正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

Четыре раза (!) Рубио спросили является ли «путин военным преступником», изворачиваясь как глист в говне, тот ни разу он не дал ответа похожего на «да». Публикуем полный диалог с сенатором Китингом: Китинг: Владимир Путин. Он военный преступник? Рубио: То, что там происходило, действительно можно охарактеризовать, как военные преступления. Но...

Buggy__Bugler's profile picture

Чокнутый горнист 🇺🇦

28,860 subscribers

47,841 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

艺术新闻政治
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

10 条评论

чудова-конюшина-Бандери 的头像
чудова-конюшина-Бандери1 年前

рубио выипали и вытряхнули в сенате. Причем представители обеих партий

Kovalev Alexander 的头像
Kovalev Alexander1 年前

И еще он забыл о такой штуке как репутация. Трамп как пришел - так и уйдет. А этот позор уже будет с ним до конца жизни. Неужели оно того стоило?

*J.O.K.E.R* 的头像
*J.O.K.E.R*1 年前

Вот же тварь, а почему бы им было с Бен Ладаном не поговорить ? Ублюдки

Касатик??? 的头像
Касатик???1 年前

Рубио - человек, который пытается сохранить возможность мирных переговоров, а Китинг - провокатор, которому выгодно продолжить войну.

🇨🇦Eat Well Live Longer🇺🇦 N△FOꑭ 的头像
🇨🇦Eat Well Live Longer🇺🇦 N△FOꑭ1 年前

у него на лбу раньше был крестик, а теперь будет нолик

Чокнутый горнист 🇺🇦 的头像
Чокнутый горнист 🇺🇦1 年前

крестик, это он себе на лбу мишень нарисовал?

Kovalev Alexander 的头像
Kovalev Alexander1 年前

Прощу прощения за грубость. Но! Если ты долго вылизывал задницу старому дегенерату - то рано или поздно здравый смысл отымеет тебя прямо в розовую дырочку. По другому никак. Рубио, видимо, не знал. Молодой еще. Или глупый.

Misha 的头像
Misha1 年前

Ну Байден назвал Путина убийцей. Это украинцам сильно помогло? «Любят ушами».

Хуевый Сашок 的头像
Хуевый Сашок1 年前

вот так уходят в закат сильные страны

Аlex Skif 的头像
Аlex Skif1 年前

@AllaTchernova Почему как?Он и есть глист в трамповской заднице.

相关视频

A Democrat Senator just RAGED & SCREAMED at Marco Rubio for not calling Putin a war criminal. "This man we're negotiating with, Vladimir Putin, is he a war criminal?" Rubio: "I'm trying to answer your question by telling you that we're trying to end the war here..." How did the worst people on earth all end up in government?
0:45

A Democrat Senator just RAGED & SCREAMED at Marco Rubio for not calling Putin a war criminal. "This man we're negotiating with, Vladimir Putin, is he a war criminal?" Rubio: "I'm trying to answer your question by telling you that we're trying to end the war here..." How did the worst people on earth all end up in government?

George

312,699 次观看 • 1 年前

🚨 BREAKING: ABC just tried to grill Marco Rubio for the US giving Putin the "red carpet" and President Trump having a "warm handshake" - and Rubio was having NONE of it. "When I hear people say that, 'oh, it elevates him.' Well, all we do is talk about Putin all the time! All the media's done is talk about Putin all the time for last four, five years. That doesn't mean he's right about the war. That doesn't mean he's justified about the war. Put all that aside. It means you're not going to have a peace agreement between Russia and Ukraine. You're not going to end a war between Russia and Ukraine without dealing with Putin!" "That's that's just common sense. I shouldn't even have to say it! So people can say whatever they want. Ultimately, at the end of the day, we have to get the Russian side to agree to things that they don't want to agree to if we're going to have peace. If not, there'll just be a war." "They'll keep k*lling each other and life will go on in America and in the rest of the world, but not for Ukraine. So the president has invested a lot of time in trying to bring an end to this war. He deserves credit for doing that. He gets criticism for doing that. He could have just let this war go on. The president could have just said, 'this is Biden's war, it started under him, we'll do what we can for Ukraine, but we're going to focus on other things.' He could have easily said that. But he's the only leader in the world that got Putin to a meeting to talk about serious things."
1:39

🚨 BREAKING: ABC just tried to grill Marco Rubio for the US giving Putin the "red carpet" and President Trump having a "warm handshake" - and Rubio was having NONE of it. "When I hear people say that, 'oh, it elevates him.' Well, all we do is talk about Putin all the time! All the media's done is talk about Putin all the time for last four, five years. That doesn't mean he's right about the war. That doesn't mean he's justified about the war. Put all that aside. It means you're not going to have a peace agreement between Russia and Ukraine. You're not going to end a war between Russia and Ukraine without dealing with Putin!" "That's that's just common sense. I shouldn't even have to say it! So people can say whatever they want. Ultimately, at the end of the day, we have to get the Russian side to agree to things that they don't want to agree to if we're going to have peace. If not, there'll just be a war." "They'll keep k*lling each other and life will go on in America and in the rest of the world, but not for Ukraine. So the president has invested a lot of time in trying to bring an end to this war. He deserves credit for doing that. He gets criticism for doing that. He could have just let this war go on. The president could have just said, 'this is Biden's war, it started under him, we'll do what we can for Ukraine, but we're going to focus on other things.' He could have easily said that. But he's the only leader in the world that got Putin to a meeting to talk about serious things."

Eric Daugherty

1,058,669 次观看 • 11 个月前

🚨BREAKING: Elon Musk and Senator Ron Johnson discuss their opposition to escalating the ongoing bloody stalemate in the War in Ukraine. Instead, advocating for peace negotiations to bring an end to the loss of lives and the destruction of Ukraine. Elon Musk: "My companies have probably done more to undermine Russia than anyone. Space X has taken away two-thirds of the Russian launch business. Starlink has overwhelmingly helped Ukraine. My concern is exactly what you articulated. If you have an extended war of attrition, every day that goes by, you're losing more Ukrainian people. They aren't even Ukrainian boys anymore because they are running out of boys. And if you are going to spend lives, it must be for a purpose. Not just a mile back and forth. In fact, the lines aren't moving. So, just every day, people die. As you said, there's no way Putin is going to lose. If he backs off, he will be assassinated. And for those who want regime change in Russia, they should think about who is the person that could take out Putin? Is that person likely to be a peacenik? Probably not. They're probably going to be even more hardcore than Putin." Senator Ron Johnson: "We all have to understand that Vladimir Putin will not lose this war... Losing to Vladimir Putin is existential to Vladimir Putin. Russia has four times the population and a much larger industrial base. Russia can produce 4.5 million artillery shells per year. We're not even up to 1 million per year. The average age of a Ukrainian soldier right now is 43 years old. Some of Zelensky's top aides say that even if the U.S. and its allies deliver all the weapons they have pledged, they don't have the men to use them. If you're worried about the people of Ukraine, you have to understand that probably 100,000 of their soldiers have been killed. The only way this war ends is in a settlement, and every day that the war goes on, more Ukrainians and more Russian conscripts die, more civilians die, and more of Ukraine gets destroyed. Again, sending $60 billion as added fuel to the flames of a bloody stalemate makes no sense. As evil of a war criminal as Putin is, he's not going to lose this war, and our colleagues here just aren't willing to accept that reality. They are living in a fantasy world thinking that Ukraine can win this thing."
3:09

🚨BREAKING: Elon Musk and Senator Ron Johnson discuss their opposition to escalating the ongoing bloody stalemate in the War in Ukraine. Instead, advocating for peace negotiations to bring an end to the loss of lives and the destruction of Ukraine. Elon Musk: "My companies have probably done more to undermine Russia than anyone. Space X has taken away two-thirds of the Russian launch business. Starlink has overwhelmingly helped Ukraine. My concern is exactly what you articulated. If you have an extended war of attrition, every day that goes by, you're losing more Ukrainian people. They aren't even Ukrainian boys anymore because they are running out of boys. And if you are going to spend lives, it must be for a purpose. Not just a mile back and forth. In fact, the lines aren't moving. So, just every day, people die. As you said, there's no way Putin is going to lose. If he backs off, he will be assassinated. And for those who want regime change in Russia, they should think about who is the person that could take out Putin? Is that person likely to be a peacenik? Probably not. They're probably going to be even more hardcore than Putin." Senator Ron Johnson: "We all have to understand that Vladimir Putin will not lose this war... Losing to Vladimir Putin is existential to Vladimir Putin. Russia has four times the population and a much larger industrial base. Russia can produce 4.5 million artillery shells per year. We're not even up to 1 million per year. The average age of a Ukrainian soldier right now is 43 years old. Some of Zelensky's top aides say that even if the U.S. and its allies deliver all the weapons they have pledged, they don't have the men to use them. If you're worried about the people of Ukraine, you have to understand that probably 100,000 of their soldiers have been killed. The only way this war ends is in a settlement, and every day that the war goes on, more Ukrainians and more Russian conscripts die, more civilians die, and more of Ukraine gets destroyed. Again, sending $60 billion as added fuel to the flames of a bloody stalemate makes no sense. As evil of a war criminal as Putin is, he's not going to lose this war, and our colleagues here just aren't willing to accept that reality. They are living in a fantasy world thinking that Ukraine can win this thing."

KanekoaTheGreat

1,103,319 次观看 • 2 年前

THOMAS MASSIE on Trump trying to whip his vote on the 2020 restatement that war powers resides with Congress "His argument... [was] that he could bluff Iran into doing what he wanted" "[But that would've] given [Trump] the power to declare war without Congress's involvement" "he didn't convince me. I did vote for the resolution that restated the Constitution... says you got to come to Congress if you want to have a war with Iran" "his first mistake may have been making Marco Rubio Secretary of State" "his second mistake would be letting Lindsey Graham on that airplane so many times, whispering in his ear" "finally, [maybe his] biggest mistake is letting Israel control too much of his policy. Perhaps it was taking $200 million from Miriam Adelson" This clip of Massie (Thomas Massie) is taken from an interview with James Patrick (James Patrick) posted to YouTube on May 21, 2026. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "In January of 2020, I had a conversation with President Trump about war with Iran. Now, to put this in context, they killed Soleimani, not on Iranian soil, but in Iraq. And he was an Iranian general. And then, we had a drone flying over there, and they shot it down. "Now, whether it was over Iran or over the water, I don't know. Maybe we'll never know. But at that point, the president threatened to take action against Iran for that, and he was being encouraged to do so by members of his cabinet. "So we had a vote here in Congress in January of 2020, and the President heard that I was going to vote for no war. Basically, the vote was a restatement of the Constitution and that war powers resided in Congress. It was to say that President Trump cannot go to war with Iran without an act of Congress. "There were only three Republicans who voted for that. But the president heard that I was going to vote for it. So he called me up to whip me on this vote, and he said, I'm more, anti-war than you are. And I said, well, you— In fact, you are. You've not started a war. You're the first president that hasn't started a war. "Now, remember, this was his fourth year in office, 2020. You're the first president that hasn't started a war that I could vote for since I was 18. And he said, I guess you're right. Thank you for saying that. "His argument to me was that if we didn't constrict his ability to rattle the sabers and threaten war, that he could bluff Iran into doing what he wanted and therefore avoid war. And they said, well, that would work just fine unless they call your bluff. And then now we've given you the power to declare war without Congress's involvement, and you're obligated to war if your intention was to bluff. Now you're obligated to war. "And, that day, he didn't convince me. I did vote for the resolution that restated the Constitution that says you got to come to Congress if you want to have a war with Iran. Now, fortunately, that war did not happen. But here we are in his second term, and I think he's— "You know, his first mistake may have been making Marco Rubio Secretary of State. And then his second mistake would be letting Lindsey Graham on that airplane so many times, whispering in his ear. And then, you know, finally, it may be the biggest mistake is letting Israel control too much of his policy. Perhaps it was taking $200 million from Miriam Adelson. "That was a mistake that, I think, led largely to him being predisposed to listening to Israel's interests over America's interests with regard to war with Iran."
3:01

THOMAS MASSIE on Trump trying to whip his vote on the 2020 restatement that war powers resides with Congress "His argument... [was] that he could bluff Iran into doing what he wanted" "[But that would've] given [Trump] the power to declare war without Congress's involvement" "he didn't convince me. I did vote for the resolution that restated the Constitution... says you got to come to Congress if you want to have a war with Iran" "his first mistake may have been making Marco Rubio Secretary of State" "his second mistake would be letting Lindsey Graham on that airplane so many times, whispering in his ear" "finally, [maybe his] biggest mistake is letting Israel control too much of his policy. Perhaps it was taking $200 million from Miriam Adelson" This clip of Massie (Thomas Massie) is taken from an interview with James Patrick (James Patrick) posted to YouTube on May 21, 2026. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "In January of 2020, I had a conversation with President Trump about war with Iran. Now, to put this in context, they killed Soleimani, not on Iranian soil, but in Iraq. And he was an Iranian general. And then, we had a drone flying over there, and they shot it down. "Now, whether it was over Iran or over the water, I don't know. Maybe we'll never know. But at that point, the president threatened to take action against Iran for that, and he was being encouraged to do so by members of his cabinet. "So we had a vote here in Congress in January of 2020, and the President heard that I was going to vote for no war. Basically, the vote was a restatement of the Constitution and that war powers resided in Congress. It was to say that President Trump cannot go to war with Iran without an act of Congress. "There were only three Republicans who voted for that. But the president heard that I was going to vote for it. So he called me up to whip me on this vote, and he said, I'm more, anti-war than you are. And I said, well, you— In fact, you are. You've not started a war. You're the first president that hasn't started a war. "Now, remember, this was his fourth year in office, 2020. You're the first president that hasn't started a war that I could vote for since I was 18. And he said, I guess you're right. Thank you for saying that. "His argument to me was that if we didn't constrict his ability to rattle the sabers and threaten war, that he could bluff Iran into doing what he wanted and therefore avoid war. And they said, well, that would work just fine unless they call your bluff. And then now we've given you the power to declare war without Congress's involvement, and you're obligated to war if your intention was to bluff. Now you're obligated to war. "And, that day, he didn't convince me. I did vote for the resolution that restated the Constitution that says you got to come to Congress if you want to have a war with Iran. Now, fortunately, that war did not happen. But here we are in his second term, and I think he's— "You know, his first mistake may have been making Marco Rubio Secretary of State. And then his second mistake would be letting Lindsey Graham on that airplane so many times, whispering in his ear. And then, you know, finally, it may be the biggest mistake is letting Israel control too much of his policy. Perhaps it was taking $200 million from Miriam Adelson. "That was a mistake that, I think, led largely to him being predisposed to listening to Israel's interests over America's interests with regard to war with Iran."

Sense Receptor

65,082 次观看 • 2 个月前

🚨Trump gave a lengthy response regarding Russia’s reaction to events in Venezuela and its war in Ukraine. While saying that he is “not thrilled” with Putin, he also claimed that both sides—Ukraine and Russia—have done “some pretty bad things.” Trump ended his answer with a rather mysterious comment that did not clearly explain what he meant. He suggested that if the American servicemen who carried out the operation to kidnap Maduro had been involved earlier, the war in Ukraine would never have happened. Who exactly he was referring to as being kidnapped, however, remains unclear. TRUMP: You were so nice before, I'm going to give you the final question. Go ahead. Thank you, Mr. President. Unless it's a bad question, in which case I'll go away. Q: It's about Putin, if you want. TRUMP: About Putin, well, that's always nice to talk about Putin. Okay. Q: You had a phone call with him on Monday. Did he talk at all about Maduro? Did y'all talk about this? TRUMP: No, we didn't... We never spoke about Maduro. Q: Are you mad at him right now? TRUMP: I'm not thrilled with Putin. I'm not thrilled with Putin. He's killing too many people. I thought that would be... so, I settled eight and one-quarter war. You know what the one-quarter was? Thailand and Cambodia. I did it again. They broke out, and I did it in about five hours, I settled it. I'm giving myself one-quarter, so I'm up to now eight and one-quarter. In other words, I settled the war, but then they broke out. They had a pretty bad breakout, over the last four days. I got them to go back to peace. So I only give one-quarter. I thought the easiest one would be... One of the easiest ones would be Russia/Ukraine. It's not. And they both have done some pretty bad things. And look, that's Biden's war, that's not my war, but I want to stop the lives... Did you see where last month, 30,000 this last... It was 27... 27,000 the month before. 30,000 mostly soldiers were killed this last month. 30,000. I want to stop that. You know, I got NATO to pay 5% instead of the 2% that they weren't paying. They weren't paying 2, now they pay 5. And we send them a lot of munitions, we send them a lot of things, missiles and various other things. A lot. And they pay. The United States is not losing money. We're probably making money on that. It's the last thing I care about. I just want to stop all those people. We're losing 25, 30,000 human beings that come from two places that are very far away. But if I can stop, because it's something I've been pretty good at doing. Deals, I guess, it's all a deal. Life is a big deal. But if I can stop that war and stop 30,000 young people, in addition to the fact that people are being killed in Kyiv, people are being killed in other cities through, you know, a much smaller number, but they're being killed, viciously killed. So I'm not happy about it. I thought that would be something that would get solved. We have Mr. Witkoff here. I think that we're making progress. But that's a war that should have never happened. If I were president, it would have never happened. Putin says it, everybody says it. If I were president, that would have never happened. But I inherited that war. That was Joe Biden, Zelensky and Putin. I came into the situation and it's a mess. And I will say this, I watched an operation last night that was so precise, that was so brilliant. I mean, it was incredible. If we had our people, like this general and our people involved, - that war, that war would not have gone on very long. That I can tell you. That war, to use an old term, that war has become a bloodbath, and we want it to get stopped".
3:15

🚨Trump gave a lengthy response regarding Russia’s reaction to events in Venezuela and its war in Ukraine. While saying that he is “not thrilled” with Putin, he also claimed that both sides—Ukraine and Russia—have done “some pretty bad things.” Trump ended his answer with a rather mysterious comment that did not clearly explain what he meant. He suggested that if the American servicemen who carried out the operation to kidnap Maduro had been involved earlier, the war in Ukraine would never have happened. Who exactly he was referring to as being kidnapped, however, remains unclear. TRUMP: You were so nice before, I'm going to give you the final question. Go ahead. Thank you, Mr. President. Unless it's a bad question, in which case I'll go away. Q: It's about Putin, if you want. TRUMP: About Putin, well, that's always nice to talk about Putin. Okay. Q: You had a phone call with him on Monday. Did he talk at all about Maduro? Did y'all talk about this? TRUMP: No, we didn't... We never spoke about Maduro. Q: Are you mad at him right now? TRUMP: I'm not thrilled with Putin. I'm not thrilled with Putin. He's killing too many people. I thought that would be... so, I settled eight and one-quarter war. You know what the one-quarter was? Thailand and Cambodia. I did it again. They broke out, and I did it in about five hours, I settled it. I'm giving myself one-quarter, so I'm up to now eight and one-quarter. In other words, I settled the war, but then they broke out. They had a pretty bad breakout, over the last four days. I got them to go back to peace. So I only give one-quarter. I thought the easiest one would be... One of the easiest ones would be Russia/Ukraine. It's not. And they both have done some pretty bad things. And look, that's Biden's war, that's not my war, but I want to stop the lives... Did you see where last month, 30,000 this last... It was 27... 27,000 the month before. 30,000 mostly soldiers were killed this last month. 30,000. I want to stop that. You know, I got NATO to pay 5% instead of the 2% that they weren't paying. They weren't paying 2, now they pay 5. And we send them a lot of munitions, we send them a lot of things, missiles and various other things. A lot. And they pay. The United States is not losing money. We're probably making money on that. It's the last thing I care about. I just want to stop all those people. We're losing 25, 30,000 human beings that come from two places that are very far away. But if I can stop, because it's something I've been pretty good at doing. Deals, I guess, it's all a deal. Life is a big deal. But if I can stop that war and stop 30,000 young people, in addition to the fact that people are being killed in Kyiv, people are being killed in other cities through, you know, a much smaller number, but they're being killed, viciously killed. So I'm not happy about it. I thought that would be something that would get solved. We have Mr. Witkoff here. I think that we're making progress. But that's a war that should have never happened. If I were president, it would have never happened. Putin says it, everybody says it. If I were president, that would have never happened. But I inherited that war. That was Joe Biden, Zelensky and Putin. I came into the situation and it's a mess. And I will say this, I watched an operation last night that was so precise, that was so brilliant. I mean, it was incredible. If we had our people, like this general and our people involved, - that war, that war would not have gone on very long. That I can tell you. That war, to use an old term, that war has become a bloodbath, and we want it to get stopped".

Kateryna Lisunova

25,159 次观看 • 7 个月前

Imagine Zelensky's face after Trump's shocking answers to questions from journalists yesterday about Ukraine: a meeting with Putin, a speedy end to the war, no NATO membership or security guarantees. ▪️The president-elect initially declined to answer a question about whether he would maintain aid to Ukraine during the negotiations. “I’m not going to tell you that,” Trump said. ▪️When asked whether he would provide security guarantees to Ukraine after the war (as Zelensky demands), Trump began to criticize the idea of Ukraine joining NATO. He said that Russia had been saying that such a step was unacceptable for it "for many, many years, long before Putin said so," and that it was "written in stone" (literally, "carved in stone," but some media translate this as "an established agreement"). ➖"And about halfway through, Biden said, no, they should be able to join NATO. Well, then Russia would have somebody right on their doorstep. And I can understand their feeling about that," Trump said. ▪️Later, he made it clear that Ukraine may never join NATO (this moment was not included in the video). That is, he said nothing about security guarantees, but the context of his answer is rather negative. Plus - a clear position against Ukraine joining NATO. ▪️Regarding another of his phrases, there was a discussion in the media about what Trump meant when he said that he “hopes that this will happen much sooner than in 6 months” - about the end of the war or about a meeting with Putin. ▪️The second question from the journalist, who had previously asked about a meeting with Putin, is not clearly audible on the video. It ends with the words "... have a conversation within three to six months?" Trump responded that he expected this conversation to happen "much sooner." ▪️What conversation Trump had in mind - with Putin or about ending the war in general, is not the most important thing in his answer. What is more important is that Trump once again stated that he wants the war in Ukraine to end as soon as possible, "because many, many young people, soldiers, are being killed every day", "hundreds of thousands of soldiers on both sides are dead. They are lying in the fields and no one can even collect them. It's a disaster", "only human bodies can stop bullets" and Trump regrets that he cannot start negotiations now, but must wait until the inauguration. On the backdrop of it, the Biden administration is to announce the last large military aid package to Ukraine in Ramstein that starts tomorrow.
1:51

Imagine Zelensky's face after Trump's shocking answers to questions from journalists yesterday about Ukraine: a meeting with Putin, a speedy end to the war, no NATO membership or security guarantees. ▪️The president-elect initially declined to answer a question about whether he would maintain aid to Ukraine during the negotiations. “I’m not going to tell you that,” Trump said. ▪️When asked whether he would provide security guarantees to Ukraine after the war (as Zelensky demands), Trump began to criticize the idea of Ukraine joining NATO. He said that Russia had been saying that such a step was unacceptable for it "for many, many years, long before Putin said so," and that it was "written in stone" (literally, "carved in stone," but some media translate this as "an established agreement"). ➖"And about halfway through, Biden said, no, they should be able to join NATO. Well, then Russia would have somebody right on their doorstep. And I can understand their feeling about that," Trump said. ▪️Later, he made it clear that Ukraine may never join NATO (this moment was not included in the video). That is, he said nothing about security guarantees, but the context of his answer is rather negative. Plus - a clear position against Ukraine joining NATO. ▪️Regarding another of his phrases, there was a discussion in the media about what Trump meant when he said that he “hopes that this will happen much sooner than in 6 months” - about the end of the war or about a meeting with Putin. ▪️The second question from the journalist, who had previously asked about a meeting with Putin, is not clearly audible on the video. It ends with the words "... have a conversation within three to six months?" Trump responded that he expected this conversation to happen "much sooner." ▪️What conversation Trump had in mind - with Putin or about ending the war in general, is not the most important thing in his answer. What is more important is that Trump once again stated that he wants the war in Ukraine to end as soon as possible, "because many, many young people, soldiers, are being killed every day", "hundreds of thousands of soldiers on both sides are dead. They are lying in the fields and no one can even collect them. It's a disaster", "only human bodies can stop bullets" and Trump regrets that he cannot start negotiations now, but must wait until the inauguration. On the backdrop of it, the Biden administration is to announce the last large military aid package to Ukraine in Ramstein that starts tomorrow.

Olga Bazova

48,602 次观看 • 1 年前

Sen. Shaheen: There's bipartisan agreement in this Senate that we should be putting more pressure on Russia. Rubio: Russia is under incredible amount of pressure. Sen. Shaheen: President Trump made a promise to end war in Ukraine on day one. And here we are, almost year and half into this administration, and he has let Russia and Putin off the hook. Graham-Blumenthal sanctions bill would do that in a way that would force Russia to come to the table and finally fulfill that promise. Rubio: I disagree with that statement. Sen. Shaheen: Well, you and I are going to have to disagree on that, Mr. Secretary. Rubio: We are, because I can tell you that at the highest levels of our administration, we've committed an extraordinary amount of time to the Ukrainian situation and trying to resolve that conflict. Meeting after meeting, all over the world, many of which I attended myself, to try to bridge the differences between the two sides. We've not been successful to date, but not for lack of trying. And we continue to be prepared to play that role. Sen. Shaheen: But, Mr. Secretary, you rightly imposed sanctions on Lukoil and Rosneft. And you've lifted those and you've given Russia the ability to continue to fund their war in Ukraine. Rubio: We have not lifted the sanctions. The sanctions remain in place. What's been granted is a license for a short-term period of time because of global oil demand. Sen. Shaheen: We're arguing semantics here. Rubio: I've acknowledged there's a trade-off in the broader policy. Sen. Shaheen: If Russians are able to make money, then they're not being hurt by the sanctions that were put in place. Rubio: Well, there are plenty of other sanctions that are hurting them. But I will tell you that in that case, I have acknowledged that there was a trade-off here between the destabilization of the availability of oil for countries in the Indo-Pacific in particular, and the decision that was made in the short term on this specific oil. Sen. Shaheen: Except that the cost of a barrel of oil was $100 when you lifted those sanctions, and it's still over $100. So it hasn't provided the kind of relief. Rubio: It would have been much higher if that oil wasn't available. But it's not just the cost, it's the availability.
1:58

Sen. Shaheen: There's bipartisan agreement in this Senate that we should be putting more pressure on Russia. Rubio: Russia is under incredible amount of pressure. Sen. Shaheen: President Trump made a promise to end war in Ukraine on day one. And here we are, almost year and half into this administration, and he has let Russia and Putin off the hook. Graham-Blumenthal sanctions bill would do that in a way that would force Russia to come to the table and finally fulfill that promise. Rubio: I disagree with that statement. Sen. Shaheen: Well, you and I are going to have to disagree on that, Mr. Secretary. Rubio: We are, because I can tell you that at the highest levels of our administration, we've committed an extraordinary amount of time to the Ukrainian situation and trying to resolve that conflict. Meeting after meeting, all over the world, many of which I attended myself, to try to bridge the differences between the two sides. We've not been successful to date, but not for lack of trying. And we continue to be prepared to play that role. Sen. Shaheen: But, Mr. Secretary, you rightly imposed sanctions on Lukoil and Rosneft. And you've lifted those and you've given Russia the ability to continue to fund their war in Ukraine. Rubio: We have not lifted the sanctions. The sanctions remain in place. What's been granted is a license for a short-term period of time because of global oil demand. Sen. Shaheen: We're arguing semantics here. Rubio: I've acknowledged there's a trade-off in the broader policy. Sen. Shaheen: If Russians are able to make money, then they're not being hurt by the sanctions that were put in place. Rubio: Well, there are plenty of other sanctions that are hurting them. But I will tell you that in that case, I have acknowledged that there was a trade-off here between the destabilization of the availability of oil for countries in the Indo-Pacific in particular, and the decision that was made in the short term on this specific oil. Sen. Shaheen: Except that the cost of a barrel of oil was $100 when you lifted those sanctions, and it's still over $100. So it hasn't provided the kind of relief. Rubio: It would have been much higher if that oil wasn't available. But it's not just the cost, it's the availability.

Kate from Kharkiv

28,977 次观看 • 2 个月前

‼️⚡️BREAKING, JUST NOW — FIRST REMARKS AFTER THE MEETING: MARCO RUBIO: I apologize because I'm pressed for time. I think we both are, but just want to update you. We had another very productive session, building off Geneva, building off the events of this week. As I told you earlier this morning, our goal here is to end the war, but it's more than just to end the war. We don't just want to end the war. We also want to help Ukraine be safe forever, so never again will they face another invasion. And equally importantly, we want them to enter an age of true prosperity. We want the Ukrainian people to emerge from this war, not just to rebuild their country, but to build it back in a way that will be stronger and more prosperous than it's ever been. And so this is comprehensive, what we're working on here today. It's not just about the terms that end fighting. It's about also the terms that set up Ukraine for long-term prosperity. I thought we started laying the groundwork for that, most certainly in Geneva. I think we continue that work in our communications throughout the week. I think we built on that again today, but there's more work to be done. This is delicate. It's complicated. There are a lot of moving parts, and obviously there's another party involved here that they'll have to be a part of the equation. And that will continue later this week, when Mr. Witkoff travels to Moscow, although we've also been in touch in varying degrees with the Russian side, but we have a pretty good understanding of their views as well. So much work remains, but today was again a very productive and useful session where I think additional progress was made, and we continue to be realistic about how difficult this is, but optimistic, particularly given the fact that as we've made progress, I think there is a shared vision here that this is not just about ending the war, which is very important. It is about securing Ukraine's future, a future that we hope will be more prosperous than it's ever been. RUSTEM UMEROV: Once again, we are grateful to American people, American leadership and great team with State Secretary Rubio, Steve Witkoff, Jared Kushner for their tremendous work with us. Our objective is prosperous, strong Ukraine. We were discussing about the future of Ukraine. We discussed all the important matters that are important for Ukraine, for Ukrainian people, and US was super supportive. We worked. We already had a successful meeting in Geneva, and today, we continue this success. So at the moment, this meeting was productive and successful. On the later stages, hopefully we'll keep you updated. Thank you very much.
2:28

‼️⚡️BREAKING, JUST NOW — FIRST REMARKS AFTER THE MEETING: MARCO RUBIO: I apologize because I'm pressed for time. I think we both are, but just want to update you. We had another very productive session, building off Geneva, building off the events of this week. As I told you earlier this morning, our goal here is to end the war, but it's more than just to end the war. We don't just want to end the war. We also want to help Ukraine be safe forever, so never again will they face another invasion. And equally importantly, we want them to enter an age of true prosperity. We want the Ukrainian people to emerge from this war, not just to rebuild their country, but to build it back in a way that will be stronger and more prosperous than it's ever been. And so this is comprehensive, what we're working on here today. It's not just about the terms that end fighting. It's about also the terms that set up Ukraine for long-term prosperity. I thought we started laying the groundwork for that, most certainly in Geneva. I think we continue that work in our communications throughout the week. I think we built on that again today, but there's more work to be done. This is delicate. It's complicated. There are a lot of moving parts, and obviously there's another party involved here that they'll have to be a part of the equation. And that will continue later this week, when Mr. Witkoff travels to Moscow, although we've also been in touch in varying degrees with the Russian side, but we have a pretty good understanding of their views as well. So much work remains, but today was again a very productive and useful session where I think additional progress was made, and we continue to be realistic about how difficult this is, but optimistic, particularly given the fact that as we've made progress, I think there is a shared vision here that this is not just about ending the war, which is very important. It is about securing Ukraine's future, a future that we hope will be more prosperous than it's ever been. RUSTEM UMEROV: Once again, we are grateful to American people, American leadership and great team with State Secretary Rubio, Steve Witkoff, Jared Kushner for their tremendous work with us. Our objective is prosperous, strong Ukraine. We were discussing about the future of Ukraine. We discussed all the important matters that are important for Ukraine, for Ukrainian people, and US was super supportive. We worked. We already had a successful meeting in Geneva, and today, we continue this success. So at the moment, this meeting was productive and successful. On the later stages, hopefully we'll keep you updated. Thank you very much.

Kateryna Lisunova

571,456 次观看 • 8 个月前

Moments later, Secretary of State Marco Rubio joined Larry Kudlow on Fox Business to confirm the news. It was real and it was happening. Kudlow asked, “What can you tell us, Mr. Secretary?” Rubio laid it out: “Well, Steve went over to Moscow yesterday, Steve Witkoff—and had a productive meeting in terms of what was discussed, details that perhaps hadn’t been shared before in terms of ideas about how to bring this war to an end.” He doubled down on the administration’s sole objective: “Let’s remind everybody that’s the goal here, the president wants to end the war.” Rubio said that after getting the update, President Trump immediately looped in European leaders. “The president after getting that update today convened several leaders from Europe, updated them on what happened in ‘the talks.’” “We’re going to be having talks with our European allies and the Ukrainians as well over the next couple of days just to see what progress we can make on that side of it, and then hopefully, if things continue to progress an opportunity will present itself very soon for the president to meet both with Vladimir Putin and with President Zelensky at some point here, hopefully in the near future.” Rubio made it clear that they weren’t there yet....peace talks take time. “But obviously a lot has to happen before that can occur.” He explained that if the two sides can get close enough, he believes that there’s only one man that can get them both to sign: President Trump. “But I’ve always believed, I’ve always said this—I think the deal, there’s going to be a deal to end this war and it’ll have to require the president to come in at the end and close on it, as I’ve seen him do numerous times on trade deals as an example.” The question now is: how close can they get both sides?
0:54

Moments later, Secretary of State Marco Rubio joined Larry Kudlow on Fox Business to confirm the news. It was real and it was happening. Kudlow asked, “What can you tell us, Mr. Secretary?” Rubio laid it out: “Well, Steve went over to Moscow yesterday, Steve Witkoff—and had a productive meeting in terms of what was discussed, details that perhaps hadn’t been shared before in terms of ideas about how to bring this war to an end.” He doubled down on the administration’s sole objective: “Let’s remind everybody that’s the goal here, the president wants to end the war.” Rubio said that after getting the update, President Trump immediately looped in European leaders. “The president after getting that update today convened several leaders from Europe, updated them on what happened in ‘the talks.’” “We’re going to be having talks with our European allies and the Ukrainians as well over the next couple of days just to see what progress we can make on that side of it, and then hopefully, if things continue to progress an opportunity will present itself very soon for the president to meet both with Vladimir Putin and with President Zelensky at some point here, hopefully in the near future.” Rubio made it clear that they weren’t there yet....peace talks take time. “But obviously a lot has to happen before that can occur.” He explained that if the two sides can get close enough, he believes that there’s only one man that can get them both to sign: President Trump. “But I’ve always believed, I’ve always said this—I think the deal, there’s going to be a deal to end this war and it’ll have to require the president to come in at the end and close on it, as I’ve seen him do numerous times on trade deals as an example.” The question now is: how close can they get both sides?

Vigilant Fox 🦊

37,219 次观看 • 1 年前

"To end this war and go the diplomatic way, I don't need all this historical sh*t, because it's just a postponement," President Zelenskyy said on the potential negotiations with Putin. Other statements by the President of Ukraine from the interview with British journalist Piers Morgan: ◾️ Yes, people are tired. Yes, people want to finish with this tragedy. We want to stop Putin and end this war as quickly as possible, but in the right way, not losing dignity in any way. ◾️ Russians try to sell to their audience the successful steps, but they can't, really. Even the very nationalistic, very radical part of Russia doesn't trust their government and Putin because they see that there are no successful steps on the battlefield. ◾️ If the war is in Europe, I think peace negotiations have to be in Europe. The next meeting will also be in Switzerland. ◾️ We had two groups - military and diplomatic. The military group spoke about how to develop a monitoring mission for a ceasefire when it comes, when the political side opens those possibilities. ◾️ The result is closer in the military direction. We will have a paper where all the details will be written about how to monitor immediately after a ceasefire. In the political direction, it's more difficult. We don't have the same view. Even trilaterally, we have three different views on the land question. This is not simple. We try to be very constructive. ◾️ Russia's proposal for Ukrainians is to withdraw our forces from part of the Donetsk region, just to withdraw by ourselves, and the war will stop. But we can't just withdraw. It's unbelievable how that can be. It's our territory, and the temporarily occupied territory is also our territory. It's not just occupied, it's temporarily occupied. We are not recognizing it judicially, and we are not recognizing it de facto in any papers. Yes, it's temporarily occupied territories. It's very painful for us, but let's stop where we stand. And this is already a big compromise. ◾️ Donbas is a part of our independence. It's a part of our values. It's not just about the land, about territories. It's about people. It's about membership, and also about strategy for defending our country. For today, with all respect to the powerful American president and to America as a whole, nobody can give us a strong word that Putin will not come again. We need strong security guarantees so that the rest of the world, or some countries, will be ready to respond to Putin if he comes back with his aggression, or when he comes again. ◾️ It's not about me. We have to think about the next generation. We have to think about the next people who will sit in our chairs, and they have to manage this. We can't give them an empty paper. We need strong security guarantees. ◾️ I can't trust the person who killed so many people in Ukraine and who began a full-scale invasion against my nation. But in any way, it's not about trust. It's about deciding how to end the war. ◾️ I'm not sure that our teams can really decide the question of the land. At the end, it's our people who accept the peace deal or not. It's not up to anybody in the world. It's up to the Ukrainian people. ◾️ We speak about security guarantees because we don't trust Russians. Personally Putin, and personally Russians. It's not just about Putin. It's about the system, about people around him. Even when another person is in his place, and other people are in my place. It means that we have to speak about institutional trust. Trust not each other, but the institution of security guarantees.
1:09

"To end this war and go the diplomatic way, I don't need all this historical sh*t, because it's just a postponement," President Zelenskyy said on the potential negotiations with Putin. Other statements by the President of Ukraine from the interview with British journalist Piers Morgan: ◾️ Yes, people are tired. Yes, people want to finish with this tragedy. We want to stop Putin and end this war as quickly as possible, but in the right way, not losing dignity in any way. ◾️ Russians try to sell to their audience the successful steps, but they can't, really. Even the very nationalistic, very radical part of Russia doesn't trust their government and Putin because they see that there are no successful steps on the battlefield. ◾️ If the war is in Europe, I think peace negotiations have to be in Europe. The next meeting will also be in Switzerland. ◾️ We had two groups - military and diplomatic. The military group spoke about how to develop a monitoring mission for a ceasefire when it comes, when the political side opens those possibilities. ◾️ The result is closer in the military direction. We will have a paper where all the details will be written about how to monitor immediately after a ceasefire. In the political direction, it's more difficult. We don't have the same view. Even trilaterally, we have three different views on the land question. This is not simple. We try to be very constructive. ◾️ Russia's proposal for Ukrainians is to withdraw our forces from part of the Donetsk region, just to withdraw by ourselves, and the war will stop. But we can't just withdraw. It's unbelievable how that can be. It's our territory, and the temporarily occupied territory is also our territory. It's not just occupied, it's temporarily occupied. We are not recognizing it judicially, and we are not recognizing it de facto in any papers. Yes, it's temporarily occupied territories. It's very painful for us, but let's stop where we stand. And this is already a big compromise. ◾️ Donbas is a part of our independence. It's a part of our values. It's not just about the land, about territories. It's about people. It's about membership, and also about strategy for defending our country. For today, with all respect to the powerful American president and to America as a whole, nobody can give us a strong word that Putin will not come again. We need strong security guarantees so that the rest of the world, or some countries, will be ready to respond to Putin if he comes back with his aggression, or when he comes again. ◾️ It's not about me. We have to think about the next generation. We have to think about the next people who will sit in our chairs, and they have to manage this. We can't give them an empty paper. We need strong security guarantees. ◾️ I can't trust the person who killed so many people in Ukraine and who began a full-scale invasion against my nation. But in any way, it's not about trust. It's about deciding how to end the war. ◾️ I'm not sure that our teams can really decide the question of the land. At the end, it's our people who accept the peace deal or not. It's not up to anybody in the world. It's up to the Ukrainian people. ◾️ We speak about security guarantees because we don't trust Russians. Personally Putin, and personally Russians. It's not just about Putin. It's about the system, about people around him. Even when another person is in his place, and other people are in my place. It means that we have to speak about institutional trust. Trust not each other, but the institution of security guarantees.

Anton Gerashchenko

20,717 次观看 • 5 个月前

🚨JUST NOW: Marco Rubio: Well, first of all, Rustem it's great to see all of you here, it is great to be back with you again. We continue this very important work, building off what's been achieved, not just in Geneva, the progress we made there, but the progress throughout the week, as we've been communicating. The end goal is obviously not just the end of the war. Obviously, that's central and fundamental. We want to see the end of the killing and the death and the suffering. And I'm sure the Ukrainian side — I know they do as well — they want peace, but it's also about securing an end to the war that leaves Ukraine sovereign and independent and with an opportunity at real prosperity. So this is not just about ending a war. This is about ending a war in a way that creates a mechanism and a way forward that will allow them to be independent and sovereign, never have another war again, and create tremendous prosperity for its people, not just rebuild the country, but to enter an era of extraordinary economic progress. Ukraine has tremendous economic potential. Ukraine has tremendous opportunity for true prosperity. Obviously, you can't do that in the middle of a war like this, but ending the war alone won't achieve that. So this is not just about peace deals. It's about creating a pathway forward that leaves Ukraine sovereign, independent and prosperous. And so we expect to make even more progress today, and we're grateful that you would travel all the way here to Florida. We apologize for the rain. It's not supposed to be raining, but there's only certain things we can control. So thank you and welcome. Rustem Umerov: I would like to start with gratitude to American people, American leadership, President Trump's initiative for the peace. We've been working with the U.S. for the last 10 months. We've been meeting and had great progress. I'm thankful to President Trump's support team that is supporting us. We are discussing about the future of Ukraine, about the security of Ukraine, about no repetition of aggression against Ukraine, about prosperity of Ukraine, about how to rebuild Ukraine. And we're thankful for the efforts of the United States and its team in helping us. The U.S. is hearing us, the U.S. is supporting us, the U.S. is walking beside us. And we're thankful for all that has been done until today, and we're looking forward to have a successful, productive meeting today. Thank you. There was ni questions taken.
2:34

🚨JUST NOW: Marco Rubio: Well, first of all, Rustem it's great to see all of you here, it is great to be back with you again. We continue this very important work, building off what's been achieved, not just in Geneva, the progress we made there, but the progress throughout the week, as we've been communicating. The end goal is obviously not just the end of the war. Obviously, that's central and fundamental. We want to see the end of the killing and the death and the suffering. And I'm sure the Ukrainian side — I know they do as well — they want peace, but it's also about securing an end to the war that leaves Ukraine sovereign and independent and with an opportunity at real prosperity. So this is not just about ending a war. This is about ending a war in a way that creates a mechanism and a way forward that will allow them to be independent and sovereign, never have another war again, and create tremendous prosperity for its people, not just rebuild the country, but to enter an era of extraordinary economic progress. Ukraine has tremendous economic potential. Ukraine has tremendous opportunity for true prosperity. Obviously, you can't do that in the middle of a war like this, but ending the war alone won't achieve that. So this is not just about peace deals. It's about creating a pathway forward that leaves Ukraine sovereign, independent and prosperous. And so we expect to make even more progress today, and we're grateful that you would travel all the way here to Florida. We apologize for the rain. It's not supposed to be raining, but there's only certain things we can control. So thank you and welcome. Rustem Umerov: I would like to start with gratitude to American people, American leadership, President Trump's initiative for the peace. We've been working with the U.S. for the last 10 months. We've been meeting and had great progress. I'm thankful to President Trump's support team that is supporting us. We are discussing about the future of Ukraine, about the security of Ukraine, about no repetition of aggression against Ukraine, about prosperity of Ukraine, about how to rebuild Ukraine. And we're thankful for the efforts of the United States and its team in helping us. The U.S. is hearing us, the U.S. is supporting us, the U.S. is walking beside us. And we're thankful for all that has been done until today, and we're looking forward to have a successful, productive meeting today. Thank you. There was ni questions taken.

Kateryna Lisunova

31,296 次观看 • 8 个月前

Garry Kasparov unleashes the truth: putin’s war is pure survival, not strategy. Garry Kasparov nails it: putin isn't some rational leader. He's a dictator obsessed with staying in power for 25 years and counting. This war? It's his life support, infecting every part of Russia. Forget ideology, he is a one-man mafia boss, desperate to project strength. He won't stop until he declares 'victory,' which he can't get, so he'll just keep expanding the war. He literally couldn't care less about how many Russians die as long as he controls Moscow and St. Petersburg. Trump even offered him an 'out' twice, and putin rejected it because it would make him look weak - and weakness means the whole flock turns on him. He's even eyeing a test of NATO's Article 5 and hoping his far-right buddies take over Europe. The West's slow reaction and constant reliance on America has just emboldened him. Kasparov is right, the only thing that changes Russia is a Ukrainian victory, and fast. Garry Kasparov: I hate starting to talk with criticism but this time I have to point out that your question basically repeated the same mistake in evaluation because you tried to analyze putin’s actions from the position of the responsible national leader. Everything you said is absolutely correct. vladimir's putin’s rule is devastating for Russia and I believe it will end to the collapse of the Russian Empire which is long overdue. But vladimir putin’s calculations are not based on this rational thinking. His view is very different. He is in power for 25 years and counting. That’s all that matters for him. He’s a dictator and he works for one thing: only survival. He’s still there. And the war has become the only way to keep him in power. War now is in every layer of Russian society, from the very top of the government to industries all the way down to kindergartens. It’s infected by the war virus and that's how putin stays in power. Interviewer: So that makes him different from let's say Soviet leaders or or even some of the tsar’s right? Again you should look at Soviet leaders based on the political momentum, just obviously Soviet leaders that we remember, you and me, so like Brezhnev, they had different calculations. But also don't forget the Soviet leaders after Stalin. They were ruling the country that had strong ideology and communist party. I'm not here to advocate for the communist party or for any kind of ideology but there's a fundamental difference between the party rule which is a mafia structure and the one man dictatorship. putin shifted Russia to a one man dictatorship where everything depends on an individual who is on the top of power, who becomes at certain time a spine of the whole system. And this system depends on his survival, demonstrating his strengths is to be a macho, to be an alpha, surrounded by other mafia bosses. And that's why, you know, his current position today is, you may call it desperate, but I don't think he he sees it the same way. He will continue the war as long as he has the resources. And this is something that the free world is just getting to understand. That was my main criticism to the west. vladimir putin, for a long time was at open war, those were hybrid at the time with the free world. And the free world, and especially Europe, was not willing to hear the messages, to see the messages and to respond accordingly. 1/2
11:29

Garry Kasparov unleashes the truth: putin’s war is pure survival, not strategy. Garry Kasparov nails it: putin isn't some rational leader. He's a dictator obsessed with staying in power for 25 years and counting. This war? It's his life support, infecting every part of Russia. Forget ideology, he is a one-man mafia boss, desperate to project strength. He won't stop until he declares 'victory,' which he can't get, so he'll just keep expanding the war. He literally couldn't care less about how many Russians die as long as he controls Moscow and St. Petersburg. Trump even offered him an 'out' twice, and putin rejected it because it would make him look weak - and weakness means the whole flock turns on him. He's even eyeing a test of NATO's Article 5 and hoping his far-right buddies take over Europe. The West's slow reaction and constant reliance on America has just emboldened him. Kasparov is right, the only thing that changes Russia is a Ukrainian victory, and fast. Garry Kasparov: I hate starting to talk with criticism but this time I have to point out that your question basically repeated the same mistake in evaluation because you tried to analyze putin’s actions from the position of the responsible national leader. Everything you said is absolutely correct. vladimir's putin’s rule is devastating for Russia and I believe it will end to the collapse of the Russian Empire which is long overdue. But vladimir putin’s calculations are not based on this rational thinking. His view is very different. He is in power for 25 years and counting. That’s all that matters for him. He’s a dictator and he works for one thing: only survival. He’s still there. And the war has become the only way to keep him in power. War now is in every layer of Russian society, from the very top of the government to industries all the way down to kindergartens. It’s infected by the war virus and that's how putin stays in power. Interviewer: So that makes him different from let's say Soviet leaders or or even some of the tsar’s right? Again you should look at Soviet leaders based on the political momentum, just obviously Soviet leaders that we remember, you and me, so like Brezhnev, they had different calculations. But also don't forget the Soviet leaders after Stalin. They were ruling the country that had strong ideology and communist party. I'm not here to advocate for the communist party or for any kind of ideology but there's a fundamental difference between the party rule which is a mafia structure and the one man dictatorship. putin shifted Russia to a one man dictatorship where everything depends on an individual who is on the top of power, who becomes at certain time a spine of the whole system. And this system depends on his survival, demonstrating his strengths is to be a macho, to be an alpha, surrounded by other mafia bosses. And that's why, you know, his current position today is, you may call it desperate, but I don't think he he sees it the same way. He will continue the war as long as he has the resources. And this is something that the free world is just getting to understand. That was my main criticism to the west. vladimir putin, for a long time was at open war, those were hybrid at the time with the free world. And the free world, and especially Europe, was not willing to hear the messages, to see the messages and to respond accordingly. 1/2

Yasmina

301,095 次观看 • 8 个月前

🇵🇱 🇺🇸 🇷🇺 🇺🇦 🇧🇾 🇱🇹 🇱🇻 🇪🇪 🇨🇳 In 2016, a Pole warned about what awaits us in the future, and he was right. ,,They want to start a war with Russia. Poles are best suited for this. And this war will be between Poland, Russia, Ukraine, Belarus and the Baltic countries. I have an appeal. I'm about 60 years old, I've lived long enough. I can die, but you, my friends, have life ahead of you. Don't let yourselves be pushed into war. Don't let yourselves be pushed into war. Look, Prime Minister Kaczyński has taken power, he is a secret prime minister. He did not abolish several critical points that are destroying us as a nation. He did not abolish the famous directive of 1066 which allowed foreign armies to enter Poland. If the Americans come here, they won't come to protect us. They will come to provoke us. The false flag principle, if someone doesn't know, I'll tell you. Americans specialize in false flags, they use them to provoke conflicts. 1 false flag: 1898 (not 1909), Spanish-American War (not American-Mexican War), the Americans blew up their own cruiser. (translation with correction, the speaker confused the dates and wars) 2 false flag: Sending a passenger ship to the U-boats area to push the USA into WW1. 3 false flag: Pearl Harbor. You have watched the movies, it is known exactly that the Japanese were supposed to attack on that day, at that hour. And what are the American authorities doing? They're pulling aircraft carriers out of port and allowing the sacrifice of 5,000 sailors and their ships. Because they needed this war. It's the same now. And now, if we let ourselves be pushed in, if we let ourselves be pushed in, it will be a false flag. There will be a rocket launched, there will be a provocation, the domino principle, martial law will be declared, the end of democracy, the end of free speech. The old political system of Yalta is ending, something must fill it. And our goal is to survive, to survive demographically, that is our main goal. Because we have not yet recovered from World War II, dear colleagues, for real. I refer you to the Internet, you can read doctrines on the Internet, official American doctrines: the Brzezinski Doctrine, the Wolfowitz Doctrine, the Sharansky Doctrine, the Bush Doctrine. And the so-called plan for the new 100th anniversary, PNAC. And TTIP, the Atlantic Free Trade Agreement. If all this comes to fruition, it will be as if we lost the war with the USA. And Brzeziński writes: It is necessary to start a war with Russia, and Poles are best suited for this. And this war will be between Poland, Russia, Ukraine, Belarus and the Baltic countries. Americans will not take sides in this war. We will fight for five years, ten years, there will be losses, moments of peace. But this war will be to weaken Russia enough... And maybe dismember, so that Russia has to take... An alliance with America against China. The problem is whether (we Poles) will still be in this world." - Wojciech Olszański.
2:55

🇵🇱 🇺🇸 🇷🇺 🇺🇦 🇧🇾 🇱🇹 🇱🇻 🇪🇪 🇨🇳 In 2016, a Pole warned about what awaits us in the future, and he was right. ,,They want to start a war with Russia. Poles are best suited for this. And this war will be between Poland, Russia, Ukraine, Belarus and the Baltic countries. I have an appeal. I'm about 60 years old, I've lived long enough. I can die, but you, my friends, have life ahead of you. Don't let yourselves be pushed into war. Don't let yourselves be pushed into war. Look, Prime Minister Kaczyński has taken power, he is a secret prime minister. He did not abolish several critical points that are destroying us as a nation. He did not abolish the famous directive of 1066 which allowed foreign armies to enter Poland. If the Americans come here, they won't come to protect us. They will come to provoke us. The false flag principle, if someone doesn't know, I'll tell you. Americans specialize in false flags, they use them to provoke conflicts. 1 false flag: 1898 (not 1909), Spanish-American War (not American-Mexican War), the Americans blew up their own cruiser. (translation with correction, the speaker confused the dates and wars) 2 false flag: Sending a passenger ship to the U-boats area to push the USA into WW1. 3 false flag: Pearl Harbor. You have watched the movies, it is known exactly that the Japanese were supposed to attack on that day, at that hour. And what are the American authorities doing? They're pulling aircraft carriers out of port and allowing the sacrifice of 5,000 sailors and their ships. Because they needed this war. It's the same now. And now, if we let ourselves be pushed in, if we let ourselves be pushed in, it will be a false flag. There will be a rocket launched, there will be a provocation, the domino principle, martial law will be declared, the end of democracy, the end of free speech. The old political system of Yalta is ending, something must fill it. And our goal is to survive, to survive demographically, that is our main goal. Because we have not yet recovered from World War II, dear colleagues, for real. I refer you to the Internet, you can read doctrines on the Internet, official American doctrines: the Brzezinski Doctrine, the Wolfowitz Doctrine, the Sharansky Doctrine, the Bush Doctrine. And the so-called plan for the new 100th anniversary, PNAC. And TTIP, the Atlantic Free Trade Agreement. If all this comes to fruition, it will be as if we lost the war with the USA. And Brzeziński writes: It is necessary to start a war with Russia, and Poles are best suited for this. And this war will be between Poland, Russia, Ukraine, Belarus and the Baltic countries. Americans will not take sides in this war. We will fight for five years, ten years, there will be losses, moments of peace. But this war will be to weaken Russia enough... And maybe dismember, so that Russia has to take... An alliance with America against China. The problem is whether (we Poles) will still be in this world." - Wojciech Olszański.

Based Poland 🇵🇱

110,385 次观看 • 2 个月前

We don't want NATO to be involved in the security of the entire Eurasian continent – ​​Lavrov The BIGGEST THREAT in the WORLD is NATO. NATO Didn't Want Russia Because NATO Wanted a WAR With Russia From 2001 all the way to 2022, 21 years, NATO moved inexorably East, surrounding Russia. And many times ... The Ukraine - Russian War Was Provoked! Tucker Carlson: Putin did not start this war. This was not, "An unprovoked invasion." "Putin just randomly went over the line into Eastern Ukraine and stole these oblasts. He stole this land that belonged to another people." That's a lie, and it's not a defense of Putin to call it everybody knows it now. The truth is that in 2001, Putin, same guy, same leader, asked the Bush Administration, in person, directly to George W. Bush, "I would like to join NATO. I would like to join the defensive alliance that exists to keep me from moving West into Western Europe." PUTIN: Two Times That We Were Ready to Join NATO. Both times we were turned down. Ukraine is the only NON-NATO nation supporting every NATO mission. In Afghanistan and Iraq Ukrainian troops are helping to support democracies. Putin says the current crisis in Ukraine is a direct result of years of aggressive NATO policies. ▶NATO has been encircling Russia since the nineties. ▶NATO exists to solve the problems created by NATO’s existence. ▶ NATO has never defended anyone, but only attacked. ▶NATO is a military Alliance that feeds on war. ▶To justify its existence, NATO constantly needs an external enemies and conflicts. ▶The purpose of the NATO alliance is "to keep the Russians out, the Americans in, and the Germans down. ▶Prof. Jeffrey Sachs: The Casus Belli of the Ukraine War is NATO Enlargement, US Coup, CIA Operations All Over Ukraine. ▶Jeffrey Sachs on Trump: Until President Trump Says Publicly, "NATO Will NOT Enlarge," This War Will Continue. That's his JOB. The way to end this war is to say publicly, "NATO enlargement was a mistake, it was a provocation, it was a threat to Russia's security." ▶Jeffrey Sachs: Russia is not going to stop fighting as long as NATO enlargement is on the table. This is the basic reason why we are at war. ▶Prof. John Mearsheimer: NATO Expansion Was Really the Key. Ukraine was becoming a de facto member of NATO. ▶Larry C. Johnson A former CIA Officer: 30 Years of Provocation by the West, 30 Years of Western Efforts to Bring Ukraine INTO NATO, 30 Years of Using, Making, Ukraine a de FACTO Member of NATO by Virtue of the FACT That, They've Conducted More NATO Military Exercises in Ukraine, Than 24 Other NATO Countries Over the Last 30 years, so That's Remarkable for a Country That's NOT 🚨Not dissolving NATO in 1990 was a big mistake, and it’s time to fix that mistake.
1:17

We don't want NATO to be involved in the security of the entire Eurasian continent – ​​Lavrov The BIGGEST THREAT in the WORLD is NATO. NATO Didn't Want Russia Because NATO Wanted a WAR With Russia From 2001 all the way to 2022, 21 years, NATO moved inexorably East, surrounding Russia. And many times ... The Ukraine - Russian War Was Provoked! Tucker Carlson: Putin did not start this war. This was not, "An unprovoked invasion." "Putin just randomly went over the line into Eastern Ukraine and stole these oblasts. He stole this land that belonged to another people." That's a lie, and it's not a defense of Putin to call it everybody knows it now. The truth is that in 2001, Putin, same guy, same leader, asked the Bush Administration, in person, directly to George W. Bush, "I would like to join NATO. I would like to join the defensive alliance that exists to keep me from moving West into Western Europe." PUTIN: Two Times That We Were Ready to Join NATO. Both times we were turned down. Ukraine is the only NON-NATO nation supporting every NATO mission. In Afghanistan and Iraq Ukrainian troops are helping to support democracies. Putin says the current crisis in Ukraine is a direct result of years of aggressive NATO policies. ▶NATO has been encircling Russia since the nineties. ▶NATO exists to solve the problems created by NATO’s existence. ▶ NATO has never defended anyone, but only attacked. ▶NATO is a military Alliance that feeds on war. ▶To justify its existence, NATO constantly needs an external enemies and conflicts. ▶The purpose of the NATO alliance is "to keep the Russians out, the Americans in, and the Germans down. ▶Prof. Jeffrey Sachs: The Casus Belli of the Ukraine War is NATO Enlargement, US Coup, CIA Operations All Over Ukraine. ▶Jeffrey Sachs on Trump: Until President Trump Says Publicly, "NATO Will NOT Enlarge," This War Will Continue. That's his JOB. The way to end this war is to say publicly, "NATO enlargement was a mistake, it was a provocation, it was a threat to Russia's security." ▶Jeffrey Sachs: Russia is not going to stop fighting as long as NATO enlargement is on the table. This is the basic reason why we are at war. ▶Prof. John Mearsheimer: NATO Expansion Was Really the Key. Ukraine was becoming a de facto member of NATO. ▶Larry C. Johnson A former CIA Officer: 30 Years of Provocation by the West, 30 Years of Western Efforts to Bring Ukraine INTO NATO, 30 Years of Using, Making, Ukraine a de FACTO Member of NATO by Virtue of the FACT That, They've Conducted More NATO Military Exercises in Ukraine, Than 24 Other NATO Countries Over the Last 30 years, so That's Remarkable for a Country That's NOT 🚨Not dissolving NATO in 1990 was a big mistake, and it’s time to fix that mistake.

Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

12,812 次观看 • 5 个月前

WATCH: Secretary of State Rubio smacks down reporter for LYING about his statements from yesterday, falsely claiming he said Israel dragged the U.S. into war with Iran.... Reporter: “Yesterday, you told us that Israel was going to strike Iran and that that's why we needed to get involved. Today, the President said that —” Rubio: “No.” Reporter: “— Iran was going to get strike [sic].” Rubio: “Yeah, your statement is false. So, that's not what — I was asked very specifically. Were you there yesterday?” Reporter: “Yes, I asked a question.” Rubio: “Okay. No. Were you the one that — because somebody asked me a question yesterday, did we go in because of Israel? And I said..., no, I told you this had to happen. Anyway, the President made a decision, and the decision he made was that Iran was not going to be allowed to hide behind its ballistic missile program, that Iran was not going to be allowed to hide behind its ability to conduct these attacks. That decision had been made. The President systematically made a decision to systematically destroy this terrorist capability that they had, and we carried that out. I was very clear on that answer. This was a question of timing, of why this had to happen as a joint operation, not the question of the intent. Once the President made a decision that negotiations were not going to work, that they were playing us on the negotiations, and that this was a threat that was untenable, the decision was made to strike them. That's what I said yesterday. And you guys need to play it. If you're going to play these statements, you need to play the whole statement, not clip it to reach a narrative that you want to do, all right?”
1:09

WATCH: Secretary of State Rubio smacks down reporter for LYING about his statements from yesterday, falsely claiming he said Israel dragged the U.S. into war with Iran.... Reporter: “Yesterday, you told us that Israel was going to strike Iran and that that's why we needed to get involved. Today, the President said that —” Rubio: “No.” Reporter: “— Iran was going to get strike [sic].” Rubio: “Yeah, your statement is false. So, that's not what — I was asked very specifically. Were you there yesterday?” Reporter: “Yes, I asked a question.” Rubio: “Okay. No. Were you the one that — because somebody asked me a question yesterday, did we go in because of Israel? And I said..., no, I told you this had to happen. Anyway, the President made a decision, and the decision he made was that Iran was not going to be allowed to hide behind its ballistic missile program, that Iran was not going to be allowed to hide behind its ability to conduct these attacks. That decision had been made. The President systematically made a decision to systematically destroy this terrorist capability that they had, and we carried that out. I was very clear on that answer. This was a question of timing, of why this had to happen as a joint operation, not the question of the intent. Once the President made a decision that negotiations were not going to work, that they were playing us on the negotiations, and that this was a threat that was untenable, the decision was made to strike them. That's what I said yesterday. And you guys need to play it. If you're going to play these statements, you need to play the whole statement, not clip it to reach a narrative that you want to do, all right?”

Curtis Houck

15,505 次观看 • 5 个月前

🇺🇸🇺🇦 Ukrainian soldier appeals to U.S. President Donald Trump! He hides his face because he is putting himself at risk. But I know him—he is a real soldier who recorded this video while on the front lines and asked me to publish it. Full text of the address can be seen in the video. «Welcome. As a citizen of Ukraine, I have something to say to the president of America and to the American people regarding the recent meeting with our president. The thing is, Zelensky is a fu..ing mo..on. He is a disgrace to Ukraine, to Ukrainian diplomacy, and to diplomacy in general... …But then Putin gave Zelensky the greatest gift he could ever receive—he started the full-scale invasion. He invaded Ukraine, and this gave Zelensky an excuse. This tied the people’s hands. The war gave him an excuse to enforce censorship, cut down on free speech, restrict protests, postpone elections, and stay in power indefinitely. That’s exactly why you are absolutely right—Zelensky doesn’t want peace. He doesn’t want the war to end because the end of the war means political and maybe even physical death for him. There is a lot of stuff—from criminal negligence to lying to his own people, possibly even straight-out capital treason. He is going to jail after this war is over and after there are proper elections and a proper democratic process. So, for him, it is a matter of life and death that the war continues indefinitely, so he can stay in power indefinitely. You say he hates Putin. He doesn’t hate Putin. He’s an actor. He pretends to hate Putin so he can use it as an excuse not to negotiate and prolong the war. I am the one who hates Putin. I have served in the Ukrainian military for three years, two of them on the front lines as infantry. I lost my health, I lost many friends—they were ki..ed by Russians. I have ki..ed Russians with my own hands. I hate them with all my heart. But I am not a fuc..ng mo..on. I see that we are not winning this, and if we continue as it is, there will be more and more losses with absolutely no gains. There is a time to be tough, and there is a time to talk. There is a time to cut losses and save what we still have. That time is now… …But other than that, all Ukrainians and even Ukrainian soldiers are open to negotiations and compromises in other areas… …We are willing to fight. But those who actually fight on the front lines are not sitting in studios. They are not represented. Nobody hears them, nobody sees them. The media tries to show a picture that everyone in Ukraine supports the war, but that is not the reality. …I know this is a somewhat ridiculous request—to disregard the entire president of a nation. But I still want to ask President Trump, the American government, and the American people, with all humility: Please don’t turn your back on millions of honest Ukrainians just because of one incompetent fuc** who, by some terrible accident, became our representative… God bless America. …As you probably know, there is not much freedom of speech in Ukraine now. There is a huge chance that if this video succeeds and becomes viral, I will be found and either imprisoned (best case) or straight-up killed (worst case). I had to wear a mask and change my voice, but you understand this is not total anonymity… So, if I disappear or die for some reason—that was the Ukrainian government. That was Zelensky. On this note, I say goodbye. Please share this video, especially in America. Send it to your government, to politicians, to influential people you know.” I will continue publishing facts about Zelensky’s crimes and corruption, which I have gathered over the past six years of his rule. Subscribe and retweet so the world can see. #MAGA Sincerely, Ukrainian oppositionist, Myroslav Oleshko Eric Trump Elon Musk Tucker Carlson David Sacks Jack Posobiec Donald Trump Jr. The White House Andrew Surabian Steve Cortes Cillian Rob Schneider 🇺🇸 Glenn Greenwald James Bradley @stillgray MAGA Resource Jeff Carlson
10:06

🇺🇸🇺🇦 Ukrainian soldier appeals to U.S. President Donald Trump! He hides his face because he is putting himself at risk. But I know him—he is a real soldier who recorded this video while on the front lines and asked me to publish it. Full text of the address can be seen in the video. «Welcome. As a citizen of Ukraine, I have something to say to the president of America and to the American people regarding the recent meeting with our president. The thing is, Zelensky is a fu..ing mo..on. He is a disgrace to Ukraine, to Ukrainian diplomacy, and to diplomacy in general... …But then Putin gave Zelensky the greatest gift he could ever receive—he started the full-scale invasion. He invaded Ukraine, and this gave Zelensky an excuse. This tied the people’s hands. The war gave him an excuse to enforce censorship, cut down on free speech, restrict protests, postpone elections, and stay in power indefinitely. That’s exactly why you are absolutely right—Zelensky doesn’t want peace. He doesn’t want the war to end because the end of the war means political and maybe even physical death for him. There is a lot of stuff—from criminal negligence to lying to his own people, possibly even straight-out capital treason. He is going to jail after this war is over and after there are proper elections and a proper democratic process. So, for him, it is a matter of life and death that the war continues indefinitely, so he can stay in power indefinitely. You say he hates Putin. He doesn’t hate Putin. He’s an actor. He pretends to hate Putin so he can use it as an excuse not to negotiate and prolong the war. I am the one who hates Putin. I have served in the Ukrainian military for three years, two of them on the front lines as infantry. I lost my health, I lost many friends—they were ki..ed by Russians. I have ki..ed Russians with my own hands. I hate them with all my heart. But I am not a fuc..ng mo..on. I see that we are not winning this, and if we continue as it is, there will be more and more losses with absolutely no gains. There is a time to be tough, and there is a time to talk. There is a time to cut losses and save what we still have. That time is now… …But other than that, all Ukrainians and even Ukrainian soldiers are open to negotiations and compromises in other areas… …We are willing to fight. But those who actually fight on the front lines are not sitting in studios. They are not represented. Nobody hears them, nobody sees them. The media tries to show a picture that everyone in Ukraine supports the war, but that is not the reality. …I know this is a somewhat ridiculous request—to disregard the entire president of a nation. But I still want to ask President Trump, the American government, and the American people, with all humility: Please don’t turn your back on millions of honest Ukrainians just because of one incompetent fuc** who, by some terrible accident, became our representative… God bless America. …As you probably know, there is not much freedom of speech in Ukraine now. There is a huge chance that if this video succeeds and becomes viral, I will be found and either imprisoned (best case) or straight-up killed (worst case). I had to wear a mask and change my voice, but you understand this is not total anonymity… So, if I disappear or die for some reason—that was the Ukrainian government. That was Zelensky. On this note, I say goodbye. Please share this video, especially in America. Send it to your government, to politicians, to influential people you know.” I will continue publishing facts about Zelensky’s crimes and corruption, which I have gathered over the past six years of his rule. Subscribe and retweet so the world can see. #MAGA Sincerely, Ukrainian oppositionist, Myroslav Oleshko Eric Trump Elon Musk Tucker Carlson David Sacks Jack Posobiec Donald Trump Jr. The White House Andrew Surabian Steve Cortes Cillian Rob Schneider 🇺🇸 Glenn Greenwald James Bradley @stillgray MAGA Resource Jeff Carlson

Myroslav Oleshko

146,210 次观看 • 1 年前

This is incredible: Dominic Cummings (the former Chief Adviser to the British Prime Minister) calling the current Western policy on Taiwan "completely insane" and "'f*cking stupid". Exceedingly rare to see former senior officials abandon political correctness to this extent, and tell the raw, unvarnished truth. Actually pretty refreshing! Here is what he says: He says that a war over Taiwan with China, is "obviously not" worth it and that "it's completely crazy" for the West to be ditching the One-China policy that aims at peacefully reuniting Taiwan and the mainland: "[A war over Taiwan with China] is a completely insane idea. It's an island that you can see from the Chinese coast. It's full of Chinese people. The people in in the army are cousins of the people in the opposite army. For decades we've had a One-China policy accepted by Democrats and Republicans across the western world [where Taiwan is] going to be unified but it should be done peacefully not violently. That was the right approach. It's completely crazy for us to be ditching that approach and to be like willfully antagonizing China over a place filled with Chinese! It's fucking stupid!" He also says it's simply not credible to tell the Chinese that Taiwan matters to the West as much as it matters to them: "Do you think the Chinese are sitting there thinking 'okay we know that Taiwan is completely existential for us and America also thinks it's existential for them'? No, of course not, of course that's not what they're thinking, because it isn't! So you can't just go around threatening nuclear war over something where it's not actually a credible threat. Where people think 'either it's complete bullshit or they are actually insane'." He says mutually assured destruction in Europe with the USSR was credible because "there the argument for America was 'we are defending the western world, we have NATO, there is a NATO agreement on mutual self defense, and if you breach that and you attack one of us then it means war against everyone.' That was a lot lot lot more credible than 'there's a little island off the Chinese coast that has absolutely nothing to do with us historically at all, it's full of Chinese people, but we're gonna threaten potential nuclear war over it.' It's totally non-credible and doing it makes you sound mad."
3:25

This is incredible: Dominic Cummings (the former Chief Adviser to the British Prime Minister) calling the current Western policy on Taiwan "completely insane" and "'f*cking stupid". Exceedingly rare to see former senior officials abandon political correctness to this extent, and tell the raw, unvarnished truth. Actually pretty refreshing! Here is what he says: He says that a war over Taiwan with China, is "obviously not" worth it and that "it's completely crazy" for the West to be ditching the One-China policy that aims at peacefully reuniting Taiwan and the mainland: "[A war over Taiwan with China] is a completely insane idea. It's an island that you can see from the Chinese coast. It's full of Chinese people. The people in in the army are cousins of the people in the opposite army. For decades we've had a One-China policy accepted by Democrats and Republicans across the western world [where Taiwan is] going to be unified but it should be done peacefully not violently. That was the right approach. It's completely crazy for us to be ditching that approach and to be like willfully antagonizing China over a place filled with Chinese! It's fucking stupid!" He also says it's simply not credible to tell the Chinese that Taiwan matters to the West as much as it matters to them: "Do you think the Chinese are sitting there thinking 'okay we know that Taiwan is completely existential for us and America also thinks it's existential for them'? No, of course not, of course that's not what they're thinking, because it isn't! So you can't just go around threatening nuclear war over something where it's not actually a credible threat. Where people think 'either it's complete bullshit or they are actually insane'." He says mutually assured destruction in Europe with the USSR was credible because "there the argument for America was 'we are defending the western world, we have NATO, there is a NATO agreement on mutual self defense, and if you breach that and you attack one of us then it means war against everyone.' That was a lot lot lot more credible than 'there's a little island off the Chinese coast that has absolutely nothing to do with us historically at all, it's full of Chinese people, but we're gonna threaten potential nuclear war over it.' It's totally non-credible and doing it makes you sound mad."

Arnaud Bertrand

131,636 次观看 • 1 年前

🚨Donald Trump THREATENS Russia🇷🇺 with 100% secondary tariffs/third-party sanctions if no deal to end the Ukraine🇺🇦 proxy war is made in 50 days The urgent need for an alternative BRICS international payment system, which was discussed in Rio, is clearer than ever. So long as the world relies on the US-dominated system, the US will continue to weaponise it like a mob boss to dictate terms to other countries. Trump is targeting BRICS with a fury, and BRICS countries don’t seem to realise the urgency. It’s all-out economic warfare against Russia today, China🇨🇳 tomorrow, and perhaps other members of BRICS, should they refuse to bend the knee to Washington. Trump once again seems to have fallen for the rhetoric of the neoconservatives, who squarely blame Vladimir Putin for the continuation of the war, and completely ignore Zelensky’s intransigence in sticking to absolutely unrealistic terms for a peace agreement. Zelensky’s negotiating position becomes weaker by the day, and his European backers egg him on to fight a losing, pointless proxy war to the last Ukrainian. All the while, Zelensky refuses to make even the slightest of concessions to stop a war which is destroying his country, which was provoked by Washington. Trump still could end the proxy war immediately; the European NATO allies are little more than satrapies. If he ordered them to halt their pursuit of escalation and put pressure on Zelensky to negotiate realistically, they would. If Trump himself ordered Zelensky to negotiate realistically, a peace agreement would be reached rapidly. Unfortunately, the likes of Lindsey Graham and Marco Rubio seem to have the ear of Trump, and not the anti-war officials in his administration.
3:35

🚨Donald Trump THREATENS Russia🇷🇺 with 100% secondary tariffs/third-party sanctions if no deal to end the Ukraine🇺🇦 proxy war is made in 50 days The urgent need for an alternative BRICS international payment system, which was discussed in Rio, is clearer than ever. So long as the world relies on the US-dominated system, the US will continue to weaponise it like a mob boss to dictate terms to other countries. Trump is targeting BRICS with a fury, and BRICS countries don’t seem to realise the urgency. It’s all-out economic warfare against Russia today, China🇨🇳 tomorrow, and perhaps other members of BRICS, should they refuse to bend the knee to Washington. Trump once again seems to have fallen for the rhetoric of the neoconservatives, who squarely blame Vladimir Putin for the continuation of the war, and completely ignore Zelensky’s intransigence in sticking to absolutely unrealistic terms for a peace agreement. Zelensky’s negotiating position becomes weaker by the day, and his European backers egg him on to fight a losing, pointless proxy war to the last Ukrainian. All the while, Zelensky refuses to make even the slightest of concessions to stop a war which is destroying his country, which was provoked by Washington. Trump still could end the proxy war immediately; the European NATO allies are little more than satrapies. If he ordered them to halt their pursuit of escalation and put pressure on Zelensky to negotiate realistically, they would. If Trump himself ordered Zelensky to negotiate realistically, a peace agreement would be reached rapidly. Unfortunately, the likes of Lindsey Graham and Marco Rubio seem to have the ear of Trump, and not the anti-war officials in his administration.

Afshin Rattansi

79,329 次观看 • 1 年前

The deeper concern, Bannon explained, is that Americans remain largely unaware of the global forces pulling them toward war. While the media focuses on domestic distractions, decisions are being made abroad that could change the course of history. “People are not awake of what is happening throughout the world and how we're being sucked in and supposedly by somebody we support, like Zelenskyy,” he said. The fact that Ukraine allegedly launched such a provocative strike without consulting Washington was, in Bannon’s words, “outrageous.” He doubled down on the danger of continuing to back a foreign leader who’s now acting unilaterally, without American oversight or input. “To know that he never gave the White House heads up. He never asked permission to do this.” Adding fuel to the fire, Senator Lindsey Graham was in Ukraine the same weekend, publicly reaffirming U.S. support. That, according to Bannon, is only making things worse. “It's outrageous! And Lindsey Graham all weekend's over there stirring the pot—We can’t have people over there telling Ukrainians that we're going back more.” In contrast, Bannon said, Donald Trump is trying to de-escalate. “What we try do is calm this down. What President Trump is trying to say is like, look, let's get to a cease-fire. Let's put our weapons down. Let's talk peace and prosperity.” Even if there’s disagreement on the economics, Trump views a negotiated settlement as the only realistic way forward. “We don't support the economic deal. But President Trump is saying that he needs it as a central part of a peace plan.” Still, none of that matters, Bannon warned, if others are charging forward recklessly. “We can't have Lindsey Graham and particularly Zelenskyy leading us into a 3rd World War with a deep strike into Russia.” And Vladimir Putin, he said, is already responding. “And Putin came back today and said, hey, we're gonna get to the bottom of this and we're going to see who is accountable in Ukraine and beyond. And that was a message to the United States.”
1:01

The deeper concern, Bannon explained, is that Americans remain largely unaware of the global forces pulling them toward war. While the media focuses on domestic distractions, decisions are being made abroad that could change the course of history. “People are not awake of what is happening throughout the world and how we're being sucked in and supposedly by somebody we support, like Zelenskyy,” he said. The fact that Ukraine allegedly launched such a provocative strike without consulting Washington was, in Bannon’s words, “outrageous.” He doubled down on the danger of continuing to back a foreign leader who’s now acting unilaterally, without American oversight or input. “To know that he never gave the White House heads up. He never asked permission to do this.” Adding fuel to the fire, Senator Lindsey Graham was in Ukraine the same weekend, publicly reaffirming U.S. support. That, according to Bannon, is only making things worse. “It's outrageous! And Lindsey Graham all weekend's over there stirring the pot—We can’t have people over there telling Ukrainians that we're going back more.” In contrast, Bannon said, Donald Trump is trying to de-escalate. “What we try do is calm this down. What President Trump is trying to say is like, look, let's get to a cease-fire. Let's put our weapons down. Let's talk peace and prosperity.” Even if there’s disagreement on the economics, Trump views a negotiated settlement as the only realistic way forward. “We don't support the economic deal. But President Trump is saying that he needs it as a central part of a peace plan.” Still, none of that matters, Bannon warned, if others are charging forward recklessly. “We can't have Lindsey Graham and particularly Zelenskyy leading us into a 3rd World War with a deep strike into Russia.” And Vladimir Putin, he said, is already responding. “And Putin came back today and said, hey, we're gonna get to the bottom of this and we're going to see who is accountable in Ukraine and beyond. And that was a message to the United States.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

256,192 次观看 • 1 年前

🚨ZELENSKYY REPEATED ONE MORE TIME THAT UKRAINE WILL NOT JOIN TRUMP’S BOARD OF PEACE, BECAUSE THERE IS NO PEACE WITH RUSSIA AT THIS POINT Q: You said that Putin is a terrorist and a war criminal, does he belong on something called a board of peace in your view? ZELENSKYY: Look, this is the initiative of President Trump. It's not my initiative. I'm not the president of the United States. We've been invited. To be honest with you, in the 20 points plan, when we spoke about security guarantees and how to monitor one of the important first steps like a ceasefire, the American side proposed that they will need partners who will monitor with the United States, and it can be like council of peace, and it will be two sides of the war. It means Russians and Ukrainians because we are on the contact line, we have to monitor, yes, by drones and technology issues, and they said it will be also Americans and some other Europeans. I mean, it's not the news about this council for me. I didn't know how it will be, that it will be in Davos, and whom President Trump will involve or propose invitation. I didn't know. It's up to him. But I said that for us, it's understandable that we will be in this board when the war will end. Now with Russians, we are enemies. Belarussia is allie of Russians. We can't be with them. And it's already in the package, in the 20 points plan. So it will work, I think so, it will work with monitor mission only after the war will end. Maybe there are some others issues like Gaza. I'm not talking about us to be involved in Gaza and other questions. So we are only speaking about these partners who will monitor ceasefire and security guarantees.
1:58

🚨ZELENSKYY REPEATED ONE MORE TIME THAT UKRAINE WILL NOT JOIN TRUMP’S BOARD OF PEACE, BECAUSE THERE IS NO PEACE WITH RUSSIA AT THIS POINT Q: You said that Putin is a terrorist and a war criminal, does he belong on something called a board of peace in your view? ZELENSKYY: Look, this is the initiative of President Trump. It's not my initiative. I'm not the president of the United States. We've been invited. To be honest with you, in the 20 points plan, when we spoke about security guarantees and how to monitor one of the important first steps like a ceasefire, the American side proposed that they will need partners who will monitor with the United States, and it can be like council of peace, and it will be two sides of the war. It means Russians and Ukrainians because we are on the contact line, we have to monitor, yes, by drones and technology issues, and they said it will be also Americans and some other Europeans. I mean, it's not the news about this council for me. I didn't know how it will be, that it will be in Davos, and whom President Trump will involve or propose invitation. I didn't know. It's up to him. But I said that for us, it's understandable that we will be in this board when the war will end. Now with Russians, we are enemies. Belarussia is allie of Russians. We can't be with them. And it's already in the package, in the 20 points plan. So it will work, I think so, it will work with monitor mission only after the war will end. Maybe there are some others issues like Gaza. I'm not talking about us to be involved in Gaza and other questions. So we are only speaking about these partners who will monitor ceasefire and security guarantees.

Kateryna Lisunova

68,599 次观看 • 6 个月前