正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Zack Polanski got interrogated about whether he supported the ‘Zionism is Racism’ motion and apparently he doesn’t in its current form. Not sure what version would be acceptable but I doubt the antisemites will be happy with him even for this.

11,379 次观看 • 3 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Roman Polanski explains why he despises the press as an institution, even while refusing to condemn individual journalists: In a 1971 interview with Dick Cavett, Polanski is asked whether he hates certain members of the press for how he was treated after the murder of his wife, Sharon Tate. He answers carefully: "Well, yes, to be honest, I do. But I wouldn't call it a hatred now, you see, somehow evolved to just indifference, and I simply don't read it and try to avoid." Cavett presses further — is there anything written about the case he would recommend? Polanski refuses to generalise. He won't claim that everything ever written by the press is obnoxious, because that would be intellectually dishonest: "It would be silly of me to say that absolutely everything written by the press is obnoxious. This is impossible." He frames his thinking through evolution and biology: "I'm philosophically oriented this way that I know that there are always mutants, you know, the principle of life and evolution. So there must be some flukes." Individual journalists, in other words, can be the exceptions. But the institution itself, taken as a whole, he condemns without qualification: "In general, I despise the press tremendously for its inaccuracy, for its irresponsibility, and for its often even deliberate cruelty. And all this, it's for lucrative purposes." Three charges, escalating in severity (inaccuracy, irresponsibility, deliberate cruelty) all of them, in his view, driven by money.

History Nerd

16,043 次观看 • 1 个月前