Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

Ювелирная работа оператора дрона #войнасукраиной #HIMARS #Китай #Moldova #Donbas #China #Crimea #ATACMS #Ukrainian #Бахмут #Donbas #Bakhmut

War_2022

4,257 subscribers

47,164 просмотров • 3 лет назад •via X (Twitter)

NSFW #войнасукраиной #HIMARS #Китай #Moldova #Donbas #China #Crimea #ATACMS #Ukrainian #Бахмут #Donbas #Bakhmut

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Watching #Bakhmut burn is particularly painful to Ukrainian psyche. It's the oldest Ukrainian cossack city-fortress in the #Donbas and the region's main urban centre until 1930s, the most pro-#Ukraine city in the Donbas during the 1917-1921 Ukrainian War of Independence.

Watching #Bakhmut burn is particularly painful to Ukrainian psyche. It's the oldest Ukrainian cossack city-fortress in the #Donbas and the region's main urban centre until 1930s, the most pro-#Ukraine city in the Donbas during the 1917-1921 Ukrainian War of Independence.

Olga Klymenko

12,991 просмотров • 3 лет назад

Counter-battery strike in Donbas: a Ukrainian HIMARS crew destroyed a Russian Msta-B towed howitzer after locating the enemy gun. #Ukraine

Counter-battery strike in Donbas: a Ukrainian HIMARS crew destroyed a Russian Msta-B towed howitzer after locating the enemy gun. #Ukraine

NOELREPORTS 🇪🇺 🇺🇦

29,583 просмотров • 7 дней назад

🇨🇦 FM Anita Anand: "The Donbas area — this is Ukrainian territory. Crimea — this is Ukrainian territory. We must never forget that." Interviewer: "Do you think it's going to come back? Crimea?" 🇨🇦 FM Anita Anand: "I do, and I will say Ukraine is going to win this war."

🇨🇦 FM Anita Anand: "The Donbas area — this is Ukrainian territory. Crimea — this is Ukrainian territory. We must never forget that." Interviewer: "Do you think it's going to come back? Crimea?" 🇨🇦 FM Anita Anand: "I do, and I will say Ukraine is going to win this war."

Kate from Kharkiv

67,850 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Ukrainian drones are systematically targeting Russian air defenses in both Crimea and Donbas — destroying two K1 “Podlyot” radars, an S-300V launcher, and a KamAZ truck with troops in the past two weeks.

Ukrainian drones are systematically targeting Russian air defenses in both Crimea and Donbas — destroying two K1 “Podlyot” radars, an S-300V launcher, and a KamAZ truck with troops in the past two weeks.

Clash Report

31,201 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Prigozhin claims that he knows about the Ukrainian plan to deal 3 blows and liberate the territory to the 1991 borders. He states that Ukraine concentrated 200,000 of reserves in the Donbas, with 80k of them being near Bakhmut. Plans include invading the Belgorod region to be used in exchange, then cutting "L/DPR" into two, and finally, liberating Crimea.

Prigozhin claims that he knows about the Ukrainian plan to deal 3 blows and liberate the territory to the 1991 borders. He states that Ukraine concentrated 200,000 of reserves in the Donbas, with 80k of them being near Bakhmut. Plans include invading the Belgorod region to be used in exchange, then cutting "L/DPR" into two, and finally, liberating Crimea.

WarTranslated

1,563,425 просмотров • 3 лет назад

“One of the biggest issues are these so-called four regions: Donbas, Crimea, Lugansk & there are two others” “They’re Russian speaking & overwhelming majority want to be ruled by Russia” Ukrainian geography aside, US envoy Steve Witkoff shares Moscow’s view of its invasion.

“One of the biggest issues are these so-called four regions: Donbas, Crimea, Lugansk & there are two others” “They’re Russian speaking & overwhelming majority want to be ruled by Russia” Ukrainian geography aside, US envoy Steve Witkoff shares Moscow’s view of its invasion.

James Waterhouse

38,688 просмотров • 1 год назад

Did anyone ever ask the people of Crimea and Donbas whether they actually want to return to Ukraine? Whether they still consider it "home" after years of bombardment, killing of their children and ruining their schools? Whether they want to be fined for listening to Russian-language music in public parks? Whether they want to lay flowers at a Bandera monument on May 9? Did anyone ask them? ------- Kyrylo Budanov on Ukrainian strikes against infrastructure in Crimea and Donbas: "Ukrainians in Crimea should understand the shortages of fuel, the power outages, the disruptions to water supplies, and so on. All of these hardships serve a greater purpose. And that greater purpose is returning back home."

Did anyone ever ask the people of Crimea and Donbas whether they actually want to return to Ukraine? Whether they still consider it "home" after years of bombardment, killing of their children and ruining their schools? Whether they want to be fined for listening to Russian-language music in public parks? Whether they want to lay flowers at a Bandera monument on May 9? Did anyone ask them? ------- Kyrylo Budanov on Ukrainian strikes against infrastructure in Crimea and Donbas: "Ukrainians in Crimea should understand the shortages of fuel, the power outages, the disruptions to water supplies, and so on. All of these hardships serve a greater purpose. And that greater purpose is returning back home."

Marta Havryshko

29,597 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Trump administration officials have proposed a 28-point peace plan designed to end the Russia-Ukraine war — a framework that would require Ukraine to give up its eastern Donbas region and Crimea, and swear off NATO membership, according to a draft shared publicly by a Ukrainian opposition politician and confirmed by a White House official. CBS News' Margaret Brennan has more details on the plan.

Trump administration officials have proposed a 28-point peace plan designed to end the Russia-Ukraine war — a framework that would require Ukraine to give up its eastern Donbas region and Crimea, and swear off NATO membership, according to a draft shared publicly by a Ukrainian opposition politician and confirmed by a White House official. CBS News' Margaret Brennan has more details on the plan.

CBS News

21,129 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

The center of Bakhmut today, three years after the end of the bloody battle for these ruins, the Verdun of our era. Just a few years ago, this was a well-kept and thriving Ukrainian city of 70,000, famous for its fountains, its long traditions of producing famous local salt and sparkling wine. It had the Atlantic Hotel, widely known across Donbas. It had good cafes, sushi bars, restaurants, cozy flower-lined alleys. Now, there's nothing but death, ruins, emptiness, and time that has stopped here forever. Now this is the "Russian world," and of course, there will never be any life here again.

The center of Bakhmut today, three years after the end of the bloody battle for these ruins, the Verdun of our era. Just a few years ago, this was a well-kept and thriving Ukrainian city of 70,000, famous for its fountains, its long traditions of producing famous local salt and sparkling wine. It had the Atlantic Hotel, widely known across Donbas. It had good cafes, sushi bars, restaurants, cozy flower-lined alleys. Now, there's nothing but death, ruins, emptiness, and time that has stopped here forever. Now this is the "Russian world," and of course, there will never be any life here again.

Illia Ponomarenko 🇺🇦

225,383 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

🇺🇦 🇷🇺 Russia won’t accept a simple ceasefire on the line of contact. Russian Ambassador to the UN Vassily Nebenzia said that President Zelenskyy and Europeans desperately asking for a simple ceasefire reflect their dire situation on the battlefield. But a simple ceasefire won’t solve the complex roots of the crisis, he added. It will only give space to “pump Ukraine” with more weapons. Earlier today, EU President Ursula von der Leyen said the EU opposes any changes to Ukraine's borders and does not support measures that could weaken the Ukrainian armed forces. As reported, the 28-point plan assumes that the US and other countries recognize Crimea and Donbas as legitimate Russian territories.

🇺🇦 🇷🇺 Russia won’t accept a simple ceasefire on the line of contact. Russian Ambassador to the UN Vassily Nebenzia said that President Zelenskyy and Europeans desperately asking for a simple ceasefire reflect their dire situation on the battlefield. But a simple ceasefire won’t solve the complex roots of the crisis, he added. It will only give space to “pump Ukraine” with more weapons. Earlier today, EU President Ursula von der Leyen said the EU opposes any changes to Ukraine's borders and does not support measures that could weaken the Ukrainian armed forces. As reported, the 28-point plan assumes that the US and other countries recognize Crimea and Donbas as legitimate Russian territories.

Lenka White

119,227 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Russia blowing up Kakhovka NPP is an act of terrorism that will have long-lasting negative effects not just on Ukraine but the whole world. The South of Ukraine is one of the main global agricultural areas. The destruction of the HPP will flood the lands, destroy the irrigation system - less food will be grown, and exported, deepening the global food crisis. Russia will be able to continue blackmailing the world with food terrorism as one of the leading food exporters. This could have devastating effects on Ukrainian economy - food is one of our main exports. The costs of restoration will be enormous. Tens of thousands more people will become IDPs. The North-Crimean canal will dry out, leaving Crimea without drinking water. This means that when Crimea returns to Ukraine, it will be a disaster zone, just like Donbas. Terrorist state is committing genocide right before our eyes. The consequences will be felt for decades. The world must acknowledge Russia as a terrorist state. Ukrainian Armed Forces must receive everything and anything to ensure a sustainable Ukrainian victory and stopping Russia as a global threat to humanity.

Russia blowing up Kakhovka NPP is an act of terrorism that will have long-lasting negative effects not just on Ukraine but the whole world. The South of Ukraine is one of the main global agricultural areas. The destruction of the HPP will flood the lands, destroy the irrigation system - less food will be grown, and exported, deepening the global food crisis. Russia will be able to continue blackmailing the world with food terrorism as one of the leading food exporters. This could have devastating effects on Ukrainian economy - food is one of our main exports. The costs of restoration will be enormous. Tens of thousands more people will become IDPs. The North-Crimean canal will dry out, leaving Crimea without drinking water. This means that when Crimea returns to Ukraine, it will be a disaster zone, just like Donbas. Terrorist state is committing genocide right before our eyes. The consequences will be felt for decades. The world must acknowledge Russia as a terrorist state. Ukrainian Armed Forces must receive everything and anything to ensure a sustainable Ukrainian victory and stopping Russia as a global threat to humanity.

Anton Gerashchenko

1,600,763 просмотров • 3 лет назад

Wow! Nuland basically admits that Ukraine-Russia peace deal, which was close to being finalized in spring 2022, “fell apart” because US, UK & other Western governments “advised” Zelensky government that it was not “good deal” even though even members of Ukrainian delegation stated in recent interviews that this was very good deal, best deal that Ukraine could get & “very real compromise” & that Ukrainian delegation celebrated it with champagne. She basically confirms statements by ex-Israeli PM, head of Ukrainian delegation, Ukrainian officials close to Zelensky, ex-German chancellor & Turkish FM that US & UK blocked this peace deal, which was close to being finalized. Victoria Nuland does not mention at all Russian war crimes in Bucha, which were inflated & mispresented by politicians, media & self-proclaimed experts as reason for ending peace talks. The peace deal agreement included withdrawal of Russian forces from all territory of Ukraine, with exceptions of Donbas & Crimea, whose status was to be determined at meeting of Putin & Zelensky, in exchange for neutral status & demilitarization of Ukraine.

Wow! Nuland basically admits that Ukraine-Russia peace deal, which was close to being finalized in spring 2022, “fell apart” because US, UK & other Western governments “advised” Zelensky government that it was not “good deal” even though even members of Ukrainian delegation stated in recent interviews that this was very good deal, best deal that Ukraine could get & “very real compromise” & that Ukrainian delegation celebrated it with champagne. She basically confirms statements by ex-Israeli PM, head of Ukrainian delegation, Ukrainian officials close to Zelensky, ex-German chancellor & Turkish FM that US & UK blocked this peace deal, which was close to being finalized. Victoria Nuland does not mention at all Russian war crimes in Bucha, which were inflated & mispresented by politicians, media & self-proclaimed experts as reason for ending peace talks. The peace deal agreement included withdrawal of Russian forces from all territory of Ukraine, with exceptions of Donbas & Crimea, whose status was to be determined at meeting of Putin & Zelensky, in exchange for neutral status & demilitarization of Ukraine.

Ivan Katchanovski

1,490,917 просмотров • 1 год назад

Today is the 11th anniversary of the start of war in the Donbas. It was launched on April 12th 2014 in Sloviansk by a group of around 60 special forces and paramilitary men led by the Russian GRU agent Igor ”Strelkov” Girkin. They crossed the border from Russia on April 11th and took control of the government building in Sloviansk on April 12th. Strelkov had been present in Ukraine from the start of the war, having entered Crimea on February 26th and participated in the armed storming of the Supreme Council of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea on February 27th. In March 2014, his unit stormed a photogrammetric center in Simferopol, further consolidating control over strategic locations. Strelkov was instrumental in organizing local pro-Russian militias and coordinating with Russian regular forces, particularly the so-called "little green men" (Russian special forces without insignia). Strelkov was a former officer of Russia’s Federal Security Service (FSB), having served until at least 2012 and was an officer of Russia’s military intelligence (GRU). He was closely linked to Sergey Aksyonov, the Russian-installed prime minister of Crimea, serving as a security aide and advisor. After Crimea, Strelkov moved to eastern Ukraine, leading a group of 52–55 armed militants across the Russian-Ukrainian border on the night of April 11–12, 2014, to seize Sloviansk, a city in Ukraine’s Donetsk region. - On April 12, 2014, his group captured key administrative buildings, including the police station, Security Service of Ukraine (SBU) offices, and city administration, declaring Sloviansk part of the self-proclaimed Donetsk People’s Republic (DPR). - Strelkov established himself as the military commander of Sloviansk, organizing defenses, setting up roadblocks, and overseeing operations that included ambushes, kidnappings, and executions. - He admitted to sparking the broader Donbas War, stating, “I’m the one who pulled the trigger of war. If our unit hadn’t crossed the border, everything would have fizzled out.” - His forces engaged Ukrainian troops, killed SBU officers, and took OSCE observers hostage. Strelkov ordered the execution of several individuals, including Ukrainians Yurii Popravko, Yurii Diakovskyi, and Volodymyr Rybak. - By May 2014, he was named “commander-in-chief” and “defense minister” of the DPR, consolidating control over separatist fighters in the region. Facing intense Ukrainian military pressure, Strelkov’s forces retreated from Sloviansk to Donetsk on July 5, 2014, after which his influence waned, and he was dismissed in August 2014. It was also in August that large formations of the Russian regular army invaded the Donbas region from Russia to stop the Ukrainian Army from crushing the pro-Russian separatist forces that had taken control of some cities in the region. Strelkov later fell out with Putin, accusing him of not taking enough of Ukraine and being too weak. Strelkov was sentenced to 4 years in prison last year for ”inciting extremism” Sloviansk is still in Ukrainian hands 11 years after Strelkov’s attack and 3 years after Russia’s full-scale invasion.

Today is the 11th anniversary of the start of war in the Donbas. It was launched on April 12th 2014 in Sloviansk by a group of around 60 special forces and paramilitary men led by the Russian GRU agent Igor ”Strelkov” Girkin. They crossed the border from Russia on April 11th and took control of the government building in Sloviansk on April 12th. Strelkov had been present in Ukraine from the start of the war, having entered Crimea on February 26th and participated in the armed storming of the Supreme Council of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea on February 27th. In March 2014, his unit stormed a photogrammetric center in Simferopol, further consolidating control over strategic locations. Strelkov was instrumental in organizing local pro-Russian militias and coordinating with Russian regular forces, particularly the so-called "little green men" (Russian special forces without insignia). Strelkov was a former officer of Russia’s Federal Security Service (FSB), having served until at least 2012 and was an officer of Russia’s military intelligence (GRU). He was closely linked to Sergey Aksyonov, the Russian-installed prime minister of Crimea, serving as a security aide and advisor. After Crimea, Strelkov moved to eastern Ukraine, leading a group of 52–55 armed militants across the Russian-Ukrainian border on the night of April 11–12, 2014, to seize Sloviansk, a city in Ukraine’s Donetsk region. - On April 12, 2014, his group captured key administrative buildings, including the police station, Security Service of Ukraine (SBU) offices, and city administration, declaring Sloviansk part of the self-proclaimed Donetsk People’s Republic (DPR). - Strelkov established himself as the military commander of Sloviansk, organizing defenses, setting up roadblocks, and overseeing operations that included ambushes, kidnappings, and executions. - He admitted to sparking the broader Donbas War, stating, “I’m the one who pulled the trigger of war. If our unit hadn’t crossed the border, everything would have fizzled out.” - His forces engaged Ukrainian troops, killed SBU officers, and took OSCE observers hostage. Strelkov ordered the execution of several individuals, including Ukrainians Yurii Popravko, Yurii Diakovskyi, and Volodymyr Rybak. - By May 2014, he was named “commander-in-chief” and “defense minister” of the DPR, consolidating control over separatist fighters in the region. Facing intense Ukrainian military pressure, Strelkov’s forces retreated from Sloviansk to Donetsk on July 5, 2014, after which his influence waned, and he was dismissed in August 2014. It was also in August that large formations of the Russian regular army invaded the Donbas region from Russia to stop the Ukrainian Army from crushing the pro-Russian separatist forces that had taken control of some cities in the region. Strelkov later fell out with Putin, accusing him of not taking enough of Ukraine and being too weak. Strelkov was sentenced to 4 years in prison last year for ”inciting extremism” Sloviansk is still in Ukrainian hands 11 years after Strelkov’s attack and 3 years after Russia’s full-scale invasion.

Visegrád 24

410,602 просмотров • 1 год назад

Russian student Daria Kozyreva, 19, was sentenced to almost three years in Russian prison last week. She was punished for taping a paper with poems by Taras Shevchenko (a Ukrainian poet) to Shevchenko's monument in Russia on the anniversary of the war. In her last word, Daria said: "Part of the Ukrainian land, yes, is still occupied. Perhaps it will be occupied for a long time to come. This is sad to admit, but alas. However, Moscow has not managed to conquer Ukraine. The heroic Ukrainian people stood up in defense of their homeland. And at the cost of many, many sacrifices they defended their country. The national flag is flying over Kyiv and will be flying forever. When the occupiers were thrown away from the capital in early 2022, they were simply left with nothing. My dream, of course, is for Ukraine to regain every inch of her land, including Donbas and Crimea. I believe that one day my dream will come true. Someday history will judge everything by justice. But Ukraine has won anyway. She has already won."

Russian student Daria Kozyreva, 19, was sentenced to almost three years in Russian prison last week. She was punished for taping a paper with poems by Taras Shevchenko (a Ukrainian poet) to Shevchenko's monument in Russia on the anniversary of the war. In her last word, Daria said: "Part of the Ukrainian land, yes, is still occupied. Perhaps it will be occupied for a long time to come. This is sad to admit, but alas. However, Moscow has not managed to conquer Ukraine. The heroic Ukrainian people stood up in defense of their homeland. And at the cost of many, many sacrifices they defended their country. The national flag is flying over Kyiv and will be flying forever. When the occupiers were thrown away from the capital in early 2022, they were simply left with nothing. My dream, of course, is for Ukraine to regain every inch of her land, including Donbas and Crimea. I believe that one day my dream will come true. Someday history will judge everything by justice. But Ukraine has won anyway. She has already won."

Anton Gerashchenko

278,749 просмотров • 1 год назад

Putin said that the Ukrainian Armed Forces' strikes on Russia are an "information operation" aimed at dividing Russian society and forcing the Russian Federation to stop the war in Ukraine. According to him, the West and Ukraine need to stop the war "even if only for a short time" to halt the advance of Russian troops at the front. The Russian Federation still aims to capture the entire Donbas, as well as "Novorossiya," Putin stated. Ukraine and Europe propose stopping the war along the front line. The Russian Federation rejected this, believing it would allow the Ukrainian Armed Forces to build up their forces in southeastern Ukraine. Russia intends to create a "security zone" in the border areas of the Sumy and Kharkiv regions. Putin commented on the power outages in Crimea and the fuel crisis on the peninsula. He stated that the issue of Crimea's energy supply will be resolved, and "we will increase fuel deliveries by land and by sea." Based on these statements, we can see that the dictator and maniac Putin lives in his own reality, he is briefed only on victories and has no intention of entering into negotiations. Against the backdrop of Russia's burning oil refineries, fuel shortages, and long lines, his speech sounds particularly schizophrenic.

Putin said that the Ukrainian Armed Forces' strikes on Russia are an "information operation" aimed at dividing Russian society and forcing the Russian Federation to stop the war in Ukraine. According to him, the West and Ukraine need to stop the war "even if only for a short time" to halt the advance of Russian troops at the front. The Russian Federation still aims to capture the entire Donbas, as well as "Novorossiya," Putin stated. Ukraine and Europe propose stopping the war along the front line. The Russian Federation rejected this, believing it would allow the Ukrainian Armed Forces to build up their forces in southeastern Ukraine. Russia intends to create a "security zone" in the border areas of the Sumy and Kharkiv regions. Putin commented on the power outages in Crimea and the fuel crisis on the peninsula. He stated that the issue of Crimea's energy supply will be resolved, and "we will increase fuel deliveries by land and by sea." Based on these statements, we can see that the dictator and maniac Putin lives in his own reality, he is briefed only on victories and has no intention of entering into negotiations. Against the backdrop of Russia's burning oil refineries, fuel shortages, and long lines, his speech sounds particularly schizophrenic.

Anton Gerashchenko

161,384 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

[STRATEGIC ANALYSIS] Part I – POKROVSK, The Fall of the Corridor Russian forces have now been geolocated controlling Rodynske, with confirmation of their presence in Krasnyi Lyman. This narrows the Ukrainian exit corridor to roughly 5 km, leaving a single road through Rivne under sustained Russian fire control. (Maps from Julian Röpcke🇺🇦 et Poulet volant ) Losses during this retreat are expected to be significant, likely resulting in a casualty ratio below two to one, unfavorable to Ukraine. This reflects a recurrent pattern of the war: Ukrainian forces end up in semi encircled positions with limited supply routes, facing an adversary with overwhelming firepower. The result is predictable: heavy attrition and diminished operational capacity. This is not deliberate strategy by Ukraine. Having lost the initiative, the Ukrainian command is fighting without a coherent grand strategy, compelled to defend the Donbas fortress belt to delay northern Donetsk’s fall. The “meatgrinder” is a Russian concept, not a Ukrainian one. Remaining in besieged pockets to “bleed” Russian troops has never been Ukraine’s objective, as these battles consistently yield unfavorable loss ratios. Historical Context of Similar Battles 2022 1. Mariupol Roughly 3.5k POWs were captured after the final surrender. Once encircled, Ukrainian losses were catastrophic with over 1.6k KIA proven and the near total loss of defending units. 2. Sieverodonetsk Marked the first battle where Ukrainian KIA exceeded Russian, reaching up to 300 KIA per day. It introduced the pattern of partial encirclement and destruction through Russian artillery dominance. 2023 1. Bakhmut UA Losses identified 12k KIA and over 10k MIA, while Russian casualties (mostly Wagner) were estimated at 20–30k KIA. Even under the most optimistic view, that is a two to one ratio at best, achieved at the cost of elite Ukrainian formations such as the 93rd Mechanized Brigade. Between Dec 2022 and Apr 2023, losses totaled 9.6k Ukrainian vs 18.8k Russian theater wide, confirming the ratio. Yet Russian losses consisted mainly of expendable conscripts, leaving Ukraine strategically weakened. Further losses followed during the May–Sept 2023 counteroffensive, especially near Klishiivka, worsening the overall balance. 2. Avdiivka The October 2023 offensive caused high casualties on both sides, continuing until the collapse in Feb 2024. Mediazona recorded 20.1k Russian KIA front wide, while UA Losses listed 9k KIA, mostly in Avdiivka.The 110th Mechanized Brigade was virtually destroyed. Even at best, the 2 to 1 ratio ended with the fall of Ukraine’s most fortified Donbas city. 2024–2025 1. Kursk (Defensive Posture) During Ukraine’s incursion and Russia’s counterattack, Ukrainian forces were trapped around Sudja, repeating the attritional pattern. Losses reached 3k KIA and 11k MIA, with 30% higher armored losses than Russia’s. Russian logistics and command ensured a tighter, lower cost victory. 2. Pokrovsk, Kupyansk, Kostyantynivka, and Others By mid 2025, siege battles across Pokrovsk, Kupyansk, and Kostyantynivka followed identical dynamics: local encirclements, exhausted defenders, restricted supply.Russian forces shifted to small assault groups and infiltration tactics, reducing casualties while sustaining pressure. Ukrainian armor losses rose sharply during the 2025 summer, reflecting logistical strain. Operationally, attrition became increasingly one sided, as Russia paired methodical advances with resource discipline and fire control. Clausewitz warned of late withdrawals: “Reason counsels not to risk the last upon the game, but to retain as much as is necessary for an orderly retreat.” #UkraineRussiaWar️ #Pokrovsk #Warfare

[STRATEGIC ANALYSIS] Part I – POKROVSK, The Fall of the Corridor Russian forces have now been geolocated controlling Rodynske, with confirmation of their presence in Krasnyi Lyman. This narrows the Ukrainian exit corridor to roughly 5 km, leaving a single road through Rivne under sustained Russian fire control. (Maps from Julian Röpcke🇺🇦 et Poulet volant ) Losses during this retreat are expected to be significant, likely resulting in a casualty ratio below two to one, unfavorable to Ukraine. This reflects a recurrent pattern of the war: Ukrainian forces end up in semi encircled positions with limited supply routes, facing an adversary with overwhelming firepower. The result is predictable: heavy attrition and diminished operational capacity. This is not deliberate strategy by Ukraine. Having lost the initiative, the Ukrainian command is fighting without a coherent grand strategy, compelled to defend the Donbas fortress belt to delay northern Donetsk’s fall. The “meatgrinder” is a Russian concept, not a Ukrainian one. Remaining in besieged pockets to “bleed” Russian troops has never been Ukraine’s objective, as these battles consistently yield unfavorable loss ratios. Historical Context of Similar Battles 2022 1. Mariupol Roughly 3.5k POWs were captured after the final surrender. Once encircled, Ukrainian losses were catastrophic with over 1.6k KIA proven and the near total loss of defending units. 2. Sieverodonetsk Marked the first battle where Ukrainian KIA exceeded Russian, reaching up to 300 KIA per day. It introduced the pattern of partial encirclement and destruction through Russian artillery dominance. 2023 1. Bakhmut UA Losses identified 12k KIA and over 10k MIA, while Russian casualties (mostly Wagner) were estimated at 20–30k KIA. Even under the most optimistic view, that is a two to one ratio at best, achieved at the cost of elite Ukrainian formations such as the 93rd Mechanized Brigade. Between Dec 2022 and Apr 2023, losses totaled 9.6k Ukrainian vs 18.8k Russian theater wide, confirming the ratio. Yet Russian losses consisted mainly of expendable conscripts, leaving Ukraine strategically weakened. Further losses followed during the May–Sept 2023 counteroffensive, especially near Klishiivka, worsening the overall balance. 2. Avdiivka The October 2023 offensive caused high casualties on both sides, continuing until the collapse in Feb 2024. Mediazona recorded 20.1k Russian KIA front wide, while UA Losses listed 9k KIA, mostly in Avdiivka.The 110th Mechanized Brigade was virtually destroyed. Even at best, the 2 to 1 ratio ended with the fall of Ukraine’s most fortified Donbas city. 2024–2025 1. Kursk (Defensive Posture) During Ukraine’s incursion and Russia’s counterattack, Ukrainian forces were trapped around Sudja, repeating the attritional pattern. Losses reached 3k KIA and 11k MIA, with 30% higher armored losses than Russia’s. Russian logistics and command ensured a tighter, lower cost victory. 2. Pokrovsk, Kupyansk, Kostyantynivka, and Others By mid 2025, siege battles across Pokrovsk, Kupyansk, and Kostyantynivka followed identical dynamics: local encirclements, exhausted defenders, restricted supply.Russian forces shifted to small assault groups and infiltration tactics, reducing casualties while sustaining pressure. Ukrainian armor losses rose sharply during the 2025 summer, reflecting logistical strain. Operationally, attrition became increasingly one sided, as Russia paired methodical advances with resource discipline and fire control. Clausewitz warned of late withdrawals: “Reason counsels not to risk the last upon the game, but to retain as much as is necessary for an orderly retreat.” #UkraineRussiaWar️ #Pokrovsk #Warfare

Delwin | Military Theorist

18,489 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

🇺🇦TODAY' UKRAINE - THE CONSEQUENCE OF 12 YEARS OF TOTAL IDIOCY Zelensky is flying, probably, to one of the most important meetings not only in his political career but in the entire modern history of Ukraine - with Donald Trump Donald J. Trump , who wants and demands the signing of a full and comprehensive peace agreement. Ukraine approaches this meeting on the brink of default: economic, military, and social. How did we get to such a state? Here’s how: February 21, 2014 - the collapse of Yanukovych’s agreement with the opposition, signed under the mediation of the foreign ministers of Germany, France, and Poland. This becomes the trigger for Russia’s seizure of Crimea, while the Ukrainian authorities simply watch and do nothing. Result: loss of Crimea. May 25, 2014 - Poroshenko wins the presidential elections under the slogans of peace. Almost immediately, he orders an offensive in Donbas. After initial successes by the Ukrainian Armed Forces, Russia intervenes, leading to encirclement near Ilovaisk. On September 5, Poroshenko signs Minsk-1. Result: loss of strategic initiative, consolidation of the loss of part of Donbas, weakening of presidential power. February 12, 2015 - signing of Minsk-2 after the defeat of the Ukrainian Armed Forces at Debaltseve, caused by the failure to implement Minsk-1 agreements. Result: acceptance of worse conditions, recognition of the special status of the ORDLO regions. April 21, 2019 - Zelensky defeats Poroshenko in the presidential elections, promising to implement the Minsk agreements and “negotiate for peace even with the devil himself.” In practice, he maintains the predecessor’s course, the Minsk agreements remain unfulfilled. Zelensky escalates confrontation with demonstrative actions. Result: loss of trust in the negotiation process, intensification of escalation. February 24, 2022 - Russia launches a full-scale invasion, after which negotiations immediately begin — first in Belarus, then in Turkey. On March 29, in Istanbul, a draft agreement is presented (neutrality, international security guarantees, the Crimea issue deferred for 15 years). On April 19, Zelensky refuses to sign this draft. Result: loss of parts of Kherson, Zaporizhzhia, Luhansk, Donetsk, and Kharkiv regions. 2025 - Ukraine approaches negotiations mediated by the American president. According to Donald Trump, Ukraine has no leverage in these negotiations: the army is exhausted, the economy destroyed, and a significant part of the territory already lost. And we still do not even know what Russia is demanding. Zelensky’s refusal of Trump’s peace initiatives will be the point of another attempt to obtain independence for Ukraine. A point set by incompetent leaders and indifferent citizens who do not know and do not understand how to defend their rights. Although, having long relied on Americans, they could have learned at least this from them. Mr. Trump, do not let Zelensky continue the war. Simply - do not let it happen. Thank you on behalf of the entire Ukrainian people. God bless you! Rapid Response 47 The White House President Donald J. Trump Marco Rubio Steve Witkoff Special Envoy Steve Witkoff Rep. Victoria Spartz Vice President JD Vance Rep. Anna Paulina Luna Marjorie Taylor Greene Fox News MAGA Resource @amuse New York Post Bannon’s WarRoom Jack Posobiec Mario Nawfal Elon Musk Myroslav Oleshko

🇺🇦TODAY' UKRAINE - THE CONSEQUENCE OF 12 YEARS OF TOTAL IDIOCY Zelensky is flying, probably, to one of the most important meetings not only in his political career but in the entire modern history of Ukraine - with Donald Trump Donald J. Trump , who wants and demands the signing of a full and comprehensive peace agreement. Ukraine approaches this meeting on the brink of default: economic, military, and social. How did we get to such a state? Here’s how: February 21, 2014 - the collapse of Yanukovych’s agreement with the opposition, signed under the mediation of the foreign ministers of Germany, France, and Poland. This becomes the trigger for Russia’s seizure of Crimea, while the Ukrainian authorities simply watch and do nothing. Result: loss of Crimea. May 25, 2014 - Poroshenko wins the presidential elections under the slogans of peace. Almost immediately, he orders an offensive in Donbas. After initial successes by the Ukrainian Armed Forces, Russia intervenes, leading to encirclement near Ilovaisk. On September 5, Poroshenko signs Minsk-1. Result: loss of strategic initiative, consolidation of the loss of part of Donbas, weakening of presidential power. February 12, 2015 - signing of Minsk-2 after the defeat of the Ukrainian Armed Forces at Debaltseve, caused by the failure to implement Minsk-1 agreements. Result: acceptance of worse conditions, recognition of the special status of the ORDLO regions. April 21, 2019 - Zelensky defeats Poroshenko in the presidential elections, promising to implement the Minsk agreements and “negotiate for peace even with the devil himself.” In practice, he maintains the predecessor’s course, the Minsk agreements remain unfulfilled. Zelensky escalates confrontation with demonstrative actions. Result: loss of trust in the negotiation process, intensification of escalation. February 24, 2022 - Russia launches a full-scale invasion, after which negotiations immediately begin — first in Belarus, then in Turkey. On March 29, in Istanbul, a draft agreement is presented (neutrality, international security guarantees, the Crimea issue deferred for 15 years). On April 19, Zelensky refuses to sign this draft. Result: loss of parts of Kherson, Zaporizhzhia, Luhansk, Donetsk, and Kharkiv regions. 2025 - Ukraine approaches negotiations mediated by the American president. According to Donald Trump, Ukraine has no leverage in these negotiations: the army is exhausted, the economy destroyed, and a significant part of the territory already lost. And we still do not even know what Russia is demanding. Zelensky’s refusal of Trump’s peace initiatives will be the point of another attempt to obtain independence for Ukraine. A point set by incompetent leaders and indifferent citizens who do not know and do not understand how to defend their rights. Although, having long relied on Americans, they could have learned at least this from them. Mr. Trump, do not let Zelensky continue the war. Simply - do not let it happen. Thank you on behalf of the entire Ukrainian people. God bless you! Rapid Response 47 The White House President Donald J. Trump Marco Rubio Steve Witkoff Special Envoy Steve Witkoff Rep. Victoria Spartz Vice President JD Vance Rep. Anna Paulina Luna Marjorie Taylor Greene Fox News MAGA Resource @amuse New York Post Bannon’s WarRoom Jack Posobiec Mario Nawfal Elon Musk Myroslav Oleshko

Oleksandr Dubinskyi

35,550 просмотров • 1 год назад

🚨🇺🇦 INTERVIEW: THE FALL OF POKROVSK - UKRAINE’S BIGGEST LOSS OF THE WAR Ukraine’s strongest fortress in the east is about to fall In the meantime, Ukraine is running out of Patriot missiles, struggling to get Tomahawks, while Russia continues to incrementally gain territory Will Trump and the EU turn things around? Denys Davydov, one of Ukraine’s most trusted military voices, doesn’t think so… We discuss: •⁠ ⁠How Russian glide bombs and drone swarms wiped out entire brigades •⁠ ⁠Why Ukraine’s Patriot systems are nearly empty and running on scraps •⁠ ⁠How U.S. Tomahawks can help but won’t turn the tide •⁠ ⁠And what happens next if the West doesn’t escalate support immediately Captain Deny warns the fall of Pokrovsk is a turning point, and the next few months will decide whether Ukraine stands or falls. 01:10 – Why glide bombs are changing the battlefield 01:32 – Pokrovsk’s fall could make Donbas indefensible 02:10 – Why Russia wants Ukraine as a pro-Russian puppet state 03:00 – The fight for Pokrovsk and what’s at stake 04:15 – 80% of Pokrovsk now infiltrated by Russian infantry 06:20 – Why Ukrainian evacuation came too late 07:35 – Special forces landed, but impact minimal 08:05 – Pokrovsk’s fall would cripple Ukraine’s economy and supply lines 09:30 – Ukraine counterattacking in the north, holding back collapse 10:15 – Why Putin won’t accept any U.S.-brokered peace deal 11:22 – Trump’s proposal for Ukraine to give up Donbas and freeze the war 12:25 – Why Ukraine refuses to surrender territory 13:10 – Could European peacekeepers change the equation 14:25 – The front line is too vast to control 15:10 – Ukraine’s limited resources and fading options 16:15 – Why Davydov says Ukraine can’t retake Crimea or Donbas 17:20 – “Only a Russian collapse can end this war” 18:05 – Casualties rising on both sides 19:00 – Ukraine now conscripting civilians from the streets 19:45 – Russia’s manpower advantage 8-to-1 20:05 – How Ukraine still holds despite being outnumbered 21:40 – Ukraine fighting to preserve identity, not just land 22:40 – Why surrender would erase Ukrainian culture 23:05 – Can Tomahawks or new U.S. weapons change the war 23:50 – Davydov says Tomahawks are “mostly political theater” 24:45 – Sanctions hurt but are short-lived without enforcement 25:25 – Flamingo vs Neptune: Ukraine’s missile problem 27:00 – Why Russia has no incentive to freeze the lines 28:10 – Keeping 800,000 soldiers busy keeps Putin’s regime stable 29:10 – War fatigue in Russia isn’t enough to stop the Kremlin 30:05 – Russia’s economy built to survive sanctions 31:35 – China and Turkey keeping Russia’s trade alive 33:05 – Trump’s new sanctions on Rosneft and Lukoil 34:10 – Davydov warns sanctions will be bypassed within months 34:55 – “Cheap oil is financially addictive” 35:40 – What Ukraine needs now: guarantees, not promises 36:25 – The limits of Western aid and the illusion of support 37:45 – Why Europe still buys Russian energy 38:30 – Davydov says Ukraine’s only hope is time and attrition 39:55 – The Black Swan scenario: another Prigozhin moment 40:40 – Why Putin fears his soldiers returning home more than NATO 42:15 – Western societies value life, Russia values endurance 43:30 – The roots of the war: invasion, NATO, and broken promises 45:15 – Crimea was seized while Ukraine was neutral 47:00 – Why Davydov says NATO is weaker than people think 48:30 – NATO’s hesitation vs. Russia’s aggression 49:55 – “Putin used NATO as an excuse to attack” 50:35 – Russia’s justification: “protecting Donbas” 52:20 – Why Ukraine can never be neutral 53:05 – The Monroe Doctrine argument and U.S. hypocrisy 54:00 – Denys: NATO threat to Russia was zero 55:00 – Why Russia’s war is ideological, not defensive 56:45 – China says it will never let Russia lose 57:50 – Beijing’s fear of a U.S. victory 58:20 – Trump’s opportunity: make China and Russia compete 59:30 – The U.S. still holding back military power 01:00:25 – Europe funding both sides of the war 01:01:20 – How fast Ukraine can train F-16 and A-10 pilots 01:02:00 – Why Ukraine needs 300 fighter jets to win air superiority 01:03:00 – Patriot systems nearly depleted 01:04:45 – “Without air defense, every village can be erased” 01:06:20 – Closing thoughts: no peace without pressure, no survival without support

🚨🇺🇦 INTERVIEW: THE FALL OF POKROVSK - UKRAINE’S BIGGEST LOSS OF THE WAR Ukraine’s strongest fortress in the east is about to fall In the meantime, Ukraine is running out of Patriot missiles, struggling to get Tomahawks, while Russia continues to incrementally gain territory Will Trump and the EU turn things around? Denys Davydov, one of Ukraine’s most trusted military voices, doesn’t think so… We discuss: •⁠ ⁠How Russian glide bombs and drone swarms wiped out entire brigades •⁠ ⁠Why Ukraine’s Patriot systems are nearly empty and running on scraps •⁠ ⁠How U.S. Tomahawks can help but won’t turn the tide •⁠ ⁠And what happens next if the West doesn’t escalate support immediately Captain Deny warns the fall of Pokrovsk is a turning point, and the next few months will decide whether Ukraine stands or falls. 01:10 – Why glide bombs are changing the battlefield 01:32 – Pokrovsk’s fall could make Donbas indefensible 02:10 – Why Russia wants Ukraine as a pro-Russian puppet state 03:00 – The fight for Pokrovsk and what’s at stake 04:15 – 80% of Pokrovsk now infiltrated by Russian infantry 06:20 – Why Ukrainian evacuation came too late 07:35 – Special forces landed, but impact minimal 08:05 – Pokrovsk’s fall would cripple Ukraine’s economy and supply lines 09:30 – Ukraine counterattacking in the north, holding back collapse 10:15 – Why Putin won’t accept any U.S.-brokered peace deal 11:22 – Trump’s proposal for Ukraine to give up Donbas and freeze the war 12:25 – Why Ukraine refuses to surrender territory 13:10 – Could European peacekeepers change the equation 14:25 – The front line is too vast to control 15:10 – Ukraine’s limited resources and fading options 16:15 – Why Davydov says Ukraine can’t retake Crimea or Donbas 17:20 – “Only a Russian collapse can end this war” 18:05 – Casualties rising on both sides 19:00 – Ukraine now conscripting civilians from the streets 19:45 – Russia’s manpower advantage 8-to-1 20:05 – How Ukraine still holds despite being outnumbered 21:40 – Ukraine fighting to preserve identity, not just land 22:40 – Why surrender would erase Ukrainian culture 23:05 – Can Tomahawks or new U.S. weapons change the war 23:50 – Davydov says Tomahawks are “mostly political theater” 24:45 – Sanctions hurt but are short-lived without enforcement 25:25 – Flamingo vs Neptune: Ukraine’s missile problem 27:00 – Why Russia has no incentive to freeze the lines 28:10 – Keeping 800,000 soldiers busy keeps Putin’s regime stable 29:10 – War fatigue in Russia isn’t enough to stop the Kremlin 30:05 – Russia’s economy built to survive sanctions 31:35 – China and Turkey keeping Russia’s trade alive 33:05 – Trump’s new sanctions on Rosneft and Lukoil 34:10 – Davydov warns sanctions will be bypassed within months 34:55 – “Cheap oil is financially addictive” 35:40 – What Ukraine needs now: guarantees, not promises 36:25 – The limits of Western aid and the illusion of support 37:45 – Why Europe still buys Russian energy 38:30 – Davydov says Ukraine’s only hope is time and attrition 39:55 – The Black Swan scenario: another Prigozhin moment 40:40 – Why Putin fears his soldiers returning home more than NATO 42:15 – Western societies value life, Russia values endurance 43:30 – The roots of the war: invasion, NATO, and broken promises 45:15 – Crimea was seized while Ukraine was neutral 47:00 – Why Davydov says NATO is weaker than people think 48:30 – NATO’s hesitation vs. Russia’s aggression 49:55 – “Putin used NATO as an excuse to attack” 50:35 – Russia’s justification: “protecting Donbas” 52:20 – Why Ukraine can never be neutral 53:05 – The Monroe Doctrine argument and U.S. hypocrisy 54:00 – Denys: NATO threat to Russia was zero 55:00 – Why Russia’s war is ideological, not defensive 56:45 – China says it will never let Russia lose 57:50 – Beijing’s fear of a U.S. victory 58:20 – Trump’s opportunity: make China and Russia compete 59:30 – The U.S. still holding back military power 01:00:25 – Europe funding both sides of the war 01:01:20 – How fast Ukraine can train F-16 and A-10 pilots 01:02:00 – Why Ukraine needs 300 fighter jets to win air superiority 01:03:00 – Patriot systems nearly depleted 01:04:45 – “Without air defense, every village can be erased” 01:06:20 – Closing thoughts: no peace without pressure, no survival without support

Mario Nawfal

1,828,232 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

$🇺🇦🇷🇺 UKRAINE’S U.S. AMBASSADOR ON THE CORRUPTION SCANDAL, THE FAILED PEACE TALKS, & RUSSIA’S MILITARY ADVANCEMENTS Ukrainian Ambassador to the U.S., Olga Stefanishyna, says the latest wave of U.S.-Russia-China diplomacy is not a step toward peace. It is a stage where Putin is signaling endurance, shaping narratives, and dragging the war into territory where time weakens Ukraine and fractures the West. Behind every “development,” she says, is a deeper strategic play. We get into: •⁠ ⁠Why Putin’s threats over Donbas were aimed directly at the U.S. delegation, not Ukraine •⁠ ⁠Why China’s parallel meeting in Moscow was a strategic watchdog move, not peace outreach •⁠ ⁠Why the U.S.-Russia talks produced no meaningful progress even after five hours •⁠ ⁠Why Russia’s demands on NATO membership are political theater for a domestic audience •⁠ ⁠How abducted Ukrainian children are being used as a narrative weapon in negotiations •⁠ ⁠Why European leaders fear the U.S. could cut a territorial deal without security guarantees •⁠ ⁠How Ukraine sees U.S. security guarantees as equal in power to NATO membership •⁠ ⁠Why Russia’s delay tactics become more dangerous the longer they continue Her warning is blunt. Russia is not negotiating. Russia is maneuvering. If Ukraine bends under pressure, she says Russia will emerge emboldened and backed by China, Iran, and North Korea. If Ukraine holds, the strategic map of Europe may shift for an entire generation. This is one of the defining geopolitical tests of our time. And the decisions made next will echo far beyond Ukraine’s borders. 01:15 – Putin threatens to take Donbas by force or surrender 02:27 – Putin signals to US delegation that intentions are rock solid 03:40 – China provides financial and component backing to Russia 05:05 – China’s representative in Moscow acts as a watchdog 05:12 – Five-hour US–Russia meeting centered on territorial issues 06:25 – Main sticking points are Donbas territory and NATO neutrality 07:00 – Russia frames the conflict as a war against NATO and the US 08:06 – Ukraine ready to freeze on the existing line for a ceasefire 09:16 – US security guarantee seen as equal in power to NATO membership 10:12 – Are business figures like Wyckoff and Kushner appropriate negotiators 12:09 – Rubio versus Wyckoff tactics: formal process vs special line of contact 13:34 – Leaks portray Wyckoff as leaning toward the Russian side 17:15 – Russia’s goals backfire as Ukraine adopts NATO standards 18:26 – Non-negotiable issues include sovereignty and return of children 23:09 – Russia described as in military agony, flexing on cities 24:32 – Trump suggests the US will eventually betray Ukraine 26:25 – Pokrovsky battle unlikely to change the front overall 28:27 – Ukrainians expect little and are prepared for anything 29:41 – Russia using delay tactics; little hope for new sanctions 32:00 – Destroying the shadow fleet is the only immediately enforceable move 33:55 – Russian strikes hit houses, theaters, and kindergartens to demoralize 34:51 – Zelensky aide Yermak allegedly tied to corruption scheme 40:29 – Zelensky said to be absolutely not involved in the scandal$

🇺🇦🇷🇺 UKRAINE’S U.S. AMBASSADOR ON THE CORRUPTION SCANDAL, THE FAILED PEACE TALKS, & RUSSIA’S MILITARY ADVANCEMENTS Ukrainian Ambassador to the U.S., Olga Stefanishyna, says the latest wave of U.S.-Russia-China diplomacy is not a step toward peace. It is a stage where Putin is signaling endurance, shaping narratives, and dragging the war into territory where time weakens Ukraine and fractures the West. Behind every “development,” she says, is a deeper strategic play. We get into: •⁠ ⁠Why Putin’s threats over Donbas were aimed directly at the U.S. delegation, not Ukraine •⁠ ⁠Why China’s parallel meeting in Moscow was a strategic watchdog move, not peace outreach •⁠ ⁠Why the U.S.-Russia talks produced no meaningful progress even after five hours •⁠ ⁠Why Russia’s demands on NATO membership are political theater for a domestic audience •⁠ ⁠How abducted Ukrainian children are being used as a narrative weapon in negotiations •⁠ ⁠Why European leaders fear the U.S. could cut a territorial deal without security guarantees •⁠ ⁠How Ukraine sees U.S. security guarantees as equal in power to NATO membership •⁠ ⁠Why Russia’s delay tactics become more dangerous the longer they continue Her warning is blunt. Russia is not negotiating. Russia is maneuvering. If Ukraine bends under pressure, she says Russia will emerge emboldened and backed by China, Iran, and North Korea. If Ukraine holds, the strategic map of Europe may shift for an entire generation. This is one of the defining geopolitical tests of our time. And the decisions made next will echo far beyond Ukraine’s borders. 01:15 – Putin threatens to take Donbas by force or surrender 02:27 – Putin signals to US delegation that intentions are rock solid 03:40 – China provides financial and component backing to Russia 05:05 – China’s representative in Moscow acts as a watchdog 05:12 – Five-hour US–Russia meeting centered on territorial issues 06:25 – Main sticking points are Donbas territory and NATO neutrality 07:00 – Russia frames the conflict as a war against NATO and the US 08:06 – Ukraine ready to freeze on the existing line for a ceasefire 09:16 – US security guarantee seen as equal in power to NATO membership 10:12 – Are business figures like Wyckoff and Kushner appropriate negotiators 12:09 – Rubio versus Wyckoff tactics: formal process vs special line of contact 13:34 – Leaks portray Wyckoff as leaning toward the Russian side 17:15 – Russia’s goals backfire as Ukraine adopts NATO standards 18:26 – Non-negotiable issues include sovereignty and return of children 23:09 – Russia described as in military agony, flexing on cities 24:32 – Trump suggests the US will eventually betray Ukraine 26:25 – Pokrovsky battle unlikely to change the front overall 28:27 – Ukrainians expect little and are prepared for anything 29:41 – Russia using delay tactics; little hope for new sanctions 32:00 – Destroying the shadow fleet is the only immediately enforceable move 33:55 – Russian strikes hit houses, theaters, and kindergartens to demoralize 34:51 – Zelensky aide Yermak allegedly tied to corruption scheme 40:29 – Zelensky said to be absolutely not involved in the scandal

Mario Nawfal

1,342,851 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад