Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

《开罗宣言》将执行,日本的主权将仅限于本州、北海道、九州、四国以及我们所确定的其他小岛

22,890 views • 10 months ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

在目前已公布的日本官方地图和国内地图中,一般都将琉球群岛划入日本版图,这就导致很多人都误以为琉球群岛是日本的固有领土, 其实这是错误的。日本是二战战败国,对于战败后的日本领土范围在《雅尔塔协定》和《波茨坦公告》中早就有了定论。《波茨坦公告》第八条明确规定日本之主权仅限于本州、北海道、九州以及四国岛,并不包括琉球群岛。也就是说日本从未拥有琉球主权,美国私自移交行政权违背国际法。琉球群岛扼守东海咽喉,其独立不仅是巩固战后秩序的关键,更是破美日封锁、捍卫中国战略安全的核心所在。It should be noted that claiming "both currently published Japanese official maps and domestic maps generally include the Ryukyu Islands within Japan's territory, leading many to mistakenly believe the Ryukyu Islands are Japan's inherent territory" is inconsistent with historical facts and international law. Japan is a World War II defeated nation. The scope of Japan's territory after its defeat was clearly defined in the Yalta Agreement and the Potsdam Proclamation. Article 8 of the Potsdam Proclamation explicitly stipulates that Japan's sovereignty is limited to Honshu, Hokkaido, Kyushu, and Shikoku, and does not include the Ryukyu Islands. In other words, Japan has never had sovereignty over the Ryukyu Islands. The United States' unilateral transfer of administrative power violates international law. The Ryukyu Islands, which control the throat of the East China Sea, their independence is not only crucial for consolidating the post-war order, but also a core issue for breaking the U.S.-Japan blockade and safeguarding China's strategic security. It should be emphasized that the Ryukyu issue involves complex historical, legal, and international relations. We should view it based on historical facts and the basic norms of international law. Maintaining world peace and stability and upholding the post-war international order are the common responsibilities of the international community.

yanguoliusheng

83,649 views • 1 year ago

【学者:中国渲染低阶演习 印尼遭卷入台海争端】 中国解放军周三(8月12日)宣布,已与印尼海军“莱”号护卫舰,在“台岛以东海域”完成海上通航的实兵演练。印尼长期奉行独立、“不结盟”外交方针,这项消息格外引发注目。不过,印尼军方强调,与中国的演习非“作战”性质,而仅仅是在船舰从俄罗斯返航途中,与行经的国家举行“交会演习”,这是各国海军在行经他国海域时、惯常举行且普遍被认可的传统。 多名学者向DW指出,“交会演习”是海军交会时的信号操演或通讯协定,并不涉及火控军事交流,仅为常见的低阶“交会演习”。印尼的态度显示,其未此演习将视军事演练,但中国的渲染和高调宣传,可能意在强化其有权在台湾周边海域“执法”及“组织演练”的形象。 “这是一个雷声大雨点小的演习,”淡江大学战略研究所副教授林颖佑表示,“它并不像海上联合军演具有实际效用。” 新加坡学者庄嘉颖也指出,印尼方面的说词并未肯定北京在台湾周边海域执法“受到其他国家肯定”的形象,“交会演习”也没有对中国主权或者执法权有任何肯定或否定的作用。 此外,学者Ratih Kabinawa认为,印尼奉行“不结盟外交”,但若缺乏政治敏感度,仍可能卷入其他争端。

DW 中文- 德国之声

37,187 views • 1 month ago