Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

🛑مقطع مهم أرسله لي عدة أشخاص بالخاص لنشره، وهو حوار قديم قبل ١٠ سنوات تقريبًا لعضو البرلمان البريطاني "جورج غالاوي" وهو يعطي صهيوني درسًا عن التاريخ الملفق الذي ادعوا فيه بإن أرض فلىىىطين هي لهم، سترى في هذا المقطع بإنهم حتى تاريخهم لا يعرفونه الحوار مترجم بالكامل ومدته ٦...

xivzz_'s profile picture

هيروديكوس

58,393 subscribers

113,296 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)

Haberler & PolitikaEğitim
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

8 Yorum

🍉🇵🇸 profil fotoğrafı
🍉🇵🇸2 yıl önce

#السعودية_العظمى #التأمين_الصحي_الوطني

SilverDolphin profil fotoğrafı
SilverDolphin2 yıl önce

هناك الكثير ممن يعرفون التاريخ. إعلان بلفور 1917 و 1947 قرار الأمم المتحدة رقم 181. فلسطين لم تكن يوما دولة ذات سيادة. خاض العرب حرب 1948 ولم تكن في صالح الفلسطينيين. بل ليحتلوا الأرض لأنفسهم.

غير معرف profil fotoğrafı
غير معرف2 yıl önce

Listen carefully @piersmorgan Turned out that G.B is the source of all evil.

Rola Rola profil fotoğrafı
Rola Rola2 yıl önce

خطيييير اللقاء لازم ينتشر على أوسع نطاق

muhammad abdulsalam profil fotoğrafı
muhammad abdulsalam2 yıl önce

@NsreenEl الراجل دا سمعته أكتر من مرة ينطق بالحق وسرده رائع وحقيقي

Mohammed📮 profil fotoğrafı
Mohammed📮2 yıl önce

@aboaosama @ALqasmi801 @MuawiyaAlrawahi

Amir Aky profil fotoğrafı
Amir Aky2 yıl önce

جورج جالوي يحركه الدعم المادي .. وإيران عرفت كيف تفعل ذلك معه عبر قناة الميادين .. بشكل غير مباشر ..

Bashar profil fotoğrafı
Bashar2 yıl önce

@georgegalloway

Benzer Videolar

Hungarian PM, Péter Magyar, doesn't hold back in exposing the shameful legacy of the old regime's 'hot line' to Moscow. Péter Magyar laying out exactly how the Orban regime alienated their Polish allies by prioritising deals with an invader over Hungary’s own principles. "...these relationships as well. And perhaps the leader of the faction was right that there was a period when cooperation within the V4 was strong. But the cooperation of the Visegrád Group did not break down because of that, it did not find itself in the crisis you spoke of. Not at all. You, dear Mr. Faction Leader, chose Vladimir Putin, Russia. And Poland will not swallow that. You know, Poland will not swallow that. Although our history is very similar, even if we were to compete, the history of the Poles is perhaps even sadder and more difficult than that of the Hungarians, but it is a difficult competition. They did not forget where they come from. And what they "owe" to Russia. And they did not make deals. And they did not give up their principles. You did. You might not personally, but I can tell you one thing: you sit in the same faction as Péter Szijjártó, who accepted an honor from Sergey Lavrov, forgot to return it—perhaps it still hangs as a magnet on his refrigerator today, he is proud of it, proud that he preferred to inform Russia about European ministerial meetings, was on a hot line with a country that invaded, that is, attempted to invade, an independent European state. That is the reason, that is one of the reasons why the Polish nation and the Polish political authorities said: enough of this."
1:44

Hungarian PM, Péter Magyar, doesn't hold back in exposing the shameful legacy of the old regime's 'hot line' to Moscow. Péter Magyar laying out exactly how the Orban regime alienated their Polish allies by prioritising deals with an invader over Hungary’s own principles. "...these relationships as well. And perhaps the leader of the faction was right that there was a period when cooperation within the V4 was strong. But the cooperation of the Visegrád Group did not break down because of that, it did not find itself in the crisis you spoke of. Not at all. You, dear Mr. Faction Leader, chose Vladimir Putin, Russia. And Poland will not swallow that. You know, Poland will not swallow that. Although our history is very similar, even if we were to compete, the history of the Poles is perhaps even sadder and more difficult than that of the Hungarians, but it is a difficult competition. They did not forget where they come from. And what they "owe" to Russia. And they did not make deals. And they did not give up their principles. You did. You might not personally, but I can tell you one thing: you sit in the same faction as Péter Szijjártó, who accepted an honor from Sergey Lavrov, forgot to return it—perhaps it still hangs as a magnet on his refrigerator today, he is proud of it, proud that he preferred to inform Russia about European ministerial meetings, was on a hot line with a country that invaded, that is, attempted to invade, an independent European state. That is the reason, that is one of the reasons why the Polish nation and the Polish political authorities said: enough of this."

Yasmina

62,887 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Let me explain why I have such fervor for the Patriots during the War for Independence by placing you into the seat of history. Place yourselves in the shoes of a Virginian planter, who just got told that the land you personally put your blood, sweat and tears surveying during which you nearly died, then fighting the French and savages over over where you also had comrades in arms die, nearly died yourself again, well all that land you fought over is actually not going to be yours to settle, it’s actually going to become an Indian buffer state given right back into the hands of the savages you just got done fighting it for. And if you want any of it, you want to use any of it, the land you personally surveyed, the land you fought to keep, you’re going to have to negotiate with parliament for any change in boundaries or for any legal usage of it. Then, on top of that, you now get direct taxes levied against you by that same parliament that says you don’t get to use that land, which itself was largely unprecedented as prior to this any acts which Parliament had undertaken were relegated primarily to international commerce which, understandably, they would get to regulate as it concerned the empire as a whole rather than the internal colonial affairs. But now they’re taxing you. To pay for the war you just paid for in the blood you spilt of the enemies of the crown and the bodies of your fellow Virginians left behind in the wilderness. And this is again, pretty much unprecedented. They’d passed a few silly laws in the past but hardly anyone even remembers them because they went totally unenforced because of how ridiculous they were. Telling people they can’t make hats? Telling people they can’t make their own iron tools? All absurd, and so they went completely disregarded. But now they actually are trying to enforce these things. So you work against it, protesting it, pushing back against it in the houses you have, your own legislatures at home. A Legislature, the house burgesses, which you yourself are a member of. And eventually it becomes so untenable they rescind it. Then, that very same day, that same parliament passes a law declaring that they are the supreme authority over you, in all matters, in all affairs, that whatever they say goes and your own legislatures are all subordinate to them. And there is no recourse for you. You don’t get any representatives of your own. You have no political representation, even though you are, again, a member of the house burgesses, modeled directly off of the English Parliament. In spite of that fact that you own 5,500 acres of land, that you are profiting 2000 British Pounds a year, when an English county only required land in evaluation of 2 pounds to vote, in spite of the fact that you have 1000x as much value as that tiny freeholding yeoman, that yeoman got to have more political say over the course of your life than you did. Because he got to at least vote, which was entirely denied to you. And of course it was. You were 3000 miles away. It would be untenable to have your lands be considered as English counties and send your representatives across the ocean back and forth to cast votes in Parliament. That's why you had the house of burgesses in the first place. Because the ancient charter struck between King James I and the first men of Virginia 150 years prior said quite clearly that they, and all their descendants, which was to say you, were to receive all liberties, immunities, and franchises that you would have had had you been born an England. That you were to be treated equally. There is no world where this situation could ever be construed as honoring the very agreement which set this forth in the first place as equal, when you no longer even had a vote in what laws might be passed over you, and that Parliament could now do whatever it wanted. A parliament which had just denied you the lands that you surveyed, that you fought for. And then as a thank you for the blood you shed, taxed you and rendered you as lesser than an English peasant with a few acres. And all of that, that's what it was to have been George Washington prior to the War for Independence. It is a testimony to his grace, goodwill, temperament, and character as a gentleman that it took him a decade to start killing people over this horrific miscarriage of justice. And to try to claim that because your gross twisting of the letter of a law in total violation of the spirit means somehow, you were the bad guy in all of this, is incredibly offensive in how terrible a read of history it is.
0:26

Let me explain why I have such fervor for the Patriots during the War for Independence by placing you into the seat of history. Place yourselves in the shoes of a Virginian planter, who just got told that the land you personally put your blood, sweat and tears surveying during which you nearly died, then fighting the French and savages over over where you also had comrades in arms die, nearly died yourself again, well all that land you fought over is actually not going to be yours to settle, it’s actually going to become an Indian buffer state given right back into the hands of the savages you just got done fighting it for. And if you want any of it, you want to use any of it, the land you personally surveyed, the land you fought to keep, you’re going to have to negotiate with parliament for any change in boundaries or for any legal usage of it. Then, on top of that, you now get direct taxes levied against you by that same parliament that says you don’t get to use that land, which itself was largely unprecedented as prior to this any acts which Parliament had undertaken were relegated primarily to international commerce which, understandably, they would get to regulate as it concerned the empire as a whole rather than the internal colonial affairs. But now they’re taxing you. To pay for the war you just paid for in the blood you spilt of the enemies of the crown and the bodies of your fellow Virginians left behind in the wilderness. And this is again, pretty much unprecedented. They’d passed a few silly laws in the past but hardly anyone even remembers them because they went totally unenforced because of how ridiculous they were. Telling people they can’t make hats? Telling people they can’t make their own iron tools? All absurd, and so they went completely disregarded. But now they actually are trying to enforce these things. So you work against it, protesting it, pushing back against it in the houses you have, your own legislatures at home. A Legislature, the house burgesses, which you yourself are a member of. And eventually it becomes so untenable they rescind it. Then, that very same day, that same parliament passes a law declaring that they are the supreme authority over you, in all matters, in all affairs, that whatever they say goes and your own legislatures are all subordinate to them. And there is no recourse for you. You don’t get any representatives of your own. You have no political representation, even though you are, again, a member of the house burgesses, modeled directly off of the English Parliament. In spite of that fact that you own 5,500 acres of land, that you are profiting 2000 British Pounds a year, when an English county only required land in evaluation of 2 pounds to vote, in spite of the fact that you have 1000x as much value as that tiny freeholding yeoman, that yeoman got to have more political say over the course of your life than you did. Because he got to at least vote, which was entirely denied to you. And of course it was. You were 3000 miles away. It would be untenable to have your lands be considered as English counties and send your representatives across the ocean back and forth to cast votes in Parliament. That's why you had the house of burgesses in the first place. Because the ancient charter struck between King James I and the first men of Virginia 150 years prior said quite clearly that they, and all their descendants, which was to say you, were to receive all liberties, immunities, and franchises that you would have had had you been born an England. That you were to be treated equally. There is no world where this situation could ever be construed as honoring the very agreement which set this forth in the first place as equal, when you no longer even had a vote in what laws might be passed over you, and that Parliament could now do whatever it wanted. A parliament which had just denied you the lands that you surveyed, that you fought for. And then as a thank you for the blood you shed, taxed you and rendered you as lesser than an English peasant with a few acres. And all of that, that's what it was to have been George Washington prior to the War for Independence. It is a testimony to his grace, goodwill, temperament, and character as a gentleman that it took him a decade to start killing people over this horrific miscarriage of justice. And to try to claim that because your gross twisting of the letter of a law in total violation of the spirit means somehow, you were the bad guy in all of this, is incredibly offensive in how terrible a read of history it is.

Kaiser von Lohengramm

105,690 görüntüleme • 10 gün önce

Play this clip to anyone that adamantly suggests that you can see the curvature of the earth from & plane, & or if they are offering the idea that anyone sees the “curvature of earth” from anywhere below 250,000 feet in altitude. Watch as they take Neil Degrasse Tyson (an astrophysicist) & claim he doesn’t know what he’s talking about & refuse to believe his words in this comment section & or if you show anyone that blindly offers these these illogical ideas. This video & others of him stating these things infuriates the weak minded. He’s stating a fact, due the radius & circumference claims given today, geometrically; it is impossible for you to see curvature from anywhere below 250,000 feet if it existed (which it does not). Now you can simply show them this clip & watch them devolve & act as if he’s wrong, simply because it goes against their faith in the Earth being a spheroid.
2:23

Play this clip to anyone that adamantly suggests that you can see the curvature of the earth from & plane, & or if they are offering the idea that anyone sees the “curvature of earth” from anywhere below 250,000 feet in altitude. Watch as they take Neil Degrasse Tyson (an astrophysicist) & claim he doesn’t know what he’s talking about & refuse to believe his words in this comment section & or if you show anyone that blindly offers these these illogical ideas. This video & others of him stating these things infuriates the weak minded. He’s stating a fact, due the radius & circumference claims given today, geometrically; it is impossible for you to see curvature from anywhere below 250,000 feet if it existed (which it does not). Now you can simply show them this clip & watch them devolve & act as if he’s wrong, simply because it goes against their faith in the Earth being a spheroid.

Kaleb The Socrat

16,288 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

🇬🇧 Most British schoolchildren are taught about Magna Carta. They are taught it was sealed in twelve fifteen at Runnymede. They are taught it is the foundation of English liberty. They are taught it is one of the most important documents in human history. They are not taught what came next. They are not taught about the eighty years between twelve fifteen and twelve ninety-five when ordinary Englishmen forced three successive kings to write down, for the first time in any kingdom in medieval Europe, what English law was, what English liberty was, and how an English king must govern. They are not taught about the Charter of the Forest, which restored the right to graze, gather firewood, and live on common land, and which remained in force for seven hundred and fifty-four years. They are not taught about the Provisions of Oxford in twelve fifty-eight, often called England's first written constitution, which placed the king under a council of fifteen and required Parliament to meet three times a year. They are not taught about the Provisions of Westminster in twelve fifty-nine, which subjected the barons themselves to the same law they had forced upon the king. They are not taught about Simon de Montfort, an earl born in France who died for England, who summoned the first Parliament in English history to include ordinary commoners alongside the great lords. They are not taught about the Statute of Marlborough in twelve sixty-seven, which is the oldest piece of statute law in the United Kingdom still in force today. ⚖️ Seven hundred and fifty-nine years old. If you've ever taken a debt to court in England, you've used it. 🏠 If you've ever rented a home, you've been protected by it. 👑 If a creditor can't lawfully drag your possessions into the street to settle what you owe, that's because of a law signed seven hundred and fifty-nine years ago. They are not taught about the Model Parliament of twelve ninety-five, summoned by Edward the First, which became the shape of every English Parliament since. Eighty years. Three successive kings. The first written constitution in any kingdom in medieval Europe. It was not given to them. It was not handed down from God or king or Pope. ✍️ It was written. By Englishmen. For England. 🇬🇧 The British write their own history. They always have. This one needed more than a thread. The full story is in our video, watch it below 👇 Help us remember who we are. Help us remember every British achievement. 👇🙏 👉 👈 Be part of us. ☝️🇬🇧 Be Proud Of Us. 🙏🇬🇧
14:13

🇬🇧 Most British schoolchildren are taught about Magna Carta. They are taught it was sealed in twelve fifteen at Runnymede. They are taught it is the foundation of English liberty. They are taught it is one of the most important documents in human history. They are not taught what came next. They are not taught about the eighty years between twelve fifteen and twelve ninety-five when ordinary Englishmen forced three successive kings to write down, for the first time in any kingdom in medieval Europe, what English law was, what English liberty was, and how an English king must govern. They are not taught about the Charter of the Forest, which restored the right to graze, gather firewood, and live on common land, and which remained in force for seven hundred and fifty-four years. They are not taught about the Provisions of Oxford in twelve fifty-eight, often called England's first written constitution, which placed the king under a council of fifteen and required Parliament to meet three times a year. They are not taught about the Provisions of Westminster in twelve fifty-nine, which subjected the barons themselves to the same law they had forced upon the king. They are not taught about Simon de Montfort, an earl born in France who died for England, who summoned the first Parliament in English history to include ordinary commoners alongside the great lords. They are not taught about the Statute of Marlborough in twelve sixty-seven, which is the oldest piece of statute law in the United Kingdom still in force today. ⚖️ Seven hundred and fifty-nine years old. If you've ever taken a debt to court in England, you've used it. 🏠 If you've ever rented a home, you've been protected by it. 👑 If a creditor can't lawfully drag your possessions into the street to settle what you owe, that's because of a law signed seven hundred and fifty-nine years ago. They are not taught about the Model Parliament of twelve ninety-five, summoned by Edward the First, which became the shape of every English Parliament since. Eighty years. Three successive kings. The first written constitution in any kingdom in medieval Europe. It was not given to them. It was not handed down from God or king or Pope. ✍️ It was written. By Englishmen. For England. 🇬🇧 The British write their own history. They always have. This one needed more than a thread. The full story is in our video, watch it below 👇 Help us remember who we are. Help us remember every British achievement. 👇🙏 👉 👈 Be part of us. ☝️🇬🇧 Be Proud Of Us. 🙏🇬🇧

Proudofus.uk

359,592 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

The more I hear from Kruger, the more I dislike him. The same applies to every single Reform MP, including Farage. They appear to believe that our heritage, history, and culture that has been refined, preserved and fought for with the blood of our ancestors, over thousands of years, is meaningless and that an Afghan, who was born here yesterday, is as British as any of us, and is an equal heir to our land and heritage. This is wrong and disgusts me deeply. Even worse, in Farage’s own words, he will class you as Welsh as any Welshman if you’ve lived in Wales for only 5 years. That must be why he kept quiet and towed the establishment line about the real identity of the Southport murderer, when he knew otherwise. He really did believe he was a Welsh choir boy. This lot will all be as bad as, or worse than the Tories in my opinion. They care not one bit about the native peoples of this country or the demographic destruction that has been forced upon us, and continues to this day. Mark my words, if we do not drop them as a party like the steaming hot turd that they are, and all move over to Restore Britain, we will all be talking about the Faragewave, come 2032. And by then, it really will all be over.
2:04

The more I hear from Kruger, the more I dislike him. The same applies to every single Reform MP, including Farage. They appear to believe that our heritage, history, and culture that has been refined, preserved and fought for with the blood of our ancestors, over thousands of years, is meaningless and that an Afghan, who was born here yesterday, is as British as any of us, and is an equal heir to our land and heritage. This is wrong and disgusts me deeply. Even worse, in Farage’s own words, he will class you as Welsh as any Welshman if you’ve lived in Wales for only 5 years. That must be why he kept quiet and towed the establishment line about the real identity of the Southport murderer, when he knew otherwise. He really did believe he was a Welsh choir boy. This lot will all be as bad as, or worse than the Tories in my opinion. They care not one bit about the native peoples of this country or the demographic destruction that has been forced upon us, and continues to this day. Mark my words, if we do not drop them as a party like the steaming hot turd that they are, and all move over to Restore Britain, we will all be talking about the Faragewave, come 2032. And by then, it really will all be over.

Oliver

31,917 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

Watch this latest video from russian state TV. It will be shown at russia’s tribunal. It will be studied in history classes by your children and grand children. “You understand that this list [of territories to be conquered] is incomplete. Everyone understands that this list is incomplete.” “It doesn’t matter what you call it …denazification or demilitarisation. Call it whatever you want. Everyone knows what it really means …the restoration of the russian empire.” “There are some nations whose existence is pointless.” This is just one clip of thousands of hours of footage in which the hatred and genocidal intentions of russia are on full display. It’s all documented for history. He’s right when he says everyone already knows what is happening. This is your regular reminder that future generations will not be in any doubt that you know right now that russia is a genocidal imperial aggressor. It’s very open about it. Polling in russia shows russians overwhelmingly believe the goal of their war is territorial conquest, not any of the excuses peddled by its supporters abroad. All of us around the world will have no plausible deniability that we didn’t know what was going on. You can see these clips. You can see the dictator literally standing over imperial era maps, comparing himself to other tsars, and discussing the erasure of a sovereign nation. You can read endless, carefully documented testimonies from people who have escaped the horrors of russian occupation and its very clearly genocidal nature. You know about all this. You scrolled past it. History will judge what you do now based on the fact that you know. It’s the reason no one has ever expressed any confusion about russia’s talk of imperial conquest or its use of neo-nazis to achieve it. Not a single person has ever said: “wait, this doesn’t make sense if it’s just a special operation to denazify and demilitarise Ukraine”. No one has ever said that because, as russian TV makes clear, no one is in doubt about what all this is really about. Russian soldiers who feign ignorance of being invaders when they are captured actually have no problem boasting of their atrocities in intercepted phone calls. Academics who insist the war is in some way excusable are suddenly very articulate about why imperialism and genocide is wrong when russia is not doing it. They know. They have just chosen to support genocidal imperialism in this case. Don’t let them gaslight you with excuses. There’s one irony here though. Russia’s war is based on denying the agency of Ukrainians and all nations in the way of russia’s expansionist aggression. However, the key to ending this is for us to respect the agency of those who deny ours. Don’t think of them as brainwashed or too stupid to know what’s going on. Respect their agency as supporters of imperial genocide. They are responsible for everything they are doing and must face the consequences of that. One day, the chorus of propaganda offering excuses will fall silent, as it did during the Nuremberg tribunal. The horrors of russia’s genocidal crimes will be more fully documented. As after Nuremberg, no one in future will give a shit about the excuses offered in our era to deny or delay the defeat of the genocidal aggressor and bring its leaders to justice. Make sure you can look your children and grandchildren in the eye and tell them what you did now to help achieve that. Send this clip to The Hague, along with all the others. #SpecialTribunalNow
6:45

Watch this latest video from russian state TV. It will be shown at russia’s tribunal. It will be studied in history classes by your children and grand children. “You understand that this list [of territories to be conquered] is incomplete. Everyone understands that this list is incomplete.” “It doesn’t matter what you call it …denazification or demilitarisation. Call it whatever you want. Everyone knows what it really means …the restoration of the russian empire.” “There are some nations whose existence is pointless.” This is just one clip of thousands of hours of footage in which the hatred and genocidal intentions of russia are on full display. It’s all documented for history. He’s right when he says everyone already knows what is happening. This is your regular reminder that future generations will not be in any doubt that you know right now that russia is a genocidal imperial aggressor. It’s very open about it. Polling in russia shows russians overwhelmingly believe the goal of their war is territorial conquest, not any of the excuses peddled by its supporters abroad. All of us around the world will have no plausible deniability that we didn’t know what was going on. You can see these clips. You can see the dictator literally standing over imperial era maps, comparing himself to other tsars, and discussing the erasure of a sovereign nation. You can read endless, carefully documented testimonies from people who have escaped the horrors of russian occupation and its very clearly genocidal nature. You know about all this. You scrolled past it. History will judge what you do now based on the fact that you know. It’s the reason no one has ever expressed any confusion about russia’s talk of imperial conquest or its use of neo-nazis to achieve it. Not a single person has ever said: “wait, this doesn’t make sense if it’s just a special operation to denazify and demilitarise Ukraine”. No one has ever said that because, as russian TV makes clear, no one is in doubt about what all this is really about. Russian soldiers who feign ignorance of being invaders when they are captured actually have no problem boasting of their atrocities in intercepted phone calls. Academics who insist the war is in some way excusable are suddenly very articulate about why imperialism and genocide is wrong when russia is not doing it. They know. They have just chosen to support genocidal imperialism in this case. Don’t let them gaslight you with excuses. There’s one irony here though. Russia’s war is based on denying the agency of Ukrainians and all nations in the way of russia’s expansionist aggression. However, the key to ending this is for us to respect the agency of those who deny ours. Don’t think of them as brainwashed or too stupid to know what’s going on. Respect their agency as supporters of imperial genocide. They are responsible for everything they are doing and must face the consequences of that. One day, the chorus of propaganda offering excuses will fall silent, as it did during the Nuremberg tribunal. The horrors of russia’s genocidal crimes will be more fully documented. As after Nuremberg, no one in future will give a shit about the excuses offered in our era to deny or delay the defeat of the genocidal aggressor and bring its leaders to justice. Make sure you can look your children and grandchildren in the eye and tell them what you did now to help achieve that. Send this clip to The Hague, along with all the others. #SpecialTribunalNow

Bad Baltic Takes

1,087,181 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

This is the side of EFF they will never show you on media. They will rather recycle old news about VBS and try as much as they can to convince us that EFF is involved. Her name is Omphile Maotwe, she is the National Treasurer of EFF and a member of Parliament. This speech should have been all over media but it will never be televised or make headlines. Media can televise and make headlines about tweets of DA leaders but they won't do the same about this brilliant speech of EFF which was made in Parliament. The fact is that Pravin destroyed our country with the help of our media. If Pravin was a member of EFF we would have seen a big graph liking his bank accounts, those of his relatives and companies they benefited from including how those companies benefited in state corruption. Investigative journalism is reserved for EFF leaders. It is used as a weapon to silence those that are not wanted like Paul Mashatile. Our media is a faction of ANC and supporter of DA. Unlike DA leaders, Commissar Omphile Maotwe is not just a leader. She hold a degree in Computer Science. You can hear how she articulate issues. Not even a single DA member can do this without reading a speech prepared by handlers in Stellenbosch. The fact remain, they hate EFF because it is kicking their dinner table. NB: Have you ever tried to apply for Job opportunities at
5:38

This is the side of EFF they will never show you on media. They will rather recycle old news about VBS and try as much as they can to convince us that EFF is involved. Her name is Omphile Maotwe, she is the National Treasurer of EFF and a member of Parliament. This speech should have been all over media but it will never be televised or make headlines. Media can televise and make headlines about tweets of DA leaders but they won't do the same about this brilliant speech of EFF which was made in Parliament. The fact is that Pravin destroyed our country with the help of our media. If Pravin was a member of EFF we would have seen a big graph liking his bank accounts, those of his relatives and companies they benefited from including how those companies benefited in state corruption. Investigative journalism is reserved for EFF leaders. It is used as a weapon to silence those that are not wanted like Paul Mashatile. Our media is a faction of ANC and supporter of DA. Unlike DA leaders, Commissar Omphile Maotwe is not just a leader. She hold a degree in Computer Science. You can hear how she articulate issues. Not even a single DA member can do this without reading a speech prepared by handlers in Stellenbosch. The fact remain, they hate EFF because it is kicking their dinner table. NB: Have you ever tried to apply for Job opportunities at

Matumba Anthony

75,278 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

🚨Do You Think Russia Doesn't Know Any of this History? 🚨Former British Diplomat Alastair Crooke: What is the AIM of this war for America? 🚨It's the same aim that's been there for NEARLY 200 years: to BREAK UP Russia, to PARTITION it into its SEPARATE PARTS and to STEAL its RESOURCES. We've seen it happens three times now that this war has been waged on Russia. You have to think what Russians feel about this because even during the Second World War, when Russia was an ally fighting the Germans, at some point Britain was supposed to support Russia, provide assistance to Russia who was stuck in Leningrad at that time. And what happened? Well, Churchill whispered to Roosevelt and he said, look, you know, maybe the reserves should be delayed in going there because isn't it better that they just kill more of each other during this time? Isn't that better? Does it really think that this whole war started suddenly on the date that Russia invaded Ukraine after Kiev increased the attacks on Donbas by a factor of 17, the artillery shelling of the civilian areas of Donbas? It was obviously intended to provoke Russia into this attack in order to try and turn it into a NATO-wide conflict against Russia. But the Russians, I mean, you know, they know their history. I mean, unlike us, they do study history. They know their history.
3:09

🚨Do You Think Russia Doesn't Know Any of this History? 🚨Former British Diplomat Alastair Crooke: What is the AIM of this war for America? 🚨It's the same aim that's been there for NEARLY 200 years: to BREAK UP Russia, to PARTITION it into its SEPARATE PARTS and to STEAL its RESOURCES. We've seen it happens three times now that this war has been waged on Russia. You have to think what Russians feel about this because even during the Second World War, when Russia was an ally fighting the Germans, at some point Britain was supposed to support Russia, provide assistance to Russia who was stuck in Leningrad at that time. And what happened? Well, Churchill whispered to Roosevelt and he said, look, you know, maybe the reserves should be delayed in going there because isn't it better that they just kill more of each other during this time? Isn't that better? Does it really think that this whole war started suddenly on the date that Russia invaded Ukraine after Kiev increased the attacks on Donbas by a factor of 17, the artillery shelling of the civilian areas of Donbas? It was obviously intended to provoke Russia into this attack in order to try and turn it into a NATO-wide conflict against Russia. But the Russians, I mean, you know, they know their history. I mean, unlike us, they do study history. They know their history.

Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

14,954 görüntüleme • 28 gün önce

A lot of international journalists across the continent and beyond have been asking me whether the opposition in Zimbabwe would vote in support of Constitutional Amendment Bill No. 3 when it comes to Parliament. For those who have been asking that question, and for others who had the same question in mind, this video is your answer. This is an opposition Member of Parliament speaking, praising President Mnangagwa and supporting his political agenda. Susan Matsunga was elected in 2023 to represent Budiriro North (Mufakose). She does not belong to the group of opposition Members of Parliament that were imposed by Sengezo Tshabangu, the charlatan who worked with others to disrupt Parliament and effectively hand ZANUPF a two-thirds majority. She belongs to the Nelson Chamisa group, the group that came through Bereka Mwana. When we criticised Bereka Mwana at the time, we were insulted. I remember explaining that Bereka Mwana was bringing in people who were bootlicking the leader of the party but did not necessarily have the substance and gravitas required to become Members of Parliament or oppose bad governance. So the more you bootlick the leader, the better your chances of getting into Parliament. She is a clear example of that. She was as militant as they come in defending the leader when he was making his festival of mistakes, and here you have her now supporting President Mnangagwa and his agenda. The problem that we have in Africa, particularly in Zimbabwe, is that people follow personalities. They do not follow ideas. When an empty vessel is a personality they like, they are happy to sink with that empty vessel. If someone comes with ideas but they do not like that person, they would rather discard the good ideas than support them. I want to make this prediction, and you can hold me to it. If it does not come to fruition, I will be very happy. ZANUPF is assured of power for at least the next 18 years. Until Zimbabweans change their attitude of supporting personalities over ideas, ZANUPF will remain in power for the next 18 years. We do not know what will happen after that, but for now, that is the trajectory. Some of you will ask why I say 18 years. It is because we are in 2026, and if ZANUPF gets Constitutional Amendment Bill No. 3 passed, it means the current president will remain in power for the next four years until 2030. The president who comes after him will then have two seven-year terms, that is 14 years. Add the four years from Mnangagwa, and that gives you 18 years. We do not know what will happen after that. Even if Mnangagwa is removed, for example through a coup, it will still be ZANUPF that remains in power. Until Zimbabweans understand that the enemy is not the person they do not like but who comes with good ideas, and that they must support ideas over personalities, ZANUPF will remain in power. Until Zimbabweans understand that politics is not like football, where you die on the hill of the team that you support, ZANUPF will remain in power. Until Zimbabweans understand the importance of working together, regardless of whether they like each other, as seen in the idea of a team of rivals associated with Abraham Lincoln, ZANUPF will remain in power. Until those who tell the truth are listened to, ZANUPF will remain in power. As long as people applaud and ululate those who tell them what they want to hear instead of what they need to hear, ZANUPF will remain in power. I want to leave you with this food for thought. In 2000, when Robert Mugabe and ZANUPF were pushing for a new constitution, the then opposition leader stood firm, campaigned across the country, and slept in people’s homes, in huts, mobilising against that constitution. It went to a referendum, and Robert Mugabe and ZANUPF lost. The opposition leader and his team managed to convince Zimbabweans, and they won. That moment showed what leadership, conviction, and grassroots mobilisation can achieve when people are organised around an idea. Today, I do not know who you can point to as the main opposition leader capable of doing the same, and that in itself is something Zimbabweans must seriously reflect on.
2:08

A lot of international journalists across the continent and beyond have been asking me whether the opposition in Zimbabwe would vote in support of Constitutional Amendment Bill No. 3 when it comes to Parliament. For those who have been asking that question, and for others who had the same question in mind, this video is your answer. This is an opposition Member of Parliament speaking, praising President Mnangagwa and supporting his political agenda. Susan Matsunga was elected in 2023 to represent Budiriro North (Mufakose). She does not belong to the group of opposition Members of Parliament that were imposed by Sengezo Tshabangu, the charlatan who worked with others to disrupt Parliament and effectively hand ZANUPF a two-thirds majority. She belongs to the Nelson Chamisa group, the group that came through Bereka Mwana. When we criticised Bereka Mwana at the time, we were insulted. I remember explaining that Bereka Mwana was bringing in people who were bootlicking the leader of the party but did not necessarily have the substance and gravitas required to become Members of Parliament or oppose bad governance. So the more you bootlick the leader, the better your chances of getting into Parliament. She is a clear example of that. She was as militant as they come in defending the leader when he was making his festival of mistakes, and here you have her now supporting President Mnangagwa and his agenda. The problem that we have in Africa, particularly in Zimbabwe, is that people follow personalities. They do not follow ideas. When an empty vessel is a personality they like, they are happy to sink with that empty vessel. If someone comes with ideas but they do not like that person, they would rather discard the good ideas than support them. I want to make this prediction, and you can hold me to it. If it does not come to fruition, I will be very happy. ZANUPF is assured of power for at least the next 18 years. Until Zimbabweans change their attitude of supporting personalities over ideas, ZANUPF will remain in power for the next 18 years. We do not know what will happen after that, but for now, that is the trajectory. Some of you will ask why I say 18 years. It is because we are in 2026, and if ZANUPF gets Constitutional Amendment Bill No. 3 passed, it means the current president will remain in power for the next four years until 2030. The president who comes after him will then have two seven-year terms, that is 14 years. Add the four years from Mnangagwa, and that gives you 18 years. We do not know what will happen after that. Even if Mnangagwa is removed, for example through a coup, it will still be ZANUPF that remains in power. Until Zimbabweans understand that the enemy is not the person they do not like but who comes with good ideas, and that they must support ideas over personalities, ZANUPF will remain in power. Until Zimbabweans understand that politics is not like football, where you die on the hill of the team that you support, ZANUPF will remain in power. Until Zimbabweans understand the importance of working together, regardless of whether they like each other, as seen in the idea of a team of rivals associated with Abraham Lincoln, ZANUPF will remain in power. Until those who tell the truth are listened to, ZANUPF will remain in power. As long as people applaud and ululate those who tell them what they want to hear instead of what they need to hear, ZANUPF will remain in power. I want to leave you with this food for thought. In 2000, when Robert Mugabe and ZANUPF were pushing for a new constitution, the then opposition leader stood firm, campaigned across the country, and slept in people’s homes, in huts, mobilising against that constitution. It went to a referendum, and Robert Mugabe and ZANUPF lost. The opposition leader and his team managed to convince Zimbabweans, and they won. That moment showed what leadership, conviction, and grassroots mobilisation can achieve when people are organised around an idea. Today, I do not know who you can point to as the main opposition leader capable of doing the same, and that in itself is something Zimbabweans must seriously reflect on.

Hopewell Chin’ono

49,840 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

With the Russia hoax being exposed more every single day, there is another hoax making its rounds again. Hoax: In 2018 Putin said that he directed his people to help Trump win the election. A short, out of context clip is now their "proof" of Russian election interference to help Trump in 2016. Brennan talked about it. Peter Baker posted about it a couple days ago. Bill Maher played it on his show last night, claiming it was proof of Russian interference to help Trump. It's all over MSNBC and CNN again. They probably all know the truth about the clip but it doesn't stop them from lying about it. Firstly, it should come as no surprise that CNN's clip is different from almost all of the others broadcasted, as you will shortly see. Top clip is the hoax: Putin is asked if he wanted Trump to win and then asked if he directed his officials to help him. Putin answers "yes I did." Here's what actually happened. Putin had just stated that he in no way directed anyone to interfere in the election, that there was no collusion, and that it was all ridiculous nonsense. Putin called the accusations garbage more than once in the press conference. Putin was then asked by a reporter why people should believe his denials about election interference and if he would hand over the 12 people Mueller indicted (show indictments btw). Putin took out his translator ear piece and gave a long answer about working with Trump to find out if crimes were committed, America and Russia working together on other stuff, treaties, etc. During that answer (bottom clip) he again said the accusations of interference were not true. At the end of his answer, the same reporter who asked him the previous questions asked "Did you want Trump to win and did you instruct officials to help him." By watching any other broadcast than CNN, it becomes very clear what happened. Putin did not hear the first half of the reporter's followup question because he was putting on an ear piece and the volume of the reporter's mic was down. Watch the top clip and the last 20 seconds of the bottom clip. Look at the difference. You will see it is obvious that Putin did not hear the first question and only heard the second question about if he instructed people to help Trump. It's obvious that he thought it applied to what he was just talking about, which was America and Russia working together. It's so funny how in the foreign broadcasts and some of the American ones, it's clear that Putin didn't hear the first half of the question. But on CNN the volume is magically up and it appears that Putin heard both questions. But the fact is that Putin had just spent most of the press conference denying any interference in the election or collusion with Trump. He wasn't all of a sudden admitting it now. He didn't hear the first question. The hoaxers never play any of the rest of the press conference with all the denials. In another press conference after this one Putin again says it was all a hoax cooked up to undermine Trump's presidency. If the MSM cared at all about America or the truth they would lay out what I just did. If you don't want to watch all the context, just watch the top clip, the beginning of the bottom clip, and the last 20 seconds of the bottom clip and you will see clearly what happened.
8:02

With the Russia hoax being exposed more every single day, there is another hoax making its rounds again. Hoax: In 2018 Putin said that he directed his people to help Trump win the election. A short, out of context clip is now their "proof" of Russian election interference to help Trump in 2016. Brennan talked about it. Peter Baker posted about it a couple days ago. Bill Maher played it on his show last night, claiming it was proof of Russian interference to help Trump. It's all over MSNBC and CNN again. They probably all know the truth about the clip but it doesn't stop them from lying about it. Firstly, it should come as no surprise that CNN's clip is different from almost all of the others broadcasted, as you will shortly see. Top clip is the hoax: Putin is asked if he wanted Trump to win and then asked if he directed his officials to help him. Putin answers "yes I did." Here's what actually happened. Putin had just stated that he in no way directed anyone to interfere in the election, that there was no collusion, and that it was all ridiculous nonsense. Putin called the accusations garbage more than once in the press conference. Putin was then asked by a reporter why people should believe his denials about election interference and if he would hand over the 12 people Mueller indicted (show indictments btw). Putin took out his translator ear piece and gave a long answer about working with Trump to find out if crimes were committed, America and Russia working together on other stuff, treaties, etc. During that answer (bottom clip) he again said the accusations of interference were not true. At the end of his answer, the same reporter who asked him the previous questions asked "Did you want Trump to win and did you instruct officials to help him." By watching any other broadcast than CNN, it becomes very clear what happened. Putin did not hear the first half of the reporter's followup question because he was putting on an ear piece and the volume of the reporter's mic was down. Watch the top clip and the last 20 seconds of the bottom clip. Look at the difference. You will see it is obvious that Putin did not hear the first question and only heard the second question about if he instructed people to help Trump. It's obvious that he thought it applied to what he was just talking about, which was America and Russia working together. It's so funny how in the foreign broadcasts and some of the American ones, it's clear that Putin didn't hear the first half of the question. But on CNN the volume is magically up and it appears that Putin heard both questions. But the fact is that Putin had just spent most of the press conference denying any interference in the election or collusion with Trump. He wasn't all of a sudden admitting it now. He didn't hear the first question. The hoaxers never play any of the rest of the press conference with all the denials. In another press conference after this one Putin again says it was all a hoax cooked up to undermine Trump's presidency. If the MSM cared at all about America or the truth they would lay out what I just did. If you don't want to watch all the context, just watch the top clip, the beginning of the bottom clip, and the last 20 seconds of the bottom clip and you will see clearly what happened.

MAZE

58,564 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Conservative by Blood. My grandparents survived the Korean War, not because life was merciful, but because geography drew a thin line between freedom and a prison with no walls. I think of Yeonmi Park. She is not a distant cousin. She could have been me. I could have been her. If the border were drawn differently, my life would be measured in inches of height lost, pounds of flesh missing, and years stolen by famine. This is not an abstract policy debate. It is bone, marrow, and memory. It is the reason my conservatism is not a hobby, a hashtag, or a choice. It is survival encoded in DNA. So when you tell me you “hate communism,” I ask: do you know what communism means? Do you know the silence of a church outlawed, the emptiness of a child’s stomach, the weight of a government that tells you your soul does not belong to Christ but to the Party? If you truly care about humanity, you cannot flirt with Marxist dreams. You cannot soften tyranny with new names. Communism is not theory. It is graves without markers. It is families broken by borders. It is a people who look like me, but live as shadows of who they should have been, if they live at all. And if words aren’t enough, listen to Yeonmi Park. She tells how in North Korea, people ate rats who had eaten the flesh of surgery’s failed and forgotten a cycle of hunger so dark, it devours even the dead. That is communism. That is why I am conservative by blood. And the blood remembers. So when liberals approach me at work and expect me to fall in line just because I’m not white, it takes every fiber in my being not to be violent. They don’t know what they’re talking about. They don’t know what they want. They don’t know how this ends. I do. History does. I remember my ancestors. I know what they endured. It is not a hard decision. Their struggle was not about transgenderism, not about late term abortions. It was about life itself. About real freedom. And it is the easiest decision in the world.
3:00

Conservative by Blood. My grandparents survived the Korean War, not because life was merciful, but because geography drew a thin line between freedom and a prison with no walls. I think of Yeonmi Park. She is not a distant cousin. She could have been me. I could have been her. If the border were drawn differently, my life would be measured in inches of height lost, pounds of flesh missing, and years stolen by famine. This is not an abstract policy debate. It is bone, marrow, and memory. It is the reason my conservatism is not a hobby, a hashtag, or a choice. It is survival encoded in DNA. So when you tell me you “hate communism,” I ask: do you know what communism means? Do you know the silence of a church outlawed, the emptiness of a child’s stomach, the weight of a government that tells you your soul does not belong to Christ but to the Party? If you truly care about humanity, you cannot flirt with Marxist dreams. You cannot soften tyranny with new names. Communism is not theory. It is graves without markers. It is families broken by borders. It is a people who look like me, but live as shadows of who they should have been, if they live at all. And if words aren’t enough, listen to Yeonmi Park. She tells how in North Korea, people ate rats who had eaten the flesh of surgery’s failed and forgotten a cycle of hunger so dark, it devours even the dead. That is communism. That is why I am conservative by blood. And the blood remembers. So when liberals approach me at work and expect me to fall in line just because I’m not white, it takes every fiber in my being not to be violent. They don’t know what they’re talking about. They don’t know what they want. They don’t know how this ends. I do. History does. I remember my ancestors. I know what they endured. It is not a hard decision. Their struggle was not about transgenderism, not about late term abortions. It was about life itself. About real freedom. And it is the easiest decision in the world.

Sovey

2,169,695 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

Obama: America has always had competing stories about who we are and what the nation stands for. The first story says that even though we got rid of a king, there is still a caste system in America, a pecking order of who makes decisions That if somebody doesn't look like or think like you or practice religion the same way you do, they must be a threat to your way of life, and they need to be put in their place. That is how Donald Trump thinks about America. Make America great again by putting the people in charge even if they don't know what the hell they are doing. But here is the thing. That story is not new. It is the oldest story in the book. It is not even uniquely American. For most of human history, that is the way society has worked. For somebody on top and somebody on bottom. There were lords and peasants. For a long time, that story of caste and privilege and concentrated power was the law of the land here in America. If you look like me, you were likely treated as property. If you were a woman, or a white man who did not own property, you could not vote. But from the very start, there was another story, born of this nation's true revolutionary spirit, a story that says, we the people means what it says, that all of us are included, that we are not subjects, but citizens, defined not by race or religion or gender or sexual orientation, but by our commitment to a common creed and a willingness to accept not just privileges, but responsibilities that come with that citizenship.
3:42

Obama: America has always had competing stories about who we are and what the nation stands for. The first story says that even though we got rid of a king, there is still a caste system in America, a pecking order of who makes decisions That if somebody doesn't look like or think like you or practice religion the same way you do, they must be a threat to your way of life, and they need to be put in their place. That is how Donald Trump thinks about America. Make America great again by putting the people in charge even if they don't know what the hell they are doing. But here is the thing. That story is not new. It is the oldest story in the book. It is not even uniquely American. For most of human history, that is the way society has worked. For somebody on top and somebody on bottom. There were lords and peasants. For a long time, that story of caste and privilege and concentrated power was the law of the land here in America. If you look like me, you were likely treated as property. If you were a woman, or a white man who did not own property, you could not vote. But from the very start, there was another story, born of this nation's true revolutionary spirit, a story that says, we the people means what it says, that all of us are included, that we are not subjects, but citizens, defined not by race or religion or gender or sexual orientation, but by our commitment to a common creed and a willingness to accept not just privileges, but responsibilities that come with that citizenship.

Acyn

188,700 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

🌲 Did you know that 99.999999% of people visiting Stanley Park never even find this hidden spot? There’s an old wartime pillbox above Siwash Rock, a secret lookout most folks never see. I took a little video from up there, check out the view that almost no one knows about! 📹✨ That pillbox above Siwash Rock in Stanley Park actually dates back to wartime days. It was originally used as a lookout and a kind of coastal defense installation. During World War I, the area around Siwash Rock was known as “Fort Siwash,” and they actually stationed an artillery battery there. By World War II, they added searchlights to that spot, too. Interestingly, there’s a quirky bit of history: for about 17 years, a man actually lived in a nearby cave near the rock, only taking a break when he went overseas for war service. So that pillbox is basically a little remnant of Vancouver’s coastal defense history, and it’s got some neat stories behind it!
1:37

🌲 Did you know that 99.999999% of people visiting Stanley Park never even find this hidden spot? There’s an old wartime pillbox above Siwash Rock, a secret lookout most folks never see. I took a little video from up there, check out the view that almost no one knows about! 📹✨ That pillbox above Siwash Rock in Stanley Park actually dates back to wartime days. It was originally used as a lookout and a kind of coastal defense installation. During World War I, the area around Siwash Rock was known as “Fort Siwash,” and they actually stationed an artillery battery there. By World War II, they added searchlights to that spot, too. Interestingly, there’s a quirky bit of history: for about 17 years, a man actually lived in a nearby cave near the rock, only taking a break when he went overseas for war service. So that pillbox is basically a little remnant of Vancouver’s coastal defense history, and it’s got some neat stories behind it!

Mark Teasdale ★

36,500 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

The Trump admin is GASLIGHTING us re: no CBDCs They know they can't do CBDCs because of the Constitution, so they're backdooring them with stablecoins Iain Davis explains— "the idea of a [CBDC] is that it will give these private institutions total control of a new digital international monetary and financial system" "CBDC is programmable money that slots into that system. That's why they want it" "That's not going to work in the US because... it's a constitutional right in the United States that the people, and only the people, oversee what they call the power, quote–unquote... to coin money" "So what are you going to do about it? You need some sort of work-round" "So stablecoins and things like deposit tokens or tokenized deposits are variations of programmable digital currency. But rather than being issued by a central bank, they're issued by a commercial bank" "stablecoins... slot into the system of programmability just as easily, if not more so than a central bank digital currency. So you can attach smart contracts to any kind of digital transaction using digital currency" "Programmable digital currency and stablecoins do exactly the same thing, serve the same purpose, as central bank digital currency" This clip of Iain Davis (InThisTogether), author of The Technocratic Dark State, is taken from a Flashlights podcast (Flashlights Podcast) episode posted to Rumble on May 17, 2026. ---------------Partial transcription of clip---------------- "It's a constitutional right in the United States that the people, and only the people, oversee what they call the power, quote–unquote, it says this in the Constitution, to coin money. So the power to coin money is overseen by the people. "Now the idea of a central bank digital currency is that it will give these private institutions total control of a new digital international monetary and financial system. That's CBDC is programmable money that slots into that system. That's why they want it. "That's not going to work in the US because even though Congress, you know, Congress is the, is the dog which is wagged by the tail in this of the Fed, the Fed, you know, the Fed tells Congress what to do, not the other way round. But theoretically it could be the other way round. And theoretically the people could assert their control over the Fed if they only knew about it, which, not many people do, but they could do it, right? It's in the US Constitution. "Now that's a problem if you're going to embark on a global transformation of the entire international monetary and financial system when your leading reserve currency is the US dollar. So that's, you know, that could all go wrong very badly. "So what are you going to do about it? You need some sort of work round. How are you, how are you going to do which for the, you know, I, for many years, well, since central bank digital currency has been something that I've been looking at, I couldn't figure out why the US wasn't more enthusiastic about central bank digital currency. "Because it's the type of thing that the US administrations are usually right up— You know, they're really gung ho about that kind of centralized control of everything. That's right up their alley. So why, why don't they like it? And then it was the work of John Titus who pointed out this problem that they've got in the US with the Constitution that made me look at that and think, right. And then I started investigating that further. And he's right about that. That is a problem. "But then they obviously need some sort of workaround. How are they going to have. Because the main point of central bank digital currency from the surveillance and control aspect is that we will all need digital identity in order to access our digital wallets, which will contain the currency and the currency and the wallets and our, digital identities will all be programmable so conditions can be set on everything that we do. "Every transaction we make will be subject to condition through some sort of smart contract probably, which will control it. Right. So you know, if you say the wrong thing or you know, you, you just write the wrong thing online, you could be punished by algorithm by controlling your access to money... "And so the key to that is central bank— the programmability of central bank digital currency. But obviously that's not going to, may not work. There's a good chance that won't work in the United States which has got the US dollar reserve is an important currency. "So what are you going to do? So stablecoins and things like deposit tokens or tokenized deposits are variations of programmable digital currency. But rather than being issued by a central bank, they're issued by a commercial bank. So or in the case of stablecoins, a non-bank, a non-bank institution like Tether. So it's not a bank. "But you can use stablecoins for exactly the same. They slot into the system of programmability just as easily, if not more so than a central bank digital currency. So you can attach smart contracts to any kind of digital transaction using digital currency. Programmable digital currency and stablecoins do exactly the same thing, serve the same purpose as central bank digital currency or the other version, the commercial bank version is deposit tokens. Any of those will do. "Now in the US they've gone down the stablecoin route so they can issue the stablecoins which will be backed by US Treasuries, just like the dollar or just like any kind of dollar instrument will be one to one convertible for the US dollar. So the stablecoins are effectively the US dollar in, in digital form. "But instead of calling it a central bank digital currency, they call it issued by, it wouldn't have to be issued by the Fed. They call it a stablecoin, which is issued by a company like Tether or you know, someone like that. So it's the same system but using a workaround. And that workaround came with the Genius Act which, which came from an executive order that Trump made when he first came to office. "Because the Americans, quite rightly when they were electing their president, were concerned about central bank digital currency. I mean anyone that understands what it is should be terrified of it. So they didn't want it, and Trump promised that they wouldn't have it. Probably. I don't know whether he knew, but certainly the gaggle of technocrats that were around him knew that they weren't going down that path. Anyway, no chance of the US introducing it because of these problems we've just outlined."
6:11

The Trump admin is GASLIGHTING us re: no CBDCs They know they can't do CBDCs because of the Constitution, so they're backdooring them with stablecoins Iain Davis explains— "the idea of a [CBDC] is that it will give these private institutions total control of a new digital international monetary and financial system" "CBDC is programmable money that slots into that system. That's why they want it" "That's not going to work in the US because... it's a constitutional right in the United States that the people, and only the people, oversee what they call the power, quote–unquote... to coin money" "So what are you going to do about it? You need some sort of work-round" "So stablecoins and things like deposit tokens or tokenized deposits are variations of programmable digital currency. But rather than being issued by a central bank, they're issued by a commercial bank" "stablecoins... slot into the system of programmability just as easily, if not more so than a central bank digital currency. So you can attach smart contracts to any kind of digital transaction using digital currency" "Programmable digital currency and stablecoins do exactly the same thing, serve the same purpose, as central bank digital currency" This clip of Iain Davis (InThisTogether), author of The Technocratic Dark State, is taken from a Flashlights podcast (Flashlights Podcast) episode posted to Rumble on May 17, 2026. ---------------Partial transcription of clip---------------- "It's a constitutional right in the United States that the people, and only the people, oversee what they call the power, quote–unquote, it says this in the Constitution, to coin money. So the power to coin money is overseen by the people. "Now the idea of a central bank digital currency is that it will give these private institutions total control of a new digital international monetary and financial system. That's CBDC is programmable money that slots into that system. That's why they want it. "That's not going to work in the US because even though Congress, you know, Congress is the, is the dog which is wagged by the tail in this of the Fed, the Fed, you know, the Fed tells Congress what to do, not the other way round. But theoretically it could be the other way round. And theoretically the people could assert their control over the Fed if they only knew about it, which, not many people do, but they could do it, right? It's in the US Constitution. "Now that's a problem if you're going to embark on a global transformation of the entire international monetary and financial system when your leading reserve currency is the US dollar. So that's, you know, that could all go wrong very badly. "So what are you going to do about it? You need some sort of work round. How are you, how are you going to do which for the, you know, I, for many years, well, since central bank digital currency has been something that I've been looking at, I couldn't figure out why the US wasn't more enthusiastic about central bank digital currency. "Because it's the type of thing that the US administrations are usually right up— You know, they're really gung ho about that kind of centralized control of everything. That's right up their alley. So why, why don't they like it? And then it was the work of John Titus who pointed out this problem that they've got in the US with the Constitution that made me look at that and think, right. And then I started investigating that further. And he's right about that. That is a problem. "But then they obviously need some sort of workaround. How are they going to have. Because the main point of central bank digital currency from the surveillance and control aspect is that we will all need digital identity in order to access our digital wallets, which will contain the currency and the currency and the wallets and our, digital identities will all be programmable so conditions can be set on everything that we do. "Every transaction we make will be subject to condition through some sort of smart contract probably, which will control it. Right. So you know, if you say the wrong thing or you know, you, you just write the wrong thing online, you could be punished by algorithm by controlling your access to money... "And so the key to that is central bank— the programmability of central bank digital currency. But obviously that's not going to, may not work. There's a good chance that won't work in the United States which has got the US dollar reserve is an important currency. "So what are you going to do? So stablecoins and things like deposit tokens or tokenized deposits are variations of programmable digital currency. But rather than being issued by a central bank, they're issued by a commercial bank. So or in the case of stablecoins, a non-bank, a non-bank institution like Tether. So it's not a bank. "But you can use stablecoins for exactly the same. They slot into the system of programmability just as easily, if not more so than a central bank digital currency. So you can attach smart contracts to any kind of digital transaction using digital currency. Programmable digital currency and stablecoins do exactly the same thing, serve the same purpose as central bank digital currency or the other version, the commercial bank version is deposit tokens. Any of those will do. "Now in the US they've gone down the stablecoin route so they can issue the stablecoins which will be backed by US Treasuries, just like the dollar or just like any kind of dollar instrument will be one to one convertible for the US dollar. So the stablecoins are effectively the US dollar in, in digital form. "But instead of calling it a central bank digital currency, they call it issued by, it wouldn't have to be issued by the Fed. They call it a stablecoin, which is issued by a company like Tether or you know, someone like that. So it's the same system but using a workaround. And that workaround came with the Genius Act which, which came from an executive order that Trump made when he first came to office. "Because the Americans, quite rightly when they were electing their president, were concerned about central bank digital currency. I mean anyone that understands what it is should be terrified of it. So they didn't want it, and Trump promised that they wouldn't have it. Probably. I don't know whether he knew, but certainly the gaggle of technocrats that were around him knew that they weren't going down that path. Anyway, no chance of the US introducing it because of these problems we've just outlined."

Sense Receptor

13,996 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

🛑 Burkina Faso 🇧🇫 - Captain with school boys and girls! The young Captain was having a conversation with the pupils, and here is what he saying, “I was telling you a while ago, in school they were telling us that we couldn’t do it here. They lied to us. We grow wheat here, and it works well, and we will develop it. Some people have started, this year, I was able to see people who did it, as part of the presidential initiative, and I was told that in the past, some were able to do it and they produced it well. Currently, we are sowing wheat in some farmlands as part do the presidential initiative. What you eat must be produced here. So, this is why I say that we will teach you many things, and we will review the curricula they teach you. For those who drink coffee, they told us that your coffee, chocolate, it is only in the countries with abundant rainfalls, that here is only savanna, desert, it does not rain, we cannot farm. Again, they lied to us. It’s not true! Coffee grows well here, cocoa grows well too. There are people here who have the farms here, even in Ouagadougou here, there are people who have cocoa trees in their yards. This means that, chocolate that children envy those from well to do familes can be manufactured here in Burkina and all the children can eat chocolate in Burkina. We found out it is possible. As for milk, why do we have to import it? We can do it. I just want to tell you that there are many things that they never told us the truth about. You guys are lucky, we are now teaching you, and we promise you that we will do all we can so that you can eat your fill. As we say, you will eat well in the morning before you go to school, you will go to school for free, you will eat lunch, you will have fun, and in the afternoon, when you return home, you will have fun in the neighborhood, then in the evening, you will learn and review your homework and sleep. This is the dream we have. As long as the children in Burkina are not in these conditions, our fight will not stop. Ok? (Claps). So, we know these are your aspirations and it is right and legal. Any parent is fighting for this. Even those who do not have children fight in the hope of having children and to take care of them, so that they can live in better conditions, and be better than them. This is the fight of everyone, this is the fight of every generation. We are lucky God gave us everything. Do you know that everywhere in Burkina we can farm? Everywhere! In the Sahel where they tell you it is the desert, it is only sand, we can farm. As for us, we have been lied to so much, it is the brainwashing of the colonizer. He did that so that we may not think 💭. But we finally found out that everything was a lie ( damn lie, emphasis is mine). If God left many lakes in that desert, He knows why. We can farm everything in Burkina, we can do everything, the land is fertile. And there are so many natural things in Burkina that we never planted but they were here, isn’t it ? Have you ever learned how to plant a shea tree in Burkina? You were born and found them already here right? It is there in the wild in nature. You know it is a gift from God. There are many things in the shea fruit. You have the shea butter, that is oil; do you know that there is chocolate in it? There are seven derivatives in the shea fruit. You also have the Parkia biglobosa (also known as the African locust bean) which is a natural fruit. We have many things, it is not only the minerals in the soil. Even with the soil, we were told that it’s ferralitic soil, that it is not fertile, everything is a lie. You see that today there is so much gold in Burkina. But it is just poorly managed. Our mission is to well manage these resources, and to take good care of you, so that you can be in your basic rights, to lead a good life, to go to school, and that we may protect you. And also that you may fulfill your duties, because your duties are very important, aren’t they?…
5:01

🛑 Burkina Faso 🇧🇫 - Captain with school boys and girls! The young Captain was having a conversation with the pupils, and here is what he saying, “I was telling you a while ago, in school they were telling us that we couldn’t do it here. They lied to us. We grow wheat here, and it works well, and we will develop it. Some people have started, this year, I was able to see people who did it, as part of the presidential initiative, and I was told that in the past, some were able to do it and they produced it well. Currently, we are sowing wheat in some farmlands as part do the presidential initiative. What you eat must be produced here. So, this is why I say that we will teach you many things, and we will review the curricula they teach you. For those who drink coffee, they told us that your coffee, chocolate, it is only in the countries with abundant rainfalls, that here is only savanna, desert, it does not rain, we cannot farm. Again, they lied to us. It’s not true! Coffee grows well here, cocoa grows well too. There are people here who have the farms here, even in Ouagadougou here, there are people who have cocoa trees in their yards. This means that, chocolate that children envy those from well to do familes can be manufactured here in Burkina and all the children can eat chocolate in Burkina. We found out it is possible. As for milk, why do we have to import it? We can do it. I just want to tell you that there are many things that they never told us the truth about. You guys are lucky, we are now teaching you, and we promise you that we will do all we can so that you can eat your fill. As we say, you will eat well in the morning before you go to school, you will go to school for free, you will eat lunch, you will have fun, and in the afternoon, when you return home, you will have fun in the neighborhood, then in the evening, you will learn and review your homework and sleep. This is the dream we have. As long as the children in Burkina are not in these conditions, our fight will not stop. Ok? (Claps). So, we know these are your aspirations and it is right and legal. Any parent is fighting for this. Even those who do not have children fight in the hope of having children and to take care of them, so that they can live in better conditions, and be better than them. This is the fight of everyone, this is the fight of every generation. We are lucky God gave us everything. Do you know that everywhere in Burkina we can farm? Everywhere! In the Sahel where they tell you it is the desert, it is only sand, we can farm. As for us, we have been lied to so much, it is the brainwashing of the colonizer. He did that so that we may not think 💭. But we finally found out that everything was a lie ( damn lie, emphasis is mine). If God left many lakes in that desert, He knows why. We can farm everything in Burkina, we can do everything, the land is fertile. And there are so many natural things in Burkina that we never planted but they were here, isn’t it ? Have you ever learned how to plant a shea tree in Burkina? You were born and found them already here right? It is there in the wild in nature. You know it is a gift from God. There are many things in the shea fruit. You have the shea butter, that is oil; do you know that there is chocolate in it? There are seven derivatives in the shea fruit. You also have the Parkia biglobosa (also known as the African locust bean) which is a natural fruit. We have many things, it is not only the minerals in the soil. Even with the soil, we were told that it’s ferralitic soil, that it is not fertile, everything is a lie. You see that today there is so much gold in Burkina. But it is just poorly managed. Our mission is to well manage these resources, and to take good care of you, so that you can be in your basic rights, to lead a good life, to go to school, and that we may protect you. And also that you may fulfill your duties, because your duties are very important, aren’t they?…

Sy Marcus Herve Traore

95,027 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce