Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

مجدداً، المحـ.ـرّضة على قـ.ـتل العلـ.ـويين وتد.مـ.ير جـ.ـبالهم.. المدعوة إيلا ذا بيلا (آلاء سـ.ـعيد طـ.ـالب).. بعد تحريـ.ـضها على قـ.ـتل الناس في الساحل، كما نشاهد في أول الفيديو.. ​تقوم الآن بمهاجمة سلـ.ـطة الأمر الواقع التي طبلت لها، وحرّضت المجـ.ـرمين فيها على قـ.ـتل الأبرياء، ونفذوا جرائـ.ـمهم... تقوم الآن بالسخرية وتقول إنها أصبحت...

11,235 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Behavior Unbecoming of a Vice President Desperate to keep her family’s influence in Philippine politics or maybe some sort of revenge for being the very first Vice President impeached in the history of the land — Sara Zimmerman Duterte on her campaign tour is proving to the world that the articles of impeachment as submitted are correct. That indeed… SHE IS UNFIT TO REMAIN IN OFFICE! Anywhere she goes, all she could offer are senseless accusations and baseless criticisms against the people who voted for her impeachment. At least she is honest that her intentions are selfish, that her endorsement of the candidates is solely for self-preservation. I dare Sara Zimmerman Duterte to tell the people listening to you, what did you do to make their lives better? You promised to solve the education crisis, things went worse when you were Department of Education Secretary. And don’t let me get started with the Office of the Vice President! Your incompetence is beyond me! I can guarantee that in terms of accomplishments and competence, you are nothing compared to those who voted to impeach you! You are nothing but those you are discrediting. If she thinks that duly elected representatives are not worth the explanation about questionable expenditures of her offices, I dare Sara Zimmerman Duterte to explain to her supporters what she claims to love and value. The impeachment prosecutors are very confident that one of the prayers in the complaint is the continuation of the proceeding even if she chooses to resign. The impeachment complaint is clear, that 80% of the members of the House of Representatives were convinced. Seven impeachment articles! And she only needs to be convicted in one! Do not vote any Duterte candidates this May 2025!

Just

56,772 просмотров • 1 год назад

#WATCH | 1984 anti-Sikh riots | Delhi: Senior Advocate HS Phoolka describes the statement of an eyewitness, Harpal Kaur Bedi, in a case against Congress leader Jagdish Tytler in the Rouse Avenue Court Senior Advocate HS Phoolka says, "Jagdish Tytler came to Pul Bangash Gurudwara on 1st November, 1984 and instigated the mob. Due to his instigation, the mob burnt the Gurudwara and killed three Sikhs. In the case going on against him, a very important testimony has been given today. Harpal Kaur Bedi had a shop there (near the Gurudwara)... The mob came and looted that shop... Her house was also in front of that shop. She left her house to find that people were looting her shop... Then they saw that Jagdish Tytler came there in a car. He stopped in front of the Gurudwara and got out of the car. They recognised Tytler because her (Harpal Kaur Bedi) husband, Amarjit Bedi, was also a Congress leader and Tytler used to come to their shop... People gathered around Tytler. He told the people to kill the Sikhs and then loot them. And pointing towards the Gurudwara, he (Tytler) asked the mob to burn it... After that, Tytler sat in his car and left. Harpal Kaur Bedi and her family returned to their house in fear... This entire scene was told to the court today. The cross-examination done by the lawyers on behalf of Jagdish Tytler was also completed today... She told the judge how she kept getting threats. She had only one son. He used to get threats, and they kept quiet because of those threats. Unfortunately, in 2015 her son died. After that, she thought that since her son is no more, she has nothing to fear. So she told everything to the CBI. Today, she told the judge that after her son's death, she realised that now she does not have to be afraid... She was also offered a lot of bribes... She was threatened not to go to the court, saying that Tytler is a very big man... She told the judge that she is getting threats, but now she is not afraid for her life. She explained the whole matter to the judge completely..."

ANI

22,803 просмотров • 1 год назад

Now they're really bringing out the high level MKUltra psyop tactics with the murder of babies in the Israel and Gaza conflict to really get people behind the war machine. Where have we seen this before? OH RIGHT. Nayirah. She was a 15 year old Kuwaiti girl who testified to congress that she had witnessed the murder of infant children by Iraqi soldiers by pulling them from incubators to die. Her testimony was instantly believed at the time and widely used in the media to bang the drums of war and get us involved in the conflict in the Gulf. Years later, it was discovered here testimony was a complete fabrication and she was an actor. The public relations firm Hill and Knowlton, which was employed by the Citizens for Free Kuwait, arranged the testimony, helped her with the speech, and coached her on delivery. The CIA is who requested she take the acting lessons in the first place. She was also the niece of a major politician in Kuwait, and later disclosed to be Nayirah al-Sabah, daughter of Saud bin Nasir Al-Sabah, Kuwaiti ambassador to the USA. You have to question everything. Every single narrative. Every story. Every picture. Every video. ALL. OF. IT. These people are the absolute masters of propaganda and mind control. They are seriously wizards in how good they are at manufacturing reality and manipulating your emotions into giving consent for things that are nowhere near your best interests. I know it's difficult for some to comprehend such disgusting levels of evil, deceit, and willful manipulation, but it is an unfortunate and demonstrable fact of reality. COVID and the vaccine should have taught you this already. 9/11 should have taught you this long before that as well. Those who don't know their history are doomed to repeat it.

Inversionism

695,067 просмотров • 2 лет назад

[EP.2] After watching the second episode, many people said they couldn’t understand the ending where Nanno takes the initiative to lift her skirt, revealing underwear with a name on it and letting the three voyeurs see. Some people think this didn’t punish the three boys at all. So what does this ending actually mean? #เด็กใหม่TheResetEP2 #GirlFromNowhereTheReset First, it completely tears apart the hypocritical pleasure of voyeurism. The biggest thrill of voyeurism is not what is actually seen, but the feeling of secretly watching without being caught, controlling someone else’s privacy and satisfying one’s own dark desires. But in the end, Nanno openly shows it to them. When she lets them look directly, the entire thrill of voyeurism disappears instantly. As Nanno says at the end, “You’re being sneaky, filthy and wretched, isn’t it because you want to see? I’ll show it to you directly. Let’s see if you still enjoy it.” Second, it is a complete reversal of power. The boys think that because they are secretly filming, they hold the upper hand. But Nanno shifts the situation from “you are secretly watching” to “I am showing it willingly.” She controls their gaze, their shame, and their reaction. She is not catering to them but humiliating them, exposing their cowardice and ugliness, their inability to be open, only daring to hide in the dark. Third, it is the harshest satire on the culture of the gaze. In real life, girls who are secretly filmed often feel ashamed and afraid, while voyeurs feel smug and safe. Nanno completely reverses this logic. She is not ashamed, they are. She is not afraid, they are. She is not filthy, they are. Her final act of lifting her skirt is not frivolity but a sharp counterattack. Nanno is not seducing anyone and she is not compromising. Instead, she is telling every voyeur that their desires, their voyeurism, and their darkness are worthless in front of her, even laughable and disgusting. The things they tried to see secretly are shown openly, yet they are the ones who no longer dare to look because they themselves know how filthy they are. In the end, Nanno’s action does not only punish the three boys in the story. It also punishes those in real life who are dark, sleazy, and afraid of the light while still believing they are in the right. And finally, when you watched the second episode, did you also find yourself hoping to see Nanno’s “KITTY”? If so, Nanno’s final act punishes the viewers in front of the screen just the same. (cr. bingbingjiangdianying)
2:13

Sensitive content

[EP.2] After watching the second episode, many people said they couldn’t understand the ending where Nanno takes the initiative to lift her skirt, revealing underwear with a name on it and letting the three voyeurs see. Some people think this didn’t punish the three boys at all. So what does this ending actually mean? #เด็กใหม่TheResetEP2 #GirlFromNowhereTheReset First, it completely tears apart the hypocritical pleasure of voyeurism. The biggest thrill of voyeurism is not what is actually seen, but the feeling of secretly watching without being caught, controlling someone else’s privacy and satisfying one’s own dark desires. But in the end, Nanno openly shows it to them. When she lets them look directly, the entire thrill of voyeurism disappears instantly. As Nanno says at the end, “You’re being sneaky, filthy and wretched, isn’t it because you want to see? I’ll show it to you directly. Let’s see if you still enjoy it.” Second, it is a complete reversal of power. The boys think that because they are secretly filming, they hold the upper hand. But Nanno shifts the situation from “you are secretly watching” to “I am showing it willingly.” She controls their gaze, their shame, and their reaction. She is not catering to them but humiliating them, exposing their cowardice and ugliness, their inability to be open, only daring to hide in the dark. Third, it is the harshest satire on the culture of the gaze. In real life, girls who are secretly filmed often feel ashamed and afraid, while voyeurs feel smug and safe. Nanno completely reverses this logic. She is not ashamed, they are. She is not afraid, they are. She is not filthy, they are. Her final act of lifting her skirt is not frivolity but a sharp counterattack. Nanno is not seducing anyone and she is not compromising. Instead, she is telling every voyeur that their desires, their voyeurism, and their darkness are worthless in front of her, even laughable and disgusting. The things they tried to see secretly are shown openly, yet they are the ones who no longer dare to look because they themselves know how filthy they are. In the end, Nanno’s action does not only punish the three boys in the story. It also punishes those in real life who are dark, sleazy, and afraid of the light while still believing they are in the right. And finally, when you watched the second episode, did you also find yourself hoping to see Nanno’s “KITTY”? If so, Nanno’s final act punishes the viewers in front of the screen just the same. (cr. bingbingjiangdianying)

alimiaomiaomiao💛🪽

1,227,380 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

🚨 JUST IN: DC Draino respectfully pressures the White House on where the remaining EPSTEIN FILES are and if she has any timeline on their release - AND "when we might start seeing some arrests." This is in the new media press briefing. DC_Draino: "A couple months ago, the DOJ released what they called 'Phase One' of the Epstein files. And they announced that a lot of those files, the remaining files, probably the bulk of the files, are actually in the New York field office." "They requested that they be returned the day after, and some legacy media reports show that not only were those files returned to the DOJ, but that hundreds of FBI agents are going through them day after day and getting them ready for public release." "Do you have any updates from the DOJ or the FBI on when those files are expected to be released, and also when we might start seeing some arrests of the client list?" LEAVITT: "I can assure you that the attorney general and her team at the Department of Justice are working on this diligently. For a specific timeline, I'd have to check in with them. And we can certainly do that for you, Rogan, in the effort of transparency." "I will tell you: the Attorney General is a bulldog. She is someone you want on your team. And when she wants to get something done, she gets it done. I've seen her do it in various instances already in her time as Attorney General." "And when she makes a promise, she keeps it. I don't have a specific timeline on you for that, but I do, know that they're working on it over there. This is the 2nd solid question from DC Draino at the White House today, leagues above the significance of other Legacy Media questions.

Eric Daugherty

959,144 просмотров • 1 год назад

The BBC and the British press will never get over the fact that all their attempts to diminish and break this woman, from the time she was simply a 23 year old courting the Future King of the UK, to now as the Future Queen Consort of the UK, all failed. Out of ALL the Royal Women in the World and in the BRF, Catherine is ONLY one they single out to call her by a nickname and her maiden name🤡 "Kate Middleton" is NOT even her name; It was NEVER her name. She was born and raised "Catherine Elizabeth Middleton". She always introduces herself as "Catherine". "Kate" is a childhood nickname used by her family and friends. Are you her family? are your her friend?🤡 So the BBC saying "Kate", who is "Kate"?🤡 The level of disrespect and familiarity is off the chart and that is why you do not allow this familiarity with people from the get-go. How hard is it to call someone by their given name? Why is she the only one singled out ? Because, my dears, They cannot get over the fact that Catherine has never and will never lower herself to play their media games and give her any access to herself or her family🔥 Catherine, just like William, are organically popular, they have never needed the press to hype them up or do PR for them. The press has zero control over them and that is what they are punishing Catherine for. And you wonder why Prince William treats the British press like with the "detached contempt" he does ?🤡 They can try but they cannot diminish Catherine. In Life, there are women who need crowns and titles to feel like Royalty. But Catherine is of the breed of women who naturally exude all the attribute of a Queen. Just look at her and you see Royalty personified. No one, not even blood royals, have her natural grace, elegance, poise and pull with the British Public. No one. You cannot teach her level of grace, you are born with it or not😌 Catherine never made a fuss about Titles because she is a woman who knows who she is and where she is going in Life and that is why she will keep shining for being herself, and the BBC will keep covering her so they can feed their children and pay their bills☕️ #CatherineTheGreat #PrincessofWales 📹 Kensington Palace

Canellecitadelle

227,011 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад