正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Your constitutional right to privacy does NOT disappear because technology or artificial intelligence advances. I urge every one of my House colleagues to support my PRIVACY Act to restore the Fourth Amendment protections guaranteed by the United States Constitution.

Rep. Keith Self

72,560 subscribers

110,821 次观看 • 12 天前 •via X (Twitter)

科学技术新闻政治

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Can you trust the government? Absolutely not. That's why our founding fathers created the 4th Amendment. My bill, the Fourth Amendment Restoration and Protection Act, will create more protections to protect the right of privacy for citizens.

Can you trust the government? Absolutely not. That's why our founding fathers created the 4th Amendment. My bill, the Fourth Amendment Restoration and Protection Act, will create more protections to protect the right of privacy for citizens.

Rand Paul

76,991 次观看 • 4 个月前

TULSI GABBARD: “How can we trust a person to uphold her oath to support and defend the Constitution of the United States who does not believe in the First Amendment? How we can trust a person to upload her oath to support and defend the Constitution of the United States who does not believe in the Second Amendment and our right to protect our loved ones?” Tulsi Gabbard 🌺

TULSI GABBARD: “How can we trust a person to uphold her oath to support and defend the Constitution of the United States who does not believe in the First Amendment? How we can trust a person to upload her oath to support and defend the Constitution of the United States who does not believe in the Second Amendment and our right to protect our loved ones?” Tulsi Gabbard 🌺

Charlie Kirk

1,823,635 次观看 • 1 年前

I introduced legislation requiring federal agencies to obtain a warrant before accessing data collected by surveillance camera systems like Flock. Your Fourth Amendment rights don’t disappear just because technology advances.

I introduced legislation requiring federal agencies to obtain a warrant before accessing data collected by surveillance camera systems like Flock. Your Fourth Amendment rights don’t disappear just because technology advances.

Rep. Keith Self

20,890 次观看 • 5 天前

Today in House Judiciary GOP 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸, I expressed support for the Congressional Records Protection Act, but it should go further. We should recognize that the Fourth Amendment requires judicial warrants to protect the privacy of all Americans.

Today in House Judiciary GOP 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸, I expressed support for the Congressional Records Protection Act, but it should go further. We should recognize that the Fourth Amendment requires judicial warrants to protect the privacy of all Americans.

Thomas Massie

123,537 次观看 • 1 个月前

All roads lead to Obama and the intelligence community. Raised by elites, and groomed by intelligence, not only to infiltrate the United States and the presidential seat of power, but to destroy the United States, one institution at a time. He was never for America or its people. He was against them and the Constitution itself.

All roads lead to Obama and the intelligence community. Raised by elites, and groomed by intelligence, not only to infiltrate the United States and the presidential seat of power, but to destroy the United States, one institution at a time. He was never for America or its people. He was against them and the Constitution itself.

The SCIF

165,284 次观看 • 7 个月前

Something must be done to protect the sacred identity of children. Because God made all of us male and female in his image. My bill, the Protect Children’s Innocence Act, will do that. I urge every one of my colleagues to join me.

Something must be done to protect the sacred identity of children. Because God made all of us male and female in his image. My bill, the Protect Children’s Innocence Act, will do that. I urge every one of my colleagues to join me.

Former Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸

474,197 次观看 • 3 年前

Either Mike Rogers doesn’t know what his committee’s bill actually does, or worse, he’s just lying to the American people. The NDAA *does* authorize $300 MILLION of your tax dollars to fuel Ukraine’s war. It’s in the text, but they tried to hide it. My amendment will strip that funding and prevent your money from paying for yet another endless war. I urge my colleagues to support it.

Either Mike Rogers doesn’t know what his committee’s bill actually does, or worse, he’s just lying to the American people. The NDAA does authorize $300 MILLION of your tax dollars to fuel Ukraine’s war. It’s in the text, but they tried to hide it. My amendment will strip that funding and prevent your money from paying for yet another endless war. I urge my colleagues to support it.

Former Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸

575,544 次观看 • 2 年前

Grateful to testify before the House Rules Committee in support of my amendment to repeal the Caesar Act in the NDAA! It’s time to give Syria a chance and I hope the Committee will allow my amendment.

Grateful to testify before the House Rules Committee in support of my amendment to repeal the Caesar Act in the NDAA! It’s time to give Syria a chance and I hope the Committee will allow my amendment.

Joe Wilson

53,577 次观看 • 11 个月前

🇨🇳🇺🇸 DeepSeek tells the world that artificial intelligence is not American intelligence, and the United States has no right to monopolize the development of AI that belongs to all mankind. -Dr. Victor Gao

🇨🇳🇺🇸 DeepSeek tells the world that artificial intelligence is not American intelligence, and the United States has no right to monopolize the development of AI that belongs to all mankind. -Dr. Victor Gao

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

131,567 次观看 • 1 年前

Dreamers are our friends, neighbors, and are essential to our communities. Today, I stood on the House floor to urge my colleagues to pass my American Dream and Promise Act to provide Dreamers a pathway to citizenship. Let’s do right by them and our nation.

Dreamers are our friends, neighbors, and are essential to our communities. Today, I stood on the House floor to urge my colleagues to pass my American Dream and Promise Act to provide Dreamers a pathway to citizenship. Let’s do right by them and our nation.

Rep. Sylvia Garcia

23,035 次观看 • 1 年前

Yesterday, our Judiciary Committee passed HR 38, National Reciprocity. I support this bill, but there is a better option, and it is National Constitutional Carry. 29 states already have Constitutional (i.e. permitless) Carry. Why not extend it to all 50 states? Under HR 38 (Reciprocity), a resident of one of the Constitutional Carry states can carry in any state that allows their citizens to obtain a permit. The recent “Bruen” Supreme Court decision requires all states that aren’t Constitutional Carry to issue carry permits to their citizens. This means that when HR 38 passes, any resident of those 29 Constitutional Carry states will be able to carry in any of the 50 states without a permit. Ironically, however, residents of the 21 states (like New York or California) that aren’t Constitutional Carry will need a permit to carry in their own state, while visitors from states that are Constitutional Carry (like Kentucky or Ohio) won’t need a permit to carry in states like New York or California. If Congress, relying on the Second Amendment, can force California to allow “Permitless” Carry for Kentuckians who visit California, why would we not force California to allow “Permitless” Carry for Californians who are in California? In other words, why not pass National Constitutional Carry and afford everyone in the United States the right to “bear arms” which is enshrined in the Constitution? The other quirk of HR 38 is that (I believe) it would allow a person from Kentucky to carry an AR-15 pistol with a 20-round magazine in California, while Californians would not be allowed to carry, or even own, the same equipment. The Supreme Court decision in “D.C. v. Heller,” whether you agree with it or not, allows states to have some regulations on firearm equipment and eligibility to possess, but HR 38 seems to contradict that framework. Contrast this with my National Constitutional Carry bill which basically says if a state allows people to possess (KEEP) a particular firearm, that state must also allow people to carry (BEAR) that firearm. I introduced my National Constitutional Carry bill in committee yesterday as a substitute amendment to HR 38, National Reciprocity. After introducing the amendment for the record and describing it, I withdrew the amendment instead of putting my Judiciary Committee colleagues in the position of deciding whether to replace National Reciprocity with National Constitutional Carry. The dilemma is that not enough Republicans in the whole House understand the difference, and the prevailing opinion is that Reciprocity can pass the whole House, but Constitutional Carry cannot. Perhaps when more of my colleagues who are not on the Judiciary Committee understand why we should pass National Constitutional Carry instead of (or in addition to) National Reciprocity, we can make a strong push to report National Constitutional Carry out of the Judiciary Committee for a vote in the full House of Representatives. In the meantime, I’m glad HR 38 is going to the House floor for a vote.

Yesterday, our Judiciary Committee passed HR 38, National Reciprocity. I support this bill, but there is a better option, and it is National Constitutional Carry. 29 states already have Constitutional (i.e. permitless) Carry. Why not extend it to all 50 states? Under HR 38 (Reciprocity), a resident of one of the Constitutional Carry states can carry in any state that allows their citizens to obtain a permit. The recent “Bruen” Supreme Court decision requires all states that aren’t Constitutional Carry to issue carry permits to their citizens. This means that when HR 38 passes, any resident of those 29 Constitutional Carry states will be able to carry in any of the 50 states without a permit. Ironically, however, residents of the 21 states (like New York or California) that aren’t Constitutional Carry will need a permit to carry in their own state, while visitors from states that are Constitutional Carry (like Kentucky or Ohio) won’t need a permit to carry in states like New York or California. If Congress, relying on the Second Amendment, can force California to allow “Permitless” Carry for Kentuckians who visit California, why would we not force California to allow “Permitless” Carry for Californians who are in California? In other words, why not pass National Constitutional Carry and afford everyone in the United States the right to “bear arms” which is enshrined in the Constitution? The other quirk of HR 38 is that (I believe) it would allow a person from Kentucky to carry an AR-15 pistol with a 20-round magazine in California, while Californians would not be allowed to carry, or even own, the same equipment. The Supreme Court decision in “D.C. v. Heller,” whether you agree with it or not, allows states to have some regulations on firearm equipment and eligibility to possess, but HR 38 seems to contradict that framework. Contrast this with my National Constitutional Carry bill which basically says if a state allows people to possess (KEEP) a particular firearm, that state must also allow people to carry (BEAR) that firearm. I introduced my National Constitutional Carry bill in committee yesterday as a substitute amendment to HR 38, National Reciprocity. After introducing the amendment for the record and describing it, I withdrew the amendment instead of putting my Judiciary Committee colleagues in the position of deciding whether to replace National Reciprocity with National Constitutional Carry. The dilemma is that not enough Republicans in the whole House understand the difference, and the prevailing opinion is that Reciprocity can pass the whole House, but Constitutional Carry cannot. Perhaps when more of my colleagues who are not on the Judiciary Committee understand why we should pass National Constitutional Carry instead of (or in addition to) National Reciprocity, we can make a strong push to report National Constitutional Carry out of the Judiciary Committee for a vote in the full House of Representatives. In the meantime, I’m glad HR 38 is going to the House floor for a vote.

Thomas Massie

229,372 次观看 • 1 年前

There’s no way to spin it, the President called for my death by hanging. Because my colleagues and I reminded our military of their oath to the Constitution.

There’s no way to spin it, the President called for my death by hanging. Because my colleagues and I reminded our military of their oath to the Constitution.

Chrissy Houlahan

236,169 次观看 • 8 个月前

TAKE 2!! PALANTIR!!!! Is this the Artificial Intelligence Patriot Act 2.0? This will be designed to track and trace every American in a database taking away our constitutional right for privacy and catapulting America into a police state. Is this a necessary evil? Let me know your thoughts below..

TAKE 2!! PALANTIR!!!! Is this the Artificial Intelligence Patriot Act 2.0? This will be designed to track and trace every American in a database taking away our constitutional right for privacy and catapulting America into a police state. Is this a necessary evil? Let me know your thoughts below..

David Nino Rodriguez

30,449 次观看 • 1 年前

I urge my republican colleagues to stop doing what’s right for Trump, and start doing what’s right for American families. I'll be voting NO on the Republican Price Hike Bill, and I encourage every member of the House to do the same.

I urge my republican colleagues to stop doing what’s right for Trump, and start doing what’s right for American families. I'll be voting NO on the Republican Price Hike Bill, and I encourage every member of the House to do the same.

Governor Mikie Sherrill

354,380 次观看 • 1 年前

When I said I wanted to restore funding to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, I meant all of it, including the operations to combat child and sex trafficking- not just the agencies Chuck Schumer deems politically necessary. Either we are serious about the security of our homeland, or we're not. Tonight, I'm again joining my House Republican colleagues in voting for a fourth time to restore funding to DHS - all of it.

When I said I wanted to restore funding to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, I meant all of it, including the operations to combat child and sex trafficking- not just the agencies Chuck Schumer deems politically necessary. Either we are serious about the security of our homeland, or we're not. Tonight, I'm again joining my House Republican colleagues in voting for a fourth time to restore funding to DHS - all of it.

Rep Andy Biggs

40,067 次观看 • 4 个月前

Alex Karp says Palantir’s products are still integrated with Anthropic for now, until the DoW phases them out: “Palantir is the most important protector of the Fourth Amendment and the right to privacy because of how our product works— and I’m deeply committed to that.” “The Fourth Amendment does not apply to adversaries on the battlefield, where we are confronting people who want to kill us.” “The only institution widely respected by every demographic in this country is the US military.” “They deserve the best and most lethal technology in the world, and we at Palantir are going to make for F’ing sure that they get it— whether we get it from Anthropic, OpenAI, from Elon Musk and xAI, or Nvidia or Google.” “We are committed to the warfighter getting the best technology.”

Alex Karp says Palantir’s products are still integrated with Anthropic for now, until the DoW phases them out: “Palantir is the most important protector of the Fourth Amendment and the right to privacy because of how our product works— and I’m deeply committed to that.” “The Fourth Amendment does not apply to adversaries on the battlefield, where we are confronting people who want to kill us.” “The only institution widely respected by every demographic in this country is the US military.” “They deserve the best and most lethal technology in the world, and we at Palantir are going to make for F’ing sure that they get it— whether we get it from Anthropic, OpenAI, from Elon Musk and xAI, or Nvidia or Google.” “We are committed to the warfighter getting the best technology.”

Jawwwn

278,260 次观看 • 5 个月前