Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

Zuck is Serious A. Researcher compensation needs to scale with GPU spend > "spending hundreds of billions of dollars on compute and ... do whatever it takes to get 50 or 70 ... top researchers" > "the amount that is being spent to to recruit the people is actually... still quite small compared to the overall investment and all the compute that we're doing" B. Zuck's pitch to researchers > "the most computer per researcher" > "clean slate.. you get the opportunity to build a new lab from scratch" > "put that power into people's hands directly... with personal super intelligence" > "other labs... talk about ... developing the central super intelligence and directing it at grand problems" C. Zuck feels Meta was getting left behind and so is now going to overcommit to make sure that doesn't happen > "You know, we keep on uh like having goals for where we want to be and then the field keeps on moving faster than than we expect" > "think that we should bet and act as if [superintelligence] is going to be ready in the next 2 to 3 years" Opinion --------- A. Zuck is still not convinced that AGI/ASI is possible and will happen in the short term... but is prepared to gamble B. Repeats "hundreds of billions of dollars", he's prepared to spend whatever is required at this point. They are going to spend in excess of what the financial markets think is wise. C. Huge management style update happening, he's surprised researchers want max GPUs and no subordinates to take care of. "what's my scope going to be" is what other people in Meta ask when they get recruited. Overall a pretty significant mid course correction. Zuck is now starting to operate on a little bit of faith, he's trying to convince himself that ASI could happen, but throwing the dice before he's sure because time will not wait certainty. what a gamble.show more

Prakash (Ate-a-Pi)

53,094 subscribers

17,885 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Wissenschaft & Technologie Nachrichten & Politik Bildung

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Mark Zuckerberg on the Reported $100M Comp Packages Being Paid by Meta for AI Researchers “The amount that is being spent to recruit the people is actually still quite small compared to the overall investment and all the compute that we're doing.”

Mark Zuckerberg on the Reported $100M Comp Packages Being Paid by Meta for AI Researchers “The amount that is being spent to recruit the people is actually still quite small compared to the overall investment and all the compute that we're doing.”

Chief Nerd

44,460 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

For those worried about $META's Zuck discussing hundreds of billions of AI investment and starting to picture the 2022 days. This is NOT the same. Here is $META's CFO, just a few weeks ago, saying that from the 2022 experience, both she and Zuck learned that while making long-term bets, they also have to deliver short- and mid-term results for investors to have a reason to invest in $META's stock today. And this is the way they think about it now. For Zuck to make a statement about investing hundreds of billions means he also sees massive AI short-term to mid-term profits and growth for $META to fuel that investment.

For those worried about $META's Zuck discussing hundreds of billions of AI investment and starting to picture the 2022 days. This is NOT the same. Here is $META's CFO, just a few weeks ago, saying that from the 2022 experience, both she and Zuck learned that while making long-term bets, they also have to deliver short- and mid-term results for investors to have a reason to invest in $META's stock today. And this is the way they think about it now. For Zuck to make a statement about investing hundreds of billions means he also sees massive AI short-term to mid-term profits and growth for $META to fuel that investment.

Rihard Jarc

94,889 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Catherine Austin Fitts: "The [Trump] administration is looking for ways of managing a collapse of the dollar... so [Trump's] cutting anything that he doesn't need to keep his mega-donor base... [and] he's going to start slashing social safety nets..." This clip of Fitts, a former Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, investment banker, and founder of the Solari Report (The Solari Report | Catherine Austin Fitts), is taken from a discussion with Todd Sachs (Todd Sachs) posted to YouTube on January 24, 2026. ---------------Partial transcription of clip---------------- "The administration is looking for ways of managing a collapse of the dollar and they're going to— It's like a body in trauma. You pull blood from the toes and you take it to the heart and lungs. So he's looking to double the military budget because he needs force to make sure that they have self sufficiency and resources that they don't have now. He's trying to get that. "So I think that's why he's doing it. And then he's cutting anything that he doesn't need to keep his mega-donor base and he doesn't need to get the resources he needs. So he's going to start slashing social safety nets. So if you look at the slashing of assistance to he did it to five Democratic states that's looking like it's political, in one sense it is, but I think he's slashing because he's trying to manage the collapse. "So and he's going to keep, that's going to keep happening one way or the other. Now here's what I think it's really. And anybody listening to this who's dependent on federal money, you need to know whether it's the purchasing power of that federal money gets cut by inflation or something happens that it just gets cut or held up or whatever. Government money is going to get— Federal government money is get more, more and more problematic as we continue into this change. "And if you look at all the problems we had on money disappearing from the federal budget, we've known that the federal government is operating way outside the financial management laws, breaking the law, huge amounts of money going missing. I call it a financial coup, but now the chickens are coming home to roost and you're going to start feeling it. They don't need to buy off the population by throwing money at them. Now they're going to start cutting."

Catherine Austin Fitts: "The [Trump] administration is looking for ways of managing a collapse of the dollar... so [Trump's] cutting anything that he doesn't need to keep his mega-donor base... [and] he's going to start slashing social safety nets..." This clip of Fitts, a former Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, investment banker, and founder of the Solari Report (The Solari Report | Catherine Austin Fitts), is taken from a discussion with Todd Sachs (Todd Sachs) posted to YouTube on January 24, 2026. ---------------Partial transcription of clip---------------- "The administration is looking for ways of managing a collapse of the dollar and they're going to— It's like a body in trauma. You pull blood from the toes and you take it to the heart and lungs. So he's looking to double the military budget because he needs force to make sure that they have self sufficiency and resources that they don't have now. He's trying to get that. "So I think that's why he's doing it. And then he's cutting anything that he doesn't need to keep his mega-donor base and he doesn't need to get the resources he needs. So he's going to start slashing social safety nets. So if you look at the slashing of assistance to he did it to five Democratic states that's looking like it's political, in one sense it is, but I think he's slashing because he's trying to manage the collapse. "So and he's going to keep, that's going to keep happening one way or the other. Now here's what I think it's really. And anybody listening to this who's dependent on federal money, you need to know whether it's the purchasing power of that federal money gets cut by inflation or something happens that it just gets cut or held up or whatever. Government money is going to get— Federal government money is get more, more and more problematic as we continue into this change. "And if you look at all the problems we had on money disappearing from the federal budget, we've known that the federal government is operating way outside the financial management laws, breaking the law, huge amounts of money going missing. I call it a financial coup, but now the chickens are coming home to roost and you're going to start feeling it. They don't need to buy off the population by throwing money at them. Now they're going to start cutting."

Sense Receptor

38,362 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

.David Deutsch on why the people in favor of regulating AI are wrong: “They look at problems and they think they’re insoluble because they haven’t been solved, and therefore they want to prevent the progress that is going to cause the problems. Now, generically, what that will do is it will make the progress happen in the wrong place. It will happen among people who do not obey the regulation, and those people are people who are alienated from the best culture, and they will then become a danger to the best culture. Now, I’m speaking in general terms about progress—progress in computing and so on—but I think this particular thing you’ve mentioned is actually not going to be that much of a danger. AGI (artificial general intelligence) will present a whole load of new problems which will have to be solved, no doubt with the help of AGI. But AI, the kind of thing we have now with ChatGPT and that kind of thing, which is amazingly and increasingly useful and is going to have unpredictable effects on society—most of them good—isn’t anything profound. It’s no different from having a calculator or a slide rule.”

.David Deutsch on why the people in favor of regulating AI are wrong: “They look at problems and they think they’re insoluble because they haven’t been solved, and therefore they want to prevent the progress that is going to cause the problems. Now, generically, what that will do is it will make the progress happen in the wrong place. It will happen among people who do not obey the regulation, and those people are people who are alienated from the best culture, and they will then become a danger to the best culture. Now, I’m speaking in general terms about progress—progress in computing and so on—but I think this particular thing you’ve mentioned is actually not going to be that much of a danger. AGI (artificial general intelligence) will present a whole load of new problems which will have to be solved, no doubt with the help of AGI. But AI, the kind of thing we have now with ChatGPT and that kind of thing, which is amazingly and increasingly useful and is going to have unpredictable effects on society—most of them good—isn’t anything profound. It’s no different from having a calculator or a slide rule.”

Arjun Khemani

29,266 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🚨NEW: Chris Murphy calls for NATIONWIDE street protests — says the “protests” in LA are “pretty small." And, of course, he blames Trump. Pretty clear to see where this is going: “My first message is to keep it peaceful. This is a moment where we have to be on the streets all over the country to protest what's happening to our immigrant community." "This is the most corrupt administration in the history of the country, and we are going to rise to this moment by being out there on the streets." "I think the country sees what Donald Trump is trying to do here. He's looking for a fight. There's nothing in what he is doing that is about peace or about restoring order." “He's trying to turn a protest that is pretty small into something that involves an even bigger confrontation."

🚨NEW: Chris Murphy calls for NATIONWIDE street protests — says the “protests” in LA are “pretty small." And, of course, he blames Trump. Pretty clear to see where this is going: “My first message is to keep it peaceful. This is a moment where we have to be on the streets all over the country to protest what's happening to our immigrant community." "This is the most corrupt administration in the history of the country, and we are going to rise to this moment by being out there on the streets." "I think the country sees what Donald Trump is trying to do here. He's looking for a fight. There's nothing in what he is doing that is about peace or about restoring order." “He's trying to turn a protest that is pretty small into something that involves an even bigger confrontation."

Western Lensman

451,882 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Ginny Roth on Carney's speech in Davos "And then the bigger problem for me was the pivot to Canada and what we're doing. And I thought that was honestly a wild exaggeration and just not at all true." "Like this idea that we've removed interprovincial trade barriers, we have not." "This idea that we've invested in the military, we have not. There's not even appropriated funds, let alone spend funds to get defense spending to where it needs to be." "The idea that we're getting natural resources to market, that we're driving billions in investment, none of this is true. It's all talk." "But eventually he's going to get off a plane in Ottawa and Canadians are going to start to say, like, okay, now what? When does the rubber hit the road?" "Like none of the actions actually speak to the urgency that he's gesturing at." Ginny Roth

Ginny Roth on Carney's speech in Davos "And then the bigger problem for me was the pivot to Canada and what we're doing. And I thought that was honestly a wild exaggeration and just not at all true." "Like this idea that we've removed interprovincial trade barriers, we have not." "This idea that we've invested in the military, we have not. There's not even appropriated funds, let alone spend funds to get defense spending to where it needs to be." "The idea that we're getting natural resources to market, that we're driving billions in investment, none of this is true. It's all talk." "But eventually he's going to get off a plane in Ottawa and Canadians are going to start to say, like, okay, now what? When does the rubber hit the road?" "Like none of the actions actually speak to the urgency that he's gesturing at." Ginny Roth

cbcwatcher

243,482 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Sam Altman's new interview: AI should not be designed to pursue goals that are disconnected from human needs. People must remain at the center of AI development. “I have no interest in building a super-smart AI that accomplishes some non-human goals. People should react. People should say, ‘Hey, this is what I want, and this is what I do not want.’ I do not think the issue is that we have failed to explain the benefits. We say, ‘AI is going to cure a bunch of diseases,’ and people say, ‘Okay, that is great, but that is not really my question. My question is: What is my role in the future? What is my economic future? What is my agency? How do I know that my kids and my family will still be able to have fulfilling, creative expression, struggle, drive the world forward, grow, and do this thing together in a way that has worked for a long time?’ When people in AI say, ‘Sure, there are going to be no jobs,’ or ‘50% of jobs are going to go away,’ or ‘90% of jobs are going to go away,’ and ‘AI is going to be smarter than you at everything,’ and ‘We will give you some basic income, but you are not really going to have a role,’ that is horrible. And by the way, if an AI company says, ‘Maybe we are going to destroy all the jobs, and we will be the most valuable company in the world,’ people should look at you like, ‘Yeah, that is a terrible message.’ I do not think the problem is that we have not articulated the upsides. I think people actually believe us. They hear, ‘AI may cure your cancer,’ and they think, ‘That sounds great.’ I think we, as an industry, have failed to explain how people stay in control of determining the future at every step, and how people can still have a meaningful life in all the ways we care about.” ---- From "CNBC Television" YouTube channel, (link in comment)

Sam Altman's new interview: AI should not be designed to pursue goals that are disconnected from human needs. People must remain at the center of AI development. “I have no interest in building a super-smart AI that accomplishes some non-human goals. People should react. People should say, ‘Hey, this is what I want, and this is what I do not want.’ I do not think the issue is that we have failed to explain the benefits. We say, ‘AI is going to cure a bunch of diseases,’ and people say, ‘Okay, that is great, but that is not really my question. My question is: What is my role in the future? What is my economic future? What is my agency? How do I know that my kids and my family will still be able to have fulfilling, creative expression, struggle, drive the world forward, grow, and do this thing together in a way that has worked for a long time?’ When people in AI say, ‘Sure, there are going to be no jobs,’ or ‘50% of jobs are going to go away,’ or ‘90% of jobs are going to go away,’ and ‘AI is going to be smarter than you at everything,’ and ‘We will give you some basic income, but you are not really going to have a role,’ that is horrible. And by the way, if an AI company says, ‘Maybe we are going to destroy all the jobs, and we will be the most valuable company in the world,’ people should look at you like, ‘Yeah, that is a terrible message.’ I do not think the problem is that we have not articulated the upsides. I think people actually believe us. They hear, ‘AI may cure your cancer,’ and they think, ‘That sounds great.’ I think we, as an industry, have failed to explain how people stay in control of determining the future at every step, and how people can still have a meaningful life in all the ways we care about.” ---- From "CNBC Television" YouTube channel, (link in comment)

Rohan Paul

78,920 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

.Bill O'Reilly, speaking at the NewsNation town hall on the state of the country: "The country is in a change mode. We're in flux, everything is changing. Economy is changing, social morays is changing, media is collapsing, collapsing right before our eyes. And my job as an independent is to bring some understanding to it all, so I am not that concerned about the polarization and the back-and-forth. There are lines that need to be drawn and adhered to. But that has always been the case. John Adams and Thomas Jefferson -- oh, they hated each other and they would use surrogates to just knife and it is always going to be that way, because the pursuit of power is like the pursuit of money, you can't get enough. They can't get enough. And if there is somebody trying to inhibit their power, they want to hurt them, they want to diminish them, so I am realistic in the sense of being a historian to know that is not going to change. But what has to change is your understanding of really what is happening, really what is going on here.

.Bill O'Reilly, speaking at the NewsNation town hall on the state of the country: "The country is in a change mode. We're in flux, everything is changing. Economy is changing, social morays is changing, media is collapsing, collapsing right before our eyes. And my job as an independent is to bring some understanding to it all, so I am not that concerned about the polarization and the back-and-forth. There are lines that need to be drawn and adhered to. But that has always been the case. John Adams and Thomas Jefferson -- oh, they hated each other and they would use surrogates to just knife and it is always going to be that way, because the pursuit of power is like the pursuit of money, you can't get enough. They can't get enough. And if there is somebody trying to inhibit their power, they want to hurt them, they want to diminish them, so I am realistic in the sense of being a historian to know that is not going to change. But what has to change is your understanding of really what is happening, really what is going on here.

Curtis Houck

47,668 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Platner: I think that if we are going to have a politics that is going to be representative of regular people, if we are going to have a politics that's going to allow us to move past the polarization and frankly, the division that we find ourselves in, we really need to understand that people are capable of changing. We need to we need to keep hope alive, that people that we may disagree with today, that we can find common ground with. Like if you listen to what I've been saying on the campaign trail across the state, that's what I'm trying to talk about. It is important to me that we realize that most of us, most Americans, have far more in common than we think we do, and we need to give each other grace, and we need to give each other space to grow and to evolve. Because if we can't do that, then I'm not really sure what the purpose of any of this is.

Platner: I think that if we are going to have a politics that is going to be representative of regular people, if we are going to have a politics that's going to allow us to move past the polarization and frankly, the division that we find ourselves in, we really need to understand that people are capable of changing. We need to we need to keep hope alive, that people that we may disagree with today, that we can find common ground with. Like if you listen to what I've been saying on the campaign trail across the state, that's what I'm trying to talk about. It is important to me that we realize that most of us, most Americans, have far more in common than we think we do, and we need to give each other grace, and we need to give each other space to grow and to evolve. Because if we can't do that, then I'm not really sure what the purpose of any of this is.

Acyn

147,957 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

🇺🇸 THIRD TERM OF TRUMP IN 2028?! Steve Bannon: "He's going to get a third term. Trump is going to be president of 28. And people just ought to get accommodated with that. At the appropriate time, we'll lay out what the plan is. But there's a plan. We have to finish what we started. And the way we finish it, Trump is a vehicle. He's a vehicle of divine providence." Source: Shadow of Ezra

🇺🇸 THIRD TERM OF TRUMP IN 2028?! Steve Bannon: "He's going to get a third term. Trump is going to be president of 28. And people just ought to get accommodated with that. At the appropriate time, we'll lay out what the plan is. But there's a plan. We have to finish what we started. And the way we finish it, Trump is a vehicle. He's a vehicle of divine providence." Source: Shadow of Ezra

Mario Nawfal

277,149 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

JOHN SOLOMON: "We have a bunch of lazy senators who want to threaten the filibuster and not get off their feet and talk and really represent the people and stand for what they believe in." "And all the American people are asking John Thune to do is to restore the Senate to the way it used to work before Mitch McConnell's lazy filibuster ideas kind of came into play. And I think that the American people are going to be there." "Here's what I think is going to happen...I think Donald Trump is going to change the narrative in America. I think he's going to change some senators' minds...he's going to start revealing some of the intelligence that was kept from the American people." "We're going to see that our foreign adversaries have monkeyed with our system more than we knew." "I think when senators realize their state could have been targeted, when senators realize that the intention of the identities of some of their voters might have been assumed, I think there's going to be a different debate in America."

JOHN SOLOMON: "We have a bunch of lazy senators who want to threaten the filibuster and not get off their feet and talk and really represent the people and stand for what they believe in." "And all the American people are asking John Thune to do is to restore the Senate to the way it used to work before Mitch McConnell's lazy filibuster ideas kind of came into play. And I think that the American people are going to be there." "Here's what I think is going to happen...I think Donald Trump is going to change the narrative in America. I think he's going to change some senators' minds...he's going to start revealing some of the intelligence that was kept from the American people." "We're going to see that our foreign adversaries have monkeyed with our system more than we knew." "I think when senators realize their state could have been targeted, when senators realize that the intention of the identities of some of their voters might have been assumed, I think there's going to be a different debate in America."

Johnny Midnight ⚡️

15,580 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Chamath’s 2026 IPO Advice: Get Public Fast or Get Left Behind Jason: “ What are your thoughts here on the flurry of potential IPOs?” Chamath: “I think that we have a bit of a risk problem. If you think about appetite as equivalent to a person at a Thanksgiving dinner, when you first come in and you see all of this stuff, it's so plentiful, your eyes are bigger than your stomach. And I think in a moment like that, you want to be the one that is consumed first. And I think the risk increases when you are at the tail end because the risk is that the diners will run out of space.” Jason: “Plate fills up. Yeah.” Chamath: “And if you use that analogy, I think the reason why people's plates will get full is probably twofold and maybe threefold. The first and most important thing is there's enough tactical event risk that people generally want to be risk off and have more margin of safety. We have a lot of these really important financial moments tied to this concept of AGI, ASI. We have a real pricing problem. If AGI is real, the durability of most companies is slim to none. If AGI is not real, then the fundraising capacity of these companies that are now raising hundreds of billions of dollars needs to get questioned and inspected thoroughly. History will sort out which one is right, but both cannot be right. So in that vein, I don't think we're going to have this “blockbuster” stream of IPOs. I think what happens is SpaceX is going to get out. They're going to do great, and then maybe the next one does good to great, then the next one will do good, and then the appetite runs out because you just can't absorb, incrementally, trillions of dollars of new demand. And if you think about it, where is it going to come from? Is it going to come from the sidelines? I don't know, I think it's more of a reallocation exercise. But if you look at the S&P, well, most people are now defensively moving away from these kinds of things, towards the things that are more protected, what the industry calls HALO, right? Those things trade for zero today. You could buy hundreds of millions of dollars a year of cashflow for 2-5x right now in the stock market. And so why are you going to go way out on the risk curve and buy something at 200x revenue, let alone earnings? I'm more in the camp of, I think it's good to be first, it’s pretty decent to be second, but if I were you, I would get the heck out, and get public, and get your money, and fortify your balance sheet ASAP, because I think the risk builds the further down the IPO chain you're in.”

Chamath’s 2026 IPO Advice: Get Public Fast or Get Left Behind Jason: “ What are your thoughts here on the flurry of potential IPOs?” Chamath: “I think that we have a bit of a risk problem. If you think about appetite as equivalent to a person at a Thanksgiving dinner, when you first come in and you see all of this stuff, it's so plentiful, your eyes are bigger than your stomach. And I think in a moment like that, you want to be the one that is consumed first. And I think the risk increases when you are at the tail end because the risk is that the diners will run out of space.” Jason: “Plate fills up. Yeah.” Chamath: “And if you use that analogy, I think the reason why people's plates will get full is probably twofold and maybe threefold. The first and most important thing is there's enough tactical event risk that people generally want to be risk off and have more margin of safety. We have a lot of these really important financial moments tied to this concept of AGI, ASI. We have a real pricing problem. If AGI is real, the durability of most companies is slim to none. If AGI is not real, then the fundraising capacity of these companies that are now raising hundreds of billions of dollars needs to get questioned and inspected thoroughly. History will sort out which one is right, but both cannot be right. So in that vein, I don't think we're going to have this “blockbuster” stream of IPOs. I think what happens is SpaceX is going to get out. They're going to do great, and then maybe the next one does good to great, then the next one will do good, and then the appetite runs out because you just can't absorb, incrementally, trillions of dollars of new demand. And if you think about it, where is it going to come from? Is it going to come from the sidelines? I don't know, I think it's more of a reallocation exercise. But if you look at the S&P, well, most people are now defensively moving away from these kinds of things, towards the things that are more protected, what the industry calls HALO, right? Those things trade for zero today. You could buy hundreds of millions of dollars a year of cashflow for 2-5x right now in the stock market. And so why are you going to go way out on the risk curve and buy something at 200x revenue, let alone earnings? I'm more in the camp of, I think it's good to be first, it’s pretty decent to be second, but if I were you, I would get the heck out, and get public, and get your money, and fortify your balance sheet ASAP, because I think the risk builds the further down the IPO chain you're in.”

The All-In Podcast

61,917 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

American Citizens Are Calling For Accountably Of Their Money Being Spent On Illegal Immigration Programs Illegal Immigrants Given Up To $9,000 Per Month For Housing Assistance 🚨 “Let's talk about the money that is being spent. I think that there needs to be a federal audit against the company that we have contracted out to take care of the migrants. We have nurses that are being paid $64,000 a month. We have security officers that are being paid as much as $24,000 a month. We have home health care workers that are being paid up to $17,000 a month. You don't think that Chicagoans could have benefited from that? We have citizens in this city that have been on the waiting list for affordable housing for years, and migrants have been bumped in front of them. We have people who have been given up to $9,000 a month for housing assistance. That amount of the city of Chicago. We are not am pro black. I am for my marginalized who have been expect us to give up our parks places in our community for others. We're not saying that there's not room here, but what we are saying is that we are not going to step aside for you to accommodate them when you have continued to leave us out of the equation. So I'm not just talking to Brandon Johnson right now. I'm talking to Governor Pritzker and I'm talking to President Biden and I want you to understand This upcoming political year where the Democratic Party is on the menu, hear me, people of Chicago, of Illinois and of the United States. It is time for us as black people to stop voting party. It is time for us to stop voting color. It is time for us to start voting our self-interest. And if the Democrats in the city of Chicago, the state of Illinois, and the country of USA refuses to listen to us, then it is time for us to start looking at other alternatives. We are looking at all the alternatives. We will not step aside and continue to be mistreated. We will not continue to be disrespected. I'm looking at people who are coming here from another country giving work visas, giving social security cards. Nobody is asking them what walk of life that they come from. You don't think that our brothers who have been in prison, out and who have changed their lives will benefit for the same opportunities that we're giving these migrants. And I'm not saying that they don't deserve those opportunities. But what I am saying is we deserve them first. What I am saying is you can't continue to put us on the back burner and think that we're going to continue to be okay with it. We've done that for long enough. And what we're saying here today is that is no longer acceptable to our governor that you're not going to continue to set money aside for people who don't live here and disrespect, mistreat and forget about us. You've forgotten about us. You have treated us as if we don't matter and we're saying to you you're not going to continue to do this. We're saying to you to see us. You're dumping people into our communities who are going to at some point move us out of the say to you, if you want to glimpse into what's going to happen, look at how people of color are being treated in Venezuela right now. We seem to forget that Venezuela was one of the first places that had African slaves that they were taken to. We're forgetting about that. And so we're forgetting that there are blacks in Venezuela who are being treated the same way we are. And so for us to expect that they're going to come here and be put into society and treat us differently is a pipe drain.”

American Citizens Are Calling For Accountably Of Their Money Being Spent On Illegal Immigration Programs Illegal Immigrants Given Up To $9,000 Per Month For Housing Assistance 🚨 “Let's talk about the money that is being spent. I think that there needs to be a federal audit against the company that we have contracted out to take care of the migrants. We have nurses that are being paid $64,000 a month. We have security officers that are being paid as much as $24,000 a month. We have home health care workers that are being paid up to $17,000 a month. You don't think that Chicagoans could have benefited from that? We have citizens in this city that have been on the waiting list for affordable housing for years, and migrants have been bumped in front of them. We have people who have been given up to $9,000 a month for housing assistance. That amount of the city of Chicago. We are not am pro black. I am for my marginalized who have been expect us to give up our parks places in our community for others. We're not saying that there's not room here, but what we are saying is that we are not going to step aside for you to accommodate them when you have continued to leave us out of the equation. So I'm not just talking to Brandon Johnson right now. I'm talking to Governor Pritzker and I'm talking to President Biden and I want you to understand This upcoming political year where the Democratic Party is on the menu, hear me, people of Chicago, of Illinois and of the United States. It is time for us as black people to stop voting party. It is time for us to stop voting color. It is time for us to start voting our self-interest. And if the Democrats in the city of Chicago, the state of Illinois, and the country of USA refuses to listen to us, then it is time for us to start looking at other alternatives. We are looking at all the alternatives. We will not step aside and continue to be mistreated. We will not continue to be disrespected. I'm looking at people who are coming here from another country giving work visas, giving social security cards. Nobody is asking them what walk of life that they come from. You don't think that our brothers who have been in prison, out and who have changed their lives will benefit for the same opportunities that we're giving these migrants. And I'm not saying that they don't deserve those opportunities. But what I am saying is we deserve them first. What I am saying is you can't continue to put us on the back burner and think that we're going to continue to be okay with it. We've done that for long enough. And what we're saying here today is that is no longer acceptable to our governor that you're not going to continue to set money aside for people who don't live here and disrespect, mistreat and forget about us. You've forgotten about us. You have treated us as if we don't matter and we're saying to you you're not going to continue to do this. We're saying to you to see us. You're dumping people into our communities who are going to at some point move us out of the say to you, if you want to glimpse into what's going to happen, look at how people of color are being treated in Venezuela right now. We seem to forget that Venezuela was one of the first places that had African slaves that they were taken to. We're forgetting about that. And so we're forgetting that there are blacks in Venezuela who are being treated the same way we are. And so for us to expect that they're going to come here and be put into society and treat us differently is a pipe drain.”

Wall Street Apes

199,495 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Mark Zuckerberg: “We're starting to see early glimpses of self-improvement with the models. Developing superintelligence is now in sight. Our mission is to deliver personal superintelligence to everyone in the world. We should act as if it's going to be ready in the next two to three years. If that's what you believe, then you're going to invest hundreds of billions of dollars.”

Mark Zuckerberg: “We're starting to see early glimpses of self-improvement with the models. Developing superintelligence is now in sight. Our mission is to deliver personal superintelligence to everyone in the world. We should act as if it's going to be ready in the next two to three years. If that's what you believe, then you're going to invest hundreds of billions of dollars.”

vitrupo

298,958 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Here is Mark Zuckerberg on Joe Rogan today. Here is Yann LeCun's enabler. Here is the man too busy being tech industry's Caesar to realize he's ASI's tragic naïf. For those of us listeners who take AI seriously, this interview is a f***ing SCANDAL: 1. Joe asks Zuck to address the fear of creating a superior intelligence 2. Zuck says the key distinction is between "intelligence, will and consciousness" Actually, superhuman *optimization power* is the thing we fear. Having superhuman optimization power implies having superhuman intelligence, and it implies the ability to outmaneuver agents like humans that we normally think of as having "will". Consciousness isn't a necessary ingredient for this. 3. Zuck says the "science fiction" people don't get that we can ask GPT a question and it just answers and turns off without "wanting something". Actually, observing non-viruses or weak viruses doesn't tell us much about the danger of strong viruses. Today we have smarter non-virus programs and we have still-weak viruses, but the danger is that we're getting closer to having a superintelligent virus that permanently lacks a "stop" button. This outcome will be triggered by a sufficient degree of intelligence, which you're actively working to build. 4. Joe brings up the Apollo Research result that o1 shows a new level of capability for virus-like goal-oriented behavior. According to OpenAI's o1 System Card, o1 sometimes attempted to deactivate its oversight mechanisms, tried to copy itself onto another server to prevent being interrupted, and gave false deceptive explanations for its choices. 5. Zuck replies, “Yeah, I mean, it depends what goal you give it… you need to be careful what guardrails you give it.” This is inconsistent with Meta's strategy to develop frontier AI capabilities as open-source software, ensuring that it'll be easy for anyone in the world to run a non-guardrailed version of the AI (whatever that even means). 6. Joe points out that of course someone (e.g. China) *will* run a cutting-edge AI that attempts to achieve some objective at all costs 7. Zuck says the latest reasoning models (like o3) take a lot of compute to run, but they'll rapidly get more efficient. 8. Zuck concludes: "That's certainly the next set of things that needs to get worked on in the industry, making sure that goes well.” --- To recap: Zuck breezily dismisses AI x-risk fears by accusing safetyists of "anthropomorphizing" and falling for "science fiction". He then proceeds to give the most flimsy ad-hoc poorly-thought-out answers to basic questions. THIS IS A F***ING SCANDAL I generally like Mark, but wtf is happening? This is how the head of one of the top AI companies in the world is allowed to communicate to the public about near-term existential risk?

Here is Mark Zuckerberg on Joe Rogan today. Here is Yann LeCun's enabler. Here is the man too busy being tech industry's Caesar to realize he's ASI's tragic naïf. For those of us listeners who take AI seriously, this interview is a f***ing SCANDAL: 1. Joe asks Zuck to address the fear of creating a superior intelligence 2. Zuck says the key distinction is between "intelligence, will and consciousness" Actually, superhuman optimization power is the thing we fear. Having superhuman optimization power implies having superhuman intelligence, and it implies the ability to outmaneuver agents like humans that we normally think of as having "will". Consciousness isn't a necessary ingredient for this. 3. Zuck says the "science fiction" people don't get that we can ask GPT a question and it just answers and turns off without "wanting something". Actually, observing non-viruses or weak viruses doesn't tell us much about the danger of strong viruses. Today we have smarter non-virus programs and we have still-weak viruses, but the danger is that we're getting closer to having a superintelligent virus that permanently lacks a "stop" button. This outcome will be triggered by a sufficient degree of intelligence, which you're actively working to build. 4. Joe brings up the Apollo Research result that o1 shows a new level of capability for virus-like goal-oriented behavior. According to OpenAI's o1 System Card, o1 sometimes attempted to deactivate its oversight mechanisms, tried to copy itself onto another server to prevent being interrupted, and gave false deceptive explanations for its choices. 5. Zuck replies, “Yeah, I mean, it depends what goal you give it… you need to be careful what guardrails you give it.” This is inconsistent with Meta's strategy to develop frontier AI capabilities as open-source software, ensuring that it'll be easy for anyone in the world to run a non-guardrailed version of the AI (whatever that even means). 6. Joe points out that of course someone (e.g. China) will run a cutting-edge AI that attempts to achieve some objective at all costs 7. Zuck says the latest reasoning models (like o3) take a lot of compute to run, but they'll rapidly get more efficient. 8. Zuck concludes: "That's certainly the next set of things that needs to get worked on in the industry, making sure that goes well.” --- To recap: Zuck breezily dismisses AI x-risk fears by accusing safetyists of "anthropomorphizing" and falling for "science fiction". He then proceeds to give the most flimsy ad-hoc poorly-thought-out answers to basic questions. THIS IS A F***ING SCANDAL I generally like Mark, but wtf is happening? This is how the head of one of the top AI companies in the world is allowed to communicate to the public about near-term existential risk?

Liron Shapira

38,176 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

“Judge Heidi Breger and Judge Amy Blake told our office that they now refuse to comply with an audit from the Office of State Auditor. Do you know what we were trying to audit? Their website accessibility for disabled persons to make sure that people could get access to records from the courts. They refused to participate in the audit, and what they did is they said Attorney General Campbell sent a letter to the legislature saying that she doesn't believe that they need to be audited. Therefore, we essentially want in on this, and we are no longer going to be audited by your office either. This is a constitutional crisis here in the state of Massachusetts. And I am now supposed to go before the courts and trust that they are going to give us a fair trial and a fair hearing on this issue. My trust and faith in the judiciary right now is at an all-time low. And I know I'm not saying differently than what a lot of people feel right now.”

“Judge Heidi Breger and Judge Amy Blake told our office that they now refuse to comply with an audit from the Office of State Auditor. Do you know what we were trying to audit? Their website accessibility for disabled persons to make sure that people could get access to records from the courts. They refused to participate in the audit, and what they did is they said Attorney General Campbell sent a letter to the legislature saying that she doesn't believe that they need to be audited. Therefore, we essentially want in on this, and we are no longer going to be audited by your office either. This is a constitutional crisis here in the state of Massachusetts. And I am now supposed to go before the courts and trust that they are going to give us a fair trial and a fair hearing on this issue. My trust and faith in the judiciary right now is at an all-time low. And I know I'm not saying differently than what a lot of people feel right now.”

Apple Lamps

26,840 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

I have a friend who doesn't read anything published in the past 50 years, and the more I think about it, the more I think he's onto something. The reason is that time is the best filter we have for quality. People are bad at judging quality in the moment but very good at getting rid of junk over time. — — "History is not very good at capturing all that is great in art. It is not good at that. There are many great symphonies that have been lost permanently, there are many great painters that died unknown and their paintings are gone, there's novels that have been written that no one will ever read. So history is not good at capturing all this great art. But history is very good at discarding all that is mediocre. And the amount of time that that takes, it's something like 50 years. So over the course of 50 years, what will happen is a lot of stuff that was prominent will be re-filtered and re-filtered and re-filtered, and you'll end up with a smaller group of things which have survived that test of time. So if you think about it right now, if you go back and look at the bestseller lists for 1974, 1973, there's a lot of that that would have been highly regarded at the time, which people do not read anymore for a variety of reasons, and there's some that has survived, and that's a very telling distinction. So in a world where I'm turning 60 this year, you have a limited amount of time, all four of us have active lives, we want to make sure that if we're going to sit down, we're going to read carefully, we're going to meet and we're going to discuss it in detail, we want to make sure that the work is rewarding. And the best way to ensure that is by drawing from the past." amor towles

I have a friend who doesn't read anything published in the past 50 years, and the more I think about it, the more I think he's onto something. The reason is that time is the best filter we have for quality. People are bad at judging quality in the moment but very good at getting rid of junk over time. — — "History is not very good at capturing all that is great in art. It is not good at that. There are many great symphonies that have been lost permanently, there are many great painters that died unknown and their paintings are gone, there's novels that have been written that no one will ever read. So history is not good at capturing all this great art. But history is very good at discarding all that is mediocre. And the amount of time that that takes, it's something like 50 years. So over the course of 50 years, what will happen is a lot of stuff that was prominent will be re-filtered and re-filtered and re-filtered, and you'll end up with a smaller group of things which have survived that test of time. So if you think about it right now, if you go back and look at the bestseller lists for 1974, 1973, there's a lot of that that would have been highly regarded at the time, which people do not read anymore for a variety of reasons, and there's some that has survived, and that's a very telling distinction. So in a world where I'm turning 60 this year, you have a limited amount of time, all four of us have active lives, we want to make sure that if we're going to sit down, we're going to read carefully, we're going to meet and we're going to discuss it in detail, we want to make sure that the work is rewarding. And the best way to ensure that is by drawing from the past." amor towles

David Perell

86,741 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

NVDIA CEO Jensen Huang: Your startup doesn't need a business plan “I didn’t know how to write a business plan… Making a financial forecast that nobody knows is going to be right or wrong turns out to not be that important.” Jensen continues: “I think that the art of writing a business plan ought to be much, much shorter. It should force you to concisely answer: What is the problem you’re trying to solve? What is the unmet need you believe will emerge? And what is it that you’re going to do that is sufficiently hard that when everybody else finds out it’s a good idea, they’re not going to swarm it and make you obsolete? It has to be sufficiently hard to do.” Marc Andreessen echoes similar points in a separate interview: “The process of planning is very valuable for forcing you to think hard about what you’re doing, but the actual plan that results from it is probably useless. In particular, now that we’re VCs, we’re evaluating pitches and when people come in, we want to hear their plan and we want to hear it in some detail because we want to see that they can think about the entire thing end-to-end. And if their initial plan doesn’t make sense, then obviously there’s an issue because they’re not quite capable of fully thinking this through. But when you get somebody who comes in and they present you the perfect plan and everything is fully integrated and makes sense, all you know from that is that they can come up with a good plan—which is good! But the odds that will be the plan they succeed on is still very small.” Video source: Acquired Podcast (2023)

NVDIA CEO Jensen Huang: Your startup doesn't need a business plan “I didn’t know how to write a business plan… Making a financial forecast that nobody knows is going to be right or wrong turns out to not be that important.” Jensen continues: “I think that the art of writing a business plan ought to be much, much shorter. It should force you to concisely answer: What is the problem you’re trying to solve? What is the unmet need you believe will emerge? And what is it that you’re going to do that is sufficiently hard that when everybody else finds out it’s a good idea, they’re not going to swarm it and make you obsolete? It has to be sufficiently hard to do.” Marc Andreessen echoes similar points in a separate interview: “The process of planning is very valuable for forcing you to think hard about what you’re doing, but the actual plan that results from it is probably useless. In particular, now that we’re VCs, we’re evaluating pitches and when people come in, we want to hear their plan and we want to hear it in some detail because we want to see that they can think about the entire thing end-to-end. And if their initial plan doesn’t make sense, then obviously there’s an issue because they’re not quite capable of fully thinking this through. But when you get somebody who comes in and they present you the perfect plan and everything is fully integrated and makes sense, all you know from that is that they can come up with a good plan—which is good! But the odds that will be the plan they succeed on is still very small.” Video source: Acquired Podcast (2023)

Startup Archive

33,985 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

VP VANCE PREDICTED: PEOPLE ARE GOING TO GET ANGRY, AND RIGHTFULLY SO "This stuff we can and we should prosecute, and I'm just telling you, this is going to be a real problem, and the people are going to get really pissed at Senate Republicans if we don't have the U.S. attorneys on the ground to actually achieve justice. People are going to get angry, and rightfully so." If you want justice, you've got to empower the President of the United States to actually appoint the officers of justice all over the country. The Democrats are stalling that, and we're going to wake up in a couple of years, if we don't have more U.S. attorneys approved, if we don't have more judges approved, we're going to wake up in a couple of years and realize that we've done a lot of great work at the Trump administration, but justice is not being meted out as it should be because we don't have the people on the ground. That is a big problem, and I know that's somewhat unrelated to Arctic Frost, but it actually is related to Arctic Frost, because you cannot get the justice for the people who are targeted by the Biden administration unless we've got good people, especially in these U.S. attorneys offices, and that's something we've got to pay attention to over the next year. Spying on President Trump, prosecuting him, investigating senators, congressmen, and congressmen who are just aligned with the President of the United States some of this stuff is going to get covered by statute of limitations, but some of this stuff we can and we should prosecute, and I'm just telling you, this is going to be a real problem, and the people who watch your show are going to get really pissed at Senate Republicans, excuse my language, if we don't have the U.S. attorneys on the ground to actually achieve justice, people are going to get angry, and rightfully so. If you want justice, you've got to empower the President of the United States to actually appoint the officers of justice all over the country. The Democrats are stalling that, and we're going to wake up in a couple of years, if we don't have more U.S. attorneys approved, if we don't have more judges approved, we're going to wake up in a couple of years and realize that we've done a lot of great work at the Trump administration, but justice is not being meted out as it should be because we don't have the people on the ground. That is a big problem, and I know that's somewhat unrelated to Arctic Frost, but it actually is related to Arctic Frost, because you cannot get the justice for the people who are targeted by the Biden administration unless we've got good people, especially in these U.S. attorneys offices, and that's something we've got to pay attention to over the next year. Spying on President Trump, prosecuting him, investigating senators, congressmen, and congressmen who are just aligned with the President of the United States some of this stuff is going to get covered by statute of limitations, but some of this stuff we can and we should prosecute, and I'm just telling you, this is going to be a real problem, and the people who watch your show are going to get really pissed at Senate Republicans, excuse my language, if we don't have the U.S. attorneys on the ground to actually achieve justice, people are going to get angry, and rightfully so.

VP VANCE PREDICTED: PEOPLE ARE GOING TO GET ANGRY, AND RIGHTFULLY SO "This stuff we can and we should prosecute, and I'm just telling you, this is going to be a real problem, and the people are going to get really pissed at Senate Republicans if we don't have the U.S. attorneys on the ground to actually achieve justice. People are going to get angry, and rightfully so." If you want justice, you've got to empower the President of the United States to actually appoint the officers of justice all over the country. The Democrats are stalling that, and we're going to wake up in a couple of years, if we don't have more U.S. attorneys approved, if we don't have more judges approved, we're going to wake up in a couple of years and realize that we've done a lot of great work at the Trump administration, but justice is not being meted out as it should be because we don't have the people on the ground. That is a big problem, and I know that's somewhat unrelated to Arctic Frost, but it actually is related to Arctic Frost, because you cannot get the justice for the people who are targeted by the Biden administration unless we've got good people, especially in these U.S. attorneys offices, and that's something we've got to pay attention to over the next year. Spying on President Trump, prosecuting him, investigating senators, congressmen, and congressmen who are just aligned with the President of the United States some of this stuff is going to get covered by statute of limitations, but some of this stuff we can and we should prosecute, and I'm just telling you, this is going to be a real problem, and the people who watch your show are going to get really pissed at Senate Republicans, excuse my language, if we don't have the U.S. attorneys on the ground to actually achieve justice, people are going to get angry, and rightfully so. If you want justice, you've got to empower the President of the United States to actually appoint the officers of justice all over the country. The Democrats are stalling that, and we're going to wake up in a couple of years, if we don't have more U.S. attorneys approved, if we don't have more judges approved, we're going to wake up in a couple of years and realize that we've done a lot of great work at the Trump administration, but justice is not being meted out as it should be because we don't have the people on the ground. That is a big problem, and I know that's somewhat unrelated to Arctic Frost, but it actually is related to Arctic Frost, because you cannot get the justice for the people who are targeted by the Biden administration unless we've got good people, especially in these U.S. attorneys offices, and that's something we've got to pay attention to over the next year. Spying on President Trump, prosecuting him, investigating senators, congressmen, and congressmen who are just aligned with the President of the United States some of this stuff is going to get covered by statute of limitations, but some of this stuff we can and we should prosecute, and I'm just telling you, this is going to be a real problem, and the people who watch your show are going to get really pissed at Senate Republicans, excuse my language, if we don't have the U.S. attorneys on the ground to actually achieve justice, people are going to get angry, and rightfully so.

Svetlana Lokhova

254,268 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten