Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

إبراهيم عيسى حط إيده عالجرح، وسأل السؤال اللي كتير ناس خايفة تسأله: ليش النظام الإيراني بيهاجم دول عربية، بس ما بيتقرب من تركيا؟👇 Ibrahim Issa put his finger on the wound and asked the question many people are afraid to ask: Why does the Iranian regime attack Arab countries,...

14,512 views • 7 months ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

🔴 صاعقة… الجولاني يجتمع ويقابل رموز النظام السابق في تركيا. كشف محمود مولدي أن الجولاني والشيباني قد تم استدعاؤهما إلى تركيا، حيث عقدا اجتماعًا مع شخصيات ووجوه بارزة من النظام السابق، وذلك بناءً على طلب تركي مباشر. لكن السؤال الذي يفرض نفسه بقسوة: لماذا يُقتل ويُنكَّل بالشعب الفقير المسكين الذي لم يشارك بأي شيء…؟ لماذا يُستهدف أبناء الطائفة العلوية، الذين لم يرتكبوا ذنبًا سوى أنهم وُلدوا في المكان الخطأ بنظر هذه العصابات، بينما تُفتح الأبواب وتُعقد الاجتماعات مع رموز النظام السابق في تركيا؟! كيف يُترك الفقراء يحترقون على الطرقات، بينما تُدار الصفقات فوق جثثهم…؟ وكيف يُصبح دم الناس وقودًا، بينما يتصافح أصحاب القرار في الغرف المغلقة؟! دمٌ رخيص على الأرض… ولقاءات دافئة في العواصم. Shockwave… Jolani meets with former regime figures in Turkey. Mahmoud Mouloudi revealed that Jolani and Al-Shaibani were summoned to Turkey, where they held a meeting with prominent figures from the former Syrian regime, following a direct request from Ankara. But the pressing and painful question remains: Why are the poor, innocent people being killed and brutalized when they had no role in anything…? Why are members of the Alawite community—whose only “crime” is their identity—being targeted, while former regime figures are welcomed at negotiation tables in Turkey? How are the poor left to bleed in the streets, while deals are made over their bodies…? How does cheap blood fuel the ground, while warm meetings take place behind closed doors? Cheap blood on the streets… warm handshakes in foreign capitals. #سوريا #توثيق #الجولاني #الشرع #مجزرة_الساحل #استقلال_الساحل_السوري #الشرع_من_دون_شرعية #التهجير_جريمة #حماية_الأقليات #محاكمة_الجولاني_الارهابي_الدولي #أوقفوا_الإبادة_الطائفية #ابادة_علوية #الابادة_الجماعية_العلوية_2025 #محرقة_العلويين_في_سوريا #الهولوكوست_العلوي #الجولاني_ليس_رئيسي #تسقط_حكومة_الجولاني_الأرهابية #سوريا_تحت_النار #الساحل_السوري #UN #UN_HRC #UNSC #StateDept #EU #HRW #AmnestyInternational #HTSCrimes #JolaniCrimes #CrimesAgainstHumanity #StopAlawiteGenocide #StopAlawiteGenocideInSyria

NEMESIS – نيميسس

82,075 views • 10 months ago

FULL COMMENTS TRUMP: THE IRAN UNDERSTANDING IS DEAD Selena 🇮🇱 Speaking on the sidelines of the NATO Summit in Ankara, Turkey, President Donald Trump offered a blunt assessment of the latest stage of the confrontation with Iran. As far as he is concerned, the memorandum of understanding with Iran is over. Trump’s message was not diplomatic. It was not cautious. It was a direct declaration that the Iranian regime cannot be trusted, cannot be allowed to obtain nuclear weapons, and cannot be treated as a normal negotiating partner. ---- ON IRAN: “THEY ARE VILLAINS” Trump described the Iranian leadership as evil, dishonest, and incompetent. He said the regime agrees to one thing in private, then walks outside and tells the press the opposite. “They’re liars. They’re cheats.” According to Trump, the core issue remains simple: Iran cannot be allowed to obtain nuclear weapons. “We cannot allow them to obtain nuclear weapons.” He said negotiations have become a waste of time because the regime does not act in good faith. “They say we never even talked about it. There’s something wrong with them. They’re cuckoo.” Trump also accused the regime of brutalizing its own people, saying protesters cannot overthrow the regime because the regime has the guns and the people do not. “They killed 54,000 people that were protesting… The press doesn’t report it.” His conclusion was clear: the regime is not misunderstood. It is not moderate. It is not rational. It is, in his words, a cancer that must be cut out early. ---- ON THE CEASEFIRE: “AS FAR AS I’M CONCERNED, IT’S OVER” Trump said that, in his view, the ceasefire framework is no longer alive. That matters because it means the diplomatic track is collapsing in real time. The pattern is familiar: Iran talks. Iran delays. Iran denies. Iran rebuilds. Trump is now saying openly what many have warned for years: the regime uses negotiations as a shield, not as a path to peace. ---- ON ERDOGAN AND NETANYAHU: TURKEY COULD HAVE ENTERED THE WAR One of the most explosive parts of Trump’s comments was about Turkey. Trump said he likes President Erdogan and praised the welcome he received in Ankara, but he also said Erdogan could have entered the war against Israel. According to Trump, Turkey did not enter because of him. “He could have gone into the war… and it would have been on the other side.” Trump described Turkey as a serious military power with millions of soldiers and major American equipment. He also noted that Turkey is trying to acquire F-35s. The meaning is serious: A NATO member, armed with major Western systems, was allegedly close to entering a regional war — not on the side of Israel, but against it. Trump said Erdogan “doesn’t like Israel much” and “doesn’t like Bibi much,” but stayed out because of Trump’s intervention. That is not a minor comment. That is a strategic warning. ---- ON ERDOGAN: “SANE” VS. IRAN “CRAZY” Trump also drew a distinction between Erdogan and the Iranian regime. He said he does not believe Erdogan likes Iran either, describing Erdogan as “very sane” while calling the Iranians “very crazy.” The point was clear: Trump views Turkey as difficult, transactional, and powerful — but still rational. Iran, in his framing, is different. Iran is ideological. Iran is dishonest. Iran is dangerous. Iran is willing to burn its own people and the region to preserve the regime. ---- ON CHINA: XI STAYED OUT Trump also praised China’s conduct during the war. He said China did not enter the conflict and did not provide equipment to Iran. “He never went into the war. He never supplied equipment to Iran.” Trump called Xi “great” and said he is a “big fan” of the Chinese president. The message was that China, despite being a global rival, did not cross the line into direct support for Iran during the conflict. That matters because Iran’s ability to survive pressure often depends on outside lifelines. Trump is saying that, at least in this case, China did not provide one. ON SPAIN: A TERRIBLE NATO PARTNER Trump also attacked Spain, calling it a terrible partner in NATO. He said the United States should stop doing trade business with Spain, including travel and visits. “We don’t want to do any trade business with Spain anymore.” Trump accused Spain of treating NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte badly and said pressure would force Madrid to come back. “Watch them come running back.” This was classic Trump: economic pressure as leverage, aimed not just at adversaries, but at allies he believes are failing their obligations. ---- THE BOTTOM LINE Trump is saying the Iran track has collapsed. The MOU is dead. The ceasefire is effectively over. The regime cannot be trusted. Turkey almost entered the war. China stayed out. Spain is being put on notice. But the central message is Iran. Trump is no longer describing the regime as a negotiating partner. He is describing it as a threat, a liar, and a cancer. The regime talked. The regime delayed. The regime denied. Same game. Same regime. Talk. Delay. Rebuild. Repeat. Now Trump is saying it out loud.

Mossad Commentary

32,610 views • 2 months ago

🇮🇷|IRGC Did Something the US Government Never Expected: It Wrote a Letter Directly to the American People. The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps invited journalists to a briefing to present a letter addressed to the American people. Not to Trump. Not to Congress. Not to the Pentagon. To the American people. This is not a diplomatic gesture. This is an act of war on the US government’s monopoly on lies. What the letter says We have not seen the full text. But we know what Iran has been saying for 47 years. And we know what the IRGC has been saying since February. The letter will say: The American people have been lied to. Your government told you the war was about nuclear weapons. It was about Israel. Your government told you Iran was the aggressor. The US and Israel bombed Iran first. Your government told you the blockade was about freedom of navigation. It was about regime change. Your government told you Iran was isolated. Iran is flying to 30 countries, trading with China and Russia, and building railways to Central Asia. Your government told you the war would be quick and cheap. Your diesel is $6.53 a gallon. Your national debt just hit $40 trillion. Your refineries are running at 97% and you haven’t built a new one in 50 years. Your government told you Iran was the threat. Iran has never invaded a single country. Iran has never occupied a single inch of Arab land. Iran has never bombed a school in America. But your government bombed a school in Iran. 168 girls. Ages 6 to 12. And your president said, “I can live with it.” Why the IRGC is doing this Because the US government and its media have blocked every channel of truth. CNN, MSNBC, Fox News, The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Wall Street Journal they all tell you the same story. Iran is the enemy. Israel is the victim. America is the hero. The war is necessary. The blockade is legitimate. They will not report this letter. They will not show this briefing. They will not let you read the words of the IRGC. Because if they did, you would ask questions. You would ask: Why did we bomb a girls’ school? Why did we kill Ali Khamenei? Why did we assassinate Iranian scientists? Why did we steal 6 million barrels of Iranian oil? Why did we target 85% of Iranian oil tankers? Why did we threaten to shut down every Iranian airline? Why did we sanction medicine and food? They cannot answer those questions. So they will ignore the letter. They will ignore the briefing. They will ignore the truth. The IRGC is a military organization. Not a government. Not a foreign ministry. A military force. It does not write letters to foreign publics. It does not hold press briefings for journalists. It does not appeal to the conscience of the enemy’s population. It fights. It builds missiles. It plans operations. It kills Americans who attack Iran. So when the IRGC invites journalists to present a letter to the American people, something has changed. The IRGC has decided that the American people are not the enemy. The IRGC has decided that the American people are hostages of their own government. The IRGC has decided that the American people deserve to know the truth. The IRGC is not afraid of the American people. It is afraid of what the American government is doing to the American people and to the world in their name.

Aprajita Nafs Nefes 🦋 Ancient Believer

17,429 views • 1 day ago

UAE’s🇦🇪 Mishal Kanoo: We DON’T RETALIATE against Iran because we don’t want the Iranian people to remember us as an ATTACKER! Afshin Rattansi: You can see from Iran’s point of view, and I think it’s widely accepted that the UAE hosting United States bases, even though the UAE, like Saudi Arabia, has said on no account can they be used for attacks on Iran… Still creates a situation where hosting those bases makes GCC countries targets when the United States is involved in military operations. Mishal Kanoo مشعل كانو: “If I accept that premise, and I do, then I should also extend the same logic to Azerbaijan, which has Israeli bases, and to Turkey, which has American bases. There was a hit on Azerbaijan, of course, and then they said it was a mistake. The same thing happened with Turkey — “sorry, it’s a mistake” — and that was a NATO country after all. The reason why the IRGC is attacking our part of the world is because they perceive us to be an easy target — someone who is not going to retaliate. And we’re not going to retaliate, not because we can’t, but because there’s a difference between not wanting to retaliate and being unable to. They know that if you attack Turkey, you are dealing with a proper army and a capable military. Turkey has been actively involved in conflicts and skirmishes in Syria, Iraq, and Azerbaijan. It’s a frightening prospect for them because of both capability and proximity — Turkey has the military strength to project force directly into Iran. Azerbaijan is similar. It may not be viewed as a major military superpower, but there are approximately 15 million Azeris living in Iran. If Azerbaijan were to respond to an attack by moving in, Iran would face a significant internal and external challenge. This is why, in the eyes of the IRGC, we are seen as the easier target — and why they keep hitting us. The argument that this is simply because of American bases doesn’t fully hold. Yes, the bases are there — but what about American ships, frigates, and other assets? Why aren’t they being targeted in the same way? Why is it primarily our region, where there is little to no retaliatory trajectory from our side? It’s because we know that, ultimately, they will remain our neighbours. We do not have an issue with the Iranian population, and we don’t want to create one for the future. When the current rulers eventually move on and new leadership emerges, we don’t want to have a history where we were the aggressors.” -One of the UAE’s🇦🇪 most prominent businessmen Mishal Kanoo مشعل كانو, Chairman of the The Kanoo Group, and one of Gulf Business’s Top 100 Powerful Arabs 2025. Watch the full interview in the quoted post below👇

Going Underground

586,435 views • 5 months ago

🚨🇮🇷 RARE INTERVIEW WITH LEADING IRANIAN PROFESSOR It’s rare I get to interview someone from INSIDE of Iran It’s even rarer to speak to someone who’s openly critical of the regime And not just anyone, but one of the country’s most respected voices Prof. Sadegh Zibakalam was arrested by both the pre-revolution Shah of Iran in the 1970s, and by the current regime 2 years ago He is critical of both the current regime, but also of the past Monarchy, as well as any U.S. or Israeli intervention or alternative to the current regime I enjoyed this conversation as Zibakalam did not mince his words, and he gave me honest direct answers to tough questions: How significant are the protests? What triggered them? Could they topple the regime? Do you think the Supreme Leader could flee the country? Is there a split between the army and the IRGC? Is there a risk of civil war? He says the Islamic regime has never been weaker. Iran's proxies are destroyed, its allies absent during the 12-day war with Israel, its currency in freefall, and its people chanting "Death to the dictator" in the streets. But Zibakalam warns against celebrating regime collapse, asking the question few want to answer: what comes next? He also believes the regime won't risk full military confrontation with the U.S. and Israel, no matter how much nationalist fervor it might generate. The gamble is too dangerous. What if Iranians don't rally behind the flag? Lastly, I asked the Professor: isn’t he worried about being imprisonment again for speaking out? He admits he's terrified. Every time his phone rings, he checks nervously to see if it's the Revolutionary Guard calling. But when asked why he keeps speaking, he gives a striking answer: "If I were in another country with my family safely abroad, I would say exactly the same things." Watch my full discussion with sadeghZibakalam on Iran's economic crisis, why the protests are different this time, and why he refuses to stop speaking despite knowing the risks. 02:48 - “I have actually been sentenced to 18 months in prison because I criticized, Iranian nuclear program.” 07:15 - “The current protests actually started nearly ten days ago. It was initiated by shopkeepers in Main Bazaar of Tehran and they closed their shops." 09:42 - “It's been nearly ten days, and they are still there and they have a protest.” 14:43 - ”But at that time it was a turning point, in my opinion, for the first time there was a significant division between the government on one hand and the people on the other hand.” 15:14 - “The government really did not do anything about this division." 16:11 - “But the younger generation, the more educated Iranians, they sort of distanced themselves from the Islamic government, in my opinion.” 18:21 - ”2 decades ago, people voted for someone not nominated by the government in significant numbers, and that was the beginning of a rift that we saw.” 19:54 - "Now, what we are hearing today is that they are openly and widely saying that we do not want this Islamic government anymore.” 22:06 - “The second important point is that for the first time they are shouting long live Reza Pahlavi, who has been in exile for years” 24:24 - “So why are people shouting his name? It's out of hatred of them and dissension of the Islamic regime." 34:55 - “Trump's warning to the Islamic leaders: if you shoot at Iranian people, I'm going to deal with you." 36:40 - “I think it would be very difficult for Trump to take any action because, what kind of action is he going to take?” 43:57 - “On the other hand, what are we to do when the Islamic regime is attacked by foreign power?” 46:04 - “We might even see fighting among the Revolutionary Guard itself, those who tend to support the government and those who tend to support the people.” 50:03 - “Who is going to rule Iran? In my opinion, no one, because we have no organized opposition.” 51:10 - “But if the Islamic regime is overthrown, there would be complete chaos.” 57:06 - “I obviously have heard, like many other Iranians, that the Supreme leader is planning to go to Russia, and I think it's a setup.” 01:03:04 - “The Islamic regime has become so weak as far as her allies are concerned.”

Mario Nawfal

2,058,401 views • 8 months ago

Reza Pahlavi, for all intents and purposes, does not owe us anything. His family built Iran from zero. When I say zero, I mean zero. A weak, fragmented Qajar state, one in which women could not leave the house without a man. One in which Iran’s internal affairs were completely controlled by outsiders. One in which foreign armies seized our lands to feed their troops while half our population died of famine. A country without an army, without national infrastructure, without sovereignty over its own resources. And I can go on, and on, and on. In return, we Iranians repaid their blood, sweat, and tears with one of the greatest treacheries imaginable in modern history. His grandfather, arguably one of the greatest men in Iran’s history, his tomb was levelled to the ground. His father was forced to leave the country he loved more than anything in the world. One could say it was not his illness that killed him, but the knife we put in his back, the betrayal of a nation he had dedicated his life to. Reza Pahlavi’s friends and family who remained in Iran were murdered, one by one, at the hands of the regime WE enabled. An entire generation around him was hunted, imprisoned, executed, or driven into exile. His sister and brother, unable to bear the weight of exile and the destruction of everything they had known, took their own lives. Reza Pahlavi has the money. He could have chosen a quiet life, a life of comfort and distance, far from the insults, the threats, the endless character assassination. Instead of spending more than four decades on this path, he could have lived for himself and his family, free of this burden. Instead, he chose responsibility. He chose to stand for the very people who betrayed his family and became the cause of so much suffering in his life. What does he ask in return? Nothing. No throne has been demanded. No position imposed. He has asked only for a national process in which the Iranian people themselves decide their future. He has anchored that path in clear principles, precisely to prevent Iran from falling once again into chaos, fragmentation, and revenge. Yet even for that, he is criticised by so-called “Iran expert” podcasters who have never carried the weight of a nation on their shoulders, who say, “He does not want to lead,” “He is not your guy.” All while he and his family live under constant attacks, threats, and scrutiny on a daily basis. Despite all of that, his love for his people and his land overrides everything. He continues to fight for us. I want to say we have done nothing to deserve it, but the people of Iran have proven otherwise in these past weeks. They are no longer blinded by decades of propaganda. They are revisiting their history. They are correcting the lies they were raised with. They are openly calling his name in the streets, knowing the price that must be paid for it. They are awake to the mistakes of past generations, and they have reached out their hand to him. And he, despite everything, has taken that hand.

Arsalan Naamdar

24,647 views • 7 months ago

It's not Israel pulling the strings re: the attack on Iran. When you follow the money, the real picture is much more compelling.... Simon Dixon explains: "We are not in a war between Iran, Israel and America. We are in a war between the military industrial complex and the factions aligned with the military industrial complex that profit from it and the financial industrial complex that are aligned with Gulf countries and China and American financial powers that now want the Build Back Better phase. "They're done with the war now. They want the Build Back Better phase and they want the military to go somewhere else... "The other side of the war, you've got the financial industrial complex that wants regional stability. You got the Gulf sovereign wealth funds. You've got the reformist pragmatists within, Iran, that is the Iranian government. And you got people within IRGC that recognize that this is an existential threat. And so they're on board with the more hardliner elements of the IRGC, so it requires change." This clip of Dixon (Simon Dixon), an angel investor, is taken from a conversation with a co-host of BTC Sessions (BTC Sessions 😎) the Bitcoin Mentor (Bitcoin Mentor) posted to YouTube on March 11, 2026. ---------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "We are not in a war between Iran, Israel and America. We are in a war between the military industrial complex and the factions aligned with the military industrial complex that profit from it and the financial industrial complex that are aligned with Gulf countries and China and American financial powers that now want the Build Back Better phase. "They're done with the war now. They want the Build Back Better phase and they want the military to go somewhere else. "Okay, so they don't lose their military. They want the forever war somewhere else. But the military, because Saudi and the Gulf countries are now exerting their influence. So let me tell you who's actually in the war. You got the US military industrial complex. You got hard liner factions of the IRGC that are maintaining their power from war. You've got Israel and the Zionist ideology. You've got the neocons in America that are owned by the AIPAC and US lobby, and that's the military industrial complex one side of the war. "The other side of the war, you've got the financial industrial complex that wants regional stability. You got the Gulf sovereign wealth funds. You've got the reformist pragmatists within, Iran, that is the Iranian government. And you got people within IRGC that recognize that this is an existential threat. And so they're on board with the more hardliner elements of the IRGC, so it requires change. "With these elements, and you still have the IRGC, you make the world think it's regime change. Because if you have regime change you'll have an uprising. You'll turn Iran into Syria with 90 million people. You'll create a vacuum, you'll create carnage. That's the military model. This is the financial industrial complex. And they're aligned with China and BRICS. "So you've got the GCC, you've got BRICS, you've got factions within Iran and they have to turn part of the regime change of what happened in Israel as well, which will be a GCC-aligned rather than America-aligned, less radicalized puppet government just like you have in Syria right now. He used to be head of ISIS, but now he works for Turkey in the GCC. "He has a job and his job is to get regional stability in line with the regional powers. And if he fails, you just take him out and call him a terrorist. If he succeeds, then you need a successor. So the real battle is MIC [military industrial complex] versus FIC [financial industrial complex]. It's not Iran versus Israel versus America. When you follow the money, that's what it's, it's saying. "Now, okay, so you won and I believe FIC will win. Yep. You know, there's more, there's more power there. But you've got to de-radicalize all these MICs. You got the radical Zionists, the evangelical Christian neocons in America. You got to, you got to take out those IRGC hardliners. And you've got to reform Israel. So you defund Israel eventually. So it's not being funded by a military. "You get Tucker Carlson, Candace Owen and all these people to de-radicalize the evangelical Christians in America. These are connected to high levels of CIA operatives. And then you strategically weaken Israel, strategically weaken Iran, and now you just got to get the US military bases out. And so that faction, I believe is coordinating the next stage of the theater. "The negotiations haven't stopped. Part of the negotiations that led to this battle was that they said, start the war and we'll know who the people that derail the plan are. Some of them might kill children in a school in Iran. And 165 6- to 12-year-old children were killed and they're investigating it right now. My guess is that's an Israel operation. America's deciding whether they're going to cover up for it. "But when you find out who's going off plan, those are the people that need to be regime changed and eliminated, okay? So every time someone goes really too far, like blowing up water plants that would effectively, you know, those are the people that are going to be eliminated until the last people standing are the ones that were sat around the negotiation table. "You'll notice how everyone that was negotiating is still alive today. That's what you'll notice. And I reckon they stay alive till the end. And there are people from IRGC, people from the Iranian government, and they will stay."

Sense Receptor

49,600 views • 6 months ago

‘Trump tried to FIRE J.D. Vance after everything that Vance said was proven right about the Iran war.‘ —Trump’s Former Lawyer Robert Barnes ‘This was about in April and May, after everything that Vance had said would happen happened in Iran, and everything Trump pretended was going to happen didn’t happen. And so the first reaction of Trump was not, “hey, I should have listened to him.” It was how annoyed he was that Vance was right and Trump was wrong. Then at that point he would actually ask people, “Can I fire the Vice President? Why can’t I fire the Vice President?” Because he’s become power mad. Trump doesn’t see himself as having any peer among prior presidents, nor any peer among contemporary leaders. And he wants to be treated that way by Vance. And Vance doesn’t treat him that way. Vance gives him honest feedback, which has been strongly opposed to this entire Iranian war all the way through. He tried to get him out the first time. And Trump kept rug-pulling every deal Vance got done, such that the Iranians no longer have any confidence at all that Trump can get anything done, just like the Russians have no confidence that Trump can get anything done. Because anytime Vance gets a deal done, Trump rug-pulls… But he’s been very assertive. He’s the only one restraining Trump at all, because everybody else, he has a cabinet of cowards and sycophants around him that are afraid to challenge him, afraid to question him, afraid to contest what he does. It took Vance twisting arms to get Caine to be more blunt about the lack of weapons that we have defensively and offensively to continue to fight the kinetic conflict with Iran on the same basis we did in the first 38 days. So yeah, it shows you where Trump’s mind is, that the only rational, sane person in the room is the one he would like to fire if he could. Constitutionally, he can’t.’ —Robert Barnes on the latest episode of Going Underground Watch the full interview below in the quoted post below 👇

Going Underground

108,453 views • 2 months ago

Tucker Carlson claims that Iran is “one of the most liberal countries in the entire region.” John Kiriakou then explained why. His friends visited Tehran, walked around, saw restaurants, cafes, music, people laughing, and late dinners. The absolute audacity to make a statement like that and proceed to laugh about it is beyond my comprehension. Iran is rated Not Free by Freedom House, with a score of 10 out of 100 in its 2026 report. Political rights: 4 out of 40. Civil liberties: 6 out of 60. It is literally one of the least free countries on earth. Amnesty International reported that Iranian authorities executed over 1,000 people in 2025, the highest yearly number Amnesty has recorded in Iran in at least 15 years. The regime uses executions not only for ordinary criminal punishment, but as a weapon of political terror, including against protesters and dissidents. The “Woman, Life, Freedom” protests began after Mahsa Amini died in custody after being detained by Iran’s morality police over hijab. The regime answered those protests with mass arrests, beatings, torture, executions, forced confessions, internet shutdowns, and show trials. The UN’s fact-finding mission has documented state repression tied to compulsory hijab enforcement and abuses against women and protesters. Iran ranked near the very bottom of global press freedom measurements as well, with Reporters Without Borders placing it 176th out of 180 in the 2025 World Press Freedom Index. The latest mass protests in Iran were met with mass arrests, internet blackouts, lethal force, disappearances, and executions. Human Rights Watch said Iranian security forces carried out “mass killings of protesters” after nationwide protests escalated on January 8. AP reported that activists put the death toll above 7,000, while other estimates, harder to verify because the regime shuts down the internet and hides evidence, have placed the possible number far far higher. A “liberal” country does not answer public unrest by cutting communications, filling prisons, shooting protesters, and sending dissidents to the gallows. A country where journalists cannot report freely, women cannot dress freely, dissidents cannot organize freely, and protesters can be hanged after sham trials is not “liberal” because somebody found a cafe in Tehran. People laughing in public does not erase prisons, gallows, morality police, torture chambers, surveillance, forced confessions, and the bodies of protesters handed back to their families. Tucker says it like he has discovered some hidden truth the rest of us are too stupid or propagandized to understand. Kiriakou then backs it up with the kind of evidence a naive college freshman brings back from a semester abroad. “I saw cafes.” Wonderful. Stalin had theaters. Assad had restaurants. Saddam had weddings. North Korea has smiling children in staged parades. Human beings keep living under tyranny because human beings keep living. That does not make the tyranny liberal. It only proves that Tucker is so committed to his narrative that Israel is the root of all evil that he is willing to look at the Islamic Republic of Iran and describe it as liberal while Iranian women, journalists, dissidents, religious minorities, and protesters pay the price for discovering otherwise. Utterly despicable and completely inexcusable. Tucker is an evil evil man. There's nothing more to say.

Yehuda Teitelbaum

23,363 views • 5 months ago

First of all, an attack on Saturday morning is nothing new to us. This time we are on the right side. We must ask the question that many Israelis are asking themselves, especially those who are now turning on their televisions and saying, “Wait a minute, but we were told that Operation Rising Lion ended with the defeat of the Iranian nuclear project.” Donald Trump said it was completely destroyed. So how can Trump and Netanyahu say today that the goal is to destroy the Iranian nuclear project? Two things need to be explained. The first is that while the U.S. said the Iranian nuclear project was completely destroyed, Israel did not use that rhetoric. It said that we had set them back years, which was indeed true. So why now? Well, three dramatic things happened here. One, in my opinion, the relatively minor one, is that the Iranians tried to move their weapons systems, including their nuclear infrastructure underground. They have now distanced themselves from nuclear and are focusing on the missile system with which it was supposed to reach Israel. They were trying to take the entire system underground, and not just underground, but to a place that even American bombs cannot reach. And that is the point of no return. The second thing, of course, is the ballistic missile system posed a threat. The third was the opportunity created by Operation Rising Lion. And that opportunity is the uprising in Iran, which, had it not been for the massacre of 30,000 Iranians, would probably have led to the fall of the regime. Israel and the U.S. together decided—by the way, they decided weeks ago. As usual, there was a whole system of tension, and Trump was hesitating, but basically the decision was made a few weeks ago. They decided to give that extra push, and it’s quite a push. I just want to explain for the sake of proportion. Operation Rising Lion had 1,000 strikes; the U.S. war in Iraq in 2003 had 116,000. So when you add that huge elephant (the U.S.), that huge mammoth, the consequences are dramatic. Not for nothing, Netanyahu said today, Operation Rising Lion will pale in comparison to what is happening. Yes, they said. Anyone who listens to the eight minutes and 20 seconds in which Trump speaks in an angry and serious tone—really, the operation—it doesn’t seem to me something electoral in the U.S. And the anger is enormous. It really seems to me as if Trump chose it. Netanyahu understands that Trump’s goal is to bring down this regime, and he says things there that are accurate and, in my opinion, historic. He says for 47 years, this regime and its people have been shouting “Death to America” and “Death to Israel.” They finance terrorism, they launch terrorism, they are responsible for the deaths of hundreds of Americans and thousands of Israelis, including on Oct. 7. What began on Saturday morning Oct. 7 may now end with this operation that began on Saturday morning.

Amit Segal

98,731 views • 7 months ago

Gray TV’s Jon Decker: “My first has to do with the blockade. There are lawmakers from both parties who claim the blockade is an act of war. What do you say to that? And my second question has to do with the fuel embargo of Cuba. How long, Mr. Secretary, will that last?” Secretary Marco Rubio: “Okay. Two things. All right. Good. I’ll answer both your questions because I like the second one too. The first one on the blockade. And why do we have a blockade? We have a blockade because they shut down the streets. So, I don’t know which members of Congress you’re talking to, but here’s what I would ask them. I would ask everybody here. It’s very simple. These guys have shut down the Straits of Hormuz. This is what Iran is saying. We will shut down the Straits. No one can go through. No country in the world can go through unless we allow you to go through and you have to pay us. But our ships can go through — meaning the Iranian ships — as much as they want. That’s crazy. Who would agree to that? So, how are we going to have a situation where they get to close the straits to everybody, and the only people who are allowed to go through there 100 percent without paying anything are the Iranians. If you do that, they’ll keep the Straits closed forever. They’re trying to make this some new normal, okay? Under no circumstances can we ever allow them to normalize the fact that they get to blow up commercial ships and put mines in the water. So, the response to that is we’re going to blockade your ships. If everyone ships are not getting out, your ships are not getting out either. That’s not an act of war. That’s a defensive measure. It’s a counter to what they have decided to do. You know what is an act of war is? Putting mines in the water. Why don’t the members of Congress, whoever it is, is complaining about it. They should be all over that. These guys put mines in the water that you mining in the water is illegal, period, under any circumstances. And they’ve done it. But this is crazy stuff. But this is what they’ve done. On Cuba — oil blockade on Cuba — there’s no oil blockade on Cuba per se. Here’s what’s happening with Cuba. Cuba used to get free oil from Venezuela, used to give them a bunch of free oil. They would take like 60 percent of that oil and resell it for cash. It wouldn’t even go to benefit the people. So, the only blockade that’s happened is the Cubans have decided, I mean, the Venezuelans have decided we’re not giving you free oil anymore. And you can only imagine nowadays, the way oil prices are, no one’s giving away free oil, much less to a failed regime. So, the problem of Cuba is worse, okay? There are economic model doesn’t work, doesn’t work. And the people who are in charge can’t fix it. And the reason that I can’t fix it is not just because they’re communists. That’s bad enough, but they’re incompetent communists. The — the only thing worse than a communist is an incompetent one. And that’s what incompetent communists run that country. They don’t know how to fix it. They really don’t. And we have 90 miles from our shores, a failed state that also happens to be friendly territory for some of our adversaries. So it’s an unacceptable status quo, and we’ll be addressing it, but not today.”

Curtis Houck

47,845 views • 4 months ago

Trump has done a complete 180 on everything he claimed to stand for. It doesn’t matter whether he’s scared, manipulated, acting on his own, or all of the above the outcome is the same. He has betrayed every principle and every single person who helped put him in power. The very people who carried him to where he is. He turned on them. Not just domestically, but internationally, look at the way he treated Orban. He forgets that Viktor Orban was a lone voice in Europe supporting him when everyone else was laughing at him and calling him a crazy orange man. Europeans hated him. Orban was his main supporter in Europe and the way he has treated Orban is just ugly, nothing more. Now he’s cozy with people like Lindsey Graham to the point where Graham is arranging meetings between him and people like the President of Finland. Let that sink in. He can scream ''I’m MAGA they are not,'' like a five-year old, but the truth is MAGA was never built by him, it was built around him. And now he’s completely betrayed what it was supposed to stand for. He’s insulted allies, betrayed partners and escalated tensions with adversaries burning bridges in every direction. And now, here we are again, he’s starting to echo the same tired neocon narrative we've heard for years ''Russia, Russia, Russia.'' It may not be as blatant yet, but give it a few weeks and we’ll be right back to blaming Russia for everything. What makes it even more crazy is that he himself was once the target of the entire Russiagate saga. I’ve seen stupidity before but this is on another level. This isn’t just more of the same, it’s something entirely new. I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again the government is a reflection of the people. And right now, we have a narcissism problem in this country. We rank at the top when it comes to that disorder. What’s the core trait of a narcissist? Look at Donald Trump a textbook case. No empathy. Someone dies, and there’s no weight to it. His comment after Charles' death was disgusting. He talks about bombing people with this disturbing sense of excitement ‘we bomb the hell out of them’ like it’s a performance. The worst part is how easily this situation could have been handled. Ayatollah was old and sick he only had a few years left. There was a real opportunity for a deal. Trump blew it when he started bombing Iran in the middle of the negotiations. Twice! We keep ignoring reality. Israel is one of the most cunning and deceptive countries in the world. This is a state that secretly developed nuclear weapons and hid them from its own so-called ‘closest ally,’ the United States. This is a country that has spied on U.S. offices, blamed others for its actions and has has killed American soldiers and journalists. If we were honest and actually calculated which country has caused more harm to U.S. interests Iran or Israel, Israel would likely be far ahead. That’s not opinion, that’s a fact. Iran didn’t just become an enemy out of nowhere. We played a major role in creating that hostility from overthrowing Mossadegh to installing the Shah, whose regime imprisoned and brutalized its own people and we supported and backed him knowing he was a dictator. Now we have the audacity to tell Iranian people that they should get rid of their dictator and we can help by bombing them. You can't make this shit up! Are you kidding me? And there are still idiots who actually buy this. Iran has largely operated from a defensive position ever since. We label them terrorists, but from their perspective, they’ve been preparing for survival building regional influence and proxy networks because they fear exactly what history suggests, that they could be targeted next with bombs or even a nuke! In 2007, Wesley Clark said that the Pentagon had a plan to attack Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Iran. We ended up doing much of that, one by one. Well, guess what, if I’m Iran, watching this and hearing a high-ranking Pentagon official say my country is on that list, and then I see each country on that list get taken down one by one, who here wouldn’t at least think about building a nuclear weapon for defensive purposes? When you know one of the biggest and strongest militaries in the world is planning to invade you someday, and they’re openly talking about it, what would you do? All of you geniuses who think Iran is the problem, honestly, which one of you wouldn’t consider building a bomb in that situation? And that’s without even getting into the role of countries like Israel and the influence they may have on pushing the United States toward these actions. If your argument is that Iran has a dictatorial regime, then you are a hypocritl. The United States installed a dictator in Iran themselves and overthrew a democratic leader and even after that the CIA said they had no problem with Ayatollah, in fact they said it would be 'good for us'.Then they got caught selling weapons to Iran. If the argument is - 'they’re building a nuclear weapon,' then the obvious question is: why? Why would they feel the need to? Maybe it has something to do with Wesley Clark, Iraq and many more?!.. So let’s be real, anyone who says Iran has no right to want a nuclear weapon is either being dishonest or just flat out stupid. Do I want them to have a nuke? No. But do they feel justified in wanting one? Absolutely! Put yourself in their position. You know the history you know what the CIA did to your country. Then you hear a high-level figure like Wesley Clark talk about a plan to take out seven countries in five years, including yours. You watch those countries get hit one after another and you are no position to stand against the US and actually win that war without taking great amount of casualties. What conclusion are you supposed to draw from that? At that point, it’s not crazy it's strategic! Any country in that situation would start thinking exactly about that, I know I would have if I was in that situation. Wouldn’t you? It’s not hard to understand why a country might see nuclear capability as a deterrent when it feels threatened by stronger military powers and some absolutely psychotic states like Israel. And let’s be realistic, Iran would never use a nuke against the United States, any use of nuclear weapons against us would mean their complete annihilation. Iran is many things but it’s not that suicidal, they don’t want to end their existence, they want their country to endure. The question is which country then would they use the nukes if they are ever put in that position? There’s only one country and that’s Israel not the US and Honestly I do not see how is that my problem at all? Do you? I mean it maybe Miriam Adelson's problem but it's not my problem. Most of Iran’s hostile actions came after the U.S. helped overthrow its government and backed a dictator for decades! So this narrative that Iran has been hostile to the us needs seriously clarification to why? Any regime would be hostile to you when you overthrow their democratic leader and instal a dictator that makes people miserable. After the revolution, Iran became openly hostile to the U.S for A REASON! The reason is the CIA and the corporate America nothing else.

ELIZABETH LANE

34,350 views • 6 months ago

REVEALED: Israeli spy agency Mossad sold Donald Trump a plot to instantly take out Iran—but it had one fatal flaw. And that one little mistake has put the United States firmly in the crosshairs of a war it cannot win—and is creating global panic over oil prices. . The top secret dossier, sold to the US by Mossad director David Barnea had a clear argument, that we can summarize as a four part narrative. One: A network of fake “Iranian NGOs” in the west would circulate a story that Iran had massacred 30,000 or more peaceful protesters, The story would be spread in order to manufacture consent for the west to launch a war against Iran. Two: The Americans would demand to have negotiations with the Iranians to distract them, by having them focusing on peace plans. Three: During this distraction, the US and Israeli air forces would then launch an attack that would take out the entire government of Iran, leaving all seats of power empty—including the peace negotiators. Four: Radical extreme opposition members in Iran, cultivated by Mossad, the CIA, and the NED, would then take control of the country—and install US puppet Reza Pahlavi as a proxy for Washington and Tel Aviv. . IT WORKED. AT FIRST And you know what? Every part of that plan worked perfectly. Except there was one key detail they had got wrong. And that brought the whole edifice crashing down. . ONE: DEMONIZING IRAN The story really starts in January. Mossad and the CIA worked with radical opposition members in Iran to launch a coup at the start of January in which armed men destroyed 700 shops, 305 ambulances and buses, 414 civil service buildings and 750 banks. [SEE VIDEO] They attacked 350 mosques, which is very strange for supposedly Muslim rioters– but they attacked not one synagogue. This was a major insurrection in which people on all sides lost their lives, with more than 3,000 dead after the coup was put down. But this armed coup was repackaged by fake NGOs in the west as a massacre of at least 30,000 peaceful protesters - or maybe 50,000 or 70,000 - by “the regime”. Mossad wanted the fake number to be more than the actual number of people the IDF killed in Gaza. This part worked perfectly. Here’s Time magazine [video] reporting that 30,000 died. Most of the western media supported this. Not one of them reported that the funding for these NGOs could be traced back to western political propaganda groups such as the NED, a CIA spin-off group. . TWO: FAKE PEACE NEGOTIATIONS Part Two of the plan also went better than they could have hoped for. The Americans not only successfully held "peace negotiations", but the Iranians actually made multiple concessions, giving Washington virtually everything it wanted. So the Americans could simply have proceeded with those and got what they wanted anyway. But the US and Israel decided to go ahead with Part Three anyway. (More 'fun'?) . THREE: KILLING GOVERNMENT LEADERS And you know what? That also worked perfectly, from beginning to end – in a surprise, unprovoked attack, the US and Israel killed not just the leader, but 40 members of the Iranian government. Now just imagine the outrage if any country took out the entire government of the UK or Germany or Canada or Australia. The world’s media would be writing editorials about it for years, literally years. . FOUR: THE PUPPET The Mossad-CIA plot was going exactly as planned. All they needed to do was achieve part four: the transfer of power to a US Juan Guaidó figure—a man already selected and waiting in the wings. The western media found supporters of the opposition in Iran to film expressing happiness, and tried to pretend that this was “all” the Iranians. But this was clearly not true. The vast majority of Iranians, including people involved in the violent protest of January, were horrified. . FATAL FLAW Now here’s where the fatal error showed up. Mossad’s plan failed to take into account one thing. There had been a change of attitude last year. Between June the 13th and the 24th of 2025, Israel attacked Iran, killing nuclear scientists, politicians and civilians, as well as members of the armed forces. That was also, clearly an illegal, unprovoked attack. No western leader cared—but the people of Iran, all the political parties, did care. They were outraged. Why are Israel and the United States allowed to just murder people in other countries and get away it? Support for the Iranian government rose dramatically. Mossad assumed that because their contacts, the extreme radical members of the opposition groups, still opposed the government, that many Iranians did. But that just was not true. The Iranians in general had become far more supportive of their government, and opposed to the US and Israel, than Mossad believed. . IRANIANS UNITED Donald Trump told the Iranian people that it was now over to you – signalling that part four should go ahead: a takeover by people allied to Washington and Tel Aviv. But it didn’t happen. So part four of the plan did not work. The Iranians drew together and fought back. Under United Nations law, they had full legal rights to respond to an illegal attack. They made defensive forays to take out the military bases around the gulf which were attacking them, and they closed the Strait of Hormuz. Trump was horrified and furious – not with the Iranians but with Netanyahu and Barnea, the Mossad chief. And this explains why he kept making contradictory statements – he kept saying things that implied the war would be over very quickly, as the original plan said, while also acknowledging that the opposite was true. Remember how he used the phrase “short term excursion”. He also said the war would last four days only. And he also said the war was “already over”. And so on. So we can see that the plan, as sold to him, was a quick in-and-out operation, just as it had been in Venezuela – so that was what he had in his head. . IF YOU SHOOT THE KING… Netanyahu, deeply embarrassed to have helped sell a war to Trump that had spiralled out of control, went into hiding—he was so deep undercover that rumours circulated that said he was dead. For Mossad and the CIA, the plot failed. There’s an ancient saying that all plotters know. “If you are going to shoot at the king, you better kill the king.” What the US and Israel did was shoot the leadership of Iran. But they failed to kill the leadership of Iran. So now they are in trouble. And you know what? I don’t think there is any sympathy for them.

Nury Vittachi

367,478 views • 6 months ago

A stunned Jimmy Dore asks Prof. Marandi to explain why Lebanese leaders are seemingly colluding with Israel against their own people during wartime? US comedian & political commentator Jimmy Dore (Jimmy Dore) recently asked Iranian Professor Muhammad Marandi (Seyed Mohammad Marandi) to explain why the current Lebanese government was seemingly colluding with Israel against its own people'? Transcript (below): - Jimmy Dore: Um, why would Lebanon be…why would the government of Lebanon...so it's almost like they're, they're in collusion with the people attacking them? Is that, is that what I'm...is that what I'm hearing you say? - Prof. Marandi: Yes. That's exactly what they’re doing… - Jimmy Dore: I don't understand ...I... can you explain that? Why would they, why would they be in collusion with people attacking their own country? I don't understand this. - Prof. Marandi: Well, there's a lot of that going on in our region because almost all of the countries in our region are in the US camp, and they are mostly proxies of the United States. Some may have a bit more independence, like in Türkiye, some less independence, but they're all in the American camp. And the Americans, and with the help of Saudi Arabia and others, installed the current president and the prime minister, and they've been carrying out peace negotiations with the Israeli regime, which is against the constitution of the country, and which is a huge concession to the regime as it's killing people in southern Lebanon. And, they're basically obedient to the United States. They were put in place, put in power by the Americans, and they will pursue American policies. And so Western NGOs in Lebanon, which have a lot of funding, they promote, and the Western embassies, they promote these positions... and the same is true with those who are funded by Saudi Arabia and Qatar and the others in the Persian Gulf, these despots that are in the American camp. They're all against the people who support the resistance. So they're preventing aid from getting in, they're preventing (displace Lebanese citizens) from moving to different parts of Lebanon as refugees...and they're preventing us from sending aid. Why? Because they want to crush the resistance. They want to humiliate them. They want to bring them to their knees because that's what empire wants. That's what the empire demands. - Jimmy Dore: Wow. Um, so it's, it's… - Prof. Marandi: I mean, Jimmy, let's just go back to Yemen. Remember when the Saudis and the Emiratis waged that genocidal war in Yemen? - Jimmy Dore: Yes… - Prof. Marandi: What they were doing to Yemen is not all that different to what was going on in Gaza and in Lebanon. All these regimes in our region were supporting this. They all supported the Saudis and Emiratis. The West were giving—they sent advisors. They were giving weapons, ammunition, so that the Saudis could wipe them out. I remember a former US official—someone who became critical—he said that he was actually on the ship in the Red Sea, an American naval ship, and they stopped a boat that was taking medicine, (that was) smuggling medicine into Yemen, and they went and dumped all that medicine into the sea. That was during the genocidal war against Yemen. All these countries were supporting the Saudis and the Emiratis, including Qatar and Türkiye. But later on, Qatar and Türkiye split from the Saudis when the Saudis and Emiratis imposed that siege on Qatar. So this is not new. None of these countries helped the people of Gaza. None of them gave a single bullet to the people of Gaza to defend themselves. Türkiye…(and) the regime in Azerbaijan, (which) sells cheap oil Israel. Türkiye, under Erdogan, transports that oil to Israel. Even now, when there's global shortage, they are sending their oil (to Israel). Sisi (and) the Egyptian government, (they) buy gas from the Israeli regime. The Jordanian government does trade and collaborates with intelligence. Syria, a huge part of their country is now occupied. They won't lift a finger to end the occupation, and they're actually collaborating against the resistance in Lebanon. And in the Persian Gulf, we saw how they assisted the United States in invading Iran. They are part of the aggression against the country. So, you know, the empire is on the decline, but its power has always been very quite immense. - Jimmy Dore: so, I mean, I'm sure you've heard people from Naftali Bennett to, you know, everybody's saying that the next war for Israel and the Greater Israel project is going to be with Türkiye. And so isn't Türkiye aware of this? Why, why would they still be… - Prof. Marandi: You know, Jimmy, there are many questions in this world that I'd love to have the real answers to. I have my own views, but, you know—Tucker Carlson, you saw his interview with the US ambassador (to Israel)— - Jimmy Dore: Yes ... to Israel. - Prof. Marandi: And in that interview, the ambassador said if the Israelis take the entire region, that's fine. That includes parts of Türkiye, that includes all of Syria, that includes Lebanon, that includes Jordan, that includes part of Iraq, that includes major parts of Saudi Arabia, that includes parts of Egypt. What did these governments do? What did they say? Nothing. Nothing. They just wrote a, a joint communique saying this, you know, they condemn this. That's it?! That is the real policy of the United States. That is the policy of European governments, the unofficial policy, Greater Israel, and that's why they're allowing for the slaughter in Gaza, the ethnic cleansing in the West Bank. I mean, European diplomats just today, they've been tweeting about—(I mean) European diplomats in Israel—they have been tweeting about participating, I think, in the, uh, pride, what's it called? - Jimmy Dore: Pride parade. The gay pride… - Prof. Marandi: Yeah, the gay pride parade. But they don't tweet about Gaza. They don't tweet about ethnic cleansing in the West Bank. You know? So this is the world that we live in…

Hussein

141,991 views • 3 months ago

Richmond Hill 'Rally for Mothers of Iran' erupts after vehicle attack An event honouring the mothers of Iran ended with a vehicle attack on rally-goers, with the suspect seen waving a flag of the Islamic Republic. On Sunday afternoon, May 10, a special Mother’s Day rally was held in Richmond Hill, Ont., in honour of the mothers of Iran. The rally was aptly titled “Mothers of Revolution.” During the event, politicians, Jewish allies, and prominent Iranian figures spoke. The mood was sombre and mournful, a stark contrast to the usual feeling of hope that generally fills crowds of thousands hoping for the best possible outcome in the conflict affecting their homeland. The mood only worsened with the events that played out at the end of the rally. When the crowd was leaving the rally location at Richmond Hill Library and people were moving towards their cars, chaos erupted. Seeing the crowd moving frantically and hearing screams, I ran towards the commotion. I saw a man next to his car being berated by the crowd while York Regional Police slowly moved in. I began asking witnesses what had happened. According to eyewitness accounts, the man, who had been present on the outskirts of the event for its duration, got into his car as people were beginning to leave and began ramming his vehicle into rally-goers’ cars. Thankfully, he only hit about two vehicles before the crowd began to encircle him to stop him. He then exited his vehicle, pulled out the flag of the Islamic Republic, and began circling his car while waving it. As the crowd moved toward him, York Regional Police finally approached the scene. At that point, the alleged perpetrator fell to the ground in what appeared to be some kind of medical emergency and began shaking and convulsing. This did not last long, however, and when he got back to his feet, he was eventually cuffed, and carried away in a police vehicle, leaving behind his car, the vehicles he had allegedly hit, and a crowd of extremely emotional Iranians questioning how something like this could possibly be happening in Canada. York Regional Police have now released additional details regarding the alleged attack at the Richmond Hill rally. They are asking any witnesses to come forward with any information, including “anyone who has video footage, including dashcam, cell phone, or security recordings from the area around the time of the incident.” According to police, the suspect allegedly struck a food delivery driver who was not even involved in the demonstration before hitting another vehicle while attempting to flee the scene. Police also say that he stopped his vehicle to yell threats at demonstrators before being taken into custody. The question is, how did he have time do that? Why was he not apprehended instantly? The victim was transported to hospital with minor injuries. But that was not the end of the chaos. Afterwards, someone allegedly became uncomfortable with Caryma Sa'd’s videographer, Lee, filming the events and began accusing him of being affiliated with the IRGC. Since the crowd had just witnessed violence from someone who could very likely be affiliated with the regime in Iran (we have at least 700 IRGC agents freely operating in Canada, some outlets say upwards of 1,000, and human rights activists say it is even more), the defensive mood was understandable, though clearly misdirected. He was then asked by several security personnel, and even police, to leave the scene because he was supposedly causing a disturbance. It was an unfortunate but understandable turn of events given the severity of the attack that had just occurred, but people were clearly directing their aggression toward independent media who were only there to cover the event, as I was. Iranians work quickly. The identity of the man who allegedly perpetrated the attack has already been found and posted across social media. Mehran Mohagheghi, who allegedly works in accounting for Grunwald and Co., has reportedly been identified through videos from the event. His Instagram account has since been deactivated. What will the consequences of this attack be? Thankfully, no one was severely hurt, but there has been a clear escalation in attacks targeting the Jewish and Iranian communities. Iranians will not be deterred. If anything, this only makes them more determined to stand against supporters of the regime that has destroyed so many lives. But they are in Canada and should not have to face attacks reminiscent of those back home in what is supposedly a free country. This is a direct result of the lack of police enforcement against open supporters of terrorist regimes in our country. And it will likely only get worse. REPORT by Scarlett Grace:

Rebel News

12,168 views • 4 months ago

Fox’s Gillian Turner: “Overnight, Iran launched missiles across the Gulf. They managed to hit the Saudi oil refinery on the Red Sea. What does it mean that they have that capability now, three weeks into the war? And Mr. Secretary, you mentioned civilian infrastructure. Iran seems to be treating us diplomatic outposts, embassies, consulates, like they are legitimate hard targets in the region. Now, what is the Pentagon doing to, I guess, secure those assets, stop those attacks?” Secretary of War Pete Hegseth: “Absolutely.” Joint Chiefs Chairman General Caine: “Thanks for the question. On the missile strikes, you know, as we said and have always said, clearly, they came into this fight with a lot of weapons. This is why we continue to be as aggressive and assertive as we can against their ballistic missile capability, both their medium-range ballistic missile capability and their short-range missile capability. So, we are continuing to hunt and find them and kill them, and we will continue to do so. So, they still retain some capability. And we have layered defenses throughout the region that will allow us to protect those. And we’re working with our partners across the Gulf region to help them improve any defensive capabilities that they may need.” Hegseth: “To that point on capabilities, you know, Iran is an energy rich country, could be should be instead, like so many other places, driven by a radical ideology, they’ve spent that money instead of investing in their people. That’s why you had millions of Iranians protesting, because they felt like their quality of life didn’t match what it could be or should be. And what was the Iranian state? There’s a reason we call Iran the number one state sponsor of terrorism, because they took the — the money they — they make and they invest it in tunnels, and they invested in missiles, and they invested in launchers and UABs. And we are destroying and degrading that, degrading that in historic proportions. But it doesn’t mean they won’t still and try to hold people at issue, which is why we’re — we’re fighting every single day to continue to compel. And you mentioned embassies and consulates, unlike previous administrations, we are doubling and tripling down on ensuring that our people, regardless of their Department of War, Department of State, whatever they do, are secure in those facilities. And the best defense is, is, is a good offense. And so, we’re not — we’re not afraid to go after and kill anybody. And we have a lot of them attempting to target our — our diplomatic facilities around. You know, we’re not — we’re not surprised that they would indiscriminately target. And we’re still seeing that.”

Curtis Houck

245,282 views • 6 months ago

🚨 Important! Call for action for IRAN 🇮🇷 All eyes are on the UN and world’s politicians to finally do real action to protect Iranians, not useless condemnations. Please Share and spread the word. Today the UN Security Council is holding an emergency meeting in New York requested by the US to discuss the regime's massacre of protesters in Iran. We need massive pressure on them because many countries, especially some Arab nations who always talk about human rights but have deep interests with the regime, plus China and Russia, are doing everything they can to block or veto the resolution meant to support the people. A resolution under Chapter VII of the UN Charter, Article 42, will be on the table. According to the official text of the UN Charter, Article 42 states: "Should the Security Council consider that measures provided for in Article 41 would be inadequate or have proved to be inadequate, it may take such action by air, sea, or land forces as may be necessary to maintain or restore international peace and security." This includes the use of armed force if non-military measures fail. And here is the key: Article 41 measures (economic sanctions, arms embargoes, diplomatic restrictions, etc.) have already been fully applied against Iran for years. After the snapback mechanism was triggered in August 2025 by the E3, all previous UN sanctions snapped back into full force as of late September 2025. This means the precondition explicitly mentioned in Article 42, that measures under Article 41 have proved inadequate or are insufficient , has already been met in Iran's case. This is exactly why a Chapter VII resolution invoking Article 42 is now appropriate and urgently needed: to authorize the international community to take all necessary measures, including decisive ones, to protect civilians and stop the regime's ongoing massacre of its own people, just like it was used in Libya (Resolution 1973) to halt Gaddafi's atrocities when sanctions alone weren't enough. I'm optimistic it can pass. Trump has already warned China that if they keep supporting the regime they will face 25 percent tariffs and China doesn't want a clash with the US right now. Russia also has very little leverage left because of the war in Ukraine.But don't rely only on the US and Israel , they are legally limited in what they can do unilaterally. The regime and its allies fiercely attack any US or Israeli involvement, claiming it's only for their own interests like oil, not for genuine humanitarian reasons to help the Iranian people. We already know how corrupt and self-serving these countries are. Even if this resolution doesn't pass, it must be proven that it was blocked, so the world sees clearly that the UN failed, forcing Trump and Israel to take necessary action themselves to stop the killings. If your country votes no or abstains it's a disgrace! If this resolution fails the UN will prove it's deeply corrupted and completely useless exactly when it's supposed to protect people from mass atrocities. It will be time to call for the dissolution of the United Nations. Please share this video, mention your politicians and make noise. We only have very limited time until voting started! Don’t let this become another Rwanda. p.s: I 'll put the live link in the comments. #IranRevolution2026 #IranProtests #IranianRevolution2026 #IranMassacare

Ida Turan 🇮🇷 ایده توران

22,237 views • 8 months ago

Opposing “Both Sides” In This War Is Crazy Imperialist Nonsense, And Other Notes People tell me, “It’s possible to oppose this war AND oppose the Iranian regime. You can denounce BOTH.” Sure you can. But you shouldn’t. You should not do this. You should not be a pro bono Pentagon propagandist in the middle of a US war of immense consequence. You should not do the hasbarists’ job for them. Make them do their own job themselves. This war already has a huge number of propagandists screaming “REGIME BAD” at the top of their lungs in order to ensure that the slaughter continues. You don’t need to add your voice to the chorus, and you shouldn’t. You should not help them manufacture consent for more human butchery. You should be using your voice solely and exclusively to end the butchery your government and its allies are inflicting on human beings. All your “REGIME BAD” sloganeering accomplished was paving the way to the carnage you see before you today. Your self-righteous denunciations of the Iranian government failed to expand the rights of a single Iranian woman or LGBTQ individual. All you accomplished was helping to grease the wheels for a war of unfathomable horror, ensuring that all Iranians now live under more fear and misery than ever before. If you live under the western empire, you have an ethical obligation to use your voice responsibly in that context. You don’t get to just irresponsibly feed into an active war propaganda campaign by regurgitating the same regime change narratives about an empire-targeted country as the US and Israeli governments, and then pretend this doesn’t make you culpable for the consequences of your actions. If your words help grease the wheels of the war machine, then you bear partial moral responsibility for what the war machine does with your assistance. You don’t get to just pretend that responsibility doesn’t exist. The families who are being torn apart with the help of your pro bono war propaganda efforts do not care about your anarchist or Trotskyist “all tyranny is equally bad” political philosophy or how good your virtuous purity posturing makes you feel about yourself. All they experience is the consequences of your actions. As a westerner, your one and only duty is to oppose the depravity of the western empire. That’s your only job. Don’t lean out the window of the Empire of Perpetual Bloodlust to wag your finger at empire-targeted countries in the global south. It’s obnoxious. Curb the murderousness of your own government and its allies. THAT’S your job. If you get your job done, THEN come talk to me about how bad and wrong some random government in west Asia looks to you. Until then, shut the fuck up and do your job. ❖ Everyone’s always telling me to mind my own business and write about Australia instead of the war in Iran. Meanwhile Australia has added to its already extensive involvement in this war by sending war machinery to help defend against Iranian missile strikes in the United Arab Emirates. So Australia isn’t just joining another American war, we’re also defending the fucking UAE — one of the most evil countries on earth. All that carnage you’ve been seeing in Sudan? That was backed by the UAE. Those emaciated kids you were seeing in Yemen a few years ago? Starved by the UAE in collaboration with Saudi Arabia, with the backing of the US and its allies. It was bad enough when we were selling these freaks mountains of weapons, now we’re actively defending them from the consequences of their ally’s unprovoked attack on Iran. Our alliance with Washington poisons the soul of this entire continent. ❖ The 2015 Iran nuclear deal was working fine; anyone who says otherwise is a lying warmonger. Trump and his handlers torched the JCPOA in 2018 because it was the primary obstacle preventing them from getting to the war that is currently happening. ❖ Iran is reportedly preparing to lay mines in the Strait of Hormuz to block shipping, which will surprise nobody who knows anything about why the US empire held off on waging this war in the first place. Sean McCarthy writes on Twitter, “For literally 45 years US planners have discussed this exact scenario and always decided against war with Iran for this reason. It took an incredible combination of blackmail, graft, lobby money and end time prophecy lunatics for Israel to make the US commit imperial suicide.” This is what’s so crazy about all this: every reason it was a bad idea to go to war with Iran in the past is still a very valid reason why it’s a bad idea to go to war with Iran. It didn’t surprise anyone when Iran closed the Strait of Hormuz; they always knew that would happen if this war started. It didn’t surprise anyone when Iran started destroying US military assets in surrounding Arab states; they always knew that would happen if this war started. It didn’t surprise anyone that Iran would dig in and rely on its powerful military and invasion-proof terrain to repel a US-Israeli offensive; they always knew that would happen if this war started. None of this is catching anyone who knew anything off-guard. It’s playing out exactly how leaders, military officials and analysts on both sides have always said it would. Nothing changed about the reasons not to attack Iran. All that’s changed is Washington’s willingness to try putting a very bad idea into practice.

Caitlin Johnstone

27,121 views • 6 months ago