Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

zero waste policy! Something as precious as macho juice is not wasted! #gaycumdump #takingloads #hotelwhore #gaybareback #spunkdonor #DNAcollector #Attack #makelovenotwar #fuckingcreatures #threesome #sperm #internalbreeding

Worldwide DNA Transfer

53,369 subscribers

255,176 просмотров • 2 лет назад •via X (Twitter)

NSFW #gaycumdump #takingloads #hotelwhore #gaybareback #spunkdonor #DNAcollector #Attack #makelovenotwar #fuckingcreatures #threesome #sperm #internalbreeding

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

#BREAKING: Velshi: He wrote an entire book about DEI being our weakness, how women were not suited to be in the military. Why are people surprised about Pete Hegseth? Basil Smikle: “…anyone that served in WWII would never say that the Tuskegee Airmen were a waste. They would never say that, and I wonder, could a Colin Powell exist in Hegseth’s army today? He couldn’t…so this isn’t really just about DEI, this is literally an attack on Black people…on women…on people of color…If you don’t like a policy, you can fix a policy, but this is intentional about going after people and taking them out of service…and it is important as you said, that these were senior individuals because the qualifications are unmistakable…and it’s decades of service…”🤔

#BREAKING: Velshi: He wrote an entire book about DEI being our weakness, how women were not suited to be in the military. Why are people surprised about Pete Hegseth? Basil Smikle: “…anyone that served in WWII would never say that the Tuskegee Airmen were a waste. They would never say that, and I wonder, could a Colin Powell exist in Hegseth’s army today? He couldn’t…so this isn’t really just about DEI, this is literally an attack on Black people…on women…on people of color…If you don’t like a policy, you can fix a policy, but this is intentional about going after people and taking them out of service…and it is important as you said, that these were senior individuals because the qualifications are unmistakable…and it’s decades of service…”🤔

Emoluments Clause

64,461 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

For example, in this video, what exactly were Mudavadi, Lee Njiru, and Kabogo doing there? Do any of them even understand satellites or space technology? This is why many Kenyans see these foreign trips as a waste of public money. During a highly technical session, the President himself looked like the only one trying to ask questions while the rest stayed silent. If Kenya truly wants to benefit from these visits, send scientists, engineers, researchers, and young innovators. People who can engage technically, learn something useful, then return home and build the country. Not 1950s-era political figures who do not even know what a satellite constellation is. The session ended with almost zero constructive input from the delegation. That is not diplomacy. It is an expensive sightseeing funded by taxpayers.

For example, in this video, what exactly were Mudavadi, Lee Njiru, and Kabogo doing there? Do any of them even understand satellites or space technology? This is why many Kenyans see these foreign trips as a waste of public money. During a highly technical session, the President himself looked like the only one trying to ask questions while the rest stayed silent. If Kenya truly wants to benefit from these visits, send scientists, engineers, researchers, and young innovators. People who can engage technically, learn something useful, then return home and build the country. Not 1950s-era political figures who do not even know what a satellite constellation is. The session ended with almost zero constructive input from the delegation. That is not diplomacy. It is an expensive sightseeing funded by taxpayers.

Sholla Ard 🇰🇪

15,515 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

🇮🇱🇦🇺⚠️ WHERE IS THE OUTRAGE?! Westerners need to watch this clip of Netanyahu because what he’s saying is deeply manipulative, invasive, and frankly unacceptable. Here, Netanyahu is lecturing a sovereign Western country, blaming Australia’s elected government for a terror attack carried out on Australian soil, because Canberra didn’t obey Israel’s political demands. Here’s what he literally claims: 🔹 Australia “caused” antisemitism by recognizing a Palestinian state. 🔹 Albanese “let the disease spread” by not following Israel’s preferred policy. 🔹 The Bondi attack happened because Australia showed “weakness.” 🔹 Western governments must act according to what Israel expects, or terrorism will “consume you as well.” There were no condolences, no expressions of solidarity, only political coercion using a domestic Australian tragedy as leverage. There is zero evidence linking the Bondi attack to Australia’s diplomatic position, and yet Netanyahu frames a lone attacker as the consequence of Western governments refusing to align with him. It gets worse, Mossad has now entered the Bondi investigation. Israel is inserting itself directly into an internal Australian case while its Prime Minister publicly blames Australia for the attack. Ask yourself: Since when does a foreign leader get to publicly shame a Western government for its democratic foreign policy? Since when is a domestic terror investigation handed influence from a foreign intelligence service? And why is he blaming Australians, instead of the attacker? Netanyahu’s message to the West is “Follow our political line or your citizens will die, and it will be your fault.” That crosses every line of respect between sovereign states and sounds like a direct threat. The fact more Westerners are not furious at this level of intrusion and manipulation is astonishing.

🇮🇱🇦🇺⚠️ WHERE IS THE OUTRAGE?! Westerners need to watch this clip of Netanyahu because what he’s saying is deeply manipulative, invasive, and frankly unacceptable. Here, Netanyahu is lecturing a sovereign Western country, blaming Australia’s elected government for a terror attack carried out on Australian soil, because Canberra didn’t obey Israel’s political demands. Here’s what he literally claims: 🔹 Australia “caused” antisemitism by recognizing a Palestinian state. 🔹 Albanese “let the disease spread” by not following Israel’s preferred policy. 🔹 The Bondi attack happened because Australia showed “weakness.” 🔹 Western governments must act according to what Israel expects, or terrorism will “consume you as well.” There were no condolences, no expressions of solidarity, only political coercion using a domestic Australian tragedy as leverage. There is zero evidence linking the Bondi attack to Australia’s diplomatic position, and yet Netanyahu frames a lone attacker as the consequence of Western governments refusing to align with him. It gets worse, Mossad has now entered the Bondi investigation. Israel is inserting itself directly into an internal Australian case while its Prime Minister publicly blames Australia for the attack. Ask yourself: Since when does a foreign leader get to publicly shame a Western government for its democratic foreign policy? Since when is a domestic terror investigation handed influence from a foreign intelligence service? And why is he blaming Australians, instead of the attacker? Netanyahu’s message to the West is “Follow our political line or your citizens will die, and it will be your fault.” That crosses every line of respect between sovereign states and sounds like a direct threat. The fact more Westerners are not furious at this level of intrusion and manipulation is astonishing.

DD Geopolitics

77,475 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

The horror of the US physician residency system aside, I feel like people need to remember that everyone has different goals as a streamer?! Because of its roots, VTubing always seems to idealize going corpo or "making it big" but there are still people who genuinely DO NOT CARE. I am a vtuber because it's fun, streaming is a hobby, and I would prefer to hang out with friends who share my interests rather than my boomer doctor coworkers who only talk about boats and golf?? I've streamed this sporadically for the past eight years, and becoming an anime man on the internet did not change anything about that. I quadrupled my follower count in the past few months from some silly posts, and yet I have zero desire to chase growth as a metric for my own personal achievement. I already have a career that I enjoy and dedicate myself to, and vtubing is something that will always take a backseat to that. But I can certainly still enjoy my time as doctor irl doctor vtuber saikenMD without having to submit to this notion that my investment needs to pay off in sponsorships, networking, or scheduled content creation. Joining a company to control my brand, hiring a manager to give advice on things I do not care about, or using my name as a code to get 10% off on whatever, is not something that is going to help me accomplish what I want to do here. Sometimes, I'm just answering medical curiosities for people who do not have anyone else in their lives whom they can ask. I do not need to turn a profit to consider my creative outlet "worthwhile," I literally waste money doing this stuff; but that's okay BECAUSE IT'S GENUINELY A GOOD TIME!!!!! like just let me live damn

saiken, M.D. 💜🩺 doctor vtuber

50,185 просмотров • 1 год назад

But the moment that followed carried more weight. It would be eye-watering for many who watched his whole journey. Musk stepped forward to deliver his goodbye—not as a tech billionaire, but as a man who’d embedded himself inside one of the most dysfunctional systems on earth in an attempt to fix it from the inside. “Well, let me say perhaps a few words,” Musk began. Musk made it clear that DOGE was not going anywhere, it was just getting started. “This is not the end of DOGE, but really the beginning.” His time as a special government employee had run its course, limited by design. But the mission, he said, was far from over. “The DOGE team will only grow stronger over time. The DOGE influence will only grow stronger.” He compared the movement to a “burst of buddhism,” something deeper than policy or bureaucracy. A mindset. A way of life. “It is permeating throughout the government,” he explained. “I’m confident that over time we will see over $1 trillion in savings—a trillion dollars of waste and fraud reduction.” For Musk, the legacy of DOGE wouldn’t be measured in headlines. It would be measured in momentum.

But the moment that followed carried more weight. It would be eye-watering for many who watched his whole journey. Musk stepped forward to deliver his goodbye—not as a tech billionaire, but as a man who’d embedded himself inside one of the most dysfunctional systems on earth in an attempt to fix it from the inside. “Well, let me say perhaps a few words,” Musk began. Musk made it clear that DOGE was not going anywhere, it was just getting started. “This is not the end of DOGE, but really the beginning.” His time as a special government employee had run its course, limited by design. But the mission, he said, was far from over. “The DOGE team will only grow stronger over time. The DOGE influence will only grow stronger.” He compared the movement to a “burst of buddhism,” something deeper than policy or bureaucracy. A mindset. A way of life. “It is permeating throughout the government,” he explained. “I’m confident that over time we will see over $1 trillion in savings—a trillion dollars of waste and fraud reduction.” For Musk, the legacy of DOGE wouldn’t be measured in headlines. It would be measured in momentum.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

663,977 просмотров • 1 год назад

Rep. James Comer says whistleblowers have exposed welfare fraud in Minnesota, alleging state leaders knew about it and warning taxpayers are fed up with waste and lack of accountability: “We’ve started in Minnesota investigating fraud with respect to welfare benefits because we have had some brave whistleblowers come forward. These are credible whistleblowers who are employed by the state government. They are overwhelmingly Democrat, and they’re bringing lots of documents forward that not only prove there was fraud but also implicate, in my opinion, the fact that both Governor Walz and Attorney General Ellison knew about it. I think this is happening in every state, but especially the blue states, because it doesn’t seem that Democrats care as much about wasteful spending as Republicans do. I think the American people are sick and tired of their tax dollars being wasted and expect people to do something about it and be held accountable.”

Rep. James Comer says whistleblowers have exposed welfare fraud in Minnesota, alleging state leaders knew about it and warning taxpayers are fed up with waste and lack of accountability: “We’ve started in Minnesota investigating fraud with respect to welfare benefits because we have had some brave whistleblowers come forward. These are credible whistleblowers who are employed by the state government. They are overwhelmingly Democrat, and they’re bringing lots of documents forward that not only prove there was fraud but also implicate, in my opinion, the fact that both Governor Walz and Attorney General Ellison knew about it. I think this is happening in every state, but especially the blue states, because it doesn’t seem that Democrats care as much about wasteful spending as Republicans do. I think the American people are sick and tired of their tax dollars being wasted and expect people to do something about it and be held accountable.”

Sean Hannity 🇺🇸

176,806 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Black America knows what lawlessness looks like. We lived with it for decades. You all know I live in a Blue City, ghetto. Broken windows. Open drug markets. Repeat offenders cycling in and out. Victims told to cope. Families told to adapt. Now the same people who abandoned our neighborhoods exported that chaos statewide. Illegals running around loose with less than zero cooperation from the state. Cashless bail emptied jails. Habitual offenders were put back on the Democrat run streets. Police were restrained. Prosecutors stopped prosecuting. Then they layered mass illegal immigration on top of it. No vetting. No enforcement. No accountability. This is not compassion. This is negligence dressed up as virtue. Law is not oppression. Order is not racism. Borders are not hatred. American Citizenship still means something. Every Democrat community suffers when laws are optional. Black communities just felt it first. America is tired of it. Black America is tired of it. Working families are tired of it. When state leaders refuse to enforce the law and chaos becomes demuxrat policy, the federal government has both the authority and the obligation to restore order. The Constitution anticipated moments like this. It did not require permission from activists. Lawlessness is not progress. It is surrender. #SilentMajoritySpeaks #AStoneGroove

Black America knows what lawlessness looks like. We lived with it for decades. You all know I live in a Blue City, ghetto. Broken windows. Open drug markets. Repeat offenders cycling in and out. Victims told to cope. Families told to adapt. Now the same people who abandoned our neighborhoods exported that chaos statewide. Illegals running around loose with less than zero cooperation from the state. Cashless bail emptied jails. Habitual offenders were put back on the Democrat run streets. Police were restrained. Prosecutors stopped prosecuting. Then they layered mass illegal immigration on top of it. No vetting. No enforcement. No accountability. This is not compassion. This is negligence dressed up as virtue. Law is not oppression. Order is not racism. Borders are not hatred. American Citizenship still means something. Every Democrat community suffers when laws are optional. Black communities just felt it first. America is tired of it. Black America is tired of it. Working families are tired of it. When state leaders refuse to enforce the law and chaos becomes demuxrat policy, the federal government has both the authority and the obligation to restore order. The Constitution anticipated moments like this. It did not require permission from activists. Lawlessness is not progress. It is surrender. #SilentMajoritySpeaks #AStoneGroove

A Gene Robinson

127,735 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

🚨Former Israeli Acting President Avraham Burg: Iran was NOT an existential threat for Israel, Netanyahu launched a WASTED war! ‘Hezbollah at the northern part of Israel is a problem, as an uncontrolled substate militia, it’s a problem for the Lebanese government, for the Israelis and maybe even for the Syrians. I mean, the entire triangle of the northern part of Israel should be troubled by the very existence and the kind of independence of Hezbollah. And something is to be done about it. Iran was not, if you ask me, an existential threat to Israel. It was a real problem. It was a real threat with the proxies and the fire and the fire belt around Israel and the provocations all over the Gulf and all over the Middle East. But it was not such an existential threat and could have been dealt differently by diplomacy, by agreements, by different equilibrium and balances. And last but not least, Hamas proved that October 7th 2023, that it is really very, very, very malicious and very criminal when it comes to their motivation to annihilate the state of Israel and to kill as many Israelis as possible. All these three are problems that Netanyahu believed, and unfortunately too many Israelis still believe that can be solved by muscles, by power, by military manoeuvres, without understanding the very ancient wisdom of war. A war that does not have a next step, which is political, which is agreement, which is a settlement, which is a kind of a new setting, is a wasted war. And all the victims, be them Israelis or be them Lebanese or innocent Gazan people or innocent Iranian people, are simply human sacrifice. It’s a waste. It’s a shame.’ -Avraham Burg joins us for Monday’s episode of Going Underground to discuss the US-Israeli war on Iran, and much more. Don’t miss it, follow us on X and follow our Rumble channel, link below in the replies 👇

🚨Former Israeli Acting President Avraham Burg: Iran was NOT an existential threat for Israel, Netanyahu launched a WASTED war! ‘Hezbollah at the northern part of Israel is a problem, as an uncontrolled substate militia, it’s a problem for the Lebanese government, for the Israelis and maybe even for the Syrians. I mean, the entire triangle of the northern part of Israel should be troubled by the very existence and the kind of independence of Hezbollah. And something is to be done about it. Iran was not, if you ask me, an existential threat to Israel. It was a real problem. It was a real threat with the proxies and the fire and the fire belt around Israel and the provocations all over the Gulf and all over the Middle East. But it was not such an existential threat and could have been dealt differently by diplomacy, by agreements, by different equilibrium and balances. And last but not least, Hamas proved that October 7th 2023, that it is really very, very, very malicious and very criminal when it comes to their motivation to annihilate the state of Israel and to kill as many Israelis as possible. All these three are problems that Netanyahu believed, and unfortunately too many Israelis still believe that can be solved by muscles, by power, by military manoeuvres, without understanding the very ancient wisdom of war. A war that does not have a next step, which is political, which is agreement, which is a settlement, which is a kind of a new setting, is a wasted war. And all the victims, be them Israelis or be them Lebanese or innocent Gazan people or innocent Iranian people, are simply human sacrifice. It’s a waste. It’s a shame.’ -Avraham Burg joins us for Monday’s episode of Going Underground to discuss the US-Israeli war on Iran, and much more. Don’t miss it, follow us on X and follow our Rumble channel, link below in the replies 👇

Going Underground

24,097 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

I have just received fresh reports from the field and I must commend the teams on ground for sustaining the momentum beyond the sanitation hours. At Mosan bus stop and the Caterpillar blackspot along Ipaja road, massive evacuation of waste has been carried out and the area is now cleared. Along the Egbeda bus stop inward Iyana Ipaja, median evacuation is currently ongoing and the transformation is visible. At Ipodo in Ikeja, our teams are on ground with the Dino bin actively evacuating accumulated refuse. The situation at Iba town along the LASU - Igando Road is being tackled head on as we speak because the humongous waste heaps there are being evacuated and will soon be a thing of the past. I have also been briefed about the ongoing tipper evacuation under the Trade Fair bridge along the Lagos Badagry expressway and the clearance work there is in full swing. These are not just isolated operations, they are the direct result of LAWMA's sustained intervention and our zero tolerance policy for environmental nuisances. I want to assure every Lagosian that what we started with the monthly sanitation exercise is being backed up with continuous enforcement and clearing operations across the State. We will not rest until every blackspot is turned into a clean and safe space. This is the new order for a #CleanerLagos and a #GreaterLagos.

I have just received fresh reports from the field and I must commend the teams on ground for sustaining the momentum beyond the sanitation hours. At Mosan bus stop and the Caterpillar blackspot along Ipaja road, massive evacuation of waste has been carried out and the area is now cleared. Along the Egbeda bus stop inward Iyana Ipaja, median evacuation is currently ongoing and the transformation is visible. At Ipodo in Ikeja, our teams are on ground with the Dino bin actively evacuating accumulated refuse. The situation at Iba town along the LASU - Igando Road is being tackled head on as we speak because the humongous waste heaps there are being evacuated and will soon be a thing of the past. I have also been briefed about the ongoing tipper evacuation under the Trade Fair bridge along the Lagos Badagry expressway and the clearance work there is in full swing. These are not just isolated operations, they are the direct result of LAWMA's sustained intervention and our zero tolerance policy for environmental nuisances. I want to assure every Lagosian that what we started with the monthly sanitation exercise is being backed up with continuous enforcement and clearing operations across the State. We will not rest until every blackspot is turned into a clean and safe space. This is the new order for a #CleanerLagos and a #GreaterLagos.

Tokunbo Wahab

28,969 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Andrew Hastie is most likely Australia’s next Prime Minister. Something tells me he won’t be getting the same affectionate hugs from NZ PM Chris Luxon that Anthony Albanese received. Last week Mr Hastie launched a stinging attack on the Net Zero policies of the Australian Labor govt. Sadly, almost every criticism he makes applies to Chris Luxon’s govt as well. New Zealand has one politician who speaks similarly to Mr Hastie, but he’s not anywhere near as direct. NZ First’s Shane Jones is restricted in what he can say because he’s a member of the governing coalition. However Shane needs to listen to this speech from Mr Hastie and give a NZ version at the next coalition meeting. Directing it to the Blue Green National party and its UN besotted leader Luxon. Someone has to stand up for regular New Zealanders too! This is a little longer than my usual videos at 3 minutes 47 seconds. However its well worth a watch. If only one New Zealand MP could stand up in the house and speak these same truths.

Andrew Hastie is most likely Australia’s next Prime Minister. Something tells me he won’t be getting the same affectionate hugs from NZ PM Chris Luxon that Anthony Albanese received. Last week Mr Hastie launched a stinging attack on the Net Zero policies of the Australian Labor govt. Sadly, almost every criticism he makes applies to Chris Luxon’s govt as well. New Zealand has one politician who speaks similarly to Mr Hastie, but he’s not anywhere near as direct. NZ First’s Shane Jones is restricted in what he can say because he’s a member of the governing coalition. However Shane needs to listen to this speech from Mr Hastie and give a NZ version at the next coalition meeting. Directing it to the Blue Green National party and its UN besotted leader Luxon. Someone has to stand up for regular New Zealanders too! This is a little longer than my usual videos at 3 minutes 47 seconds. However its well worth a watch. If only one New Zealand MP could stand up in the house and speak these same truths.

The Redbaiter

120,993 просмотров • 1 год назад

In this convincing critique, retired Lieutenant General Ben Hodges, former Commander of U.S. Army Europe, expresses deep skepticism regarding the feasibility of proposed security guarantees by Trump for Ukraine. “There is no such thing as Article 5-like.” - Ben Hodges. “Does any Ukrainian, any Ukrainian believe for one second that vladimir putin will live up to any agreement? Of course not. Nobody believes that, that putin could be trusted. The only way that he would not fill into the whatever part that Ukrainian troops came out of would be if there were thousands of American, German, British, French soldiers sitting there. That's, otherwise, it will be a very short amount of time before you have either Russian troops or you have Rosgvardia or some other unknown separatist quasi-things that the Russians would try to say, "Well, that's not us. We didn't do that," just like they did back in 2014. So how anybody could trust that Russia would actually live up to some agreement like that, I think that that would really be, you'd have to suspend belief to accept that. The idea of this when I hear this phrase "Article 5-like," I mean, what does that mean? Article 5 means an armed attack on one shall be considered an armed attack on all. So if the United States is offering Article 5-like, that means if Russia attacked Ukraine again, then that would be as if Russia had attacked the United States. Do you really think, does anybody really think that this administration would actually do something about it? And what's an attack? Is it one Shahed drone or does it have to be 500 Shahed drones or Russian troops overrunning, you know, another Ukrainian city? I mean, what constitutes an armed attack? So there is no such thing as Article 5-like. I mean, this administration does not even enforce the sanctions it has already put in place. India's oil import from Russia has gone up in October and then again in November, even though these latest tough sanctions were put in place. So I personally, I have zero confidence that the Trump administration would do anything to enforce this kind of agreement. Now again, the burden and the risk is on Ukraine, not on old retired people like me on the outside watching. But as I look at what's happened over the last year and indeed over the last several years, I would be very reluctant to agree to something with Russia if it depended on Russia living up to it in good faith or depending on the United States. This is where you would have to see a very strong European force that was there, not one that's sitting in Poland, but a European force in Ukraine that has real capability, has real rules of engagement, and has the capability to shoot back immediately when Russia tests—as they inevitably will test immediately.” ( Full interview in the comments )

In this convincing critique, retired Lieutenant General Ben Hodges, former Commander of U.S. Army Europe, expresses deep skepticism regarding the feasibility of proposed security guarantees by Trump for Ukraine. “There is no such thing as Article 5-like.” - Ben Hodges. “Does any Ukrainian, any Ukrainian believe for one second that vladimir putin will live up to any agreement? Of course not. Nobody believes that, that putin could be trusted. The only way that he would not fill into the whatever part that Ukrainian troops came out of would be if there were thousands of American, German, British, French soldiers sitting there. That's, otherwise, it will be a very short amount of time before you have either Russian troops or you have Rosgvardia or some other unknown separatist quasi-things that the Russians would try to say, "Well, that's not us. We didn't do that," just like they did back in 2014. So how anybody could trust that Russia would actually live up to some agreement like that, I think that that would really be, you'd have to suspend belief to accept that. The idea of this when I hear this phrase "Article 5-like," I mean, what does that mean? Article 5 means an armed attack on one shall be considered an armed attack on all. So if the United States is offering Article 5-like, that means if Russia attacked Ukraine again, then that would be as if Russia had attacked the United States. Do you really think, does anybody really think that this administration would actually do something about it? And what's an attack? Is it one Shahed drone or does it have to be 500 Shahed drones or Russian troops overrunning, you know, another Ukrainian city? I mean, what constitutes an armed attack? So there is no such thing as Article 5-like. I mean, this administration does not even enforce the sanctions it has already put in place. India's oil import from Russia has gone up in October and then again in November, even though these latest tough sanctions were put in place. So I personally, I have zero confidence that the Trump administration would do anything to enforce this kind of agreement. Now again, the burden and the risk is on Ukraine, not on old retired people like me on the outside watching. But as I look at what's happened over the last year and indeed over the last several years, I would be very reluctant to agree to something with Russia if it depended on Russia living up to it in good faith or depending on the United States. This is where you would have to see a very strong European force that was there, not one that's sitting in Poland, but a European force in Ukraine that has real capability, has real rules of engagement, and has the capability to shoot back immediately when Russia tests—as they inevitably will test immediately.” ( Full interview in the comments )

Yasmina

12,710 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Meet Mahalingappa Itnal, a farmer from Karnataka who just changed the game.🌽🌽🌽🌽🌽 For centuries, jaggery (gur) has been made almost exclusively from sugarcane, a crop that takes nearly a full year to grow and demands huge amounts of water. But Mahalingappa stood in his corn fields and asked a question so simple it had been overlooked for generations: “Why are we throwing away the stalks?” Corn stalks are usually treated as waste and burned, discarded, or left to rot after the harvest. Mahalingappa saw potential instead of waste. Through experimentation and persistence, he figured out how to extract juice from corn stalks and convert it into jaggery. The result? A nutritious, natural sweetener made from a crop that matures in just 90–120 days. This single insight quietly disrupts an entire system. Corn requires far less water than sugarcane, grows faster, and is already cultivated widely across India. Farmers can now earn additional income from what was once agricultural waste, without waiting a full year for returns. Less water stress. Less burning of crop residue. More resilience for small farmers. What makes this even more powerful is that the solution didn’t come from a lab, a multinational, or a billion dollar agri-tech firm. It came from lived knowledge, observation, and indigenous innovation , something Indian farmers have always had, but are rarely credited for. Time and again, traditional wisdom and grassroots innovation were dismissed as “unscientific” or “backward.” Only later does modern science arrive to validate what farmers already knew instinctively: that nature wastes nothing, and sustainability lies in working with the land, not extracting from it. Mahalingappa Itnal didn’t just make jaggery from corn stalks. He redefined waste, challenged monoculture thinking, and reminded us that some of the most powerful innovations grow quietly in our fields. Yes, corn stalk jaggery is more nutritional, not by hype, but by chemistry and biology. This is the future of agriculture. It’s local, regenerative, farmer-led.

Meet Mahalingappa Itnal, a farmer from Karnataka who just changed the game.🌽🌽🌽🌽🌽 For centuries, jaggery (gur) has been made almost exclusively from sugarcane, a crop that takes nearly a full year to grow and demands huge amounts of water. But Mahalingappa stood in his corn fields and asked a question so simple it had been overlooked for generations: “Why are we throwing away the stalks?” Corn stalks are usually treated as waste and burned, discarded, or left to rot after the harvest. Mahalingappa saw potential instead of waste. Through experimentation and persistence, he figured out how to extract juice from corn stalks and convert it into jaggery. The result? A nutritious, natural sweetener made from a crop that matures in just 90–120 days. This single insight quietly disrupts an entire system. Corn requires far less water than sugarcane, grows faster, and is already cultivated widely across India. Farmers can now earn additional income from what was once agricultural waste, without waiting a full year for returns. Less water stress. Less burning of crop residue. More resilience for small farmers. What makes this even more powerful is that the solution didn’t come from a lab, a multinational, or a billion dollar agri-tech firm. It came from lived knowledge, observation, and indigenous innovation , something Indian farmers have always had, but are rarely credited for. Time and again, traditional wisdom and grassroots innovation were dismissed as “unscientific” or “backward.” Only later does modern science arrive to validate what farmers already knew instinctively: that nature wastes nothing, and sustainability lies in working with the land, not extracting from it. Mahalingappa Itnal didn’t just make jaggery from corn stalks. He redefined waste, challenged monoculture thinking, and reminded us that some of the most powerful innovations grow quietly in our fields. Yes, corn stalk jaggery is more nutritional, not by hype, but by chemistry and biology. This is the future of agriculture. It’s local, regenerative, farmer-led.

JIX5A

93,906 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Gavin Newsom to eliminate up to 2 million home gardens in California Effected residents living in Los Angeles, San Diego and Riverside would be responsible for up to $13,000 to bring themselves into compliance “This policy he is spearheading, also called zone zero, would require that all these good standing trees and vegetation within a five foot radius of your house be removed. And that would include garden plants like fruits and vegetables. This policy will impact roughly 2 million homes within the state of California. And for somebody living in a part of this state like Los Angeles could cost you up to $13,000 to come into compliance. They're so generous about this, they're gonna give you 3 years to comply before they send some sort of inspector to your house. And the neat thing is if the inspector sees stuff that they don't like, they can just pull it out themselves. They can mess with your garden, they can mess with your plants, they can mess with your vegetation” “If you needed to know that Gavin Newsom was responsible for sure, here's the receipt. I mean, they passed two bills in the legislature to create a footprint for implementing something like this. Not only that, but because of the delay in this policy being implemented, here's the specific executive order from Gavin Newsom earlier this year that he wants zone zero regulations to be implemented by December 31st, 2025. And as you as you can see, this policy is so controversial that the California Department of Wildfires, which is responsible for implementing this, hasn't done it yet.“ This policy will affect homeowners the state designates high-risk wildfire areas in southern California, including parts of Los Angeles County Primarily impacts: Wildland-urban interface and certain neighborhoods in cities like Los Angeles (e.g., parts of Pacific Palisades, Altadena, Malibu, Rancho Palos Verdes), San Diego, Ventura, Riverside, and other fire-prone counties Residents must - Remove flammable vegetation, mulch, plants, and combustible materials (e.g., wood piles, flammable fences/outbuildings in that zone). - No live plants directly touching the structure; low-growing, only fire-resistant plants may be allowed

Gavin Newsom to eliminate up to 2 million home gardens in California Effected residents living in Los Angeles, San Diego and Riverside would be responsible for up to $13,000 to bring themselves into compliance “This policy he is spearheading, also called zone zero, would require that all these good standing trees and vegetation within a five foot radius of your house be removed. And that would include garden plants like fruits and vegetables. This policy will impact roughly 2 million homes within the state of California. And for somebody living in a part of this state like Los Angeles could cost you up to $13,000 to come into compliance. They're so generous about this, they're gonna give you 3 years to comply before they send some sort of inspector to your house. And the neat thing is if the inspector sees stuff that they don't like, they can just pull it out themselves. They can mess with your garden, they can mess with your plants, they can mess with your vegetation” “If you needed to know that Gavin Newsom was responsible for sure, here's the receipt. I mean, they passed two bills in the legislature to create a footprint for implementing something like this. Not only that, but because of the delay in this policy being implemented, here's the specific executive order from Gavin Newsom earlier this year that he wants zone zero regulations to be implemented by December 31st, 2025. And as you as you can see, this policy is so controversial that the California Department of Wildfires, which is responsible for implementing this, hasn't done it yet.“ This policy will affect homeowners the state designates high-risk wildfire areas in southern California, including parts of Los Angeles County Primarily impacts: Wildland-urban interface and certain neighborhoods in cities like Los Angeles (e.g., parts of Pacific Palisades, Altadena, Malibu, Rancho Palos Verdes), San Diego, Ventura, Riverside, and other fire-prone counties Residents must - Remove flammable vegetation, mulch, plants, and combustible materials (e.g., wood piles, flammable fences/outbuildings in that zone). - No live plants directly touching the structure; low-growing, only fire-resistant plants may be allowed

Wall Street Apes

393,092 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Larry Ellison just did in code what Washington couldn’t do in twenty years. Twenty years of hearings. Twenty years of funerals. Twenty years of the same argument while the body count climbed. Ellison stopped waiting. Ellison: “We think we can absolutely lock down schools… dramatically reduce the case of anyone being on campus that doesn’t belong on campus.” He is not lobbying Congress. He is not writing op-eds. He is writing software. The American school has always been a soft target dressed up as a fortress. A buzzer at the front door. A sign-in sheet nobody reads. A guard watching one hallway out of fifty. It worked because most days, nobody was trying. Ellison is deleting that fiction. Every face authenticated at the gate. Every inch of the campus watched by something that never sleeps. Every movement measured against a model of what belongs. Ellison: “The second someone pulls out a gun… use AI cameras to immediately recognize that.” The camera is not recording evidence for the trial afterward. The camera is hunting. It knows the silhouette of a pistol the way a hawk knows the silhouette of a rabbit. It triggers the lockdown before the first round is chambered. It seals the doors while the shooter is still deciding whether to walk through them. A human guard reacts in seconds. A terrified teacher reacts in seconds. A 911 call connects in minutes. A machine reacts in milliseconds and never looks away. We spent two decades treating this as a moral argument. Rights versus regulation. Access versus treatment. Prayers versus policy. The debate produced speeches. It never produced safety. Ellison treats it as an engineering problem. Make the attack architecturally impossible. The argument becomes irrelevant. That is the shift nobody voted on. The future of the American classroom is not being decided in the Senate. It is being decided in a server rack. Parents did not ask for this. Teachers did not design this. No child ever asked to be guarded by a camera that knows what a gun looks like. The fortress is going up anyway. While the country argued about the right answer, a handful of engineers shipped one. The school of the future is not a building. It is a perimeter enforced by code. And it will guard your children whether you asked for it or not.

Larry Ellison just did in code what Washington couldn’t do in twenty years. Twenty years of hearings. Twenty years of funerals. Twenty years of the same argument while the body count climbed. Ellison stopped waiting. Ellison: “We think we can absolutely lock down schools… dramatically reduce the case of anyone being on campus that doesn’t belong on campus.” He is not lobbying Congress. He is not writing op-eds. He is writing software. The American school has always been a soft target dressed up as a fortress. A buzzer at the front door. A sign-in sheet nobody reads. A guard watching one hallway out of fifty. It worked because most days, nobody was trying. Ellison is deleting that fiction. Every face authenticated at the gate. Every inch of the campus watched by something that never sleeps. Every movement measured against a model of what belongs. Ellison: “The second someone pulls out a gun… use AI cameras to immediately recognize that.” The camera is not recording evidence for the trial afterward. The camera is hunting. It knows the silhouette of a pistol the way a hawk knows the silhouette of a rabbit. It triggers the lockdown before the first round is chambered. It seals the doors while the shooter is still deciding whether to walk through them. A human guard reacts in seconds. A terrified teacher reacts in seconds. A 911 call connects in minutes. A machine reacts in milliseconds and never looks away. We spent two decades treating this as a moral argument. Rights versus regulation. Access versus treatment. Prayers versus policy. The debate produced speeches. It never produced safety. Ellison treats it as an engineering problem. Make the attack architecturally impossible. The argument becomes irrelevant. That is the shift nobody voted on. The future of the American classroom is not being decided in the Senate. It is being decided in a server rack. Parents did not ask for this. Teachers did not design this. No child ever asked to be guarded by a camera that knows what a gun looks like. The fortress is going up anyway. While the country argued about the right answer, a handful of engineers shipped one. The school of the future is not a building. It is a perimeter enforced by code. And it will guard your children whether you asked for it or not.

Dustin

10,157 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

The thing about war is, it’s not a one way street as Pete Hegseth would have you believe. Take a look at this report from the New York Times. As you can see, a series of satellite images were released showing damage at U.S. bases across the region, some of which killed American military personnel. The question is, do you believe the account of the Iranians or the ‘nothing to see here’ US account? It turns out the Iranian account is correct and the American response was to instruct satellite companies to remove the incriminating images. Just as Hegseth can’t bring himself to admit that they killed over a hundred elementary school girls on day one in an erroneous triple tap, he wants to hide the extensive damage caused by precision attacks by Iran on U.S. assets. We know time and again Trump has lied about Iran begging him to do a deal, and that as a result, billions have been made from market manipulation. Even now, he’s is claiming Iran wants a deal as fire is being exchanged in the Strait of Hormuz, exchanges that he yesterday described as ‘love taps’. In critical times of war it’s not a good look when enemy accounts of events are proved to be accurate while your own president and Secretary of Defense is found to be repeatedly lying. The cost of this conflict has been laughably estimated to be $25 billion when credible inside U.S. sources claim that over 50% of critical missile stocks have been depleted. The obvious question being, imagine what damage Iran could have done given the extensive ACTUAL damage the U.S. have tried to hide? The narrative is that Iran are days away from economic catastrophe, yet the CIA have reported that Iran could survive the U.S. blockade for up to three months. The whole U.S. narrative, just like the administration’s economic and foreign policy agenda is built on a lie, in a fantasy world that Trump expects us to join him, while it falls apart at the seams. It has been said time and again by military and foreign policy experts that this war of choice was a mistake. There has been no regime change or popular uprising. If anything the new Iranian leadership is more hardline than it was before. There was no imminent nuclear threat, that was just another in a litany of lies to justify what was an attempt to extort Iran and seize their oil as had happened in Venezuela. In his blinkered quest for glory and self enrichment, Trump assumed Iran was just another ‘shit hole country’ incapable of resisting the might of the U.S. military. He understood nothing of the Iranian decentralized command and control ‘mosaic strategy’. In his own words he did not think they would close the Strait of Hormuz or attack Gulf states. He simply expected Iran to capitulate, so Kushner and Witkoff could hand them his Qatari bank details for them to send him his cut of their oil sales. As things stand, he is out of options, the global South is creaking as their economies experience unnecessary distress, gas prices are at $4.50 and if he told the truth as opposed to lying, oil prices would likely be at $200 a barrel. The Strait of Hormuz is closed, the enriched uranium has not been removed. Iranian drone and missile stocks remain at over 50% with some estimates putting them at 70% and Trump is claiming victory, suggesting Iran has no cards. He’s living in a fantasy world having wasted billions and sacrificed American lives having inflicted irreparable damage to Gulf state alliances. The UAE has now left OPEC while China now describes the US as ‘A superpower with a limp’ In one stupid act, Trump has raised questions about U.S. military power when faced with an asymmetric kinetic response. Questions have arisen about US readiness when it comes to minesweepers and logistics capabilities as US sailors were shown to be rationing food. Nobody is doubting the ability of the U.S. military who performed exactly as expected. The problem is, they’re lions being led by donkeys. 🎥 TikTok -

The thing about war is, it’s not a one way street as Pete Hegseth would have you believe. Take a look at this report from the New York Times. As you can see, a series of satellite images were released showing damage at U.S. bases across the region, some of which killed American military personnel. The question is, do you believe the account of the Iranians or the ‘nothing to see here’ US account? It turns out the Iranian account is correct and the American response was to instruct satellite companies to remove the incriminating images. Just as Hegseth can’t bring himself to admit that they killed over a hundred elementary school girls on day one in an erroneous triple tap, he wants to hide the extensive damage caused by precision attacks by Iran on U.S. assets. We know time and again Trump has lied about Iran begging him to do a deal, and that as a result, billions have been made from market manipulation. Even now, he’s is claiming Iran wants a deal as fire is being exchanged in the Strait of Hormuz, exchanges that he yesterday described as ‘love taps’. In critical times of war it’s not a good look when enemy accounts of events are proved to be accurate while your own president and Secretary of Defense is found to be repeatedly lying. The cost of this conflict has been laughably estimated to be $25 billion when credible inside U.S. sources claim that over 50% of critical missile stocks have been depleted. The obvious question being, imagine what damage Iran could have done given the extensive ACTUAL damage the U.S. have tried to hide? The narrative is that Iran are days away from economic catastrophe, yet the CIA have reported that Iran could survive the U.S. blockade for up to three months. The whole U.S. narrative, just like the administration’s economic and foreign policy agenda is built on a lie, in a fantasy world that Trump expects us to join him, while it falls apart at the seams. It has been said time and again by military and foreign policy experts that this war of choice was a mistake. There has been no regime change or popular uprising. If anything the new Iranian leadership is more hardline than it was before. There was no imminent nuclear threat, that was just another in a litany of lies to justify what was an attempt to extort Iran and seize their oil as had happened in Venezuela. In his blinkered quest for glory and self enrichment, Trump assumed Iran was just another ‘shit hole country’ incapable of resisting the might of the U.S. military. He understood nothing of the Iranian decentralized command and control ‘mosaic strategy’. In his own words he did not think they would close the Strait of Hormuz or attack Gulf states. He simply expected Iran to capitulate, so Kushner and Witkoff could hand them his Qatari bank details for them to send him his cut of their oil sales. As things stand, he is out of options, the global South is creaking as their economies experience unnecessary distress, gas prices are at $4.50 and if he told the truth as opposed to lying, oil prices would likely be at $200 a barrel. The Strait of Hormuz is closed, the enriched uranium has not been removed. Iranian drone and missile stocks remain at over 50% with some estimates putting them at 70% and Trump is claiming victory, suggesting Iran has no cards. He’s living in a fantasy world having wasted billions and sacrificed American lives having inflicted irreparable damage to Gulf state alliances. The UAE has now left OPEC while China now describes the US as ‘A superpower with a limp’ In one stupid act, Trump has raised questions about U.S. military power when faced with an asymmetric kinetic response. Questions have arisen about US readiness when it comes to minesweepers and logistics capabilities as US sailors were shown to be rationing food. Nobody is doubting the ability of the U.S. military who performed exactly as expected. The problem is, they’re lions being led by donkeys. 🎥 TikTok -

𝔗𝔯𝔲𝔱𝔥 𝔐𝔞𝔱𝔱𝔢𝔯𝔰

24,547 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Blaming Israel for Belleville synagogue shooting is blaming the victim A Belleville resident told Ezra Levant 🍁🚛 that the synagogue shooting happened because of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's action, something Ezra says isn't an explanation; it's an excuse and assigns collective guilt to Canadian Jews who may or may not support a foreign country. While reporting from Belleville on the Yom Kippur synagogue attack, Ezra Levant spoke with a local resident who was visibly shaken by what had happened in her city. She was friendly, she was decent, and she was clearly distressed. She also said something Ezra felt had to be challenged directly. Netanyahu, she said, has whipped this up. If Netanyahu were gone, things would improve. The attack on the Sons of Jacob synagogue was, in her telling, connected to what Israel is doing in Gaza. Ezra's response on Monday's Ezra Levant Show was unambiguous: "That's not true." The synagogue in Belleville is not an Israeli consulate. It is not the Israeli military. It is not even remotely a symbol of Israeli government policy. It is Canadian Jews, or simply Canadians, gathering to pray on the holiest day of their calendar. To suggest that attacking them is somehow a counterweight to Benjamin Netanyahu is to hold every Jewish person in Canada collectively responsible for the decisions of a foreign government they do not control and may not even support. But the deeper problem with that framing, Ezra argued, is what it implies about the nature of antisemitism itself. If Netanyahu is the cause, then removing Netanyahu is the cure. Elect a different Israeli prime minister and the Jew hatred dissipates. Except it doesn't — and it never has. Antisemitism predates the modern state of Israel. It predates Netanyahu by thousands of years. There were pogroms before Israel existed. There were massacres before Israel existed. The supply of reasons to hate Jews has always been elastic; if one reason is removed, another appears. If it wasn't Netanyahu, it would be something else. There is always something else. What Ezra thinks that woman was actually doing, and he said this charitably, not critically, is processing. Belleville is not a city that has been primed to absorb this kind of evil. When evil this deliberate arrives in a place that has no framework for it, the mind reaches for a manageable explanation. It wasn't random. It wasn't ideological. It was Netanyahu. It was provocation. It was something we did that can therefore be undone. That is psychologically easier than the alternative: that there are people who hate Jews, have always hated Jews, will always find a reason to hate Jews, and that no diplomatic adjustment or change of government will alter that. The same pattern appeared after September 11th, Ezra noted. The men who hijacked those planes were not shy about their motives. Radical Islam, as Ezra put it, despises the West because Western democracy is a standing challenge to the idea of a single global Islamic order governed by Sharia law. America is the great obstacle. Israel is the smaller one. They say so and they have always said so. And yet after every attack, a portion of the Western commentariat goes looking for the provocation — the colonial history, the micro-incident on Twitter last week, the foreign policy decision that finally pushed them over the edge. "You can furnish your own excuses for terrorism," Ezra said. "But you don't need to. The terrorists tell you why they're doing it." The man who opened fire on the Sons of Jacob synagogue in Belleville on Yom Kippur has already provided his explanation, whether he stated it explicitly or not. Providing him with a better one, one that roots the cause in Israeli politics rather than in his own choices, does not make the explanation more accurate. It makes the victims responsible for what was done to them.

Blaming Israel for Belleville synagogue shooting is blaming the victim A Belleville resident told Ezra Levant 🍁🚛 that the synagogue shooting happened because of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's action, something Ezra says isn't an explanation; it's an excuse and assigns collective guilt to Canadian Jews who may or may not support a foreign country. While reporting from Belleville on the Yom Kippur synagogue attack, Ezra Levant spoke with a local resident who was visibly shaken by what had happened in her city. She was friendly, she was decent, and she was clearly distressed. She also said something Ezra felt had to be challenged directly. Netanyahu, she said, has whipped this up. If Netanyahu were gone, things would improve. The attack on the Sons of Jacob synagogue was, in her telling, connected to what Israel is doing in Gaza. Ezra's response on Monday's Ezra Levant Show was unambiguous: "That's not true." The synagogue in Belleville is not an Israeli consulate. It is not the Israeli military. It is not even remotely a symbol of Israeli government policy. It is Canadian Jews, or simply Canadians, gathering to pray on the holiest day of their calendar. To suggest that attacking them is somehow a counterweight to Benjamin Netanyahu is to hold every Jewish person in Canada collectively responsible for the decisions of a foreign government they do not control and may not even support. But the deeper problem with that framing, Ezra argued, is what it implies about the nature of antisemitism itself. If Netanyahu is the cause, then removing Netanyahu is the cure. Elect a different Israeli prime minister and the Jew hatred dissipates. Except it doesn't — and it never has. Antisemitism predates the modern state of Israel. It predates Netanyahu by thousands of years. There were pogroms before Israel existed. There were massacres before Israel existed. The supply of reasons to hate Jews has always been elastic; if one reason is removed, another appears. If it wasn't Netanyahu, it would be something else. There is always something else. What Ezra thinks that woman was actually doing, and he said this charitably, not critically, is processing. Belleville is not a city that has been primed to absorb this kind of evil. When evil this deliberate arrives in a place that has no framework for it, the mind reaches for a manageable explanation. It wasn't random. It wasn't ideological. It was Netanyahu. It was provocation. It was something we did that can therefore be undone. That is psychologically easier than the alternative: that there are people who hate Jews, have always hated Jews, will always find a reason to hate Jews, and that no diplomatic adjustment or change of government will alter that. The same pattern appeared after September 11th, Ezra noted. The men who hijacked those planes were not shy about their motives. Radical Islam, as Ezra put it, despises the West because Western democracy is a standing challenge to the idea of a single global Islamic order governed by Sharia law. America is the great obstacle. Israel is the smaller one. They say so and they have always said so. And yet after every attack, a portion of the Western commentariat goes looking for the provocation — the colonial history, the micro-incident on Twitter last week, the foreign policy decision that finally pushed them over the edge. "You can furnish your own excuses for terrorism," Ezra said. "But you don't need to. The terrorists tell you why they're doing it." The man who opened fire on the Sons of Jacob synagogue in Belleville on Yom Kippur has already provided his explanation, whether he stated it explicitly or not. Providing him with a better one, one that roots the cause in Israeli politics rather than in his own choices, does not make the explanation more accurate. It makes the victims responsible for what was done to them.

Rebel News

16,427 просмотров • 6 дней назад

CZECHIA & SLOVAKIA REVOLT AGAINST BRUSSELS: “ENOUGH OF GREEN FANATICISM AND MIGRATION DIKTÁT!” A new Central European alliance forms — rejecting ETS2, the combustion-engine ban, the migration pact, and any attack on the Beneš decrees. A high-level Czech visit to Slovakia has turned into something much bigger: the rebirth of a Czech–Slovak political axis openly challenging Brussels’ most controversial policies. During official talks with Richard Raši, Speaker of the Slovak National Council, both sides made it clear: Central Europe will no longer silently obey orders from Brussels. In a rare display of unity, Czechia and Slovakia agreed to jointly reject: 🔥 ETS2 — a new tax on ordinary citizens disguised as green policy 🔥 The EU’s ban on combustion engines — a direct attack on local industry 🔥 The EU migration pact — forced redistribution pushed by Western states 🔥 Any attempts to dismantle the Beneš decrees — a red line for both nations This is not just a policy disagreement. This is open resistance. Czech and Slovak representatives warned that many of these EU projects serve the interests of Western economies — not the people of Central Europe, who will pay the heaviest price. ⸻ A message to Brussels: Central Europe is not a colony The visit comes as frustration with EU overreach reaches a boiling point across the region. Politicians in Prague and Bratislava are increasingly vocal about: •Green Deal extremism •Forced migration quotas •Attacks on historical memory •Pressure from Germany and EU technocrats The statement on the Beneš decrees — a topic Germany and Austria would prefer reopened — is particularly explosive. Prague and Bratislava have drawn a firm line: our history is not negotiable. ⸻ Czech–Slovak unity returns Further meetings with Prime Minister Robert Fico and President Peter Pellegrini will strengthen what now looks like a coordinated Central European front — a revived alliance that Europe has not seen since the peaceful breakup of Czechoslovakia. And the message this time is clear: “We will defend our sovereignty — together.” ⸻ If you like what we are doing — like, share, subscribe, and invite your friends for more. Follow us also on Facebook: Slavic Networks. Nirali SlavicFreeSpirit VVeles

CZECHIA & SLOVAKIA REVOLT AGAINST BRUSSELS: “ENOUGH OF GREEN FANATICISM AND MIGRATION DIKTÁT!” A new Central European alliance forms — rejecting ETS2, the combustion-engine ban, the migration pact, and any attack on the Beneš decrees. A high-level Czech visit to Slovakia has turned into something much bigger: the rebirth of a Czech–Slovak political axis openly challenging Brussels’ most controversial policies. During official talks with Richard Raši, Speaker of the Slovak National Council, both sides made it clear: Central Europe will no longer silently obey orders from Brussels. In a rare display of unity, Czechia and Slovakia agreed to jointly reject: 🔥 ETS2 — a new tax on ordinary citizens disguised as green policy 🔥 The EU’s ban on combustion engines — a direct attack on local industry 🔥 The EU migration pact — forced redistribution pushed by Western states 🔥 Any attempts to dismantle the Beneš decrees — a red line for both nations This is not just a policy disagreement. This is open resistance. Czech and Slovak representatives warned that many of these EU projects serve the interests of Western economies — not the people of Central Europe, who will pay the heaviest price. ⸻ A message to Brussels: Central Europe is not a colony The visit comes as frustration with EU overreach reaches a boiling point across the region. Politicians in Prague and Bratislava are increasingly vocal about: •Green Deal extremism •Forced migration quotas •Attacks on historical memory •Pressure from Germany and EU technocrats The statement on the Beneš decrees — a topic Germany and Austria would prefer reopened — is particularly explosive. Prague and Bratislava have drawn a firm line: our history is not negotiable. ⸻ Czech–Slovak unity returns Further meetings with Prime Minister Robert Fico and President Peter Pellegrini will strengthen what now looks like a coordinated Central European front — a revived alliance that Europe has not seen since the peaceful breakup of Czechoslovakia. And the message this time is clear: “We will defend our sovereignty — together.” ⸻ If you like what we are doing — like, share, subscribe, and invite your friends for more. Follow us also on Facebook: Slavic Networks. Nirali SlavicFreeSpirit VVeles

Slavic Networks

70,820 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

This is Monique Ryan, standing on her soapbox to declare that old people have too much money. Yes, that's the great injustice of our time, apparently. Not corruption, not waste, not crime, not even the bloated salaries of out-of-touch, parasitic, millionaire career-politicians like herself; but retirees who worked for 6 decades and committed the sin of saving money and build something in their lives. Monique is one of the most privileged people on earth. She pockets a huge taxpayer-funded salary, lives in one of the most expensive electorates in the entire world, and sits on a personal net worth most Aussies can only dream of. And yet, from that pedestal of comfort, she wants to punish pensioners, homeowners, and retirees. In case you didn't know... Monique is a Teal, which basically means she's a Green, still a socialist at heart (with other people's money), but with better clothes and a glass of champagne in hand instead of a Centrelink cheque. Think the kind who virtue-signal about "equity" and claiming to represent the poor while hosting fundraisers at the Kooyong Lawn Tennis Club (iykyk). This mindset reflects exactly what Australia is being dragged into- a soft-socialist state where success and wealth is something to be ashamed of. Worked hard? Too bad. Saved responsibly? Shame on you. Own a home in your seventies? You’re the enemy now. Meanwhile, 20-year-olds who can't afford rent are told it’s all your fault. Not bad government policy, not reckless immigration, not endless waste. Just you. You're greedy, you're immoral, you're the problem. How dare you own a house when someone else can't afford one? How dare you retire with money when 20 year olds are struggling with rent? Monique, the Greens and all our supporters are the face of Australia's slow-motion drift into soft socialism. The creed is simple: punish hard work, reward deadbeats, dress it up as "equity", and expect you to clap along while we dismantle the very idea of aspiration. It's champagne socialism at its most poisonous and the best part is, we've convinced you she's the hero.

This is Monique Ryan, standing on her soapbox to declare that old people have too much money. Yes, that's the great injustice of our time, apparently. Not corruption, not waste, not crime, not even the bloated salaries of out-of-touch, parasitic, millionaire career-politicians like herself; but retirees who worked for 6 decades and committed the sin of saving money and build something in their lives. Monique is one of the most privileged people on earth. She pockets a huge taxpayer-funded salary, lives in one of the most expensive electorates in the entire world, and sits on a personal net worth most Aussies can only dream of. And yet, from that pedestal of comfort, she wants to punish pensioners, homeowners, and retirees. In case you didn't know... Monique is a Teal, which basically means she's a Green, still a socialist at heart (with other people's money), but with better clothes and a glass of champagne in hand instead of a Centrelink cheque. Think the kind who virtue-signal about "equity" and claiming to represent the poor while hosting fundraisers at the Kooyong Lawn Tennis Club (iykyk). This mindset reflects exactly what Australia is being dragged into- a soft-socialist state where success and wealth is something to be ashamed of. Worked hard? Too bad. Saved responsibly? Shame on you. Own a home in your seventies? You’re the enemy now. Meanwhile, 20-year-olds who can't afford rent are told it’s all your fault. Not bad government policy, not reckless immigration, not endless waste. Just you. You're greedy, you're immoral, you're the problem. How dare you own a house when someone else can't afford one? How dare you retire with money when 20 year olds are struggling with rent? Monique, the Greens and all our supporters are the face of Australia's slow-motion drift into soft socialism. The creed is simple: punish hard work, reward deadbeats, dress it up as "equity", and expect you to clap along while we dismantle the very idea of aspiration. It's champagne socialism at its most poisonous and the best part is, we've convinced you she's the hero.

Commentary Australian Greens

79,546 просмотров • 1 год назад