正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

You’d think parking a Cybertruck would be dramatic. It really is not. Four-wheel steering lets the rear wheels turn opposite the front wheels at low speeds, making tight turns feel much easier. That’s why something this big can still move through city spaces with surprising agility. Parking lot. Narrow... show more

Mario Nawfal

3,842,530 subscribers

41,409 次观看 • 1 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Cybertruck packed a ridiculous number of automotive firsts into one production truck. •⁠ ⁠48V architecture: Less current, thinner wires, less weight and less wasted energy. •⁠ ⁠True steer-by-wire: No mechanical steering shaft. The steering can adapt to speed instead of being locked into one fixed ratio. •⁠ ⁠Front + rear steering: Tight parking turns when you need them, extra stability when you’re moving fast. •⁠ ⁠Structural stainless-steel exoskeleton: The body panels aren’t just there to look tough. They actually help carry the load. •⁠ ⁠Full-hard stainless air bending: Tesla found a way to shape extremely hard stainless steel without wrecking the finished surface. •⁠ ⁠Etherloop: A gigabit network replaces piles of old-school wiring, cutting roughly 70% of it. Cybertruck gets noticed for how it looks. A lot of the really clever stuff is hiding underneath. Tesla Cybertruck / Writer: Annette, Grok Imagine Designer: Janné

Cybertruck packed a ridiculous number of automotive firsts into one production truck. •⁠ ⁠48V architecture: Less current, thinner wires, less weight and less wasted energy. •⁠ ⁠True steer-by-wire: No mechanical steering shaft. The steering can adapt to speed instead of being locked into one fixed ratio. •⁠ ⁠Front + rear steering: Tight parking turns when you need them, extra stability when you’re moving fast. •⁠ ⁠Structural stainless-steel exoskeleton: The body panels aren’t just there to look tough. They actually help carry the load. •⁠ ⁠Full-hard stainless air bending: Tesla found a way to shape extremely hard stainless steel without wrecking the finished surface. •⁠ ⁠Etherloop: A gigabit network replaces piles of old-school wiring, cutting roughly 70% of it. Cybertruck gets noticed for how it looks. A lot of the really clever stuff is hiding underneath. Tesla Cybertruck / Writer: Annette, Grok Imagine Designer: Janné

Mario Nawfal

63,689 次观看 • 11 天前

A 45-minute commute sounds a lot less annoying when you can literally sleep through it. Cybercab’s seats recline surprisingly far, and with no steering wheel or pedals, there’s nothing inside pretending someone still needs to drive. You get in, stretch out and let the car deal with the road. That’s the part of autonomy people will probably appreciate very quickly. Traffic can be Tesla’s problem now. Tesla / Writer: Annette, Grok Imagine Designer: Janné

A 45-minute commute sounds a lot less annoying when you can literally sleep through it. Cybercab’s seats recline surprisingly far, and with no steering wheel or pedals, there’s nothing inside pretending someone still needs to drive. You get in, stretch out and let the car deal with the road. That’s the part of autonomy people will probably appreciate very quickly. Traffic can be Tesla’s problem now. Tesla / Writer: Annette, Grok Imagine Designer: Janné

Mario Nawfal

39,706 次观看 • 1 个月前

The golden era of transportation got very literal. Tesla’s gold Cybercab is now carrying paying passengers in Austin, with no steering wheel, no pedals and no human driver sitting there as backup. That’s what makes this two-seater such a big deal. It wasn’t converted into a Robotaxi. It was built from the start for one job: driving people around by itself. Even the gold is doing some work. The color is molded straight into the body panels instead of going through a traditional paint shop. Not painted gold. Born gold. Tesla / Writer: Annette, Grok Imagine Designer: Janné

The golden era of transportation got very literal. Tesla’s gold Cybercab is now carrying paying passengers in Austin, with no steering wheel, no pedals and no human driver sitting there as backup. That’s what makes this two-seater such a big deal. It wasn’t converted into a Robotaxi. It was built from the start for one job: driving people around by itself. Even the gold is doing some work. The color is molded straight into the body panels instead of going through a traditional paint shop. Not painted gold. Born gold. Tesla / Writer: Annette, Grok Imagine Designer: Janné

Mario Nawfal

68,898 次观看 • 24 天前

I think I’m the only Korean in the world invited to Tesla’s Cybercab launch this week. And from what I can tell so far on 𝕏, Tesla/Elon invited only around ~20 or so people, not counting +1s. But that’s the part I can’t stop thinking about… Why make an event this important THIS exclusive? Cybercab is a vehicle with no steering wheel and no pedals, built from the ground up for autonomous transportation. If Tesla pulls this off at scale, it will completely change what a car is, what it costs to move people around, and eventually what transportation itself means. So why invite only a tiny handful of people to witness the beginning of it? There has to be a reason… And whatever happens on September 3, I’m forever grateful to Tesla and Elon for trusting me with an invite to be there in person and witness a moment like this. I really don’t take this opportunity lightly… I’m forever grateful. But September 3 is starting to feel much bigger than people realize…

I think I’m the only Korean in the world invited to Tesla’s Cybercab launch this week. And from what I can tell so far on 𝕏, Tesla/Elon invited only around ~20 or so people, not counting +1s. But that’s the part I can’t stop thinking about… Why make an event this important THIS exclusive? Cybercab is a vehicle with no steering wheel and no pedals, built from the ground up for autonomous transportation. If Tesla pulls this off at scale, it will completely change what a car is, what it costs to move people around, and eventually what transportation itself means. So why invite only a tiny handful of people to witness the beginning of it? There has to be a reason… And whatever happens on September 3, I’m forever grateful to Tesla and Elon for trusting me with an invite to be there in person and witness a moment like this. I really don’t take this opportunity lightly… I’m forever grateful. But September 3 is starting to feel much bigger than people realize…

Teslaconomics

41,192 次观看 • 1 个月前

🚨 CYBERTRUCK BULLETPROOF GLASS: THE ULTIMATE ROAD RAGE DEFENDER (OR APOCALYPSE GETAWAY CAR) Tesla’s Cybertruck isn’t just a rolling stainless steel brick - it’s a fortress on wheels, and the armored glass windows are the real star of the show. These aren’t your average car windows. They’re engineered to laugh off high-velocity bullets from common firearms (think AR-15s, handguns, shotguns). Tesla has publicly demonstrated the glass taking multiple rounds - cracking but not shattering - while keeping the cabin sealed and occupants safe. Here’s where it gets wild: because the glass holds up under fire, someone inside could theoretically return fire through the window without the bullets coming back in. Shooters outside would be spraying rounds at a near-impenetrable barrier, while the person inside stays protected and can engage back - if needed. It’s like a mobile shooting range with you as the target and the Cybertruck as the backstop.' This isn’t accidental design - Tesla built the Cybertruck with an ultra-hard 30X cold-rolled stainless steel exoskeleton and reinforced cabin, making it one of the most durable production vehicles ever made. The armored glass is just one piece of the “survive anything” puzzle. Elon has joked about the Cybertruck’s toughness, but the bulletproof demo videos are no joke - glass taking 9mm and .45 rounds without letting shards fly inside. And yes, the windows still roll down (slowly, carefully). Tesla doesn’t market it as a tactical or military vehicle (they can’t legally), but the internet has already dubbed it the ultimate zombie-apocalypse rig or VIP escort car. Reviewers have tested it extensively, confirming the glass holds up under sustained fire better than most armored SUVs on the market. So next time you’re stuck in traffic and someone’s road-raging, just remember: your Cybertruck might not only survive the encounter - it could win it. Source: Tesla, ArmoredCG, independent ballistic tests (2024–2025), Tesla Owners Silicon Valley

🚨 CYBERTRUCK BULLETPROOF GLASS: THE ULTIMATE ROAD RAGE DEFENDER (OR APOCALYPSE GETAWAY CAR) Tesla’s Cybertruck isn’t just a rolling stainless steel brick - it’s a fortress on wheels, and the armored glass windows are the real star of the show. These aren’t your average car windows. They’re engineered to laugh off high-velocity bullets from common firearms (think AR-15s, handguns, shotguns). Tesla has publicly demonstrated the glass taking multiple rounds - cracking but not shattering - while keeping the cabin sealed and occupants safe. Here’s where it gets wild: because the glass holds up under fire, someone inside could theoretically return fire through the window without the bullets coming back in. Shooters outside would be spraying rounds at a near-impenetrable barrier, while the person inside stays protected and can engage back - if needed. It’s like a mobile shooting range with you as the target and the Cybertruck as the backstop.' This isn’t accidental design - Tesla built the Cybertruck with an ultra-hard 30X cold-rolled stainless steel exoskeleton and reinforced cabin, making it one of the most durable production vehicles ever made. The armored glass is just one piece of the “survive anything” puzzle. Elon has joked about the Cybertruck’s toughness, but the bulletproof demo videos are no joke - glass taking 9mm and .45 rounds without letting shards fly inside. And yes, the windows still roll down (slowly, carefully). Tesla doesn’t market it as a tactical or military vehicle (they can’t legally), but the internet has already dubbed it the ultimate zombie-apocalypse rig or VIP escort car. Reviewers have tested it extensively, confirming the glass holds up under sustained fire better than most armored SUVs on the market. So next time you’re stuck in traffic and someone’s road-raging, just remember: your Cybertruck might not only survive the encounter - it could win it. Source: Tesla, ArmoredCG, independent ballistic tests (2024–2025), Tesla Owners Silicon Valley

Mario Nawfal

134,581 次观看 • 9 个月前

Today, I took the new Lucid Gravity SUV out for a quick drive. Here are my initial thoughts of the car and the drive: Materials & Seats: I have to say, this is a nice vehicle. The interior feels very premium, and the materials feel expensive. The perforated vegan leather seats are plush, provide good support, and hug you nicely. I sat in two Gravitys, one specced with the $4,200 Tahoe Brown vegan leather seats (really liked that color) and one with the all-black interior. The massaging seats are also surprisingly useful. Unlike the gimmicky ones in many cars, these actually feel great and not like a tiny mouse poking your back. I’d use them regularly if I owned one. The powered second-row seats are roomy and comfortable, with plenty of space for legs and feet. One small gripe I have: the grab handles on the interior feel like very cheap, hollow plastic. Design: The Gravity leans more toward minivan styling than SUV, but I actually think it works. Lucid managed to fit a whopping 120 cubic feet of cargo capacity into this thing. For context, that’s about 24% more than the Tesla Model X (91.6 cu ft), even though the Gravity is an inch shorter. It’s also just 10% less than the Cadillac Escalade IQ EV (131 cu ft), despite the Escalade being more than two feet longer. The 6K OLED panoramic display looks great, but the software felt a little laggy at times and is tough to see in direct sunlight. The steering wheel button design isn’t my favorite, but I do like the flat-top, flat-bottom design, Reminds me of Cybertruck’s wheel. Cargo loading is very convenient. With the air suspension lowered, the rear load floor is super low, making it easy to get things in and out. The trunk opening, though, is oddly shaped. I found the hatch uncomfortably close to my head, but raising the air suspension helps a little. Taller folks may still run into that issue. Showroom Employees: I met three Lucid employees at the showroom, one of whom had worked at Tesla for 10 years. All of them were very nice and knowledgeable. Sound System: It’s VERY good—great bass response, not muddy. It has Dolby Atmos, and it rocks. The Cybertruck still has the best factory sound system I’ve ever heard, but the Gravity’s is still great. ADAS: Unfortunately, I didn’t have much time to try it out, so I can’t give an opinion. But the 360-degree camera view is nice. It makes parking much easier and has a curb-rash alert so you don’t scrape your expensive wheels. Test Drive: The Gravity I drove, including options, was priced at $115,000. The ride felt firmer than I expected, even in the softest air suspension setting, but it was still comfortable. The sportier modes were fun and deliver that classic, quick-acceleration EV experience. The steering feel struck a good balance—sporty, but not tiring for everyday use. Visibility is good, and the glass windshield that extends past your head is cool (though I still think the Model X windshield is more immersive). Charging: The Gravity has native NACS and can charge at speeds up to 220 kW at Tesla Superchargers. In general, the vehicle is capable of up to 400 kW charging speeds. Final Thoughts: As Tesla fans, we can sometimes be tough on non-Tesla EVs, but I think the Gravity SUV is evidence that Tesla’s mission is working: accelerating the advent of sustainable energy. Tesla’s mission and past work helped pave the way for a vehicle like the Lucid Gravity to exist and come to market. While Lucid’s path to profitability is still in question, and while the Gravity is expensive (for now), even from my short time with it, this feels like Lucid’s first truly great product. Only the $94,900 Grand Touring trim is available right now, but the company says the less expensive Touring trim will come out late this year for $79,900. We shall see. More photos and videos of mine in the thread below:

Today, I took the new Lucid Gravity SUV out for a quick drive. Here are my initial thoughts of the car and the drive: Materials & Seats: I have to say, this is a nice vehicle. The interior feels very premium, and the materials feel expensive. The perforated vegan leather seats are plush, provide good support, and hug you nicely. I sat in two Gravitys, one specced with the $4,200 Tahoe Brown vegan leather seats (really liked that color) and one with the all-black interior. The massaging seats are also surprisingly useful. Unlike the gimmicky ones in many cars, these actually feel great and not like a tiny mouse poking your back. I’d use them regularly if I owned one. The powered second-row seats are roomy and comfortable, with plenty of space for legs and feet. One small gripe I have: the grab handles on the interior feel like very cheap, hollow plastic. Design: The Gravity leans more toward minivan styling than SUV, but I actually think it works. Lucid managed to fit a whopping 120 cubic feet of cargo capacity into this thing. For context, that’s about 24% more than the Tesla Model X (91.6 cu ft), even though the Gravity is an inch shorter. It’s also just 10% less than the Cadillac Escalade IQ EV (131 cu ft), despite the Escalade being more than two feet longer. The 6K OLED panoramic display looks great, but the software felt a little laggy at times and is tough to see in direct sunlight. The steering wheel button design isn’t my favorite, but I do like the flat-top, flat-bottom design, Reminds me of Cybertruck’s wheel. Cargo loading is very convenient. With the air suspension lowered, the rear load floor is super low, making it easy to get things in and out. The trunk opening, though, is oddly shaped. I found the hatch uncomfortably close to my head, but raising the air suspension helps a little. Taller folks may still run into that issue. Showroom Employees: I met three Lucid employees at the showroom, one of whom had worked at Tesla for 10 years. All of them were very nice and knowledgeable. Sound System: It’s VERY good—great bass response, not muddy. It has Dolby Atmos, and it rocks. The Cybertruck still has the best factory sound system I’ve ever heard, but the Gravity’s is still great. ADAS: Unfortunately, I didn’t have much time to try it out, so I can’t give an opinion. But the 360-degree camera view is nice. It makes parking much easier and has a curb-rash alert so you don’t scrape your expensive wheels. Test Drive: The Gravity I drove, including options, was priced at $115,000. The ride felt firmer than I expected, even in the softest air suspension setting, but it was still comfortable. The sportier modes were fun and deliver that classic, quick-acceleration EV experience. The steering feel struck a good balance—sporty, but not tiring for everyday use. Visibility is good, and the glass windshield that extends past your head is cool (though I still think the Model X windshield is more immersive). Charging: The Gravity has native NACS and can charge at speeds up to 220 kW at Tesla Superchargers. In general, the vehicle is capable of up to 400 kW charging speeds. Final Thoughts: As Tesla fans, we can sometimes be tough on non-Tesla EVs, but I think the Gravity SUV is evidence that Tesla’s mission is working: accelerating the advent of sustainable energy. Tesla’s mission and past work helped pave the way for a vehicle like the Lucid Gravity to exist and come to market. While Lucid’s path to profitability is still in question, and while the Gravity is expensive (for now), even from my short time with it, this feels like Lucid’s first truly great product. Only the $94,900 Grand Touring trim is available right now, but the company says the less expensive Touring trim will come out late this year for $79,900. We shall see. More photos and videos of mine in the thread below:

Sawyer Merritt

110,465 次观看 • 1 年前

Elon’s companies take my everyday life to a completely different level. Every morning, Grok Bot prints personalized math worksheets for my 5-year-old and 8-year-old right when I walk down stairs at 6am after I workout. And they’re not getting the same worksheet every day either… They do their best, I take a picture of their work, send it back to my CEO Grok Bot, and it uses how they did to create the next worksheet. Literally, different problems, new challenges… every single day. Then I get into my Cybertruck, press a button to turn on Tesla FSD, and it drives us to school while I sit there and help my kids with their work instead of spending the entire drive stressed, focused on operating the car. And if we get stuck on a problem or are curious about something… Grok is integrated right into the Cybertruck to help us. Meanwhile, Starlink keeps me connected, so while we’re on the road I can share all of this on 𝕏. Then those posts make me $ through 𝕏 Money, more than I ever did working at Apple for 8+ yrs back in the day. Think about that entire loop… Grok Bot helps my kids by creating personalized math worksheets. Tesla FSD drives us. Grok helps us inside the Tesla. Starlink keeps us connected. 𝕏 lets me share my life, thoughts, and experiences with the world. 𝕏 Money pays me for doing it. These are all products working together inside my daily life. Sometimes I look around and think… I genuinely feel like I’m living in 2069.

Elon’s companies take my everyday life to a completely different level. Every morning, Grok Bot prints personalized math worksheets for my 5-year-old and 8-year-old right when I walk down stairs at 6am after I workout. And they’re not getting the same worksheet every day either… They do their best, I take a picture of their work, send it back to my CEO Grok Bot, and it uses how they did to create the next worksheet. Literally, different problems, new challenges… every single day. Then I get into my Cybertruck, press a button to turn on Tesla FSD, and it drives us to school while I sit there and help my kids with their work instead of spending the entire drive stressed, focused on operating the car. And if we get stuck on a problem or are curious about something… Grok is integrated right into the Cybertruck to help us. Meanwhile, Starlink keeps me connected, so while we’re on the road I can share all of this on 𝕏. Then those posts make me $ through 𝕏 Money, more than I ever did working at Apple for 8+ yrs back in the day. Think about that entire loop… Grok Bot helps my kids by creating personalized math worksheets. Tesla FSD drives us. Grok helps us inside the Tesla. Starlink keeps us connected. 𝕏 lets me share my life, thoughts, and experiences with the world. 𝕏 Money pays me for doing it. These are all products working together inside my daily life. Sometimes I look around and think… I genuinely feel like I’m living in 2069.

Teslaconomics

17,133 次观看 • 16 天前

Taste is invisible until you try to write it down. This is probably my biggest lesson with AI building as of late. At Sundial, I get to work with really friggin' amazing analysts who know the art, and I see how much of our collective time now is now spent turning that art into playbooks or skills for an LLM. Encoding things like: "How would a great analyst actually look at this metric move?" or "What is ACTUALLY the interesting signal in this story versus noise?" or "How can we know if a product change actually moved the needle?" It's really humbling work! You write an instruction set. The LLM misses. You add more context. It still misses. You add even more. Now it's confused. You strip it back. Now it's too vague. You try a different framing. Better, but inconsistent. Works on Monday, fails on Tuesday. You go again. I've come to realize the gap between 70% quality and 95% quality is not 3 or 4 big things. It's more like 100s of small things. Which is exactly why you can't write an article about it, or copy it, or shortcut it! This gap *is* taste, quantified. The accumulated weight of a thousand small judgments you don't notice you're making, until you sit down to externalize them and realize you can't. Being good at something is not the same as being able to articulate why you're good at it. I now see two bottlenecks to making something better than today's generic AI: 1. Can you *see* what better looks like in the first place? 2. Even if you can see, can you *articulate* what that is in a way that the LLM can understand and systemize? #2 is now a new craft, the art of distilling the art. The people who can do it well are the ones building standout products.

Taste is invisible until you try to write it down. This is probably my biggest lesson with AI building as of late. At Sundial, I get to work with really friggin' amazing analysts who know the art, and I see how much of our collective time now is now spent turning that art into playbooks or skills for an LLM. Encoding things like: "How would a great analyst actually look at this metric move?" or "What is ACTUALLY the interesting signal in this story versus noise?" or "How can we know if a product change actually moved the needle?" It's really humbling work! You write an instruction set. The LLM misses. You add more context. It still misses. You add even more. Now it's confused. You strip it back. Now it's too vague. You try a different framing. Better, but inconsistent. Works on Monday, fails on Tuesday. You go again. I've come to realize the gap between 70% quality and 95% quality is not 3 or 4 big things. It's more like 100s of small things. Which is exactly why you can't write an article about it, or copy it, or shortcut it! This gap is taste, quantified. The accumulated weight of a thousand small judgments you don't notice you're making, until you sit down to externalize them and realize you can't. Being good at something is not the same as being able to articulate why you're good at it. I now see two bottlenecks to making something better than today's generic AI: 1. Can you see what better looks like in the first place? 2. Even if you can see, can you articulate what that is in a way that the LLM can understand and systemize? #2 is now a new craft, the art of distilling the art. The people who can do it well are the ones building standout products.

Julie Zhuo

17,633 次观看 • 4 个月前

Rita AI now supports Seedance 2.0. If you're looking for a platform that combines AI image generation, AI video generation, and workflow orchestration, this one is worth checking out. In addition to Seedance 2.0, it also supports Kling 3.0 and Motion Control, making dynamic camera moves, controllable motion, and video generation much easier. Link: I tested it with the following prompt, and the result felt very cinematic: A fearless young woman rides a skateboard at high speed through the crowded streets of New York City, weaving through pedestrians, darting past street vendors, yellow taxis, and cyclists with breathtaking agility. She rockets through intersections, skims past towering skyscrapers and iconic storefronts, and launches over curbs, street cracks, and scattered obstacles with stylish precision. Every movement feels bold, controlled, and exhilarating. Shot like a cinematic action sequence, the scene features fast-paced tracking shots, dramatic low-angle close-ups of the skateboard wheels scraping the asphalt, sweeping side-follow shots, and occasional slow-motion hero moments as she lands tricks and cuts through traffic. Dynamic motion blur heightens the sensation of speed, while golden hour sunlight bathes the city in a warm glow, reflecting off glass facades, metal surfaces, and the street below. Steam drifts from subway vents, traffic lights flicker, and the soundless visual energy of New York creates a pulsing urban backdrop. Ultra-realistic, intense, stylish, and immersive, with the visual tone of a high-end action film, capturing speed, confidence, danger, and freedom in the heart of the city.

Rita AI now supports Seedance 2.0. If you're looking for a platform that combines AI image generation, AI video generation, and workflow orchestration, this one is worth checking out. In addition to Seedance 2.0, it also supports Kling 3.0 and Motion Control, making dynamic camera moves, controllable motion, and video generation much easier. Link: I tested it with the following prompt, and the result felt very cinematic: A fearless young woman rides a skateboard at high speed through the crowded streets of New York City, weaving through pedestrians, darting past street vendors, yellow taxis, and cyclists with breathtaking agility. She rockets through intersections, skims past towering skyscrapers and iconic storefronts, and launches over curbs, street cracks, and scattered obstacles with stylish precision. Every movement feels bold, controlled, and exhilarating. Shot like a cinematic action sequence, the scene features fast-paced tracking shots, dramatic low-angle close-ups of the skateboard wheels scraping the asphalt, sweeping side-follow shots, and occasional slow-motion hero moments as she lands tricks and cuts through traffic. Dynamic motion blur heightens the sensation of speed, while golden hour sunlight bathes the city in a warm glow, reflecting off glass facades, metal surfaces, and the street below. Steam drifts from subway vents, traffic lights flicker, and the soundless visual energy of New York creates a pulsing urban backdrop. Ultra-realistic, intense, stylish, and immersive, with the visual tone of a high-end action film, capturing speed, confidence, danger, and freedom in the heart of the city.

underwood

61,800 次观看 • 5 个月前

introducing a new, very fun, LLM benchmark- the Game-of-Life Bench! the rules are simple: given an 8x8 grid following Conway's game of life rules, the goal is to create an initial pattern with at most 32 cells that can last the longest number of turns before dying/repeating. some results to highlight (with caveats detailed below): - gpt 5.1 lasts the longest with a 106 step run - claude models are really bad at this! they refuse to reason about this task and score < 25 points - deepseek r1 is the best open model with 102 steps. why? because i wanted to create a benchmark that has (i think) no practicality, but is still fun to look at, cheap, and still measures something interesting. i also am a big fan of the game of life. its absurdly simple rules leading to intractability is extremely cool to me. also, i saw a lot of work with LLMs trying to "predict" the next state in Conway's game of life, I think game-of-life bench is more fun because it's pretty open ended and only asks the LLM for the initial state. I also think this could be an RL env? but idk why you would ever train on this task haha i don't think this is a "serious" benchmark because it doesnt measure anything practical, but i still think it's a hard benchmark exactly because you can't predict what happens with your initial state many turns into the future; this is why i was initially expecting all LLMs to be bad at it, but turns out, some are clearly better than the others (the ordering may surprise you!) reminder: this is still a work-in-progress; (1) i am gpu-poor so could only do 10 runs for each model, even though total running cost is relatively low. maybe with some more credits i can run more seeds for each model. (2) i handpicked models which i think are at the frontier right now, plus some others that were on my mind. so, if you'd like to see a model on here, let me know. (3) i currently only do an 8x8 grid because i thought that by itself would be pretty hard for current LLMs, but of course we can increase grid sizes! (4) the coolest thing is, i dont think we can calculate the max possible number of states (yay undecidability!) you can go without repeating, so this is essentially a no-ceiling task, which is pretty cool! again, i did this mostly out of a desire to make LLMs do something fun. if this keeps me entertained for a few more days, i'd likely release a blog post on it. if it keeps me entertained for a week (and someone sponsors me), i'll put more work into it :P lastly, this is fully open sourced, so feel free to run this on your own!

introducing a new, very fun, LLM benchmark- the Game-of-Life Bench! the rules are simple: given an 8x8 grid following Conway's game of life rules, the goal is to create an initial pattern with at most 32 cells that can last the longest number of turns before dying/repeating. some results to highlight (with caveats detailed below): - gpt 5.1 lasts the longest with a 106 step run - claude models are really bad at this! they refuse to reason about this task and score < 25 points - deepseek r1 is the best open model with 102 steps. why? because i wanted to create a benchmark that has (i think) no practicality, but is still fun to look at, cheap, and still measures something interesting. i also am a big fan of the game of life. its absurdly simple rules leading to intractability is extremely cool to me. also, i saw a lot of work with LLMs trying to "predict" the next state in Conway's game of life, I think game-of-life bench is more fun because it's pretty open ended and only asks the LLM for the initial state. I also think this could be an RL env? but idk why you would ever train on this task haha i don't think this is a "serious" benchmark because it doesnt measure anything practical, but i still think it's a hard benchmark exactly because you can't predict what happens with your initial state many turns into the future; this is why i was initially expecting all LLMs to be bad at it, but turns out, some are clearly better than the others (the ordering may surprise you!) reminder: this is still a work-in-progress; (1) i am gpu-poor so could only do 10 runs for each model, even though total running cost is relatively low. maybe with some more credits i can run more seeds for each model. (2) i handpicked models which i think are at the frontier right now, plus some others that were on my mind. so, if you'd like to see a model on here, let me know. (3) i currently only do an 8x8 grid because i thought that by itself would be pretty hard for current LLMs, but of course we can increase grid sizes! (4) the coolest thing is, i dont think we can calculate the max possible number of states (yay undecidability!) you can go without repeating, so this is essentially a no-ceiling task, which is pretty cool! again, i did this mostly out of a desire to make LLMs do something fun. if this keeps me entertained for a few more days, i'd likely release a blog post on it. if it keeps me entertained for a week (and someone sponsors me), i'll put more work into it :P lastly, this is fully open sourced, so feel free to run this on your own!

Akshit

13,775 次观看 • 7 个月前

Out of Ryan Cohen’s entire interview, the line that should be burned into everyone’s brain is this: “If I were running the business, it would be making a lot more money.” That is the whole thesis. Not hype. Not memes. Not nostalgia. A founder-operator looked at eBay, saw one of the most recognized marketplaces on earth, saw billions being spent with barely any user growth, saw a company sitting on trust, traffic, collectibles, payments, authentication, and global commerce infrastructure… Basically said: This asset is wildly under-earning. That is why this matters. GameStop is not trying to buy eBay because it wants a bigger logo. Ryan Cohen is saying eBay should be worth much more, and he believes he can turn it into something worth hundreds of billions of dollars. GameStop’s proposal is reportedly $125 per share, valuing eBay around $56 billion, with Cohen prepared to push the offer directly to shareholders if needed. That is the biggest takeaway. He is not talking like a meme-stock mascot. He is talking like an owner. Cut the waste. Fix the machine. Use GameStop’s stores as physical commerce nodes. Build authentication, fulfillment, live commerce, collectibles, and marketplace trust into one ecosystem. The wild part? I believe him. Because Ryan Cohen has already shown what he does when people call a business dead. He cuts the fat. He protects the balance sheet. He ignores the noise. He lets the work speak. Wall Street keeps asking what GameStop’s plan is. Maybe the plan is simple: Find underperforming assets with massive cultural value, put them under owner-led discipline, and make them print. eBay should be making a lot more money. Ryan Cohen just said the quiet part out loud.

MD

61,222 次观看 • 5 个月前

While I have premium I definitely want to do a long post breaking down the main scene from this show that I obsess with. There's so much that I feel could be learned from it. Not just for expansion animators either. There's honestly a LOT that can be learned from how this show directed its expansion scenes that can be applied to even safe for work animations. Obviously yes, the expansion alone is really good. What makes it so good though is just the fact that there's things you pick up on that you likely don't even realize until you re-watch. I'm using this scene as an example as it's not AS good I would say, but it still has a lot going for it. One thing I've always loved from it that I want to use in my own animations someday is that the expansion sort of comes in waves as opposed to one consistent growth. In a way, it makes it feel more natural while also selling how tight the top is getting. It could have been accompanied by showing the knot getting tighter or smaller with each growth. It's a small part of the animation but just that one thing already adds another layer to appreciate. It's not like most expansion scenes where there's very little outside of just "growing" on its own. There's a bunch of little things that subtly improve it without being obnoxious. The first expansion scene has WAY more that I want to talk about honestly. Far more than this one has. It will probably be a really long post now that I think about it...

While I have premium I definitely want to do a long post breaking down the main scene from this show that I obsess with. There's so much that I feel could be learned from it. Not just for expansion animators either. There's honestly a LOT that can be learned from how this show directed its expansion scenes that can be applied to even safe for work animations. Obviously yes, the expansion alone is really good. What makes it so good though is just the fact that there's things you pick up on that you likely don't even realize until you re-watch. I'm using this scene as an example as it's not AS good I would say, but it still has a lot going for it. One thing I've always loved from it that I want to use in my own animations someday is that the expansion sort of comes in waves as opposed to one consistent growth. In a way, it makes it feel more natural while also selling how tight the top is getting. It could have been accompanied by showing the knot getting tighter or smaller with each growth. It's a small part of the animation but just that one thing already adds another layer to appreciate. It's not like most expansion scenes where there's very little outside of just "growing" on its own. There's a bunch of little things that subtly improve it without being obnoxious. The first expansion scene has WAY more that I want to talk about honestly. Far more than this one has. It will probably be a really long post now that I think about it...

FancyPlanks 🐀

16,420 次观看 • 9 个月前

Grok Bot is officially available in Tesla vehicles! I had early access for my Grok Bot team to be integrated directly inside my Cybertruck with the help of the SpaceXAI and Cursor team. And this is truly one of those things that’s hard to fully understand the power of it until you actually lived with it. It’s the same Grok Voice experience you already know in your Tesla… no separate app is needed. When you’re signed into Grok, your Grok Bots are right there and you can talk directly with all of them with just your voice. So today, Tesla FSD was driving me. I said, “Hey Grok.” Then I talked to my CEO bot like I would talk to someone working for me. I told it what I wanted for dinner tonight: 1/ Blueberries 2/ Strawberries 3/ Ribeye 4/ Shrimp 5/ And taco night for my family of four. That was it. I didn’t sit there searching for every single ingredient. I didn’t open Amazon and start building a cart item by item. I just explained what I wanted. Then, my CEO bot routed the job. My Chef bot figured out what we needed for taco night. Then my Amazon Cart Builder bot started putting the cart together and choosing the best items based on my purchase history. And while all of that was happening… FSD drove me to the gym and parked itself. I went inside and worked out. My bots kept working. And by the time I was finished, the cart was ready for me. I opened it. Looked everything over. Then I just clicked Order. Grok Bot + Tesla FSD completely removed all the manual work in between that would have wasted part of my day researching building a grocery list, getting the Amazon cart ready, and manually driving to my destination. And THAT was the wow moment for me… I just talked to Grok. FSD drove. I worked out. My Grok Bot team handled the busy work. When I finished the gym, the cart was simply just waiting for my approval. And all I had to do was click order. (btw you can make your Grok Bot place the order automatically as well, but I’m super picky with my food so mine are specifically built so I review it at the end). With this technology, you’re no longer opening five different apps and doing every tiny step yourself. You just tell your team what you want with your voice. They go work on it. You go live your life. The biggest upgrade here is that Grok Bot + Tesla FSD is giving us back the one thing we can never make more of… TIME. Grok Bot handles the work. Tesla FSD handles the drive. I get my time back. This is really the future… I’m glad people will be able to try out Grok Bot integrated with their Teslas today… this is truly life-changing technology.

Grok Bot is officially available in Tesla vehicles! I had early access for my Grok Bot team to be integrated directly inside my Cybertruck with the help of the SpaceXAI and Cursor team. And this is truly one of those things that’s hard to fully understand the power of it until you actually lived with it. It’s the same Grok Voice experience you already know in your Tesla… no separate app is needed. When you’re signed into Grok, your Grok Bots are right there and you can talk directly with all of them with just your voice. So today, Tesla FSD was driving me. I said, “Hey Grok.” Then I talked to my CEO bot like I would talk to someone working for me. I told it what I wanted for dinner tonight: 1/ Blueberries 2/ Strawberries 3/ Ribeye 4/ Shrimp 5/ And taco night for my family of four. That was it. I didn’t sit there searching for every single ingredient. I didn’t open Amazon and start building a cart item by item. I just explained what I wanted. Then, my CEO bot routed the job. My Chef bot figured out what we needed for taco night. Then my Amazon Cart Builder bot started putting the cart together and choosing the best items based on my purchase history. And while all of that was happening… FSD drove me to the gym and parked itself. I went inside and worked out. My bots kept working. And by the time I was finished, the cart was ready for me. I opened it. Looked everything over. Then I just clicked Order. Grok Bot + Tesla FSD completely removed all the manual work in between that would have wasted part of my day researching building a grocery list, getting the Amazon cart ready, and manually driving to my destination. And THAT was the wow moment for me… I just talked to Grok. FSD drove. I worked out. My Grok Bot team handled the busy work. When I finished the gym, the cart was simply just waiting for my approval. And all I had to do was click order. (btw you can make your Grok Bot place the order automatically as well, but I’m super picky with my food so mine are specifically built so I review it at the end). With this technology, you’re no longer opening five different apps and doing every tiny step yourself. You just tell your team what you want with your voice. They go work on it. You go live your life. The biggest upgrade here is that Grok Bot + Tesla FSD is giving us back the one thing we can never make more of… TIME. Grok Bot handles the work. Tesla FSD handles the drive. I get my time back. This is really the future… I’m glad people will be able to try out Grok Bot integrated with their Teslas today… this is truly life-changing technology.

Teslaconomics

687,666 次观看 • 10 天前

People do this kind of thing when they feel they are experiencing reality at a high frame rate. It does not feel risky to hold a laptop by a corner if you feel like you have an “agency frame” every half second. It feels risky if you have an “agency frame” every 60 seconds. You’d be betting that a hand you do not have control over for 60 seconds will keep gripping. Our conscious frame rate can vary dramatically throughout the day, and it’s hard to perceive the difference because we can only sample ourselves at our conscious frame rate, we can’t oversample ourselves. People drunk drive because they fail to perceive their slower frame rate. Their frame rate feels normal because it matches their sample rate. But we do get a subtle sense of when we’re “switched on”. Everything seems to go easier, everything feels less risky and more easy to correct. A lot of people toward the autistic side of the spectrum are experiencing reality very granularly with a “high agency frame rate”. This is why their social interactions can seem overly forced and awkward, they can be bad at dancing, etc—because they are exerting conscious control over their body and language at very tight intervals—you get a sense that they are extremely “self aware” and not “letting go”. “Letting go” in the social sense is actually about reducing your agency frame rate. That’s why alcohol is good for socializing and bad for driving. With a reduced agency frame rate our speech and body language feels more natural, less forced. More like we are flowing with the social group mind rather than being an island of constant awkward agency.

People do this kind of thing when they feel they are experiencing reality at a high frame rate. It does not feel risky to hold a laptop by a corner if you feel like you have an “agency frame” every half second. It feels risky if you have an “agency frame” every 60 seconds. You’d be betting that a hand you do not have control over for 60 seconds will keep gripping. Our conscious frame rate can vary dramatically throughout the day, and it’s hard to perceive the difference because we can only sample ourselves at our conscious frame rate, we can’t oversample ourselves. People drunk drive because they fail to perceive their slower frame rate. Their frame rate feels normal because it matches their sample rate. But we do get a subtle sense of when we’re “switched on”. Everything seems to go easier, everything feels less risky and more easy to correct. A lot of people toward the autistic side of the spectrum are experiencing reality very granularly with a “high agency frame rate”. This is why their social interactions can seem overly forced and awkward, they can be bad at dancing, etc—because they are exerting conscious control over their body and language at very tight intervals—you get a sense that they are extremely “self aware” and not “letting go”. “Letting go” in the social sense is actually about reducing your agency frame rate. That’s why alcohol is good for socializing and bad for driving. With a reduced agency frame rate our speech and body language feels more natural, less forced. More like we are flowing with the social group mind rather than being an island of constant awkward agency.

Scott Stevenson

1,808,759 次观看 • 9 个月前

Look at the tips of her fingers. The marble is turning into leaves... This is the most astonishing detail in Bernini's Apollo and Daphne, in the Galleria Borghese in Rome. Daphne, fleeing the god Apollo, has begged to be saved, and at the instant he catches her she begins to turn into a laurel tree. Bernini carved the exact second it happens, and the change starts at her hands: her raised fingers are sprouting laurel leaves, so thin that in bright light they turn faintly translucent, the way a real leaf glows when you hold it up to the sun. To understand what that took, consider what marble actually is. It is heavy, brittle, and utterly unforgiving. A single slip, one vibration too many, and a leaf that took days to carve shatters, and there is no putting it back. When the sculpture was restored in 1997, conservators discovered how Bernini protected this fragile growth while he worked: he had wrapped the thinnest, most delicate parts in little cushions of plaster, to shield them from the vibrations traveling through the stone as he carved the rest. The same restoration revealed his real secret... The leaves and the strands of windblown hair are riddled with the marks of a bow drill, a tool that bores holes into stone. But Bernini did not drill straight in, which would have left round, mechanical holes. On the tiny leaves at Daphne's fingertips, he tilted the drill at an angle, cutting long shallow grooves instead, so the marble would mimic the natural veins and splits of a living leaf. He was imitating the way foliage actually grows. I wrote this so that the next time a sculpture detail takes your breath away, you do not see only marble. You see the months of patience of a human being who chose to spend part of his short life turning cold stone into a living leaf, so that four hundred years later a stranger would stop and feel something... I started this newsletter because our past is extraordinary, and fewer and fewer people are showing us how to truly see it. Every week I try to. If that is something you would like to be part of, you can join at the link below, and if you'd like to support my work, a paid subscription is what makes it possible: Thanks for reading.

Look at the tips of her fingers. The marble is turning into leaves... This is the most astonishing detail in Bernini's Apollo and Daphne, in the Galleria Borghese in Rome. Daphne, fleeing the god Apollo, has begged to be saved, and at the instant he catches her she begins to turn into a laurel tree. Bernini carved the exact second it happens, and the change starts at her hands: her raised fingers are sprouting laurel leaves, so thin that in bright light they turn faintly translucent, the way a real leaf glows when you hold it up to the sun. To understand what that took, consider what marble actually is. It is heavy, brittle, and utterly unforgiving. A single slip, one vibration too many, and a leaf that took days to carve shatters, and there is no putting it back. When the sculpture was restored in 1997, conservators discovered how Bernini protected this fragile growth while he worked: he had wrapped the thinnest, most delicate parts in little cushions of plaster, to shield them from the vibrations traveling through the stone as he carved the rest. The same restoration revealed his real secret... The leaves and the strands of windblown hair are riddled with the marks of a bow drill, a tool that bores holes into stone. But Bernini did not drill straight in, which would have left round, mechanical holes. On the tiny leaves at Daphne's fingertips, he tilted the drill at an angle, cutting long shallow grooves instead, so the marble would mimic the natural veins and splits of a living leaf. He was imitating the way foliage actually grows. I wrote this so that the next time a sculpture detail takes your breath away, you do not see only marble. You see the months of patience of a human being who chose to spend part of his short life turning cold stone into a living leaf, so that four hundred years later a stranger would stop and feel something... I started this newsletter because our past is extraordinary, and fewer and fewer people are showing us how to truly see it. Every week I try to. If that is something you would like to be part of, you can join at the link below, and if you'd like to support my work, a paid subscription is what makes it possible: Thanks for reading.

James Lucas

64,947 次观看 • 3 个月前

Seedance 2.0 on Haimeta is next level. It doesn’t even look AI-generated anymore, it looks filmed. Prompt: FORMAT: 15s / 180 BPM / ONE CONTINUOUS SHOT / 360 POV downhill stair run, viral energy, max chaos SUBJECTS: First-person cyclist, handlebars and front wheel flashing low in frame during drops and hard turns. Vendors, laundry, scooters, dogs, chickens, cars, and pedestrians erupt around the rider as sudden obstacles. ENVIRONMENT: Dense Brazilian hillside streets, painted concrete stairs, tight landings, tiled corners, hanging wires, murals, awnings, puddles, hot late afternoon light, deep alley shadows, city sprawling below. MOOD: Adrenaline, max chaos, and nonstop street speed with violent spatial intensity in every direction. COLOR LOGIC: Hyperreal Pop Look CAMERA DETAILS: 360 action-cam POV, horizon-stable but brutal, nonstop forward drive, minimal roll, heavy stair vibration, sharp side and rear parallax, full-sphere chaos, no release. TIMELINE: 0:00-0:03: POV freefalls down a steep stairwell. The front wheel punches over the first steps, bars jackhammer below frame, the whole sphere shuddering with every hit while a child lunges in from the left to yank a rolling soccer ball out of the rider's line and walls, rails, balconies, and faces whip past on both sides. Violent forward descent with brutal stair vibration. SFX: (city hum, distant funk beat, tire chatter, breath, rapid stair hits, frame rattle). Hard sun above, deep shadow pockets below. 0:03-0:05: POV slashes left across a tiny landing, skips a broken crate, and drops again as laundry cracks across the front hemisphere, shoulder missing painted concrete by inches while side-wrap onlookers recoil. Hard lateral shake, immediate snap back into the stair run. SFX: (cloth slap, skid, crowd shout, chain buzz, stair chatter). 0:05-0:08: POV hammers the next staircase as a stray dog cuts center frame and startled chickens burst upward from the side steps, wings flaring across the sphere. The rider flicks the bars, rear wheel skates loose, then needles between a fruit cart and handrail with almost no clearance while the sphere jitters from every stair impact. Fast vibrating continuous-shot chaos. SFX: (tire chirp, crate clack, wings flapping, squawks, paw skitter, stair thuds, bass from window, metal rattle). 0:08-0:10: POV blasts out of one stair run, skips across a short asphalt gap between two stair sections without slowing, slams the opposite curb, and drops straight into the next descending steps. Only once the rider is fully back on the stairs do horns burst behind while passing cars rip through the side wrap. Full-speed crossing with strong lateral parallax and zero release. SFX: (engine idle, tire buzz, chain rattle, curb thump, car horns behind). 0:10-0:13: POV keeps attacking the next stair section immediately after the asphalt gap, machine-gunning through two tight landings and another steep stepped lane, every hit punching a fresh jolt through the sphere as stacked homes, wires, and alley mouths curl around the viewer and the overlook rushes closer. Forward lunge with impact drive and nonstop shake. SFX: (air rush, heavy thump, stair chatter, horn echo fading, chain lash, wind buffeting). 0:13-0:15: POV rips through the final stepped approach to the overlook and throws the rear wheel into a savage sideways skid, dust and gravel spraying across the lower frame while stair-lined drops fall away to both sides and the skyline blooms around the entire sphere in one fast violent sweep. The bike stays hot through the slide as the city fills every direction. SFX: (rear tire screech, gravel spray, freewheel spin, city roar, music drop)."

Seedance 2.0 on Haimeta is next level. It doesn’t even look AI-generated anymore, it looks filmed. Prompt: FORMAT: 15s / 180 BPM / ONE CONTINUOUS SHOT / 360 POV downhill stair run, viral energy, max chaos SUBJECTS: First-person cyclist, handlebars and front wheel flashing low in frame during drops and hard turns. Vendors, laundry, scooters, dogs, chickens, cars, and pedestrians erupt around the rider as sudden obstacles. ENVIRONMENT: Dense Brazilian hillside streets, painted concrete stairs, tight landings, tiled corners, hanging wires, murals, awnings, puddles, hot late afternoon light, deep alley shadows, city sprawling below. MOOD: Adrenaline, max chaos, and nonstop street speed with violent spatial intensity in every direction. COLOR LOGIC: Hyperreal Pop Look CAMERA DETAILS: 360 action-cam POV, horizon-stable but brutal, nonstop forward drive, minimal roll, heavy stair vibration, sharp side and rear parallax, full-sphere chaos, no release. TIMELINE: 0:00-0:03: POV freefalls down a steep stairwell. The front wheel punches over the first steps, bars jackhammer below frame, the whole sphere shuddering with every hit while a child lunges in from the left to yank a rolling soccer ball out of the rider's line and walls, rails, balconies, and faces whip past on both sides. Violent forward descent with brutal stair vibration. SFX: (city hum, distant funk beat, tire chatter, breath, rapid stair hits, frame rattle). Hard sun above, deep shadow pockets below. 0:03-0:05: POV slashes left across a tiny landing, skips a broken crate, and drops again as laundry cracks across the front hemisphere, shoulder missing painted concrete by inches while side-wrap onlookers recoil. Hard lateral shake, immediate snap back into the stair run. SFX: (cloth slap, skid, crowd shout, chain buzz, stair chatter). 0:05-0:08: POV hammers the next staircase as a stray dog cuts center frame and startled chickens burst upward from the side steps, wings flaring across the sphere. The rider flicks the bars, rear wheel skates loose, then needles between a fruit cart and handrail with almost no clearance while the sphere jitters from every stair impact. Fast vibrating continuous-shot chaos. SFX: (tire chirp, crate clack, wings flapping, squawks, paw skitter, stair thuds, bass from window, metal rattle). 0:08-0:10: POV blasts out of one stair run, skips across a short asphalt gap between two stair sections without slowing, slams the opposite curb, and drops straight into the next descending steps. Only once the rider is fully back on the stairs do horns burst behind while passing cars rip through the side wrap. Full-speed crossing with strong lateral parallax and zero release. SFX: (engine idle, tire buzz, chain rattle, curb thump, car horns behind). 0:10-0:13: POV keeps attacking the next stair section immediately after the asphalt gap, machine-gunning through two tight landings and another steep stepped lane, every hit punching a fresh jolt through the sphere as stacked homes, wires, and alley mouths curl around the viewer and the overlook rushes closer. Forward lunge with impact drive and nonstop shake. SFX: (air rush, heavy thump, stair chatter, horn echo fading, chain lash, wind buffeting). 0:13-0:15: POV rips through the final stepped approach to the overlook and throws the rear wheel into a savage sideways skid, dust and gravel spraying across the lower frame while stair-lined drops fall away to both sides and the skyline blooms around the entire sphere in one fast violent sweep. The bike stays hot through the slide as the city fills every direction. SFX: (rear tire screech, gravel spray, freewheel spin, city roar, music drop)."

Iqra Saifi

25,934 次观看 • 5 个月前

I HAVE QUESTIONS ABOUT THE RIDE TO THE HOSPITAL In his November 2025 interview with Shawn Ryan, Brian Harpole described what happened after Charlie Kirk was put onto the back passenger seats of that black Chevrolet Suburban SUV BRIAN HARPOLE “Charlie was a big man, long… We get him in, but the door’s not going to close.” He said Charlie’s left leg was obstructing the rear passenger door: “Charlie’s so tall that his leg, his left leg, is down in the door and the door won’t close.” Harpole then described his own position: “I’m on my knees with the door open with my butt hanging out of the side.” Shawn Ryan asked whether another guard was holding him so he would not fall out. Harpole replied: “So I don’t fall out.” And how fast was the Chevrolet Suburban travelling? “We’re going 60, 80, 100.” ——————-—————— So I genuinely want to understand: how do you drive for approximately ten minutes at speeds between 60 and 100 mph with a rear passenger door open—and Brian kneeling in the doorway with his backside hanging out? A journey this extraordinary should have left an extraordinary trail of evidence. Traffic cameras. Business CCTV. Hospital security cameras. Private surveillance. Where is this evidence, why haven’t we seen it? ChatGPT Important Data: “At 70 mph, the airflow produces roughly 12.5 pounds of pressure per square foot. Across the exposed area of a large Suburban passenger door, that could mean approximately 140–225 pounds of aerodynamic force, with around 250–370 pound-feet of torque acting through the hinges, depending on the door’s angle. At 100 mph, the force would more than double—to roughly 285–460 pounds, with potentially 500–750 pound-feet of hinge torque. And that does not include the additional violent loading caused by acceleration, braking, swerving, bumps, or the door slamming against its mechanical stop.” Try and imagine this: you’re putting your hand out of a car window at 70 mph. The force of the air is so strong that it immediately whips your hand backward, strains your arm, and makes it difficult to keep your hand steady. Now imagine that force acting not on your hand, but on an entire SUV passenger door—hundreds of times larger—while someone is kneeling with their “butt hanging out” while packing a neck wound. Ask yourself what a large, unrestrained SUV door would behave like at those speeds, and the man kneeling directly beside it? I need to understand how this account is supposed to work. Obviously, this GROK video is absurdly inaccurate, but it does help illustrate just how improbable this terrifying ~10 minute journey to the hospital sounds. Just think about it, a rear passenger door significantly open while an SUV is travelling at speeds between 60 - 100 mph? And instead of calling 911, you’re on the phone with Ben Shapiro???? Why does NOTHING of the official story make any sense?!! Jack Posobiec Andrew Kolvet Blake Neff Turning Point USA Candace Owens Baron Coleman Ian Carroll Project Constitution Jimmy Dore theleahfiles Owen Benjamin 🐻 Alex Jones theleahfiles Joe Kent 🇺🇸Lionel🇺🇸 John Mappin Irina Mappin Donald Trump Jr. #CharlieKirk #CandaceOwens #TPUSA #Israel #Propaganda #TylerRobinson

I HAVE QUESTIONS ABOUT THE RIDE TO THE HOSPITAL In his November 2025 interview with Shawn Ryan, Brian Harpole described what happened after Charlie Kirk was put onto the back passenger seats of that black Chevrolet Suburban SUV BRIAN HARPOLE “Charlie was a big man, long… We get him in, but the door’s not going to close.” He said Charlie’s left leg was obstructing the rear passenger door: “Charlie’s so tall that his leg, his left leg, is down in the door and the door won’t close.” Harpole then described his own position: “I’m on my knees with the door open with my butt hanging out of the side.” Shawn Ryan asked whether another guard was holding him so he would not fall out. Harpole replied: “So I don’t fall out.” And how fast was the Chevrolet Suburban travelling? “We’re going 60, 80, 100.” ——————-—————— So I genuinely want to understand: how do you drive for approximately ten minutes at speeds between 60 and 100 mph with a rear passenger door open—and Brian kneeling in the doorway with his backside hanging out? A journey this extraordinary should have left an extraordinary trail of evidence. Traffic cameras. Business CCTV. Hospital security cameras. Private surveillance. Where is this evidence, why haven’t we seen it? ChatGPT Important Data: “At 70 mph, the airflow produces roughly 12.5 pounds of pressure per square foot. Across the exposed area of a large Suburban passenger door, that could mean approximately 140–225 pounds of aerodynamic force, with around 250–370 pound-feet of torque acting through the hinges, depending on the door’s angle. At 100 mph, the force would more than double—to roughly 285–460 pounds, with potentially 500–750 pound-feet of hinge torque. And that does not include the additional violent loading caused by acceleration, braking, swerving, bumps, or the door slamming against its mechanical stop.” Try and imagine this: you’re putting your hand out of a car window at 70 mph. The force of the air is so strong that it immediately whips your hand backward, strains your arm, and makes it difficult to keep your hand steady. Now imagine that force acting not on your hand, but on an entire SUV passenger door—hundreds of times larger—while someone is kneeling with their “butt hanging out” while packing a neck wound. Ask yourself what a large, unrestrained SUV door would behave like at those speeds, and the man kneeling directly beside it? I need to understand how this account is supposed to work. Obviously, this GROK video is absurdly inaccurate, but it does help illustrate just how improbable this terrifying ~10 minute journey to the hospital sounds. Just think about it, a rear passenger door significantly open while an SUV is travelling at speeds between 60 - 100 mph? And instead of calling 911, you’re on the phone with Ben Shapiro???? Why does NOTHING of the official story make any sense?!! Jack Posobiec Andrew Kolvet Blake Neff Turning Point USA Candace Owens Baron Coleman Ian Carroll Project Constitution Jimmy Dore theleahfiles Owen Benjamin 🐻 Alex Jones theleahfiles Joe Kent 🇺🇸Lionel🇺🇸 John Mappin Irina Mappin Donald Trump Jr. #CharlieKirk #CandaceOwens #TPUSA #Israel #Propaganda #TylerRobinson

Vivian Kubrick

206,822 次观看 • 2 个月前