Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

من نافذة المركبة دراغون، إليكم هذه النظرة الأخيرة على منزلنا الفضائي محطة الفضاء الدولة بعد المغادرة. منظر لا يوصف! هل اشتقتم إلى الفضاء مثلي؟ From the Dragon Endeavor, a final look at our space home International Space Station . Unbelievable view! Have you already missed space like me?

Astro_Alneyadi's profile picture

Sultan AlNeyadi

117,216 subscribers

187,635 просмотров • 2 лет назад •via X (Twitter)

Здоровье и велнесПутешествияНаука и технологии
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 10

Фото профиля Amro Zakaria Abdu
Amro Zakaria Abdu2 лет назад

@Space_Station @MBRSpaceCentre @NASA @SpaceX @NASA_Johnson لا أعرف كيف ستتأقلم مع العيش على الأرض بعد تجربة العيش في الفضاء كل هذه المدة بكل جوانبها العلمية والنفسية والروحية. تجربة كفيلة بتغيير نظرة الإنسان للدنيا وللحياة بأكملها. شكراً لاصطحابنا معك في هذه الرحلة التاريخية.

Фото профиля نَوْرَ
نَوْرَ2 лет назад

@Space_Station @MBRSpaceCentre @NASA @SpaceX @NASA_Johnson الارض مسطحة كما ذكر الله تعالى وفسر المفسرين والى الارض كيف سطحت و

Фото профиля John Kraus
John Kraus2 лет назад

@Space_Station @MBRSpaceCentre @NASA @SpaceX @NASA_Johnson Really cool! Nice video!

Фото профиля منى بوالمالح💙
منى بوالمالح💙2 лет назад

@Space_Station @MBRSpaceCentre @NASA @SpaceX @NASA_Johnson تجربه جميله وطبيعي انك راح تشتاق للفضاء الله يحفظكم وان شاء الله لكم زيارات ثانيه الحينه لازم نسميك الفضائي سلطان

Фото профиля هاني السعدي اليافعي
هاني السعدي اليافعي2 лет назад

@Space_Station @MBRSpaceCentre @NASA @SpaceX @NASA_Johnson بصراحة أدمنا على تقاريرك من الفضاء .. كانت تجربة رائعة ولا تنسى

Фото профиля ZAEEM JO
ZAEEM JO2 лет назад

@Space_Station @MBRSpaceCentre @NASA @SpaceX @NASA_Johnson بسم الله ماشاء الله تبارك الله سبحان الخالق

Фото профиля سامي الحالمي
سامي الحالمي2 лет назад

@Space_Station @MBRSpaceCentre @NASA @SpaceX @NASA_Johnson تسلم يمينك هذا تصوير وفيديو مهمه يظهر محطة الفضاء والكره الأرض أعتقد انه لا احد قبل من رواد الفضاء اتى بفيديو كمثل هذا 🫡

Фото профиля Abdul Raouf
Abdul Raouf2 лет назад

@Space_Station @MBRSpaceCentre @NASA @SpaceX @NASA_Johnson Wow! Fascinating! I don't know how I feel when I see this, unreal!

Фото профиля فضائي
فضائي2 лет назад

@Space_Station @MBRSpaceCentre @NASA @SpaceX @NASA_Johnson منظر مهيب 🥹

Фото профиля د. جمال الملا
د. جمال الملا2 лет назад

@Space_Station @MBRSpaceCentre @NASA @SpaceX @NASA_Johnson الف الحمد لله على السلامة تابعناك وكانت تقاريرك رائعة واستفدنا منها

Похожие видео

مبارك عليكم الشهر 🌙 اسأل الله ان يهل علينا شهر رمضان بالخير والبركة على الجميع.. اهديكم هذه المشاهد الليلية الجميلة من محطة الفضاء الدولية. Ramadan Mubarak 🌙 Wishing you all a month filled with blessings Sharing the beautiful night time scenery from the International Space Station with you all
3:00

مبارك عليكم الشهر 🌙 اسأل الله ان يهل علينا شهر رمضان بالخير والبركة على الجميع.. اهديكم هذه المشاهد الليلية الجميلة من محطة الفضاء الدولية. Ramadan Mubarak 🌙 Wishing you all a month filled with blessings Sharing the beautiful night time scenery from the International Space Station with you all

Sultan AlNeyadi

613,238 просмотров • 3 лет назад

“When you look at the Earth from space, you realize that our planet is a beautiful, interconnected system. We are all in this together.” - Mae Jemison, Space Shuttle NASA astronaut This time-lapse taken aboard the International Space Station shows a blanket of stars surrounding our Earth. The view is one that is known to create a moment of pause in appreciation of the beauty of our shared home. #WorldViewWednesday
0:21

“When you look at the Earth from space, you realize that our planet is a beautiful, interconnected system. We are all in this together.” - Mae Jemison, Space Shuttle NASA astronaut This time-lapse taken aboard the International Space Station shows a blanket of stars surrounding our Earth. The view is one that is known to create a moment of pause in appreciation of the beauty of our shared home. #WorldViewWednesday

NASA's Johnson Space Center

61,946 просмотров • 1 год назад

Day 144, orbit 2233 — Many of you noticed the pink glow in the recent timelapses done in Columbus… That’s thanks to Veggie 🌱, the International Space Station’s vegetable production system — our little space garden! The Veggie chamber glows magenta-pink because it emits a light spectrum that’s perfect for plant growth! During Expedition 74, Veggie hosted the Veg-06 experiment, with two main goals: to study how alfalfa plants and beneficial bacteria work together in microgravity to capture nitrogen from the air and turn it into nutrients plants can use… and to look at how lignin – the material that helps plants stand upright on Earth – changes in space. The alfafa plants 🌿 were successfully grown – watered and nurtured by all of us – then harvested (aerial parts and roots) and stowed in a freezer. They were sent back to Earth for further analysis on board the CRS SpX‑34 cargo Dragon. For us, working on Veggie is a real taste of home – a reminder of what a garden looks and smells like. There’s something very special about watching the plants grow and caring for them day after day. I loved working on this experiment 💚 It is clear that being able to grow fresh food 🌶 in space will be crucial for long exploration missions, not just for nutrition, but for crew morale as well. A better understanding of nitrogen fixation is also key to improving soil quality on Earth, while studying lignin may benefit agriculture and forestry in the long run. Go science! 🎥 European Space Agency / NASA #εpsilon • International Space Station • NASAKennedy • NASAJohnson • European Space Agencyspaceflight
1:24

Day 144, orbit 2233 — Many of you noticed the pink glow in the recent timelapses done in Columbus… That’s thanks to Veggie 🌱, the International Space Station’s vegetable production system — our little space garden! The Veggie chamber glows magenta-pink because it emits a light spectrum that’s perfect for plant growth! During Expedition 74, Veggie hosted the Veg-06 experiment, with two main goals: to study how alfalfa plants and beneficial bacteria work together in microgravity to capture nitrogen from the air and turn it into nutrients plants can use… and to look at how lignin – the material that helps plants stand upright on Earth – changes in space. The alfafa plants 🌿 were successfully grown – watered and nurtured by all of us – then harvested (aerial parts and roots) and stowed in a freezer. They were sent back to Earth for further analysis on board the CRS SpX‑34 cargo Dragon. For us, working on Veggie is a real taste of home – a reminder of what a garden looks and smells like. There’s something very special about watching the plants grow and caring for them day after day. I loved working on this experiment 💚 It is clear that being able to grow fresh food 🌶 in space will be crucial for long exploration missions, not just for nutrition, but for crew morale as well. A better understanding of nitrogen fixation is also key to improving soil quality on Earth, while studying lignin may benefit agriculture and forestry in the long run. Go science! 🎥 European Space Agency / NASA #εpsilon • International Space Station • NASAKennedy • NASAJohnson • European Space Agencyspaceflight

Adenot Sophie

86,912 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

I’m seeing a lot of questions on the launch of China’s Chang’e 6 mission yesterday to get samples - for the first time - from the far side of the moon. We don’t know (afaik) why specifically they’re doing that, but we have a pretty good idea what grand vision China is working towards with their space program. How? From this 2022 video by Chas Freeman (former Assistant Secretary of Defense and Nixon's interpreter during his era-defining 1972 China visit), who imho is undoubtedly one of the most knowledgeable former US officials on China. He says that according to his own discussions with people running China’s space program, they’re following the vision described in the book "The high frontier" by Gerard K. O'Neill, which Freeman says has "become the bible of the Chinese space program". I read the book. So what vision does it describe? The book was written in 1976 by O'Neill who was a professor of physics at Princeton University. He also founded the Space Studies Institute, an organization devoted to funding research into space manufacturing and colonization. In other words, he knew his stuff. The book makes the very fair point that we have massive resource constraints on earth, especially given the growing population. He estimated in 1976 that we should be "about six and a half billion people in the year 2000", and we were 6.114 billion back then so he was pretty prescient. He estimates that these constraints will progressively give rise to more and more social tensions as the growing earth population competes for our limited resources as well as faces global problems like climate change. In his view, dealing with this will either require "an authoritarian regime capable of mounting the immense task of social reorganization needed to escape catastrophe" or, alternatively, “mankind would [need to adopt] a static society [that would be] forced in self-defense to suppress new ideas". The 3rd alternative is of course the colonization of space. The most interesting aspect of the book is that he claims everything he writes is feasible with knowledge and technology that already existed in the late 70s. In short he calls for the establishment of large human habitats in the Earth-Moon system, located at stable Lagrange points ("parking spots" in space where gravity from different spatial bodies cancel each other out). In particular he developed the concept of what's known today as the "O'Neill cylinder" which he says "could support quite easily a population of ten million people, growing its food in agricultural cylinders near but outside the main habitat". Energy-wise, it'd simply make use of solar energy via a system of mirrors. As he describes it: "the concentration of the unvarying, intense sunlight of space by very lightweight, inexpensive mirrors can provide all the energy that industry will ever need [...] at a fraction of a cent per kilowatt-hour". He envisages building these habitats with material from the moon, shot into space via "mass drivers", a form of electromagnetic catapult. Also "the habitats would have artificial gravity similar as that of earth by rotating about twenty-eight times an hour”, but he also envisages low-gravity areas, especially for recreational activities such as swimming pools or dancing representations. To trade with earth, he develops the idea of beaming solar power back to earth via "microwave from solar power stations in orbit". As he describes it "the microwave beam would arrive at Earth with a beam width of about seven kilometers. Its intensity would be modest, less than half that of sunlight. In contrast to sunlight, though, it would be there all the time, even at night or in clouds or rain, and it would be in a form ready for conversion to DC current with a loss of only 10 percent. The areas receiving these beams’ output on Earth would be fenced, and outside the fence the intensity of microwave radiation would be no higher than outside a microwave oven with the door closed. He estimates that if "Satellite Solar Power Stations (SSPS) were to become the sole source of electric energy in the United States in the year 2000, the land area necessary for the SSPS antennas would still be only 0.2 percent of that of the continental United States". In short, the establishment of space colonies could lead to the fulfillment of a good share of Earth's energy needs. Last but not least he describes life in space habitats as better than that of earth, largely thanks to the level of control we'd have over the environment (total climate control which would enable an abundance of food and no natural disaster) as well as unlimited cheap energy. To conclude, Chas Freeman typically really knows his stuff when it comes to China and he’s very intellectually honest (a rare trait among US officials) so I have no doubt he tells the truth when he says the Chinese told him that was the vision. And China famously thinks very big and very long term so it would be quite like them to go for something like this. There are also quite a few tangible signs that China is working towards that vision. See for instance this November 2022 news where “China’s space station will join a project to collect solar power from space and send it to Earth in a high-energy microwave beam”: That’s exactly O’Neill’s vision! Or check this October 2022 news that says China is developing new "electromagnetic sledges" that can propel a carriage weighing a few tonnes to a record speed, with a key application for this being “aerospace”: Remember: O’Neill’s vision is to build his habitats with material from the moon, shot into space via "mass drivers", a form of electromagnetic catapult. So there you go… Or also the fact that the Chinese will build, together with the Russians, a moon base - planned for 2028 - powered by a “space nuclear reactor” that’s already been developed (on Earth) and has passed review by China’s Ministry of Science: The space nuclear reactor can generate 1MW of electricity, enough to power 10 International Space Stations. Enough power, maybe, to undertake mining activity and power an electromagnetic catapult… After visions change, the world changes, so it’s also possible that China’s view on what they want to do has evolved. In any case, Chas Freeman is right that China’s motivation for all its initiatives in space can’t just be to “boldly explore where no-one has been before”, they have to be working towards something. And Freeman is also absolutely right to lament that the U.S. decided to ban any cooperation in space with the Chinese. Those endeavors are something that could have been jointly developed as a multilateral effort to unite us all as a species… Instead China is now forced to go at it alone with Russia and we face a future where our petty divisions on Earth will be carried with us to space…
3:58

I’m seeing a lot of questions on the launch of China’s Chang’e 6 mission yesterday to get samples - for the first time - from the far side of the moon. We don’t know (afaik) why specifically they’re doing that, but we have a pretty good idea what grand vision China is working towards with their space program. How? From this 2022 video by Chas Freeman (former Assistant Secretary of Defense and Nixon's interpreter during his era-defining 1972 China visit), who imho is undoubtedly one of the most knowledgeable former US officials on China. He says that according to his own discussions with people running China’s space program, they’re following the vision described in the book "The high frontier" by Gerard K. O'Neill, which Freeman says has "become the bible of the Chinese space program". I read the book. So what vision does it describe? The book was written in 1976 by O'Neill who was a professor of physics at Princeton University. He also founded the Space Studies Institute, an organization devoted to funding research into space manufacturing and colonization. In other words, he knew his stuff. The book makes the very fair point that we have massive resource constraints on earth, especially given the growing population. He estimated in 1976 that we should be "about six and a half billion people in the year 2000", and we were 6.114 billion back then so he was pretty prescient. He estimates that these constraints will progressively give rise to more and more social tensions as the growing earth population competes for our limited resources as well as faces global problems like climate change. In his view, dealing with this will either require "an authoritarian regime capable of mounting the immense task of social reorganization needed to escape catastrophe" or, alternatively, “mankind would [need to adopt] a static society [that would be] forced in self-defense to suppress new ideas". The 3rd alternative is of course the colonization of space. The most interesting aspect of the book is that he claims everything he writes is feasible with knowledge and technology that already existed in the late 70s. In short he calls for the establishment of large human habitats in the Earth-Moon system, located at stable Lagrange points ("parking spots" in space where gravity from different spatial bodies cancel each other out). In particular he developed the concept of what's known today as the "O'Neill cylinder" which he says "could support quite easily a population of ten million people, growing its food in agricultural cylinders near but outside the main habitat". Energy-wise, it'd simply make use of solar energy via a system of mirrors. As he describes it: "the concentration of the unvarying, intense sunlight of space by very lightweight, inexpensive mirrors can provide all the energy that industry will ever need [...] at a fraction of a cent per kilowatt-hour". He envisages building these habitats with material from the moon, shot into space via "mass drivers", a form of electromagnetic catapult. Also "the habitats would have artificial gravity similar as that of earth by rotating about twenty-eight times an hour”, but he also envisages low-gravity areas, especially for recreational activities such as swimming pools or dancing representations. To trade with earth, he develops the idea of beaming solar power back to earth via "microwave from solar power stations in orbit". As he describes it "the microwave beam would arrive at Earth with a beam width of about seven kilometers. Its intensity would be modest, less than half that of sunlight. In contrast to sunlight, though, it would be there all the time, even at night or in clouds or rain, and it would be in a form ready for conversion to DC current with a loss of only 10 percent. The areas receiving these beams’ output on Earth would be fenced, and outside the fence the intensity of microwave radiation would be no higher than outside a microwave oven with the door closed. He estimates that if "Satellite Solar Power Stations (SSPS) were to become the sole source of electric energy in the United States in the year 2000, the land area necessary for the SSPS antennas would still be only 0.2 percent of that of the continental United States". In short, the establishment of space colonies could lead to the fulfillment of a good share of Earth's energy needs. Last but not least he describes life in space habitats as better than that of earth, largely thanks to the level of control we'd have over the environment (total climate control which would enable an abundance of food and no natural disaster) as well as unlimited cheap energy. To conclude, Chas Freeman typically really knows his stuff when it comes to China and he’s very intellectually honest (a rare trait among US officials) so I have no doubt he tells the truth when he says the Chinese told him that was the vision. And China famously thinks very big and very long term so it would be quite like them to go for something like this. There are also quite a few tangible signs that China is working towards that vision. See for instance this November 2022 news where “China’s space station will join a project to collect solar power from space and send it to Earth in a high-energy microwave beam”: That’s exactly O’Neill’s vision! Or check this October 2022 news that says China is developing new "electromagnetic sledges" that can propel a carriage weighing a few tonnes to a record speed, with a key application for this being “aerospace”: Remember: O’Neill’s vision is to build his habitats with material from the moon, shot into space via "mass drivers", a form of electromagnetic catapult. So there you go… Or also the fact that the Chinese will build, together with the Russians, a moon base - planned for 2028 - powered by a “space nuclear reactor” that’s already been developed (on Earth) and has passed review by China’s Ministry of Science: The space nuclear reactor can generate 1MW of electricity, enough to power 10 International Space Stations. Enough power, maybe, to undertake mining activity and power an electromagnetic catapult… After visions change, the world changes, so it’s also possible that China’s view on what they want to do has evolved. In any case, Chas Freeman is right that China’s motivation for all its initiatives in space can’t just be to “boldly explore where no-one has been before”, they have to be working towards something. And Freeman is also absolutely right to lament that the U.S. decided to ban any cooperation in space with the Chinese. Those endeavors are something that could have been jointly developed as a multilateral effort to unite us all as a species… Instead China is now forced to go at it alone with Russia and we face a future where our petty divisions on Earth will be carried with us to space…

Arnaud Bertrand

265,181 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Elon Musk in 2008: "NASA was going to pay Russia $70M per astronaut. SpaceX could do it for $15M" Musk is presenting SpaceX to a small audience. He shows a video of the Falcon 9 first stage firing: "This is almost a million pounds of thrust in vacuum, about four times the maximum thrust of a 747. It's pretty much Armageddon down there. You don't want to be standing at the base of that test stand." He explains the NASA contract: "The contract SpaceX has right now is to demonstrate cargo transfer to the space station and return of experiments to Earth. What we're hoping NASA will exercise is an option on that contract to also carry astronauts. I think they will exercise that option fairly soon." On the coming gap in American spaceflight: "The Space Shuttle is retiring in 2010. So unless our spacecraft is active, the US will not have the ability to send people to orbit. For about five or six years, unless SpaceX is successful, there will be no American manned space capability. There'll just be the Russians." He describes the situation bluntly: "The Russians are charging us over $70 million per seat after the shuttle retires. They got us over a barrel and they're doing us hard. We'll spend half a billion dollars per year on the Russians just buying tickets for six or seven astronauts to go to the space station." Musk shares SpaceX's cost: "Our cost per person, even assuming no reusability, assuming every bit of it is expended and no refurbishment, is about $15 million per person. And it's us. The jobs are here. So I think it's kind of a no-brainer. But no-brainers in Washington DC don't always happen." On Congress: "We've been given money for the cargo portion but not for the manned portion. The amount we're asking for to get this done is $300 million. For every year that we're dependent on the Russians, we have to send them half a billion dollars. It seems kind of ludicrous. But anyway, that's DC." Someone asks about the space elevator: "The idea is you have this really long cable, like 40 to 60,000 miles long, with the ends way out in space and the base on Earth. There are a lot of issues with the space elevator. It relies on super strong materials, carbon nanotubes. Until we build, say, a carbon nanotube footbridge, then I think we should not really be thinking too much about building a 60,000-mile elevator. Not this century." On space solar power: "If there's anyone in the world who should love space solar power, it's me. I'm chairman and the largest shareholder of a solar company called SolarCity, and I've got a rocket company. So it should be perfect. Unfortunately, I don't think space solar power makes sense. I wish it did because that'd be awesome. But even if you assume it costs zero to transport the solar panels to space, when you take into account the equipment to convert the energy to microwaves, then equipment on the ground to convert it back to electricity, just that capital cost blows you out of the water. It's not competitive with terrestrial solar power. So there's no point in even thinking about it." On fuel costs: "The fuel and oxidizer cost is really super low. For our big rocket, it's only a couple hundred thousand dollars. For our small rocket, it's about $30,000 or $40,000. If you just look at the propellant cost, it's very, very cheap." On the long-term goal: "One of the design goals for Falcon 9 is that it can go from in the hangar to in the air in under 60 minutes, which would be super fast for a rocket, particularly a big rocket. It's going to take several flights before we get there. But as long as we lay the foundation and make sure the design is capable of that, we can at least have the possibility of getting to a flight an hour in the future."
16:43

Elon Musk in 2008: "NASA was going to pay Russia $70M per astronaut. SpaceX could do it for $15M" Musk is presenting SpaceX to a small audience. He shows a video of the Falcon 9 first stage firing: "This is almost a million pounds of thrust in vacuum, about four times the maximum thrust of a 747. It's pretty much Armageddon down there. You don't want to be standing at the base of that test stand." He explains the NASA contract: "The contract SpaceX has right now is to demonstrate cargo transfer to the space station and return of experiments to Earth. What we're hoping NASA will exercise is an option on that contract to also carry astronauts. I think they will exercise that option fairly soon." On the coming gap in American spaceflight: "The Space Shuttle is retiring in 2010. So unless our spacecraft is active, the US will not have the ability to send people to orbit. For about five or six years, unless SpaceX is successful, there will be no American manned space capability. There'll just be the Russians." He describes the situation bluntly: "The Russians are charging us over $70 million per seat after the shuttle retires. They got us over a barrel and they're doing us hard. We'll spend half a billion dollars per year on the Russians just buying tickets for six or seven astronauts to go to the space station." Musk shares SpaceX's cost: "Our cost per person, even assuming no reusability, assuming every bit of it is expended and no refurbishment, is about $15 million per person. And it's us. The jobs are here. So I think it's kind of a no-brainer. But no-brainers in Washington DC don't always happen." On Congress: "We've been given money for the cargo portion but not for the manned portion. The amount we're asking for to get this done is $300 million. For every year that we're dependent on the Russians, we have to send them half a billion dollars. It seems kind of ludicrous. But anyway, that's DC." Someone asks about the space elevator: "The idea is you have this really long cable, like 40 to 60,000 miles long, with the ends way out in space and the base on Earth. There are a lot of issues with the space elevator. It relies on super strong materials, carbon nanotubes. Until we build, say, a carbon nanotube footbridge, then I think we should not really be thinking too much about building a 60,000-mile elevator. Not this century." On space solar power: "If there's anyone in the world who should love space solar power, it's me. I'm chairman and the largest shareholder of a solar company called SolarCity, and I've got a rocket company. So it should be perfect. Unfortunately, I don't think space solar power makes sense. I wish it did because that'd be awesome. But even if you assume it costs zero to transport the solar panels to space, when you take into account the equipment to convert the energy to microwaves, then equipment on the ground to convert it back to electricity, just that capital cost blows you out of the water. It's not competitive with terrestrial solar power. So there's no point in even thinking about it." On fuel costs: "The fuel and oxidizer cost is really super low. For our big rocket, it's only a couple hundred thousand dollars. For our small rocket, it's about $30,000 or $40,000. If you just look at the propellant cost, it's very, very cheap." On the long-term goal: "One of the design goals for Falcon 9 is that it can go from in the hangar to in the air in under 60 minutes, which would be super fast for a rocket, particularly a big rocket. It's going to take several flights before we get there. But as long as we lay the foundation and make sure the design is capable of that, we can at least have the possibility of getting to a flight an hour in the future."

Grey

56,512 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Wolf: He has state troopers positioned outside, babysitting the crosswalk. He’s put up signs saying that if you chalk any part of it, you’ll end up in handcuffs. This is about so much more than rainbow colors on the pavement. That space is sacred. It’s hallowed ground. It’s the place where I can still hear my best friends’ voices, where I can still see their smiles, where I think about the last words we said to each other, and where I remember our final embrace before it became clear they weren’t coming home. That’s what that space means to people like me. That’s what it means to the entire Orlando community. And what Ron DeSantis and Donald Trump have done is desecrate those memories. In desecrating that space, they’ve also revealed their agenda. Ron DeSantis has spent more money positioning law enforcement to babysit that crosswalk than there ever was security outside of Pulse nightclub the night it was attacked by someone filled with hate and armed with a weapon of war. So when you look at what people in Orlando, across Florida, and across the globe have been subjected to, you see three things: first, it’s a flex of power and control over people. Second, it’s a disgrace — a desecration of the memories of those we were memorializing. And third, it shows they care far more about punishing LGBTQ+ people than they ever did about keeping people safe in the first place.
2:02

Wolf: He has state troopers positioned outside, babysitting the crosswalk. He’s put up signs saying that if you chalk any part of it, you’ll end up in handcuffs. This is about so much more than rainbow colors on the pavement. That space is sacred. It’s hallowed ground. It’s the place where I can still hear my best friends’ voices, where I can still see their smiles, where I think about the last words we said to each other, and where I remember our final embrace before it became clear they weren’t coming home. That’s what that space means to people like me. That’s what it means to the entire Orlando community. And what Ron DeSantis and Donald Trump have done is desecrate those memories. In desecrating that space, they’ve also revealed their agenda. Ron DeSantis has spent more money positioning law enforcement to babysit that crosswalk than there ever was security outside of Pulse nightclub the night it was attacked by someone filled with hate and armed with a weapon of war. So when you look at what people in Orlando, across Florida, and across the globe have been subjected to, you see three things: first, it’s a flex of power and control over people. Second, it’s a disgrace — a desecration of the memories of those we were memorializing. And third, it shows they care far more about punishing LGBTQ+ people than they ever did about keeping people safe in the first place.

Acyn

146,728 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

Elon Musk: There's a total misunderstanding that my companies are being subsidized and supported by the government. “We've got to be one of the biggest government contractors. We do essential work for the government. We do useful essential work that we compete for and win contracts on because our product is much better and costs less. If you take, for example, the NASA contract to transport astronauts to and from the space station, NASA awarded two contracts at the start, one to Boeing and one to SpaceX. Boeing was awarded twice as much as SpaceX. SpaceX has done all the astronaut transport from the space station and Boeing has only done one transport of two astronauts to the space station. And we have to bring them back. Boeing got twice as much as SpaceX. There's this total misunderstanding that my companies have been subsidized and supported by the government. Do you really think that a Biden administration is going to subsidize me? Probably not. Are you kidding? No. In fact, they take away every contract they possibly can. So, for example, there was the FCC $42 billion contract for providing rural broadband. We actually first said, look, we think there shouldn't be any subsidies, so we recommend that this program just not exist. But since you're insisting that it exist, we will compete and we have better products. So we won, I don't know about a quarter of it, which would have included the devastated areas like North Carolina and stuff. And the FCC took it away illegally. They just voted three out of five commissioners voted away and said, even though you won it, we're rescinding it. On what grounds? And do you know how many people they've connected? Zero. So you think that was political? Well, the three Democrats voted against it. And the two Republicans voted for it.” Source: Interview with Tucker Carlson, October 7, 2024
1:31

Elon Musk: There's a total misunderstanding that my companies are being subsidized and supported by the government. “We've got to be one of the biggest government contractors. We do essential work for the government. We do useful essential work that we compete for and win contracts on because our product is much better and costs less. If you take, for example, the NASA contract to transport astronauts to and from the space station, NASA awarded two contracts at the start, one to Boeing and one to SpaceX. Boeing was awarded twice as much as SpaceX. SpaceX has done all the astronaut transport from the space station and Boeing has only done one transport of two astronauts to the space station. And we have to bring them back. Boeing got twice as much as SpaceX. There's this total misunderstanding that my companies have been subsidized and supported by the government. Do you really think that a Biden administration is going to subsidize me? Probably not. Are you kidding? No. In fact, they take away every contract they possibly can. So, for example, there was the FCC $42 billion contract for providing rural broadband. We actually first said, look, we think there shouldn't be any subsidies, so we recommend that this program just not exist. But since you're insisting that it exist, we will compete and we have better products. So we won, I don't know about a quarter of it, which would have included the devastated areas like North Carolina and stuff. And the FCC took it away illegally. They just voted three out of five commissioners voted away and said, even though you won it, we're rescinding it. On what grounds? And do you know how many people they've connected? Zero. So you think that was political? Well, the three Democrats voted against it. And the two Republicans voted for it.” Source: Interview with Tucker Carlson, October 7, 2024

ELON CLIPS

17,280 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Farewell to International Space Station! This is truly a special place, special mission, and special team that makes it happen. It is a bittersweet departure today – I have a keen awareness that I may never be back here, and even if I was, it would be at a different time with a different crew. This chapter is over. Spaceflight has always been a life goal, and it has turned into a life-fulfilling endeavor – but not for the reasons I thought growing up. When I was young, I pictured the launch, the incredible ball of fire and the acceleration, the spacewalks (how could you not wonder what it’s like to be in that suit?), and I was fascinated by the shuttles, capsules, and stations. But as I complete this second mission living and working in space, what draws me to this job is the people. Experiences like this are amazing, but the relationships we build that make it possible are the “why.” Every day, this mission depends on people from all over the world, of different nationalities, races, religions, and cultures. It depends on government and commercial entities, it depends on all political parties, and it depends on commitment to an unchanged goal over many years and decades. It depends on people dedicated to being part of something bigger than themselves, whose names may never be known but who wake up every day to make the world a better place and to be part of something they will be proud to tell their grandkids about. History will look kindly upon them. Humans have always had a propensity to explore … across lands and oceans, up mountains, and into the sky. We as a species will never stop wondering what else is out there, and what it would be like to go. But then, in the words of TS Elliot, “…at the end of all our exploring, will be to arrive where we started, and know the place for the first time.” Crew-10 is on its way home.
0:55

Farewell to International Space Station! This is truly a special place, special mission, and special team that makes it happen. It is a bittersweet departure today – I have a keen awareness that I may never be back here, and even if I was, it would be at a different time with a different crew. This chapter is over. Spaceflight has always been a life goal, and it has turned into a life-fulfilling endeavor – but not for the reasons I thought growing up. When I was young, I pictured the launch, the incredible ball of fire and the acceleration, the spacewalks (how could you not wonder what it’s like to be in that suit?), and I was fascinated by the shuttles, capsules, and stations. But as I complete this second mission living and working in space, what draws me to this job is the people. Experiences like this are amazing, but the relationships we build that make it possible are the “why.” Every day, this mission depends on people from all over the world, of different nationalities, races, religions, and cultures. It depends on government and commercial entities, it depends on all political parties, and it depends on commitment to an unchanged goal over many years and decades. It depends on people dedicated to being part of something bigger than themselves, whose names may never be known but who wake up every day to make the world a better place and to be part of something they will be proud to tell their grandkids about. History will look kindly upon them. Humans have always had a propensity to explore … across lands and oceans, up mountains, and into the sky. We as a species will never stop wondering what else is out there, and what it would be like to go. But then, in the words of TS Elliot, “…at the end of all our exploring, will be to arrive where we started, and know the place for the first time.” Crew-10 is on its way home.

COL Anne McClain

69,039 просмотров • 1 год назад

Jared Isaacman's opening statement during his hearing to be the new NASA Administrator 🇺🇸 "As mentioned before, I have lived the American dream. I have been fortunate to have an amazing business and aeronautics career, to have led two notable missions to space, to help charitable causes that matter deeply to my family, and now I am beyond thankful to have a chance to repay my debt to this nation by serving alongside the brilliant minds at the world’s most accomplished space agency The last time I sat before you, I introduced myself, my qualifications, and the challenges and opportunities ahead. This time, I am here with a message of urgency" After more than a half-century, America is set to launch NASA astronauts around the Moon in just a matter of months — a challenging endeavor to say the least — and one that requires fulltime leadership. Secretary Duffy, in his letter to this committee endorsing my nomination, emphasized this point. That message is shared by more than two dozen other letters of support, including an online petition started by members of the NASA workforce and a letter from 36 NASA astronauts — who, like me, have sat through anomaly investigations, launch and flight readiness reviews, have accepted the risks of going to space, and understand what is at stake And I know it is not lost on anyone in this room that we are in a great competition with a rival that has the will and means to challenge American exceptionalism across multiple domains, including in the high ground of space. This is not the time for delay, but for action, because if we fall behind — if we make a mistake — we may never catch up, and the consequences could shift the balance of power here on Earth" The Congress, and specifically this Committee, understand the urgency of the moment — placing a historic investment in human space exploration that President Trump signed in the one big beautiful bill. It’s now time for NASA and our partners to deliver To that end, I want to assure you, Senators, I am not here for personal gain, to favor or enrich contractors, to close centers, or to disrupt programs essential to completing America’s objectives in space. If confirmed, I am here to bring urgency and an extreme focus to the mission — to do all I can working with the best and brightest at NASA to lead humanity’s effort to unlock the secrets of the universe and ensure American leadership across the last great frontier. In concert with that grand endeavor, we will ensure the following: The success of the Artemis program that President Trump began during his first term. America will return to the Moon before our great rival, and we will establish an enduring presence to understand and realize the scientific, economic, and national security value on the lunar surface Along the way, we will pioneer the next ‘giant leap’ capabilities to extend America’s reach even further into space, including expanding and accelerating investments into nuclear propulsion and surface power programs. These efforts, in addition to industry partners building reusable launch vehicles, we will set the stage for future missions to Mars and beyond We will never accept a gap in capabilities again — not with our space station presence in low Earth orbit or our ability to send American astronauts to the Moon We will strive to build an orbital and lunar economy that can fund the future we all want to see in space and not rely exclusively on the taxpayer. We will begin making the investments now for the inevitable spacefaring future that is just on the horizon We will make the most efficient use of every dollar allocated — pushing for more x-planes, more rovers and telescopes, more exciting missions like Hubble, James Webb, and Dragonfly with the aim of enlightening the world through breakthrough scientific discoveries — knowing that if NASA doesn’t do it, no one else will Some of the most talented people in America show up to work at NASA. Alongside a reinvigorated culture and intense focus on achieving the near-impossible — what no other organization is capable of or dares to accomplish —we will achieve these objectives… And when, not if, we get the job done — it will be because of the professionals at NASA, our international & commercial partners, this committee and Congress, and President Trump’s administration that will have succeeded in ushering in a new golden age of science and discovery. We will do it for America, for humankind, and in doing so, we will inspire the world and the generations to follow to take us even farther We are just getting started on the greatest adventure in human history — and with urgency, purpose, and extreme focus on the mission, NASA will lead the way, Thank you" Let's get him confirmed 🚀
4:53

Jared Isaacman's opening statement during his hearing to be the new NASA Administrator 🇺🇸 "As mentioned before, I have lived the American dream. I have been fortunate to have an amazing business and aeronautics career, to have led two notable missions to space, to help charitable causes that matter deeply to my family, and now I am beyond thankful to have a chance to repay my debt to this nation by serving alongside the brilliant minds at the world’s most accomplished space agency The last time I sat before you, I introduced myself, my qualifications, and the challenges and opportunities ahead. This time, I am here with a message of urgency" After more than a half-century, America is set to launch NASA astronauts around the Moon in just a matter of months — a challenging endeavor to say the least — and one that requires fulltime leadership. Secretary Duffy, in his letter to this committee endorsing my nomination, emphasized this point. That message is shared by more than two dozen other letters of support, including an online petition started by members of the NASA workforce and a letter from 36 NASA astronauts — who, like me, have sat through anomaly investigations, launch and flight readiness reviews, have accepted the risks of going to space, and understand what is at stake And I know it is not lost on anyone in this room that we are in a great competition with a rival that has the will and means to challenge American exceptionalism across multiple domains, including in the high ground of space. This is not the time for delay, but for action, because if we fall behind — if we make a mistake — we may never catch up, and the consequences could shift the balance of power here on Earth" The Congress, and specifically this Committee, understand the urgency of the moment — placing a historic investment in human space exploration that President Trump signed in the one big beautiful bill. It’s now time for NASA and our partners to deliver To that end, I want to assure you, Senators, I am not here for personal gain, to favor or enrich contractors, to close centers, or to disrupt programs essential to completing America’s objectives in space. If confirmed, I am here to bring urgency and an extreme focus to the mission — to do all I can working with the best and brightest at NASA to lead humanity’s effort to unlock the secrets of the universe and ensure American leadership across the last great frontier. In concert with that grand endeavor, we will ensure the following: The success of the Artemis program that President Trump began during his first term. America will return to the Moon before our great rival, and we will establish an enduring presence to understand and realize the scientific, economic, and national security value on the lunar surface Along the way, we will pioneer the next ‘giant leap’ capabilities to extend America’s reach even further into space, including expanding and accelerating investments into nuclear propulsion and surface power programs. These efforts, in addition to industry partners building reusable launch vehicles, we will set the stage for future missions to Mars and beyond We will never accept a gap in capabilities again — not with our space station presence in low Earth orbit or our ability to send American astronauts to the Moon We will strive to build an orbital and lunar economy that can fund the future we all want to see in space and not rely exclusively on the taxpayer. We will begin making the investments now for the inevitable spacefaring future that is just on the horizon We will make the most efficient use of every dollar allocated — pushing for more x-planes, more rovers and telescopes, more exciting missions like Hubble, James Webb, and Dragonfly with the aim of enlightening the world through breakthrough scientific discoveries — knowing that if NASA doesn’t do it, no one else will Some of the most talented people in America show up to work at NASA. Alongside a reinvigorated culture and intense focus on achieving the near-impossible — what no other organization is capable of or dares to accomplish —we will achieve these objectives… And when, not if, we get the job done — it will be because of the professionals at NASA, our international & commercial partners, this committee and Congress, and President Trump’s administration that will have succeeded in ushering in a new golden age of science and discovery. We will do it for America, for humankind, and in doing so, we will inspire the world and the generations to follow to take us even farther We are just getting started on the greatest adventure in human history — and with urgency, purpose, and extreme focus on the mission, NASA will lead the way, Thank you" Let's get him confirmed 🚀

Latest in space

222,252 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Inspired by our scheduled International Space Station link up with the Crown Princess of Sweden, I set my camera lens on my mother’s home country (I have dual citizenship with Sweden!). With the inclination of the ISS orbit, we never pass directly over Scandinavia, but I was lucky enough to catch some aurora dancing in that neighborhood, just a few days before our call. Heja Sverige! The timelapse shows city night lights but settings optimized for aurora, air glow, stars. :06 Norway appears at right edge of screen :10 Sweden appears at right edge of screen :19 Sweden in center of screen :28 Moscow appears on right of screen :37 Moscow in center of screen In the first image, you can see part of each of the Scandinavian countries – Sweden is in the center of the image (looks like some clouds over Southern Sweden, so lights look a bit blurry there), the air glow of the atmosphere at night, and the aurora (and the edge of an ISS solar array). In the second image, you can see parts of Norway and Sweden (again a bit blurry in Southern Sweden due to clouds). The large bright spot in lower right area of image is Stockholm. Both photos were taken on March 11, and the timelapse taken on March 13.
0:47

Inspired by our scheduled International Space Station link up with the Crown Princess of Sweden, I set my camera lens on my mother’s home country (I have dual citizenship with Sweden!). With the inclination of the ISS orbit, we never pass directly over Scandinavia, but I was lucky enough to catch some aurora dancing in that neighborhood, just a few days before our call. Heja Sverige! The timelapse shows city night lights but settings optimized for aurora, air glow, stars. :06 Norway appears at right edge of screen :10 Sweden appears at right edge of screen :19 Sweden in center of screen :28 Moscow appears on right of screen :37 Moscow in center of screen In the first image, you can see part of each of the Scandinavian countries – Sweden is in the center of the image (looks like some clouds over Southern Sweden, so lights look a bit blurry there), the air glow of the atmosphere at night, and the aurora (and the edge of an ISS solar array). In the second image, you can see parts of Norway and Sweden (again a bit blurry in Southern Sweden due to clouds). The large bright spot in lower right area of image is Stockholm. Both photos were taken on March 11, and the timelapse taken on March 13.

Jessica Meir

135,018 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Folk Remedies & Kitchen Medicine….An Introductory Course launching in just 5 days! 🌿 No hard-to-find herbs. 🌿 No special tools. 🌿 Just everyday kitchen staples used in powerful, time-tested ways. If you’ve ever felt like you needed a whole apothecary to practice herbalism, let me tell you—you already have everything you need. For generations, the kitchen was more than just a place to prepare meals—it was the heart of the home, a space where wisdom was passed down, and healing happened in real-time. Long before pharmacies lined the streets, families relied on the plants, spices, and simple ingredients within arm’s reach to soothe a cough, calm a fever, or mend a troubled stomach. A grandmother’s pantry held more than flour and sugar—it was stocked with garlic for infections, fennel for colicky babies, and onion for congestion. These remedies weren’t complicated; they were intuitive, born out of necessity, and refined by experience. Somewhere along the way, much of this wisdom faded, replaced by over-the-counter solutions that promised quick fixes but distanced us from the deep, nourishing power of food as medicine. But the knowledge isn’t lost—it’s waiting to be remembered. The cinnamon in your cupboard isn’t just for baking; it can ease blood sugar swings and soothe a sore throat. That sprig of thyme you toss into soup? It’s a powerful ally for respiratory health. Honey is more than a sweetener; it’s a wound healer, a cough soother, a gift from nature. When we start looking at our kitchens through the lens of healing, we reclaim something profound—the ability to care for ourselves and our families with what we already have.
0:50

Folk Remedies & Kitchen Medicine….An Introductory Course launching in just 5 days! 🌿 No hard-to-find herbs. 🌿 No special tools. 🌿 Just everyday kitchen staples used in powerful, time-tested ways. If you’ve ever felt like you needed a whole apothecary to practice herbalism, let me tell you—you already have everything you need. For generations, the kitchen was more than just a place to prepare meals—it was the heart of the home, a space where wisdom was passed down, and healing happened in real-time. Long before pharmacies lined the streets, families relied on the plants, spices, and simple ingredients within arm’s reach to soothe a cough, calm a fever, or mend a troubled stomach. A grandmother’s pantry held more than flour and sugar—it was stocked with garlic for infections, fennel for colicky babies, and onion for congestion. These remedies weren’t complicated; they were intuitive, born out of necessity, and refined by experience. Somewhere along the way, much of this wisdom faded, replaced by over-the-counter solutions that promised quick fixes but distanced us from the deep, nourishing power of food as medicine. But the knowledge isn’t lost—it’s waiting to be remembered. The cinnamon in your cupboard isn’t just for baking; it can ease blood sugar swings and soothe a sore throat. That sprig of thyme you toss into soup? It’s a powerful ally for respiratory health. Honey is more than a sweetener; it’s a wound healer, a cough soother, a gift from nature. When we start looking at our kitchens through the lens of healing, we reclaim something profound—the ability to care for ourselves and our families with what we already have.

Barbara Oneill

56,607 просмотров • 1 год назад

"The Entities Told Me to Stop Coming Back" | Carl Hayden Smith Carl Hayden Smith thinks humans are about to do something to the DMT realm that we have done to every other frontier: colonize it. In this clip he lays out why extended-state DMT (DMTx) is not just a longer trip but a potential invasion. His hunch is that the entities only tolerate us "popping into their space" for short durations, the way you might trap a spider under a glass to look at it before letting it back outside. Stay too long, come back too often, and the relationship changes. He says the beings have already told him directly that he was returning "too frequently" and should stop coming back so often. Smith is a consciousness researcher who was a test subject in landmark DMT studies and helped launch the Trace Institute in LA to test Donald Hoffman's theory that spacetime itself is a "headset" our consciousness wears. He walks Danny through the idealist view that everything arises from consciousness, why our five senses are filters that keep the rest of reality out, and how DMT strips those filters away to expose what is really there. He also touches on Andrew Gallimore's stranger vision of the future: humans kept in pods, fed through a drip with waste managed like the Matrix, so they can live inside the entities' world. The most personal claim in the clip is his precognition experience. During the pilot study, Smith says he tapped into his own mental state roughly six months into his future and only recognized it as precognition when that moment actually arrived. He argues DMTx could "upgrade the headset" and leave people with altered traits, not just altered states, but only if it is approached mindfully and ethically, with respect for whatever is on the other side. The open question he leaves hanging: if we really are guests in someone else's space, what happens when we decide to move in?
9:23

"The Entities Told Me to Stop Coming Back" | Carl Hayden Smith Carl Hayden Smith thinks humans are about to do something to the DMT realm that we have done to every other frontier: colonize it. In this clip he lays out why extended-state DMT (DMTx) is not just a longer trip but a potential invasion. His hunch is that the entities only tolerate us "popping into their space" for short durations, the way you might trap a spider under a glass to look at it before letting it back outside. Stay too long, come back too often, and the relationship changes. He says the beings have already told him directly that he was returning "too frequently" and should stop coming back so often. Smith is a consciousness researcher who was a test subject in landmark DMT studies and helped launch the Trace Institute in LA to test Donald Hoffman's theory that spacetime itself is a "headset" our consciousness wears. He walks Danny through the idealist view that everything arises from consciousness, why our five senses are filters that keep the rest of reality out, and how DMT strips those filters away to expose what is really there. He also touches on Andrew Gallimore's stranger vision of the future: humans kept in pods, fed through a drip with waste managed like the Matrix, so they can live inside the entities' world. The most personal claim in the clip is his precognition experience. During the pilot study, Smith says he tapped into his own mental state roughly six months into his future and only recognized it as precognition when that moment actually arrived. He argues DMTx could "upgrade the headset" and leave people with altered traits, not just altered states, but only if it is approached mindfully and ethically, with respect for whatever is on the other side. The open question he leaves hanging: if we really are guests in someone else's space, what happens when we decide to move in?

Jordan Chain

48,292 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

🚨New: Yan Diomande on why he turned down PSG, Manchester City, Liverpool and Arsenal — and why Real Madrid is the only move he consider: 🗣️Yan Diomandé: “The interest from PSG, Manchester City, Liverpool and Arsenal was flattering on paper. But when you actually look at how those teams play and what they would ask of me, the mismatches were obvious. At PSG the system is fluid and star-heavy. They need attackers who can constantly rotate positions and share the ball with three or four other high-profile forwards. I play my best football with clear space to attack 1v1 and finish moves myself. That setup never felt like the right environment for a winger who wants to be decisive every week rather than one of several options. Manchester City is even more specific. The structure is world-class, but it turns wide players into disciplined positional pieces. You have to track inside, hold your shape, and sacrifice a lot of the freedom that makes a dribbler dangerous. I didn’t want to become another efficient cog in that machine, no matter how many trophies it wins. Liverpool’s intensity is impressive, but the way they attack relies on constant chaos and overlapping runs from full-backs. My game is more about control, timing the dribble, and isolating full-backs in space. That high-tempo, transition-heavy style just doesn’t suit how I see myself developing. Arsenal are building something solid under Arteta, but their possession phases are very structured and patient. Wingers are expected to stay in tight positions and recycle the ball a lot. I’m not looking to join a project that is still refining its identity at the highest level. I want a team that already knows how to win the biggest matches. Real Madrid only came into the race late, and that actually made the difference clearer. Their interest felt different. They don’t try to force you into a rigid system. They give attackers freedom to create in the final third while still demanding the mentality to perform when everything is on the line. That combination of freedom and history is what stood out for me. Once those conversations started, the other options stopped mattering.
0:41

🚨New: Yan Diomande on why he turned down PSG, Manchester City, Liverpool and Arsenal — and why Real Madrid is the only move he consider: 🗣️Yan Diomandé: “The interest from PSG, Manchester City, Liverpool and Arsenal was flattering on paper. But when you actually look at how those teams play and what they would ask of me, the mismatches were obvious. At PSG the system is fluid and star-heavy. They need attackers who can constantly rotate positions and share the ball with three or four other high-profile forwards. I play my best football with clear space to attack 1v1 and finish moves myself. That setup never felt like the right environment for a winger who wants to be decisive every week rather than one of several options. Manchester City is even more specific. The structure is world-class, but it turns wide players into disciplined positional pieces. You have to track inside, hold your shape, and sacrifice a lot of the freedom that makes a dribbler dangerous. I didn’t want to become another efficient cog in that machine, no matter how many trophies it wins. Liverpool’s intensity is impressive, but the way they attack relies on constant chaos and overlapping runs from full-backs. My game is more about control, timing the dribble, and isolating full-backs in space. That high-tempo, transition-heavy style just doesn’t suit how I see myself developing. Arsenal are building something solid under Arteta, but their possession phases are very structured and patient. Wingers are expected to stay in tight positions and recycle the ball a lot. I’m not looking to join a project that is still refining its identity at the highest level. I want a team that already knows how to win the biggest matches. Real Madrid only came into the race late, and that actually made the difference clearer. Their interest felt different. They don’t try to force you into a rigid system. They give attackers freedom to create in the final third while still demanding the mentality to perform when everything is on the line. That combination of freedom and history is what stood out for me. Once those conversations started, the other options stopped mattering.

Vfynn_🥷🏼 𐙚

19,727 просмотров • 26 дней назад

🎤 #كي_لاننسى 🙏 هذا يوم لا يُنسى ، 2/11/2025 ، يوم هولوكوست الفاشر ، يوم اختلطت فيه رائحة الدم والجثث والحريق ودموع الثكالى والأيتام والحزن وقهر الرجال والفجيعة ، في ذلك التاريخ ، خرجت من البيت أجهش بالبكاء ، وزوجتي تلحق بي في فناء المنزل تسأل: "هل أصاب أهلك شيء؟" ظنّت أن هناك هاتف قد فجعني في أحد من أقاربي ، ووالله إني فُجعت بالفعل بأهلي في الفاشر ، التفتُ لها وأومأت لها بالهاتف ، وشاهدَت معي مقطع الطفل وأخته يبكون وهم بجانب أمهم المقتولة فبكت هي الاخرى ، واحسرتاه ، قلت: "نعم ، هم أهلنا وأصابتهم مصيبة" فأخذت أقلّب المساحات الصوتية أريد افرغ مابداخلي من غضب ، فوجدت الأخ أبوخالد العاصوف العاصوف 🇸🇦 في مساحته يُرعد غضباً على نفس الموضوع "الفاشر " ، فلم أتملّك نفسي وبكيت وأبكيت من في المساحة ، فشلت في الحديث من هول ما رأيت ! يا ويلك يا ظالم ! ماذا فعلت في #السودان؟ وفي أي وجه ستقابل ربك يا مجرم؟ الا لعنة الله عليك آناء الليل واطراف النهار الا اخزاك الله سائر اليوم والشهر والعام والعمر كله 🤲 #هولوكوست_الفاشر ✍️ #الدعم_السريع_منظمة_ارهابية 🎤 #NeverForget 🙏 This is a day that will not be forgotten, 2/11/2025, the day of the El Fasher Holocaust. A day when the smell of blood, bodies, fire, and tears of the bereaved, orphans, sorrow, and the anguish of men mixed together. On that date, I left my house bursting into tears. My wife followed me into the yard asking, "Did something happen to your family?" She thought a phone call had brought bad news about one of my relatives. By God, I was indeed hurt by what happened to my people in El Fasher. I turned to her and nodded towards the phone. She saw the video of the child and his sister crying next to their murdered mother and she cried too. Alas! I said, "Yes, they are our people and they were struck by a calamity." I started scrolling through voice spaces wanting to vent my anger. I found brother Abu Khalid Al-Asouf العاصوف 🇸🇦 in his space thundering with anger about the same topic, "El Fasher". I couldn't control myself and I cried, making others in the space cry too. I was speechless at the horror of what I saw! Woe to you, oppressor! What have you done in #Sudan? In what face will you meet your Lord, you criminal? May God's curse be upon you night and day, may He disgrace you forever! #ElFasherHolocaust #Yes #RapidSupportMilitiaIsATerroristOrganization ياسين سالم ،، كاتب وصحفي من #السعودية 🇸🇦 Yaseen Salem
0:29

🎤 #كي_لاننسى 🙏 هذا يوم لا يُنسى ، 2/11/2025 ، يوم هولوكوست الفاشر ، يوم اختلطت فيه رائحة الدم والجثث والحريق ودموع الثكالى والأيتام والحزن وقهر الرجال والفجيعة ، في ذلك التاريخ ، خرجت من البيت أجهش بالبكاء ، وزوجتي تلحق بي في فناء المنزل تسأل: "هل أصاب أهلك شيء؟" ظنّت أن هناك هاتف قد فجعني في أحد من أقاربي ، ووالله إني فُجعت بالفعل بأهلي في الفاشر ، التفتُ لها وأومأت لها بالهاتف ، وشاهدَت معي مقطع الطفل وأخته يبكون وهم بجانب أمهم المقتولة فبكت هي الاخرى ، واحسرتاه ، قلت: "نعم ، هم أهلنا وأصابتهم مصيبة" فأخذت أقلّب المساحات الصوتية أريد افرغ مابداخلي من غضب ، فوجدت الأخ أبوخالد العاصوف العاصوف 🇸🇦 في مساحته يُرعد غضباً على نفس الموضوع "الفاشر " ، فلم أتملّك نفسي وبكيت وأبكيت من في المساحة ، فشلت في الحديث من هول ما رأيت ! يا ويلك يا ظالم ! ماذا فعلت في #السودان؟ وفي أي وجه ستقابل ربك يا مجرم؟ الا لعنة الله عليك آناء الليل واطراف النهار الا اخزاك الله سائر اليوم والشهر والعام والعمر كله 🤲 #هولوكوست_الفاشر ✍️ #الدعم_السريع_منظمة_ارهابية 🎤 #NeverForget 🙏 This is a day that will not be forgotten, 2/11/2025, the day of the El Fasher Holocaust. A day when the smell of blood, bodies, fire, and tears of the bereaved, orphans, sorrow, and the anguish of men mixed together. On that date, I left my house bursting into tears. My wife followed me into the yard asking, "Did something happen to your family?" She thought a phone call had brought bad news about one of my relatives. By God, I was indeed hurt by what happened to my people in El Fasher. I turned to her and nodded towards the phone. She saw the video of the child and his sister crying next to their murdered mother and she cried too. Alas! I said, "Yes, they are our people and they were struck by a calamity." I started scrolling through voice spaces wanting to vent my anger. I found brother Abu Khalid Al-Asouf العاصوف 🇸🇦 in his space thundering with anger about the same topic, "El Fasher". I couldn't control myself and I cried, making others in the space cry too. I was speechless at the horror of what I saw! Woe to you, oppressor! What have you done in #Sudan? In what face will you meet your Lord, you criminal? May God's curse be upon you night and day, may He disgrace you forever! #ElFasherHolocaust #Yes #RapidSupportMilitiaIsATerroristOrganization ياسين سالم ،، كاتب وصحفي من #السعودية 🇸🇦 Yaseen Salem

ياسين سالم

36,927 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

In 2007, Elon Musk predicted: SpaceX will replace the space shuttle by 2011. Tesla will make a $30,000 car. Solar power will be “a really big deal.” SpaceX had never reached orbit. Tesla had never delivered a car. He spent 20 minutes explaining everything he saw coming: The interviewer pushed back. What about Richard Branson? "What Branson is doing is a much smaller technological challenge. His craft is suborbital. It goes to Mach 3. Our craft is orbital. Mach 25." "But that doesn't describe the whole scale of difficulty. The energy required scales to the square of velocity." "To do what Branson is doing, you need 9 units of energy. To do what we're doing, you need 625." "What Branson is building can cross the English Channel. What we're building can circumnavigate the globe." "I still think what he's doing is great. I bought a ticket on his effort. But it's not in the same league technologically." So what does worry him? "The things that can really hurt SpaceX are our own foolishness. Our own errors. But none of the competition that I'm aware of." This was 2007. SpaceX had never reached orbit. He had already mapped the future. "When the shuttle retires in 2010, starting in 2011, SpaceX's rocket will replace the space shuttle in servicing the space station." It happened. "The Model 2 of Tesla is a $49,000 four-door five-passenger sedan. The Model 3 is intended to be around a $30,000 price point. That's affordable by almost everyone who can buy a new car." It happened. The interviewer asked about his trajectory. From physics at Stanford to Zip2 to PayPal to rockets. "When I graduated from college, there were three areas I thought would be most impactful to the future of humanity." "The internet. Space exploration. And changing the economy from a hydrocarbon-based economy to one which is solar electric." He built companies in all three. The interviewer asked about NASA. "There's a confusion in the public mind that SpaceX is competing with NASA. NASA is a customer of ours." He asked about the space program. "In 1969 we were able to go to the moon. Here we are over three decades later and we can barely get to low Earth orbit. By any measure, that is a step backwards." "If you look at news articles in the late 60s, the expectation was that by the 21st century we would have a moon base and probably a Mars base." "If you'd asked anyone at that point whether we would be unable to go to the moon and not have been to Mars, they would think you're crazy." The interviewer asked about the moon. "I don't think we should be going back to the moon. We should be focused on Mars." "The moon is kind of like the Arctic. Very barren. Very little resources. Not a place we could establish another human civilization." "We saw that movie in the 60s. The remake's never as good." Then came the lifestyle question. You've made a fortune. Ever thought about sitting on a beach drinking beer? "I find that really pretty boring. That would be torture if I had to do that every day." "I really need to be preoccupied with something. If I'm just sitting there relaxing, I can only do that for a very short period of time and then it becomes unbearable." A friend of his has a phrase for startups. "A startup is like eating glass and staring into the abyss." So why do it? "For me it's always about: does what I'm doing matter if we are successful? Does it matter to the world?" "There are easier ways to make money than starting a rocket company or a car company." "The interest in Tesla is not that the world needs another car company. It's that we have a very important environmental problem. Global climate change is going to be one of the most significant issues of the 21st century." "The only way to get around that is with an electric vehicle paired with zero-emission power generation. Solar power is going to be a really big deal." The interviewer asked about selling Tesla to a big car company. "Right now the big car companies believe that a viable electric vehicle is not possible, and even if it was, people wouldn't buy it." "We need to show that neither of those are true. That the technology works. That people want to buy it." "If we sold to one of the big car companies, it would really slow things down." On his daily routine: "I'm not an early morning person. I tend to get up around 7:30 or 8 and be in the office around 9:30. But I stay until about 8pm." On his office: "I just have a cubicle at SpaceX. Surrounded by my colleagues." On legacy: "What I'd like to do is help solve some important problems." "With respect to space, I hope to help make humanity a multiplanetary species." This 20 minute interview will teach you more about vision, ambition, and betting on yourself than every biography combined. Bookmark & give it 20 minutes today, no matter what.
20:05

In 2007, Elon Musk predicted: SpaceX will replace the space shuttle by 2011. Tesla will make a $30,000 car. Solar power will be “a really big deal.” SpaceX had never reached orbit. Tesla had never delivered a car. He spent 20 minutes explaining everything he saw coming: The interviewer pushed back. What about Richard Branson? "What Branson is doing is a much smaller technological challenge. His craft is suborbital. It goes to Mach 3. Our craft is orbital. Mach 25." "But that doesn't describe the whole scale of difficulty. The energy required scales to the square of velocity." "To do what Branson is doing, you need 9 units of energy. To do what we're doing, you need 625." "What Branson is building can cross the English Channel. What we're building can circumnavigate the globe." "I still think what he's doing is great. I bought a ticket on his effort. But it's not in the same league technologically." So what does worry him? "The things that can really hurt SpaceX are our own foolishness. Our own errors. But none of the competition that I'm aware of." This was 2007. SpaceX had never reached orbit. He had already mapped the future. "When the shuttle retires in 2010, starting in 2011, SpaceX's rocket will replace the space shuttle in servicing the space station." It happened. "The Model 2 of Tesla is a $49,000 four-door five-passenger sedan. The Model 3 is intended to be around a $30,000 price point. That's affordable by almost everyone who can buy a new car." It happened. The interviewer asked about his trajectory. From physics at Stanford to Zip2 to PayPal to rockets. "When I graduated from college, there were three areas I thought would be most impactful to the future of humanity." "The internet. Space exploration. And changing the economy from a hydrocarbon-based economy to one which is solar electric." He built companies in all three. The interviewer asked about NASA. "There's a confusion in the public mind that SpaceX is competing with NASA. NASA is a customer of ours." He asked about the space program. "In 1969 we were able to go to the moon. Here we are over three decades later and we can barely get to low Earth orbit. By any measure, that is a step backwards." "If you look at news articles in the late 60s, the expectation was that by the 21st century we would have a moon base and probably a Mars base." "If you'd asked anyone at that point whether we would be unable to go to the moon and not have been to Mars, they would think you're crazy." The interviewer asked about the moon. "I don't think we should be going back to the moon. We should be focused on Mars." "The moon is kind of like the Arctic. Very barren. Very little resources. Not a place we could establish another human civilization." "We saw that movie in the 60s. The remake's never as good." Then came the lifestyle question. You've made a fortune. Ever thought about sitting on a beach drinking beer? "I find that really pretty boring. That would be torture if I had to do that every day." "I really need to be preoccupied with something. If I'm just sitting there relaxing, I can only do that for a very short period of time and then it becomes unbearable." A friend of his has a phrase for startups. "A startup is like eating glass and staring into the abyss." So why do it? "For me it's always about: does what I'm doing matter if we are successful? Does it matter to the world?" "There are easier ways to make money than starting a rocket company or a car company." "The interest in Tesla is not that the world needs another car company. It's that we have a very important environmental problem. Global climate change is going to be one of the most significant issues of the 21st century." "The only way to get around that is with an electric vehicle paired with zero-emission power generation. Solar power is going to be a really big deal." The interviewer asked about selling Tesla to a big car company. "Right now the big car companies believe that a viable electric vehicle is not possible, and even if it was, people wouldn't buy it." "We need to show that neither of those are true. That the technology works. That people want to buy it." "If we sold to one of the big car companies, it would really slow things down." On his daily routine: "I'm not an early morning person. I tend to get up around 7:30 or 8 and be in the office around 9:30. But I stay until about 8pm." On his office: "I just have a cubicle at SpaceX. Surrounded by my colleagues." On legacy: "What I'd like to do is help solve some important problems." "With respect to space, I hope to help make humanity a multiplanetary species." This 20 minute interview will teach you more about vision, ambition, and betting on yourself than every biography combined. Bookmark & give it 20 minutes today, no matter what.

Jaynit

108,110 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Ilhan Omar made her first public appearance since her infamous State of the Union outburst...and it was a total DISASTER. CNN’s Wolf Blitzer gave her THREE chances to apologize for her barbaric behavior last night…she REFUSED every single one. BLITZER: “The House Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries, advised your caucus, the Democratic members, to either skip the State of the Union address or sit there in silence.” “Should you have just boycotted the address? And do you think you violated the guidelines set out by your own leader?” OMAR: “No, I think it was really unavoidable the president talked about protecting Americans, and I just had to remind him that his administration was responsible for killing two of my constituents.” Blitzer tried a different angle. BLITZER: “Many members of your Democratic Party criticized their Republican counterparts when they interrupted president Biden’s State of the Union address.” “Do you have any regrets at all about the interaction we played between you and President Trump just last night?” OMAR: “I do not, and I think many people look at that moment when the president says it is our responsibility to protect Americans and he does not acknowledge the fact that two Americans two of my constituents, two of our neighbors were were killed.” Blitzer tried one final time. BLITZER: “With hindsight, Congresswoman, do you think you would have been better off boycotting the speech like so many other democratic lawmakers did, or did you do the right thing by actually showing up there?” OMAR: “I brought for Minnesotans up as guests for the Minnesota delegation. It was important for us to be there, to bear witness, to hold space for our constituents that have lived through an occupation from federal law enforcement, that have been terrorized, that have seen our neighbors been killed and and traumatized in so many ways…” “And so, no, I think it was really important for my constituents to see me there. It was really important to my constituents to hear that I was reminding the president that Renee Good and Alex Pretti were killed under this administration.”
2:12

Ilhan Omar made her first public appearance since her infamous State of the Union outburst...and it was a total DISASTER. CNN’s Wolf Blitzer gave her THREE chances to apologize for her barbaric behavior last night…she REFUSED every single one. BLITZER: “The House Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries, advised your caucus, the Democratic members, to either skip the State of the Union address or sit there in silence.” “Should you have just boycotted the address? And do you think you violated the guidelines set out by your own leader?” OMAR: “No, I think it was really unavoidable the president talked about protecting Americans, and I just had to remind him that his administration was responsible for killing two of my constituents.” Blitzer tried a different angle. BLITZER: “Many members of your Democratic Party criticized their Republican counterparts when they interrupted president Biden’s State of the Union address.” “Do you have any regrets at all about the interaction we played between you and President Trump just last night?” OMAR: “I do not, and I think many people look at that moment when the president says it is our responsibility to protect Americans and he does not acknowledge the fact that two Americans two of my constituents, two of our neighbors were were killed.” Blitzer tried one final time. BLITZER: “With hindsight, Congresswoman, do you think you would have been better off boycotting the speech like so many other democratic lawmakers did, or did you do the right thing by actually showing up there?” OMAR: “I brought for Minnesotans up as guests for the Minnesota delegation. It was important for us to be there, to bear witness, to hold space for our constituents that have lived through an occupation from federal law enforcement, that have been terrorized, that have seen our neighbors been killed and and traumatized in so many ways…” “And so, no, I think it was really important for my constituents to see me there. It was really important to my constituents to hear that I was reminding the president that Renee Good and Alex Pretti were killed under this administration.”

Overton

1,335,865 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Stop perma full clearing if you want to win games Video below explaining it but i am providing a transcript for anyone that doesnt speak english to translate or maybe that are deaf You are losing games by full clearing now. What I mean by this isn't that full clearing is inherently bad. What I mean is that lot of people get stuck thinking they just have to full clear the problem is once you get your first item, a lot of the time it's actually best to just not full clear. Because when you get your first item and especially when you're ahead, you should be looking to do things actively on the map. Because if you just full clear, you're giving the enemy essentially, breathing space. And if they're behind, they shouldn't have breathing space. If you're just full clearing and they're full clearing, you're giving They equal gold, which you never want to do when you're ahead, because any they get is going to be worth more than any gold you get, because of percentages. so whenever you're strong like this, you want to look for ways you can impact the map instead of full clearing. Especially since, in this scenario here, I can see my entire top side is warded. So even if I do get invaded and lose my camps, I at least know it's getting invaded. and I can account for that and do something else here. So, my bot lane just came out of base, fresh items, so they're also strong. So they're also looking to fight. Here I need to wait for them to push one more way before dragon. So I'm just going to take my red buff, and then we're going to look to do the dragon. And the reason this is so important is because we're both spiking. We just came from base. And the enemy has a very strong dragon fight. They have Lissandra, Rengar, and Ash Seraphine, which means Ash Seraphine should almost always have prio. So, if we don't take Dragon with this one timer, Ash Seraphine will always have prio, and then they have a strong 2v2 with the Slander Vengar. So, we have this one time to take it. If I was just to go full clear, my bot would never have prio ever again. This is our one window, and we're able to take the Dragon where my bot lane has prio. So instead of full clearing, I just go straight to the Dragon. And if there is a fight, I'm strong here because I'm on Item Spike, and so is my bot lane. So it's actually a decent fight. And then I can fast forward. So then Rengar ends up ganking my bot lane. I kill him. And then I'm recalling again because I have a decent buy here of 1500 gold. And it's going to be the same thing essentially here. I'm not just going to full clear. There's no reason to just full clear, right? I'm very strong. I have full item. I just bought 1500 gold worth of items. And top's kind of overextending here. So I'm just going to sprint straight top. And we don't end up killing, but we do get his ult and his flash. That's pretty worth. Could have honestly killed him if I Thresh missed his hook. It's a bit unlucky. But the point is. The point is to just not folklore. and I still get my camps guaranteed, and the most Rengar could take is just my raptors. I know he can't take my top side because I'm top side right. So the most I can lose is my raptors. And it's always worth it to just go for the kill top. If I lose my raptors now, it's earlier in the game, and it's a lot harder to break your full clear because you do get punished more. Because one, it's harder to kill people because have less items, less damage, less cooldown stuff like that. It's harder to farm it takes longer. So more camps, you're more your camps are sitting the longer it's going to take for you to clear them. And then, if you do lose camps early game, it snowballs way harder. So I'd say once you get your upgraded Smite, like your Rainbow Smite, like your first upgraded Smite, that's when it's a little bit easier to skip camps. You basically don't really want to break your full clear aside from that. But once you get your first item, for sure, you want to be skipping camps to look for proactive plays. You don't have to go for plays just to go for plays, but you should be looking for that. So I hope that was pretty helpful. Any questions, you can just always DM me or comment below and I'll try to get back to you.
3:24

Stop perma full clearing if you want to win games Video below explaining it but i am providing a transcript for anyone that doesnt speak english to translate or maybe that are deaf You are losing games by full clearing now. What I mean by this isn't that full clearing is inherently bad. What I mean is that lot of people get stuck thinking they just have to full clear the problem is once you get your first item, a lot of the time it's actually best to just not full clear. Because when you get your first item and especially when you're ahead, you should be looking to do things actively on the map. Because if you just full clear, you're giving the enemy essentially, breathing space. And if they're behind, they shouldn't have breathing space. If you're just full clearing and they're full clearing, you're giving They equal gold, which you never want to do when you're ahead, because any they get is going to be worth more than any gold you get, because of percentages. so whenever you're strong like this, you want to look for ways you can impact the map instead of full clearing. Especially since, in this scenario here, I can see my entire top side is warded. So even if I do get invaded and lose my camps, I at least know it's getting invaded. and I can account for that and do something else here. So, my bot lane just came out of base, fresh items, so they're also strong. So they're also looking to fight. Here I need to wait for them to push one more way before dragon. So I'm just going to take my red buff, and then we're going to look to do the dragon. And the reason this is so important is because we're both spiking. We just came from base. And the enemy has a very strong dragon fight. They have Lissandra, Rengar, and Ash Seraphine, which means Ash Seraphine should almost always have prio. So, if we don't take Dragon with this one timer, Ash Seraphine will always have prio, and then they have a strong 2v2 with the Slander Vengar. So, we have this one time to take it. If I was just to go full clear, my bot would never have prio ever again. This is our one window, and we're able to take the Dragon where my bot lane has prio. So instead of full clearing, I just go straight to the Dragon. And if there is a fight, I'm strong here because I'm on Item Spike, and so is my bot lane. So it's actually a decent fight. And then I can fast forward. So then Rengar ends up ganking my bot lane. I kill him. And then I'm recalling again because I have a decent buy here of 1500 gold. And it's going to be the same thing essentially here. I'm not just going to full clear. There's no reason to just full clear, right? I'm very strong. I have full item. I just bought 1500 gold worth of items. And top's kind of overextending here. So I'm just going to sprint straight top. And we don't end up killing, but we do get his ult and his flash. That's pretty worth. Could have honestly killed him if I Thresh missed his hook. It's a bit unlucky. But the point is. The point is to just not folklore. and I still get my camps guaranteed, and the most Rengar could take is just my raptors. I know he can't take my top side because I'm top side right. So the most I can lose is my raptors. And it's always worth it to just go for the kill top. If I lose my raptors now, it's earlier in the game, and it's a lot harder to break your full clear because you do get punished more. Because one, it's harder to kill people because have less items, less damage, less cooldown stuff like that. It's harder to farm it takes longer. So more camps, you're more your camps are sitting the longer it's going to take for you to clear them. And then, if you do lose camps early game, it snowballs way harder. So I'd say once you get your upgraded Smite, like your Rainbow Smite, like your first upgraded Smite, that's when it's a little bit easier to skip camps. You basically don't really want to break your full clear aside from that. But once you get your first item, for sure, you want to be skipping camps to look for proactive plays. You don't have to go for plays just to go for plays, but you should be looking for that. So I hope that was pretty helpful. Any questions, you can just always DM me or comment below and I'll try to get back to you.

Griffin

637,506 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

the MC asked him if he had any upcoming projects during Pride Month for fans to follow and here is his answer: 🐰: so, I won't use this time to promote any of my work or anything like that. instead, I’d like to use this space to leave you all with the message I mentioned earlier. I want everyone to be a small puzzle piece that, when put together, helps push our society forward. today, Namping is here speaking simply as one fellow human being. I don’t want you to look at me as an artist or anything like that. I just feel that today, I want to be a small source of inspiration. no matter who you are, whether you follow Namping, follow Domundi, follow P'Aof, or following anyone else, I want you to know that today, everyone's movement and everyone's willingness to open their hearts is incredibly important. today's message might not differ much from the one Namping shared last year, because it's still an issue we are actively pushing for. but the crucial thing today is, "has everyone started to change? have we started creating safe spaces for ourselves, for those close to us, for people in society, for our colleagues, and for people within the fandom?". if we have already started doing this today, I want everyone to keep it going and continue making changes together. today, the audience here who are our fans, is at least one group that can expand and grow. once this understanding is established and everyone cooperates, Namping truly believes that one day, Thai society which currently has ongoing movements regarding marriage equality and other progressive movements, will see real change. I don't want us to just leave this as the responsibility of activists or those who are directly struggling. instead, all of us, as fellow human beings who each face our own challenges, should hold hands and move forward together. if we view it as everyone’s problem, as a societal problem, and ensure no one is left behind, this is more than enough for today. 👏👏👏👏 I STAN THE RIGHT PERSON, SERIOUSLY🥹🥹🥹🥹 NAMPING ICONSIAM UNITY OF PRIDE #NampingPrideICONSIAM #nampingster
1:36

the MC asked him if he had any upcoming projects during Pride Month for fans to follow and here is his answer: 🐰: so, I won't use this time to promote any of my work or anything like that. instead, I’d like to use this space to leave you all with the message I mentioned earlier. I want everyone to be a small puzzle piece that, when put together, helps push our society forward. today, Namping is here speaking simply as one fellow human being. I don’t want you to look at me as an artist or anything like that. I just feel that today, I want to be a small source of inspiration. no matter who you are, whether you follow Namping, follow Domundi, follow P'Aof, or following anyone else, I want you to know that today, everyone's movement and everyone's willingness to open their hearts is incredibly important. today's message might not differ much from the one Namping shared last year, because it's still an issue we are actively pushing for. but the crucial thing today is, "has everyone started to change? have we started creating safe spaces for ourselves, for those close to us, for people in society, for our colleagues, and for people within the fandom?". if we have already started doing this today, I want everyone to keep it going and continue making changes together. today, the audience here who are our fans, is at least one group that can expand and grow. once this understanding is established and everyone cooperates, Namping truly believes that one day, Thai society which currently has ongoing movements regarding marriage equality and other progressive movements, will see real change. I don't want us to just leave this as the responsibility of activists or those who are directly struggling. instead, all of us, as fellow human beings who each face our own challenges, should hold hands and move forward together. if we view it as everyone’s problem, as a societal problem, and ensure no one is left behind, this is more than enough for today. 👏👏👏👏 I STAN THE RIGHT PERSON, SERIOUSLY🥹🥹🥹🥹 NAMPING ICONSIAM UNITY OF PRIDE #NampingPrideICONSIAM #nampingster

fifi🦆🐰

75,154 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

John Carpenter on the politics of "Escape from New York" (1981) & "Escape From LA" (1996) & who he considers to be the real enemy of America: “Most science fiction and action movies since the 80s take the point of view that the hero is usually on the side of the right wing, whether he takes the law into his own hands or not. All of these films basically have the same general idea, look at 'True Lies' (1994) by James Cameron as an example. Who were the bad guys? Cliché Persians. The enemy we fear is always the other, either from the outside, like the aliens coming down to Earth, or from the inside. In 'Escape From LA' (1996) what I really say is that what we have to watch out for is not the enemy from outer space, the enemy are the Republicans and they’re taking over the world. But that’s just because I’m from the old days, when we used to smoke dope and hate the government. In my film we have a Muslim who’s heroic, she’s ki||ed, but she’s a nice person. The biggest villain is the right wing white president. In horror movies, you always boil it down to a conflict between external and internal. You’ve got a tribe of people sitting around a camp fire and the medicine man is saying, we have all got to be afraid of whatever is out there beyond the darkness, it’s that other tribe down the river, they’re evil, they’re demons, we have to ki|| them. Now what I did on 'Escape From LA' was to create a fictional America of the future in which the country has become a theocracy and the morally guilty are deported to Los Angeles. The idea came from inverting the idea of the first movie, 'Escape from New York' (1981). New York was a prison and the rest of the country was free. In this movie the rest of the country is like Russia during the 50s, it’s walled off, and the only free place is Los Angeles. Then I’m sneaking in all sorts of references to what we want to call politically correct. There’s a movement now in America to restrict a lot of our freedoms in order to have order, we’re ready to get rid of all our freedoms, we want to be told what to do and we want the rules really clear cut. But I come from a place of arrested development as an adolescent. My whole being is, never tell me what to do. I hate being told what to do. It’s just an absolute questioning and hatred of authority.” (John Carpenter and Debra Hill's interview with Elisa Leonelli, 1996) P.S: On this day, 30 years ago, "Escape From LA" (1996) was released in the USA & Canada.
1:29

John Carpenter on the politics of "Escape from New York" (1981) & "Escape From LA" (1996) & who he considers to be the real enemy of America: “Most science fiction and action movies since the 80s take the point of view that the hero is usually on the side of the right wing, whether he takes the law into his own hands or not. All of these films basically have the same general idea, look at 'True Lies' (1994) by James Cameron as an example. Who were the bad guys? Cliché Persians. The enemy we fear is always the other, either from the outside, like the aliens coming down to Earth, or from the inside. In 'Escape From LA' (1996) what I really say is that what we have to watch out for is not the enemy from outer space, the enemy are the Republicans and they’re taking over the world. But that’s just because I’m from the old days, when we used to smoke dope and hate the government. In my film we have a Muslim who’s heroic, she’s ki||ed, but she’s a nice person. The biggest villain is the right wing white president. In horror movies, you always boil it down to a conflict between external and internal. You’ve got a tribe of people sitting around a camp fire and the medicine man is saying, we have all got to be afraid of whatever is out there beyond the darkness, it’s that other tribe down the river, they’re evil, they’re demons, we have to ki|| them. Now what I did on 'Escape From LA' was to create a fictional America of the future in which the country has become a theocracy and the morally guilty are deported to Los Angeles. The idea came from inverting the idea of the first movie, 'Escape from New York' (1981). New York was a prison and the rest of the country was free. In this movie the rest of the country is like Russia during the 50s, it’s walled off, and the only free place is Los Angeles. Then I’m sneaking in all sorts of references to what we want to call politically correct. There’s a movement now in America to restrict a lot of our freedoms in order to have order, we’re ready to get rid of all our freedoms, we want to be told what to do and we want the rules really clear cut. But I come from a place of arrested development as an adolescent. My whole being is, never tell me what to do. I hate being told what to do. It’s just an absolute questioning and hatred of authority.” (John Carpenter and Debra Hill's interview with Elisa Leonelli, 1996) P.S: On this day, 30 years ago, "Escape From LA" (1996) was released in the USA & Canada.

DepressedBergman

38,702 просмотров • 11 дней назад