Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

حظ العبد من اسم الله "الحق": ألا يقول العبد إلا حقًّا، وألا يفعل إلا حقًّا، وألا يرى غير الله حقًّا، فكل المخلوقات وجودها مسبوق بعدم ومُنتهٍ بفناء. برنامج #الإمام_الطيب - الحلقة 27 #رمضان 1445 هـ / 2024 م __ A person's share in Allah's Name, _Al-Haqq, is that they...

39,481 просмотров • 2 лет назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 9

Фото профиля Specter 🇵🇸🇪🇬
Specter 🇵🇸🇪🇬2 лет назад

اسأل الله الحق أن يعاملك بعدله لابرحمته

Фото профиля محمد عبدالرؤف
محمد عبدالرؤف2 лет назад

و نعم بالله يا شيخنا الجليل

Фото профиля شاعر السلام
شاعر السلام2 лет назад

اللهم صلي على نبينا محمد اللهم احسن دُعائنا في #ليلة_القدر اللهم امين

Фото профиля Rizk Saad
Rizk Saad2 лет назад

بارك الله فيك ومتعك بالصحه وختم حياتك بجنه الخلد

Фото профиля Daniel Smyth
Daniel Smyth2 лет назад

We have a birth and an end. We should always say the truth, for we have no reason to lie but such happens and it is not the way it should be. because when we lie, we are deceiving our selves. This is why we should have a 'council of beliefs' inclusive of all beliefs, assigned to the United Nations so the truths of all beliefs can be shown and the liers that use our beliefs as tools to do harm, can no longer use any belief to do harm.

Фото профиля يارا مو شقلتك
يارا مو شقلتك2 лет назад

@tarekjaber3 ما هي العدالة الاجتماعية المفقودة في السعودية؟ @tarekjaber3

Фото профиля Ayman ElToukhy
Ayman ElToukhy2 лет назад

هل يمكن اداء صلاه الحاجه بعد صلاه العيد للدعاء لاهل غزه.

Фото профиля د.هيا
د.هيا2 лет назад

ايش قصدك!!!

Фото профиля Ahmed
Ahmed2 лет назад

@AlAzhar ألستم مسؤولون عن الأمه بأكملها؟! ليه وسائل الدعوى و التوعية شبه ميته أو لاتناسب العصر؟ فين إستغلال التكنولوجيا و الإنترنت و السينما للدعوه و تصحيح المفاهيم داخليا و خارجيا و توحيد الصفوف؟ فين الرقابة و الهجوم المضاد للأفلام و المسلسلات و الأغاني؟ فشلتوا في حرب الوعي

Похожие видео

اسم الله "الحق" ورد في القرآن الكريم والسنة النبوية وأجمعت عليه الأمة، ويختلف معناه باختلاف ما يُطلق عليه، فإذا أُطلِقَ "الحق" صفة لله تعالى فإنَّه يعني «الموجود» أزلًا وأبدًا، الذي لا يسبقه عدمٌ، ولا يلحقه عدمٌ، وإذا أُطلق على الذَّات العليَّة فمعناه: أنَّ الحقَّ هو الله تعالى، وقد وَرَدَ بهذا المعنى في قوله تعالى: ﴿وَلَوِ اتَّبَعَ الحَقُّ أَهْوَاءَهُمْ لَفَسَدَتِ السَّمَاوَاتُ وَالْأَرْضُ وَمَن فِيهِنَّ﴾ [المؤمنون: ٧١]. برنامج #الإمام_الطيب - الحلقة 26 #رمضان 1445 هـ / 2024 م __ Allah's Name, Al-Haqq, is mentioned in the Quran and the Sunnah and is unanimously agreed upon by the Ummah. It differs in meaning according to the designated. If it is used as a Divine Attribute, it means the Eternally Existent Being, with no beginning or end. However, if it is used to refer to the Sublime Self, it means that Almighty Allah is the Truth. In this sense, the term is used in the verse that reads, "Had the Truth followed their desires, the heavens, the earth, and all those in them would have certainly been corrupted." (Quran 23: 71) The Imam Al-Tayeb Program - Episode 26 Ramadan 1445 AH / 2024 AD

أحمد الطيب

53,329 просмотров • 2 лет назад

I’ve seen a lot of people accuse Saudi Arabia of fabricating the moon sighting. Below is proof that it wasn’t. The first video is the exact moment the moon was sighted. The second video is the official testifying before a judge about the set up and what he saw exactly. He says "At 6:11pm (precisely) we saw an opening in the sky, and we all saw the moon and around the opening was all clouds" There is also a picture but it is against the Sunnah to share proof when a testimony is given by a Muslim so I refuse to share it in case we set a precedent to always share a picture and that would be a big error. A testimony of a Muslim is enough as we see from the Hadith of the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم It was narrated that Ibn 'Abbaas رضي الله عنه said: A Bedouin came to the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم and said, I have seen the new moon tonight. He said, "Do you bear witness that there is no god except Allah and that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah?" He said, Yes. He said, "Get up, O Bilaal, and announce to the people that they should fast tomorrow." [at Tirmidhi: 691 Abu Dawood: [2340], an Nasaa'i: [2112] Ibn Maajah: [1652]. Shaykh al Albaani رحمه الله said: So we see from the Hadith that he, صلى الله عليه وسلم، instructed Bilaal to announce to the people that they would fast the next day. So the Messenger صلى الله عليه وسلم was content with the testimony of this man, whom he did not know, on the basis that he bore witness that there is no God but Allah and that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah, i.e. he knew that he was a Muslim, but he did not check on him any further and he did not try to find out how intelligent and smart he was, as was the case in the first Hadith in which the witness was 'Abd Allah ibn 'Umar ibn al Khattab رضي الله عنه. Yet despite that he accepted his testimony. This Hadith makes things easier for people, and what this means is that the judge should be content with the witness as he appears to be, without needing to find people who know this man and can testify that he is of good character, as was the habit of judges since time immemorial. Rather it is sufficient to know that he is a Muslim. This man was a Bedouin of whom the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم had no prior knowledge and he was content that he uttered the Shahaadatayn before him. So he was a Muslim with the same rights and duties as any other, and based on his testimony and the fact that he was a Muslim he said: O Bilaal, announced to the people that they should fast tomorrow. [At Ta laaq 'ala Kitaab Bulugh al Maraam, (audio tape), Hadith 5, Kitaab al Siyaam] This Hadith is evidence for the principle that a Muslim is to be regarded as being of good character unless proven otherwise. Al San'aani رحمه الله said concerning what we learn from the hadeeth of Ibn 'Abbaas رضي الله عنه: It indicates that the basic principle with regard to the Muslims is that they are of good character, because the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم did not ask the Bedouin for anything except the Shahaadah. [Subul as Salaam by as San'aani: 2/153] And Allah knows best.

ابن البخاري

245,087 просмотров • 1 год назад

“Jews are our enemies not because they occupied Palestine. They would have been enemies even if they did not occupy a thing.” Egyptian cleric Muhammad Hussein Ya’qoub on Al-Rahma TV: “If the Jews left Palestine to us, would we start loving them? Of course not. We will never love them. Absolutely not. The Jews are infidels – not because I say so, and not because they are killing Muslims, but because Allah said: “The Jews say that Uzair is the son of Allah, and the Christians say that Christ is the son of Allah. These are the words from their mouths. They imitate the sayings of the disbelievers before. May Allah fight them. How deluded they are.” It is Allah who said that they are infidels. Your belief regarding the Jews should be, first, that they are infidels, and second, that they are enemies. They are enemies not because they occupied Palestine. They would have been enemies even if they did not occupy a thing. Allah said: “You shall find the strongest men in enmity to the disbelievers [sic] to be the Jews and the polytheists.” Third, you must believe that the Jews will never stop fighting and killing us. They [fight] not for the sake of land and security, as they claim, but for the sake of their religion: “And they will not cease fighting you until they turn you back you’re your religion, if they can.” This is it. We must believe that our fighting with the Jews is eternal, and it will not end until the final battle – and this is the fourth point. You must believe that we will fight, defeat, and annihilate them, until not a single Jew remains on the face of the Earth. It is not me who says so. The Prophet said: “Judgment Day will not come until you fight the Jews and kill them. The Jews will hide behind stones and trees, and the stones and tree will call: Oh Muslim, oh servant of Allah, there is a Jew behind me, come and kill him – except for the Gharqad tree, which is the tree of the Jews.” I have heard that they are planting many of these trees now. As for you Jews – the curse of Allah upon you. The curse of Allah upon you, whose ancestors were apes and pigs. You Jews have sown hatred in our hearts, and we have bequeathed it to our children and grandchildren. You will not survive as long as a single one of us remains. Oh Jews, may the curse of Allah be upon you. Oh Jews... Oh Allah, bring Your wrath, punishment, and torment down upon them. Allah, we pray that you transform them again, and make the Muslims rejoice again in seeing them as apes and pigs. You pigs of the earth! You pigs of the earth! You kill the Muslims with that cold pig [blood] of yours.”

Drew Pavlou 🇦🇺🇺🇸🇺🇦🇹🇼

207,580 просмотров • 1 год назад

EXPOSED: Leslie Manookian just revealed how Big Pharma “literally engineered” fake polls to convince senior Trump officials that MAHA is unpopular. So we just did our own, real poll. And the results were “staggering.” “91% of respondents said that they believe in the right to informed consent.” “[88% agree that] Americans have the right to refuse medical treatment for themselves.” “87% support the right to make one’s own medical choices and believe that it's a basic human right that should be protected by law.” That’s the truth. But Big Pharma is creating rigged polls to convince those “This company, Fabrizio, is basically the pollsters for the current presidential administration.” “They put out a poll in December that basically made it sound like [RFK Jr.]’s health policies are incredibly unpopular.” “Then in January, they put out another poll.” “And this poll … had even harsher results.” This poll was designed to create a false sense that “any kind of research” from HHS that breaks with mainstream medicine was “unpopular with the electorate and was going to lead to them potentially losing the midterms.” “This is what they were saying: it’s unpopular with voters, stop talking about vaccines.” “The polls … say things like, do you support proven safe and effective vaccinations?” “Not: do you believe in forced medicine?” “But: do you believe in the necessity of proven safe vaccinations?” “Do you believe other people should be able to risk public health by pursuing their own path?” “All these questions are so loaded.” “These polls were literally engineered in order to elicit the responses that they want so they could then say: this is unpopular, shut Bobby down.” “So my strategist said, why don’t we do our own poll?” “Within one week, we had created a 50 question poll [with Zogby], and it went out to 1,000 … very likely voters.” “The pollsters told us that they never see supermajorities in any kind of poll, let alone something that is supposedly so controversial.” Leslie Manookian Weston A. Price Foundation Brownstone Institute

Health Freedom Defense Fund

27,367 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Wow. Tucker just said that insiders insinuated to him that in many cases the "aliens" are more than likely Nephilim alluded to in Genesis 6 and every ancient religion. Genesis 6 refers to a spiritual union between angels and humankind that created giants. Every ancient religion has referred to these creatures, including Native American culture and the oldest Mesopotamian civilization. He says that the US government clearly possesses technology that is not publicly known about. He thinks that the government has been attempting to convince the populace that the supernatural is not real for the last eighty years because they are likely in bed with dark spiritual forces. What timing! I'm literally writing a thread on this topic right now and have been studying this in-depth! "All creation myths and one of them is that the belief that supernatural beings take physical form. They all believe that. The Greek Myths, Jesus. They aren't just shadows floating around. They are physical. They reproduce with people. Christianity, Jesus. That's what the story is. It's described in Genesis as well, in Genesis 6. It's not just the religion of the ancient Hebrews or the religion of the modern Christians. It's Hinduism as well...The American Indians. All the same. If every culture in the world is reaching the same conclusions about something. Maybe there is something there. Maybe it's not so crazy to think that what everyone else has always thought since the beginning of time which that there is this combination of human beings and the spiritual realm. I don't understand the specifics of it but I know that it has been written about since people have been writing... I think that's what we are looking at. It sounds out of the realm. It's not a crazy thing to think. I can't prove it.. What was it that led you to believe that? Talking to a lot of people.. I was really shocked by what credible people told me. I became completely satisfied that they were not lying... The belief that the real struggles are in the spiritual realm. That has been a constant belief since the beginning of history. Everyone has thought that except us in the West since 1945. I can't say that enough. Once you get perspective on this question. You are like, ok that may sound crazy to someone who thinks buying sh** on Amazon is the meaning of life...The fact that there is a lot of shit going on that we cannot see or measure with our senses. That is absolutely true.. The main thing they want you to believe is that the supernatural is not real. Then you have to ask yourself why? Why is that important to you? Why do you care if I think the supernatural is real? How dare you as my government try to get involved in my spiritual beliefs. Why has that been so important for 80 years? To convince me the supernatural is not real? My gut response is because it is real... They lie for a living. Reverse engineer their lies. Whatever they are telling is not true is the truth. What is the motive? The obvious answer is they are working for supernatural forces. I think that's probably true. I can't prove that. I'm suggestion that. I believe it. I believe that because I was told directly by people... The other reason I think that... When I hear lying..What's so important to them to get all these journalists to repeat these lies? Why? Why are they doing that? Why bother? Stories debunking claims about UAP's and UFO's. They are conspiracy theorists. Why would you attack someone for that?" What timing! I'm literally writing a thread on this topic right now and have been studying this in-depth! Tucker Carlson Shawn Ryan

Green Lives Matter

3,845,518 просмотров • 2 лет назад

I shared a video from Nick Freitas yesterday about how to encourage and reach young men. You should check it out if you didn’t see it. Now, here is a clip that shows how to repel and discourage young men. This is so frustrating, Sean DeMars and Neil Shenvi. Leaving aside the whole “woke right” thing, whatever. You acknowledge that the Left has total cultural control. Then you mock the idea that white men are systemically discriminated against in our culture, or that we live in an effeminate gynocracy. What do you think the Left does with its total cultural control? You mock young men by claiming that their discrimination has no basis in reality, but has to be understood via some “gnostic” higher knowledge. This is not fair. We are starting to get more and more hard data on this issue. I will admit that there is an element of “look around, this should be obvious.” It should be, and you’re really sticking your head in the sand to deny these things. But being on the Right is to believe in God’s created reality. It’s not about “lived experience,” it’s about what is actually true. White men are being discriminated against in this culture, and the West has been feminized radically in the last 60 years. The biggest problem with the woke was always that they were wrong, beyond even their philosophical system. It wasn’t merely that they were claiming to be oppressed, but it was that this claim was wrong. "This argument sounds like that argument" is just so lazy when one was factually wrong, and one is factually right. The claims of the Right are correct in general. But at the end of the day, good luck crapping on young men like this. We'll see how that works out for you. I won’t be joining you.

Nate Schlomann

47,845 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Victor Davis Hanson: Elon Musk is a Renaissance man, a Da Vinci of our age—and Democrats hate that. “Elon Musk represents everything [Democrats] are not. He's a Renaissance man of the 21st century. He reinvented social media. He's saving NASA from itself. He created the whole EV industry, basically single-handedly. Let's not even get into the AI, the tunnels and all the other things he does. So, he's a Renaissance man. He's a Da Vinci of our age, and they hate that. This election is starting to come down to the people who lecture us and say, you can't do things, can't do this, can't do that, got to think this way, must be this way, to the people who are getting tired of being lectured. They say we can do stuff, and we're going to do stuff. And one side says, you should be ashamed of who you are. Your Constitution was flawed, it got worse, now it's even the worst of all, you should be guilty of who you are. And the other side says, you know, I'm tired of that. Our civilization has nothing to apologize for. We're better than any other alternative, and we don't have to be perfect to be good. So, I think people were getting to an inflection point, like you pointed out, and you can feel it. You can feel it in the country that people are getting tired of this. And the people, the real people who want to do things and are optimistic and think things are going to get better are going to not vote for them, they don't want to. They don't want their message anymore, their habit. The jig's up. I really believe that.” Victor Davis Hanson with Laura Ingraham on Fox News, October 16, 2024

ELON CLIPS

1,622,329 просмотров • 1 год назад

Opposing the Iranian Theocracy is not 'Islamophobic' (sic) "But Trump will not invade Iran. It's as simple as that. So far as Trump won't invade Iran, it's perfectly legitimate for Farage to be critical of the Iranian theocracy and say he believes it needs to end. Of course, who doesn't believe that theocracies need to come to an end in 2026? If you didn't believe that theocracies need to be abolished in 2026, there's something wrong with you. There's something wrong with the way you process life. And that means we've got a problem with you too. So, of course, it's fine to say openly that the Iranian regime needs to end. Absolutely it is, because it does need to end. They are, as we said, I will say it again, a bunch of child abusing, God using theocrats who are living in the medieval times, and think that they have authority and integrity to speak and command the Persian people because they are abusing the religion of Islam in what they invented. It's man-made. It's called Shiite Islamism as opposed to Sunni Islamism or Al-Qaeda. The difference is Al-Qaeda never came to power. These Muppets got into power in Iran. Shiite Islamism was invented by Khomeini. They even called it something in Persian. They called it Vilayat al-Faqih. The 'Guardianship of the Jurists'. It was a new theory that Khomeini invented to justify coming to power in 1979 when he did. Because importantly, before he invented the theory of Vilayat al-Faqih, or the 'Guardianship of the Jurists', there was no such thing as Shia Islamism and the Shiite community, which is a minority 20% of the world's Muslims, believed that nobody had the authority to rule on God's behalf until the Messiah, the awaited return of the Messiah, Jesus Christ, who will rule in God's name. Until the return of the Messiah, nobody has the right to claim to rule in God's name. That is orthodox traditional Shia belief. If you go to Iraq and meet Sistani, the Ayatollah in Iraq, that's what he believes. It's why he's not political. Because all Orthodox Shia Muslims believed that nobody could claim to rule in God's name, that they were religiously mandated to secular rule until the return of the Messiah. It's precisely that traditional Orthodox Shia belief that Khomeini intervened in and innovated in by creating Shiite Islamism in the form of the Vilayat al-Faqih or the 'Guardianship of the Jurists' doctrine. Vilayat al-Faqih or the 'Gardianship of the Jurists' is a doctrine Khomeini invented to justify, as it says, the name is on the tin, the jurists, the clerics, the mullahs, guarding the rule until the Mehdi comes. which is why they were then theoretically able to justify getting into the position of power as they did in the Iranian revolution. Therefore, with that context provided to you, you'll understand it is absolutely not Islamophobic to be opposed to the Iranian theocracy. And anybody that supports a theocracy, as we said earlier, should be very clear. It should be very clear that they have got issues in 2026. Moving on, that's that one out of the way." Maajid Nawaz WARRIOR CREED livestream.

أبو عمّار

40,832 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Lecture in Kabul about Shia vs Sunni (rough translation); This is a hot topic today, let us pray that Allah (swt) removes this enmity and animosity between us. The Muslim Ummah has been destroyed by this jealousy, grudge and enmity. It has destroyed our unity. It is the English who have turned us against each other, they have spread suspicion between sects and schools of thoughts. Let us remember that this war which America and Israel is waging is not against Shias, it is a war against Islam. America and Israel are thinking about destroying Islam. They are not thinking about “this is Shia and this is Sunni”. They did this in Iraq, pelting Shias and Sunnis against each other. They did the same in Syria. They were here in Afghanistan for 20 years, where was the talk about Shia? Were they talking and fighting Shias? No. The sole purpose of America and Israel is to make Muslims weak. Because for 1,200 years in this world, it was Muslims running empires. Muslims were powerful rulers under the banner of Islam. So America and Israel don’t want Muslims to stand on their feet again and become rulers of the world. If someone raises his head as a Muslim, they take care of them right there and then. There must be few thousand people in this majlis, forgive my language, they either take out the head, or take out the bottom (castrate then). They have castrated many countries, they have castrated the Arab countries, including Pakistan. I hope no one says that is a Muslim country with an atom bomb, no, Pakistan is castrated. The atom bomb is not under its own control, it is under the control of the English and Americans. They say we will either chop the head of a Muslim, or chop the bottom of a Muslim. One of them must be chopped. And this is what they have done. Have they done this or not? Tell the truth. All Arab countries have turned themselves like animals with four legs and have handed over the leash to America. Have they done this or not? Its leash is in the hand of America. They can’t even raise their voice a little, to show that they are independent, and to show that their heads are on top of their own neck, they cannot say anything. Does slavery have a tail and horn? Is this true or not, tell the truth? Allah (swt) says; “And prepare against them whatever you are able of power” In that era, it was swords, horses, armors, helmets, this was in the era of the prophet (pbuh). Now, those things will not work. Today, even a gun is not sufficient, now it is missiles, drones, atom bombs, press a switch and it goes to its destination. This is an order from Allah that Muslims should prepare against the enemy, and deter the enemy. Don’t start problems between each other over sects, otherwise you will be finished. Allah has said to us in the Quran; “and do not dispute and [thus] lose courage and [then] your strength would depart” You will be destroyed, your strength will be gone. This strength will be wasted and lost against each other. Is this true or not? These bullets, these weapons and martyrs from this side, and in that side, Pakistan fights Afghanistan under the command of America, right? They are Muslim, at least they are Muslim by name, it is a Muslim country, so wouldn’t it have been better if this strength, if those bullets and weapons were used against Israel and the enemies of Muslims? But our strength is being used against each other. How unfortunate is this? Whose plots are these? The plots of the English. They say muddy the water, and catch the fish…

The Sure Path

41,599 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад