正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

نادي البلد من جده… للعالم. صعود البلد أول مسلسل واقعي لنادي كورة عربي – ابتداءً من ١٩ ديسمبر على إم بي سي أكشن و شاهد. احفظوا الموعد 🔥 #نادي_البلد #جدة #MBCAction #shahid The first ever football club reality tv show now on the big screen! Born in Jeddah- Made...

19,726 次观看 • 8 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

25 YEARS AGO TODAY, the very first series of Celebrity Big Brother launched 👁️🔴 The series lasted just 8 days, and was supposed to be a one-off Comic Relief special, but it ended up going on to have a monumental impact on reality TV. There have now been 24 series of CBB, and it is the only British TV show in history to air on every main channel: BBC One, Channel 4, Channel 5, and now ITV. It returns for a 25th series next year, on ITV. The first series was won by comedian Jack Dee, but the most memorable moment however, was when Vanessa Feltz had a meltdown on the dining table. She had only been locked away for.. 3 days. While series 1 was the most watched ever, with an average of 5.2 million viewers, it went on to have a bigger global impact over the years. Series 4 had the first ever ‘civilian’ contestant take part, Chantelle, who went on to win the show. Series 5 had the infamous race-row, which made global news and had an impact on political relations between the UK and India. Series 11 was won by Rylan, who went on to host the side show for 5 years, and he then became a regular TV presenter on Strictly and Eurovision. Series 13 was extended mid-series and went on to reach 3.7 million viewers. Series 17 became viral with Tiffany Pollard vs. Gemma Collins, which later went on to spawn a Zara Larsson song a decade later. Also… RIP David. Series 22 saw it cancelled for the 3rd time, but not without making international news once again, thanks to Roxanne Pallet. Series 23 relaunched on ITV, and featured Ex-Factor judges Louis Walsh and Sharon Osbourne. Then… the most recent series went viral once more, thanks to a blossoming relationship between former Love Islander Chris Hughes and at-the-time lesbian, JoJo Siwa. And let’s not forget one of the best things Celebrity Big Brother ever gave us — Kim Woodburn. RIP Queen of clean!

sᴜᴘᴇʀ ᴛᴠ

81,892 次观看 • 5 个月前

B*stard taught he ate?? This is your highest engagement on this APP! And who made it possible?? BIG TEE🤣 you know what I love about your weak reply?? you did not deny the fact that both your mother and GRANDMOTHER are certified OLOSHOS So now, who is Natacha Anita Akide ? I’m a graduate of Sociology from Ignatius Ajuru University, where I finished with a 2.1. And yes I also do hold an honorary doctorate degree in Arts and Culture from prowess University. I featured on an American SHOW MTVs The Challenge (First Nigerian to be picked), featured on the most viewed reality TV show on the African continent Big Brother Naija.. And when I left the show, I trended #1 one worldwide severally and till today not one housemate can boost of the same. I’ve been on radio, and within my first year, my show, The Big Friday Show, won more awards than any other radio show in AFRICA at the time.. and whilst I was on air, it was the biggest radio show in the country. We had listeners from Ghana, Cameroon, the U.S., the U.K., Canada, and South Africa. Almost every other day, people called in from around the world to speak with me. During that period, I was also one of the highest-paid OAPs in the country. Over the years, I’ve worked with more than 300 brands, both local and international, consistently delivering value. I’ve worked with brands like Huda Beauty, Cîroc, Tiger Beer, Fenty Beauty and Trophy Stout.. I’ve been on several TV Ads to drive sales for brands I represent, signed as a brand ambassador for Oppo, and my image? Was used across their global platforms for promotional purposes. Now let’s talk about what I’ve done for my community? Over the years, I’ve distributed 50,000 pads to young girls in high schools, while also educating them on hygiene. All of this was personally funded, i ave never solicited public funds to carry out these initiatives. I’ve also gone back to my community to support the elderly through medical outreach programs, providing eye tests, glasses, and medication to help improve their quality of life. At the same time, I’ve empowered young people within my community. The icing on the cake? I organized the biggest Beauty Festival in Africa, where I trained 3,000 fans across different masterclasses, and on top of that, I broke two Guinness World Records in one day! The first African to break two records in one day All of these within a span of 7 years. Now I ask you: when your bastard mother of a thousand fathers was my age what did she achieve??

TACHA🔱🇬🇭 🇳🇬

1,355,423 次观看 • 4 个月前

What does it take to go from absolute zero to beating the world’s best on the global stage? Zhang Xue has the answer. Born in 1987 in a remote mountain village in Hunan, his parents separated when he was young. How did a boy raised in a leaky mud house with almost nothing survive? He dropped out of junior high at 14 and became a motorcycle repair apprentice — the only thing that ever made sense to him. At 17, he opened his own tiny repair shop. How do you build a future when you start with nothing but grease on your hands and pure determination? At 19, he saw a TV crew filming nearby. What would you do if this was your one shot at something bigger? He chased their van 100 kilometers through pouring rain on an old bike, covered head to toe in mud, shouting for them to film his wheelies and jumps. They put him on television. A racing team saw his raw passion and gave him a chance. He turned pro rider and mechanic. Through many crashes, he mastered engines like few others ever have. In 2013, at age 26, he arrived in Chongqing with only 20,000 RMB in his pocket. Could a village dropout really make it in the motorcycle capital of China? He started modifying bikes and selling them online. Success came fast. By 2017, he co-founded Kaiyue Moto and scaled it from 800 bikes a year to 30,000. But when investors wanted easy profits, he asked himself: Do I settle for quick money, or chase real high-performance engineering? In March 2024, he walked away with nothing but his name and his vision. What kind of courage does it take to start over from zero — again? One month later, he launched ZXMOTO, his own name proudly on the tank. It was everything he had. In 2025, the first 500RR launched and sales exploded, reaching 750 million RMB while still investing heavily in quality. In 2026, the powerful 820RR triple arrived, followed by major funding at a 1.09 billion valuation. Then came March 28-29 in Portimão, Portugal. Could a new Chinese brand really challenge the big factory teams in WorldSSP racing? His French rider delivered back-to-back victories on the 820RR-RS, beating established international teams by nearly four seconds. For the first time, a Chinese motorcycle brand stood on the top of a World Superbike podium. The Chinese flag rose. The national anthem played. At just 38 years old, Zhang Xue — junior high dropout, former village mechanic — has proven that the underdog story is still possible. Now compare this to Elon Musk, who grew up with wealth, received excellent education, and built his companies with substantial support from government and military contracts. Zhang Xue started with nothing. No safety net. No elite schooling. Only decades of hands-on skill, relentless drive, and unbreakable belief. Same intense ambition — completely different beginnings. What does true self-made success look like? This is it. Respect to every established brand in the industry. But this run deserves to be remembered. The underdog spirit is alive.

Angelo Giuliano 🇨🇭🇮🇹

44,146 次观看 • 4 个月前

Rory McIlroy said it, but no one is paying attention, especially those from major golf organizations and the PGA Tour board At the Valero Texas Open pre-tournament Wednesday interview Rory McIlroy said: “It will be really interesting to see how the major championship numbers fare compared to the other bigger events because there’s an argument to be made if the numbers are better and you’ve got all the best players in the world playing, then there’s an argument to say ‘OK, we need to get this thing back together.’ “But on the flip side, if the numbers aren’t as good, it’s an argument to still say we need to put everyone back together because people are losing interest in the game even if they don’t want to tune in to the four major championships.” The Masters final round ratings came out today and there is a reported 20% drop in TV viewership from last year’s final round. Earlier in the week ESPN reported that it had its largest two-day average (3.4 million viewers) for the first and second rounds of The Masters tournament since 2018. Coincidentally the first-round leader of the tournament was @b_dechambeau , Tiger Woods was back and playing decent (the first two rounds) and world #1 Scottie Scheffler was one shot back from DeChambeau. At the end of the second round DeChambeau was tied for the lead with Scheffler, and Tiger Woods made the cut. No wonder ESPN had good viewership numbers for the first two rounds. A LIV Golf player was tied for the lead with world number #1 Scottie Scheffler after the second round and Tiger Woods made his 24th consecutive cut in The Masters, a record for major championships. Then everything went downhill from there. At the end of the third round DeChambeau had faded to 5th place, 4 shots behind the leader Scheffler and at that point everyone had Scheffler as the tournament winner, which he won on Sunday. Scheffler played wonderful golf and dominated the last round of the tournament, he won by 4 shots over a PGA Tour player playing in his first ever major championship and 7 strokes over a group of Tour veterans. LIV Golf players Cam Smith and DeChambeau finished in a tie for 6th place, 9 shots back of the winner. The tournament was decided early in the final round, there were no back nine roars, and no one really threatened Scheffler’s lead. In the past when Tiger Woods had those dominant tournaments the TV ratings did not suffer. On the contrary, sometimes they increased. There are four factors for the drop in TV ratings: 1. The lack of charismatic players at the top of that leaderboard, starting with the eventual winner Scottie Scheffler and followed by a Tour rookie with a wonderful game but not much personality. Scheffler is playing the best golf in the world and is the undisputed world #1 but as we say in Spanish, he is a “huevo sin sal” (a boiled egg without salt), his game is awesome, but even with all the push from the golf establishment he doesn’t have the charisma or the “star power” of a Woods, McIlroy or DeChambeau to name a few. 2. All the analysts gave the tournament to Scheffler at the start of the week and once he had the solo lead after the third round it was over for the viewers. They had been hearing all week that Scheffler was going to win it, and the golf media did not really push anyone else. 3. The lack of LIV golfers within close distance of Scheffler like it happened on the first two rounds, and CBS not showing much of those LIV players closer to the lead on Sunday. Four LIV players finished in the top 12 but LIV Golf fans saw little of them on TV. CBS ignored the LIV fans while ESPN was showing plenty of LIV players since Wednesday’s par 3 contest, big mistake by CBS! 4. Golf is divided! Like Rory said, “we need to put everyone back together because people are losing interest in the game.” That losing interest translates to 20% less on the PGA Tour and now 20% less on the final round of a major that is considered the biggest draw. Just a couple of weeks ago the women’s college National Basketball Championship game had almost twice as many viewers as The Masters final round. Now they will try to spin the bad ratings numbers with streaming app numbers, but we have been hearing for three years that streaming numbers does not count. For them, suddenly, streaming numbers are valuable! What the major golf organizations should do is stop the pettiness, move the egos to the side, ACCEPT that your industry is being disrupted (it was there for the taking, but you guys were asleep on the wheel), listen to what McIlroy and Jon Rahm Rodriguez have to say, and instead of dividing it further, get together in a room and solve this problem at ONCE (not in a year or two to see what happens or to wait for other investments like the TGL to get off the ground), do it for the good of the game! A lot has been said about the players greed and the money talks, but the major golf organizations and its leaders (Ridley, Tiger, Whan, Waugh, Slumbers, Kinnings, Monahan/Herlihy, et al.) are the greediest and most power hungry of them all, and are doing a disservice to the game of golf.

JCAGOLFReport

974,941 次观看 • 2 年前

‼️🚨🔵 PRESSER 🔵🚨‼️ 🎙 Liam Rosenior’s Full Pre-Arsenal Press Conference 🌀 Liam Rosenior on squad rotation & not having a “best XI” ⚙️ “I can’t speak for other managers in terms of myself. I don’t have a best XI. I never have done in all of the clubs that I’ve worked with. Why? Because of the demands — the physical demands of the Premier League, Ligue 1 or the Championship now with 46 games. You need a squad, and you need to use the players in the correct way to challenge over the course of the season. I’ve been here three and a half weeks, I’m still getting to know the players. I try to pick the right starting team, but I also try to pick a bench that gives us the right finishing team. So far, the substitutes in every game have made a huge impact. That’s not just tactical — a big part of that is mentality.” 🧠💪 🌀 Liam Rosenior on Estevão ❤️ “He is going through a really difficult time for personal reasons. I won’t put any pressure on him when he returns. It has to be right for him.” 🌀 Liam Rosenior on facing Arsenal ⚔️ “The reality is Arsenal are favourites. They’re a goal up and they’re at home, so they’ll expect to go through. We need to take it as far and as deep as we can, then hopefully the second half of the tie will be massive in terms of turning it around.” 🌀 Liam Rosenior on Jamie Gittens’ injury 🚑 “Jamie unfortunately felt his hamstring. I don’t yet know the extent of the injury. It’s a real shame because I wanted to give him a start and allow him to show what he can do. Hopefully it’s not too bad.” 🌀 Liam Rosenior on Chelsea’s mentality in big games 🔥 “They can play in big games and they can perform in big games — and it is definitely a big game on Tuesday.” 🌀 Liam Rosenior on focus & preparation 🧊 “Talking about what Arsenal or Mikel Arteta have or haven’t done isn’t my concern. My concern is resting and recovering. It’s another three-game week. It’s going to be a very physical game on Tuesday, and my job is to prepare the team as best I can.” 🌀 Liam Rosenior on Arsenal’s recent nerves 😌 “We’ll see. We’ll see. We’ll go and play our game.” 🌀 Liam Rosenior on experience within his squad 🏆 “When I look at my players — Enzo Fernandez has won a World Cup, and the group won two trophies last year. They can play in big games, they can perform in big games. Tuesday is definitely a big game.” 🌀 Liam Rosenior on Enzo Fernández 🧠⚡ “He’s fit. You see him arriving in the box in the 92nd, 93rd minute. Enzo has a rare athleticism — a gift — where he recovers very quickly. His distances covered are top from a data point of view, and the quality and leadership he brings to the team is huge. I’m really enjoying working with him.” 🌀 Liam Rosenior on Mamadou Sarr 🤝 “I don’t speak about players who are at other clubs. It’s something I’ve never done, and I won’t start today.” 🌀 Liam Rosenior on pressure & proving himself 🎯 “I’ll be really honest — all this talk about proof of whether I’m right for the job or not, I don’t really care. I’m here to do the job. If we get to the final, it’s great for Chelsea Football Club. It’s not about me. I’ll prove in time whether I’m worthy or not, but it’s not at the forefront of my mind.”

Miki Djan

72,283 次观看 • 6 个月前

The “great” Iran Nuclear Deal by Obama that President Trump HAMMERED from the start. Anyone who posts: “I did not vote for this,” you’re ignorant. EOs do NOT require Legislation. National Emergencies have an automatic 2 year termination clause. To continue NEs, it requires: Pen, Paper, and President. Executive Order 12170, by Jimmy Carter, declared a National Emergency with IRAN in 1979. Why is the OLDEST National Emergency in place with IRAN? Why did the bureaucrats on both sides keep continuing this every 2 years and never dealt with for 37 years? Why did the bureaucrats allow Iran to build Nuclear Facilities for 37 years? "Biden" had “Democratic control of the House and Senate” from 2021—2023... Yet continued 8 EOs with 8 National Emergencies by PDJT that would've automatically terminated in 2 years by Law? All of which are: Deporting Illegal Migrants Enforcing DOGE Froze assets of funding PRC Taking back the Panama Canal Eliminating Stock and Trader fraud Combatting all forms of Human Rights Abuse Eliminating Lawfare and Election Interference Destroying Big Pharma, Opioids and Illicit Drugs Combatting all forms of Trafficking And: Ending foreign wars declared in EOs with National Emergencies from 1979 to 2016. Obama declared the National Emergency with Yemen in an Executive Order in 2012 that was continued every 2 years by Congress to PDJT. Why would “Biden” and Dems listen to PDJT speeches what he was going to do in 2025—2029, yet keep those active to enforce, without skipping a beat, starting Jan. 20, 2025? The War Order was introduced in the Democratic controlled House on Dec. 20, 2019, under PDJT. A DEMOCRATIC controlled House introduced the War Order under PDJT. The past 9 years all outline: 👉🏻 Special Operations, Unconventional and Irregular Warfare. 👉🏻 Military Occupation, and Continuity of Government. 👉🏻 Government in Exile and Puppet State. BIPARTISAN with MULTIPLE World Leaders. PDJT is the FIRST President to create a Strategic Plan for Subterranean Warfare = Underground/Tunnels. Iran and Israel Operations are outlined in our Army Publications in 2019. 4 Ways Military pairs with Federal Laws: Executive Orders, National Emergencies, Proclamations, Treaties. Presidential Emergency Action Documents part of a Continuity of Government Plan. PEADs are PRE-PLANNED and expand Power of the President and are Executive Orders, National Emergencies, Proclamations, Treaties. The COG was invoked in EO 13961, Dec. 7, 2020. If “Biden” was president, he’d had same power as every other, so, why not revoke the EO on Jan. 20, 2021, versus let it run from Dec. 7, 2020, to Jan. 19, 2025, to the last full day of presidency? PARTIALLY revoked = STILL in COG. What are the odds COG is found in Joint Operation 3.0 dated Jan. 17, 2017, and the new Federal Continuity Directive 1 was issued Jan. 17, 2017? And the same odds that Joint Planning 5.0 dated June 16, 2017, following the issue of Federal Continuity Directive 2 issued June 13, 2017, designed to support Joint Operation 3.0? When you have unequivocal proof of a COG... You have unequivocal proof of PEADs. PDT issues a NSPM-2 in 2017 with Order of Succession. “Biden” "renewed" the NSPM-2 but did NOT have an OoS = continuing COG. PDT issues a 2nd NSPM-2 in 2025 with OoS. The NSPM-2 OoS is SPECIFICALLY for a: COG. The OoS starting with Sec of State is also for COG. Every other Pres. had an OoS in the Dept of DEF and a National Security Strategy since their origin, except "Biden." The most RECENT OoS in the Dept of DEF is from EO 13963, Dec. 10, 2020, found in DoDI 3020.26, "DoD Continuity Policy," June 4, 2024. COG for Dept of DEF. Current was 83.7%. Obama said 3.67%. Obama said 6,104 centrifuges. Current 14,000 in Fordow. The Deal = no enrichment at all in Fordow. Current Enrichment was 83.7% from 3.67%? Obama lied. 🔥💩 PDT is terminating the EOs and NEs by SWAMP. Yes, yes you did vote for this morons. 🫡♟️🇺🇸

Derek Johnson

197,902 次观看 • 1 年前

After working with Nick shirley in San Francisco, LA and Sacramento, my account is really starting to get a lot of new followers... I am humbled and very grateful for all the love and support 🇺🇸 Allow me to reintroduce myself to y'all 🌎🌍🌏 Hello, my name is Darren Stallcup and long story short my house burned down to the ground when I was a kid and I started hitchhiking North, East, South and West across the country. Ended up in an Eskimo Village on the arctic ocean. Now I'm back home fighting the good fight in San Francisco. The Far Left Lion's Den. Imagine, if you would be so kind, the pressure of being a Republican in San Francisco... For the last four five six seven eight nine ten years, every single day has been a brutal tooth and nail uphill battle for every inch just to survive in what was once (and still can be) one of the most beautiful cities in the world. San Francisco, The Paris Of The West. I’ve walked these blocks day and night as a citizen journalist, shining a light on the chaos. Between 2019 and 2026, 5,000+ have **** from fentanyl in just San Francisco alone. Numbers released by health officials are not accurate. Coroner's office sure as hell can't keep up with all the bodies much less identify them. For many moons I went to sleep to the sounds of people screaming on the streets below and EVERY morning without would awake to emergency sirens. I’ve volunteered at churches and shelters, raised awareness about the dangers of fentanyl, defended families and tourists from violent drugged out lunatics, stopped more than one restaurant robberies, guarded our last few remaining grocery stores from hordes of thieves for over 200+ nights, I have spent countless days helping the less fortunate struggling on our streets, handing out food, clothing, blankets, ponchos, winter jackets and other personal hygine kits.... because talk is cheap but real action in the frontline trenches actually saves lives. Yeah, I’ve been in the field and I am a real frontline trenches leader. I’ve stood up and spoken truth at City Hall, on national stages and even international television, refusing to back down no matter how loud the opposition gets. When China President Xi came to San Francisco, I was passed the ball and I made sure America knew the truth: Our city only gets cleaned up for communists and the super bowl. This fight isn’t pretty or cool. Many people consider my work to be cringe or gross. I guess it's not a trend to care about your fellow human beings slowly rotting away on the sidewalk... And it takes a toll on my body. I do have PTSD. I do have survivors guilt. I have lost family and friends on the streets of San Francisco. I do sometimes suffer from anxiety and depression. I can't sleep at night. Any small noise and I immeadiatly jump. That's how many times I have woken up to my door getting kicked in and fighting off burglars. Healing doesn't happen over night and it will take generations for our city to recover from the damage done by these corrupt and incompetent far left leaders who have enabled chaos for fiannical gain. These organizations, non-profits and NGOs who support these leftist politicans also just so happen to be benefiting from the suffering of the less fortunate on the streets. That's not an accident. We are on the 20th year anniversary of Gavin Newsom's 10 year plan to solve homelessness in California... Billions of dollars later and the situation is worse than ever before. Not the first billions of dollars wasted by these leftists... Look at that high speed train between LA and SF. What a pipe dream that was... Maybe someday when I am 99 years old and can barely walk California will finally get that train... Of course, here in upside down world California, every day feels like an episode from the twilight zone. The good guys have become the bad guys and the bad guys have become the good guys. I have been attacked, harassed, doxxed, followed home, gangstalked and everything else underneath the sun. These leftists are violent and have no respect for our country and anybody that dare love America, they go after them. It's been It's exhausting and someday they might take me out but until that day comes I refuse to surrender San Francisco to the far left. If you are sick and tired of the same old damn broken system here in California, know that there are warriors like me still in the arena, fighting for real change with everything we got. We The People must stand tall together and take our cities back. My Message To America: Keep fighting the good fight and never give up hope. One small act truly does have the power to change the world. Be that change. #WorldPeace

Darren Stallcup - World Peace Movement

105,681 次观看 • 4 个月前

🚨 ANDREW TATE ARRESTED IN MIAMI: UK CPS JUST AUTHORIZED A WAVE OF NEW CHARGES But This Is What Happens When One Man Becomes Too Powerful Exposing the Left’s Lies Andrew and Tristan Tate were arrested July 18 in Miami by US Marshals on a UK extradition warrant. The Crown Prosecution Service just announced they’re prosecuting additional charges on top of the existing ones — including seven more counts of rape for Andrew, multiple new trafficking facilitation counts, assaults, and 19 charges involving indecent images of a child and extreme pornography. Alleged offences dating back years, now involving seven claimed victims. The brothers deny every single allegation and have always maintained they are innocent. No convictions. This is the latest chapter in a years-long legal war. But it didn’t come from nowhere. It came because Andrew Tate became one of the most powerful voices on the planet by telling young men the truth the left never wanted them to hear. Born in 1986 in Washington DC to a legendary chess master father and British mother, raised in the UK, Tate first made his name as a multiple-time world kickboxing champion. He exploded into public view on Big Brother UK in 2016 before a video surfaced (which he has always said was consensual adult activity). That’s when the real empire began. He built his power the old-fashioned way — through raw, unapologetic content that cut straight through the noise. Luxury cars, private jets, cigars, discipline, and brutal honesty about masculinity, money, and modern society. He launched Hustler’s University (now The Real World) and The War Room, teaching men how to escape wage slavery, build wealth online, get in shape, and stop being simps. Tens of thousands joined. Billions of views followed. Even after Big Tech banned him from almost every platform for “hate speech,” the clips spread everywhere. When Elon Musk bought X and reinstated him, his reach went nuclear. Why did the left come after him so hard? Because Tate was against everything they push. He called modern feminism a cancer that destroys families and turns women into victims while emasculating men. He said men and women are different by nature — men lead, protect, and provide; women nurture the home and family. He told young men to reject degeneracy, build themselves into high-value men, and stop apologizing for being masculine. He called out the Matrix — the system of lies that keeps people weak, broke, and obedient. He supported Trump, criticized globalists, and said the West is dying because it abandoned tradition, God, and real manhood. Millions of lost young men listened, got in the gym, started businesses, and woke up. That kind of influence terrifies the establishment. And then there was Romania. In 2017 Tate and his brother moved to Bucharest and built their life and businesses there. He was blunt about why: the West, especially the UK, had become a feminist hellhole where any woman could destroy a man’s life with an accusation at any time. In a now-deleted video he said this was “probably 40% of the reason” he left — “I’m not a fucking rapist, but I like the idea of just being able to do what I want. I like being free.” He praised Romania as more based and traditional, with stronger morality, less woke brainwashing, and a system that didn’t automatically side with accusers to destroy men. He said the West had turned men into slaves to political correctness and false claims while Romania still had real freedom for a man to live on his terms. He built his empire there while continuing to red-pill the world. That’s real power. Not bought with donations or handed out by elites — earned by speaking directly to what millions of young men felt but were told never to say. He filled the void the left created with their war on masculinity, fatherless homes, and anti-male propaganda in schools. Now the machine is at it again with fresh charges and an arrest in the US. Tate and his brother say it’s all lies and lawfare

ⁿᵉʷˢ Barron Trump 🇺🇸

91,635 次观看 • 1 个月前

In Remembrance of Dorothy Malone. Born | January 29, 1924 in Chicago, Illinois, USA. Died | January 19, 2018 aged 93 in Dallas, Texas, USA. Video | Humphrey Bogart as Philip Marlowe and Dorothy Malone as Acme Bookstore proprietress in the classic film noir, The Big Sleep (1946), directed by Howard Hawks. The blonde, sultry, dreamy-eyed beauty of Dorothy Malone, who was born Mary Maloney in Chicago, took some time before it made an impact with American film-going audiences. But once she did, she played it for all it was worth in her one chance Academy Award-winning “bad girl” performance, a role quite unlike the classy and strait-laced lady herself. Raised in Dallas, she was one of five children born to an accountant father and housewife mother. Two older sisters died of polio. Attending Ursuline Convent and Highland Park High School, she was quite popular (as “School Favourite”). She was also a noted female athlete while there and won several awards for swimming and horseback riding. Following graduation, she studied at Southern Methodist University with the intent of becoming a nurse, but a role in the college play “Starbound” happened to catch the eye of an RKO talent scout and she was offered a Hollywood contract. The lovely brunette started off in typical RKO starlet mode with acting/singing/dancing/diction lessons and bit parts (billed as Dorothy Maloney) in such films as the Frank Sinatra musicals Higher and Higher (1943) and Step Lively (1944), a couple of the mystery “Falcon” entries and a showier role in Show Business (1944) with Eddie Cantor and George Murphy. RKO lost interest, however, after the two-year contract was up. Warner Bros., however, stepped up to the plate and offered the actress a contract. Now billed as Dorothy Malone, her third film offering with the studio finally injected some adrenaline into her floundering young career, when she earned the small role of a seductive book clerk in the Bogart/Bacall classic The Big Sleep (1946). Critics and audiences took notice of her captivating little part. As a reward, the studio nudged her up the billing ladder with more visible roles in Two Guys from Texas (1948), Romance on the High Seas (1948), South of St. Louis (1949) and Colorado Territory (1949), with the westerns showing off her equestrian prowess if not her acting ability. Despite this positive movement, Warner Bros. did not extend Dorothy's contract in 1949 and she returned willingly back to her tight-knit family in her native Dallas. Taking a steadier job with an insurance agency, she happened to attend a work-related convention in New York City and grew fascinated with the big city. Deciding to recommit to her acting career, she moved to the Big Apple and studied at the American Theatre Wing. In between her studies, she managed to find work on TV, which spurred freelancing “B” movie offers in the routine form of Saddle Legion (1951), The Bushwhackers (1951), the Martin & Lewis romp Scared Stiff (1953), Law and Order (1953), Jack Slade (1953), Pushover (1954) and Private Hell 36 (1954). Things picked up noticeably once Dorothy went platinum blonde, which seemed to emphasise her overt and sensual beauty. First off was as a sister to Doris Day in Young at Heart (1954), a musical remake of Four Daughters (1938), back at Warner Bros. She garnered even better attention when she appeared in the war picture Battle Cry (1955), in which she shared torrid love scenes with film's newest heartthrob Tab Hunter, and continued the momentum with the reliable westerns Five Guns West (1955) and Tall Man Riding (1955) but not with melodramatic romantic dud Sincerely Yours (1955) which tried to sell to the audiences a heterosexual Liberace. By this time she had signed with Universal. Following a few more westerns for good measure (At Gunpoint (1955), Tension at Table Rock (1956) and Pillars of the Sky (1956), Dorothy won the scenery-chewing role of wild, nymphomaniac Marylee Hadley in the Douglas Sirk soap opera Written on the Wind (1956) co-starring Rock Hudson, Lauren Bacall and Robert Stack. Stack and Malone had the showier roles and completely out-shined the two leads, both earning supporting Oscar nominations in the process. Stack lost in his category but Dorothy nabbed the trophy for her splendidly trampy, boozed-up Southern belle which was highlighted by her writhing mambo dance. Unfortunately, Dorothy's long spell of mediocre filming did not end with all the hoopla she received for Written on the Wind (1956). The Tarnished Angels (1957), which reunited Malone with Hudson and Stack faltered, and Quantez (1957) with Fred MacMurray was just another run-of-the-mill western. Two major film challenges might have changed things with Man of a Thousand Faces (1957) as the unsympathetic first wife of James Cagney's Lon Chaney Sr, and as alcoholic actress Diana Barrymore in the biographic melodrama Too Much, Too Soon (1958). Cagney, however, overshadowed everyone in the first and the second was fatally watered down by the Production Code committee. To compensate, Dorothy, at age 35 in 1959, finally was married ― to playboy actor Jacques Bergerac (Ginger Rogers's ex-husband). A daughter, Mimi, was born the following year. Fewer film offers, which included Warlock (1959) and The Last Voyage (1960), came her way as Dorothy focused more on family life. While a second daughter, Diane, was born in 1962, the turbulent marriage wouldn't last and their divorce became final in December 1964. A bitter custody battle ensued with Dorothy eventually winning primary custody. It took the small screen to rejuvenate Dorothy's career in the mid-1960s when she earned top billing of TV's first prime time soap opera Peyton Place (1964). Dorothy, starring in Lana Turner's 1957 film role of Constance MacKenzie, found herself in a smash hit. The run wasn't entirely happy however. Doctors discovered blood clots on her lungs which required major surgery and she almost died. Lola Albright filled in until she was able to return. Just as bad, the significance of her role dwindled with time and 20th Century-Fox finally wrote her and co-star Tim O'Connor off the show in 1968. Dorothy filed a breach of contract lawsuit which ended in an out-of-court settlement. Her life on- and off-camera did not improve. Dorothy's second marriage to stockbroker Robert Tomarkin in 1969 would last only three months, and a third to businessman Charles Huston Bell managed about three years. Now-matronly roles in the films Winter Kills (1979), Vortex (1982), The Being (1981) and Descanse en piezas (1987), were few and far between a few TV-movies ― which included some “Peyton Place” revivals, did nothing to advance her career. Malone returned and settled for good back in her native Dallas, returning to Hollywood only on occasion. Dorothy's last film was a cameo in the popular thriller Basic Instinct (1992) as a friend to Sharon Stone. She will be remembered as one of those Hollywood stars who proved she had the talent but somehow got the short end of the stick when it came to quality films offered. She retired to Texas and died in Dallas shortly before her 94th birthday on January 19, 2018.

Hollywood Golden Age of Cinema

22,629 次观看 • 7 个月前

The US spent decades trying to break John D. Rockefeller, and the day it finally won, it turned him into the most powerful man in history. At his peak, his fortune was worth close to 2% of the entire American economy. He got there by taking control of 90% of all the oil in America, the one resource the entire economy ran on. And right now a small group of companies controls AI, search, and the cloud, and Washington is once again talking about breaking them apart. Rockefeller already ran this exact "experiment" a hundred years ago. Here's how it ended and what it tells us about the current AI situation: He started with a single oil refinery in Cleveland in the 1860s, and within about 20 years he had swallowed almost the entire industry. When people finally figured out how he did it, the country was horrified. Everyone assumes Rockefeller won because he made cheaper oil. But what he actually did was turn the railroads into a weapon against everyone else. Rockefeller shipped more oil than anyone in the country, so he squeezed the railroads for secret discounts on every barrel he moved. Then he took it somewhere nobody else dared... He cut a deal called a drawback: - Every time a competitor shipped a barrel of oil, the railroad charged them full price - Then the railroad handed a slice of that payment straight to Rockefeller - His rivals were paying a fee that funded the man trying to destroy them - And most of them had no idea it was even happening That deal lived inside a scheme called the South Improvement Company in 1872. When word leaked, the public outrage was so loud the railroads scrapped it within weeks. But it did not matter. Rockefeller had already used the threat. In a matter of weeks in 1872, he pressured 23 refiners in Cleveland into selling out to him. Historians still call it the Cleveland Massacre. After that, his playbook barely changed. He would slash his prices in a town until the local refiner went bankrupt, buy the wreckage for pennies, then push the prices right back up. Refiner by refiner, city by city, he took the entire industry. Then a journalist named Ida Tarbell went after him: Her own father had been one of the small oilmen Rockefeller crushed. Starting in 1902, she published an investigation in McClure's magazine that laid out every rebate, every drawback, and every dirty tactic in brutal detail. For the first time, the public saw exactly how the empire had been built. And the government finally moved. In 1911, the Supreme Court ruled that Standard Oil was an illegal monopoly and ordered it broken into 34 separate companies. It was supposed to be the end of him. But the breakup made Rockefeller richer than he had EVER been. He still owned a giant stake in every one of those 34 new companies. Set free to compete in their own regions, the pieces were suddenly worth more apart than they had ever been together. The value of his holdings roughly DOUBLED. By 1916, John D. Rockefeller became the first billionaire in history. The government had spent years trying to strip him of his power, and the punishment handed him the biggest fortune the world had ever seen. And those 34 companies never went away either. They grew into Exxon, Chevron, Mobil, and Amoco, the core of what we now call Big Oil. Exxon alone is worth more than $600 billion today. Standard Oil did not actually die in 1911. Its pieces just kept getting bigger. Which brings us back to now: The government wants to run it all over again, this time against the companies that own AI. They already convinced a judge that Google runs an illegal monopoly over search, and it has pushed to carve the company apart. Amazon, Apple, and Meta are each fighting antitrust cases of their own. Everyone assumes a breakup would finally cut these giants down to size. History says the opposite tends to happen. When you shatter a monopoly, the founders and the big shareholders do not lose a thing. They walk away owning a slice of every company that falls out of it. Each of those pieces gets set loose to grow in its own lane, and the market re-prices them one by one. The parts almost always end up worth more than the whole ever was. Rockefeller's fortune doubled after 1911. Then it happened AGAIN... In 1984, the government broke AT&T into seven Baby Bells to end the phone monopoly. Within about 20 years, those pieces had merged back into two giants, AT&T and Verizon, that now pull in more than $260 billion a year between them and dominate the market all over again. Investors who simply held the pieces saw their stake climb more than 600% in the years that followed. So when you hear that Washington is coming for the companies that own AI, remember what happened the last two times. The monopoly did not die. It split into pieces, the pieces got bigger, and the people who owned them got richer.

Ricardo

50,143 次观看 • 1 个月前

One of the claims I address in my new book, Israel on Trial, is the allegation that Israel has committed genocide. Genocide has a clear legal definition. It means that a country, not individual soldiers, a country has the specific intent to destroy an entire people in whole or in part as such, because they are that people, by killing their members or because of their racial, religious, or ethnic origins. The proponents of the genocide claim have to show that the Israeli government had the specific intent to wipe out the Palestinians of Gaza because they are Palestinians, not because there's Hamas fighters embedded within them, not because they're trying to release the hostages. That's why when you read, for example, the briefing book that the legal team from South Africa submitted at the International Court of Justice, there's no mention of Hamas really. There's barely a mention of October 7th. There's no hostages. It's a fictional world in which there are no hostages, there was no October 7th, there is no Hamas, and there's just Israeli war planes and an innocent civilian population. That starts to look a lot more like genocide if you remove all of the essential elements that are the reality on the ground. How do we begin to analyze this question? The first is historically. We know for example from the Nuremberg trials that this argument that Hamas and its supporters are advancing was already rejected by the original people who tried the original war crimes trial at Nuremberg. The German defense team wanted to advance the defense that you shouldn't be too angry with our people, and you shouldn't think that the prosecution has any moral right to be prosecuting and trying our defendants, because the pilots who were flying over Dresden and Berlin and Tokyo and Hiroshima are equally guilty of these war crimes. And the Nuremberg trials resoundingly rejected that theory and said, "You're not guilty of these war crimes when you're fighting a war of existential survival against a genocidal regime in a war that is defensive in origin, that you didn't start, and never wanted and frankly never expected." But it's much more than that. Israel has fought the most precise, and in some respects the most humane, urban warfare conflict the world has ever seen. And you don't have to take my word for it. Take the HLMG, the High Level Military Group. The HLMG is a collection of high-level officers and generals from almost every Western army in the world. Not Jews. Not Mossad agents. These are generals from America, from Canada, from New Zealand, who all went to Gaza, went to Israel, looked at the evidence, looked at Israel's strike packages, realized that Israel is fighting a war that is essentially run by lawyers. This doesn't appear in the newspapers, but as I can tell you when I lead these judges' trips to Israel, Israel is fighting an almost preposterously Jewish war, where all of the calls of strikes that are not emergent are made by lawyers in the field. This is a reality that must be understood. Israel has a corps of military advocate generals. They're called MAGs. Think about our JAGs, for example, and many of our judges were JAGs, and so the context and the contrast is stark. Military advocate generals are deployed in the field with the commanders all over Gaza and on the Gazan border, and one of the things that you should remember about the military advocate generals isn't just their deployment. It's also that their advice is not precatory. So in the United States, a JAG says to a commander, "You shouldn't strike. That's my advice." But the commander can always override the strike because the advice is precatory. In Israel, the MAG's advice is not precatory. It's mandatory. It's an order that must be followed. Of course, if the commander disagrees, there's a whole appellate mechanism that goes to senior commanders that ultimately could end up in front of an IDF judge. I mean, this is the ridiculously legalistic way in which these Jews fight these wars. And frankly, we have seen, as judges, dozens and dozens and dozens of videos where this plays out in real time. Videos, which somehow don't make it into The New York Times, where pilots are in their planes or flying their drones over clear Hamas targets— terrorists shooting out of a mosque or out of a hospital or out of a UN car. Yes, that happens in Gaza every single day. And the pilot says, "I'm ready to fire." And then something amazing happens, something our American JAG officers are like, "What is happening here?" A nerdy Jewish lawyer comes over the air, the airwave and says, "Hey, what's that 50 yards away on the top right of the screen? Scan over to the top right of the screen." And it's two children playing soccer or three women holding a loaf of bread having a conversation. And instantly it's "Strike canceled. Strike canceled. Strike canceled." Over and over again in Gaza and in Lebanon, legitimate strikes on legitimate military targets that almost any other Western army in the world would take are canceled by Israeli lawyers, international law scholars, because of a concern for the preservation of innocent Palestinian civilian life.

Roy K. Altman

125,400 次观看 • 2 个月前

As we reach the end of the clusterf*ck that is the first month of Mad King Don’s rule. The hard right believe the 2 years of preparation by the Heritage Foundation on their ‘Mandate for Leadership’ (Project 2025) has paid off. They arrived in office ready to burn government to the ground and the Democrat’s answer? Chuck Schumer dad dancing and chanting ‘We will win’. No chuck YOU F*CKING LOST BIGLY. You lost the White House, the House and the Senate and more significantly the popular vote. This is no longer about Republicans and Democrats, this is about the Trump Party and Democrats. In this new political world, traditional Dem political thinking is completely irrelevant. However, Dems persist with the same old same old, which is shocking to me. It’s as if they think ‘We can deal with it at the next election’. Wake the f*ck up! NOTHING and I mean NOTHING will ever be the same again nobody is coming to save you. Democrats can blame their election loss on ‘stupid ignorant voters’ all day every day. They can say, ‘It’s their fault, we tried to warn them and they took no notice’. I’ve forgotten how many times I’ve read this on social media. It is both arrogant and utterly delusional. Democrats FAILED the American people. It really is as simple as that. I was part of that failure and I’m happy to own it, however uncomfortable that might feel. Dems have to understand what went wrong and learn from the mistakes made. Finding anyone in Democratic leadership to admit fault, is like trying to find rocking horse shit. They were still having a mocha flat white made with Peruvian goat’s milk, while Elon was skinning and gutting the government, terminating tens of thousands of federal jobs and cutting hundreds of vital services that their base can’t survive without. There should have been a Dem war room stood up immediately after the election loss, to prepare for what they surely knew what was to come. Let’s be Crystal clear. Dems spent over a billion dollars on a campaign in which they got their ass handed them on a plate by a convicted criminal and adjudicated rapist. Take a moment to think about that, then tell me it’s the voter’s fault, because that’s what they’re saying. It’s lamentable when your message is ‘The other guy is a fascist, vote for me’, oh and ‘we’re for abortion’. Trump didn’t win this election, Dems handed it to him gift wrapped with a big red bow. This was born of a failure to use the midterms to transition from a man who had been a transformative president, to the next generation of Dem leaders. It’s almost embarrassing the depth of political talent in the Democrat party right now. Yet hubris got in the way and handed America to Trump. They didn’t learn a thing from 2016. Everybody loves an underdog, especially a reality TV underdog. In 2020, given Trump’s catastrophic handling of the COVID pandemic, Dems should have won in a landslide. There should have been no opportunity for Trump to question the election, because the win should have been too big to even entertain challenging the result. There was absolutely no recognition of that by Dem leadership. They were just happy they won. Big mistake. In 2022 the backlash from the overturning of Roe v Wade halted Republicans to the point where the red wave never materialised. From this point on, abortion rights became the flagship of the Dem platform, to the exclusion of EVERYTHING including immigration which was unbelievably stupid. They failed to articulate the phenomenal economy Biden had rebuilt, preferring to focus instead on ‘the other guy is a fascist’ argument. More important, the focus was on the middle class not the working class. After just one month of Mad King Don, it will take a generation to recover from the catastrophic damage he has caused. Without leadership, the American people are adrift in an ocean of lies and despair, excluding MAGAs of course who are cheering themselves into economic slavery while smashing themselves in the face daily.

𝔗𝔯𝔲𝔱𝔥 𝔐𝔞𝔱𝔱𝔢𝔯𝔰

193,256 次观看 • 1 年前

Former medical coder/whistleblower Zowe Smith describes waking up to the "vaccine" fraud: "[The] lab where I worked... everybody was saying... you get the flu from the flu shot... [then] when [the Covid jabs] came out, people were having strokes and encephalitis and blood clots like I've never seen before... [And] they were getting Covid-19 immediately after getting the shot." This clip of Smith (Zowe Smith), who is also the author of The COVID Code: My Life in the Thrill Kill Medical Cult, is taken from an interview with David Knight (David Knight Show LIVE 9am EST, M-F) posted to Rumble on November 13, 2025. -----------------Partial transcription of clip-------------- "I started to wake up during really, when they started declaring two weeks to flatten the curve, and I started seeing people wearing masks in public. I knew this was not a pandemic, and there was something, some kind of psychological operation going on because I had worked in the hospital for the swine flu scare, and it wasn't a thing in the hospital. It was just regular flu. I've even talked to, people that were on the front lines, like ER doctors and nurses, and they said— Some of them even said that they got it, and it wasn't that big of a deal. "When they declared Covid, I was really suspicious. This is just going to be another vaccination campaign because they already had mandates for the flu shot for health care workers for, like, a decade before that. And I had been doing the exemption every year. And the reason I did that is because the first year that they made health care workers get the flu shot, everybody was getting the flu. And so that was the year that we came up with the— It was just a rumor within the university lab where I worked, but everybody was saying it, that you get the flu from the flu shot. "Ever since then, I just didn't want to do it. So during that whole year of Operation Warp Speed, the only thing that's going to get us back to normal is this vaccine. I thought this— If the flu shot never worked, the chances that the COVID shot is going to work is slim to nil. And the amount of pressure for this one compared to the flu shot is astronomical. So there's something to it. So that made me actually not just look at the COVID shot, but look at all the other vaccines. "What I learned was they don't teach coders or doctors or nurses anything about vaccine side effects or adverse effects, despite the fact that they have, codes to assign for vaccine effects. But I would see patients come in with, like, Guillain Barre before this, and the doctors would try very hard not to relate it to a vaccine. "There would be codes in there, like adverse effect of flu shot or adverse effect of whatever. And those are supposed to be, like a safety signal code, like one of the reasons why the ICD10 system, which is owned by the WHO, by the way, so every. Every member state that is part of the WHO has to report these codes. And it's for statistical monitoring purposes. "This is how they monitor pandemics. This is how they monitor cancer, like how many cases of cancer there are throughout the world, or heart problems or pneumonia cases. This is the system that they use. And it's also supposed to be used, starting in clinical trials for devices and drugs to look for a safety signal. So I thought with this COVID-19 vaccine, there should be a code for adverse effect of this shot, and it should be my job to assign it. "I did my due diligence and I looked into all the warnings and what could happen if people got the shot. And then I looked at what could happen if people got the other vaccines. And I started to realize that they had been burying all of the effects that people would get from vaccines and not assigning these adverse effect codes up until 2020. "Then when the COVID-19 vaccine came out, there was no code to report it. So it should have been my job to collect that danger signal. And I even went on a podcast called Deborah Gets Red Pilled, was just a radio show, in early 2021, right after I quit my job. And I said the COVID-19 vaccine is more dangerous than all of the other vaccines combined. And that was with my— That was just an observation, but it was 10 years of medical coding experience and then learning what I learned about vaccine side effects and all the cases that I saw of children in the ER constantly having eczema or rashes or even anaphylactic responses. And then I look at the record, they just got a vaccine, but the doctor's not connecting the two. "So when COVID-19 came out, people were having strokes and encephalitis and blood clots like I've never seen before. Myocarditis. They were getting COVID-19 immediately after getting the shot, like the same day or the next day, and then being hospitalized. There are people with paralytic problems, seizure disorders, blood disorders, where they couldn't even figure out what was going on because the patient was clotting and bleeding at the same time and they didn't even know how to treat it. Crazy stuff started happening just in the first four months of the vaccine rollout."

Sense Receptor

25,813 次观看 • 9 个月前

If you ever wondered what level of desperation the british press is at when it comes to seeing Prince William acknowledge Harry publicly, look no further than how they are salivating and extrapolating at a simple mention of the name "Harry" by William🤭🤦🏽‍♀️ In a new trailer for his Homeward documentary which will air this Wednesday on ITV, Prince William mentioned how his mother inspired his work on homelessness saying: "My mother took me to the Passage, she took Harry and I both there. I'd never been to anything like that before and I was a bit anxious as to what to expect"🔥 "My mother went about her usual part of making everyone feel relaxed and having a joke with everyone...I remember having some good conversation, playing chess and chatting. You meet people, like I did then, who put a different perspective in your head."❤️ A beautiful quote that has now been hijacked by the press who latched onto the name "harry" mentioned publicly for the first time in 6 years. And now an olive tree somewhere seem to have lost a branch🤡 And now the ex royal butler is on TV wondering how long they have been facetiming behind doors🤡 Soon, we will hear how Harry has moved to adelaide cottage with W&C🤡 What is very interesting here, is how effective William's silence has been. By refusing to engage in any sort of way in the drama, William has starved both H&m and the british press of the drama they craved😏 The question here is Why would William airbrush Harry out of his past? He has proven he does not hold any grudge against Harry. In fact, we saw that He still has pictures of him and harry is still the brother who went to the homeless charity with Diana and William. That is an actual fact. So it would be extremely small to airbrush Harry out of a story that involved him. It is rather Harry who is small and petty and who wiped William out of Invictus when William helped set it up and was involved in more pertinent ways than Harry, simply out of Jealousy🤷🏽‍♀️ However, the Homeward Doc is not about Harry but rather about contextualising how Diana influenced BOTH of her sons toward being sensitive to Homelessness. Yet, out of both sons, ONLY WILLIAM decided to do something about it🔥 THAT is the big reveal here. Diana exposed both sons but Only one was impacted enough and cared enough to decide to make a difference toward Homelessness❤️ This is the work that the documentary will highlight. Not any brotherly relationship or olive branch or facetiming between H and W🤡 A rather interesting highlight was learning how George, Charlotte and Louis are already aware of the problem of homelessness the UK faces. Prince William introduced the topic saying that when he was younger and Diana took his brother and him on school runs, he would wonder about the homeless on the streets: "When you are that small, you are just curious and trying to work out what's going on," "You ask the question 'why are they sitting there?' My mother would talk to us a bit about why they were there and it definitely made a really big impact."❤️ Indeed, it made a big impact enough to galvanise him into working with the homeless charity for 19 years and today, creating housing and a rehabilitation system, supported by local agencies, to help solve the issue🥺 In 1993, his mother introduced him to a cause he will carry in life. Today, 31 years later and a father himself, it is William's turn to teach his children about who the people sleeping on the side of the streets are: "The first few times I thought 'do I bring this up or should I wait to see if they notice? Sure enough, they did. They were sort of in silence when I said what was going on."🔥 Our first teachers in life are our Parents. Children look up to parents for guidance in life. Thus, It is reassuring to know that W&C are raising well balanced children taught to show care and compassion to others and above all, to help and serve the british public❤️☕️ 📹ITVx

Canellecitadelle

104,953 次观看 • 1 年前

From Creator to Founder: The Rollercoaster Journey of Building Chatter Social Man, what a journey it’s been so far. Four years ago, I was just another creator, spending late nights on Clubhouse during the height of the pandemic. Like so many others, I was searching for connection, for community, for something meaningful. But what I found there wasn’t just connection—it was purpose. Alongside my brother, Jonathan Bing, we built a nightly show that reached over 5 million people. Imagine that: 5 million lives touched by conversations that felt real and unfiltered, all on a platform that at its peak had 10 million monthly active users. Clubhouse was magic. But then the decline began. Watching the platform struggle, I couldn’t help but reflect: what made it great? What went wrong? And what could the future look like if we did things differently? The Spark of Chatter As a content creator, I understood the needs of both creators and users. I knew what excited people, what kept them engaged, and what made them leave. Clubhouse had tapped into something special, but it had missed the mark on scalability and sustainability. By September 2023, I couldn’t stop thinking about the potential for something new—something that brought back the magic of real-time interaction but made it scalable, engaging, and sticky. And so, I set out to build Chatter Social. But I wasn’t a tech founder. I didn’t have a background in software development or a network of Silicon Valley insiders. What I did have was determination and the belief that if I could bring the right people together, we could build something extraordinary. Building the Team The journey to build Chatter started with assembling a team. Through my network from my days on Clubhouse, I found Samir, my first CTO. He believed in the vision and was instrumental in getting the project off the ground. Shortly after, I connected with Tyler, our Head of Design, whose creativity brought life to our ideas. A developer joined us soon after, and we were off to the races. By the end of 2023, Samir had to step away due to other commitments, and we promoted the developer to CTO. At the same time, I brought on Banko, a Sony music executive, as our CMO. Banko’s connections led to one of our biggest early wins: landing Davido, a global superstar, as an owner-ambassador. To this day, I still marvel at the fact that Davido believed in our vision when all we had were Tyler’s Figma designs. From Dream to Reality Early 2024 was a whirlwind. We hired Yurii and Vasyl, two developers from Ukraine who brought incredible skill and dedication to the team. Vasyl, in particular, stood out as a leader and has since earned an equity position in the company. But despite these wins, we were facing growing pains. Our new CTO struggled to meet deadlines, and as a result, I found myself constantly pushing back the launch date. What started as a January release turned into February, then March, then April, then May. By then, people on Twitter Spaces—where I had been hyping up the platform—started doubting if we even had a product. Launch and Lessons June 1, 2024, marked a turning point. It was the day my son Noah was born and the day we launched Chatter in private beta. We started with just 40 users, but by the end of the month, we had grown to 1,000. The engagement was unbelievable. Users loved it, even though we had launched with just one feature: live rooms. This represented less than 20% of what we had planned, but it was enough to show that we were onto something big. In July, we launched our public beta on the App Store as an invite-only platform. Within 48 hours, Chatter ranked as a top 30 social app in over 30 countries. But our invite system throttled access, and most users couldn’t get in. While engagement metrics soared for those inside, our AWS costs exploded. In August, our AWS bill hit $10,000. By September, it had climbed to $15,000, and we were drowning in bugs and glitches. The breaking point came when our CTO became unresponsive, often disappearing during critical moments. Users were dropping off, frustrated by the issues, developers were confused and the team was also growing increasingly frustrated, I made the tough decision to let him go. A New Beginning Enter Horane, a long-time user of Chatter who had been with us since private beta. He was the first to discover some of the most innovative use cases for the platform and had a deep passion for its potential. After meeting him in person at a Chatter event, I knew he was the right person to step into the CTO role. When Horane took over, we discovered just how bad the situation was. Key areas of the codebase were locked, and there were no separate environments for development and production. Every fix seemed to break something else. But through sheer determination and countless 18-hour days, Horane stabilized the platform. Today, Chatter is far from perfect, but it’s stable. The bugs that plagued us have been reduced to moderate issues, and our core users—those who stuck with us through the chaos—are still engaged on the platform. Looking Ahead: Chatter V2 While the platform is stable now, we’ve shifted our focus to Chatter V2. This is where the magic really begins. V2 isn’t just an improvement; it’s a complete reimagining of the platform. It includes all the features we couldn’t release in V1 because we were too busy putting out fires. Imagine this: Chatter V1, with only one live feature, was incredibly sticky. Now think about what happens when we release a fully loaded platform with all the innovative features we’ve been working on behind the scenes. The possibilities are endless. V2 is slated to hit TestFlight by the end of December, with a public release in January 2025. And this time, we’re ready—not just with the product but with the lessons we’ve learned. The Hard Lessons This journey has taught me more than I ever thought possible: 1) Your Team is Everything: The right people can make or break your vision. Finding people who believe in your mission is just as important as finding people with the right skills. 2) Adaptability is Key: As a non-technical founder, I had to learn about development, DevOps, and product management on the fly. Challenges will push you to grow, whether you’re ready or not. 3) Trust the Process: Every setback, every delay, every bug—it all taught us something. Without those lessons, we wouldn’t be building the incredible V2 product we are today. 4) Resilience is Non-Negotiable: From technical disasters to predatory investors who tried to exploit my desperation, I’ve had to fight for this vision every step of the way. What’s Next December is shaping up to be an exciting month. We have some amazing events planned on the platform to close out the year, bringing our core community together as we prepare for the V2 launch. When V2 drops, it will mark a new era for Chatter. This isn’t just a social audio platform or a social audiovisual platform. Chatter is all about interactive experiences—making social media social again in ways that are truly unique. The public launch is slated for February 2025, and for the first time, we’ll have the marketing dollars to tell the world about Chatter. Our core community has been our biggest cheerleaders, and I can’t wait to see how the world reacts when they experience what we’ve built. Final Thoughts This has been the hardest year of my life, but also the most rewarding. To other founders, or anyone thinking about starting a company: know this—it will test you in ways you can’t imagine. You’ll face betrayal, doubt, and moments where you feel like giving up. But if you believe in your vision and refuse to quit, you’ll find a way forward. Thank you to everyone who has supported me, my team, and Chatter. We’re just getting started. Let’s talk about it. 🚀 If this story inspired you, please like and share it so others can learn from my experiences. The journey is far from over, but I’m more excited than ever for what’s to come.

Nelson Epega

43,485 次观看 • 1 年前

Tuesday - Louis CK Louie is 58 now but moves like he's 85. He's got the darkest thickest under-eye bags I've ever seen, they're even apparent from below. He will not make it to 70 and if he does he will be so physically repulsive he won't even have to tell jokes any more — which is a shame because in my opinion he's the greatest living stand up by far. I am sick and tired of pretending there's any competition in this genre. This was the THIRD time I had heard him do this set, which barely cracks his top ten hours, and I was laughing my ass off the entire time. EVEN WITH THIS LOUD DRUNK BITCH BESIDE ME.. it made me realize how formulaic Shane Gillis and every other big up-and-comer feels in comparison right now, like they're all rolling off a conveyor belt at the comedy factory where you take a PREMISE, add a PUNCHLINE, and a CALL BACK, with THREE TAGS, and mechanically deploy this stuff over and over with no real through-line or heart in it at all. Louie is relentlessly personal and so his sets evolve with him. I saw him for the first time last year in Indianapolis, and was "severely disappointed." He seemed stilted, nervous, coasting on absurdist buzzword shit tailored for drunken simpletons. He'd say "Vagina" with no context and these hicks would lose their minds. I drove 4 hours to see him that day and couldn’t believe how empty his material was. Jokes that could’ve been written by anybody. There was one prick of personal truth — when he talked about putting his Dad away in a Home. He's been writing about his absentee father his whole life. It’s obviously a great source of anxiety and frustration. So it's no surprise that he leaned in to that thread, sharpened it over the course of the tour, and now the whole set circles around this theme of aging: "All my fat friends are dead. If you have a friend that's older than 50 you should say goodbye." Says big tall egg-shaped Louie, who looks like two Carlins combined. My date was way too drunk to appreciate the occasion. We were in front row seats at the Hollywood Bowl. She bought them for us at dinner, 1 hour before. Different Asian girl from Monday. She had never been to a stand up show in her life, and so she didn't really "get" comedy, and she wouldn't stop fucking talking. Pulling her phone out and texting God knows who. The security guy whose job it was to prevent me from climbing on stage and whipping my cock out had to reprimand her: "Please put your phone away" in the middle of the set. I could not believe it. We're here in the front row beneath the GOAT and he's KILLING, in a stadium of 20,000, and you're texting on your god damn phone? Who? Who could it be? It was a homeless guy from reddit. Not me, a different homeless guy. At one point she actually asked if she could step out and do some blow. I said are you kidding? There's like 10 minutes left, just shut the fuck up and enjoy it. I'm starting to worry that females can't appreciate stand up like I can. Overall rating: 9/10. He’s probably gonna die soon but for now he’s still got it. Mark Normand tonight, Dave Chappelle Thursday, Mulaney Friday.

Worst Boyfriend Ever

817,929 次观看 • 3 个月前

Listening to people complain about the Tesla Robotaxi rollout reminds me of that scene in Idiocracy where President Camacho promises everyone that Not Sure (Ashok) is going to fix all the country's problems, and do it all in one week. It turns out that the economy is collapsing because people have been watering the crops with Gatorade instead of water. They switch back to water, but by the time the week is over Not Sure is fighting for his life roman gladiator style in a giant colosseum. Then people realize that the crops actually *are* growing with the water, and his life is saved just in time. I remember a time when the Tesla community was a powerful force in pushing back against naysayers. When a chorus of haters and short sellers said "Model 3 production is too slow. They will never reach 5,000 a week. They will never reach profitability" it was the Tesla community that pushed back and said they believed in the company. And sure enough the company did eventually scale up Model 3 and Y, did eventually hit profitability, and did eventually hit their targets even if they missed them a few times first. The Tesla community saw that because they understood the company in a way the naysayers didn't. Now, many of those some people have become the naysayers. I can't blame them completely. A lot of the people who understood EVs and the auto industry very well are left scratching their head trying to understand AI, autonomy, and robotaxis. You've got a bunch of options traders who are not AI experts but bought options that are expiring now, hoping Robotaxi would have scaled further. Just like the people in Idiocracy they have good reason to be upset — they're hungry, and the crops aren't growing. But just like the naysayers were wrong about Tesla being unable to scale the Model 3 & Y, today's naysayers couldn't be more wrong about Tesla being unable to scale Robotaxi. At this point they have hundreds of fully driverless cars registered in 6 cities. This is the first time this has ever been done with pure computer vision. How many announcements and signs of progress can you dismiss before you finally admit what is happening? This is not a linear thing. The first step in deploying Robotaxis is to put a few on the road and see how they work. And no, it's not just going to be perfect out of the box on the first day. There are going to be issues you couldn't forsee, unique problems in new areas, and improvements to be made. But once you can do 200 driverless cars safely, it doesn't take much more to scale to 1,000 and beyond. Just look at last week in Texas where we went from 100 to 175 cars registered in a 24 hour period. The number increased slowly, then all at once in one big jump. That is how exponential growth works. If you're looking at the initial growth and trying to extrapolate that out linearly, you're going to be way off. It feels like everyone is so focused on Elon not solving everything in one week like he promised that they're missing the fact that it is actually working. The crops actually are starting to grow. How are people not seeing the progress of FSD 14.3.6, FSD 14 lite, and all the new cities Robotaxi is entering? Remember when driving a car with pure vision, without LIDAR or Radar, was supposed to be impossible? That's the magic of Elon Musk. He takes what is supposed to be impossible — a reusable spaceship, generalized self-driving cars at scale — and makes what's supposed to be impossible feel like it's actually late. When he starts on a project, they say it can never be done. By the time he finishes, people are asking why they didn't finish it faster. Say what you will, but the Tesla team is absolutely executing right now. They are killing it. I can't be the only one that sees the signs. Everything I've seen tells me that they are going to scale this. As they add more training compute, as the data set grows larger, as the fleet crosses 10 million cars, as they ship FSD 15 and their AI5 and AI6 chips, the cars are just going to keep getting smarter and smarter. The capabilities of these autonomous vehicles are already starting to cross into the realm of superhuman, and they're not stopping there. If you want to point out every stumble, every missed deadline, every limitation in the current Robotaxi service, that's your prerogative. You have the right to say whatever you want. But I think that as we look back on this time, these people are going to look extremely dumb in hindsight. When autonomous vehicles blanket the globe, we'll ask how people didn't see it earlier as the service expanded into 7 markets. This company has nearly 10 million cars on the road. More than 12 billion FSD miles have been driven around the globe. And international expansion is just starting. This is the company that developed Cybercab to be as dead simple as possible. To not require any paint. They built a vehicle that can truly bring generalized autonomy to the masses around the world. I can't believe how many people are unable to see it. Based on everything I'm seeing, I've never had more conviction that this technology is going to change the world. AI is beginning to reach out of our computer and into the physical world, and Tesla has a central role to play in making that a reality.

Whole Mars Catalog

96,272 次观看 • 1 个月前

I've become a missionary with one message. Every time I meet a young person, the same words: have children, get married, build a family. I did not decide on this calling. It overtook me. And it overtook me for a single reason. I had no idea. I genuinely did not understand how much joy, how much meaning, how much sheer beauty pours out of a child until I was holding one of my own and felt the floor of my life drop into something deeper than I knew was there. I grew up white, affluent, secular, comfortable, and insulated. That world does not put babies in front of you. None of my friends were starting families. Out of my whole circle, almost no one has a big one. We were not formed by the presence of children. We were formed by their absence, by the strange quiet of homes built for two careers and no cradle. And a person believes what his world shows him. So we believed. What we believed was a lie. It is a lie with an author, and that the author is the enemy of joy himself. It is the gospel of the world, and its commandment is wait. Wait until you are older. Wait until the career is built and the savings are stacked and the twenties are properly spent. Enjoy your freedom. You are not ready. It does not arrive sounding like temptation. It arrives sounding like wisdom, like prudence, like the responsible thing, and that is exactly why it works. The most effective lies are the ones that wear the face of virtue. And the maddening thing is that it collapses from every angle at once. It is not rooted in biology, because the body is made for this work precisely in the years we are told to postpone it. The flesh keeps a calendar the culture pretends not to see. And it is not rooted in theology either. You will not find this deferral anywhere in the Christian imagination, in any of the fathers, in any of the scriptures. So choose whatever lens you like. Take the cold secular measure or the ancient sacred one. By either light the counsel is rotten. It is bad for the body and bad for the soul and bad for the society downstream of both. This is why I have come to see it as one of the central tragedies of my generation. Every age carries its own wound. The Great Depression was a depression of bread, a scarcity in the world of matter, hunger you could measure. Ours is a depression of a different order. It is a famine of the spirit in the middle of abundance. We have more than any people who ever lived and we are starving in a way our ancestors would not recognize, because the thing we are refusing cannot be bought and cannot be banked. The ones most made to give and receive this love are quietly declining it. They are walking away from the one inheritance that actually compounds, and the cruelest part is that they do not feel the loss as loss. You cannot grieve what you were taught not to want. That is the deepest cut of it. The lie does not only steal the thing. It steals the capacity to know the thing was stolen. A man can spend his whole life on the far side of a door he never knew was a door, mistaking the wall for the edge of the world. Because this beauty is not ordinary beauty. It is not the pleasure of a good meal or a clear morning. It is participation in something that comes down from above, the same generative love that spoke everything out of nothing and called it good. To make a person, to be undone and remade by loving that person more than your own life, is to be drawn for a moment inside the very act that holds the cosmos together. A child does not merely add to your life. A child reorders the soul. It teaches you what you are by asking everything of you, and you discover, kneeling there exhausted at three in the morning, that you had a capacity for self gift you never suspected, a depth in yourself you had no other way to reach. In the Gospel of John, on the last night, Jesus prays, these things I have spoken to you that my joy may be in you, and that your joy may be complete. And I have come to understand why family is the road into that fullness, why it is not one path among many but the one most fitted to the shape of the promise. Consider who is praying. Christ does not come to us as a lone figure dropped out of the sky. He comes out of a family older than the world, the eternal communion of Father and Son, the love between them so total and so alive that theologians dared to call it a third person. Before there was anything, there was a family. The deepest fact about reality is not a force or a law or a void. It is a household. It is begetting and being begotten, giving and receiving, a Father who is only a Father because there is a Son. So when Jesus speaks of joy made complete, he is not pointing away from family toward something higher. He is pointing toward the very thing he came from, the life he has known from eternity and came to share. His joy is the joy of belonging utterly to a Father and pouring himself out for those he loves. When you marry, when you bring a child into the world, when you wear yourself down in the small unseen labors of a home, you are not stepping outside that divine life. You are stepping into a small image of it. Your family is a created echo of an uncreated one. The love you give your child rhymes with the love the Father has for the Son. The exhaustion, the tenderness, the way a parent would tear the sky open to protect a sleeping infant, all of it is the heavens pressed faintly into flesh, the eternal household leaving its fingerprint on yours. That is why the joy is not merely added to family but completed in it. We were made in the image of a God who is, at his very root, relation and gift and generation. To found a family is to do the most Godlike thing a creature can do, to participate from below in the begetting that God does from all eternity. Your home becomes a window. Through it, dimly and imperfectly, you glimpse the country you came from and are going to. And now a word for the young people reading this, the ones who do not yet have children. I want to tell you what it is like from where I stand. When I am out somewhere, a restaurant, anywhere, and a large family comes through the door, the noise and the chaos and the small bodies of them, something happens in me on two levels at once. The first is joy. A pure gladness at the sight, the way you feel watching something good and alive. But underneath it, almost in the same instant, a sadness reaches up and takes hold of my heart. Because I know now, at my age, after my own years of waiting, that I will never have that. I will never know the particular fruit of a family that large, the fullness of that table, the weight of all those lives gathered under one roof. The door to it has quietly closed, and I felt it close. And I am telling you plainly, because I love you and have no reason to lie to you: you will feel this too. You will. The day will come when you see what you passed up, and you will recognize the ache for what it is, and it will be too late to answer it. So please, learn from a man who got it wrong. Let my regret be worth something by becoming your wisdom. Do not wait yourself into a grief you cannot undo. Choose now, while the door is open, so that you may step into a joy that does not end.

Kirk Rollins

77,958 次观看 • 2 个月前

is our AI project to make computing feel more human L A N D E R Here are the 4 best demo videos of the magic of DATA in action. DATA is a personalized assistant who knows and remembers every conversation you have with it accross your iPhone, Mac, iPad, Watch, Texts, Emails, and HomePods. You can talk to DATA right in your AirPods or text it just like a person. DATA can read, write, understand, speak any language, and translate between them. It can help with real work and home life tasks like research, writing, scheduling, reminders, and triage. And it's easily customizable so you can have DATA automatically do whatever you want whenever you want with just a few taps and natural language instructions - no code required. DATA can do just about anything you can do on your phone on your behalf automatically including very advanced things Siri can't, like summarizing, analyzing, and drafting replies or writing documents. It can read web pages, texts or emails you show it, or PDFs of any kind. It can do other real world tasks that require complex analysis and common sense too, like: - figure out where the nearest beach is (even when you're in Colorado) and instantly fetch the current surf report up to the current minute. - summarize and drafting replies to entire email chains - plan out entire work projects or multi-day vacations on your calendar - sketch out ideas for you in picture form or drafting Notion pages with charts and graphs. DATA can also use its own judgement to determine when to run an action or not, even if you've scheduled it, allowing you to make VERY complex automations that require many different inputs to make a decision, like for example: - only opening the blinds on your lunch break if it's sunny out and you're working from home. DATA works natively and easily with Apple HomeKit & other shortcuts. DATA can also take initiative and check in with you throughout the day by voice or text and proactively send messages to you and others on your behalf based on your personal and professional goals, current tasks, and calendar. DATA can integrate with many apps on your phone, and is compatible with multiple large AI language models. I've gotten to make a few demo videos that I think really capture how powerful DATA can be for every day life. Here they are all in one tweet. Make sure your sound is on as you watch them. 1. This is the first demo video I ever made from April 19th, 2023. It walks through all the ways you can interact with and use the DATA shortcuts. Everything from saying "Hey Siri" to tapping on custom apps on your home-screen. 2. The second demo video was made May 5 and is an example use case I made of how commands work - commands allow DATA to actually run actions on your phone like taking pictures and sending messages. This demo shows me taking a picture of an email template, and data drafting an email based on that template. It's gotten much better at realizing when it has just run a command and incorporating that information naturally into the conversation now, especially on GPT-4. 3. This third Commands video, May 12 is a walkthrough of ALL the phone functions that commands allow DATA to do: sending texts and emails, making pictures, seeing pictures, reading things, and scheduling events. Since this video we've added auto-replies to texts and emails, summarizing documents, writing documents, health app data retrieval, web surfing, scheduling alarms, making playlists, and more. 4. This last demo I made today, June 15, shows everything DATA does working in concert to generate a crazy detailed morning briefing with background music - including making a unique playlist and giving a detailed analysis of current events complete with Ski & Surf conditions near me other live information from the internet. So now that you've seen everything DATA can do, what's the coolest feature? What features should we add? What would you use DATA for first?

steve

640,176 次观看 • 3 年前

I Built a 37.0 Profit Factor Bot by Cracking Every TradingView Source Code tradingview is a gold mine hiding in plain sight and i just found the master key to unlock every single secret hidden within its community scripts. most traders spend their entire lives staring at candles and hoping for a miracle while the actual alpha is buried in the open source code that nobody bothers to look at. i used to be that guy who sat there getting liquidated at three in the morning because i thought i could outplay the market with my gut feeling and some drawings on a screen. it turns out that the game is completely rigged against you if you are trading manually but there is a specific way to flip the script. i am going to show you how to stop guessing and start knowing exactly what works across every possible market condition before you ever risk a single dollar. i spent years losing money and thousands on developers because i thought i was not smart enough to code the systems myself but i was wrong. the first step to cracking the market is realizing that every indicator on the super charts has a source code section that is completely open to the public. you can literally scroll through the community scripts and pull the exact logic for thousands of different strategies that people claim are the holy grail of trading. but the secret is not just having the code because most of these indicators are actually garbage that will blow your account up in a week. this is where the real loop opens because you need a way to test these ideas across twenty five different data sets in seconds rather than months. i use a custom setup with ai agents specifically a sub agent i call the backtest architect to handle the heavy lifting of turning pine script into python code. the goal is to create a factory where you can feed in a raw indicator and get back a full report on its expectancy and profit factor without lifting a finger. most people find one strategy and marry it for life but a real data dog knows that you have to iterate to success or you will get left behind. i am running eighty one different backtests right now because i know that ninety percent of what i find will be trash but that remaining ten percent is where the wealth is made. the backtest architect knows exactly how to structure the folders and data paths so that we are testing everything from the base indicator to complex versions with filters. you might think that popular tools like fibonacci or order blocks are the way to go because everyone on social media talks about them like they are law. but when i actually ran the numbers through the machine the results were embarrassing and most of those strategies just resulted in negative expectancy. it is a dangerous trap to follow the crowd into a trade just because some guru said a certain level was important when the data shows it is a coin flip at best. the dynamic swing indicator was one of the few that actually held its weight during the recent massive testing sessions we ran. it was pulling in profit factors of over thirty seven with annualized returns that look too good to be true until you see the trade list. we combined it with filters like the adx and the money flow index to see if we could refine the signals and the results were absolutely staggering. when you have a system that can run through forty data sets while you are drinking tea you realize that manual trading is a form of self harm. i realized this after spending hundreds of thousands on apps and devs only to find out that i could just learn to build these bots myself live on the internet. the speed of iteration is the only thing that matters in this game because the faster you can fail the faster you can find the one strategy that actually prints. one of the biggest hurdles i faced was thinking that i needed to be a math genius or a senior engineer to automate my trading systems. the truth is that code is the great equalizer because it allows a regular person to compete with massive hedge funds by using the same logic and speed. i decided to learn everything in public because i wanted people to see the process of losing money with liquidations and then finally finding a path to automation. the reality of the market is that it moves in cycles and what worked yesterday will almost certainly fail tomorrow unless you are constantly testing. that is why i built the agents to automatically look through the results folder and rank the top performers based on a composite score. it takes all the emotion out of the process because i am no longer looking for a reason to enter a trade i am just looking at a csv file that tells me the truth. if you are still drawing lines on a chart and hoping for the best you are basically playing a game of chance against a high speed casino. the transition from a manual trader to a systems builder is the single most important pivot you will ever make in your life. it is not about being right or wrong it is about having a positive expectancy that has been proven across thousands of trades and multiple years of history. i had to fix a few errors in the short selling logic where the agents were getting confused between maximum and minimum values for take profit levels. these tiny bugs are the difference between a winning system and a blown account so you have to be willing to dive into the code and refine the machine. but once the system is tuned and the sub agents are running it becomes a beautiful workflow that functions entirely without your input. we are currently moving through the editors picks and the trending indicators one by one because i want to have a database of every single strategy on the platform. being a data dog means you never stop searching for that edge and you never settle for a strategy that just looks okay on a single chart. you have to demand excellence from your code because the market will not give you a single inch of mercy if you are lazy with your research. the ultimate goal is to have fully automated systems trading for you so you can focus on scaling rather than staring at a screen for ten hours a day. i am already up to over eighty backtests in this single session and i plan on hitting hundreds more by the end of the week. once you realize that you can crack the code of any indicator you see on the internet you will never look at a chart the same way again. this is the power of using agents to bridge the gap between a raw idea and a finished trading bot that actually works in the real world. i am done with getting liquidated and i am done with the stress of over trading because the code handles everything with cold precision. the path to success is paved with data and if you are not willing to automate your process you are just waiting for your next liquidation to happen

Moon Dev

26,010 次观看 • 5 个月前