Загрузка видео...
Не удалось загрузить видео
哇哦! 美众院24名议员提出决议案,官方认可台湾地位! 决议呼吁川普总统, “放弃一个中国政策; 承认台湾是一个独立国家的客观现实; 承认台湾民选政府的合法性,实现双边外交关系正常化; 开启正式谈判,建立美台自由贸易协议; 力促台湾加入联合国等国际组织” (中美角力之下,祝台湾好运!)
170,703 просмотров • 1 год назад •via X (Twitter)
Комментарии: 11

这是打击👊中共政权的最好消息, 让台湾成为独立的国家, 彻底断掉中共蹂躏台湾的念想

🇺🇸 One Nation, under Trump, Stronger THAN EVER. Are you Trump Tough? 💪Tough T's Here:

我不赞成,台湾都反川,在西方政治正确中新生的左派政权。

美国脑残共和党众议员“力推”中国统一进程!

这只会加速武统台湾!

放屁

貌似你们台湾都喜欢民主党和白左,我们保守派为啥挺你们呀?

You're retard😂 The “One China, One Taiwan” and “Two Chinas” proposals have already been rejected by the United Nations.👇🏻 In 1971, the United Nations General Assembly passed Resolution 2758, which restored the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) legitimate seat in the United Nations and recognized the PRC as the “only legitimate representative of China in the United Nations.” This resolution effectively denied the Republic of China (Taiwan) the possibility of retaining its seat in the UN. However, prior to the adoption of Resolution 2758, some countries had proposed related plans, which were ultimately rejected or failed to gain approval in the General Assembly: 1.The United States’ “dual representation” proposal: The United States suggested granting the PRC a seat in the United Nations while allowing the Republic of China (Taiwan) to retain its seat. This proposal was viewed by the majority of UN member states as violating the one-China principle and was therefore not adopted. 2.Saudi Arabia’s “one China, one Taiwan” proposal: Saudi Arabia’s proposal was similar to the U.S. “dual representation” plan, aiming for both Taiwan and mainland China to have representation in the UN. However, this proposal also failed to gain support and did not become a formal resolution. The adoption of Resolution 2758 marked the majority of UN member states’ support for the one-China policy, recognizing the PRC as the sole legitimate government representing China. Following the resolution, the Republic of China (Taiwan) was formally excluded from the United Nations and its affiliated organizations. The proposals of “One China, One Taiwan” and “Two Chinas” were raised in the past at the United Nations and were rejected. Today, with the international community’s increasing recognition of the “One China” principle, raising these views again would lead people to mock you.🤪

文智战友好!好消息!

大概率不会通过 特朗普利益至上 综合来说中国更重要

纸上谈兵,美国是纸老虎,没什么可怕的,该打你的时候,一定不会手软,台湾只是棋子,翻不出惊天骇浪!





