Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Your constitutional right to privacy does NOT disappear because technology or artificial intelligence advances. I urge every one of my House colleagues to support my PRIVACY Act to restore the Fourth Amendment protections guaranteed by the United States Constitution.

111,574 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

32 Kommentare

Profilbild von Orwell Day
Orwell Dayvor 2 Monaten

Your bill leaves the cameras in place. The government will just spy on us in secret so long as the cameras exist. All it will take is one "emergency" and they will throw the warrant requirement out. The only solution is the complete removal of these cameras.

Profilbild von Brandon Proulx
Brandon Proulxvor 2 Monaten

To everyone saying there’s no expectation of privacy in public: That’s from United States v. Knotts (1983). You don’t have an expectation of privacy in ordinary public observation. But the SCOTUS warned: if dragnet-type surveillance should eventually occur, there will be time enough then to decide whether different rules apply. Flock cameras are a dragnet surveillance system, and that “eventually” is now.

Profilbild von Dub Dublin
Dub Dublinvor 2 Monaten

Constitutional rights are not granted by the Constitution, they are guaranteed by it. The legislation that needs to be passed is not to "restore" the 4th Amendment, but to *severely* (yeah, as in death) punish any person or organization who would dare to infringe our rights under it.

Profilbild von Robert Vaughan
Robert Vaughanvor 2 Monaten

The Flock cameras aren't property or a town or city. Private company spying on you. Monitoring you, selling information about you. Monitoring you for the government. Top guy for Flock I understand had thousands of emails to Jeffrey Epstein. These cameras are monitoring your children at Schools and Parks. 1984, George Orwell's "Big Brother is Watching". Think about the AI data centers. They all need to be taken down.

Profilbild von Katryn Vega
Katryn Vegavor 2 Monaten

We don’t need an act. Just stand on the real law. Constitutions

Profilbild von The Patriot One
The Patriot Onevor 2 Monaten

Look at all these Flock cameras in Texas!

Profilbild von 688vet
688vetvor 2 Monaten

Why are so many pointed at the doors of gun ranges and stores that sell guns?

Profilbild von Verratus_Dominatu ✌️😈💜
Verratus_Dominatu ✌️😈💜vor 2 Monaten

This man seems to have also voted nay on the screen Act/KOSA bill. Apparently is consistent in his belief about privacy.

Profilbild von Gospel of the Kingdom of God (RED BOOK)
Gospel of the Kingdom of God (RED BOOK)vor 2 Monaten

What are the "FLOCK" cameras surveillance state actually being setup for? flock (of sheep) - "a number of animals of one kind moving or feeding together;" of domestic animals. The bodies of Christians, in relation to Christ; the flock. The godless socialist are overtly letting you know what this unlawful surveillance state will be used for; when being a Christian becomes illegal. Socialism is Satanism/Luciferianism, and slavery is the highest form of socialism, and they are not intellectually honest; their standard operating procedure is to lie, kill, steal, and destroy. The Satanic/Luciferian socialists have one thing in common: sexual perversion, which includes fornication, sodomy, buggery, and pedophilia. It's the glue that binds them all together in a demonic bondage within the soul, a mingled people. Through fraternal orders, sex cults, and religion, they infiltrate, subvert, and pervert every institution and area of government. They use a convergence of corporatocracy and technofascism with technocracy to force behavioral conformity and ideological alignment. To force submission into their system of worshiping the devil by an occult spiritual covenant written in both the temporal and eternal realms. "The time to fight for freedom is when you have the freedom to fight." PSALMS 144 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸 #4thAmendment #flock #christisking

Profilbild von NobodySpecial
NobodySpecialvor 2 Monaten

Dismantle the ALPR network. That network is just another tool for the governmental agencies to spy on Americans. I am a law abiding citizen and I have nothing to hide. However, I cherish my American rights and they are being threatened by governments and corporations for profit, it’s time to stand up and say “NO MORE”! Stop spying on Americans!

Profilbild von VagabonJoe
VagabonJoevor 2 Monaten

How about a bill that flat out bans mass surveillance? We don’t want to trade safety for freedom.

Profilbild von Timothy Adams
Timothy Adamsvor 2 Monaten

It’s true we have no expectation of privacy in public from the public,, but we most certainly have an expectation of privacy in public from the goddamn government ,, they work for us not the other way around,, you fuck sticks in government & policing are either gonna get that straight or it’s back to emulating GW.. 😤

Profilbild von Lance A Schart 🏳️‍🌈🇺🇦🇦🇱🦩🇵🇸🇬🇪🇹🇼
Lance A Schart 🏳️‍🌈🇺🇦🇦🇱🦩🇵🇸🇬🇪🇹🇼vor 2 Monaten

REMINDER: Texas MAGA Mouthpiece ⁦@RepKeithSelf⁩ was WARNED of potential 4A privacy dangers BEFORE he voted to APPROVE, PAY FOR and install #FlockCameras across Collin Co. TX (2018). KEITH SELF HELPED TO CREATE THIS PROBLEM!

Profilbild von 100% Independent and a little bit mean
100% Independent and a little bit meanvor 2 Monaten

ALSO...there is NO expectation of "privacy" while in the "public". The complaint is what they DO with the data they are ALLOWED to collect. Read a book moron...

Profilbild von Knightranger Publishing
Knightranger Publishingvor 2 Monaten

If it's a violation of our Fourth Amendment rights, then why do you need more laws to enforce it? Why is the Constitution the only laws you don't get in trouble for breaking? Tell them to cease or they will be arrested.

Profilbild von 3rdEyeVisuals
3rdEyeVisualsvor 2 Monaten

Yeah, WTF else are you burning into this SEEMINGLY beneficial bill? Until you start creating SINGLE-ISSUE BILLS, YOU ARE NOTHING BUT A FRAUD AND TRAITOR TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE! All you do is lie, cheat, and steal from We The People.

Profilbild von Rand
Randvor 2 Monaten

Thank you, that’s much better than making many of us criminals. If you’re paying attention to media, you’ll know that hundreds of people are already ready to become felons due to perception of unconstitutional, encroachment with cameras and sensors by flock et al.

Profilbild von Burning In Water While Drowning In Fire 🔥🔥🔥
Burning In Water While Drowning In Fire 🔥🔥🔥vor 2 Monaten

The real problem is that the constitution is not applied to private companies 👀 our four fathers had no idea of a digital world that would become so powerful and so private companies can now silence who they want online and build a surveillance state because the constitution does not apply to them.

Profilbild von ohio made 👠
ohio made 👠vor 2 Monaten

We put you in this position and we demand our privacy one way or another we will peacefully take back our privacy.

Profilbild von Real Busy Bethany
Real Busy Bethanyvor 2 Monaten

We're experiencing this bombardment of our Constitutional rights because BIG Tech "private" companies" are ran by Globalists who believe they are above the law!

Profilbild von John Cogburn
John Cogburnvor 2 Monaten

If the Gov’t is okay with massive surveillance then it’s time every member of the House and Senate and their Staffers wear streaming Body Worn Cameras since the people they represent “have an interest” in all of their actions, decisions and associations.

Profilbild von KdaddyG
KdaddyGvor 2 Monaten

FUCK THESE FLOCK SURVAILENCE SYSTEMS AND ANY AND ALL OTHERS LIKE IT. ITS UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND WE WILL NOT STAND BY AND ALLOW IT.

Profilbild von GrumpyHermit
GrumpyHermitvor 2 Monaten

If they're guaranteed, why do we need to restore them? Sounds like this government needs to be abolished

Profilbild von John Doe
John Doevor 2 Monaten

Those things need to be banned entirely! And no I don’t give a flying fuck what you boot lickers think either so piss off!!!

Profilbild von Storming505
Storming505vor 2 Monaten

All of America's privacy laws need to be revised!

Profilbild von J. Penrose-Drain
J. Penrose-Drainvor 2 Monaten

we also need to eliminate judge-made theories about the imaginary absence of privacy in public spaces. we have inherent rights to being left alone and not monitored that our elite have tried to shred.

Profilbild von Strazzix
Strazzixvor 2 Monaten

here let me help you 1 step further. take the fucking cameras down. overwhelmingly people are against this and yet you still let it continue. you take them down or we replace your ass for failing us consistently. you dont get to just talk anymore, time for action or replacement

Profilbild von Ryan Boden ♂️
Ryan Boden ♂️vor 2 Monaten

We don't need more legislation. We already have a 4th Amendment but @TheJusticeDept and @HarmeetKDhillon aren't bothering to enforce it because Flock and their competitors are "good business" and they don't care if Americans get bent over.

Profilbild von Jose Espresso 🐯
Jose Espresso 🐯vor 2 Monaten

People who are saying "You have no expectation to privacy" when defending a surveillance state, where is the line? Is it ok for the government to mass produce flock cameras and have one pointing directly at every house? What is too much if the OBVIOUS direction of these cameras isn't it?

Profilbild von Texas Education 911
Texas Education 911vor 2 Monaten

Thank you! Keep up the good work and good communication with Texans.

Profilbild von AreYouAwakeNow?
AreYouAwakeNow?vor 2 Monaten

Congress of the United States House of Representatibes COMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND GOVERNMENT REFORM 2157 Rayburn House Office Building WasHiNgtoN, DC 20515-6143 MAJORITY (202) 225-5074 MINORITY (202) 225-5051 August 6, 2025 Garrett Langley Chief Executive Officer Flock Group Inc. 1170 Howell Mill Road NW, Suite 210 Atlanta, GA 30318 Dear Mr. Langley, We write regarding reports that - federal and - local law enforcement officials ‼️are using license plate reader technology operated by Flock Group Inc. (Flock) to wrongly track and to potentially harm people‼️, in concerning 👉violation of Americans’ - privacy, - freedom, and - civil liberties. Recently, local authorities in Texas reportedly used Flock’s automatic license plate reader technology to conduct a nationwide search for a woman they claimed had a self- administered abortion in Texas.1 As part of this search, Texas law enforcement appears to have reviewed footage from more than 83,000 automatic license plate reader cameras, including cameras in Washington and Illinois, where abortion is lawfully protected as a basic right.2 Tracking a woman across state lines for this purpose—and allowing authorities in anti-abortion states to violate the freedom and privacy of people in states that protect abortion access—is a gross misuse and abuse of surveillance technology, and could result in the prosecution of women who travel to seek necessary reproductive care. ICE agents have also reportedly used Flock data to track immigrants, improperly accessing license plate data in states and localities with laws or ordinances in place that prohibit the use of their resources to assist with the arrest of law-abiding undocumented residents. Given the vast amount of data collected by Flock cameras, and the enormous potential for abuse, it is critical that Flock, law enforcement entities, and state and local governments are transparent and accountable for how this sensitive data is accessed and by whom.

Profilbild von Flocked Designs
Flocked Designsvor 2 Monaten

Thanks @RepKeithSelf for getting ahead of this issue that was settled in 1791. Maybe you should give this a read, hmm. #FlockOff #FlockNo

Ähnliche Videos

Yesterday, our Judiciary Committee passed HR 38, National Reciprocity. I support this bill, but there is a better option, and it is National Constitutional Carry. 29 states already have Constitutional (i.e. permitless) Carry. Why not extend it to all 50 states? Under HR 38 (Reciprocity), a resident of one of the Constitutional Carry states can carry in any state that allows their citizens to obtain a permit. The recent “Bruen” Supreme Court decision requires all states that aren’t Constitutional Carry to issue carry permits to their citizens. This means that when HR 38 passes, any resident of those 29 Constitutional Carry states will be able to carry in any of the 50 states without a permit. Ironically, however, residents of the 21 states (like New York or California) that aren’t Constitutional Carry will need a permit to carry in their own state, while visitors from states that are Constitutional Carry (like Kentucky or Ohio) won’t need a permit to carry in states like New York or California. If Congress, relying on the Second Amendment, can force California to allow “Permitless” Carry for Kentuckians who visit California, why would we not force California to allow “Permitless” Carry for Californians who are in California? In other words, why not pass National Constitutional Carry and afford everyone in the United States the right to “bear arms” which is enshrined in the Constitution? The other quirk of HR 38 is that (I believe) it would allow a person from Kentucky to carry an AR-15 pistol with a 20-round magazine in California, while Californians would not be allowed to carry, or even own, the same equipment. The Supreme Court decision in “D.C. v. Heller,” whether you agree with it or not, allows states to have some regulations on firearm equipment and eligibility to possess, but HR 38 seems to contradict that framework. Contrast this with my National Constitutional Carry bill which basically says if a state allows people to possess (KEEP) a particular firearm, that state must also allow people to carry (BEAR) that firearm. I introduced my National Constitutional Carry bill in committee yesterday as a substitute amendment to HR 38, National Reciprocity. After introducing the amendment for the record and describing it, I withdrew the amendment instead of putting my Judiciary Committee colleagues in the position of deciding whether to replace National Reciprocity with National Constitutional Carry. The dilemma is that not enough Republicans in the whole House understand the difference, and the prevailing opinion is that Reciprocity can pass the whole House, but Constitutional Carry cannot. Perhaps when more of my colleagues who are not on the Judiciary Committee understand why we should pass National Constitutional Carry instead of (or in addition to) National Reciprocity, we can make a strong push to report National Constitutional Carry out of the Judiciary Committee for a vote in the full House of Representatives. In the meantime, I’m glad HR 38 is going to the House floor for a vote.

Thomas Massie

229,372 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr