Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

You really can't make this up. CBC's source of misinformation about the Freedom Convoy, the guy that spun Ottawa into a frenzy, is presented as an expert by CBC in "misinformation" Justin Ling spun wild tales that were believed by media and law enforcement and none had the courage...

60,337 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

CBC's own investigation revealed that the disinformation campaign around Alberta separatism largely came from click farmers and YouTube operators in the Netherlands...content creators chasing ad revenue by hiring actors and pumping out sensational videos Meanwhile, the RCMP has told the Alberta government that, as of April 2026, they have found no credible evidence of foreign interference in the provincial separatist movement Yet on CBC, Dragons' Den investor Arlene Dickinson insisted there is Russian disinformation at work. When she said, "I find that very difficult to believe... that there's no foreign interference in this," CBC anchor Andrew Nichols offered no pushback. The network's own reporting on the Dutch operators did not substantiate the kind of coordinated foreign interference she implied. This echoes CBC's coverage of the Freedom Convoy, where figures like Justin Ling pushed narratives of extremism and foreign interference with little hard evidence at the time—narratives that politicians and officials later cited as "proof" during the public inquiry. It feels like another CBC-driven frenzy. Arlene Dickinson's certainty aside, the stakes here go far beyond a few protesters on Parliament Hill. This concerns an entire province's grievances and future. Painting legitimate discontent as the product of foreign puppets risks alienating people further rather than addressing root issues Brodie Fenlon, as Editor-in-Chief, it might be time to dial back the hype and stick closer to the facts on the ground Brodie Fenlon

cbcwatcher

25,213 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

CBC spent a 9/11 commemoration in Gander treating the invited U.S. ambassador as the story Pete Hoekstra said the day was about the dead, the stranded passengers, and the town that took them in. CBC kept steering it back to tariffs, “51st state” talk, and whether he should have been allowed in the building. That is not reporting a ceremony. That is using a memorial as a vehicle The transcripts are not subtle. Anchors and reporters loop the same lines: he has “drawn the ire,” he is “Trump’s man,” some people “don’t even want him here,” there was a petition, Gander had to issue a statement that September 11 is bigger than politics. Then they cut to Hoekstra saying, again, that this is about thanking Gander and that the economic fight can wait. CBC treats that answer as an obstacle to be worked around rather than the point of the day That pattern is the inflammatory part. A publicly funded broadcaster with a large older audience does not have to invent a trade war. It only has to keep naming the ambassador, the tariffs, and the sovereignty rhetoric in the same breath as a 25-year-old act of hospitality. Viewers who already dislike the administration get a fresh reason to stay angry. Viewers who came for the history get the current fight instead. The town’s organizers wanted the focus on 2001. The coverage did not Gander’s record that week was practical and decent: planes on the ground, people housed, fed, and treated as guests. Turning the anniversary into another round of “can you believe they invited him” is the opposite of that instinct. If the relationship is strained, the strain is not clarified by making a memorial the latest venue for it. CBC chose to inflame anyway Brodie Fenlon

cbcwatcher

17,499 просмотров • 20 дней назад