Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Bu video yüklenirken bir sorun oluştu. Bu geçici bir ağ sorunundan kaynaklanıyor olabilir veya video kullanılamıyor olabilir.

Ana Sayfaya Dön

"You make arguments that the jury was improperly instructed, especially on those questions, that's all fair game..." Hannah Dugan's defense team is preparing to ask Judge Lynn Adelman to set aside the jury's guilty verdict SUN ON UPFRONT: Dugan defense attorney Steve Biskupic

Matt Smith

10,343 subscribers

62,584 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

Komedi Haberler & Politika Eğitim

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

Scott Jennings: "Judge Hannah Dugan was convicted yesterday for helping an illegal alien escape ICE custody. Let's check back on this panel from April where an attorney lectured me and promised the case wouldn't make it to a jury!”

Scott Jennings: "Judge Hannah Dugan was convicted yesterday for helping an illegal alien escape ICE custody. Let's check back on this panel from April where an attorney lectured me and promised the case wouldn't make it to a jury!”

Farm Girl Carrie 👩‍🌾

43,940 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

#KarenReadRetrial The jury in the Read case asked a total of four questions today. The first three were asked and answered around 11am and the jurors were sent back to deliberate. The fourth question though was not answered until after lunch. That question was about a hung jury, specifically "If we find not guilty on two charges but can't agree on one charge, is it a hung jury on all three charges or just one charge?" The question raised some eyebrows as the first trial ended in a hung jury which was then appealed to the Supreme Court with claims from the defense that the first jury had actually acquitted Read on the murder charge. Even more eyebrow raising were Judge Cannone's comments to Alan Jackson that the defense at first told Judge Cannone to ignore the question when it came in. Why in the world would a defense team who appealed a previous hung jury decision all the way to the Supreme Court tell the Judge to ignore a question focused on a hung jury? Something about the question and the defense's initial request to disregard seems very, very off.

#KarenReadRetrial The jury in the Read case asked a total of four questions today. The first three were asked and answered around 11am and the jurors were sent back to deliberate. The fourth question though was not answered until after lunch. That question was about a hung jury, specifically "If we find not guilty on two charges but can't agree on one charge, is it a hung jury on all three charges or just one charge?" The question raised some eyebrows as the first trial ended in a hung jury which was then appealed to the Supreme Court with claims from the defense that the first jury had actually acquitted Read on the murder charge. Even more eyebrow raising were Judge Cannone's comments to Alan Jackson that the defense at first told Judge Cannone to ignore the question when it came in. Why in the world would a defense team who appealed a previous hung jury decision all the way to the Supreme Court tell the Judge to ignore a question focused on a hung jury? Something about the question and the defense's initial request to disregard seems very, very off.

Julie Carpenter

94,866 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Lyle and Eric Menendez's defense attorney is going to ask a judge to reconsider the brothers' convictions based on new evidence that was not presented at their trials. #CourtTV What do YOU think? Should the #MenendezBrothers be freed? MORE HERE:

Lyle and Eric Menendez's defense attorney is going to ask a judge to reconsider the brothers' convictions based on new evidence that was not presented at their trials. #CourtTV What do YOU think? Should the #MenendezBrothers be freed? MORE HERE:

Court TV

16,875 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

The jury in the Karen Read murder trial asked the judge two questions by mid-afternoon Tuesday. One of the questions they asked to the judge was: “If we find not guilty on two charges, but can't agree on third charge, is it a hung on all charges?”

The jury in the Karen Read murder trial asked the judge two questions by mid-afternoon Tuesday. One of the questions they asked to the judge was: “If we find not guilty on two charges, but can't agree on third charge, is it a hung on all charges?”

Law&Crime Network

192,999 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

JUSTICE ⚖️ Remember Eduardo Flores-Ruiz the Illegal that disgraced Judge Hannah Dugan let out the back door of the courthouse Well... the Homeland Security just deported him Judge Dugan is set to go on trial next month Who else hopes she's disbarred and gets a lengthy jail term 👍

JUSTICE ⚖️ Remember Eduardo Flores-Ruiz the Illegal that disgraced Judge Hannah Dugan let out the back door of the courthouse Well... the Homeland Security just deported him Judge Dugan is set to go on trial next month Who else hopes she's disbarred and gets a lengthy jail term 👍

@Chicago1Ray 🇺🇸

202,735 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

Judge Hanah Dugan was CONVICTED yesterday for helping an illegal alien escape ICE custody. Let’s check back on this panel from April where an attorney lectured me and promised the case wouldn’t make it to a jury 🤷‍♂️

Judge Hanah Dugan was CONVICTED yesterday for helping an illegal alien escape ICE custody. Let’s check back on this panel from April where an attorney lectured me and promised the case wouldn’t make it to a jury 🤷‍♂️

Scott Jennings

922,544 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

It was very interesting to listen to Defense Diaries, in particular when David Yannetti was talking about the Louise Woodward case (and how the Judge set aside the jury verdict in the criminal case). The Aaron Spencer fundraiser, still ongoing, has raised over $10,000 in just 3 hours. Robert J. Alessi and Mr. Yannetti also announced their podcast is "close" to coming on their air. Of note; my father, Fredric Ellis, represented the Eappen Family in their civil lawsuit against the agency that employed Woodward as a nanny.

It was very interesting to listen to Defense Diaries, in particular when David Yannetti was talking about the Louise Woodward case (and how the Judge set aside the jury verdict in the criminal case). The Aaron Spencer fundraiser, still ongoing, has raised over $10,000 in just 3 hours. Robert J. Alessi and Mr. Yannetti also announced their podcast is "close" to coming on their air. Of note; my father, Fredric Ellis, represented the Eappen Family in their civil lawsuit against the agency that employed Woodward as a nanny.

Grant Smith Ellis

15,234 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

FANI WILLIS IN THE HOT SEAT GA Sen. Sen. Colton Moore says lawmakers are set to press Fani Willis on “the original questions,” including the early grand jury release, alleged judge shopping, Nathan Wade, and “all those trips that she took to the White House.” @tbatesnews

FANI WILLIS IN THE HOT SEAT GA Sen. Sen. Colton Moore says lawmakers are set to press Fani Willis on “the original questions,” including the early grand jury release, alleged judge shopping, Nathan Wade, and “all those trips that she took to the White House.” @tbatesnews

Real America's Voice (RAV)

13,829 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

1670, London. 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧 Two men were arrested for preaching on a street. That was illegal. One of them was William Penn. They were put on trial at the Old Bailey. The judge told the jury to find them guilty. They said not guilty. He sent them back. They came back. Not guilty. He sent them back again. Not guilty. So the judge locked them up. No food. No water. No toilet. For two days. He brought them back into court. Starving. Exhausted. Humiliated. He asked for their verdict. Not guilty. The judge fined every juror. Eleven paid. One didn't. His name was Edward Bushel. He refused to pay. And he sued the judge. He won. The court ruled that no jury can be punished for its verdict. Ever. A jury answers to its conscience — not to the judge. That's still the law. Today. Because one Englishman refused to pay a fine. And twelve more who were starved, locked up, and humiliated. Still said no. Be Proud Of Us. 🇬🇧 #proudofus

1670, London. 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧 Two men were arrested for preaching on a street. That was illegal. One of them was William Penn. They were put on trial at the Old Bailey. The judge told the jury to find them guilty. They said not guilty. He sent them back. They came back. Not guilty. He sent them back again. Not guilty. So the judge locked them up. No food. No water. No toilet. For two days. He brought them back into court. Starving. Exhausted. Humiliated. He asked for their verdict. Not guilty. The judge fined every juror. Eleven paid. One didn't. His name was Edward Bushel. He refused to pay. And he sued the judge. He won. The court ruled that no jury can be punished for its verdict. Ever. A jury answers to its conscience — not to the judge. That's still the law. Today. Because one Englishman refused to pay a fine. And twelve more who were starved, locked up, and humiliated. Still said no. Be Proud Of Us. 🇬🇧 #proudofus

Proudofus.uk

263,837 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

Nobody is telling you how FUCKED the self-defense industrial complex just became. Everyone is watching the verdict. The guilty headline. The crowd outside the courthouse. Nobody is talking about the fact that a Texas jury just torched the entire "shove justifies a stab" defense in a few hours. Not a week. Not three days. A few hours. By twelve people who heard every argument the defense had. → Cost of bringing a knife to a track meet: the rest of your life → Cost of the self-defense claim: collapsed before deliberations even started → That is not a close case. That is an overwhelming one. Teammates stood on that stand and told the truth. The knife wasn't found at the scene. He brought it. The prosecutor told the jury directly: "You do not get to meet a shove with a stab, especially if you provoke the shove." The jury agreed. In hours. 💀 Here's what nobody is explaining to you: This doesn't just close THIS case. This closes ALL "I felt threatened" arguments when you're the one who escalated. Forever. → Every defense attorney who planned to run the same playbook just watched it get buried → The speed of deliberation — a few hours on a murder charge — means there was nothing to debate → Twelve strangers looked at the evidence and found it so overwhelming they barely needed to talk → Austin Metcalf died in his twin brother's arms at a high school track meet. The jury remembered that. → Sentencing range: 5 years to life → Self-defense claim: gone → Teammates who were standing right there: told the truth → The defense's entire theory: rejected in an afternoon The family spent over a year watching their son's killer argue he had the right to do it. Today that argument died in a Texas courtroom and it took the jury less time to reject it than it takes to watch a movie. This is not just a verdict. It's the end of the "provoke the confrontation then claim the victim" era in Texas courts. Bookmark this. You're watching the biggest shift in self-defense law since Stand Your Ground got its first real test. Follow and turn on notifications before it's too late.

Nobody is telling you how FUCKED the self-defense industrial complex just became. Everyone is watching the verdict. The guilty headline. The crowd outside the courthouse. Nobody is talking about the fact that a Texas jury just torched the entire "shove justifies a stab" defense in a few hours. Not a week. Not three days. A few hours. By twelve people who heard every argument the defense had. → Cost of bringing a knife to a track meet: the rest of your life → Cost of the self-defense claim: collapsed before deliberations even started → That is not a close case. That is an overwhelming one. Teammates stood on that stand and told the truth. The knife wasn't found at the scene. He brought it. The prosecutor told the jury directly: "You do not get to meet a shove with a stab, especially if you provoke the shove." The jury agreed. In hours. 💀 Here's what nobody is explaining to you: This doesn't just close THIS case. This closes ALL "I felt threatened" arguments when you're the one who escalated. Forever. → Every defense attorney who planned to run the same playbook just watched it get buried → The speed of deliberation — a few hours on a murder charge — means there was nothing to debate → Twelve strangers looked at the evidence and found it so overwhelming they barely needed to talk → Austin Metcalf died in his twin brother's arms at a high school track meet. The jury remembered that. → Sentencing range: 5 years to life → Self-defense claim: gone → Teammates who were standing right there: told the truth → The defense's entire theory: rejected in an afternoon The family spent over a year watching their son's killer argue he had the right to do it. Today that argument died in a Texas courtroom and it took the jury less time to reject it than it takes to watch a movie. This is not just a verdict. It's the end of the "provoke the confrontation then claim the victim" era in Texas courts. Bookmark this. You're watching the biggest shift in self-defense law since Stand Your Ground got its first real test. Follow and turn on notifications before it's too late.

🇦🇪 Rashid Al Mansoori راشد المنصوري

133,897 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

"The PM was asked.. did the PM ask him why he overruled the verdict.. the PM replied, I did ask him and I did not accept his explanation. Did the PM ask you?" Robbins: ".. I must remain quiet on that.." "Is it fair to say he did ask you?" "I must reserve my position on that.."

"The PM was asked.. did the PM ask him why he overruled the verdict.. the PM replied, I did ask him and I did not accept his explanation. Did the PM ask you?" Robbins: ".. I must remain quiet on that.." "Is it fair to say he did ask you?" "I must reserve my position on that.."

Saul Staniforth

196,448 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

The defense is the reason the Cowboys lost this game. The defense was horrible. The defense has been horrible all year. But that doesn't change the fact that the offense only needed a handful of yards to get in FG range, and they completely wet the bed on this drive. Disgusting.

The defense is the reason the Cowboys lost this game. The defense was horrible. The defense has been horrible all year. But that doesn't change the fact that the offense only needed a handful of yards to get in FG range, and they completely wet the bed on this drive. Disgusting.

Dan Rogers

64,276 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

Judge Freniere was speaking to Karen Reads Defense Attorneys when she made this statement earlier today. She saw the unprofessional tactics they used during KR trials and she called them out on it. If you think I’m wrong, ask Criminal Defense Attorneys that have practiced in front of Judge Freniere.

Judge Freniere was speaking to Karen Reads Defense Attorneys when she made this statement earlier today. She saw the unprofessional tactics they used during KR trials and she called them out on it. If you think I’m wrong, ask Criminal Defense Attorneys that have practiced in front of Judge Freniere.

Elaine S

27,311 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

"Obviously, QB dominates the thinking and the conversation. Beyond that, I have questions about the defense. You need that defense to be a top 10 unit for this team to have any chance to make a jump from 5 to 8-9 wins. While it feels like there's a lot in place...I have some major questions about this team." 🚨 Scott Petrak ct w/ Baskin & Phelps on the #Browns entering training camp

"Obviously, QB dominates the thinking and the conversation. Beyond that, I have questions about the defense. You need that defense to be a top 10 unit for this team to have any chance to make a jump from 5 to 8-9 wins. While it feels like there's a lot in place...I have some major questions about this team." 🚨 Scott Petrak ct w/ Baskin & Phelps on the #Browns entering training camp

92.3 The Fan

14,931 görüntüleme • 26 gün önce

Defense attorney Alan Shore disrupts court to protect his client, Kelly Nolan, who is on trial for her husband Joe Nolan's death. Kelly claims Joe took a lethal combination of prescription medication to frame her after learning of her infidelity. Despite warnings from her defense team, Brad Chase and Denny Crane, that her emotionless behavior will alienate the jury, Kelly remains detached, arguing that a truly guilty person would have easily faked grief.

Defense attorney Alan Shore disrupts court to protect his client, Kelly Nolan, who is on trial for her husband Joe Nolan's death. Kelly claims Joe took a lethal combination of prescription medication to frame her after learning of her infidelity. Despite warnings from her defense team, Brad Chase and Denny Crane, that her emotionless behavior will alienate the jury, Kelly remains detached, arguing that a truly guilty person would have easily faked grief.

Estherr

64,386 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce