Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

You’re risking everything in DeFi for a few extra % EllioTrades thinks putting money in DeFi right now is one of the worst risk/reward trades you can make. "The risk of losing all your money in exchange for a few percent is not worth it." "AI is creating a... show more

EllioTrades Clips

26,608 subscribers

26,029 views • 4 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics Science & Technology Finance

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

If the Drift exploit made you scared of losing money in DeFi, this is for you They have built a Risk Rating model for ALL of Solana DeFi: → Risk Analysis, Rating → Real APYs → Multisig Threshold, Timelocks, Audits → Comparison tool for all DeFi strategies Check it out.

If the Drift exploit made you scared of losing money in DeFi, this is for you They have built a Risk Rating model for ALL of Solana DeFi: → Risk Analysis, Rating → Real APYs → Multisig Threshold, Timelocks, Audits → Comparison tool for all DeFi strategies Check it out.

gum

22,516 views • 4 months ago

Rune Christensen, Co-Founder of Sky (Sky), on USDS, STUSDS, and risk tiers in DeFi "Lindy, like stablecoin product with a really really reasonable rate of return" "right now it's at 3.75%, which is actually 10 points above SOFR" "a lot of people dunking on DeFi for not being able to beat TradFi, but USDS does in fact still beat TradFi and is very much highly risk optimized" "with Sky you can also use a product like STUSDS, which is a higher risk token that still has this link to the US dollar" "you can actually go even more high risk and buy something like SPK, which is a completely volatile governance token of one of the Sky agents" "STUSDS, because it's a risk token and it's explicitly marketed as risk capital, it's for advanced users because it has higher risk" "it's not just a stablecoin that is designed to protect you above everything else" "with STUSDS it's also about being able to offer a higher rate of return" "one of the consequences of this is that it can have its liquidity, its one to one liquidity with USDS frozen"

Rune Christensen, Co-Founder of Sky (Sky), on USDS, STUSDS, and risk tiers in DeFi "Lindy, like stablecoin product with a really really reasonable rate of return" "right now it's at 3.75%, which is actually 10 points above SOFR" "a lot of people dunking on DeFi for not being able to beat TradFi, but USDS does in fact still beat TradFi and is very much highly risk optimized" "with Sky you can also use a product like STUSDS, which is a higher risk token that still has this link to the US dollar" "you can actually go even more high risk and buy something like SPK, which is a completely volatile governance token of one of the Sky agents" "STUSDS, because it's a risk token and it's explicitly marketed as risk capital, it's for advanced users because it has higher risk" "it's not just a stablecoin that is designed to protect you above everything else" "with STUSDS it's also about being able to offer a higher rate of return" "one of the consequences of this is that it can have its liquidity, its one to one liquidity with USDS frozen"

Frontliner 💯

75,006 views • 3 months ago

"Yields are so low across DeFi right now that they're actually not attractive to traditional investors or Wall Street. You need higher than three or four percent for it to be compelling" Ryan Rasmussen, Head of Research at Bitwise, on why DeFi yields aren't compelling to Wall Street right now "The reality is yields are so low across DeFi right now in most places that they're actually not attractive to traditional investors or to Wall Street. The perceived risk, and there is risk, of lending in DeFi is much higher than what you're being compensated for at two or three or maybe four percent. You need higher than that for it to be compelling" "That's why a lot of focus is on yield. Because there's not a lot of euphoria in onchain activity right now, you don't see the double digit stablecoin yields you typically do in bull markets. I think that's good in the sense that it's driving creativity around strategies that properly manage risk to provide enhanced yield" "But that enhanced yield isn't like 28 percent, which is the type that ultimately blows up post bull markets. It's like eight or nine percent, and that's great for a lot of investors"

"Yields are so low across DeFi right now that they're actually not attractive to traditional investors or Wall Street. You need higher than three or four percent for it to be compelling" Ryan Rasmussen, Head of Research at Bitwise, on why DeFi yields aren't compelling to Wall Street right now "The reality is yields are so low across DeFi right now in most places that they're actually not attractive to traditional investors or to Wall Street. The perceived risk, and there is risk, of lending in DeFi is much higher than what you're being compensated for at two or three or maybe four percent. You need higher than that for it to be compelling" "That's why a lot of focus is on yield. Because there's not a lot of euphoria in onchain activity right now, you don't see the double digit stablecoin yields you typically do in bull markets. I think that's good in the sense that it's driving creativity around strategies that properly manage risk to provide enhanced yield" "But that enhanced yield isn't like 28 percent, which is the type that ultimately blows up post bull markets. It's like eight or nine percent, and that's great for a lot of investors"

The Wolf Of All Streets

23,598 views • 1 month ago

So much talk of money in golf the last few years and it’s all gone one way: More. Now golf’s money explosion has come for the Ryder Cup—and the Europeans drew a line in the sand yesterday and said enough is enough. Fascinated to see how it will play out.

So much talk of money in golf the last few years and it’s all gone one way: More. Now golf’s money explosion has come for the Ryder Cup—and the Europeans drew a line in the sand yesterday and said enough is enough. Fascinated to see how it will play out.

Dan Rapaport

171,703 views • 1 year ago

🍾 Cork has launched its beta on Ethereum Mainnet! We’re introducing a new DeFi primitive that tokenizes the risk of depeg events. With our key launch partners Lido, ether.fi, , and Sky, Cork is initiating a new phase of DeFi defined by more opportunity, protection, and stability. Tokenized risk for DeFi is here 🧵

🍾 Cork has launched its beta on Ethereum Mainnet! We’re introducing a new DeFi primitive that tokenizes the risk of depeg events. With our key launch partners Lido, ether.fi, , and Sky, Cork is initiating a new phase of DeFi defined by more opportunity, protection, and stability. Tokenized risk for DeFi is here 🧵

Cork Protocol

87,558 views • 1 year ago

Elon Musk: "People get confused sometimes they think an economy is money , But money is a database for the exchange of goods and services and for time-shifting the exchange of goods and services. Money is a database. Money does not have power in and of itself You can run the thought experiment: if you are shipwrecked on a remote island and you have a trillion dollars in a Swiss bank account, "it's worthless" You’d rather have a can of soup. You can have all the Bitcoin in the world and you’re still going to starve The actual economy is goods and services”

Elon Musk: "People get confused sometimes they think an economy is money , But money is a database for the exchange of goods and services and for time-shifting the exchange of goods and services. Money is a database. Money does not have power in and of itself You can run the thought experiment: if you are shipwrecked on a remote island and you have a trillion dollars in a Swiss bank account, "it's worthless" You’d rather have a can of soup. You can have all the Bitcoin in the world and you’re still going to starve The actual economy is goods and services”

X Freeze

9,600,152 views • 7 months ago

Join Club2️⃣8️⃣ Official 🚀launch is 5/28/2024 Join a club that is sharing the truth about DeFi and how it can make money for you while you sleep. $DeFi #DeFi #XRP

Join Club2️⃣8️⃣ Official 🚀launch is 5/28/2024 Join a club that is sharing the truth about DeFi and how it can make money for you while you sleep. $DeFi #DeFi #XRP

Mr.AquaMan.33𝕏

79,569 views • 2 years ago

Not satisfied with taking lunches from the mouthes of hungry children, our entitled government are now looking to change speed limits in front of schools. Is shaving a few seconds off your commute really worth putting our kids' lifes at extra risk?

Not satisfied with taking lunches from the mouthes of hungry children, our entitled government are now looking to change speed limits in front of schools. Is shaving a few seconds off your commute really worth putting our kids' lifes at extra risk?

Nick

45,417 views • 2 years ago

Q: Should startups always raise as much money as possible? In the clip below, Marc Andreessen shares a framework that Benchmark co-founder Andy Rachleff taught him called "The Onion Theory of Risk". You can think of a day 1 startup as having every conceivable kind of risk: founding team risk, product risk, technical risk, market acceptance risk, revenue risk, cost of sales risk, viral growth risk, etc. A startup is basically just a long list of risks, and as Marc explains: "The way I think about running a startup is the way I think about raising money. It's a process of peeling away layers of risk as you go." You raise seed money to peel away the first two or three risks (e.g. founding team risk, product risk, initial launch risk). You raise the Series A round to peel away the next layer of risks (e.g. recruiting risk, customer risk, revenue risk, cost of sales risk) And so on. Basically, you're peeling away risk as you're achieving milestones. And as you achieve milestones, you're both: making progress on your business and justifying raising more capital. So in terms of fundraising, you should be calibrating the amount of money you're raising to the risks you need to pull out of your business for you to raise your next round. For example, if you're raising your Series A round, the best way to do that is to say to investors: "I raised a seed round then achieved ____ milestones and eliminated ____ risks. Now I'm going to raise $X for the Series A to achieve ____ milestones and eliminate ____ risks. This will get the company to ____ state for the Series B round. " This seems fairly obvious, but as Marc points out, it's a much more systematic way of going about things versus just raising as much money as possible, renting fancy offices, and hiring as many people as you can to grow as fast as you can. The more money you raise, the more you dilute your ownership stake in your business so it pays to be thoughtful. Raise the capital you will need to achieve the milestones and eliminate the risks required for your next financing round. It also probably makes sense to give yourself some margin as safety because things never go exactly as planned in startup land. Follow Startup Archive for more tactical startup advice!

Q: Should startups always raise as much money as possible? In the clip below, Marc Andreessen shares a framework that Benchmark co-founder Andy Rachleff taught him called "The Onion Theory of Risk". You can think of a day 1 startup as having every conceivable kind of risk: founding team risk, product risk, technical risk, market acceptance risk, revenue risk, cost of sales risk, viral growth risk, etc. A startup is basically just a long list of risks, and as Marc explains: "The way I think about running a startup is the way I think about raising money. It's a process of peeling away layers of risk as you go." You raise seed money to peel away the first two or three risks (e.g. founding team risk, product risk, initial launch risk). You raise the Series A round to peel away the next layer of risks (e.g. recruiting risk, customer risk, revenue risk, cost of sales risk) And so on. Basically, you're peeling away risk as you're achieving milestones. And as you achieve milestones, you're both: making progress on your business and justifying raising more capital. So in terms of fundraising, you should be calibrating the amount of money you're raising to the risks you need to pull out of your business for you to raise your next round. For example, if you're raising your Series A round, the best way to do that is to say to investors: "I raised a seed round then achieved milestones and eliminated risks. Now I'm going to raise $X for the Series A to achieve milestones and eliminate risks. This will get the company to state for the Series B round. " This seems fairly obvious, but as Marc points out, it's a much more systematic way of going about things versus just raising as much money as possible, renting fancy offices, and hiring as many people as you can to grow as fast as you can. The more money you raise, the more you dilute your ownership stake in your business so it pays to be thoughtful. Raise the capital you will need to achieve the milestones and eliminate the risks required for your next financing round. It also probably makes sense to give yourself some margin as safety because things never go exactly as planned in startup land. Follow Startup Archive for more tactical startup advice!

Startup Archive

178,597 views • 2 years ago

HOW TO GET A TOP STABLECOIN YIELD IN DeFi NOW WITH $pmUSD? Tired of crypto volatility? Time for you to look into a more reliable side of DeFi👀 Move your liquidity to a gold-backed stablecoin & explore every option to farm the best stable yields. EVERYTHING IS HERE👇

HOW TO GET A TOP STABLECOIN YIELD IN DeFi NOW WITH $pmUSD? Tired of crypto volatility? Time for you to look into a more reliable side of DeFi👀 Move your liquidity to a gold-backed stablecoin & explore every option to farm the best stable yields. EVERYTHING IS HERE👇

RAAC

18,348 views • 5 months ago

Farmer: This is the worst I can ever remember it being in this industry for over a decade. Seeing how bad it is for farms right now, we risk losing them.

Farmer: This is the worst I can ever remember it being in this industry for over a decade. Seeing how bad it is for farms right now, we risk losing them.

FactPost

58,236 views • 10 months ago

How is everyone making money in Crypto right now but me? Either everyone is a liar or I'm the worst trader of all time

How is everyone making money in Crypto right now but me? Either everyone is a liar or I'm the worst trader of all time

Clemente

164,753 views • 11 days ago

Q: Should startups always raise as much money as possible? In the clip below, Marc Andreessen shares a framework that Benchmark co-founder Andy Rachleff taught him called "The Onion Theory of Risk". You can think of a day 1 startup as having every conceivable kind of risk: founding team risk, product risk, technical risk, market acceptance risk, revenue risk, cost of sales risk, viral growth risk, etc. A startup is basically just a long list of risks, and as Marc explains: "The way I think about running a startup is the way I think about raising money. It's a process of peeling away layers of risk as you go." You raise seed money to peel away the first two or three risks (e.g. founding team risk, product risk, initial launch risk). You raise the Series A round to peel away the next layer of risks (e.g. recruiting risk, customer risk, revenue risk, cost of sales risk) And so on. Basically, you're peeling away risk as you're achieving milestones. And as you achieve milestones, you're both: making progress on your business and justifying raising more capital. So in terms of fundraising, you should be calibrating the amount money you're raising to the risks you need to pull out of your business for you to raise your next round. For example, if you're raising your Series A round, the best way to do that is to say to investors: "I raised a seed round then achieved ____ milestones and eliminated ____ risks. Now I'm going to raise $X for the Series A to achieve ____ milestones and eliminate ____ risks. This will get the company to ____ state for the Series B round. " This seems fairly obvious, but as Marc points out, it's a much more systematic way of going about things versus just raising as much money as possible, renting fancy offices, and hiring as many people as you can to grow as fast as you can. The more money you raise, the more you dilute your ownership stake in your business so it pays to be thoughtful. Raise the capital you will need to achieve the milestones and eliminate the risks required for your next financing round. It also probably makes sense to give yourself some margin as safety because things never go exactly as planned in startup land.

Q: Should startups always raise as much money as possible? In the clip below, Marc Andreessen shares a framework that Benchmark co-founder Andy Rachleff taught him called "The Onion Theory of Risk". You can think of a day 1 startup as having every conceivable kind of risk: founding team risk, product risk, technical risk, market acceptance risk, revenue risk, cost of sales risk, viral growth risk, etc. A startup is basically just a long list of risks, and as Marc explains: "The way I think about running a startup is the way I think about raising money. It's a process of peeling away layers of risk as you go." You raise seed money to peel away the first two or three risks (e.g. founding team risk, product risk, initial launch risk). You raise the Series A round to peel away the next layer of risks (e.g. recruiting risk, customer risk, revenue risk, cost of sales risk) And so on. Basically, you're peeling away risk as you're achieving milestones. And as you achieve milestones, you're both: making progress on your business and justifying raising more capital. So in terms of fundraising, you should be calibrating the amount money you're raising to the risks you need to pull out of your business for you to raise your next round. For example, if you're raising your Series A round, the best way to do that is to say to investors: "I raised a seed round then achieved milestones and eliminated risks. Now I'm going to raise $X for the Series A to achieve milestones and eliminate risks. This will get the company to state for the Series B round. " This seems fairly obvious, but as Marc points out, it's a much more systematic way of going about things versus just raising as much money as possible, renting fancy offices, and hiring as many people as you can to grow as fast as you can. The more money you raise, the more you dilute your ownership stake in your business so it pays to be thoughtful. Raise the capital you will need to achieve the milestones and eliminate the risks required for your next financing round. It also probably makes sense to give yourself some margin as safety because things never go exactly as planned in startup land.

Michael McGuiness

735,645 views • 3 years ago

I can’t say exactly how effective Bitcoin is as a money, but it’s being perceived by many as an alternative money and so is worth paying attention to. Money needs to be both a medium of exchange and a storehold of wealth — and the latter is more important. I doubt that any central bank will take it on as a reserve currency. That’s because all of the transactions are public, so there’s no privacy to it, and there’s a risk that in the future the code could be broken to make it less effective through government controls. My personal approach is that I do have some Bitcoin in my portfolio, but not much.

I can’t say exactly how effective Bitcoin is as a money, but it’s being perceived by many as an alternative money and so is worth paying attention to. Money needs to be both a medium of exchange and a storehold of wealth — and the latter is more important. I doubt that any central bank will take it on as a reserve currency. That’s because all of the transactions are public, so there’s no privacy to it, and there’s a risk that in the future the code could be broken to make it less effective through government controls. My personal approach is that I do have some Bitcoin in my portfolio, but not much.

Ray Dalio

353,005 views • 10 months ago

The Alpha release of Infinex Connect is now live for Patrons! This is the first step towards bringing the Infinex experience to DeFi, and enabling a new generation of modern crypto apps.

The Alpha release of Infinex Connect is now live for Patrons! This is the first step towards bringing the Infinex experience to DeFi, and enabling a new generation of modern crypto apps.

Infinex

145,431 views • 1 year ago

The only constraint on scaling is how much money you have in your bank account. If you put $1,000 in and you're certain to make more than $1,000 back — you're going to put as much as you can in. That's AppLovin's whole model: "Make the advertiser an arbitrager. Very few people define performance marketing as that. Very few companies have executed it. Facebook's done a fantastic job of it. This is entirely what we're focused on. If they're making money, they're going to spend."

The only constraint on scaling is how much money you have in your bank account. If you put $1,000 in and you're certain to make more than $1,000 back — you're going to put as much as you can in. That's AppLovin's whole model: "Make the advertiser an arbitrager. Very few people define performance marketing as that. Very few companies have executed it. Facebook's done a fantastic job of it. This is entirely what we're focused on. If they're making money, they're going to spend."

David Senra

34,091 views • 3 months ago

Ai is in X, Ai is in Google, Ai is in Instagram and TikTok( more than ANYTHING ) Ai is in your iPhone, your Samsung, Ai is in everything. And they’re profiting off of you not knowing anything. Using our resources to create more avenues of wealth for themselves, using our planet. And no one knows anything because you sit around yelling at everyone about how much you hate Ai, While still using Ai, simultaneously. After you’re done yelling, then what? What can you do for the economy and people you care for if you know nothing? Posting more soon.

Ai is in X, Ai is in Google, Ai is in Instagram and TikTok( more than ANYTHING ) Ai is in your iPhone, your Samsung, Ai is in everything. And they’re profiting off of you not knowing anything. Using our resources to create more avenues of wealth for themselves, using our planet. And no one knows anything because you sit around yelling at everyone about how much you hate Ai, While still using Ai, simultaneously. After you’re done yelling, then what? What can you do for the economy and people you care for if you know nothing? Posting more soon.

TheRionsEye

41,128 views • 8 months ago

One of the few remaining Main Event Champions in the field Greg Raymer is all-in and at risk! Can the "@Fossilman" survive? 🪨

One of the few remaining Main Event Champions in the field Greg Raymer is all-in and at risk! Can the "@Fossilman" survive? 🪨

PokerNews

33,050 views • 1 month ago

This is the ONE YOU HAVE BEEN WAITING FOR! Talking with Peter DiCarlo about Investing, Trading, $TSLA, Psychology of Money and much more. If you're in the markets at all this is a CANNOT Miss Interview.

This is the ONE YOU HAVE BEEN WAITING FOR! Talking with Peter DiCarlo about Investing, Trading, $TSLA, Psychology of Money and much more. If you're in the markets at all this is a CANNOT Miss Interview.

NicholasGibbs

85,857 views • 8 months ago

There is basically no risk to trying anymore. The internet's attention span is a few days, you probably won’t die and most people won’t even notice anyway. We live in a period of no risk, all reward. Free spins.

There is basically no risk to trying anymore. The internet's attention span is a few days, you probably won’t die and most people won’t even notice anyway. We live in a period of no risk, all reward. Free spins.

Andrew Tate

497,707 views • 6 months ago