, so the way I look at it is there are gonna be pockets of different, uh, you know, cadences, right? Like, so people who are deploying in enterprises, for example, right? The validation and how long it takes for them to deploy an LLM that's secure. It's, with guardrails, et cetera, maybe longer. [00:04:52] Anush Elangovan: but you still have to go through the process and you have to be prepared to like, walk that walk to deploy an enterprises. That doesn't mean it's [00:05:00] not fast, that's as fast as you can do for that industry, right? And if you are deploying AI in healthcare, right, it's, it's got its own, uh, cycle. [00:05:07] Anush Elangovan: but in each one of these, you want to see how, like, go down to the essence of what is it that you actually have to do. And, you know, I, I, I like how you framed it. It's like it's, you shed your prior assumptions of how things are done, right. And, and you kind of build up from a, uh, first principles, uh, approach to say, this is how I could use AI to unlock, whatever I'm doing. [00:05:33] Anush Elangovan: And, and, some of it, you know, it's good to really step back and look at. Just question every part of it, right? Like right now you're getting chat GPT and, Gemini competing for like, math, olympiads and, and, uh, college, uh, reasoning, uh, tests. Right? And, and those are like that, that is amazing and increasingly like complex tasks that they're trying to do. [00:05:58] Anush Elangovan: But there may also be like. [00:06:00] More mundane things that AI could, could get applied to. Right? And, and so when we think about shedding old ways, you wanna shed it not just in like the tip of the spear. It's like, you know, I'm gonna see what's the frontier model. It's also, it could be something as simple as. [00:06:18] Anush Elangovan: How do you choose a, a movie, uh, you know, like a recommendation system, right? Or, or, uh, an automated, uh, flight, uh, rebooking system. So the moment, you know, your flight is late, uh, right now it's a notification, right? It's like, oh, you got a text message saying your flight's late. And I got that like three times this week. [00:06:38] Anush Elangovan: But anyway, uh, and, and, and, and, I was just like, okay, so if I were to rethink this. All this MCPs that we have that should be hooked up into an MCP that says, your flight's delayed. Here are your options. If you want, you know, these are the paid options. Yeah. Here are the free options. This will get you back into your you know, Toronto airport [00:07:00] tonight. [00:07:00] Anush Elangovan: Or if you stay, here's a hotel plus this, plus this, plus. It's just like, go ahead is all I should say. Versus now I'm like, okay, can someone, you know, can I call a travel agent? Can I do this? Can I go online and log into And you know, so we gotta fundamentally rethink even those like small, nuances of, things that we do that can be automated out and AI is really, really good at doing something like this, right? Maybe I just explained an AI startup idea right now. Somebody should just start that. [00:07:29] Andrew Zigler: I think you did. Yeah, you definitely did. Someone, one of our listeners is definitely going to lift that off of you. I, I, I, you know, I hate being on the receiving end of those. You feel a little helpless and then you have to like, follow the whole flow. So I know what you mean. Like I, I like how you called out that the build and this like. [00:07:45] Andrew Zigler: Where speed is your moat and the innovation layer is protecting you, is what makes you better than your competitors. How you scale that and you bring that to market. So by understanding the problems that you're solving, uh, throwing away those older assumptions, but also [00:08:00] recognizing that like. We're building every single day, new things and new ways of using stuff that we're still figuring out the implications of. [00:08:08] Andrew Zigler: And so when you have a lot of velocity and you're introducing a lot of new ideas, and maybe you have that workflow now that automatically rebook your flight off of your late flight text message, and uh, I know I would certainly use it, but you know, what kind of philosophies guide the way that y'all think about building this ecosystem to manage that stability while letting folks. [00:08:29] Andrew Zigler: Play with the speed and the assumptions and the airplane re bookings. [00:08:34] Anush Elangovan: so, so I think, you know, we need to peel one layer down, right? and the philosophy is, Hey, we, we just discovered electricity, right? And you know what we're gonna do? We are gonna make motors, uh, or dynamos, right? Like engines. Uh, sure. We don't know if it's gonna be a Ferrari that you're gonna make, or it's a a a a dump truck. [00:08:57] Anush Elangovan: That's good for doing this. But let's [00:09:00] let, which is also required, right? You need a dump truck. You need a garbage truck. And, [00:09:04] Andrew Zigler: Yeah. You need the [00:09:04] Anush Elangovan: course you need, uh, a Ferrari for a midlife crisis, right? So, [00:09:09] Andrew Zigler: precisely. [00:09:10] Anush Elangovan: But, but my, uh, point is what do we build next? And, uh, and this is what I meant by like, okay, let's, let's take those baby steps to build the. [00:09:20] Anush Elangovan: Infrastructure that's required that we know we'll have to use, right? So, so if I just discovered electricity, okay, great. Now one, how do I save this electricity and how do I use it? So there's battery technology, so you need to do something like that, right? Like so. But then you also want to make it into an actionable thing. [00:09:37] Anush Elangovan: You want to make it for like automobiles, or you wanna use it for, you know, powering, uh, entire cities. So it is that transformational. So, uh, AI is that transformational. So, if you distill down, it'll, it'll come down to how do we think about, what we can do with this this fundamental technology that, We may not be aware of what it [00:10:00] is gonna unlock next, but at least you know the next step is clear, right? It's like a dense fog, you know, it's gonna be like, it, it's the right path. You see the light, but it's kind of like out there and, and the steps you're taking are concrete and you're like, okay, this is good. [00:10:16] Anush Elangovan: I, this is better than where I was or where we were. So we are moving forward. So you can build with the. Intuition from what you see in the short term and a tactical view, but towards what you think the future is gonna be. [00:10:28] Andrew Zigler: Right. You almost like we're all in this like fog of war, right? And like you said, you're reaching out and you're trying to step through it. You could think of it too, as like you're in the dark and your hands are up in front of you and you know that. You're, you're not gonna run your face into a wall because your hands are out in front of you, but you're not gonna maybe do much better than that. [00:10:45] Andrew Zigler: So that's kind of like, I think the eco, the, the industry, the world that we find ourselves in, uh, and we all have to, then this becomes the power of an ecosystem, of a group of people working together to create that layer of, [00:11:00] uh, of establishing the [00:11:01] Anush Elangovan: exactly. And I, I, I just, instead of, you know, saying fog of war I describe it as like, you're in this. Beautiful valley with like a morning, uh, fog that's in. You can smell the flowers. You, you hear the birds. You are like, okay, it's, we are in like, uh, utopian paradise and yes, I just need to like, continue the walk, right? [00:11:24] Anush Elangovan: and then move forward with that, conviction that you're in the right spot. [00:11:27] Andrew Zigler: Yeah. So let's talk about that ecosystem world. This nice, I love how you describe it, this grassy side of a hill in the morning that's covered in some mist and maybe we can't see 30 feet in one direction, but it sure is a beautiful hill and it smells nice. And so we're all here. And why is, in that world, why is. [00:11:44] Andrew Zigler: You know, open source, their strategic advantage that y'all are going for in the AI hardware market. And, and then how does like ROCm turn that into wins for people within that ecosystem? [00:11:56] Anush Elangovan: you know, the, the way we look at it is this, is kind of like how I view [00:12:00] AI and the ecosystem, right? But, but it is for everyone to enjoy. Uh, and so we do want to make sure that. You know, it is, uh, beneficial for everyone. [00:12:09] Anush Elangovan: The ecosystem can come in and, and innovate. It's an open innovation engine. and uh, it is very different from, you know, having a walled garden with, Hey, only I know how to do this and I'm gonna do it and throw it over the fence and you can use it or keep walking, right? So we'd like to be good citizens that way, but also. [00:12:30] Anush Elangovan: Uh, it is self-fulfilling in a way, right? Like it, the, the pace at which we innovate with open source is unmatched. Like, you know, our serving engines are like VLLM and, and sg l. Those things, uh, those frameworks are like super, super aggressive in terms of how fast they come out with features and how fast they can you know, get performant models out. [00:12:52] Anush Elangovan: And that compared with what, uh, you'd get from, you know, the likes of like T-R-T-L-L-M or something is always lagging, right? Because you [00:13:00] just can't keep up with you know, 200 commits a week just on one particular model to get that model really performant [00:13:06] Andrew Zigler: And, and, and in that world where, you know, everyone can enjoy the winds of this, what kind of customer stories or innovation stories have really stood out to you and excite you about building and creating this place for developers? [00:13:19] Anush Elangovan: Yeah. So I think the parts that are super exciting for me are when when we get to see a customer that is first skeptical. Then they start a little like, okay, fine, we'll give you a chance. Uh, we do a simple, uh, POC and then they're like, huh, this seems to work. Yeah, we told you it works. [00:13:42] Anush Elangovan: You don't have to change one line of code. Really? Yes, no need to change one line of code. Okay, let's try a production workload. So then they try it. Oh, you're more performant than the competition. Yes. We're more performant than, than the competition. So how much does it cost? And we're like, oh, it's your TCO is better with, uh, [00:14:00] AMD. [00:14:00] Anush Elangovan: So again, they're like, wow, okay, good. So now how do we deploy at scale? And then we go deploy it at scale. And when they give a thumbs up on that and they say, this is good, right? That's when you know, you, you see it go full circle from like, oh, we, we've never heard about AMD to like actually deploy to tens of thousands of GPUs In the order of a few months, right? It, it, it really is fascinating to see and very exciting and invigorating to [00:14:28] Andrew Zigler: Yeah. At like a great exposure to a lot of interesting problems. And, and then people using the infrastructure, the, the technology available to solve those problems. Really specific problems by the way, that's often why they're bringing their data and AI to it, uh, is because it is really specific and important for them. [00:14:45] Andrew Zigler: And there's a, a lot I think that other engineering orgs can learn and even emulate from AMD's success and, and having this open source ecosystem and it causing this acceleration within. You [00:15:00] know, uh, customers and enterprises that use and adopt the tools and, and, and that creates an advantage. And that goes back to why we're talking and like the real thesis of our conversation today. [00:15:10] Andrew Zigler: So how do you think engineering leaders that are listening to this and obviously tapping into this great success AMD has from an open source flywheel, how do you think other, other folks building in the same space can foster that open, first, that open source oriented culture in order to, you know, accelerate their innovation goals? [00:15:29] Anush Elangovan: Yeah, that's a very good question. So the startup that um, was acquired by AMD we, we built, I mean, we started off doing iot stuff and you know, smart ring and all that, right? But in the, the end of like, uh, and not the end, the last six years of the company was building ML compilers. [00:15:47] Anush Elangovan: And ml, ML compilers are like super, uh, complicated, sophisticated, advanced algorithms, dah, dah, dah. but it was all open source, right? So our VCs were like, wait, what do you mean your core [00:16:00] IP is open source? And um, the speed is the moat applied even then, right? It was just like, yes, if you have an idea that. [00:16:08] Anush Elangovan: Because someone saw this idea that you are, they're gonna be able to catch up, then you probably have the wrong idea anyway. But if they are, you know, you execute and they're gonna catch up, that you should assume they're gonna catch up. Right? So you gotta move forward. So keeping it open source is super important. [00:16:25] Anush Elangovan: But also to your question on like, you know, the learnings from an AMD standpoint, right? If there are, hard problems, I'd say dig in and work through it, right? Like there's no way but through it, right? That should be the simple mentality. And more, uh, frequently than not. you'll see that you'll just make it through in a, in, in good form. [00:16:52] Anush Elangovan: But if you doubt it and you're like, oh, I don't know if I should commit, if I'm, I, you know, what should just commit to do the right thing [00:17:00] every step, right? Every step, and just keep taking one step in front of the other. And in no time you'll see that you'll be running. Right. And, and yes, the first few steps will be like, yeah, everyone's complaining about your software quality. [00:17:15] Anush Elangovan: Everyone's complaining about this and that, and it doesn't work. And, and a few steps in, you know, you get, you get the hang of all the complaints that are coming in. You get the feedback loop. You're like, okay, what, what are you prioritizing again? One step in front of the other, right? You just keep knocking that out and then you get to a point where you're, it just becomes second nature, right? To do the, to do the right thing. And, and then yes, if someone gives you two options, you'll be like, fine. This is, uh, you know, there's always the resource trade off. There's always a human capital trade off, but what's the right thing to do? of course, I, I'm pragmatic about what we choose, but, but if the right thing for your long-term success is dig in, go first, principles, make it [00:18:00] happen. [00:18:00] Anush Elangovan: Well. Then just go for that. There's, there is no shortcut to [00:18:04] Andrew Zigler: acknowledging, you know, how it aligns with your mission, your core company goals, and what you're looking to achieve. And, and I, I love how you rightfully called out that in the open source world and you know, you have your technology that you've built, what you think is your moat upon, right? [00:18:22] Andrew Zigler: It's your code and, and to open source that, or to just make it where anyone could peer in is, you know. Scary in one regard, but two, it just kind of feels like you're handing away your throne room in some kind of sense, a very direct feeling sense. But the ultimately, you were really right to call out, and this is something I think about all the time, that the real power there is still the speed This the speed. [00:18:42] Andrew Zigler: That was the moat at the beginning of our conversation. It's the speed in combination with your. Very specific domain understanding of what you're building and what you're creating, and your new role as the steward of that world and how people plug into it, which [00:19:00] has frankly, a lot more influence and power than lording over a closed. [00:19:04] Andrew Zigler: You know, repository or an ecosystem, and like you said, like throwing things over the wall. Sure. There, there might be people always on the other side of that wall, but you're not gonna have a great connection with them. You're not gonna be able to really clearly understand them. I, I like your metaphor of the side of the field of the mountain a lot more. [00:19:23] Andrew Zigler: But, but in the, in this world, you know, where. That speed is, is the power and, and open source is just one way that you can harness that speed to get really far ahead and to innovate. , There's other parts of this equation that you can be experimenting with too, and I'd love to pick your brain about them as a software leader and, and, and one of them is about looking forward and kind of understanding that future that we're all building towards and beyond today's models and hardware. [00:19:48] Andrew Zigler: You know, what do you see as the next major bottleneck or opportunity in the AI compute space? As, as you know, enterprises and folks start to get a little more mature about what's available to [00:20:00] them. [00:20:00] Anush Elangovan: Yeah, I think, the bottleneck and opportunity is, uh, what I'd call, call walking the last mile of ai. Right. Uh, and like I I, I gave you an example, uh, previously, but, but it's similar to that. It's like there are cases where Humans have so many, uh, things to do in your day. You know, like the, if we sit down and actually had a customer focus like, okay, these customers lives, I'm gonna save four hours of this customer's life. And if you actually sit down and look at all of that, it'll be. Easily automatable, easily you know, uh, applicable, uh, for ai, right? [00:20:39] Anush Elangovan: Like, but then making it happen is gonna take a little bit, right? It's like maybe it's, uh, paying your utility bill, right? Or something like that, right? Or, or, your healthcare explanation of benefits. Uh, like, I'm sure you get an explanation of benefits, and I'm like, I, I don't even know what that thing is. [00:20:55] Anush Elangovan: It's just like EOB and like. [00:20:57] Andrew Zigler: it's a big, a big old PDF. Yeah, [00:21:00] exactly. [00:21:01] Anush Elangovan: Like, like, I'm like great straight to the, uh, shredder, right? And but that could be, you know, automated with the ai, right? It, it, it'd be like, Hey, the summary of this thing is you went and visited this day. Everything is okay. Everything is paid for, so don't worry, it's not a bill. [00:21:17] Anush Elangovan: That again, the same, uh, thing, but the sense of what that information overload is could be. Digested by ai, uh, accumulated over time and retrieved when you need it. Like, I don't, I actually don't even need to know this EOB right now, unless of course, whenever I need to know it, that maybe, you know, like for some benefits I need to figure out what do, what did I do over the past year and how do I apply it? Source:

Mike

15,145 Aufrufe โ€ข vor 9 Monaten

Don't Buy a Mac Mini for Clawdbot: The Secret $10,000 Architecture That Costs You Nothing clawdbot might be the reason you feel like you need a ten thousand dollar computer right now but i am about to show you why that fomo is going to leave you broke. if you have been watching everyone rush out to buy mac minis and mac studios just to run open claw or some local models you are witnessing a massive transfer of wealth from your pocket to apple for no reason. there is a specific setup i use that costs almost nothing and keeps my main machine safe from whatever these autonomous agents are doing. if you stick with me i will walk you through the exact architecture of a professional trading system that handles the heavy lifting without you needing to drop a single rack on hardware most people are scared of running these bots on their main computer because they don't want an agent messing with their personal files or browser sessions. instead of buying a second mac mini for six hundred dollars you can just go to the top left of your screen and create a brand new user profile. this acts like a completely isolated sandbox where you can install all your trading tools and agents without them ever seeing your main data. it is essentially like getting a free computer for the price of five minutes of clicking around your settings but what if you aren't on a mac or you need to access your system while you are traveling without carrying three laptops in your backpack. this is where the first loop of professional automation starts to close because i use something called chrome remote desktop to bridge the gap. this allows me to leave a dedicated machine running in a safe place while i access the full desktop environment from a tablet or a cheap laptop anywhere in the world. it solves the mobility issue but it still doesn't solve the problem of those massive ten thousand dollar price tags for high end mac pros if you are a pc user or just someone who doesn't want to own physical hardware yet you should look into a windows vps through a provider like contabo. most developers will tell you to use a linux terminal but if you aren't a coder yet you need a visual interface you can actually see. getting a windows server allows you to log in and see a desktop just like your home computer for about fifteen dollars a month. i usually recommend at least twelve gigabytes of ram to keep things from getting janky when you are running multiple browser windows and agents at once now you might be thinking that the whole point of the big hardware was to run local models like kimi or glm to save on api costs. i spent years thinking i had to own the machines myself and i even spent hundreds of thousands on developers before i realized i could just do this myself. the secret to running those massive open source models without the ten thousand dollar investment is renting gpu power by the hour. sites like lambda labs let you spin up a monster machine that can run any model in existence for just a couple dollars an hour this is the ultimate pivot because it allows you to test if your strategy actually prints money before you commit to the hardware. you can turn the server on when you are iterating and turn it off the second you are done which keeps your overhead near zero. if you haven't proven that your bot can pay for itself yet then buying a mac studio is just an expensive hobby rather than a business move. there is a much bigger loophole involving the anthropic subscriptions that most people are completely overlooking right now right now i am using a specific plan with claude code that costs about two hundred dollars a month but it lets me run open claw all day without hitting api limits. if i were paying for those same tokens through the standard api i would probably be spending hundreds of dollars every single day. it is a massive cost savings that allows you to iterate and fail until you find a winning strategy without draining your bank account. even if they eventually close this loophole or snitch on the usage patterns it serves as the perfect training ground for a data dog the goal is to find a system that works with a smaller or cheaper model like haiku before you ever try to scale up to the heavy weights. if you can make a strategy profitable using a less intelligent and cheaper model then you know you have found real alpha. once you have that foundation you can decide if it finally makes sense to build your own custom pc rig which will always be half the price of an apple machine. i am an apple guy so i usually pay the tax anyway but i only do it once the system is already generating enough to cover the cost ten times over i believe that code is the great equalizer because it took me from losing money and getting liquidated to having fully automated systems doing the work for me. i had to learn to live with the iterations and the failures on youtube to get to this point of clarity. the universe tends to get out of your way once you make a non negotiable contract with yourself to see the process through to the end. you don't need the flashy hardware or the most expensive setup to start winning in this game stay focused on the logic and the data rather than the hype and the fomo that everyone else is falling for. if you can master the bridge between renting power and owning your logic you will be ahead of ninety nine percent of the people in this space. the path to a fully automated life isn't paved with expensive gadgets but with the discipline to iterate until the system finally prints

Moon Dev

17,382 Aufrufe โ€ข vor 6 Monaten

yall think black hat sauce is methods wtf do you think is the base for those methods? It's making them believe and feel false realities > If you want real black hat alpha, this is it. YOU WANT your VSLs or marketing campaigns to have a high CVR, AOV & retention (mrr in the backend) black hat methods get to these means in many ways like (fake authority using ai for clebs, back end mrr, fake promises, etc) >> however you can overcome the need for all of this while getting the same end results by just curating the reality of the VSL and experience in general to fit what those methods would have done. like for example - how would we be able to invoke a first time experience ecstasy of emotion in a vsl? > not only will this make the experience of the ad unique but also give you a platform to create a real authority figure that matches the belief of a cleb. from my experience I've found the way to do this is visually, auditorily, and ofc with your creatives. As yall know for my VSLs I try to take very unique different angles, with very specific visuals that back it up. and if you have trouble with this, you're literally in the perfect time in the world. You can use sora 2, put in your theme & ideas and ask it to be creative, include 100 different shots/scenes (add a aesthetic source image to make the generations 100x better) and boom. You have so many different frames and angles to get inspired by. > Also with MRR, you know one neurochemical that boosts the fuck out of CVR & retention? makes you trust more in a offer, promise, and changes your consciousness in ways that subsequently makes you spend more? its oxytocin. best example that I always use. the Charity water VSL (search up on yt). $700m off of MRR how? because of how touching and deep it hit. those types of narratives and experiences is what secretes oxytocin. And that's one legit real way you can boost your mrr and keep it long term if your angle is tied in a way to keep eliciting that reaction. It can be for any offer or product, happy or sad (best to stick with happy unless for a charity vsl like this one, or if yk what you're doing). > However remember one chemical change doesn't mean everything. There are tons of different states of mind you can put someone in, but they won't led to the results you want unless you include Specifics (on the offer, promises, and social proofs/belief elements) A big idea & unique angle and a proposition that ties in the creative --> to a reason showing that they NEED to buy this offer for whatever reason. >>> these changes and efforts we go to make a VSL work, doesn't pull it's weight & potential if we don't see it through a lens of economic game theory. over the last 28 years or so "several lines of experimentation have discovered that our goal- directed behaviors can be under โ€œunconscious controlโ€ (Custers & Aarts, 2010)" The unconscious mind is the foundation for all your customers actions, they act because the deeper sections of their brains pick up a cue run it through memory, and pre biologically embedded risk/reward and elimination scenarios to see if this new stimuli is similar/relevant to past stimuli that has aided in spreading it's genes in the past (i.e. been useful to the past generations which led to this trait being past on over and over again) For your purposes, the way to use this to your advantage and to activate it in a positive sense so it guides your customer to a conversion is to implement visual & auditory cues in your VSL that mirror the goal and desire/outcome they so deeply desire. this can be done by the language you use (copy), visuals/b roll etc. this will overlap with prefrontalโ€“striatal loops as conscious intent โ‰ˆ 72 % making your customer already feel and get a grasp of their desires This is where belief and proofs come in, they all go hand in hand and strengthen the end goal (to buy). _____ also another note for the unique angle, drop off of CVRs happens also when a customer gets sight of a familiar stimulus in a VSL/offer (could be anything) even if they don't think of it consciously, the brain processes everything happening which is directed to be a data point for thought, through a memory check and relation test. If in the past, you had a bad experience with that stimulus, or something similar. The brain will count the offer as invalid with the outcome of lowering belief and seeing the future outcome as achievable. _______ more data on this inside also one of the biggest needle movers is tension in VSLs, include that in everything. ๐Ÿฅ‚

Krma

37,202 Aufrufe โ€ข vor 10 Monaten

Finally! Part One of my Twitter AMA. Appreciate all the questionsโ€ฆ and the patience. I swear I wasnโ€™t flying around on jets or partying on yachts with girls or whatever. I was just, uhhโ€ฆ busy. ๐Ÿ˜‡ Definitely do not follow me on Insta. (Also, I didnโ€™t mic my assistant properly, so the questions are in this video are listed below. Ya get what you pay for kids.) Caleb Canales @calebcanales3 If you were to tell your younger self mid 20s my age. Whatโ€™s the best serious piece of advice youโ€™d have. Business and outside of business what would it be and why? What was your number 1 hurdle in growing Ringba? How did you overcome it? What should you have done differently to prevent it from flat lining? When you launched Ringba, what were the most important avenues you took to take it from $100k/m to $1m/m and beyond? With this, has revenue peaked and slowed since? If so whatโ€™s reason for it and how are you planning to break past plateau to continue growing it? Jason Kutasi Something we have been working through a lot is when is process beneficial v. It becomes too much and slows down innovation. Teams. We would recognize a problem and add more process to fix the issue(s). Then we lifted our heads go and looked at the whiteboard and saidโ€ฆ fuck. We have too much process. So what Iโ€™m looking for is experience sharing around what happened when you saw this, what you did, and what did and didnโ€™t work. Sean Heilweil Sean Heilweil Everyone loves a good origin storyโ€ฆ James Camp James Camp ๐Ÿ› ,๐Ÿ›  Hiring bottom up vs hiring top down IE do you think about hiring people to take minutia off the plate first? Or do you hire c suite level first? Luke Alexander Luke Alexander Iโ€™d be interested to see if you did anything unique with distribution of ringba How you think about building A+ products World view and mental model stuff 305Shark 305Shark questions I get asked the most are: - which campaign should I run? - where to find pay per call buyers? - how to make $1m in 4 months? alchemist alchemist Positioning. Services. โ€œCommoditizedโ€ services especially (I.e. lending, insurance if that qualifies as a service, debt relief, etc.) Tyler Currier Tyler Currier How to get and keep top talent? Specifically what you feel most people mess up? Traffic Maxxer Traffic Maxxer ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Mindset shifts you had to go from $100/days to $1k/days when you were an affiliate Alex Maximus Williams @Alex_williamsz Hey Adam unc I want a video on transitioning from agency to commerce Avoid being not funny, avoid not missing this prompt

Adam Young

19,721 Aufrufe โ€ข vor 1 Jahr

๐ŸšจNAFO Please Read๐ŸšจYou are not alone๐Ÿšจ We are at a pivotal moment of Good VS Evil My story: So............. as one man, I have made little difference to help Ukraine, like the rest of us, I have done my part on Twitter working my NAFO 9-5 alongside my real world 9-5, donating when I can, fighting disinformation. Whilst trying to live a normal social life and trying to be a good family man and father, like many of us, son's, daughters, mothers, dad's grandad's and grandma's, aunties, uncles.... Normal people, not soldiors. And as one person, this hasn't been much. Not you or me. None of us, alone, have made a single difference. Our Story: You feel week... because your voice isn't loud enough, not enough people see or understand your anger and hatred for Russia and the fucking evils that they do. You feel frustrated because the people around you, such as your family and friends, don't understand why this fight is so important to you? You live in a foreign land to Ukraine, why is it your fight, why should you care, why does it bother you? There are no bombs dropping on your families when you sleep....... You go to work and you don't have to run to bomb shelters midday rather than taking lunch whilst getting coffee..... Who gives a fuck right? But you, NAFO. Have something inside yourself, Love, Compasion, Knowledge and Understanding. You do not live blindly. You can not look away from the fucking evilness of the Russian scumbag dictators. This is why you are not alone, and why we are all the same, and why this is a family. This is why we love and respect each other. We come from so many different countries, our countries used to hate each other and compete, we were in some ways racist in our misconceptions of each other, but Ukraine brought us together. through the devastation of our souls through the pain of seeing what Russia did and trying to do to the Ukrainian people every day, we realised, we are the same and we only speak different languages and eat different food. But inherently, we are human, we live to love the people we care about, and we can sympathise with people we do not now, people we have never met, and with a nation we have never been too..... because, we are human... anything else is inhumane..... anything else is despicable and disgusting and inexcusable. You cannot distinguish this from the start of World War 2. You cannot tell how this is not the same. When good people fail to do enough. And the devastation that followed. But we are here. Regardless of a belief that this would stop in Ukraine, which it won't. We know that just for this one country, this is too much, this is not okay. And that we will never fucking turn a blind eye. Every day we care, and we do small things, small things that multiply, and together we achieve big things. Together, we have been fucking fierce and mighty, a force to be reconned with. Something that cannot be stopped. We know within ourselves that we will never stop fighting and doing what we can. People may not understand us. But i'm reaching into my heart and telling you. What YOU do. YOU the person reading this. You have changed opinions. You have stopped at least one person believing Russian propaganda. YOU have saved at least one life, Atleast. Through your passion of being a good fucking human. You have made a difference in this world. Never underestimate the power of us. We have learned to love each other through the devastation in Ukraine, We have learned how important these people we never knew are to us. Never give up on them. Now, this is nothing, but I'm sure we all know there are people among us that do things that we cannot fathom or understand. The gods among us that started charities, and took physical action, we must always help them in any way we can. You have no fucking idea how much a $2 donation means to them, a ยฃ5 donation rather than buying a coffee, they turn our everday money into life saving money. The smaller donations are the backbone to many of these charities, they keep them going. You would not believe the power of many. Please donate and give what you can. If you cannot give, then I admire you more, if you struggle yourself, then it's more commendable to care about people across the world struggling in different ways rather than thinking about yourself. But one thing we can all do is share the cause we support. Give them exposure, and make them understand we believe in their causes. Remember, that in the future, when Ukraine is free and Russia is done. We can tell our children, our grandchildren........ That we did our part. And that we did, just a little and did what we could, but we never turned a blind eye, and we never looked away. My final and personal part. I want to say thank you to ๆก็”Ÿ ไฟกไน‹ๅŠฉ for giving me constant amazing media. You have a great team. And I hope you understand that I wanted to use your material in some of my videos to give people hope. You seriously produce some amazing material with a very talented team that is putting out a truthful word in a sea of propaganda and hate. I have joined all the videos I have made so far everyone. And I hope this video as a whole gives you hope in the sheer power of Ukraine when it has its friends behind it. What it can do with our countries backing, and why it is so important. Ukraine will never give up, Ukraine will never surrender. And we should never give up on it. Never underestimate how much your support can multiple across many. Please enjoy this 19 Minutes and 21 seconds of sheer Ukrainian Power and Hope. People fighting for good, their families, and the right to simply call themselves Ukrainian. All footage and video here was filmed by braver people, i simply cut it into pieces and then put their work together and added music to it. Slava Ukraine ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ And glory to whatever country you are from, if you care too. We are not just Ukrainian or NAFO or NATO, we are fucking Human and this is what we do! #NAFO

Bricktop_NAFO

918,976 Aufrufe โ€ข vor 2 Jahren

FULL TRANSCRIPT OF ELON'S CYBERCAB AND ROBOVAN PRESENTATION 00:00 Welcome 01:16 Cybercab & Future of transportation 04:33 Cost 05:53 Timeline 07:13 Self-driving technology 10:05 Inductive charging 10:24 The cities of the future 11:04 Robovan 12:13 Optimus Welcome Welcome to the We, Robot party. We have quite a show for you tonight. I think you're going to like it. As you can see, I just arrived in the Robotaxi, the Cybercab. And there's 20 more where that came from. So they've been traveling, there's no people in them. As you can see, the car is just going by with no people. We have 50 fully autonomous cars here tonight. So you'll see model Y's and the Cybercabs, all driverless. You'll be able to take a ride in the Cybercab. There's no steering wheel or pedals. So I hope this goes well, we'll find out. You see a lot of sci-fi movies where the future is dark and dismal, where it's not a future you want to be in. So, you know, I love Blade Runner, but I don't know if we want that future. We want that duster he's wearing, but not the bleak apocalypse. We want to have a fun, exciting future that, if you could look in a crystal ball and see the future, you'd be like, yes, I wish I could be there now. That's what we want. Cybercab & Future of transportation So, when we think about transport today, there's a lot of pain that we take for granted, that we think is normal. Like having to drive around LA in 3 hours of traffic. Yeah, people that live in LA, I mean, you know, try to get from Pasadena to El Segundo during rush hour. You can fly to another city faster than you can get to LA. And you have to drive the whole way, unless you're in a Tesla. Of course, our Tesla already does quite well at this supervised self-driving. So, supervised full self-driving is actually working quite well. I'm sure there's people in the crowd who are using that. So, we'll move from supervised full self-driving to unsupervised full self-driving where the car, you could fall asleep and wake up at your destination. But there's also a challenge for a lot of people that cars cost too much. I mean, when you factor in everything that goes into a car and the car insurance and the car payments, storage of the car, it's very expensive. You say, like, how many hours a week are cars used? Your average passenger car is only used about 10 hours a week out of 168 hours. So, the vast majority of the time cars are just doing nothing. But if they're autonomous, they could be used, I don't know, five times more, maybe ten times more. So you could actually, for the same car, would have five times as much value, maybe ten times as much value. There's 168 hours in the week, and like I said, only ten of them are used for driving. And then, a bunch of those hours are looking for a parking spot, which can be pretty annoying at times. So, with autonomy, you get your time back. This is a very big deal. So it's not just, it'll save lives, like a lot of lives and prevent injuries. I think we'll see autonomous cars become ten times safer than a human. I mean, if you think of times past where there used to be an elevator operator in every elevator but once in a while, they get tired and accidentally shear somebody in half. Now, we have automated elevators. You just get an elevator and you press a button and you don't even think about it and it just takes you to the floor. And if you did see an elevator operator with a big relay switch, you'd be like, that's weird. That's how cars will be. And it's not just the lives saved in injuries, but if you think about the cumulative time that people spend in a car and the time that they will get back that they can now spend, well, I guess, on their phones or watching a movie or doing work or whatever you want to do you can think of the car in autonomous world as being like just little lounge. You're just sitting in a comfortable little lounge and you can do whatever you want while you're in this comfortable little lounge. And when you get out, you will be at your destination. So, yeah, it's gonna be awesome. Cost So, in fact, I think the cost of autonomous transport will be so low that you can think of it like individualized mass transit. The average cost of a bus per mile for a city, not the ticket price, because that is subsidized, but the average price is about a dollar a mile, whereas the cost of Cybercab we think probably over time, the operating cost is probably going to be around twenty cents a mile. Including taxes and everything else, it probably ends up being 30 or 40 cents a mile. And you will be able to buy one. And we expect the cost to be below $30,000. And I think there'll be an interesting business model where, let's say somebody is an Uber or Lyft driver today where they can actually sort of manage a fleet of cars and like, sort of manage, I don't know, 10, 20 cars and just take care of them. Like a shepherd tends their flock. You have a little flock of cars and you're the shepherd and you take care of your flock of cars. I think that would be pretty cool. I think it's going to be a glorious future. It's going to be really something special. Timeline We do expect actually to start fully autonomous unsupervised FSD in Texas and California next year. And that's obviously, that's with the Model 3 and Model Y. And then we expect to be in production with the Cybercab, which is really highly optimized for autonomous transport in probably, I tend to be a little optimistic with time frames, but in 2026. So, yeah, before 2027, let me put it that way. And we'll make this vehicle in very high volume. But well, before that, you will experience a robotic taxi via the Model 3 and Model Y program and model S and X, too. But the Model 3 and Y will achieve unsupervised full self-driving with permission, in wherever regulators essentially approve it. In the US, and then to follow outside the US. And Cybertruck, too. All our cars are basically, all cars that we make. Let's not get nuanced here. Self-driving technology One of the reasons why the computer can be so much better than a person is that we have millions of cars that are training on driving. It's like living millions of lives simultaneously and seeing very unusual situations that a person in their entire lifetime would not see. With that amount of training data, it's obviously going to be much better than what a human could be because you can't live a million lives. And it's also, it can see in all directions simultaneously and it doesn't get tired or text or any of those things. So, it will naturally be, like I said 10, 20, 30 times safer than a human, just for all those reasons. And I want to emphasize that the solution that we have is, AI and vision. So, there's no expensive equipment needed. The Model 3 and Model Y and S and X that we make today will be capable of full autonomy, unsupervised. And that means that our cost of producing the vehicle is low. Now, we are going to actually over-spec the computer for the Cybercab. So, our AI 5 computer will be somewhat over-spec'd because I think there's actually also an opportunity, sort of like an Amazon Web Services, where if the car is driving for 50 hours a week, there's still over 100 hours left and there's a potential there to have a massive amount of distributed inference compute, where if you've got like a fleet of 100 million vehicles and a kilowatt of efficient inference compute, you have 100 gigawatts of compute, which is really quite substantial. And if it's there, you might as well use it so that I think will make sense. So, our autonomous future is here. As I said, we've got 50 Teslas driving autonomously. We're trying to give you a sense of what cities will be like in the future. And when you get in, you'll see like, it's really quite a wild experience to just be in a car with no steering wheel, no pedals, no controls, and it feels great. So we have enough vehicles here, so everyone should be able to try it out and experience the set that we've built here. It's a very big set. So it's like really we've used I don't know, 20, 30 acres or something like that. It's really big. So, it goes on, the ride's long. And we set it up to feel like a ride, like a park ride. So, it'll be cool and you'll get to experience it tonight. Inductive charging Something we're also doing is and it's really high time we did this is inductive charging. So, the robotaxi has no plug. It just goes over the inductive charger and charges. So, yeah, it's kind of how it should be. The cities of the future One of the things that is really interesting is how will this affect the cities that we live in. And when you drive around a city, or when the car drives you around the city, you'll see there's a lot of parking lots. There's parking lots everywhere, parking garages. What would happen if you have an autonomous world is that you can now turn parking lots into parks. And so, from we're taking the inglot out of parking lot. You're welcome. So, there's a lot of opportunity to create green space in the cities that we live in. So, like, that would be quite fantastic. Robovan Oh, and also, what happens if you need a vehicle that is bigger than a Model Y? The Robovan. We're going to make this and it's going to look like that. Now, can you imagine going down the streets and you see this coming towards you? That'd be sick. So this can carry up to 20 people, and it can also transport goods. You can configure it for goods transport within a city. Or transport of up to 20 people at a time. The Robovan is what's gonna solve for high density. If you want to take a sports team somewhere or you're looking to really get the cost of travel down to, I don't know, 5, 10 cents a mile, then you can use the Robovan. One of the things we want to do, and we've seen this with the Cybertruck, is we want to change the look of the roads. The future should look like the future. Optimus Speaking of robots. Everything we've developed for our cars, the batteries, power electronics, the advanced motors, gearboxes, the software, the AI inference computer, it all actually applies to a humanoid robot. The same techniques. It's just a robot with arms and legs instead of a robot with wheels. We've made a lot of progress with Optimus. And as you can see, we started up with someone in a robot suit. And then, we've progressed dramatically, year after year. So, if you extrapolate this, you're really going to have something spectacular, something that anyone could own. So, you can have your own personal R2-D2-C3PO. And I think at scale, this would cost something like, I don't know, $20,000, $30,000, probably less than a car is my prediction, long-term. It'll take us a minute to get to the long term. But fundamentally, at scale, the Optimus robot, you should be able to buy an Optimus robot for, I think, probably $20,000 to $30,000, long-term. And what can it do? It'll basically do anything you want. It can be a teacher or babysit your kids, it can walk your dog, mow your lawn, get the groceries, just be your friend, serve drinks whatever you can think of, it will do. And, yeah, it's going to be awesome. I think this will be the biggest product ever of any kind, because I think everyone of the 8 billion people of Earth, I think everyone's going to want their Optimus buddy. And there's going to be maybe two. And then, they'll be producing products and services. I predict, actually, provided we address risks of digital superintelligence, 80% probability of good outcome, look on the bright side, the cup is 80% full, the cost of products and services will decline dramatically. And basically, anyone will be able to have any products and services they want. It will be an age of abundance the likes of which people have not, almost no one has envisioned. It will be something special. So now, one of the things we wanted to show tonight was that Optimus is not a canned video. It's not walled off. The Optimus robots will walk among you. Please, please be nice to the Optimus robots. You'll be able to walk right up to them and they'll serve drinks at the bar. I mean, it's a wild experience just to have humanoid robots and they're there, you're just in front of you. So yeah, with that, let's party!

Mario Nawfal

241,051 Aufrufe โ€ข vor 1 Jahr

MrBeast: "If you knew what I knew, you could get 10 million subscribers in six months" "Your videos suck. You think your videos are good, but they suck. They just do. And the sooner you learn how to make good, great videos that people actually want to watch, the sooner you'll get views." MrBeast shares his early reality: "When I was 14, I thought my videos were the best in the world. They weren't, they were terrible. To be successful, you kind of have to have a little bit of that ego where you think your content's great. But also, if you have sub-1,000 subscribers, there's a good probability your videos just suck. They just do." He explains what to do about it: "You need to make hundreds of videos. Improve something every time. And just get to the point where they don't suck. When you make good content, you'll blow up. It's not the algorithm. It's not anything. Most people who are in my position just made terrible videos, and that's okay. Because you've got to make a bunch of videos and improve over time to be great." MrBeast uses an analogy: "You don't just pick up a baseball and become an MLB-level athlete within a year. It takes many, many, many years. YouTube's kind of the same way." On analysis paralysis: "A lot of people get analysis paralysis. They'll sit there and plan their first video for three months. If you have zero videos on your channel, your first video is not gonna get views. Period. Your first 10 are not gonna get views. I can very confidently say that. So stop sitting there and thinking for months and months on end. Just get to work and start uploading." He gives the formula: "All you need to do is make 100 videos and improve something every time. Do that, and then on your 101st video, we'll start talking. Maybe you can get some views. But your first 100 are gonna suck." How to improve something each time: "The second video: put more effort into the script. The third one: learn a new editing trick. The fourth one: figure out a way to have better inflections in your voice. The fifth one: study a new thumbnail tip and implement it. The sixth one: figure out a new title. There's infinite ways. The coloring, the frame rate, the editing, the filming, the production, the jokes, the pacing, every little thing can be improved. There's literally no such thing as a perfect video." On the algorithm: "What YouTube wants is for people to click on a video and watch it. That's what it is at its core. By studying the algorithm, you'll learn that you're more studying human psychology. What do humans want to watch?" MrBeast shares a simple reframe: "Anytime you say the word 'algorithm,' just replace it with 'audience' and it works perfectly. 'The algorithm didn't like that video?' No, the audience didn't like that video. Literally, that's it. If people are clicking and watching, it gets promoted more. The algorithm just reflects what the people want." On titles: "Short, simple, and just so freaking interesting that you have to click. If someone reads it, are they like, do they have to watch it? Is it just so intrinsically interesting that it's gonna haunt them if they don't click?" He adds nuance: "Keep it below 50 characters. Above 50 characters, on certain devices it goes dot, dot, dot, and that's the worst thing because then people don't even know what they're clicking on." MrBeast shares the extremity principle: "The more extreme the opinion, typically the higher the click-through rate. 'Fiji water sucks', that'd do fine. But 'Fiji water is the worst water I've ever drank in my life', way more extreme, would do way better. But then you have to deliver. The more extreme you are, the more extreme you have to be in the video." On the first 5 seconds: "Before you film a video, what is the thumbnail? What is the title? Then what's the first 5 seconds? Then what's the first 30 seconds?" He explains why autoplay changed everything: "On YouTube now, videos automatically play. So many people don't even see the thumbnail because it autoplays so quickly. The thumbnail is irrelevant for them. I have to visually convince you to click on the video in the first 5 seconds. Before, the hook was important because you had to convince people to watch. Now you have to convince people to click and watch at the same time, with the first 5 seconds." On matching expectations: "Your title and thumbnail set expectations. At the very beginning of the video, to minimize drop-off, you want to assure them that those expectations are being met. If you click on a video called 'Tether is a scam' and at the very beginning, he starts talking about literally anything else, you're like, 'Oh, this is BS. This isn't what I clicked on.' But if at the very start you go, 'Tether is a scam and I'm gonna teach you why,' then it's like, okay, you match the expectations. Then you want to exceed them." He emphasizes the importance: "The thing people undervalue the most is literally the first 10 seconds of the video. That 15% difference in viewership between losing 35% of viewers in the first 30 seconds versus losing 20%, that really does make the difference between 2 million views and 10 million views. You just had a more strategic intro that hooked them." On removing dull moments: "You basically want to remove every dull moment. Find the 10 most critical people you know, make them watch the video, and just roast it. If I talk to a camera for 10 seconds without a cut, a lot of people will get bored. Having a B-cam and C-cam three seconds in, cutting to a different angle, now it's more interesting even though it's essentially the same thing." On keeping viewers watching: "Give them why they clicked. Tell them why they should watch. Then just stick on topic. That right there isn't even super complex, but I would already put you in the upper echelon of YouTube. A lot of people drag it out. It's like, 'I'm going to eat $100 ice cream, but first...' and then it's them birthday shopping for their mom. That's not why I came here." On quality over quantity: "It's much easier to get 5 million views on one video than 50,000 views on 100 videos. A lot of small YouTubers just post videos that aren't bad but aren't great, and none of them ever pop off, so they never get an audience. It might be better to upload half or a third or even a fifth of the videos, but make the videos you upload so freaking good that the algorithm has to promote it." He warns against the consistency trap: "When you set a consistent schedule and you're constantly having to upload videos that aren't as good as you'd like because you gotta hit 'Oh, this Monday I said I'd upload', that's a dangerous trap. The viewers notice the quality isn't as good and it makes them less likely to watch. I think it hurts your longevity." On the real metric that matters: "A big thing that everyone underestimates, what was your experience with your last video? If people loved the last video of yours that they watched, they're more likely to watch your next one. When people watch your video, you don't want them to go, 'Okay, that was good, but that's enough of you for the day.' What you want is them to go, 'Holy crap, that was crazy! Oh my god, what's that?' and they watch 10 videos. That's how you get high view counts. People watch 10 videos, not one." On thumbnails: "You want it to be simple. When they're scrolling, you want them to instantly understand what you're conveying and feel some type of emotion. Make it so interesting, or spike their curiosity so much, that if they don't click it, they'll wonder before they go to bed what happened?" He gives an example: "If you uploaded 'I rode a skateboard with 1,000 other people on it', and people are falling off the side, it's about to go off a big ramp if you don't click that, you're gonna be so curious. Later in the day, when you're daydreaming, you'll think, 'What happened to those 1,000 people on that skateboard?' That's the mindset you should have when making thumbnails." On knowledge being the only barrier: "It's all knowledge. It really is. I could start a new channel tomorrow without using my face or my voice, without ever promoting it, and in six months have 20 million subscribers. I just could. It's purely knowledge. If you knew what I knew, you could get 10 million subscribers no matter where you are right now within six months." He addresses the skeptics: "90% of the people watching don't agree with that. Everyone has excuses. 'Nah, YouTube just doesn't work like that, Jimmy.' But I mentor a lot of people. I see it all the time. It is possible. It is simply knowledge. The second you accept that it is knowledge and you start your journey of learning figuring out what makes a good video, what does my audience want, how can I elevate and then you take that knowledge and just assume 'I will never understand what the perfect video is' and every single day be devoted to learning and improving as much as possible there you go." On money not being the barrier: "There are tons of viral ideas that don't require money. It does not require money to go viral. One of my most-viewed videos was spending 24 hours in a desert, we just grabbed a tent and some stuff and went to the desert. It got 60-70 million views. People say, 'I could be MrBeast if I had money.' A, I didn't start off with money; I was poor, I had no money. It took me seven years just to buy a camera saving up from YouTube. And B, some of our most-viewed videos literally anyone can do." On why no one will outwork him: "No one's ever gonna do what I do better than me. It's just not humanly possible. I reinvest every penny I make. I work every hour I'm awake. I devote every atom in my brain to solving this. I hire the best people on the planet. I've been doing this for 14 years. And I think in decades, not years. I'm gonna be doing this for another 20-30 years. If I thought someone was doing better than me, I'd just start sleeping less so I could work even more." But he doesn't recommend it: "I don't have a life. I don't have work-life balance. My personality, my soul, my being is making the best videos possible. That is why I exist on this planet. And I don't recommend it. You should have work-life balance. You should not devote your entire life to this one thing. I have a mental breakdown every other week because I push myself so hard. I don't recommend it." The only question that matters: "Subscribers don't matter. Views don't matter. I mean, they do. But everything you want as a creator comes from making the best videos possible and thumbnails. The video part's the hard part. Ask: 'How can I make my videos better?' Do that every single day for years. And then you'll probably get views."

Jaynit

125,413 Aufrufe โ€ข vor 2 Monaten

DISTURBING DISCORD VOICE CALL WHERE aiden | AG4L CONFESSES TO DOXING LIO CONVOY WIFE AND DESCRIBES SA FANTASIES. These uploaded audio provide direct, explicit confirmation of the leaked Discord voice call allegations. They capture a highly volatile, toxic, and unhinged conversation where Aidenโ€”details an intense, malicious fixation on creator Lio Convoy (referred to interchangeably as Lio, Tommy, or Thomas) and his wife. The clips show a progression from admitting to leaking her private data to plotting targeted career sabotage, before escalating into graphic, explicit fantasies of physical violence, sexual assault, and driving the couple to suicide. CATEGORIZED LIST OF DISTURBING QUOTES 1. Admission of Doxxing and Plots for Career Sabotage In these sections, Aiden attempts to deflect the doxxing label, but immediately follows it up with plans to weaponize the victim's leaked employment details to ruin her professional life. * Aiden: "I didn't dox her... How am I not supposed to fucking make fun of his wife? She's literally balding." * Other User (Confronting him): "Maybe by not saying her full name, full legal name, where she works." * Aiden: "Dude, dude, I'm posting... I'm literally going to put out like astroturf like messages to his wife supporting the ice killing so that it fucks with her career. And then I'm going to submit her name to Antifa." * Other User: "He already told us that he posted like her picture three times... and told us her position at that job." 2. Desired Psychological Harm and Suicide Aiden explicitly describes a hyperfixation on destroying the couple's lives, measuring his future online reputation by his ability to drive them to self-harm. * Aiden: "Have you ever just been like autistically hyperfixated on ruining someone's life? ... I just want to ruin this guy's life and his wife. I want to make his wife cry." * Aiden: "My reputation, I promise you by the end of 2026 I'll be known as the guy that drove a couple to suicide." * Aiden: "Thomas and his wife are going to... they're going to amicably decide to leave this earth. So Thomas is going to agree to roll over and death... his wife." 3. Graphic Rhetoric of Violence and Sexual Assault The most severe portions of the clips involve graphic descriptions of severe physical harm, murder, and sexual assault directed at Lio Convoy's wife, along with deep-web solicitation fantasies. * Aiden: "I want to fucking burst this fat tubby sack of shit open like a fucking pinata." * Aiden: "I'm gonna gut his wife like a fish." * Aiden: "I'm am putting out a call to dox Thomas's wife and his family." * Aiden: "Hiring a deep web hitman on Thomas's house and his wife? And then hiring a deep web rapist on Thomas?" * Aiden: "Killing Lio's wife. Strangling Lio's wife. I don't even need a knife, cause I'm fucking killing Lio's wife with my bare fucking hands. Kill Lio's wife with a soda can..." * Aiden: "Dismembering Lio's wife." * Other User (Asking Aiden): "Would... is she hot enough to like rape before you kill her or is she more like..." * Aiden: "I want you to keep this all in mind while you dox her and fuck with their life." EXPLANATION OF THE FALLOUT These recordings illustrate exactly why the controversy shattered Aiden's public standing. While online feuds and roasting are common in commentary circles, the audio reveals a calculated effort to target an uninvolved spouse at her real-world workplace, combined with extreme violent rhetoric. The presence of other users alternately trying to sober him up ("Aiden, how much have you had to drink?", "This is bad, buddy") or actively feeding into the behavior ("I found her LinkedIn, do you actually want it?") highlights the insular, echo-chamber dynamic of these private Discord servers before the audio was leaked to the public.

DENAL TORRES BURGOS

46,283 Aufrufe โ€ข vor 3 Monaten

When I was reading Brian Tully, Ken Mello and Robert Cosgrove's affidavits yesterday in the Aidan TurtleBoy Kearney case, I was challenged by an account that was intent on defending Leigha Bathtub Genduso and Kate Peter. Best quotes from my retort; "Number one, Steph, please address the factโ€”please address why Kate Peterโ€™s February 24, 2024 email to Ken Mello was not turned over in the 5,000 pages of emails that Robert Cosgrove spent seven months putting together that were between Kate Peter and Ken Mello and Kate Peter and Brian Tully. Why was that February 24, 2024 email not turned over? Secondly, is the fact that those emails were turned overโ€”despite the fact that it wasnโ€™t a full turnover of emailsโ€”in August of 2025 tie into why the Lindsey Gaetani charges involving Aiden were dismissed? Thirdly: is the fact that Kate Peterโ€”now we know from these documentsโ€”directly handled two pieces of key evidence in the Gaetani indictments involving Kearney the reason why, coupled with the August 2025 disclosure of those manipulated email records between Tully and Kate and Kate Peter and Ken Mello, was that the reason why the 2024 indictments involving Lindsey Gaetani were actually null-prossed? Time to answer some tough questions, Steph. Why was that audio of Leigha Genduso not included in the extraction that Brian Tully released completely unredacted in April of 2024? And why have you never said a word about how Tully manipulated that extraction to remove messages from Tully to Lindsey and from Kate to Lindsey before releasing it? And Tully apparently didnโ€™t include Leigha Gendusoโ€™s audio message that is now part of the public court record, as well? Yes, Steph, you canโ€™t address it on merit, you canโ€™t, because youโ€™re not here to do that, are you? Youโ€™re here to vacuously distract with nonsensical emotional rhetoric. And I will not stand for it. No, Iโ€™ll continue reading. Itโ€™ll get worse before it gets better, Steph. Iโ€™ll tell you that right now. No, she did not, Steph. Iโ€™ll tell you what, right now. You know how I know? Because look at Steph, it was posted on social media. Oh, Steph, it was posted on social media and not included in the extraction. So how could Lindsey have deleted it? Lindsey saved it, because Tully didnโ€™t include it in the extraction, and then Lindsey dropped it on social media. And that proves it. That absolutely proves it. All right, so Steph, if you donโ€™t know and donโ€™t care, thatโ€™s the end of this discussion. If we have to move you on begrudgingly, we will. But as of now, you canโ€™t address any of this on merit. You donโ€™t know the factual record. Youโ€™re getting humiliated. And furthermore, Iโ€™m sending a message through you to Kate that her moles are not welcome here. So, well, yeah, but no, thatโ€™s notโ€”hold on, do you realize, Steph, the point is not where it was posted. It was that the audio file exists. If it was not on Lindseyโ€™s phone when they did the extraction, she couldnโ€™t have it. But she still has it. There you go. So, listen, oh, I knew we were onto something. I didnโ€™t know it was this bad, Steph. You shouldnโ€™t have tipped Kateโ€™s hand like this, by the way. Reacting that way is only making me aware that this is the whole kit and caboodle. No, Steph, again, you have no standing to stand up for anyone, call anyone anything, or otherwise say anything here, because you will not address the merits of the argument. You just admitted you donโ€™t care about the filings, you donโ€™t know the details, and you refuse to engage. So therefore, weโ€™re done." PARTIAL TRANSCRIPT: If youโ€™re just tuning in, my name is Grant Smith Ellis, and we are reading through Brian Tully, Robert Cosgrove, and Ken Melloโ€™s affidavit. Itโ€™s tough to call it an affidavit from Ken Mello, because quite frankly, he didnโ€™t write an affidavit. Robert Cosgrove adapted hearsay statements in Ken Melloโ€™s voice in his own affidavit. That might tell you something. I donโ€™t know. What the fuck do I know? Iโ€™m just a towel. Thank you very much for tuning in. I have noticed that there is a very specific group of people in Kate Peterโ€™s orbit trying to target Towel right now. People do not want Towel to be heard. That means Iโ€™m going to speak more. I am going to just keep talking and keep saying things, because now I have put it all together. Oh, thatโ€™s right. I have one more thing to type. Furthermore, as soon as, within weeks of Kateโ€™s emails to Tully and Mello being turned over in, what was it? August of 2025, the TurtleBoy charges involving Lindsey Gaetani were dropped. And what do you know? Kate was involved in handling evidence submitted by Tully and Mello to the grand jury for Lindseyโ€™s charges, for the charges involving Lindsey Gaetani, for Aidenโ€™s charges involving Lindsey Gaetani. Furthermore, the new email from Kate to Mello indicates Kate was indeed also involved in the 2023 indictments against Kearney that the Norfolk DA seems intent on trying to wall off from Kate Peterโ€™s involvement. Oh, little towels, I'm just a little towel. Steph, Grant says, โ€œWhy are you making fun of her by calling her bathtub.โ€ Wait, what? No, no, no, Steph, letโ€™s be very clear. When Leigha Genduso engaged inโ€”and I think it was Kate actually who did itโ€”but when Leigha Genduso or Kate responded to revenge porn with revenge porn, nothing about that was okay, okay? Whether it was legal or not at the time, nobody sharing revenge porn of anybody else was okay, all right? I just want to be very clear. So when Kate did it, it was not okay. When Aiden did it, if thatโ€™s what happened with Leighaโ€”I donโ€™t know, I wasnโ€™t aroundโ€”not okay. If Leigha did it to Aiden, not okay, okay? Everybody on the same page? Like, itโ€™s not okay to do that to people. I just want everyone on the same page. No one wouldโ€”itโ€™s just like, treat people how you want to be treated, bro. So I just donโ€™t do it. Now, I get some people would say, fight fire with fire, okay, still, donโ€™t fucking do it. Please donโ€™t do it. I donโ€™t understand why people do it. It blows my mind. I donโ€™t understand why people justify it. Oh, itโ€™s okay that Kate or Leigha did it, cause Aiden did it too. Itโ€™s like, no, though. I get it's a shitty thing to happen. Donโ€™t do it back. Just stop. Itโ€™s ridiculous. Steph's likeโ€”"I keep seeing you call her bathtub." Yea, bro she took a video in a bathtub once and posted it on social media. Okay, you want to livestream yourself from a fucking bathtub then I'm going to call you Leigha Bathtub Genduso. I donโ€™t know what to tell you. You donโ€™t have to call her that, but Iโ€™m going to do that, right? And Iโ€™m not going to stop. But yeah, Three-Clerk-Monte bang bang. Sometimes you just got to tell them how it is, Three-Clerk Monte, you know what Iโ€™m saying? Even while youโ€™re on your break. By the way, Steph, Iโ€™m just going to break here just posting things, right? And Iโ€™m saying Iโ€™m not even supposed to be riled up right now. Weโ€™re going to go back to reading the indictment in a little bit. Iโ€™m just a little towel. Iโ€™m on one, you know what Iโ€™m saying? Absolutely not. I donโ€™t know which Steph you are. I donโ€™t know if youโ€™re that Steph or whatever, the fake Canadian. Youโ€™re not going to come on here and tell me I cannot call her Leigha Bathtub Genduso. Iโ€™m going to triple down. Iโ€™m going to call Leigha Bathtub Genduso more now. Thank you for all the comments, by the way. It helps the stream get attention in the Kate Peter sucks. Remember that? Yes, that I want you to get this tattooed on your arm: Kate Peter sucks. Iโ€™ll help you spell it: K-A-T-E P-E-T-E-R, no S at the end, just Kate Peter, now a new word, sucks, S-U-C-K-S. Everybody on the same page? All right, itโ€™s artistic expression, bro. What do you want to say? Oh no, sheโ€™s gone. Steph, I was enjoying all your comments. Yes, Steph, thatโ€™s exactly what I want. I want you to keep interacting in the comments because it gets the stream more attention in the feed. I want that. I want you to continue to engage, and Iโ€™m going to keep calling her Leigha Bathtub Genduso. Itโ€™s not an obsession. It is the product of multiple years of work on the story to uncover something hidden that you donโ€™t want to be talked about in public. Thatโ€™s the reality. Is that not right Steph, youโ€™re concerned that Kate Peter compromised the cases against Aiden Kearney because she worked as a PI for Marty Craft, whoโ€™s now lost his license because of what she was up to according to peopleโ€™s reports in this chat, and you feel that itโ€™s uncomfortable to have to hold her to the same moral standard that you do Aiden because youโ€™re biased, right? Fine, I donโ€™t care. Iโ€™ll tell it to your face yes. No, Steph, you have something to say? You say it right here, one-on-one. Letโ€™s debate. We can do it. I have all the evidence now. We can talk about it all. Thatโ€™s correct. I donโ€™t create realities, Steph. I bring them to light. Your normative moral framework and what you want to happen is just that. The descriptive reality is independent of what any of us want. It is simply a factual record. In the context of our asymptotic relationship with that factual record, notwithstanding, I was interested in the truth, and you are who is afraid of it, letโ€™s be clear. I wouldnโ€™t say youโ€™re debating me, Steph. You canโ€™t debate on the merit of the facts. You want to know why? Because, for example, it would be very hard for you to counter something like this paragraph right here, right? Where Robert Cosgrove says that any data missing from Lindsey Gaetaniโ€™s phone was not on the phone at the time Brian Tully did the extraction. And you might be saying to yourself, Grant, how can you know? How can you know that Brian Tully intentionally released the phone unredacted after only removing messages from Kate to Lindsey and from Tully to Lindsey and after removing things like audio messages from Leigha Genduso? How do I know? Well, because how else would Lindsey have posted it on social media? My word, Steph. Itโ€™s almost like thereโ€™s proof that Robert Cosgrove was withholding material information related to the sum and substance of Kate Peterโ€™s communications with various members of the prosecution team and/or witnesses and/or the handling of evidence in order to insulate certain charges from Kate Peter touching that evidence so that they could continue to trial, notwithstanding the discovery obligations of the state under the new updated Rule 14 as implemented on March 1, 2025. And towel is in a snarky mood indeed. And youโ€™re not going to be able to do anything about itโ€”oh, please, you're not saying to yourself, "whatโ€™s wrong with towel, Steph?" Youโ€™re basically saying, "why are you crossing the thin blue line?" And I would like to respond to you by saying, in the least unloving way, but the fact that you would ask me, โ€œWhat is Grant doing?โ€ because I wonโ€™t adhere to your thin blue line? Get the fuck out of here. Go climb up somebody elseโ€™s tree. Go find your own treehouse. Not happening. Absolutely not happening. You will look this factual record in the eye. You will confront your moral problems with the various actions of different people involved on your own time. And Leigha Bathtub Genduso will be central to this moral reckoning. And thereโ€™s not a damn thing you or your fake Canadian ass can do about it. Iโ€™m on one. I told you. Listen, you want it? You want it to be on record? Weโ€™ll do it. No, no, Iโ€™m just not loyal to your interests, Steph. Iโ€™m loyal to truth. Iโ€™m loyal to the people who are actually harmed. Iโ€™m not loyal to you or any of your friends or Kate Peter or the thin blue line or the thin green line or the thin pink line for that matter. All of you can take your lines and go fuck yourselves. Fake Canadian. Yeah, right, Steph. Yeah, letโ€™s go with that. Yep, letโ€™s go with fake Canadian, because why would you want me looking more in to you? A reporter? You want me to look more into you? No. God, take the L, man, just move on. Thatโ€™s correct. No, listen, Steph, you want to talk about Michael Proctorโ€™s familyโ€™s relationship to my mother? You want to be the person who draws that line? Iโ€™ll tell you about it. You sure you want to talk about it? You damn fake Canadian. We may have to get this fake Canadian out of here. Sheโ€™s riling me up. Youโ€™re riling me up by trying to defend Kate Peter. I knew you were a rat the whole time. Goddamn Kate Peter mole. I knew it. I saw through that shit. "I just heard you acknowledge me about the AI. No hate. I appreciate you reading this. Good content." Thank you, sir. Thank you, to the person who said that! You see what Iโ€™m saying, Steph? You know what? I think we should just let Steph talk to herself, all right? She can just keep promoting the stream and the algorithm. Let her talk to herself. But Steph, even if youโ€™re talking to yourself, I still have to write the post, okay? Damn fake Canadians. Steph is a fake Canadian and she may or may not be a communist. What you gonna' do about it? You damn fake Canadian. All right, no, I actually have to write this follow-up post. Stop it, Steph. Stop trying to gaslight to protect Kate Peter. Youโ€™ll be thrown out of here faster than someone with a cannabis conviction trying to enter Canada who doesnโ€™t actually live there. Damn fake Canadians. Thank you, Kristina. I appreciate it. Yes, and Kristina, you ever wonder if maybe people come in here specifically to derail the conversation because weโ€™re talking about very damning things as to Kate Peter? Well then, let me write my other post, by the way. Iโ€™ll help. I will put it up on the screen for you in one second. I just got to get the video loading before I start typing. Oh, Steph, you were on assignment. Stop bitching. I hope they paid you well for it. Donโ€™t bark up my towel tree about you had to spend time with me so you could run intel to all the Kate Peter people. I donโ€™t care. I knew what you were doing. Do you think I was born yesterday? Come on. You all insult my intelligence routinelyโ€”not you in the chat. Some of you moles are just like, โ€œHe wonโ€™t know.โ€ What, are you just going to tell me Iโ€™m the greatest thing ever and then itโ€™s going to go along? Iโ€™m just saying, Iโ€™ve been posting on social media being like, โ€œAidan, if people tell you that youโ€™re the greatest thing ever, that might be true, but some of them are going to tell you that because theyโ€™re moles.โ€ Come on. This is very basic-level intel stuff here. Steph, that was very nice of you. I am never going to degrade you for supporting people in need. What Iโ€™m concerned about, okayโ€”Iโ€™m not concerned about who you are as a person. Iโ€™m concerned about what you didnโ€™t tell us. All right? Yeah? And that's my right. No, absolutely not, Steph. You know exactly what happened. You flipped on a dime as soon as I started asking questions about Kate Peter because she has a lot of moles in her orbit. And then as soon as we started talking about her today, coincidentally enough, you popped right back up. Oh, whatโ€™s this? Robert Cosgrove represented in a sworn affidavit that any material missing from Lindsey Gaetaniโ€™sโ€”see what Iโ€™m doing, Steph? This is, uh, this is for youโ€”Lindsey Gaetaniโ€™s phone extraction was not on the phone when MSP did that extraction. And then Brian Tully leaked that extraction unredacted. Thatโ€™s a message from Leigha Bathtub Genduso proves Tully failed to include material that was indeed on Lindsey's phone. That was for you too, Steph. Itโ€™s weird that you know Bathtub, by the way. Thatโ€™s just odd. Like sheโ€™s known Kate Peter for years too. If this Steph, who I watched Sandlot with, is the same Steph as the one whoโ€™s a second cousin of John Oโ€™Keefe, then she lied to me. She lied to me. If we can prove that this is the same, same Steph, then she lied to me. She told me she was from Canada, Saskatchewan, whatever the fuck. Thatโ€™s what Iโ€™m saying. So Steph, if you are that Steph from wherever the fuck you live, broโ€”if you are that Stephโ€”you lied to us all. You told us you were fucking Canadian. Wait a minute, wait a minute, wait a minute, wait a minute, wait a minuteโ€”are you actually that Steph? No fucking way. You lied to all of us this whole time and pretended to be Canadian? No, that was notโ€”I didnโ€™t ask if you were from Canada. I said, are you the same Steph who was second cousins with John Oโ€™Keefe and did you come on this channel and go on a Zoom call with me representing yourself to be Canadian from Saskatchewan? I donโ€™t even haveโ€”no, that is not the question Iโ€™m asking you. Are you the same Steph that is second cousins with John Oโ€™Keefe? Thanks for letting us know. See what I mean? Kristina, itโ€™s not the same Steph. Itโ€™s just some random person who really likes Leigha Genduso, Leigha Bathtub Genduso, and Kate Peter. Random coincidence! Just totally random. Come on. Iโ€™m rolling my eyes so hard Iโ€™m laughing. This has been really interesting though. I know you said no. That makes it even weirder. If youโ€™re not that Steph, your fervent defense of Kate Peter and Leigha Bathtub Genduso is even more weird. Go back to Discord. Come on now, shoo. Youโ€™re bothering me. If you bother me too much, Iโ€™m just going to go on a 45-minute rant eviscerating Kate Peter with facts, all right? So itโ€™s better to just go. Like I told Benny Sweatpants the other day. Send him my regards, all right? No, I like calling out your hypocrisy. You wouldnโ€™t say a negative word about Kate Peter if I demonstrated the factual record for you in real time. Live! Which Iโ€™m doing. You havenโ€™t addressed one element of it on substance. All youโ€™ve done is gaslight, and frankly youโ€™re going to find yourself removed if you continue to fail to adhere to the rules of Towel Channel. As you know, the rules of Towel Channel are pretty simple, which is: one, donโ€™t be discriminatory; two, donโ€™t be derogatory; three, donโ€™t sealion; four, donโ€™t gaslight; and five, no Kate Peters. All right? Jayโ€™s like, โ€œIโ€™m aboard the Grant train.โ€ Thanks, Jay. It wasnโ€™t one question, Steph. It was three questions. Let me reiterate them to you very quickly. Number one, Steph, please address the factโ€”please address why Kate Peterโ€™s February 24, 2024 email to Ken Mello was not turned over in the 5,000 pages of emails that Robert Cosgrove spent seven months putting together that were between Kate Peter and Ken Mello and Kate Peter and Brian Tully. Why was that February 24, 2024 email not turned over? Secondly, is the fact that those emails were turned overโ€”despite the fact that it wasnโ€™t a full turnover of emailsโ€”in August of 2025 tie into why the Lindsey Gaetani charges involving Aiden were dismissed? Second question: is the fact that Kate Peterโ€”now we know from these documentsโ€”directly handled two pieces of key evidence in the Gaetani indictments involving Kearney the reason why, coupled with the August 2025 disclosure of those manipulated email records between Tully and Kate and Kate Peter and Ken Mello, was that the reason why the 2024 indictments involving Lindsey Gaetani were actually null-prossed? Time to answer some tough questions, Steph. And furthermore, why was that audio of Leigha Genduso not included in the extraction that Brian Tully released completely unredacted in April of 2024? And why have you never said a word about how Tully manipulated that extraction to remove messages from Tully to Lindsey and from Kate to Lindsey before releasing it? And Tully apparently didnโ€™t include Leigha Gendusoโ€™s audio message that is now part of the public court record. Yes, Steph, you canโ€™t address it on merit, you canโ€™t, because youโ€™re not here to do that, are you? Youโ€™re here to vacuously distract with nonsensical emotional rhetoric. And I will not stand for it. No, Iโ€™ll continue reading. Itโ€™ll get worse before it gets better, Steph. Iโ€™ll tell you that right now. No, she did not, Steph. Iโ€™ll tell you what, right now. You know how I know? Because look at Steph, it was posted on social media. Oh, Steph, it was posted on social media and not included in the extraction. So how could Lindsey have deleted it? Lindsey saved it, because Tully didnโ€™t include it in the extraction, and then Lindsey dropped it on social media. And that proves it. That absolutely proves it. All right, so Steph, if you donโ€™t know and donโ€™t care, thatโ€™s the end of this discussion. If we have to move you on begrudgingly, we will. But as of now, you canโ€™t address any of this on merit. You donโ€™t know the factual record. Youโ€™re getting humiliated. And furthermore, Iโ€™m sending a message through you to Kate that her moles are not welcome here. So, well, yeah, but no, thatโ€™s notโ€”hold on, do you realize, Steph, the point is not where it was posted. It was that the audio file exists. If it was not on Lindseyโ€™s phone when they did the extraction, she couldnโ€™t have it. But she still has it. There you go. So, listen, oh, I knew we were onto something. I didnโ€™t know it was this bad, Steph. You shouldnโ€™t have tipped Kateโ€™s hand like this, by the way. The reacting that way is only making me aware that this is the whole kitten caboodle. No, Steph, again, you have no standing to stand up for anyone, call anyone anything, or otherwise say anything here, because you will not address the merits of the argument. You just admitted you donโ€™t care about the filings, you donโ€™t know the details, and you refuse to engage. So therefore, weโ€™re done. Oh, itโ€™s such a shame. All right, I gotta move her on. All right, Steph, it was great. Weโ€™ll put you in a little timeout. You can come back tomorrow, okay? Iโ€™m glad you spent some time with us, but the reality is I just donโ€™tโ€”I donโ€™t wanna play that type of Kate Peter game, all right? Yep, now, Christina, you, as you know, this channel in Brโ€ฆ every possible perspective. I donโ€™t care what you want to come in here and believe, you know you and I align on a lot of the factual record about a lot of these different cases. Itโ€™s not that. Iโ€™ll never ever have a problem with that. Itโ€™s the bad faithโ€”and itโ€™s not you, Christina. You are wonderful. Youโ€™ve never done itโ€”but itโ€™s the people who get too close to Kate Peter and then as embodied in that colloquy with Steph right there, whoever the fuck she is, we still donโ€™t know. As embodied in that colloquy, you have a situation where when confronted with the facts instead of responding or even giving the time of day to what Kate Peter or Tully or Cosgrove might have done wrong, immediately it starts with the emotional manipulation, the attacks, the distraction. So I hope thatโ€”I hope that tells us all something. But yes, letโ€™s keep reading because before I got in that fun colloquy, we wereโ€”I bet Steph was sent here to try to derail me. Nice try, Steph, take it elsewhere. All right, so we got those two posts up, by the way. All right, following service. Do you remember where we were in all this? The very lastโ€”so we just read about the Kate emails. By the way, now we know the whole Kate and Kaboodle is the Kate emails. We just read about the Kate emails and take a look where it goes next. All right, it just keeps going and going. Oh, do you think I should add Kate, Steph to the chart, by the way? Where should she go on the chart? Should she go under the Trollhollmio section? I feel like thatโ€™s appropriate. You know, this is just my opinion of how all these people tie together. Say you got Kate Peter, the Lord of Darkness in the middleโ€”thatโ€™s my opinion. Then you got Jamz up there, Llama over there, Jason Broyles down here, Gaffney over here, Trollhollomio here. Then you got people like Critical Mass, Virgil, thatโ€”I donโ€™t know who that is. And then you got Tully, Michael Morrissey, and Michael Proctor. Then you got Jake Sun, Twisted Tragedies tied to Gaffney. Then you got that guy, Jason Broyles, who thinksโ€”who pretends to be a woman online. You got him, I think heโ€™s tied to Barry Lewis and this weird woman from Connecticut that Kate keeps working with. She used to pretend to be like an advocate for medical patients, but now apparently sheโ€™s a big advocate of prednisone. I donโ€™t really understand. Sheโ€™s been going online telling people that people with colitis have to use prednisone apparently and they canโ€™t use cannabis. Iโ€™m baffled by it. I didnโ€™t know she was a doctor. Listen, if I knew that this woman was a doctor, I would start looking to whether sheโ€™s received payments from the pharmaceutical industry because Iโ€™ve never met a cannabis advocate who tells people they have to use prednisone for colitis. So that woman baffles me. Also, sheโ€™s the reason consumption event in Massachusetts are now regulated by the CCC. So listen, you all think that Kate Peterโ€™s just some kind of like moron. She just plays that role, okay? Like she plays like she doesnโ€™t know what sheโ€™s talking about and she doesnโ€™t mostly with these court developments. But look at her network. Like people fawn over her like TurtleBoy. She is the female TurtleBoy in so many ways. And what makes her scary is she doesnโ€™t own it.

Grant Smith Ellis

13,617 Aufrufe โ€ข vor 9 Monaten

Rick Rubin: "I've met very few billionaires who are happy" "I don't look at the outside very much. I look inward. I try to focus on what do I feel, what am I seeing, in the hopes that by sharing what's going on in me, it resonates with someone else. I can't predict what someone else would like. And I don't think anybody can. So if I'm authentically true to myself, that's the best chance of someone else liking something." Rubin explains the paradox of acceptance: "People want to be accepted. And I'm suggesting that the best way to be accepted is to be yourself. It's not to change yourself to what someone else thinks. First of all, you don't really know what someone else thinks. And if you're not genuine to yourself, nothing is there. It's just a projection or a mask. It's not true." On what makes something interesting: "In a sea of information, the more yours is personal, the more it's not like hers or his or theirs, the more it's yours. If we're all thinking the same thing, it's boring. Why would we make anything if everyone thinks the same thing? What makes us interesting are the differences. Even the imperfections. The imperfections are what make us human." Rubin shares what captures his attention: "There's so much middle of the road, and it doesn't interest me. I want it because it's louder, quieter, softer, harder. It's pushing some boundary. That's why I take notice. It's not more of the same. It's the one that makes you stop and think: did I really hear that? Did I really see that? What's going on here?" On what success actually means: "If I like it, that doesn't mean anything. That's what people think. Just because I like it doesn't give it any value. But as an artist, if you like it, that's all of the value. That's the success. It comes when you say, 'I like this enough for other people to see it.' Not 'other people like it, so it's successful.' That doesn't mean anything. Because other people liking it is out of your control. All that's in your control is making the thing to the best of your ability." Rubin reframes what greatness means: "I came to realize recently, it's all an offering to God. And if you're making an offering to God, you're not thinking about the budget, or hoping this segment of the audience is going to like it. We don't think like that. It's a higher vibration. We're making the best we can make, to the best of our ability, out of love and devotion. That's what it is. There is no higher form." On criticism and reviews: "Most of the artists I work with don't read any criticism or reviews, good or bad. The ones who are the strongest in who they are can even read a terrible review and laugh at it. Because when someone gives you criticism, it's telling you as much about who they are as what you've made." Rubin explains the only real competition: "The idea of the Oscars or the Grammys, where we're saying which album is better than another, it doesn't make any sense to me. Because it's always apples and oranges. The only people we can honestly compete with is ourselves. Is this the best I can make today? Have I gone further than I've gone before? That's all we can do. That's the only competition that makes sense." On the obsession required for mastery: "Many of the artists that are great at what they do are great for one reason: they fall in love with this thing, and they just want to know everything they could possibly learn about it. I'm working on a documentary project with comedians now. One of the things they talk about is their commitment; when other people are going out on the weekend, they're going to perform every night they possibly can. For a period of 10 years. Having bad performances. Having people not like what they do. Banging their head against the wall. But that obsession with breaking through, and when I say breaking through, I don't mean to the audience. I mean with themselves." Rubin shares a hard truth about dreams and jobs: "Maybe your purpose in life isn't related to your job. Maybe your job is your job, and the job is the thing that supports you. And then the rest of your waking hours are devoted to your purpose. Don't let following your dreams undermine your ability to support yourself. If you decide 'I want to be a comedian and I'm putting all my eggs in the comedian basket', the pressure of having to support yourself will change you as a comedian. Not for the better. You want the stability of being able to take care of yourself in the world to be free to do whatever your passion is." He challenges the mythology of genius: "There's a mythology that the people who make things that we love are special people, the people on Mount Olympus, magic people who are geniuses. And then there's the rest of us. That's not the case. We're all just people. We're all doing our best. We're all good at some things, not good at other things. We're humans. And sometimes we find a way to make something beautiful." Rubin shares his most vulnerable moment: "The call came: 'How do you feel? You have the number one album in the country.' And I remember saying, 'I've never been more unhappy in my life.' We mistakenly think some kind of outward success is going to change something in us. And it does not. It may make life more comfortable. But it doesn't change who we are. Any hole in ourselves that we're hoping to fill does not get filled." He explains why successful people are often unhappy: "If you spend 20 years of your life working towards a goal that's going to solve everything, and then you finally achieve what you've been trying to do for 20 years, and nothing changes, that's when you get hopeless. It's not uncommon to see very successful artists who are very unhappy. I'm sure you've met many very successful business people. Billionaires. Very few of them are happy. Very few. They've accomplished their dreams and are unhappy. Because we don't know what we want. We're trying to fill something that maybe can't be filled through material or public success. It's something else. Some internal thing." Rubin closes with this: "Don't do things just because you think you're going to get something for it. That's not why we do things. Do what's interesting to you. Follow what's interesting. Don't worry about the outcome. We can never predict the outcome. Follow your own inner guide. It might not make sense to anyone else. It might not even make sense to us. And that's okay. The wisest thing we can do is know enough to know we don't know. Anytime you think 'I know how it is' your world just got a lot smaller."

Jaynit

153,068 Aufrufe โ€ข vor 4 Monaten

(1/2) Last night's Aidan Kearney meltdown over his falling out with Karen Read on an X Space is the peak of catharsis and real-time online toxicity: It starts with the the bombshell claim about Aidan recorded Karen Read, moves to Karen's newly-released texts about being "done" with Aidan after "someone" sent a recording of that conversation to David Yannetti and Alan Jackson, then spirals into ad hominems, and ends with Kearney storming off to counter-publish. The flood of primary source documents posted on online overnight, thus, acts as the host's (Chris) victory lap over Kearney. FULL TRANSCRIPT; *(Cleaned for grammar/spelling, punctuated for flow, and line-broken for readability. Some errors are expected.)* **Aidan:** Am I on? **Host/Other:** You're on. **Aidan:** So who are you? Who is this? **Chris:** Don't worry about it. It doesn't matter who I am. **Aidan:** Well, it does. You're some fucking kangaroo court motherfucker talking about her. What the fuck do you know about anything? **Chris:** Well, I don't know exactly what you've been doing. **Aidan:** So what are your sources? What are your sources? What are your sources you're talking about? Huh? You don't know your sources? What do you talk about? No, your sources. Shut up. Let's see 'em. Let's see your sources. **Lily:** Hang on, Aidan. I'm the host. I'm Lily. **Aidan:** Yes, Lily. Hi, Lily. How are you? **Lily:** I'm good. I'm just going to wait. I know you may not know it, Chris, but you know me. And so I just wanted to say hi. **Aidan:** Yeah, I know, but this Koala motherfucker is up here making shit up, running his mouth nonsense. Let's see the receipts. I mean, what were you talking to Karen Read about? What are you talking about? Who the fuck are you? **Chris:** I'm asking you flat out: Did you or did you not record her phone calls between yourself and Karen? **Aidan:** I did not. I did not. **Chris:** Okay, so Karen is lying? **Aidan:** You talked to Karen Read? Karen isn't talking to anyone in the media, but she's talking to this call-the-motherfucker. That's what you're telling me right now. **Chris:** Like I said, If you want to go down this hill, stand ten toes down." **Aidan:** I'm calling you out because you're making shit up. **Chris:** Who? I'm not making anything up. I'm not making anything up. I'm not making anything up. **Aidan:** So let's see it. Let's see the fucking evidence. Let's see your communications with Karen Read where she says that. Let's see it. **Lily:** Hang on. Chris, you're going to have to provide the receipts. **Chris:** I'm going to tell you, the guy who's doing thisโ€”you know, he's going to put them out. **Chris:** Do you really want to prove it? You want to prove it to me? I've got all the mistakes that come out. I can't. Literally. Yeah. Yeah. Sure. What's that? Let's see it. Let's see it. Produce it. Tweet it out right now. **Aidan:** So I'm denying itโ€”like, hardcore, 100%. I'm the guy you have to deny it to. I don't, because you've become a bit of a fuck-up. It's about as fucking legitimate as Lindsey trying to be a rake. Let's fucking see it, motherfucker. You got it, right? 'Cause Iโ€”accusationsโ€”I always bring fucking receipts. Where's your receipt, bitch? **Aidan:** You got 'em? **Chris:** I've got 'em now. I think you want me to be sayingโ€”to be honestโ€”hang a room on the fucker with no receipt. **Aidan:** You got 'em? Yes or no? **Chris:** I've got a receipt. Where's your fuck? **Chris:** You just need, broโ€”you just need to like chill, because you're gonna have a lot of fucking neck on your face, because I don't really care. **Chris:** I said to the people who bought this story: If I end up having egg on my face, I'll put everyone's name in it, and I'm givenโ€”I have a... Just shut your fucking mouth for one fucking minute. **Aidan:** Right. Let's see it. **Chris:** I've just messaged the person. **Aidan:** Joe Flipp, you want to talk about a fucking psychopath? That motherfucker isโ€”just, Joe Flipp. Really want to fucking go there?" 'Cause it's Joe. You can just say it's Nick from Philadelphia, isn't it? Yeah, I know all about Nick from Philadelphia. If you fucking want to go there and the fucking hellโ€”that psychopathโ€”what Olivia Lambo went through. You just don't want to come out. Does he want to talk about all that? Does he want to launch? **Chris:** Okay? You know what? How was your lunch with Meredith the other week. Fuck it. I don't care. How was your lunch with Meredith? How's your lunch with Meredith? **Aidan:**What the fuck? **Chris:** Chat, what, what am I talking about? How is your lunch with Meredith here? We gotโ€”you know what you want to do? You want to carry on and be a fuck with me here? I like youโ€”always up. **Chris:** How was your lunch with Meredith a couple weeks ago, and what did you play for her? What the fuck are you talking about? Yeah, what the fuck am I talking about? You know exactly what I'm talking about. And I'm trying to do this respectfully, but you come in hot like you always do. So now I'm just gonna fucking do it. How was your lunch with Meredith the other week? **Aidan:** I didn't have one with Meredith. Yeah, bullshit. Okay, so that's it. So someone else is lying now. **Chris:** So you're gonna call Meredith a liar? Why? Meredith's a liar? **Aidan:** Are you talking to Meredith? **Chris:**I'm not talking to Meredith. **Aidan:** What are you talking about? **Chris:** Okay, well, so you have great Meredith in an Oscar. If you said that to Meredith, you just spread rumors. That's what you doโ€”you don't spread any rumors. I want to laugh tonight about this. **Erika Walsh:** I warned you, Chris, about this last night. **Aidan:** You got noโ€”Joe Flippโ€”fucking feeding you nonsense. That slimy psychopath, fucking nut job who called in Olivia's entire family to harass themโ€”to the point where she had the fucking... Nothing to do with Olivia. And Joe's Flippโ€” **Chris:* this is to do with you. Stop deflecting, that motherfucker. **Aidan:** I'm telling you thisโ€”he's the one telling you this. **Chris:** I've been told by three different people. Three different people. There's people in this chat who know about this. There's people in chatโ€”they won't stand up and say anything, but I know the people who know about this. **Aidan:** Bring all these lame cons up one by one so I can slam 'em down one by one, because none of you motherfuckers got a receipt to back up any of this shit. None of you do. Bring it. By adding them. **Chris:** Stand by. Stand by. Stand by. **Joe Flipperhead:** You have the text, bro. You know I saw the screenshot. **Aidan:** So we gonna talk about what you did to Olivia Lambo? We have a lot of things, dude. **Joe:** You're deflecting. When you... **Aidan:** You want to go there? Mark Bedderow? Oh, of being in on a fucking conspiracy against you? To tell usโ€”if when we told you Olivia Lambo... You made us fucking get on a FaceTime with her because you thought she was dead. You thought you were being catfished by her, fucking... I was, and so we agreed to do a Zoom call with her. And when I called you and I told you Olivia Lambo is realโ€”I just saw her face. What did you do? You accused me and Mark Bedderow of lying to you, of being in on it, because you are a fucking psychopathic motherfucker. And I didn't put it there because I don't want to fuck... **Joe:** Yeah, you did put it out there, though. If you want to get into the Olivia thing, that's fine, and I'll go down that road. But you're calling me a psychopath You fucking recorded Karen Read's fucking calls and sent them to people. **Chris:** I'm just gonna keep muting him because he's yelling. You can say it. **Aidan:** Is this Lily's space or yours? **Joe:** I have the text, dude. I'll put it on one of our... Yourโ€”She told me she's fucking done with you, dude. **Aidan:** All right. I'm going on my own right now. I'm calling out fucking Joe Flipp-ed life. If I get muted one more fucking time. I'm gonna do a whole fucking... Thank you. I'm publishing all your fucking textsโ€”the whole world can see what a fucking sadistic psychopath you are. You controlling predator piece of shit. You fucking go there. **Chris:** This is completely the actions of a normal innocent person. **Aidan:* You're a pyscho freak. **Joe:** Yeah, says the guy that recorded Karen. **Aidan:** Oh, yeah, let's hear it. See the fucking recording. Can I hear it? **Joe:** I got the text saying you recorded. But the text says there's a recording, so where's the fucking recording? *Aidan:** Hey, let's hear Joe. Why? I just got asked if I'mโ€”what would you say if I'm a massage in this? Like, goโ€” **Joe:** Why does Liv still text me to this day? **Aidan:** You text her. Oh, you want to see the receipts, dude? I've seen the receiptsโ€”all of them. Okay, I got all the receipts. **Joe:** You got the August ones, the September ones where she misses me and hates how things ended? You got those? Fuck, I see 'em. Publish 'em. I will do it. I don't planโ€”I talk about you. Go for it. **Chris:** You're doing everything back. **Joe:** When I told you how she wouldn't FaceTime me for three months, how she puts up month-old pictures if you wouldn't fucking... **Aidan:** Yeah, you know why? You know why she wouldn't do that? She's just not into you. Ever have you do this with every girl you fucking talk to? **Joe:**You said to me, after reading the text from her sisterโ€” **Chris:** Says the guy who is swining on a 19-year old. **Joe:** You said Aidan, that she said to you, "she's love with you," bro. That's what you said. She's in love with you. That's what you said. Yeah, when her sisterโ€”and then he can get you caught by somebody. Let's just get back to you. Deflection from Aidan, who doesn't want to be on the line. **Joe:** As you wishโ€”she wouldn't FaceTime me. She wouldn't meet up with me, and she lied to me constantly. Yeah, why would she meet up? **Aidan:** Maybe she's just not that into you. Ever think about that? Maybe she's just not that into you. Maybe you saw the text. I know, I knowโ€”it's hard for you to accept that the girl just doesn't want you. You have to accept the person doesn't want nothing to do with you, isn't it? I did, and you got clingy and possessive. And so she fucking stopped talking to you, so you called her mother and you talkedโ€”you don't even know because you're psychotic, bro. I'm fucking... you. *Joe:** You're just deflecting, bro. This is fucking pathetic. I'm not your one. She's talking about this. **Aidan:** I got no fucking thingโ€”youโ€”you are a fucking psychopath. **Joe:** You're first of allโ€”she doesn't want you to fucking be talking about this because why? **Aidan:** You're the one fucking airing it out now, motherfucker. **Chris:** You're the one airing it because you got caught recording Karen. **Aidan:** So let's hear the recording. Let's play the recording. You got a recording of me, right? **Joe:** I know you did it, dude. **Aidan:** What? **Joe:** I know you recorded. Are you lying? Karen Read's a liar? All right, am I...? **Aidan:** You are the fucking coward. Where's the recording? What recording you talking about? You'reโ€”you'reโ€” **Joe:** You're accusing Karen Read of lying about this? **Aidan:** Yes. **Joe:** You're reallyโ€”are you really serious? How many fuckingโ€”serious? **Aidan:** Let's hear the fucking recording. **Lily** Chris or Joe? Please play it. Did it? You didn't have... for people. Can you please provide a receipt? Just like I think it's fair. **Joe:** Aidan has it. **Aidan:: I thought you had it. I thought you had it. Let's hear it. Let's hear the recording. **Joe:** All right, you sent me the text that I sent. You haven't... **Aidan:** Yeah, let'sโ€”so let's hear the actual recording. Does it exist, though? **Joe:** So Karen is lying. **Aidan:: Karen Read would never lie (sarcastic tone). Oh, yeah. **Chris:** True color. *Joe:** So yeah, let me just run this: You recorded it. You recorded the conversation. You showed it to people, and then the very next day she randomly accused you of fucking doing it. That's what happened. That's what your story is, right? **Aidan:** There's no fucking recording. **Joe:** There is, dude. Where is it? **Aidan:** So let me hear it. Play it. **Joe:** I don't fucking have it. **Aidan:** Oh, you don't know if there's a recording, do you? Thank you. Because you're full of shit. I knowโ€”I just fucking caught you. That's what you just said. Thoseโ€”bring it up here. I talked to somebodyโ€”bring her up here. Bring Karen Read up here, bro. You talked to her? Bring her on up here. **Joe:** I spoke to somebody that you played the recording for. Okay, ohโ€”you know, justโ€”I just say I've already said it, so just say it. Okay, I said I wanted to not say her name, but you know whoโ€”you played it for. **Aidan:** I haven't played it for anyone justโ€” there's no recording. **Joe:** Stop fucking lying. Let's hear it from the point. *Aidan:** Let's hear it. Let's hear it. **Joe:** Aidan, this is fucking crazy, dude. **Aidan:** I'm not the one that fucking caught itโ€”got blocked by Olivia's mother, and fucking brother... **Joe** Here we go. This is deflecting, and dudeโ€”that's admitting how fucking guilty you are right here. **Aidan:** Let's hear a fucking recording. You said you got a fucking recording, right? **Joe:** Nobody said that. We saidโ€”oh, Karen Read doesn't want to talk to you anymore because you recorded her calls, set them to people, and it got back to her. **Chris:** I got a question for you, Aidan, I didn't knowโ€”so sure. When you went on your little pity party and then youโ€” **Joe:** The worst part is you lied to everybody acting on it. You had no idea what was wrong and why she she fucking set you straightโ€”trying to get sympathy. That, my friend, is fucking psychotic. **Aidan:** Okay, okay, sure thing. Yeah, you said I sent the recording out. Where's the recording? *Joe:** Dude? It's notโ€”I'm not obligated to fucking get the recording. **Aidan:** Oh, yeah, you wouldn't want to back it up, right? **Joe:** You're soโ€”you're going to go on record that Karen is lying? Say it. You're caling Karen Read a liar about this. **Aidan:** There is no fucking recording. **Joe:** You're lying, dude. It's fucking crazy. This is what's here. Itโ€”play the note. You played it for somebody. You got it. I don't got it. **Aidan:** Let's hear you play it. You're the one that says there's a fucking record. **Chris:** I mean, that'sโ€”you have a history of recording people. **Lily:** Wait, we haveโ€”well, I feel like we have a responsibility as me as a host to Chris and... You're bothโ€”you're actually both not providing a receipt, and I'mโ€”Aidan is actually asking for a receipt. I have toโ€”for the recording. **Joe and Chris** He hasโ€”asking for the recording. **Lily:** You guysโ€”she has which he sent toโ€”we know I said. So who has it? One of the receipts. I know you're not gonna haveโ€” **Aidan:: you don't have the recording becauseโ€” **Lily:** Just fucking say it. Karen doesn't want the recording out there. **Aidan:** What recording? There's no recording. **Joe:** Never even asked her for it, to be honest with you. **Aidan:** And so you waitโ€”yeah, you never asked. Thank youโ€”you never asked. **Joe:** Karen is fucking so done with you, bro. She sentโ€”she told me about this completely unsolicited. **Lily:**That's beside the point, and I'm not the firstโ€”(Joe) Karen's done with him, ..but what the fuckโ€”just post the fucking receipt for him. **Chris:** You can't come on here saying he has it, Lily. He's seen the same thing you've seen. He's even seen the same thing that I showed you. **Lily:** I know. You don't come on here and say I've got this, and then Aidan demands a receiptโ€”you deserve. Okay... **Joe:** He's deflecting, asking for a recording he knows about the text. **Lily:** Yeah, I know, Joe. I get what you're saying, and I respect everyโ€”like what you're saying, but he's denying it. **Joe:** Fine, I'll post the fuckโ€”I'll post them right now. I really don't give a fuck. **Lily:** Thank you. And that's immenseโ€”he canโ€”he can then riff like whatever he can. I can'tโ€”I'm so like nervous. I've got dry mouth because... Then Aidan can like look at those, and he at least hasโ€”you know exactly what's been spoken about. He's just denying it. I can't say that, and I get it, but he is asking for the receipt, which is fair. And **Joe:** I'll even add the text message when he came on here initially. He said it was all alive, right? He said he sent meโ€”fucking text message on Monday morning. **Lily:** I see it. We've established that now. We established that Aidan's denying it, so just post the receipt that you have, and then he can actually reflect on that andโ€”and do you see what I mean? He's not gonna turn around now and say actually it is true. But if you've got the receipt, he can then say, "I willโ€”this is x, y and z there." I just think it's fairโ€”like... **Aidan:** Now, yeah, what he has is a screenshot that he claims is from Karen Read. It wasโ€” **Joe:** You're saying it's not from Karen Read. **Aidan:** I don'tโ€”there's no fucking name on the top. **Joe:** Yeah, I have it. Do you want me to read? **Aidan:** Okay, so there was an allegation? I'm reading. **Joe:** Do I have a text from you saying I was sent the same thing the morning after the verdict? Did you not say that to me? **Aidan:** Yes, you sent me the same thing the morning after the verdict. **Joe:** Okay, so then she sent it to me too. **Aidan:** Yeah, she knowsโ€”she said to me the morning after the Wilburโ€”she after the morning after the show, she said that she was sent a 30-minute fucking tape. Where's the fuck? What tape? Okay, she's not fucking accusing me. I have noโ€”there's no fucking tape. There's no tape. She thinks I recorded her because I fucking told people about the conversation. That's it. **Joe:** You're telling me you didn't? **Aidan:: And I'm telling you I fucking didn't. You're wrong. **Joe:** 100% You're lying, dude. **Aidan:** Okay, so prove it. Let's see it. You got evidence, right? You like evidence? You got Any? **Joe**: I meanโ€”Iโ€”a screenshot ofโ€”how many people did you send it to? **Aidan:** Zero, because there's no recording. **Joe:** There is. **Aidan:** Let's hear it. Play it. Let's play it. Let's go. **Joe:** Let's hold on. Let's hold on. Can I go real quick? So you come in here calling itโ€”you were making fun of Chris because he's an Australian motherfucker. He doesn't have nothing, right? You said there was no text, no proof. And then now we're transitioning to the recording because I don't have the recording. Okay, so you think Karen Read is just fucking lying about this? How would she know? How would she know what about the recording? **Aidan:** There is no recording. **Joe:** You're telling me you didn't show it to anybody? Is that really what you're gonna tell people? **Aidan:**There's no recording to share with anyone. Okay, okay. Well, I mean, you got evidence, right? To back this up. **Joe:** Yeah, right. **Aidan:: You got something, right? Yeah, yeah. Did you been right? I mean, you have that, right? You have that right because you wouldn't say somethingโ€”because if you know I had it, right? **Joe:** I haveโ€”why Karen Read won't speak to you. **Aidan:** You have a screenshot of a conversation with Karen Read. You don't have an actual fucking audio, though. **Joe:** I haveโ€”in Karen Read's words. Why do you think she would lie about this? **Aidan:** Do I think she would lie about having a recording? **Joe:** She wouldn't lie about this. Explain that oneโ€”about having a recording. **Aidan:** Yes, I know she's lying about that. **Joe:** Why, though? **Aidan:** I don't know why Karen is acting the way she is. It's unfortunate. Yeah, and honestly, I'm not the oneโ€”you're a fucking airing it all out right now. That's odd that Karen would green-light you coming on here and fucking doing this. That's kind of odd. Because I love youโ€”notice, but likeโ€”kind of yeah, we raised 1.1 million fucking dollars for a little... Here I knowโ€”here, I'm here. I'm here. There's still aโ€” **Chris;** there's no because youโ€”still a fucking snake. Yeah, I know. He records people's phone calls. **Aidan:: Let's hear the tape. Let's hear the tape. You're the one makingโ€”you guys got nothing. Nothing. Nothing. I just sent the fucking text out. Just sayโ€”there you go, buddy. **Aidan:** Okay, so Karen Read is green-lighting this sort of drama? That's what you're saying? **Joe:** I asked her. I saidโ€”you asked her? She said yes, go ahead. I said, do you want your side out there? She said, 'sure. You're gonna read it? Sure. I told many people my side. This is my last straw. I would never and have never betrayed him. Meanwhile, he has put me in harm's way in a huge way multiple times.' **Aidan:** I put herโ€”fucking words, okay? Not mine. Yep. Okay. I put Karen Read in harm's way? I went to jail for Karen Read. I don't know if you're familiar. **Chris:** You didn't go to jail for Karen Read, you fuck. **Aidan:** Oh, really? Then what am I on bail for? What isโ€”the fullโ€”what's the full? **Chris:** You went to jail for Karen Read? You went to jail because of Lindsey. You went to jail because you're a fucking dick. **Aidan:** Why was I on bail? I think you're a fuckโ€”while you're on bail. I'm saying becauseโ€”why would I care? Maybe someone in the nightโ€” **Chris:** hey, you're full of shit. You're a fucking hell. **Aidan:** What the fuck was I on bail for? **Joe** Because they may know thatโ€”if you didn't record it, why are you being so hush-hush about it with everybody? Why would he just tell the people what she was saying since she's lying? What do you mean hush-hush about it? **Aidan** You think I won't talk about what she texted me? But you were hinting at it because I don't want to hear the fucking drama, but apparently she does because she'sโ€”you fucking do this because you're recording. Thank you. You're telling me no recording of any fucking phone calls? What's theโ€”what's the fight? So you weren't mocking her the past however longโ€”every time you went on the show saying you owe everything to Karen, all that shit? How is that little white lie? **Aidan:** I owe everything to Karen? What? Why is that little sub-story? You went on two weeksโ€”how is that mocking her? That wasn't in the recording. What recording? There's no fucking recording. **Joe:** I heard it was a 10-minute recording. Does that make sense? **Aidan:** No recording, bro. Let's hear it. You heard it. Let's hear it. **Joe:** Dude, I'm not putting that part out here. **Aidan:** She's talking about her shit. What she's texting you right nowโ€”obviously. Who egging this on, isn't she? **Joe:** Who? Okay? Okay, who? Keep playing dumb. Heyโ€”who? **Aidan:** Mm-hmm? Believe it or notโ€”you guys got nothing, right? **Chris;** We got goodโ€”from the horse's mouth, mate. I mean, it's not over the horse. Yeah, that's enough for me. I don't need... **Aidan:** Karen's not talking to anyone in the media. **Joe:** If you read the text message, I just reached out to her as a friendโ€”just to reach out and say hope you're doing well. She went into this whole thing about you. **Aidan:** So you reached outโ€”let me get this rightโ€”you reached out to her just to say hope you're doing well, and the first thing she did was complain about me? **Joe:** Yes, okay. That says it all. There we go. Where is she? Tired of me? Maybe she's fucking tired of you telling the people bullshit. **Aidan:** Whatโ€”whatโ€”whatโ€”whatโ€”what bullshit have I told people? That you have no idea why she won't fucking come on your whatever it is. **Aidan:** What do you mean I have no idea why? **Joe:** That's what you've been sayingโ€”you don't know what's going on, like you feel a bit sorry forโ€”like the thing with the fucking Howie Carr, dude. That was ridiculous. **Aidan:** What was ridiculous? You're the entire way you handledโ€”I didn't say a word about that. **Chris:** Yes, you did. You deleted the receipt, but let's seeโ€”where did I complain about her appearance on Howie Carr? You made a lot of all quiet. Oh, this fuck it. Oh... **Joe:** Wait, but you think we're fucking dumb? Do people are fucking dumb? So where did Iโ€”after you deleted it, and then you made a post about deleting it. **Aidan:** What did I say about it? I don't remember. **Chris:** But you don't remember? Yeah, you deleted it, bro. You deleted it. Yeah, remember? You deleted it. And then you made a post about the deleting of the post. Part 2 coming later.

Grant Smith Ellis

85,913 Aufrufe โ€ข vor 11 Monaten

Catherine Austin Fitts: "Let me give you some of the theories [why they're spraying our skies]... one [is] we are coming into a solar minimum, and geo-engineering will delay... an ice age... there have regularly been cycles of almost near extinction events coming from various things in the solar system, including a solar minimum." This clip of Fitts, a former Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, investment banker, and founder of the Solari Report (The Solari Report | Catherine Austin Fitts), is taken from an episode of the Children's Health Defense (Childrenโ€™s Health Defense) series Financial Rebellion posted to Rumble on October 23, 2025. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "I think they now feel they have enough of the control grid in place that they can start saying what they're doing... There's enough research to show what's in the spray. I think that the truth... we all want is why are you doing this? And if you look at the first report that we ever did on the Solari report, it goes through all the potential reasons why you might do this and spend an enormous amount of taxpayers' money doing this. And you know, to this day we don't know. "But I think they will be reluctant ultimately to tell us the real reason and will use something like climate change or one of these sort of fake reasons. But... my feedback from the inside is they feel very reluctant and think people will be better off not knowing than knowing. "Let me give you some of the theories [why they're doing this]. Some of the theories, and they make a lot of sense and I would refer everybody to our interviews with Clifford Carnicom, is, one, that we are coming into a solar minimum and this geoengineering will delay what some people think will be an ice age. That's number one. The second is that by essentially digitizing the environment, you create a space fence that, for national security purposes, think of it as like a radar system that will allow you much more powerfully and more quickly to understand what's coming in, but also... to keep people in. "So it will facilitate your surveillance system... Friedland has several books on the space fence. So that's another. Is that by digitizing the atmosphere you can, or you know, maybe I shouldn't say digitize but, but provide this kind of particulate that you can... manipulate and manage the weather. And that is a very powerful economic and political tool. "If you look at some of the warfare that we've implemented against different countries, it's essentially weather warfare or what's called natural ecosystem terrorism. So you can trigger earthquakes, you can trigger all sorts of events that look natural. So it's literally a weapon of war, but also something, that manages economic control. You can steer a hurricane. "In my opinion, [Hurricane] Katrina was clearly a steered event. But there's real questions. If you talk to people on the ground, you know, in the '70s, in a hurricane, they blew the levees and there's indication that they probably blew the levees. You know, so there's covert operations on the ground that dovetail. It's not just when you have these kinds of complex disaster capitalism or plunder operations. It's not just one thing. "There's an interesting quote we always use from William Cohen when he was Secretary of Defense talking about using earthquakes and tsunamis as weapons of war. So essentially you're talking about engineering climate change. But not... the kind of fake climate change caused by humans. You're talking about climate change. If you go throughout history, there have regularly been cycles of almost near extinction events coming from various things in the solar system, including a solar minimum. "If you look at the history of sun activity and sunspot cycles there, you can really see when that activity goes down, it has very terrible influence on the economy and on the sort of the economy... you'll see, for example, relationships historically between sunspots and how well the stock market or the economic indicators do."

Sense Receptor

13,575 Aufrufe โ€ข vor 10 Monaten