Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

ในที่สุด Anthony Fauci ก็ยอมรับแล้วว่าได้ลงนามมอบทุนวิจัยให้แก่หัองแล็บอู่ฮั่นในการตัดต่อไวรัสโควิดเพื่อหาวิธีป้องกันล่วงหน้าจนกลายเป็นโรคระบาดครั้งใหญ่ที่เปลี่ยนโฉมหน้าของโลก งานวิจัยในการตัดต่อไวรัสดังกล่าวถูกสั่งห้ามทำมาก่อนหน้านั้นแล้วตั้งแต่สมัยรัฐบาลโอบามา เพราะเกรงว่าจะเกิดอันตรายมากกว่าประโยชน์ แต่ Fauci ไม่ยอมหยุด โดยลักลอบให้ทุนลับๆแก่ห้องแล็บอู่ฮั่นผ่านบริษัทที่ชื่อว่า EcoHealth Alliance ซึ่งห้องแล็บอู่ฮั่นดังกล่าวก็เคยถูกผู้ตรวจสอบวิจารณ์ถึงระบบความปลอดภัยที่หละหลวมมาแล้ว จนในที่สุด เชื้อไวรัสร้ายแรงในสัตว์ที่ผ่านการตัดต่อให้ติดมนุษย์ได้ง่ายขึ้นก็หลุดออกมาจากห้องแล็บ แต่ทางการจีนกับนักวิทยาศาสตร์ขี้ฉ้อจากหลายๆชาติร่วมสุมหัวกันปกปิดเรื่องนี้ โดยการเขียนบทความวิชาการลวงโลกให้คนเชื่อว่าไวรัสดังกล่าวมาจากเนื้อสัตว์ป่าที่ขายในตลาดเมืองอู่ฮั่น และพยายามทำให้เรื่องจริงที่ว่ามันเป็นไวรัสตัดต่อที่หลุดออกมาจากห้องแล็บกลายเป็นทฤษฎีสมคบคิดไปเสีย วันนี้ความจริงปรากฎออกมาแล้ว ไปฟัง Fauci ให้การต่อคณะอนุกรรมสอบสวนที่มาของไวรัสในสภาสหรัฐกันว่า Fauci แก้ตัวยังไง

SleeplessBKK's profile picture

.

45,637 subscribers

2,224,970 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren •via X (Twitter)

Wissenschaft & TechnologieNachrichten & Politik
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

7 Kommentare

Profilbild von สมศักดิ์ เจียม
สมศักดิ์ เจียมvor 2 Jahren

ไม่เห็นมีตรงไหนบอกอย่างที่สรุปมาเลย

Profilbild von หนุ่มใหญ่แต่อยากรู้อยากเห็น
หนุ่มใหญ่แต่อยากรู้อยากเห็นvor 2 Jahren

4) ตอนนี้พยายามโบ้ยความผิดให้ เฟาซีและพรรคพวก และพ่วงจีน+อู่ฮั่นไปด้วย จริงๆที่เขาสงสัยจุดรั่วจุดแรก คือ แล็บชีวนิรภัยระดับ4ของฐานทัพในรัฐแมริแลนด์ แล้วหลังจากนั้นก็มีคนตายจากโรคปอดลึกลับในเมกา เยอะแยะ ตามมาด้วยกีฬาทหารโลก และโรคปอดลึกลับที่อู่ฮั่น จนถูกจับตัวได้ที่ไทย

Profilbild von Kaynes Peterson - 🇹🇭 Gun Right Supporter
Kaynes Peterson - 🇹🇭 Gun Right Supportervor 2 Jahren

เห็นมีคนเขียน Note ว่าในคลิปสั้น Dr.Fauci ไม่ได้พูด แล้วไปอ้างคำให้การหลายปีก่อนของ Fauci มาว่าไม่ได้ทำ จริงๆ มันชัดนะครับว่า NIH ให้ทุนทำ Gain of Function กับ Wuhan และหลายๆที่จริงและมันจบตั้งแต่สัปดาห์ก่อนแล้ว (Fauci เลยโดนเรียกมาเผาสัปดาห์นี้ไง)

Profilbild von 🛜FREQNZi
🛜FREQNZivor 2 Jahren

ในคลิปไม่มีการพูดถึงว่าเป็นรีเสิร์ชเรื่องอะไร เป็นการพูดถึงกระบวนการอนุมัติงบวิจัย ที่บางครั้งจะมีการส่งมาให้ Fauci เซ็นเป็นก้อน ซึ่งเค้ายอมรับว่าบาวครั้งเค้าเซ็นไปโดยไม่ได้ดูรายละเอียดว่าเป็นการวิจัยอะไร เนื่องจากปีๆ นึงมีจำนวนงานวิจัยขออนุมัติหลายพันโครงการ

Profilbild von Syd Cheychin
Syd Cheychinvor 2 Jahren

ไม่อยากจะเชื่อว่านี่คือคำแก้ตัวที่ออกมาจากปากของคนระดับนี้ของอเมริกาค่ะ จะบอกว่าเป็นการอนุมัติแบบ blanket approval กับทุนมากมายหลายทุนแล้วปัดความรับผิดชอบว่ายากลงลึกในรายละเอียดของทุกทุนได้ แหมมขอยืม quote ของ Peter Parker นะคะ Great power comes great responsibility ค่ะท่าน!

Profilbild von pitya nob
pitya nobvor 2 Jahren

งานนี้น่าสนใจว่า ประเทศทั่วโลกจะมีสักกี่ประเทศที่กล้าฟ้องร้องรัฐบาลจีนคอมมิวนิสต์ เพื่อเรียกค่าเสียหาย? จะเป็นเงื่อนไขในการเจรจาทางการค้าระหว่างประเทศหรือไม่?

Profilbild von metaSIAMESE
metaSIAMESEvor 2 Jahren

ในคลิปเขาพูดแค่เรื่องลายเซ็น ซึ่งในฐานะ ผอ. สถาบัน เขาก็บอกว่าเป็นไปไม่ได้ว่าเขาจะอ่านทุกทุนวิจัยโดยละเอียด (หลายพันทุน) แต่เขาเชื่อใจผู้ทรงคุณวุฒิที่ประเมินทุนและให้ผ่าน

Ähnliche Videos

What is the relationship among Anthony Fauci, Peter Daszak and Shi Zhengli? What is EcoHealth Alliance? How much funding did Fauci grant them? What did they do in Wuhan? Remember on April 24, 2020, President Trump terminated Daszak's research funding at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, but Fauci funded a much larger grant to Daszak on August 27, 2020. The whole world was in lockdown for COVID-19. And now Disease X? Are they trying to lock us down again?
2:27

What is the relationship among Anthony Fauci, Peter Daszak and Shi Zhengli? What is EcoHealth Alliance? How much funding did Fauci grant them? What did they do in Wuhan? Remember on April 24, 2020, President Trump terminated Daszak's research funding at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, but Fauci funded a much larger grant to Daszak on August 27, 2020. The whole world was in lockdown for COVID-19. And now Disease X? Are they trying to lock us down again?

NFSC Speaks

16,453 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

🚨 MORENS INDICTED: "This is the beginning of lab leak coverup accountability." Justin Goodman of White Coat Waste says U.S. Department of Justice indictment of David Morens, a former top Fauci adviser, is only "the tip of the iceberg." "He was coordinating with Peter Daszak, EcoHealth Alliance, and Fauci behind the scenes... destroying records, evading FOIA, violating records retention laws." And buried in the indictment? Co-conspirator #1 is believed to be Peter Daszak. NIAID Official #1 is believed to be Anthony Fauci himself. Goodman says Morens' indictment is a step in the right direction, but warns the same Fauci-era network is still embedded inside NIH, with Fauci-era holdovers occupying all 5 deputy director positions under the new administration. "If you want to get Fauci's fingerprints off the NIH and see real reforms, you've got to clean house there." Accountability cannot stop with one indictment.
5:33

🚨 MORENS INDICTED: "This is the beginning of lab leak coverup accountability." Justin Goodman of White Coat Waste says U.S. Department of Justice indictment of David Morens, a former top Fauci adviser, is only "the tip of the iceberg." "He was coordinating with Peter Daszak, EcoHealth Alliance, and Fauci behind the scenes... destroying records, evading FOIA, violating records retention laws." And buried in the indictment? Co-conspirator #1 is believed to be Peter Daszak. NIAID Official #1 is believed to be Anthony Fauci himself. Goodman says Morens' indictment is a step in the right direction, but warns the same Fauci-era network is still embedded inside NIH, with Fauci-era holdovers occupying all 5 deputy director positions under the new administration. "If you want to get Fauci's fingerprints off the NIH and see real reforms, you've got to clean house there." Accountability cannot stop with one indictment.

LindellTV

18,466 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Em junho de 2021, publiquei esta videoreportagem reunindo as evidências de que Anthony Fauci estava manipulando a narrativa sobre a pandemia. O vídeo foi censurado em praticamente todas as plataformas. Naquele momento, falar sobre os e-mails de Anthony Fauci, Wuhan, EcoHealth Alliance, pesquisas de ganho de função, censura nas redes sociais e as contradições da narrativa oficial era suficiente para ter vídeos removidos, alcance reduzido e receber os rótulos de “desinformação” e “negacionismo”. Hoje, os diários pessoais de Anthony Fauci reforçam essas investigações e passaram a integrar oficialmente a investigação conduzida pelo Senado dos Estados Unidos. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. afirma que as anotações revelam profundas contradições entre o que Fauci registrava em privado e o que dizia publicamente. Nesta semana, ele prestará depoimento sob juramento. O que em 2021 era censurado pelas plataformas hoje é investigado oficialmente pelo Senado da maior democracia do Ocidente. Cinco anos depois, com a divulgação dos diários de Fauci e o avanço das investigações nos Estados Unidos, esta reportagem ganha um novo significado.Nada como o tempo… Assista e tire suas próprias conclusões.
8:28

Em junho de 2021, publiquei esta videoreportagem reunindo as evidências de que Anthony Fauci estava manipulando a narrativa sobre a pandemia. O vídeo foi censurado em praticamente todas as plataformas. Naquele momento, falar sobre os e-mails de Anthony Fauci, Wuhan, EcoHealth Alliance, pesquisas de ganho de função, censura nas redes sociais e as contradições da narrativa oficial era suficiente para ter vídeos removidos, alcance reduzido e receber os rótulos de “desinformação” e “negacionismo”. Hoje, os diários pessoais de Anthony Fauci reforçam essas investigações e passaram a integrar oficialmente a investigação conduzida pelo Senado dos Estados Unidos. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. afirma que as anotações revelam profundas contradições entre o que Fauci registrava em privado e o que dizia publicamente. Nesta semana, ele prestará depoimento sob juramento. O que em 2021 era censurado pelas plataformas hoje é investigado oficialmente pelo Senado da maior democracia do Ocidente. Cinco anos depois, com a divulgação dos diários de Fauci e o avanço das investigações nos Estados Unidos, esta reportagem ganha um novo significado.Nada como o tempo… Assista e tire suas próprias conclusões.

Karina Michelin

35,954 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

🔥 FAUCI UNDER INVESTIGATION — THE HOUSE OF CARDS IS FALLING DNI Tulsi Gabbard just confirmed what many have long suspected — a formal probe into Anthony Fauci for perjury and his role in funding gain-of-function experiments at the Wuhan Lab. If her words hold, this isn’t just about COVID’s origin — it’s about accountability for global devastation that may have been U.S.-funded and covered up. Fauci denied it under oath. He smeared anyone who questioned it. Now the evidence trail — EcoHealth Alliance, Daszak, the Wuhan “bat lady” — is closing in. This could be the moment the truth finally breaks through the firewall. No more excuses. Full declassification. Subpoenas for Fauci, Daszak, and every NIH official involved. End gain-of-function — everywhere. The era of lab-made pandemics must end — and those responsible must face justice.
2:59

🔥 FAUCI UNDER INVESTIGATION — THE HOUSE OF CARDS IS FALLING DNI Tulsi Gabbard just confirmed what many have long suspected — a formal probe into Anthony Fauci for perjury and his role in funding gain-of-function experiments at the Wuhan Lab. If her words hold, this isn’t just about COVID’s origin — it’s about accountability for global devastation that may have been U.S.-funded and covered up. Fauci denied it under oath. He smeared anyone who questioned it. Now the evidence trail — EcoHealth Alliance, Daszak, the Wuhan “bat lady” — is closing in. This could be the moment the truth finally breaks through the firewall. No more excuses. Full declassification. Subpoenas for Fauci, Daszak, and every NIH official involved. End gain-of-function — everywhere. The era of lab-made pandemics must end — and those responsible must face justice.

Jim Ferguson

104,351 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

Wuhan Virologist Testifies: Fauci Created COVID as 'Bioweapon to Kill Millions' Bombshell news from China where a senior scientist from the Wuhan Institute of Virology has gone rogue, blown the whistle, and directly implicated Dr. Anthony Fauci in a plot to kill millions of people around the world with a gain-of-function bioweapon. According to Dr. Chao Shan, Fauci's covert alliance with the Chinese Communist Party, and his behind-the-scenes role at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, were part of a chilling depopulation agenda hiding in plain sight. But it gets even worse for Fauci. This episode features direct accounts from multiple high-level whistleblowers - including an insider from EcoHealth Alliance and former intelligence analysts, risking their lives to expose the truth about the man they call the modern Dr. Josef Mengele.
20:21

Wuhan Virologist Testifies: Fauci Created COVID as 'Bioweapon to Kill Millions' Bombshell news from China where a senior scientist from the Wuhan Institute of Virology has gone rogue, blown the whistle, and directly implicated Dr. Anthony Fauci in a plot to kill millions of people around the world with a gain-of-function bioweapon. According to Dr. Chao Shan, Fauci's covert alliance with the Chinese Communist Party, and his behind-the-scenes role at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, were part of a chilling depopulation agenda hiding in plain sight. But it gets even worse for Fauci. This episode features direct accounts from multiple high-level whistleblowers - including an insider from EcoHealth Alliance and former intelligence analysts, risking their lives to expose the truth about the man they call the modern Dr. Josef Mengele.

TPV Sean

151,201 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Joe Rogan and Taylor Sheridan just had a raw conversation about Tulsi Gabbard’s final act as Director of National Intelligence exposing Fauci. ROGAN: “Tulsi Gabbard gave that press conference about Fauci and she talked about how he lied in front of Congress and that he absolutely used American tax funds to fund gain of function research through EcoHealth Alliance and through the Wuhan lab… and you know no one's covering it.” SHERIDAN: “Didn't we all know that already?” ROGAN: “Well, we knew it, but my parents didn't. People that just like just read the newspapers and watch TV, they don't know.” SHERIDAN: “I've never seen anything as flagrantly obvious as COVID coming from the Wuhan lab.” “You've got news anchors keeping a straight face saying it came from the wet market.” ROGAN: “This was a courageous step… calling it out and saying that it came from a lab in Wuhan, China was somehow conflated with racism.” SHERIDAN: “Fauci had attorneys reaching out to Biden's camp the last day when he got the pardon. Geez, it's just a preemptive pardon is nuts.” ROGAN: “By every definition, it's gain of function research. And Fauci is still saying, ‘You do not know what you are talking about.’” “If you read RFK Jr.'s book, The Real Anthony Fauci… he ran this exact same playbook during the AIDS pandemic. The villain is Anthony Fauci.”
5:05

Joe Rogan and Taylor Sheridan just had a raw conversation about Tulsi Gabbard’s final act as Director of National Intelligence exposing Fauci. ROGAN: “Tulsi Gabbard gave that press conference about Fauci and she talked about how he lied in front of Congress and that he absolutely used American tax funds to fund gain of function research through EcoHealth Alliance and through the Wuhan lab… and you know no one's covering it.” SHERIDAN: “Didn't we all know that already?” ROGAN: “Well, we knew it, but my parents didn't. People that just like just read the newspapers and watch TV, they don't know.” SHERIDAN: “I've never seen anything as flagrantly obvious as COVID coming from the Wuhan lab.” “You've got news anchors keeping a straight face saying it came from the wet market.” ROGAN: “This was a courageous step… calling it out and saying that it came from a lab in Wuhan, China was somehow conflated with racism.” SHERIDAN: “Fauci had attorneys reaching out to Biden's camp the last day when he got the pardon. Geez, it's just a preemptive pardon is nuts.” ROGAN: “By every definition, it's gain of function research. And Fauci is still saying, ‘You do not know what you are talking about.’” “If you read RFK Jr.'s book, The Real Anthony Fauci… he ran this exact same playbook during the AIDS pandemic. The villain is Anthony Fauci.”

Defiant Ghost

753,105 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Dr. McCullough Names Four Key Figures Guilty of Crimes Against Humanity 1.) Dr. Anthony Fauci, Former Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID). 2.) Dr. Ralph Baric, Professor at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill 3.) Peter Daszak, President of EcoHealth Alliance. 4.) Dr. Shi Zhengli, leading virologist at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in Wuhan, China.
0:37

Dr. McCullough Names Four Key Figures Guilty of Crimes Against Humanity 1.) Dr. Anthony Fauci, Former Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID). 2.) Dr. Ralph Baric, Professor at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill 3.) Peter Daszak, President of EcoHealth Alliance. 4.) Dr. Shi Zhengli, leading virologist at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in Wuhan, China.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

789,517 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Dr. McCullough Names Four Key Figures Guilty of Crimes Against Humanity 1.) Dr. Anthony Fauci, Former Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID). 2.) Dr. Ralph Baric, Professor at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill 3.) Peter Daszak, President of EcoHealth Alliance. 4.) Dr. Shi Zhengli, leading virologist at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in Wuhan, China. Ryan Cole
0:37

Dr. McCullough Names Four Key Figures Guilty of Crimes Against Humanity 1.) Dr. Anthony Fauci, Former Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID). 2.) Dr. Ralph Baric, Professor at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill 3.) Peter Daszak, President of EcoHealth Alliance. 4.) Dr. Shi Zhengli, leading virologist at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in Wuhan, China. Ryan Cole

Dr Dave Cartland BMedSc MBChB Ex-MRCGP

332,034 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Promethean Action; Monday Update June 22nd 2026 TONY FAUCI'S KILLING FIELD: The Biolab Empire That Took Us From Wuhan to Ukraine Barbara Boyd (Barbara M Boyd) argues that outgoing DNI Tulsi Gabbard’s recent document releases reveal a global, US-funded biolab network centered on Dr. Anthony Fauci, traced back to January 2014—the same start date cited in Joe Biden’s pardons of Hunter Biden and Fauci. She claims Obama’s 2014 gain-of-function ban pushed the research overseas, with NIH funding routed through EcoHealth Alliance to Wuhan, while Pentagon-backed contractors—especially Metabiota—expanded work in Ukraine after the Maidan coup. Boyd highlights a May 2020 Lawrence Livermore assessment describing Wuhan as fitting criteria for an accidental release of an engineered coronavirus, and alleges Fauci steered Biden-era COVID origins reviews toward natural origin while lying to Congress. She links Ukraine lab inventories and broader COVID-era policies to a larger geopolitical and technocratic agenda. 00:00 The Monday Brief - TONY FAUCI'S KILLING FIELD: The Biolab Empire That Took Us From Wuhan to Ukraine - June 22, 2026 02:04 Obama Bans It; Fauci Outsources It 06:03 Tulsi Documents the Biden/Fauci Cover-up 09:44 The Big Picture Source Links in 1st comment
13:33

Promethean Action; Monday Update June 22nd 2026 TONY FAUCI'S KILLING FIELD: The Biolab Empire That Took Us From Wuhan to Ukraine Barbara Boyd (Barbara M Boyd) argues that outgoing DNI Tulsi Gabbard’s recent document releases reveal a global, US-funded biolab network centered on Dr. Anthony Fauci, traced back to January 2014—the same start date cited in Joe Biden’s pardons of Hunter Biden and Fauci. She claims Obama’s 2014 gain-of-function ban pushed the research overseas, with NIH funding routed through EcoHealth Alliance to Wuhan, while Pentagon-backed contractors—especially Metabiota—expanded work in Ukraine after the Maidan coup. Boyd highlights a May 2020 Lawrence Livermore assessment describing Wuhan as fitting criteria for an accidental release of an engineered coronavirus, and alleges Fauci steered Biden-era COVID origins reviews toward natural origin while lying to Congress. She links Ukraine lab inventories and broader COVID-era policies to a larger geopolitical and technocratic agenda. 00:00 The Monday Brief - TONY FAUCI'S KILLING FIELD: The Biolab Empire That Took Us From Wuhan to Ukraine - June 22, 2026 02:04 Obama Bans It; Fauci Outsources It 06:03 Tulsi Documents the Biden/Fauci Cover-up 09:44 The Big Picture Source Links in 1st comment

Dangerous Thoughts

11,083 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

#Fauci scomparso dall’elezione di #Trump”: “La CIA ha condotto simulazioni pandemiche per imporre un sistema totalitario” - Robert F. Kennedy “L’ultimo capitolo del mio libro, The Real Anthony Fauci, elenca una ventina di simulazioni, tutte sponsorizzate dalla CIA”, ha ricordato il prossimo ministro della Sanità di Trump. Ma la “risposta non è stata in termini di salute pubblica”, ciò che si è studiato è stato come imporre un sistema totalitario, come abolire la libertà di espressione”. L'USAID, una copertura per la CIA, ha fornito milioni di dollari alla EcoHealth Alliance del Dr. Peter Daszak, che ha convogliato i fondi al laboratorio di Wuhan. Lì Fauci, che non voleva correre il rischio di violare la Convenzione di Ginevra, stava sviluppando armi biologiche. Comprendiamo meglio perché la CIA ha corrotto i suoi analisti affinché mentissero sull’origine della pandemia. ▶️ Il Covid ha “ucciso milioni di americani, è esattamente ciò per cui è stato progettato”, spiega… l’FBI 👇👇👇
1:11

#Fauci scomparso dall’elezione di #Trump”: “La CIA ha condotto simulazioni pandemiche per imporre un sistema totalitario” - Robert F. Kennedy “L’ultimo capitolo del mio libro, The Real Anthony Fauci, elenca una ventina di simulazioni, tutte sponsorizzate dalla CIA”, ha ricordato il prossimo ministro della Sanità di Trump. Ma la “risposta non è stata in termini di salute pubblica”, ciò che si è studiato è stato come imporre un sistema totalitario, come abolire la libertà di espressione”. L'USAID, una copertura per la CIA, ha fornito milioni di dollari alla EcoHealth Alliance del Dr. Peter Daszak, che ha convogliato i fondi al laboratorio di Wuhan. Lì Fauci, che non voleva correre il rischio di violare la Convenzione di Ginevra, stava sviluppando armi biologiche. Comprendiamo meglio perché la CIA ha corrotto i suoi analisti affinché mentissero sull’origine della pandemia. ▶️ Il Covid ha “ucciso milioni di americani, è esattamente ciò per cui è stato progettato”, spiega… l’FBI 👇👇👇

Sabrina F.

19,642 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

"Think of the damage that was done by the shutdowns." "The U.S. economy to kids' education, I mean, it's fair to argue that a lot of kids have not recovered and may never from being out of school for the length of time Fauci wanted them to be, because he was urging these shutdowns." Brit Hume is right to call Fauci out. We should be seeing a lot more of this in the corporate news media. Dr. Anthony Fauci has revealed himself to be a pathological liar in addition to being a malevolent narcissist. His personal documents show he did not want credit for the shutdowns publicly but he privately took credit for NYC and California shutting down schools. This was the biggest public policy disaster in a generation. In addition, Fauci privately believed the fatality rate from Covid-19 was 0.2%-0.3%, while citing figures in the media that were 10X as high, if not higher. This sparked hot house Covid mania among the psychologically unstable and the medically impaired. This overhyping of the fatality rate was completely reckless, if not absolutely depraved. Let us not overlook that it laid the groundwork for unorthodox, if not unconstitutional, mail-in ballot changes in swing states that mysteriously led to Biden getting "81 million votes." Fauci also admitted early on in his diary entries that the lab leak was likely the origin of SARS-CoV-2, while selling the public the wet market theory. This was clearly done to distance himself from the Wuhan Lab, which was funded through his associates at EcoHealth Alliance. The Covid pandemic response was not just botched due to flawed policies, but because of the malignant aims of a deranged megalomaniac. It is time for that megalomaniac to pay. Fauci for prison.
5:01

"Think of the damage that was done by the shutdowns." "The U.S. economy to kids' education, I mean, it's fair to argue that a lot of kids have not recovered and may never from being out of school for the length of time Fauci wanted them to be, because he was urging these shutdowns." Brit Hume is right to call Fauci out. We should be seeing a lot more of this in the corporate news media. Dr. Anthony Fauci has revealed himself to be a pathological liar in addition to being a malevolent narcissist. His personal documents show he did not want credit for the shutdowns publicly but he privately took credit for NYC and California shutting down schools. This was the biggest public policy disaster in a generation. In addition, Fauci privately believed the fatality rate from Covid-19 was 0.2%-0.3%, while citing figures in the media that were 10X as high, if not higher. This sparked hot house Covid mania among the psychologically unstable and the medically impaired. This overhyping of the fatality rate was completely reckless, if not absolutely depraved. Let us not overlook that it laid the groundwork for unorthodox, if not unconstitutional, mail-in ballot changes in swing states that mysteriously led to Biden getting "81 million votes." Fauci also admitted early on in his diary entries that the lab leak was likely the origin of SARS-CoV-2, while selling the public the wet market theory. This was clearly done to distance himself from the Wuhan Lab, which was funded through his associates at EcoHealth Alliance. The Covid pandemic response was not just botched due to flawed policies, but because of the malignant aims of a deranged megalomaniac. It is time for that megalomaniac to pay. Fauci for prison.

Kyle Becker

19,253 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

🚨 THE MAN WHO COULD UNLOCK THE FAUCI NETWORK For years, the spotlight has been fixed on Anthony Fauci. But investigators may now have something potentially far more valuable: A man from inside Fauci’s own circle who could talk. Dr David Morens wasn't an outsider. He served as a senior adviser inside Fauci’s NIAID. He communicated with Peter Daszak of EcoHealth Alliance. Congress uncovered extraordinary emails concerning private Gmail accounts, FOIA and what Morens himself described as a “secret back channel.” And the relationship went further. When Bill Gates sent Anthony Fauci an unpublished manuscript of How to Prevent the Next Pandemic, Fauci passed it to Morens — who read the entire book and commented on every chapter. That doesn't establish wrongdoing by Gates. But it tells us something important about Morens: ACCESS. TRUST. PROXIMITY. Now Morens is facing serious federal criminal charges and has pleaded not guilty. So I believe prosecutors should be asking a very simple question: WHAT DOES DAVID MORENS KNOW? If Morens possesses evidence concerning misconduct by other people, should prosecutors consider a cooperation agreement in return for truthful, fully corroborated testimony? Who instructed whom? Why were communications allegedly moved away from official government systems? What passed between NIAID and EcoHealth? Who knew? And where could the evidence ultimately lead? This isn't about deciding guilt in advance. It is about doing what investigators are supposed to do: FOLLOW THE EVIDENCE. FOLLOW THE COMMUNICATIONS. FOLLOW THE NETWORK. I lay out the case in this PTC and my accompanying investigation. Senator Rand Paul Senator Ron Johnson I believe David Morens could be one of the most important witnesses in this entire investigation. The question now is whether investigators can get him to talk.
17:26

🚨 THE MAN WHO COULD UNLOCK THE FAUCI NETWORK For years, the spotlight has been fixed on Anthony Fauci. But investigators may now have something potentially far more valuable: A man from inside Fauci’s own circle who could talk. Dr David Morens wasn't an outsider. He served as a senior adviser inside Fauci’s NIAID. He communicated with Peter Daszak of EcoHealth Alliance. Congress uncovered extraordinary emails concerning private Gmail accounts, FOIA and what Morens himself described as a “secret back channel.” And the relationship went further. When Bill Gates sent Anthony Fauci an unpublished manuscript of How to Prevent the Next Pandemic, Fauci passed it to Morens — who read the entire book and commented on every chapter. That doesn't establish wrongdoing by Gates. But it tells us something important about Morens: ACCESS. TRUST. PROXIMITY. Now Morens is facing serious federal criminal charges and has pleaded not guilty. So I believe prosecutors should be asking a very simple question: WHAT DOES DAVID MORENS KNOW? If Morens possesses evidence concerning misconduct by other people, should prosecutors consider a cooperation agreement in return for truthful, fully corroborated testimony? Who instructed whom? Why were communications allegedly moved away from official government systems? What passed between NIAID and EcoHealth? Who knew? And where could the evidence ultimately lead? This isn't about deciding guilt in advance. It is about doing what investigators are supposed to do: FOLLOW THE EVIDENCE. FOLLOW THE COMMUNICATIONS. FOLLOW THE NETWORK. I lay out the case in this PTC and my accompanying investigation. Senator Rand Paul Senator Ron Johnson I believe David Morens could be one of the most important witnesses in this entire investigation. The question now is whether investigators can get him to talk.

Jim Ferguson

57,054 Aufrufe • vor 15 Tagen

RFK Jr. Exposes the Wuhan Cover-Up—How Fauci, the Pentagon, and CIA-Funded Labs Engineered a Global Catastrophe In his explosive new book, Wuhan Cover-Up, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. meticulously documents how Dr. Anthony Fauci, the Pentagon, and a shadowy network of military and intelligence agencies funneled hundreds of millions of dollars into high-risk bioweapons research—under the guise of “public health”—while systematically ignoring warnings of catastrophic lab leaks. The Loophole That Unleashed a Pandemic After the U.S. signed the 1972 Biological Weapons Convention, a critical loophole allowed “dual-use” research—ostensibly for vaccine development—to become a backdoor for bioweapons engineering. The Pentagon, wary of public backlash, outsourced this dangerous work to Fauci, who was handed a 68% raise, making him the highest-paid federal employee in history ($434K/year—more than the President). His budget? A staggering $6.1 billion, plus an additional $1.7 billion annually (now $2.2 billion) for biodefense projects that blurred the line between science and warfare. A Pattern of Recklessness Fauci’s top fundee, Ralph Baric (UNC), received 147 grants—tens of millions of dollars—despite his lab’s history of multiple escapes of deadly pathogens. In 2014, three dangerous viruses leaked from U.S. labs, including smallpox. Over 300 leading bioweapons experts, including Harvard’s Mark Lipsitch, begged Obama to shut down Fauci’s experiments, fearing a lab-made pandemic. Obama issued a cease-and-desist. Fauci defied it. Outsourcing Danger to Wuhan When scrutiny intensified, Fauci shifted operations to Wuhan, laundering funds through Peter Daszak’s EcoHealth Alliance and CIA-linked USAID. FOIA requests confirm: When Fauci’s direct funding was blocked, Daszak turned to DARPA and other military agencies. The goal? Gain-of-function research—engineering viruses to jump species, using humanized mice to test airborne transmission. Baric even developed “seamless ligation”, a technique to erase lab fingerprints, teaching it to China’s “Bat Lady,” Xing-Yi Ge. A Ticking Time Bomb U.S. diplomats and scientists repeatedly warned of Wuhan’s BSL-2 labs—woefully inadequate for deadly coronaviruses. State Department cables called the facility a “biosecurity nightmare.” Yet Fauci kept funding it. Why? Follow the money: BARDA, ARPA, and the Defense Threat Reduction Agency all bankrolled the work, while Fauci insisted it was for “vaccine research.” The Unanswered Question Was COVID-19 an accident—or the inevitable result of a decades-long, military-funded experiment? Kennedy doesn’t claim to know Fauci’s intent. But the facts are damning: - Escapes at Baric’s “gold-standard” lab (mice biting researchers, infected personnel). - Chinese labs operating below safety standards, with U.S. taxpayer dollars. - A paper trail of FOIA’d emails proving Fauci and Daszak colluded to hide risks. The Motive? Profit. Power. And a military-industrial complex that treats pandemics as a lucrative opportunity. This isn’t conspiracy theory. It’s documented history. The question isn’t if another lab leak will happen—it’s when.
10:56

RFK Jr. Exposes the Wuhan Cover-Up—How Fauci, the Pentagon, and CIA-Funded Labs Engineered a Global Catastrophe In his explosive new book, Wuhan Cover-Up, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. meticulously documents how Dr. Anthony Fauci, the Pentagon, and a shadowy network of military and intelligence agencies funneled hundreds of millions of dollars into high-risk bioweapons research—under the guise of “public health”—while systematically ignoring warnings of catastrophic lab leaks. The Loophole That Unleashed a Pandemic After the U.S. signed the 1972 Biological Weapons Convention, a critical loophole allowed “dual-use” research—ostensibly for vaccine development—to become a backdoor for bioweapons engineering. The Pentagon, wary of public backlash, outsourced this dangerous work to Fauci, who was handed a 68% raise, making him the highest-paid federal employee in history ($434K/year—more than the President). His budget? A staggering $6.1 billion, plus an additional $1.7 billion annually (now $2.2 billion) for biodefense projects that blurred the line between science and warfare. A Pattern of Recklessness Fauci’s top fundee, Ralph Baric (UNC), received 147 grants—tens of millions of dollars—despite his lab’s history of multiple escapes of deadly pathogens. In 2014, three dangerous viruses leaked from U.S. labs, including smallpox. Over 300 leading bioweapons experts, including Harvard’s Mark Lipsitch, begged Obama to shut down Fauci’s experiments, fearing a lab-made pandemic. Obama issued a cease-and-desist. Fauci defied it. Outsourcing Danger to Wuhan When scrutiny intensified, Fauci shifted operations to Wuhan, laundering funds through Peter Daszak’s EcoHealth Alliance and CIA-linked USAID. FOIA requests confirm: When Fauci’s direct funding was blocked, Daszak turned to DARPA and other military agencies. The goal? Gain-of-function research—engineering viruses to jump species, using humanized mice to test airborne transmission. Baric even developed “seamless ligation”, a technique to erase lab fingerprints, teaching it to China’s “Bat Lady,” Xing-Yi Ge. A Ticking Time Bomb U.S. diplomats and scientists repeatedly warned of Wuhan’s BSL-2 labs—woefully inadequate for deadly coronaviruses. State Department cables called the facility a “biosecurity nightmare.” Yet Fauci kept funding it. Why? Follow the money: BARDA, ARPA, and the Defense Threat Reduction Agency all bankrolled the work, while Fauci insisted it was for “vaccine research.” The Unanswered Question Was COVID-19 an accident—or the inevitable result of a decades-long, military-funded experiment? Kennedy doesn’t claim to know Fauci’s intent. But the facts are damning: - Escapes at Baric’s “gold-standard” lab (mice biting researchers, infected personnel). - Chinese labs operating below safety standards, with U.S. taxpayer dollars. - A paper trail of FOIA’d emails proving Fauci and Daszak colluded to hide risks. The Motive? Profit. Power. And a military-industrial complex that treats pandemics as a lucrative opportunity. This isn’t conspiracy theory. It’s documented history. The question isn’t if another lab leak will happen—it’s when.

Camus

53,448 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Dr. Anthony Fauci, who served as director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease (NIAID) and as Chief Medical Advisor to President Biden during Covid-19, today testified to Congress about Covid vaccines and Covid’s origin. "The first iteration of vaccines did have an effect — not 100%, not a high effect — they did prevent infection, and subsequently, obviously, transmission,” Fauci said. “However, it's important to point out something that we did not know early on that became evident as the months went by: the durability of protection against infection, and hence, the transmission was relatively limited." But there was never definitive evidence that the vaccines would prevent transmission. In December 2020, the FDA determined that “data are not available to make a determination about how long the vaccine will provide protection, nor is there evidence that the vaccine prevents transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from person to person.” The CDC in 2020 and 2021 stated that protection would wear off, that the evidence was unclear, and that the data were limited, noted data analyst Kelley K during the hearing. When Fauci said in May 2021 that a vaccinated person would become a “dead end to the virus,” he was repeating a political talking point and not accurately representing the science. Claiming vaccination would prevent spread was a strategy to increase vaccine uptake among young, healthy people who were not vulnerable to severe COVID outcomes. In other words, the science had not been “settled,” but Fauci and other public health leaders chose to espouse a noble lie to encourage vaccination. To his credit, Fauci testified before Congress today and sat for many hours of a transcribed interview. But Fauci also implied that investigating his role put him at risk. “Every time someone gets up and says I'm responsible for the death of people throughout the world,” he emphasized, “the death threats go up.” We unreservedly condemn any threats Fauci and his family may have received. It is illegal to threaten people with death or physical violence, as it should be. At the same time, we must be free to discuss Fauci’s role in funding the laboratory research to make coronaviruses more infectious, known as “gain-of-function research,” without fear of being accused of inciting violence against Fauci or his family members. It would be an abuse of power to suggest that any effort to hold Fauci accountable is equivalent to threatening him or his family. The responsibility for making threats lies with the person making them and not with those whose statements have ostensibly influenced them. And yet many Democrats repeatedly suggested that there was something sinister and dangerous about criticisms of Fauci for his role in shaping the US response to the pandemic as well as his role advocating for and funding the kinds of biomedical research that may have caused it. And Democrats repeatedly referred to the idea that US taxpayer dollars funded the research that resulted in the creation of SARS-CoV-2 a “conspiracy theory.” Said Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-CA), "The investigation of Dr Fauci shows he is an honorable public servant who has devoted his entire career to the public health and the public interest. And he is not a comic book supervillain. He did not fund research to create the Cove in 19 pandemic. He did not lie to Congress about gain of function research in Wuhan, and he did not organize a lab leak suppression campaign today." Said Rep. Kathy Castor (D-FL), "The evidence to date points to COVID 19 having originated from an animal market in China... this committee should be doing more to fight for those answers, but instead has wasted significant time and taxpayer money fueling conspiracy theories." Said Kweisi Mfume (D-MD), "Conspiracy theory after another get debunked...." But the lab leak theory is not a conspiracy theory. A few hours before Fauci testified, The New York Times, the most important newspaper for Democrats, published a complete and graphics-heavy case for the lab leak theory of Covid-19’s origin. A “growing volume of evidence — gleaned from public records released under the Freedom of Information Act, digital sleuthing through online databases, scientific papers analyzing the virus and its spread, and leaks from within the U.S. government — suggests that the pandemic most likely occurred because a virus escaped from a research lab in Wuhan, China,” wrote Alina Chan who coauthored the 2021 book, Viral, with Matt Ridley, in the Times. In today’s hearing, Fauci insisted that he did not fund risky gain-of-function research in Wuhan, China. The research his agency funded, he claimed, was not technically gain-of-function under the regulatory definition set by something called “The Guidelines on Potential Pandemic Pathogens Care and Oversight (P3CO).” Asked Rep. Raul Ruiz (D-CA), "Dr. Fauci, according to the regulatory definitions, for example, in P3CO, that NIH applied to proposed research, did NIH ever fund gain of function research in Wuhan, China?" Responded Fauci, "As you said, Congressman Ruiz, according to the regulatory and operative definition of P3CO, the NIH did not fund gain of function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology." But Fauci and Francis Collins, the former head of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), spent years seeking to weaken oversight of such research. In 2011, after the NIH biosecurity board unanimously recommended that certain dangerous gain-of-function bird flu research not be published, Fauci and Collins published an opinion piece called “A flu virus risk worth taking” in the Washington Post, arguing that the benefits of this research outweighed the potential for a pandemic. The following year, 2012, NIH’s biosecurity board signed non-disclosure agreements and met with Fauci and Collins. The board, apparently under pressure from Fauci and Collins, then revised its previous recommendation to publish the risky bird flu research. According to Fauci and Democrats in Congress, NIH’s grant to EcoHealth Alliance did not fall under P3CO guidelines because it was not anticipated to increase a pathogen’s danger to humans, specifically. But in emails, NIH staff expressed their concerns about EcoHealth Alliance’s work creating hybrid “chimera” MERS and SARS viruses, in order to increase their infectiousness, in 2016. NIH staff pointed out that there was a moratorium placed on that research in 2014. Peter Daszak, the president of the EcoHealth Alliance, persuaded NIH staff to concede to a research threshold, saying EcoHealth would halt its research if the chimeras had enhanced viral growth 10 times that of the original viruses. After reaching an agreement with NIH, Daszak specifically referred to this work as gain-of-function, writing, “This is terrific! We are very happy to hear that our Gain of Function research funding pause has been lifted. Cheers, Peter.” Then, in 2018, EcoHealth went on to seemingly violate its agreement by producing a chimeric virus with a viral load 10,000 times greater than the original virus. As such, Fauci, his colleagues, and the Democrats were playing word games, redefining what they mean by gain-of-function research in ways that allowed them to deny responsibility. And that’s not all. After the Obama administration had established a Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) committee to review proposed gain-of-function projects before the NIH could approve them, Fauci and Collins knowingly sought to make changes to NIH policy in order to allow funding for riskier gain-of-function experiments. These changes included removing the committee’s ability to block projects and limiting the type of projects the committee could review. In his testimony, Fauci misrepresented the scientific possibility that NIH funding is associated with the Covid-19 outbreak, as well as his role in the “Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2” paper, which infamously and misleadingly, claimed that, “Our analyses clearly show that SARS-CoV-2 is not a laboratory construct or a purposefully manipulated virus.” But consider how, in 2018, EcoHealth Alliance applied for a grant from the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) for a project called “DEFUSE” that would involve Shi Zhengli’s lab group at WIV and Ralph Baric’s lab at the University of North Carolina (UNC). Documents obtained through the Freedom of Information Act reveal that the features of SARS-CoV-2 closely resemble the work described in EcoHealth Alliance’s proposal. On February 1, 2020, Fauci and Collins held a meeting called “Coronavirus sequence comparison” with other scientists to compare the spike proteins of SARS-CoV-2 and RaTG13, its closest genetic relative which the NIH-funded Wuhan lab discovered. This meeting would lead to the “Proximal Origin” paper. In the hearing, Fauci downplayed his role. After Majority Counsel Mitch Benzine asked, "Did Dr. Anderson send you drafts to review?" Fauci responded, "He sent drafts, but I'm going to jump ahead of you if I might dribble around. I did not edit it. That was mentioned by a few of the Congressmen. I did not edit the paper." While it may be true that Fauci did not “edit” the “Proximal Origin” paper, lead author Kristian Andersen said he “prompted” it, and the authors sent him a final draft for approval. In their private exchanges, the authors repeatedly refer to Collins and Fauci as the “Bethesda boys.” Their offices were located in Bethesda, Maryland. The “Bethesda boys” appear to have directed some of the paper’s content. After Andersen suggested that a first draft should be sent “up the chain,” Fauci and Collins voiced concern that culturing or serial passaging (a process through which a virus can be made more infectious to humans) was still included as a possible origin. Jeremy Farrar, head of the Wellcome Trust, then pressured the authors to remove it. Shortly after publishing the preprint, Holmes told Andersen, “Sorry the last bit had to be done without you… pressure from on high.” Fauci would go on to cite this paper as objective evidence from independent scientists. All of this, and yet, throughout the Oversight Committee’s hearing, Democrats refused to provide oversight and criticized their colleagues who attempted to provide it. “I'm sorry for the personal attacks you have received and may have to deal with today,” said one. “Thank you, sir, and your entire team for saving lives in this country, and I'm sorry you have to continue going on with these attacks,” said another. “The Republicans failed to find, uh, a shred of evidence of their far-fetched conspiracy linking Dr. Fauci to a cover-up of the origins of the pandemic,” said one. “Sir, do you think the American public should listen to America's brightest and best doctors and scientists? Or instead, listen to podcasters, conspiracy theorists, and unhinged Facebook memes,” asked another. Since World War II, Democrats, liberals, and progressives have criticized their political enemies as overly deferent to authority. Today, at the hearing with Fauci and other hearings where mainstream science is questioned, they criticize their enemies for not being sufficiently deferent. What changed?...
9:54

Dr. Anthony Fauci, who served as director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease (NIAID) and as Chief Medical Advisor to President Biden during Covid-19, today testified to Congress about Covid vaccines and Covid’s origin. "The first iteration of vaccines did have an effect — not 100%, not a high effect — they did prevent infection, and subsequently, obviously, transmission,” Fauci said. “However, it's important to point out something that we did not know early on that became evident as the months went by: the durability of protection against infection, and hence, the transmission was relatively limited." But there was never definitive evidence that the vaccines would prevent transmission. In December 2020, the FDA determined that “data are not available to make a determination about how long the vaccine will provide protection, nor is there evidence that the vaccine prevents transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from person to person.” The CDC in 2020 and 2021 stated that protection would wear off, that the evidence was unclear, and that the data were limited, noted data analyst Kelley K during the hearing. When Fauci said in May 2021 that a vaccinated person would become a “dead end to the virus,” he was repeating a political talking point and not accurately representing the science. Claiming vaccination would prevent spread was a strategy to increase vaccine uptake among young, healthy people who were not vulnerable to severe COVID outcomes. In other words, the science had not been “settled,” but Fauci and other public health leaders chose to espouse a noble lie to encourage vaccination. To his credit, Fauci testified before Congress today and sat for many hours of a transcribed interview. But Fauci also implied that investigating his role put him at risk. “Every time someone gets up and says I'm responsible for the death of people throughout the world,” he emphasized, “the death threats go up.” We unreservedly condemn any threats Fauci and his family may have received. It is illegal to threaten people with death or physical violence, as it should be. At the same time, we must be free to discuss Fauci’s role in funding the laboratory research to make coronaviruses more infectious, known as “gain-of-function research,” without fear of being accused of inciting violence against Fauci or his family members. It would be an abuse of power to suggest that any effort to hold Fauci accountable is equivalent to threatening him or his family. The responsibility for making threats lies with the person making them and not with those whose statements have ostensibly influenced them. And yet many Democrats repeatedly suggested that there was something sinister and dangerous about criticisms of Fauci for his role in shaping the US response to the pandemic as well as his role advocating for and funding the kinds of biomedical research that may have caused it. And Democrats repeatedly referred to the idea that US taxpayer dollars funded the research that resulted in the creation of SARS-CoV-2 a “conspiracy theory.” Said Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-CA), "The investigation of Dr Fauci shows he is an honorable public servant who has devoted his entire career to the public health and the public interest. And he is not a comic book supervillain. He did not fund research to create the Cove in 19 pandemic. He did not lie to Congress about gain of function research in Wuhan, and he did not organize a lab leak suppression campaign today." Said Rep. Kathy Castor (D-FL), "The evidence to date points to COVID 19 having originated from an animal market in China... this committee should be doing more to fight for those answers, but instead has wasted significant time and taxpayer money fueling conspiracy theories." Said Kweisi Mfume (D-MD), "Conspiracy theory after another get debunked...." But the lab leak theory is not a conspiracy theory. A few hours before Fauci testified, The New York Times, the most important newspaper for Democrats, published a complete and graphics-heavy case for the lab leak theory of Covid-19’s origin. A “growing volume of evidence — gleaned from public records released under the Freedom of Information Act, digital sleuthing through online databases, scientific papers analyzing the virus and its spread, and leaks from within the U.S. government — suggests that the pandemic most likely occurred because a virus escaped from a research lab in Wuhan, China,” wrote Alina Chan who coauthored the 2021 book, Viral, with Matt Ridley, in the Times. In today’s hearing, Fauci insisted that he did not fund risky gain-of-function research in Wuhan, China. The research his agency funded, he claimed, was not technically gain-of-function under the regulatory definition set by something called “The Guidelines on Potential Pandemic Pathogens Care and Oversight (P3CO).” Asked Rep. Raul Ruiz (D-CA), "Dr. Fauci, according to the regulatory definitions, for example, in P3CO, that NIH applied to proposed research, did NIH ever fund gain of function research in Wuhan, China?" Responded Fauci, "As you said, Congressman Ruiz, according to the regulatory and operative definition of P3CO, the NIH did not fund gain of function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology." But Fauci and Francis Collins, the former head of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), spent years seeking to weaken oversight of such research. In 2011, after the NIH biosecurity board unanimously recommended that certain dangerous gain-of-function bird flu research not be published, Fauci and Collins published an opinion piece called “A flu virus risk worth taking” in the Washington Post, arguing that the benefits of this research outweighed the potential for a pandemic. The following year, 2012, NIH’s biosecurity board signed non-disclosure agreements and met with Fauci and Collins. The board, apparently under pressure from Fauci and Collins, then revised its previous recommendation to publish the risky bird flu research. According to Fauci and Democrats in Congress, NIH’s grant to EcoHealth Alliance did not fall under P3CO guidelines because it was not anticipated to increase a pathogen’s danger to humans, specifically. But in emails, NIH staff expressed their concerns about EcoHealth Alliance’s work creating hybrid “chimera” MERS and SARS viruses, in order to increase their infectiousness, in 2016. NIH staff pointed out that there was a moratorium placed on that research in 2014. Peter Daszak, the president of the EcoHealth Alliance, persuaded NIH staff to concede to a research threshold, saying EcoHealth would halt its research if the chimeras had enhanced viral growth 10 times that of the original viruses. After reaching an agreement with NIH, Daszak specifically referred to this work as gain-of-function, writing, “This is terrific! We are very happy to hear that our Gain of Function research funding pause has been lifted. Cheers, Peter.” Then, in 2018, EcoHealth went on to seemingly violate its agreement by producing a chimeric virus with a viral load 10,000 times greater than the original virus. As such, Fauci, his colleagues, and the Democrats were playing word games, redefining what they mean by gain-of-function research in ways that allowed them to deny responsibility. And that’s not all. After the Obama administration had established a Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) committee to review proposed gain-of-function projects before the NIH could approve them, Fauci and Collins knowingly sought to make changes to NIH policy in order to allow funding for riskier gain-of-function experiments. These changes included removing the committee’s ability to block projects and limiting the type of projects the committee could review. In his testimony, Fauci misrepresented the scientific possibility that NIH funding is associated with the Covid-19 outbreak, as well as his role in the “Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2” paper, which infamously and misleadingly, claimed that, “Our analyses clearly show that SARS-CoV-2 is not a laboratory construct or a purposefully manipulated virus.” But consider how, in 2018, EcoHealth Alliance applied for a grant from the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) for a project called “DEFUSE” that would involve Shi Zhengli’s lab group at WIV and Ralph Baric’s lab at the University of North Carolina (UNC). Documents obtained through the Freedom of Information Act reveal that the features of SARS-CoV-2 closely resemble the work described in EcoHealth Alliance’s proposal. On February 1, 2020, Fauci and Collins held a meeting called “Coronavirus sequence comparison” with other scientists to compare the spike proteins of SARS-CoV-2 and RaTG13, its closest genetic relative which the NIH-funded Wuhan lab discovered. This meeting would lead to the “Proximal Origin” paper. In the hearing, Fauci downplayed his role. After Majority Counsel Mitch Benzine asked, "Did Dr. Anderson send you drafts to review?" Fauci responded, "He sent drafts, but I'm going to jump ahead of you if I might dribble around. I did not edit it. That was mentioned by a few of the Congressmen. I did not edit the paper." While it may be true that Fauci did not “edit” the “Proximal Origin” paper, lead author Kristian Andersen said he “prompted” it, and the authors sent him a final draft for approval. In their private exchanges, the authors repeatedly refer to Collins and Fauci as the “Bethesda boys.” Their offices were located in Bethesda, Maryland. The “Bethesda boys” appear to have directed some of the paper’s content. After Andersen suggested that a first draft should be sent “up the chain,” Fauci and Collins voiced concern that culturing or serial passaging (a process through which a virus can be made more infectious to humans) was still included as a possible origin. Jeremy Farrar, head of the Wellcome Trust, then pressured the authors to remove it. Shortly after publishing the preprint, Holmes told Andersen, “Sorry the last bit had to be done without you… pressure from on high.” Fauci would go on to cite this paper as objective evidence from independent scientists. All of this, and yet, throughout the Oversight Committee’s hearing, Democrats refused to provide oversight and criticized their colleagues who attempted to provide it. “I'm sorry for the personal attacks you have received and may have to deal with today,” said one. “Thank you, sir, and your entire team for saving lives in this country, and I'm sorry you have to continue going on with these attacks,” said another. “The Republicans failed to find, uh, a shred of evidence of their far-fetched conspiracy linking Dr. Fauci to a cover-up of the origins of the pandemic,” said one. “Sir, do you think the American public should listen to America's brightest and best doctors and scientists? Or instead, listen to podcasters, conspiracy theorists, and unhinged Facebook memes,” asked another. Since World War II, Democrats, liberals, and progressives have criticized their political enemies as overly deferent to authority. Today, at the hearing with Fauci and other hearings where mainstream science is questioned, they criticize their enemies for not being sufficiently deferent. What changed?...

Michael Shellenberger

582,268 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

David Morens, ex-assessor sênior de Anthony Fauci, declarou-se culpado, em 18 de agosto, de conspirar para cometer crimes e fraudar os Estados Unidos. A confissão ocorreu no Tribunal Federal de Greenbelt, em Maryland, quatro meses depois de ele ser indiciado por ocultar documentos da pandemia. Em acordo com os procuradores, Morens admitiu uma acusação de conspiração e pode pegar até cinco anos de prisão. Morens admitiu ter driblado as leis de Acesso à Informação e de Registros Federais. O esquema começou depois que o NIH suspendeu uma verba concedida à EcoHealth Alliance para pesquisas sobre coronavírus. Parte do dinheiro havia sido repassada ao laboratório de Wuhan. Segundo a confissão, Morens e seus cúmplices trabalharam para recuperar o financiamento e combater a hipótese de vazamento laboratorial. Sabendo que as conversas poderiam ser requisitadas, abandonaram os canais oficiais e migraram para o Gmail pessoal de Morens. Nesse esconderijo digital, trocaram informações sigilosas do NIH, editaram cartas à direção da agência, articularam a liberação de recursos e abasteceram autoridades do NIAID por canais clandestinos. Morens também admitiu ter recebido vinhos por suas “articulações nos bastidores” e discutido a publicação de um artigo científico defendendo a origem natural da Covid-19 como forma de “merecer” o presente. Também lhe ofereceram jantares em restaurantes estrelados. E-mails obtidos pelo Congresso mostram Morens dizendo ter aprendido com uma funcionária do setor de transparência como “fazer e-mails desaparecerem”. Em outra mensagem, escreveu que poderia enviar material ao Gmail particular de Fauci ou entregá-lo pessoalmente, porque Fauci seria “inteligente demais” para receber conteúdo problemático pelos canais oficiais. Fauci não foi acusado nesse processo, mas como uma conspiração desse tamanho funcionou durante anos dentro de seu gabinete sem que o homem no comando soubesse de nada? Morens será sentenciado em 12 de novembro; se ele pretende reduzir a pena, é bom que revele os nomes, a cadeia de comando e tudo o que Fauci sabia. O primeiro integrante confessou; agora é hora de derrubar o restante do muro.
0:50

David Morens, ex-assessor sênior de Anthony Fauci, declarou-se culpado, em 18 de agosto, de conspirar para cometer crimes e fraudar os Estados Unidos. A confissão ocorreu no Tribunal Federal de Greenbelt, em Maryland, quatro meses depois de ele ser indiciado por ocultar documentos da pandemia. Em acordo com os procuradores, Morens admitiu uma acusação de conspiração e pode pegar até cinco anos de prisão. Morens admitiu ter driblado as leis de Acesso à Informação e de Registros Federais. O esquema começou depois que o NIH suspendeu uma verba concedida à EcoHealth Alliance para pesquisas sobre coronavírus. Parte do dinheiro havia sido repassada ao laboratório de Wuhan. Segundo a confissão, Morens e seus cúmplices trabalharam para recuperar o financiamento e combater a hipótese de vazamento laboratorial. Sabendo que as conversas poderiam ser requisitadas, abandonaram os canais oficiais e migraram para o Gmail pessoal de Morens. Nesse esconderijo digital, trocaram informações sigilosas do NIH, editaram cartas à direção da agência, articularam a liberação de recursos e abasteceram autoridades do NIAID por canais clandestinos. Morens também admitiu ter recebido vinhos por suas “articulações nos bastidores” e discutido a publicação de um artigo científico defendendo a origem natural da Covid-19 como forma de “merecer” o presente. Também lhe ofereceram jantares em restaurantes estrelados. E-mails obtidos pelo Congresso mostram Morens dizendo ter aprendido com uma funcionária do setor de transparência como “fazer e-mails desaparecerem”. Em outra mensagem, escreveu que poderia enviar material ao Gmail particular de Fauci ou entregá-lo pessoalmente, porque Fauci seria “inteligente demais” para receber conteúdo problemático pelos canais oficiais. Fauci não foi acusado nesse processo, mas como uma conspiração desse tamanho funcionou durante anos dentro de seu gabinete sem que o homem no comando soubesse de nada? Morens será sentenciado em 12 de novembro; se ele pretende reduzir a pena, é bom que revele os nomes, a cadeia de comando e tudo o que Fauci sabia. O primeiro integrante confessou; agora é hora de derrubar o restante do muro.

Karina Michelin

19,770 Aufrufe • vor 8 Tagen

Dr. McCullough Names Four Key Conspirators in the Greatest Crime in Human History 1.) Dr. Anthony Fauci • “Fauci was in on it the entire time. He was pretending like he was responding to something that was brand new, but he knew the entire time. In fact, he was part of a conspiracy to cover up where the virus came from.” 2.) Dr. Ralph Baric, Professor of Epidemiology and researcher at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. • “He’s the one who engineered taking part of a bat coronavirus onto a human coronavirus and making it invade and be lethal.” 3.) Dr. Peter Daszak, President of the EcoHealth Alliance. • “He carried the plans from Baric over to China.” 4.) Dr. Shi Zhengli, Senior scientist and researcher at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. “The bat lady.” • “She went into the bat caves and handled the bats and harvested the virus, and they published papers.” Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH® ended on this note: “They telegraphed it. They said, ‘It [COVID] is ready to go.’ That’s what these papers say, ‘It’s ready to go. We’ve got it. We created the virus.’ They announced it in broad daylight.”
2:41

Dr. McCullough Names Four Key Conspirators in the Greatest Crime in Human History 1.) Dr. Anthony Fauci • “Fauci was in on it the entire time. He was pretending like he was responding to something that was brand new, but he knew the entire time. In fact, he was part of a conspiracy to cover up where the virus came from.” 2.) Dr. Ralph Baric, Professor of Epidemiology and researcher at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. • “He’s the one who engineered taking part of a bat coronavirus onto a human coronavirus and making it invade and be lethal.” 3.) Dr. Peter Daszak, President of the EcoHealth Alliance. • “He carried the plans from Baric over to China.” 4.) Dr. Shi Zhengli, Senior scientist and researcher at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. “The bat lady.” • “She went into the bat caves and handled the bats and harvested the virus, and they published papers.” Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH® ended on this note: “They telegraphed it. They said, ‘It [COVID] is ready to go.’ That’s what these papers say, ‘It’s ready to go. We’ve got it. We created the virus.’ They announced it in broad daylight.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

236,897 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren