Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

كلمتي في الحفل الذي أقمتُه باسم السلك الدبلوماسي المعتمد لدى المملكة العربية السعودية بمناسبة اليوبيل الذهبي لصحيفة عرب نيوز، بحضور صاحب السمو الملكي الأمير تركي الفيصل متحدثاً رئيسياً، وبمشاركة السفراء، وعدد من نخبة الإعلاميين والمهتمين بالشأن الثقافي والإعلامي السعودي. كان احتفالاً مميزاً جمع بين الدبلوماسية والإعلام، وأبرز الدور الريادي...

dya_bamakhrama's profile picture

#ضياءالدين_بامخرمة

51,524 subscribers

210,657 просмотров • 1 год назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политика
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

In my capacity as Dean of the Diplomatic Corps accredited to the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, I hosted a farewell reception in honor of the Ambassadors of Portugal and Thailand upon the conclusion of their missions in Riyadh, and on the same occasion welcomed the newly appointed Ambassadors of Panama, The Gambia, Comoros, Australia, Lebanon, and Mauritius, wishing them every success in their diplomatic duties. بصفتي عميد السلك الدبلوماسي المعتمد لدى المملكة العربية السعودية، أقمتُ حفل توديع لسفيري البرتغال وتايلاند بمناسبة انتهاء مهمتيهما في الرياض، كما رحّبتُ بالسفراء الجدد المعينين في الرياض، من بنما وجامبيا وجزر القمر وأستراليا ولبنان وموريشيوس.
3:54

In my capacity as Dean of the Diplomatic Corps accredited to the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, I hosted a farewell reception in honor of the Ambassadors of Portugal and Thailand upon the conclusion of their missions in Riyadh, and on the same occasion welcomed the newly appointed Ambassadors of Panama, The Gambia, Comoros, Australia, Lebanon, and Mauritius, wishing them every success in their diplomatic duties. بصفتي عميد السلك الدبلوماسي المعتمد لدى المملكة العربية السعودية، أقمتُ حفل توديع لسفيري البرتغال وتايلاند بمناسبة انتهاء مهمتيهما في الرياض، كما رحّبتُ بالسفراء الجدد المعينين في الرياض، من بنما وجامبيا وجزر القمر وأستراليا ولبنان وموريشيوس.

#ضياءالدين_بامخرمة

156,573 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

نظّمت مدارس المملكة «لقاء شركاء مدارس المملكة» في محطة مفصلية ضمن مسيرتها التطويرية، احتفاءً بشراكاتٍ راسخة أسهمت في دعم البيئة التعليمية وتعزيز منظومتها المؤسسية. وأُقيم اللقاء في مساحة متجددة داخل الحرم المدرسي، في تجسيدٍ يجمع بين الهوية الثقافية السعودية والبيئة التعليمية المعاصرة، وتزامن ذلك مع تدشين الهوية المؤسسية المستحدثة التي تعكس رؤية المدارس المستقبلية ونهجها التعليمي المتجدد. وقد تشرف اللقاء بحضور صاحبة السمو الملكي الأميرة ريم بنت الوليد بن طلال آل سعود، رئيسة مجلس الادارة، وبمشاركة عدد من الشركاء من الجهات الوطنية والتعليمية، تأكيدًا على إيمان مدارس المملكة بقوة الشراكة ودورها في بناء مستقبل تعليمي مستدام. Kingdom Schools organized the “Kingdom Schools Partners Gathering” at a pivotal milestone in its ongoing development journey, celebrating longstanding partnerships that have contributed to strengthening the learning environment and advancing the school’s institutional framework. The gathering was held in a newly revitalized space within the school campus, an environment that reflects the harmony between Saudi cultural identity and contemporary educational design. The occasion also coincided with the launch of Kingdom Schools’ refreshed institutional identity, embodying the school’s forward looking vision and renewed educational approach. The event was honored by the presence of Her Royal Highness Princess Reem bint Alwaleed bin Talal, Chairwoman of Kingdom Schools, along with representatives from national and educational partner organizations, reaffirming Kingdom Schools’ belief in the power of partnership as a cornerstone in building a sustainable educational future.
1:00

نظّمت مدارس المملكة «لقاء شركاء مدارس المملكة» في محطة مفصلية ضمن مسيرتها التطويرية، احتفاءً بشراكاتٍ راسخة أسهمت في دعم البيئة التعليمية وتعزيز منظومتها المؤسسية. وأُقيم اللقاء في مساحة متجددة داخل الحرم المدرسي، في تجسيدٍ يجمع بين الهوية الثقافية السعودية والبيئة التعليمية المعاصرة، وتزامن ذلك مع تدشين الهوية المؤسسية المستحدثة التي تعكس رؤية المدارس المستقبلية ونهجها التعليمي المتجدد. وقد تشرف اللقاء بحضور صاحبة السمو الملكي الأميرة ريم بنت الوليد بن طلال آل سعود، رئيسة مجلس الادارة، وبمشاركة عدد من الشركاء من الجهات الوطنية والتعليمية، تأكيدًا على إيمان مدارس المملكة بقوة الشراكة ودورها في بناء مستقبل تعليمي مستدام. Kingdom Schools organized the “Kingdom Schools Partners Gathering” at a pivotal milestone in its ongoing development journey, celebrating longstanding partnerships that have contributed to strengthening the learning environment and advancing the school’s institutional framework. The gathering was held in a newly revitalized space within the school campus, an environment that reflects the harmony between Saudi cultural identity and contemporary educational design. The occasion also coincided with the launch of Kingdom Schools’ refreshed institutional identity, embodying the school’s forward looking vision and renewed educational approach. The event was honored by the presence of Her Royal Highness Princess Reem bint Alwaleed bin Talal, Chairwoman of Kingdom Schools, along with representatives from national and educational partner organizations, reaffirming Kingdom Schools’ belief in the power of partnership as a cornerstone in building a sustainable educational future.

مدارس المملكة

37,302 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Saudi Arabia Announces USD 3 Billion Additional Support, Extends USD 5 Billion Deposit: Finance Minister Federal Minister for Finance and Revenue, Senator Muhammad Aurangzeb, has informed that the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia has committed USD 3 billion in additional deposits, with disbursement expected in the coming week. He further stated that the existing USD 5 billion Saudi deposit would no longer remain subject to the earlier annual rollover arrangement and would instead be extended for a longer period. The Finance Minister made the annoucement while talking to members of the media in Washington, D.C., on the sidelines of the World Bank–IMF Spring Meetings 2026, and shared important details regarding Saudi financial support for Pakistan and the government’s external financing strategy. Senator Aurangzeb said this support comes at a critical time for Pakistan’s external financing needs and would help reinforce foreign exchange reserves and strengthen the country’s external account. He reiterated the government’s commitment to maintaining reserves in line with its obligations to markets and under the IMF-supported programme, including the objective of achieving around USD 18 billion in reserves, equivalent to approximately 3.3 months of import cover, by the end of the fiscal year. The Finance Minister noted that Pakistan had successfully repaid its USD 1.4 billion Eurobond last week, describing it as a “non-event,” and reaffirmed that the government remained fully committed to meeting all upcoming external obligations and maturities on time. He emphasized that Pakistan’s external financing plan is clearly defined and being implemented in a responsible and disciplined manner. Referring to his engagements in Washington, Senator Aurangzeb said that he, along with the Governor, State Bank of Pakistan and Pakistan’s Ambassador to the United States, had held a detailed meeting with Saudi Finance Minister H.E. Mohammed bin Abdullah Al-Jadaan. He recalled that he had also met the Saudi Finance Minister in Islamabad the previous Friday, but noted that the government had deliberately refrained from commenting publicly in the absence of formal communication, despite media reports and speculation, as such matters required clarity and joint understanding before being shared. The Finance Minister expressed profound gratitude to the leadership of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, particularly His Royal Highness Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, Saudi Finance Minister H.E. Mohammed bin Abdullah Al-Jadaan, and the Saudi Vice Finance Minister, for their continued support and close cooperation. He particularly appreciated the efforts made to bring the support package to fruition. Senator Aurangzeb also acknowledged the role of Pakistan’s political and economic leadership in securing and operationalizing the support. He thanked the Prime Minister of Pakistan, the Field Marshal, the Deputy Prime Minister, the Governor, State Bank of Pakistan, the Finance Secretary Mr. Imdad Ullah Bosal, and their respective teams for their contributions and coordination. The Finance Minister stated that, at this juncture, sentiment and confidence were critically important. He said Pakistan was receiving unprecedented appreciation from international financial institutions, the IMF, the World Bank, institutional investors, and counterparts he was meeting in Washington. He noted that the international community was particularly recognizing Pakistan’s recent diplomatic and facilitative role in helping enable dialogue between parties that had not held face-to-face discussions for decades. He said this international appreciation, coupled with Saudi Arabia’s timely financial support, provided Pakistan with important momentum and confidence going forward, both for the economy and for the external account, including its commercial dimensions. Senator Aurangzeb further noted that Pakistan was advancing its broader external financing agenda, including the recently announced Global Medium-Term Note (GMTN) programme and the planned inaugural Panda Bond issuance, as part of efforts to diversify funding sources and strengthen market access. The Finance Minister concluded by reaffirming the government’s commitment to macroeconomic stability, fulfillment of external obligations, reform continuity, and sustained engagement with bilateral and multilateral partners. He said a more detailed interaction with the media would take place at the conclusion of the visit.
8:41

Saudi Arabia Announces USD 3 Billion Additional Support, Extends USD 5 Billion Deposit: Finance Minister Federal Minister for Finance and Revenue, Senator Muhammad Aurangzeb, has informed that the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia has committed USD 3 billion in additional deposits, with disbursement expected in the coming week. He further stated that the existing USD 5 billion Saudi deposit would no longer remain subject to the earlier annual rollover arrangement and would instead be extended for a longer period. The Finance Minister made the annoucement while talking to members of the media in Washington, D.C., on the sidelines of the World Bank–IMF Spring Meetings 2026, and shared important details regarding Saudi financial support for Pakistan and the government’s external financing strategy. Senator Aurangzeb said this support comes at a critical time for Pakistan’s external financing needs and would help reinforce foreign exchange reserves and strengthen the country’s external account. He reiterated the government’s commitment to maintaining reserves in line with its obligations to markets and under the IMF-supported programme, including the objective of achieving around USD 18 billion in reserves, equivalent to approximately 3.3 months of import cover, by the end of the fiscal year. The Finance Minister noted that Pakistan had successfully repaid its USD 1.4 billion Eurobond last week, describing it as a “non-event,” and reaffirmed that the government remained fully committed to meeting all upcoming external obligations and maturities on time. He emphasized that Pakistan’s external financing plan is clearly defined and being implemented in a responsible and disciplined manner. Referring to his engagements in Washington, Senator Aurangzeb said that he, along with the Governor, State Bank of Pakistan and Pakistan’s Ambassador to the United States, had held a detailed meeting with Saudi Finance Minister H.E. Mohammed bin Abdullah Al-Jadaan. He recalled that he had also met the Saudi Finance Minister in Islamabad the previous Friday, but noted that the government had deliberately refrained from commenting publicly in the absence of formal communication, despite media reports and speculation, as such matters required clarity and joint understanding before being shared. The Finance Minister expressed profound gratitude to the leadership of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, particularly His Royal Highness Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, Saudi Finance Minister H.E. Mohammed bin Abdullah Al-Jadaan, and the Saudi Vice Finance Minister, for their continued support and close cooperation. He particularly appreciated the efforts made to bring the support package to fruition. Senator Aurangzeb also acknowledged the role of Pakistan’s political and economic leadership in securing and operationalizing the support. He thanked the Prime Minister of Pakistan, the Field Marshal, the Deputy Prime Minister, the Governor, State Bank of Pakistan, the Finance Secretary Mr. Imdad Ullah Bosal, and their respective teams for their contributions and coordination. The Finance Minister stated that, at this juncture, sentiment and confidence were critically important. He said Pakistan was receiving unprecedented appreciation from international financial institutions, the IMF, the World Bank, institutional investors, and counterparts he was meeting in Washington. He noted that the international community was particularly recognizing Pakistan’s recent diplomatic and facilitative role in helping enable dialogue between parties that had not held face-to-face discussions for decades. He said this international appreciation, coupled with Saudi Arabia’s timely financial support, provided Pakistan with important momentum and confidence going forward, both for the economy and for the external account, including its commercial dimensions. Senator Aurangzeb further noted that Pakistan was advancing its broader external financing agenda, including the recently announced Global Medium-Term Note (GMTN) programme and the planned inaugural Panda Bond issuance, as part of efforts to diversify funding sources and strengthen market access. The Finance Minister concluded by reaffirming the government’s commitment to macroeconomic stability, fulfillment of external obligations, reform continuity, and sustained engagement with bilateral and multilateral partners. He said a more detailed interaction with the media would take place at the conclusion of the visit.

Ministry of Finance, Government of Pakistan

216,167 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

🚨🇸🇦🇹🇷🇵🇰 When Trump Said: "My Office is the Middle East... and Israel is the Pen": The Full Story of the "Malign Alliance of Necessity" That the Mecca Agreement Destroyed Before It Even Began! Every chess game has its backstage. And every backstage has a moment where the masks fall off. What happened in Holy Makkah, and the intense diplomatic activity that preceded it, was no ordinary summit. It was the official announcement of the defeat of the most dangerous project ever plotted against the region. It was the thunderous voice that declared: "Game over." Let's go back. To the true beginning. Before the chaos, before the strikes, before the war. On February 3, 2025, Donald Trump stood holding his pen and uttered the sentence that revealed everything: "Look at this amazing pen. My office is the Middle East, and this pen is Israel. It's a very small piece of land. It's amazing what they've been able to do... but it's a very small piece of land." This was not just a passing comment. It was the key to understanding the whole game. It was an explicit declaration that Israel is not just an ally, but the "tool." The pen with which Washington would write the destiny of the region. The pen that would redraw the maps. The pen that would expand that "small piece of land." Trump said it clearly: the paper is the Middle East, and the pen in his hand is Israel. And so the project began. The "Greater Israel" project. The project to "change the map of the Middle East." Netanyahu, who repeatedly echoed this threat during the phony war on Iran, wasn't speaking in a vacuum. He was executing. He was holding the pen Trump described, ready to write. But Trump wasn't going to grant this expansion for free. The man who seized Venezuela's oil in January 2026 was looking for customers. He had a massive surplus of oil, and his ports were far away. The ships weren't coming to him. So how could he attract them? How could he force the world to buy from him? The answer was: chaos. Creating chaos in Hormuz. Making passage through it suicidal. Closing Bab el-Mandeb by Houthi proxy. Then standing before the world to say: "Come to our safe ports." And just days ago, he declared it explicitly: "America is the number one oil exporter in the world." And here, on this chessboard, the players gathered. A Malign Alliance of Necessity. Not bound by love, but by a single goal: to punish Saudi Arabia and drown it. Iran, with its ideological regime, wants Trump to legitimize its right to manage the Strait of Hormuz. It cares less about the killing of its Supreme Leader than it does about harming the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and the rest of the Gulf states, especially after the liberation of Syria. Likewise, Israel and Abu Dhabi want to punish Saudi Arabia for dismantling the fragmentation project. Israel, the pen Trump described, dreams of a fragmented Yemen and a torn Sudan. And Abu Dhabi, which invested billions in supporting the tools of fragmentation, from the Houthis to the Rapid Support Forces, to bleed Saudi Arabia dry, hoping it might thereby rise. The truth is, it ended up stuck in Netanyahu's quagmire. And so the game began. Trump threatens. Netanyahu roars, "We will change the map." Iran seeks revenge. Iran threatens. The Houthi screams in Bab el-Mandeb. And Abu Dhabi writhes in frustration, declaring at times its phantom participation in the war, and moving covertly at others to fuel chaos in Yemen and Sudan. The American and global media plays its role to perfection: hyping, exaggerating, portraying Trump as if he's about to destroy Iran, while another channel asks leaders to "call Trump to calm him down." All of this to keep the region in chaos. To keep the ships stranded. To paralyze Gulf energy, and to legitimize Iran's right to manage the Strait of Hormuz so it remains closed, then turns into another Panama Canal. We have known this game for a long time. Then came the public voice of the project. The late U.S. Senator Lindsey Graham, who was the official spokesman for this malign alliance. On June 21, he came out to threaten the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and the countries of the region. He said it explicitly: Saudi Arabia must join the normalization agreement, and it must be "bold" in doing so, or else it will face "dire consequences." The threat was no longer hidden. It became public. The dictates were being issued in the open: either submit to our project, or bear the consequences. But Graham died, and his malice lives on in the actions of this alliance, this Malign Alliance of Necessity. Trump, Netanyahu, Graham, Iran, and Abu Dhabi were playing chess. But there were others working in silence. Throughout the months of chaos and before, His Royal Highness Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif were engaged in intense diplomatic activity. Continuous meetings. Deep strategic coordination. They were weaving the quiet strategic response in closed rooms, far from the noise of threats. And in Holy Makkah, from the Sacred House, came the coronation, where the Joint Defense Agreement between Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and Pakistan was signed, flipping the table on all of them (the Malign Alliance of Necessity). This agreement was not just a closed tripartite alliance. The Turkish Foreign Minister hinted that Egypt would join after completing technical procedures. And it was announced that the door is open for the rest of the countries to join. This is not just an agreement. This is the nucleus of a new regional order. An open order. An order not imposed by force, but built through partnership. This was the moment the table was flipped onto the heads of the old players. The moment they were ejected from the field. The moment the birth of the true Middle East was written, before Trump and Netanyahu could begin to write their supposed birth. The game is exposed. Trump wants to sell his oil, and he wanted Israel to be the pen to write its greater map. Netanyahu wants "more space" and wants no stability for Saudi Arabia and Turkey. Iran wants the Strait of Hormuz. And Abu Dhabi wants revenge for its failure. But Makkah turned all the tables. No one can bypass these leaders now. Saudi Arabia, which absorbed the pain; Turkey, standing beside it; and Pakistan, with its nuclear might; are no longer just players. They are the authors of the future. And the pen that Trump thought he held to write Israel's map no longer has a table to write upon. 🦅🇸🇦🇹🇷🇵🇰🔥
0:31

🚨🇸🇦🇹🇷🇵🇰 When Trump Said: "My Office is the Middle East... and Israel is the Pen": The Full Story of the "Malign Alliance of Necessity" That the Mecca Agreement Destroyed Before It Even Began! Every chess game has its backstage. And every backstage has a moment where the masks fall off. What happened in Holy Makkah, and the intense diplomatic activity that preceded it, was no ordinary summit. It was the official announcement of the defeat of the most dangerous project ever plotted against the region. It was the thunderous voice that declared: "Game over." Let's go back. To the true beginning. Before the chaos, before the strikes, before the war. On February 3, 2025, Donald Trump stood holding his pen and uttered the sentence that revealed everything: "Look at this amazing pen. My office is the Middle East, and this pen is Israel. It's a very small piece of land. It's amazing what they've been able to do... but it's a very small piece of land." This was not just a passing comment. It was the key to understanding the whole game. It was an explicit declaration that Israel is not just an ally, but the "tool." The pen with which Washington would write the destiny of the region. The pen that would redraw the maps. The pen that would expand that "small piece of land." Trump said it clearly: the paper is the Middle East, and the pen in his hand is Israel. And so the project began. The "Greater Israel" project. The project to "change the map of the Middle East." Netanyahu, who repeatedly echoed this threat during the phony war on Iran, wasn't speaking in a vacuum. He was executing. He was holding the pen Trump described, ready to write. But Trump wasn't going to grant this expansion for free. The man who seized Venezuela's oil in January 2026 was looking for customers. He had a massive surplus of oil, and his ports were far away. The ships weren't coming to him. So how could he attract them? How could he force the world to buy from him? The answer was: chaos. Creating chaos in Hormuz. Making passage through it suicidal. Closing Bab el-Mandeb by Houthi proxy. Then standing before the world to say: "Come to our safe ports." And just days ago, he declared it explicitly: "America is the number one oil exporter in the world." And here, on this chessboard, the players gathered. A Malign Alliance of Necessity. Not bound by love, but by a single goal: to punish Saudi Arabia and drown it. Iran, with its ideological regime, wants Trump to legitimize its right to manage the Strait of Hormuz. It cares less about the killing of its Supreme Leader than it does about harming the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and the rest of the Gulf states, especially after the liberation of Syria. Likewise, Israel and Abu Dhabi want to punish Saudi Arabia for dismantling the fragmentation project. Israel, the pen Trump described, dreams of a fragmented Yemen and a torn Sudan. And Abu Dhabi, which invested billions in supporting the tools of fragmentation, from the Houthis to the Rapid Support Forces, to bleed Saudi Arabia dry, hoping it might thereby rise. The truth is, it ended up stuck in Netanyahu's quagmire. And so the game began. Trump threatens. Netanyahu roars, "We will change the map." Iran seeks revenge. Iran threatens. The Houthi screams in Bab el-Mandeb. And Abu Dhabi writhes in frustration, declaring at times its phantom participation in the war, and moving covertly at others to fuel chaos in Yemen and Sudan. The American and global media plays its role to perfection: hyping, exaggerating, portraying Trump as if he's about to destroy Iran, while another channel asks leaders to "call Trump to calm him down." All of this to keep the region in chaos. To keep the ships stranded. To paralyze Gulf energy, and to legitimize Iran's right to manage the Strait of Hormuz so it remains closed, then turns into another Panama Canal. We have known this game for a long time. Then came the public voice of the project. The late U.S. Senator Lindsey Graham, who was the official spokesman for this malign alliance. On June 21, he came out to threaten the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and the countries of the region. He said it explicitly: Saudi Arabia must join the normalization agreement, and it must be "bold" in doing so, or else it will face "dire consequences." The threat was no longer hidden. It became public. The dictates were being issued in the open: either submit to our project, or bear the consequences. But Graham died, and his malice lives on in the actions of this alliance, this Malign Alliance of Necessity. Trump, Netanyahu, Graham, Iran, and Abu Dhabi were playing chess. But there were others working in silence. Throughout the months of chaos and before, His Royal Highness Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif were engaged in intense diplomatic activity. Continuous meetings. Deep strategic coordination. They were weaving the quiet strategic response in closed rooms, far from the noise of threats. And in Holy Makkah, from the Sacred House, came the coronation, where the Joint Defense Agreement between Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and Pakistan was signed, flipping the table on all of them (the Malign Alliance of Necessity). This agreement was not just a closed tripartite alliance. The Turkish Foreign Minister hinted that Egypt would join after completing technical procedures. And it was announced that the door is open for the rest of the countries to join. This is not just an agreement. This is the nucleus of a new regional order. An open order. An order not imposed by force, but built through partnership. This was the moment the table was flipped onto the heads of the old players. The moment they were ejected from the field. The moment the birth of the true Middle East was written, before Trump and Netanyahu could begin to write their supposed birth. The game is exposed. Trump wants to sell his oil, and he wanted Israel to be the pen to write its greater map. Netanyahu wants "more space" and wants no stability for Saudi Arabia and Turkey. Iran wants the Strait of Hormuz. And Abu Dhabi wants revenge for its failure. But Makkah turned all the tables. No one can bypass these leaders now. Saudi Arabia, which absorbed the pain; Turkey, standing beside it; and Pakistan, with its nuclear might; are no longer just players. They are the authors of the future. And the pen that Trump thought he held to write Israel's map no longer has a table to write upon. 🦅🇸🇦🇹🇷🇵🇰🔥

🇸🇦Abdulsalam Saleh

21,343 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

ركزوا جيدًا… عندما أعلنت صوماليلاند انفصالها كانت السعودية من أكثر الأنظمة رفضًا وارتباكًا… والسبب ليس حرصًا على “وحدة الدول” كما يروّج إعلامها، بل خوفًا على شبكة مصالحها القديمة في النفط والغاز التي امتدت لسنوات في اليمن والصومال والسودان وأجزاء من ليبيا عبر واجهات قبلية وشخصيات متنفذة تعمل لحسابها. اكتشاف مئات الآبار في صوماليلاند أربك الحسابات… فلم نسمع ضجيجًا ولا تهديدًا ولا تدخلاً مباشرًا، لأن الملف كان خارج قدرتهم على المناورة. الدعم الاسرائيلي الذي حظي به هناك قيّد الحركة، فاختفى الصراخ فجأة. النظام السعودي كان يدعم الجماعات الارهابية في هذه الدول ويسيطر على النفط الخام اليوم يجري التحقق من تلك الحقول التي استُغلت طويلًا بعيدًا عن أعين الشعوب، بينما كانت المنطقة تغرق في الفوضى والصراعات. التاريخ واضح: من عاش سنوات يعبث بثروات الضعفاء ويغذي الأزمات لحماية نفوذه… لن يهرب من لحظة الحساب. الأيام تدور… والحقائق لا تبقى مخفية السعودية ارتكبت جرائم حرب حيث انها كانت ولا زالت تدعم الجماعات الارهابية التي في الصومال واليمن والسودان وليبيا يجب على دولة الصومال إنّ تحذوا حذو صوماليلاند وتكشف الانتهاكات الخطيرة التي يرتكبها نظام السعودية بحق الثروات النفطية الصومالية انتهى وقت التكتيم والنظام السعودي سينهار إذا قطعتم يد المتنفذين والعصابات التي تخدمهم في دولكم الفقيرة #Somaliland #السعوديه_تدعم_الارهاب Focus carefully… When Somaliland declared its separation, Saudi Arabia was among the most rejecting and alarmed regimes — not out of concern for “territorial unity” as its media claims, but out of fear for its long-standing network of oil and gas interests that stretched across Yemen, Somalia, Sudan, and parts of Libya through tribal fronts and influential figures operating on its behalf. The discovery of hundreds of wells in Somaliland disrupted those calculations… there was no noise, no threats, no direct intervention, because the file was beyond their ability to maneuver. The Israeli backing there restricted movement, and the shouting suddenly disappeared. The Saudi regime was supporting militant groups in these countries while controlling crude resources. Today, those fields are being examined after being exploited for years away from the eyes of the people, while the region drowned in conflict and instability. History is clear: Whoever spent years manipulating the wealth of the weak and fueling crises to protect influence… will not escape accountability. Days turn… and truths do not remain hidden. Saudi Arabia committed war crimes by supporting armed groups in Somalia, Yemen, Sudan, and Libya. The Somali state must follow Somaliland’s path and expose the serious violations committed against Somali oil resources. The era of silence is over — and the Saudi regime will collapse once the hands of the influential networks and gangs serving it in your poor countries are cut off. #Somaliland #Saudi_Arabia_supports_terrorism
0:37

ركزوا جيدًا… عندما أعلنت صوماليلاند انفصالها كانت السعودية من أكثر الأنظمة رفضًا وارتباكًا… والسبب ليس حرصًا على “وحدة الدول” كما يروّج إعلامها، بل خوفًا على شبكة مصالحها القديمة في النفط والغاز التي امتدت لسنوات في اليمن والصومال والسودان وأجزاء من ليبيا عبر واجهات قبلية وشخصيات متنفذة تعمل لحسابها. اكتشاف مئات الآبار في صوماليلاند أربك الحسابات… فلم نسمع ضجيجًا ولا تهديدًا ولا تدخلاً مباشرًا، لأن الملف كان خارج قدرتهم على المناورة. الدعم الاسرائيلي الذي حظي به هناك قيّد الحركة، فاختفى الصراخ فجأة. النظام السعودي كان يدعم الجماعات الارهابية في هذه الدول ويسيطر على النفط الخام اليوم يجري التحقق من تلك الحقول التي استُغلت طويلًا بعيدًا عن أعين الشعوب، بينما كانت المنطقة تغرق في الفوضى والصراعات. التاريخ واضح: من عاش سنوات يعبث بثروات الضعفاء ويغذي الأزمات لحماية نفوذه… لن يهرب من لحظة الحساب. الأيام تدور… والحقائق لا تبقى مخفية السعودية ارتكبت جرائم حرب حيث انها كانت ولا زالت تدعم الجماعات الارهابية التي في الصومال واليمن والسودان وليبيا يجب على دولة الصومال إنّ تحذوا حذو صوماليلاند وتكشف الانتهاكات الخطيرة التي يرتكبها نظام السعودية بحق الثروات النفطية الصومالية انتهى وقت التكتيم والنظام السعودي سينهار إذا قطعتم يد المتنفذين والعصابات التي تخدمهم في دولكم الفقيرة #Somaliland #السعوديه_تدعم_الارهاب Focus carefully… When Somaliland declared its separation, Saudi Arabia was among the most rejecting and alarmed regimes — not out of concern for “territorial unity” as its media claims, but out of fear for its long-standing network of oil and gas interests that stretched across Yemen, Somalia, Sudan, and parts of Libya through tribal fronts and influential figures operating on its behalf. The discovery of hundreds of wells in Somaliland disrupted those calculations… there was no noise, no threats, no direct intervention, because the file was beyond their ability to maneuver. The Israeli backing there restricted movement, and the shouting suddenly disappeared. The Saudi regime was supporting militant groups in these countries while controlling crude resources. Today, those fields are being examined after being exploited for years away from the eyes of the people, while the region drowned in conflict and instability. History is clear: Whoever spent years manipulating the wealth of the weak and fueling crises to protect influence… will not escape accountability. Days turn… and truths do not remain hidden. Saudi Arabia committed war crimes by supporting armed groups in Somalia, Yemen, Sudan, and Libya. The Somali state must follow Somaliland’s path and expose the serious violations committed against Somali oil resources. The era of silence is over — and the Saudi regime will collapse once the hands of the influential networks and gangs serving it in your poor countries are cut off. #Somaliland #Saudi_Arabia_supports_terrorism

ARAB TOP القمة العربية

42,558 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

NATIONAL STATEMENT BY DATO’ SERI ANWAR IBRAHIM PRIME MINISTER OF MALAYSIA AT THE EXTRAORDINARY ARAB AND ISLAMIC SUMMIT RIYADH 11th NOVEMBER 2024 Assalamua’laikum warahmatullahi wabarakatuh. May the peace and blessings of Allah SWT be upon you. First and foremost, I wish to extend my profound gratitude to His Majesty King Salman bin Abdulaziz Al-Saud for inviting me to this Summit. I also wish to thank Your Royal Highness Prince Mohammed bin Salman Al-Saud and the Government of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia for convening this important meeting today. I concur with the many excellent points and recommendations made by my fellow leaders. Their views reflect the unified voice of the Muslim ummah, borne out of the surge of shared conviction among our peoples. We acknowledge that the circumstances confronting the Muslim world and the Ummah have been most trying and challenging. Yet, it is indeed highly commendable that painstaking efforts have been made, and continue to be made, including summits such as this, so as to find ways and means to put an end to the violence, destruction, and misery brought on the Palestinian people, and to relieve their long and untold suffering. Your Majesties, Excellencies, Israel no longer belongs within the civilised community of nations, and its barbarism demands nothing less than decisive action to safeguard not just the Middle East, but the entire global order. Fifty years ago, the world was so horrified by the atrocities in South Africa that the United Nations General Assembly took the unprecedented step of denying its government a seat at the Assembly. Israel, however, has gone beyond the pale, beyond reason, beyond humanity itself in its vile and blatant perpetration of the genocide of the people of Palestine. These cumulative acts of violence against an entire nation leaves us with no choice but to demand for the swift and effective action of the international community including embargo, suspension and even expulsion. In its relentless campaigns, Israel has now struck at the very heart of the international community’s lifeline for Palestine by targeting the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees. By barring UNRWA from operating, Israel is causing the collapse of the world’s humanitarian response, cutting off the most basic means of survival in Gaza for those who have already lost so much. We must put an end to this continued senseless carnage and take immediate steps to furnish more effective protection for the UNRWA. Similarly, we must accord better protection for the UN peacekeepers in Lebanon, comprising nearly 50 nations, including Malaysia – who have been attacked and terrorised by Israeli forces. The international community must act swiftly and forcefully. As an immediate measure, we must push, as Malaysia did at the UN General Assembly in September, to impose an immediate arms embargo against Israel. Nevertheless, the severity of Israel’s assault on humanity’s most basic rules of the international compact deserves consideration of a more serious response. For the sake of not only the Palestinians but of humanity itself, we must punish and deter Israel’s repeated violations of international law and norms. We should, therefore, build a consensus towards suspending or even expelling Israel from the United Nations itself.
4:46

NATIONAL STATEMENT BY DATO’ SERI ANWAR IBRAHIM PRIME MINISTER OF MALAYSIA AT THE EXTRAORDINARY ARAB AND ISLAMIC SUMMIT RIYADH 11th NOVEMBER 2024 Assalamua’laikum warahmatullahi wabarakatuh. May the peace and blessings of Allah SWT be upon you. First and foremost, I wish to extend my profound gratitude to His Majesty King Salman bin Abdulaziz Al-Saud for inviting me to this Summit. I also wish to thank Your Royal Highness Prince Mohammed bin Salman Al-Saud and the Government of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia for convening this important meeting today. I concur with the many excellent points and recommendations made by my fellow leaders. Their views reflect the unified voice of the Muslim ummah, borne out of the surge of shared conviction among our peoples. We acknowledge that the circumstances confronting the Muslim world and the Ummah have been most trying and challenging. Yet, it is indeed highly commendable that painstaking efforts have been made, and continue to be made, including summits such as this, so as to find ways and means to put an end to the violence, destruction, and misery brought on the Palestinian people, and to relieve their long and untold suffering. Your Majesties, Excellencies, Israel no longer belongs within the civilised community of nations, and its barbarism demands nothing less than decisive action to safeguard not just the Middle East, but the entire global order. Fifty years ago, the world was so horrified by the atrocities in South Africa that the United Nations General Assembly took the unprecedented step of denying its government a seat at the Assembly. Israel, however, has gone beyond the pale, beyond reason, beyond humanity itself in its vile and blatant perpetration of the genocide of the people of Palestine. These cumulative acts of violence against an entire nation leaves us with no choice but to demand for the swift and effective action of the international community including embargo, suspension and even expulsion. In its relentless campaigns, Israel has now struck at the very heart of the international community’s lifeline for Palestine by targeting the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees. By barring UNRWA from operating, Israel is causing the collapse of the world’s humanitarian response, cutting off the most basic means of survival in Gaza for those who have already lost so much. We must put an end to this continued senseless carnage and take immediate steps to furnish more effective protection for the UNRWA. Similarly, we must accord better protection for the UN peacekeepers in Lebanon, comprising nearly 50 nations, including Malaysia – who have been attacked and terrorised by Israeli forces. The international community must act swiftly and forcefully. As an immediate measure, we must push, as Malaysia did at the UN General Assembly in September, to impose an immediate arms embargo against Israel. Nevertheless, the severity of Israel’s assault on humanity’s most basic rules of the international compact deserves consideration of a more serious response. For the sake of not only the Palestinians but of humanity itself, we must punish and deter Israel’s repeated violations of international law and norms. We should, therefore, build a consensus towards suspending or even expelling Israel from the United Nations itself.

Anwar Ibrahim

70,009 просмотров • 1 год назад

Iran has a nuclear option that it can use at any moment: Hitting Aramco and other Israeli-US puppet Gulf regime oil and gas infrastructure and destroying the regional and world economy. It can begin with just a few strikes, then expand if deterrence is not established and Israel and the US in coordination with their regional Arab colonies continue their war project of collapsing and destroying the Iranian state, nation and people, up until the entire global economy is brought to a halt. Russia is not coming to save you. China is not coming to save to you. In this world every individual is born and dies alone, and so it is with states and nations: You are born and die alone. You must take all the means that are available to you to protect your nation and people when you are under total war from history's most depraved murderous genocidal death-cult, the Zionist Israeli-US-NATO empire. And that includes their "Arab puppet" Saudi-Gulf fascist Zionist dictatorships. These are not independent states. They are Zionist colonies. MBS and UAE's MBZ are not rulers of nations and peoples, they are colonial viceroys of Israel and the US. Everything they do is pre-determined by their masters who give them the orders, who set up vast networks of tortures and prison-guards to watch over their slave societies and behead and rape anyone who posts even a slightly critical tweet about their coke-addled porn-obsessed royals who are serial rapists who traffic in children and women: In 2018 the Saudi Israeli-US puppet dictator MBS repeated the Zionist Netanyahu propaganda about Iran and Khamenei being "today's Hitler" who had to be destroyed. This was as the Saudi-UAE Zionist puppet regimes had been waging a genocidal war on Yemen for years, played a key role in the dismantling of Syria as a nation for their Israeli-US masters by funding and arming ISIS-fascist death and rape-squads alongside the CIA and Mossad, and after they also played a key role in the fascist military coup in Egypt overthrowing the first democratically elected government in their history for being opposed to US-Israeli hegemony. Then in 2019 the Houthis hit an Aramco Saudi oil facility, and they became scared to death. And by "they" I mean their Israeli-US colonial overlords. Now suddenly the global economy was being directly threatened. In 2022 the Saudi-Gulf colonies, again as ordered by their Israeli-US masters, froze the genocidal war on Yemen for now as they went after "the head of the snake", which is how they all see Iran. The Saudis and MBS, always with their Israeli-US masters, then began a massive project to collapse the Iranian state from within. They set up a propaganda network in the UK under the name of Iran International, bought some of the most well-known and famous Iranian actors, artists, athletes, influencers, public figures, took control of their huge social media platforms, then deployed them to unleash the 2022 hybrid war against Iran, which I exposed in detail in these threads: The project ultimately failed. The Iranian state, nation and people proved itself to be able to withstand these kinds of hybrid-wars aimed at fomenting civil war to destroy them. Seeing this attempt fail over the course of 2023, the strategy then changed, especially after October 7. Knowing that Iran has the nuclear option to destroy the regional and global economy by destroying the oil infrastructure of its Saudi-Gulf Zionist puppets, their Israeli and American masters decided to shift the frontlines. The Saudi-Gulf regimes were ordered to engage in the classic strategy that they always use, as they did with the fake Witkoff negotiations, the fake negotiations with Nasrallah for a ceasefire, the fake Genocide Joe negotiations for a permanent ceasefire to lull Iran into not retaliating with True Promise 2, and the luring of Qasem Soleimani to Baghdad to assassinate him which Trump, the Israelis and the Saudis organized: Weaponizing diplomacy as deception. I detailed that in these threads: So what did they do? The Saudis and UAE, who for years had called Iran the new Nazis who had to be destroyed as they are the "head of the octopus" of resistance to Zionist Israeli-US-NATO hegemony which includes their Arab colonies, suddenly became doves. Overnight they became friendly. There was this whole spectacle of a Chinese-coordinated deal. That was all bullshit. It was meaningless. There was no substance behind it, just as there was no substance behind the Hamas-Fatah supposed reconciliation facilitated by China. They just said some words, nothing concrete was committed to, and the Israeli Palgusano puppet Abbas remains a collaborator in good standing with the genocidal Israeli death-cult, jailing, torturing and killing Palestinians for his master. The Chinese tried to facilitate a diplomatic resolution to these conflicts, but that is impossible with the current power dynamics. You cannot have a diplomatic resolution between a genocidal Zionist colony and those that resist it. The masters would never allow it. If those chosen to occupy the current ruling positions in the Saudi regime had actually done that, they would not have existed anymore. They would have been replaced by other compliant viceroy puppets. And they and everyone knows it. In the past few months they have ratcheted up the propaganda of being peace-loving neighbors who just want to see Iran thrive and do well and definitely don't have anything to do with any war that was going to be imminently launched and which they definitely had no idea about and hadn't been closely coordinating with their masters to ensure would have all the means needed to do. In November 2024 the Saudis sent the head of their army to Iran for a bilateral meeting, and just two months ago, in April, they sent their Defense Minister to Iran who met with their top military leadership. Look at the video of that meeting. Virtually all the Iranian military leaders you see there have now been assassinated. As I noted in this thread: the Saudi-UAE Gulf Zionist colonies are an essential part of the war against the Iranian state, nation and people. They host American bases. They fabricate and spread Zionist propaganda. They are essential in the project of destroying Hezbollah in Lebanon. They are active in Iraq. They destroyed Syria. They have Egypt. And they will shift from this feigned fake passivity into active direct involvement with the genocidal war for Iran's survival once they believe the nuclear option of hitting their oil and gas infrastructure is no longer viable because substantial state and military collapse has already been achieved. They will arm and fund death and rape-squads to roam the streets of Iranian cities. Their media will launder them as brave heroes. And they will gleefully celebrate and rejoice over having finally destroy "the new Hitler and Nazis", as MBS said echoing the words of his Israeli-US Zionist masters. But the nuclear option is still there now, and there other actions that can be taken alongside it to establish deterrence like closing the Strait of Hormuz: And they must be used now. They must be deployed immediately, and then scaled up as needed. Begin with limited strikes, then expand if deterrence is not established, and keep going. If they continue with their project of destroying the Iranian nation and people, then you will all be destroyed. Then all the Zionist colonies in the region will be destroyed. If we burn, YOU WILL BURN WITH US.
1:04

Iran has a nuclear option that it can use at any moment: Hitting Aramco and other Israeli-US puppet Gulf regime oil and gas infrastructure and destroying the regional and world economy. It can begin with just a few strikes, then expand if deterrence is not established and Israel and the US in coordination with their regional Arab colonies continue their war project of collapsing and destroying the Iranian state, nation and people, up until the entire global economy is brought to a halt. Russia is not coming to save you. China is not coming to save to you. In this world every individual is born and dies alone, and so it is with states and nations: You are born and die alone. You must take all the means that are available to you to protect your nation and people when you are under total war from history's most depraved murderous genocidal death-cult, the Zionist Israeli-US-NATO empire. And that includes their "Arab puppet" Saudi-Gulf fascist Zionist dictatorships. These are not independent states. They are Zionist colonies. MBS and UAE's MBZ are not rulers of nations and peoples, they are colonial viceroys of Israel and the US. Everything they do is pre-determined by their masters who give them the orders, who set up vast networks of tortures and prison-guards to watch over their slave societies and behead and rape anyone who posts even a slightly critical tweet about their coke-addled porn-obsessed royals who are serial rapists who traffic in children and women: In 2018 the Saudi Israeli-US puppet dictator MBS repeated the Zionist Netanyahu propaganda about Iran and Khamenei being "today's Hitler" who had to be destroyed. This was as the Saudi-UAE Zionist puppet regimes had been waging a genocidal war on Yemen for years, played a key role in the dismantling of Syria as a nation for their Israeli-US masters by funding and arming ISIS-fascist death and rape-squads alongside the CIA and Mossad, and after they also played a key role in the fascist military coup in Egypt overthrowing the first democratically elected government in their history for being opposed to US-Israeli hegemony. Then in 2019 the Houthis hit an Aramco Saudi oil facility, and they became scared to death. And by "they" I mean their Israeli-US colonial overlords. Now suddenly the global economy was being directly threatened. In 2022 the Saudi-Gulf colonies, again as ordered by their Israeli-US masters, froze the genocidal war on Yemen for now as they went after "the head of the snake", which is how they all see Iran. The Saudis and MBS, always with their Israeli-US masters, then began a massive project to collapse the Iranian state from within. They set up a propaganda network in the UK under the name of Iran International, bought some of the most well-known and famous Iranian actors, artists, athletes, influencers, public figures, took control of their huge social media platforms, then deployed them to unleash the 2022 hybrid war against Iran, which I exposed in detail in these threads: The project ultimately failed. The Iranian state, nation and people proved itself to be able to withstand these kinds of hybrid-wars aimed at fomenting civil war to destroy them. Seeing this attempt fail over the course of 2023, the strategy then changed, especially after October 7. Knowing that Iran has the nuclear option to destroy the regional and global economy by destroying the oil infrastructure of its Saudi-Gulf Zionist puppets, their Israeli and American masters decided to shift the frontlines. The Saudi-Gulf regimes were ordered to engage in the classic strategy that they always use, as they did with the fake Witkoff negotiations, the fake negotiations with Nasrallah for a ceasefire, the fake Genocide Joe negotiations for a permanent ceasefire to lull Iran into not retaliating with True Promise 2, and the luring of Qasem Soleimani to Baghdad to assassinate him which Trump, the Israelis and the Saudis organized: Weaponizing diplomacy as deception. I detailed that in these threads: So what did they do? The Saudis and UAE, who for years had called Iran the new Nazis who had to be destroyed as they are the "head of the octopus" of resistance to Zionist Israeli-US-NATO hegemony which includes their Arab colonies, suddenly became doves. Overnight they became friendly. There was this whole spectacle of a Chinese-coordinated deal. That was all bullshit. It was meaningless. There was no substance behind it, just as there was no substance behind the Hamas-Fatah supposed reconciliation facilitated by China. They just said some words, nothing concrete was committed to, and the Israeli Palgusano puppet Abbas remains a collaborator in good standing with the genocidal Israeli death-cult, jailing, torturing and killing Palestinians for his master. The Chinese tried to facilitate a diplomatic resolution to these conflicts, but that is impossible with the current power dynamics. You cannot have a diplomatic resolution between a genocidal Zionist colony and those that resist it. The masters would never allow it. If those chosen to occupy the current ruling positions in the Saudi regime had actually done that, they would not have existed anymore. They would have been replaced by other compliant viceroy puppets. And they and everyone knows it. In the past few months they have ratcheted up the propaganda of being peace-loving neighbors who just want to see Iran thrive and do well and definitely don't have anything to do with any war that was going to be imminently launched and which they definitely had no idea about and hadn't been closely coordinating with their masters to ensure would have all the means needed to do. In November 2024 the Saudis sent the head of their army to Iran for a bilateral meeting, and just two months ago, in April, they sent their Defense Minister to Iran who met with their top military leadership. Look at the video of that meeting. Virtually all the Iranian military leaders you see there have now been assassinated. As I noted in this thread: the Saudi-UAE Gulf Zionist colonies are an essential part of the war against the Iranian state, nation and people. They host American bases. They fabricate and spread Zionist propaganda. They are essential in the project of destroying Hezbollah in Lebanon. They are active in Iraq. They destroyed Syria. They have Egypt. And they will shift from this feigned fake passivity into active direct involvement with the genocidal war for Iran's survival once they believe the nuclear option of hitting their oil and gas infrastructure is no longer viable because substantial state and military collapse has already been achieved. They will arm and fund death and rape-squads to roam the streets of Iranian cities. Their media will launder them as brave heroes. And they will gleefully celebrate and rejoice over having finally destroy "the new Hitler and Nazis", as MBS said echoing the words of his Israeli-US Zionist masters. But the nuclear option is still there now, and there other actions that can be taken alongside it to establish deterrence like closing the Strait of Hormuz: And they must be used now. They must be deployed immediately, and then scaled up as needed. Begin with limited strikes, then expand if deterrence is not established, and keep going. If they continue with their project of destroying the Iranian nation and people, then you will all be destroyed. Then all the Zionist colonies in the region will be destroyed. If we burn, YOU WILL BURN WITH US.

☀️👀

1,009,065 просмотров • 1 год назад

In the future, Islam will obliterate Christianity in the USA, Europe, and in the Indian subcontinent (where between 30-50 million Christians live), just as it has eradicated Christianity and Judaism in the Middle East and eliminated parts of Hinduism in the Indian subcontinent over the last 1,400 years since its establishment. - This is one of the tactics that Islam uses to take over the world: Quran 4.100 “Whoever emigrates for the sake of Allah will find much refuge and abundance in the earth, and whoever forsakes his home, a refugee for Allah and his messenger, and death overtakes him, his reward is then obligatory upon Allah. Allah is always forgiving, merciful.” *Here the Qur’an states the cardinal importance of “emigration for the cause of Allah,” that is, moving to a new land with the intention of bringing Islam to it. See also 4:66 and 4:89. The primary pattern for emigrants in Islamic tradition is the Hijra, Muhammad’s move from Mecca to Medina, where for the first time he became a political and military leader. It is “obligatory” for Allah to reward emigrants; this is one of the Qur’an’s few promises of reward for specific actions (see also 9:111). Continue to welcome Islam into the Western world with open arms and friendship. Continue to respect Islam, and eventually, it will do to you what Muhammad did in the 7th century to those who welcomed him in the city of Medina. He completely destroyed the host culture. Quran 9.5: “...kill the Mushrikun (non-Muslims) wherever you find them…" Al-Bukhari: "To wage war against Allah means to reject faith in Him." From Quran 2.191: "The sin of disbelief in Allah is greater than committing murder". - Note: This has never changed; Islam continues to operate continuously, in an organized and systematic manner, through Da'wa, fraud, lies, and violence, in order to destroy and conquer Western culture from within. 👇👇👇 The report was written by Tom Quiggin, a member of the Terrorism and Security Experts of Canada Network (TSEC). Concurrent research at the TSEC network includes a methodology project for intelligence analysts involved in the analysis of extremism. A Horizon Scanning project on the convergence of extremist ideologies is being readied for distribution in late 2014. This project was funded internally by the TSEC network. There is no government, corporate, media or foreign money involved. KEY JUDGEMENTS: *Canada has a significant presence of Muslim Brotherhood adherent individuals and organizations. Their values and actions are frequently the antithesis of the Canadian Constitution, values and law. Despite statements to the contrary, the Muslim Brotherhood considers itself above local laws and national constitutions. *The Muslim Brotherhood’s use of settlement and the “process of civilization jihad” has proven effective. The long term aim is to globally impose a virulent form of political Islam to the exclusion of other faiths or systems. *Internationally, the Muslim Brotherhood is realigning under pressure as old alliances crumble and opportunities arise. An aggressive posture is reemerging which has used extensive political violence in the past. *The policy and process of denial is deeply rooted in the Muslim Brotherhood. *Muslim Brotherhood adherent groups should not be given governmental accreditation, access to public grants nor should they have charity status. *Canada’s stance against Muslim Brotherhood adherent organizations in recent years has been more aggressive than the USA, especially in financial areas. 1. Overview: Settlement and the Civilization-Jihadist Process: The Muslim Brotherhood represents a greater existential and systemic threat to North American civilization and society than violent extremist movements such as Al Qaeda. The Muslim Brotherhood, self-described by its founder Hassan Banna as a Salafist group, has been entrenching itself in North American since the late 1950s and early 1960s using the process of ‘settlement,’ multiple front organizations and persistent denials. They describe this as a process of civilization jihad. The aim of the group in North America is to weaken and destroy the free and open societies within Canada and the USA from within and replace them with the heavily politicized views of Hassan Banna, Sayyid Qutb and the Muslim Brotherhood. This is consistent with the global aims of the group. This should be of concern as a period of relative moderation has come to an end and the Muslim Brotherhood is becoming increasingly aggressive in its actions. The Muslim Brotherhood began as a social movement and it still has an extensive program of education and outreach. Dawah (da’wa, da’wah or dawa) and religious education lie at the heart of the Muslim Brotherhood program. Dawah can be defined as calling or the practice or policy of conveying the message of Islam to non-Muslims. Within the context of the Muslim Brotherhood, it takes on a more ominous tone as dawah is not just the practice of outreach, but it is one of the principal missions of the Muslim Brotherhood as a whole. And by dawah, they appear to include the message of Islam, but the message of the founder of the Muslim Brotherhood, Hassan Banna as is evidenced by the constant references to his life and writings. Dawah in the Muslim Brotherhood is not just outreach, rather it is an alternative form of conquering a society. Ikhwan Web, the official English language website of the Muslim Brotherhood makes this clear: The MB shall never forget religious education and Dawah, as they are the essence of its existence. In the North American context, Zeid Noman made it clear that in the early stages of development of the Muslim Brotherhood in North America, dawah was an integral factor. This was the first true tremor for the Ikhwan's activism here in America as these brothers started to demand clearer Ikhwan formulas, clearer commitment and means or ones with a specific and not a general nature and that there are conditions to accept one into the ranks of this Dawa'a and to make work secret. …Some of them came for work and know that this life is a farm for the afterlife and he sacrifices what he has for the sake of. .., for the sake of this Dawa'a. ….Therefore, we had to take two simultaneous moves and with two harmonious wings: The first one is the reality or now attempt to implement the needs of the reality which is what the students' movement needs and that we also work hard to settle the Dawa'a. By "settlement of the Dawa'a", the Muslim Brotherhood Dawa'a is meant. It is not meant to spread Islam as spread of Islam is a general thing and it is indeed a goal for each Muslim in general terms. The second thing is the settlement of the Dawa'a and finding permanent fundamentals in the cities where Ikhwans now live in order to ...er, in order for them to be the meeting points for the coming brothers. (Emphasis added) In a 1995 speech in Ohio, Yussef Qaradawi, a lifelong adherent of the Muslim Brotherhood movement and one of its key intellectual inspirational figures stated that: Conquest through dawah, that is what we hope for….We will conquer Europe, we will conquer America, not through the sword but through dawah. In 2007, some 12 years later, Qaradawi made it clear that his views had not changed: The peaceful conquest has foundations in this religion, and therefore, I expect that Islam will conquer Europe without resorting to the sword or fighting. It will do so by means of da’wa and ideology. Europe is miserable with materialism, with the philosophy of promiscuity, and with the immoral considerations that rule the world “considerations of self-interest and self-indulgence. Despite the claims of conquest only through dawah, the Muslim Brotherhood has committed a series of assassinations and bombings in the name of the group. This includes the assassination of a judge in Egypt (Ahmed El-Khazindar Bey, Senior Judge, Egyptian Court of Appeal) in 194816 as well as the attempted assassination of President Nasser in 1954. The Syrian arm of the Muslim Brotherhood was engaged in a violent campaign from 1976 to 1982 which included a 1979 attack against students at the military academy in Aleppo. Most of the students killed were from the leadership Alawite group and the victims were largely the sons of various regime officials. The campaign ended with a brutal government massacre of Muslim Brotherhood supporters in the town of Hama. Currently, the Palestinian arm of the Muslim Brotherhood (HAMAS) remains committed to violence and has worked against peace efforts such as the Oslo Accords. In addition to Dawah, another feature of the Muslim Brotherhood is the concept of the Islamization of Knowledge, conceptualized in part by former Montreal resident Dr. Ismail Faruqi. In his book Islamization of Knowledge: General Principles and Work Plan, Dr. Faruqi argues that there was a need to: …recast the whole legacy of human knowledge from the stand point of Islam. He presented 12 workplan aims to produce university level textbooks recasting some twenty disciplines in accordance to the Islamic vision because of the backward and lowly contemporary position of the ummah in all fields, political, economic, and religio-cultural. While presenting itself as a voice of moderation, the Muslim Brotherhood is an adherent of an 85+ year old policy of establishing the Brotherhood’s brand of Islam as the global faith at the exclusion of all other religions and secular forms of organization. Other Muslim groups that do not adhere are subjected to scorn and abuse. The Muslim Brotherhood has wavered on the use of violence, sometimes presenting itself as a political movement that expels those who use violence. On other occasions it does military training at local camps and uses assassinations and bombings. Foreign funding and foreign organizational assistance have been the hallmarks of many of the adherent charities and organizations. In 1991, the Muslim Brotherhood in North America issued An Explanatory Memorandum on the General Strategic Goal for the Group in North America (5/22/1991).” The document was presented by Mohamed Akram (A.K.A. Mohammad Akram Al-Adlouni) who is now the Secretary General of al-Quds International located in Lebanon. The chairman of the board of trustees is identified as Qatar based28 Youssef Qaradawi. According to Akram, it was the result of five years of policy review work which was proceeded by some 20 years of organizational activity. It was finally approved their Shura Council. In section 4 of the 1991 Explanatory Memorandum, which is subtitled Understanding the role of the Muslim Brother in North America, the document points out that: The process of settlement is a "Civilization-Jihadist Process" with all the word means. The Ikhwan must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and "sabotaging" its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God's religion is made victorious over all other religions. It is not an analytically acceptable practice to take one data point, such as the above, and then assess that the organization is always committed to this goal. To be clear, however, a remarkable degree of consistency of beliefs and goals exists across a range of Muslim Brotherhood organizations – both temporally and geographically. The most recent examples mimic those of a more violent past. The phase of moving away from violence appears to be ending/has ended and the organisation as a whole is becoming more aggressive and expresses an inflexible approach with violent overtones. In 2010 the Muslim Brotherhood’s General Guide Mohamed Badie claimed that the “Muslim and Arab Regimes are Disregarding Allah's Commandment to Wage Jihad" and that change can occur by raising a jihadi generation that pursues death just as the enemies pursue life. He notes that resistance is the only solution. These comments appear similar to those of Salah Sultan of Ohio (ISNA, Fiqh Council , MAS) who says that America will suffer economic stagnation, ruin, destruction and crime which will surpass what is happening in Gaza. He also noted that the US will suffer more deaths than all of those killed in the third Gaza holocaust and that it will happen soon. Both of these statements by influential Muslim Brotherhood leaders appear as informal declarations of war, similar to those of al Qaeda in 1996 and 1998. Egyptian President (2012-2013) and Muslim Brotherhood member Mohammed Morsi’s attempted project to ‘Brotherhoodize’ Egypt (The Nahda or Renaissance Project) was a sign of recent intentions. By granting himself near dictatorial powers38 followed by his attacks on the press/TV and the judiciary, he demonstrated that he was more of a servant of the Muslim Brotherhood and Khairat alShater’s Nahda Project43 than he was the leader of Egypt. Al-Shater had envisaged the Nahda Project as instituting “the religion of God; the Islamization of life, empowering of God’s religion.” Ironically, Dr. Morsi was recruited into the Muslim Brotherhood while studying in North America (PhD, USC, 1992). He graduated the year after the 1991 General Memorandum outlined the role of civilization-jihadist project in North America. Read more:
2:37

In the future, Islam will obliterate Christianity in the USA, Europe, and in the Indian subcontinent (where between 30-50 million Christians live), just as it has eradicated Christianity and Judaism in the Middle East and eliminated parts of Hinduism in the Indian subcontinent over the last 1,400 years since its establishment. - This is one of the tactics that Islam uses to take over the world: Quran 4.100 “Whoever emigrates for the sake of Allah will find much refuge and abundance in the earth, and whoever forsakes his home, a refugee for Allah and his messenger, and death overtakes him, his reward is then obligatory upon Allah. Allah is always forgiving, merciful.” *Here the Qur’an states the cardinal importance of “emigration for the cause of Allah,” that is, moving to a new land with the intention of bringing Islam to it. See also 4:66 and 4:89. The primary pattern for emigrants in Islamic tradition is the Hijra, Muhammad’s move from Mecca to Medina, where for the first time he became a political and military leader. It is “obligatory” for Allah to reward emigrants; this is one of the Qur’an’s few promises of reward for specific actions (see also 9:111). Continue to welcome Islam into the Western world with open arms and friendship. Continue to respect Islam, and eventually, it will do to you what Muhammad did in the 7th century to those who welcomed him in the city of Medina. He completely destroyed the host culture. Quran 9.5: “...kill the Mushrikun (non-Muslims) wherever you find them…" Al-Bukhari: "To wage war against Allah means to reject faith in Him." From Quran 2.191: "The sin of disbelief in Allah is greater than committing murder". - Note: This has never changed; Islam continues to operate continuously, in an organized and systematic manner, through Da'wa, fraud, lies, and violence, in order to destroy and conquer Western culture from within. 👇👇👇 The report was written by Tom Quiggin, a member of the Terrorism and Security Experts of Canada Network (TSEC). Concurrent research at the TSEC network includes a methodology project for intelligence analysts involved in the analysis of extremism. A Horizon Scanning project on the convergence of extremist ideologies is being readied for distribution in late 2014. This project was funded internally by the TSEC network. There is no government, corporate, media or foreign money involved. KEY JUDGEMENTS: *Canada has a significant presence of Muslim Brotherhood adherent individuals and organizations. Their values and actions are frequently the antithesis of the Canadian Constitution, values and law. Despite statements to the contrary, the Muslim Brotherhood considers itself above local laws and national constitutions. *The Muslim Brotherhood’s use of settlement and the “process of civilization jihad” has proven effective. The long term aim is to globally impose a virulent form of political Islam to the exclusion of other faiths or systems. *Internationally, the Muslim Brotherhood is realigning under pressure as old alliances crumble and opportunities arise. An aggressive posture is reemerging which has used extensive political violence in the past. *The policy and process of denial is deeply rooted in the Muslim Brotherhood. *Muslim Brotherhood adherent groups should not be given governmental accreditation, access to public grants nor should they have charity status. *Canada’s stance against Muslim Brotherhood adherent organizations in recent years has been more aggressive than the USA, especially in financial areas. 1. Overview: Settlement and the Civilization-Jihadist Process: The Muslim Brotherhood represents a greater existential and systemic threat to North American civilization and society than violent extremist movements such as Al Qaeda. The Muslim Brotherhood, self-described by its founder Hassan Banna as a Salafist group, has been entrenching itself in North American since the late 1950s and early 1960s using the process of ‘settlement,’ multiple front organizations and persistent denials. They describe this as a process of civilization jihad. The aim of the group in North America is to weaken and destroy the free and open societies within Canada and the USA from within and replace them with the heavily politicized views of Hassan Banna, Sayyid Qutb and the Muslim Brotherhood. This is consistent with the global aims of the group. This should be of concern as a period of relative moderation has come to an end and the Muslim Brotherhood is becoming increasingly aggressive in its actions. The Muslim Brotherhood began as a social movement and it still has an extensive program of education and outreach. Dawah (da’wa, da’wah or dawa) and religious education lie at the heart of the Muslim Brotherhood program. Dawah can be defined as calling or the practice or policy of conveying the message of Islam to non-Muslims. Within the context of the Muslim Brotherhood, it takes on a more ominous tone as dawah is not just the practice of outreach, but it is one of the principal missions of the Muslim Brotherhood as a whole. And by dawah, they appear to include the message of Islam, but the message of the founder of the Muslim Brotherhood, Hassan Banna as is evidenced by the constant references to his life and writings. Dawah in the Muslim Brotherhood is not just outreach, rather it is an alternative form of conquering a society. Ikhwan Web, the official English language website of the Muslim Brotherhood makes this clear: The MB shall never forget religious education and Dawah, as they are the essence of its existence. In the North American context, Zeid Noman made it clear that in the early stages of development of the Muslim Brotherhood in North America, dawah was an integral factor. This was the first true tremor for the Ikhwan's activism here in America as these brothers started to demand clearer Ikhwan formulas, clearer commitment and means or ones with a specific and not a general nature and that there are conditions to accept one into the ranks of this Dawa'a and to make work secret. …Some of them came for work and know that this life is a farm for the afterlife and he sacrifices what he has for the sake of. .., for the sake of this Dawa'a. ….Therefore, we had to take two simultaneous moves and with two harmonious wings: The first one is the reality or now attempt to implement the needs of the reality which is what the students' movement needs and that we also work hard to settle the Dawa'a. By "settlement of the Dawa'a", the Muslim Brotherhood Dawa'a is meant. It is not meant to spread Islam as spread of Islam is a general thing and it is indeed a goal for each Muslim in general terms. The second thing is the settlement of the Dawa'a and finding permanent fundamentals in the cities where Ikhwans now live in order to ...er, in order for them to be the meeting points for the coming brothers. (Emphasis added) In a 1995 speech in Ohio, Yussef Qaradawi, a lifelong adherent of the Muslim Brotherhood movement and one of its key intellectual inspirational figures stated that: Conquest through dawah, that is what we hope for….We will conquer Europe, we will conquer America, not through the sword but through dawah. In 2007, some 12 years later, Qaradawi made it clear that his views had not changed: The peaceful conquest has foundations in this religion, and therefore, I expect that Islam will conquer Europe without resorting to the sword or fighting. It will do so by means of da’wa and ideology. Europe is miserable with materialism, with the philosophy of promiscuity, and with the immoral considerations that rule the world “considerations of self-interest and self-indulgence. Despite the claims of conquest only through dawah, the Muslim Brotherhood has committed a series of assassinations and bombings in the name of the group. This includes the assassination of a judge in Egypt (Ahmed El-Khazindar Bey, Senior Judge, Egyptian Court of Appeal) in 194816 as well as the attempted assassination of President Nasser in 1954. The Syrian arm of the Muslim Brotherhood was engaged in a violent campaign from 1976 to 1982 which included a 1979 attack against students at the military academy in Aleppo. Most of the students killed were from the leadership Alawite group and the victims were largely the sons of various regime officials. The campaign ended with a brutal government massacre of Muslim Brotherhood supporters in the town of Hama. Currently, the Palestinian arm of the Muslim Brotherhood (HAMAS) remains committed to violence and has worked against peace efforts such as the Oslo Accords. In addition to Dawah, another feature of the Muslim Brotherhood is the concept of the Islamization of Knowledge, conceptualized in part by former Montreal resident Dr. Ismail Faruqi. In his book Islamization of Knowledge: General Principles and Work Plan, Dr. Faruqi argues that there was a need to: …recast the whole legacy of human knowledge from the stand point of Islam. He presented 12 workplan aims to produce university level textbooks recasting some twenty disciplines in accordance to the Islamic vision because of the backward and lowly contemporary position of the ummah in all fields, political, economic, and religio-cultural. While presenting itself as a voice of moderation, the Muslim Brotherhood is an adherent of an 85+ year old policy of establishing the Brotherhood’s brand of Islam as the global faith at the exclusion of all other religions and secular forms of organization. Other Muslim groups that do not adhere are subjected to scorn and abuse. The Muslim Brotherhood has wavered on the use of violence, sometimes presenting itself as a political movement that expels those who use violence. On other occasions it does military training at local camps and uses assassinations and bombings. Foreign funding and foreign organizational assistance have been the hallmarks of many of the adherent charities and organizations. In 1991, the Muslim Brotherhood in North America issued An Explanatory Memorandum on the General Strategic Goal for the Group in North America (5/22/1991).” The document was presented by Mohamed Akram (A.K.A. Mohammad Akram Al-Adlouni) who is now the Secretary General of al-Quds International located in Lebanon. The chairman of the board of trustees is identified as Qatar based28 Youssef Qaradawi. According to Akram, it was the result of five years of policy review work which was proceeded by some 20 years of organizational activity. It was finally approved their Shura Council. In section 4 of the 1991 Explanatory Memorandum, which is subtitled Understanding the role of the Muslim Brother in North America, the document points out that: The process of settlement is a "Civilization-Jihadist Process" with all the word means. The Ikhwan must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and "sabotaging" its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God's religion is made victorious over all other religions. It is not an analytically acceptable practice to take one data point, such as the above, and then assess that the organization is always committed to this goal. To be clear, however, a remarkable degree of consistency of beliefs and goals exists across a range of Muslim Brotherhood organizations – both temporally and geographically. The most recent examples mimic those of a more violent past. The phase of moving away from violence appears to be ending/has ended and the organisation as a whole is becoming more aggressive and expresses an inflexible approach with violent overtones. In 2010 the Muslim Brotherhood’s General Guide Mohamed Badie claimed that the “Muslim and Arab Regimes are Disregarding Allah's Commandment to Wage Jihad" and that change can occur by raising a jihadi generation that pursues death just as the enemies pursue life. He notes that resistance is the only solution. These comments appear similar to those of Salah Sultan of Ohio (ISNA, Fiqh Council , MAS) who says that America will suffer economic stagnation, ruin, destruction and crime which will surpass what is happening in Gaza. He also noted that the US will suffer more deaths than all of those killed in the third Gaza holocaust and that it will happen soon. Both of these statements by influential Muslim Brotherhood leaders appear as informal declarations of war, similar to those of al Qaeda in 1996 and 1998. Egyptian President (2012-2013) and Muslim Brotherhood member Mohammed Morsi’s attempted project to ‘Brotherhoodize’ Egypt (The Nahda or Renaissance Project) was a sign of recent intentions. By granting himself near dictatorial powers38 followed by his attacks on the press/TV and the judiciary, he demonstrated that he was more of a servant of the Muslim Brotherhood and Khairat alShater’s Nahda Project43 than he was the leader of Egypt. Al-Shater had envisaged the Nahda Project as instituting “the religion of God; the Islamization of life, empowering of God’s religion.” Ironically, Dr. Morsi was recruited into the Muslim Brotherhood while studying in North America (PhD, USC, 1992). He graduated the year after the 1991 General Memorandum outlined the role of civilization-jihadist project in North America. Read more:

Ofer Binshtok - Kafir - עופר בינשטוק

248,169 просмотров • 1 год назад

Alright, beautiful people. It's time to cheer ourselves up in this dark time and experience the beauty of Kyiv, the Ukrainian capital. This will remind us and show you what is at stake in this war - and what it is that we're trying so hard to save from the blood-stained jaws of fascist Putin Russia. I'm inviting you to take a walk through the Kyiv Pechersk Lavra (or the Kyiv Lavra of the Caves), one of the most beautiful places in Kyiv and the most significant holy place in Eastern Slavic Orthodox Christianity. It's really as important as, for instance, St. Peter's Basicila to Italy or Notre Dame de Paris to France -- one can't imagine Kyiv without the Lavra, and I'm sure you couldn't help but have seen those silhouettes. So, about 1,000 years ago, Kyiv was living its golden age as the center of a large medieval kingdom of Rus under Prince Yaroslav the Wise—very possibly the greatest ruler of Kyiv ever. The official residence of the rulers of Kyiv Rus was located in the town of Berestove outside Kyiv (it's now where Kyiv's Park of Eternal Glory is). The Berestove priest Illarion sought comfort and solitude, so he dug a lonesome cave in the hills at the Dnipro riverside, where he could spend his time alone in prayers. That happened around 1051 A.D. That guy soon became the head of the Kyiv Church and left, but more hermits followed his suit and established their shelters in those caves. Over many years, they burrowed long mazes of catacombs and established churches and monastic cells. The monastery gradually became a grandiose Lavra, a magnificent center of religious and cultural life, the greatest in this corner of human civilization. As early as 1073 A.D., the Cathedral of the Dormition (or the 'Great Church') was established (and you can see the modern iteration of it, the magnificent white cathedral bearing images of the saints on its walls. Just like Kyiv, the Lavra was ruined and resurrected from ashes several times over its 1,000-year history. Mongolians seized and desolated Kyiv in 1240, and the Lavra was devastated so hard that it spent well over a century in empty ruins. Yet, it would always rise again in all of its glory. During WWII, the Great Church was blown up just as many other iconic locations of Kyiv, such as Kherschatyk Street (in my opinion, what happened was that the Soviets planted bombs at the Lavra upon their withdrawal from the city in 1941 and failed to detonate them on time; and Nazis took out the treasures of the Lavra and got rid of the Soviet bombs by blowing up the cathedral. Like many other significant treasures of Kyiv, the Great Church of the Lavra was resurrected by independent Ukraine by the 2000s. The Lavra is indeed a city within a city—I'm only showing you a tiny part of it that is popular with tourists. Unfortunately, the ancient monastery caves have been closed to visitors for over a year. Technically, the Lavra is a giant museum with many art exhibitions, collections of historical artifacts, and recreation zones for anyone. Right now, for instance, the Lavra Historical Museum exhibits ancient Scthyntian gold from Crimea that was recently returned to Ukraine. At the Lavra, you can easily find the resting places of many historical figures of the past, such as the one of Kostiantyn Ostrozky, the legendary ultra-rich magnate of the 15th and 16th centuries and the Lavra's lavish sponsor, or Petr Stolypin, the Russian imperial prime minister who was assassinated at the Kyiv Opera House in 1911. Of course, the Lavra is about the iconic Great Bell Tower, one of Kyiv's most legendary landmarks. The tower is 96 meters high and can be seen from around 30 kilometers away from the Lavra. It takes over 370 stairs to reach the tower's top -- but I'm telling you, it's 100% worth it as the Great Bell Tower shows you a truly stunning view of Kyiv, especially when the weather is fine. Fucking legend. For centuries, until recently, the Lavra was under complete control by the Russian Orthodox Church, which is fundamentally loyal to Russia. In 2023, amid the war against Russia, Kyiv authorities and the Zelensky administration tried (and failed) to terminate the Moscow clergy's legal presence at the Lavra in 2023. Currently, the Russian church and its monks remain in control of the so-called Lower Lavra. In the Upper Lavra, which has most of the iconic places and locations, the recently re-established Orthodox Church of Ukraine, the de-facto successor of the old original Christian church of the Kyiv Rus, now has its divine service again. Welcome to the beautiful ancient Kyiv.
3:23

Alright, beautiful people. It's time to cheer ourselves up in this dark time and experience the beauty of Kyiv, the Ukrainian capital. This will remind us and show you what is at stake in this war - and what it is that we're trying so hard to save from the blood-stained jaws of fascist Putin Russia. I'm inviting you to take a walk through the Kyiv Pechersk Lavra (or the Kyiv Lavra of the Caves), one of the most beautiful places in Kyiv and the most significant holy place in Eastern Slavic Orthodox Christianity. It's really as important as, for instance, St. Peter's Basicila to Italy or Notre Dame de Paris to France -- one can't imagine Kyiv without the Lavra, and I'm sure you couldn't help but have seen those silhouettes. So, about 1,000 years ago, Kyiv was living its golden age as the center of a large medieval kingdom of Rus under Prince Yaroslav the Wise—very possibly the greatest ruler of Kyiv ever. The official residence of the rulers of Kyiv Rus was located in the town of Berestove outside Kyiv (it's now where Kyiv's Park of Eternal Glory is). The Berestove priest Illarion sought comfort and solitude, so he dug a lonesome cave in the hills at the Dnipro riverside, where he could spend his time alone in prayers. That happened around 1051 A.D. That guy soon became the head of the Kyiv Church and left, but more hermits followed his suit and established their shelters in those caves. Over many years, they burrowed long mazes of catacombs and established churches and monastic cells. The monastery gradually became a grandiose Lavra, a magnificent center of religious and cultural life, the greatest in this corner of human civilization. As early as 1073 A.D., the Cathedral of the Dormition (or the 'Great Church') was established (and you can see the modern iteration of it, the magnificent white cathedral bearing images of the saints on its walls. Just like Kyiv, the Lavra was ruined and resurrected from ashes several times over its 1,000-year history. Mongolians seized and desolated Kyiv in 1240, and the Lavra was devastated so hard that it spent well over a century in empty ruins. Yet, it would always rise again in all of its glory. During WWII, the Great Church was blown up just as many other iconic locations of Kyiv, such as Kherschatyk Street (in my opinion, what happened was that the Soviets planted bombs at the Lavra upon their withdrawal from the city in 1941 and failed to detonate them on time; and Nazis took out the treasures of the Lavra and got rid of the Soviet bombs by blowing up the cathedral. Like many other significant treasures of Kyiv, the Great Church of the Lavra was resurrected by independent Ukraine by the 2000s. The Lavra is indeed a city within a city—I'm only showing you a tiny part of it that is popular with tourists. Unfortunately, the ancient monastery caves have been closed to visitors for over a year. Technically, the Lavra is a giant museum with many art exhibitions, collections of historical artifacts, and recreation zones for anyone. Right now, for instance, the Lavra Historical Museum exhibits ancient Scthyntian gold from Crimea that was recently returned to Ukraine. At the Lavra, you can easily find the resting places of many historical figures of the past, such as the one of Kostiantyn Ostrozky, the legendary ultra-rich magnate of the 15th and 16th centuries and the Lavra's lavish sponsor, or Petr Stolypin, the Russian imperial prime minister who was assassinated at the Kyiv Opera House in 1911. Of course, the Lavra is about the iconic Great Bell Tower, one of Kyiv's most legendary landmarks. The tower is 96 meters high and can be seen from around 30 kilometers away from the Lavra. It takes over 370 stairs to reach the tower's top -- but I'm telling you, it's 100% worth it as the Great Bell Tower shows you a truly stunning view of Kyiv, especially when the weather is fine. Fucking legend. For centuries, until recently, the Lavra was under complete control by the Russian Orthodox Church, which is fundamentally loyal to Russia. In 2023, amid the war against Russia, Kyiv authorities and the Zelensky administration tried (and failed) to terminate the Moscow clergy's legal presence at the Lavra in 2023. Currently, the Russian church and its monks remain in control of the so-called Lower Lavra. In the Upper Lavra, which has most of the iconic places and locations, the recently re-established Orthodox Church of Ukraine, the de-facto successor of the old original Christian church of the Kyiv Rus, now has its divine service again. Welcome to the beautiful ancient Kyiv.

Illia Ponomarenko 🇺🇦

77,221 просмотров • 2 лет назад

The History of Lagos Belongs to the Awori: A Correction of the Public Record The history of a people is best told by the people themselves. When outsiders, no matter how well-intentioned, attempt to narrate our history, crucial truths are lost, and a legacy of disrespect is created. As an Awori, I must set the record straight, because the story of Lagos is the story of my ancestors. For too long, our history has been told on our behalf, often inaccurately. We see this in videos where even respected figures, like a descendant of the great Chief Oshodi Tapa (a man of Nupe heritage), misrepresent fundamental details about our identity. This must stop. The Awori are still here, and the authentic history of Lagos resides with us. Here are the undeniable truths. 1. We Are the Indigenous People, Not "Settlers" Let us be perfectly clear: the Awori did not "settle" Lagos. We are the indigenous people of this land. Before there was a port, a palace, or a city, this was the ancestral home of the Awori, governed by our king, the Olofin, from the royal cradle of Isheri. The land was ours by primordial right, and it was our civilization that served as the foundation for everything that came after. We were the hosts, not the first guests. 2. Ashipa Was Our Chief First The identity of Ashipa, the first Oba of Lagos, is not a mystery to the Awori. He was not a Benin prince. - His name was Fagade, and he was a distinguished chief within our own community at Isheri. He was one of us. - His elevation came through an act of honor and diplomacy. When a Benin war captain, Asheru, died at Isheri, it was Chief Ashipa who undertook the noble task of returning his body to Benin for a proper burial. - This act earned him the respect of the Oba of Benin, who honored him with the war title "Oloriogun" and, crucially, gave him a Benin princess, Princess Wuse, in marriage. The Lagos Royal Family's own official history, published in 2021, confirms this. They proudly name their progenitor as “Fagade – The Ashipa an Isheri prince.” 3. The Benin Connection Is One of Alliance, Not Origin The only blood from Benin in the Lagos royal line came through Ashipa’s wife, the mother of his heir, Oba Ado. This makes the Benin Kingdom our respected in-laws, not our founders. The relationship was an alliance that brought power and prestige to the Lagos throne, but the throne itself was established by an Awori chief, on Awori land, with the consent of the Awori people. This is proven by the very symbol of the monarchy. A conquering king does not adopt the crown of the people he has conquered. Yet, the Obas of Lagos adopted the white cap, the sacred symbol of the indigenous Awori Idejo chiefs, as their crown. This was an act of respect and integration into our existing Awori power structure. Our History, Our Voice The story of Lagos is rich and complex. It involves many peoples—the Nupe, the Brazillian returnees, and many others who were welcomed and found a home here. But the foundation, the root, and the trunk of the tree are undeniably Awori. The history of Lagos is not a public debate for outsiders to interpret. It is our heritage. It is disrespectful for our story to be told for us, especially when it is told incorrectly. If you wish to know the story of the house, ask the family that built it. For the authentic history of Lagos, consult the Awori. Signed: Baba Awori
5:20

The History of Lagos Belongs to the Awori: A Correction of the Public Record The history of a people is best told by the people themselves. When outsiders, no matter how well-intentioned, attempt to narrate our history, crucial truths are lost, and a legacy of disrespect is created. As an Awori, I must set the record straight, because the story of Lagos is the story of my ancestors. For too long, our history has been told on our behalf, often inaccurately. We see this in videos where even respected figures, like a descendant of the great Chief Oshodi Tapa (a man of Nupe heritage), misrepresent fundamental details about our identity. This must stop. The Awori are still here, and the authentic history of Lagos resides with us. Here are the undeniable truths. 1. We Are the Indigenous People, Not "Settlers" Let us be perfectly clear: the Awori did not "settle" Lagos. We are the indigenous people of this land. Before there was a port, a palace, or a city, this was the ancestral home of the Awori, governed by our king, the Olofin, from the royal cradle of Isheri. The land was ours by primordial right, and it was our civilization that served as the foundation for everything that came after. We were the hosts, not the first guests. 2. Ashipa Was Our Chief First The identity of Ashipa, the first Oba of Lagos, is not a mystery to the Awori. He was not a Benin prince. - His name was Fagade, and he was a distinguished chief within our own community at Isheri. He was one of us. - His elevation came through an act of honor and diplomacy. When a Benin war captain, Asheru, died at Isheri, it was Chief Ashipa who undertook the noble task of returning his body to Benin for a proper burial. - This act earned him the respect of the Oba of Benin, who honored him with the war title "Oloriogun" and, crucially, gave him a Benin princess, Princess Wuse, in marriage. The Lagos Royal Family's own official history, published in 2021, confirms this. They proudly name their progenitor as “Fagade – The Ashipa an Isheri prince.” 3. The Benin Connection Is One of Alliance, Not Origin The only blood from Benin in the Lagos royal line came through Ashipa’s wife, the mother of his heir, Oba Ado. This makes the Benin Kingdom our respected in-laws, not our founders. The relationship was an alliance that brought power and prestige to the Lagos throne, but the throne itself was established by an Awori chief, on Awori land, with the consent of the Awori people. This is proven by the very symbol of the monarchy. A conquering king does not adopt the crown of the people he has conquered. Yet, the Obas of Lagos adopted the white cap, the sacred symbol of the indigenous Awori Idejo chiefs, as their crown. This was an act of respect and integration into our existing Awori power structure. Our History, Our Voice The story of Lagos is rich and complex. It involves many peoples—the Nupe, the Brazillian returnees, and many others who were welcomed and found a home here. But the foundation, the root, and the trunk of the tree are undeniably Awori. The history of Lagos is not a public debate for outsiders to interpret. It is our heritage. It is disrespectful for our story to be told for us, especially when it is told incorrectly. If you wish to know the story of the house, ask the family that built it. For the authentic history of Lagos, consult the Awori. Signed: Baba Awori

Baba Awori

20,962 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

The Trump administration underestimated Iran’s willingness to close the Strait of Hormuz, note many in the media. CNN reported that while the Departments of Energy and the Treasury participated in pre-war planning meetings, “the agency analysis and forecasts that would be integral elements of the decision-making process in past administrations were secondary considerations.” But the Strait of Hormuz was a catastrophe waiting to happen. A few years from now, people will look back on this moment and find it incredible that the world allowed the global economy to be dependent on moving so much oil and natural gas through such a dangerous bottleneck. Part of the solution is for the world to reduce its dependence on Persian Gulf oil and gas. That will require expanding production outside the Persian Gulf. Another part is to help Persian Gulf nations move more of their oil and gas through new or expanded pipelines to the Red Sea and perhaps even the Mediterranean. The faster the world builds those alternatives, the less leverage Iran retains. Many believe that the United States must not allow Iran to control the Strait under any circumstances, and the instinct to fight for Hormuz is understandable. It has been a central artery of global energy for over half a century. But instead of fighting to reopen the Strait, the world should build around it. The infrastructure to do so already exists in embryonic form. Saudi Arabia’s East-West pipeline, built during the Iran-Iraq war in the 1980s, carries crude 750 miles across the kingdom from the Gulf coast to the Red Sea port of Yanbu, with a design capacity of 7 million barrels per day. The UAE’s Abu Dhabi Crude Oil Pipeline runs to Fujairah on the Gulf of Oman, bypassing the Strait entirely. And Iraq’s Kirkuk-Ceyhan pipeline connects to the Mediterranean coast of Turkey. Gulf states are already exploring a broader network of pipelines, railways, and roads, including the U.S.-backed India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor (IMEC), that would create multiple export routes to the Red Sea and the Mediterranean. Kuwait, Bahrain, and Qatar, which have no bypass pipelines at all, should build routes through Saudi Arabia or Iraq, argued The National, a UAE newspaper. And Japan, South Korea, and India should, the paper argued, invest alongside Gulf sovereign wealth funds. Iran will almost certainly impose tolls on vessels transiting the Strait, as its parliament has already passed a bill to formalize fee collection. A toll of $2 to $5 per barrel, the range analysts expect Iran to charge, would add roughly $40 to $100 billion per year to global energy costs. But more war will cause far more harm than simply building alternatives because every escalation destroys infrastructure that the world needs to produce and export energy. While “all roads” may lead to “structurally higher oil prices,” as one analysis of future scenarios concluded, one of those roads leads to far less damage to people and energy infrastructure. Iran’s strikes on Ras Laffan, Qatar’s LNG hub, will take three to five years to repair. The strikes on South Pars threaten the world’s largest natural gas reserve. Iran’s attacks on Gulf neighbors have damaged refineries, desalination plants, and port facilities across Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Bahrain, and Kuwait. And consider how much more damage is possible. After the US struck Kharg Island, Iran’s main oil export hub, and Israel hit Iran’s largest petrochemical complex at South Pars, the world’s largest natural gas reserve, Iran’s military threatened to “deprive the U.S. and its allies of the region’s oil and gas for years.” As such, the $40 to $100 billion is a fraction of the $2 trillion or more that Goldman Sachs has estimated the war has already cost the global economy in lost output, destroyed infrastructure, and elevated energy prices. And continued war could lead Iran to cut off the flows of existing Saudi oil flows through its East-West pipeline. Iranian adviser Aliakbar Velayati warned that Iran views the Bab al-Mandab Strait off Yemen “with the same intensity as Hormuz” and that “the flow of energy and global trade can be disrupted with a single signal.” Please subscribe now to support Public's award-winning investigative journalism, read the rest of the article, and watch the full video.
3:56

The Trump administration underestimated Iran’s willingness to close the Strait of Hormuz, note many in the media. CNN reported that while the Departments of Energy and the Treasury participated in pre-war planning meetings, “the agency analysis and forecasts that would be integral elements of the decision-making process in past administrations were secondary considerations.” But the Strait of Hormuz was a catastrophe waiting to happen. A few years from now, people will look back on this moment and find it incredible that the world allowed the global economy to be dependent on moving so much oil and natural gas through such a dangerous bottleneck. Part of the solution is for the world to reduce its dependence on Persian Gulf oil and gas. That will require expanding production outside the Persian Gulf. Another part is to help Persian Gulf nations move more of their oil and gas through new or expanded pipelines to the Red Sea and perhaps even the Mediterranean. The faster the world builds those alternatives, the less leverage Iran retains. Many believe that the United States must not allow Iran to control the Strait under any circumstances, and the instinct to fight for Hormuz is understandable. It has been a central artery of global energy for over half a century. But instead of fighting to reopen the Strait, the world should build around it. The infrastructure to do so already exists in embryonic form. Saudi Arabia’s East-West pipeline, built during the Iran-Iraq war in the 1980s, carries crude 750 miles across the kingdom from the Gulf coast to the Red Sea port of Yanbu, with a design capacity of 7 million barrels per day. The UAE’s Abu Dhabi Crude Oil Pipeline runs to Fujairah on the Gulf of Oman, bypassing the Strait entirely. And Iraq’s Kirkuk-Ceyhan pipeline connects to the Mediterranean coast of Turkey. Gulf states are already exploring a broader network of pipelines, railways, and roads, including the U.S.-backed India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor (IMEC), that would create multiple export routes to the Red Sea and the Mediterranean. Kuwait, Bahrain, and Qatar, which have no bypass pipelines at all, should build routes through Saudi Arabia or Iraq, argued The National, a UAE newspaper. And Japan, South Korea, and India should, the paper argued, invest alongside Gulf sovereign wealth funds. Iran will almost certainly impose tolls on vessels transiting the Strait, as its parliament has already passed a bill to formalize fee collection. A toll of $2 to $5 per barrel, the range analysts expect Iran to charge, would add roughly $40 to $100 billion per year to global energy costs. But more war will cause far more harm than simply building alternatives because every escalation destroys infrastructure that the world needs to produce and export energy. While “all roads” may lead to “structurally higher oil prices,” as one analysis of future scenarios concluded, one of those roads leads to far less damage to people and energy infrastructure. Iran’s strikes on Ras Laffan, Qatar’s LNG hub, will take three to five years to repair. The strikes on South Pars threaten the world’s largest natural gas reserve. Iran’s attacks on Gulf neighbors have damaged refineries, desalination plants, and port facilities across Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Bahrain, and Kuwait. And consider how much more damage is possible. After the US struck Kharg Island, Iran’s main oil export hub, and Israel hit Iran’s largest petrochemical complex at South Pars, the world’s largest natural gas reserve, Iran’s military threatened to “deprive the U.S. and its allies of the region’s oil and gas for years.” As such, the $40 to $100 billion is a fraction of the $2 trillion or more that Goldman Sachs has estimated the war has already cost the global economy in lost output, destroyed infrastructure, and elevated energy prices. And continued war could lead Iran to cut off the flows of existing Saudi oil flows through its East-West pipeline. Iranian adviser Aliakbar Velayati warned that Iran views the Bab al-Mandab Strait off Yemen “with the same intensity as Hormuz” and that “the flow of energy and global trade can be disrupted with a single signal.” Please subscribe now to support Public's award-winning investigative journalism, read the rest of the article, and watch the full video.

Michael Shellenberger

61,948 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

That interview was absolutely dynamite and totally coherent. Dr. Sophie Chandauka comes across as a logical, rational, and brilliant woman who’s unfairly facing harassment for bravely standing up for what is right. It's evident that the governance at Sentebale fell short of Charity Commission standards, with questionable financial records, loss of funds, Trustees on the board for 19 years, complacency and Harry consistently disregarding rules, standards, and policies. Trustees with poor attendance records should do their job properly or sit down. Dr Sophie decision to shift the decision-making process and primary operations to Africa clearly upset some, as people tend to resist change. Its apparent that the charity was stagnant and needed the fresh ideas and eyes. Possible power struggles between Markle and the chair. Prince Harry maintained a good and cordial relationship with Sophie until she deviated from his instructions, at which point he unleashed his yes men and the Sussex PR machinery against her. Harry displays hypocrisy by planting smears and false narratives in the media, accusing others of the very behaviors he exhibits, projecting his own shortcomings onto everyone. Sophie made the right call in refusing to let the charity serve as an extension of the Sussex PR apparatus, and it's apparent that Harry, Duke of Sussex and Meghan Markle, Duchess of Sussex operate according to their own rules, neglecting proper business etiquette and company practices. Chandauka diplomatically said The Sussexes are entitled, rude and cause chaos at events. This goes against their security concerns. I can only imagine how difficult and petulant they were while in the RF. Naturally, the charity has lost donors, as Harry has devoted the past five years to pursuing his personal agenda of self-promotion, revenge, and hypocrisy over the charity needs. Sophie emerged as a highly intelligent and well-prepared woman who is now unfairly facing attacks, smears, and abuse from Harry's trolls, sycophants, and PR team. She had clearly prioritised the best interests of the charity, its employees, and the community it serves above the needs of Harry’s tantrums and ego. My advice to the ex trustees and Sussex PR machine, Sophie will sue you. Just because Harry founded Sentebale with the help of the RF doesn’t mean he gets a free pass; if he’s not prioritising the charity’s needs over his and his wife’s personal agenda right now, he should step aside until he can focus on what actually matters—not his crisis PR or self-promotion cash grab. I’ve got mad respect and total confidence in the women (Lionesses) running Sentebale. Additionally, Harry should have handled this situation with proper mediation rather than turning to the media, which sparked this highly public dispute. Meghan has negatively impacted every part of his life, and Harry has allowed it to happen. Together, they exhibit toxic behavior and possess a distorted view of themselves. They need to mature and put an end to their self-absorbed nonsense. To the Sussex Squad trolls and the media friends supporting Harry and Meghan Markle, I urge you to cease your attacks on the insightful and caring African women of strength at Sentebale. It's time for some self-reflection on your part. “Our commitment to supporting youth in Southern Africa with better health, stronger livelihoods, and climate resilience remains as strong as ever. The work continues because they deserve nothing less” ❤️ — Senteable Leadership Team #PrinceHarry #Sentebale #DrSophie
18:14

That interview was absolutely dynamite and totally coherent. Dr. Sophie Chandauka comes across as a logical, rational, and brilliant woman who’s unfairly facing harassment for bravely standing up for what is right. It's evident that the governance at Sentebale fell short of Charity Commission standards, with questionable financial records, loss of funds, Trustees on the board for 19 years, complacency and Harry consistently disregarding rules, standards, and policies. Trustees with poor attendance records should do their job properly or sit down. Dr Sophie decision to shift the decision-making process and primary operations to Africa clearly upset some, as people tend to resist change. Its apparent that the charity was stagnant and needed the fresh ideas and eyes. Possible power struggles between Markle and the chair. Prince Harry maintained a good and cordial relationship with Sophie until she deviated from his instructions, at which point he unleashed his yes men and the Sussex PR machinery against her. Harry displays hypocrisy by planting smears and false narratives in the media, accusing others of the very behaviors he exhibits, projecting his own shortcomings onto everyone. Sophie made the right call in refusing to let the charity serve as an extension of the Sussex PR apparatus, and it's apparent that Harry, Duke of Sussex and Meghan Markle, Duchess of Sussex operate according to their own rules, neglecting proper business etiquette and company practices. Chandauka diplomatically said The Sussexes are entitled, rude and cause chaos at events. This goes against their security concerns. I can only imagine how difficult and petulant they were while in the RF. Naturally, the charity has lost donors, as Harry has devoted the past five years to pursuing his personal agenda of self-promotion, revenge, and hypocrisy over the charity needs. Sophie emerged as a highly intelligent and well-prepared woman who is now unfairly facing attacks, smears, and abuse from Harry's trolls, sycophants, and PR team. She had clearly prioritised the best interests of the charity, its employees, and the community it serves above the needs of Harry’s tantrums and ego. My advice to the ex trustees and Sussex PR machine, Sophie will sue you. Just because Harry founded Sentebale with the help of the RF doesn’t mean he gets a free pass; if he’s not prioritising the charity’s needs over his and his wife’s personal agenda right now, he should step aside until he can focus on what actually matters—not his crisis PR or self-promotion cash grab. I’ve got mad respect and total confidence in the women (Lionesses) running Sentebale. Additionally, Harry should have handled this situation with proper mediation rather than turning to the media, which sparked this highly public dispute. Meghan has negatively impacted every part of his life, and Harry has allowed it to happen. Together, they exhibit toxic behavior and possess a distorted view of themselves. They need to mature and put an end to their self-absorbed nonsense. To the Sussex Squad trolls and the media friends supporting Harry and Meghan Markle, I urge you to cease your attacks on the insightful and caring African women of strength at Sentebale. It's time for some self-reflection on your part. “Our commitment to supporting youth in Southern Africa with better health, stronger livelihoods, and climate resilience remains as strong as ever. The work continues because they deserve nothing less” ❤️ — Senteable Leadership Team #PrinceHarry #Sentebale #DrSophie

The British Prince

128,701 просмотров • 1 год назад

( #WednesdayMotivation #Wednesdayvibe Hump Day Garnacho #GetBetrayed #NHS75 Horizon ) Statement No. 02 The Story of the death of King Salman Al Saud and the clinical death of Mohamed Ben Salman owing to coronavirus. Warning to Prince Mohammed Bin Salman.. Imam Mahdi Nasser Mohammed Al-Yamani 23-Jumada II-1443AH 26-January-2022AD 07:07 AM (According to the official time of Mecca Mother of Towns) __________ Warning to Prince Mohammed Bin Salman In the name of Allaah, the Most Gracious the Most Merciful. O His Royal Highness Prince Mohammed Bin Salman Bin Abdul Aziz, I bear witness to Allaah and all mankind and jinns that I command you to set all my Saudi and Non-Saudi supporters from the prisons of KSA, all at once without any delay in implementing the order Perhaps Mohammed Bin Salman would like to say: "And who are you, O Nasser Mohammed Al-Yamani, to issue an order to His Royal Highness Mohammed Bin Salman to give orders to release your Saudi and Non-Saudi supporters from the prisons of Saudi Arabia?" Then, Nasser Mohammed Al-Yamani replies to you and says: " I am indeed Imam Mahdi, Allaah's caliph on the whole world. I swear by Allaah the Great who will achieve His purpose, if you did not obey the command of Allaah's caliph Al-Mahdi Nasser Mohammed Al-Yamani, Allaah would do to you what He has done to your Father; thus He Sends against you His firm plan, COVID, so it strikes you down into a clinical death as it did to your father; leading to your own death! So your highness and superiority in Earth would not benefit you and you will never find besides Allaah a helper or protector, then He makes you an example for whoever disobeys the order to obey His caliph on the whole world Perhaps Mohammed Bin Salman would like to say: "Do you believe the rumors about the death of my father? Nay, they are just conjectures. O Nasser Mohammed Al-Yamani, did not you claim that you do not say about Allah conjectures that do not avail anything against the truth?" Then, Allaah's caliph Al-Mahdi Nasser Mohammed Al-Yamani replies to you and says: "O Mohammed Bin Salman, Allaah's caliph on the worlds is not of those who speak using expectations, predictions, or guesses and far is that from being the truth! I swear by Lord of the earth and heavens that the news from Allaah Lord of the worlds confirms the fact that Allaah has stricken down King Salman Bin Abdul Aziz with the so-called Coronavirus. Or do you think that your father was stricken down with corona due to his age and the weakness of his immune system, and you see that you are young and Allaah's firm plan cannot take you down into a clinical death until Allaah pleases then you die? Surely, there is no escape from COVID; Allaah's firm plan, so beware of the planning of Allaah the One the Overpowering! Do not you know that whoever opposes Allaah's caliph Al-Mahdi Nasser Mohammed Al-Yamani has opposed Allaah? And whoever opposes Allaah and His caliph indeed Allaah is severe in Punishment. So who would save you from the severe torment of Allaah if Nasser Mohammed Al-Yamani was truly Imam Mahdi; Allaah's caliph on the worlds?! O man, I do not say I am Allaah's caliph on Yemen only but Allaah's caliph on the whole world. Would not Allaah achieve His purpose if Nasser Mohammed Al-Yamani was truly the Caliph of Allaah who is chosen by Allaah Lord of the worlds? And if I were a liar it would be to my own loss and no harm shall befall you. Also, if I were truthful, Allaah would inevitably hit you with what His caliph Al-Mahdi Nasser Mohammed Al-Yamani,promised you O man, fear Allaah and submit to Allaah's caliph Al-Mahdi Nasser Mohammed Al-Yamani, thus Allaah would increase you in power and honor as I will not break Allaah's promise, in the clear verses of His Book the Great Quran, to whoever fears Allaah the One the Overpowering from among decision-makers, so he sought Allaah's forgiveness and worshipped Him alone no partners Has He. Allaah's has indeed ordered me to increase him in power and honor in line with the promise of Allaah in the clear verses of His Book the Great Quran in the Word of Allaah the Exalted: {وَإِذْ تَأَذَّنَ رَبُّكُمْ لَئِن شَكَرْتُمْ لَأَزِيدَنَّكُمْ ۖ وَلَئِن كَفَرْتُمْ إِنَّ عَذَابِي لَشَدِيدٌ ﴿٧﴾} {And (remember) when your Lord proclaimed: "If you give thanks (by accepting Faith and worshipping none but Allah), I will give you more (of My Blessings), but if you are thankless (i.e. disbelievers), verily! My Punishment is indeed severe."} 14:7 So think and consider and get the plotting of the three out of your head! O Mohammed Bin Salman, What is your thought about Whom Ar-Rahman (Allaah) is with Him?! I swear by Allaah that mankind and jinns will not have power over him, and whoever denied this has tasted a punishment. And we will wait and see who is swifter in planning, the arrogant ones or Allaah? And this challenge is not out of my own accord but it is from Allaah who Knows best what is within yourselves O Mohammed Bin Salman and his soldiers. That is why Allaah has ordered me to say to Mohammed Bin Salman and his soldiers the following: (What is your thought about Whom Allaah is with Him) So it is better for you to obey the command and to turn away from plotting and if you did not I challenge you and all those who want to plot against the Caliph of Allaah the One the Overpowering, and we shall wait and see who is swifter in planning and He has power over everything, the best protector and the best helper. All matters return to Allaah, He knows the treachery of the eyes and whatever is concealed by hearts And I remind and say: Think and estimate and decide and choose what is good for yourself and ask forgiveness for your sin and be one of the thankful and do not be one of the disbelievers, I am for you among the advisors and for all the decision-makers in the peoples of mankind, and I repeat and state that I do not sing to you with poetry or exaggerate without the right in prose, but rather the Caliph of Allaah, the One, the Overpowering, Won't Allaah accomplish his purpose -Glorified and highly Exalted is He above what they say? Whoever worships Allaah alone no partners with Him, Allaah will give him glory to his glory, and whoever disbelieves, Allaah will strip him of his possessions, and he will lose this world and the hereafter. That is the clear loss And Peace be on the messengers and Praise be to Allaah.. Allaah's Caliph and servant Imam Mahdi; Nasser Mohammed Al Yamani Translated by: Deena ADEL ,Bahy Mansour
7:10

( #WednesdayMotivation #Wednesdayvibe Hump Day Garnacho #GetBetrayed #NHS75 Horizon ) Statement No. 02 The Story of the death of King Salman Al Saud and the clinical death of Mohamed Ben Salman owing to coronavirus. Warning to Prince Mohammed Bin Salman.. Imam Mahdi Nasser Mohammed Al-Yamani 23-Jumada II-1443AH 26-January-2022AD 07:07 AM (According to the official time of Mecca Mother of Towns) __________ Warning to Prince Mohammed Bin Salman In the name of Allaah, the Most Gracious the Most Merciful. O His Royal Highness Prince Mohammed Bin Salman Bin Abdul Aziz, I bear witness to Allaah and all mankind and jinns that I command you to set all my Saudi and Non-Saudi supporters from the prisons of KSA, all at once without any delay in implementing the order Perhaps Mohammed Bin Salman would like to say: "And who are you, O Nasser Mohammed Al-Yamani, to issue an order to His Royal Highness Mohammed Bin Salman to give orders to release your Saudi and Non-Saudi supporters from the prisons of Saudi Arabia?" Then, Nasser Mohammed Al-Yamani replies to you and says: " I am indeed Imam Mahdi, Allaah's caliph on the whole world. I swear by Allaah the Great who will achieve His purpose, if you did not obey the command of Allaah's caliph Al-Mahdi Nasser Mohammed Al-Yamani, Allaah would do to you what He has done to your Father; thus He Sends against you His firm plan, COVID, so it strikes you down into a clinical death as it did to your father; leading to your own death! So your highness and superiority in Earth would not benefit you and you will never find besides Allaah a helper or protector, then He makes you an example for whoever disobeys the order to obey His caliph on the whole world Perhaps Mohammed Bin Salman would like to say: "Do you believe the rumors about the death of my father? Nay, they are just conjectures. O Nasser Mohammed Al-Yamani, did not you claim that you do not say about Allah conjectures that do not avail anything against the truth?" Then, Allaah's caliph Al-Mahdi Nasser Mohammed Al-Yamani replies to you and says: "O Mohammed Bin Salman, Allaah's caliph on the worlds is not of those who speak using expectations, predictions, or guesses and far is that from being the truth! I swear by Lord of the earth and heavens that the news from Allaah Lord of the worlds confirms the fact that Allaah has stricken down King Salman Bin Abdul Aziz with the so-called Coronavirus. Or do you think that your father was stricken down with corona due to his age and the weakness of his immune system, and you see that you are young and Allaah's firm plan cannot take you down into a clinical death until Allaah pleases then you die? Surely, there is no escape from COVID; Allaah's firm plan, so beware of the planning of Allaah the One the Overpowering! Do not you know that whoever opposes Allaah's caliph Al-Mahdi Nasser Mohammed Al-Yamani has opposed Allaah? And whoever opposes Allaah and His caliph indeed Allaah is severe in Punishment. So who would save you from the severe torment of Allaah if Nasser Mohammed Al-Yamani was truly Imam Mahdi; Allaah's caliph on the worlds?! O man, I do not say I am Allaah's caliph on Yemen only but Allaah's caliph on the whole world. Would not Allaah achieve His purpose if Nasser Mohammed Al-Yamani was truly the Caliph of Allaah who is chosen by Allaah Lord of the worlds? And if I were a liar it would be to my own loss and no harm shall befall you. Also, if I were truthful, Allaah would inevitably hit you with what His caliph Al-Mahdi Nasser Mohammed Al-Yamani,promised you O man, fear Allaah and submit to Allaah's caliph Al-Mahdi Nasser Mohammed Al-Yamani, thus Allaah would increase you in power and honor as I will not break Allaah's promise, in the clear verses of His Book the Great Quran, to whoever fears Allaah the One the Overpowering from among decision-makers, so he sought Allaah's forgiveness and worshipped Him alone no partners Has He. Allaah's has indeed ordered me to increase him in power and honor in line with the promise of Allaah in the clear verses of His Book the Great Quran in the Word of Allaah the Exalted: {وَإِذْ تَأَذَّنَ رَبُّكُمْ لَئِن شَكَرْتُمْ لَأَزِيدَنَّكُمْ ۖ وَلَئِن كَفَرْتُمْ إِنَّ عَذَابِي لَشَدِيدٌ ﴿٧﴾} {And (remember) when your Lord proclaimed: "If you give thanks (by accepting Faith and worshipping none but Allah), I will give you more (of My Blessings), but if you are thankless (i.e. disbelievers), verily! My Punishment is indeed severe."} 14:7 So think and consider and get the plotting of the three out of your head! O Mohammed Bin Salman, What is your thought about Whom Ar-Rahman (Allaah) is with Him?! I swear by Allaah that mankind and jinns will not have power over him, and whoever denied this has tasted a punishment. And we will wait and see who is swifter in planning, the arrogant ones or Allaah? And this challenge is not out of my own accord but it is from Allaah who Knows best what is within yourselves O Mohammed Bin Salman and his soldiers. That is why Allaah has ordered me to say to Mohammed Bin Salman and his soldiers the following: (What is your thought about Whom Allaah is with Him) So it is better for you to obey the command and to turn away from plotting and if you did not I challenge you and all those who want to plot against the Caliph of Allaah the One the Overpowering, and we shall wait and see who is swifter in planning and He has power over everything, the best protector and the best helper. All matters return to Allaah, He knows the treachery of the eyes and whatever is concealed by hearts And I remind and say: Think and estimate and decide and choose what is good for yourself and ask forgiveness for your sin and be one of the thankful and do not be one of the disbelievers, I am for you among the advisors and for all the decision-makers in the peoples of mankind, and I repeat and state that I do not sing to you with poetry or exaggerate without the right in prose, but rather the Caliph of Allaah, the One, the Overpowering, Won't Allaah accomplish his purpose -Glorified and highly Exalted is He above what they say? Whoever worships Allaah alone no partners with Him, Allaah will give him glory to his glory, and whoever disbelieves, Allaah will strip him of his possessions, and he will lose this world and the hereafter. That is the clear loss And Peace be on the messengers and Praise be to Allaah.. Allaah's Caliph and servant Imam Mahdi; Nasser Mohammed Al Yamani Translated by: Deena ADEL ,Bahy Mansour

Imam Mahdi Nasser Mohammed Al-Yamani

12,835 просмотров • 3 лет назад

Prime Minister Muhammad Shehbaz Sharif warmly welcomed Iranian President Dr. Masoud Pezeshkian and his delegation to Pakistan amid reaffirming Islamabad’s commitment to strengthening bilateral ties across multiple sectors, including trade, economic development, infrastructure and reconstruction, and promoting peace and stability in the region. During his opening remarks at the delegation-level talks, the Prime Minister said it was a great pleasure to receive the Iranian President in Islamabad and thanked him for accepting his invitation to visit Pakistan. Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif said, “I have no doubt that the brave and resilient people of Iran, with their immense capabilities and natural resources, will transform their country into a flourishing economy.” Pakistan and Iran would continue joint efforts to achieve shared prosperity, he added. The prime minister thanked the Iranian leadership for trusting Pakistan’s sincere and honest mediation efforts and assured Tehran that Pakistan would continue to play a constructive role in promoting lasting peace. “True brotherhood requires no questions or answers,” the Prime Minister remarked, emphasizing that Pakistan would continue supporting peace initiatives based on dignity, honour and mutual respect. The prime minister conveyed his warm regards to Iran’s Supreme Leader and praised the Iranian leadership for its efforts that led to the signing of a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) and the achievement of a ceasefire with “dignity and honour.” Expressing solidarity with the people of Iran, Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif offered his deepest condolences over the loss of innocent lives, including children, women, boys and girls, during the recent conflict. He commended President Pezeshkian’s sagacious, calm and vigilant leadership that had helped pave the way for a more peaceful future. Highlighting the role of Pakistan’s military leadership, Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif particularly acknowledged the efforts of Field Marshal Syed Asim Munir, whom he credited with working tirelessly to facilitate dialogue and support the signing of the MoU. “He worked untiringly through difficult days and nights with one mission: to do everything humanly possible to stop a war that could have brought devastation across vast regions,” the prime minister said. He also referred to the first technical-level session held in Switzerland and thanked Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Senator Ishaq Dar as well as Interior Minister Mohsin Naqvi for their diplomatic engagements and shuttle diplomacy efforts. The prime minister further appreciated the support extended by Qatar and other brotherly countries for advancing the peace initiative. He also lauded the contributions of Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan and Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi for their support and efforts toward regional stability. PM Shehbaz Sharif noted that he had informed Parliament about President Pezeshkian’s visit and said the people of Pakistan were delighted to welcome the Iranian leader. Reaffirming the close ties between the two neighbouring countries, he stated, “Iran and Pakistan are brothers, and we stand together in times of happiness and sorrow.” Addressing speculation regarding the contents of the MoU, Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif clarified that ballistic missiles were neither included in the agreement nor discussed during negotiations, as the issue was not on the agenda. He cautioned against any misunderstanding regarding the agreement and suggested that certain elements had attempted to undermine peace efforts. The prime minister emphasized that there should be no confusion about the MoU’s scope, reiterating that it focused on promoting peace and stability and did not contain any provisions related to ballistic missile issues.
0:58

Prime Minister Muhammad Shehbaz Sharif warmly welcomed Iranian President Dr. Masoud Pezeshkian and his delegation to Pakistan amid reaffirming Islamabad’s commitment to strengthening bilateral ties across multiple sectors, including trade, economic development, infrastructure and reconstruction, and promoting peace and stability in the region. During his opening remarks at the delegation-level talks, the Prime Minister said it was a great pleasure to receive the Iranian President in Islamabad and thanked him for accepting his invitation to visit Pakistan. Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif said, “I have no doubt that the brave and resilient people of Iran, with their immense capabilities and natural resources, will transform their country into a flourishing economy.” Pakistan and Iran would continue joint efforts to achieve shared prosperity, he added. The prime minister thanked the Iranian leadership for trusting Pakistan’s sincere and honest mediation efforts and assured Tehran that Pakistan would continue to play a constructive role in promoting lasting peace. “True brotherhood requires no questions or answers,” the Prime Minister remarked, emphasizing that Pakistan would continue supporting peace initiatives based on dignity, honour and mutual respect. The prime minister conveyed his warm regards to Iran’s Supreme Leader and praised the Iranian leadership for its efforts that led to the signing of a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) and the achievement of a ceasefire with “dignity and honour.” Expressing solidarity with the people of Iran, Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif offered his deepest condolences over the loss of innocent lives, including children, women, boys and girls, during the recent conflict. He commended President Pezeshkian’s sagacious, calm and vigilant leadership that had helped pave the way for a more peaceful future. Highlighting the role of Pakistan’s military leadership, Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif particularly acknowledged the efforts of Field Marshal Syed Asim Munir, whom he credited with working tirelessly to facilitate dialogue and support the signing of the MoU. “He worked untiringly through difficult days and nights with one mission: to do everything humanly possible to stop a war that could have brought devastation across vast regions,” the prime minister said. He also referred to the first technical-level session held in Switzerland and thanked Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Senator Ishaq Dar as well as Interior Minister Mohsin Naqvi for their diplomatic engagements and shuttle diplomacy efforts. The prime minister further appreciated the support extended by Qatar and other brotherly countries for advancing the peace initiative. He also lauded the contributions of Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan and Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi for their support and efforts toward regional stability. PM Shehbaz Sharif noted that he had informed Parliament about President Pezeshkian’s visit and said the people of Pakistan were delighted to welcome the Iranian leader. Reaffirming the close ties between the two neighbouring countries, he stated, “Iran and Pakistan are brothers, and we stand together in times of happiness and sorrow.” Addressing speculation regarding the contents of the MoU, Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif clarified that ballistic missiles were neither included in the agreement nor discussed during negotiations, as the issue was not on the agenda. He cautioned against any misunderstanding regarding the agreement and suggested that certain elements had attempted to undermine peace efforts. The prime minister emphasized that there should be no confusion about the MoU’s scope, reiterating that it focused on promoting peace and stability and did not contain any provisions related to ballistic missile issues.

Prime Minister's Office

10,964 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

BOOM!!! 💥💥💥 Dr. Aseem Malhotra's testimony was delivered in the Helsinski District Court on April 12, 2024, with the understanding that any deviation from the truth would constitute perjury. This clip was immediately banned by YouTube so please share widely. I've trimmed the clip, removing the interpreter's segment for a smoother listening experience. Here's the first hour of the testimony. ---------------------------------- My name is Doctor Aseem Malhotra. I am a consultant cardiologist. I've been a qualified doctor since 2001. I have held various roles both in academic health policy. In England, in the United Kingdom, and of the various roles, I won't bore you with all the details. I think three of the most relevant and prominent are the fact that I was an ambassador for the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges for six years, which represented every doctor in the UK. I served a full term of six years as a trustee of the King's fund. I was the youngest member to be appointed to this body which advises government on health policy. I was a founding member of Action on Sugar and a first science director. And through that role I'm considered the lead campaigner on bringing about a sugary drinks tax in the UK. And also, finally I served for five years as visiting professor of evidence based medicine at the Bahiana School of Medicine in Salvador, Brazil. In early 2020, at the beginning of the pandemic I was most vocal doctor on the mainstream, making the link very early on between COVID and those who are vulnerable to suffering serious complications from COVID In fact, in March 2020, I was asked to go on Sky News to explain my initial research findings of the link between especially obesity and COVID, but also to give people an opportunity and to suggest to the government this was a great time for them to implement public health policy to help people enhance or optimise their immune system, which could happen within just a few weeks of dietary changes and optimising vitamin D. This was later also backed up by medical journal publications a few months later. And I was first to mention on the back of an article I published in the Daily Telegraph newspaper, which became a front page commentary and was picked up by BBC News and Good Morning Britain, where I had said that it's likely our prime minister, Boris Johnson, was hospitalised because of his weight. As a result of that, the then secretary for health, Matt Hancock, and this was publicised in the news, had asked me to advise him on the link between COVID and obesity. ...before I explain my journey and in many ways U-turn on my understanding in terms of the benefits and harms of the COVID vaccine, my experience in this area over the last couple of years has made me realise more than ever that even for that the greatest barrier to the truth are not factual or intellectual barriers, but psychological. I think all of us as human beings are vulnerable to these psychological barriers and we should have compassion for ourselves. And I will just very briefly summarise those three psychological barriers before I get into my detailed account of what I was involved in in regards to the COVID vaccine. The first psychological barrier is one of fear. And many of us understandably, and I still remember from early on in the pandemic, we were all scared. We did not know what we were dealing with. The issue with fear is that when people and populations are in a state of fear, we are less likely to engage in critical thinking and we are more likely to be compliant. Although COVID was particularly devastating for vulnerable groups in the elderly and I even have managed and still manage people with long COVID, the fear was grossly exaggerated. And one of the examples of that is that when we had good information on the mortality rate of COVID in the United States, one survey in 2020 revealed that 50% of Americans believed that if they caught COVID, the risk of 19 hospitalisation was 50% one and two, when the actual figure, certainly an average for people in middle age, was less than 1%. The second barrier to the truth, which I think is very relevant to the situation we find ourselves in now, is one called willful blindness. This is when human beings, all of us, are vulnerable to this, turn a blind eye to the truth in order to feel safe, avoid conflict, reduce anxiety and to protect prestige and fragile egos. Some examples of this include, on a personal level, willful blindness can occur when a spouse turns a blind eye to the affair of their partner. On an institutional level, some great examples of willful blindness include Hollywood and Harvey Weinstein, the Catholic Church and child molestation. I believe the current situation we find ourselves in, with much of the mainstream narrative and the medical establishment and policy makers not acknowledging quite horrific, serious and common harms from this vaccine, is another example of willful blindness. And I also say this with full empathy, because I was one of those people that was for a very long time, willfully blind to the harms of the COVID vaccine. In January 2021, I was one of the first people to take two doses of the COVID mRNA vaccine because I volunteered in a vaccine centre. I still believe that traditional vaccines are some of the safest amongst all pharmacological interventions in medicine and I could not conceive of any possibility whatsoever of this vaccine causing harm. As a public figure and respected doctor in the UK, I have built relationships across the board with many other public figures, including celebrities and politicians, who often come to me for medical advice. One of those people was film director Gurinder Chadha, who you may be familiar with some of her work, including the movie "Bend It like Beckham", who had asked me whether or not she should take the vaccine and had sent me blogs which I dismissed and regarded as anti vax nonsense. I was then asked to go on good morning, Britain because Gurinder Chadha, the director herself tweeted that I had convinced her to take the vaccine. The main reason for this TV appearance was to help tackle vaccine hesitancy, which was very prominent amongst people from ethnic minority groups in the UK. I made the point on that programme that I understand where vaccine hesitancy was coming from because of the history that I have been involved with over many years in highlighting the shortcomings of pharmaceutical industry influence over medicine. And I even made the point, if I remember correctly, that they have been found guilty of fraud on many occasions, that the third most common cause of death, prepandemic after heart disease and cancer, is prescribed medications. I, however, reassured the public and said that despite these figures, of everything we do in medicine, traditional vaccinations are amongst the safest. I still believe this to be the case. A few months later, in April 2021, I met with a colleague and friend of mine who I regard as one of the brightest cardiologists in the United Kingdom. I was surprised when he told me that he had not taken the COVID vaccine. He explained to me that he had concerns because he had seen in the supplementary appendix of Pfizer's original trial that there were four cardiac arrests in the vaccine group and only one in the placebo. These numbers were small and did not reach statistical significance. So this could be random chance, or his concern was it could represent a signal of problems in the future. And if this was the case, we are going to have a huge problem. He said he'd rather wait and see what happens before taking the vaccine. On July 26, 2021, my father, aged 73, who was a very prominent, well known doctor in the UK, including being the honorary vice president of the British Medical Association and had received honours from the Queen of England with an OBE, suffered an unexpected sudden cardiac arrest. I was particularly devastated by this happening and I was also I find it difficult to understand why my father, who was a fit and well man, I knew his cardiac history and his cardiac status, would suffer a cardiac arrest. But also my initial investigation was to try and understand why there had been a 30 minutes ambulance delay arriving to his apartment. Two weeks later, the deputy chief nurse of NHS England, a government health body, called me up. She was very upset, she knew my father very well and she was crying and she told me, Aseem, there's something I need to tell you. She in effect told me that throughout the country, for the last two months prior to my father's cardiac arrest in most regions of the UK, ambulances were not getting to patients in time for heart attacks and cardiac arrests. And there had been a deliberate, and I will use these words because I mentioned it, I've mentioned it before, a cover up involving the government and the Department of Health to withhold this information from doctors and the public. I worked with an investigative journalist with the I newspaper in the UK to write an article and a news story that became BBC News headlines a few months later, exposing this. Just before I exposed this, I messaged a professor of cardiology who I trust in the UK. He has a leadership role to explain to him what had happened and what I was about to do. I have text message evidence of this. He told me not to do this because it would make me enemies. I explained to him that I had a duty to patients and the public. I'm highlighting this as one example and I'll give you more examples of a cultural problem within medicine. The next part of this story is the post mortem findings of my father. They did not make any sense to me. I am considered a leading expert, maybe in the world, on the development and progression of coronary artery disease. My father had two severe blockages in his coronary arteries. There was no actual evidence of heart attack and likely there was a rhythm disturbance because of reduced blood supply that led to his cardiac arrest. Then in, within the space of a few weeks, around October and November, 3, different sources of information was brought to my attention that made me realise that there was probably a significant problem with the COVID mRNA vaccine. The first in October 2021. I remember I was giving lectures in Stockholm. I was contacted by a journalist with a Times newspaper who reported to me and said, Dr Malhotra, we have reports of an unexplained 25% increase in heart attacks in hospitals in Scotland and asked me what I thought was going on. I explained to her that at that time, with the evidence I knew in my own experience, I said that two likely contributory factors were lockdown stress. We know that when populations undergo severe stress after war, for example, there is an increase in heart attacks and strokes that can last for many years. She asked me whether I thought that there was a contribution. I was surprised when she asked me whether I thought there may be a contribution of the COVID vaccine to these heart attacks. I said to her, a good scientist should never exclude any possibility. But I felt at the time it was unlikely to be related to the COVID vaccine. But we should watch this space and keep our eyes open. A few weeks later, a publication appeared in the Journal Circulation, which is considered the highest impact cardiology journal in the United States that revealed a potentially very strong link between the COVID mRNA vaccines and acceleration in heart attack risk. Very specifically, in several hundred people of middle age, there was a plausible mechanism, by use of inflammatory markers in the blood, that increased the baseline risk of those people having a heart attack in five years, from 11% to 25%, just within two months of having the COVID mRNA vaccines. Of course, this is one bit of data, but even if partially true, that is a huge increase in risk in a very short space of time. And for me now made me think and link back to why my father may have suffered a cardiac arrest six months after having two doses of the vaccine. I remember thinking and speaking to a colleague, that if this was true, then we were going to see an increase in cardiac arrests, heart attacks and excess deaths in heavily vaccinated countries for the next few years. Then within a few weeks, I was called up by a whistleblower at a very prestigious british institution. I will name that institution, which I have not done publicly before as a University of Oxford. This cardiologist explained to me that a group of researchers in his department had accidentally found, through the use of very specialised imaging of the heart, that there was a signal of increased inflammation of the heart arteries, which was there in the vaccinated, but not there in the unvaccinated. The lead researcher of that group had sat down, the juniors, and had said that we are not going to explore these findings any further because it may affect our funding from the pharmaceutical industry. At that point, with these three bits of information, I then felt it was my ethical duty to speak out. And I went on GBNews to talk about what I'd found what I'd heard and I'd asked for the Vaccine Committee of the UK on TV to investigate this, to see whether there was a real problem with the vaccine in relation to heart issues. Around the same time which I found very strange is that the Secretary of State for Health at that stage, who was not Matt Hancock, was Sajid Javid, had announced in parliament that we are going to introduce legislation to ensure that all healthcare workers are mandated to have the COVID vaccine. For me, this, by that stage had no ethical or scientific justification, because certainly after the summer of 2021, it had become very apparent that the COVID mRNA vaccine was not stopping infection and it certainly was not stopping transmission. It was understood that approximately 80,000 NHS workers had refused at this stage to have the COVID vaccine. And now they were threatened with losing their job if by April the following year they had not been fully vaccinated. Many of these people were very concerned and contacted me around that time, I was also conducting many interviews, both through the BBC and Sky News and GBNews in regards to what happened with my father's ambulance delay. And I used it as an opportunity on the mainstream media to call for Sajid Javid, the secretary for health, to U-turn on the introduction of a mandate for healthcare workers based upon the fact that I felt it was not scientific and it was unethical. I also received my own personal backlash from these comments where I was contacted by the Royal College of Physicians who I had an affiliation with, and they asked me to respond to anonymous complaints from doctors that I was spreading, in quotes, antivax disinformation. I felt with my own knowledge and experience of the healthcare system that this was a direct response probably fueled by a combination of willful blindness and institutional corruption. To elaborate a bit further, when I say institutional corruption, I mean that my view was that the complaints were likely being fueled by academics with financial ties to the pharmaceutical industry. I felt very concerned about the potential introduction of the vaccine, well, the vaccine mandate. And therefore I decided there were two things that I decided to do. The first was I made a phone call to the chairman of the British Medical Association in December 2021. I had a good relationship with him and he respected my opinion. And I spent 2 hours on the phone explaining to him everything that I knew up to that stage about my concerns of the COVID mRNA vaccine. He said to me, "Aseem, nobody appears to critically appraise the evidence on the COVID mRNA vaccine as well as you have from our conversation, he said, most of my colleagues are getting their information on the benefits and harms of the vaccine from the BBC". This was replicated by the former chair of the CDC in the United States, Rochelle Walensky, who in an interview later on had said that her initial optimism of the vaccine benefits came from CNN News report. I say this just to emphasise that we should all accept our vulnerabilities to where we receive health information. Even doctors, policymakers, judges and lawyers are all influenced on the public massively by mainstream media. The chairman of the BMA also agreed with me. There was no ethical or scientific justification for mandating the COVID vaccine. He said the BMA also did not support it. And he said because of my conversation with him, he would speak directly to the secretary for health, Sajid Javid. One month later, at the end of January 2022, the COVID vaccine mandate for healthcare workers was overturned. I at that stage, given the fact that there was some backlash happening towards me, I realised that because this is a very big issue and area, and not my initial area of expertise, I needed to carry out my own critical analysis of the COVID mRNA vaccines. I spent six to nine months critically appraising the data, including speaking to two Pfizer whistleblowers, three investigative medical journalists and eminent scientists from the University of Oxford, Stanford and Harvard. The most critical bit, the most critical research that was published on this issue, which I think the whole court should acknowledge in August 2022, was published in the journal Vaccine. That research was conducted by some of the world's top independent of drug industry influence academics. That research, we was able to reanalyze the original randomised control trials conducted by Pfizer and Moderna. They were able to do this because new information was made available on the FDA's website and Health Canada's website. The conclusions of that paper were really very disturbing. The original trials that led to the drug regulatory approval of these vaccines revealed that you were more likely to suffer serious harm from taking the vaccine, specifically hospitalisation, life changing event or disability, than you were to be hospitalised with COVID That rate of harm at two months was very high at 1 in 800. Just to give you some perspective, historically we have suspended other vaccines for much less. In 1976, the swine flu vaccine was pulled because it was found to cause a neurological syndrome called Guillain-Barre syndrome In one in 100,000 people. In 1999, the rotavirus vaccine was suspended because it was found to cause a form of bowel obstruction in children affecting 1 in 10,000. This was 1 in 800. In my view, it was very clear that given this information, published in the highest impact Vaccine journal in the world, peer reviewed, and has not had any significant rebuttals, that this vaccine now, in my view, should never have been approved for use in a single human being in the first place. In my view, this very important court case in some ways, actually is a distraction from the much bigger issue, which is there should be court cases around the world with a full inquiry into the pharmaceutical industry and an inquiry as to how we got this so very wrong. Of course, one could argue this is just one bit of research, but actually, unfortunately, there are different, many different strands of research that are showing a signal of considerable and common serious harm from these vaccines. From pharmacovigilance data that is reporting what we call yellow card reports from the public. We have plausible biological mechanism of harm. We have other research called observational data. We have autopsy data also confirming that certainly with the majority of people who died within a short space of time of having the vaccine in relation to the heart, was definitively caused by the vaccine. This is really a very, very, very horrific situation we find ourselves in. One would hope and expect that the regulators should be independently evaluating all medications. But of course, the evidence reveals this is far from true. There was an investigation by the BMJ, also published in the summer of 2022, which revealed that most of the major regulators across the world were taking most of their money from the drug industry. For example, the MHRA in the UK receives 86% of its funding from the drug industry, and the FDA in America receives 65% of its funding from the drug industry, A fact that most doctors do not know. And therefore, I would not expect members of the court to know this either, is that very, very rarely do drug industry sponsored research get independently evaluated. Clinical trial data can often involve thousands of pages of information on individual patients. The drug companies hold onto that raw data. They then give summary results to the regulator, who are then paying, who have an incentive to approve the drugs, and the drugs are then approved. I made these points in my peer reviewed article published in the Journal of Insulin Resistance in September 2022, where I concluded that we should pause and investigate the issue around the COVID mRNA vaccines. I have since then been campaigning and advocating for a return to ethical evidence based medical practise around the world. Some of the clear solutions moving forward would be changes in the law that are required so that patients, doctors, members of the public can have greater confidence in the information they receive to make decisions about their health. Two very clear, low hanging fruit solutions, which are both ethical, scientific and democratic, would be that the drug industry should be allowed to develop drugs, but they shouldn't be allowed to test them themselves. And they certainly shouldn't be allowed to design their own research to and hold onto the raw data. Their information needs to be independently evaluated. One other clear solution would also be that the medical regulators, again, should not be taking any money from the industry, as this is a gross conflict of interest. I also want to highlight for people to understand the bigger picture. Prior to the pandemic, I had realised that there was a big problem with the reliability of clinical research, where invariably the results of clinical trials on all drugs sponsored by the drug industry, grossly exaggerate their safety and benefits. I have taken this information to the European Parliament, where I spoke in 2019, and I spoke to very senior politicians in the UK government. But although they were sympathetic, they felt that the issue was much bigger than them as individuals, and therefore it also needed media attention to get public awareness on the importance of such an inquiry. Before we continue with further questions, as I've been speaking for quite a long time now I'll just finish with two references just for the court and the judges to understand just how bad this problem is. Prepandemic the man who I call the Stephen Hawking of medicine is Professor John Ioannidis from the University of Stanford. The reason I call him the Stephen Hawking of Medicine is he's the most cited medical researcher in the world and is a mathematical genius. In 2006, he published a paper which was entitled why most published research findings are false. In that paper, he makes a point that the greater the financial interests in a given field, the less likely the research findings are to be true. I say this in context of the Pfizer mRNA vaccine which has made the company $100 billion. The other point that he makes in a further paper in 2017 is, again, the reason the system continues as it is is most doctors are unaware of the information they receive when they make clinical decisions has been corrupted by commercial influence. The other credible name I will mention is the editor of the Lancet, Richard Horton, who I personally know. In 2015, he wrote an article in the Lancet in relation to a secret meeting that had taken place with himself and some of the world's top medical academics. In that, he wrote that possibly half of the medical published literature may simply be untrue. And he said that science has taken a turn towards darkness. But who's going to take the first step to clean up the system? I believe in this case and in this court today, this is going to be a very pivotal potential moment in history for that first step. ---------------------- Dr Aseem Malhotra H/T: Tiina Keskimäki 🇫🇮
29:17

BOOM!!! 💥💥💥 Dr. Aseem Malhotra's testimony was delivered in the Helsinski District Court on April 12, 2024, with the understanding that any deviation from the truth would constitute perjury. This clip was immediately banned by YouTube so please share widely. I've trimmed the clip, removing the interpreter's segment for a smoother listening experience. Here's the first hour of the testimony. ---------------------------------- My name is Doctor Aseem Malhotra. I am a consultant cardiologist. I've been a qualified doctor since 2001. I have held various roles both in academic health policy. In England, in the United Kingdom, and of the various roles, I won't bore you with all the details. I think three of the most relevant and prominent are the fact that I was an ambassador for the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges for six years, which represented every doctor in the UK. I served a full term of six years as a trustee of the King's fund. I was the youngest member to be appointed to this body which advises government on health policy. I was a founding member of Action on Sugar and a first science director. And through that role I'm considered the lead campaigner on bringing about a sugary drinks tax in the UK. And also, finally I served for five years as visiting professor of evidence based medicine at the Bahiana School of Medicine in Salvador, Brazil. In early 2020, at the beginning of the pandemic I was most vocal doctor on the mainstream, making the link very early on between COVID and those who are vulnerable to suffering serious complications from COVID In fact, in March 2020, I was asked to go on Sky News to explain my initial research findings of the link between especially obesity and COVID, but also to give people an opportunity and to suggest to the government this was a great time for them to implement public health policy to help people enhance or optimise their immune system, which could happen within just a few weeks of dietary changes and optimising vitamin D. This was later also backed up by medical journal publications a few months later. And I was first to mention on the back of an article I published in the Daily Telegraph newspaper, which became a front page commentary and was picked up by BBC News and Good Morning Britain, where I had said that it's likely our prime minister, Boris Johnson, was hospitalised because of his weight. As a result of that, the then secretary for health, Matt Hancock, and this was publicised in the news, had asked me to advise him on the link between COVID and obesity. ...before I explain my journey and in many ways U-turn on my understanding in terms of the benefits and harms of the COVID vaccine, my experience in this area over the last couple of years has made me realise more than ever that even for that the greatest barrier to the truth are not factual or intellectual barriers, but psychological. I think all of us as human beings are vulnerable to these psychological barriers and we should have compassion for ourselves. And I will just very briefly summarise those three psychological barriers before I get into my detailed account of what I was involved in in regards to the COVID vaccine. The first psychological barrier is one of fear. And many of us understandably, and I still remember from early on in the pandemic, we were all scared. We did not know what we were dealing with. The issue with fear is that when people and populations are in a state of fear, we are less likely to engage in critical thinking and we are more likely to be compliant. Although COVID was particularly devastating for vulnerable groups in the elderly and I even have managed and still manage people with long COVID, the fear was grossly exaggerated. And one of the examples of that is that when we had good information on the mortality rate of COVID in the United States, one survey in 2020 revealed that 50% of Americans believed that if they caught COVID, the risk of 19 hospitalisation was 50% one and two, when the actual figure, certainly an average for people in middle age, was less than 1%. The second barrier to the truth, which I think is very relevant to the situation we find ourselves in now, is one called willful blindness. This is when human beings, all of us, are vulnerable to this, turn a blind eye to the truth in order to feel safe, avoid conflict, reduce anxiety and to protect prestige and fragile egos. Some examples of this include, on a personal level, willful blindness can occur when a spouse turns a blind eye to the affair of their partner. On an institutional level, some great examples of willful blindness include Hollywood and Harvey Weinstein, the Catholic Church and child molestation. I believe the current situation we find ourselves in, with much of the mainstream narrative and the medical establishment and policy makers not acknowledging quite horrific, serious and common harms from this vaccine, is another example of willful blindness. And I also say this with full empathy, because I was one of those people that was for a very long time, willfully blind to the harms of the COVID vaccine. In January 2021, I was one of the first people to take two doses of the COVID mRNA vaccine because I volunteered in a vaccine centre. I still believe that traditional vaccines are some of the safest amongst all pharmacological interventions in medicine and I could not conceive of any possibility whatsoever of this vaccine causing harm. As a public figure and respected doctor in the UK, I have built relationships across the board with many other public figures, including celebrities and politicians, who often come to me for medical advice. One of those people was film director Gurinder Chadha, who you may be familiar with some of her work, including the movie "Bend It like Beckham", who had asked me whether or not she should take the vaccine and had sent me blogs which I dismissed and regarded as anti vax nonsense. I was then asked to go on good morning, Britain because Gurinder Chadha, the director herself tweeted that I had convinced her to take the vaccine. The main reason for this TV appearance was to help tackle vaccine hesitancy, which was very prominent amongst people from ethnic minority groups in the UK. I made the point on that programme that I understand where vaccine hesitancy was coming from because of the history that I have been involved with over many years in highlighting the shortcomings of pharmaceutical industry influence over medicine. And I even made the point, if I remember correctly, that they have been found guilty of fraud on many occasions, that the third most common cause of death, prepandemic after heart disease and cancer, is prescribed medications. I, however, reassured the public and said that despite these figures, of everything we do in medicine, traditional vaccinations are amongst the safest. I still believe this to be the case. A few months later, in April 2021, I met with a colleague and friend of mine who I regard as one of the brightest cardiologists in the United Kingdom. I was surprised when he told me that he had not taken the COVID vaccine. He explained to me that he had concerns because he had seen in the supplementary appendix of Pfizer's original trial that there were four cardiac arrests in the vaccine group and only one in the placebo. These numbers were small and did not reach statistical significance. So this could be random chance, or his concern was it could represent a signal of problems in the future. And if this was the case, we are going to have a huge problem. He said he'd rather wait and see what happens before taking the vaccine. On July 26, 2021, my father, aged 73, who was a very prominent, well known doctor in the UK, including being the honorary vice president of the British Medical Association and had received honours from the Queen of England with an OBE, suffered an unexpected sudden cardiac arrest. I was particularly devastated by this happening and I was also I find it difficult to understand why my father, who was a fit and well man, I knew his cardiac history and his cardiac status, would suffer a cardiac arrest. But also my initial investigation was to try and understand why there had been a 30 minutes ambulance delay arriving to his apartment. Two weeks later, the deputy chief nurse of NHS England, a government health body, called me up. She was very upset, she knew my father very well and she was crying and she told me, Aseem, there's something I need to tell you. She in effect told me that throughout the country, for the last two months prior to my father's cardiac arrest in most regions of the UK, ambulances were not getting to patients in time for heart attacks and cardiac arrests. And there had been a deliberate, and I will use these words because I mentioned it, I've mentioned it before, a cover up involving the government and the Department of Health to withhold this information from doctors and the public. I worked with an investigative journalist with the I newspaper in the UK to write an article and a news story that became BBC News headlines a few months later, exposing this. Just before I exposed this, I messaged a professor of cardiology who I trust in the UK. He has a leadership role to explain to him what had happened and what I was about to do. I have text message evidence of this. He told me not to do this because it would make me enemies. I explained to him that I had a duty to patients and the public. I'm highlighting this as one example and I'll give you more examples of a cultural problem within medicine. The next part of this story is the post mortem findings of my father. They did not make any sense to me. I am considered a leading expert, maybe in the world, on the development and progression of coronary artery disease. My father had two severe blockages in his coronary arteries. There was no actual evidence of heart attack and likely there was a rhythm disturbance because of reduced blood supply that led to his cardiac arrest. Then in, within the space of a few weeks, around October and November, 3, different sources of information was brought to my attention that made me realise that there was probably a significant problem with the COVID mRNA vaccine. The first in October 2021. I remember I was giving lectures in Stockholm. I was contacted by a journalist with a Times newspaper who reported to me and said, Dr Malhotra, we have reports of an unexplained 25% increase in heart attacks in hospitals in Scotland and asked me what I thought was going on. I explained to her that at that time, with the evidence I knew in my own experience, I said that two likely contributory factors were lockdown stress. We know that when populations undergo severe stress after war, for example, there is an increase in heart attacks and strokes that can last for many years. She asked me whether I thought that there was a contribution. I was surprised when she asked me whether I thought there may be a contribution of the COVID vaccine to these heart attacks. I said to her, a good scientist should never exclude any possibility. But I felt at the time it was unlikely to be related to the COVID vaccine. But we should watch this space and keep our eyes open. A few weeks later, a publication appeared in the Journal Circulation, which is considered the highest impact cardiology journal in the United States that revealed a potentially very strong link between the COVID mRNA vaccines and acceleration in heart attack risk. Very specifically, in several hundred people of middle age, there was a plausible mechanism, by use of inflammatory markers in the blood, that increased the baseline risk of those people having a heart attack in five years, from 11% to 25%, just within two months of having the COVID mRNA vaccines. Of course, this is one bit of data, but even if partially true, that is a huge increase in risk in a very short space of time. And for me now made me think and link back to why my father may have suffered a cardiac arrest six months after having two doses of the vaccine. I remember thinking and speaking to a colleague, that if this was true, then we were going to see an increase in cardiac arrests, heart attacks and excess deaths in heavily vaccinated countries for the next few years. Then within a few weeks, I was called up by a whistleblower at a very prestigious british institution. I will name that institution, which I have not done publicly before as a University of Oxford. This cardiologist explained to me that a group of researchers in his department had accidentally found, through the use of very specialised imaging of the heart, that there was a signal of increased inflammation of the heart arteries, which was there in the vaccinated, but not there in the unvaccinated. The lead researcher of that group had sat down, the juniors, and had said that we are not going to explore these findings any further because it may affect our funding from the pharmaceutical industry. At that point, with these three bits of information, I then felt it was my ethical duty to speak out. And I went on GBNews to talk about what I'd found what I'd heard and I'd asked for the Vaccine Committee of the UK on TV to investigate this, to see whether there was a real problem with the vaccine in relation to heart issues. Around the same time which I found very strange is that the Secretary of State for Health at that stage, who was not Matt Hancock, was Sajid Javid, had announced in parliament that we are going to introduce legislation to ensure that all healthcare workers are mandated to have the COVID vaccine. For me, this, by that stage had no ethical or scientific justification, because certainly after the summer of 2021, it had become very apparent that the COVID mRNA vaccine was not stopping infection and it certainly was not stopping transmission. It was understood that approximately 80,000 NHS workers had refused at this stage to have the COVID vaccine. And now they were threatened with losing their job if by April the following year they had not been fully vaccinated. Many of these people were very concerned and contacted me around that time, I was also conducting many interviews, both through the BBC and Sky News and GBNews in regards to what happened with my father's ambulance delay. And I used it as an opportunity on the mainstream media to call for Sajid Javid, the secretary for health, to U-turn on the introduction of a mandate for healthcare workers based upon the fact that I felt it was not scientific and it was unethical. I also received my own personal backlash from these comments where I was contacted by the Royal College of Physicians who I had an affiliation with, and they asked me to respond to anonymous complaints from doctors that I was spreading, in quotes, antivax disinformation. I felt with my own knowledge and experience of the healthcare system that this was a direct response probably fueled by a combination of willful blindness and institutional corruption. To elaborate a bit further, when I say institutional corruption, I mean that my view was that the complaints were likely being fueled by academics with financial ties to the pharmaceutical industry. I felt very concerned about the potential introduction of the vaccine, well, the vaccine mandate. And therefore I decided there were two things that I decided to do. The first was I made a phone call to the chairman of the British Medical Association in December 2021. I had a good relationship with him and he respected my opinion. And I spent 2 hours on the phone explaining to him everything that I knew up to that stage about my concerns of the COVID mRNA vaccine. He said to me, "Aseem, nobody appears to critically appraise the evidence on the COVID mRNA vaccine as well as you have from our conversation, he said, most of my colleagues are getting their information on the benefits and harms of the vaccine from the BBC". This was replicated by the former chair of the CDC in the United States, Rochelle Walensky, who in an interview later on had said that her initial optimism of the vaccine benefits came from CNN News report. I say this just to emphasise that we should all accept our vulnerabilities to where we receive health information. Even doctors, policymakers, judges and lawyers are all influenced on the public massively by mainstream media. The chairman of the BMA also agreed with me. There was no ethical or scientific justification for mandating the COVID vaccine. He said the BMA also did not support it. And he said because of my conversation with him, he would speak directly to the secretary for health, Sajid Javid. One month later, at the end of January 2022, the COVID vaccine mandate for healthcare workers was overturned. I at that stage, given the fact that there was some backlash happening towards me, I realised that because this is a very big issue and area, and not my initial area of expertise, I needed to carry out my own critical analysis of the COVID mRNA vaccines. I spent six to nine months critically appraising the data, including speaking to two Pfizer whistleblowers, three investigative medical journalists and eminent scientists from the University of Oxford, Stanford and Harvard. The most critical bit, the most critical research that was published on this issue, which I think the whole court should acknowledge in August 2022, was published in the journal Vaccine. That research was conducted by some of the world's top independent of drug industry influence academics. That research, we was able to reanalyze the original randomised control trials conducted by Pfizer and Moderna. They were able to do this because new information was made available on the FDA's website and Health Canada's website. The conclusions of that paper were really very disturbing. The original trials that led to the drug regulatory approval of these vaccines revealed that you were more likely to suffer serious harm from taking the vaccine, specifically hospitalisation, life changing event or disability, than you were to be hospitalised with COVID That rate of harm at two months was very high at 1 in 800. Just to give you some perspective, historically we have suspended other vaccines for much less. In 1976, the swine flu vaccine was pulled because it was found to cause a neurological syndrome called Guillain-Barre syndrome In one in 100,000 people. In 1999, the rotavirus vaccine was suspended because it was found to cause a form of bowel obstruction in children affecting 1 in 10,000. This was 1 in 800. In my view, it was very clear that given this information, published in the highest impact Vaccine journal in the world, peer reviewed, and has not had any significant rebuttals, that this vaccine now, in my view, should never have been approved for use in a single human being in the first place. In my view, this very important court case in some ways, actually is a distraction from the much bigger issue, which is there should be court cases around the world with a full inquiry into the pharmaceutical industry and an inquiry as to how we got this so very wrong. Of course, one could argue this is just one bit of research, but actually, unfortunately, there are different, many different strands of research that are showing a signal of considerable and common serious harm from these vaccines. From pharmacovigilance data that is reporting what we call yellow card reports from the public. We have plausible biological mechanism of harm. We have other research called observational data. We have autopsy data also confirming that certainly with the majority of people who died within a short space of time of having the vaccine in relation to the heart, was definitively caused by the vaccine. This is really a very, very, very horrific situation we find ourselves in. One would hope and expect that the regulators should be independently evaluating all medications. But of course, the evidence reveals this is far from true. There was an investigation by the BMJ, also published in the summer of 2022, which revealed that most of the major regulators across the world were taking most of their money from the drug industry. For example, the MHRA in the UK receives 86% of its funding from the drug industry, and the FDA in America receives 65% of its funding from the drug industry, A fact that most doctors do not know. And therefore, I would not expect members of the court to know this either, is that very, very rarely do drug industry sponsored research get independently evaluated. Clinical trial data can often involve thousands of pages of information on individual patients. The drug companies hold onto that raw data. They then give summary results to the regulator, who are then paying, who have an incentive to approve the drugs, and the drugs are then approved. I made these points in my peer reviewed article published in the Journal of Insulin Resistance in September 2022, where I concluded that we should pause and investigate the issue around the COVID mRNA vaccines. I have since then been campaigning and advocating for a return to ethical evidence based medical practise around the world. Some of the clear solutions moving forward would be changes in the law that are required so that patients, doctors, members of the public can have greater confidence in the information they receive to make decisions about their health. Two very clear, low hanging fruit solutions, which are both ethical, scientific and democratic, would be that the drug industry should be allowed to develop drugs, but they shouldn't be allowed to test them themselves. And they certainly shouldn't be allowed to design their own research to and hold onto the raw data. Their information needs to be independently evaluated. One other clear solution would also be that the medical regulators, again, should not be taking any money from the industry, as this is a gross conflict of interest. I also want to highlight for people to understand the bigger picture. Prior to the pandemic, I had realised that there was a big problem with the reliability of clinical research, where invariably the results of clinical trials on all drugs sponsored by the drug industry, grossly exaggerate their safety and benefits. I have taken this information to the European Parliament, where I spoke in 2019, and I spoke to very senior politicians in the UK government. But although they were sympathetic, they felt that the issue was much bigger than them as individuals, and therefore it also needed media attention to get public awareness on the importance of such an inquiry. Before we continue with further questions, as I've been speaking for quite a long time now I'll just finish with two references just for the court and the judges to understand just how bad this problem is. Prepandemic the man who I call the Stephen Hawking of medicine is Professor John Ioannidis from the University of Stanford. The reason I call him the Stephen Hawking of Medicine is he's the most cited medical researcher in the world and is a mathematical genius. In 2006, he published a paper which was entitled why most published research findings are false. In that paper, he makes a point that the greater the financial interests in a given field, the less likely the research findings are to be true. I say this in context of the Pfizer mRNA vaccine which has made the company $100 billion. The other point that he makes in a further paper in 2017 is, again, the reason the system continues as it is is most doctors are unaware of the information they receive when they make clinical decisions has been corrupted by commercial influence. The other credible name I will mention is the editor of the Lancet, Richard Horton, who I personally know. In 2015, he wrote an article in the Lancet in relation to a secret meeting that had taken place with himself and some of the world's top medical academics. In that, he wrote that possibly half of the medical published literature may simply be untrue. And he said that science has taken a turn towards darkness. But who's going to take the first step to clean up the system? I believe in this case and in this court today, this is going to be a very pivotal potential moment in history for that first step. ---------------------- Dr Aseem Malhotra H/T: Tiina Keskimäki 🇫🇮

aussie17

799,537 просмотров • 2 лет назад