Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

You’re risking everything in DeFi for a few extra % EllioTrades thinks putting money in DeFi right now is one of the worst risk/reward trades you can make. "The risk of losing all your money in exchange for a few percent is not worth it." "AI is creating a... show more

EllioTrades Clips

26,608 subscribers

26,029 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & Politik Wissenschaft & Technologie Finanzen

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

If the Drift exploit made you scared of losing money in DeFi, this is for you They have built a Risk Rating model for ALL of Solana DeFi: → Risk Analysis, Rating → Real APYs → Multisig Threshold, Timelocks, Audits → Comparison tool for all DeFi strategies Check it out.

If the Drift exploit made you scared of losing money in DeFi, this is for you They have built a Risk Rating model for ALL of Solana DeFi: → Risk Analysis, Rating → Real APYs → Multisig Threshold, Timelocks, Audits → Comparison tool for all DeFi strategies Check it out.

gum

22,516 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Rune Christensen, Co-Founder of Sky (Sky), on USDS, STUSDS, and risk tiers in DeFi "Lindy, like stablecoin product with a really really reasonable rate of return" "right now it's at 3.75%, which is actually 10 points above SOFR" "a lot of people dunking on DeFi for not being able to beat TradFi, but USDS does in fact still beat TradFi and is very much highly risk optimized" "with Sky you can also use a product like STUSDS, which is a higher risk token that still has this link to the US dollar" "you can actually go even more high risk and buy something like SPK, which is a completely volatile governance token of one of the Sky agents" "STUSDS, because it's a risk token and it's explicitly marketed as risk capital, it's for advanced users because it has higher risk" "it's not just a stablecoin that is designed to protect you above everything else" "with STUSDS it's also about being able to offer a higher rate of return" "one of the consequences of this is that it can have its liquidity, its one to one liquidity with USDS frozen"

Rune Christensen, Co-Founder of Sky (Sky), on USDS, STUSDS, and risk tiers in DeFi "Lindy, like stablecoin product with a really really reasonable rate of return" "right now it's at 3.75%, which is actually 10 points above SOFR" "a lot of people dunking on DeFi for not being able to beat TradFi, but USDS does in fact still beat TradFi and is very much highly risk optimized" "with Sky you can also use a product like STUSDS, which is a higher risk token that still has this link to the US dollar" "you can actually go even more high risk and buy something like SPK, which is a completely volatile governance token of one of the Sky agents" "STUSDS, because it's a risk token and it's explicitly marketed as risk capital, it's for advanced users because it has higher risk" "it's not just a stablecoin that is designed to protect you above everything else" "with STUSDS it's also about being able to offer a higher rate of return" "one of the consequences of this is that it can have its liquidity, its one to one liquidity with USDS frozen"

Frontliner 💯

75,006 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

"Yields are so low across DeFi right now that they're actually not attractive to traditional investors or Wall Street. You need higher than three or four percent for it to be compelling" Ryan Rasmussen, Head of Research at Bitwise, on why DeFi yields aren't compelling to Wall Street right now "The reality is yields are so low across DeFi right now in most places that they're actually not attractive to traditional investors or to Wall Street. The perceived risk, and there is risk, of lending in DeFi is much higher than what you're being compensated for at two or three or maybe four percent. You need higher than that for it to be compelling" "That's why a lot of focus is on yield. Because there's not a lot of euphoria in onchain activity right now, you don't see the double digit stablecoin yields you typically do in bull markets. I think that's good in the sense that it's driving creativity around strategies that properly manage risk to provide enhanced yield" "But that enhanced yield isn't like 28 percent, which is the type that ultimately blows up post bull markets. It's like eight or nine percent, and that's great for a lot of investors"

"Yields are so low across DeFi right now that they're actually not attractive to traditional investors or Wall Street. You need higher than three or four percent for it to be compelling" Ryan Rasmussen, Head of Research at Bitwise, on why DeFi yields aren't compelling to Wall Street right now "The reality is yields are so low across DeFi right now in most places that they're actually not attractive to traditional investors or to Wall Street. The perceived risk, and there is risk, of lending in DeFi is much higher than what you're being compensated for at two or three or maybe four percent. You need higher than that for it to be compelling" "That's why a lot of focus is on yield. Because there's not a lot of euphoria in onchain activity right now, you don't see the double digit stablecoin yields you typically do in bull markets. I think that's good in the sense that it's driving creativity around strategies that properly manage risk to provide enhanced yield" "But that enhanced yield isn't like 28 percent, which is the type that ultimately blows up post bull markets. It's like eight or nine percent, and that's great for a lot of investors"

The Wolf Of All Streets

23,598 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

🍾 Cork has launched its beta on Ethereum Mainnet! We’re introducing a new DeFi primitive that tokenizes the risk of depeg events. With our key launch partners Lido, ether.fi, , and Sky, Cork is initiating a new phase of DeFi defined by more opportunity, protection, and stability. Tokenized risk for DeFi is here 🧵

🍾 Cork has launched its beta on Ethereum Mainnet! We’re introducing a new DeFi primitive that tokenizes the risk of depeg events. With our key launch partners Lido, ether.fi, , and Sky, Cork is initiating a new phase of DeFi defined by more opportunity, protection, and stability. Tokenized risk for DeFi is here 🧵

Cork Protocol

87,628 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Join Club2️⃣8️⃣ Official 🚀launch is 5/28/2024 Join a club that is sharing the truth about DeFi and how it can make money for you while you sleep. $DeFi #DeFi #XRP

Join Club2️⃣8️⃣ Official 🚀launch is 5/28/2024 Join a club that is sharing the truth about DeFi and how it can make money for you while you sleep. $DeFi #DeFi #XRP

Mr.AquaMan.33𝕏

83,449 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Elon Musk: "People get confused sometimes they think an economy is money , But money is a database for the exchange of goods and services and for time-shifting the exchange of goods and services. Money is a database. Money does not have power in and of itself You can run the thought experiment: if you are shipwrecked on a remote island and you have a trillion dollars in a Swiss bank account, "it's worthless" You’d rather have a can of soup. You can have all the Bitcoin in the world and you’re still going to starve The actual economy is goods and services”

Elon Musk: "People get confused sometimes they think an economy is money , But money is a database for the exchange of goods and services and for time-shifting the exchange of goods and services. Money is a database. Money does not have power in and of itself You can run the thought experiment: if you are shipwrecked on a remote island and you have a trillion dollars in a Swiss bank account, "it's worthless" You’d rather have a can of soup. You can have all the Bitcoin in the world and you’re still going to starve The actual economy is goods and services”

X Freeze

9,601,388 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Q: Should startups always raise as much money as possible? In the clip below, Marc Andreessen shares a framework that Benchmark co-founder Andy Rachleff taught him called "The Onion Theory of Risk". You can think of a day 1 startup as having every conceivable kind of risk: founding team risk, product risk, technical risk, market acceptance risk, revenue risk, cost of sales risk, viral growth risk, etc. A startup is basically just a long list of risks, and as Marc explains: "The way I think about running a startup is the way I think about raising money. It's a process of peeling away layers of risk as you go." You raise seed money to peel away the first two or three risks (e.g. founding team risk, product risk, initial launch risk). You raise the Series A round to peel away the next layer of risks (e.g. recruiting risk, customer risk, revenue risk, cost of sales risk) And so on. Basically, you're peeling away risk as you're achieving milestones. And as you achieve milestones, you're both: making progress on your business and justifying raising more capital. So in terms of fundraising, you should be calibrating the amount of money you're raising to the risks you need to pull out of your business for you to raise your next round. For example, if you're raising your Series A round, the best way to do that is to say to investors: "I raised a seed round then achieved ____ milestones and eliminated ____ risks. Now I'm going to raise $X for the Series A to achieve ____ milestones and eliminate ____ risks. This will get the company to ____ state for the Series B round. " This seems fairly obvious, but as Marc points out, it's a much more systematic way of going about things versus just raising as much money as possible, renting fancy offices, and hiring as many people as you can to grow as fast as you can. The more money you raise, the more you dilute your ownership stake in your business so it pays to be thoughtful. Raise the capital you will need to achieve the milestones and eliminate the risks required for your next financing round. It also probably makes sense to give yourself some margin as safety because things never go exactly as planned in startup land. Follow Startup Archive for more tactical startup advice!

Q: Should startups always raise as much money as possible? In the clip below, Marc Andreessen shares a framework that Benchmark co-founder Andy Rachleff taught him called "The Onion Theory of Risk". You can think of a day 1 startup as having every conceivable kind of risk: founding team risk, product risk, technical risk, market acceptance risk, revenue risk, cost of sales risk, viral growth risk, etc. A startup is basically just a long list of risks, and as Marc explains: "The way I think about running a startup is the way I think about raising money. It's a process of peeling away layers of risk as you go." You raise seed money to peel away the first two or three risks (e.g. founding team risk, product risk, initial launch risk). You raise the Series A round to peel away the next layer of risks (e.g. recruiting risk, customer risk, revenue risk, cost of sales risk) And so on. Basically, you're peeling away risk as you're achieving milestones. And as you achieve milestones, you're both: making progress on your business and justifying raising more capital. So in terms of fundraising, you should be calibrating the amount of money you're raising to the risks you need to pull out of your business for you to raise your next round. For example, if you're raising your Series A round, the best way to do that is to say to investors: "I raised a seed round then achieved milestones and eliminated risks. Now I'm going to raise $X for the Series A to achieve milestones and eliminate risks. This will get the company to state for the Series B round. " This seems fairly obvious, but as Marc points out, it's a much more systematic way of going about things versus just raising as much money as possible, renting fancy offices, and hiring as many people as you can to grow as fast as you can. The more money you raise, the more you dilute your ownership stake in your business so it pays to be thoughtful. Raise the capital you will need to achieve the milestones and eliminate the risks required for your next financing round. It also probably makes sense to give yourself some margin as safety because things never go exactly as planned in startup land. Follow Startup Archive for more tactical startup advice!

Startup Archive

178,597 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren

Not satisfied with taking lunches from the mouthes of hungry children, our entitled government are now looking to change speed limits in front of schools. Is shaving a few seconds off your commute really worth putting our kids' lifes at extra risk?

Not satisfied with taking lunches from the mouthes of hungry children, our entitled government are now looking to change speed limits in front of schools. Is shaving a few seconds off your commute really worth putting our kids' lifes at extra risk?

Nick

45,417 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

HOW TO GET A TOP STABLECOIN YIELD IN DeFi NOW WITH $pmUSD? Tired of crypto volatility? Time for you to look into a more reliable side of DeFi👀 Move your liquidity to a gold-backed stablecoin & explore every option to farm the best stable yields. EVERYTHING IS HERE👇

HOW TO GET A TOP STABLECOIN YIELD IN DeFi NOW WITH $pmUSD? Tired of crypto volatility? Time for you to look into a more reliable side of DeFi👀 Move your liquidity to a gold-backed stablecoin & explore every option to farm the best stable yields. EVERYTHING IS HERE👇

RAAC

18,348 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Watch Ben Shapiro shut down the AI doomer panel on CNN NewsNight: “It's fun to talk about the apocalyptic risk because we've all seen apocalypse movies. There is a much more [likely risk] and that is the risk of stagnation. If you stagnate AI, it is probably the beginning of the end of the American economy. We are currently running into economic dire straits in which T-bills are absolutely getting crushed, in which we have a $40 trillion national debt. The uniparty is for spending enormous amounts of money and never paying for any of it. That is the actual uniparty in the United States. The only possible escape from that is to reach some sort of escape velocity in terms of productivity, which is why the Trump administration has been pushing AI.”

Watch Ben Shapiro shut down the AI doomer panel on CNN NewsNight: “It's fun to talk about the apocalyptic risk because we've all seen apocalypse movies. There is a much more [likely risk] and that is the risk of stagnation. If you stagnate AI, it is probably the beginning of the end of the American economy. We are currently running into economic dire straits in which T-bills are absolutely getting crushed, in which we have a $40 trillion national debt. The uniparty is for spending enormous amounts of money and never paying for any of it. That is the actual uniparty in the United States. The only possible escape from that is to reach some sort of escape velocity in terms of productivity, which is why the Trump administration has been pushing AI.”

Steve Guest

208,633 Aufrufe • vor 28 Tagen

How is everyone making money in Crypto right now but me? Either everyone is a liar or I'm the worst trader of all time

How is everyone making money in Crypto right now but me? Either everyone is a liar or I'm the worst trader of all time

Clemente

166,789 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Farmer: This is the worst I can ever remember it being in this industry for over a decade. Seeing how bad it is for farms right now, we risk losing them.

Farmer: This is the worst I can ever remember it being in this industry for over a decade. Seeing how bad it is for farms right now, we risk losing them.

FactPost

58,236 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Q: Should startups always raise as much money as possible? In the clip below, Marc Andreessen shares a framework that Benchmark co-founder Andy Rachleff taught him called "The Onion Theory of Risk". You can think of a day 1 startup as having every conceivable kind of risk: founding team risk, product risk, technical risk, market acceptance risk, revenue risk, cost of sales risk, viral growth risk, etc. A startup is basically just a long list of risks, and as Marc explains: "The way I think about running a startup is the way I think about raising money. It's a process of peeling away layers of risk as you go." You raise seed money to peel away the first two or three risks (e.g. founding team risk, product risk, initial launch risk). You raise the Series A round to peel away the next layer of risks (e.g. recruiting risk, customer risk, revenue risk, cost of sales risk) And so on. Basically, you're peeling away risk as you're achieving milestones. And as you achieve milestones, you're both: making progress on your business and justifying raising more capital. So in terms of fundraising, you should be calibrating the amount money you're raising to the risks you need to pull out of your business for you to raise your next round. For example, if you're raising your Series A round, the best way to do that is to say to investors: "I raised a seed round then achieved ____ milestones and eliminated ____ risks. Now I'm going to raise $X for the Series A to achieve ____ milestones and eliminate ____ risks. This will get the company to ____ state for the Series B round. " This seems fairly obvious, but as Marc points out, it's a much more systematic way of going about things versus just raising as much money as possible, renting fancy offices, and hiring as many people as you can to grow as fast as you can. The more money you raise, the more you dilute your ownership stake in your business so it pays to be thoughtful. Raise the capital you will need to achieve the milestones and eliminate the risks required for your next financing round. It also probably makes sense to give yourself some margin as safety because things never go exactly as planned in startup land.

Q: Should startups always raise as much money as possible? In the clip below, Marc Andreessen shares a framework that Benchmark co-founder Andy Rachleff taught him called "The Onion Theory of Risk". You can think of a day 1 startup as having every conceivable kind of risk: founding team risk, product risk, technical risk, market acceptance risk, revenue risk, cost of sales risk, viral growth risk, etc. A startup is basically just a long list of risks, and as Marc explains: "The way I think about running a startup is the way I think about raising money. It's a process of peeling away layers of risk as you go." You raise seed money to peel away the first two or three risks (e.g. founding team risk, product risk, initial launch risk). You raise the Series A round to peel away the next layer of risks (e.g. recruiting risk, customer risk, revenue risk, cost of sales risk) And so on. Basically, you're peeling away risk as you're achieving milestones. And as you achieve milestones, you're both: making progress on your business and justifying raising more capital. So in terms of fundraising, you should be calibrating the amount money you're raising to the risks you need to pull out of your business for you to raise your next round. For example, if you're raising your Series A round, the best way to do that is to say to investors: "I raised a seed round then achieved milestones and eliminated risks. Now I'm going to raise $X for the Series A to achieve milestones and eliminate risks. This will get the company to state for the Series B round. " This seems fairly obvious, but as Marc points out, it's a much more systematic way of going about things versus just raising as much money as possible, renting fancy offices, and hiring as many people as you can to grow as fast as you can. The more money you raise, the more you dilute your ownership stake in your business so it pays to be thoughtful. Raise the capital you will need to achieve the milestones and eliminate the risks required for your next financing round. It also probably makes sense to give yourself some margin as safety because things never go exactly as planned in startup land.

Michael McGuiness

735,645 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren

I can’t say exactly how effective Bitcoin is as a money, but it’s being perceived by many as an alternative money and so is worth paying attention to. Money needs to be both a medium of exchange and a storehold of wealth — and the latter is more important. I doubt that any central bank will take it on as a reserve currency. That’s because all of the transactions are public, so there’s no privacy to it, and there’s a risk that in the future the code could be broken to make it less effective through government controls. My personal approach is that I do have some Bitcoin in my portfolio, but not much.

I can’t say exactly how effective Bitcoin is as a money, but it’s being perceived by many as an alternative money and so is worth paying attention to. Money needs to be both a medium of exchange and a storehold of wealth — and the latter is more important. I doubt that any central bank will take it on as a reserve currency. That’s because all of the transactions are public, so there’s no privacy to it, and there’s a risk that in the future the code could be broken to make it less effective through government controls. My personal approach is that I do have some Bitcoin in my portfolio, but not much.

Ray Dalio

353,382 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

The Alpha release of Infinex Connect is now live for Patrons! This is the first step towards bringing the Infinex experience to DeFi, and enabling a new generation of modern crypto apps.

The Alpha release of Infinex Connect is now live for Patrons! This is the first step towards bringing the Infinex experience to DeFi, and enabling a new generation of modern crypto apps.

Infinex

145,509 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Marriage is the biggest gamble of the life for a MAN. Plan it with caution and diligence. All that glitters is not gold. There is more risk involved in a marriage than in investing in the stock market.

Marriage is the biggest gamble of the life for a MAN. Plan it with caution and diligence. All that glitters is not gold. There is more risk involved in a marriage than in investing in the stock market.

NCMIndia Council For Men Affairs

12,388 Aufrufe • vor 22 Tagen

You have 100 dollars and you want 200. Betting red one dollar at a time, your chance is one in 33,171. Betting the whole 100 on a single spin, it is 47.4 percent. The careful version is fifteen thousand times worse. This is also the arithmetic of your trading account, and it means almost everything you have been taught about managing risk is, in the strict mathematical sense, a method for losing more reliably. An MIT professor works this out on a blackboard in a lecture on random walks. The result is called gambler's ruin. Two and a half points of disadvantage is nothing on one spin. But a dollar at a time you are not making one spin, you are making hundreds, and the edge gets a fresh attempt at you on every one of them. It was never the size of the disadvantage. It is the number of times you agree to face it. One hundred on red, once: 47.4 percent. Twenty dollar bets: 37.3 percent. Five dollar bets: 11.1 percent. One dollar bets: 0.003 percent. Mathematicians call the right answer bold play. It was proved optimal for unfavourable games in 1965. It is not a strategy for winning. It is the least ruinous way to play a game you should not be in. If your edge after spread and fees is negative, and for most active retail accounts it is, then your position sizing rule is not protecting you. Risking one percent per trade is the one dollar bet. It arrives at zero with near certainty, just politely, over a longer period, with a spreadsheet. Discipline does not beat a negative edge. It schedules it. All of this reverses if you have a real edge. Then small and frequent is correct and bold play is madness. So the only question that has ever mattered is whether you have one, and the number of people certain they do has never resembled the number who do. Your broker does not need you to be wrong. It needs you to be frequent.

You have 100 dollars and you want 200. Betting red one dollar at a time, your chance is one in 33,171. Betting the whole 100 on a single spin, it is 47.4 percent. The careful version is fifteen thousand times worse. This is also the arithmetic of your trading account, and it means almost everything you have been taught about managing risk is, in the strict mathematical sense, a method for losing more reliably. An MIT professor works this out on a blackboard in a lecture on random walks. The result is called gambler's ruin. Two and a half points of disadvantage is nothing on one spin. But a dollar at a time you are not making one spin, you are making hundreds, and the edge gets a fresh attempt at you on every one of them. It was never the size of the disadvantage. It is the number of times you agree to face it. One hundred on red, once: 47.4 percent. Twenty dollar bets: 37.3 percent. Five dollar bets: 11.1 percent. One dollar bets: 0.003 percent. Mathematicians call the right answer bold play. It was proved optimal for unfavourable games in 1965. It is not a strategy for winning. It is the least ruinous way to play a game you should not be in. If your edge after spread and fees is negative, and for most active retail accounts it is, then your position sizing rule is not protecting you. Risking one percent per trade is the one dollar bet. It arrives at zero with near certainty, just politely, over a longer period, with a spreadsheet. Discipline does not beat a negative edge. It schedules it. All of this reverses if you have a real edge. Then small and frequent is correct and bold play is madness. So the only question that has ever mattered is whether you have one, and the number of people certain they do has never resembled the number who do. Your broker does not need you to be wrong. It needs you to be frequent.

Verax

85,472 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

The only constraint on scaling is how much money you have in your bank account. If you put $1,000 in and you're certain to make more than $1,000 back — you're going to put as much as you can in. That's AppLovin's whole model: "Make the advertiser an arbitrager. Very few people define performance marketing as that. Very few companies have executed it. Facebook's done a fantastic job of it. This is entirely what we're focused on. If they're making money, they're going to spend."

The only constraint on scaling is how much money you have in your bank account. If you put $1,000 in and you're certain to make more than $1,000 back — you're going to put as much as you can in. That's AppLovin's whole model: "Make the advertiser an arbitrager. Very few people define performance marketing as that. Very few companies have executed it. Facebook's done a fantastic job of it. This is entirely what we're focused on. If they're making money, they're going to spend."

David Senra

34,091 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Exciting news: aarnâ's app just got a completely new look 📱 aarnâ is mobile-first, and the mobile app is designed with a smooth, intuitive UX built for mass adoption, simplicity, and a user-focused interface. With aarnâ's app, you have a seamless connection to each one of the structured products. You can see your position on vaults, make deposits, see news, yield numbers, and much more. The whole of DeFi, in the palm of your hand. Now with a totally new design 👇

Exciting news: aarnâ's app just got a completely new look 📱 aarnâ is mobile-first, and the mobile app is designed with a smooth, intuitive UX built for mass adoption, simplicity, and a user-focused interface. With aarnâ's app, you have a seamless connection to each one of the structured products. You can see your position on vaults, make deposits, see news, yield numbers, and much more. The whole of DeFi, in the palm of your hand. Now with a totally new design 👇

aarnâ

35,076 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr