Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

🔴 من غازي عنتاب إلى حلب… الكراسي التركية تصل الأسواق! بدأت بلدية غازي عنتاب التركية بتغيير ملامح مدينة حلب وتجهيزها لضمها رسميًا إلى تركيا.. بنقول مبروك؟ أم أنّ للقصة بقية؟! From Gaziantep to Aleppo… Turkish chairs arrive in the markets! The municipality of Gaziantep is now reshaping Aleppo, preparing...

NemesisSYR_'s profile picture

NEMESIS – نيميسس

23,921 subscribers

93,347 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & PolitikReisen
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

حسن شعبان بري من مواليد حلب عام 1972، وهو كبير شبيحة آل بري في حلب، حيث لعب مع عشيرته دوراً أساسياً في قمع المظاهرات السلمية التي انطلقت في أحياء مدينة حلب في بداية الثورة السورية، وساهموا في اعتقال وتعذيب العشرات من أبناء المدينة وتسليمهم لأجهزة أمن النظام السوري، كما انخرط آل بري في عدد من العمليات المسلحة إلى جانب قوات النظام في مدينة حلب. ولدى دخول عناصر الجيش الحر إلى مدينة حلب في عام 2012، تم الاتفاق على هدنة ما بين شبيحة آل بري وعناصر الجيش الحر إلا أن شبيحة آل بري خرقوا الهدنة وقتلوا عدداً من عناصر الجيش الحر مما أدى إلى أسر عدد من أعضاء العائلة. وبعد مقتل زين الدين (زينو) تولى "حسن بري" زعامة العشيرة وأعاد تنظيم صفوفهم ومدهم بالمال والسلاح بالتعاون مع أجهزة أمن النظام في مدينة حلب، واستمر آل بري في القتال إلى جانب قوات النظام بحلب حتى نهاية 2016، وتفرغوا بعد ذلك لعمليات النهب والابتزاز بهدف السيطرة على الأملاك في الأحياء الشرقية من حلب والتي خرج منها مقاتلو المعارضة. ويمتهن شبيحة آل بري أعمال التهريب والمخدرات وغيرها من الأعمال غير المشروعة والتي تدر عليهم أرباحاً كبيرة، حيث يقوم حسن بري بالتغطية على تلك الأعمال المشبوهة من خلال شراكاته مع رجالات النظام في حلب، وسبق له أن تولى عضوية مجلس الشعب عن حلب في الدور التشريعي الأول 2012-2016 والدور التشريعي الثاني 2016-2020 بدعم من أجهزة المخابرات. Hassan Shaaban Bari Born in Aleppo in 1972, he is the leader of the Bari clan's shabiha in Aleppo. He and his clan played a key role in suppressing the peaceful demonstrations that erupted in the neighborhoods of Aleppo at the beginning of the Syrian revolution. They contributed to the arrest and torture of dozens of the city's residents and handed them over to the Syrian regime's security services. The Bari clan also participated in several armed operations alongside regime forces in Aleppo. When the Free Syrian Army entered Aleppo in 2012, a truce was agreed upon between the Bari clan's shabiha and the Free Syrian Army. However, the Bari clan's shabiha violated the truce and killed a number of Free Syrian Army members, leading to the capture of several family members. After the death of Zein al-Din (Zeino), Hassan Berri assumed leadership of the clan, reorganizing its ranks and supplying it with money and weapons in cooperation with the regime's security services in Aleppo. The Berri clan continued to fight alongside regime forces in Aleppo until the end of 2016, after which they devoted themselves to looting and extortion with the aim of seizing property in the eastern neighborhoods of Aleppo, from which opposition fighters had fled. The Berri clan's thugs engage in smuggling, drug trafficking, and other illegal activities that generate significant profits. Hassan Berri covers up these suspicious activities through his partnerships with regime officials in Aleppo. He previously served as a member of the People's Assembly for Aleppo in the first legislative session (2012-2016) and the second legislative session (2016-2020), with the support of the intelligence services. #افضحوهم #أرشيف_الثورة_السورية #ذاكرة_الثورة_السورية #SRA
1:12

حسن شعبان بري من مواليد حلب عام 1972، وهو كبير شبيحة آل بري في حلب، حيث لعب مع عشيرته دوراً أساسياً في قمع المظاهرات السلمية التي انطلقت في أحياء مدينة حلب في بداية الثورة السورية، وساهموا في اعتقال وتعذيب العشرات من أبناء المدينة وتسليمهم لأجهزة أمن النظام السوري، كما انخرط آل بري في عدد من العمليات المسلحة إلى جانب قوات النظام في مدينة حلب. ولدى دخول عناصر الجيش الحر إلى مدينة حلب في عام 2012، تم الاتفاق على هدنة ما بين شبيحة آل بري وعناصر الجيش الحر إلا أن شبيحة آل بري خرقوا الهدنة وقتلوا عدداً من عناصر الجيش الحر مما أدى إلى أسر عدد من أعضاء العائلة. وبعد مقتل زين الدين (زينو) تولى "حسن بري" زعامة العشيرة وأعاد تنظيم صفوفهم ومدهم بالمال والسلاح بالتعاون مع أجهزة أمن النظام في مدينة حلب، واستمر آل بري في القتال إلى جانب قوات النظام بحلب حتى نهاية 2016، وتفرغوا بعد ذلك لعمليات النهب والابتزاز بهدف السيطرة على الأملاك في الأحياء الشرقية من حلب والتي خرج منها مقاتلو المعارضة. ويمتهن شبيحة آل بري أعمال التهريب والمخدرات وغيرها من الأعمال غير المشروعة والتي تدر عليهم أرباحاً كبيرة، حيث يقوم حسن بري بالتغطية على تلك الأعمال المشبوهة من خلال شراكاته مع رجالات النظام في حلب، وسبق له أن تولى عضوية مجلس الشعب عن حلب في الدور التشريعي الأول 2012-2016 والدور التشريعي الثاني 2016-2020 بدعم من أجهزة المخابرات. Hassan Shaaban Bari Born in Aleppo in 1972, he is the leader of the Bari clan's shabiha in Aleppo. He and his clan played a key role in suppressing the peaceful demonstrations that erupted in the neighborhoods of Aleppo at the beginning of the Syrian revolution. They contributed to the arrest and torture of dozens of the city's residents and handed them over to the Syrian regime's security services. The Bari clan also participated in several armed operations alongside regime forces in Aleppo. When the Free Syrian Army entered Aleppo in 2012, a truce was agreed upon between the Bari clan's shabiha and the Free Syrian Army. However, the Bari clan's shabiha violated the truce and killed a number of Free Syrian Army members, leading to the capture of several family members. After the death of Zein al-Din (Zeino), Hassan Berri assumed leadership of the clan, reorganizing its ranks and supplying it with money and weapons in cooperation with the regime's security services in Aleppo. The Berri clan continued to fight alongside regime forces in Aleppo until the end of 2016, after which they devoted themselves to looting and extortion with the aim of seizing property in the eastern neighborhoods of Aleppo, from which opposition fighters had fled. The Berri clan's thugs engage in smuggling, drug trafficking, and other illegal activities that generate significant profits. Hassan Berri covers up these suspicious activities through his partnerships with regime officials in Aleppo. He previously served as a member of the People's Assembly for Aleppo in the first legislative session (2012-2016) and the second legislative session (2016-2020), with the support of the intelligence services. #افضحوهم #أرشيف_الثورة_السورية #ذاكرة_الثورة_السورية #SRA

أرشيف الثورة السورية Syrian Revolution Archive

22,420 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🔴 امرأة حلبية بالف رجل…! امرأة من الطائفة السنية الكريمة في حلب ترفع صوتها بوجه عصابات الجولاني ومرتزقته، لتفضح جرائمهم وأساليبهم في قمع الناس وسرقة أرزاقهم. صرختها ليست عابرة، بل صرخة مدينة كاملة أنهكتها الفوضى والإرهاب، وكسرت قيود الصمت لتقول: كفى! هكذا تثبت المرأة السورية من جديد أنها قوة لا تُقهر، وأنها تستطيع أن تكون في موقفها وشجاعتها أمة بأكملها. 🔴 A woman from Aleppo, worth a thousand men…! A courageous woman from the honorable Sunni community in Aleppo stood up to Jolani’s gangs and their mercenaries, exposing their crimes and their tyranny against the people. Her cry is not just personal — it is the voice of an entire city suffocated by chaos and terror, breaking the silence to declare: Enough! Once again, Syrian women prove they are an unstoppable force, capable of standing as a whole nation through their courage and dignity. #حلب #سوريا #الجولاني #مقاومة #توثيق #سوريا_المنسية #Aleppo #Syria #Jolani #Resistance #VoiceOfSyria #StopTerrorism
7:08

🔴 امرأة حلبية بالف رجل…! امرأة من الطائفة السنية الكريمة في حلب ترفع صوتها بوجه عصابات الجولاني ومرتزقته، لتفضح جرائمهم وأساليبهم في قمع الناس وسرقة أرزاقهم. صرختها ليست عابرة، بل صرخة مدينة كاملة أنهكتها الفوضى والإرهاب، وكسرت قيود الصمت لتقول: كفى! هكذا تثبت المرأة السورية من جديد أنها قوة لا تُقهر، وأنها تستطيع أن تكون في موقفها وشجاعتها أمة بأكملها. 🔴 A woman from Aleppo, worth a thousand men…! A courageous woman from the honorable Sunni community in Aleppo stood up to Jolani’s gangs and their mercenaries, exposing their crimes and their tyranny against the people. Her cry is not just personal — it is the voice of an entire city suffocated by chaos and terror, breaking the silence to declare: Enough! Once again, Syrian women prove they are an unstoppable force, capable of standing as a whole nation through their courage and dignity. #حلب #سوريا #الجولاني #مقاومة #توثيق #سوريا_المنسية #Aleppo #Syria #Jolani #Resistance #VoiceOfSyria #StopTerrorism

NEMESIS – نيميسس

130,215 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🔴 ليس دفاعاً عن بشار… حتى لا يخرج علينا الذباب الإلكتروني بالهجوم!! لكن أتحدّى أي شخص في كل سوريا أن يقول إنه شاهد بشار أو أحد أبنائه يقود هذه السيارات الفارهة! هذه المواكب التي نراها اليوم ليست من جيب بشار ولا من مال الحكومة السورية، بل هدايا من الخارج ومن تجار سوريين، وخاصة من دمشق وحلب، لأجل مصالحهم الاستثمارية. أما الحقيقة الصادمة: موكب الجولاني يساوي أضعاف مضاعفة من هذه السيارات! فقارنوا بين الاثنين… لتعرفوا أين يضيع مال الشعب وأين يكمن الفساد الأكبر. 🔴 Not in defense of Bashar — just to avoid the swarm of online trolls attacking us, but I challenge anyone in Syria to say they’ve seen Bashar or his sons driving these luxury cars! These convoys we see are not paid from Bashar’s pocket or the Syrian government’s funds, but rather gifts from abroad and Syrian businessmen, especially from Damascus and Aleppo, in exchange for investment favors. The shocking truth: Jolani’s convoy is worth multiple times more than these cars! So compare the two… and see where the people’s wealth is truly being wasted. #سوريا #دمشق #حلب #فساد #موكب #الجولاني #بشار #اقتصاد #Syria #Damascus #Aleppo #Corruption #Convoy #Jolani #Bashar #Economy
0:31

🔴 ليس دفاعاً عن بشار… حتى لا يخرج علينا الذباب الإلكتروني بالهجوم!! لكن أتحدّى أي شخص في كل سوريا أن يقول إنه شاهد بشار أو أحد أبنائه يقود هذه السيارات الفارهة! هذه المواكب التي نراها اليوم ليست من جيب بشار ولا من مال الحكومة السورية، بل هدايا من الخارج ومن تجار سوريين، وخاصة من دمشق وحلب، لأجل مصالحهم الاستثمارية. أما الحقيقة الصادمة: موكب الجولاني يساوي أضعاف مضاعفة من هذه السيارات! فقارنوا بين الاثنين… لتعرفوا أين يضيع مال الشعب وأين يكمن الفساد الأكبر. 🔴 Not in defense of Bashar — just to avoid the swarm of online trolls attacking us, but I challenge anyone in Syria to say they’ve seen Bashar or his sons driving these luxury cars! These convoys we see are not paid from Bashar’s pocket or the Syrian government’s funds, but rather gifts from abroad and Syrian businessmen, especially from Damascus and Aleppo, in exchange for investment favors. The shocking truth: Jolani’s convoy is worth multiple times more than these cars! So compare the two… and see where the people’s wealth is truly being wasted. #سوريا #دمشق #حلب #فساد #موكب #الجولاني #بشار #اقتصاد #Syria #Damascus #Aleppo #Corruption #Convoy #Jolani #Bashar #Economy

NEMESIS – نيميسس

600,073 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

#Leaked: Erdoğan offered Donald Trump a ground attack on Iran, similar to how they attacked Assad. Trump accepted Erdoğan’s offer. What was Erdoğan’s offer? Under the command of Abu Mohammad al-Jolani, they could mobilize 100,000 jihadists from around the world in Syria (which is happening now) and then attack iran. However, Erdoğan then asked Trump to give the green light to Jolani to remove the Kurds from the front line and grant him access to Iraq, so he could join with Sunnis in Iraq and prepare an attack on Iraq, then move into Iran. Trump said OK & invited jolani to white house That is how the attack on the Kurds started. At present, there is an operations room in Aleppo, Syria. Members of ISIS, HTS, and Turkish intelligence are there. They are bringing jihadists from all around the world to Syria. Another operations room is located in Turkey, in the city of Gaziantep. The escape of ISIS prisoners was not an accident; it was part of the plan. The Syrian regime will release all SIS members and prepare them for the next move. Erdoğan’s goal is to destroy the Kurds in Syria, then Iraq, and then Iran. Plan organiser : tom barrack who convince trump to give jolani green light to attack kurds :Tom Barrack #kurds #RojavaDefend #Rojava
1:23

#Leaked: Erdoğan offered Donald Trump a ground attack on Iran, similar to how they attacked Assad. Trump accepted Erdoğan’s offer. What was Erdoğan’s offer? Under the command of Abu Mohammad al-Jolani, they could mobilize 100,000 jihadists from around the world in Syria (which is happening now) and then attack iran. However, Erdoğan then asked Trump to give the green light to Jolani to remove the Kurds from the front line and grant him access to Iraq, so he could join with Sunnis in Iraq and prepare an attack on Iraq, then move into Iran. Trump said OK & invited jolani to white house That is how the attack on the Kurds started. At present, there is an operations room in Aleppo, Syria. Members of ISIS, HTS, and Turkish intelligence are there. They are bringing jihadists from all around the world to Syria. Another operations room is located in Turkey, in the city of Gaziantep. The escape of ISIS prisoners was not an accident; it was part of the plan. The Syrian regime will release all SIS members and prepare them for the next move. Erdoğan’s goal is to destroy the Kurds in Syria, then Iraq, and then Iran. Plan organiser : tom barrack who convince trump to give jolani green light to attack kurds :Tom Barrack #kurds #RojavaDefend #Rojava

Botin Kurdistani

433,797 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

هل تتذكّرون تفجير فرع المرور في مدينة حلب؟ كان ذلك في عام ٢٠١٥، يوم اهتزّت المدينة على دوي انفجار ضخم، وسقط العشرات من الشهداء والجرحى. حينها، لم تنتظر قناة الجزيرة القطرية تحقيقًا أو دليلًا، سارعت كعادتها لاتهام النظام السوري، ونسجت روايتها الجاهزة سلفًا. واليوم… بعد عشر سنوات، يخرج علينا ضابط مخابرات تركي متقاعد، ويسرب تسجيلات تُظهر المنفذ الحقيقي للتفجير: أحد عناصر جبهة النصرة، التابعة آنذاك لـ”الرئيس المؤقت” لسوريا… الجولاني! نعم، الجولاني الذي كان يذبح على الهوية… هو نفسه من يترأس اليوم سلطة الأمر الواقع، ويحكم شعبًا باسم “التحرير”. ومع كل هذا، لا تزال الأبواق نفسها تلوك الأكاذيب ذاتها… وقريبًا جدًا… سيتبيّن أن بشار “بريء من كل التهم”. فقط انتظروا بقية الأتراك حتى يبلغوا التقاعد. الصبر مفتاح “العدالة المعلّبة”… Do you remember the bombing of the traffic branch in Aleppo? It was 2015 — a massive blast tore through the city, leaving dozens dead and wounded. Back then, Al Jazeera wasted no time. No investigation. No evidence. Just another headline blaming the Syrian regime. Now, ten years later, a retired Turkish intelligence officer leaks footage revealing the real perpetrator: a member of Jabhat al-Nusra, the group led by Syria’s so-called “interim president”… Jolani. Yes, the same Jolani who once slaughtered civilians… is now “ruling” Syria and caring for his “people”. And yet… the same old voices keep repeating the same tired lies. Soon enough… Bashar will be declared innocent of all charges. We’re just waiting on the rest of the Turks… to retire. Justice™ takes its time. #سوريا #حلب #تفجير_فرع_المرور #جبهة_النصرة #الجولاني #الجزيرة #سوريا_2025 #العدالة_المؤجلة #HTSCrimes #JolaniCrimes #WarCrimes #CrimesAgainstHumanity #AlJazeera #SyriaFiles
1:40

هل تتذكّرون تفجير فرع المرور في مدينة حلب؟ كان ذلك في عام ٢٠١٥، يوم اهتزّت المدينة على دوي انفجار ضخم، وسقط العشرات من الشهداء والجرحى. حينها، لم تنتظر قناة الجزيرة القطرية تحقيقًا أو دليلًا، سارعت كعادتها لاتهام النظام السوري، ونسجت روايتها الجاهزة سلفًا. واليوم… بعد عشر سنوات، يخرج علينا ضابط مخابرات تركي متقاعد، ويسرب تسجيلات تُظهر المنفذ الحقيقي للتفجير: أحد عناصر جبهة النصرة، التابعة آنذاك لـ”الرئيس المؤقت” لسوريا… الجولاني! نعم، الجولاني الذي كان يذبح على الهوية… هو نفسه من يترأس اليوم سلطة الأمر الواقع، ويحكم شعبًا باسم “التحرير”. ومع كل هذا، لا تزال الأبواق نفسها تلوك الأكاذيب ذاتها… وقريبًا جدًا… سيتبيّن أن بشار “بريء من كل التهم”. فقط انتظروا بقية الأتراك حتى يبلغوا التقاعد. الصبر مفتاح “العدالة المعلّبة”… Do you remember the bombing of the traffic branch in Aleppo? It was 2015 — a massive blast tore through the city, leaving dozens dead and wounded. Back then, Al Jazeera wasted no time. No investigation. No evidence. Just another headline blaming the Syrian regime. Now, ten years later, a retired Turkish intelligence officer leaks footage revealing the real perpetrator: a member of Jabhat al-Nusra, the group led by Syria’s so-called “interim president”… Jolani. Yes, the same Jolani who once slaughtered civilians… is now “ruling” Syria and caring for his “people”. And yet… the same old voices keep repeating the same tired lies. Soon enough… Bashar will be declared innocent of all charges. We’re just waiting on the rest of the Turks… to retire. Justice™ takes its time. #سوريا #حلب #تفجير_فرع_المرور #جبهة_النصرة #الجولاني #الجزيرة #سوريا_2025 #العدالة_المؤجلة #HTSCrimes #JolaniCrimes #WarCrimes #CrimesAgainstHumanity #AlJazeera #SyriaFiles

NEMESIS – نيميسس

23,949 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

▶️ NEW: Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who is wanted by the International Criminal Court for war crimes, invited U.S. Senator Lindsey Graham to Jerusalem this weekend to deliver an unambiguous case for military escalation across Gaza, Iran, and Lebanon — pressing maximalist Israeli positions that cut directly against President Trump’s efforts to secure peace and stabilize the region. The remarks come as Trump weighs competing paths ahead of a planned December 29 meeting with Netanyahu. Turkey’s foreign minister Hakan Fidan has warned of a “huge risk” that Trump’s Gaza peace could collapse without a “substantial” intervention with Netanyahu. But, after meetings with Israel’s prime minister, foreign minister, and defense minister, as well as senior IDF and Israeli intelligence officials and U.S. military leaders, Graham told reporters the following: ⸻ 🔴 On Gaza and Hamas “disarmament” “Hamas is not disarming. They’re rearming. They’re not interested in giving up power. They’re consolidating power.” “Phase two is an aspiration that cannot be achieved, in my view.” “Ninety days after the ceasefire, Hamas is stronger, not weaker.” “You cannot have a good outcome in Gaza with Hamas still armed. I don’t believe you can develop a part of Gaza if Hamas controls the other part.” “We need a plan quickly. Put Hamas on a time clock to disarm. If they don’t disarm, I would encourage President Trump to unleash Israel to finish off Hamas.” “It would be a long, brutal war, but necessary.” “There will never be peace in this region until Hamas is finished off militarily and politically.” ⸻ 🔴 On Iran “Iran is up to no good.” “We obliterated the Iranian nuclear facilities. We did not obliterate Iran’s desire to have a nuclear weapon.” “The regime hasn’t changed at all. They still want to destroy Israel and consider America the Great Satan.” “If there’s credible evidence they’re going back into the enrichment business at other sites, or rebuilding ballistic missiles that could threaten Israel or Europe, we should hit them before they can do that.” “Appeasement does not lead to peace.” “The only language radical Islam understands is force.” Later, when asked if Israel should strike Iran again: “Hit them as hard as you can, as often as you can. Make sure they can’t develop a nuclear weapon.” “If you see an effort to regenerate the enrichment program, hit it.” “If you see an effort to build more ballistic missiles … hit it NOW.” ⸻ 🔴 On Lebanon and Hezbollah “The trend lines in Lebanon are, quite frankly, optimistic.” “The Lebanese government has decided to call for Hezbollah to disarm.” “If Hezbollah gave up their heavy weapons, that would be a godsend for Lebanon and the region.” “If Hezbollah refuses, we should engage in military operations with Israel and the United States to achieve that goal.” “Hezbollah either gives up their heavy weapons voluntarily, or we come up with a military campaign to take them out.” “Once Hamas and Hezbollah are off the table, two proxies of Iran, the likelihood of a Saudi-Israel deal goes up dramatically.” ⸻ 🔴 On Turkey and a Gaza ‘stabilizing force’ “The idea that Turkey would be part of a stabilizing force would rock Israel to its core.” “There is no political support anywhere in Israel for Turkey being involved.” “Turkey’s comments against Israel are beyond the pale.” “If anybody thinks Turkey should be involved on the ground in Gaza, you would create a massive political crisis inside Israel.” ⸻ 🔴 On Israel, international criticism, and October 7 “Israel is not the problem. Hamas is the problem. Hezbollah is the problem. Iran is the problem.” “This is a war of television. You’re winning on the ground, but you’re losing in the air.” “The war aims are not genocide.” “October 7 was designed to stop normalization between Saudi Arabia and Israel.” “If after October 7 Hamas is still standing, that would be the biggest mistake ever.” “You can’t rewrite history, but you can learn from it.”
17:54

▶️ NEW: Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who is wanted by the International Criminal Court for war crimes, invited U.S. Senator Lindsey Graham to Jerusalem this weekend to deliver an unambiguous case for military escalation across Gaza, Iran, and Lebanon — pressing maximalist Israeli positions that cut directly against President Trump’s efforts to secure peace and stabilize the region. The remarks come as Trump weighs competing paths ahead of a planned December 29 meeting with Netanyahu. Turkey’s foreign minister Hakan Fidan has warned of a “huge risk” that Trump’s Gaza peace could collapse without a “substantial” intervention with Netanyahu. But, after meetings with Israel’s prime minister, foreign minister, and defense minister, as well as senior IDF and Israeli intelligence officials and U.S. military leaders, Graham told reporters the following: ⸻ 🔴 On Gaza and Hamas “disarmament” “Hamas is not disarming. They’re rearming. They’re not interested in giving up power. They’re consolidating power.” “Phase two is an aspiration that cannot be achieved, in my view.” “Ninety days after the ceasefire, Hamas is stronger, not weaker.” “You cannot have a good outcome in Gaza with Hamas still armed. I don’t believe you can develop a part of Gaza if Hamas controls the other part.” “We need a plan quickly. Put Hamas on a time clock to disarm. If they don’t disarm, I would encourage President Trump to unleash Israel to finish off Hamas.” “It would be a long, brutal war, but necessary.” “There will never be peace in this region until Hamas is finished off militarily and politically.” ⸻ 🔴 On Iran “Iran is up to no good.” “We obliterated the Iranian nuclear facilities. We did not obliterate Iran’s desire to have a nuclear weapon.” “The regime hasn’t changed at all. They still want to destroy Israel and consider America the Great Satan.” “If there’s credible evidence they’re going back into the enrichment business at other sites, or rebuilding ballistic missiles that could threaten Israel or Europe, we should hit them before they can do that.” “Appeasement does not lead to peace.” “The only language radical Islam understands is force.” Later, when asked if Israel should strike Iran again: “Hit them as hard as you can, as often as you can. Make sure they can’t develop a nuclear weapon.” “If you see an effort to regenerate the enrichment program, hit it.” “If you see an effort to build more ballistic missiles … hit it NOW.” ⸻ 🔴 On Lebanon and Hezbollah “The trend lines in Lebanon are, quite frankly, optimistic.” “The Lebanese government has decided to call for Hezbollah to disarm.” “If Hezbollah gave up their heavy weapons, that would be a godsend for Lebanon and the region.” “If Hezbollah refuses, we should engage in military operations with Israel and the United States to achieve that goal.” “Hezbollah either gives up their heavy weapons voluntarily, or we come up with a military campaign to take them out.” “Once Hamas and Hezbollah are off the table, two proxies of Iran, the likelihood of a Saudi-Israel deal goes up dramatically.” ⸻ 🔴 On Turkey and a Gaza ‘stabilizing force’ “The idea that Turkey would be part of a stabilizing force would rock Israel to its core.” “There is no political support anywhere in Israel for Turkey being involved.” “Turkey’s comments against Israel are beyond the pale.” “If anybody thinks Turkey should be involved on the ground in Gaza, you would create a massive political crisis inside Israel.” ⸻ 🔴 On Israel, international criticism, and October 7 “Israel is not the problem. Hamas is the problem. Hezbollah is the problem. Iran is the problem.” “This is a war of television. You’re winning on the ground, but you’re losing in the air.” “The war aims are not genocide.” “October 7 was designed to stop normalization between Saudi Arabia and Israel.” “If after October 7 Hamas is still standing, that would be the biggest mistake ever.” “You can’t rewrite history, but you can learn from it.”

Drop Site

203,583 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Let me tell you something you already know, but we’re all too scared to say out loud: Syria is gone. Not only physically but also the soul, its shared identity, its possibility of coexistence. And we killed it. Not just the "regime", not just the "rebels", not just foreign actors, but the collective “we,” inside and out, that let ideology, revenge, and ignorance reign. I didn’t grow up thinking of myself as an “outsider.” Born in Aleppo in 1987, I lived side by side with Kurds, Sunnis, Christians, Armenians, Alawites. My University was mixed, my friends fasted during Ramadan, and I joined them. There was no talk of who's more Syrian, who belongs. We simply were. But war changes people. It strips the skin off identity and exposes the bone-deep rot. One day you’re sharing meals, the next, you're asked if you're an “outsider,” as if four generations of being born and buried in Syria isn’t enough to count. As if the jihadi from Chechnya who just crossed the border with a Kalashnikov has more claim to the country than I do. The violence wasn’t just in the bullets or the bombings, it was in the shift. Friends turned strangers, neighbors turned jailers. Minorities became bargaining chips in a war not of their making, demonized for alleged crimes they never committed. Take the Alawites, for example. A community now collectively punished, starved, and scapegoated. Are they not Syrians too? They’re being hunted, burned out of their lands, erased in silence. We forget—or choose to forget—that the Assad regime was not a sectarian monolith. Most of its political and financial machinery was Sunni. Yet somehow, the Alawites carry the original sin. Somehow, the Druze are now suspects too. The nuance dies where ideology begins. Let me be clear: This is not a defense of Assad. It’s a plea for honesty. If we can’t separate the actions of the former regime from the ethnicities and sects that happen to be associated with it, we are no better than those who use religion as a sword. If ISIS were 100% Sunni, and we didn’t blame all Sunnis, why then do we blame all Alawites for Assad? This is genocide through silence, displacement through distortion. And it didn’t start with Assad. The Alawites fled to the mountains generations ago for a reason. They were persecuted centuries before the word “Ba’ath” even existed. These aren’t new tensions, they're old wounds, reopened and infected by Qatari propaganda and petrodollar-funded fanaticism. Some people still talk about rebuilding Syria. With what? Social media receipts of our betrayals? Video footage of churches and mosques destroyed? Our sectarian hatreds are archived now, tagged, captioned, and searchable. There is no forgetting. There is no healing when the wound is kept on loop. There’s a brutal kind of clarity in exile. When you're stripped of flag and myth, what remains is truth. And the truth is: Syria, as we knew it, is over. It fell due to our ignorance, to the sectarian blindness, to our failure to see each other as human before labeling each other as enemies. We mourn a country that no longer exists. We carry its corpse in our memories. But don’t be fooled, we’re not looking backwards. We’re just refusing to lie about what’s ahead. From the conversation with sarkis yousef
12:56

Let me tell you something you already know, but we’re all too scared to say out loud: Syria is gone. Not only physically but also the soul, its shared identity, its possibility of coexistence. And we killed it. Not just the "regime", not just the "rebels", not just foreign actors, but the collective “we,” inside and out, that let ideology, revenge, and ignorance reign. I didn’t grow up thinking of myself as an “outsider.” Born in Aleppo in 1987, I lived side by side with Kurds, Sunnis, Christians, Armenians, Alawites. My University was mixed, my friends fasted during Ramadan, and I joined them. There was no talk of who's more Syrian, who belongs. We simply were. But war changes people. It strips the skin off identity and exposes the bone-deep rot. One day you’re sharing meals, the next, you're asked if you're an “outsider,” as if four generations of being born and buried in Syria isn’t enough to count. As if the jihadi from Chechnya who just crossed the border with a Kalashnikov has more claim to the country than I do. The violence wasn’t just in the bullets or the bombings, it was in the shift. Friends turned strangers, neighbors turned jailers. Minorities became bargaining chips in a war not of their making, demonized for alleged crimes they never committed. Take the Alawites, for example. A community now collectively punished, starved, and scapegoated. Are they not Syrians too? They’re being hunted, burned out of their lands, erased in silence. We forget—or choose to forget—that the Assad regime was not a sectarian monolith. Most of its political and financial machinery was Sunni. Yet somehow, the Alawites carry the original sin. Somehow, the Druze are now suspects too. The nuance dies where ideology begins. Let me be clear: This is not a defense of Assad. It’s a plea for honesty. If we can’t separate the actions of the former regime from the ethnicities and sects that happen to be associated with it, we are no better than those who use religion as a sword. If ISIS were 100% Sunni, and we didn’t blame all Sunnis, why then do we blame all Alawites for Assad? This is genocide through silence, displacement through distortion. And it didn’t start with Assad. The Alawites fled to the mountains generations ago for a reason. They were persecuted centuries before the word “Ba’ath” even existed. These aren’t new tensions, they're old wounds, reopened and infected by Qatari propaganda and petrodollar-funded fanaticism. Some people still talk about rebuilding Syria. With what? Social media receipts of our betrayals? Video footage of churches and mosques destroyed? Our sectarian hatreds are archived now, tagged, captioned, and searchable. There is no forgetting. There is no healing when the wound is kept on loop. There’s a brutal kind of clarity in exile. When you're stripped of flag and myth, what remains is truth. And the truth is: Syria, as we knew it, is over. It fell due to our ignorance, to the sectarian blindness, to our failure to see each other as human before labeling each other as enemies. We mourn a country that no longer exists. We carry its corpse in our memories. But don’t be fooled, we’re not looking backwards. We’re just refusing to lie about what’s ahead. From the conversation with sarkis yousef

Kevork Almassian

126,539 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

عشرات المصرفيين باتوا مطلوبين، اعتبارًا من الأسبوع المقبل، للمثول أمام المدعي العام المالي، القاضي ماهر شعيتو والاستدعاءات تهدف إلى التحقيق معهم في تحويل أموالهم إلى الخارج عند بداية الأزمة عام 2019 هذا الملف بقي نائمًا ست سنوات، قبل أن يعيد القاضي شعيتو تحريكه بعد ذلك، تولّى مصرف لبنان جمع المعلومات والأرقام المتعلقة بتحويلات أعضاء مجالس الإدارة والمديرين التنفيذيين في المصارف وتضم الدفعة الأولى نحو 45 مصرفيًا من سبعة مصارف ثم يُفترض أن تتوالى الاستدعاءات، وأن تشمل التحقيقات أكثر من 300 مصرفي من جميع المصارف المتورطة، وعددها أربعون مصرفًا أو أكثر المهم أن نعرف أن هؤلاء المصرفيين كانوا يمنعون المودعين العاديين من تحويل أموالهم، فيما كانوا يحوّلون أموالهم وأموال عائلاتهم، ويسهّلون تحويلات سياسيين ونافذين وإذا توسّعت التحقيقات لتشمل الجميع، ولا سيما السياسيين المشتبه بتورطهم، فإننا نتحدث عن مبالغ تُقدّر بمليارات الدولارات ولا ينبغي أن ننسى ملفات أخرى يجب أن تصل أيضًا إلى القضاء من بينها شبهات تحقيق مصرفيين عشرات ملايين الدولارات من خلال التلاعب بعمليات منصة «صيرفة» وهناك أيضًا شبهات تلاعب بالأصول، أو نقلها لمصلحة أصحاب المصارف وذوي النفوذ فضلًا عن المتاجرة بالشيكات، وفضائح تسديد القروض باللولار، وغيرها من العمليات المشبوهة التي يعرف مصرف لبنان الكثير عنها، فيما لا يزال الجميع ينتظر تحرّكه في المقابل، كان المودع المسكين، ولا يزال، مضطرًا إلى القبول بفتات السحوبات التي تتيحها التعاميم وهنا يُطرح سؤال: كيف يمكن مصرفيين تحوم حولهم شبهات إساءة الأمانة، ويخضعون اليوم للتحقيق، أن يبقوا في مواقعهم داخل الإدارات ومجالس الإدارة؟ هذا السؤال موجّه إلى مصرف لبنان، مخزن أسرار الأزمة ونقول له: افتح يا سمسم! Dozens of bankers are now required, starting next week, to appear before Financial Public Prosecutor Judge Maher Chaito The summonses are aimed at investigating their transfer of funds abroad at the beginning of the crisis in 2019 This file remained dormant for six years before Judge Chaito revived it Banque du Liban then took charge of gathering information and figures related to transfers made by bank board members and executive managers The first batch includes around 45 bankers from seven banks The summonses are then expected to continue, with the investigations expanding to include more than 300 bankers from all the banks involved, numbering forty banks or more What is important to understand is that these bankers were preventing ordinary depositors from transferring their money, while they were transferring their own funds and those of their families, and facilitating transfers for politicians and influential figures If the investigations expand to include everyone, especially politicians suspected of involvement, we are talking about amounts estimated in the billions of dollars And we should not forget other files that must also reach the judiciary Among them are suspicions that bankers made tens of millions of dollars by manipulating transactions on the "Sayrafa" platform There are also suspicions of manipulating assets or transferring them for the benefit of bank owners and influential figures In addition to trading in checks, scandals involving the repayment of loans in "lollars", and other suspicious operations about which Banque du Liban knows a great deal, while everyone is still waiting for it to act Meanwhile, the unfortunate depositor was, and still is, forced to accept the crumbs of withdrawals allowed by the circulars And here a question arises: How can bankers facing suspicions of breach of trust, and who are now under investigation, remain in their positions within management and boards of directors? This question is directed at Banque du Liban, the repository of the crisis's secrets And we say to it: Open Sesame! Mounir Younès/منير يونس #لبنان #المصارف #المصرفيون #مصرف_لبنان #ماهر_شعيتو #المودعون #صيرفة #اللولار #القضاء #Lebanon #Banks #Bankers #BanqueDuLiban #MaherChaito #Depositors #Sayrafa #Lollar #Judiciary
2:06

عشرات المصرفيين باتوا مطلوبين، اعتبارًا من الأسبوع المقبل، للمثول أمام المدعي العام المالي، القاضي ماهر شعيتو والاستدعاءات تهدف إلى التحقيق معهم في تحويل أموالهم إلى الخارج عند بداية الأزمة عام 2019 هذا الملف بقي نائمًا ست سنوات، قبل أن يعيد القاضي شعيتو تحريكه بعد ذلك، تولّى مصرف لبنان جمع المعلومات والأرقام المتعلقة بتحويلات أعضاء مجالس الإدارة والمديرين التنفيذيين في المصارف وتضم الدفعة الأولى نحو 45 مصرفيًا من سبعة مصارف ثم يُفترض أن تتوالى الاستدعاءات، وأن تشمل التحقيقات أكثر من 300 مصرفي من جميع المصارف المتورطة، وعددها أربعون مصرفًا أو أكثر المهم أن نعرف أن هؤلاء المصرفيين كانوا يمنعون المودعين العاديين من تحويل أموالهم، فيما كانوا يحوّلون أموالهم وأموال عائلاتهم، ويسهّلون تحويلات سياسيين ونافذين وإذا توسّعت التحقيقات لتشمل الجميع، ولا سيما السياسيين المشتبه بتورطهم، فإننا نتحدث عن مبالغ تُقدّر بمليارات الدولارات ولا ينبغي أن ننسى ملفات أخرى يجب أن تصل أيضًا إلى القضاء من بينها شبهات تحقيق مصرفيين عشرات ملايين الدولارات من خلال التلاعب بعمليات منصة «صيرفة» وهناك أيضًا شبهات تلاعب بالأصول، أو نقلها لمصلحة أصحاب المصارف وذوي النفوذ فضلًا عن المتاجرة بالشيكات، وفضائح تسديد القروض باللولار، وغيرها من العمليات المشبوهة التي يعرف مصرف لبنان الكثير عنها، فيما لا يزال الجميع ينتظر تحرّكه في المقابل، كان المودع المسكين، ولا يزال، مضطرًا إلى القبول بفتات السحوبات التي تتيحها التعاميم وهنا يُطرح سؤال: كيف يمكن مصرفيين تحوم حولهم شبهات إساءة الأمانة، ويخضعون اليوم للتحقيق، أن يبقوا في مواقعهم داخل الإدارات ومجالس الإدارة؟ هذا السؤال موجّه إلى مصرف لبنان، مخزن أسرار الأزمة ونقول له: افتح يا سمسم! Dozens of bankers are now required, starting next week, to appear before Financial Public Prosecutor Judge Maher Chaito The summonses are aimed at investigating their transfer of funds abroad at the beginning of the crisis in 2019 This file remained dormant for six years before Judge Chaito revived it Banque du Liban then took charge of gathering information and figures related to transfers made by bank board members and executive managers The first batch includes around 45 bankers from seven banks The summonses are then expected to continue, with the investigations expanding to include more than 300 bankers from all the banks involved, numbering forty banks or more What is important to understand is that these bankers were preventing ordinary depositors from transferring their money, while they were transferring their own funds and those of their families, and facilitating transfers for politicians and influential figures If the investigations expand to include everyone, especially politicians suspected of involvement, we are talking about amounts estimated in the billions of dollars And we should not forget other files that must also reach the judiciary Among them are suspicions that bankers made tens of millions of dollars by manipulating transactions on the "Sayrafa" platform There are also suspicions of manipulating assets or transferring them for the benefit of bank owners and influential figures In addition to trading in checks, scandals involving the repayment of loans in "lollars", and other suspicious operations about which Banque du Liban knows a great deal, while everyone is still waiting for it to act Meanwhile, the unfortunate depositor was, and still is, forced to accept the crumbs of withdrawals allowed by the circulars And here a question arises: How can bankers facing suspicions of breach of trust, and who are now under investigation, remain in their positions within management and boards of directors? This question is directed at Banque du Liban, the repository of the crisis's secrets And we say to it: Open Sesame! Mounir Younès/منير يونس #لبنان #المصارف #المصرفيون #مصرف_لبنان #ماهر_شعيتو #المودعون #صيرفة #اللولار #القضاء #Lebanon #Banks #Bankers #BanqueDuLiban #MaherChaito #Depositors #Sayrafa #Lollar #Judiciary

Beirut Politics

15,472 Aufrufe • vor 19 Tagen

Congratulations to those dim enough to believe it was possible to be anti-Zionist and pro-coup in Syria. You have delivered the Zionists what was beyond Herzl's wildest dreams. Not only have you eradicated Syria culturally and geographically but you have eradicated Palestine and created Greater Israel. This was always obvious; always inevitable; and the basis of anti-imperialist opposition to this regime change mission. It will now take a Herculean task, which can only be performed by the actually anti-Zionist regional forces of the Resistance Axis, to reconstitute, recover, resupply and reshape the war for Palestine. To do this, it will have to take a much more aggressive posture. By the eradication of Palestine, I mean something very specific: you have rescued the Zionists from existential defeat by turning this war in their favour. Whether you knew it or not, that was the objective of the chief sponsors of this regime change operation. For Erdoğan, it's a chance to recover his desperate domestic political position and finally steal the industrial heartlands of Syria, as he has been doing in phases throughout the past decade in an asset-stripping rampage. And to cement, once and for all, the blood ties between Turkey and the Zionist state by redrawing the map of the Eastern Mediterranean and West Asia together. For Qatar, delivering Syrian territory on a plate to the Zionists supposedly gives them immunity from Trump's cabinet of hawks, underscoring their loyalty to and reliability for the American imperial project in West Asia. The gas and construction billions (and Qatar's consequent increased strategic importance to Europe and the US) that will follow from a new pipeline to Europe and rebuilding Syria's ruins were their key original motivation for sponsoring regime change. Another consequence is that Qatar gets to play at nation-building, something its elites are still sore they couldn't do in Egypt when the UAE launched a coup against the Mursi regime, replacing the Muslim Brotherhood with military dictatorship to cut short the Arab Spring. Fourteen years and billions of dollars of investment in Zionising Syria via various terror factions have also drawn Qatari policymakers much personally closer to the CIA and Mossad, which is useful for the 'mediation' role Qatar prizes so highly. The Americans have taken the largest and most strategically significant bastion of Arabism (a now defunct idea) and an ally of Russia, the Islamic Republic and China, and will turn it into an economic basket case while telling the world it's a Muslim Singapore. In deposing Bashar, they have decapitated the fulcrum of anti-imperialism in the Levant and the only Arab state leader of the past few decades able to enunciate an intellectually coherent materialist theory of empire, as well as an advocate of de-dollarisation. The rump state carved from former Syria will now be ruled by ISIS-in-suits with Milei characteristics. The Americans have already been ruling a third of Syria (a landmass the size of Croatia) for a decade and stealing all of Syria's considerable oil and wheat resources in one of the most brazen acts of imperial piracy in modern history. Their starvation sanctions have led us to this point more than any other single factor, throttling the rest of the country while Idlib under the ISIS hordes was allowed to trade freely. For the UK, which has led at different stages of the war alongside the UAE and then Qatar on propaganda for the regime change project, it's also a way of proving to the Americans that this economically unproductive and politically irrelevant rainy little island still has something to offer the Empire in the shape of PR firms, lobbying shops, gun-runners and traffickers of gullible Salafi sectarians. Last but certainly not least: for the Zionists, it's beyond a dream. They have gone from stasis in an existential war in which they met none of their initial objectives and had to resort to chaotic assassinations, to destroying their largest remaining Arab military foe and having free rein on all of Syria on land should they wish, as well as certain domination of the skies and seas once the Russian naval and air bases are evacuated. They own Syria now, everyone else is just living in it. The Chabad will tell you that, as will Jawlani every time he's interviewed. Nations can only exist and be sovereign when they control their territory. Syria no longer exists, after having been chipped away at for fourteen years by the most expensive and largest regime change campaign in US history. Frankly, it's a miracle that it was able to survive so long in the face of this David v Goliath onslaught. What exists now are US-held territories and military bases (some of which could be used to attack Iraq); ever-expanding Turkish territory which could result in Aleppo being culturally or politically absorbed into Turkey (a major long-term prize); and a deeply sectarian Damascus regime under former Islamic State in Iraq (ISI) deputy and al-Qa'ida in Syria leader, Abu Muhammad al-Jawlani, which also answers directly to Turkish intelligence. The ISIS-in-suits regime is likely to sign a Zionisation deal just for sanctions relief, so recovering the oilfields seems unlikely, especially under Trump. But a Zionisation deal being floated may encourage some Syrians to rethink their support for their new ISIS overlords and cause a new domestic Resistance movement to emerge, under extreme punishment and threat from the gaggle of US allies who now run former Syria.
0:44

Congratulations to those dim enough to believe it was possible to be anti-Zionist and pro-coup in Syria. You have delivered the Zionists what was beyond Herzl's wildest dreams. Not only have you eradicated Syria culturally and geographically but you have eradicated Palestine and created Greater Israel. This was always obvious; always inevitable; and the basis of anti-imperialist opposition to this regime change mission. It will now take a Herculean task, which can only be performed by the actually anti-Zionist regional forces of the Resistance Axis, to reconstitute, recover, resupply and reshape the war for Palestine. To do this, it will have to take a much more aggressive posture. By the eradication of Palestine, I mean something very specific: you have rescued the Zionists from existential defeat by turning this war in their favour. Whether you knew it or not, that was the objective of the chief sponsors of this regime change operation. For Erdoğan, it's a chance to recover his desperate domestic political position and finally steal the industrial heartlands of Syria, as he has been doing in phases throughout the past decade in an asset-stripping rampage. And to cement, once and for all, the blood ties between Turkey and the Zionist state by redrawing the map of the Eastern Mediterranean and West Asia together. For Qatar, delivering Syrian territory on a plate to the Zionists supposedly gives them immunity from Trump's cabinet of hawks, underscoring their loyalty to and reliability for the American imperial project in West Asia. The gas and construction billions (and Qatar's consequent increased strategic importance to Europe and the US) that will follow from a new pipeline to Europe and rebuilding Syria's ruins were their key original motivation for sponsoring regime change. Another consequence is that Qatar gets to play at nation-building, something its elites are still sore they couldn't do in Egypt when the UAE launched a coup against the Mursi regime, replacing the Muslim Brotherhood with military dictatorship to cut short the Arab Spring. Fourteen years and billions of dollars of investment in Zionising Syria via various terror factions have also drawn Qatari policymakers much personally closer to the CIA and Mossad, which is useful for the 'mediation' role Qatar prizes so highly. The Americans have taken the largest and most strategically significant bastion of Arabism (a now defunct idea) and an ally of Russia, the Islamic Republic and China, and will turn it into an economic basket case while telling the world it's a Muslim Singapore. In deposing Bashar, they have decapitated the fulcrum of anti-imperialism in the Levant and the only Arab state leader of the past few decades able to enunciate an intellectually coherent materialist theory of empire, as well as an advocate of de-dollarisation. The rump state carved from former Syria will now be ruled by ISIS-in-suits with Milei characteristics. The Americans have already been ruling a third of Syria (a landmass the size of Croatia) for a decade and stealing all of Syria's considerable oil and wheat resources in one of the most brazen acts of imperial piracy in modern history. Their starvation sanctions have led us to this point more than any other single factor, throttling the rest of the country while Idlib under the ISIS hordes was allowed to trade freely. For the UK, which has led at different stages of the war alongside the UAE and then Qatar on propaganda for the regime change project, it's also a way of proving to the Americans that this economically unproductive and politically irrelevant rainy little island still has something to offer the Empire in the shape of PR firms, lobbying shops, gun-runners and traffickers of gullible Salafi sectarians. Last but certainly not least: for the Zionists, it's beyond a dream. They have gone from stasis in an existential war in which they met none of their initial objectives and had to resort to chaotic assassinations, to destroying their largest remaining Arab military foe and having free rein on all of Syria on land should they wish, as well as certain domination of the skies and seas once the Russian naval and air bases are evacuated. They own Syria now, everyone else is just living in it. The Chabad will tell you that, as will Jawlani every time he's interviewed. Nations can only exist and be sovereign when they control their territory. Syria no longer exists, after having been chipped away at for fourteen years by the most expensive and largest regime change campaign in US history. Frankly, it's a miracle that it was able to survive so long in the face of this David v Goliath onslaught. What exists now are US-held territories and military bases (some of which could be used to attack Iraq); ever-expanding Turkish territory which could result in Aleppo being culturally or politically absorbed into Turkey (a major long-term prize); and a deeply sectarian Damascus regime under former Islamic State in Iraq (ISI) deputy and al-Qa'ida in Syria leader, Abu Muhammad al-Jawlani, which also answers directly to Turkish intelligence. The ISIS-in-suits regime is likely to sign a Zionisation deal just for sanctions relief, so recovering the oilfields seems unlikely, especially under Trump. But a Zionisation deal being floated may encourage some Syrians to rethink their support for their new ISIS overlords and cause a new domestic Resistance movement to emerge, under extreme punishment and threat from the gaggle of US allies who now run former Syria.

David Miller

86,534 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🚨🇸🇦🇹🇷🇵🇰 When Trump Said: "My Office is the Middle East... and Israel is the Pen": The Full Story of the "Malign Alliance of Necessity" That the Mecca Agreement Destroyed Before It Even Began! Every chess game has its backstage. And every backstage has a moment where the masks fall off. What happened in Holy Makkah, and the intense diplomatic activity that preceded it, was no ordinary summit. It was the official announcement of the defeat of the most dangerous project ever plotted against the region. It was the thunderous voice that declared: "Game over." Let's go back. To the true beginning. Before the chaos, before the strikes, before the war. On February 3, 2025, Donald Trump stood holding his pen and uttered the sentence that revealed everything: "Look at this amazing pen. My office is the Middle East, and this pen is Israel. It's a very small piece of land. It's amazing what they've been able to do... but it's a very small piece of land." This was not just a passing comment. It was the key to understanding the whole game. It was an explicit declaration that Israel is not just an ally, but the "tool." The pen with which Washington would write the destiny of the region. The pen that would redraw the maps. The pen that would expand that "small piece of land." Trump said it clearly: the paper is the Middle East, and the pen in his hand is Israel. And so the project began. The "Greater Israel" project. The project to "change the map of the Middle East." Netanyahu, who repeatedly echoed this threat during the phony war on Iran, wasn't speaking in a vacuum. He was executing. He was holding the pen Trump described, ready to write. But Trump wasn't going to grant this expansion for free. The man who seized Venezuela's oil in January 2026 was looking for customers. He had a massive surplus of oil, and his ports were far away. The ships weren't coming to him. So how could he attract them? How could he force the world to buy from him? The answer was: chaos. Creating chaos in Hormuz. Making passage through it suicidal. Closing Bab el-Mandeb by Houthi proxy. Then standing before the world to say: "Come to our safe ports." And just days ago, he declared it explicitly: "America is the number one oil exporter in the world." And here, on this chessboard, the players gathered. A Malign Alliance of Necessity. Not bound by love, but by a single goal: to punish Saudi Arabia and drown it. Iran, with its ideological regime, wants Trump to legitimize its right to manage the Strait of Hormuz. It cares less about the killing of its Supreme Leader than it does about harming the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and the rest of the Gulf states, especially after the liberation of Syria. Likewise, Israel and Abu Dhabi want to punish Saudi Arabia for dismantling the fragmentation project. Israel, the pen Trump described, dreams of a fragmented Yemen and a torn Sudan. And Abu Dhabi, which invested billions in supporting the tools of fragmentation, from the Houthis to the Rapid Support Forces, to bleed Saudi Arabia dry, hoping it might thereby rise. The truth is, it ended up stuck in Netanyahu's quagmire. And so the game began. Trump threatens. Netanyahu roars, "We will change the map." Iran seeks revenge. Iran threatens. The Houthi screams in Bab el-Mandeb. And Abu Dhabi writhes in frustration, declaring at times its phantom participation in the war, and moving covertly at others to fuel chaos in Yemen and Sudan. The American and global media plays its role to perfection: hyping, exaggerating, portraying Trump as if he's about to destroy Iran, while another channel asks leaders to "call Trump to calm him down." All of this to keep the region in chaos. To keep the ships stranded. To paralyze Gulf energy, and to legitimize Iran's right to manage the Strait of Hormuz so it remains closed, then turns into another Panama Canal. We have known this game for a long time. Then came the public voice of the project. The late U.S. Senator Lindsey Graham, who was the official spokesman for this malign alliance. On June 21, he came out to threaten the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and the countries of the region. He said it explicitly: Saudi Arabia must join the normalization agreement, and it must be "bold" in doing so, or else it will face "dire consequences." The threat was no longer hidden. It became public. The dictates were being issued in the open: either submit to our project, or bear the consequences. But Graham died, and his malice lives on in the actions of this alliance, this Malign Alliance of Necessity. Trump, Netanyahu, Graham, Iran, and Abu Dhabi were playing chess. But there were others working in silence. Throughout the months of chaos and before, His Royal Highness Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif were engaged in intense diplomatic activity. Continuous meetings. Deep strategic coordination. They were weaving the quiet strategic response in closed rooms, far from the noise of threats. And in Holy Makkah, from the Sacred House, came the coronation, where the Joint Defense Agreement between Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and Pakistan was signed, flipping the table on all of them (the Malign Alliance of Necessity). This agreement was not just a closed tripartite alliance. The Turkish Foreign Minister hinted that Egypt would join after completing technical procedures. And it was announced that the door is open for the rest of the countries to join. This is not just an agreement. This is the nucleus of a new regional order. An open order. An order not imposed by force, but built through partnership. This was the moment the table was flipped onto the heads of the old players. The moment they were ejected from the field. The moment the birth of the true Middle East was written, before Trump and Netanyahu could begin to write their supposed birth. The game is exposed. Trump wants to sell his oil, and he wanted Israel to be the pen to write its greater map. Netanyahu wants "more space" and wants no stability for Saudi Arabia and Turkey. Iran wants the Strait of Hormuz. And Abu Dhabi wants revenge for its failure. But Makkah turned all the tables. No one can bypass these leaders now. Saudi Arabia, which absorbed the pain; Turkey, standing beside it; and Pakistan, with its nuclear might; are no longer just players. They are the authors of the future. And the pen that Trump thought he held to write Israel's map no longer has a table to write upon. 🦅🇸🇦🇹🇷🇵🇰🔥
0:31

🚨🇸🇦🇹🇷🇵🇰 When Trump Said: "My Office is the Middle East... and Israel is the Pen": The Full Story of the "Malign Alliance of Necessity" That the Mecca Agreement Destroyed Before It Even Began! Every chess game has its backstage. And every backstage has a moment where the masks fall off. What happened in Holy Makkah, and the intense diplomatic activity that preceded it, was no ordinary summit. It was the official announcement of the defeat of the most dangerous project ever plotted against the region. It was the thunderous voice that declared: "Game over." Let's go back. To the true beginning. Before the chaos, before the strikes, before the war. On February 3, 2025, Donald Trump stood holding his pen and uttered the sentence that revealed everything: "Look at this amazing pen. My office is the Middle East, and this pen is Israel. It's a very small piece of land. It's amazing what they've been able to do... but it's a very small piece of land." This was not just a passing comment. It was the key to understanding the whole game. It was an explicit declaration that Israel is not just an ally, but the "tool." The pen with which Washington would write the destiny of the region. The pen that would redraw the maps. The pen that would expand that "small piece of land." Trump said it clearly: the paper is the Middle East, and the pen in his hand is Israel. And so the project began. The "Greater Israel" project. The project to "change the map of the Middle East." Netanyahu, who repeatedly echoed this threat during the phony war on Iran, wasn't speaking in a vacuum. He was executing. He was holding the pen Trump described, ready to write. But Trump wasn't going to grant this expansion for free. The man who seized Venezuela's oil in January 2026 was looking for customers. He had a massive surplus of oil, and his ports were far away. The ships weren't coming to him. So how could he attract them? How could he force the world to buy from him? The answer was: chaos. Creating chaos in Hormuz. Making passage through it suicidal. Closing Bab el-Mandeb by Houthi proxy. Then standing before the world to say: "Come to our safe ports." And just days ago, he declared it explicitly: "America is the number one oil exporter in the world." And here, on this chessboard, the players gathered. A Malign Alliance of Necessity. Not bound by love, but by a single goal: to punish Saudi Arabia and drown it. Iran, with its ideological regime, wants Trump to legitimize its right to manage the Strait of Hormuz. It cares less about the killing of its Supreme Leader than it does about harming the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and the rest of the Gulf states, especially after the liberation of Syria. Likewise, Israel and Abu Dhabi want to punish Saudi Arabia for dismantling the fragmentation project. Israel, the pen Trump described, dreams of a fragmented Yemen and a torn Sudan. And Abu Dhabi, which invested billions in supporting the tools of fragmentation, from the Houthis to the Rapid Support Forces, to bleed Saudi Arabia dry, hoping it might thereby rise. The truth is, it ended up stuck in Netanyahu's quagmire. And so the game began. Trump threatens. Netanyahu roars, "We will change the map." Iran seeks revenge. Iran threatens. The Houthi screams in Bab el-Mandeb. And Abu Dhabi writhes in frustration, declaring at times its phantom participation in the war, and moving covertly at others to fuel chaos in Yemen and Sudan. The American and global media plays its role to perfection: hyping, exaggerating, portraying Trump as if he's about to destroy Iran, while another channel asks leaders to "call Trump to calm him down." All of this to keep the region in chaos. To keep the ships stranded. To paralyze Gulf energy, and to legitimize Iran's right to manage the Strait of Hormuz so it remains closed, then turns into another Panama Canal. We have known this game for a long time. Then came the public voice of the project. The late U.S. Senator Lindsey Graham, who was the official spokesman for this malign alliance. On June 21, he came out to threaten the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and the countries of the region. He said it explicitly: Saudi Arabia must join the normalization agreement, and it must be "bold" in doing so, or else it will face "dire consequences." The threat was no longer hidden. It became public. The dictates were being issued in the open: either submit to our project, or bear the consequences. But Graham died, and his malice lives on in the actions of this alliance, this Malign Alliance of Necessity. Trump, Netanyahu, Graham, Iran, and Abu Dhabi were playing chess. But there were others working in silence. Throughout the months of chaos and before, His Royal Highness Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif were engaged in intense diplomatic activity. Continuous meetings. Deep strategic coordination. They were weaving the quiet strategic response in closed rooms, far from the noise of threats. And in Holy Makkah, from the Sacred House, came the coronation, where the Joint Defense Agreement between Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and Pakistan was signed, flipping the table on all of them (the Malign Alliance of Necessity). This agreement was not just a closed tripartite alliance. The Turkish Foreign Minister hinted that Egypt would join after completing technical procedures. And it was announced that the door is open for the rest of the countries to join. This is not just an agreement. This is the nucleus of a new regional order. An open order. An order not imposed by force, but built through partnership. This was the moment the table was flipped onto the heads of the old players. The moment they were ejected from the field. The moment the birth of the true Middle East was written, before Trump and Netanyahu could begin to write their supposed birth. The game is exposed. Trump wants to sell his oil, and he wanted Israel to be the pen to write its greater map. Netanyahu wants "more space" and wants no stability for Saudi Arabia and Turkey. Iran wants the Strait of Hormuz. And Abu Dhabi wants revenge for its failure. But Makkah turned all the tables. No one can bypass these leaders now. Saudi Arabia, which absorbed the pain; Turkey, standing beside it; and Pakistan, with its nuclear might; are no longer just players. They are the authors of the future. And the pen that Trump thought he held to write Israel's map no longer has a table to write upon. 🦅🇸🇦🇹🇷🇵🇰🔥

🇸🇦Abdulsalam Saleh

21,343 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Alex Krainer (Alex (Sasha) Krainer) traces the creation of Israel directly to the City of London and the British Round Table networks that later became Chatham House. Designed from the 1870s as an “unsinkable aircraft carrier,” it was intended to keep the Middle East in permanent instability so Britain could control the surrounding states. That same power principle later made the petrodollar system possible. Current events in Western Asia were scripted in advance by the British intelligence establishment, including the removal of Nicolás Maduro before any move on Iran. The United States is treated as a disposable proxy. The new Pakistan-Saudi-Turkey alliance is aimed at expelling the United States, Britain and Israel from the region. All of it traces back to the City of London’s long-standing design. “Everything that we’re seeing unfold in the world today, particularly in Western Asia—in the Middle East—has been almost perfectly scripted by the British intelligence establishment, including the need to take out Nicolás Maduro in Venezuela before going to Iran—even that was in [the British think tank Policy Exchange’s major report titled The Iran Question and British Strategy]. Somehow this same network of power managed to maneuver Trump into this humiliating defeat. Of course they don’t care about Trump, and they don’t care about the United States. For them, it is just another proxy war. The United States is being used as a proxy. The glue that holds all this together is the petrodollar, because it takes a lot of money to get all these people to do things for you. You might need a couple of billion to bail Donald Trump out of bankruptcy, make him whole so that he can run for office. Then you say: you actually owe us a couple of favors and we have all this kompromat on you. Consider the choice between silver and lead. Work with us, and it could be very good for you and your family. Work against us, and it would be deadly for you and your family. That might be the way Trump was turned around. Even if Trump was trying to do something more clever, even if there was some sincerity about his declared intentions to pull away from the Middle East, to withdraw troops from Iraq, Syria and Germany, those things have all been thrown overboard. Iran has achieved a strategic victory over the United States. The brand-new alliance announced between Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and Turkey is not, as some claim, a co-option by Washington to defend Israel. The purpose of the alliance is to back up the eviction of the United States, Great Britain and Israel from the region. What do these three countries have in common? All three have been threatened by Israel. Israel has massive territorial ambitions against Saudi Arabia—a huge chunk of Saudi Arabia would form part of Greater Israel. Saudi Arabia does not have the power to resist by itself. Israeli officials have been threatening war against Turkey for months. Before the war against Iran, Israeli officials were on record saying that once they were done with Iran, Pakistan was next. None of these countries has any interest in wasting resources defending Israel. The Israeli leadership is now acting in such an irrational way that they believe they can do anything—seven-front wars, an eighth, a ninth, a tenth. It does not matter because they are God’s chosen people and everybody else is stupid. They can bring the big dumb giant United States to fight their wars for them infinitely with no restrictions. The sky is the limit. They will just kill everybody they don’t like and create the world they desire, in which they are the ruling elite and everybody else serves them. There are people who actually believe this, and they are very close to the seat of power in Israel. I just want to connect Israel again to the headquarters of the operation, which is the City of London. Some people will say the Zionist Jewish donors in the United States have a lot of money so they can influence politics. But don’t the Russians have a lot of money? The Chinese have a lot of money. The Japanese have a lot of money. The Arabs have a lot of money. The Indians have a lot of money. So how come this tiny little parasite in the Levant gets to control British foreign policy, ostensibly, American foreign policy, German foreign policy and so forth? How can that possibly be? We also know that the preparations for the creation of the state of Israel go back to at least the 1870s. We also know that Israel was completely the creation of the British Empire, with a lot of foresight, because the members of the Round Table that became the Royal Society and has now become Chatham House—still one of the most powerful think tanks in Great Britain—understood the requirement. Alumni of that organization in the 1920s or 1930s gave an interview to the Manchester Guardian and said that in order for Great Britain to remain a global maritime empire they needed to control the Middle East, and to do that they needed to seed the region with a ‘particularly patriotic stock.’ That was the code word for Zionist Jews, as opposed to Arabs who were notoriously disunited and difficult to control and difficult to wield. So they decided to create a Jewish state. It was going to be their unsinkable aircraft carrier in the region, busy destabilizing the region in perpetuity so that they could control all the countries around Israel politically. That has been the reality even longer than the petrodollar. That is the power principle that made the petrodollar possible, and the petrodollar is how we got the whole world trading in US dollars—and most of those dollars flow to money-center banks outside of the United States through an elaborate system of money laundering and these private contractors, charities, NGOs and so forth.” Israel was engineered by the British oligarchy as a permanent instrument of regional control. That same architecture underpins the petrodollar system still in force today.
7:57

Alex Krainer (Alex (Sasha) Krainer) traces the creation of Israel directly to the City of London and the British Round Table networks that later became Chatham House. Designed from the 1870s as an “unsinkable aircraft carrier,” it was intended to keep the Middle East in permanent instability so Britain could control the surrounding states. That same power principle later made the petrodollar system possible. Current events in Western Asia were scripted in advance by the British intelligence establishment, including the removal of Nicolás Maduro before any move on Iran. The United States is treated as a disposable proxy. The new Pakistan-Saudi-Turkey alliance is aimed at expelling the United States, Britain and Israel from the region. All of it traces back to the City of London’s long-standing design. “Everything that we’re seeing unfold in the world today, particularly in Western Asia—in the Middle East—has been almost perfectly scripted by the British intelligence establishment, including the need to take out Nicolás Maduro in Venezuela before going to Iran—even that was in [the British think tank Policy Exchange’s major report titled The Iran Question and British Strategy]. Somehow this same network of power managed to maneuver Trump into this humiliating defeat. Of course they don’t care about Trump, and they don’t care about the United States. For them, it is just another proxy war. The United States is being used as a proxy. The glue that holds all this together is the petrodollar, because it takes a lot of money to get all these people to do things for you. You might need a couple of billion to bail Donald Trump out of bankruptcy, make him whole so that he can run for office. Then you say: you actually owe us a couple of favors and we have all this kompromat on you. Consider the choice between silver and lead. Work with us, and it could be very good for you and your family. Work against us, and it would be deadly for you and your family. That might be the way Trump was turned around. Even if Trump was trying to do something more clever, even if there was some sincerity about his declared intentions to pull away from the Middle East, to withdraw troops from Iraq, Syria and Germany, those things have all been thrown overboard. Iran has achieved a strategic victory over the United States. The brand-new alliance announced between Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and Turkey is not, as some claim, a co-option by Washington to defend Israel. The purpose of the alliance is to back up the eviction of the United States, Great Britain and Israel from the region. What do these three countries have in common? All three have been threatened by Israel. Israel has massive territorial ambitions against Saudi Arabia—a huge chunk of Saudi Arabia would form part of Greater Israel. Saudi Arabia does not have the power to resist by itself. Israeli officials have been threatening war against Turkey for months. Before the war against Iran, Israeli officials were on record saying that once they were done with Iran, Pakistan was next. None of these countries has any interest in wasting resources defending Israel. The Israeli leadership is now acting in such an irrational way that they believe they can do anything—seven-front wars, an eighth, a ninth, a tenth. It does not matter because they are God’s chosen people and everybody else is stupid. They can bring the big dumb giant United States to fight their wars for them infinitely with no restrictions. The sky is the limit. They will just kill everybody they don’t like and create the world they desire, in which they are the ruling elite and everybody else serves them. There are people who actually believe this, and they are very close to the seat of power in Israel. I just want to connect Israel again to the headquarters of the operation, which is the City of London. Some people will say the Zionist Jewish donors in the United States have a lot of money so they can influence politics. But don’t the Russians have a lot of money? The Chinese have a lot of money. The Japanese have a lot of money. The Arabs have a lot of money. The Indians have a lot of money. So how come this tiny little parasite in the Levant gets to control British foreign policy, ostensibly, American foreign policy, German foreign policy and so forth? How can that possibly be? We also know that the preparations for the creation of the state of Israel go back to at least the 1870s. We also know that Israel was completely the creation of the British Empire, with a lot of foresight, because the members of the Round Table that became the Royal Society and has now become Chatham House—still one of the most powerful think tanks in Great Britain—understood the requirement. Alumni of that organization in the 1920s or 1930s gave an interview to the Manchester Guardian and said that in order for Great Britain to remain a global maritime empire they needed to control the Middle East, and to do that they needed to seed the region with a ‘particularly patriotic stock.’ That was the code word for Zionist Jews, as opposed to Arabs who were notoriously disunited and difficult to control and difficult to wield. So they decided to create a Jewish state. It was going to be their unsinkable aircraft carrier in the region, busy destabilizing the region in perpetuity so that they could control all the countries around Israel politically. That has been the reality even longer than the petrodollar. That is the power principle that made the petrodollar possible, and the petrodollar is how we got the whole world trading in US dollars—and most of those dollars flow to money-center banks outside of the United States through an elaborate system of money laundering and these private contractors, charities, NGOs and so forth.” Israel was engineered by the British oligarchy as a permanent instrument of regional control. That same architecture underpins the petrodollar system still in force today.

🅰pocalypsis 🅰pocalypseos 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 🅉

22,122 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

When Judge Napolitano asked me on his show how Syria ended up with Abu Mohammed al-Jolani as its “president,” I could almost hear the cognitive dissonance on the other side of the screen. How does a man who was once the emir of al-Qaeda in Syria, a co-founder of ISIS by any reasonable historical reading of his trajectory, become Washington’s chosen man in Damascus? For me, the answer is not a mystery. It is the logical end of a dirty war that began not with Syrian protesters in 2011, but in an American-run prison camp in Iraq years earlier. And if anyone still suspected this was “just a conspiracy theory,” a former CIA officer – John Kiriakou, who went to prison for exposing CIA torture – has now said publicly what many of us have long argued: Jolani is, in all likelihood, a CIA asset. Let’s start with the timeline, because the timeline alone already screams “intelligence operation.” Abu Mohammed al-Jolani was in a CIA-run prison in Iraq – Camp Bucca – alongside another familiar name: Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi. Both men were released in early 2011. “Coincidentally,” that is exactly when the regime-change war in Syria begins. Within weeks, Baghdadi goes on to lead what becomes ISIS, and Jolani crosses into Syria to found Jabhat al-Nusra – officially al-Qaeda’s franchise in my country. Washington designates Nusra a terrorist organization. The UN follows suit. On paper, Jolani is the enemy. The State Department even slaps a $10 million bounty on his head. But bounties are cheap. Cruise missiles are expensive. And for over a decade, while the US flattened cities in Iraq and Syria allegedly to fight “terrorism,” it somehow never found the time, or the coordinates, to seriously target Jolani or his core command structure, even though he controlled large swaths of Syrian territory from Aleppo countryside all the way to Idlib. Because Jolani and his men were fighting the one government Washington had already decided must go: the Syrian state under Bashar al-Assad. This is where Operation Timber Sycamore comes in: a multi-billion-dollar CIA covert program that funneled weapons, money, and training to so-called “rebels” in Syria. They were sold to Western audiences as “moderate opposition.” On the ground, those moderates were a disappearing species. What existed in reality were hardline Salafi-jihadist factions, with Nusra at the top of the food chain. The Free Syrian Army (FSA) was the mask, the logo on the paperwork, the brand name you could sell to Congress and CNN. The real muscle on the ground was Jolani’s men and other takfiri groups, who did the actual fighting, took the actual territory, and imposed their version of rule. Weapons went “to the moderates.” The moderates magically handed them to al-Qaeda. Everyone in Washington pretended to be surprised. No one stopped the pipeline. Over the years, the mask slipped. US officials themselves began to speak of Jolani as something more than just a former enemy. James Jeffrey, Washington’s former envoy to Syria, openly called Jolani “an asset” for US strategy – not my word, his. Robert Ford, the former US ambassador to Syria, has publicly admitted that he personally worked with Jolani to “take him out of the world of terrorism” and polish him into a politician. Think about what that means: the same US that claims to be fighting an endless war against al-Qaeda quietly devotes diplomatic energy to rehabilitating the Syrian branch of al-Qaeda into a partner, a useful strongman, a future head of state. I said on the show, and I repeat it here: I believe Jolani was recruited in Camp Bucca. The timeline makes no sense otherwise. You don’t walk out of an American-run prison and, weeks later, magically have the networks, the money, the arms, and the logistical capacity to found al-Qaeda in Syria, right at the moment when Washington and its allies need a battering ram against Damascus. Recently, former CIA director David Petraeus even sat with Jolani and told him, “Your success is our success.” What more do people need? A signed employment contract? But let’s assume, for a moment, that you still think this is a stretch. Enter John Kiriakou. Kiriakou is not a YouTuber chasing clicks. He is a former CIA officer who went to prison because he exposed the torture program and named the torturers. His loyalty is clearly not to the Agency’s PR department. Recently, on Unfettered Speech, he described the Jolani situation bluntly. Here is the essence of what he said, which Judge Napolitano played on air: -The “new president” of Syria is a former al-Qaeda member and a co-founder of ISIS. -This same man is welcomed at the White House. -Senior US officials, including the Assistant Secretary of State for the Near East, travel to meet him. -President Trump suddenly lifts sanctions on Syria as Jolani consolidates power, prompting Syrians – desperate and exhausted – to dance in the streets. The only thing that makes sense is that Jolani is a CIA asset, per Kiriakou’s. When a former CIA officer who has already sacrificed his career and freedom to tell the truth looks at the pattern and says, “This is our guy,” it is not a conspiracy theory anymore. Now, you may ask, why would the United States and its allies back such a man? The answer lies in what Syria used to be, and what it has now been turned into. Before this war, Syria, for all its flaws, was a horizontally integrated state. People identified themselves as Syrian first and then Armenian, Druze, Christian, Alawite, Sunni, Shi’a, Kurdish, and so on. The state’s foreign policy aligned with Iran and Hezbollah, supported Palestinian factions, and kept a real deterrent posture toward Israel. For Washington and Tel Aviv, this was unacceptable. The goal was not “democracy”; that word is just wrapping paper. The real objective was to remove a government allied with Iran and replace it with a fragmented landscape: a weak central authority in Damascus, surrounded by sectarian cantons and warlord enclaves, all dependent on foreign patrons. Jolani is perfect for this role. For Israel, he brings vertical division. A man with a long al-Qaeda pedigree ruling Syria is a nightmare for minorities: Christians, Druze, Alawites, Shi’a, many Kurds, and other smaller communities. They will not accept al-Qaeda rule. So they retreat into their own militias, their own cantons, their own de facto mini-states, exactly in line with old Israeli strategic doctrines like the Yinon Plan, which openly advocated fragmenting neighboring states along sectarian lines. On the ground, we already see it: -Druze militias running their own affairs in the south with quiet Israeli backing. -Kurdish forces in the northeast under US protection, managing their own autonomous zone. -Alawites discussing an autonomous coastal enclave. -Christians living in silence and fear. You don’t need formal borders on a map to balkanize a country. When I, as a Syrian of Armenian origin, stop thinking of myself as Syrian first and start thinking purely as Armenian, when I instinctively fear my neighbor because he is from another sect, the balkanization has already happened in the mind. For Washington, Jolani is equally “useful.” He has promised to normalize relations with Israel, to open Syria’s markets to Western capital, and to hand over the country’s resources from the hydrocarbons east of the Euphrates to the gas fields under the Mediterranean to American and allied companies. A 24-million-person country reduced to a reconstruction market: $300 billion worth of contracts, infrastructure projects, and “investments.” But for investors to feel safe, they need a strongman in Damascus who can project the illusion of stability while remaining utterly dependent on foreign protection. That strongman, in their design, is Abu Mohammed al-Jolani. But Jolani is not acting alone. Around him is a constellation of Western intelligence veterans and “conflict resolution” NGOs acting as intermediaries. British MI6 circles, under figures like Jonathan Powell – former chief of staff to Tony Blair – are central in managing this process. Powell runs an organization called Inter Mediate, which specializes in “talking to armed groups.” Behind the humanitarian language lies political engineering. One of Inter Mediate’s operatives, a woman named Clare Haigh, is now said to have an office inside the Syrian presidential palace, advising Jolani on how to talk, how to dress, how to handle journalists, how to sell himself as a reformed jihadist turned statesman. And then there is Qatar. Ahmed Zaidan – once Osama bin Laden’s favorite journalist, photographed sipping tea with him and broadcasting his tapes on Al Jazeera – is now a personal adviser to Jolani. Make it make sense. An al-Qaeda emir, handled by US and British intelligence veterans, advised by bin Laden’s favorite media man, massaged by Western PR consultants, welcomed in Washington, and crowned in Damascus as “president.” If you wrote this as fiction, an editor would tell you it’s too on the nose. Since Jolani took power through an international and regional deal that pushed Assad aside, over 11,000 people have been killed. Many of them are from the very minorities the West loves to mention in speeches but abandons in practice. Videos circulate of his fighters asking terrified villagers at gunpoint, “Are you Muslim or not?” and executing those who give the “wrong” answer, including Druze and Alawites who are not recognized as “true Muslims” by their extremist ideology. Christians, who had already suffered massive emigration between 2011 and 2024, are being squeezed further. They have no organized armed force, no foreign sponsor. They are expected either to live under the mercy of an al-Qaeda-bred regime or to leave the land of their ancestors. This is what Washington’s “asset management” looks like in human terms. If you are an American reading this, you might be tempted to say: “This cannot be. My government would never knowingly empower al-Qaeda.” But it already has, repeatedly. From Afghanistan in the 1980s, when US intelligence backed the Mujahideen (and, indirectly, their Arab foreign fighter allies), to Libya and Syria in the last decade, where jihadist factions were instrumentalized against secular or nationalist governments, the pattern is clear. The names and acronyms change. The logic does not. The same establishment that lectures the world on “democracy” and “human rights” is perfectly willing to install a man like Jolani as the ruler of one of the oldest civilizations on earth, as long as he delivers strategic gains: -breaking the Iran–Syria–Hezbollah axis; -fragmenting Syria into weak, controllable pieces; -opening its resources and markets to Western and Gulf capital; -and giving Israel unprecedented strategic depth and security. Everything else – the massacres, the ethnic cleansing, the collapse of national identity, the destruction of ancient communities – is treated as collateral damage. I am often asked what Syria will look like in five or ten years. I wish I could answer with optimism. Right now, the forces pushing to turn my country into a permanent vassal state – ruled by a former al-Qaeda emir, policed by foreign intelligence, exploited by foreign capital – are incredibly strong. But nothing in this region is permanent. People who come to power by cutting off other people’s heads often lose their own. If there are still sane voices left in Western politics – people like Tulsi Gabbard 🌺, whom I mentioned on air – they must at least recognize this insanity: backing an al-Qaeda emir as “our man in Damascus” is not just immoral; it is ultimately self-destructive. Syria does not need Jolani. The West does not need Jolani. There are Syrians who can have friendly relations with the United States without being former al-Qaeda commanders, without murdering their own people, without turning an ancient nation into a laboratory for extremist social engineering. The question is not whether such alternatives exist. They do. The question is whether Washington and its allies want a sovereign, stable Syria, or whether they prefer a shattered, cantonized carcass kept alive just enough for the next “asset” to feed on.
22:55

When Judge Napolitano asked me on his show how Syria ended up with Abu Mohammed al-Jolani as its “president,” I could almost hear the cognitive dissonance on the other side of the screen. How does a man who was once the emir of al-Qaeda in Syria, a co-founder of ISIS by any reasonable historical reading of his trajectory, become Washington’s chosen man in Damascus? For me, the answer is not a mystery. It is the logical end of a dirty war that began not with Syrian protesters in 2011, but in an American-run prison camp in Iraq years earlier. And if anyone still suspected this was “just a conspiracy theory,” a former CIA officer – John Kiriakou, who went to prison for exposing CIA torture – has now said publicly what many of us have long argued: Jolani is, in all likelihood, a CIA asset. Let’s start with the timeline, because the timeline alone already screams “intelligence operation.” Abu Mohammed al-Jolani was in a CIA-run prison in Iraq – Camp Bucca – alongside another familiar name: Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi. Both men were released in early 2011. “Coincidentally,” that is exactly when the regime-change war in Syria begins. Within weeks, Baghdadi goes on to lead what becomes ISIS, and Jolani crosses into Syria to found Jabhat al-Nusra – officially al-Qaeda’s franchise in my country. Washington designates Nusra a terrorist organization. The UN follows suit. On paper, Jolani is the enemy. The State Department even slaps a $10 million bounty on his head. But bounties are cheap. Cruise missiles are expensive. And for over a decade, while the US flattened cities in Iraq and Syria allegedly to fight “terrorism,” it somehow never found the time, or the coordinates, to seriously target Jolani or his core command structure, even though he controlled large swaths of Syrian territory from Aleppo countryside all the way to Idlib. Because Jolani and his men were fighting the one government Washington had already decided must go: the Syrian state under Bashar al-Assad. This is where Operation Timber Sycamore comes in: a multi-billion-dollar CIA covert program that funneled weapons, money, and training to so-called “rebels” in Syria. They were sold to Western audiences as “moderate opposition.” On the ground, those moderates were a disappearing species. What existed in reality were hardline Salafi-jihadist factions, with Nusra at the top of the food chain. The Free Syrian Army (FSA) was the mask, the logo on the paperwork, the brand name you could sell to Congress and CNN. The real muscle on the ground was Jolani’s men and other takfiri groups, who did the actual fighting, took the actual territory, and imposed their version of rule. Weapons went “to the moderates.” The moderates magically handed them to al-Qaeda. Everyone in Washington pretended to be surprised. No one stopped the pipeline. Over the years, the mask slipped. US officials themselves began to speak of Jolani as something more than just a former enemy. James Jeffrey, Washington’s former envoy to Syria, openly called Jolani “an asset” for US strategy – not my word, his. Robert Ford, the former US ambassador to Syria, has publicly admitted that he personally worked with Jolani to “take him out of the world of terrorism” and polish him into a politician. Think about what that means: the same US that claims to be fighting an endless war against al-Qaeda quietly devotes diplomatic energy to rehabilitating the Syrian branch of al-Qaeda into a partner, a useful strongman, a future head of state. I said on the show, and I repeat it here: I believe Jolani was recruited in Camp Bucca. The timeline makes no sense otherwise. You don’t walk out of an American-run prison and, weeks later, magically have the networks, the money, the arms, and the logistical capacity to found al-Qaeda in Syria, right at the moment when Washington and its allies need a battering ram against Damascus. Recently, former CIA director David Petraeus even sat with Jolani and told him, “Your success is our success.” What more do people need? A signed employment contract? But let’s assume, for a moment, that you still think this is a stretch. Enter John Kiriakou. Kiriakou is not a YouTuber chasing clicks. He is a former CIA officer who went to prison because he exposed the torture program and named the torturers. His loyalty is clearly not to the Agency’s PR department. Recently, on Unfettered Speech, he described the Jolani situation bluntly. Here is the essence of what he said, which Judge Napolitano played on air: -The “new president” of Syria is a former al-Qaeda member and a co-founder of ISIS. -This same man is welcomed at the White House. -Senior US officials, including the Assistant Secretary of State for the Near East, travel to meet him. -President Trump suddenly lifts sanctions on Syria as Jolani consolidates power, prompting Syrians – desperate and exhausted – to dance in the streets. The only thing that makes sense is that Jolani is a CIA asset, per Kiriakou’s. When a former CIA officer who has already sacrificed his career and freedom to tell the truth looks at the pattern and says, “This is our guy,” it is not a conspiracy theory anymore. Now, you may ask, why would the United States and its allies back such a man? The answer lies in what Syria used to be, and what it has now been turned into. Before this war, Syria, for all its flaws, was a horizontally integrated state. People identified themselves as Syrian first and then Armenian, Druze, Christian, Alawite, Sunni, Shi’a, Kurdish, and so on. The state’s foreign policy aligned with Iran and Hezbollah, supported Palestinian factions, and kept a real deterrent posture toward Israel. For Washington and Tel Aviv, this was unacceptable. The goal was not “democracy”; that word is just wrapping paper. The real objective was to remove a government allied with Iran and replace it with a fragmented landscape: a weak central authority in Damascus, surrounded by sectarian cantons and warlord enclaves, all dependent on foreign patrons. Jolani is perfect for this role. For Israel, he brings vertical division. A man with a long al-Qaeda pedigree ruling Syria is a nightmare for minorities: Christians, Druze, Alawites, Shi’a, many Kurds, and other smaller communities. They will not accept al-Qaeda rule. So they retreat into their own militias, their own cantons, their own de facto mini-states, exactly in line with old Israeli strategic doctrines like the Yinon Plan, which openly advocated fragmenting neighboring states along sectarian lines. On the ground, we already see it: -Druze militias running their own affairs in the south with quiet Israeli backing. -Kurdish forces in the northeast under US protection, managing their own autonomous zone. -Alawites discussing an autonomous coastal enclave. -Christians living in silence and fear. You don’t need formal borders on a map to balkanize a country. When I, as a Syrian of Armenian origin, stop thinking of myself as Syrian first and start thinking purely as Armenian, when I instinctively fear my neighbor because he is from another sect, the balkanization has already happened in the mind. For Washington, Jolani is equally “useful.” He has promised to normalize relations with Israel, to open Syria’s markets to Western capital, and to hand over the country’s resources from the hydrocarbons east of the Euphrates to the gas fields under the Mediterranean to American and allied companies. A 24-million-person country reduced to a reconstruction market: $300 billion worth of contracts, infrastructure projects, and “investments.” But for investors to feel safe, they need a strongman in Damascus who can project the illusion of stability while remaining utterly dependent on foreign protection. That strongman, in their design, is Abu Mohammed al-Jolani. But Jolani is not acting alone. Around him is a constellation of Western intelligence veterans and “conflict resolution” NGOs acting as intermediaries. British MI6 circles, under figures like Jonathan Powell – former chief of staff to Tony Blair – are central in managing this process. Powell runs an organization called Inter Mediate, which specializes in “talking to armed groups.” Behind the humanitarian language lies political engineering. One of Inter Mediate’s operatives, a woman named Clare Haigh, is now said to have an office inside the Syrian presidential palace, advising Jolani on how to talk, how to dress, how to handle journalists, how to sell himself as a reformed jihadist turned statesman. And then there is Qatar. Ahmed Zaidan – once Osama bin Laden’s favorite journalist, photographed sipping tea with him and broadcasting his tapes on Al Jazeera – is now a personal adviser to Jolani. Make it make sense. An al-Qaeda emir, handled by US and British intelligence veterans, advised by bin Laden’s favorite media man, massaged by Western PR consultants, welcomed in Washington, and crowned in Damascus as “president.” If you wrote this as fiction, an editor would tell you it’s too on the nose. Since Jolani took power through an international and regional deal that pushed Assad aside, over 11,000 people have been killed. Many of them are from the very minorities the West loves to mention in speeches but abandons in practice. Videos circulate of his fighters asking terrified villagers at gunpoint, “Are you Muslim or not?” and executing those who give the “wrong” answer, including Druze and Alawites who are not recognized as “true Muslims” by their extremist ideology. Christians, who had already suffered massive emigration between 2011 and 2024, are being squeezed further. They have no organized armed force, no foreign sponsor. They are expected either to live under the mercy of an al-Qaeda-bred regime or to leave the land of their ancestors. This is what Washington’s “asset management” looks like in human terms. If you are an American reading this, you might be tempted to say: “This cannot be. My government would never knowingly empower al-Qaeda.” But it already has, repeatedly. From Afghanistan in the 1980s, when US intelligence backed the Mujahideen (and, indirectly, their Arab foreign fighter allies), to Libya and Syria in the last decade, where jihadist factions were instrumentalized against secular or nationalist governments, the pattern is clear. The names and acronyms change. The logic does not. The same establishment that lectures the world on “democracy” and “human rights” is perfectly willing to install a man like Jolani as the ruler of one of the oldest civilizations on earth, as long as he delivers strategic gains: -breaking the Iran–Syria–Hezbollah axis; -fragmenting Syria into weak, controllable pieces; -opening its resources and markets to Western and Gulf capital; -and giving Israel unprecedented strategic depth and security. Everything else – the massacres, the ethnic cleansing, the collapse of national identity, the destruction of ancient communities – is treated as collateral damage. I am often asked what Syria will look like in five or ten years. I wish I could answer with optimism. Right now, the forces pushing to turn my country into a permanent vassal state – ruled by a former al-Qaeda emir, policed by foreign intelligence, exploited by foreign capital – are incredibly strong. But nothing in this region is permanent. People who come to power by cutting off other people’s heads often lose their own. If there are still sane voices left in Western politics – people like Tulsi Gabbard 🌺, whom I mentioned on air – they must at least recognize this insanity: backing an al-Qaeda emir as “our man in Damascus” is not just immoral; it is ultimately self-destructive. Syria does not need Jolani. The West does not need Jolani. There are Syrians who can have friendly relations with the United States without being former al-Qaeda commanders, without murdering their own people, without turning an ancient nation into a laboratory for extremist social engineering. The question is not whether such alternatives exist. They do. The question is whether Washington and its allies want a sovereign, stable Syria, or whether they prefer a shattered, cantonized carcass kept alive just enough for the next “asset” to feed on.

Kevork Almassian

177,007 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten